Literature Review Matrix
thedream
LiteratureMatrixhomework.docxResearch Methods Synthesis Matrix
|
|
Peer-Reviewed Primary Research Article #1 |
Peer-Reviewed Primary Research Article #2 |
Peer-Reviewed Primary Research Article #3 |
Peer-Reviewed Primary Research Article #4 |
Peer-Reviewed Primary Research Article #5 |
|
Article Citation |
Wills, T. A., Knight, R., Williams, R. J., Pagano, I., & Sargent, J. D. (2015). Risk factors for exclusive e-cigarette use and dual e-cigarette use and tobacco use in adolescents. Pediatrics, 135(1), e43-e51. |
Rooke, C., Cunningham-Burley, S., & Amos, A. (2016). Smokers’ and ex-smokers’ understanding of electronic cigarettes: a qualitative study. Tobacco control, 25(e1), e60-e66. |
Hiscock, R., Bauld, L., Amos, A., & Platt, S. (2012). Smoking and socioeconomic status in England: the rise of the never smoker and the disadvantaged smoker. Journal of Public Health, 34(3) 390-396. |
Khuder, S., Price, J., Jordan, T., Khuder, S., & Silvestri, K. (2008). Cigarette smoking among adolescents in Northwest Ohio: correlates of prevalence and age at onset. International journal of environmental research and public health, 5(4), 278-289. |
Hossain, A., Hossain, Q. Z., & Rahman, F. (2015). Factors influencing teenager to initiate smoking in South-west Bangladesh. Universal Journal of Public Health, 3(6), 241-250. |
|
Week 3 Research Design |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Experimental/RCT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Survey/Quasi- Experimental |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single Case Design |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualitative Research |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participant Number (N) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary Paragraph |
|
||||
|
Week 4 Data Collection Type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Questionnaires (Open ended, closed, Likert) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interviews (In person, telephone, focus group) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Observation (Who are the observers; did they use an instrument?) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measurement (Type of data collected: nominal, ordinal, interval, ratio) Was the tool shown to be valid & reliable? Test/retest data? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary |
|
||||
|
Week 5 Descriptive Stats (About sample or outcome data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
How as data presented? (Pie chart, graph) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Any measures of central tendency? (Mean, median, mode) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard deviation (sd) or ranges of data presented? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Any correlation (relationship) of data? (r) value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary Paragraph |
|
||||
|
Week 6 Data Analysis & Inference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Any probability data findings presented? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Any confidence intervals (CI) presented? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hypothesis addressed? (Null or alternative hypothesis accepted?) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Any statistical software used? (SAS, SPSS, Strata) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect size used (if mentioned)? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Power Analysis done? (used to calculate number of subjects needed) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualitative data analysis (how data was collected, coded, software used)? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary Paragraph |
|
||||
|
Week 7 Evaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Was hypothesis clear? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Was previous instrument reliability & validity provided or calculated on sample? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
How were participants recruited? Were they compensated for participation? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethics: was the study approved by an IRB? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do you see clinical significance (benefit) to this research? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall Comments: (Any Future research needed) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall Summary: |
|
