Make improvement on the assignment by using the info. Also create the table of contents. Make Letter of Transmittal.

Writer

Reviewer

ENGL 216

Course Project Peer Review 1

Week 6

For each peer review ,

1. Download this form and save it as Your Last Name Peer Review of Your Writer’s Last Name .

2. Read your writer’s report carefully.

3. Address each of the questions below in 2 – 4 sentences. An effective comment will make an observation, and if needed, suggest an improvement. Use as much space as you need.

Does the INTRODUCTION section provide a purpose, description, and scope for the report? To what extent does the writer clearly explain the purpose? If needed, how can the writer make the purpose of the report clearer?

There is no table of content which would have listed sections in hierarchical way, using title subtitles and giving accurate page reference. However, the introduction provides the purpose. Description and scope of the report. The main purpose of the report is to discuss various types of accounting systems.

Does the DISCUSSION section provide enough background information for the reader? Does the writer organize the ideas logically? To what extent are the main points easy to find and to grasp? If needed, what information should the writer add to this section?

The information in the draft is well organized but not in that logical manner because the writer did not indicate the discussion part of the paper for a reader to understand the issues surround accounting system. However, the information provided is good to inform the reader though did not add more to it part.

Does the CONCLUSION section flow logically from the discussion section and provide a transition to the recommendations section? To what extent does the writer restate the main points clearly and concisely? If needed, what information should the writer add to this section?

The main points are clear and concise, and also flow in logical form. The conclusion takes everything said but does not mention anything new.

Does the RECOMMENDATIONS section provide one or more recommendations? To what extent does the writer clearly explain the actions he/she is recommending the audience take, how to implement them, and how much they will cost? To what extent does the writer convince the reader these are sound recommendations worthy of adopting? If needed, how can the writer make the recommendations clearer and more persuasive?

The recommendation section is clearly stated, and it also supported the information provided in the report.

To what extent do(es) the VISUAL ELEMENT(S) enhance the writer’s key points? Does the writer tag the element, label it, and cite it according to APA guidelines? If needed, how can the visual more effectively enhance the writer’s ideas or follow APA guidelines more accurately?

The visual element was not complete, the table and Diagrammatic representation of Fresh Books software did not provide enough information for a reader to understand. I believe writer need to work on the visual element in order to convince the readers.

To what extent is the REFERENCES list correctly formatted? To what extent has the writer incorporated each listed source effectively into the main body of the report and cited it accurately according to APA guidelines? If needed, what does the writer need to do to more accurately follow APA guidelines?

The reference list was not annotated properly, the writer did not follow the correct APA formatting. The writer need to follow the sample paper under our discussion board to make necessary correction.

To what extent does the writer use DOCUMENT DESIGN ELEMENTS—headings and subheadings, single spacing (or 1.15), extra spacing between sections and/or paragraphs, proper font choice, and bullets—effectively? If needed, what design elements should the writer include?

The document design was used in right order. The writer used proper front size in almost all the heading and subheading. The front size was 12pt where the topic and sub topic were bolder

Does the writer use a PROFESSIONAL TONE and show “you attitude”? Does he/she use a plain style, with concise sentence that are grammatically correct and punctuated accurately? If needed, what revisions should the writer make?

The writer looks professional in his work. There were minor areas in punctuation, but the writer has good information and suggestion in the report