M3 Research and Literature

profilezanuyekeh
M3ResearchandLiterature.docx
Home>Applied Sciences homework help>M3 Research and Literature

5. When using frequency recording, the data label on the y-axis will be (select all that apply):

A. Number of behaviors

B. Percent

C. Latency

D. Time

 

Percent occurrenceLinks to an external site. A picture containing black, screenshot Description automatically generated

6. “Percentage” measures are (Select all that apply):

A. A ratio of different dimensional quantities

B. A proportion of correct to incorrect

C. A proportion of intervals in which the target behavior occurred

D. Acceptable to use if the behavior occurs 1-2 times a day

Step 3  Now, let’s practice.  Let’s look at the measurement of the dependent variables section from five single subject research design studies and identify the measurement systems:

HERE IS AN EXAMPLE:  ANALYZING THE MULTIPLE FUNCTIONS OF STEREOTYPICAL BEHAVIOR FOR STUDENTS WITH AUTISM: IMPLICATIONS FOR ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENTLinks to an external site.

Select the measurement system* used from the following:

(*Describe the single measurement system used across  Brad, James, Julie, Rita, and Tom only )

· _____ Frequency

· Interval

· X       Partial interval

· _____ Whole interval

· _____ Momentary time sample

· _____ Percent correct opportunities (e.g. correct, accuracy, etc.)

Study 1:  THE EFFECTS OF ESTABLISHING OPERATIONS ON PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT OUTCOMESLinks to an external site. Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader

· _____ Frequency

· Interval

· _____ Partial interval

· _____ Whole interval

· _____ Momentary time sample

· _____ Percent opportunities (e.g. correct, accuracy, etc.)

Study 2: COMPARING THE TEACHING INTERACTION PROCEDURE TO SOCIAL STORIES FOR PEOPLE WITH AUTISMLinks to an external site.

· _____ Frequency

· Interval

· _____ Partial interval

· _____ Whole interval

· _____ Momentary time sample

· _____ Percent correct opportunities (e.g. correct, accuracy, etc.)

Study 3 :   CONTINGENT EXERCISE: A MILD BUT POWERFUL PROCEDURE FOR SUPPRESSING INAPPROPRIATE VERBAL AND AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIORLinks to an external site. Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader

· _____ Frequency

· Interval

· _____ Partial interval

· _____ Whole interval

· _____ Momentary time sample

· _____ Percent correct opportunities (e.g. correct, accuracy, etc.)

Study 4:  A staff-training program to increase spontaneous vocal requests in children with autismLinks to an external site.

· _____ Frequency

· Interval

· _____ Partial interval

· _____ Whole interval

· _____ Momentary time sample

· _____ Percent correct opportunities (e.g. correct, accuracy, etc.)

Study 5:   MOTIVATING AUTISTIC CHILDREN THROUGH STIMULUS VARIATIONLinks to an external site. Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader

For this study, what is the data collection system for data shown on Figures 1 and 2 only  (NOT: Figures 3 & 4)

· _____ Frequency

· Interval

· _____ Partial interval

· _____ Whole interval

· _____ Momentary time sample

· _____ Percent correct opportunities (e.g. correct, accuracy, etc.)

 

Module 3

Rubric

Annotated Bibliography Single Review

Annotated Bibliography Single Review

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle Review Form

The article review form is included and all sections are completed.

2 pts

Excellent

The article review form is complete and the information is accurate.

1.5 pts

Satisfactory

The article review form is complete, but has some minor issues with accuracy.

1 pts

Needs Improvement

The article review form is complete, but there are some errors in or missing major components.

0.5 pts

Unsatisfactory

The article review form is not complete.

2 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReference

The reference is included in correct APA format.

2 pts

Excellent

All aspects of the reference are in correct APA format.

1.5 pts

Satisfactory

Most aspects of the reference are in correct APA format, but there is one error or missing aspect.

1 pts

Needs Improvement

There are two errors in formatting or missing components.

0.5 pts

Unsatisfactory

There are more than two errors in formatting or missing components.

2 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation--Method

All aspects of the method are explained in the student's annotation (participants/setting, design, DV, IV, procedure).

2 pts

Excellent

All aspects of the method are explained in the student's annotation (participants/setting, design, DV, IV, procedure).

1.5 pts

Satisfactory

Most aspects of the method are explained in the student's annotation (participants/setting, design, DV, IV, procedure), but there is one error or missing aspect.

1 pts

Needs Improvement

Most aspects of the method are explained in the student's annotation (participants/setting, design, DV, IV, procedure), but there are two errors or missing aspects.

0.5 pts

Unsatisfactory

Most aspects of the method are explained in the student's annotation (participants/setting, design, DV, IV, procedure), but there are more than two errors or missing aspects.

2 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation--Results

All aspects of the results are explained in the student's annotation (level, trend, etc, experimental control).

2 pts

Excellent

All aspects of the results are explained in the student's annotation (level, trend, etc, experimental control).

1.5 pts

Satisfactory

Most aspects of the results are explained in the student's annotation (level, trend, etc, experimental control), but there is one error or missing aspect.

1 pts

Needs Improvement

Most aspects of the results are explained in the student's annotation (level, trend, etc, experimental control), but there are two errors or missing aspects.

0.5 pts

Unsatisfactory

Most aspects of the results are explained in the student's annotation (level, trend, etc, experimental control), but there are more than two errors or missing aspects.

2 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation--Discussion

All aspects of the discussion are discussed in the student's annotation (limitations, implications, future research).

2 pts

Excellent

All aspects of the discussion are discussed in the student's annotation (limitations, implications, future research).

1.5 pts

Satisfactory

Most aspects of the discussion are discussed in the student's annotation (limitations, implications, future research), but there is one error or missing aspect.

1 pts

Needs Improvement

Most aspects of the discussion are discussed in the student's annotation (limitations, implications, future research), but there are two errors or missing aspects.

0.5 pts

Unsatisfactory

Most aspects of the discussion are discussed in the student's annotation (limitations, implications, future research), but there are more than two errors or missing aspects.

2 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStudent's Own Words

All annotations are completely in the student's own words, with no citations or direct quotations from the article.

1.5 pts

Excellent

All annotations are completely in the student's own words, with no citations or direct quotations from the article.

1 pts

Satisfactory

Most annotations are completely in the student's own words, with one or less citations or direct quotations from the article.

0.5 pts

Needs Improvement

Most annotations are completely in the student's own words, with two citations or direct quotations from the article.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Most annotations are completely in the student's own words, with more than two citations or direct quotations from the article.

1.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpelling and Grammar

There are no errors in spelling and grammar in the student's annotation or in the student's article review form.

1.5 pts

Excellent

There are no errors in spelling and grammar in the student's annotation or in the student's article review form.

1 pts

Satisfactory

There is one error in spelling and grammar in the student's annotation or in the student's article review form.

0.5 pts

Needs Improvement

There are two errors in spelling and grammar in the student's annotation or in the student's article review form.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

There are more than two errors in spelling and grammar in the student's annotation or in the student's article review form.

1.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength

Each review should be no less than 80 words and no more than 120 words, covering the critical elements of the study.

1 pts

Full Marks

Each review should be no less than 80 words and no more than 120 words, covering the critical elements of the study.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

The review is either over the length requirement or does not meet it.

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFull Sentences

All annotations are in full sentences.

1 pts

Excellent

All annotations are in full sentences.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

The annotation is not in full sentences.

1 pts

Total Points: 15

image1.png