Peer Editing: Elbow Rehabilitation Program

Learning Plan – Peer Editing: Case Study/SWOT Rubric

Characteristic Effective Developing Emerging

Accurate Always offers feedback

that is technically

accurate. (10 points)

Mostly offers feedback

that is technically

accurate. (8 points)

Sometimes offers

feedback this is

inaccurate. (6 points)

Thorough Provides sufficient

feedback to move the

writer toward

improvement. (5 points)

Provides some feedback

to move the writer toward

improvement. (4 points)

Provides limited or vague

feedback. (3 points)

Direct and

Succinct

Clearly articulates the

issues/concerns with the

writer’s work.

Thoughts and ideas area

focused and succinct. (5

points)

Articulates the

issues/concerns with

some perceived

trepidation or hesitancy.

Thoughts and ideas are

mostly focused/succinct.

(4 points)

Hints at the issue/concern

with the writer’s work.

Thoughts and ideas seem

unfocused/random. There

is evidence of rambling.

(3 points)

Practical and

Useful

Used feedback to link

writer’s performance to

assignment

components/requirements.

Designed feedback

comments to invite self-

evaluation and future

learning. (5 points)

Presented reasonable

feedback, but not always

focused on the assignment

components/requirements.

(4 points)

Comments detract from

the intent of the

assignment. (3 points)

Total: ___/25