9

M08.docx

M08: Theory Application Paper

Assignment Overview:

For this assignment, you will write an 8-to-10-page paper that applies two behavioral theories or concepts to the health or risk behavior you introduced in your Topic Proposal paper. The goal is to analyze how these theories have been used to explain or intervene upon the behavior and assess their effectiveness based on existing research.

Objectives:

· To apply two behavioral theories or concepts to a specific health or risk behavior.

· To evaluate the effectiveness of these theories in understanding or modifying the behavior.

· To integrate and critique relevant research on the application of these theories.

Instructions:

1. Introduction:

· Briefly reintroduce the health or risk behavior you discussed in your Topic Proposal paper.

· Summarize the importance of understanding this behavior and the goals of your analysis.

2. Theory Application:

· Theory 1:

· Describe the first theory or concept you will use.

· Explain how this theory has been applied to the behavior in existing research.

· Discuss the strengths and limitations of this theory in the context of the behavior.

· Theory 2:

· Describe the second theory or concept you will use.

· Explain how this theory has been applied to the behavior in existing research.

· Discuss the strengths and limitations of this theory in the context of the behavior.

3. Integration and Comparison:

· Compare and contrast the two theories in terms of their application to the behavior.

· Discuss how each theory contributes to understanding or modifying the behavior.

· Evaluate the overall effectiveness of each theory based on research findings.

4. Assessment of Fit:

· Assess how well each theory fits the behavior based on the evidence you have reviewed.

· Consider whether one theory provides a more comprehensive understanding or intervention strategy than the other.

5. Conclusion:

· Summarize your findings and insights about the application of the theories.

· Reflect on the implications for future research or practical interventions related to the behavior.

Format and Submission:

· Your paper should be 8-10 pages in length, double-spaced, using a standard 12-point font and 1-inch margins.

· Include an APA title page.

· Use APA formatting for citations and references.

· Submit your paper as a PDF or Word document.

Evaluation Criteria:

· Theory Application: Clear and accurate application of two behavioral theories to the chosen health or risk behavior.

· Research Integration: Effective use of research to support the analysis of theory application and assessment.

· Comparison and Assessment: Insightful comparison of the theories and thorough assessment of their fit with the behavior.

· Writing Quality: The paper is well-organized, demonstrates critical thinking, and is free of grammatical errors.

Resources:

Review class notes, textbooks, and scholarly articles related to the theories discussed in class. If you need additional assistance, consider consulting academic resources or discussing your ideas with your instructor.

Note: For this assignment, please refrain from choosing the Social Ecological Framework as one of your theories.

Rubric

Theory Application Paper Rubric

Theory Application Paper Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction

Reintroduce the behavior in your Topic Proposal and summarize the importance of understanding this behavior

3 to >2.25 pts

Excellent

Provides a clear reintroduction of the behavior and a thorough summary of its importance and analysis goals.

2.25 to >1.5 pts

Good

Reintroduces the behavior and summarizes its importance and analysis goals with minor details missing.

1.5 to >0.75 pts

Satisfactory

Reintroduction of the behavior and summary of its importance are present but lack depth or clarity.

0.75 to >0.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Introduction is unclear or incomplete, with a weak summary of the behavior’s importance and analysis goals.

0 pts

Not Evident

Introduction is missing or irrelevant.

3 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Theory

Describe the first theory or concept you will use and explain how this theory has been applied to the behavior in existing research. Discuss the strengths and limitations of this theory in the context of the behavior.

10 to >7.0 pts

Excellent

Clearly describes first chosen theory, with a detailed explanation of its application to the behavior. Strengths and limitations are well-discussed.

7 to >5.0 pts

Good

Describes first theory with a good explanation of its application. Strengths and limitations are covered but may lack depth.

5 to >3.0 pts

Satisfactory

Provides a basic description of the first theory and its application. Discussion of strengths and limitations is limited.

3 to >0.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Description of the first theory and its application is unclear or incomplete. Strengths and limitations are poorly discussed.

0 pts

Not Evident

First theory is not described or applied.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Theory

Describe the second theory or concept you will use and explain how this theory has been applied to the behavior in existing research. Discuss the strengths and limitations of this theory in the context of the behavior.

10 to >7.0 pts

Excellent

Clearly describes the second chosen theory, with a detailed explanation of its application to the behavior. Strengths and limitations are well-discussed.

7 to >5.0 pts

Good

Describes second theory with a good explanation of its application. Strengths and limitations are covered but may lack depth.

5 to >3.0 pts

Satisfactory

Provides a basic description of the second theory and its application. Discussion of strengths and limitations is limited.

3 to >0.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Description of the second theory and its application is unclear or incomplete. Strengths and limitations are poorly discussed.

0 pts

Not Evident

Second theory is not described or applied.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntegration and Comparison

Insightful comparison of the theories.

7 to >4.2 pts

Excellent

Provides a comprehensive comparison of the two theories, with insightful discussion of their contributions to understanding or modifying the behavior. Evaluation is thorough.

4.2 to >2.8 pts

Good

Compares the two theories with a good discussion of their contributions. Evaluation may be slightly less detailed.

2.8 to >1.4 pts

Satisfactory

Basic comparison of the theories is present, but lacks depth or clarity. Discussion of contributions and evaluation is limited.

1.4 to >0.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Comparison is unclear or superficial. Contributions of the theories and evaluation are not well-developed.

0 pts

Not Evident

Comparison of theories is missing or irrelevant.

7 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssessment of Fit

A thorough assessment of their fit with the behavior.

7 to >4.2 pts

Excellent

Thoroughly assesses how well each theory fits the behavior, with detailed evidence and critical evaluation of their effectiveness.

4.2 to >2.8 pts

Good

Assesses the fit of each theory with good evidence and evaluation. Minor gaps in detail or critical assessment may be present.

2.8 to >1.4 pts

Satisfactory

Basic assessment of the theories’ fit with the behavior is provided. Evidence or evaluation may be limited or lacking depth.

1.4 to >0.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Assessment is incomplete or unclear, with minimal evidence or critical evaluation of the theories' fit.

0 pts

Not Evident

Assessment of the theories' fit is missing or irrelevant.

7 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion

Summarize findings and reflect on the implications for future research or practical interventions related to the behavior.

5 pts

Excellent

Effectively summarizes findings and insights. Reflects thoughtfully on implications for future research or practical interventions.

3 pts

Good

Summarizes findings and insights well, with some reflection on future implications. Minor details may be missing.

2 pts

Satisfactory

Provides a basic summary and reflection. Insights or implications may be superficial or incomplete.

1 pts

Needs Improvement

Conclusion is unclear or incomplete. Reflection on future implications is minimal or lacking.

0 pts

Not Evident

Conclusion is missing or irrelevant.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Quality

The paper is well-organized, free of grammatical errors, and follows APA format.

3 to >2.5 pts

Excellent

The paper is exceptionally well-organized, free of grammatical errors, and adheres to APA format requirements.

2.5 to >1.0 pts

Good

The paper is well-organized with minor grammatical errors. Mostly follows format requirements with some APA inconsistencies.

1 to >0.5 pts

Satisfactory

The paper is organized but has noticeable grammatical errors. Format requirements are only partially followed.

0.5 to >0.0 pts

Needs Improvement

The paper is poorly organized with frequent grammatical errors. Format requirements are not adequately followed.

0 pts

No Marks

The paper is disorganized with pervasive grammatical errors and does not follow format requirements.

3 pts

Total Points: 45

9

image1.png