MARKETING
1
M003LO N, CW2 Rubric
0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Criteria 1 Knowledge and Understanding: Use of relevant, credible marketing information gathered from a range of sources. (Models, concepts, theories, data, visual data etc.).
No attempt, No submissio n, Absent
Insufficient use of marketing information gathered from a limited, unreliable range of sources to support your work. Weak demonstratio n of data handling with unsatisfactory comprehensi on of application and/or integration of the data.
Limited use of marketing information gathered from a narrow, unreliable range of sources to support your work. Superficial or scant demonstratio n of data handling with partial or formulaic comprehensi on of application and/or integration of the data.
Satisfactory use of relevant marketing information gathered from a selected range of sources to support your work. Adequate demonstratio n of data handling with basic if generic comprehensi on of application and/or integration of the data.
Reasonable use of relevant, credible marketing information gathered from a range of sources to support your work. Appropriate demonstratio n of data handling with decent comprehensi on of application and/or integration of the data.
Effective use of relevant, credible marketing information gathered from a good range of sources to support your work. Competent demonstratio n of data handling with proper or accurate comprehensi on of application and/or integration of the data.
Proficient use of relevant, credible marketing information gathered from a broad range of sources to support your work. Commendabl e demonstratio n of data handling with precise comprehensi on of application and/or integration of the data.
Impressive use of relevant, credible marketing information gathered from a wide range of sources to support your work. Excellent demonstratio n of data handling with articulate comprehensi on of application and/or integration of the data.
Brilliant use of relevant, credible marketing information gathered from a broad range of sources to support your work. Outstanding demonstratio n of data handling with superb comprehensi on of application and/or integration of the data.
Impeccable use of relevant, credible marketing information gathered from a vast range of sources to support your work. Exceptional demonstratio n of data handling with remarkable comprehensi on of application and/or integration of the data.
2
Criteria 2 Cognitive (thinking) Skills: Analysis, application, interpretation and synthesis of marketing information and/or theories.
No attempt, No submissio n, Absent
Poor analysis, application, interpretation or synthesis of marketing information and/or theories with insufficient or weak attempt at integration of these within the work
Limited or inadequate analysis, application, interpretation or synthesis of marketing information and/or theories with partial or superficial attempt at integration of these within the work
Acceptable if basic analysis, application, interpretation or synthesis of marketing information and/or theories with demonstrable if generic attempt at integration of these within the work
Appropriate or reasonable analysis, application, interpretation or synthesis of marketing information and/or theories with reasonable demonstrable attempt at integration of these within the work.
Competent or effective analysis, application, interpretation or synthesis of marketing information and/or theories with demonstrable or proper attempt at integration of these within the work.
Commendabl e or proficient analysis, application, interpretation or synthesis of marketing information and/or theories with demonstrable attempt at integration of these within the work.
Excellent and articulate analysis, application, interpretation or synthesis of marketing information and/or theories, with thorough integration of these within the work.
Outstanding analysis, application, interpretation or synthesis of marketing information and/or theories, with thorough integration of these within the work.
Exceptional analysis, application, interpretation or synthesis of marketing information and/or theories, with thorough integration of these within the work.
Criteria 3 Practical Skills: Professional presentation and use of I.T and/or marketing standard equipment and software.
No attempt, No submissio n, Absent
Poor professional presentation and little or no use of I.T and/or demonstratio n of ability to make use of marketing standard equipment or software.
Inadequate unprofession al presentation and basic use of I.T and/or demonstratio n of ability to make use of marketing standard equipment or software.
Basic presentation and weak use of I.T and/or demonstratio n of ability to make use of marketing standard equipment or software.
Appropriate professional presentation use of I.T and/or demonstratio n of ability to make use of marketing standard equipment or software.
Competent professional presentation and accurate use of I.T and/or demonstratio n of ability to make use of marketing standard equipment or software.
Commendabl e professional presentation and proficient use of I.T and/or demonstratio n of ability to make use of marketing standard equipment or software.
Excellent professional presentation and innovative use of I.T and/or demonstratio n of ability to make use of marketing standard equipment or software.
Outstanding professional presentation innovative use of I.T and/or demonstratio n of ability to make use of marketing standard equipment or software.
Exceptional professional presentation innovative use of I.T and/or demonstratio n of ability to make use of marketing standard equipment or software.
3
Criteria 4 Transferable Skills: Visual, verbal and written communication of appropriate marketing information and theories (e.g. terminology, application of theory and contemporary examples). Referencing and Citation: Acknowledgement of sources used.
No attempt, No submissio n, Absent
Poor visual, verbal and written communicati on of appropriate marketing information with weak application of terminology and/or theories. Referencing and citations unsatisfactory .
Incomplete or inadequate visual, verbal and written communicati on of appropriate marketing information with inadequate application of terminology and/or theories. Citation use limited in areas. Some questionable references.
Basic visual, verbal and written communicati on of appropriate marketing information with satisfactory if generic application of terminology and/or theories. Some citations missing. References rather basic.
Appropriate visual, verbal and written communicati on of appropriate marketing information with reasonable or decent application of terminology and/or theories. Fair use of citations. Structured reference list.
Competent visual, verbal and written communicati on of appropriate marketing information with effective or accurate application of terminology and/or theories. Competent use of citations. Structured reference list.
Commendabl e visual, verbal and written communicati on of appropriate marketing information with proficient application of terminology and/or theories. Very good use of citations and references.
Excellent visual, verbal and written communicati on of appropriate marketing information with well-‐ articulated application of terminology and/or theories. Highly Impressive use of citations and references.
Outstanding visual, verbal and written communicati on of appropriate marketing information with brilliant application of terminology and/or theories. Outstanding use of citations and wonderful reference list.
Exceptional visual, verbal and written communicati on of appropriate marketing information with impeccable application of terminology and/or theories. Perfect use of citations and an extraordinary reference list.
Criteria 5 Executive Summary and Introduction: Executive Summary and Introduction identifying and explaining the company's background, it's mission, vision and values.
No attempt, No submissio n, Absent
Poor attempt at developing an Executive Summary and Introduction with weak or insufficient explanation of the company's background, it's mission, vision and values.
Inadequate attempt at developing an Executive Summary and Introduction with limited or superficial explanation of the company's background, it's mission, vision and values.
Basic attempt at developing an Executive Summary and Introduction with adequate if generic explanation of the company's background, it's mission, vision and values.
Appropriate attempt at developing an Executive Summary and Introduction with a reasonable or decent explanation of the company's background, it's mission, vision and values.
Competent attempt at developing an Executive Summary and Introduction with a proper or effective explanation of the company's background, it's mission, vision and values.
Commendabl e attempt at developing an Executive Summary and Introduction with a proficient or precise explanation of the company's background, it's mission, vision and values.
Excellent attempt at developing an Executive Summary and Introduction with a well-‐ articulated explanation of the company's background, it's mission, vision and values.
Outstanding attempt at developing an Executive Summary and Introduction with a superb explanation of the company's background, it's mission, vision and values.
Exceptional attempt at developing an Executive Summary and Introduction with an impeccable explanation of the company's background, it's mission, vision and values.
4
Criteria 6 Situation Analysis: Business Environments -‐ demonstrating and evidencing understanding of business environments -‐ This is supported and evidenced with the literature review: relevance and completeness (content). Quality of presentation on rationale for literature approach selected, its relevance and limitations in the context of this research (marketing plan), showing a balance of sources.
No attempt, No submissio n, Absent
Unsatisfactor y analysis of business environments . This might be manifesting through the absence of two stages and / or the lack of depth and referencing (of frameworks as well as empirical evidence) across the board.
Partial analysis of business environments . This might be manifesting through the absence of one stage and / or the lack of depth and referencing (of frameworks as well as empirical evidence) with regards to the material displayed.
Passable analysis of business environments . Both stages must have been considered, perhaps not with enough rigour and / or depth throughout. Both theoretical frameworks and empirical evidence are fairly clearly defined and referenced.
Fair analysis of business environments . Both stages must have been completed, perhaps with some gaps in terms of scope and depth. Both theoretical frameworks and empirical evidence are clearly defined and referenced throughout.
Effective analysis of business environments . Both stages must have been dealt with in full without any major gaps in terms of scope and depth. Both theoretical frameworks and empirical evidence are fully defined and referenced throughout.
Proficient analysis of business environments . Both stages must have been integrated in a compelling PESTEL/SWOT analysis. There can be no gaps in terms of scope and depth. Both theoretical frameworks and empirical evidence are reflected upon well.
Impressive analysis of business environments . Both stages must have been integrated in a compelling PESTEL/SWOT analysis. The scope and the depth of theoretical frameworks and empirical evidence are allowing for a critical discussion to take place throughout this section.
Outstanding analysis of business environments . Both stages must have been integrated in a compelling PESTEL/SWOT analysis. The scope and the depth of theoretical frameworks and empirical evidence are allowing for a critical discussion leading to sound options for marketing strategy.
Perfect analysis of business environments . Both stages must have been integrated in an accurate PESTEL/SWOT analysis. The scope and the depth of theoretical frameworks and empirical evidence are allowing for a detailed critical discussion leading to extensive options for marketing strategy.
Criteria 7 Situation Analysis: Segmentation, Targeting and Positioning (STP) -‐ demonstrate the STP process highlighting links between an overall market and how a company chooses to compete
No attempt, No submissio n, Absent
Poor effort in terms of how the report articulates the chosen marketing strategy into value adding components. Segmentation , targeting
Inadequate effort in terms of how the report articulates the chosen marketing strategy into value adding components. Segmentation
Sufficient effort in terms of how the report articulates the chosen marketing strategy into value adding components.
Fair effort in terms of how the report articulates the chosen marketing strategy into value adding components. Segmentation , targeting
Competent effort in terms of how the report articulates the chosen marketing strategy into value adding components. Segmentation
Strong effort in terms of how the report articulates the chosen marketing strategy into value adding components. Segmentation
Articulate effort in terms of how the report articulates the chosen marketing strategy into value adding components. Segmentation
Outstanding effort in terms of how the report articulates the chosen marketing strategy into value adding components. Segmentation
Impeccable effort in terms of how the report articulates the chosen marketing strategy into value adding components.
5
in that market. and positioning aren't clearly defined and discussed; there is an overall lack of a useful proposition.
, targeting and positioning are defined in basic terms and not discussed in an acceptable level of detail; there is still no overall proposition on display.
Segmentation , targeting and positioning are defined in basic terms and discussed in an acceptable level of detail; though there is a slightly confusing overall proposition on display.
and positioning are clearly defined and discussed in an acceptable level of detail; there is an overall proposition on display.
, targeting and positioning are well defined and discussed in a good level of detail; the overall proposition is logically explained in context.
, targeting and positioning are fully defined and discussed in a very good level of detail; the overall proposition is critically explained in context.
, targeting and positioning are minutely defined and discussed in much detail; the overall proposition is critically supported in context.
, targeting and positioning are minutely defined and discussed in much detail. Theory and data are fully integrated into the overall proposition and in line with the ongoing rationale.
Segmentation , targeting and positioning are impressively well defined and discussed in much detail. Theory and data are logically integrated into the overall proposition and in line with the ongoing rationale.
Criteria 8 Objectives and Strategy -‐ identifying specific marketing objectives. Apply the widely used SMART framework to assess the suitability of objectives set to drive different strategies or the improvement of the full range of business processes. The Marketing strategy needs to demonstrate a
No attempt, No submissio n, Absent
Weak justification for the marketing strategy selection and its breakdown into suitable objectives. The report barely uses the information and/or the knowledge available
Incomplete justification for the marketing strategy selection and its breakdown into suitable objectives. The report tries using the information and/or the knowledge available (from previous
Acceptable justification for the marketing strategy selection and its breakdown into suitable objectives. The report makes some use of using the information and/or the knowledge available
Reasonable justification for the marketing strategy selection and its breakdown into suitable objectives. The report uses the information and/or the knowledge available (from previous
Competent justification for the marketing strategy selection and its breakdown into suitable objectives. The report makes good use of the information and the knowledge available (from
Commendabl e justification for the marketing strategy selection and its breakdown into suitable objectives. The report consistently makes good use of the information and the knowledge available
Excellent justification for the marketing strategy selection and its breakdown into suitable objectives. The report makes excellent use of the information and the knowledge available
Superb justification for the marketing strategy selection and its breakdown into suitable objectives. The report consistently makes excellent use of the information and the knowledge
Perfect justification for the marketing strategy selection and its breakdown into suitable objectives. The report makes full use of the information and the knowledge available (from
6
comprehensive plan for achieving the marketing objectives of the organisation.
(from previous sections).
sections) without shedding much light on the above-‐ mentioned areas.
(from previous sections), yet it does leave some gaps regarding the above-‐ mentioned areas.
sections) consistently, yet it might still leave some minor gaps regarding the above-‐ mentioned areas.
previous sections) without leaving any gaps with regards to the above-‐ mentioned areas.
(from previous sections). The connections between theory and data are logical.
(from previous sections). The connections between theory and data are logical and well integrated.
available (from previous sections). The connections between theory and data are logical and well integrated into an appropriate rationale.
previous sections) without any hesitation. The connections between theory and data are fully logical and extremely well integrated into a watertight rationale.
Criteria 9 Tactics -‐ providing a rationale for the implementation of specific marketing activities in relation to the full marketing mix (7 Ps), completeness and manner of presentation of the tactics, the actions, the operational aspect of the strategy: what concrete actions need to be taken to meet the objectives.
No attempt, No submissio n, Absent
Unsatisfactor y justification for the implementati on of programmes and/or techniques in relation to the marketing mix. The report is missing three or more Ps, and there is a general lack of detail.
Limited justification for the implementati on of programmes and/or techniques in relation to the marketing mix. The report is missing two or more Ps, and there is a general lack of detail in theoretical and empirical terms.
Basis cjustification for the implementati on of programmes and / or techniques in relation to the marketing mix. The report is still missing one of the Ps, and there is some lack of detail especially in empirical terms -‐ a partial use of theory is not
Fair justification for the implementati on of programmes and / or techniques in relation to the marketing mix. The section is completed in all its parts (Ps); only a minor lack of detail is going to be tolerated.
Proper justification for the implementati on of programmes and/or techniques in relation to the marketing mix. The section is completed in all its parts (Ps); no lack of detail is going to be tolerated. In short, a complete rationale
Proficient justification for the implementati on of programmes and/or techniques in relation to the marketing mix. The section is completed in all its parts (Ps); an extensive rationale must be provided that includes well-‐ articulated
Excellent justification for the implementati on of programmes and/or techniques in relation to the marketing mix. The section is completed in all its parts (Ps); a comprehensiv e rationale must be provided that includes several well-‐
Exceptional justification for the implementati on of programmes and/or techniques in relation to the marketing mix. The section is completed in all its parts (Ps); a fully comprehensiv e rationale must be provided that includes many well-‐
Faultless justification for the implementati on of programmes and/or techniques in relation to the marketing mix. The section is completed in all its parts (Ps); an exhaustive rationale must be provided that includes theoretical
7
going to be tolerated.
must be provided that includes theoretical and empirical elements.
theoretical and empirical arguments.
articulated theoretical and empirical arguments.
articulated theoretical and empirical arguments.
and empirical arguments of the highest order.
Criteria 10 Action and Control -‐ the marketing objectives need to be measured. Successful goal setting requires placing KPIs and benchmarks on your plans. Assign numbers, deadlines, and metrics to each marketing objective to allow the company to evaluate progress along the way and assess results.
No attempt, No submissio n, Absent
Weak integration of (not necessarily SMART) selected metrics for the measurement of key objectives as set in the plan. These might also be relatively unrelated to the marketing strategy (and the marketing mix).
Incomplete integration of not necessarily SMART) selected metrics for the measurement of key objectives as set in the plan. These might in part be unrelated to the marketing strategy (and the marketing mix).
Sufficient integration of (SMART) selected metrics for the measurement of key objectives as set in the plan. These might still be unrelated to the marketing strategy, but must reflect the marketing mix.
Decent integration of (specifically SMART) selected metrics for the measurement of key objectives as set in the plan. These should for the most part be related to the marketing strategy and the marketing mix.
Accurate integration of (specifically SMART) selected metrics for the measurement of key objectives as set in the plan. These should be related to the marketing strategy and the marketing mix -‐ a few, but fully sensible ideas.
Well-‐ articulated integration of (specifically SMART) selected metrics for the measurement of key objectives as set in the plan. Some fully sensible ideas connected with both the marketing strategy and the marketing mix.
Impressive integration of (fully SMART) selected metrics for the measurement of key objectives as set in the plan. Several fully sensible concepts connected with both the marketing strategy and the marketing mix.
Superb integration of (fully SMART) selected metrics for the measurement of key objectives as set in the plan. Several wellarticulate d concepts taking into account both the marketing strategy and the marketing mix.
Immaculate integration of (fully SMART) selected metrics for the measurement of key objectives as set in the plan. Many compelling concepts taking into account both the marketing strategy and the marketing mix.