Organization Development

profileVignesh Sivadass
MANG6254GradeDescriptors.doc

Postgraduate Grade Descriptor for [MANG6254, Organisational Development]

Percentage

0-34

35–49

50–59

60–69

70-79

80 - 100

Degree Class

Fail

Compensatable fail*

Pass

Merit

Distinction

Distinction

Cognitive/

Thinking:

Inadequate

Inconsistent

Level of critical

Good level of critical

Critical

Critical

Shows

an

evidence of critical

evidence of critical

understanding is

understanding

understanding is

understanding is

understanding

of

understanding as

understanding.

reasonable.

evident.

applied in a

applied in a very

theory

and

concepts,

required at this

Argument is just

Some confusion may

Competent in

comprehensive and

comprehensive and

adequate but may be

be evident but most

producing argument

concise manner.

concise manner.

and

an

ability

to

level. Lacks ability

poorly structured.

argument is relevant

that is well

Analysis is

Analysis is very

critically assess them.

to develop an

and adequate.

sustained, structured

appropriate and

comprehensive.

Weighting 20%

effective argument

and legitimate.

precise.

Very high degree of

as required for

High degree of

competence to

level 7.

competence to

produce innovative

produce innovative,

and original

original argument

argument

Subject Specific: Supports

No evidence.

Limited evidence.

Some relevant ideas/

Good relevant

Very good relevant

Excellent relevant

arguments with clear,

arguments evident.

examples are

examples are

examples are

effective examples/

Reasonable

evident, clearly

evident, very clearly

evident,

evidence.

articulation.

articulated.

articulated.

exceptionally clearly

Weighting 20%

articulated and

evidenced to the

topic.

Subject Specific: Scope of

No evidence.

Limited evidence

Reasonable coverage

Good coverage and

Very good coverage

Excellent coverage

relevant literature

with numerous

and referencing but

referencing with

and referencing with

and referencing.

including Harvard style

omissions.

incomplete or

minimal omissions.

minimal errors.

reference list.

numerous omissions.

Weighting 20%

Transferable Skills: Well-

No/inadequate

Poor structure with

Adequate structure

Good structure with

Very good structure

Excellent structure

structured with

structure.

limited introduction

with reasonable

competent

with concise,

with exceptionally

appropriate introduction

and conclusions.

introduction and

introduction and

comprehensive

clear introduction

and conclusions.

conclusions.

conclusions.

introduction and

and conclusions.

Weighting 20%

conclusions.

Southampton Business School: Postgraduate Module Grade Descriptor

2

Percentage

0-34

35–49

50–59

60–69

70-79

80 - 100

Degree Class

Fail

Compensatable fail*

Pass

Merit

Distinction

Distinction

Transferable Skills:

Very poor and

Significant

Adequately

Well expressed.

Very well expressed.

Exceptionally

Correct and fluent English

often/mostly

deficiencies in

expressed but some

Clear and

Confident and very

competent and

language.

inarticulate. Mostly

expression.

inconsistencies

appropriate use of

good use of

fluent use of

Weighting 20%

incomprehensible.

Inconsistent and

apparent. Adequate

language.

language.

expression.

poor use of

use of language.

Confident and

language.

excellent use of

language.

*Compensatable fail is only possible for compulsory or optional modules. ** For group submissions only