Transportation and Distribution Final Assignment
Criteria Unacceptable Minimally Responsive Satisfactory Exemplary Points
Incorporation of
Feedback [Used for
Milestone Assignments]
Little to no attempt was
made to improve upon the
assignment based on prior
feedback.
The incorporation of feedback is
provided, with minor changes made
based on the feedback from previous
milestones, more extensive changes
are expected based on the feedback.
This reflects major misconceptions
and/or incomplete understanding of
the assignment and topic.
The incorporation of feedback is
accurate and generally complete,
though minor portions may be
missing OR the attempt to integrate
the feedback from previous
milestones did not effectively
enhance the current milestone,
overall from the original draft. More
details and clarity of concepts are
needed to effectively enhance the
Final Project.
The incorporation of feedback is
accurate and complete, with feedback
effectively integrated from previous
milestones. The revisions have
enhanced the Final Project.
Score 0 17 21 25 25
Description and
Relevancy of the role
that logistics providers
play with regard to
transportation planning
and execution strategies
for your chosen
product/industry.
A description of the role that
logistics providers play with
regard to transportation
planning and execution
strategies for your chosen
product/industry is not
identified nor described.
A description of the role that
logistics providers play with regard
to transportation planning and
execution strategies for your chosen
product/industry is identified, but
not described appropriately, with
major details missing and evidence
of misconceptions.
The description of the role that
logistics providers play with regard
to transportation planning and
execution strategies for your chosen
product/industry is relevant, and is
described appropriately, though
minor details are missing.
The description of the role that
logistics providers play with regard to
transportation planning and execution
strategies for your chosen
product/industry is relevant, and is
described appropriately and in detail.
Score 0 17 21 25 25
Interpretation and
Analysis of how reverse
logistics impacts
operations within the
supply chain system for
your chosen product.
Interpretations of how
reverse logistics impacts
operations within the supply
chain system for your chosen
product are barely presented,
if at all.
Interpretations of how reverse
logistics impacts operations within
the supply chain system for your
chosen product, and reflect major
misconceptions and/or incomplete
understanding.
Interpretations of how reverse
logistics impacts operations within
the supply chain system for your
chosen product are complete.
Justifications are accurate and
appropriate, identifying sections as
evidence and discussing them, with
some important details missing.
Interpretations of how impact reverse
logistics impacts operations within the
supply chain system for your chosen
product are complete. Justifications
are thorough and accurate, identifying
clearly specific sections as evidence
and discussing them with detail.
Score 0 17 21 25 25
SBT_BUS381_M8A1_FINAL_PROJECT_RUBRIC
Use of Sources as
Evidence
The resources, if any, are not
credible.
Resources are noted in the
bibliography, but are not relevant to
the topic at hand. They may be used
as sources of evidence to support
claims, but are used forcibly, and not
appropriately.
Including additional sources or
information about the sources may
have strengthened the support of
certain claims.
The selected resources noted in the
bibliography are credible and have
relevance with the topic at hand,
and are used as sources of evidence
to support claims made. Some of
these connections, however, may be
a little far-fetched.
Including additional sources or
information about sources may have
strengthened the support of certain
claims.
The selected resources noted in the
bibliography are credible, and have
clear relevance with the topic at hand,
and are used as sources of evidence to
support claims made.
A sufficient number of sources were
used to make strong arguments
for/against claims.
Score 0 7 12 15 15
Writing Quality/APA
Style
Frequent problems with
organization, clarity and/or
conventions make the paper
hard to read. APA style
guidelines are not adhered
to, which increases the risk of
plagiarism.
Numerous mechanical errors are
distracting; and organization of ideas
are lacking, but not enough to
interfere with meaning. APA style
guidelines are attempted, with major
errors.
There are few problems with
organization, clarity or conventions
that should have been fixed. APA
style guidelines are followed, with
only minor errors. Problems and
errors are not serious enough to
distract the reader.
The writing skillfully communicates the
message(s) and the language flows
seamlessly throughout; there are
minimal problems with spelling,
punctuation, and grammar; APA style
guidelines are followed accurately.
Score 0 6 8 10 10
Total Points 100