1. Summarize your articles in 300 words or more. Please use your own words. No copy-and-paste. As discussed in the residency when we were discussing journal articles, you need to focus on the Abstract, Introduction, Results, and Conclusion. 2. Di
Chapter 8
Competitive Firms and Markets
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
Table of Contents
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
Perfect Competition
Competition in the Short-Run
Competition in the Long-Run
Competition Maximizes Economic Well-Being
Introduction
Managerial Problem
In recent years, federal and state fees have increased substantially and truckers have had to adhere to many new regulations.
What effect do these new fixed costs have on the trucking industry’s market price and quantity? Are individual firms providing more or fewer trucking services? Does the number of firms in the market rise or fall?
Solution Approach
We need to combine our understanding of demand curves with knowledge about firm and market supply curves to predict industry price, quantity, and profits.
Empirical Methods
The relevant market structure is perfect competition where buyers and sellers are price takers and firms have a horizontal demand.
To maximize profit in the short run, the firm takes the price from the market and with marginal cost determines its output.
Firms have zero economic profit in the long run.
Perfect competition maximizes economic well being of the society.
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
3
8.1 Perfect Competition
Perfect competition is a market structure in which buyers and sellers are price takers.
A price-taking firm cannot affect the market price for a product, it faces a horizontal demand and it sells at the market price.
Characteristics of a Perfect Competitive Market
Characteristic # 1. Large Number of Buyers and Sellers
If the sellers in a market are small and numerous, no single firm can raise or lower the market price.
Characteristic # 2. Identical Products
Buyers perceive firms sell identical or homogeneous products. Granny Smith apples are identical, all farmers charge the same price.
Characteristic # 3. Full Information
Buyers know the prices charged by all firms and that products are identical. No single firm can unilaterally raise its price above the market equilibrium price.
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.1 Perfect Competition
Characteristic # 4. Negligible Transaction Costs
Buyers and sellers do not have to spend much time and money finding each other or hiring lawyers to write contracts to make a trade.
Perfectly competitive markets have very low transaction costs.
Characteristic # 5. Free Entry and Exit
The ability of firms to enter and exit a market freely in the long run leads to a large number of firms in a market and promotes price taking.
Example: Perfect Competition in the Chicago Mercantile Exchange
It has the 5 characteristics of perfect competition: many buyers and sellers; they trade identical products; have full price information; waste no time to make a trade; and anyone can be a buyer or seller.
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.1 Perfect Competition
Deviations from Perfect Competition
Many markets possess some but not all of the characteristics of perfect competition. But, buyers and sellers are, for all practical purposes, price takers.
Cities use zoning laws and fees to limit the number of stores or motels, yet there are many sellers and all are price takers.
From now on, we will use the terms competition and competitive to refer to all markets in which no buyer or seller can significantly affect the market price—they are price takers—even if the market is not perfectly competitive.
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.2 Competition in the Short-Run
How Much to Produce
How much to produce is the 1st step in the 2-step decision-making process to determine how to maximize profit.
As we know from Chapter 7: to maximize profit, find q where MR(q) = MC(q)
A competitive firm has a horizontal demand, it can sell any q at the market price, p. Given that revenue R = pq, then MR = p
A profit-maximizing competitive firm produces the amount of output, q, at which p = MC(q)
Graphical Presentation
In Figure 8.1, the market price of lime is p = $8 per metric ton (horizontal demand). The MC curve crosses the horizontal demand curve at point e where the firm’s output is 284 units.
The π = $426,000, shaded rectangle in panel a. Panel b shows that this is the maximum profit.
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.2 Competition in the Short-Run
Figure 8.1 How a Competitive Firm Maximizes Profit
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.2 Competition in the Short-Run
Whether to Produce
Whether to produce is the 2nd step in the 2-step decision-making process to determine how to maximize profit.
Shutdown rule: R < VC (Chapter 7).
Shutdown rule for a competitive firm: p < AVC = VC/q
The market price is above minimum AC.
In Figure 8.2, if price above $6 (point b), the firm operates with a positive profit.
The market price is between minimum AC and minimum AVC.
In Figure 8.2, the competitive firm still operates if price between $5 and $6, (points a and b). It loses money but operates to minimize the loss.
The market price is less that the minimum AVC.
In Figure 8.2, the competitive firm shuts down if market price is below $5, (below point a).
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.2 Competition in the Short-Run
Figure 8.2 The Short-Run Shutdown Decision
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.2 Competition in the Short-Run
The Short-Run Firm Supply Curve
A competitive firm chooses its output to maximize profit or minimize losses when p = MC(q).
Graphical Presentation
In Figure 8.3 the market price increases from p1 = $5 to p2 = $6 to p3 = $7 to p4 = $8. The respective profit-maximizing outputs are e1 through e4.
As the market price increases, the equilibria trace out the marginal cost curve.
The competitive firm’s short-run supply curve is the marginal cost curve above its minimum average variable cost (red line that starts at point e1 in Figure 8.3).
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.2 Competition in the Short-Run
Figure 8.3 How the Profit-Maximizing Quantity Varies with Price
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.2 Competition in the Short-Run
The Short-Run Market Supply Curve
Market supply curve: horizontal sum of the supply curves of all the individual firms in the market.
Short-Run Market Supply with Identical Firms
In the short run, the maximum number of firms in a market, n, is fixed. In panel a of Figure 8.4, there is one firm and in panel b, there are 4 firms identical to the one in panel a.
If all firms are identical, each firm’s costs are identical, supply curves are identical. The market supply at any price is n times the supply of an individual firm; flatter. In panel b of Figure 8.4, S5 is the market supply of 4 identical firms.
Short-Run Market Supply with Firms that Differ
If the firms have different costs functions, their supply curves and shutdown points differ. Figure 8.5 in the textbook shows this market supply; flatter.
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.2 Competition in the Short-Run
Figure 8.4 Short-Run Market Supply with Five Identical Lime Firms
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.2 Competition in the Short-Run
Figure 8.5 Short-Run Market Supply with Two Different Lime Firms
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.2 Competition in the Short-Run
Short-Run Competitive Equilibrium
By combining the short-run market supply curve and the market demand curve, we can determine the short-run competitive equilibrium.
Graphical Presentation
Suppose that there are five identical firms in the lime manufacturing industry. Panel a of Figure 8.6 shows the short-run cost curves and the supply curve, S1, for a typical firm, and panel b shows the corresponding short-run competitive market supply curve, S.
If the market demand curve is D1, then the short-run equilibrium is E1, the market price is $7, and market output is Q1 = 1,075 units (panel a). Each firm takes the market price, maximizes profit at e1, and no firm wants to change its behavior, so e1 is the firm’s equilibrium.
If the demand curve shifts to D2, the market equilibrium is p = $5 and Q2 = 250 units (panel a). At that price, each firm produces q = 50 units and loses $98,500, area A + C. However, they do not shut down.
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.2 Competition in the Short-Run
Figure 8.6 Short-Run Competitive Equilibrium in the Lime Market
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.3 Competition in the Long-Run
Long-Run Competitive Profit Maximization
Objective: Firms want to maximize long run profit and all costs are variable or avoidable.
Decision 1: How Much to Produce
To maximize profit or minimize a loss, firm operates where long-run marginal profit is zero―where MR (price) equals long-run MC.
Decision 2: Whether to Produce
After determining the output level, q*, the firm shuts down if its revenue is less than its avoidable cost (all costs). So, it shuts down if it would make an economic loss by operating.
The Long-Run Firm Supply Curve
It is the firm’s long-run marginal cost curve above the minimum of its long-run average cost curve.
It forecast the plant size that could maximize profit.
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.3 Competition in the Long-Run
The Long-Run Market Supply Curve
The competitive market supply curve is the horizontal sum of the supply curves of the individual firms.
However in the long run, firms can enter or leave the market.
Thus, before the horizontal sum, we need to determine how many firms are in the market at each possible market price.
Entry and Exit
In the long run, each firm decides whether to enter or exit depending on whether it can make a long-run profit.
In perfectly competitive markets, firms can enter and exit freely in the long run.
A shift of the market demand curve to the right attracts firms to enter the market (π > 0) until the last firm makes 0 long run profit.
A shift of the market demand curve to the left forces firms to exit the market (π < 0) until the last firm makes 0 long run profit.
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.3 Competition in the Long-Run
Long-Run Market Supply with Identical Firms and Free Entry
The long-run market supply curve is flat at the minimum of long-run average cost if firms can freely enter and exit the market, an unlimited number of firms have identical costs, and input prices are constant.
Graphical Presentation
In Figure 8.7, panel a, the individual supply starts at the minimum long run average cost ($10) and each firm produces 150 units. The market supply curve is horizontal at $10 (panel b), n firms will produce 150n units.
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.3 Competition in the Long-Run
Figure 8.7 Long-Run Firm and Market Supply with Identical Vegetable Oil Firms
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.3 Competition in the Long-Run
Long-Run Market Supply When Entry is Limited
When entry is limited, long-run market supply curves slope upward (horizontal sum of few individual supply curves).
The reasoning is the same as in the short run, panel b of Figure 8.4.
The number of firms is limited because of government restrictions, resource scarcity, or high entry cost.
Long-Run Market Supply When Firms Differ
When firms are not identical, long-run market supply curves slope upward.
Firms with relatively low minimum long-run average costs are willing to enter the market at lower prices than others.
The long-run supply curve is upward sloping only if lower cost firms cannot dominate the market because of their limited capacity and limited number.
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.3 Competition in the Long-Run
Long-Run Competitive Equilibrium
Equilibrium occurs at the intersection of the long-run market supply and demand curves
With identical firms, constant input prices, free entry/exit: equilibrium price equals minimum long-run average cost.
A shift in the demand curve affects only the equilibrium quantity and not the equilibrium price.
Short-Run and Long-Run Equilibrium Comparison
In the short run, if the demand is as low as D1, the market price in the short-run equilibrium, F1, is $7 (Figure 8.8). At that price, individual firms lose money and some exit in the long run. In the long-run equilibrium, E1, price is $10, and each firm produces 150 units, e, and breaks even.
If demand expands to D2, in the short run, firms make profits at F2. These profits attract entry in the long run, quantity increase and price falls, E2.
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.3 Long Run Competitive Equilibrium
Figure 8.8 The Short-Run and Long-Run Equilibria for Vegetable Oil
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.3 Competition in the Long-Run
Zero Long-run Profit with Free Entry
The long-run supply curve is horizontal if firms are free to enter the market, firms have identical cost, and input prices are constant. All firms in the market are operating at minimum long-run average cost (cost efficient).
That is, they are indifferent between shutting down or not because they are earning zero economic profit.
Any firm that does not maximize profit loses money.
So, to survive in a competitive market in the long run, a firm must maximize its profit (P=MC and be cost efficient).
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.4 Competition Maximizes Economic Well-Being
We study competition in a book on managerial economics because of two reasons:
First
Many sectors of the economy are highly competitive including agriculture, parts of the construction industry, many labor markets, and much retail and wholesale trade.
Second
Perfect competition serves as an ideal or benchmark for other industries.
Most important theoretical result in economics: a perfectly competitive market maximizes an important measure of economic well-being (consumer surplus, producer surplus and total surplus).
Government intervention in a perfectly competitive market reduces a society’s economic well-being. However, it may increase economic well-being in non-competitive markets, such as in a monopoly.
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.4 Competition Maximizes Economic Well-Being
Consumer Surplus (CS), monetary difference between what a consumer is willing to pay for the quantity of the good purchased and what the consumer actually pays. $-gain from trade for the consumer.
Producer Surplus(PS), monetary difference between the amount a good sells for and the minimum amount necessary for the producers to be willing to produce the good (Profit). $-gain from trade for the firm.
Total Surplus (TS), monetary measure of the total benefit to all market participants from market transactions (gains from trade). Total surplus implicitly weights the gains to consumers and producers equally.
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
Consumer Surplus
CS
Producer Surplus
PS
Total Surplus
TS = CS + PS
8.4 Competition Maximizes Economic Well-Being
Consumer Surplus
The demand curve reflects a consumer’s marginal willingness to pay: the maximum amount a consumer will spend for an extra unit (marginal value for the last unit).
Measuring Consumer Surplus using a Demand curve
Graphically, the consumer surplus is the area below the demand curve and above the market price up to the quantity actually consumed.
In Figure 8.9, panel a, the consumer surplus from the 1st, 2nd and 3rd magazines is $3 ($2+$1+$0).
In panel b, the consumer surplus, CS, is the area under the demand curve and above the horizontal line at the price p1 up to the quantity he buys, q1.
Effects of a price change on Consumer Surplus
If the supply curve shifts upward or a new sales tax is imposed, the CS falls, as illustrated in Figure 8.10
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.4 Competition Maximizes Economic Well-Being
Figure 8.9 Consumer Surplus
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.4 Competition Maximizes Economic Well-Being
Figure 8.10 Fall in Consumer Surplus from Roses as Price Rises
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.4 Competition Maximizes Economic Well-Being
Producer Surplus
By definition, the total producer surplus is the area above the supply curve and below the market price up to the quantity actually produced.
Measuring Producer Surplus using a Supply curve
The firm’s producer surplus in panel a of Figure 8.11 is the area below the market price, $4, and above the marginal cost (supply curve) up to the quantity sold, 4. The area under the marginal cost curve up to the number of units actually produced is the variable cost of production.
The market producer surplus in panel b of Figure 8.11 is the area above the supply curve and below the market price, p*, line up to the quantity sold, Q*. The area below the supply curve and to the left of the quantity produced by the market, Q*, is the variable cost.
Using Producer Surplus
We can use PS to study the effects of variable cost changes in profits for all the firms in a market.
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.4 Competition Maximizes Economic Well-Being
Figure 8.11 Producer Surplus
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.4 Competition Maximizes Economic Well-Being
Competition Maximizes Total Surplus
By definition, total surplus is the sum of the areas of CS and PS.
Perfect competition maximizes total surplus. Producing less or more than the competitive output lowers total surplus.
Graphical Presentation
In Figure 8.12, at the competitive equilibrium e1, with Q1 and p1, TS1 = A + B + C + D + E.
Producing less at e2, Q2 and p2, TS2 = A + B + D. TS2< TS1.
As a consequence of producing less, C + E are lost.
C + E is the deadweight loss (DWL)
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.4 Competition Maximizes Economic Well-Being
Figure 8.12 Reducing Output from the Competitive Level Lowers Total Surplus
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.4 Competition Maximizes Economic Well-Being
Deadweight Loss (DWL)
DWL is the net reduction in total surplus from a loss of surplus by one group that is not offset by a gain to another group from an action that alters a market equilibrium.
The deadweight loss results because consumers value extra output by more than the marginal cost of producing it. In Figure 8.12, between Q2 and Q1, consumers value the extra output by C + E more than it costs to produce it.
Society would be better off producing and consuming extra units of this good than spending this amount on other goods.
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
8.4 Competition Maximizes Economic Well-Being
Effects of Government Intervention
A government policy that limits trade in a competitive market reduces total surplus.
Effects of Government Intervention: Price Ceiling
A price ceiling sets a limit on the highest price a firm can legally charge.
If the government sets the ceiling below the pre-control competitive price, consumers want to buy more than the pre-control equilibrium quantity but firms supply less than that quantity.
Price Ceiling and Deadweight Loss
Fewer units are sold with a price ceiling than at the pre-control equilibrium.
Deadweight loss: Consumers value the good more than the marginal cost of producing extra units. Producer surplus must fall because firms receive a lower price and sell fewer units.
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›
Managerial Solution
Managerial Problem
In recent years, federal and state fees have increased substantially and truckers have had to adhere to many new regulations.
What effect do these new fixed costs have on the trucking industry’s market price and quantity? Are individual firms providing more or fewer trucking services? Does the number of firms in the market rise or fall?
Solution
The trucking industry is a very competitive industry, trucks of certain size are identical and higher fees increase average but not marginal costs.
An increase in fixed cost causes the market price and quantity to rise and the number of trucking firms to fall, as expected.
In addition, it has the surprising effect that it causes producing firms to increase the amount of services that they provide.
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-‹#›