for prof matildah only
FINAL EXAM 2
FINAL EXAM
Final Exam
December 23, 2018
BUSI 2083 Introduction to Managerial Accounting
Running Head: FINAL EXAM 1
CASE ANALYSIS 1 2
1. Issue Identification
Preparation of the budget is the basic problem in this case, while the immediate problem is to choose the best alternatives between the three proposals, which should be based on the cost and manpower utilization. The implication of the problem is that for the budget to be prepared, the cost of replacing the outdated machine must be determined using the capital employed. The main root of the problem is that the milling machine is outdated causing the sales revenue to decline since it is incurring huge maintenance costs. Donovan is faced with making a decision on whether to build a general purpose milling machine, buy a special purpose numerically controlled milling machine or buy a general purpose milling machine.
2. Key Success Factors
Some of the key factors to the success of the organization include
1. Better quality control
2. Cost leadership
3. Productivity
4. Existing idle capacity
5. Marketing
6. Finances
7. Strategic focus
8. profitability
9. Availability of in-house expertise
9/10
3. Alternatives
The alternatives include building a general purpose milling machine at a cost of $212,500, buying a special numerically controlled milling machine at an initial cost of $625,000, or purchasing a general purpose milling machine costing $295,000.
5/5
4. Quantitative Analysis
Cost of building a general purpose milling machine (relevant costs):
|
Direct materials |
$55,000OK |
|
Direct labor |
$90,000 OK |
|
Variable overhead |
$45,000 OK |
|
Fixed overhead |
$22,500 |
|
Total cost |
$212,500 |
The allocated administrative costs amounting to $12,000 are irrelevant costs.
Calculating the cost of buying a special controlled milling machine:
|
Cost of the machine |
$625,000 OK |
|
Less; present value of the salvage value (8%, 5 years) (25000*0.6806) |
($17,015) |
|
Add; training cost (26 *$3,000) |
$78,000 OK |
|
Total relevant cost |
$685,958 OK |
The labor cost at $15 per hour is irrelevant
Calculating the cost of buying a general purpose milling machine:
|
Cost of the machine |
$295,000 OK |
|
Less; present value of the salvage value (8%, 5 years) (5000*0.6806) |
($3,403) |
|
Total relevant cost |
$291,597 |
PLEASE HAVE A LOOK AT THE YEARLY CASH FLOW
Analysis of General Purpose Equipment vs Special Purpose
Yearly cash flows:
|
|
General Purpose |
Special Purpose |
|
Sales |
$243,000 |
$243,000 |
|
Variable Expenses |
|
|
|
Operators (2,000 x $15) |
60,000 |
30,000 |
|
Insurance |
3,000 |
5,000 |
|
Maintenance |
26,000 |
12,000 |
|
Direct Materials |
19,500 |
19,500 |
|
Variable OH (50% of DL$) |
30,000 |
15,000 |
|
Total Variable Costs |
138,500 |
81,500 |
|
|
$104,500 |
$162,250 |
Comparing building or buying the general purpose milling machine, the initial cost of building the machine is lower, hence buying the general purpose machine option is ignored.
To obtain the budget for building a general purpose milling machine or buying a special purpose milling machine, we calculate the net present value of each option
|
|
Building a general purpose milling machine |
Buying a special purpose milling machine |
|
Sales revenue |
$195,750 |
$243,750 |
|
Less; Direct material costs |
($19,500) |
($19,500) |
|
Maintenance costs |
($26,000) |
($12,000) |
|
Net Revenues |
$150,250 |
$212,250 |
|
Present value annuity factor |
3.9927 |
3.9927 |
|
Annual savings |
$599,903 |
$847,451 |
|
Initial cost |
$212,500 |
$685,958 |
|
NPV |
$387,403 |
$161,493 |
PLEASE HAVE ALOOK AT THE CORRECT COST ANALYSIS AND NVP
Analysis of Cost for Each Alternative
Note: Fixed overhead and administrative costs are irrelevant.
10/40
5. Qualitative Analysis
The company operations in some of its branches are not performing well. The parts division, which has been in operation for 10 years, has seen its profits decrease since 2010. Many divisions operations are affected by the economic conditions hence it is important to evaluate the current situation of the economy before undertaking a major capital-intensive project.
Since each division performance is measured individually, management should be able to evaluate their performance by comparing budgeted sales and expenses with the actual figures. Using the capital expenditure estimates of the division, Kevin will be able to evaluate if the division will be able to finance the new milling machine based on the option selected.
Decision making based on whether to buy or build the milling machine and which type of milling machine will depend on the initial cost of acquiring the milling machine. The availability of excess production capacity available to produce a general purpose milling machine provides an avenue for the company to produce its own high-quality product using the available resources and workforce. Given that the company will be able to save on maintenance costs associated with the old milling machine, as well as insurance costs, it is advisable to build a general purpose machine in-house, which would cost less compared to buying a special milling machine.
10/30
PLEASE HAVE A LOOK AT THE QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS
Build General Purpose Machine:
• risk of lost sales–machine will take 6 months to complete. Presently
there is idle capacity but this may change over the life of the project
• while division is considered to have expertise there is no "guarantee"
(an outside supplier would have a guarantee)
Buy General Purpose Machine:
• Provided some kind of supplier guarantee or warranty
• machine immediately available
• no firm expertise necessary to buy as opposed to build a general
purpose machine
Buy Special Purpose Machine:
• guarantee/warranty should be available
• extensive training required to operate milling machine-what happens
when operator leaves company?-additional costs will be incurred to
hire and then train replacement operator(s)
• is cash available for financing the investment?
• impact on ROI and bonus
• due to capital nature of East Divsion, it may not be appropriate to
evaluate management on ROI since it may inhibit goal congruence,
i.e., the division may make short-run decisions to improve ROI at the
expense of long-run company objectives.
6. Recommended Course of Action
I recommend building a general purpose milling machine (OK) since its initial costs and also net present value is lower compared to buying the milling machine or buying a special purpose milling machine. It is also advisable to take into consideration the availability of expertise able to build the general purpose machines and also the fact that the company has idle capacity.
5/5
7. Circumvention of Potential Problems
The recommendation did not take into account the insurance cost reduction, although it was stated that the cost of insurance for the special purpose machine was higher than that of the general purpose machine. The time frame for building the new general purpose machine is 6 months which was not incorporated in the calculation of net present value but which does not affect the outcome of the decision made. 5/5
|
Activity/Competencies Demonstrated |
% of Total Grade |
Total Grade |
|
Identification and Analysis of Issues (90%) |
|
|
|
a. Issue identification |
/5 | |
|
b. Identification of Key Success Factors |
/10 | |
|
c. Identification of Alternatives |
/5 |
05 |
|
d. Quantitative Analysis |
/40 |
11 |
|
e. Qualitative Analysis |
/30 |
10 |
|
Recommendation (10%) |
|
|
|
a. Recommendation on course of action |
/5 |
05 |
|
b. Circumvention of Potential Problems |
/5 |
05 |
|
Total |
/100 |
50 |