Patho Research and Report

6/18/21, 4:10 PMModule 2 Assignment: Research and Report - BIO216C01 Pathophysiology (Susan Kennedy) SU21 - CCCOnline

Page 1 of 3https://ccco.desire2learn.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=2318747&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=3115660

Research and Report Assignment Rubric Course: BIO216C01 Pathophysiology (Susan Kennedy) SU21

Criteria Highly Proficient (81-100%) Moderately Proficient (61- 80%)

Somewhat Proficient (41- 60%)

Not Proficient (1-40%) No Submission (0 points)

Content Development

Evidence: Selecting and

using information to

investigate a point of

view or conclusion

Connections to

Discipline: Makes

connections across

disciplines and

perspectives

Conclusions and Related

Outcomes (Implications

and Consequences)

Control of Syntax and

Mechanics

15 points

Uses appropriate, relevant,

and compelling content to

illustrate mastery of the

subject, conveying the

writer's understanding and

shaping the whole work.

Paper meets the minimum

length of 750 words.

12 points

Uses appropriate, relevant,

and compelling content to

explore ideas within the

context of the discipline and

shape the whole work. Paper

meets the minimum length

of 750 words.

9 points

Uses appropriate and

relevant content to develop

and explore ideas

throughout most of the

work. Paper may not meet

the minimum length of 750

words.

6 points

Uses appropriate and

relevant content to develop

simple ideas in some parts of

the work. Paper may not

meet the minimum length of

750 words.

0 points

Work is not submitted, or

submitted work contains

none of the required

components, or submitted

work contains plagiarized

content.

15 points

Information is taken from

source(s) with enough

interpretation and evaluation

to develop a comprehensive

analysis or synthesis.

Viewpoints of experts are

questioned thoroughly.

12 points

Information is taken from

source(s) with enough

interpretation and evaluation

to develop a coherent

analysis or synthesis.

Viewpoints of experts are

subject to questioning.

9 points

Information is taken from

source(s) with some

interpretation and

evaluation, but not enough

to develop a coherent

analysis or synthesis.

Viewpoints of experts are

taken as mostly fact, with

little questioning.

6 points

Information is taken from

source(s) without any

interpretation or evaluation.

Viewpoints of experts are

taken as fact, without

question.

0 points

Work is not submitted, or

submitted work contains

none of the required

components, or submitted

work contains plagiarized

content.

10 points

Student independently

creates a whole out of

multiple parts (synthesizes),

or student draws conclusions

by combining examples,

facts, or theories from more

than one field of study or

perspective, using

discussions, readings, and

exploration in final

submission.

8 points

Student independently

connects examples, facts, or

theories from more than one

field of study or perspective,

using discussions, readings,

and exploration in final

submission.

6 points

When prompted, student

connects examples, facts, or

theories from more than one

field of study or perspective,

using discussions, readings,

and exploration in final

submission.

4 points

When prompted, student

presents examples, facts, or

theories from more than one

field of study or perspective,

using discussions, readings,

and exploration in final

submission.

0 points

Work is not submitted, or

submitted work contains

none of the required

components, or submitted

work contains plagiarized

content.

10 points

In the final research and

report paper, conclusions

and related outcomes

(consequences and

implications) are logical, and

reflect student’s informed

evaluation and ability to

place evidence and

perspectives discussed in

priority order.

8 points

Conclusions are logically tied

to a range of information,

including opposing

viewpoints. Related

outcomes (consequences and

implications) are identified

clearly in the student's final

research and report paper.

6 points

Conclusion is logically tied to

information because

information is chosen to fit

the desired conclusion. Some

related outcomes

(consequences and

implications) are identified

clearly in the student’s final

research and report paper.

4 points

Conclusion is inconsistently

tied to some of the

information discussed.

Related

outcomes (consequences and

implications) are

oversimplified in the

student’s final research and

report paper.

0 points

Work is not submitted, or

submitted work contains

none of the required

components, or submitted

work contains plagiarized

content.

5 points

Uses language that skillfully

communicates meaning to

readers with clarity and

fluency, and is virtually error

free.

4 points

Uses straightforward

language that conveys

meaning to readers. The

language in the portfolio has

few errors.

3 points

Uses language that generally

conveys meaning to readers

with clarity, although writing

may include some errors.

2 points

Uses language that

sometimes impedes

understanding of meaning

because of errors in usage.

0 points

Work is not submitted, or

submitted work contains

none of the required

components, or submitted

work contains plagiarized

content.

6/18/21, 4:10 PMModule 2 Assignment: Research and Report - BIO216C01 Pathophysiology (Susan Kennedy) SU21 - CCCOnline

Page 2 of 3https://ccco.desire2learn.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=2318747&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=3115660

Total

Overall Score

Sources and Evidence 5 points

Demonstrates skillful use of

high-quality, credible, and

relevant sources to develop

ideas that are appropriate for

the discipline and genre of

the writing. Sources are cited

and referenced using APA

Style.

4 points

Demonstrates consistent use

of credible and relevant

sources to support ideas that

are situated within the

discipline and genre of the

writing. Sources are all or

mostly cited and referenced

using APA Style.

3 points

Demonstrates an attempt to

use credible and/or relevant

sources to support ideas that

are appropriate for the

discipline and genre of the

writing. Sources are mostly

cited and referenced using

APA Style.

2 points

Demonstrates an attempt to

use sources to support ideas,

but sources may or may not

be cited and referenced

using APA Style.

0 points

Work is not submitted, or

submitted work contains

none of the required

components, or submitted

work contains plagiarized

content.

Highly Proficient (81-100%) 49 points minimum

Moderately Proficient (61-80%) 37 points minimum

Somewhat Proficient (41-60%) 25 points minimum

Not Proficient (1-40%) 1 point minimum

6/18/21, 4:10 PMModule 2 Assignment: Research and Report - BIO216C01 Pathophysiology (Susan Kennedy) SU21 - CCCOnline

Page 3 of 3https://ccco.desire2learn.com/d2l/lms/dropbox/user/folder_submit_files.d2l?db=2318747&grpid=0&isprv=0&bp=0&ou=3115660