Article Review 1000 wrds due in 24 hours

profileHalifax
Lecture5-ArticleReviewIntroductoryParagraph1.pptx

ENGL 101:

Article Review Paper –

Introductory Paragraph

& Thesis Statement

Hello everyone, and welcome to your first ENGL 101 class. My name is Heesun Nam, and I will be your instructor for this course. Today, I want to spend some time going through introductions, the course syllabus, as well as the course format.

1

In Today’s Class

What was on the Lecture Video Again?

Topic Sentence

Start Task #2

Thesis Statement (Overall evaluation using evaluative criteria)

Some Quick Questions

Please answer the poll on Zoom!

Announcements

Make sure to go over your article with your learning coach this week

Read the article THOROUGHLY – do not just read the abstract!

DISCUSS the article with your learning coach and BRAINSTORM weaknesses and strengths of the article (if you have not done so already)!

No class on Thursday, September 30 (Day of Learning for Truth and Reconciliation)

Introductory Paragraph

Short (3-4 sentences)

Begin with the general topic of the article/book (=NOT a specific thesis of the article)

Then, add the author’s full name and his or her background/credentials (1 – 2 sentences)

End with the thesis statement

Sentence #1: General Topic Sentence

This sentence lets the reader know what the article is ABOUT (but does not reveal the ARGUMENT of the article)

EXAMPLE: In “A Modest Proposal for Christ-Figure Interpretations”, Richard Walsh discusses the implications of analyzing filmic characters from a Christological perspective.

Sentence #2: Credential of the Author

Who is the author and why should we trust him/her?

3 Es = 3 Ways to Demonstrate Credibility

Education

Experience

Expertise

Credibility Credibility Rating!

Credibility rating (#1 – 5) of a text depends on the TYPE of text

1. Popular source for self-help or entertainment

2. Personal story, testimonial, or narrative (blogs, magazines, pop culture books)

3. News article, magazine article, article from a professional organization; may include research but reported in journalistic or less formal style

4. Scholarly source but written for average reader; includes references and scholarly research such as studies, statistics, and reports.

5. Scholarly source written for advanced academic work; includes references and scholarly research; written in very formal style, with long sentences and difficult vocabulary. This level is written for experts in the field.

Sample ‘Credibility’ Sentence

Walsh is a Professor of Religion in Methodist University with a Ph.D. in biblical studies from Baylor University, and he has authored several books in the areas of religion and film.

Sentence #3: Thesis Statement

Discusses your OVERALL EVALUATION of the article

Do you think the article is strong or weak?

** Remember that you are critiquing the WRITING of the article, not its IDEAS

Discusses both the strengths and weaknesses of the article

Uses SPECIFIC EVALUATIVE CRITERIA to achieve this purpose

Evaluative Criteria: think ‘MEOW’

M ain argument

E vidence

O rganization

W riting style

Questions to Ask:

What is my opinion about the article? Do I think it is strong or weak?

This establishes your OVERALL EVALUATION of the article

What are some strengths of the article in relation to MEOW?

e.g. The article is organized very well so it is easy for readers to follow the logic of its argument

What are some weaknesses of the article in relation to MEOW?

e.g. The article does not have enough evidence to support its argument

Thesis Statement Formula

Although + less important (SVO), overall evaluation, more significant (SVO) + more significant (SVO).

e.g. If your overall evaluation is positive:

Begin with a weakness of the article then add two strengths

e.g. If your overall evaluation is negative:

Begin with a strength then add two negative points

Thesis Statement Samples

1) The overall evaluation is positive (=the article is effective)

“Although the writing style of the article is not suitable for its readers, the article is effective because of its strong main argument and fluid organization”

2) The overall evaluation is negative (=the article is ineffective)

“Although the writing style of the article is captivating for its readers, the article is ineffective because of its insufficient evidence and disjointed organization”

In-Class Activity

Begin working on the first part of Task #2

Homework

Begin Task #2 (the first half – the entire task is due next Friday)

Try writing a summary of the article (e.g. main argument -> three sub-arguments -> examples used)

A lecture video on the summary paragraph will be posted by Friday.

.MsftOfcThm_Accent1_Fill { fill:#83992A; } .MsftOfcThm_Accent1_Stroke { stroke:#83992A; }