Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

Literature Evaluation Table

SUBMIT ASSIGNMENT

Start Date

Feb 19, 2024, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Feb 25, 2024, 11:59 PM

Points

50

Rubric

View Rubric

Status

Active

Assessment Traits

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

PICOT

In individuals living with diabetes in an underserved urban community (P), how does the implementation of a community-based diabetes management program that includes education on diabetes management, affordable access to medications and supplies, and support systems (I) compared to standard diabetes care practices without the improved program (C) change their glycemic control (O) within one year of program implementation (T)?

In nursing practice, accurate identification and application of research is essential to achieving successful outcomes. The ability to articulate research data and summarize relevant content supports the student's ability to further develop and synthesize the assignments that constitute the components of the capstone project.

This assignment will be used to develop a written implementation plan.

For this assignment, provide a synopsis of the review of the research literature. Using the "Literature Evaluation Table," determine the level and strength of the evidence for each of the eight research articles you have selected. The articles should be current (published within the past 5 years) and closely relate to the PICOT question developed earlier in this course. The articles may include quantitative research, descriptive analyses, longitudinal studies, or meta-analysis articles. A systematic review may be used to provide background information for the purpose or problem identified in the proposed capstone project.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Rubric Criteria

Collapse All Rubric CriteriaCollapse All

Literature Search Strategy Employed

3.5 points

Criteria Description

Describe the library databases searched and the keywords used to find research articles.

5. Target

3.5 points

A description of the library databases searched and the keywords used to find research articles is thorough and accurate.

4. Acceptable

3.12 points

A description of the library databases searched and the keywords used to find research articles is mostly detailed.

3. Approaching

2.77 points

A description of the library databases searched and the keywords used to find research articles is present but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient

2.63 points

A description of the library databases searched and the keywords used to find research articles is inaccurate or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of the library databases searched and the keywords used to find research articles is missing.

Connection to PICOT Question and Capstone Change Project

5 points

Criteria Description

Explain how each article supports your proposed PICO(T) question and Capstone Change Project.

5. Target

5 points

An explanation of how each article supports your proposed PICO(T) question and Capstone Change Project is thorough and detailed.

4. Acceptable

4.45 points

An explanation of how each article supports your proposed PICO(T) question and Capstone Change Project is mostly detailed.

3. Approaching

3.95 points

An explanation of how each article supports your proposed PICO(T) question and Capstone Change Project is present but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient

3.75 points

An explanation of how each article supports your proposed PICO(T) question and Capstone Change Project is inaccurate or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

An explanation of how each article supports your proposed PICO(T) question and Capstone Change Project is missing.

Setting

3.5 points

Criteria Description

Identify where the study took place, including a description of the setting (impatient versus outpatient, etc.).

5. Target

3.5 points

An identification of where the study took place, including a description of the setting (impatient versus outpatient, etc.), is thorough and detailed.

4. Acceptable

3.12 points

An identification of where the study took place, including a description of the setting (impatient versus outpatient, etc.), is mostly detailed.

3. Approaching

2.77 points

An identification of where the study took place, including a description of the setting (impatient versus outpatient, etc.), is present, but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient

2.63 points

An identification of where the study took place, including a description of the setting (impatient versus outpatient, etc.), is inaccurate or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

An identification of where the study took place, including a description of the setting (impatient versus outpatient, etc.), is missing.

Sample

3.5 points

Criteria Description

Explain the number and characteristics of participants in the study.

5. Target

3.5 points

An explanation of the number and characteristics of participants in the study is thorough and detailed.

4. Acceptable

3.12 points

An explanation of the number and characteristics of participants in the study is mostly detailed.

3. Approaching

2.77 points

An explanation of the number and characteristics of participants in the study is present but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient

2.63 points

An explanation of the number and characteristics of participants in the study is inaccurate or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

An explanation of the number and characteristics of participants in the study is missing.

APA References

3.5 points

Criteria Description

Eight peer-reviewed articles relevant to the PICOT question are presented in APA format and include a working link or GCU permalink.

5. Target

3.5 points

A list of eight peer-reviewed articles relevant to the PICOT question are presented in APA format, including a working link or GCU permalink, is thorough and detailed.

4. Acceptable

3.12 points

A list of eight peer-reviewed articles relevant to the PICOT question are presented in APA format, including a working link or GCU permalink, is mostly detailed.

3. Approaching

2.77 points

A list of eight peer-reviewed articles relevant to the PICOT question are presented in APA format, including a working link or GCU permalink, is present but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient

2.63 points

A list of eight peer-reviewed articles relevant to the PICOT question are presented in APA format, including a working link or GCU permalink, is inaccurate or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A list of eight peer-reviewed articles relevant to the PICOT question are presented in APA format, including a working link or GCU permalink, is missing.

Design

3.5 points

Criteria Description

Explain the type of qualitative study design.

5. Target

3.5 points

An explanation of the type of qualitative study design is thorough and detailed.

4. Acceptable

3.12 points

An explanation of the type of qualitative study design is mostly detailed.

3. Approaching

2.77 points

An explanation of the type of qualitative study design is present but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient

2.63 points

An explanation of the type of qualitative study design is inaccurate or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

An explanation of the type of qualitative study design is missing.

Purpose/Aim of Study

3.5 points

Criteria Description

Describe the purpose or aim of each study.

5. Target

3.5 points

A description of the purpose or aim of each study is thorough and detailed.

4. Acceptable

3.12 points

A description of the purpose or aim of each study is mostly detailed.

3. Approaching

2.77 points

A description of the purpose or aim of each study is present but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient

2.63 points

A description of the purpose or aim of each study is inaccurate or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of the purpose or aim of each study is missing.

Recommendations

5 points

Criteria Description

Describe the recommendations from each study.

5. Target

5 points

A description of the recommendations from each study is thorough and detailed.

4. Acceptable

4.45 points

A description of the recommendations from each study is mostly detailed.

3. Approaching

3.95 points

A description of the recommendations from each study is present but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient

3.75 points

A description of the recommendations from each study is inaccurate or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of the recommendations from each study is missing.

Outcomes/Key Findings

5 points

Criteria Description

Describe the outcomes/key findings of each study, including implications for nursing practices (summary of study results).

5. Target

5 points

A description of the outcomes/key findings of each study, including implications for nursing practices (summary of study results is thorough and detailed.

4. Acceptable

4.45 points

A description of the outcomes/key findings of each study, including implications for nursing practices (summary of study results is mostly detailed.

3. Approaching

3.95 points

A description of the outcomes/key findings of each study, including implications for nursing practices (summary of study results is present, but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient

3.75 points

A description of the outcomes/key findings of each study, including implications for nursing practices (summary of study results is inaccurate or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of the outcomes/key findings of each study, including implications for nursing practices (summary of study results) is missing.

Methods

3.5 points

Criteria Description

Describe the interventions and instruments of each study.

5. Target

3.5 points

A description of the interventions and instruments of each study is thorough and detailed.

4. Acceptable

3.12 points

A description of the interventions and instruments of each study is mostly detailed.

3. Approaching

2.77 points

A description of the interventions and instruments of each study is present but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient

2.63 points

A description of the interventions and instruments of each study is inaccurate or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of the interventions and instruments of each study is missing.

Research questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)

3.5 points

Criteria Description

Identify the research question(s) and hypothesis of each study.

5. Target

3.5 points

An identification of the research question(s) and hypothesis of each study is thorough and detailed.

4. Acceptable

3.12 points

An identification of the research question(s) and hypothesis of each study is mostly detailed.

3. Approaching

2.77 points

An identification of the research question(s) and hypothesis of each study is present but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient

2.63 points

An identification of the research question(s) and hypothesis of each study is inaccurate or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

An identification of the research question(s) and hypothesis of each study is missing.

Finalized PICOT Question

2.5 points

Criteria Description

Finalize a PICOT question.

5. Target

2.5 points

A finalized PICOT question is thorough and accurate.

4. Acceptable

2.23 points

A finalized PICOT question is mostly detailed.

3. Approaching

1.98 points

A finalized PICOT question is present but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient

1.88 points

A finalized PICOT question is inaccurate or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A finalized PICOT question is missing.

Analysis

4.5 points

Criteria Description

Explain how the data collected from each study was analyzed.

5. Target

4.5 points

An explanation of how the data collected from each study was analyzed is thorough and detailed.

4. Acceptable

4.01 points

An explanation of how the data collected from each study was analyzed is mostly detailed.

3. Approaching

3.56 points

An explanation of how the data collected from each study was analyzed is present but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient

3.38 points

An explanation of how the data collected from each study was analyzed is inaccurate or incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

An explanation of how the data collected from each study was analyzed is missing.

Total50 points