CJ Administration

C.JUSTICEGIRL

M07_PEAK1530_09_PP_C07.pptx

Home >Law homework help >Criminal homework help >CJ Administration

Justice Administration Police, Courts, and Corrections Management

Ninth Edition

Chapter 7

Court Organization and Operation

If this PowerPoint presentation contains mathematical equations, you may need to check that your computer has the following installed:

1) MathType Plugin

2) Math Player (free versions available)

3) NVDA Reader (free versions available)

Inside the Courts: Décor, Decorum, Citizens

Décor

The physical or decorative style of a setting

Decorum

Correct or proper behavior indicating respect and politeness

Both are intended to convey the sense that the courtroom is a hallowed place in our society.

The courts must also appear to provide justice.

The court should reflect the formal arrangement of the participants.

Justice in the Eye of the Beholder

Courts must appear to provide justice.

Court has the responsibility to provide a fair hearing.

Due process clause.

Critics say appearance is given too much attention, and focus should be on the enforcement of the law.

Seeking Truth in an Adversarial Atmosphere

Adversarial system is the legal system whereby two opposing sides present their arguments in court.

Seeks a winner, not truth.

Evidence is tested under cross-examination.

Power is lodged with several different people.

Both prosecutors and defense attorneys have certain rights.

Judges and juries are only triers of fact.

A Dual Court System

Dual Court System: An organizational distinction between courts, with a federal court system and 50 individual state court systems.

Federal Courts: Organization and Administration (1 of 2)

Federal Courts:

The U.S. Supreme Court

Composed of nine justices

One chief justice and eight associate justices

Nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate; serve for life.

Federal Courts: Organization and Administration (2 of 2)

Uses the writ of certiorari according to the rule of four.

The Court hears cases that concern an issue of constitutional or legal importance, and where the party bringing the case has standing.

Complete discretion to control the nature and number of cases it reviews.

Hears approximately 1% of cases that petitioned.

U.S. Courts of Appeals

The courts of appeals are the intermediate courts of appeals (ICAs) for the federal court system.

Eleven of the circuits are identified by number, and another is called the D.C. Circuit.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit hears cases across the country is the 13th Appeals.

The number of judges in each circuit varies, from 6 in the First Circuit to 28 in the Ninth, depending on the volume and complexity of the caseload.

Each circuit has a chief judge, chosen by seniority.

Half the cases are civil, about 20% are criminal, and the rest are administrative.

FIGURE 7-1 Geographic Boundaries of the U.S. Court of Appeals, and U.S. District Courts

Source: United States Courts of Appeals and United States District Courts, www.uscourts.gov/images/circuitmap.pdf.

U.S. District Courts

94 in number, of which 89 are located within the 50 states.

There is at least one district court in each state (some states have more, such as California, New York, and Texas, all of which have four).

The president nominates district judges, who must then be confirmed by the Senate; they serve for life unless removed for cause.

The U.S. District Courts are the federal trial courts of original jurisdiction for all major violations of federal criminal law.

Judicial Conference of the United States

The administrative policymaking organization of the federal judicial system.

Its membership consists of the chief justice, the chief judges of each of the courts of appeals, one district judge from each circuit, and the chief judge of the Court of International Trade.

Administers the judiciary budget and makes recommendations to Congress concerning the creation of new judgeships, increase in judicial salaries, revising federal rules of procedure, and budgets for court operations.

Plays a major role in the impeachment of federal judges.

Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts

The day-to-day administrative tasks of the federal courts have been handled by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

Director of AO is appointed by the chief justice of the Supreme Court.

Presents annual budget request, argues for the need for additional judgeships, and transmitting proposed changes in court rules.

State Courts of Last Resort and Appeal

Court of last resort:

That court in a given state that has its highest and final appellate authority.

Referred to as the state supreme court.

Hears about 100 cases a year.

Have limited original jurisdiction in dealing with matters such as disciplining lawyers and judges.

Policymaking role apparent in deciding death penalty cases—which, in most states, are automatically appealed to the state's highest court.

The state supreme courts are also the ultimate review board for matters involving interpretation of state law.

Intermediate Courts of Appeals

ICAs exist in both the federal and state court systems that hear appeals, organizationally situated between the trial courts and the court of last resort.

10 states do not have ICA, and only have supreme courts.

In most states, they hear both civil and criminal appeals.

Like their federal counterparts, state ICAs can use rotating three-judge panels.

ICAs engage primarily in error corrections; they review trials to make sure that the law was followed.

Trial Courts (1 of 2)

Courts of original jurisdiction (or "first instance") where evidence and testimony are first introduced and findings of fact and law are made.

There are an estimated 2,000 major trial courts in the 50 states and Washington, D.C., staffed with more than 10,000 general-jurisdiction judges.

The most common names for these courts are district, circuit, and superior.

Trial Courts (2 of 2)

Each court has its own support staff consisting of a clerk of court, a sheriff, and others.

In most states, the trial courts of general jurisdiction are also grouped into judicial districts or circuits.

2015 over 18 million criminal cases came into state courts.

Specialty courts are on the rise.

FIGURE 7-3 Org. Structure for a County District Court Serving a Pop. of 300,000

Limited Jurisdiction: Lower Courts

Inferior courts:

The lowest level of state courts, normally trial courts of limited jurisdiction

There are more than 13,500 trial courts of limited jurisdiction, with about 16,000 judicial officers. They constitute 61 percent of all judicial bodies in the United States.

Variously called district, justice, justice of the peace, city, magistrate, or municipal courts, the lower courts decide a restricted range of cases.

These courts are created and maintained by city or county governments.

The workload of the lower courts can be divided into felony criminal cases, non-felony criminal cases, and civil cases.

Unification, Consolidation, Reform

Court unification

Reorganizing a trial court's structure, procedures, funding, and administration so streamline operations, better deploy personnel, and improve trial and appellate processes.

To be truly centralized or consolidated, a state's court system should have at a minimum:

Consolidation into a single-tier trial court

Rule-making authority

Centralization of administration

Unification includes a centralized budgeting by the state judicial administrator.

FIGURE 7-4 Illinois and New York Court Structures

The Influence of Courts in Policymaking (1 of 2)

Policymaking

Establishing rules, principles, or guidelines to govern actions by ordinary citizens and persons in positions of authority

The U.S. Supreme Court has dramatically changed race relations, overhauled juvenile courts, increased the rights of the accused, prohibited prayer and segregation in public schools, legalized abortion, and allowed for desecration of the U.S. flag.

The nation's courts have had major impact in the prisons—from which nearly 60,000 prisoner petitions are filed each year in the U.S. district courts.

The Influence of Courts in Policymaking (2 of 2)

While it may appear that the courts are too broad in their review of issues, judges "cannot impose their views until someone brings a case to court."

Thus it is said that the judiciary is the "least dangerous branch," having no enforcement powers.