Decision making
Week 10
“Decision Making
Methods 2”
Dr Ramesh Vahidi [email protected]
MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022 1
Southampton Business School
5th May 2022
From DM Methods 1: We identified ‘Problems’ and tried to ‘Structure’ them …
MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022 2
Depending on the context and our purposes: “Problems could also be found and some aspects of them could be structured using: PESTEL, Stakeholders analysis, Success/Strategy/Governance theories and models, etc. or a combination of these as we discussed in one of this module's lectures”
Aim of Week 10: Let’s Decide or Find Resolution
• Providing you with a few more common and
practical decision making and analysis
approaches/methods/tools, which could be
applied for further structuring, analysing and
resolving project decisions/problems.
MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022 3
We will cover
• Part 1 → Single Criterion Decision Making
• Part 2 → Multi-criteria Decision Making
• Part 3 → Example of Scoring Model
• Part 4 → Another Scoring Model - Background to the next lecture
MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022 4
PART 1
“Single Criterion
Decision Making”
MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022 5
Southampton Business School
6
MANG6312 - DM Methods 2
106-929-822
https://vevox.app/#/m/106929822
- It is a new book published for the first time and is only on Amazon;
- There are only few suppliers.
- The suppliers’ prices, delivery periods and country of origin are the same.
- The suppliers’ reviews/credits differ only very slightly.
You have several options (suppliers) on Amazon for buying a book that you need urgently. How will you choose one of those if:
MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022
MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022 7
Single Criterion Decisions & Decision Making
Decisions that you might have a few options but they
differ only on one aspect.
So you only need to compare them based on one criteria
(or aspect) for selecting the desired/best/viable option.
8
Are most of the decisions in
your daily life single-criterion
decisions?
MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022
MANG6312 - DM Methods 2
106-929-822
https://vevox.app/#/m/106929822
PART 2
“Multi-Criteria
Decision Making
(MCDM)”
MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022 9
Southampton Business School
10
Decision: You are the project manager for “Selecting and purchasing the security systems for the Olympics athletes and volunteers’ accommodations”.
The potential suppliers have suggested two systems with various levels of security at very different prices.
Limitations: Allocated budget at most covers one of the cheapest and one of the most expensive systems (not two expensive systems) at a time.
There will be very good rewards for coming under budget and heavy penalties for going over budget (if possible at all!).
Assume you have the following options for your purchase, which one you would choose:
1) I will choose the cheaper for both accommodations;
2) I will choose the cheaper for athletes and the more expensive for volunteers;
3) I will choose the more expensive for the athletes and the cheaper for volunteers;
4) I have problem with making this decision!
5) I don't wish to manage this project!
Question: Could you suggest a single criterion for choosing the most appropriate option?
MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022
MANG6312 DM Methods 2 106-929-822
https://vevox.app/#/m/106929822
11
In the Olympics accommodation
for Athletes/Volunteer what
were your other criteria for
choosing the best option? (if
you had a choice to add!)
MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022
MANG6312 - DM Methods 2
106-929-822
https://vevox.app/#/m/106929822
A Decision with Multiple Criteria
Question1: In previous exercise, what were your other criteria for choosing the best option? (if you had a choice!)?
Cost, recording memory of the camera, distance and scope it covers, ease of repairs/replacement, suppliers’ reputation, guarantee, installation time, athletes’ satisfaction, volunteers’ satisfaction, risk of choosing each camera, athletes’ and volunteers’ insurances, human life, equality, ethics, …
Question2: How could these criteria and their relevant data help you in choosing the best option? (What will happen if you ignore these in reality?)
MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022 12
1) Converting all the criteria into monetary (cost and benefit) equivalents.
Questions:
- How do you evaluate the athletes/volunteers satisfaction in monetary terms?
- How do you evaluate potential injuries/threats to life in monetary terms?
*Limited application in PM decisions, specially dealing with humans/soft aspects!
2) Combining all the different criteria regardless of their nature.
Questions:
- How to deal with the criteria that are non-convertible or hard to convert to monetary or quantitative equivalents?
MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022 13
Approaches to Decisions with Multiple Criteria
Two main approaches
- Scoring models
- Hierarchical models
MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022 14
Approaches to Decisions with Multiple Criteria
Ranking Criteria with a Typical Scoring Model
• Decision criteria: identifies what makes you choose an alternative E.g. → Cost, level of security, suppliers’ reputation, athletes’ satisfaction, volunteers’ satisfaction, installation time, …
• Desirability of an alternative:
1) How far that criteria is important for us? E.g. → is it all about: the cost, the level of satisfaction, the time it takes or a combination of these? To what extent …
2) How far it can satisfy a criteria? E.g. → how much, to what level of satisfaction, how long it takes …
• Steps after defining the problem and alternatives:
1. Define the decision criteria.
2. Identify the weight for each criterion.
3. Calculate each alternative’s score.
4. Prioritize alternatives.
5. Select the alternative with highest score. MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022
15
PART 3
Example of Scoring Model
MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022 16
Decision Analysis with Scoring Model
MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022
Options
Opt1 Opt2
Criterion Importance of Criteria
Weight (0-10)
Rating (0-1)
Score Rating (0-1)
Score
CR1
CR2
…
CRn
Decision: Selecting between Option 1 and Option 2
How important is CR1 in making the decision?
(Within a scale of 1-10)
17
How far Opt1 can satisfy this criterion?
(0 do not satisfy – 1 fully satisfy)
What is the score of Opt1 in relation to CR1?
Weight x Rate = Score
Example Scale for weighting the criteria
Very Important Important Not very
important Not
Important
Example Weights 10 6 3 0
Example of Decision Analysis with Scoring Model: Heathrow T5 – As was originally made
MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022
Options
No Test Test
Criterion Importance Weight
0-10 Rating
0-1 Score
Rating 0-1
Score
Cost saving Not very important
3 0.8 3x0.8=2.4 0.5 3x0.5=1.5
Time saving Very important 10 1 10 0.1 1
System Quality
Not very important
3 0.7 2.1 1 3
Customer Satisfaction
Important 6 0.9 5.4 1 6
Reputation Very important 10 0.9 9 1 10
28.9 21.5
Decision: Testing or not testing the IT system before opening T5
T5’s Perception: Test will not affect these aspects
18(0 do not satisfy – 1 fully satisfy)
Example of Decision Analysis with Scoring Model: Heathrow T5 – With the insights after opening
MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022
Options
No Test Test
Criterion Importance Weight Rating Score Rating Score
Cost Not very important
3 0.8 2.4 0.5 1.5
Time Very Important 10 1 10 0.1 1
System Quality
Not very Important
3 10 0.7 0 0 1 3
10
Customer Satisfaction
Very Important 6 10 0.9 0.1 1 1 6 10
Reputation Very Important 10 0.9 0.1 1 1 10
14.4 32.5
Decision: testing or not testing the IT system before opening T5
19
Example of Decision Analysis with Scoring Model: How would you have scored Heathrow T5 before the opening?!
MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022
Options
No Test Test
Criterion Importance Weight
0-10 Rating
0-1 Score
Rating 0-1
Score
Cost saving
Time saving
System Quality
Customer Satisfaction
Reputation
Decision: Heathrow team's view on Testing or not testing the IT system before opening of T5?
20
Example of Decision Analysis with Scoring Model: Security System Selection
MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022
Options
Option 1 Option 2 Option 3
Criterion Importance Weight
0-10 Rating
0-1 Score
Rating 0-1
Score Rating
0-1 Score
Decision: Ranking and Selecting options 1-3
21
PART 4 Scoring Model - Background
to the next lecture
MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022 22
“Problem Formulation,
Decision Making/Analysis
Method based on Hierarchies”
Poor Man’s Hierarchy
MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022 23
Southampton Business School
Poor Man’s Hierarchy
• Aim: simple ranking of multiple criteria or options.
• Basis: pairwise comparisons of criteria or options.
• Used in managerial decisions (improves ‘seat of the pants’ DM!)
• Simplified, introductory model of a method called the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) that we will discuss next week.
MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022 24
(Frame, 2002, pp. 200-203)
Poor Man’s Hierarchy
MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022 25
Steps:
1) Define the decision criteria/Options
2) Compare their priorities in pairs
3) Add the priorities for the final scores.
Rules:
- The diagonal cells are left blank
- 1 = the cell in side is preferred to the one on
the top
- 0 = the cell on the top is preferred to the
one on the side
- Compare only at the top of the diagonal
- Put the opposite values, below the diagonal
CR1 CR2 CR3 CR4 Score
CR1 - 1 0 1 2
CR2 0 - 1 0 1
CR3 1 0 - 1 2
CR4 0 1 0 - 1
Opt1 Opt2 Opt3 Opt4 Score
Opt1 - 1 0 1 2
Opt2 0 - 1 0 1
Opt3 1 0 - 1 2
Opt4 0 1 0 - 1
CR1 is preferred to CR2
CR3 is preferred to CR1
• Problem: selection of a new site to establish manufacturing operations.
• Example question: Which is the more desirable criterion, availability of cheap labour or regional tax policies?
MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022 26
Poor Man’s Hierarchy - Example
Decision Making in Groups
• Put the sum or average (for some methods) of the group’s votes in cells. Helpful to keep sperate records of various votes where possible.
• Final decision on options:
- Clearer Discussions: ideas discussed/documented based on significance of each criteria;
- More structured: Options can be evaluated based on how they satisfy the criteria and then their scores are calculated (same as the last step of the scoring model).
MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022 27
Decision Analysis with Scoring Model Sydney Opera House
MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022
Decision: You are the selection panel for Sydney Opera House architect. You have received a number of proposals from different architects from a number of countries. Decide on the criteria for selection of the best architect and identify the priorities for your criteria. Extend the table if required.
28
CR1 CR2 CR3 CR4 CR5 CR6 CR7 Score
CR1
CR2
CR3
CR4
CR5
CR6
CR7
Learning Outcomes of Week 10
By actively attending the sessions and following up with further background studies
you are expected to be able to:
Demonstrate capability of selecting an appropriate tool for identification,
formulation, analysis and possibly making decisions/resolving problems
Appreciate the fundamentals of Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM).
Appreciate the example tools and techniques for MCDM: Scoring model, Poor
Man Hierarchy.
Apply the tools and techniques in simple cases and understand the results.
29 MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022
Readings
Frame, Davison J. (2002) The New Project Management: Tools for an Age of Rapid Change, Complexity. Jossey-Bass. 2nd ed. (for Poor Man’s Hierarchy)
Goodwin, P. & Wright, G. (2014) Decision analysis for management judgement. 5th edn. West Essex: John Wiley & Sons. (for AHP)
Virine, L. & Trumper, M. (2008) Project decisions-The art and science. Vienna: Management Concepts Inc. (multiple criteria/objective models) (Chapters 6 from pp. 79 to 86; Further reading: Chapters 7 & 8)
MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022 30
31 MANG6312©RameshVahidi2022