Economic question

profileeason7237
Lect11s19Pop2.pptx

Lecture 11 Population2

S19

Review

Total fertility rate; how is it defined?

Suppose the TFR in Bangladesh in 2000 is 3.0 in 2010; does this mean that girls aged 15 in 2010 will have on average 3.0 children during their childbearing years? Do you think they will have more or less than 3.0 children?

Economic theory of fertility Becker theory

Benefits of children

1. psychological (enjoyment); maintain family line or name (sons?)

2. earning power of children; help on the farm

3. support in parents’ old age

Becker theory, cont.

4. quality-quantity trade-off; benefits of high-quality children vs benefits of more kids; child output = quantity times quality; 2 healthy smart kids is same child output as 4 ordinary kids; child output = total expenditure on kids

5. Income and substitution effects; perhaps child output is a “normal good”; what effect on fertility of unexpected inheritance?

Economic theory of fertility

Costs of children

1. food, housing, clothing

2. health care, education

3. opportunity cost of parents’ time

4. child care expenses

How do benefits and costs change with economic development?

What are the effects on fertility of:

1. higher wages for men

2. higher wages for women

3. urbanization

4. financial development (savings accounts; social security)

5. more schooling for women (Fig. 7.5)

6. What else has caused fertility to fall?

Economics of Development, 7th Edition

Copyright © 2013, W.W. Norton & Company

7

How do benefits and costs change with economic development?

7. higher rate of return to schooling; what determines the quantity-quality choice? Education of parents may affect their preference for well-educated children

Returns to schooling and fertility

Higher return to schooling should increase the amount parents spend on schooling of each child; this raises the “quality” of the child and makes each child more expensive; hence fertility should fall

CK12 Pop1

Would free contraceptives reduce fertility?

Arguments against this proposition

1. Fertility declines in 19th century Europe occurred without modern contraceptives

2. Cost of contraceptive: a few cents; cost of raising a child: many times more

3. Contraceptives are not readily available; but this may be because of lack of demand

4. Desired fertility and actual fertility (slide from Weil textbook)

Figure 4.12 Desired Fertility versus Total Fertility Rate in Developing Countries

Population Growth and Economic Development

Does pop growth reduce the growth in per capita income? Naïve view; Sources of growth

Capital deepening in Solow model

Demographic dividend; dependency ratio for children and for the elderly. East Asian growth; perhaps 1/3 due to dividend

Population size and per capita income

Population optimists and pessimists

Benefits of larger size; economies of scale, more geniuses

Negative effects of larger size; natural resource constraints; land, water, environment

Effects on wages and rents; effects on income distribution

Population Policy

If you want to reduce fertility, which policies would be more effective? That depends on your theory of fertility

Strong advocate of the Economic Theory: Pritchett article 1994; controlling for desired fertility, contraceptive prevalence had little effect on fertility

Population Policy

Message from Pritchett and his like: change incentives of families

Education of girls

Remove legal barriers to women working outside the home

Financial development and social security

Matlab program

Broader perspective than Becker theory

Family planning programs

Matlab program (controlled experiment) in Bangladesh; dramatic reduction in fertility over 20 years; health and education benefits as well

See Perkins p. 248

Matlab program

Women were visited at home, with husband at work; main effect was probably to change women’s autonomy and preferences

But the program was very expensive; not feasible to scale it up; Pritchett again

Household Bargaining

Ashraf paper 2014: Household bargaining and fertility in Zambia

Two treatments in the experiment: women were visited alone and given contraceptive not observable by husband, or husband was kept informed of visits and methods of contraception

Fertility lower in first case, but these women later reported less subjective wellbeing

Population Policy

Should fertility decisions be left to the choices of families?

Are there market failures? External effects of fertility choices?

Who in the family decides? Do fathers always act in the best interests of their wives and children?

Population Policy

Arguments for targeting poor families in family planning programs

1. They are more likely to be influenced

2. Fewer children grow up poor

3. Children of the poor have fewer siblings

4. Traditional culture has pro-natalist norms, which don’t benefit poor families

Practice 6a CK13 Pop2

Population Policy

Banerjee and Duflo, 2011, Poor Economics, Chap 5 on fertility; many interesting experiments are described

Study in Indonesia: regions with more clinics had lower fertility; but the decline in fertility was unrelated to the increase in clinics

Population Policy

Rise in household saving rate in China: 5% in 1978 to 34% in 1994

Do people act rationally? Kenya study of abstinence training

In Peru, squatters were given title to land; fertility declined only if the woman’s name was also on the title: bargaining power

Family Planning Programs

Family planning programs are associated with fertility declines; but what causes the declines? Is it development itself, or the programs?

Optional assignment: Tiloka da Silva and Silvana Tenreyo, Population Control Policies and Fertility Decline, posted on BB; possible paper topic

Da Silva article

Fertility seems to have declined more rapidly than would be explained by the changes in economic development

Fig 3 in the paper shows fertility by GDP per capita in 1960 and 1913

Debate: are parents rational and forward-looking? Have preferences changed? Did govt programs make a difference?

Da Silva article

Rapid fertility declines in East Asia, where govts supported fertility reduction (Singapore, Hkong, China…)

Early family planning programs in 1960s had little impact: resistance by religious figures and limited reach of health care systems

In 1974 family planning was attacked in some countries as an imperialist plot

Da Silva article

But Govt attitudes changed between 1970s and 1990s in LA and Middle East

India and Bangladesh govt pushed family planning with incentives for health workers to get mothers sterilized; heavily criticized

Brazil’s mil govt and Catholic Church opposed family planning but private organizations went ahead; telenovelas in Brazil

Da Silva article

By the 1990s most LDC govts featured family planning programs and mass media campaigns; slogans: two is enough, etc.

The article asks why fertility fell. Was it mainly the incentives in the economic theory, or changes in preferences of parents, brought on by the family planning programs?

Da Silva article

Effects of urbanization: rather modest; fertility declines in both urban and rural areas

Effects of women’s education: fertility declines among women at all levels of education

Infant mortality; strong effects across countries: where infant mortality fell, so did fertility; but why? Perhaps rapid pop growth stimulated family planning programs