|
Criteria
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
|
Summary
|
Summary is succinct (no more than 1 paragraph), neutral, introduces text clearly, and is stylistically superior (diverse signal verbs)
|
Summary presents main points of text but is either too short or long. Mostly neutral but includes a few evaluative words. Stylistically average
|
Summary lacks clear introduction to text. Too short or long. Contains evaluative language and is stylistically repetitive
|
Summary is either non-existent or much too long. Contains overt evaluation. Original text is misrepresented and/or taken out of context
|
|
Thesis Statement
|
Well-crafted, clear and concise introductory thesis statement outlining overall argument and central points
|
Thesis statement presents argument but lacks central points and could be further developed
|
Discernible thesis but broad, unfocused and doesn’t outline essay structure
|
No discernible thesis statement
|
|
Textual Support
|
Specific references to text (summary, paraphrase, quotations) with sufficient support
|
Specific references to text (summary, paraphrase, quotations) but could use more support
|
Vague references to text, but no specific paraphrasing or quotations
|
No textual support
|
|
Organization
|
Logically organized, displaying engaging intro, body, and conclusion which follows thesis statement (topic sentences, transition words)
|
Mostly structured but essay includes unnecessary tangents or misplaced points
|
Central argument is eventually lost. Essay lacks focus and structure and breaks from thesis statement
|
No particular flow is followed. Points are underdeveloped and/or vague
|
|
Mechanics
|
Grammatically error free with correct citation, appropriate pg. number and proper format (font, spacing, etc.)
|
Minor grammatical errors with mostly correct citation. Slightly under appropriate pg. number
|
Significant grammatical errors, and/or under appropriate pg. number. Format issues, including citation
|
Unacceptable grammatical/format errors. Significant citation issues (or no works cited)
|