Global Leadership
Leading Global Expansion
“Global Risk Consultants (GRC) is a privately owned, independent risk consulting business to
the international oil and gas and petrochemical industries. Our targeted solutions and advice
help our clients achieve their goals throughout the asset lifecycle, through our expert
assistance with risk and safety assessment, environmental management, optimisation of oil
and gas facility operations, and business solutions”. (Corporate website).
Grant Briggs was the new International Marketing Director for GRC. He had been hired 3
months ago to lead the strategic expansion of GRC’s business activities worldwide. From its
head office in Perth, Australia, GRC had the aim to become a truly global organisation. In
particular there was a mission to develop international revenue streams from all significant
regions. While GRC had been and were involved in many international projects there was a
view that these activities were not strategic or particularly well-focused.
In his first three months with the company Grant had spent time understanding the
nature of the issues involved. He found that the current approach to global expansion was
through ‘word-of-mouth’ and, while this was not in itself an issue, it meant that there was
often very little discernible pattern or structure to the global expansion and many of the
projects became ‘pet projects’ of those engineers, geologists and other senior professionals
who had made those connections in overseas markets. In addition, the competition in the
oil and gas risk consulting space was intensive and increasingly global. There were many
large consulting organisations with related capabilities.
While informal business development and expansion was important it was critical for Grant
to develop a strategy for global expansion in order that it could be done with greater
business integration in mind.
Grant did not have a background in oil and gas or petrochemicals, nor was he an
engineer or a geologist. He was a marketing and business development expert, with over 30
years of strategic marketing experience. He had started his career in the music industry in
the United Kingdom and his experience working with global teams and leading global
business development projects had expanded to include diverse sectors including tourism,
health and finance. He had moved from the United Kingdom to Australia ten years ago,
enthused by both the lifestyle and career opportunities available.
A Global Business?
GRC had established offices in several parts of the world; Australia, United Kingdom, USA,
Singapore, and Abu Dhabi, UAE. This visibility was important, however, the offices acted in
a largely reactive way and exercised little control over which projects were accepted. Most
projects were driven by those who had ‘discovered’ them and were sometimes pursued
because of the interest-value to the professional(s) involved rather than with business
development, expansion and revenue generation in mind. This approach utilized many
valuable resources in projects which may have little importance for the reputation of GRC in
a global business context, or had little revenue generation capability.
In recent years Australian competitors and those from many other parts of the world
had developed successful expansion strategies and central to most of these was the
rationalization and prioritization of expansion activities with clear objectives. GRC did not
have this. One major issue was the degree of autonomy that professionals in GRC had to
develop their own projects wherever they felt it was feasible. As a result many partners and
consultants at GRC networked with other GRC offices around the world to create projects
with no marketing or business coordination and integration. Grant realized that this was
inefficient and an ineffective way of expanding a successful global business.
His analysis of the impact of this approach for the business found that there were
key issues that needed to be resolved but that the most critical was to work with those who
were deeply implicated in the current arrangements and who had vested interests in
maintaining things as they were/are.
Key Stakeholders
In any consulting firm senior partners are the most central stakeholders. It is they who
decide on the firm strategy, including global expansion. In GRC while some senior partners
share Grant’s views of how to proceed with global expansion, not all do. In fact, it is senior
partners who are often those developing ad-hoc and ‘pet’ projects throughout the world
based on their interests and expertise rather than on what is best for successful business
expansion and revenue generation.
Grant has identified Colin Burch and Morris Jefferson as two senior partners and co-
founders of the business who have identified the value of a strategy for expansion.
However, two other senior partners - Yarub Al-Douri and Allison Dowley - have been keen
to argue for continuation of the present ‘word-of-mouth’ approach. In a recent
conversation with Yarub – a chemical engineer and senior partner of the safety and risk
division, Grant mentioned that he felt all of the ad-hoc developments were actually
affecting the business negatively. Yarub became quite angry- “No”, he stated, “this business
is built on the expertise of professionals who are experts in risk within the oil and gas sector.
They should be the ones to determine if projects are worth pursuing. It is a professional
issue not a strategic one”. Grant realised at this point that there was a great divergence of
viewpoints among senior partners.
He also became aware that the people managing overseas offices were engineers,
geologists, environmental scientists etc. They were technical people with a passion for their
area of expertise, rather than strategy and business development. This was a potential
problem because they would be focused more, perhaps, on the interest and challenge of
the projects rather than whether they were good for the business overall or aligned with
business strategy.
GRC’s managing partner, Howard Chan, wanted Grant to develop a report outlining
his approach for turning GRC into a truly global firm, including a framework for dealing with
the current issues. He was unsure which way to go and he had both positive and negative
views of the change to a more structured global expansion strategy. However, he also knew
that in professional consulting firms it was very difficult to ‘structure’ consultants and lead
change in the consulting team.
GRC had done well in developing and expanding global projects but volume of
projects does not necessarily equate to increase in revenue and margin. This is particularly
true in the oil and gas and petrochemical sectors where projects are notoriously lengthy
from beginning to fruition. Howard also wondered whether Grant’s lack of experience in
resources sectors and particularly, risk consulting, was a help or hindrance. However, he had
an outstanding reputation as a marketing and business development expert and had applied
his skills and capabilities to a range of industrial and commercial sectors in his career.
Being Global
Grant knew that pursuing projects globally was not the same as ‘being global’. GRC had the
vision of being a global risk consulting firm within the resources sector but doing projects in
an ad-hoc way did not contribute to a branding of GRC as ‘global’ or enhance its global
reputation and integration. Importantly, this approach did not contribute to the bottom
line contribution of the global business.
He knew he had a very difficult task; leading a global team effort, leading global change,
leading a change in mindsets. He had to provide a report to Howard that dealt with these
issues and showed how principles and ideas about global leadership could inform how GRC
could become a truly global firm. This was not the first time that he had to take a global
leadership role, but there were many levels to this project and he had to make sure that his
report was able to identify all the issues and map their interconnectedness.
Becoming Global - Providing a Solution
Adopting the role of Grant Briggs, International Marketing Director of GRC, you are required
to prepare a report for Howard Chan, Managing Partner of GRC, that outlines your proposed
approach for turning GRC into a truly global risk consulting firm. Your report should take the
form of a consultant’s report, and should:
• Describe the current situation at GRC, demonstrating your understanding of the
scenario and context.
• Identify the core challenges and areas of opportunity related to GRC’s aim of
becoming a global firm.
• Analyse the underlying issues, drawing on your knowledge of global leadership
concepts.
• Propose an integrated framework for achieving the desired change of strategic
global expansion, again drawing on your knowledge of global leadership
concepts to provide evidence and support for your approach.
• Provide a ‘Becoming Global’ execution plan for the Managing Director, detailing
short term and long term practical actions, with responsible person/people, to
achieve the required shift within the organisation.