|
PJM535 Mod 4 CT
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
|
|
25 to >20.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
20 to >15.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
15 to >10.0 pts
Below Expectation
Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
10 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
|
25 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
|
|
20 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of project scope; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.
|
16 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
|
12 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
|
8 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
|
|
25 to >20.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Provides strong or adequate thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications.
|
20 to >15.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in thought, insight, and analysis.
|
15 to >10.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in thought, insight, and analysis.
|
10 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate thought, insight, and analysis.
|
|
25 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources / Examples
|
|
10 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
|
8 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
|
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
|
4 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.
|
|
10 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.
|
8 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.
|
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.
|
4 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style
|
|
10 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than one significant error.
|
8 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than two to three significant errors.
|
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with four to five significant errors.
|
4 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with more than five significant errors.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
Total Points: 100
|
ccc123
M535Mod4CT.docx
