Literature Review Essay 4 pages
ENGL 4700 Spring 2020 | 1
Dr. Dominy
1
Literature Review
At least four full pages in length, not including the works cited page
15% of final grade
Due Tuesday, March 24th at 11:59 in the D2L Dropbox
Description of the Assignment
This assignment will require you to write an essay that uses two of the assigned critical essays on Absalom,
Absalom! plus one that you find on your own to describe a key facet and the evolution of the critical
conversation on Absalom, Absalom!. As you have likely seen in our reading of critical essays on the novel,
literary critics frequently review what has been said before them in prior publications in order to show where
they will depart from established criticism or extend those ideas further. That is the goal with this assignment.
Use the articles you choose to show what the extant conversation is and how it could be extended or refuted.
Directions 1) Use the resources available through the Library’s website to find a critical article on your own about
Absalom, Absalom! Rather than just searching GALILEO, I encourage you to particularly target the
MLA International Bibliography database.
2) Read the third article you choose carefully, and group it with two that we have read together for class. 3) Prepare for writing the essay by taking adequate notes that relate the essays to each other. Where do they
agree or disagree? Where do they cite the same evidence from Faulkner’s novel? What do they seem to
say together?
4) After thorough preparation, write an essay that claims what these three essays seem to be saying together about Absalom, Absalom! by explaining the connections or disagreements you found between
the three essays. Your essay should have
a. A focused introduction that introduces the three essays b. A thesis statement that explains what the three essays taken together reveal or indicate about the
critical conversation on Faulkner’s fiction.
c. Body paragraphs that support the thesis with adequate and appropriate summary, paraphrase, and quotation to show the similarities, agreements, and disagreements among the three essays. Be
sure to elaborate in instances that you summarize/paraphrase/quote to make the connections you
draw clear to the reader, and always cite the source.
d. A conclusion that reiterates your thesis for the reader. e. A works cited page
5) This essay should NOT a. Simply summarize the three articles. b. Praise or criticize the essays in the manner of a book or movie review c. Stray too far from the three essays in order to make an argument or meditate or reflect on the
topic the essay addresses. Keep the focus of the essay on what is in the three essays.
If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask. Stop by office hours or send an email.
ENGL 4700 Spring 2020 | 2
Dr. Dominy
2
Rubric for Literature Review Excellent Effective Adequate Limited Unsuccessful
Argument and
Interpretation
The essay presents
a sophisticated,
insightful, nuance
argument offering
an original
interpretation of a
literary text.
The essay presents
and insightful
arguments offering
an interpretation of
a literary text.
The essay presents
a basic argument
about a literary text
that is not as well
developed as a
good argument.
The essay presents
an unoriginal or
underdeveloped
argument about a
literary text.
The essay
summarizes the
primary subject
text. There is no
argument or
interpretation.
Paragraphing,
Composition, and
Organization
All paragraphs are
sophisticated,
related to the thesis,
and have a clear
main idea;
transition are fluid
and very effective.
Order and
progression is
logical.
All paragraphs are
related to the thesis
and have a clear
main idea.
Transitions are
effective. Order
and progression is
logical.
All paragraphs are
related to the thesis
and most have a
main idea.
Transitions are
adequate, and the
paragraphs are in
an effective order.
Some paragraphs
not relevant or
several lack a main
idea. Transitions
are misplaced or
inadequate.
Paragraphs lack
relevance and main
ideas; transitions are
absent; logic is
absent.
Use of Evidence The essay amply
uses sophisticatedly
support from
sources to support
claims.
The essay uses
source material to
support its
argument
convincingly. It
may over or under-
quote a little.
The essay uses just
enough material to
support its
argument.
The essay does not
adequately quote
from its sources as
evidence.
The essay’s
argument has no
textual basis.
Comprehension,
Synthesis and
Integration of
Secondary Critical
Material
The essay amply
uses secondary
source material to
contextualize its
argument. Source
material is of
quality, and it is
explored and
explained.
The essay uses
secondary source
material to
contextualize its
argument well. All
material is relevant
and that relevance
is explained.
The essay
adequately quotes
and explains
secondary source
material related to
the argument. It
may over or under-
quote a little.
Sources are still of
quality.
The essay over
uses, underuses, or
misuses source
material.
Secondary sources
are used primarily
to prove
interpretive points.
Quoted material is
irrelevant. Sources
may lack in quality.
The essay does not
use source material
or it is composed of
more than 50%
quoted material.
Sources are not of
quality.
Citation and
Documentation
Parenthetical
citations and works
cited entries are
complete and
nearly flawless in
their format.
Parenthetical
citations and works
cited list may
include some
formatting
problems but are
complete and clear
in their attribution
of source material.
There are one or
two formatting
problems with
parenthetical
citations and works
cited entries, but
they are complete
and clear in their
attribution of
source material.
The essay’s works
cited page or
parenthetical has
some significant
problems, but all
quoted and
paraphrased
material is
attributed.
The essay has no
works cited page or
no parenthetical
documentation, or
documentation is
incomplete.
Usage, Grammar,
Style
Nearly perfect in its
style and
proofreading
Errors are present
but do not distract
Errors are
distracting
Errors create
difficult reading
Errors create an
incomprehensible
essay