Essay
Leveraging the Impact of 360-Degree Feedback36
STANDARDIZED OR CUSTOMIZED INSTRUMENTS An organization can choose an existing, standardized assessment instrument
(sometimes called off - the - shelf solutions) or have an instrument custom designed
for its use. Unfortunately, there is no such thing as the perfect instrument, and
there are advantages and disadvantages to both types.
A primary advantage to using a standardized instrument is cost; it is often less
expensive than a customized alternative. Also, an existing 360 - degree feedback
instrument can provide extensive normative data, so participants have the oppor-
tunity to compare their scores to many other managers in other organizations.
Standardized Tools Standardized instruments have been created to be sold directly to individuals or
organizations that wish to implement 360 - degree feedback. The availability of
off - the - shelf instruments is increasing at a rapid pace. If you decide to use such
an instrument, your fi rst task is to learn what instruments are available in order
to choose the best possible tool for your organization. Use the Standardized
Instrument Checklist (see Exhibit 2.8 ) to record your notes about the standard-
ized feedback tools you are considering.
Customized Tools An alternative to using an off - the - shelf instrument is to create a survey specifi -
cally designed for the organization. A customized instrument has an advantage
over a standardized one in that it is designed to measure competencies that are
important and specifi c to the organization (Chappelow, 2004).
At fi rst glance, this may seem to be the best choice. An organization is like a
family: it likes to think that it is unique in its best qualities and in its dysfunctions,
and that no off - the - shelf instrument can capture its particular essence. While it is
not diffi cult for an organization to come up with a list of important competen-
cies, the diffi culty lies in creating the survey, scoring program, and developmental
materials that are needed for a successful 360 process.
In addition to the logistical challenges of creating a customized instrument,
validity and reliability studies must be conducted to ensure that the instrument is
psychometrically sound, that is, reliable and valid. (Reliability is the consistency
or stability of the data collected by the instrument; validity is the extent to which
the instrument measures what it is supposed to measure and the appropriate use
c02.indd 36c02.indd 36 2/11/08 12:51:36 PM2/11/08 12:51:36 PM
Fleenor, J. W., Taylor, S., Chappelow, C., Fleenor, J. W., & Taylor, S. (2008). Leveraging the impact of 360-degree feedback. ProQuest Ebook Central <a onclick=window.open('http://ebookcentral.proquest.com','_blank') href='http://ebookcentral.proquest.com' target='_blank' style='cursor: pointer;'>http://ebookcentral.proquest.com</a> Created from trident on 2021-01-19 08:35:48.
C op
yr ig
ht ©
2 00
8. C
en te
r fo
r C
re at
iv e
Le ad
er sh
ip . A
ll rig
ht s
re se
rv ed
.
Implementing a 360 - Degree Feedback Process 37
Exhibit 2.8. Standardized Instrument Checklist
Date:
Instrument:
____The items and scales make sense to our organization (they have face
validity).
____The competencies the instrument assesses are relevant to the behaviors
we want to change in our organization.
____The competencies it assesses are related to our organization’s underly-
ing management model.
____The data will be meaningful to our managers. It will be perceived as
consistent and accurate.
____The behaviors assessed are amenable to change.
____The provider has suitable experience and expertise with the instrument,
target audience, and subject matter.
Leveraging the Impact of 360-Degree Feedback. Copyright © 2008 by Center for Creative Leadership. R eproduced by permission of Pfeiffer, an Imprint of Wiley. www.pfeiffer.com
of the results.) Some organizations fail to conduct these studies; however, this
approach is extremely shortsighted. If the organization expects its employees to
be open and to make changes based on the feedback, it must provide evidence
that these changes are actually the ones that are needed.
Demonstrated reliability and validity are essential for an effective and defen-
sible 360 - degree feedback process. It ’ s counterproductive to give employees
feedback that is based on unstable and inaccurate data. Designing a reliable and
valid survey requires the involvement of an expert in instrument development.
A doctoral degree in psychology, educational measurement, or a related fi eld is
usually required. If the organization doesn ’ t have this expertise internally, it may
have to hire the services of a consultant who has the necessary training and
experience.
c02.indd 37c02.indd 37 2/11/08 12:51:37 PM2/11/08 12:51:37 PM
Fleenor, J. W., Taylor, S., Chappelow, C., Fleenor, J. W., & Taylor, S. (2008). Leveraging the impact of 360-degree feedback. ProQuest Ebook Central <a onclick=window.open('http://ebookcentral.proquest.com','_blank') href='http://ebookcentral.proquest.com' target='_blank' style='cursor: pointer;'>http://ebookcentral.proquest.com</a> Created from trident on 2021-01-19 08:35:48.
C op
yr ig
ht ©
2 00
8. C
en te
r fo
r C
re at
iv e
Le ad
er sh
ip . A
ll rig
ht s
re se
rv ed
.
Leveraging the Impact of 360-Degree Feedback38
Much of this expense and diffi culty can be avoided by using a customizable
instrument offered by a provider of 360 - feedback services. These instruments
allow the selection of desired competencies from a collection of competencies
that have been tested for reliability and validity. The content and length of a cus-
tomized instrument can be tailored by selecting important competencies and
combining them to create an assessment that closely refl ects the needs of the
organization. All of the guidelines that apply to selecting an off - the - shelf instru-
ment apply to customizable instruments, and you can use the Customizable
Instrument Checklist (see Exhibit 2.9 ) to expand your analysis of instruments
you are considering.
Exhibit 2.9. Customizable Instrument Checklist
Date:
Instrument / Provider:
• Does the application require both paper and online options, and does
the assessment provide both options?
• What customization options exist?
• Can e-mails and greetings be personalized?
• Can the website be branded for your initiative?
• Is the software hosted or must you install it at your site?
• What are the technology requirements to access and use the software?
• What administrative capabilities are available to you?
• How is project status monitored?
• What report options are available?
• How long does it take to set up your survey once customization choices
have been made?
Leveraging the Impact of 360-Degree Feedback. Copyright © 2008 by Center for Creative Leadership. R eproduced by permission of Pfeiffer, an Imprint of Wiley. www.pfeiffer.com
c02.indd 38c02.indd 38 2/11/08 12:51:37 PM2/11/08 12:51:37 PM
Fleenor, J. W., Taylor, S., Chappelow, C., Fleenor, J. W., & Taylor, S. (2008). Leveraging the impact of 360-degree feedback. ProQuest Ebook Central <a onclick=window.open('http://ebookcentral.proquest.com','_blank') href='http://ebookcentral.proquest.com' target='_blank' style='cursor: pointer;'>http://ebookcentral.proquest.com</a> Created from trident on 2021-01-19 08:35:48.
C op
yr ig
ht ©
2 00
8. C
en te
r fo
r C
re at
iv e
Le ad
er sh
ip . A
ll rig
ht s
re se
rv ed
.