major case analysis

Major Case Analysis Rubric - GBA-398 - Saint Leo University

1/4

GBA398

Preview Rubric Major Case Analysis Rubric

Criteria Exceptional

20 points

Proficient

18 points

Basic

16 points

Novice

14 points

No Submission

0 points

Analyze

businesses

• Central theme clearly developed

that shows depth

and understanding

of appropriate CBK

content.

• Clearly identifies problem(s) in case.

• Accurately supports analysis

with appropriate

CBK content.

• Well-developed insights combining

multiple CBK

perspectives into a

well-integrated

approach.

• Central theme developed, referring

to examples or

theories from prior

CBK courses but

lacks specificity.

• Clearly identifies problem(s) in case.

• Supports analysis with appropriate

CBK perspectives,

but lacks specificity.

• Paper develops insights but does

not have a well-

integrated

approach.

• Paper is organized,

• Central theme not well developed.

Alludes to examples or

theories from prior

CBK courses but lacks

specificity.

• Identifies some issues, but fails to

clearly identify key

problem(s).

• Supports analysis with CBK

perspectives, but in a

cursory manner and

not well-integrated.

• Paper is organized, information mostly

sequenced in a logical

• Does not refer to examples or

theories from prior

CBK courses.

• Fails to identify the central problem

in the case.

• Does not support posts with CBK

perspectives.

• Paper is disorganized,

information is not

logically sequenced,

and key points not

obvious.

No Submission

from an

integrated

perspective,

using the

appropriate

CBK content.

Major Case Analysis Rubric - GBA-398 - Saint Leo University

2/4

• Paper is well organized,

information is

logically sequenced,

and key points are

obvious.

information is

logically sequenced,

but key points not

obvious.

manner, and key points

not obvious.

• Central theme clearly developed

that shows depth

and understanding

of the business

decision.

• Supports decisions and

recommendations

with specific

examples and uses

multiple

components of a

business.

• Central theme developed, referring

to examples or

theories from prior

CBK courses but

lacks specificity.

• Supports decisions and

recommendations

with examples and

multiple

components of a

business, but lacks

specificity.

• Alludes to a central theme, but not clearly

developed.

• Lacks specificity in decisions or

recommendations.

• Supports decisions and

recommendations with

brief examples.

• Fails to incorporate multiple components

of a business, and lacks

specificity.

• Central theme not present.

• Decisions not supported.

• Fails to incorporate multiple

components of a

business, and

lacks specificity.

No Submission

Integrate the

various

components

of a business

and apply

them to

complex

business

decisions.

Apply critical

• Supports analysis with specific critical

thinking examples

and theories.

• Applies critical thinking concepts in

an accurate and

insightful manner.

• Supports analysis with some

critical thinking

concepts, but lacks

specificity.

• Applies critical thinking concepts in

an accurate manner,

but lacks insight.

• CBK and critical thinking

components applied in

a cursory manner and

not well-integrated.

• Alludes to readings, but lacks

specificity in CBK

content area.

• Does not refer to examples or

theories from prior

CBK courses.

• Does not apply specific critical

thinking concepts.

No Submission

thinking

techniques

to solve

integrated

business

scenarios.

Major Case Analysis Rubric - GBA-398 - Saint Leo University

3/4

Total / 100

• CBK and critical thinking

components well

integrated and

applied correctly to

address key issues in

case.

• Supports decisions and

recommendations

with specific

examples and

multiple

components of a

business.

• CBK and critical thinking

components applied

correctly, but not

well integrated.

• Supports decisions and

recommendations

with specific

examples and

multiple

components of a

business, but lacks

specificity.

• Alludes to readings, but lacks

specificity in decisions

or

recommendations.

• Applies critical thinking concepts in a

cursory manner.

• Does not refer to examples or

theories from prior

CBK courses and

does not apply

critical thinking

components.

No Submission

• One or two minor errors in grammar,

punctuation, etc.

(e.g. typos, missing

punctuation).

• Paper is properly formatted with APA

style.

• Three or four minor errors in

grammar,

punctuation, etc.

• Paper is properly formatted with APA

style.

• One major error in grammar, punctuation,

etc.

• Paper has one or two minor APA formatting

errors.

• Grammar, punctuation, etc. has

multiple repeated

errors.

• Paper has multiple APA formatting

errors.

No Submission

Demonstrate

the core value

of excellence

through the

application of

critical thinking

and an

integrated view

of the

organization.

Writing

Grammar,

punctuation,

paragraph

structure, etc.

Is appropriate.

APA Format

Major Case Analysis Rubric - GBA-398 - Saint Leo University

4/4

Overall Score

Novice

60 points minimum

No Submission

0 points minimum

Basic

70 points minimum

Proficient

80 points minimum

Exceptional

90 points minimum