|
Lesson Plan with Modifications
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccommodations: student with mild cognitive challenges InTASC 2 CAEP R1.1
|
|
15 pts
Advanced
Column A: Key characteristics of the learner with this designation and his/her overall instructional needs are identified. Column B: Appropriate accommodations to this lesson addressing each identified need of this student are described
|
12.75 pts
Proficient
Column A: Key characteristics of the learner with this designation are identified. Column B: Appropriate accommodations to this lesson addressing this student’s needs are described
|
10.5 pts
Basic
Column A: General characteristics of the learner with this designation are identified but include descriptions of needs of students with other designations. Column B: General accommodations to this lesson addressing are described OR accommodations are whole-class based and not specific to this student
|
8.25 pts
Minimal
Did not provide sufficient number or type of accommodations OR Clarity of writing – the writing is not at a level acceptable for graduate academic writing
|
0 pts
No Marks
Not addressed
|
|
15 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #2 - Learning Differences
The teacher uses understanding of individual differences and diverse cultures and communities to ensure inclusive learning environments that allow each learner to reach his/her full potential.
threshold: 3.0 pts
|
|
4 pts
Advanced - The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
|
3 pts
Proficient - The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
|
2 pts
Basic - The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.
|
1 pts
Minimal - The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills
|
|
--
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccommodations: student with student with ADHD InTASC 2 CAEP R1.1
|
|
15 pts
Advanced
Column A: Key characteristics of the learner with this designation and his/her overall instructional needs are identified. Column B: Appropriate accommodations to this lesson addressing each identified need of this student are described
|
12.75 pts
Proficient
Column A: Key characteristics of the learner with this designation are identified. Column B: Appropriate accommodations to this lesson addressing this student’s needs are described
|
10.5 pts
Basic
Column A: General characteristics of the learner with this designation are identified but include descriptions of needs of students with other designations. Column B: General accommodations to this lesson addressing are described OR accommodations are whole-class based and not specific to this student
|
8.25 pts
Minimal
Did not provide sufficient number or type of accommodations OR Clarity of writing – the writing is not at a level acceptable for graduate academic writing
|
0 pts
No Marks
Not addressed
|
|
15 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #2B - Learning Differences
The teacher uses understanding of individual differences and diverse cultures and communities to ensure inclusive learning environments that allow each learner to reach his/her full potential.
threshold: 3.0 pts
|
|
4 pts
Advanced - The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
|
3 pts
Proficient - The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
|
2 pts
Basic - The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.
|
1 pts
Minimal - The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills
|
|
--
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccommodations: for hearing impaired student InTASC 2 CAEP R1.1
|
|
15 pts
Advanced
Column A: Key characteristics of the learner with this designation and his/her overall instructional needs are identified. Column B: Appropriate accommodations to this lesson addressing each identified need of this student are described
|
12.75 pts
Proficient
Column A: Key characteristics of the learner with this designation are identified. Column B: Appropriate accommodations to this lesson addressing this student’s needs are described
|
10.5 pts
Basic
Column A: General characteristics of the learner with this designation are identified but include descriptions of needs of students with other designations. Column B: General accommodations to this lesson addressing are described OR accommodations are whole-class based and not specific to this student
|
8.25 pts
Minimal
Did not provide sufficient number or type of accommodations OR Clarity of writing – the writing is not at a level acceptable for graduate academic writing
|
0 pts
No Marks
Not addressed
|
|
15 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #2C - Learning Differences
The teacher uses understanding of individual differences and diverse cultures and communities to ensure inclusive learning environments that allow each learner to reach his/her full potential.
threshold: 3.0 pts
|
|
4 pts
Advanced - The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
|
3 pts
Proficient - The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
|
2 pts
Basic - The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.
|
1 pts
Minimal - The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.
|
|
--
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccommodations: for visually impaired student InTASC 2 CAEP R1.1
|
|
15 pts
Advanced
Column A: Key characteristics of the learner with this designation and his/her overall instructional needs are identified. Column B: Appropriate accommodations to this lesson addressing each identified need of this student are described
|
12.75 pts
Proficient
Column A: Key characteristics of the learner with this designation are identified. Column B: Appropriate accommodations to this lesson addressing this student’s needs are described
|
10.5 pts
Basic
Column A: General characteristics of the learner with this designation are identified but include descriptions of needs of students with other designations. Column B: General accommodations to this lesson addressing are described OR accommodations are whole-class based and not specific to this student
|
8.25 pts
Minimal
Did not provide sufficient number or type of accommodations OR Clarity of writing – the writing is not at a level acceptable for graduate academic writing
|
0 pts
No Marks
Not addressed
|
|
15 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #2D- Learning Differences
The teacher uses understanding of individual differences and diverse cultures and communities to ensure inclusive learning environments that allow each learner to reach his/her full potential.
threshold: 3.0 pts
|
|
4 pts
Advanced - The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
|
3 pts
Proficient - The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
|
2 pts
Basic - The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.
|
1 pts
Minimal - The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.
|
|
--
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccommodations: gifted/talented student InTASC 2 CAEP R1.1
|
|
15 pts
Advanced
Column A: Key characteristics of the learner with this designation and his/her overall instructional needs are identified. Column B: Appropriate accommodations to this lesson addressing each identified need of this student are described
|
12.75 pts
Proficient
Column A: Key characteristics of the learner with this designation are identified. Column B: Appropriate accommodations to this lesson addressing this student’s needs are described
|
10.5 pts
Basic
Column A: General characteristics of the learner with this designation are identified but include descriptions of needs of students with other designations. Column B: General accommodations to this lesson addressing are described OR accommodations are whole-class based and not specific to this student
|
8.25 pts
Minimal
Did not provide sufficient number or type of accommodations OR Clarity of writing – the writing is not at a level acceptable for graduate academic writing
|
0 pts
No Marks
Not addressed
|
|
15 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #2E - Learning Differences
The teacher uses understanding of individual differences and diverse cultures and communities to ensure inclusive learning environments that allow each learner to reach his/her full potential.
threshold: 3.0 pts
|
|
4 pts
Advanced - The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
|
3 pts
Proficient - The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
|
2 pts
Basic - The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.
|
1 pts
Minimal - The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.
|
|
--
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInclusion of Parents in their child’s education InTASC 10 CAEP R1.4 Collaboration
|
|
15 pts
Advanced
Includes detailed, practical, culturally responsive ways to collaboratively involve parents with their child’s educational experiences.
|
12.75 pts
Proficient
Includes general ways to involve parents with their child’s education
|
10.5 pts
Basic
Includes ways parents can be informed of their child’s educational progress
|
8.25 pts
Minimal
Little to no discussion of ways to include parents
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
15 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #10 - Collaboration
The teacher collaborates with students, families, colleagues, other professionals, and community members to share responsibility for student growth and development, learning, and well-being.
threshold: 3.0 pts
|
|
4 pts
Advanced - The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills
|
3 pts
Proficient - The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
|
2 pts
Basic - The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.
|
1 pts
Minimal - The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.
|
|
--
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA formatting
|
|
5 pts
Advanced
The presentation specifically attends to Belhaven APA format. There is a Works Cited/Reference page with no errors.
|
4.25 pts
Proficient
Consistently follows Belhaven APA format including title page, running heads, citations, quotations or references (NO errors).
|
3.5 pts
Basic
Limited (no more than 3) APA errors in Belhaven APA format including title page, running heads, citations, quotations or references.
|
2.75 pts
Minimal
More than 6 APA errors in format including title page, running heads, citations, quotations or references.
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics
|
|
5 pts
Advanced
The presentation demonstrates exceptional use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). NO ERRORS.
|
4.25 pts
Proficient
The presentation demonstrates consistent use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). NO ERRORS.
|
3.5 pts
Basic
The presentation demonstrates inconsistent use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax).
|
2.75 pts
Minimal
The presentation does NOT demonstrate use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax).
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
5 pts
|
|
Total Points: 100
|
Smcnelson
LessonPlanwithModifications.docx
