College Eenglish
COMM1008 – Major Assessment 2 – Persuasive Research Project Rubric
|
Paper includes |
YES |
NO |
|
|
|
|
|
References Page (APA) |
|
|
|
Focus and Organization: __% |
||||
|
Superior/ Advanced (85-100%) |
Very Good (61-84%) |
Fair (41-60%) |
Below Expectations (20-40%) |
INC |
|
· Thesis Statement/Main Message is a clear, focused, specific, and creative arguable claim. · Assignment is logically organized and unified; the logical connection between content and Thesis Statement/Main Message is clear. · Specified organizational components consistently met |
· Thesis Statement/Main Message is a clear, focused, and specific arguable claim. · Assignment is mostly logically organized and unified; the logical connection between content and Thesis Statement/Main Message is mostly clear. · Specified organizational components mostly met.
|
· Thesis Statement/Main Message is somewhat clear, focused, and specific; Thesis Statement/Main Message is not an arguable claim or lacks clear direction. · Assignment is somewhat logically organized and unified; the logical connection between content and Thesis Statement/Main Message is somewhat clear. · Specified organizational components somewhat met |
· Thesis Statement/Main Message is not clear, focused, specific, or arguable. · Assignment is not logically organized or unified; the logical connection between content and Thesis Statement/Main Message is unclear. · Specified organizational components are not met |
Incomplete |
|
10-------------9.3----------8.5 |
8.4-------------7.3----------6.1 |
6.0-------------5.0----------4.1 |
4.0-------------3.0----------2.0 |
|
|
Development and Analysis: __% |
||||
|
Superior/ Advanced (85-100%) |
Very Good (61-84%) |
Fair (41-60%) |
Below Expectations (20-40%) |
INC |
|
· Students' claims are consistently supported with appropriate, relevant, logical, convincing, and creative evidence. · Evidence is critically and logically explained through analysis that is varied and fully detailed. · Specified development and analysis components consistently met |
· Students' claims are mostly supported with appropriate, relevant, logical, and convincing evidence. · Most evidence is logically explained through analysis that is varied and detailed. · Specified development and analysis components mostly met |
· Students' claims are supported with some appropriate, relevant, and logical evidence. · Evidence is somewhat explained, but how the selected evidence proves the thesis may be unclear. · Specified development and analysis components somewhat met |
· Students' claims are supported with very little evidence. · Evidence is insufficiently and/or illogically explained. · Specified development and analysis components are not met |
Incomplete |
|
10-------------9.3----------8.5 |
8.4------------7.3---------6.1 |
6.0------------5.0---------4.1 |
4.0-------------3.0----------2.0 |
|
|
Style: __% |
||||
|
Superior/ Advanced (85-100%) |
Very Good (61-84%) |
Fair (41-60%) |
Below Expectations (20-40%) |
INC |
|
· Language is clear, accurate, concise, and creative. · Language and tone are audience-appropriate. · Quotations and paraphrases from sources are effectively and seamlessly integrated. · Sentences are varied and engaging. · Specified style components consistently met |
· Language is mostly clear, accurate, and concise. · Language and tone are mostly audience-appropriate. · Quotations and paraphrases are mostly effectively integrated. · Sentences are mostly varied and engaging. · Specified style components mostly met |
· Language is somewhat clear, accurate, and concise. · Language and tone are somewhat audience-appropriate. · Some effective integration of quotations and paraphrases. · Sentences are somewhat varied and engaging. · Specified style components somewhat met |
· Language is mostly unclear, inaccurate, and not concise. · Language and tone are not audience-appropriate. · Few effectively integrated quotations and paraphrases. · Sentences are not varied or engaging. · Specified style components are not met |
Incomplete |
|
10-------------9.3----------8.5 |
8.4------------7.3---------6.1 |
6.0------------5.0---------4.1 |
4.0-------------3.0----------2.0 |
|
|
Grammar and Mechanics: __% |
||||
|
Superior/ Advanced (85-100%) |
Very Good (61-84%) |
Fair (41-60%) |
Below Expectations (20-40%) |
NR/ INC |
|
· Free of grammar and spelling errors. · Free of mechanical errors. · Specified grammar and mechanics components consistently met |
· Very few grammar and spelling errors. · Very few mechanical errors (fragments, comma splices, run-ons, misuse of punctuation). · Specified grammar and mechanics components mostly met |
· Some grammar and spelling errors. · Some mechanical errors (fragments, comma splices, run-ons, misuse of punctuation). · Specified grammar and mechanics components somewhat met |
· Many grammar and spelling errors. · Many mechanical errors (fragments, comma splices, run-ons, misuse of punctuation). · Specified grammar and mechanics components not met |
Incomplete |
|
10-------------9.3----------8.5 |
8.4------------7.3---------6.1 |
6.0------------5.0---------4.1 |
4.0-------------3.0----------2.0 |
|
|
APA Referencing: __% |
||||
|
Superior/ Advanced (85-100%) |
Very Good (61-84%) |
Fair (41-60%) |
Below Expectations (20-40%) |
INC |
|
· In-text citations for quotations and paraphrases are consistently correct. · APA references are completely correct. · Format requirements are consistently correct. |
· In-text citations for quotations and paraphrases are mostly correct. · APA references are mostly correct. · Format requirements are mostly correct. |
· In-text citations for quotations and paraphrases are somewhat correct. · APA references are somewhat correct. · Format requirements are somewhat correct. |
· In-text citations for quotations are mostly incorrect. · APA references are mostly incorrect. · Format requirements are mostly incorrect. |
Incomplete |
|
10-------------9.3----------8.5 |
8.4------------7.3---------6.1 |
6.0------------5.0---------4.1 |
4.0-------------3.0----------2.0 |
/50 /20 |