An electronic copy of your completed work (without an assignment coversheet) must be submitted via the Unit Moodle website. The site utilises URKUND (a plagiarism detecting tool) and so it is important you DO NOT include a cover page or this marking guide
CHAPTER 10 -‐ TM DESTINATION DEVELOPMENT
L E C T U R E 8 W E E K 9 – I E T 9 4 7 0 D R . P A T R I C K L ’ E S P O I R D E C O S T A
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
! Discuss the implications of the destination cycle for tourism managers
! Outline the destination cycle in the Butler sequence ! Explain how the different elements can be incorporated into the
destination cycle ! Critique the Butler sequence ! Identify and discuss the factors that influence the destination cycle ! Describe the combined process of contagious and hierarchical spatial
diffusion as an explanation for the process of tourism development at a national scale
! Describe how the destination cycle can be applied to tourism development
DESTINATION CYCLE – THE PREMISES
! Tourism activities induce changes within a destination ! Integrating earlier concepts on impacts, markets, destinations
and tourism products allows us to examine the process of Destination Development
! The Theory of Destination cycle IMPLIES that Destinations experience predictable evolution and helps ! Identify where a destination is positioned on the destination
cycle ! appreciate implications for the future – to intervene or not
! The latter point implies that Destination cycle is theoretically NOT UNAVOIDABLE and therefore can be REDIRECTED
! MANAGEMENT MEASURES can help realise ecologically and socio-culturally sustainable outcomes
THE BUTLER SEQUENCE
! Butler (1980) developed S-shaped resort cycle model, called the Butler sequence (aka Tourism Areal Life Cycle – TALC)
! Model proposes that UNDER FREE MAKKET AND SUSTAINED DEMAND CONDITIONS destinations tend to experience five stages of growth:-
! Exploration ! Involvement ! Development ! Consolidation ! Stagnation
! ASSUMPTION OF THE MODEL: push factors create a sufficient level of demand to fuel the progression of the Butler sequence
THE BUTLER SEQUENCE
! The Butler sequence is one of the most cited and applied models within tourism studies
! The model is popular because it is structurally simple ! The model is similar to other models
! product lifecycle curve – used by economists and marketers to describe the behaviour of the market in purchasing consumer goods
! demographic transition model- used by demographers to describe the natural growth of a country’s population over time – SEE BURTON’s four phases of tourism participation and their association with demographic transformations (pp 61- 69)
! The model has intuitive appeal- we can see some form of cyclical dynamic at destinations
! It is comprehensive – allows for the incorporation of all facets of tourism
! More than just the visitor numbers – see table 10.1 below for more of these facets or variables that the model can incorporate for analysis
! It looks to be universally applicable
Table 10.1
CHANGING CHARACTERISTICS AS PROPOSED BY THE BUTLER SEQUENCE
Table 10.1
CHANGING CHARACTERISTICS AS PROPOSED BY THE BUTLER SEQUENCE
EXPLORATION-‐ PRE TOURISM STAGE
! In the Butler sequence, the exploration stage has very small numbers of visitors – dispersed; longer stays
! Negligible visitation- Tourism “industry” as such does not exist ! So no establishment of specialised facilities or services ! Visitors are allocentric types – adventurous
! drawn to authentic experience – unspoiled natural attractions ! Not affected by seasonality
! Though absolute revenue is small - Multiplier effect is large – no leakage – Why? (tourists’ desire to consume interesting local products)
! Resident attitude towards visitors is cordial – Pre- euphoric attitudes of residents towards visitors as impacts are not large enough to benefit the economy
! Exploration-stage destination is only peripherally connected to origin destination within a tourism system perspective
q DesBnaBon Cycle
The Butler sequence
The Exploration Stage
EXPLORATION
• what type of tourists are evident during this stage of the DC? • drawn to a region because of its cultural/natural uniqueness
• revenues obtained from tourism are small • what is the attitude toward tourists?
# of
v is
ito rs
Time
TWO-‐TRACK TOURISM IN IRAQ
• War destroys tourism in Iraq but then sBmulates tourism (dark tourism)
• Tourists are common targets (carry a lot of cash because credit cards not accepted)
INVOLVEMENT
! Several developments characterise Butler’s involvement stage:- o Local entrepreneurs begin to provide a limited amount of
specialised services and facilities in response to regular appearance of tourists
o Largely informal tourism sector begins to form small clusters of development: inns and guesthouses, eating places, guides and semi- commercial attractions- Still little visual and environmental impacts
o Visitor intake increases slowly in response to these local initiatives ! Tangible economic benefits are increasing and given control is still
local, therefore ! Positive community attitudes towards tourism
! A formal system of tourism development starts to kick in ! More non-local participation ! Greater number of mid-centric tourists ! Indicating destination is integrating within the tourism system as
demand increases
INVOLVEMENT-‐FACTORS THAT TRIGGER THE INVOLVEMENT STAGE (FROM EXPLORATION) ! Trigger factors can be internal or external ! Internal forces arise within the destination – e.g. entrepreneur develops adventurous attraction to encourage visitation ! Signal a proactive approach by locals to tourism development ! Local control would likely be maintained ! External forces originate outside the destination and can occur because of word-of-mouth (about the “untouched” destination), or a high-profile event (e.g. documentary or feature article), or construction of a road or airport ! RESULT: increase in tourism numbers ! Signal large-scale variety of development inducing rapid change
directed by outside interests ! Local community goes on defensive reactive mode
DEVELOPMENT
! The development stage is characterised by rapid tourism growth and dramatic changes over a relatively short period of time
! The change from involvement to development is transitionary – no clear boundary
! Specific events (e.g. construction of the first major resort, celebrity visit) may act as a catalyst for accelerated change
! Pull factors will influence growth rate ! Some example destinations – Byron Bay, Hervey Bay ! Local control rapidly eroded with large scale tourism development ! Destination integrated within the tourism system resulting in
! Involvement of larger transnational companies gaining more control ! Attracting mid-centric and psychocentric tourists – as characterised
by organised package tours
15
q DesBnaBon Cycle
The Butler sequence
The Development Stage
DEVELOPMENT
Time
# of
v is
ito rs
• change from involvement to development stage is transitional • destination is fully integrated into tourism system • what does the landscape look like now (i.e. attractions)? • what type of consumers are now present? How long do they stay? • how do residents view visitors?
DEVELOPMENT -‐ CONSEQUENCES
• Rapidly changing landscapes – large resorts replacing small hotels; agricultural lands replaced by golf courses; mangroves giving way to marinas, etc.
• Unique “sense of place” revealed by the exploration stage gives way to generic ‘international scape”
• Environmental stresses are widespread as negative environmental responses become more apparent
• Residents’ attitude change to one of Apathy • As pressures grow on carrying capacities of the place, residents’
attitude change to one of Annoyance • Aspects of local culture becomes increasingly commodified • Examples if destinations (in development stage) in Australia: Port
Macquarie in New South Wales, the alpine resorts of Thredbo
CONSOLIDATION-‐ THE BEGINNING OF THE END?
! The consolidation stage involves a decline in the growth rate of visitor arrivals and tourism-related activity ALTHOUGH the total amount of activity continues to increase
! Visitor numbers in a 12-month period typically exceed the resident population
! Destination’s carrying capacities (environmental, social and economic) are exceeded
! Quality of the tourism products and tourism and resident experience tend to be in decline
! Crowded, high-density tourism districts dominate with high concentration of psychocentric clientele on short stay tour packages
! Large tour operators and hotel chains ! Destination wholly integrated within the global tourism system ! Tourism dominates the economy of the area- locals become blatantly
ANTAGONISTIC ! Transnational companies begin to show DISINTEREST in
redevelopment resulting in high turnover/change in ownership and abandonment of facilities
18
q DesBnaBon Cycle
The Butler sequence
The Consolidation Stage
CONSOLIDATION
Time
# of
v is
ito rs
• overwhelming dependency on tourism • psychocentric clientele – large package tour operators & hotel chains • carrying capacities breached • deterioration of tourism product begins • high turnover in tourism facilities can lead to abandonment • seasonality emerges as an impediment • locals - antagonistic or resigned • negative WOM advertising = decline in visitor numbers (leads to stagnation)
STAGNATION
! The stagnation stage involves peak (and stable) visitor numbers and high levels of associated facilities (such as available accommodation)
! Surplus capacity is a persistent problem – leading to much discounting, deterioration, bankruptcies (as fixed costs are high in tourism sector in general)
! Hotel accommodation is frequently turned into self-catering apartments or even permanent residences for retirees
! Destination is perceived to be ‘out of fashion’ ! Destination increasingly relies on repeat psychocentric tourists ! Examples of destinations in that stage: global pleasure periphery,
Spain’s Costa Brava, The Bahamas’s New Providence Island
DECLINE OR REJUVENATION ! The stagnation stage can persist indefinitely; but most likely to turn into a
downturn or an upturn Decline will occur as a result of a combination of :
! Repeat visitors no longer satisfied- efforts to recruit new visitors fail ! Major destination’s attractions may no longer be available – causing LAST
CHANCE TOURISM – see p. 294 Come and see before it’s gone ! No attempts to revitalise or reinvent the local tourism product ! Residents’ attitude deteriorate – outright hostility towards tourists ! Tourism facilities abandoned or converted and can induce
! Snowballing effect that further accelerates decline of destination ! Examples of destinations in decline- The Coolangatta district of the Gold
Coast, the older established areas of Miami Beach, the French and Spanish rivieras
DECLINE OR REJUVENATION ! The stagnation stage can persist indefinitely; but most likely to turn into a
downturn or an upturn Rejuvenation (may occur after stagnation or decline
stages): ! Decline or decreasing numbers may serve as a catalyst for action and
provides an “arena of innovation” (Weaver, 2012) ! Stakeholders respond creatively and effectively to major internal and external
challenges – proactive strategies adopted by destination ! Innovation may turn destination around ! Requires close collaboration between private and public sectors – see
contemporary issue on page 295 ! E.g. Atlantic City legalizing casino-based gambling – bringing new tourism
products and therefore attracting new market segments ! Vegas re-branding itself to appeal to the “naughty” side of its visitors with
its campaign “what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas” ! New York changing its image as a dangerous city to become a major
cosmopolitan and safe World city.
APPLICATION AND CRITIQUE OF THE BUTLER SEQUENCE ! A major implication of the model is that tourism carries within itself
the seeds of its own destruction ! Negative sociocultural, economic and environmental impacts
accelerates move along the TALC (Butler’s sequence (BS) or S curve)
! Proactive management strategies essential if destinations want to avoid self-destruction – requires vision and long term strategies
! Cycle Applications – ! The model has been examined over 50 times ! General support for the model ! Important theoretical and practical tool for describing and predicting
the evolution of destinations ! Some anomalies where results are ambiguous or BS does not apply –
e.g. Grand Cayman Island, Niagara Falls, Coolangatta (refer Table 10.2)
Table 10.2 selected anomalies to the Butler sequence in empirical case studies
The Australian ski resort of Thredbo evolved from an essenBally winter-‐only resort to a Year-‐round desBnaBon, thus reversing the expected seasonaility pa`ern
APPLICATION AND CRITIQUE OF THE BUTLER SEQUENCE ! General Criticisms– ! Sequence criticised for determinism – that stages are inevitable ! Tourism planners must identify likely experiences in those early stage
destinations rather than worrying that such destinations will eventually decline
! Destination cycle dynamics is Western centric assuming the cycle sets off as soon as Western explorer-tourists appear in the exploration stage ! A non-western cycle dynamics may exist when indigenous
communities participate as tourists in the “pre-exploration” stage that precedes the Western exploration phase
! Determinism related to carrying capacity thresholds – ! Tourism development continues until thresholds exceeded BUT
destination managers can be proactive and INTERFERE to override free market forces to avoid negative impacts of tourism such as in
1. Supply-driven scenario (refer Figure 10.3 a) 2. Demand-driven scenario (refer Figure 10.3 b)
ALTERNATIVE RESPONSES TO THE BS
S U P P L Y D R I V E N S C E N A R I O F I G 1 0 . 3 A
• Carrying capacities are deliberately left as they are
• Development levels curtailed to remain below relevant thresholds
• Long involvement period triggered followed by consolidation at desired level such that development is avoided
• How? • Restricting number of visiotrs • Imposing development standards • Restricting air access • Limiting size and number of accommodation
facilities
• Zoning only certain limited areas for front stage tourism development
• Prohibiting expansion of infrastructures that would facilitate tourism
• increasing visa entry fees
D E M A N D - D R I V E N S C E N A R I O F I G 1 0 . 3 B
• Conventional sequence takes place BUT
• Measures taken to increase carrying capacity thresholds to cope with increasing visitor intakes, i.e. increase supply to meet demand
• How? • Clear demarcation between front
stage and backstage socio-cultural elements
• Relying on education programs to create awareness in both residents and tourists
• Adopt site hardening initiatives to pre-empt environmental stresses due to increasing tourism activities – e.g. installation of sewage and water treatment facilities
• Expansion of local manufacturing and agricultural facilities to provide adequate backward linkages to the tourism sector – to avoid LEAKAGES
ALTERNATIVE RESPONSES TO THE BUTLER SEQUENCE
Figure 10.3
APPLICATION AND CRITIQUE OF THE BUTLER SEQUENCE ! The question of geographic scale – ! Destination can be applied at different scales – from single small
attraction to continent or macro-region such as the pleasure periphery ! Sequence may be better suited to certain scales rather than applicable
across geographical spectrum ! The Butler sequence as an ‘ideal type’against which real life
situations can be measured – ! The model is best suited to destinations that are:- ! Relatively small ! Spatially well-defined ! Highly tourism focused ! Dominated by ‘laissez-faire’ forces ! In high demand
FACTORS THAT CHANGE THE DESTINATION CYCLE
! It is important for managers to understand the factors that affect the cycle, namely the degree they can be manipulated and controlled
! The factors that influence the evolution of tourism in destinations can be positioned within a simple eight-cell matrix model of cycle trigger factors (see Figure 10.4)
! Internal-intentional actions– this is the ideal- involves stimulants and depressants ! stimulants that trigger further growth – e.g. upgrading of infrastructures, effective
marketing campaigns by local authorities, pursuit of growth pole-type strategy based on tourism
! Depressants (entry fees, restrictions on infrastructure) are deliberately used to restrict or reverse growth of tourism
! External-unintentional actions– opposite situation- least desirable - tend to be unpredictable because they originate outside of the control of the destination and they are not deliberate actions e.g. cyclones in Vanuatu
! Internal-unintentional actions– intermediate – originate within the destination thus allows some sort of control or ability to managers to deal with them e.g. of depressants – civil war or coral reef destruction caused by local pollution source
! External-intentional actions– decisions taken by external sources or other countries affecting the local destination; e.g. Decision by Atlantic city to allow gambling posed challenges to Las Vegas
FACTORS THAT CHANGE THE DESTINATION CYCLE
Figure 10.4
NATIONAL TOURISM DEVELOPMENT
! Butler sequence is not applicable at the scale of entire
countries, unless the country is extremely small ! Spatial diffusion – a process whereby ! an innovation or idea spreads from a point of origin to
other locations (Gertis et al., 2011) ! In larger countries tourism development is best described
as the result of a combined spatial diffusion process that is distorted by assorted barriers and opportunities
! the spatial diffusion can be contagious or hierarchical (refer Figure 10.5)
SPATIAL DIFFUSION H I E R A R C H I C A L D I F F U S I O N
• Innovative idea originates from large urban centre
• Spreads through communication and transportation systems to smaller centres
• E.g. historical spreading of televisions from urban centres to small regions
C O N T A G I O U S D I F F U S I O N
• Innovative idea spreads as a function of spatial proximity
• Likened to the ripple effect
HIERARCHICAL AND CONTAGIOUS SPATIAL DIFFUSION
Figure 10.5
EFFECTS OF SPATIAL DIFFUSION E F F E C T S O F H I E R A R C H I C A L D I F F U S I O N
! City functions as gateway ! Contains prominent/primary
attractions to tourists ! City acts as a magnet for
domestic tourists ! These will trickle down the
urban hierarchy as the country evolves, i.e
! Smaller cities begin to provide better services and attractions in their own right
! Causing tourism to spread over time into lower levels of the urban system
! Aided by expansion of external systems such as transportation
E F F E C T S O F C O N T A G I O U S D I F F U S I O N
• Follow on from effects of hierarchical diffusion
• Growing cities become significant domestic markets and important destination for inbound tourists
• Communities nearby adopt tourism (because of proximity)
• Destination cycle thus first affects communities on the periphery of existing tourism regions to then spread further as the recreational hinterland expands to surrounding areas in the country side.
BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS TO DIFFUSION
B A R R I E R S
• Demand is not unlimited
• Lack of attractions capable of carrying destination beyond exploration stage
• Community resistance • Political boundaries • Climate
F A C I L I T A T O R S
• Extensive area of tourism potential such as a beach- lined coast or alpine valley
• Upgraded transportation networks
MODEL OF NATIONAL TOURISM DEVELOPMENT
Figure 10.6
Time 0-‐ an involvement stage Capital city is main gateway Time 1-‐ recreaBonal hinterlands Or village markets form around city-‐ excursion desBnaBons ResulBng from growth pole strategy Time 2-‐ contagious diffusion Allows tourism to expand outwards Of main city (hinterlands) and tourism Adopted in second Ber city – Hierarchical diffusion Time 3-‐ expansion conBnues as new Places experience involvement; se`lement In the interior become alpine tourist resorts Time 4 – transportaBon corridors allow expansion Into other interior fourth-‐Ber se`lements such that The enBre country becomes a tourism landscape
CHAPTER REVIEW
! Butler sequence introduced in 1980 ! Model proposes that destinations tend to pass through a series of
stages ! The stages are exploration, involvement, development,
consolidation, and stagnation ! The destination may then continue through stagnation, or
subsequently go through decline and/or rejuvenation