Literature Review
Kapashi27
LiteratureEvaluationTable.docx
Literature Evaluation Table
Abraham Musa
Grand Canyon University:493-NRS
Running head: LITERATURE EVALUATION
1
9
LITERATURE EVALUATION
06/14/2020.
Literature Evaluation
|
Criteria |
Article 1 |
Article 2 |
Article 3 |
Article 4 |
|
Author, Journal, and access link |
Parker et al., Journal of Foot and Ankle Research Link: https://jfootankleres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13047-018-0311-0 |
Leila Yazdanpanah, et al., World Journal of Diabetes |
Robert Frykberg and Jaminelli Banks, Federal Practitioner: For the Health care Professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS |
Al-Rubeaan et al., Plos One |
|
Article title and year published |
A randomized controlled trial and cost-consequence analysis of traditional and digital foot orthoses supply chains in a National Health Service setting: application to feet at risk of diabetic plantar ulceration, 2019 |
Literature review on the management of diabetic foot ulcer 2015
|
Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Review 2016 |
Diabetic Foot Complications and Their Risk Factors from a Large Retrospective Cohort Study 2015 |
|
Research Question/Hypothesis |
Effectiveness of custom-made foot orthotic device in managing DFU |
Patient education encourages them to care for their foot hence preventing DFU related complications |
Early diagnosis is essential in the management of foot ulcerations |
Prevention programs can help minimize the risk of DFU complications |
|
Purpose/Aim of the study |
To compare traditional orthoses supply chain to the current digital means |
To determine the impact of effective management of DFU |
A brief overview of DFU, including treatment and prevention |
To identify the risk of development of DFU from diabetes mellitus |
|
Design (qualitative/quantitative) |
Quantitative |
Quantitative |
Qualitative |
Quantitative |
|
Setting/Sample |
The study was conducted at the Royal Blackburn Hospital. A total of 60 participants were recruited. |
Review of previous research findings on the management of diabetic foot |
Review of previous scientific findings |
A total of 62,681 people participated |
|
Analysis |
The risk status of the feet was analyzed using the SCI-DC framework. An SPSS v24 was used. |
A meta-analysis of previous literature |
Analysis of previous research data |
A logistics regression model was used to determine age and gender relationships |
|
Key findings |
Custom made orthoses reduced number of regions on the foot at high risk of pressure |
The most effective technique for managing neuropathic DFU is total contact casts |
No effective therapy can be utilized without risk of infection |
The prevalence of DFU is related to age and the duration of T2D |
|
Recommendations |
No recommendations were made |
No recommendations |
No recommendations |
No recommendations |
|
How the article supports the EBP/Capstone project |
Findings assist in the provision of orthoses based on patient's context |
Analysis of results will improve approaches to DFU |
Data can be used to advise on Multidisciplinary approach in DFU management |
Findings can assist nurses to identify risk factors for DFU |
|
Criteria |
Article 5 |
Article 6 |
Article 7 |
Article 8 |
|
Author, Journal, and access link |
Estelle Everett and Nestoras Mathioudakis, HHS Public Access Link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5793889/
|
Parker et al., Diabetic/Metabolism Research and Reviews |
Noha Amin and John Doupis, World Journal of Diabetes |
Andrew Boulton, Medicine Link: https://www.medicinejournal.co.uk/article/S1357-3039(14)00296-5/fulltext |
|
Article title and year published |
Update on the management of diabetic foot ulcers, 2018 |
Differences Between National and International Guidelines for the Management of Diabetic Foot Disease |
Diabetic foot disease: From the evaluation of the “foot at risk” to the novel diabetic ulcer treatment modalities 2016 |
The Diabetic Foot 2015 |
|
Research Question/Hypothesis |
Adjuvant therapies can be effective in the management of diabetic foot ulcers |
National guidelines differ from international guidelines on the management of diabetic foot |
Proper assessment of DFU ensure better diagnosis |
Team approach reduces complications of DFU |
|
Purpose/Aim of the study |
To review the rationale of and efficacy of adjuvant therapies used in treating DFU |
To compare national and international guidelines on managing diabetic foot |
To identify risks factors associated with DFU |
To evaluate diabetic foot; risk factors, etiology, epidemiology, and treatment |
|
Design (qualitative/quantitative) |
Qualitative study |
Qualitative |
Qualitative |
Qualitative |
|
Setting/Sample |
Review of previous research findings |
77 recommendations from the 2015 IWGDF documents were analyzed |
Literature review of previous findings |
Review of previous findings |
|
Analysis |
A meta-analytic review of previous literature |
Statistical analysis of the documents |
A meta-analysis of previous scientific results |
Analysis of previous research |
|
Key findings |
There is a gap between current and desirable DFU outcomes |
6 national guidelines were similar for management with 42% similarity in wound healing |
Patient education on management of DFU improve clinical outcomes |
Proper assessment of DFU utilizing team approach is pivotal ineffective care |
|
Recommendations |
Good clinical judgment based on the patient's context should be considered |
No recommendations |
No recommendations |
No recommendation |
|
How the article supports the EBP/Capstone project |
Findings can guide clinicians in managing diabetic foot ulcers. |
Data can help monitor compliance with the guidelines |
Scientific findings can aid in establishing training programs for DFU patients |
Findings from research can be used to improve clinical outcomes of DFU |
References:
Al-Rubeaan, K., Derwish, M. A., Ouizi, S., Youssef, A. M., Subhani, S. N., Ibrahim, H. M., & Alamri, B. N. (2015). Diabetic Foot Complications and Their Risk Factors from a Large Retrospective Cohort Study. Plos One, 10(5). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124446
Amin, N., & Doupis, J. (2016). Diabetic foot disease: From the evaluation of the “foot at risk” to the novel diabetic ulcer treatment modalities. World Journal of Diabetes, 7(7), 153. doi:10.4239/wjd. v7.i7.153
Boulton, A. J. (2015). The diabetic foot. Medicine, 43(1), 33-37. doi: 10.1016/j.mpmed.2014.10.006
Everett, E., & Mathioudakis, N. (2018). Update on the management of diabetic foot ulcers. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1411(1), 153-165. doi:10.1111/nyas.13569
Frykberg, R. G., & Banks, J. (2016). Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Review. Federal Practitioner: For the Health Care Professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS, 33(2), 16-23.
Parker, C. N., Netten, J. J., Parker, T. J., Jia, L., Corcoran, H., Garrett, M., . . . Lazzarini, P. A. (2018). Differences between national and international guidelines for the management of diabetic foot disease. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, 35(2). doi:10.1002/dmrr.3101
Parker, D. J., Nuttall, G. H., Bray, N., Hugill, T., Martinez-Santos, A., Edwards, R. T., & Nester, C. (2019). A randomized controlled trial and cost-consequence analysis of traditional and digital foot orthoses supply chains in a National Health Service setting: Application to feet at risk of diabetic plantar ulceration. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 12(1). doi:10.1186/s13047-018-0311-0
