feedback report

CRITERION

80-100

70-79

60 -69

50 - 59

40 – 49

REFER/FAIL

Presentation & style - 10%

Presentation

5

Equilvant to a professionally produced report

Shows a polished and imaginative approach to the topic

Carefully and logically

organised

Shows organisation and coherence

Shows some attempt to organise in a logical manner

Disorganised/

Incoherent

NON SUBMISSION

Clarity of expression (incl. accuracy, spelling, grammar, punctuation +

5

Excellent and appropriate style of writing adopted 100% accurate.

Fluent writing style appropriate to document. Grammar and spelling accurate

Language fluent

Grammar and spelling accurate

Language mainly fluent Grammar and spelling mainly accurate

Meaning apparent, but language not always fluent Grammar and/or spelling contain errors

Meaning unclear and/or grammar and/or spelling contain frequent errors

Feedback addressed to participant directly

Without exception all of the feedback report is addressed to the participant.

Feedback constantly addressed to participant student, inc: front cover, subheadings

Main body of the feedback constantly addressed to the participant.

Feedback mainly addressed to the participant

Shows some attempt to address feedback to the participant

Feedback is written about the participant in the third person.

Content and knowledge -70%

Relevant introduction.

5

An engaging and compelling introduction encouraging the student to want to read on. Appropriate academic references are included to the employability agenda and feedback

Has developed structure of report, clearly introducing the employability agenda and purpose of developmental feedback using appropriate supporting academic references

Has developed structure of report, introducing employability agenda the purpose of developmental feedback with supporting academic references

Has developed structure of report, some reference made employability agenda the purpose of developmental feedback and some supporting academic references

Limited evidence of structure of report and employability agenda the purpose of developmental feedback and supporting academic references

Either no evidence of structure, or reference made to employability agenda or developmental feedback lacking academic references

Competencies descriptors and BARS.

10

Without exception makes reference to full competencies descriptions and BARS and evidence detailed is without exception supporting the BARS rating.

Includes, makes appropriate reference to full competencies descriptions and BARS. Evidence detailed consistently supports BARS rating.

Includes, makes appropriate reference to full competencies descriptions and BARS. Evidence detailed supports BARS rating.

Includes, full competencies descriptions and BARS. Evidence detailed mainly supports BARS rating.

Either competencies descriptions or BARS not included. Greater proportion of the evidence detailed does not support BARS rating.

Both competencies and or BARS rating not included.

3 strengths and 3 areas to develop, drawn from the assessed competencies in the DC exercises

35

Highly appropriate and relevant examples without exception including detailed actual examples and excellent suggestions for improvement.

Appropriate and relevant examples, using detailed actual examples and includes clear suggestions for improvement,

Appropriate and relevant examples, using actual examples and suggestion for improvement

Relevant examples, using some actual examples and some suggestions for improvement.

Limited relevant examples and limited suggestions for improvements.

Inaccurate or inappropriate examples no suggestions for development

Use of non-judgemental language.

20

Consistently describes what was read, observed, heard. No evidence of negative judgements made.

Describes what was read, observed, heard. No evidence of negative judgements made.

Describes what was read, observed, heard. Little evidence of negative judgements made.

Describes what was read, observed, heard. Some evidence of negative judgements made.

Describes what was read, observed, heard, evidence of negative judgements made.

Consistently uses negative judgemental language.

Conclusions Personal Development Plan – 20%

Conclusions

5

Compelling conclusions with excellent links made to the personal development plan.

Full name and email of the participant. Statement that the report will be send by one member of the DC group (in appendix).

Clear, relevant conclusions, excellent link made to the personal development plan.

Full name and email of the participant. Statement that the report will be send by one member of the DC group (in appendix).

Good, relevant conclusions link made to the personal development plan

Full name and email of the participant. Statement that the report will be send by one member of the DC group (in appendix).

Evidence of relevant conclusions, link made to the PD plan,

Full name and email of the participant. Statement that the report will be send by one member of the DC group (in appendix).

Limited evidence of relevant conclusions

No details of the participant or statement as how to the report will be sent (in appendix)

No conclusion

No details of the participant or statement as how to the report will be sent (in appendix

Personal development Plan

15

Without exception goals are constituently developed using SMART, clearly based on feedback given. Detailed and varied resources (some University resources included all with actual contact details/hyper links

Goals are constituently developed using SMART, clearly based on feedback given. Detailed and varied resources (some University resources included all with actual contact details/hyper links

Most goals developed using SMART, clearly based on feedback given.

Detailed resources included mostly with actual contact details/hyper links

Some goals developed using SMART, based on feedback given. Some resources included mostly with actual contact details/hyper links

Goals developed do not use SMART. Limited linking to feedback given. Limited resources included

PD Plan not included