Lean Sigma Six- Measure

profilenehneh1
LeanSixSigmaTemplateMeasure-FeedbackCorrection.pptx

Project Progress Overview

Key Deliverables:

List of Customer(s) and Project CTQs

Team Charter

High Level Process Map (COPIS/SIPOC)

Stakeholder, Commitment, Involvement, or Forcefield Analysis

CTQ

Operational definition, Specification limits, target, defect definition for Project Y(s)

Data Collection Plan

Measurement System Analysis

Process Capability or Sigma

Value Stream or Time Value Mapping

Cause and Effect Diagram

FMEA (optional)

Statistical Goal Statement for Project

List of Statistically Significant Xs

Hypothesis Testing

Error Proofing

Assessment Criteria

Change Management

Prioritization Matrices

Solution Screening

Pilot

Key Performance Indicators

Statistical Process Control

Control Charts

Standardized Processes

Tollgates:

Planned

Completed

mm/dd/yyyy

9/20/2019

mm/dd/yyyy

mm/dd/yyyy

mm/dd/yyyy

mm/dd/yyyy

mm/dd/yyyy

mm/dd/yyyy

mm/dd/yyyy

mm/dd/yyyy

Define

Measure

Analyze

Improve

Control

Overview

11/10/2019

‹#›

1

Working through a Problem

ANALYZE: Change to a Statistical Problem

-Set realist goals

360 peer feedback tool

Review discipline actions (in handbook)

Establish Process Capability

Set Performance Objectives

Identify Variation Sources

IMPROVE: Develop a Statistical Solution

Screen Potential Causes

Discover Variable Relationships, Propose Solutions

Establishing Operating Tolerances, Pilot Solutions

CONTROL: Implement the Practical Solution

Maintain the improvements by standardizing the work methods or processes. Documents change processes, train employees, continue tracking metrics.

Validate X Measurement Systems

Determine Process Capability

Implement Process Control

DEFINE: Formulate the Practical Problem

Develop Team Charter

Define Process – COPIS/SIPOC

Voice of Customer

-Reduce employee turnover by 20%.

-Update employee handbook.

-Improve employee feedback

-Capture a baseline data for employee turnover

-Ensure handbook regulations are updated

Select the CTQ characteristic

Define CTQ Performance Standards

Data Collection Plan & MSA

MEASURE: Investigate the Practical Problem

Y

x

y

y

y/x

Develop and implement solutions that reduce employee turnover.

Measure

11/10/2019

‹#›

2

Michelle Cox (MC) - How do you know 20% is the right amount? How will the employee handbook help with feedback?

Michelle Cox (MC) - A 360 degree peer feedback tool is very difficult to implement. Consider a less complex feedback program, especially for a small company as there will be less annonymity .

Measure

Define CTQ Performance Standards

CTQ

Start with the VOC Translation Matrix in Step 1

Needs Statement

Reduce employee turnover by 20%.

Project Y Measure

-Improve employee turnover cost

-Employ satisfied employees

Operational Definition

-Improve performance feedback tool

-Update employee handbook

Target/Nominal Value

20%

Specification/Tolerance limit(s)

-Nonprofit

-Budget

(Delete this box prior to tollgate)

You can copy this page as many times as necessary to cover the CTQ’s identified (delete slide if not used)

Basic Statistics for Continuous Data

11/10/2019

‹#›

3

1. Addresses: What Does the Customer Want? What is a Good Product/Process? What is a Defect?

2. Goal of Performance Standard is to Translate the Customer Need into a MEASURABLE Characteristic.

3. Operational Definition is a Precise Description that Tells How to get a Value for the Characteristic You are Measuring.

If you have more than one Project CTQ, you can either duplicate this page to show the additional CTQ’s or you can add additional boxes.

Michelle Cox (MC) - A tolerance is defined by a regulation. A specification limit is set by the customer, which is the employee. As such, you do not have any.

Michelle Cox (MC) - The operational definition of employee turnover would be the departure of employees that is not for cause. The reason you would want to define that is because you do not want to keep employees that may be not qualified or that are having performance issues. As such, you do not want that departure to be counted in the turnover rates.

Measure

Select the CTQ Characteristic (Y)

(Delete this box prior to tollgate)

Double-click to open Excel Worksheet and enter data. You can use this QFD instead of prior page info if you prefer (delete slide if not used).

QFD

11/10/2019

‹#›

4

***I have not received the information needed to put in this slide***

Michelle Cox (MC) - This is not employees. This is the 3 things that your employees told you in the Voice of customer. Then think about how you can measure those items. They cannot all be 5s one will be a 5, one will be a 4, and one will be a 3.

Project Progress Overview

Key Deliverables:

List of Customer(s) and Project CTQs

Team Charter

High Level Process Map (COPIS/SIPOC)

Stakeholder, Commitment, Involvement, or Forcefield Analysis

CTQ

Operational definition, Specification limits, target, defect definition for Project Y(s)

Data Collection Plan

Measurement System Analysis

Process Capability or Sigma

Value Stream or Time Value Mapping

Cause and Effect Diagram

FMEA (optional)

Statistical Goal Statement for Project

List of Statistically Significant Xs

Hypothesis Testing

Error Proofing

Assessment Criteria

Change Management

Prioritization Matrices

Solution Screening

Pilot

Key Performance Indicators

Statistical Process Control

Control Charts

Standardized Processes

Tollgates:

Planned

Completed

mm/dd/yyyy

9/20/2019

mm/dd/yyyy

mm/dd/yyyy

mm/dd/yyyy

mm/dd/yyyy

mm/dd/yyyy

mm/dd/yyyy

mm/dd/yyyy

mm/dd/yyyy

Define

Measure

Analyze

Improve

Control

Overview

11/10/2019

‹#›

5

Working through a Problem

ANALYZE: Change to a Statistical Problem

-Set realist goals

Set yearly performance reviews

Review discipline actions (in handbook)

Establish Process Capability

Set Performance Objectives

Identify Variation Sources

IMPROVE: Develop a Statistical Solution

Screen Potential Causes

Discover Variable Relationships, Propose Solutions

Establishing Operating Tolerances, Pilot Solutions

CONTROL: Implement the Practical Solution

Maintain the improvements by standardizing the work methods or processes. Documents change processes, train employees, continue tracking metrics.

Validate X Measurement Systems

Determine Process Capability

Implement Process Control

DEFINE: Formulate the Practical Problem

Develop Team Charter

Define Process – COPIS/SIPOC

Voice of Customer

-Reduce employee turnover by 20% (as requested by the stakeholders).

-Update employee handbook.

-Improve employee feedback

-Capture a baseline data for employee turnover

-Ensure handbook regulations are updated

Select the CTQ characteristic

Define CTQ Performance Standards

Data Collection Plan & MSA

MEASURE: Investigate the Practical Problem

Y

x

y

y

y/x

Develop and implement solutions that reduce employee turnover.

Measure

11/10/2019

‹#›

6

Measure

Define CTQ Performance Standards

CTQ

Start with the VOC Translation Matrix in Step 1

Needs Statement

Reduce employee turnover by 20%.

Project Y Measure

-Improve employee turnover cost

-Employ satisfied employees

Operational Definition

-Improve performance feedback tool

-Update employee handbook

Target/Nominal Value

20%

Specification/Tolerance limit(s)

-Nonprofit

-Budget

(Delete this box prior to tollgate)

You can copy this page as many times as necessary to cover the CTQ’s identified (delete slide if not used)

Basic Statistics for Continuous Data

11/10/2019

‹#›

7

1. Addresses: What Does the Customer Want? What is a Good Product/Process? What is a Defect?

2. Goal of Performance Standard is to Translate the Customer Need into a MEASURABLE Characteristic.

3. Operational Definition is a Precise Description that Tells How to get a Value for the Characteristic You are Measuring.

If you have more than one Project CTQ, you can either duplicate this page to show the additional CTQ’s or you can add additional boxes.

Measure

Select the CTQ Characteristic (Y)

(Delete this box prior to tollgate)

Double-click to open Excel Worksheet and enter data. You can use this QFD instead of prior page info if you prefer (delete slide if not used).

QFD

11/10/2019

‹#›

8

***I have not received the information needed to put in this slide***

Measurements

Years at the job

Education Level

Current or prior employee

Discipline Occurrences

Customer Requirement (CTQ)

CTQ

Importance

Weighting

Employee 1 5

Employee 2 5

Employee 3 5

Employee 4 5

Employee 5 5

Employee 6 5

Employee 7 5

Employee 8 5

Employee 9 5

Employee 10 5

Overall Relationship Score- - - -

D-QFD

0 Define - QFD
Quality Functional Deployment (QFD)
Measurements
Years at the job Education Level Current or prior employee Discipline Occurrences
Customer Requirement (CTQ) CTQ Importance Weighting
Employee 1 5
Employee 2 5
Employee 3 5
Employee 4 5
Employee 5 5
Employee 6 5
Employee 7 5
Employee 8 5
Employee 9 5
Employee 10 5
Overall Relationship Score - - - -
&L&"GEsansCon57,Italic"&8&F - &A&C&"GEsansCon57,Italic"&8&D&R&"GEsansCon57,Bold Italic"&20&P
Customer Rates from 1 [low] to 5 [high]
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess

D-QFD

0 Define - QFD
Quality Functional Deployment (QFD)
Measurements
Years at the job Education Level Current or prior employee Discipline Occurrences
Customer Requirement (CTQ) CTQ Importance Weighting
Employee 1 5
Employee 2 5
Employee 3 5
Employee 4 5
Employee 5 5
Employee 6 5
Employee 7 5
Employee 8 5
Employee 9 5
Employee 10 5
Overall Relationship Score - - - -
&L&"GEsansCon57,Italic"&8&F - &A&C&"GEsansCon57,Italic"&8&D&R&"GEsansCon57,Bold Italic"&20&P
Customer Rates from 1 [low] to 5 [high]
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess
Rate 1 [low], 3 [medium], 9 [high] the relationship between the CTQ and the subprocess