Literature Review
EDCO 745
Literature Review: Final Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
||||
|
Content |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Below Expectations |
Not present |
|
Literature Review Composition |
21 to 22 points The student composed a 7–10-page literature review that included all required sections and applied all the sources meaningfully. |
19 to 20 points The student composed a 7–10-page literature review that included all required sections and applied most of the sources meaningfully. |
17 to 18 points The student composed a 5–6-page literature review that included all or most of the required sections and applied some of the sources meaningfully. |
1 to 16 points The student composed a 1–4-page literature review that included some of the required sections and applied few of the sources meaningfully. |
0 points Not Present |
|
Literature Review Summary of the Research |
49 to 53 points The student’s summary included ample arguments for why further research was warranted for the selected counseling topic and clearly identified research question(s) that should be addressed. |
45 to 48 points The student’s summary included arguments for why further research was warranted for the selected counseling topic and identified research question(s). |
41 to 44 points The student’s summary needed to be developed more fully. Arguments lacked sufficient information why further research was warranted for the selected counseling topic and identified research question(s). |
1 to 40 points The student’s summary did not include arguments for why further research was warranted for the selected counseling topic and identified research question(s). |
0 points Not Present |
|
Literature Review Evaluation of the Research |
28 to 30 points Evaluation of literature is thoroughly assessed using point comparisons/contrasts, raising questions, and/or noting strengths/weaknesses with supportive evidence demonstrated critical thinking and personal application to selected counseling topic. |
26 to 27 points Evaluation of literature is assessed using point comparisons/contrasts, questions, and/or noting strengths/weaknesses with supportive evidence. |
23 to 25 points The student’s evaluation of literature is weak. Comparisons/contrasts, raising questions, and/or noting strengths/weaknesses need improvement. |
1 to 22 points The student’s evaluation of literature is very weak or absent. Comparisons/contrasts, raising questions, and/or noting strengths/weaknesses needs significant improvement; Supportive evidence was lacking. |
0 points Not Present |
|
Structure |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Below Expectations |
Not present |
|
Style |
22 to 23 points The literature review properly uses current APA style and reflects doctoral writing quality. In-text citations and references list are formatted correctly. The literature review reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are very few spelling and/or grammar errors. |
20 to 21 points The literature review mostly uses current APA style and reflects doctoral writing quality. In-text citations and references list are mostly formatted correctly. The literature review reflects generally a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are few spelling and/or grammar errors. |
18 to 19 points The literature review uses some current APA style and reflects doctoral writing quality. In-text citations and references list are sometimes formatted correctly. The literature review sometimes reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are some spelling and/or grammar errors. |
1 to 17 points The literature review uses few current APA style and reflects doctoral writing quality. In-text citations and references list are rarely formatted correctly. The literature review seldom reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are many spelling and/or grammar errors. |
0 points Not Present |
|
Sources |
21 to 22 points The Reference page meets or exceeds the required number of sources. All reference page sources are referenced in at least one literature review subheading area. |
19 to 20 points The Reference page meets the required number of sources. Most reference page sources are referenced in at least one literature review subheading area. |
17 to 18 points The Reference page does not meet the required number of sources. Some reference page sources are not referenced in at least one literature review subheading area. |
1 to 16 points The Reference page is not present or contains few sources. Few reference page sources are referenced in a literature review subheading area. |
0 points Not Present |
Page 2 of 2