Article Assgnm 2
patience_24
Locatingscholarlymaterial....docx
This assignment is due Week 3:
Find three articles from three different scholarly journals or valid and reliable publications in your field-specific ( health sciences) to your role and solution to the opioid crisis. Your articles should contain data that you need to support your solution for your magazine article. The articles should not only contain descriptive data but should manipulate data (perform a test with a p-value), showing the success of a solution similar to yours. Do not review articles that describe the opioid crisis. Instead, focus on your solution.
ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
Discuss why the test and data in the article are appropriate.
Describe the data presented in each article in detail.
Provide an interpretation of the results of the articles that is digestible by the average adult.
This assignment is due Week 3: You will be assessed using the M2.4 Evaluating Scientific Data Rubric.
M2.4 Evaluating Scientific Data Rubric
M2.4 Evaluating Scientific Data Rubric
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
|
|
|
35 pts |
|
|
|
|
40 pts |
|
|
|
|
15 pts |
|
|
|
|
10 pts |
|
|
Total Points: 100 |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quantity of Articles and Applicability to Solution |
|
35 pts Exemplary You provide a summary of more than three valid and reliable articles that contain data which are directly applicable to your solution. |
28 pts Proficient You provide a summary of at least three valid and reliable articles that contain data which are directly applicable to your solution. |
25 pts Progressing You provide a summary of at least two valid and reliable articles and/or applicability to your solution is too brief or unclear. |
21 pts Incomplete You provide a summary of at least two articles but they are not valid and reliable and/or applicability to your solution is too brief or unclear |
0 pts Not addressed or Not submitted You provide a summary of at least one article and/or articles are not valid and reliable and/or applicability to your solution is inaccurate or missing, and/or assignment is missing. |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Explanation of Statistics |
|
40 pts Exemplary You describe the data presented in your articles in common terminology and provide detailed and accurate interpretations of the data for each article. You detail important differences in data sets if applicable. |
32 pts Proficient You describe the data presented in your articles in common terminology and provide accurate interpretations of the data for each article. Minor details need further development. You detail important differences in data sets if applicable. |
28 pts Progressing You provide a general description of the data for each article and/or data from some articles are missing and/or some terminology is too technical and/or your description needs more information for the reader to understand the data. |
24 pts Incomplete Your description of what each of the articles' data tells the reader is unclear, too technical, and/or inaccurate. |
0 pts Not addressed or Not submitted Your explanation of the data are incorrect OR not provided OR assignment is missing. |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing Quality/APA Style |
|
15 pts Exemplary The writing skillfully communicates the message(s) and the language flows seamlessly throughout; there are minimal problems with spelling, punctuation, and grammar; APA style guidelines are followed accurately |
12 pts Proficient There are few problems with organization, clarity or conventions that should have been fixed. APA style guidelines are followed, with only minor errors. Problems and errors are not serious enough to distract the reader. |
11 pts Progressing Numerous mechanical errors are distracting; and organization of ideas are lacking, but not enough to interfere with meaning. APA style guidelines are attempted, with major errors. |
7 pts Incomplete Frequent problems with organization, clarity and/or conventions make the paper hard to read. APA style guidelines are not adhered to, which increases the risk of plagiarism. |
0 pts Not addressed or Not submitted No submission. Does not adhere to Academic Honesty Policy. |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Due date |
|
10 pts Exemplary Submitted by due date. |
8 pts Proficient Submitted one day after due date. |
6 pts Progressing Submitted two days after due date. |
4 pts Incomplete Submitted three days after due date. |
0 pts Not addressed or Not submitted Submitted four or more days after due date. |
