White supremacy, Racism and Racial Formations
(1900) IDA B. WELLS, “LYNCH LAW IN AMERICA”
J U LY 1 3 , 2 0 1 0 / C O N T R I B U T E D B Y: B L A C K PA S T
Ida B. Wells, ca. 1893
☰ M E N U
Enter keyword… S E A R C H
(1900) Ida B. Wells, "Lynch Law in America" • https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/1900-ida-b-w...
1 of 15 8/6/20, 2:56 PM
Beginning in 1892 with the destruction of her newspaper, the Memphis Free
Speech, Ida B. Wells for the next forty years was the most prominent
opponent of lynching in the United States. What follows is a speech she made
to a Chicago audience on the subject in January 1900.
Our country’s national crime is lynching. It is not the creature of an hour, the
sudden outburst of uncontrolled fury, or the unspeakable brutality of an insane
mob. It represents the cool, calculating deliberation of intelligent people who
openly avow that there is an “unwritten law” that justifies them in putting
human beings to death without complaint under oath, without trial by jury,
without opportunity to make defense, and without right of appeal. The
“unwritten law” first found excuse with the rough, rugged, and determined man
who left the civilized centers of eastern States to seek for quick returns in the
gold-fields of the far West. Following in uncertain pursuit of continually
eluding fortune, they dared the savagery of the Indians, the hardships of
mountain travel, and the constant terror of border State outlaws.
Naturally, they felt slight toleration for traitors in their own ranks. It was
enough to fight the enemies from without; woe to the foe within! Far removed
from and entirely without protection of the courts of civilized life, these
fortune-seekers made laws to meet their varying emergencies. The thief who
stole a horse, the bully who “jumped” a claim, was a common enemy. If caught
he was promptly tried, and if found guilty was hanged to the tree under which
the court convened.
Those were busy days of busy men. They had no time to give the prisoner a bill
of exception or stay of execution. The only way a man had to secure a stay of
execution was to behave himself. Judge Lynch was original in methods but
exceedingly effective in procedure. He made the charge, impaneled the jurors,
Public Domain, Photo by Mary Garrity
(1900) Ida B. Wells, "Lynch Law in America" • https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/1900-ida-b-w...
2 of 15 8/6/20, 2:56 PM
and directed the execution. When the court adjourned, the prisoner was dead.
Thus lynch law held sway in the far West until civilization spread into the
Territories and the orderly processes of law took its place. The emergency no
longer existing, lynching gradually disappeared from the West.
But the spirit of mob procedure seemed to have fastened itself upon the lawless
classes, and the grim process that at first was invoked to declare justice was
made the excuse to wreak vengeance and cover crime. It next appeared in the
South, where centuries of Anglo-Saxon civilization had made effective all the
safeguards of court procedure. No emergency called for lynch law. It asserted
its sway in defiance of law and in favor of anarchy. There it has flourished ever
since, marking the thirty years of its existence with the inhuman butchery of
more than ten thousand men, women, and children by shooting, drowning,
hanging, and burning them alive. Not only this, but so potent is the force of
example that the lynching mania has spread throughout the North and middle
West. It is now no uncommon thing to read of lynchings north of Mason and
Dixon’s line, and those most responsible for this fashion gleefully point to these
instances and assert that the North is no better than the South.
This is the work of the “unwritten law” about which so much is said, and in
whose behest butchery is made a pastime and national savagery condoned. The
first statute of this “unwritten law” was written in the blood of thousands of
brave men who thought that a government that was good enough to create a
citizenship was strong enough to protect it. Under the authority of a national
law that gave every citizen the right to vote, the newly-made citizens chose to
exercise their suffrage. But the reign of the national law was short-lived and
illusionary. Hardly had the sentences dried upon the statute-books before one
Southern State after another raised the cry against “negro domination” and
proclaimed there was an “unwritten law” that justified any means to resist it.
The method then inaugurated was the outrages by the “red-shirt” bands of
(1900) Ida B. Wells, "Lynch Law in America" • https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/1900-ida-b-w...
3 of 15 8/6/20, 2:56 PM
Louisiana, South Carolina, and other Southern States, which were succeeded by
the Ku-Klux Klans. These advocates of the “unwritten law” boldly avowed their
purpose to intimidate, suppress, and nullify the negro’s right to vote. In
support of its plans the Ku-Klux Klans, the “red-shirt” and similar
organizations proceeded to beat, exile, and kill negroes until the purpose of
their organization was accomplished and the supremacy of the “unwritten law”
was effected. Thus lynchings began in the South, rapidly spreading into the
various States until the national law was nullified and the reign of the
“unwritten law” was supreme. Men were taken from their homes by “red-shirt”
bands and stripped, beaten, and exiled; others were assassinated when their
political prominence made them obnoxious to their political opponents; while
the Ku-Klux barbarism of election days, reveling in the butchery of thousands
of colored voters, furnished records in Congressional investigations that are a
disgrace to civilization.
The alleged menace of universal suffrage having been avoided by the absolute
suppression of the negro vote, the spirit of mob murder should have been
satisfied and the butchery of negroes should have ceased. But men, women, and
children were the victims of murder by individuals and murder by mobs, just as
they had been when killed at the demands of the “unwritten law” to prevent
“negro domination.” Negroes were killed for disputing over terms of contracts
with their employers. If a few barns were burned some colored man was killed
to stop it. If a colored man resented the imposition of a white man and the two
came to blows, the colored man had to die, either at the hands of the white man
then and there or later at the hands of a mob that speedily gathered. If he
showed a spirit of courageous manhood he was hanged for his pains, and the
killing was justified by the declaration that he was a “saucy nigger.” Colored
women have been murdered because they refused to tell the mobs where
relatives could be found for “lynching bees.” Boys of fourteen years have been
lynched by white representatives of American civilization. In fact, for all kinds
(1900) Ida B. Wells, "Lynch Law in America" • https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/1900-ida-b-w...
4 of 15 8/6/20, 2:56 PM
of offenses–and, for no offenses–from murders to misdemeanors, men and
women are put to death without judge or jury; so that, although the political
excuse was no longer necessary, the wholesale murder of human beings went
on just the same. A new name was given to the killings and a new excuse was
invented for so doing.
Again the aid of the “unwritten law” is invoked, and again it comes to the
rescue. During the last ten years a new statute has been added to the
“unwritten law.” This statute proclaims that for certain crimes or alleged crimes
no negro shall be allowed a trial; that no white woman shall be compelled to
charge an assault under oath or to submit any such charge to the investigation
of a court of law. The result is that many men have been put to death whose
innocence was afterward established; and to-day, under this reign of the
“unwritten law,” no colored man, no matter what his reputation, is safe from
lynching if a white woman, no matter what her standing or motive, cares to
charge him with insult or assault.
It is considered a sufficient excuse and reasonable justification to put a
prisoner to death under this “unwritten law” for the frequently repeated charge
that these lynching horrors are necessary to prevent crimes against women.
The sentiment of the country has been appealed to, in describing the isolated
condition of white families in thickly populated negro districts; and the charge
is made that these homes are in as great danger as if they were surrounded by
wild beasts. And the world has accepted this theory without let or hindrance. In
many cases there has been open expression that the fate meted out to the
victim was only what he deserved. In many other instances there has been a
silence that says more forcibly than words can proclaim it that it is right and
proper that a human being should be seized by a mob and burned to death
upon the unsworn and the uncorroborated charge of his accuser. No matter
that our laws presume every man innocent until he is proved guilty; no matter
that it leaves a certain class of individuals completely at the mercy of another
(1900) Ida B. Wells, "Lynch Law in America" • https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/1900-ida-b-w...
5 of 15 8/6/20, 2:56 PM
class; no matter that it encourages those criminally disposed to blacken their
faces and commit any crime in the calendar so long as they can throw suspicion
on some negro, as is frequently done, and then lead a mob to take his life; no
matter that mobs make a farce of the law and a mockery of justice; no matter
that hundreds of boys are being hardened in crime and schooled in vice by the
repetition of such scenes before their eyes–if a white woman declares herself
insulted or assaulted, some life must pay the penalty, with all the horrors of the
Spanish Inquisition and all the barbarism of the Middle Ages. The world looks
on and says it is well.
Not only are two hundred men and women put to death annually, on the
average, in this country by mobs, but these lives are taken with the greatest
publicity. In many instances the leading citizens aid and abet by their presence
when they do not participate, and the leading journals inflame the public mind
to the lynching point with scare-head articles and offers of rewards. Whenever
a burning is advertised to take place, the railroads run excursions, photographs
are taken, and the same jubilee is indulged in that characterized the public
hangings of one hundred years ago. There is, however, this difference: in those
old days the multitude that stood by was permitted only to guy or jeer. The
nineteenth century lynching mob cuts off ears, toes, and fingers, strips off flesh,
and distributes portions of the body as souvenirs among the crowd. If the
leaders of the mob are so minded, coal-oil is poured over the body and the
victim is then roasted to death. This has been done in Texarkana and Paris,
Tex., in Bardswell, Ky., and in Newman, Ga. In Paris the officers of the law
delivered the prisoner to the mob. The mayor gave the school children a holiday
and the railroads ran excursion trains so that the people might see a human
being burned to death. In Texarkana, the year before, men and boys amused
themselves by cutting off strips of flesh and thrusting knives into their helpless
victim. At Newman, Ga., of the present year, the mob tried every conceivable
torture to compel the victim to cry out and confess, before they set fire to the
(1900) Ida B. Wells, "Lynch Law in America" • https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/1900-ida-b-w...
6 of 15 8/6/20, 2:56 PM
faggots that burned him. But their trouble was all in vain–he never uttered a
cry, and they could not make him confess.
This condition of affairs were brutal enough and horrible enough if it were true
that lynchings occurred only because of the commission of crimes against
women–as is constantly declared by ministers, editors, lawyers, teachers,
statesmen, and even by women themselves. It has been to the interest of those
who did the lynching to blacken the good name of the helpless and defenseless
victims of their hate. For this reason they publish at every possible opportunity
this excuse for lynching, hoping thereby not only to palliate their own crime but
at the same time to prove the negro a moral monster and unworthy of the
respect and sympathy of the civilized world. But this alleged reason adds to the
deliberate injustice of the mob’s work. Instead of lynchings being caused by
assaults upon women, the statistics show that not one-third of the victims of
lynchings are even charged with such crimes. The Chicago Tribune, which
publishes annually lynching statistics, is authority for the following:
In 1892, when lynching reached high-water mark, there were 241 persons
lynched. The entire number is divided among the following States:
Alabama……… 22 Montana………. 4
Arkansas…….. 25 New York……… 1
California…… 3 North Carolina… 5
Florida……… 11 North Dakota….. 1
Georgia……… 17 Ohio…………. 3
Idaho……….. 8 South Carolina… 5
Illinois…….. 1 Tennessee…….. 28
Kansas………. 3 Texas………… 15
Kentucky…….. 9 Virginia……… 7
Louisiana……. 29 West Virginia…. 5
Maryland…….. 1 Wyoming………. 9
(1900) Ida B. Wells, "Lynch Law in America" • https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/1900-ida-b-w...
7 of 15 8/6/20, 2:56 PM
Arizona Ter…. 3 Missouri………. 6
Mississippi….. 16 Oklahoma……… 2
Of this number, 160 were of negro descent. Four of them were lynched in New
York, Ohio, and Kansas; the remainder were murdered in the South. Five of
this number were females. The charges for which they were lynched cover a
wide range. They are as follows:
Rape……………… 46 Attempted rape…… 11
Murder……………. 58 Suspected robbery… 4
Rioting…………… 3 Larceny…………. 1
Race Prejudice…….. 6 Self-defense…….. 1
No cause given…….. 4 Insulting women…. 2
Incendiarism………. 6 Desperadoes……… 6
Robbery…………… 6 Fraud…………… 1
Assault and battery… 1 Attempted murder…. 2
No offense stated, boy and girl………….. 2
In the case of the boy and girl above referred to, their father, named Hastings,
was accused of the murder of a white man. His fourteen-year-old daughter and
sixteen-year-old son were hanged and their bodies filled with bullets; then the
father was also lynched. This occurred in November, 1892, at Jonesville, La.
Indeed, the record for the last twenty years shows exactly the same or a smaller
proportion who have been charged with this horrible crime. Quite a number of
the one-third alleged cases of assault that have been personally investigated by
the writer have shown that there was no foundation in fact for the charges; yet
the claim is not made that there were no real culprits among them. The negro
has been too long associated with the white man not to have copied his vices as
well as his virtues. But the negro resents and utterly repudiates the efforts to
(1900) Ida B. Wells, "Lynch Law in America" • https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/1900-ida-b-w...
8 of 15 8/6/20, 2:56 PM
blacken his good name by asserting that assaults upon women are peculiar to
his race. The negro has suffered far more from the commission of this crime
against the women of his race by white men than the white race has ever
suffered through his crimes. Very scant notice is taken of the matter when this
is the condition of affairs. What becomes a crime deserving capital punishment
when the tables are turned is a matter of small moment when the negro woman
is the accusing party.
But since the world has accepted this false and unjust statement, and the
burden of proof has been placed upon the negro to vindicate his race, he is
taking steps to do so. The Anti-Lynching Bureau of the National Afro-American
Council is arranging to have every lynching investigated and publish the facts
to the world, as has been done in the case of Sam Hose, who was burned alive
last April at Newman, Ga. The detective’s report showed that Hose killed
Cranford, his employer, in self-defense, and that, while a mob was organizing
to hunt Hose to punish him for killing a white man, not till twenty-four hours
after the murder was the charge of rape, embellished with psychological and
physical impossibilities, circulated. That gave an impetus to the hunt, and the
Atlanta Constitution’s reward of $500 keyed the mob to the necessary burning
and roasting pitch. Of five hundred newspaper clippings of that horrible affair,
nine-tenths of them assumed Hose’s guilt–simply because his murderers said
so, and because it is the fashion to believe the negro peculiarly addicted to this
species of crime. All the negro asks is justice–a fair and impartial trial in the
courts of the country. That given, he will abide the result.
But this question affects the entire American nation, and from several points of
view: First, on the ground of consistency. Our watchword has been “the land of
the free and the home of the brave.” Brave men do not gather by thousands to
torture and murder a single individual, so gagged and bound he cannot make
even feeble resistance or defense. Neither do brave men or women stand by and
see such things done without compunction of conscience, nor read of them
(1900) Ida B. Wells, "Lynch Law in America" • https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/1900-ida-b-w...
9 of 15 8/6/20, 2:56 PM
without protest. Our nation has been active and outspoken in its endeavors to
right the wrongs of the Armenian Christian, the Russian Jew, the Irish Home
Ruler, the native women of India, the Siberian exile, and the Cuban patriot.
Surely it should be the nation’s duty to correct its own evils!
Second, on the ground of economy. To those who fail to be convinced from any
other point of view touching this momentous question, a consideration of the
economic phase might not be amiss. It is generally known that mobs in
Louisiana, Colorado, Wyoming, and other States have lynched subjects of other
countries. When their different governments demanded satisfaction, our
country was forced to confess her inability to protect said subjects in the
several States because of our State-rights doctrines, or in turn demand
punishment of the lynchers. This confession, while humiliating in the extreme,
was not satisfactory; and, while the United States cannot protect, she can pay.
This she has done, and it is certain will have to do again in the case of the
recent lynching of Italians in Louisiana. The United States already has paid in
indemnities for lynching nearly a half million dollars, as follows:
Paid China for Rock Springs (Wyo.) massacre……….. $147,748.74
Paid China for outrages on Pacific Coast………….. 276,619.75
Paid Italy for massacre of Italian prisoners at
New Orleans ……………………… 24,330.90
Paid Italy for lynchings at Walsenburg, Col ………… 10,000.00
Paid Great Britain for outrages on James Bain
and Frederick Dawson ………………. 2,800.00
Third, for the honor of Anglo-Saxon civilization. No scoffer at our boasted
American civilization could say anything more harsh of it than does the
American white man himself who says he is unable to protect the honor of his
women without resort to such brutal, inhuman, and degrading exhibitions as
characterize “lynching bees.” The cannibals of the South Sea Islands roast
(1900) Ida B. Wells, "Lynch Law in America" • https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/1900-ida-b-w...
10 of 15 8/6/20, 2:56 PM
human beings alive to satisfy hunger. The red Indian of the Western plains tied
his prisoner to the stake, tortured him, and danced in fiendish glee while his
victim writhed in the flames. His savage, untutored mind suggested no better
way than that of wreaking vengeance upon those who had wronged him. These
people knew nothing about Christianity and did not profess to follow its
teachings; but such primary laws as they had they lived up to. No nation,
savage or civilized, save only the United States of America, has confessed its
inability to protect its women save by hanging, shooting, and burning alleged
offenders.
Finally, for love of country. No American travels abroad without blushing for
shame for his country on this subject. And whatever the excuse that passes
current in the United States, it avails nothing abroad. With all the powers of
government in control; with all laws made by white men, administered by white
judges, jurors, prosecuting attorneys, and sheriffs; with every office of the
executive department filled by white men–no excuse can be offered for
exchanging the orderly administration of justice for barbarous lynchings and
“unwritten laws.” Our country should be placed speedily above the plane of
confessing herself a failure at self-government. This cannot be until Americans
of every section, of broadest patriotism and best and wisest citizenship, not
only see the defect in our country’s armor but take the necessary steps to
remedy it. Although lynchings have steadily increased in number and barbarity
during the last twenty years, there has been no single effort put forth by the
many moral and philanthropic forces of the country to put a stop to this
wholesale slaughter. Indeed, the silence and seeming condonation grow more
marked as the years go by.
A few months ago the conscience of this country was shocked because, after a
two-weeks trial, a French judicial tribunal pronounced Captain Dreyfus guilty.
And yet, in our own land and under our own flag, the writer can give day and
detail of one thousand men, women, and children who during the last six years
(1900) Ida B. Wells, "Lynch Law in America" • https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/1900-ida-b-w...
11 of 15 8/6/20, 2:56 PM
Tweet
were put to death without trial before any tribunal on earth. Humiliating
indeed, but altogether unanswerable, was the reply of the French press to our
protest: “Stop your lynchings at home before you send your protests abroad.”
Share:
S U B J E C T S :
Af rican American History, , Speeches
T E R M S :
Gender - Women, , United States - Illinois, , 19th Century (1800-1899), ,
Speech Time Frame: 1878-1900
Quick Donate
$1.00
Donate
Soda-sized
Do you find this information helpful? A small
donation would help us keep this accessible to all.
Forego a bottle of soda and donate its cost to us
for the information you just learned, and feel
good about helping to make it available to
everyone!
Print! Share 457
Like this:
Like
Be the first to like this.
(1900) Ida B. Wells, "Lynch Law in America" • https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/1900-ida-b-w...
12 of 15 8/6/20, 2:56 PM
P R E V I O U S
(1896) Booker T. Washington,
“Democracy and Education”
N E XT
(1966) Stokely Carmichael, “Black
Power”
A F R I C A N A M E R I C A N H I S T O R Y
People
Places
Groups & Organizations
Events
Primary Documents
Institutions
Speeches
CITE THIS ARTICLE IN APA FORMAT:
BlackPast, B. (2010, July 13) (1900) Ida B. Wells, “Lynch Law in America”.
Retrieved f rom https://www.blackpast.org/af rican-american-history/1900-ida-
b-wells-lynch-law-america/
SOURCE OF THE AUTHOR'S INFORMATION:
So Just, “Speeches on Social Justice” http://www.sojust.net/speeches
/ida_wells_lynch_law.html
C O P Y !
(1900) Ida B. Wells, "Lynch Law in America" • https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/1900-ida-b-w...
13 of 15 8/6/20, 2:56 PM
Perspectives
G L O B A L A F R I C A N H I S T O R Y
People
Places
Groups & Organizations
Events
Primary Documents
Institutions
Speeches
Perspectives
A B O U T B L A C K PA S T
About Us
Academic Historians
Independent Historians
Student Historians
Board of Directors
Academic Advisory Board
International Advisory Board
Patrons
(1900) Ida B. Wells, "Lynch Law in America" • https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/1900-ida-b-w...
14 of 15 8/6/20, 2:56 PM
C O N TA C T B L A C K PA S T
Contact Us
Write for Us
How You Can Help Us
© 2 0 2 0 . A L L R I G H T S R E S E R V E D .
B L A C K P A S T . O R G I S A 5 0 1 ( C ) ( 3 ) N O N - P R O F I T O R G A N I Z A T I O N . A L L D O N A T I O N S
A R E T A X D E D U C T I B L E .
" # $
(1900) Ida B. Wells, "Lynch Law in America" • https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/1900-ida-b-w...
15 of 15 8/6/20, 2:56 PM