12 Page Research Paper- Leadership
Running Head: LEADERSHIP ISSUES ! 1
Leadership Issues
Brandman University
Brittany Baron
January 30th 2018
Running Head: LEADERSHIP ISSUES ! 2
Leadership Issues
They are very few leaders or managers that will admit to avoid conversations that are
difficult which can lead to confrontation with their colleagues. Though I have realized that while
several people talk about the significance of candor for having things done, managers usually
steer clear or sidestep of emotionally charged situations by giving it aback they do not exist,
hence delaying reckoning day or to bring in third parties that are sympathetic. Leaders deal with
such issues whenever they work with the company which was battling with a rare conflict among
the top leadership. Example there was a food industry which hired a CEO so as to increase the
commercialization of their technology. The CEO had a successful first six months. The CEO
brought a new round of the funding, streamlined the process of manufacturing, and put the
company on some few critical goals, specifically a key safety approval from the regulators that
are federal. The CEO has also recruited so many senior managers with several years of
experience in the food industry and bear strong relationships with the authorities of regulation.
He one of the employed senior leadership became unsatisfied with the position he was
given and went to the board chair secretly and was issuing threats to be given a very senior
position than the current one he was holding lest he leaves if his demand are not addressed.
Though the Chair of the board was pleased with the accomplishments of the CEO, he was afraid
losing the senior officer as that would undermine the launch of the products they had scheduled.
Therefore after wide consultation with the board, they agreed to relieve off the CEOs from his
duties and acquiesced to the demands of the senior officer.
Running Head: LEADERSHIP ISSUES ! 3
This kind of situation can be treated as coup and it is deplorable for the board members to
give in to the demands by the senior officer to replace the CEO who has done great
accomplishments for the company. This shows that there was no genuine communication from
the part of the senior manager who single handedly worked with the chair of the board to oust the
competent CEO. The board also seemed to have not gathered courage to talk to the CEO. What is
also interesting is both the board chair and the senior manager believed there action was in the
interest of the company, investors and the market. They assumed to approach the CEO and
discussed the matter at hand and decided to go directly to the board. The chair of the board also
thought that the only way to grow the company was to ignore the CEO and side with the senior
manager. He thought that would grow the company. He thought that any conversation with the
CEO would not be constructive (Posner, 2007).
Communication in the leadership position is therefore very important and should not
always be assumed. What causes a major drift among leaders fear to converse about pertinent
issues that are touching them. Most of them like assumption which should not be the case.
Leaders should always be free with one another and consult each other whenever any difficulty
arises among them. Little disagreements can cause major cracks that slowly lead to the collapse
of the entire leadership. Confrontation among leaders should not be seen as enmity but away of
airing one’s view on the issues affecting them.
Running Head: LEADERSHIP ISSUES ! 4
This kind of situation can be treated as coup and it is deplorable for the board members to
give in to the demands by the senior officer to replace the CEO who has done great
accomplishments for the company. This shows that there was no genuine communication from
the part of the senior manager who single handedly worked with the chair of the board to oust the
competent CEO. The board also seemed to have not gathered courage to talk to the CEO. What is
also interesting is both the board chair and the senior manager believed there action was in the
interest of the company, investors and the market. They assumed to approach the CEO and
discussed the matter at hand and decided to go directly to the board. The chair of the board also
thought that the only way to grow the company was to ignore the CEO and side with the senior
manager. He thought that would grow the company. He thought that any conversation with the
CEO would not be constructive (Guerrero, 2013).
He one of the employed senior leadership became unsatisfied with the position he was
given and went to the board chair secretly and was issuing threats to be given a very senior
position than the current one he was holding lest he leaves if his demand are not addressed.
Though the Chair of the board was pleased with the accomplishments of the CEO, he was afraid
losing the senior officer as that would undermine the launch of the products they had scheduled.
Therefore after wide consultation with the board, they agreed to relieve off the CEOs from his
duties and acquiesced to the demands of the senior officer.
Running Head: LEADERSHIP ISSUES ! 5
Reference
Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2007). The leadership challenge. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-
Bass.
Rowe, W. G., & Guerrero, L. (2013). Cases in leadership. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE
Publications.