Self-Assessment Tests
66352_FM_ptg01_i-xxviii.indd 4 10/21/14 12:16 AM
Australia • Brazil • Mexico • Singapore • United Kingdom • United States
Robert N. Lussier, Ph.D. Spring field College
Christopher F. Achua, D.B.A. University of Virginia’s College at Wise
S I X T H E D I T I O N
Leadership THEORY, APPLICATION,
& SKILL DE VELOPMENT
66352_FM_ptg01_i-xxviii.indd 1 10/21/14 12:16 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
66352_FM_ptg01_i-xxviii.indd 4 10/21/14 12:16 AM
This is an electronic version of the print textbook. Due to electronic rights restrictions, some third party content may be suppressed. Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. The publisher reserves the right to remove content from this title at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it. For valuable information on pricing, previous editions, changes to current editions, and alternate formats, please visit www.cengage.com/highered to search by ISBN#, author, title, or keyword for materials in your areas of interest.
Important Notice: Media content referenced within the product description or the product text may not be available in the eBook version.
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
© 2016, 2013 Cengage Learning
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this work covered by the copyright herein may be reproduced, transmitted, stored, or used in any form or by any means graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including but not limited to photocopying, recording, scanning, digitizing, taping, Web distribution, information networks, or information storage and retrieval systems, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
Library of Congress Control Number: 2014942594
Student Edition ISBN: 978-1-285-86635-2
Cengage Learning 20 Channel Center Street Boston, MA 02210 USA
Cengage Learning is a leading provider of customized learning solutions with office locations around the globe, including Singapore, the United Kingdom, Australia, Mexico, Brazil, and Japan. Locate your local office at: www.cengage.com/global
Cengage Learning products are represented in Canada by Nelson Education, Ltd.
To learn more about Cengage Learning Solutions, visit www.cengage.com
Purchase any of our products at your local college store or at our preferred online store www.cengagebrain.com
Leadership: Theory, Application, & Skill Development, 6e Robert N. Lussier, Christopher F. Achua
Vice President, General Manager, Social Science & Qualitative Business: Erin Joyner
Product Director: Michael Schenk
Senior Product Manager: Scott Person
Senior Content Developer: Julia Chase
Product Assistant: Brian Pierce
Marketing Director: Kristen Hurd
Market Manager: Emily Horowitz
Marketing Coordinator: Christopher Walz
Art and Cover Direction, Production Management, and Composition: Lumina Datamatics, Inc.
Senior Media Developer: Sally Nieman
Manufacturing Planner: Ron Montgomery
Cover Image: © Ascent Xmedia/Taxi/Getty Images
Intellectual Property
Analyst: Jennifer Nonenmacher
Project Manager: Sarah Shainwald
Printed in the United States of America Print Number: 01 Print Year: 2014
For product information and technology assistance, contact us at Cengage Learning Customer & Sales Support, 1-800-354-9706
For permission to use material from this text or product, submit all requests online at cengage.com/permissions
Further permissions questions can be emailed to [email protected]
66352_FM_ptg01_i-xxviii.indd 2 10/24/14 12:40 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
WCN: 02-200-203
DEDICATION
To my wife Marie and our six children:
Jesse, Justin, Danielle, Nicole, Brian, and Renee
— Robert N. Lussier
To my family, especially my wife (Pauline),
the children (Justin, Brooke, Jordan, Cullen, Gregory and Zora)
and my mother (Theresia Sirri).
— Christopher F. Achua
66352_FM_ptg01_i-xxviii.indd 3 10/21/14 12:16 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
66352_FM_ptg01_i-xxviii.indd 4 10/21/14 12:16 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
v
Brief Contents Preface xiii
Acknowledgments xxv
About the Authors xxviii
PART ONE INDIVIDuALS AS LEADERS
1 Who Is a Leader and What Skills Do Leaders Need? 1
2 Leadership Traits and Ethics 31
3 Leadership Behavior and Motivation 68
4 Contingency Leadership Theories 108
5 Influencing: Power, Politics, Networking, and Negotiation 144
PART TWO TEAM LEADERSHIP
6 Communication, Coaching, and Conflict Skills 183
7 Leader–Member Exchange and Followership 230
8 Team Leadership and Self-Managed Teams 268
PART THREE ORgANIzATIONAL LEADERSHIP
9 Charismatic and Transfor mational Leadership 319
10 Leadership of Culture, Ethics, and Diversity 357
11 Strategic Leadership and Change Management 395
12 Crisis Leadership and the Learning Organization 428
Appendix: Leadership and Spirituality in the Workplace 464
Glossary 474
Index 481
66352_FM_ptg01_i-xxviii.indd 5 10/21/14 12:16 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
v i
Contents Preface xiii Acknowledgments xxv About the Authors xxviii
PART ONE INDIVIDuALS AS LEADERS
CHAPTER 1 Who Is a Leader and What Skills Do Leaders Need? 1 Leadership Described 2
Leadership Development 2 / Defining Leadership with Five Key Elements 5
Leadership Skills 8 Are Leaders Born or Made? 8 / Can Leadership Be Taught and Skills Developed? 9 / Managerial Leadership Skills 9
Leadership Managerial Roles 11 Interpersonal Roles 11 / Informational Roles 12 / Decisional Roles 12
Levels of Analysis of Leadership Theory 14 Individual Level of Analysis 14 / group Level of Analysis 14 / Organizational Level of Analysis 14 / Interrelationships among the Levels of Analysis 15
Leadership Theory Paradigms 16 The Trait Theory Paradigm 16 / The Behavioral Leadership Theory Paradigm 16 / The Contingency Leadership Theory Paradigm 17 / The Integrative Leadership Theory Paradigm 17 / From the Management to the Leadership Theory Paradigm 17
Objectives of the Book 18 Leadership Theory 19 / Application of Leadership Theory 20 / Leadership Skill Development 20 / Flexibility 20
Organization of the Book 20
Chapter Summary 21 Key Terms 22 / Review Questions 22 / Critical-Thinking Questions 22 CASE: From Steve Jobs to Tim Cook—Apple 23 VIDEO CASE: Leadership at P. F. Chang’s 24 Developing Your Leadership Skills 1-1 24 Developing Your Leadership Skills 1-2 26
66352_FM_ptg01_i-xxviii.indd 6 10/21/14 12:17 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
CONTENTS vii
CHAPTER 2 Leadership Traits and Ethics 31 Personality Traits and Leadership Trait universality 32
Personality and Traits 33 / Personality Profiles 34 / Leadership Trait universality 35
The Big Five Including Traits of Effective Leaders 36 Surgency 36 / Agreeableness 37 / Adjustment 37 / Conscientiousness 38 / Openness 38
The Personality Profile of Effective Leaders 41 Achievement Motivation Theory 41 / Leader Motive Profile Theory 43
Leadership Attitudes 45 Theory X and Theory Y 46 / The Pygmalion Effect 47 / Self-Concept 48 / How Attitudes Develop Leadership Styles 49
Ethical Leadership 50 Does Ethical Behavior Pay? 51 / Factors Influencing Ethical Behavior 52 / How People Justify unethical Behavior 54 / guides to Ethical Behavior 56
Chapter Summary 57 Key Terms 58 / Review Questions 58 / Critical-Thinking Questions 59 CASE: Blake Mycoskie and TOMS 59 VIDEO CASE: “P.F.” Chang’s Serves Its Workers Well 61 Developing Your Leadership Skills 2-1 61 Developing Your Leadership Skills 2-2 63 Developing Your Leadership Skills 2-3 63
CHAPTER 3 Leadership Behavior and Motivation 68 Leadership Behavior and Styles 69
Leadership Behavior 69 / Leadership Styles and the university of Iowa Research 70
university of Michigan and Ohio State university Studies 71 university of Michigan: Job-Centered and Employee-Centered Behavior 72 / Ohio State university: Initiating Structure and Consideration Behavior 74 / Differences, Contributions, and Applications of Leadership Models 75
The Leadership grid 75 Leadership grid Theory 76 / Leadership grid and High-High Leader Research 77 / Behavioral Theory Contributions and Applications 78
Leadership and Major Motivation Theories 79 Motivation and Leadership 79 / The Motivation Process 79 / An Overview of Three Major Classifications of Motivation Theories 80
Content Motivation Theories 80 Hierarchy of Needs Theory 80 / Two-Factor Theory 82 / Acquired Needs Theory 86 / Balancing Work–Life Needs 87
Process Motivation Theories 87 Equity Theory 87 / Expectancy Theory 88 / goal-Setting Theory 89 / using goal Setting to Motivate Employees 91
Reinforcement Theory 92 Types of Reinforcement 93 / Schedules of Reinforcement 94 / You get What You Reinforce 95 / Motivating with Reinforcement 96 / giving Praise 96
66352_FM_ptg01_i-xxviii.indd 7 10/21/14 12:17 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
viii CONTENTS
Putting the Motivation Theories Together within the Motivation Process 99
Chapter Summary 100 Key Terms 100 / Review Questions 101 / Critical-Thinking Questions 101 CASE: Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg 102 VIDEO CASE: Motivation at Washburn guitars 103 Developing Your Leadership Skills 3-1 103 Behavior Model Skills Training 3-1 104 Behavior Model Video 3-1 104 Developing Your Leadership Skills 3-2 104
CHAPTER 4 Contingency Leadership Theories 108 Contingency Leadership Theories and Models 109
Leadership Theories versus Leadership Models 110 / Contingency Theory and Model Variables 110 / global Contingency Leadership 111
Contingency Leadership Theory and Model 112 Leadership Style and the LPC 113 / Situational Favorableness 114 / Determining the Appropriate Leadership Style 114 / Research, Criticism, and Applications 116
Leadership Continuum Theory and Model 117
Path–goal Leadership Theory and Model 119 Situational Factors 120 / Leadership Styles 121 / Research, Criticism, and Applications 122
Normative Leadership Theory and Models 123 Leadership Participation Styles 124 / Model Questions to Determine the Appropriate Leadership Style 124 / Selecting the Time-Driven or Development-Driven Model for the Situation 127 / Determining the Appropriate Leadership Style 127 / Research, Criticism, and Applications 127
Putting the Behavioral and Contingency Leadership Theories Together 128 Prescriptive and Descriptive Models 129
Leadership Substitutes Theory 131 Substitutes and Neutralizers 131 / Leadership Style 132 / Changing the Situation 132 / Research, Criticism, and Applications 132
Chapter Summary 133 Key Terms 134 / Review Questions 134 / Critical-Thinking Questions 134 CASE: Foxconn Technology group 135 VIDEO CASE: Leadership at McDonald’s 136 Developing Your Leadership Skills 4-1 139 Developing Your Leadership Skills 4-2 140
CHAPTER 5 Influencing: Power, Politics, Networking, and Negotiation 144 Power 145
Sources of Power 146 / Types of Power and Influencing Tactics, and Ways to Increase Your Power 146
Organizational Politics 153 The Nature of Organizational Politics 154 / Political Behavior 155 / guidelines for Developing Political Skills 156
66352_FM_ptg01_i-xxviii.indd 8 10/21/14 12:17 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
CONTENTS ix
Networking 159 Perform a Self-Assessment and Set goals 160 / Create Your One-Minute Self-Sell 161 / Develop Your Network 162 / Conduct Networking Interviews 162 / Maintain Your Network 164 / Social Networking at Work 164
Negotiation 165 Negotiating 166 / The Negotiation Process 166
Ethics and Influencing 171
Chapter Summary 172 Key Terms 173 / Review Questions 173 / Critical-Thinking Questions 173 CASE: Organizational Power and Politics 174 VIDEO CASE: Employee Networks at Whirlpool Corporation 175 Developing Your Leadership Skills 5-1 176 Developing Your Leadership Skills 5-2 177 Developing Your Leadership Skills 5-3 178 Developing Your Leadership Skills 5-4 179
PART TWO TEAM LEADERSHIP
CHAPTER 6 Communication, Coaching, and Conflict Skills 183 Communication 184
Communication and Leadership 185 / Sending Messages and giving Instructions 185 / Receiving Messages 188
Feedback 191 The Importance of Feedback 191 / Common Approaches to getting Feedback on Messages—and Why They Don’t Work 192 / How to get Feedback on Messages 192
Coaching 194 How to give Coaching Feedback 194 / What Is Criticism—and Why Doesn’t It Work? 197 / The Coaching Model for Employees Who Are Performing Below Standard 198 / Mentoring 200
Managing Conflict 200 The Psychological Contract 201 / Conflict Management Styles 201
Collaborating Conflict Management Style Models 205 Initiating Conflict Resolution 206 / Responding to Conflict Resolution 207 / Mediating Conflict Resolution 207
Chapter Summary 210 Key Terms 210 / Review Questions 211 / Critical-Thinking Questions 211 CASE: Reed Hastings—Netflix 211 VIDEO CASE: Communication at Navistar International 213 Developing Your Leadership Skills 6-1 214 Behavior Model Skills Training 6-1 215 Behavior Model Video 6-1 221 Developing Your Leadership Skills 6-2 222 Behavior Model Skills Training 6-2 222 Behavior Model Video 6-2 223 Developing Your Leadership Skills 6-3 223 Developing Your Leadership Skills 6-4 224 Behavior Model Video 6-3 225 Developing Your Leadership Skills 6-5 225 Behavior Model Video 6-4 226
66352_FM_ptg01_i-xxviii.indd 9 10/21/14 12:17 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
x CONTENTS
CHAPTER 7 Leader–Member Exchange and Followership 230 From Vertical Dyadic Linkage Theory to Leader–Member Exchange Theory 232
Vertical Dyadic Linkage Theory 232 / Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) Theory 234 / Factors That Influence LMX Relationships 235 / The Benefits of High-Quality LMX Relationships 237 / Criticisms of LMX Theory 238
Followership 239 Defining Followership 240 / Types of Followers 241 / Becoming an Effective Follower 242 / guidelines to Becoming an Effective Follower 244 / Factors That Can Enhance Follower Influence 246 / Dual Role of Being a Leader and a Follower 249
Delegation 249 Delegating 249 / Delegation Decisions 250 / Delegating with the use of a Model 252 / Evaluating Followers: guidelines for Success 254
Chapter Summary 255 Key Terms 256 / Review Questions 256 / Critical-Thinking Questions 257 CASE: W. L. gore & Associates 257 VIDEO CASE: Delegation at Boyne uSA Resorts 259 Developing Your Leadership Skills 7-1 260 Behavior Model Skills Training 260 The Delegation Model 260 Behavior Model Video 7.1 261 Developing Your Leadership Skills 7-2 261
CHAPTER 8 Team Leadership and Self-Managed Teams 268 The use of Teams in Organizations 270
Is It a group or a Team? 271 / Benefits and Limitations of Teamwork 272 / What Is an Effective Team? 275 / Characteristics of Highly Effective Teams 276 / Team Leadership 279 / Organizational Culture and Team Creativity 281
Types of Teams 283 Functional Team 283 / Cross-Functional Team 284 / Virtual Team 285 / Self-Managed Team (SMT) 285
Decision Making in Teams 286 Normative Leadership Model 286 / Team-Centered Decision-Making Model 287 / Advantages and Disadvantages of Team-Centered Decision Making 287
Conducting Effective Team Meetings 288 Planning Meetings 289 / Conducting Meetings 290 / Handling Problem Members 291
Self-Managed Teams 293 The Nature of Self-Managed Teams 294 / The Benefits of Self-Managed Teams 295 / Top Management and Self-Managed Team Success 297 / The Changing Role of Leadership in Self-Managed Teams 298 / The Challenges of Implementing Self-Managed Teams 299
Chapter Summary 300 Key Terms 301 / Review Questions 301 / Critical Thinking Questions 302 CASE: Frederick W. Smith—FedEx 302 VIDEO CASE: The NEADS Team: People and Dogs 304 Behavior Model Skills Training 8-1 304 Leadership Decision-Making Model 305 Behavior Model Video 8-1 and Video Exercise 307 Developing Your Leadership Skills 8-1 308 Developing Your Leadership Skills 8-2 310
66352_FM_ptg01_i-xxviii.indd 10 10/21/14 12:17 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
CONTENTS xi
PART THREE ORgANIzATIONAL LEADERSHIP
CHAPTER 9 Charismatic and Transfor mational Leadership 319 Charismatic Leadership 321
Weber’s Conceptualization of Charisma 321 / Locus of Charismatic Leadership 322 / The Effects of Charismatic Leaders on Followers 323 / How One Acquires Charismatic Qualities 324 / Charisma: A Double-Edged Sword 326
Transformational Leadership 328 The Effects of Transformational Leadership 328 / Transformational versus Transactional Leadership 329 / The Transformation Process 331
Charismatic-Transformational Leadership 333 Qualities of Effective Charismatic and Transformational Leadership 333 / Charismatic and Transformational Leadership: What’s the Difference? 339
Stewardship and Servant Leadership 342 Stewardship and Attributes of the Effective Steward Leader 343 / Servant Leadership and Attributes of the Effective Servant Leader 344
Chapter Summary 346 Key Terms 348 / Review Questions 348 / Critical-Thinking Questions 348 CASE: ursula Burns: Xerox’s Chairwoman and CEO 349 VIDEO CASE: Timbuk2: Former CEO Sets a Course 351 Developing Your Leadership Skills 9-1 351
CHAPTER 10 Leadership of Culture, Ethics, and Diversity 357 What Is Organizational Culture? 359
Culture Creation and Sustainability 359 / The Power of Culture 360 / Strong versus Weak Cultures 361 / The Leader’s Role in Influencing Culture 364 / Types of Culture 366 / National Culture Identities—Hofstede’s Value Dimensions 369
Organizational Ethics 371 Fostering an Ethical Work Environment 372 / Authentic Leadership 374
Diversity Leadership 375 The Changing Work Place 376 / Benefits of Embracing Diversity 376 / Creating a Pro-Diversity Organizational Culture 378 / The Effects of globalization on Diversity Leadership 382
Chapter Summary 383 Key Terms 384 / Review Questions 385 / Critical-Thinking Questions 385 CASE: Mary Barra—New CEO of general Motors 385 VIDEO CASE: Diversity at PepsiCo 387 Developing Your Leadership Skills 10-1 387 Developing Your Leadership Skills 10-2 388 Developing Your Leadership Skills 10-3 389
CHAPTER 11 Strategic Leadership and Change Management 395 Strategic Leadership 397
globalization and Environmental Sustainability 399 / Strategic Leadership and the Strategic Management Process 400
The Strategic Management Process 401 Crafting a Vision and Mission Statement 402 / Setting Organizational Objectives 404 / Strategy Formulation 405 / Strategy Execution 408 / Strategy Evaluation and Control 411
66352_FM_ptg01_i-xxviii.indd 11 10/21/14 12:17 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
xii CONTENTS
Leading Organizational Change 411 The Need for Organizational Change 412 / The Role of Top Leaders in Managing Change 412 / The Change Management Process 413 / Why People Resist Change 414 / Minimizing Resistance to Change 416
Chapter Summary 418 Key Terms 419 / Review Questions 419 / Critical Thinking Questions 420 CASE: Nike in the Era of CEO Mark Parker 420 VIDEO CASE: Original Penguin Spreads Its Wings 422 Developing Your Leadership Skills 11-1 422 Developing Your Leadership Skills 11-2 423 Developing Your Leadership Skills 11-3 423
CHAPTER 12 Crisis Leadership and the Learning Organization 428 Crisis Leadership 430
Crisis Communication in the Age of Social Media 432 / Formulating a Crisis Plan 433 / The Three-Stage Crisis Management Plan 433 / The Five-Step Crisis Risk Assessment Model 437 / Effective Crisis Communication 440 / guideliness to Effective Crisis Communication 441
The Learning Organization and Knowledge Management 443 Learning Organization Characterisitcs 444 / What Is Knowledge Management? 445 / Traditional Versus the Learning Organization 446 / The Learning Organizational Culture and Firm Performance 449 / The Role of Leaders in Creating a Learning Organization Culture 449
Chapter Summary 452 Key Terms 454 / Review Questions 454 / Critical Thinking Questions 454 CASE: Merck CEO–Ken Frazier. First African American Leading a Major Pharmaceutical Company 455 VIDEO CASE: Managing in Turbulent Times at Second City Theater 457 Developing Your Leadership Skills 12-1 457 Developing Your Leadership Skills 12-2 458
Appendix: Leadership and Spirituality in the Workplace 464 Glossary 474 Index 481
66352_FM_ptg01_i-xxviii.indd 12 10/21/14 12:17 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
x i i i
Preface Target Market This book is intended for leadership courses offered at the undergraduate and graduate levels in schools of busi- ness, public administration, health care, education, psychology, and sociology. No prior coursework in business or management is required. The textbook can also be used in management development courses that emphasize the leadership function, and can supplement management or organizational behavior courses that emphasize leader- ship, especially with an applications/skill development focus.
Goals and Overview of Competitive Advantages In his book Power Tools, John Nirenberg asks, “Why are so many well-intended students learning so much and yet able to apply so little in their personal and professional lives?” Is it surprising that students cannot apply what they read and cannot develop skills, when most textbooks continue to focus on theoretical concepts? Textbooks need to take the next step and develop students’ ability to apply what they read and to build skills using the concepts. I (Lussier) started writing management textbooks in 1988—prior to the call by the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) for skill development and outcomes assessment—to help professors teach their stu- dents how to apply concepts and develop management skills. Pfeffer and Sutton concluded that the most important insight from their research is that knowledge that is actually implemented is much more likely to be acquired from learning by doing, than from learning by reading, listening, or thinking. We designed this book to give students the opportunity to learn by doing.
The overarching goal of this book is ref lected in its subtitle: theory, application, skill development. We devel- oped the total package to teach leadership theory and concepts, to improve ability to apply the theory through critical thinking, and to develop leadership skills. Following are our related goals in writing this book:
• To be the only traditional leadership textbook to incorporate the three-pronged approach. We make a clear dis- tinction between coverage of theory concepts, their application, and the development of skills based on the con- cepts. The Test Bank includes questions under each of the three approaches.
• To make this the most “how-to” leadership book on the market. We offer behavior models with step-by-step guidelines for handling various leadership functions (such as how to set objectives, give praise and instructions, coach followers, resolve conflicts, and negotiate).
• To offer the best coverage of traditional leadership theories, by presenting the theories and research findings with- out getting bogged down in too much detail.
• To create a variety of high-quality application material, using the concepts to develop critical-thinking skills. • To create a variety of high-quality skill-development exercises, which build leadership skills that can be used in
students’ personal and professional life. • To offer behavior-modeling leadership skills training. • To make available a DVD, including 7 Behavior Model Videos and 12 Video Cases. • To suggest self-assessment materials that are well integrated and illustrate the important concepts discussed in the
text. Students begin by determining their personality profile in Chapter 2, and then assess how their personality affects their leadership potential in the remaining chapters.
66352_FM_ptg01_i-xxviii.indd 13 10/21/14 12:17 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
xiv PREFACE
• To provide a flexible teaching package, so that professors can design the course to best meet the leadership needs of their students. The total package includes more material than can be covered in one course. Supplemental material is included, thus only one book is needed—making it a low-cost alternative for the student.
Flexibility Example The textbook, w it h 12 chapters, a llows time for ot her materia ls to be used in t he leadership course. The textbook includes all the traditional topics in enough detail, however, to use only the textbook for the course. It offers so much application and skill-development material that it cannot all be covered in class during one semester. Instructors have the f lexibility to select only the content and features that best meet their needs.
Specific Competitive Advantage— Pedagogical Features Three-Pronged Approach We created course materials that truly develop students into leaders. As the title of this book implies, we provide a balanced, three-pronged approach to the curriculum:
• A clear understanding of the traditional theories and concepts of leadership, as well as of the most recently developed leadership philosophies
• Application of leadership concepts through critical thinking • Development of leadership skills
The three-pronged approach is clear in the textbook and is carried throughout the Instructor’s Manual and Test Bank.
Theory
Leadership Theories, Research and References, and Writing Style: This book has been written to provide the best coverage of the traditional leadership theories, present- ing the theories and research findings clearly without being bogged down in too much detail. The book is heavily referenced with classic and current citations. Unlike the text- books of some competitors, this book does not use in-text citations, to avoid distract- ing the reader and adding unnecessary length to the text chapters. Readers can refer to the notes for complete citations of all sources. Thus, the book includes all the traditional leadership topics, yet we believe it is written in a livelier, more conversational manner than those of our competitors.
The following features are provided to support the first step in the three-pronged approach—theory.
Learning Outcomes: Each chapter begins with Learning Outcomes. At the end of the chapter, the Learning Outcomes are integrated into the chapter summary.
Key Terms: A list of key terms appears at the end of each chapter. Clear definitions are given in the text for approximately 15 of the most important concepts from the chapter (with the key term in bold and the definition in italic).
Chapter Summary: The summary lists the Learning Outcomes from the beginning of the chapter and gives the answers. For each chapter, the last Learning Outcome requires
66352_FM_ptg01_i-xxviii.indd 14 10/21/14 12:17 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
PREFACE xv
students to define the key terms of the chapter by writing the correct key term in the blank provided for each definition.
Review Questions: These questions require recall of information generally not covered in the Learning Outcomes.
Application The second prong of our textbook is to have students apply the leadership theories and concepts so that they can develop critical-thinking skills. Students develop their applica- tion skills through the following features.
Opening Case Application: At the beginning of each chapter, information about an actual manager and organization is presented. The case is followed by four to eight questions to get students involved. Throughout the chapter, the answers to the ques- tions are given to i l lustrate how t he ma nager/orga nization actua l ly uses t he tex t concepts to create oppor tunities and solve problems t hrough decision ma k ing. A distinctive head (Opening Case APPLICATION) appears when the opening case is applied in the text.
Work Applications: Open-ended questions, ca l led Work Applications, require students to explain how the text concepts apply to their own work experience; there are over 100 of these scattered throughout the text. Student experience can be present, past, summer, full-time, or part-time employment. The questions help the students bridge the gap between theory and the real world. The Work Applications are also included in the Test Bank, to assess students’ ability to apply the concepts.
Concept Applications: Every chapter contains a series of two to six Concept Applica- tion boxes that require students to determine the leadership concept being illustrated in a specific, short example. All the recommended answers appear in the Instructor’s Manual with a brief explanation. In addition, the Test Bank has similar questions, clearly labeled, to assess students’ ability to apply the concepts.
WORK Application 2-1 Based on your personality profile, identify which dimensions are stronger, moderate, and weaker.
1. What Big Five and leadership personality traits does Ellen Kullman possess?
To a large extent, Ellen Kullman is a successful leader because of her strong personality in the Big Five. She has a strong need for surgency that helped her climb the corporate ladder at DuPont, which is dominated by men.
It took energy and determination to become the first woman CEO of DuPont. She is ranked #3 on the Fortune 50 Most Powerful Women list.
Kullman has agreeableness. She gets along well with people having strong interpersonal skills with EI. Kullman relies more on her personal relationships than her power as CEO to get the job done. She is also sociable and sensitive to others.
She is conscientious at getting the job done. Being very dependable by achieving great success was a cornerstone of her climbing the corporate ladder at DuPont. Plus she is viewed has having a high level of integrity.
Kullman is well adjusted. Competing in a company and industry dominated by men, she has self-control and self-confidence. She is calm, good under pressure, relaxed, secure, and positive. She praises the accomplishments of her employees at all levels.
She is open to new experience because of her innovating and bringing to market new products at a faster clip. Kullman is highly intelligent, has an internal locus of control as she takes charge to bring changes, and is flexible.
OPENING CASE Application
66352_FM_ptg01_i-xxviii.indd 15 10/21/14 12:17 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
xvi PREFACE
Critical-Thinking Questions: There are more than 80 critical-thinking questions (an average of seven per chapter) that can be used for class discussion and/or written assign- ments to develop communication and critical thinking skills.
Cases: Following the Review Questions and Critical Thinking Questions, students are presented with another actual manager and organization. The students learn how the manager/organization applies the leadership concepts from that chapter. Each Case is fol- lowed by questions for the student to answer. Chapters 2 through 11 also include cumula- tive case questions. Cumulative questions relate case material from prior chapters. Thus, students continually review and integrate concepts from previous chapters. Answers to the Case questions are included in the Instructor’s Manual.
Video Cases: All chapters include one Video Case. Seeing actual leaders tackling real management problems and opportunities enhances student application of the concepts. The 12 Video Cases have supporting print material for both instructors and students, including a brief description and critical-thinking questions. Answers to the Video Case questions are included in the Instructor’s Manual.
P.F. Chang’s has over 120 full-service, casual dining Asian bistros and contemporar y Chinese diners across the country, and its employees have the authority to make decisions that benefit customers. Giving employees the free- dom to make decisions has had a huge impact on their at- titudes and performance. Managers at P.F. Chang’s receive extensive training on how to create and nur ture a positive attitude among their employees, and all workers receive an
employee handbook, which clearly spells out exactly what is expected of them.
1. In what ways does P.F. Chang’s create organizational commitment among its workers?
2. How might a manager at P.F. Chang’s use the Big Five personality factors to assess whether a candidate for a position on the wait staff would be suitable?
V I D E O C A S E
“P.F.” Chang’s Serves Its Workers Well
CONCEPT APPLICATION 2-1
Big Five Personality Dimensions Identify each of these seven traits/behaviors by its personality dimension. Write the appropriate letter in the blank before each item. a. surgency d. conscientiousness b. agreeableness e. openness to experience c. affiliation
1. A leader is saying a warm, friendly hello to followers as they arrive at the meeting.
2. A leader is brainstorming ideas with followers on new products.
3. A follower is yelling about a problem, a leader calmly explains how to solve it.
4. A leader is not very talkative when meeting some unexpected customers.
5. A leader is letting a follower do the job his or her own way to avoid a conflict.
6. A leader is giving detailed instructions to a follower to do the job.
7. A purchasing agent submitted the monthly report on time as usual.
66352_FM_ptg01_i-xxviii.indd 16 10/21/14 12:17 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
PREFACE xvii
Skill Development The difference between learning about leadership and learning to be a leader is the ac- quisition of skills, our third prong. This text focuses on skill development so students can use the leadership theories and concepts they learn to improve their personal and profes- sional life.
Self-Assessments: Scattered throughout the text are 37Self-Assessments. Students com- plete these exercises to gain personal knowledge. All information for completing and scoring the assessments is contained within the text. Students determine their personal- ity profile in Chapter 2, and then assess how their personality affects their leadership in the remaining chapters. Self-knowledge leads students to an understanding of how they can and will operate as leaders in the real world. Although Self-Assessments do not de- velop a specific skill, they serve as a foundation for skill development.
SELF-ASSESSMENT 9-3 Personality and Charismatic and Transformational Leadership
Charismatic leaders have charisma based on personality and other personal traits that cut across all of the Big Five personality types. Review the ten qualities of charismatic leaders in Exhibit 9.3 on page 333. Which traits do you have?
If you have a high surgency Big Five personality style and a high need for power, you need to focus on
using socialized, rather than personalized, charismatic leadership.
Transformational leaders tend to be charismatic as well. In Self-Assessment 9-1 on page 329 you determined if you were more transformational or transactional. How does your personality affect your transformational and transac- tional leadership styles?
You Make the Ethical Call The boxes present issues of ethics for class discussion, with many presenting actual situations faced by real companies. Each dilemma contains two to four questions for class discussion.
YOU Make the ETHICAL Call
1.1 Is Leadership Really Important?
Scott Adams is the creator of the car toon character Dilber t. Adams makes fun of manag- ers, in par t because he distrusts top-level managers, saying that leadership is really a crock. Leadership is about manipulating people to get them to do something they don’t want to do, and there may not be anything in it for them. CEOs basically run the same scam as for tune-tellers, who make up a bunch of guesses, and when by chance one is correct, they hope you forget the other errors. First, CEOs blame their predecessors for anything that is bad, then they shuffle everything around, star t a new strategic program, and wait. When things go well, despite the CEO, the CEO takes the credit and moves on to the next job. Adams says we may be hung up on leadership as par t of our DNA. It seems we have always sought to put somebody above everybody else.
1. Do you agree with Scott Adams that leadership is a crock?
2. Do we really need to have someone in the leadership role?
66352_FM_ptg01_i-xxviii.indd 17 10/21/14 12:17 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
xviii PREFACE
Developing Your Leadership Skills: There are between one and four Exercises at the end of each chapter. We use the term developing your leadership skills only in referring to an exercise that will develop a skill that can be used in the students’ personal or professional life at work. Full support of 30 activities can be found in the Instructor’s Manual, includ- ing detailed information, timing, answers, and so on. There are three primary types of exercises:
Individual Focus. Students make individual decisions about exercise questions before or during class. Students can share their answers in class discussions, or the instructor may elect to go over recommended answers.
Group/Team Focus. Students discuss the material presented and may select group an- swers and report to the class.
Role-Play Focus. Students are presented with a model and given the opportunity to use the model to apply their knowledge of leadership theories through role-playing exercises.
Behavior Model Skills Training: Six of the Developing Your Leadership Skills Exercises may be used as part of behavior modeling by using the step-by-step models in the text and the Behavior Model Videos. Meta-analysis research has concluded that behavior modeling skills training is effective at developing leadership skills. For example, students read the conf lict resolution model in the text, watch the video in class, and then complete an Exercise (role-play) to resolve a conf lict, using the model and feedback from others.
Case Role-Play Exercise: Following each Case are instructions to prepare students to conduct an in-class role-play, based on a situation presented in the Case. Through role- playing, students develop their skills at handling leadership situations. For example, stu- dents are asked to conduct a motivational speech and to develop a vision and mission statement for an organization.
Step-by-Step Behavior Models: In addition to traditional theories of leadership, the text includes behavior models: how-to steps for handling day-to-day leadership functions, such as how to set objectives, give praise, coach, resolve conf licts, delegate, and negotiate.
Behavior Model Videos: There are seven Behavior Model Videos that reinforce the de- velopment of skills. The videos demonstrate leaders successfully handling common lead- ership functions, using the step-by-step behavior models discussed earlier in the Theory section. Students learn from watching the videos and/or using them in conjunction with the Skill-Development Exercises. Material in the text integrates the videos into the chap- ters. Ideas for using all videos are detailed in the Instructor’s Manual.
Objectives
To better understand the four situational communication styles and which style to use in a given situation
Video (12 minutes) Overview
You will first listen to a lecture to understand how to use the situational communications model. Then, you will view two man- agers, Steve and Darius, meeting to discuss faulty parts. You are asked to identify the communication style Darius uses in four
different scenes. Write the letters of the style on the scene line after each scene. This may be completed as part of Developing Your Leadership Skills Exercise 6-2.
Scene 1. Autocratic (S1A)
Scene 2. Consultative (S2C)
Scene 3. Participative (S3P)
Scene 4. Empowerment (S4E)
Behavior Model Video
Situational Communications
6.1
66352_FM_ptg01_i-xxviii.indd 18 10/21/14 12:17 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
PREFACE xix
In this behavior model skills training session, you will perform three activities:
1 Read “Improving Performance with the Coaching Model” (to review how to use the model).
2 Watch Behavior Model Video 6.2, “Coaching.’’
3 Complete Developing Your Leadership Skills Exercise 6-3 (to develop your coaching skills).
For further practice, use the coaching model in your personal and professional life.
Session 2
Behavior Model Skills Training 2
Supplements Support Instructor’s Companion Site. Access important teaching resources on this companion Web site. For your convenience, you can download electronic versions of the instructor supplements from the password-protected section of the site, including the Instructor’s Manual, Cognero Testing files, Word Test Bank files, PowerPoint® slides, and a DVD Guide.
• Instructor’s Manual. The accompanying Instructor’s Manual, prepared by Robert Lus- sier and Christopher Achua, contains the following for each chapter of the book: a de- tailed outline for lecture enhancement, Review Question answers, Concept Application answers, Case and Video Case question answers, instructions on use of videos, and De- veloping Your Leadership Skills Exercise ideas (including setup and timing). The In- structor’s Manual also contains an introduction that discusses possible approaches to the course and provides an overview of possible uses for various features and how to test and grade them. It explains the use of permanent groups to develop team leadership skills and provides guidance in the development of a course outline/syllabus.
• Cengage Learning Testing Powered by Cognero. This is a flexible, online system that al- lows you to author, edit, and manage test bank content from multiple Cengage Learning solutions; create multiple test versions in an instant; and deliver tests from your LMS, your classroom, or wherever you want. Cengage Learning Testing Powered by Cognero works on any operating system or browser, no special installs or downloads needed. You can create tests from school, home, the coffee shop—anywhere with Internet access.
• Word Test Bank files. These files are converted from the Cognero testing system. All questions have been scrutinized for accuracy, the test bank for each chapter includes true/false, multiple-choice, and essay questions, all correlated to national business standards, learning objectives, level of difficulty, and page references.
• PowerPoint® Lecture Presentations. An asset to any instructor, the lectures provide out- lines for every chapter, illustrations from the text, and emphasize key concepts provid- ing instructors with a number of learning opportunities for students.
• DVD Guide. Designed to facilitate use of the accompanying DVD, this guide provides summaries of each Video Case, as well as the Behavior Model Video segments. Discus- sion starter question and suggested answers are included.
DVD. Chapter closing videos and Behavior Model videos compiled specifically to accom- pany Leadership allow students to engage with the textual materials by applying theories and concepts of real-world situations.
66352_FM_ptg01_i-xxviii.indd 19 10/21/14 12:17 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
xx PREFACE
Summary of Key Innovations Our goal is to make both students and instructors successful by providing learning fea- tures that not only teach about leadership but also help students become leaders. Here are the special ways in which this is done:
• Three-pronged approach (theory, application, skill development) in the textbook and corresponding assessment of the three areas in the Test Bank
• Unique skill-development materials that build leadership skills for use in students’ per- sonal and professional life
• Unique application material to develop critical-thinking skills in applying the leadership concepts and theories
• Unsurpassed video package, with 12 Video Cases and 7 Behavior Model Videos • Flexibility—use any or all of the features that work for you!
Changes to the Sixth Edition The sixth edition and accompanying supplements have been thoroughly revised.
Chapter 1 The chapter has been updated and 90 percent of the references are new to this edition. Learning outcomes 5 and 6 have been combined because they are related, and learning outcome 7 has been deleted, but the review and list of key terms remains in the Chapter Summary. There is a new Opening Case Application about Amazon. The opening section headings (level 1 and 2 heads) have been changed to better match the first learning out- come. The subsection (level 3 head) on the Importance of Leadership has been rewritten with all new current references. There is a new subsection, Why Study Leadership? to an- swer this question. There is a new sub-section, The Need for Self-Assessment in Leader- ship Development, so that students understand the value of the self-assessment exercises in each chapter. Also, it gets student self-assessment in the very first section of the chap- ter. Self-Assessment 1-1 has been expanded to include more questions, which makes some changes to the Five Elements of Leadership. Within the Five Elements of Leadership, The Leader–Follower subsection now has level 4 headings and the inf luencing, organizational objectives, change, and people subsections have been heavily revised and shortened with new references. The section “Can Leadership Skills be Taught and Skills Developed” has been rewritten and shortened with all new references. The introduction to the Manage- ment Leadership Skills and the discussion of the three management skills has been short- ened with new references. The Interpersonal Roles now begins with the leader, and the discussion of all ten roles has been condensed. You Make the Ethical Call 1.2, Execu- tive Compensation, has been shortened and updated with all new references. Each of the Leadership Theory Paradigms has been shortened by removing some of the details of the findings of each paradigm that is discussed in later chapters. AACSB standards have been updated using the 2013 AACSB Business Accreditation Standards, General Skills Areas. The listing of AACSB skills developed in each of the Skill Building Exercises throughout the book has also been updated. The case is essentially new as indicated in the new title “From Steve Jobs to Tim Cook—Apple.” The information on Jobs has been decreased and the information on Cook has been increased, with several new references and current performance reported with Cook as CEO.
Chapter 2 The chapter has been updated and 92 percent of the references are new to this edition. The opening case is still DuPont, but it has been rewritten and updated with new references.
66352_FM_ptg01_i-xxviii.indd 20 10/21/14 12:17 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
PREFACE xxi
The first major section has been re-titled “Personality Traits and Leadership Trait Uni- versality” and reorganized to better focus on Learning Outcome 1, “Explain the univer- sality of traits of effective leaders.” The number 2 head “Applying Trait Theory” has been replaced with “Leadership Trait Universality,” and the discussion of “We Can Improve” and “Derailed Leadership Traits” level 3 heads has been moved to the “Personality Pro- file” section. The introduction to the Ethical Leadership section has been rewritten with all new references. The section “Does Ethical Behavior Pay?” has been rewritten with all new references. There is a new subsection, “Why Do Good People Do Bad Things?” The subsection “The Situation” has been expanded to include the “bad apple bad barrel” con- cept and include more situations in which unethical behavior may occur. In the “Guides to Ethical Behavior” section, subsection discussing codes of ethics and discernment and getting advice have been added. There is a new Work Application 2-4 to apply how people justify unethical behavior at work. The section “ Being an Ethical Leader ” has been de- leted to shorten the chapter a bit. The end-of-chapter case is new—TOMS.
Chapter 3 The chapter has been updated and 86 percent of the references are new to this edition while listing the classical references to leadership and motivation theory. The opening case is still Trader Joe’s, but it has been updated and shortened. The introduction to the chapter has been rewritten with all new references. The “University of Michigan and Ohio State University Studies” section has been shortened a bit. The section, Motivation and Leadership, has been rewritten with all new references. The section on Reinforce- ment Theory has been shortened some, and the subsection “The Folly of Rewarding A, While Hoping for B” with Exhibit 3.12 has been deleted. The end-of-chapter case is new, Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg. There is also a new role-play exercise that goes with it.
Chapter 4 The chapter has been updated throughout. However, this chapter is based on older con- tingency leadership theories. Therefore, it includes more classical references than several of the other chapters. There are 46 references and 13 are from the fifth edition, so 33 or 72 percent of the references are new to this edition. The opening case is still Indra Nooyi at PepsiCo, but the case has been completely rewritten. The Contingency Leader- ship Theory and Models section introduction has been updated with all new references. The closing case name has been changed by dropping the name Terry Gou from the title. It has been updated and the information about Foxconn has been shortened a bit. There are changes to all of the applying the concept boxes. The skill building exercises include the new AACSB General Skills Areas.
Chapter 5 The chapter has been updated throughout. There are 80 references and 5 are from the fifth edition; so 75, or 94 percent, of the references are new to this edition. The opening case is Mark Cuban, but the case has been completely rewritten and shorter. The intro- duction to the Power section has been essentially rewritten with all new references. The amount of explanation of the Types of Power and Inf luencing Tactics, and Ways to In- crease Your Power has been reduced. The subsection “Acquiring and Losing Power” has been deleted. The introduction to the Networking section has been rewritten with all new references. The second level heading Social Networking at Work has been dropped to a third level, rewritten and shortened. The key term definition of negotiation has been changed. The end-of-chapter case title and the people’s names in the case have been changed.
66352_FM_ptg01_i-xxviii.indd 21 10/21/14 12:17 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
xxii PREFACE
Chapter 6 The chapter has been updated throughout. There are 87 references and 3 are from the fifth edition; so 84, or 97 percent, of the references are new to this edition. The entire Communications section has been shortened a bit throughout. The section “Communi- cation and Leadership” has been completely rewritten with all new references. The second level heading 360-Degree Multirater Feedback is now a level 3 head. Learning Outcome 6 and the section “Common Approaches to “Getting Feedback on Messages, and Why They Don’t Work” have been changed by dropping the four reasons why people don’t ask questions. The introduction to the Coaching section has been rewritten with new refer- ences. The Managing Conf lict section has been reorganized, moving the Conf lict and Leadership section into the introduction and Psychological Contract sections. The end- of-chapter cases is still Netf lix, but it has been updated and shortened a bit.
Chapter 7 More than 90 percent of the references are new to this edition. Learning Outcomes 1 through 4 and 8 are new. The opening case has been updated with new references. We changed the opening section title heading to read as follows: “From Vertical Dyadic Link- age Theory to Leader–Member Exchange Theory.” We redirected the discussion away from Evolution of Dyadic Theory and focused only on VDL and LMX. The subsection on Team Member Exchange Theory is eliminated from Chapter 7 and moved to Chapter 8 that deals with Team Leadership. The subsection on factors that inf luence LMX relation- ships has been rewritten with two new level 3 headings: The Role of the Leader and The Role of the Follower in Inf luencing LMX relationships. We eliminated the subsection titled “Developing High-Quality LMX Relationships.” The content in this section is now discussed under the newly created subsection titled “The Role of the Follower in Inf lu- encing LMX Relationships.” The subsection on strengths and limitations of LMX theory has been eliminated. In its place is a new subsection titled “The Two Main Criticisms of LMX Theory.” The subsection “Determinants of Follower Inf luence” has been renamed “Factors That Can Enhance Follower Inf luence.” The subsection “Follower Evaluation and Feedback” has been renamed “Evaluating Followers: Guidelines for Success.”
Chapter 8 This chapter has been broadly updated with a significant amount of references new to this edition. The opening case is still Southwest Airlines, but it has been rewritten and updated with new references. There is a new Concept Application 8-2 to test the student’s understanding of organizational culture and team creativity. There has been a major re- vision of the opening heading “The Use of Teams in Organizations” with new references. The subsection “Groups versus Teams: What is the Difference” has been re-titled “Is It a Group or a Team?” This section has been completely revised and shortened. Exhibit 8-2, “The Team Leader’s Role in Creating Effective,” has been deleted. The listed activities in the exhibit have been summarized into a concise but easy to understand narrative. Exhibit 8.3, “Guidelines for Improving Cross-Functional Team Effectiveness,” has been deleted due to its redundancy to the characteristics of effective teams presented in Exhibit 8-1. The end-of-chapter case has been revised with new references and updates.
Chapter 9 This chapter has been broadly updated with a significant amount of references new to this edition. The opening case still features Oprah Winfrey, but it has been completely rewrit- ten from a different vantage point and updated with new references. The introduction
66352_FM_ptg01_i-xxviii.indd 22 10/21/14 12:17 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
PREFACE xxiii
to the chapter has been shortened. All Concept Application exercises have been updated and, in many cases, new questions added. The subsection on the Effects of Transforma- tional Leadership has been rewritten and the content shortened. The subsection on the Transformational versus Transactional Leadership has been rewritten and the content shortened. The section on Stewardship and Servant Leadership has been restructured from three subheadings to just two subheadings. The new sub-headings are: Stewardship and Attributes of the Effective Steward Leader and Servant Leadership and Attributes of the Effective Servant Leader. The end-of-chapter case still features Ursula Burns and Xe- rox Corporation but with new information and updates.
Chapter 10 The chapter has been updated throughout. There are 117 references and 4 are from the fifth edition; so 113, or 97%, of the references are new to this edition. The opening case is Avon Corporation, but the case has been completely rewritten to focus on Avon’s a new CEO—Sheri McCoy. All the Concept Application Exercises have been changed or modified. A new subsection on Culture Creation and Sustainability has been added. Two subheadings—Characteristics of Strong Cultures and Characteristics of Weak Cultures— have been dropped from level 2 to level 3 subheadings. These two subheadings have been significant shortened by not discussing each characteristic as a separate subheading. In- stead, a summary narrative is given and the specific characteristics presented in the ex- hibits. The four subheadings on types of culture—Cooperative, Competitive, Adaptive, and Bureaucratic—have been dropped from level 2 to level 3 subheadings. Each of Hof- stede’s Five Value Dimensions for Understanding National Cultures has been dropped from a level 2 to a level 3 subheading. The four recommended practices for fostering an ethical work environment have been dropped from level 2 to level 3 subheadings. The subsection on the Characteristics of Authentic Leaders has been dropped. Its content is included in the subsection titled “What is Authentic Leadership?” The subheading for- merly titled “Changing Demographics and Workforce Diversity” has been re-titled “The Changing Workplace.” Also, demographic diversity has been deleted as a key term. The subsection titled “The Downside of Diversity” has been deleted. Each of the factors that support a pro-diversity organizational culture has been changed from level 2 to level 3 subheadings. The end-of-chapter case is new.
Chapter 11 The chapter has been updated throughout. There are 98 references and 12 are from the fifth edition; so 86, or 90 percent, of the references are new to this edition. The opening case has been updated. All the Concept Application Exercises have been modified. The subsection on strategic leadership failures has been dropped. The focus of the chapter is on strategic leadership; as such, we made it is the first major heading (level 1) and con- verted Globalization and Environmental Sustainability into a level 2 subheading under Strategic Leadership. The first part of the chapter on strategic leadership and the strategic management process has undergone significant restructuring and rewriting. A new sub- heading titled “Leading the Strategic Management Process” has been added under strate- gic leadership. Each of the five tasks of the strategic management process is discussed as level 2 subheadings with significant revisions and updates. Exhibit 11-1 (Strategic Man- agement Framework) has been replaced with a new exhibit). It is now titled “The Strategic Management Process.” We have eliminated the subsection (level 3 heading) titled “Rec- ommendations for Minimizing Resistance to Change.” The subsection titled “Strategic Management in Action” has been dropped. Exhibit 11-2 (Change Implementation Pro- cess) has been dropped. The end-of-chapter case has been updated.
66352_FM_ptg01_i-xxviii.indd 23 10/21/14 12:17 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
xxiv PREFACE
Chapter 12 The chapter has been updated throughout. There are 121 references, and only 13 are from the fifth edition; so 108, or 89 percent, of the references are new to this edition. The opening chapter case is new. It focuses on Antonio Perez and Eastman Kodak. The sub- section on crisis leadership training has been dropped. Content has been incorporated under Crisis Leadership. The section on formulating a crisis management plan has been reorganized with two new subsections added and one deleted. Also, in this section, crisis risk assessment has received expanded coverage and elevated to a level 2 subheading now titled “The Five-Step Risk Assessment Model.” The subsection titled “Spotlight on the Af- rican Crisis” has been deleted. The end-of-chapter case is still on Ken Frazier and Merck but completely new in its content and focus.
66352_FM_ptg01_i-xxviii.indd 24 10/21/14 12:17 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
x x v
Acknowledgments I’m deeply honored that Judi Neal, CEO of Edgewalkers, http://edgewalkers.org/ (wrote the Appendix, “Leadership and Spirituality in the Workplace”). I also want to thank my mentor and coauthor of many publications, Joel Corman, for his advice and encourage- ment during and after my graduate education at Suffolk University.
I hope everyone who uses this text enjoys teaching from these materials as I do.
Robert N. Lussier, Spring field College
As it has been with past editions of this book, working with Bob Lussier is always a learn- ing and growth experience that I value very much. He is a good friend and a mentor. To my students, friends, and colleagues who have encouraged and supported me morally, I say thanks. And, finally, I give recognition and thanks to the leadership of my institution, the University of Virginia’s College at Wise, for their support of scholarship of this kind.
Christopher F. Achua, University of Virginia’s College at Wise
Finally, we both would like to acknowledge the superb assistance we received from our editorial team. The guidance, support, and professionalism of Scott Person, Julia Chase, Jennifer Ziegler, the team at Lumina Datamatics, Inc., and Sally Nieman were invaluable to the completion of this project. We would also like to thank Amy Richard for her prepa- ration of support material. We sincerely acknowledge the reviewers and survey respon- dents of this and past editions who provided feedback that greatly improved the quality of this book in many areas.
Reviewers Chris Adalikwu, Concordia College—Selma, Alabama Josje Andmore, Camosun College School of Business Kathy Bohley, University of Indianapolis John Bonosoro, Webster University Brenda D. Bradford, Missouri Baptist University Brian W. Bridgeforth, Herzing College Carl R. Broadhurst, Campbell University Jon Burch, Trevecca Nazarene University Debi Cartwright, Truman State University Don Cassiday, North Park University Ken Chapman, Webster University Felipe Chia, Harrisburg Area Community College Valerie Collins, Sheridan College George W. Crawford, Clayton College & State University Janice Cunningham, Indiana Tech
66352_FM_ptg01_i-xxviii.indd 25 10/21/14 12:17 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
xxvi ACKNOWLEDgMENTS
Sue Cunningham, Rowan Cabarrus Community College Joseph Daly, Appalachian State University Frederick T. Dehner, Rivier College Melinda Drake, Limestone College Rex Dumdum, Marywood University Ray Eldridge, Freed-Hardeman University Debi Carter-Ford, Wilmington College Dave Foster, Montana State University Gerald A. Garrity, Anna Maria College Thomas Garsombke, Northland College Ronald Gayhart, Lakeshore Tech College Michele Geiger, College of Mount St. Joseph James Gelatt, University of Maryland University College Don R. Gibson, Houston Baptist University Eunice M. Glover, Clayton College & State University Garry Grau, Northeast State Community College Wade Graves, Grayson County College Ray Grubbs, Millsaps College Frank Hamilton, Eckerd College Deborah Hanson, University of Great Falls Nathan Hanson, Palm Beach Atlantic Mary Ann Hazen, University of Detroit Mercy Linda Hefferin, Elgin Community College Marilyn M. Helms, Dalton State College Mary Hogue, Kent State University, Stark Campus Carol Himelhoch, Siena Heights University Donny Hurwitz, Austin Community College Stewart Husted, Virginia Military Institute Dr. Katherine Hyatt, Reinhardt University Gale A. Jaeger, Marywood University Lori Happel-Jarratt, The College of St. Scholastica David Jones, North Carolina State University Thomas O. Jones, Jr., Greensboro College Louis Jourdan, Clayton State University Paul N. Keaton, University of Wisconsin–La Crosse Gary Kleemann, Arizona State University East Susan Kowalewski, D’Youville College Bill Leban, DeVry University Chet Legenza, DeVry University Sondra Lucht, Mountain State University Cheryl Macon, Butler Community College James Maddox, Friends University Kathleen B. Magee, Anna Maria College
66352_FM_ptg01_i-xxviii.indd 26 10/21/14 12:17 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
ACKNOWLEDgMENTS xxvii
Charles Mambula, Suffolk University Gary May, Clayton College & State University David McCalman, University of Central Arkansas Lee E. Meadows, Walsh College Ken Miller, Mountain State University Michael Monahan, Frostburg State University Steve Morreale, Worcester State College Lorrie Mowry, McCook Community College Jamie Myrtle, MidAmerica Nazarene University Rhonda S. Palladi, Georgia State University Patricia Parker, Maryville University Jeff Pepper, Chippewa Valley Tech College Nicholas Peppes, St. Louis Community College Melinda Phillabaum, Indiana University Laura Poppo, Virginia Tech William Price, North County Community College Dr. Kanu Priya, Arkansas State University Gordon Rands, Western Illinois University Kira K. Reed, Syracuse University Marlys Rizzi, Simpson College Mary Sacavage, Alvernia College Schuylkill Center Khaled Sartawi, Fort Valley State University Christopher Sieverdes, Clemson University H. D. Sinopoli, Waynesburg College Thomas G. Smith, Fort Valley State University Emeric Solymossy, Western Illinois University—Quad Cities Martha C. Spears, Winthrop University Shane Spiller, Morehead State University Karen Stephens, Camosun College Bill Tracey, Central Connecticut State University Dr. Robert Trumpy, Central Washington University Robin Turner, Rowan-Cabarrus Community College John Waltman, Eastern Michigan University Fred A. Ware, Jr., Valdosta State University Kerr F. Watson, Mount Olive College Kristopher Weatherly, Campbellsville University Amy Wojciechowski, West Shore Community College Mike Woodson, Northeast Iowa Community College Jan Wyatt, Hesser College Benjamin R. Wygal, Southern Adventist University Kimberly S. Young, St. Bonaventure University Kenneth J. Zula, Keystone College Joseph E. Zuro, Troy State University
66352_FM_ptg01_i-xxviii.indd 27 10/21/14 12:17 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
x x v i i i
About the Authors ROBERT N. LUSSIER is a professor of management at Springfield College and has taught management for more than 25 years. He has developed innovative and widely copied methods for applying concepts and developing skills that can be used in one’s personal and professional life. He was the director of Israel Programs and taught there. Other international experiences include Namibia and South Africa.
Dr. Lussier is a prolific writer, with over 400 publications to his credit. His articles have been published in the Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, Business Horizons, En- trepreneurship Theory and Practice, Journal of Business Strategies, Journal of Management Education, Journal of Small Business Management, Journal of Small Business Strategy, SAM® Advanced Management Journal, and others. His other textbooks include Manage- ment Fundamentals: Concepts, Applications, Skill Development 6e (Sage); Human Rela- tions in Organizations: Applications and Skill Building 9e (Irwin/McGraw-Hill); Business, Society and Government Essentials: Strategy and Applied Ethics (Routledge); and others.
When not writing, Dr. Lussier consults to a wide array of commercial and nonprofit organizations. In fact, some of the material in the book was developed for such clients as Baystate Medical Center, Coca-Cola, Friendly’s Ice Cream, the Institute of Financial Education, Mead, Monsanto, Smith & Wesson, the Social Security Administration, the Visiting Nurses Associations of America, and the YMCA.
Dr. Lussier holds a bachelor of science in business administration from Salem State College, two master’s degrees in business and education from Suffolk University, and a doctorate in management from the University of New Haven.
CHRISTOPHER F. ACHUA is a professor in the Department of Business and Economics at the University of Virginia’s College at Wise. His teaching has centered on three disciplines: strategic management, marketing, and organizational leadership. Dr. Achua’s interest in engaging students in real-life learning opportunities led him to create and direct programs such as the Center for Entrepreneurship, Leadership, and Service and the Small Business Institute at his university. These programs focused on developing students’ leadership and entrepreneurial skills by applying theory to real-world situations.
Dr. Achua has presented scholarly papers at regional and national conferences. His papers have been published in many refereed proceedings, the Small Business Institute Journal, and the Journal of Small Business Strategy. When not involved in academic pur- suits, he lends his expertise to community development programs and initiatives. He has served on several boards of organizations in the local community, and was chair of the Mountain Empire Regional Business Incubator’s board of directors.
Dr. Achua received his undergraduate degree in business administration and account- ing from the University of Sioux Falls, South Dakota; his MBA from the University of South Dakota; and his doctorate from the United States International University (now Alliant International University) in San Diego, California.
66352_FM_ptg01_i-xxviii.indd 28 10/21/14 12:17 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
1
Chapter
1
C h a p t e r O U t L I N e
Leadership Described
Leadership Development
Defining Leadership with Five Key Elements
Leadership Skills
Are Leaders Born or Made?
Can Leadership Be Taught and Skills Developed?
Managerial Leadership Skills
Leadership Managerial Roles
Interpersonal Roles
Informational Roles
Decisional Roles
Levels of Analysis of Leadership Theory
Individual Level of Analysis
Group Level of Analysis
Organizational Level of Analysis
Interrelationships among the Levels of Analysis
Leadership Theory Paradigms
The Trait Theory Paradigm
The Behavior Leadership Theory Paradigm
The Contingency Leadership Theory Paradigm
The Integrative Leadership Theory Paradigm
From the Management to the Leadership Theory Paradigm
Objectives of the Book
Leadership Theory
Application of Leadership Theory
Leadership Skill Development
Flexibility
Organization of the Book
Who Is a Leader and What Skills Do Leaders Need?
Learning Outcomes After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
1 Briefly describe the five key elements of leadership. p. 5
2 Identify and define the managerial leadership skills. p. 8
3 List the ten managerial roles based on their three categories. p. 11
4 Explain the interrelationships among the levels of leadership analysis. p. 15
5 Describe the major similarity and difference between the trait and behavioral leadership theories, and the interrelationships between them and contingency theories. p. 16
66352_ch01_ptg01_001-030.indd 1 10/15/14 12:47 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
2 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
Jeff Bezos amazon.com We begin each chapter by introducing an exceptional leader and company, followed by some questions for you to answer, and we answer the questions throughout the chapter.
Back in July 1995, e-commerce pioneer Jeff Bezos launched Amazon.com as an online bookstore at age 30. Over the years he transformed Amazon into “the every- thing store” that rivals Walmar t as a store, Apple as a de- vice maker, and IBM as a data services provider. Amazon is a Fortune 500 company, ranked in the top 50, with sales expected to exceed $75 billion in 2013.
Bezos is a demanding boss who doesn’t tolerate stu- pidity. If employees don’t have the right answers or try to bluff or show uncer tainty or frailty, he has been known to make harsh comments. But his criticism is almost always on target that leads to improvements. He is obsessed with improving company performance and customer ser vice and has a public e-mail. When he gets a complaint that irks him, employees get a Bezos question mark e-mail, and they react to resolve the issue quickly, like a ticking bomb.
Bezos is incredibly intelligent, even about things he knows little about. He has won numerous awards for his leadership, including Time magazine Person of the Year and Fortune named Bezos as the best CEO in 2012. He has an estimated net worth of close to $30 billion.
OpeNING CaSe QUeStIONS:
1. Why is Amazon so successful?
2. Does Amazon use our definition of leadership?
3. What managerial leadership skills does CEO Jeff Bezos use at Amazon?
4. What managerial leadership roles does CEO Jeff Bezos perform at Amazon?
Can you answer any of these questions? You’ll find an- swers to these questions about Amazon and its leadership throughout the chapter.
To learn more about Amazon, visit the company’s Web site at http://www. amazon.com.
1 Reference for open case and answers to the question within the chapter.
OPENING CASE Application
T he focus of this chapter is on helping you understand what leadership is and what this book is all about. As you can see in the chapter outline, we begin by discussing why leadership is important and defining leadership. Then we explain the three managerial leadership skills and the ten roles that managerial leaders perform. Next
we explain the three levels of leadership analysis, which provides the framework for the book. After explaining the four major leadership paradigms that have developed over the years, we end this chapter by stating the objectives of the book and presenting its organization.
Leadership Described In this section, we discuss the leadership course and define leadership as having five key elements.
Leadership Development Leadership is everyone’s business, so let’s begin with a discussion of the importance of leadership, then answer the question, “Why study leadership?” and also state the impor- tance of self-awareness in leadership development.
Why Leadership Development Is Important Here are just a few reasons why leadership is so important and the need for self-awareness in leadership.
66352_ch01_ptg01_001-030.indd 2 10/15/14 12:47 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 1 Who IS A LEADER AND WhAt SkILLS Do LEADERS NEED? 3
Leadership is a key issue in management and has been for more than 100 years,2 as thousands of leadership studies have been conducted,3 and interest in leadership remains strong.4 I did a Google search and got “about 434,000,000 results.”5
Organizations spend a great deal of effort and resources to teach employees how to lead.6 More specifically, corporations spend more than $2.2 trillion on education and training, with an estimated $10 billion being spent on leadership development alone.7 Leadership development is often cited as an important priority because it is viewed as a competitive advantage8 as there can be significant positive returns to the investment in leadership development.9
Although it is generally agreed that leadership is important, critics of leadership devel- opment programs state that new college graduates lack the skills necessary to effectively lead people.10
As the examples illustrate, leadership matters, and there is a great need for leaders to use best practices.11 To this end, the focus of this book is to help you develop your leadership skills, so that you can become a successful leader in your personal and professional life.
Why Study Leadership? It’s natural at this point to be thinking, “What can I get from this book?” or “What’s in it for me?” These common questions are seldom asked or answered directly. The short answer is that the better you can work with people—and this is what most of this book is about—the more successful you will be in both your personal and your professional lives.12 If you are a manager, or want to be a manager someday, you need good leadership skills to be successful.13 Even if you are not interested in being a manager, you still need leadership skills to succeed in today’s workplace.14 The old workplace, in which managers simply told employees what to do, is gone. Today, employees want to be involved in management,15 and organizations expect employees to work in teams and share in decision making and other management tasks.16
The study of leadership also applies directly to your personal life. You communicate with, and interact with, people every day; you make personal plans and decisions, set goals, prioritize what you will do, and get others to do things for you. Are you ever in con- f lict with family and friends? This book can help you develop leadership skills that you can apply in all of those areas.
The Need for Self-Assessment in Leadership Development Instructors often incorporate self-assessment.17 “Know Thyself ” or self-awareness has been called the leadership first commandment,18 so the first step to leadership devel- opment is self-awareness of leadership competencies.19 To provide you with leadership self-awareness, every chapter has self-assessment exercises. Let’s start now to better un- derstand your leadership potential by completing Self-Assessment 1-1.
Leadership potential SELF-ASSESSMENT 1-1
As with all of the self-assessment exercises in this book, there are no right or wrong answers, so don’t try to pick what you think is the right answer. Be honest in answering the questions, so that you can better understand yourself and your behavior as it relates to leadership.
For each pair of statements, distribute 5 points, based on how characteristic each statement is of you. If the first statement is totally like you and the second is not like you at all, give 5 points to the first and 0 to the second. If it is the opposite, use 0 and 5. If the statement is usually like you, then the distribution can be 4 and 1, or 1 and 4.
If both statements tend to be like you, the distribution should be 3 and 2, or 2 and 3. Again, the combined score for each pair of statements must equal 5.
66352_ch01_ptg01_001-030.indd 3 10/15/14 12:47 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
4 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
1. Why is amazon so successful?
Founder and CEO Jeff Bezos is the key to Amazon’s success. Bezos is obsessed with improving company performance and customer service by offering wider selection, lower prices, and fast, reliable delivery. Amazon’s mission is to seek to be Ear th’s most customer-centric company for four primary customer sets: consumers, sellers, enterprises, and content creators. Under Bezos’s leadership, Amazon has grown to become the everything store, with global operation in Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Spain, and the United Kingdom, selling more than 20 million products. It is known as one of the most successful companies in the world, and is ranked 3rd as the Fortune World’s Most Admired Companies and ranked 1st as the most trusted U.S. brand.
OPENING CASE Application
here are the scoring distributions for each pair of statements:
0–5 or 5–0 one of the statements is totally like you, the other not like you at all. 1–4 or 4–1 one statement is usually like you, the other not. 2–3 or 3–2 Both statements are like you, although one is slightly more like you.
1. I’m interested in and willing to take charge of a group of people.
I want someone else to be in charge of the group.
2. When I’m not in charge, I’m willing to give input to the leader to improve performance.
When I’m not in charge, I do things the leader’s way, rather than offer my suggestions.
3. I’m interested in and willing to get people to listen to my suggestions and to imple- ment them.
I’m not interested in influencing other people. 4. I offer ideas and suggestions that are com-
monly implemented by others. I don’t offer many ideas and suggestions,
and they are often ignored. 5. When I’m in charge, I want to share the
management responsibilities with group members.
When I’m in charge, I want to perform the management functions for the group.
6. I want to have clear goals and to develop and implement plans to achieve them.
I like to have very general goals and take things as they come.
7. I like to change the way my job is done and to learn and do new things.
I like stability, or to do my job the same way; I don’t like learning and doing new things.
8. I enjoy working with people and helping them succeed.
I don’t really like working with people and helping them succeed.
9. I get greater pleasure in team accomplishments.
I get greater pleasure in personal accomplishments.
10. I seek harmony in teams and try to resolve conflicts.
I avoid conflict and let group members resolve their own conflicts.
to determine your leadership potential score, add up the numbers (0–5) for the first statement in each pair; don’t bother adding the numbers for the second statement. the total should be between 0 and 50. Place your score on the continuum at the end of this assessment.
0 — 5 — 10 — 15 — 20 — 25 — 30 — 35 — 40 — 45 — 50 Lower leadership potential Higher leadership potential
Generally, the higher your score, the greater your potential to be an effective leader. however, essentially no one gets a perfect score. the key to success is not simply potential but persistence and hard work. You can develop your leadership ability through this course by applying the principles and theories to your personal and professional lives.
If you want to be a leader, what areas do you need to work on to improve your leadership skills?
SELF-ASSESSMENT 1-1 Leadership potential (continued)
66352_ch01_ptg01_001-030.indd 4 10/15/14 12:47 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 1 Who IS A LEADER AND WhAt SkILLS Do LEADERS NEED? 5
YOU Make the ethICaL Call
1.1 Is Leadership Really Important?
Scott Adams is the creator of the car toon character Dilber t. Adams makes fun of manag- ers, in par t because he distrusts top-level managers, saying that leadership is really a crock. He says leadership is about manipulating people to get them to do something they don’t want to do, and when there may not be anything in it for them. According to Adams, CEOs basically run the same scam as for tune-tellers, who make up a bunch of guesses and when by chance one is correct, they hope you forget the other errors. First, CEOs blame their predecessors for anything that is bad, then they shuffle ever ything around, star t a new strategic program, and wait. When things go well, despite the CEO, the CEO takes the credit and moves on to the next job. Adams says we may be hung up on leader- ship as par t of our DNA. It seems we have always sought to put somebody above every- body else.20
1. Do you agree with Scott Adams that leadership is a crock?
2. Do we really need to have someone in the leadership role?
Briefly describe the five key elements of leadership. Learning outcome
1
Defining Leadership with Five Key elements When people think about leadership, images come to mind of powerful dynamic individ- uals who command victorious armies, shape the events of nations, develop religions, or direct corporate empires. Why are certain leaders so successful? Why do certain leaders have dedicated followers while others do not? Why were Gandhi, Mother Theresa, Martin Luther King, and Nelson Mandela such inf luential leaders? In this book, you will learn the major leadership theories and research findings regarding leadership effectiveness.
There is no universal definition of leadership because leadership is complex, and be- cause leadership is studied in different ways that require different definitions. As in lead- ership research studies, we will use a single definition that meets our purpose in writing this book. Here, we define leadership and discuss its five elements, which are included in Self-Assessment 1-1, as each of the ten questions relates to the elements of our leadership definition and to your leadership potential.
Leadership is the inf luencing process between leaders and followers to achieve orga- nizational objectives through change. Let’s discuss the five key elements of our definition; see Exhibit 1.1 for a list.
Leadership Definition Key EXHIBIT 1.1
Influence
Organizational Objectives
PeopleChange
LeadershipLeaders–Followers
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch01_ptg01_001-030.indd 5 10/15/14 12:47 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
6 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
Leaders–Followers Leadership is typically understood to take place where leaders and followers share a formal group membership,21 and leadership is important as more organizations struc- ture work around teamwork.22 Question 1 of Self-Assessment 1-1 is meant to get you thinking about whether you want to be a leader or a follower. If you are not interested and not willing to be in charge, you are better suited to be a follower. However, leader- ship is shared.
Leadership is shared. One leader can’t figure it all out.23 Leadership is plural, not singular, as you can have many leaders.24 Good followers also perform leadership roles when needed. And followers inf luence leaders. Thus, in our definition of leadership, the inf luencing process is between leaders and followers, not just a leader inf luencing fol- lowers; it’s a two-way street.25 Knowing how to lead and developing leadership skills will make you a better leader and follower.26 So whether you want to be a leader or a follower, you will benefit from this book.
Organizations and managers or employees. Throughout this book, leadership is referred to in the context of formal organizational settings in business corporations (GE, IBM), government agencies (the Kent Police Department), and nonprofit organizations (Red Cross). Organizations have two major classifications of employees: managers, who have subordinates and formal authority to tell them what to do; and employees, who do not. All managers perform four major functions: planning, organizing, leading, and con- trolling. Leadership is thus a part of the manager’s job. However, there are managers— you may know some—who are not effective leaders. There are also nonmanagers who have great inf luence on managers and peers.27
Manager or leader and followers? In this book, we do not use the terms manager and leader interchangeably. When we use the word manager, we mean a person who has a formal title and authority. When we use the term leader, we mean a person who may be either a manager or a nonmanager. A leader has the ability to inf luence others; a manager may not. Thus, a leader is not necessarily a person who holds some formal position such as manager.
A follower is a person who is being inf luenced by a leader. A follower can be a man- ager or a nonmanager—leadership is shared. Good followers are not “yes people” who simply follow the leader without giving input that inf luences the leader. The qualities needed for effective leadership are the same as those needed to be an effective follower. Throughout this book, we use the term behavior when referring to the activities of peo- ple or the things they do and say as they are inf luenced. You will learn more about fol- lowership in Chapter 7.
As implied in Question 2 of Self-Assessment 1-1, good followers give input and inf lu- ence leaders. If you want to be an effective follower, you need to share your ideas. Also, as a leader you need to listen to others and implement their ideas to be effective. According to GE CEO Jeff Immelt, GE is not run like a big company; it is run like a big partner- ship, where every leader can make a contribution not just to their job, but to the entire company.28
Influence Influencing is the process of a leader communicating ideas, gaining acceptance of them, and motivating followers to support and implement the ideas through change. The essence of leadership is inf luencing.29 Let’s face it; we all want to get our way, which is being inf luential.
Question 3 of Self-Assessment 1-1 asked if you were interested in, and willing to, inf luence others, as a leader or follower and Question 4 asked if you offer ideas and
WORK Application 1-1 Recall a present or past job. Were you both a leader and a follower? Explain.
WORK Application 1-2 Briefly explain the influencing relationship between the leader and followers where you work(ed).
66352_ch01_ptg01_001-030.indd 6 10/15/14 12:47 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 1 Who IS A LEADER AND WhAt SkILLS Do LEADERS NEED? 7
suggestions that are commonly implemented by others. When you have a management position, you have more power to inf luence others. But, effective followers also inf lu- ence others. Your ability to inf luence others can be developed. Inf luencing includes power, politics, and negotiating; you will learn more about how to inf luence others in Chapter 5.
Question 5 asked if you want to share management responsibility as a leader. Inf luenc- ing is also about the relationship between leaders and followers. Managers may coerce subordinates to inf luence their behavior, but leaders do not. Leaders gain the commit- ment and enthusiasm of followers who are willing to be inf luenced as they share leader- ship. Good leaders seek input from all team members.30
Organizational Objectives Effective leaders inf luence followers, but to do what—to accomplish shared objectives.31 Setting objectives clearly affects performance.32 Members of the organization need to work together toward an outcome that the leader and followers both want, a desired fu- ture or shared purpose that motivates them toward this more preferable outcome. As im- plied in Question 6 of Self-Assessment 1, effective leaders set clear goals with their team. You will learn how to set objectives in Chapter 3.
Change Inf luencing and setting objectives is about change, as leaders set objectives for behav- ioral change.33 Leaders bring about change by asking followers for their input,34 to change the status quo,35 to continuously improve work processes, and to develop new innovative products and services.36 As implied in Question 7 of Self-Assessment 1 and the informa- tion in this section, to be an effective leader and follower you must be open to change. To be successful, you need to change your systems and strategies.37 When was the last time you did something new and different? You will learn more about leading change in Chapter 11.
People Although the term people is not specifically mentioned in our definition of leadership, after reading about the other elements, you should realize that leadership is about leading people through relationships.38 It’s the people that accomplish the objectives.39 As im- plied in Questions 8–10 of Self-Assessment 1-1, to be effective at almost every job today, you must be able to get along with people.40 You will learn how to develop your people skills throughout this book.
WORK Application 1-3 State one or more objectives from an organization where you work(ed).
WORK Application 1-4 Are the managers where you work(ed) effective at influencing their employees to bring about change? Explain.
WORK Application 1-5 Do managers where you work(ed) treat their employees as valuable assets? Explain.
2. Does amazon use our definition of leadership?
Jeff Bezos is clearly the leader at Amazon, but he also gets ideas from his followers. Bezos is also very influential. He con- vinces investors to give him money to grow Amazon, gets other businesses to offer products and services through his Web site, and gets customers to buy those products. Bezos has a clear shared vision and objectives for the company. Amazon is fundamentally changing the way that people buy and read books with e-book readers and tablets. Amazon is about service to people.
OPENING CASE Application
66352_ch01_ptg01_001-030.indd 7 10/15/14 12:47 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
8 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
Leadership Skills In this section, let’s start by answering the age old question—are leaders born or made and can leadership be taught and skills developed—and then we will discuss the three skills managerial leaders need to succeed. But first complete Self-Assessment 1-2 to deter- mine your managerial leadership skills.
are Leaders Born or Made? Are leaders born or made, or what determines leadership—nature or nurture? You may think this is a trick question, because most researchers say the answer is both. Effective leaders are not simply born or made. They are born with some leadership ability and develop it.41 So both perspectives add to the debate on the origins of leadership skills.42 Researchers estimate that 30 percent of leadership is heritable, whereas 70 percent is de- veloped.43 You will learn more about leadership traits (nature) in Chapter 2.
Some go so far as to say that leaders are definitely made, not born, and that everyone has equal potential to develop leadership skills (nurture). NFL Greenback Packers legend- ary football coach Vince Lombardi said, “Leaders are made, they are not born. They are made by hard effort.”44 Whatever your leadership ability is now, you can invest in devel- oping your leadership skills, or you can allow them to remain as they are now. We’ll talk more about this in the last section of this chapter.
Identify and define the managerial leadership skills. Learning outcome
2
Managerial Leadership SkillsSELF-ASSESSMENT 1-2
Rate each statement by how well the behavior describes you on a scale of 1–5. 1 2 3 4 5 Doesn’t describe me Describes me
1. I enjoy working with things.
2. I enjoy working with people.
3 I enjoy working with conceptual ideas.
4. I like to work with technical things like computers and equipment.
5. I like to figure out people’s feeling, atti- tudes, and motives.
6. I like to solve problems.
7. Following directions and procedures comes easy for me.
8. Getting along with a variety of people comes easy for me.
9. Analytical and quantitative reasoning comes easy for me
10. I’m good at getting a task done by the deadline.
11. I’m good at getting people to overcome conflict and work together.
12. I’m good at figuring out ways of overcom- ing barriers to get things done.
to determine your score, add up the numbers (1–5) for each skill and place them on the following lines. Each skill score should be between 5 and 20.
technical skill (items 1, 4, 7, 10) Interpersonal skill (items 2, 5, 8, 11) Decision-making skill (items 3, 6, 9, 12)
Your score for each skill is essentially a measure of your preference. As the first three questions ask, do you prefer working with things, people, or conceptual ideas, or are they equal? In this section, you will learn about these three skills and throughout the book you will be given the opportunity to develop your managerial leadership skills.
66352_ch01_ptg01_001-030.indd 8 10/15/14 12:47 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 1 Who IS A LEADER AND WhAt SkILLS Do LEADERS NEED? 9
Can Leadership Be taught and Skills Developed? Another question to answer is: Can leadership be taught and skills developed? Leadership is an individual capability.45 Research supports that leadership is learnable,46 that stu- dents can develop their leadership skills,47 including their knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSA).48 As already discussed, why would colleges and corporations spend a great deal of effort and resources (billions of dollars) on leadership training if leadership skills can’t be developed?49 Also, as stated, self-assessments aid in leadership development.50 Leadership skills are developed through various forms of play, so it can be fun.51 Because leadership skills are so important, the focus of this book is on developing our skills.
Managerial Leadership Skills Now let’s discuss the three management skills that you need to be successful,52 as man- agement skills have been identified as a core competency.53 They are listed in Exhibit 1-2 and discussed here. We also point out the differences in the skills needed based on the level of management.
WORK Application 1-6 Do you believe that you are a born leader? Do you believe that you can develop your leadership skills to improve job performance?
Management Skills EXHIBIT 1.2
Decision Making Skills
(primarily concerned with conceptual ideas)
Interpersonal Skills (primarily concerned with people)
Technical Skills (primarily concerned with things)
Technical Skills technical skills involve the ability to use methods and techniques to perform a task. This includes knowledge about methods, processes, procedures, and techniques, and the abil- ity to use tools and equipment to perform a task. Technical skills can also be called busi- ness skills, or can include them.54 When managers are working on budgets, for example, they may need computer skills in order to use spreadsheet software such as Microsoft® Excel®. Most employees are promoted to their first management position primarily be- cause of their technical skills. Technical skills vary widely from job to job, and they are the easiest of the three management skills to develop.55 Therefore, we do not focus on developing technical skills.
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch01_ptg01_001-030.indd 9 10/15/14 12:47 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
10 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
Interpersonal Skills Interpersonal skills involve the ability to understand, communicate, and work well with individuals and groups through developing effective relationships. Interpersonal skills are also called human, people, and soft skills. As we interact with others, we are using our in- terpersonal skills.56 As discussed in our definition of leadership, relationships are critical to leadership success, and they are built on interpersonal skills.57 Unfortunately, college grads have been found lacking it their interpersonal skills.58Interpersonal skills are based on several other skills, including communicating, teamwork, power, politics, negotiating, networking, motivating, conf lict, diversity, and ethical skills. We will discuss these inter- personal skills throughout the book, and you will have the opportunity to develop your interpersonal skills through this course.
Decision-Making Skills Decision-making skills are based on the ability to conceptualize situations and select al- ternatives to solve problems and take advantage of opportunities. It’s about how we reason and made decisions.59 It involves critical thinking,60 using a rational process,61 analyz- ing alternatives,62 and attempting to maximize positive outcomes for the organization.63 Clearly the decisions you have made over the years affect who you are today and your success.
Decision-making skills are based on several other skills, including conceptual, diag- nostic, analytical, critical-thinking, quantitative reasoning, and time management skills, as well as the ability to be creative, perceive trends, anticipate changes, and recognize problems and opportunities. We will discuss decision-making skills throughout the book, and you will have the opportunity to develop your decision-making skills through this course.
Skills Needed Based on Management Level Although managers need all three skills, the need for each skill does vary based on the level of management. Top-level managers have a greater need for interpersonal and deci- sion-making skills than technical skills. Middle-level managers have a balanced need for all three skills. First-level managers have a greater need for technical and interpersonal skills than decision-making skills. Complete Concept Application 1-1 to apply the man- agement skills.
WORK Application 1-7 Select a manager, preferably one who is or was your boss, and state the specific management skills he or she uses(used) on the job.
Managerial Leadership Skills Identify each activity as being one of the following types of management skills: a. technical b. interpersonal c. decision-making
1. A manager is trying to figure out why a delivery hasn’t been shipped out yet.
2. A manager is sending a text message from her smartphone.
3. A manager is making copies of a report he just finished at the copy machine downstairs.
4. A manager is praising an employee for a job well done.
5. A manager is determining the priority of orders to be filled next week.
CONCept APPLICATION 1-1
66352_ch01_ptg01_001-030.indd 10 10/15/14 12:47 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 1 Who IS A LEADER AND WhAt SkILLS Do LEADERS NEED? 11
3. What managerial leadership skills does CeO Jeff Bezos use at amazon?
Jeff Bezos has technical skills as he developed the first online bookstore as a high-tech pioneer. He continues to challenge his employees’ technical operations that expand the company performance and customer service. He also has interpersonal skills as he motivates employees to continually grow the business. Bezos clearly has decision-making skills as he is the one who has the conceptual ability to develop a successful business model and to continually change it to grow the company.
OPENING CASE Application
Leadership Managerial Roles In this section, we discuss what leaders do on the job—the management roles they play.64 You will notice an overlap between the skills and roles because the leader needs the com- petencies (knowledge, skills, and ability—KSAs) to enact the managerial roles.65 So we need to engage effectively in leadership roles.66
Henry Mintzberg identified ten managerial roles that leaders perform to accomplish organizational objectives.67 He grouped these roles into three categories. The manage- rial role categories are interpersonal, informational, and decisional. Exhibit 1.3 shows the ten managerial roles, based on the three categories.
List the ten managerial roles based on their three categories. Learning outcome
3
Interpersonal roles The interpersonal leadership roles include figurehead, leader, and liaison. Clearly, interpersonal skills are needed to successfully play interpersonal roles through managing interpersonal relationships.68
Leader Role The leader role is that of performing the management functions (planning, organizing, leading, and controlling) to effectively operate the managers’ unit to accomplish orga- nizational objectives.69 Therefore, the leader role inf luences how the leader performs the other roles. You will learn more about the leadership role throughout this book.
Figurehead Role Leaders perform the figurehead role when they represent the organization or depart- ment in legal, social, ceremonial, and symbolic activities. Here are some of the figure- head activities: signing official documents; entertaining clients or customers as official
Managerial Roles EXHIBIT 1.3
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
Interpersonal roles Informational roles Decisional roles
Leader Figurehead Liaison
Monitor Disseminator Spokesperson
Entrepreneur Disturbance- handler Resource-allocator Negotiator
66352_ch01_ptg01_001-030.indd 11 10/15/14 12:47 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
12 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
representatives and receiving/escorting official visitors; informally talking to people and attending outside meetings as an organizational representative; presiding at meetings and ceremonial events.
Liaison Role Leaders perform the liaison role when they interact with people outside their organiza- tional unit. Liaison behavior includes networking to develop and maintain relationships, serving on committees with members from outside the organizational unit, and attend- ing professional/trade association meetings.
Informational roles The informational leadership roles include monitor, disseminator, and spokesperson. Informational role success is also based on interpersonal skills.
Monitor Role Leaders perform the monitor role when they gather information by talking to others, reading (memos, reports, professional/trade publications, newspapers, etc.), attending meetings, visiting competitor facilities, and so forth.
Disseminator Role Leaders perform the disseminator role when they send information to others within the organizational unit. Using information translated into skills that advance the organiza- tion is now often being referred to as knowledge management.
Spokesperson Role Leaders perform the spokesperson role when they provide information to people outside the organizational unit. People must report information to their boss and other depart- ments, customers, suppliers, and so forth.
Decisional roles The decisional leadership roles include entrepreneur, disturbance-handler, resource allocator, and negotiator. Decision-making skills are important and they are needed to be successful in the decisional roles.70
Entrepreneur Role Leaders perform the entrepreneur role when they innovate new or improved products and services and initiate improvements in business processes. Leaders often get ideas for im- provements through the monitor role.
Disturbance-Handler Role Leaders perform the disturbance-handler role when they take corrective action during crisis that interrupts business, such as a natural disaster, or emergencies like a breakdown of important machines/equipment or needed material not arriving as scheduled. Leaders typically give this role priority over all other roles during the disruption.
Resource-Allocator Role Leaders perform the resource-allocator role when they schedule, request authorization, and perform budgeting activities. Deciding who gets the limited resources is important as people make decisions seeking self-interest that may not be in the best interest of the organization.71
Negotiator Role Leaders perform the negotiator role when they represent their organizational unit during transactions that do not include set boundaries, such as only one price and term of a sale
WORK Application 1-8 Give one job example of the specific behavior you or some other leader displayed when performing the figurehead, leader, and liaison roles. For each of the three roles, be sure to identify the leader as you or another, the role by its name, and the specific behavior.
WORK Application 1-9 Give one job example of the specific behavior you or some other leader conducted when performing the monitor, disseminator, and spokesperson roles. For each of the three roles, be sure to identify the leader as you or another, the role by its name, and the specific behavior.
WORK Application 1-10 Give one job example of the specific behavior you or some other leader performed when fulfilling the entrepreneur, disturbance- handler, resource-allocator, and negotiator roles. For each of the four roles, be sure to identify the leader as you or another, the role by its name, and the specific behavior.
66352_ch01_ptg01_001-030.indd 12 10/15/14 12:47 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 1 Who IS A LEADER AND WhAt SkILLS Do LEADERS NEED? 13
or purchase for a product/service, pay of an employee, or a raise for themselves. Leaders can try to negotiate a good deal to benefit the organization.
Although managers are responsible for all ten roles, which roles are most important— and which roles the manager performs and which are performed by other leaders—will vary based on the manager’s job and the organizational environment.
After answering Work Applications 8 through 10, you should realize that we perform the leadership roles regardless of management title. Completing Concept Application 1-2, Questions 6-20, gives you practice at identifying the ten managerial roles.
4. What managerial leadership roles does CeO Jeff Bezos perform at amazon?
Like all managers who are good leaders, Jeff Bezos plays all ten roles, and he delegates these roles to his followers. His interpersonal roles include signing documents; entertaining customers; running and attending meetings; leadership devel- opment and evaluation of followers; and serving on committees and boards.
His informational roles include extensive communications. Bezos is consistently analyzing information in the monitoring role, and sending information in his disseminator role, and is clearly the spokesperson for the company in the decisional role category. Bezos is an online entrepreneur. His other roles include developing new products to keep ahead of the competition and dealing with disturbances created by local and foreign government business laws and regulations.
OPENING CASE Application
Leadership Managerial Roles Identify each of the following 15 behaviors by its leadership role. Write the appropriate letter in the blank before each item.
Interpersonal roles Informational roles Decisional roles a. leader d. monitor g. entrepreneur b. figurehead e. disseminator h. disturbance-handler c. liaison f. spokesperson i. resource-allocator j. negotiator
6. The supervisor is being promoted to middle management and is discussing her pay for the new job.
7. The supervisor is disciplining an employee for smoking on the job.
8. The leader is visiting a competitor’s Web site to find out its prices.
9. The leader is getting maintenance to come fix a broken pipe and clean up a flood of water in the work area.
10. The manager has decided to stop having customers sign credit card receipts for less than $50 to speed up the checkout line.
11. The manager is breaking up a fight between two employees and getting the other employees to get back to work.
12. The manager is e-mailing the employees to inform them of their work hours for next week.
13. The manager in productions is talking to the manager in facilities about performing routine maintenance for the department equipment.
CONCept APPLICATION 1-2
(continued)
66352_ch01_ptg01_001-030.indd 13 10/15/14 12:47 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
14 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
Levels of Analysis of Leadership Theory One useful way to classify leadership theory and research is by the levels of analysis.72 The three levels of analysis of leadership theory are individual, group, and organiza- tional. Most leadership theories are formulated in terms of processes at only one of these three levels.73 You will brief ly learn about each level in this section, and the details of each in Parts One through Three of this book.
Individual Level of analysis The individual level of analysis of leadership theory focuses on the individual leader and the relationship with individual followers.74 The individual level can also be called the dyadic process. There is an implicit assumption that leadership effectiveness can- not be understood without examining how a leader and follower inf luence each other over time. You will also have multiple dyadic relationships at work. In Part One, “In- dividuals as Leaders” (Chapters 1 through 5), the focus is on the individual level of analysis.
Group Level of analysis The second level of analysis of leadership theory focuses on the relationship between the leader and the collective group of followers. This level is also called group process. Group process theories focus on how a leader contributes to group effectiveness. Extensive re- search on small groups has identified important determinants of group effectiveness, which you will learn about in Part Two, “Team Leadership” (Chapters 6 through 8). An important part of group process is meetings. In Chapter 8, you will learn how to conduct productive meetings.
Organizational Level of analysis The third level of analysis focuses on the organization, and is also called organizational process. Individuals and teams contribute to organizational success. Organizational per- formance in the long run depends on effectively adapting to the environment and ac- quiring the necessary resources to survive. You will learn more about determinants of organizational performance in Part Three, “Organizational Leadership” (Chapters 9 through 12).
14. An employee quit and the manager is in the process of replacing the person.
15. The manager is signing a purchase order for new equipment.
16. The public relations leader is sending a press release to the local newspaper.
17. The manager has been given $1,000 to split and give to two of his 20 employees as bonuses.
18. The purchasing manager is discussing the price of an expensive new machine, and its installation and maintenance contract deal.
19. At the company annual employee meeting, the CEO is passing out awards for excellent performance.
20. The manager is reading the monthly trade journal.
CONCept APPLICATION 1-2
66352_ch01_ptg01_001-030.indd 14 10/15/14 12:47 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 1 Who IS A LEADER AND WhAt SkILLS Do LEADERS NEED? 15
Interrelationships among the Levels of analysis Exhibit 1.4 illustrates the interrelationships among the levels of analysis of leadership theory. Note that the individual is placed at the bottom of the triangle because group and organizational performance are based on individual performance. It has been said that an organization is the sum of all of its individual transactions. Depending on the size of the group and organization you work for, your individual performance may inf luence the performance of the group and organization positively or negatively.76
YOU Make the ethICaL Call
1.2 Executive Compensation
Executive compensation is a complex and controversial subject. On one side of the de- bate, executive management skill has a direct impact on the success of the firm. Top ex- ecutives should be paid multimillion-dollar compensation packages; after all, if it weren’t for some effective CEOs, companies would not be making the millions of dollars of profits they make each year. They deser ve a piece of the pie they helped create. In capitalist countries, talented CEOs, like in pro spor ts, are entitled to fetch their price.
On the other side, top executives have been criticized for being overpaid, especially as CEO pay rose while employees were getting laid off during the recession. Eight CEOs, led by J.C. Penny, made more than 1,000 times their average worker. The Oracle CEO made an estimated $189,000 per hour. For tune 500 CEOs all make millions. Some say top executives are being overpaid.75
1. Do executives deserve to make around 300 times as much as the average worker?
2. Is it ethical for managers to take large pay increases while laying off employees and when giving them only small raises?
3. Are companies being socially responsible when paying executives premium compensation?
Explain the interrelationships among the levels of leadership analysis. Learning outcome
4
Individual
O rganizational
Gr ou
p
Interrelationships among the Levels of Analysis of Leadership Theory EXHIBIT 1.4
If individual performance is low throughout the organization, the triangle will fall be- cause it will not have a firm foundation, or performance will be low. The group part of the triangle supports the organizational side. So if the groups are not effective, the triangle
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch01_ptg01_001-030.indd 15 10/15/14 12:47 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
16 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
will fall or organizational performance will be low. At the same time, both group and organizational performance affect the performance of the individual. If groups are highly motivated and productive (or not productive), chances are the individual will be produc- tive (or not) as well. Success tends to be contagious. Working for a winning organization like Google tends to motivate individuals to perform at their best to stay on top. However, an organization and its performance are more than the simple sum of its individuals and groups.
Leadership Theory Paradigms The first thing we need to do is define the important concepts of this section. A leader- ship theory is an explanation of some aspect of leadership; theories have practical value because they are used to better understand, predict, and control successful leadership. So, the main purpose of a theory is to inform practice.77 It has been said that there is nothing as practical as a good theory. There are four major classifications of leadership theory, also called research approaches, used to explain leadership. Leadership theory classifica- tions include trait, behavioral, contingency, and integrative theories. In this section, we discuss each classification and indicate where it is covered in more detail later in this book.
A leadership paradigm is a shared mindset that represents a fundamental way of thinking about, perceiving, studying, researching, and understanding leadership. The lead- ership paradigm has changed in the 60 years during which it has been studied. The four major classifications of leadership theory all represent a change in leadership paradigm. You will also learn about the change in paradigm from management to leadership in this section.
Describe the major similarity and difference between the trait and behavioral leadership theories, and the interrelationships between them and contingency theories.
Learning outcome
5
the trait theory paradigm Early leadership studies were based on the assumption that leaders are born, not made. Researchers wanted to identify a set of characteristics or traits that distinguished leaders from followers, or effective leaders from ineffective leaders. Leadership trait theo- ries attempt to explain distinctive characteristics accounting for leadership effectiveness. Researchers analyzed physical and psychological traits, or qualities, such as high energy level, appearance, aggressiveness, self-reliance, persuasiveness, and dominance, in an ef- fort to identify a set of traits that all successful leaders possessed.
The list of traits was to be used as a prerequisite for promoting candidates to leader- ship positions. Only candidates possessing all the identified traits would be given leader- ship positions. You will learn more about trait theory in the next chapter.
the Behavioral Leadership theory paradigm By the 1950s, most of the leadership research had changed its paradigm, going from trait theory to focusing on what the leader actually did on the job (behavior).78 In the continu- ing quest to find the one best leadership style in all situations, researchers attempted to identify differences in the behavior of effective leaders versus ineffective leaders. Another subcategory of behavioral leadership focuses on the nature of management work. Thus, behavioral leadership theories attempt to explain distinctive styles used by effec- tive leaders, or to define the nature of their work. Mintzberg’s ten managerial roles are an
WORK Application 1-11 Give examples of traits and behaviors that helped make your past or present manager a successful leader.
66352_ch01_ptg01_001-030.indd 16 10/15/14 12:47 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 1 Who IS A LEADER AND WhAt SkILLS Do LEADERS NEED? 17
example of behavioral leadership theory. Behavioral research focuses on finding ways to classify behavior that will facilitate our understanding of leadership. You will learn about some of the most popular behavioral leadership theories in Chapter 3.
the Contingency Leadership theory paradigm Both the trait and behavioral leadership theories were attempts to find the one best lead- ership style in all situations; thus they are called universal theories. In the 1960s, it be- came apparent that there is no one best leadership style in all situations; the right answer often depends on the situation.79 Thus, the leadership paradigm shifted to contingency theory. Contingency leadership theories attempt to explain the appropriate leader- ship style based on the leader, followers, and situation. In other words, which traits and/or behaviors will result in leadership success given the situational variables? You will learn about the major contingency leadership theories in Chapter 4.
the Integrative Leadership theory paradigm In the mid-to-late 1970s, the paradigm began to shift to the integrative, to tie the theories together, or neo-charismatic theory. As the name implies, integrative leadership the- ories attempt to combine the trait, behavioral, and contingency theories to explain suc- cessful, inf luencing leader–follower relationships. Theories identify behaviors and traits that facilitate the leader’s effectiveness, and explore why the same behavior by the leader may have a different effect on followers, depending on the situation. The integrative lead- ership theory paradigm is emphasized in our definition of leadership and thus inf luences this entire book, especially Chapters 6 through 12.
From the Management to the Leadership theory paradigm In the first section, we talked about some of the differences between a manager (formal position of authority) and a leader (has the ability to inf luence others), because the over- arching paradigm has shifted from management to leadership. Successful managers tend to use a truly participative form of leadership as they share the responsibility of manage- ment with employees, or as leadership responsibilities are transitioned from managers to inf luential team members.
Some of the differences identified between managers and leaders are as follows. Man- agers focus on doing things right, and leaders focus on doing the right thing. Managers are concerned with stability and the best way to get the job done, and leaders place greater concern on innovation and change. The old command-and-control model of manage- ment just doesn’t work in today’s global economy.80 The old-style autocratic managers are not climbing today’s corporate ladder. Today, managers must be able to lead through mo- tivating others and creating favorable conditions for success, as well as manage. So, going from the management to the leadership theory paradigm is a shift from the older autocratic management style to the newer participative leadership style of management.
Although we have made a comparison between managers and leaders, you should real- ize that successful leaders are also good at managing, and successful managers are good leaders. There is overlap between the two paradigms—a successful organization needs both managers and leaders. The focus is on how to integrate management and leadership, or on developing leadership skills of managers and employees, which we do in this book. To simplistically stereotype people as either managers or leaders does little to advance our understanding of leadership. Also, because the term manager is an occupational title, to foster an inaccurate, negative stereotype of managers is certainly not our intent.
WORK Application 1-12 Does your present or past manager focus more on management or leadership? Explain, using examples.
66352_ch01_ptg01_001-030.indd 17 10/15/14 12:47 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
18 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
Objectives of the Book The overarching objectives of this book are ref lected in its subtitle: Theory, Application, and Skill Development. We call it a three-pronged approach, with these objectives:
• To teach you the theory and concepts of leadership • To develop your ability to apply leadership theory through critical thinking • To develop your leadership skills in your personal and professional life
There has been a call to bridge the gap between research and practice (knowing and doing)81 to teach students how to apply the concepts,82 and for students to develop lead- ership skills.83 To meet these calls, unlike most other books, ever since our first edition, we don’t simply teach you leadership theory; we develop your ability to apply the theory and actually develop skills. This book offers some unique features relating to each of the three objectives (see Exhibit 1.5). We encourage you to turn back to the preface and read our goals in writing this book, and the descriptions of the features so that you can get the most from this book.
The Three-Pronged Approach: Features of the Book EXHIBIT 1.5
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
Leadership Theories Identify each research approach by its leadership theory paradigm. Write the appropriate letter in the blank before each item.
a. trait d. integrative b. behavioral e. management to leadership c. contingency
21. A researcher is determining which leadership style is most appropriate.
22. A researcher is training managers to include employees in their decision making.
23. A researcher is observing managers’ actions as they interact with employees.
24. A researcher is attempting to understand how managers influence employees to achieve high levels of performance.
25. A researcher is attempting to determine if the way managers dress influences their effectiveness.
CONCept APPLICATION 1-3
theory application Skill Development
Research References Learning Outcomes Key terms Summary Review questions
Opening cases Work applications Concept applications Critical-thinking questions Cases Video cases You make the ethical call
Self-assessment exercises Case role-playing exercises Step-by-step behavior models Behavior model videos Developing your leadership skills exercises Behavior modeling training
66352_ch01_ptg01_001-030.indd 18 10/15/14 12:47 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 1 Who IS A LEADER AND WhAt SkILLS Do LEADERS NEED? 19
Leadership theory Throughout this book, you will learn about several leadership theories and the concepts on which they are based. Conceptual knowledge is the foundation for its application and skill development.84 As shown in Exhibit 1.5, this book offers six features to help you learn the leadership theory. The theories and concepts you will learn are based on re- search (EBM) and are considered important (AACSB), as discussed later in this chapter.
Evidence-Based Management Research-based knowledge is relevant and useful to practice, and evidence-based man- agement translates theory into workplace behavior.85 evidence-based management (eBM) means that decisions and organizational practices are based on the best available scientific evidence. The theories and concepts you will learn in this book are based on sci- entific research (not opinions, outdated research, or myths). If you look at the references at the end of this book, you will see that a majority of the journal articles are published by the premier professional association, the Academy of Management (AoM), and what it publishes is relevant to practicing leaders. However, unlike the AoM journals, we write about the theory and concepts at a level that is easy to read and understand.
Published research inf luences what people do in organizations; however, many organi- zations do not practice EBM.86 Our objective is to move you away from making decisions based on personal preference and unsystematic experience toward EBM. If you go to the next level and apply EBM theory and concepts, you can develop your leadership skills.
AACSB 2013 Business Accreditation Standards It is important to develop managerial leadership competencies. So how do we know what leadership competencies are important to your career success? For the answer, we turned to the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB), which gives ac- creditation to business schools, which states that “students engage in experiential and ac- tive learning designed to improve skills and the application of knowledge in practice is expected.” Following is the list of “General Skills Areas” students are expected to develop taken from the 2013 AACSB Accreditation Standards, Standard 9.87
• Written and oral communication (able to communicate effectively orally and in writ- ing). Chapter 6 covers communications.
• Ethical understanding and reasoning (able to identify ethical issues and address the issues in a socially responsible manner). Chapters 2 and 10 cover ethics, and each chap- ter includes “You Make the Ethical Call” situations
• Analytical thinking (able to analyze and frame problems). This general skill is de- veloped throughout the book through multiple applications and skill-development exercises.
• Information technology (able to use current technologies in business and management contexts). This is not normally a topic of a leadership course.
• Interpersonal relations and teamwork (able to work effectively with others and in team environments). Chapter 8 focuses on team leadership.
• Diverse and multicultural work environments (able to work effectively in diverse en- vironments). Chapter 10 covers these topics.
• Reflective thinking (able to understand oneself in the context of society). This general skill is developed throughout the book through multiple applications and skill-develop- ment exercises, especially the self-assessment exercises.
• Application of knowledge (able to translate knowledge of business and management into practice). This general skill is developed throughout the book through every ap- plication and skill-development exercise.
66352_ch01_ptg01_001-030.indd 19 10/15/14 12:47 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
20 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
All of the Developing Your Leadership Skills exercises state which AACSB General Skills Area standards are developed through completing the exercise.
application of Leadership theory Students need to learn to think critically,88 but one of the most common criticisms of management education is the tendency to focus on teaching of theory but not on the ap- plication of theory to practice.89 Thus, students lack the ability to apply knowledge.90 Stu- dents need to be given the opportunity to practice applying what they learn.91 To this end, this book offers you seven features (see Exhibit 1.5, the Application column) to practice applying the concepts and theory.
Leadership Skill Development Many business programs do little to prepare leaders for their day-to-day realities.92 There isn’t enough effort given to developing leadership skills.93 Thus, students need to be given the op- portunity to practice their leadership skills.94 To this end, this book offers you six features (see Exhibit 1.5, the Skill Development column) to help you develop your leadership skills. We also discuss a model versus an exhibit, behavior modeling, and the need to practice the skills next.
Models versus Exhibits All of the behavioral “models” in this book provide specific, step-by-step instructions, and they are labeled as models. They are “prescriptive models.” When we offer general advice without a specific instruction, we label the guidelines “exhibits.” However, the purpose of both models and exhibits is to help you improve your performance.
Behavior Modeling Leadership Skills Training Behavior modeling is the only multiple leadership skills training that has been empirically validated by rigorous procedures.95 In some of the chapters, the features listed in Exhibit 1.5 are combined in behavior modeling skills training. For these exercises you may do a self-assessment. In any case, follow this procedure: (1) read the step-by-step models, (2) watch a behavior modeling video, and (3) practice the skill (which may include role-play- ing) through a skill-development exercise. The last step in this training is using the skill in your personal and/or professional life for further development of the leadership skill.
Practice As with just about everything in life, you cannot become skilled by simply reading or try- ing something once. Vince Lombardi said that leaders are made by effort and hard work. If we want to develop our leadership skills, we need to learn the leadership concepts, apply the concepts, and do the preparation and skill-development exercises. But most important, to be successful, we need to be disciplined to practice using our leadership skills in our personal and professional lives. Think of leadership development like a sport. If you don’t practice, you will not be good at it, and you will lose the skill you do have over time.
Flexibility This book has so many features that they most likely cannot all be covered during a one-semes- ter course. Your instructor will select the features to be covered that best meet the course objec- tives and the amount of class time available. You may do some or all of the features not covered in the course on your own, or do some exercises with the assistance of others outside of class.
Organization of the Book This book is organized by level of leadership analysis and leadership theory paradigm. See Exhibit 1.6 for an illustration of the organization of this book.
66352_ch01_ptg01_001-030.indd 20 10/15/14 12:47 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 1 Who IS A LEADER AND WhAt SkILLS Do LEADERS NEED? 21
The chapter summar y is organized to answer the six learning outcomes for Chapter 1.
1 Briefly describe the five key elements of leadership. Leader–Follower—leaders influence the behavior of fol- lowers, and vice versa. Influencing—the relationship between leaders and followers, who change roles. Or- ganizational objectives—outcomes that leaders and fol- lowers want to accomplish. Change—needed to achieve objectives. People—leadership is about leading people.
2 Identify and define the managerial leadership skills.
the three skills are technical, interpersonal, and deci- sion making. Technical skills involve the ability to use methods and techniques to perform a task. Interpersonal skills involve the ability to understand, communicate, and work well with individuals and groups through develop- ing effective relationships. Decision-making skills are based on the ability to conceptualize situations and select
alternatives to solve problems and take advantage of opportunities.
3 List the ten managerial roles based on their three categories.
Leaders perform the interpersonal role when they act as figurehead, leader, and liaison. Leaders perform the informational role when they act as monitor, dissemina- tor, and spokesperson. Leaders perform the decisional role when they act as entrepreneur, disturbance-handler, resource-allocator, and negotiator.
4 explain the interrelationships among the levels of leadership analysis.
the three levels of leadership analysis are individual, group, and organizational. the individual performance affects the group and organizational performance. the group performance affects the organizational perfor- mance. And both the group and organization affect the performance of the individual.
Chapter Summary
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
Organization of the Book, Including Level of Analysis and Leadership Paradigm EXHIBIT 1.6
part ONe. INDIVIDUaLS aS LeaDerS (individual-level analysis of leadership theory—–Trait, Behavioral, and Contingency Leadership Theories)
1. Who Is a Leader and What Skills Do Leaders Need? 2. Leadership Traits and Ethics 3. Leadership Behavior and Motivation 4. Contingency Leadership Theories 5. Influencing: Power, Politics, Networking, and Negotiation
part tWO. teaM LeaDerShIp (group-level analysis of leadership theory—– Integrative Leadership Theory Applications)
6. Communication, Coaching, and Conflict Skills 7. Leader–Member Exchange and Followership 8. Team Leadership and Self-Managed Teams
part three. OrGaNIZatIONaL LeaDerShIp (organizational-level analysis—– Integrative Leadership Theory Applications)
9. Charismatic and Transformational Leadership 10. Leadership of Culture, Ethics, and Diversity 11. Strategic Leadership and Change Management 12. Crises Leadership and the Learning Organization
“Take It To The Net”. Access student resources at www.cengagebrain.com. Search for Lussier, Leadership 6e to find student study tools.
66352_ch01_ptg01_001-030.indd 21 10/15/14 12:47 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
5 Describe the major similarity and difference between the trait and behavioral leadership the- ories, and the interrelationships between them and contingency theories.
the similarity between the trait and behavioral leader- ship theories is that they are both universal theories, or they are seeking one best leadership style for all situations. the difference is the approach to determining
leadership effectiveness. trait theory attempts to explain personal characteristics of effective leaders, whereas behavioral theory attempts to explain what leaders actually do on the job.
The contingency theory is interrelated with the trait and behav- ioral leadership theories because it uses these two theories as the foundation for determining which leadership style is most appropriate—based on the leader, followers, and situation.
Key terms behavioral leadership theories, 16
contingency leadership theories, 17
decisional leadership roles, 12
decision-making skills, 10
evidence-based management (EBM), 19
influencing, 6
informational leadership roles, 12
integrative leadership theories, 17
interpersonal leadership roles, 11
interpersonal skills, 10
leadership, 5
leadership paradigm, 16
leadership theory, 16
leadership theory classifications, 16
leadership trait theories, 16
levels of analysis of leadership theory, 14
management to the leadership theory paradigm, 17
managerial role categories, 11
technical skills, 9
1 Why is leadership important?
2 What are the five key elements in our leadership definition? How do the elements interrelate to form this definition?
3 Are leaders born or made, and can leadership skills be developed?
4 List and define the interpersonal managerial leadership roles.
5 List and define the informational managerial leadership roles.
6 List and define the decisional managerial leadership roles.
7 List and define the levels of analysis of leadership theory.
8 List and define the leadership theory paradigms.
9 How can the shift in paradigm from management to leader- ship possibly help—and hurt—the management profession?
10 What are the three-pronged approach objectives to this book?
review Questions
The following critical-thinking questions can be used for class dis- cussion and/or as written assignments to develop communica- tion skills. Be sure to give complete explanations for all questions.
1 Should leadership be the manager’s job, or should leader- ship be a shared process?
2 Are you interested in sharing leadership, or do you prefer to be a follower?
3 Some people say the hard skills (e.g., finance, quantitative analysis) are more important for managers than soft skills
(e.g., interpersonal skills), and some say the opposite is true. What is your view?
4 Should leadership courses focus on teaching students about leadership or on teaching students to be leaders?
5 Can college students really develop their leadership skills through a college course? Why or why not?
6 Is leadership ability universal, or is a good leader in one environment also effective in another? For example, can a leader in one industry (e.g., a hospital) be successful in another industry (e.g., a bank)?
Critical-thinking Questions
22 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
66352_ch01_ptg01_001-030.indd 22 10/15/14 12:47 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 1 Who IS A LEADER AND WhAt SkILLS Do LEADERS NEED? 23
C A S E
From Steve Jobs to Tim Cook—Apple
Steven Jobs cofounded Apple Computer with Steven Wozniak back in 1976 in Jobs’s family garage. At age 21, Steven Jobs coproduced the first PC and Apple Com- puter ; at 25 Jobs was running Apple with a net wor th of $25 million, and at age 26 he made the cover of Time magazine. Over the years, Jobs was consistently ranked as one of the best CEO leaders of all times. In 2011, eight of the ten most read Wall Street Journal ar ticles were about Steve Jobs and Apple products.96
Jobs also star ted two other companies. In 1985, Jobs star ted NeXT (a computer platform development). In 1986, he went to Hollywood star ting what became Pixar Animated Studios. Jobs contracted with Disney to produce a number of computer-animated feature films, which Disney would co- finance and distribute. In 2006, Jobs sold Pixar to Disney and became its largest shareholder. In fact, Jobs’s shares in Disney were worth more than five times the value of his Apple stock.
Most of us never have any real influence over any industry, but Jobs is ranked #1 for his leadership and power in influenc- ing five industries: computers (coproducer of the PC—Mac), Hollywood (Pixar), music (iPod), retailing (iTunes and Apple stores), and wireless phones/telecom (iPhone and iPad). So far, no one has had more influence over a broader range of businesses than Jobs. Some say that his influence actually trans- formed these industries.97
On August 24, 2011, Jobs resigned as CEO, naming Tim Cook as his successor. Jobs died in October 2011. Many peo- ple questioned whether Apple could succeed without Jobs. Being seriously ill for a couple of years, without hype or fanfare, Jobs was quietly making sure Apple success would continue. In his resignation letter, Jobs wrote, “I believe Apple’s brightest and most innovative days are ahead of it.”98 Apple insiders say that Cook was really the driving force for two years prior to Jobs’s resignation.99 To his own credit, in his first year as CEO, Tim Cook was ranked 8th on the Fortune 2011 Business Per- son of the Year.100
CEO Tim Cook’s performance was assessed a year after the death of Steve Jobs. Tim Cook is not tr ying to be Jobs’s clone and is making his own mark changing Apple.101 He is a different type of leader than Jobs—being less emotional and more of a professional manager. Cook got the operations side working better than ever, coordinating suppliers to deliver on
the unprecedented sale of the iPhone 5 in nearly 30 countries, and Apple is on track to launch it in 100 countries. Cook is quicker to admit product flaws and take corrective action than Jobs, such as the faulty Maps on the iPhone 5.102 Cook has also given a stockholder dividend and is placing greater emphasis on corporate social responsibility, such as charitable contribu- tions that Jobs was against.103
A year after Jobs’s death, Apple stock was up 75 percent, making it the most valuable company in the world. In 2013, Apple was ranked 1st on the Fortune World’s Most Admired Companies,104 ranked 6th for revenues on the Fortune 500 U.S. largest corporations, 2nd by profits of $41,733,000,105 and ranked 19th on the Global 500 largest corporations.106 It is also ranked 4th as the most trusted U.S. brands.107
One thing Cook says he will not change is the Apple’s fo- cus on making the best products in the world—not just good ones, or lots of them—the absolute best. Cook really likes the fact that people really care so much about Apple and its prod- ucts.108 The final grade for Cook: No one is saying Apple is better off without Jobs, but to a surprising degree, Apple is doing fine without him.109
However, Cook is not without critics.110 Even some who say he did a good job in his first year question, Can he keep it up?111 One criticism is that there are no new product catego- ries (such as no Apple TV set).112 Only time will tell if Cook can keep Apple’s momentum going.
Jobs found the secret to career fulfillment—he discovered something he was good at and loved to do. We can’t all be another Steve Jobs, but we can find career fulfillment.
G O t O t h e I N t e r N e t : To learn more about Steve Jobs and Tim Cook and Apple, visit Apple’s Web site (http://www.apple.com).
Support your answers to the following questions with specific information from the case and text or with information you get from the Web or another source.
1. Explain how each of the five elements of our definition of leadership applies to Tim Cook leading Apple.
2. Identify leadership skills Tim Cook has that led to his and Apple’s success. Which skill is his strongest?
3. Identify managerial leadership roles played by Tim Cook as CEO of Apple. Which role was the most impor tant?
66352_ch01_ptg01_001-030.indd 23 10/15/14 12:47 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
24 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
4. Which level of analysis is the primary focus of this case?
5. Explain how each of the leadership theory classifications applies to this case, and which one is most relevant.
6. Can Tim Cook continue grow Apple, or will it be like so many other companies (like BlackBerry) that lose their competitive edge. Why or why not?
C a S e e X e r C I S e a N D r O L e - p L a Y
Preparation: Assume that you were a powerful board mem- ber of Apple in the 1980s. You were involved in helping Jobs select the new CEO, John Sculley, and that you have worked with Jobs on the board for five years. The board has disagreed with Jobs’s recommendation to replace Sculley as CEO, so Sculley stays in power and Jobs is out of power. You have to tell Jobs the bad news, which you know he will not want to hear.
Your instructor may elect to let you break into small groups to share ideas and develop a plan for your meeting with Jobs. If you develop a group plan, select one leader to present the meeting with Jobs.
role-play: One person (representing him- or herself or their group) conducts the meeting with Steve Jobs (to notify him that Sculley stays as CEO and he is removed from power) before the entire class. Or, multiple role-plays may take place in small groups of five to six; however, role-players can’t conduct the meeting in front of the team that developed the meet- ing plan. They must present to a group that did not develop the plan for the meeting. The people role-playing Jobs should put themselves in his place. How would you feel about being thrown out of the company you cofounded and led? Don’t forget that Jobs is rather hot tempered and very outspoken.
Rick Federico is chairman and CEO of P.F. Chang’s, which owns and operates a chain of Asian restaurants across the country. He has earned the respect of his managers, his workers, his customers, and even his competitors. He be- lieves his greatest tasks as a leader involve remaining focused on his customers, his workers, and the food they serve. As P.F. Chang’s grows, Federico wants to be sure that the quality of service, atmosphere, and food are always at their highest.
1. Describe some of Rick Federico’s personal leadership traits.
2. Choose three of the leadership managerial roles and explain how Rick Federico might use them as head of P. F. Chang’s.
V I D E o C A S E
Leadership at P. F. Chang’s
Getting to Know You by Name
preparing for this exercise Complete Self-Assessment 1-2 on page 8, and read the accompanying information before class.
Objectives
1 To get acquainted with some of your classmates
2 To get to know your instructor
3 To develop your skill at remembering and calling people by their name
aaCSB General Skills area
The primary AACSB skill developed through this exercise is communication ability with application of knowledge.
In this chapter you learned about the impor tance of leader–follower relationships. An impor tant par t of leadership relations is making people feel impor tant. Being able to call people by name will improve your leadership effectiveness.
1-1Developing Your Leadership Skills
66352_ch01_ptg01_001-030.indd 24 10/15/14 12:47 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 1 Who IS A LEADER AND WhAt SkILLS Do LEADERS NEED? 25
tips for remembering people’s Names
• The first thing you need to do is make a conscious effor t to improve your skill at calling people by name. If you say you are no good at remembering names, you won’t be. If you say, “I can be good at it,” and work at it, you can.
• When you are introduced to a person, consciously greet them by name. For example, say, “Hi, Juan, glad to meet you.” Then, during your conversation, say the name a few more times until it sticks with you. Use the person’s name when you ask and answer questions.
• When you meet a person whom you will see again, with- out being introduced by someone else, introduce yourself by name—and get the other person to say their name. Then, as before, call them by name during your conversa- tion. For example, if you get to class early and want to talk, introduce yourself to someone rather than just talking without learning the person’s name. If someone you don’t know just starts talking to you, introduce yourself.
• When you are in a small group being introduced to peo- ple, don’t just say “hi” and ignore the names. Depending on the number of people, you can say “hello” and repeat each name as you look at the person. If you don’t remember a name, ask. Just say, “I’m sorry, I didn’t get your name.” You may also want to mentally repeat the person’s name several times. As you talk to the people in the group, use their names. If you forget a name, listen for others to say it as the discussion continues.
• If you have been introduced to a person and forget their name the next time you meet them, you have two choices. You can apologetically ask them their name. Or, before talking to the person, you can ask someone else for the person’s name, and then greet them by name. Again, use the person’s name during the conversation.
• Use association to help you remember. For example, if you meet John Higby, you could picture him hugging a bee. If the person’s name is Ted, picture him with the body of a teddy bear. If you know the person likes something, say tennis, picture him or her with a tennis ball on his or her head. Think of other people you know who have the same name and make an association.
• Ask for a business card, or ask for the person’s telephone number so you can write it down; this will help you remember the name.
• Write down the person’s name and some information about them after you meet them. Sales representatives use this technique very effectively to recall personal information they may forget. If you are on a committee with people you don’t know and don’t see very often, use the membership list of names (or write them yourself).
Then write an association for each person, so that you can identify all members (this may be done during the meeting without drawing attention). Your notes might include personal characteristics (tall, thin, dark hair) or something about their work (marketing, engineer). Then, before the next meeting, review the list of names and characteristics so you can make the association and greet each person by name.
Doing this exercise in Class
procedure 1 (5–8 minutes) Break into groups of five or six, preferably with people you do not know. In the group, have each member give his or her name and two or three significant things about himself or herself. After all the members have finished, ask each other questions to get to know each other better.
procedure 2 (2–4 minutes) Can anyone in the group call the others by name? If so, he or she should do so. If not, have each member repeat his or her name. Follow with each member calling all members by name. Be sure that each person has a turn to call everyone by name.
procedure 3 (5–8 minutes) Select a person to play the spokesperson role for your group. Remember, this is a leader- ship course. The spokesperson writes down questions in the following two areas:
• Course: Is there anything more that you want to know about the course, such as any expectations or concerns that you have?
• Instructor: Make a list of questions for the instructor in order to get to know him or her better.
procedure 4 (10–20 minutes) Each spokesperson asks the instructor one question at a time, until all questions are asked. If time permits, people who are not the spokesperson may ask questions.
Conclusion
The instructor may make concluding remarks.
apply It (2–4 minutes) What did I learn from this experience? How will I use this knowledge in the future? Specifically state which tip for remembering names you will use in the future. Identify precisely when you will practice this skill: for example, on “x” day/date when I go to class—or to work, or to a par ty— I will introduce myself to someone I don’t know.
Sharing
In the group, or to the entire class, volunteers may give their answers to the “Apply It” questions.
66352_ch01_ptg01_001-030.indd 25 10/15/14 12:47 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
26 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
On the line before each statement, write Y for yes, or N for no.
1. I enjoy meeting new people. 2. I’m good at remembering people’s names. 3. When I meet new people, I learn their
names and call them by name. 4. I’m interested in and willing to improve my
ability to remember and use names.
If you answered yes to Questions 1–3, you have developed some skill in this area. Your answer to Question 4 indicates whether you intend to further develop your skill. the choice is yours.
SELF-ASSESSMENT 1-3 Names
Objective
To gain a better understanding of leadership traits and behavior
aaCSB General Skills area
The primary AACSB skill developed through this exercise is analytic skills and application of knowledge.
preparing for this exercise Read and understand the trait and behavioral leadership theo- ries. On the following lines, list specific traits and behaviors that you believe effective leaders have or should have. Your answers may or may not be based on your observation of successful leaders.
Traits: Behaviors:
Doing this exercise in Class
Option 1 (5–15 minutes) Students give their answers to the instructor, who writes them on the board under the heading of Traits or Behaviors. During or after the answers are listed, the class may discuss them.
Option 2 (10–20 minutes) Break into groups of five or six, and select a leader to perform the spokesperson role (remem- ber, this is a leadership class). The spokesperson records the answers of the group, and then writes them on the board (5–10 minutes). The instructor leads a class discussion (5–10 minutes).
Developing Your Leadership Skills
Identifying Leadership Traits and Behaviors
1-2
endnotes 1 Open case references: B. Stone, “The Secrets of Bezos:
How Amazon Became the Ever ything Store,” Business- Week (October 10, 2013): 58–76; “Scorecard,” Forbes (October 28, 2013): 23; www.amazon.com, accessed October 24, 2013; “Largest U.S. Corporations— For tune 500,” Fortune (May 20, 2013): 1–20; G. Ander s, “Jeff Bezos Gets It,” Forbes (April 23, 2012): 77–86; P. Andruss, “Branding’s Big Guns,” Entrepreneur (April 2012): 50–55.
2 M. A. Hogg, D. Van Knippenberg, and D. E. Rast, “Intergroup Leadership in Organizations: Leading Across Group and Organizational Boundaries,” Academy of Management Review 37(2) (2012): 232–255.
3 G. Yukl, “Effective Leadership Behavior : What We Know and What Questions Need More Attention,” Academy of Management Perspectives 26(4) (2011): 66–85.
4 B. Schyns, T. Kiefer, R. Kerschreiter, and A. Tymon, “Teaching Implicit Leadership Theories to Develop Leaders and Leadership: How and Why It Can Make a Difference,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2012): 397–408.
5 Google search (www.google.com), accessed October 3, 2013.
66352_ch01_ptg01_001-030.indd 26 10/15/14 12:47 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 1 Who IS A LEADER AND WhAt SkILLS Do LEADERS NEED? 27
6 R. Kark, “Games Managers Play: Play as a Form of Leadership Development,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 507–527.
7 B. Benjamin and C. O’Reilly, “Becoming a Leader : Early Career Challenges Faced by MBA Graduates,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 452–472.
8 S. K. Johnson, L. L. Garrison, G. H. Bronnme, J. W. Fleenor, and J. L. Steed, “Go for the Goals: Relationship between Goal Setting and Transfer of Training Following Leadership Development,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 11(4) (2012): 555–569.
9 B. Benjamin and C. O’Reilly, “Becoming a Leader : Early Career Challenges Faced by MBA Graduates,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 452–472.
10 B. Benjamin and C. O’Reilly, “Becoming a Leader : Early Career Challenges Faced by MBA Graduates,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 452–472.
11 “Call for Papers,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 12(2) (2013): 324.
12 B. Benjamin and C. O’Reilly, “Becoming a Leader : Early Career Challenges Faced by MBA Graduates.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011), 452–472.
13 N. Breugst, H. Patzelt, D. A. Shepherd, and H. Aguinis, “Relationship Conflict Improves Team Performance Assessment Accuracy: Evidence from a Multilevel Study.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 11(2) (2012): 187–206.
14 G. Yukl, “Effective Leadership Behavior : What We Know and What Questions Need More Attention.” Academy of Management Perspectives 26 (4) (2012): 66–85.
15 W. J. Henisz, “Leveraging the Financial Crisis to Fulfill the Promise of Progressive Management,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10 (2) (2011): 298321.
16 R. E. Silverman, “Who’s the Boss? There Isn’t One.” The Wall Street Journal (June 20, 2012): B1.
17 M. W. Ohland, “The Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness: Development of a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale for Self- and Peer Evaluation,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 11(3) (2012): 609–630.
18 G. Petriglieri, J. D. Wood, and J. L. Petriglieri, “Up Close and Personal: Building Foundations for Leaders’ Development through the Personalization of Management Learning,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 430–450.
19 M. Mayo, M. Kakarika, J. C. Pastor, and S. Brutus, “Aligning or Inflating Your Leadership Self-Image? A Longitudinal Study
of Responses to Peer Feedback in MBA Teams,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 11(4) (2012): 631–652.
20 G. Williams, “Comic Belief: Is Leadership Really a Crock?” Entrepreneur (April 2003): 28.
21 M. A. Hogg, D. Van Knippenberg, and D. E. Rast, “Intergroup Leadership in Organizations: Leading across Group and Organizational Boundaries,” Academy of Management Review 37(2) (2012): 232–255.
22 S. B. Sitkin and J. R. Hackman, “Developing Team Leadership: An Interview with Coach Mike Krzyzewski,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 494–501.
23 B. P. Owens and D. R. Hekman, “Modeling How to Grow: An Inductive Examination of Humble Leader Behaviors, Contingencies, and Outcomes,” Academy of Management Journal 55(4) (2012): 787–818.
24 S. B. Sitkin and J. R. Hackman, “Developing Team Leadership: An Interview with Coach Mike Krzyzewski,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 494–501.
25 B. P. Owens and D. R. Hekman, “Modeling How to Grow: An Inductive Examination of Humble Leader Behaviors, Contingencies, and Outcomes,” Academy of Management Journal 55(4) (2012): 787–818.
26 D. S. DeRue and S. J. Ashford, “Who Will Lead and Who Will Follow? Social Process of Leadership Identity Construction in Organizations,” Academy of Management Review 35(4) (2010): 627–647.
27 D. S. DeRue and S. J. Ashford, “Who Will Lead and Who Will Follow? Social Process of Leadership Identity Construction in Organizations,” Academy of Management Review 35(4) (2010): 627–647.
28 J. Immelt, GE Annual Shareowners Meeting, April 26, 2006, http://www.ge.com/pdf/investors/events/068 /ge_annualshar-eownersmeeting_042606_en.pdf.
29 G. Yukl, “Effective Leadership Behavior : What We Know and What Questions Need More Attention,” Academy of Management Perspectives 26(4) (2011): 66–85.
30 B. Benjamin and C. O’Reilly, “Becoming a Leader : Early Career Challenges Faced by MBA Graduates,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 452–472.
31 G. Yukl, “Effective Leadership Behavior : What We Know and What Questions Need More Attention,” Academy of Management Perspectives 26(4) (2011): 66–85.
32 S. K. Johnson, L. L. Garrison, G. H. Bronnme, J. W. Fleenor, and J. L. Steed, “Go for the Goals: Relationship between Goal Setting and Transfer of Training Following Leadership
66352_ch01_ptg01_001-030.indd 27 10/15/14 12:47 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
28 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
Development,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 11(4) (2012): 555–569.
33 S. K. Johnson, L. L. Garrison, G. H. Bronnme, J. W. Fleenor, and J. L. Steed, “Go for the Goals: Relationship between Goal Setting and Transfer of Training Following Leadership Development,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 11(4) (2012): 555–569.
34 H. A. Richardson and S. G. Taylor, “Understanding Input Events: A Model of Employees’ Responses to Requests for Their Input,” Academy of Management Review 37(3) (2012): 471–491.
35 E. R. Burris, “The Risks and Rewards of Speaking Up: Managerial Responses to Employee Voice,” Academy of Management Journal 55(4) (2012): 851–875.
36 J. Liang, C. I.C. Farh, and J. L. Farh, “Psychological Antecedents of Promotive and Prohibitive Voice: A Two- Wave Examination,” Academy of Management Journal 55(1) (2012): 71–92.
37 S. B. Sitkin and J. R. Hackman, “Developing Team Leadership: An Interview with Coach Mike Krzyzewski,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10 (3) (2011): 494–501.
38 B. Benjamin and C. O’Reilly, “Becoming a Leader : Early Career Challenges Faced by MBA Graduates,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 452–472.
39 A. J. Nyberg and R. E. Ployhart, “Context-Emergent Turnover (CET) Theory: A Theory of Collective Turnover,” Academy of Management Review 38(1) (2013): 109–131.
40 M. A. Hogg, D. Van Knippenberg, and D. E. Rast, “Intergroup Leadership in Organizations: Leading across Group and Organizational Boundaries,” Academy of Management Review 37(2) (2012): 232–255.
41 B. Benjamin and C. O’Reilly, “Becoming a Leader : Early Career Challenges Faced by MBA Graduates,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 452–472.
42 R. Kark, “Games Managers Play: Play as a Form of Leadership Development,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 507–527.
43 B. Benjamin and C. O’Reilly, “Becoming a Leader : Early Career Challenges Faced by MBA Graduates,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 452–472.
44 V. Lombardi, “Quote,” SBANC Newsletter (May 19, 2009): 1.
45 B. Benjamin and C. O’Reilly, “Becoming a Leader : Early Career Challenges Faced by MBA Graduates,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 452–472.
46 J. Antonakis, M. Fenley, and S. Liechti, “Can Charisma Be Taught? Tests of Two Interventions,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 374–396.
47 R. Klimoski and B. Amos, “Practicing Evidence-Based Education in Leadership Development,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 11(4) (2012): 685–702.
48 A. J. Nyberg and R. E. Ployhart, “Context-Emergent Turnover (CET) Theory: A Theory of Collective Turnover,” Academy of Management Review 38(1) (2013): 109–131.
49 R. Kark, “Games Managers Play: Play as a Form of Leadership Development,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 507–527.
50 M. Feys, F. Anseel, and B. Wille, “Improving Feedback Repor ts: The Role of Procedural Information and Information Specificity,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(4) (2011): 661–681.
51 R. Kark, “Games Managers Play: Play as a Form of Leadership Development,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 507–527.
52 G. Yukl, “Effective Leadership Behavior : What We Know and What Questions Need More Attention,” Academy of Management Perspectives 26(4) (2011): 66–85.
53 B. Benjamin and C. O’Reilly, “Becoming a Leader : Early Career Challenges Faced by MBA Graduates,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 452–472.
54 R. B. Kaiser and R. B. Kaplan, “The Deeper Work of Executive Development: Outgrowing Sensitivities,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 5(4) (2006): 463–483.
55 R. B. Kaiser and R. B. Kaplan, “The Deeper Work of Executive Development: Outgrowing Sensitivities,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 5(4) (2006): 463–483.
56 E. R. Crawford and J. A. Lepine, “A Configural Theory of Team Process: Accounting for the Structure of Taskwork and Teamwork,” Academy of Management Review 38(1) (2013): 32–48.
57 M. Crossan, D. Mazutis, G. Seijts, and J. Gandz, “Developing Leadership Character in Business Programs,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 12(2) (2013): 285–305.
58 B. Benjamin and C. O’Reilly, “Becoming a Leader : Early Career Challenges Faced by MBA Graduates,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 452–472.
59 S. Mantere and M. Ketokivi, “Reasoning in Organization Science,” Academy of Management Review 38(1) (2013): 70–89.
66352_ch01_ptg01_001-030.indd 28 10/15/14 12:47 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 1 Who IS A LEADER AND WhAt SkILLS Do LEADERS NEED? 29
60 D. F. Baker and S. J. Baker, “To Catch the Sparkling Glow: A Canvas for Creativity in the Management Classroom,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 11(4) (2012): 704–721.
61 H. R. Greve, “Microfoundations of Management: Behavioral Strategies and Levels of Rationality in Organizational Action,” Academy of Management Perspectives 27(2) (2013): 103–119.
62 A. H. Van De Ven and A. Lifschitz, “Rational and Reasonable Microfoundations of Markets and Institutions,” Academy of Management Perspectives 27(2) (2013): 156–172.
63 A. H. Jordan and P. G. Audia, “Self-Enhancement and Learning from Performance Feedback,” Academy of Management Review 37(2) (2012): 211–231.
64 H. C. Vough, M.T, Cardador, J. S. Bendar, E. Dane, and M. G. Pratt, “What Clients Don’t Get about My Profession: A Model of Perceived Role–Based Image Discrepancies,” Academy of Management Journal 56(4) (2013): 1050–1080.
65 R. Grossman, E. Salas, D. Pavlas, and M. A. Rosen, “Using Instructional Features to Enhance Demonstration- Based Training in Management Education,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 12(2) (2013): 219–243.
66 R. Kark, “Games Managers Play: Play as a Form of Leadership Development,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 507–527.
67 H. Mintzberg, The Nature of Managerial Work (New York: Harper & Row, 1973).
68 E. R. Crawford and J. A. Lepine, “A Configural Theory of Team Process: Accounting for the Structure of Taskwork and Teamwork,” Academy of Management Review 38(1) (2013): 32–48.
69 G. Yukl, “Effective Leadership Behavior : What We Know and What Questions Need More Attention,” Academy of Management Perspectives 26(4) (2011): 66–85.
70 S. Mantere and M. Ketokivi, “Reasoning in Organization Science,” Academy of Management Review 38(1) (2013): 70–89.
71 A. H. Van De Ven and A. Lifschitz, “Rational and Reasonable Microfoundations of Markets and Institutions,” Academy of Management Perspectives 27(2) (2013): 156–172.
72 H. R. Greve, “Microfoundations of Management: Behavioral Strategies and Levels of Rationality in Organizational Action,” Academy of Management Perspectives 27(2) (2013): 103–119.
73 M. Crossan, D. Mazutis, G. Seijts, and J. Gandz, “Developing Leadership Character in Business Programs,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 12(2) (2013): 285–305.
74 S. G. Winter, “Habit, Deliberation, and Action: Strengthening the Microfoundations of Routines and Capabilities,” Academy of Management Perspectives 27(2) (2013): 120–137.
75 Information taken from the AFL-CIO’s Web site at http:// www.aflcio.org/corporatewatch/paywatch/pay/index.cfm, accessed October 21, 2013; R. Lowenstein, “Is Any CEO Worth $189,000 per hour?” BusinessWeek (February 20–26, 2012): 8–9; R. Fisman and T. Sullivan, “In Defense of the CEO,” The Wall Street Journal (January 12–13, 2013): C1–C2; E. D. Smith and P. Kuntz, “Some CEOs Are More Equal Than Others,” BusinessWeek (May 6–12, 2013): 70–73.e more equal than others. BusinessWeek (May 6 – 12, 2013), 70-73
76 S. G. Winter, “Habit, Deliberation, and Action: Strengthening the Microfoundations of Routines and Capabilities,” Academy of Management Perspectives 27(2) (2013): 120–137.
77 B. Schyns, T. Kiefer, R. Kerschreiter, and A. Tymon, “Teaching Implicit Leadership Theories to Develop Leaders and Leadership: How and Why It Can Make a Difference,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2012): 397–408.
78 A. H. Van De Ven and A. Lifschitz, “Rational and Reasonable Microfoundations of Markets and Institutions,” Academy of Management Perspectives 27(2) (2013): 156–172.
79 H. R. Greve, “Microfoundations of Management: Behavioral Strategies and Levels of Rationality in Organizational Action,” Academy of Management Perspectives 27(2) (2013): 103–119.
80 A. Murray, “The End of Management,” The Wall Street Journal (August 21–22, 2010): W3.
81 R. Klimoski and B. Amos, “Practicing Evidence-Based Education in Leadership Development,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 11(4) (2012): 685–702.
82 T. T. Baldwin, J. R. Pierce, R. C. Jones, and S. Farouk, “The Elusiveness of Applied Management Knowledge: A Critical Challenge for Management Education,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(4) (2011): 583–605.
83 J. K. Nelson, L. W. Poms, and P. P. Wolf, “Developing Efficacy Beliefs for Ethics and Diversity Management,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 11(1) (2012): 49–68.
66352_ch01_ptg01_001-030.indd 29 10/15/14 12:47 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
30 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
84 T. T. Baldwin, J. R. Pierce, R. C. Jones, and S. Farouk, “The Elusiveness of Applied Management Knowledge: A Critical Challenge for Management Education,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(4) (2011): 583–605.
85 R. Klimoski and B. Amos, “Practicing Evidence-Based Education in Leadership Development,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 11(4) (2012): 685–702.
86 “Call for Papers,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 12(2) (2013): 324.
87 AACSB Web site (http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation /business/standards/2013/learning-and-teaching/standard9. asp), accessed October 24, 2013.
88 D. F. Baker and S. J. Baker, “To Catch the Sparkling Glow: A Canvas for Creativity in the Management Classroom,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 11(4) (2012): 704–721.
89 S. Mantere and M. Ketokivi, “Reasoning in Organization Science,” Academy of Management Review 38(1) (2013): 70–89.
90 T. T. Baldwin, J. R. Pierce, R. C. Jones, and S. Farouk, “The Elusiveness of Applied Management Knowledge: A Critical Challenge for Management Education,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(4) (2011): 583–605.
91 R. Grossman, E. Salas, D. Pavlas, and M. A. Rosen, “Using Instructional Features to Enhance Demonstration- Based Training in Management Education,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 12(2) (2013): 219–243.
92 B. Benjamin and C. O’Reilly, “Becoming a Leader : Early Career Challenges Faced by MBA Graduates,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 452-472.
93 R. Klimoski and B. Amos, “Practicing Evidence-Based Education in Leadership Development,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 11(4) (2012): 685–702.
94 J. K. Nelson, L. W. Poms, and P. P. Wolf, “Developing Efficacy Beliefs for Ethics and Diversity Management,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 11(1) (2012): 49–68.
95 M. Sorcher and A. P. Goldstein, “A Behavior Modeling Approach in Training,” Personnel Administration 35(1972): 35–41.
96 J. E. Vascellaro, “Top Stories of 2011: All Apple All the Time,” The Wall Street Journal (December 29, 2011): B4.
97 “America’s Most Admired Companies,” Fortune (March 17, 2008): 116–133; J. Hempel and B. Kowitt, “Smartest People in Tech,” Fortune (June 26, 2010): 82–83.
98 M. Helft, “Steve Jobs’ Real Legacy: Apple Inc,” Fortune (September 26, 2011): 59–65.
99 P. Burrows and J. Tyrangiel, “Unfortunately, That Day Has Come,” BusinessWeek (August 29–September 4, 2011): 33.
100 R. Murphy, “The 2011 Businessperson of the Year,” Fortune (December 12, 2011): 87–91.
101 A. Lashinsky, “How Tim Cook Is Changing Apple,” Fortune (July 11, 2012): 111–118.
102 B. Stone, A. Satariano, and P. Burrows, “Out of the Shadow,” BusinessWeek (October 8–14, 2012): 6–8.
103 J. Tyrangiel, “Tim Cook’s Freshman Year,” BusinessWeek (December 6, 2012): 62–76.
104 Staff, “The World’s Most Admired Companies,” Fortune (March 18, 2013): 137–139.
105 Staff, “Largest U.S. Corporations,” Fortune (May 20, 2013): 1–20.
106 Staff, “Global 500 World’s Largest Corporations,” Fortune (July 22, 2013): 134.
107 P. Andruss, “Brankding’s Big Guns,” Entrepreneur (April 2012): 50–56.
108 J. Tyrangiel, “Tim Cook’s Freshman Year,” BusinessWeek (December 6, 2012): 62–76.
109 B. Stone, A. Satariano, and P. Burrows, “Out of the Shadow,” BusinessWeek (October 8–14, 2012): 6–8.
110 A. Lashinsky, “Game Over?,” Fortune (July 22, 2013): 64–68.
111 B. Stone, A. Satariano, and P. Burrows, “Out of the Shadow,” BusinessWeek (October 8–14, 2012): 6–8.
112 J. Tyrangiel, “Tim Cook’s Freshman Year,” BusinessWeek (December 6, 2012): 62–76.
66352_ch01_ptg01_001-030.indd 30 10/15/14 12:47 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
31
Chapter
C h a p t e r O U t L I N e
Personality Traits and Leadership Trait Universality
Personality and Traits
Personality Profiles
Leadership Trait Universality
The Big Five Including Traits of Effective Leaders
Surgency
Agreeableness
Adjustment
Conscientiousness
Openness
The Personality Profile of Effective Leaders
Achievement Motivation Theory
Leader Motive Profile Theory
Leadership Attitudes
Theory X and Theory Y
The Pygmalion Effect
Self-Concept
How Attitudes Develop Leadership Styles
Ethical Leadership
Does Ethical Behavior Pay?
Factors Influencing Ethical Behavior
How People Justify Unethical Behavior
Guides to Ethical Behavior
Being an Ethical Leader
Leadership Traits and Ethics
Learning Outcomes After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
1 Explain the universality of traits of effective leaders. p. 35
2 Describe the Big Five personality dimensions. p. 35
3 Discuss why the trait of dominance is so important for managers to have. p. 36
4 State how the Achievement Motivation Theory and the Leader Motive Profile are related and different. p. 41
5 Identify similarities and differences among Theory X and Theory Y, the Pygmalion effect, and self-concept. p. 46
6 Describe how attitudes are used to develop four leadership styles. p. 49
7 Compare the three levels of moral development. p. 52
8 Explain the stakeholder approach to ethics. p. 56
2
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 31 10/15/14 12:48 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
32 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
E llen Kullman is an effective leader. The focus of this chapter is on leadership traits, which includes ethics. We begin by learning about personality traits of leaders and the personality profile of effective leaders. Next we learn how attitudes affect leadership. We end with a discussion of ethics in leadership.
Personality Traits and Leadership Trait Universality Recall that trait theory of leadership was the foundation for the field of leadership stud- ies. Some authors believe that the most important thing about a leader is traits, rather than skills.6 In this section, we discuss traits and personality, personality profiles, and leadership trait universality. But before you learn about personality traits, complete Self-Assessment 2-1 to determine your personality profile. Throughout this chapter, you will gain a better understanding of personality traits, which help explain why people do the things they do (behavior).
ellen Kullman Dupont DuPont was founded over 200 years ago and continues to be a world leader in market-driven innovation and science. Its innovation includes thousands of new products and patent applications every year, serving markets as diverse as agriculture, nutrition, electronics and communications, safety and protection, home and construction, transpor ta- tion and apparel.1 Look closely at the things around your home and workplace, and chances are you’ll find dozens of items made with DuPont materials.
Ellen Kullman received a BS in mechanical engineering from Tufts University, and later a master’s degree in man- agement from Northwestern University, and she began her career at GE. She star ted at DuPont in 1988 as a market- ing manager. Kullman climbed the corporate ladder to the top in 2009, becoming chair of the board and CEO of Du- Pont.2 Under Kullman’s leadership DuPont’s strategy shifted from selling commodity units into high-margin areas and the stock has more than doubled during her tenure.
DuPont operates in more than 90 countries, with rev- enues in excess of $39.5 billion. DuPont is ranked #72
on the For tune 500 company list and 1st in the chemi- cals ranking,3 ranked #267 on the Global 500,4 and ranked #41 on the Fortune World’s Most Admired Companies.5
OpeNING CaSe QUeStIONS:
1. What Big Five personality traits does Ellen Kull- man possess?
2. Does Ellen Kullman have the personality profile of an effective leader?
3. How did “attitude” help improve the perfor- mance of DuPont?
4. How did Ellen Kullman’s self-concept affect her leadership?
5. What role does ethics play at DuPont?
Can you answer any of these questions? You’ll find answers to these questions and learn more about DuPont and its leadership throughout the chapter.
To learn more about Ellen Kullman and DuPont, visit its Web site at http://www.dupont.com.
OPENING CASE Application
SELF-ASSESSMENT 2-1 Big Five personality profile
There are no right or wrong answers, so be honest and you will really increase your self-awareness. We suggest doing this exercise in pencil or making a copy before you write on it. We will explain why later.
Using the scale below, rate each of the 25 statements according to how accurately it describes you. Place a number from 1 to 7 on the line before each statement.
(continued)
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 32 10/15/14 12:48 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 2 LEADERShIP TRAITS AND EThICS 33
Like me Some what like me Not like me 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
______ 1. I step forward and take charge in lead- erless situations.
______ 2. I am concerned about getting along well with others.
______ 3. I have good self-control; I don’t get emotional, angry, or yell.
______ 4. I’m dependable; when I say I will do something, it’s done well and on time.
______ 5. I try to do things differently to improve my performance.
______ 6. I don’t give up very easily, and push myself to achieve my objectives.
______ 7. I enjoy having lots of friends. ______ 8. I think positively about the outcomes
of situations and perform well under pressure.
______ 9. I work hard to be successful. ______ 10. I’m flexible and go with the flow when
things change. ______ 11. I am outgoing and willing to be assertive
when in conflict. ______ 12. I try to see things from other people’s
points of view. ______ 13. I have confidence in my judgments, deci-
sion making, ideas, and capabilities.
______ 14. I am loyal to my boss, coworkers, and the organizations.
______ 15. I’m good at problem solving and making decisions.
______ 16. I want to climb the corporate ladder to as high a level of management as I can.
______ 17. I want other people to like me and to view me as very friendly.
______ 18. I give people lots of praise and encour- agement; I don’t put people down and criticize.
______ 19. I follow the policies and rules of an organization.
______ 20. I volunteer to be the first to learn and do new tasks at work.
______ 21. I try to influence other people to get my way.
______ 22. I enjoy working with others more than working alone.
______ 23. I am relaxed and secure, rather than nervous and insecure.
______ 24. I am considered to be trustworthy because I do a good job and support others.
______ 25. I believe that my successful performance depends on me, not others or good luck
Surgency Agreeableness Adjustment Conscientiousness Openness to Experience
_____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____
1. 6. 11. 16. 21.
Total
35 30 25 20 15 10 5
Scale
_____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____
2. 7. 12. 17. 22.
Total
35 30 25 20 15 10 5
Scale
_____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____
3. 8. 13. 18. 23.
Total
35 30 25 20 15 10 5
Scale
_____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____
4. 9. 14. 19. 24.
Total
35 30 25 20 15 10 5
Scale
_____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____
5. 10. 15. 20. 25.
Total
35 30 25 20 15 10 5
Scale
To determine your Big Five personality profile: (1) In the blanks, place the numbers from 1 to 7 that represents your score for each statement. (2) Add up each column; your total should be a number from 5 to 35. (3) On the number scale, circle the number that is closest to your total score. Each column in the chart represents a specific personality dimension.
The higher the total number, the stronger is the personality dimension that describes your personality. What is your strongest dimension? Your weakest dimension? Continue reading the chapter for specifics about your personality in each of the five dimensions.
You may visit http://ipip.ori.org for a more detailed 50- or 100-item Big Five Personality Assessment.
personality and traits Why are some people outgoing and others shy, loud and quiet, warm and cold, aggressive and passive? This list of behaviors is made up of individual traits.
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 33 10/15/14 12:48 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
34 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
Personality and Traits Are Different but Related traits are distinguishing personal characteristics. The image we project is based largely on our character traits.7 personality is a combination of traits that classifies an individu- al’s behavior. Researchers study personal characteristics8 and personality9 to understand and explain why people behave the way they do.10
Personality is developed based on genetics and environmental factors. The genes you received before you were born inf luence your personality traits today. Your family, friends, school, and work also inf luence your personality. So our personality is partly innate, partly learned, and we can change, but it takes time and effort.11
Why Understanding Personality Is Important Understanding people’s personalities is important because personality affects behavior as well as perceptions and attitudes.12 Understanding personalities helps us explain and predict others’ behavior and job performance.13 For a simple example, if you know Kate is very shy, you can better understand why she is quiet when meeting new people. You can also predict that Kate will be quiet when going places and meeting new people. You can also better understand why Kate would not seek a job as a salesperson, and if she did, you could predict that she might not be highly successful.
personality profiles personality profiles identify individual stronger and weaker traits. Completing Self- Assessment 2-1 gives us our personality profile. Student profiles tend to have a range of scores for the five dimensions. Review your personality profile. Do you have higher scores (stronger traits) on some dimensions and lower scores (weaker traits) on others? There are many personality tests, such as the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory.
When we take personality tests, our self-awareness goes up as we figure out our stron- ger and weaker traits. But we have to make a realistic assessment and acceptance of our strengths and weaknesses and work to improve our behavior. We realize that we are dif- ferent from other people, and, as stated above, we can change our behavior to improve our relationships and develop leadership skills.14
Job Performance Many organizations (including the National Football League) give personality tests to ensure a proper match between the worker and the job. Personality profiles are also used to categorize people as a means of predicting job success, and high conscientiousness is a good predictor of job performance, whereas people who are unstable tend to have poor job performance. People who are high in openness to experience tend to lead innovation to improve organizational performance.15
The Big Five Correlates with Leadership Researchers conducted a major meta-analysis combining 73 prior studies to correlate the Big Five personality dimensions with leadership. The highest correlation with leadership was surgenc y (.31), fol lowed by conscientiousness (.28) a nd openness to experience (24). Agreeableness was weak ly correlated (.08), and adjustment was negatively correlated with leadership (–.24).16 In other words, people high in surgency are perceived as leaderlike—they work hard, and they bring about change. They are not too concerned about being well liked and trying to please everyone, and they are stable or not overly emotional.
WORK Application 2-1 Based on your personality profile, identify which dimensions are stronger, moderate, and weaker.
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 34 10/15/14 12:48 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 2 Leadership TraiTs and eThics 35
Derailed Leadership Traits Let’s identify traits that led to leadership failure. A study was conducted that compared 21 derailed executives with 20 executives who had successfully climbed the corporate lad- der to the top. The derailed executives had prior success and were expected to go far, but they were passed over for promotion again, were fired, or were forced to retire early. See Exhibit 2.1 for a list of the six major reasons for derailment.17 Overall, the problem of derailed managers is poor human relations skills.
WORK Application 2-2 Select a present or past manager, and state whether he or she has any of the six traits of derailment. Give specific examples of weaknesses.
Why Executives Are Derailed EXHIBIT 2.1
We Can Improve As stated, we can change our behavior to be more effective. The key to success is to assess our personality strengths and weaknesses and to plan how to change our behavior to improve our relationships and leadership skills. Once we determine the behavior we want to improve, it takes deliberate practice to succeed. You are given the opportunity to apply what you learn throughout this book in your personal and professional lives.
Explain the universality of traits of effective leaders. Learning outcome
1
Describe the Big Five personality dimensions. Learning outcome
2
Leadership trait Universality In applying trait theory, we need to remember that there are traits that many successful leaders have,18 and we will discuss them in the next major section with the Big Five, but there is no agreed-upon list of traits that leaders need to be successful. So you don’t need to have all of them to be a successful leader.
There are always exceptions to all the traits. For example, in Fortune 500 companies, 30 percent of the CEOs are 6 feet 2 inches or taller, compared to only 4 percent of the general U.S. population. However, there are lots of CEOs who are less than 6 feet.19 Successful leaders are commonly extroverts, but 40 percent of CEOs describe themselves as introverts, including Microsoft’s Bill Gates and investors Warren Buffet and Charles Schwab.20 Also, certain personality traits have been shown to be important in some team settings, but not in others.
· They used a bullying style viewed as intimidating, insensitive, and abrasive. · They were viewed as being cold, aloof, and arrogant. · They betrayed personal trust. · They were self-centered and viewed as overly ambitious and thinking of the next job. · They had specific performance problems with the business. · They overmanaged and were unable to delegate or build a team.
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 35 10/24/14 4:07 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
36 part 1 indiVidUaLs as Leaders
The Big Five Including Traits of Effective Leaders There are many personality classification methods.21 However, the Big Five Model of Personality traits is the most widely accepted way to classify personalities because of its strong research support and its reliability across age, sex, race, and language groups.22
The purpose of the Big Five is to reliably categorize, into one of five dimensions, most if not all of the traits you would use to describe someone. Thus, each dimension includes multiple traits. The Big Five Model of personality categorizes traits into the dimen- sions of surgency, agreeableness, adjustment, conscientiousness, and openness to experi- ence. The dimensions are listed in Exhibit 2.2 and described in this section.
Note that some researchers have slightly different names for the five dimensions, and not all will agree under which dimension each leadership trait should be classified; there is some overlap. We include traits of effective leaders under each dimension based on their strong research support, and our definitions of each of the Big Five include the effective leadership traits in that category. However, again we should realize that there is no one list of traits accepted by all researchers, and that not all effective leaders have all these traits and, like all of us, are higher and lower in some than others.
Surgency The surgency personality dimension includes dominance, extraversion, and high energy with determination. Review Self-Assessment 2-1 statements 1, 6, 11, 16, and 21 for examples of surgency traits. Let’s discuss the three important dimensions of surgency here.
Discuss why the trait of dominance is so important for managers to have. Learning Outcome
3
Dominance Successful leaders assert themselves and want to be managers and to take charge.23 If you do not want to be a leader, chances are you will not be an effective manager. Thus, the dominance trait affects all the other traits related to effective leaders. Do you want to be a leader?
the Big Five Model of personality Leadership traits within the Big Five
Surgency
Agreeableness
Adjustment
Conscientiousness
Openness
a. Dominance b. Extroversion c. Energy/Determination d. Sociability/Sensitivity e. Emotional intelligence f. Emotional Stability and Narcissism g. Self-confidence h. Dependability i. Integrity j. Flexibility k. Intelligence l. Locus of control
The Big Five Including Traits of Effective Leaders EXHIBIT 2.2
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 36 10/24/14 4:07 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 2 LEADERShIP TRAITS AND EThICS 37
Extraversion It is on a continuum between extravert and introvert. Extraverts are outgoing, like to meet new people, and are assertive and willing to confront others, whereas introverts are shy. Extraverts are frequently selected for leadership positions.24 How outgoing are you?
High energy with determination Leaders tend to have high energy with a positive drive to work hard to achieve goals, and they create energy in others.25 Their positive attitude and optimism inf luence their high tolerance for frustration as they strive to overcome obstacles through being persistent; they don’t give up easily. Do you have a high energy level with determination?
agreeableness The agreeableness personality dimension includes traits of sociability and emo- tional intelligence. Rev iew Self-Assessment 2-1 statements 2, 7, 12, 17, a nd 22 for exa mples of ag reeableness t ra its. Let ’s d iscuss t he t wo impor ta nt d imensions of agreeableness next.
Sociability/Sensitivity Sociable people have an inclination to seek out enjoyable social relationships. Strong sociability personality types are friendly, courteous, easy to get along with, and diplo- matic. How important is having good social relationships to you?
Sensitivity is part of being sociable. It refers to understanding group members as indi- viduals. Recall that being insensitive is one of the reasons why executives are derailed. If you are concerned only about yourself and don’t understand others, you probably will not be very successful. Are you sensitive to others?
Emotional Intelligence An offshoot of IQ is EQ (emotional quotient—EQ or emotional intelligence—EI). EI is the ability to work well with people.26 EQ is being used to identify future leaders.27 There are four components of EQ:28
• Self-awareness relates to being conscious of your emotions and how they affect your personal and professional life. Self-awareness is the cornerstone of all insight. Use your self-awareness (the exercises in this book help) to accurately assess your strengths and limitations; this leads to higher self-confidence.
• Social awareness relates to the ability to understand others. Empathy is an ability to put yourself in other people’s situations, sense their emotions, and understand things from their perspective.
• Self-management relates to the ability to control disruptive emotions, ours and others. Successful leaders are self-motivated and don’t let negative emotions (worry, anxiety, fear, anger) interfere with getting things done.
• Relationship management relates to the ability to work well with others, which is dependent on the other three EI components. Most of this book focuses on developing relationship management skills. Do you have high EI skills in all four areas?
adjustment The adjustment personality dimension includes traits of emotional stability and self-confidence. Review Self-Assessment 2-1 statements 3, 8, 13, 18, and 23 for exam- ples of adjustment traits. Let’s discuss the two important dimensions of adjustment here.
WORK Application 2-3 Select a present or past manager and assess his or her surgency traits of effective leaders. Give an example of the manager’s strong or weak dominance, extroversion, and energy/determination in a typical specific situation.
WORK Application 2-4 Using the same manager from Work Application 3, assess his or her agreeableness traits of effective leaders. Give an example of the manager’s strong or weak sociability/sensitivity and emotional intelligence in a typical specific situation.
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 37 10/15/14 12:48 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
38 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
Emotional stability/self-control and narcissism We all have emotions in leader–follower interactions. The question is how do we handle them? 29 Adjustment is on a continuum between being emotionally stable and unstable. Stable refers to self-control, being calm—good under pressure, relaxed, secure, and positive—praising others. Unstable is out of control—poor under pressure, nervous, insecure, negative, and hostile— criticizing others without helping them improve. How emotionally stable are you?
Narcissism is related to being unstable, and it is on the increase.30 Narcissists are pre- occupied with themselves, ignoring the needs of others, have an exaggerated sense of their own self-importance, and tend to make bad decisions.31 Are you just looking out for yourself as #1 as a narcissist?
Self-confidence It is on a continuum from strong to weak, indicating whether we are self-assured in our judgments, decision making, ideas, and capabilities. How can we succeed at anything if we don’t believe we can? Our self-confidence builds with our success at setting and achieving our goals. Effective self-confidence is based on an accurate awareness of our strengths and weaknesses, with an orientation to self-improvement. Do you have effective self-confidence?
Conscientiousness The conscientiousness personality dimension includes traits of dependability and integrity. Review Self-Assessment 2-1 statements 4, 9, 14, 19, and 24 for examples of con- scientiousness. How strong is your desire to be successful?
Dependability It is on a continuum between responsible/dependable to irresponsible/undependable. Highly dependable people get the job done and are characterized as loyal, committed to their coworkers and the organization. Are you dependable?
Integrity It is on a continuum between being honest and ethical or not. Integrity is the foundation for trustworthiness.32 We focus on honesty here and will discuss ethics in more detail in the last section of this chapter. Integrity is about being honest—no lying, cheating (ma- nipulating), or stealing.33 Clearly, to be effective, leaders need integrity.34 Do you have integrity?
Openness The openness-to-experience personality dimension includes traits of f lexibility, intelligence, and internal locus of control. Review Self-Assessment 2-1 statements 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 for examples of openness-to-experience traits.
Flexibility It refers to the ability to adjust to different situations and change.35 Without f lexibility, you will not be successful. Flexible people are generally more creative and innovative— willing to try new things and change. How willing are you to change and try new things? Are you f lexible?
Intelligence It refers to cognitive ability to think critically, to solve problems, and to make decisions. It is also referred to as general mental ability intelligence quotient (IQ). Intelligence is the
WORK Application 2-5 Using the same manager from Work Application 3, assess his or her emotional adjustment traits of effective leaders. Give an example of the manager’s strong or weak emotional stability and narcissism and self-confidence in a typical specific situation.
WORK Application 2-6 Using the same manager from Work Application 3, assess his or her conscientiousness traits of effective leaders. Give an example of the manager’s strong or weak dependability and integrity in a typical specific situation.
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 38 10/15/14 12:48 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 2 LEADERShIP TRAITS AND EThICS 39
best predictor of job performance but not the only one as conscientiousness is also im- portant. The founders of Microsoft (Bill Gates), Google (Sergey Brin and Larry Page), and Facebook (Mark Zuckerberg) all have 150+ IQs and math SAT skills at the 800 level, and they tend to have a bias for IQ when hiring.36
IQ, EQ, and I got a clue. It has been said that to be successful a high IQ is important37 but not enough. We also need strong interpersonal skills, or a high EQ (leading). Plus, we have to have a clue of what we are trying to accomplish (objectives) and how we will get the job done (planning, organizing, and controlling). Can you think of any people who are intelligent but lack people skills or don’t seem to have a clue about what to do or how to get things done?
Locus of control It is on a continuum between external and internal belief in control over one’s destiny/ performance. Externalizers believe that they have no control over their fate and that their behavior has little to do with their performance. Internalizers believe that they control their fate and that their behavior directly affects their performance. Effective internal- izer leaders take responsibility for who they are, for their behavior and performance, and for the performance of their organizational unit. Are you more of an internalizer or an externalizer?
YOU Make the ethICaL Call
2.1 Downsizing and Part-Time Workers
As firms struggle to compete in the global economy, many have downsized. Downsizing is the process of cutting resources to increase productivity. The primary area of cutting is human resources, which has led to layoffs. Another method of keeping costs down is using par t-time employees who do not receive benefits (e.g., health care) rather than full-time employees who receive benefits.
Walmar t is known for having a heavy ratio of par t- to full-time employees to keep costs down. Walmar t is expanding its sales of grocer y items, competing directly with supermarket chains. One of the reasons Walmar t has lower prices is because it uses mostly par t-time workers at or close to minimum wage and without benefits. Most super- market chain employees are unionized and get higher wages and more benefits, and they want better pay and benefits. But supermarket chains state that they can’t afford to pay more; they must compete with Walmar t.
1. Do you view Walmar t as a company with integrity?
2. Is downsizing ethical and socially responsible?
3. Is using par t-time, rather than full-time, employees ethical and socially responsible?
1. What Big Five and leadership personality traits does ellen Kullman possess?
To a large extent, Ellen Kullman is a successful leader because of her strong personality in the Big Five. She has a strong need for surgency that helped her climb the corporate ladder at DuPont, which is dominated by men.
It took energy and determination to become the first woman CEO of DuPont. She is ranked #3 on the Fortune 50 Most Powerful Women list.38
Kullman has agreeableness. She gets along well with people having strong interpersonal skills with EI. Kullman relies more on her personal relationships than her power as CEO to get the job done. She is also sociable and sensitive to others.
OPENING CASE Application
WORK Application 2-7 Using the same manager from Work Application 3, assess his or her openness to experience traits of effective leaders. Give an example of the manager’s strong or weak flexibility, intelligence, and locus of control in a typical specific situation.
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 39 10/15/14 12:48 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
40 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
She is conscientious at getting the job done. Being very dependable by achieving great success was a cornerstone of her climbing the corporate ladder at DuPont. Plus she is viewed has having a high level of integrity.
Kullman is well adjusted. Competing in a company and industry dominated by men, she has self-control and self-confidence. She is calm, good under pressure, relaxed, secure, and positive. She praises the accomplishments of her employees at all levels.
She is open to new experience because of her innovating and bringing to market new products at a faster clip. Kullman is highly intelligent, has an internal locus of control as she takes charge to bring changes, and is flexible.
CONCept APPLICATION 2-1
Big Five Personality Dimensions Identify each of these seven traits/behaviors by its personality dimension. Write the appropriate letter in the blank before each item. a. surgency d. conscientiousness b. agreeableness e. openness to experience c. affiliation
1. A leader is saying a warm, friendly hello to followers as they arrive at the meeting.
2. A leader is brainstorming ideas with followers on new products.
3. A follower is yelling about a problem, a leader calmly explains how to solve it.
4. A leader is not very talkative when meeting some unexpected customers.
5. A leader is letting a follower do the job his or her own way to avoid a conflict.
6. A leader is giving detailed instructions to a follower to do the job.
7. A purchasing agent submitted the monthly report on time as usual.
CONCept APPLICATION 2-2
Personality Traits of Effective Leaders Identify each of the following eight behaviors by its trait. The leader may be behaving effectively, or the behavior may be the opposite of the effective trait behavior. Refer to Exhibit 2.2 and use the “leadership traits within the Big Five.” Write the appropriate letter a–l in the blank before each item.
8. A leader telling his boss that he is right on schedule to finish the job, planning to catch up before the boss finds out.
9. A leader assigned a task to one follower, giving very specific instructions, and another task telling that follower to complete the task any way they want to.
10. A leader is fixing a broken machine.
11. A leader is acting very nervous while giving the follower a new task.
12. A leader tells a follower that he can have lunch at noon. But 15 minutes later, the leader tells the follower to have lunch at 1:00.
13. A leader listens to the follower complain and then paraphrases the complaint back to the follower.
14. A leader in situation 10 above is/has been working to fix the machine for three hours now.
15. A leader is giving excuses as to why performance is low and that nothing can be done to improve.
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 40 10/15/14 12:49 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 2 LEADERShIP TRAITS AND EThICS 41
The Personality Profile of Effective Leaders Effective leaders have a common personality profile. David McClelland’s trait theories of Achievement Motivation Theory and Leader Motive Profile Theory have strong research support and a great deal of relevance to the practice of leadership. Achievement Motiva- tion Theory identifies three major traits, which McClelland calls needs. Leader Motive Profile Theory identifies the personality profile of effective leaders.39 You will learn about both of these theories in this section.
WORK Application 2-8 How can you improve your leadership skills by understanding your manager’s (and other people’s) personality profile?
State how the Achievement Motivation Theory and the Leader Motive Profile are related and different
Learning Outcome
4
achievement Motivation theory achievement Motivation theory attempts to explain and predict behavior and performance based on a person’s need for achievement, power, and affiliation. Through an unconscious process, our behavior is motivated by our desire to satisfy our needs. McClelland stated that needs are based on personality and are developed as we interact with the environment. All people possess these three needs but to varying degrees.
The Need for Achievement (n Ach) The need for achievement is the concern for excellence in accomplishments through individual efforts. High n Ach is categorized as the Big Five dimension of conscientious- ness with dependability, but the person is not necessarily being high in integrity. People with high n Ach tend to be characterized as wanting to take personal responsibility for solving problems. They are goal oriented and set moderate, realistic, and attainable goals. They seek challenge, excellence, and individuality; take calculated, moderate risk; desire concrete feedback on their performance; and work hard. McClelland’s research showed that only about 10 percent of the U.S. population has a very “strong” dominant need for achievement. There is evidence of a correlation between high achievement need and high performance in the general population.
The Need for Power (n Pow) The need for power is the concern for inf luencing others and seek ing positions of authority. High n Pow is categorized as the Big Five dimension of surgency. People with a high need for power tend to be characterized as wanting to control the situation, want- ing inf luence or control over others, enjoying competition in which they can win (they don’t like to lose), being willing to confront others, and seeking positions of authority and status. They tend to be ambitious and have a lower need for affiliation and agreeableness. They are attuned to power and politics as essential for successful leadership, and they tend to seek management positions.
The Need for Affiliation (n Aff) The need for affiliation is the concern for developing, maintaining, and restoring close personal relationships. High n Aff is categorized as the Big Five dimension of agreeable- ness. People with strong n Aff have the trait of sociability/sensitivity and often high EI. People with high n Aff tend to be characterized as seeking close relationships with others, wanting to be liked by others, enjoying lots of social activities, and seeking to belong; so they join groups and organizations. People with high n Aff are more concerned about what others think of them than about getting their own way (inf luencing others). N Aff is negatively related to leadership. Those with a high n Aff tend to have a low n Pow; they tend to avoid management because they like to be one of the group rather than its leader.
WORK Application 2-9 Explain how your need for achievement, power, and/or affiliation has affected your behavior and performance, or that of someone you work with or have worked with. Give an example of the behavior and performance, and list your predicted motive need.
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 41 10/15/14 12:49 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
42 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
Your Motive Profile Note that McClelland does not have a classification for the adjustment and openness- to- experience Big Five personality dimensions; they are not needs. A person can have a high or low need for achievement, power, and affiliation and be either well adjusted or not, and either open or closed to new experiences. So these two dimensions of personality are ignored in determining the Achievement Motivation Theory personality profile. Complete Self-Assessment 2 to determine your motive profile now.
CONCept APPLICATION 2-3
Achievement Motivation Theory Identify each of the five behaviors below by its need, writing the appropriate letter in the blank before each item. The person may be behaving based on a strong need, or the behavior may be the opposite, indicating a weak need. Also state how the behavior meets the need and predict the performance. a. achievement b. power c. affiliation
16. A person is refusing to be the chairman of the committee.
17. A person is going to talk to a coworker to resolve a conflict they have.
18. The other coworker above will not be the first one to make a move to resolve the conflict; but when the other party comes to him, he will be receptive.
19. A finance major has offered to calculate the financial analysis for the group’s simulation game and to make the presentation to the class.
20. A management major is studying hard for many hours to maintain his A average.
SELF-ASSESSMENT 2-2 Motive profile
Return to Self-Assessment 2-1 on page 32 and place the scores from your Big Five personality profile in the following blanks, next to their corresponding needs. On the number scale, circle your total score for each need.
Need for achievement (conscientiousness)
Need for power (surgency)
Need for affiliation (agreeableness)
35 35 35 30 30 30 25 25 25 20 20 20 15 15 15 10 10 10 5 5 5
Total Score ___________ Total Score_________ Total Score_________
There is no right or wrong score for this profile. To interpret your score, check to see if there is much difference between the three need scores. If all three are about the same, one need is not stronger than the others are. If scores vary, one need is higher than the others and is called the stronger or dominant need, and the lower score is the weaker need. You can also have other combinations, such as two stronger and one weaker, or vice versa. Do you have stronger and weaker needs?
Knowing a motive profile is useful, because it can explain and predict behavior and performance. Read on to determine if you have the motive profile of an effective leader.
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 42 10/15/14 12:49 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 2 LEADERShIP TRAITS AND EThICS 43
Leader Motive profile theory Leader Motive profile theory attempts to explain and predict leadership success based on a person’s need for achievement, power, and affiliation. McClelland found that effective leaders consistently have the same motive profile and that Leader Motive Profile has been found to be a reliable predictor of leader effectiveness.40 Let’s first define the profile of effective leaders and then discuss why it results in success. The Leader Motive profile (LMp) includes a high need for power, which is socialized, that is greater than the need for affiliation and with a moderate need for achievement. The achievement score is usually somewhere between the power and affiliation score, and the reason is described below.
Power Power is essential to leaders because it is a means of inf luencing followers. Without power, there is no leadership. To be successful, leaders need to want to be in charge and enjoy dominance in the leadership role,41 with high energy and determination to succeed. We will need power to inf luence our followers, peers, and higher-level managers. We will discuss how to gain power and be successful in organizational politics in Chapter 5.
Socialized Power McClel la nd f ur t her identif ied power as neit her good nor bad. It ca n be used for personal gain at the expense of others (personalized power), or it can be used to help oneself and others (socialized power).42 Social power is discussed again later, with ethics. Effective leaders use socialized power, which includes the traits of sensitivity to others and stability with good EI relationships,43 and is the Big Five adjustment dimension. Thus, a person with a low need for affiliation can have a high sensitivity to others. McClelland’s research supports the reasons for executive derailment, because these negative traits are personalized power. Socialized power is not included in the motive profile, so complete Self-Assessment 3 to determine your motive profile with socialized power.
Achievement To be effective, leaders generally need to have a moderate need for achievement. They have high energ y, self-confidence, and openness-to-experience traits, and they are dependable—conscientious (Big Five dimension). The reason for a moderate, rather than a high, need for achievement, which would include a lower need for power, is the danger of personalized power. People with a high need for achievement tend to seek individual achievement, and when they are not interested in being a leader, there is the chance for personalized power and derailment.
Affiliation Effective leaders have a lower need for affiliation than power, so that relationships don’t get in the way of inf luencing followers. If the achievement score is lower than that for affiliation, the probability of the following problems occurring may be increased. Lead- ers with high n Aff tend to have a lower need for power and are thus reluctant to play the bad-guy role, such as disciplining and inf luencing followers to do things they would rather not do—like change. However, recall that effective leaders do have concern for followers—socialized power.
WORK Application 2-10 Make an intelligent guess about your present or past manager’s motive profile. Is it an LMP? Explain.
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 43 10/15/14 12:49 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
44 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
SELF-ASSESSMENT 2-3 Motive profile with Socialized power
Return to Self-Assessment 2-1 on page 32 and place the scores from Self-Assessment 2 (your motive profile) in the following blanks. On the number scale, circle your total score.
Need for achievement (conscientiousness)
Need for power (surgency)
Socialized power (adjustment)
Need for affiliation (agreeableness)
35 35 35 35 30 30 30 30 25 25 25 25 20 20 20 20 15 15 15 15 10 10 10 10 5 5 5 5
Total Score ___________ Total Score ___________ Total Score ___________ Total Score ___________
Again, there is no right or wrong score. The adjustment score will give you an idea if your power is more social or personal. Also realize that the questions in Self-Assessment 2-1 (3, 8, 13, 18, and 23) are not totally focused on social power. Thus, if you believe you have higher sensitivity to others, your score on McClelland’s LMP socialized power could be higher.
The Leader Motive Profile is included in the definition of leadership. Our definition of leadership includes the five key elements of leadership (see Exhibit 1.1 on page 5) in the LMP. Our definition of leadership includes influencing and leaders–followers (power) and getting along with people (social power with EI). It also includes organizational objectives (which achievers set and accomplish well) and change (which achievers are open to).
2. Does ellen Kullman have the personality profile of an effective leader?
Ellen Kullman has an LMP. Her need for power is illustrated through climbing the corporate ladder in a male-dominated industry and company. She has a socialized need for power since she relies more on relationships than simply her power as CEO, and she uses par ticipative management and does allow others to make decisions in local issues. Kullman has a need for achievement that leads to continued success. She also has a lower need for affiliation as she sets objectives and standards for improving performance and uses her power when needed.
Do you have an LMP? Complete Self-Assessment 4 now to find out.
OPENING CASE Application
SELF-ASSESSMENT 2-4 Leadership Interest
Select the option that best describes your interest in leadership now.
______ 1. I am, or want to become, a manager and leader.
______ 2. I am, or want to become, a leader with- out being a manager.
______ 3. I am not interested in being a leader ; I want to be a follower.
If you want to be a leader, recall that research has shown that you can develop your leadership skills.
If you selected option 1, do you have an LMP? If you answered yes, it does not guarantee that you will climb the corporate ladder. however, having an LMP does increase your chances, because it is a predictor of leadership suc- cess. On the other hand, an LMP is not enough; you need leadership skills to be successful. If your Self-Assessment 3
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 44 10/15/14 12:49 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 2 LEADERShIP TRAITS AND EThICS 45
Before we go on to discuss leadership attitudes, let’s review what we’ve covered so far in Exhibit 2.3 by putting together the Big Five Model of Personality, the nine traits of effective leaders, and Achievement Motivation Theory and LMP.
Leadership Attitudes attitudes are positive or negative feelings about people, things, and issues. We all have favorable or positive attitudes, and unfavorable or negative attitudes about life, work, school, leadership, and every thing else.4 4 J.W. Marriott, Jr., president of Marriott Corporation, stated that the company’s success depends more upon employee attitudes than any other single factor. Legendary football coach Lou Holtz says that attitude is the most
score doesn’t indicate that you have an LMP, go back to Self-Assessment 2-1 on page 33 and review questions 1, 6, 11, 16, and 21. Did you score them accurately? The most important question is 16. If you believe you have an LMP, be aware that your profile could be different using McClelland’s LMP questionnaire. Also recall that not all successful leaders have an LMP; you can still be successful. Developing your leadership skills, through effort, will increase your chances of leadership success.
If you selected option 2, don’t be concerned about your LMP. Focus on developing your leadership skills. however, your personality profile can help you better understand your strengths and weaknesses to identify areas to improve upon. This also holds true for people who selected option 1.
If you selected option 3, that’s fine. Most people in the general population probably would select this option. Many professionals who have great jobs and incomes are followers, and they have no interest in becoming managers. however, recall that research has shown that leaders and followers need the same skills, that organizations are looking for employees with leadership skills, and that organizations con- duct skills training with employees at all levels. To increase your chances of having a successful and satisfying career, you may want to develop your leadership skills. You may someday change your mind about becoming a leader and manager.
Your need for power and LMP can change over time, along with your interest in leadership and management and your skill level, regardless of which option you selected.
the Big Five Model of personality
Leadership traits within the Big Five
achievement Motivation theory and Leader Motive profile (LMp)
Surgency a. Dominance b. Extroversion c. Energy/Determination
Need for power
Agreeableness d. Sociability/Sensitivity e. Emotional intelligence
Need for affiliation
Adjustment f. Emotional Stability and Narcissism
g. Self-confidence
Socialized power (LMP)
Conscientiousness h. Dependability i. Integrity
Need for achievement
Openness j. Flexibility k. Intelligence l. Locus of control
No separate need; it is included in the other needs
Combing the Big Five with Traits and Needs EXHIBIT 2.3
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 45 10/15/14 12:49 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
46 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
important thing in this world and that we each choose the attitude we have. So, being a positive or negative person is your choice. Successful leaders have positive, optimistic at- titudes. Do you?
In this section, we discuss the important question, “how does leadership affect the behavior of followers?”45 We start with how attitudes relate to Theory X and Theory Y, and how the Pygmalion effect inf luences followers’ behavior and performance. Then we discuss self-concept and how it affects the leader’s behavior and performance. Lastly, we consider how the leader’s attitudes about followers, and about his or her self-concept, affect the leadership style of the leader.
Identify similarities and differences among Theory X and Theory Y, the Pygmalion effect, and self-concept.
Learning Outcome
5
theory X and theory Y Today, theory X and theory Y attempt to explain and predict leadership behavior and performance based on the leader’s attitude about followers. Before you read about Theory X and Y, complete Self-Assessment 2-5.
SELF-ASSESSMENT 2-5 theory X and theory Y attitudes
For each pair of statements distribute 5 points, based on how characteristic each statement is of your belief system. The combined score for each pair of the ten statements must equal 5.
here are the scoring distributions for each pair of statements:
0–5 or 5–0 I believe one statement and not the other. 1–4 or 4–1 I believe one statement much more than the other. 2–3 or 3–2 I believe both statements, although one more than the other.
1. People enjoy working. People do not like to work. 2. Employees don’t have to be closely super-
vised to do their job well. Employees will not do a good job unless
you closely supervise them. 3. If the manager is not around, the employ-
ees will work just as hard. If the manager is not around, the employ-
ees will take it easier than they will when being watched.
4. Employees will do a task well for you if you ask them to.
If you want something done right, you need to do it yourself.
5. Interesting, challenging work is the best motivator of employee.
Money is the best motivator of employees.
6. Employees want to be involved in making decisions.
Employees want the managers to make the decisions.
7. Employees will do their best work if you allow them to do the job their own way.
Employees will do their best work if they are taught how to do it the one best way.
8. Managers should share the management responsibilities with group members.
Managers should perform the manage- ment functions for the group.
9. Managers should let employees have full access to information that is not confidential.
Managers should give employees only the information they need to know to do their job.
(continued)
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 46 10/15/14 12:49 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 2 LEADERShIP TRAITS AND EThICS 47
D ou g l a s Mc G re gor c l a s s i f ie d at t it u d e s or b e l ie f s y s t e m s , w h ic h he c a l le d assumptions, as Theory X and Theory Y.46 People with Theory X attitudes hold that employees dislike work and must be closely super v ised in order to do t heir work. Theor y Y attitudes hold that employees like to work and do not need to be closely super vised in order to do their work. In each of the ten pairs of statements in Self- Assessment 2-5, t he f i rst l i nes a re T heor y Y at t it udes a nd t he second l i nes a re Theory X attitudes.
Managers with Theory X attitudes tend to have a negative, pessimistic view of em- ployees and display more coercive, autocratic leadership styles using external means of controls, such as threats and punishment. Managers with Theory Y attitudes tend to have a positive, optimistic view of employees and display more participative leadership styles using internal motivation and rewards.
It is widely accepted that managers with Theory Y attitudes are generally more pro- ductive than Theory X attitudes.47 The six derailed executive traits ref lect Theory X behaviors. If you scored higher in Theory X for Self-Assessment 2-5, it does not mean that you cannot be an effective leader. There are some situations, such as large-scale produc- tion and unskilled workers where a more autocratic style works well. As with personality traits, we can change our attitudes, with effort. We don’t have to be autocratic leaders.
the pygmalion effect The pygmalion effect proposes that leaders’ attitudes toward and expectations of followers, and their treatment of them, explain and predict followers’ behavior and performance. We have already talked about attitudes, so let’s add expectations and treatment. In business, expectations are stated as objectives and standards. Lou Holtz advises setting a higher standard; the worst disservice you can do as a coach, teacher, parent, or leader is to expect little and lower standards. Just treating employees well and getting them in a good mood as they start their day can have a huge impact on performance.48
10. The participative management style is the best leadership style.
The autocratic management style is the best leadership style.
To determine your attitude about people at work, add up the numbers (0–5) for the first statement in each pair; don’t bother adding the numbers for the
second statements. The total should be between 0 and 50. Place your score on the continuum below.
0 — 5 — 10 — 15 — 20 — 25 — 30 — 35 — 40 — 45 — 50 T h e o r y X T h e o r y Y
Generally, the higher your score, the greater are your Theory Y beliefs, and the lower the score, the greater your Theory X attitudes.
WORK Application 2-11 Give an example of when a person (parent, friend, teacher, coach, manager) really expected you either to perform well or to fail, and treated you like you would, which resulted in your success or failure
3. how did “attitude” help improve the performance of Dupont?
A major factor in Ellen Kullman’s improving the performance of DuPont is in her positive attitude with a Theory Y attitude toward her employees. She has a positive optimistic view of employees and uses a participative leadership style. Kullman has faith in her employees and expects them to succeed, and they do.
OPENING CASE Application
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 47 10/15/14 12:49 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
48 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
Self-Concept So far, we have discussed the leaders’ attitudes about followers. Now we will examine leaders’ attitudes about themselves. Self-concept refers to the positive or negative attitudes people have about themselves. If you have a positive view of yourself as being a capable person, you will tend to have the positive self-confidence trait. Self-efficacy is the belief in your own capability to perform in a specific situation, which is based on your self-concept and self-confidence.
What we think determines what happens to us. As Henry Ford put it, “If you think you can, you can; if you think you can’t, you can’t.” Recall times when you had positive self- efficacy and were successful, or negative self-efficacy and failed. If you don’t believe you can be a successful leader, you probably won’t be.
4. how did ellen Kullman’s self-concept affect her leadership?
Ellen Kullman rarely doubted that she could do whatever she applied herself to accomplish. Back when she went to Tufts to major in engineering, there were not many women entering the male-dominated field, but she knew she would gradu- ate and go on to a successful career. Without a positive self-attitude, she would not have had the confidence, especially being in a male-dominated company, that she could climb the corporate ladder at DuPont all the way to the top. Kullman has self-efficacy as CEO, as she knew she could improve the performance at DuPont, and she is doing that.
OPENING CASE Application
Developing a More Positive Attitude and Self-Concept Our behavior and performance will be consistent with the way we see ourselves. Think and act like a winner, and you may become one. Self-awareness and self-development help.49 Follow- ing are some ideas to help you change your attitudes and develop a more positive self-concept:
1. Realize that there are few, if any, benefits to negative, pessimistic attitudes about others and yourself. Do holding a grudge, worrying, and being afraid of failure help you to succeed?
2. Consciously try to have and maintain a positive, optimistic attitude. If you don’t have a positive attitude, it may be caused by your unconscious thoughts and behavior. Only with conscious effort can you improve your self-concept.
3. Cultivate optimistic thoughts. Scientific evidence suggests that your thoughts affect every cell in your body. Every time you think positive thoughts, your body, mind, and spirit respond. Use positive self-talk—I will do a good job; it will be done on time; and so on. Also use mental imagery—picture yourself achieving your goal.
4. If you catch yourself complaining or being negative in any way, stop and change to a positive attitude. With time, you will catch yourself less often as you become more positive about yourself.
5. Avoid negative people, especially those who make you feel negative about yourself. Associate with people who have a positive self-concept, and use their positive behavior.
6. Set and achieve goals. Set short-term goals (daily, weekly, monthly) that you can achieve. Achieving specific goals will improve your self-concept.
7. Focus on your success; don’t dwell on failure. We are all going to make mistakes and experience failure, but we need to bounce back. If you achieve five of six goals, dwell on the five and forget the one you missed. Lou Holtz says happiness is nothing more than a poor memory for the bad things that happen to you.
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 48 10/15/14 12:49 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 2 LEADERShIP TRAITS AND EThICS 49
8. Don’t belittle accomplishments or compare yourself to others. If you meet a goal and say it was easy anyway, you are being negative. If you compare yourself to someone else and say they are better, you are being negative. No matter how good you are, there is almost always someone better. So focus on being the best that you can be, rather than putting yourself down for not being the best.
9. Accept compliments. When someone compliments you, say thank you; it builds self- concept. Don’t say things like it was nothing, or anyone could have done it, because you lose the opportunity for a buildup.
10. Be a positive role model. If the leader has a positive attitude, the followers usually do too. We can choose to be optimistic or pessimistic—and we usually find what we are looking for. If you look for the positive, you are likely to be happier and get more out of life; why look for the negative and be unhappy?
11. When things go wrong and you’re feeling down, do something to help someone who is worse off than you. You will realize that you don’t have it so bad, and you will realize that the more you give, the more you get. Volunteering at a hospital, soup kitchen, or becoming a Big Brother or Sister can help change your attitude. This is also a great cure for loneliness.
WORK Application 2-12 Recall a present or past manager. Using Exhibit 2.4, which combinations of attitudes best describe your manager’s leadership style? Give examples of the manager’s behavior that illustrate his or her attitudes.
Describe how attitudes are used to develop four leadership styles. Learning Outcome
6
how attitudes Develop Leadership Styles We now put together the leader’s attitudes toward others, using Theory X and Theory Y, and the leader’s attitude toward self, using self-concept, to illustrate how these two sets of attitudes develop into four leadership styles. Com- bining attitudes with the Leader Motive Profile (LMP), an effective leader tends to have Theory Y attitudes with a positive self-concept. See Exhibit 2.4 to understand how attitudes toward self and others affect leadership styles.
Leadership Styles Based on Attitudes EXHIBIT 2.4
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
theory Y attitudes theory X attitudes
Positive self-concept The leader typically gives and accepts positive feedback, expects others to succeed, and uses a par ticipative leadership style.
The leader typically is bossy, pushy, and impatient; does much criticizing with little praising; and uses an autocratic leadership style.
Negative self-concept The leader typically is afraid to make decisions, is unassertive, and is self- blaming when things go wrong.
The leader typically blames others when things go wrong, is pessimistic about resolving personal or organizational problems, and promotes feeling of hopelessness among followers.
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 49 10/15/14 12:49 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
50 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
Ethical Leadership Before we discuss ethical behavior, complete Self-Assessment 2-6 to find out how ethical your behavior is.
how ethical Is Your Behavior?SELF-ASSESSMENT 2-6
For this exercise, you will be using the same set of statements twice. The first time you answer them, focus on your own behavior and the frequency with which you use it for each question. On the line before the question number, place the numbers 1–4 that represent how often you “did do” the behavior in the past, if you “do the behavior now,” or if you “would do” the behavior if you had the chance.
These numbers will allow you to determine your level of ethics. You can be honest without fear of having to tell others your score in class. Sharing ethics scores is not part of the exercise.
F r e q u e n t l y N e v e r 1 2 3 4
The second time you use the same statements, focus on other people in an organization that you work/worked for. Place an “O” on the line after the number if you observed someone doing this behavior. Also place an “R” on the line if you reported (whistle-blowing) this behavior within the organization or externally.
O — o b s e r v e d R — r e p o r t e d 1–4 O–r
College
1. Cheating on homework assignments. 2. Cheating on exams. 3. Passing in papers that were com-
pleted by someone else, as your own work.
Workplace 4. Lying to others to get what you
want or stay out of trouble. 5. Coming to work late, leaving work
early, taking long breaks/lunches and getting paid for it.
6. Socializing, goofing off, or doing personal work rather than doing the work that should be done and getting paid for it.
7. Calling in sick to get a day off, when not sick.
8. Using the organization’s phone, computer, Internet, copier, mail, car, and so on for personal use.
9. Taking home company tools/ equipment for personal use with- out permission and then returning them/it.
10. Taking home organizational supplies or merchandise and keeping it.
11. Giving company supplies or mer- chandise to friends or allowing
them to take them without saying anything.
12. Putting in for reimbursement for meals and travel or other expenses that weren’t actually eaten or taken.
13. Taking spouse/friends out to eat or on business trips and charging it to the organizational expense account.
14. Accepting gifts from customers/ suppliers in exchange for giving them business.
15. Cheating on your taxes. 16. Misleading customers to make a
sale, such as short delivery dates. 17. Misleading competitors to get infor-
mation to use to compete against them, such as saying/pretending to be a customer/supplier.
18. Manipulating data to make you look good, or others bad.
19. Selling more of the product than the customer needs, to get the commission.
20. Spreading false rumors about coworkers or competitors to make yourself look better for advance- ment or to make more sales.
21. Lying for your boss when asked/told to do so.
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 50 10/15/14 12:49 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 2 LEADERShIP TRAITS AND EThICS 51
Members of organizations face moral issues,50 and leaders set the ethical climate and are responsible for employee ethical or unethical behavior.51 Unfortunately, scandals have become too commonplace,52 often based on the greedy win at all cost philosophy.53 Corporate scandals globally have led to a distrust of leaders,54 to the point where only around 30 percent of developed countries trust organizational leaders.55 ethics are the standards of right and wrong that inf luence behavior. Right behavior is considered ethical, and wrong behavior is considered unethical.
Government laws and regulations are designed to help keep business honest. To this end, Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to help ensure that complaints about financial irregularities would surface and be swiftly acted upon, without retaliation against the person who exposed the unethical behavior (“whistle-blower”). However, the government can’t make people be ethical. But recall that AACSB (Chapter 1) lists ethi- cal understanding as an important competency.56 Thus, business schools are focusing on ethics,57 as it is generally agreed that ethics can be taught.58
In this section, we discuss that ethical behavior does pay; how personality traits and attitudes, moral development, and the situation affect ethical behavior; how people justify unethical behavior; some simple guides to ethical behavior; and being an ethical leader.
Does ethical Behavior pay? Generally, the answer is yes. Research has found a direct link to bottom-line performance.59 Unethical decisions have led to dramatic costs in fines, reputational damage, and impris- onment.60 Society also suffers, such as the financial crisis that plunged world economies into recession.61 Most highly successful people are ethical.62 Being ethical may be difficult, but it has its rewards.63 It actually makes you feel better.64 Honest people have fewer mental health and physical complaints, like anxiety and back pain, and better social interactions.65
22. Deleting information that makes you look bad or changing infor- mation to look better than actual results—false information.
23. Being pressured, or pressuring oth- ers, to sign off on documents with false information.
24. Being pressured, or pressuring others, to sign off on documents you haven’t read, knowing they may contain information or deci- sions that might be considered inappropriate.
25. If you were to give this assessment to a person you work with and with whom you do not get along very well, would she agree with your answers? Use a scale of yes 4–1 on the line before the number 25 and skip O or R.
Other Unethical Behavior: Add other unethical behaviors you observed. Identify if you reported the behavior by using R.
26. _____ 27. _____ 28. _____
Note: This self-assessment is not meant to be a pre- cise measure of your ethical behavior. It is designed to get you thinking about ethics and your behavior and that of others from an ethical perspective. There is no right or wrong score; however, each of these actions is considered unethical behavior in most organizations. Another ethical issue of this exercise is your honesty when rating the frequencies of your behavior. how honest were you? Scoring: To determine your ethics score, add the numbers 1–4. Your total will be between 25 and 100. Place the number here and on the continuum below that represents your score. The higher your score, the more ethical is your behavior, and vice versa for lower scores.
2 5 — 3 0 — 4 0 — 5 0 — 6 0 — 7 0 — 8 0 — 9 0 — 1 0 0 Unethical Ethical
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 51 10/15/14 12:49 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
52 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
Ethics is so important that large organizations have ethics officers who are responsible for developing and implementing ethics codes (standards of what is ethical and what is not) to help guide employees to ethical behavior.66
Leadership success is based on personal traits, including integrity—having character of being honest (no lying, steeling, or cheating).67 Trust among employees is vital, and trust is based on integrity.68 If you are not honest with people and take advantage of them, they will not trust you and you will not have the ability to influence them. So there is a direct link between being ethical and being an effective leader.69
Compare the three levels of moral development. Learning Outcome
7
Factors Influencing ethical Behavior In this subsection, we discuss why good people do bad things, and three related concepts: how personality traits and attitudes, moral development, and the situation affect ethical behavior.
Why Do Good People Do Bad Things? Most people understand right and wrong behavior and have a conscience. So why do good people do bad things? Most often, when people behave unethically, it is not because they have some type of character flaw or were born bad. It can be incredibly tempting to be unethical.70 Most people aren’t simply good or bad. Just about everyone has the capacity to be dishonest.71 One percent of people will always be honest, one percent will always be dishonest, and 98 percent will be unethical at times but just a little.72 We respond to “incentives” and can usually be manipulated to behave ethically or unethically, if you find the right incentives.73 The incentive is usually looking out for our own self-interest,74 and can be personal gain or to avoid getting into trouble.75
Most people don’t go into business thinking, “I’m going to be unethical.” It often starts with the temptation to do something unethical for personal gain. Without getting caught and punished, people tend to get worse over time as they become desensitized to their unethical behavior. In most cases, the person is eventually caught and punished. This is illustrated in the film The Wolf of Wall Street. Leonardo DiCaprio plays the role of Jordan Belfort, whose unethical behavior starts small and leads to his imprisonment.76 So once you start down the road of unethical behavior, it is difficult to pull a u-turn.
Personality Traits and Attitudes Our ethical behavior is related to our individual needs and personality traits of character with integrity.77 But personality alone is not a good predictor of unethical behavior. Lead- ers with surgency (dominance) personality traits have two choices: to use power for per- sonal benefit or to use socialized power. To gain power and to be conscientious with high achievement, some people will use unethical behavior.
An agreeableness personality sensitive to others can lead to following the crowd in ei- ther ethical or unethical behavior. Emotionally unstable people and those with external lo- cus of control are more likely to use unethical behavior. People with positive attitudes about ethics tend to be more ethical than those with negative or weak attitudes about ethics.78
Moral Development A second factor affecting ethical behavior is moral development, which refers to under- standing right from wrong and choosing to do the right thing with a moral identity.79
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 52 10/15/14 12:49 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 2 LEADERShIP TRAITS AND EThICS 53
Our ability to make ethical choices is related to our level of moral development and judg- ments.80 There are three levels of personal moral development, as discussed in Exhibit 2.5, and we can improve our character development.81
Levels of Moral Development EXHIBIT 2.5
3. postconventional Behavior is motivated by universal principles of right and wrong, regardless of the expecta- tions of the leader or group. One seeks to balance the concerns for self with those of others and the common good. He or she will follow ethical principles even if they violate the law at the risk of social rejection, economic loss, and physical punishment (Martin Luther King, Jr., broke what he considered unjust laws and spent time in jail seeking universal dignity and justice).
“I don’t lie to customers because it is wrong.”
The common leadership style is visionary and committed to serving others and a higher cause while empowering followers to reach this level.
2. Conventional Living up to expectations of acceptable behavior defined by others motivates behavior to fulfill duties and obligations. It is common for followers to copy the behavior of the leaders and group. If the group (can be society/organization/department) accepts lying, cheating, stealing, and so on, when dealing with customers/suppliers/government/competitors, so will the individual. On the other hand, if these behaviors are not accepted, the individual will not do them either. Peer pressure is used to enforce group norms.
“I lie to customers because the other sales reps do it too.”
It is common for lower-level managers to use a similar leadership style of the higher-level managers.
1. preconventional
Self-interest motivates behavior to meet one’s own needs to gain rewards while following rules and being obedient to authority to avoid punishment.
“I lie to customers to sell more products and get higher commission checks.”
The common leadership style is autocratic toward others while using one’s position for personal advantage.
Source: Adapted from Lawrence Kohlberg, “Moral Stages and Moralization: The Cognitive- Development Approach.” In Thomas Likona (ed.),
Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research, and Social Issues (Austin, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976), 31–53.
At the first level, preconventional, we choose right and wrong behavior based on our self- interest and the consequences (reward and punishment). With ethical reasoning at the second level, conventional, we seek to maintain expected standards and live up to the expectations of others. One does what the others do. At the third level, postconventional, we make an effort to define moral principles regardless of leader or group ethics. Although most of us have the ability to reach the third level of moral development, postconventional, only about 20 percent of people reach this level.
Source: Adapted from Lawrence Kohlberg, “Moral Stages and Moralization: The Cognitive-Development Approach.” In Thomas Likona (ed.), Moral Development and Behavior : Theory, Research, and Social Issues (Austin, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976), 31–53.
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 53 10/15/14 12:49 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
54 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
Most people behave at the second level, conventional, while some have not advanced beyond the first level, preconventional. How do you handle peer pressure to be unethical? What level of moral development are you on? What can you do to further develop your ethical behavior? We will discuss how to be an ethical leader.
The Situation Our third factor affecting ethical behavior is the situation. People consider the situational forces in determining ethical behavior.82 We are susceptible to social inf luence.83 Unethi- cal organizational behavior has been attributed to the effects of individual unethical “bad apples.”84 The bad is stronger than the good effect as a bad apple can spoil the whole barrel (organization).85
Highly competitive and unsupervised situations increase the odds of unethical behav- ior. Unethical behavior occurs more often when there is no formal ethics policy or code of ethics, and when unethical behavior is not punished, and it is especially prevalent when it is rewarded. In other words, people are more unethical when they believe they will not get caught and punished.86 Unethical behavior is also more likely when performance falls below aspiration levels. People also tend to be more ethical in the morning.87 People are also less likely to report unethical behavior (blow the whistle) when they perceive the violation as not being serious and when the offenders are their friends.
Integration To tie the three factors affecting ethical behavior together, we need to realize that personality traits and attitudes and moral development interact with the situation to determine if a person will use ethical or unethical behavior. In this chapter we use the individual level of analysis: Am I ethical, and how can I improve my ethical behavior? At the organizational level, many firms offer training programs and develop codes of ethics to help employees behave ethically. The organizational level of analysis is examined in Part Three of this book; therefore, ethics and whistle-blowing will be further discussed in Chapter 10.
WORK Application 2-13 Give an organizational example of behavior at each of the three levels of moral development.
5. What role does ethics play at Dupont?
It always has been, and continues to be, the intent of DuPont that its employees maintain the highest ethical standards in their conduct of company affairs. Here are some of its ethical principles. In living up to its ethical philosophy, DuPont will be fair and honest in all dealings on behalf of the company, do what is right rather than what is expedient, and conduct all dealings with suppliers, customers, and others in a manner that excludes consideration of personal advantage.88
OPENING CASE Application
how people Justify Unethical Behavior As we seek our own self-interest,89 most of us give in to temptation and do the wrong thing sometimes.90 Few people see themselves as unethical. We all want to view ourselves in a positive manner. If we only cheat a little, we can still feel good about our sense of integrity.91 Therefore, when we do use unethical behavior, we often justify the behavior to protect our self-concept so that we don’t have to feel bad.92 Moral justification is the thinking process of rationalizing why unethical behavior is used. We rationalize with statements like “this is a widespread business practice,” “everybody does it,” and “I deserve it.” Let’s discuss several thinking processes used to justify unethical behavior.
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 54 10/15/14 12:49 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 2 LEADERShIP TRAITS AND EThICS 55
• Higher purpose is rationalizing immoral behavior in terms of a higher purpose. “It’s for a greater good.”93 People lie, cheat, and steal, claiming it is for the good of the organiza- tion, department, or employees.
• Displacement of responsibility is the process of blaming one’s unethical behavior on others. “I was only following orders; my boss told me to inflate the figures.”94
• Diffusion of responsibility is the process of the group using the unethical behavior with no one person being held responsible. “It isn’t my decision.”95 Everyone does it.”96 “We all take bribes/kickbacks; it’s the way we do business,” or “We all take merchandise home (steal).” If you hear others are doing something, you will tend to be tempted to be unethical to.97
• Advantageous comparison is the process of comparing oneself to others who are worse. “I call in sick when I’m not sick only a few times a year; Tom and Ellen do it all the time.” “We pollute less than our competitors do.” I’m only fudging a little.”98
• Disregard or distortion of consequences is the process of minimizing the harm caused by the unethical behavior. 99 “If I inflate the figures, no one will be hurt and I will not get caught. And if I do, I’ll just get a slap on the wrist anyway.” Was this the case at Enron?
• Attribution of blame is the process of claiming the unethical behavior was caused by someone else’s behavior. “It’s my coworker’s fault that I hit him. He called me/did xxx, so I had to hit him.”
• Euphemistic labeling is the process of using “cosmetic” words to make the behavior sound acceptable. Terrorist group sounds bad but freedom fighter sounds justifiable. Misleading or covering up sounds better than lying to others.
It is important to understand the subtlety of how unethical behavior can take hold of you. Simply doing what “works for you,” what “makes you feel good,” or “doing whatever it takes,” often leads to unethical behavior. Unethical behavior that you justify might give you some type of short-term gain, but in the long run, you’ve sabotaged yourself.100 Which justification pro- cesses have you used? How can you improve your ethical behavior by not using justification?
WORK Application 2-14 Give at least two organizational examples of unethical behavior and the process of justification.
CONCept APPLICATION 2-4
Justifying Unethical Behavior Identify each thinking process used to justify the unethical behavior below. a. moral justification e. disregard or distortion of consequences b. displacement of responsibility f. attribution of blame c. diffusion of responsibility g. euphemistic labeling d. advantageous comparison
21. Yes. We have to take the other team’s play book so that we can win the game.
22. I only take candy once in a while. Jean takes one every day.
23. We all do it, so don’t worry about it. Everyone takes candy without paying for it.
24. It’s not my fault. Kevin started breaking it, so I just joined in.
25. Yes. I’m keeping it. I found it and the company will never miss it anyway.
26. I lied to the customer because my boss told me too.
27. Yes. Our boss is married, but that is no stopping her from having an affair with the president.
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 55 10/15/14 12:49 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
56 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
Guides to ethical Behavior Every day in our personal and professional life, we face situations in which we can make ethical or unethical choices. As discussed, you make these choices based on your personal- ity traits and attitudes, level of moral development, and the situation. Research shows that making a decision without using an ethical guide leads to less ethical choices.101 So ethical guidelines can have a positive influence on our making ethical decisions.102 Following are some guides that can help us make ethical decisions.
Golden Rule The golden rule is, “Do unto others as you want them to do unto you.” Or, put other ways, “Don’t do anything to other people that you would not want them to do to you.” “Lead others as you want to be led.” Sammy Hagar says, “You have to treat people the way you want to be treated.”103 Do you like it when people lie to you, cheat you, or steal from you?
Four-Way Test Rotary International developed the four-way test of the things we think and do to guide business transactions. The four questions are (1) Is it the truth? (2) Is it fair to all con- cerned? (3) Will it build goodwill and better friendship? (4) Will it be beneficial to all concerned? When making your decision, if you can answer yes to these four questions, it is probably ethical. Anne Beiler, founder of Auntie Anne’s, advice is to tell the truth, even if it hurts.104
YOU Make the ethICaL Call
2.2 Sex and Violence
Over the years, various social activist groups, including the Parents Television Council, the National Viewers and Listeners Association, and the National Coalition against Censorship, have taken a stance for and against censorship of sex and violence on TV and in the mov- ies. People call for more censorship to protect children from seeing sex and violence, while others don’t want censorship, stating it violates free speech laws.
Advocates of regulation state the fact than many cable stations show reruns of major network shows in the daytime and early evening when children are watching. For example, Sex and the City and Jersey Shore are aired in different areas at all hours of the day and night.
1. Does the media (TV, movies, and music) influence societal values?
2. Does the media, with sex and violence, reflect current religious and societal values?
3. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has the power to regulate televi- sion. Should the FCC regulate the media, and, if yes, how far should it go? Should it require toning down the sex and violence, airing the shows only later at night, or should it take shows like Sex and the City and Jersey Shore off the air?
4. Is it ethical and socially responsible to show sex and violence against women, and to por tray women as sex objects?
5. Which of the seven justifications of unethical behavior do the media use to defend sex and violence?
Explain the stakeholder approach to ethics. Learning Outcome
8
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 56 10/15/14 12:49 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 2 LEADERShIP TRAITS AND EThICS 57
Codes of Ethics Also called codes of conduct, state the importance of conducting business in an ethical manner and provide guidelines or standards for ethical behavior.105 Most large businesses have written codes of ethics you should follow.
Stakeholder Approach to Ethics Under the stakeholder approach to ethics, one creates a win–win situation for rel- evant parties affected by the decision. A win–win situation meets the needs of the orga- nization and employees as well as those of other stakeholders, so that everyone benefits from the decision. Stakeholders include everyone affected by the decision.106 You can ask yourself one simple question to help you determine if your decision is ethical from a stakeholder approach:
“Am I proud to tell relevant stakeholders my decision?”
If you are proud to tell relevant stakeholders your decision, it is probably ethical. If you are not proud to tell others your decision, or you keep justifying it, the decision may not be ethical. Justifying is usually a cop-out. You can’t always create a win for everyone, but you can try.
Discernment and Advice Making an immediate decision leads to increased odds of unethical behavior, whereas taking time to contemplate the decision and talking to others for advice lead to increased odds of ethical behavior.107 If you are unsure whether a decision is ethical, talk to your boss, higher-level managers, and other people with high ethical standards. If you are re- luctant to ask others for advice because you may not like their answers, and you keep justifying it, the decision may not be ethical. Seeking advice is especially important in the global economy because what is considered unethical in one country may be considered ethical in another country.108
Chapter Summary
The chapter summary is organized to answer the ten learning outcomes for this chapter.
1 explain the universality of traits of effective leaders.
Traits are universal in the sense that there are certain traits that most effective leaders have. however, traits are not universal in the sense that there is no one list of traits that is clearly accepted by all researchers, and not all effective leaders have all the traits.
2 Describe the Big Five personality dimensions. The surgency personality dimension includes leadership and extraversion traits. The agreeableness personality
dimension includes traits related to getting along with people. The adjustment personality dimension includes traits related to emotional stability. The conscientious- ness personality dimension includes traits related to achievement. The openness-to-experience personal- ity dimension includes traits related to being willing to change and try new things.
3 Discuss why the trait of dominance is so impor- tant for managers to have.
Because the dominance trait is based on the desire to be a leader, this trait affects the other traits in a positive or negative way based on that desire.
“Take It To The Net”. Access student resources at www.cengagebrain.com. Search for Lussier, Leadership 6e to find student study tools.
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 57 10/15/14 12:49 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
58 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
Key terms Achievement Motivation Theory, 41
adjustment personality dimension, 37
agreeableness personality dimension, 37
attitudes, 45
Big Five Model of Personality, 36
conscientiousness personality dimension, 38
ethics, 51
Leader Motive Profile (LMP), 43
Leader Motive Profile Theory, 43
moral justification, 54
openness-to-experience personality dimension, 38
personality, 34
personality profiles, 34
Pygmalion effect, 47
self-concept, 48
stakeholder approach to ethics, 57
surgency personality dimension, 36
Theory X and Theory Y, 46
traits, 34
review Questions
1 What are the Big Five dimensions of traits?
2 What is the primary use of personality profiles?
3 What are some of the traits that describe the high-energy trait?
4 Is locus of control important to leaders? Why?
5 What does intelligence have to do with leadership?
6 Does sensitivity to others mean that the leader does what the followers want to do?
4 State how the achievement Motivation theory and the Leader Motive profile are related and different.
Achievement Motivation and Leader Motive Profile the- ories are related because both are based on the need for achievement, power, and affiliation. They are different because the Achievement Motivation Theory is a general motive profile for explaining and predicting behavior and performance, while the LMP is the one profile that spe- cifically explains and predicts leadership success.
5 Identify similarities and differences among theory X and theory Y, the pygmalion effect, and self-concept.
The concept of Theory X and Theory Y is similar to the Pygmalion effect, because both theories focus on the leader’s attitude about the followers. The Pygmalion effect extends Theory X and Theory Y attitudes by including the leader’s expectations and how he or she treats the follow- ers, using this information to explain and predict follow- ers’ behavior and performance. In contrast, Theory X and Theory Y focus on the leader’s behavior and performance. Both approaches are different from self-concept because they examine the leader’s attitudes about others, whereas self-concept relates to the leader’s attitude about him- or herself. Self-concept is also different because it focuses on how the leader’s attitude about him- or herself affects his or her behavior and performance.
6 Describe how attitudes are used to develop four leadership styles.
The leader’s attitude about others includes Theory Y (positive) and Theory X (negative) attitudes. The lead- er’s attitude about him- or herself includes a positive self-concept or a negative self-concept. Combinations of these variables are used to identify four leadership styles: Theory Y positive self-concept, Theory Y negative self-concept, Theory X positive self-concept, and Theory X negative self-concept.
7 Compare the three levels of moral development. At the lowest level of moral development, preconventional, behavior is motivated by self-interest, seeking rewards, and avoiding punishment. At the second level, conventional, be- havior is motivated by meeting the group’s expectations to fit in by copying others’ behavior. At the highest level, post- conventional, behavior is motivated to do the right thing, at the risk of alienating the group. The higher the level of moral development, the more ethical is the behavior.
8 explain the stakeholder approach to ethics. Under the stakeholder approach to ethics, the leader (or follower) creates a win–win situation for relevant parties affected by the decision. If you are proud to tell relevant stakeholders your decision, it is probably ethical. If you are not proud to tell others your decision, or you keep justifying it, the decision may not be ethical.
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 58 10/15/14 12:49 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
7 Does McClelland believe that power is good or bad? Why?
8 Should a leader have a dominant need for achievement to be successful? Why or why not?
9 How do attitudes develop leadership styles?
10 Which personality traits are more closely related to ethical and unethical behavior?
11 Do people change their level of moral development based on the situation?
12 Why do people justify their unethical behavior?
The following critical-thinking questions can be used for class discussion and/or as written assignments to develop commu- nication skills. Be sure to give complete explanations for all questions.
1 Would you predict that a person with a strong agreeable- ness personality dimension would be a successful com- puter programmer? Why or why not?
2 McGregor published Theory X and Theory Y over 30 years ago. Do we still have Theory X managers? Why?
3 In text examples related to the Pygmalion effect, Lou Holtz calls for setting a higher standard. Have the standards in school, society, and work increased or decreased over the last five years?
4 Do you believe that if you use ethical behavior it will pay off in the long run?
5 Can ethics be taught and learned?
6 Which justification do you think is used most often?
7 As related to the simple guide to ethical behavior, how do you want to be led?
Critical-thinking Questions
Chapter 2 LEADERShIP TRAITS AND EThICS 59
C A S E
Blake Mycoskie and TOMS
By age 29, Blake Mycoskie had already star ted four busi-nesses. He got the idea to star t his fifth business on a trip to Argentina. Blake obser ved that many people were wearing alpargatas—soft casual canvas shoes—and he thought they would sell in America. But he also realized that there were also many poor people without any shoes who had blisters, sores, and infections. So he decided to help.
Back home in America, Blake got involved in a vol- unteer shoe drive to ship shoes overseas. But he realized that there was a need for a constant flow of shoes and that even a nonprofit organization couldn’t be very sustainable through simply donations. He was also an entrepreneur and wanted to make money. So Blake came up with the idea of being a social entrepreneur by combining business and charity to help oth- ers and make the world a better place.109
Blake Mycoskie founded TOMS, which stands for TOMmorrowS shoes, in 2006. He developed the One for One business model—for ever y pair of shoes TOMS sells, it
gives away a free pair to a child in need. But as with entre- preneurial new ventures, it wasn’t easy. In fact, Blake was told that he didn’t understand the shoe industry and that his busi- ness wouldn’t be successful. But that didn’t stop Blake. To date, TOMS has given away more than 10 million pairs of shoes.110
Blake realized that he couldn’t just buy the alpar- gate shoes. They needed to be more stylish, comfor table, and durable to sell in the United States. So with no knowledge of the shoe industr y and not speaking Spanish, he returned to Argentina to find a local par tner, and teamed up with shoe- maker Alejo for help. Together they developed a prototype and Blake brought 250 pairs home to Los Angeles.
Blake ran a focus group by inviting a bunch of friends, mostly women, to his place. He told them his stor y and One for One, and they discussed the potential mar- ket and price for the shoes and where they could be sold. They loved the stor y, bought a pair of shoes, and spread the word.
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 59 10/15/14 12:49 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
60 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
Blake went to retail stores and told his stor y and tried to get them to sell TOMS, but he got lots of rejections. Blake would tell his stor y to anyone who would listen. He would wear two different shoes just to get people to talk to him so he could tell his story. Blake’s first two big breaks came when American Rag agreed to sell TOMS and the LA Times ran his story in the newspaper. Orders started pouring in. So Blake started the business on a shoestring budget by using his apart- ment and three interns he found through Craigslist.
Blake went back to Argentina to give away free shoes and develop a supply chain of TOMS shoes. Blake be- lieves that success is more than status and money and that it’s about contributing to the world and living and working on your own terms. He has personal, professional, and philan- thropic success. Today, TOMS gives free shoes to 60 countries.
Blake has expanded his social entrepreneurship mission to include writing a book, Start Something That Matters, to inspire others to contribute to the world.111 He also expanded his unique One for One business model to include TOMS Eyewear, helping save and restore sight for those in need. TOMS Web site (www.toms.com) includes the Marketplace where people can shop for a variety of other products and contribute to funding education. TOMS has Giving Partners to increase its charity, and it has given millions to nonprofit organi- zations. To encourage social entrepreneurship, TOMS develops ways to use its platform to support their ventures. In addition, the Star t Something That Matters Foundation has begun to help innovators bring their ideas to life.112
G O t O t h e I N t e r N e t : To learn more about Blake Mycoskie and TOMS, visit the Web site (http:// www.toms.com).
Support your answers to the following questions with spe- cific information from the case and text or with other informa- tion you get from the Web or other sources.
1. What do you think Blake Mycoskie’s personality traits are for each of the Big Five dimensions?
2. Which of the traits of effective leaders would you say has had the greatest impact on Blake Mycoskie success at TOMS?
3. Which motivation would McClelland say was the ma- jor need driving Blake Mycoskie to continue to work so hard despite being wor th millions of dollars?
4. Does Blake Mycoskie have an LMP?
5. What type of self-concept does Blake Mycoskie have, and how does it affect his success?
6. Is Blake Mycoskie ethical in business? Which level of moral development is he on?
C U M U L a t I V e C a S e Q U e S t I O N
7. Which leadership managerial role(s) played by Blake Mycoskie have an impor tant par t in the success of TOMS (Chapter 1)?
C a S e e X e r C I S e a N D r O L e - p L a Y
Preparation: Think of a business that you would like to start some day and answer these questions, which will help you develop your plan. (1) What would be your company’s name? (2) What would be its mission (purpose or reason for being)? (3) What would your major products and/or services be? (4) Who would be your major competitors? (5) What would be your competitive advantage? (What makes you different from your competitors? Why would anyone buy your product or service rather than the competition’s?) (6) As Blake would say, what is your story?
Your instructor may elect to let you break into groups to develop a group business idea. If you do a group business, select one leader with a thick skin who can handle a “Blake” meeting to present the proposal to the entire class. An alter- native is to have a student(s) who has an actual business idea/ project/proposal of any type present it for feedback.
role-play “Blake” Meeting: One person (representing oneself or a group) may give the business proposal idea to the entire class; or break into groups of five or six and, one at a time, deliver proposals. The members of the class that listen play the role of Blake at the “Blake” meeting, or they challenge presenters and offer suggestions for improvement.
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 60 10/15/14 12:49 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 2 LEADERShIP TRAITS AND EThICS 61
P.F. Chang’s has over 120 full-service, casual dining Asian bistros and contemporar y Chinese diners across the country, and its employees have the authority to make decisions that benefit customers. Giving employees the free- dom to make decisions has had a huge impact on their at- titudes and performance. Managers at P.F. Chang’s receive extensive training on how to create and nur ture a positive attitude among their employees, and all workers receive an
employee handbook, which clearly spells out exactly what is expected of them.
1. In what ways does P.F. Chang’s create organizational commitment among its workers?
2. How might a manager at P.F. Chang’s use the Big Five personality factors to assess whether a candidate for a position on the wait staff would be suitable?
V I D E O C A S E
“P.F.” Chang’s Serves Its Workers Well
Improving Attitudes and Personality Traits
preparing for this exercise You should have read and now understand attitudes and per- sonality traits. Effective leaders know themselves and work to maximize their strengths and minimize their weaknesses. As the name of this exercise implies, you can improve your attitudes and personality traits through this exercise by following these steps.
1 Identify strengths and weaknesses. Review the six self-assessment exercises in this chapter. List your three major strengths and areas that can be improved:
We don’t always see ourselves as others do. Research has shown that many people are not accurate in describing their own personalities, and that others can describe them more objectively. Before going on with this exercise, you may want to ask some- one you know well to complete your personality profile (see Self-Assessment 2-1 on page 32), rate your attitude as positive or negative, and list your strengths and areas for improvement.
2 Develop a plan for improving. Star t with your Number One area to improve on. Write down specific things that you can do to improve. List specific times, dates, and places that you will implement your plans. You may want to review the 11 tips for developing a more positive attitude and self-concept for ideas.
3 Work on other areas for improvement. After you see improvement in your first area, develop a new plan for your second area, and proceed through the steps again.
Optional Way to Improve: If you have a negative attitude toward yourself or others—or you would like to improve your behavior with others (family, coworkers), things, or issues (disliking school or work)—tr y following the inter- nationally known motivational speaker and trainer Zig Ziglar’s system.113 Thousands of people have used this system suc- cessfully. This system can also be used for changing personality traits as well.
Here are the steps to follow, with an example plan for a per- son who has a negative self-concept and also wants to be more sensitive to others. Use this example as a guide for developing your own plan.
1 Self-concept. Write down everything you like about your- self. List all your strengths. Then go on and list all your weaknesses. Get a good friend to help you.
2 Make a clean new list, and using positive affirmations, write all your strengths. Example: “I am sensitive to others’ needs.”
3 On another sheet of paper, again using positive affirmations, list all your weaknesses. For example, don’t write “I need to lose weight.” Write “I am a slim (whatever you realisti- cally can weigh in 30 days) pounds.” Don’t write “I have to stop criticizing myself.” Write “I positively praise myself often, every day.” Write “I have good communications skills,” not “I am a weak communicator.” The following list gives example affirmations for improving sensitivity to others. Note the repetition; you can use a thesaurus to help.
2-1Developing Your Leadership Skills
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 61 10/15/14 12:49 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
62 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
I am sensitive to others.
My behavior with others conveys my warmth for them. I convey my concern for others.
My behavior conveys kindness toward others.
My behavior helps others build their self-esteem. People find me easy to talk to.
I give others my full attention. I patiently listen to others talk.
I answer others slowly and in a polite manner.
I answer questions and make comments with useful information.
My comments to others help them feel good about themselves.
I compliment others regularly.
4 Practice. Every morning and night for at least the next 30 days, look at yourself in the mirror and read your list of positive affirmations. Be sure to look at yourself between each affirmation as you read. Or, record the list on a tape recorder and listen to it while looking at yourself in the mirror. If you are really motivated, you can repeat this step at other times of the day. Star t with your areas for improvement. If it takes five minutes or more, don’t bother with the list of your strengths. Or stop at five min- utes; this exercise is effective in shor t sessions. Although miracles won’t happen overnight, you may become more aware of your behavior in the first week. In the second or third week, you may become aware of yourself using new behavior successfully. You may still see some negatives, but the number will decrease in time as the positive increases.
Psychological research has shown that if a person hears something believable repeated for 30 days, he or she will tend to believe it. Ziglar says that you cannot consistently perform in a manner that is inconsistent with the way you see yourself. So, as you listen to your positive affirmations, you will believe them, and you will behave in a manner that is consistent with your belief. Put simply, your behav- ior will change with your thoughts without a lot of hard work. For example, if you listen to the affirmation, “I am an honest person” (not, “I have to stop lying”), in time— without having to work at it—you will tell the truth. At first you may feel uncomfor table reading or listening to positive affirmations that you don’t really believe you have. But keep looking at yourself in the mirror and reading or listening, and with time you will feel comfor table and believe it and live it.
Are you thinking you don’t need to improve, or that this method will not work? Yes, this system often does work. Zig Ziglar has trained thousands of satisfied people. One of this book’s authors tried the system himself, and within two or three weeks, he could see improvement in his behavior. The question isn’t will the system work for you, but rather will you work the system to improve?
5 When you slip, and we all do, don’t get down on yourself. In the sensitivity-to-others example, if you are rude to
someone and catch yourself, apologize and change to a positive tone. Effective leaders admit when they are wrong and apologize. If you have a hard time admitting you are wrong and saying you are sorry, at least be obvi- ously nice so that the other person realizes you are saying you are sorry indirectly. Then forget about it and keep trying. Focus on your successes, not your slips. Don’t let ten good discussions be ruined by one insensitive com- ment. If you were an MLB player and got nine out of ten hits, you’d be the best in the world.
6 Set another goal. After 30 days, select a new topic, such as developing a positive attitude toward work, school, or trying a specific leadership style that you want to develop. You can also include more than one area to work on.
Doing this exercise in Class
Objective
To develop your skill at improving your attitudes and per- sonality traits. As a leader, you can also use this skill to help your followers improve.
aaCSB General Skills area
The primary AACSB skills developed through this exercise are analytic and reflective thinking skills and application of knowledge.
preparation You should have identified at least one area for improvement and developed a plan to improve.
procedure 1 (1–2 minutes) Break into groups of two or pref- erably three; be sure the others in your group are people you feel comfor table sharing with.
procedure 2 (4–6 minutes) Have one of the group members volunteer to go first. The first volunteer states the attitude or personality trait they want to work on and describes the plan. The other group members give feedback on how to improve the plan. Try to give other plan ideas that can be helpful and/or provide some specific help. You can also make an agreement to ask each other how you are progressing at set class intervals. Don’t change roles until you’re asked to do so.
procedure 3 (4–6 minutes) A second group member volun- teers to go next. Follow the same procedure as above.
procedure 4 (4–6 minutes) The third group member goes last. Follow the same procedure as above.
Conclusion
The instructor may lead a class discussion and/or make conclud- ing remarks.
apply It (2–4 minutes) What did I learn from this exercise? Will I really try to improve my attitude and personality by implementing my plan?
Sharing
In the group, or to the entire class, volunteers may give their answers to the “Apply It” questions.
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 62 10/15/14 12:49 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 2 LEADERShIP TRAITS AND EThICS 63
2-2
preparing for this exercise Read the section on “Personality Traits and Leadership,” and complete Self-Assessment 2-1 on page 32. From that exercise, rank yourself below from the highest score (1) to lowest (5) for each of the Big Five traits. Do not tell anyone your ranking until asked to do so.
– surgency – adjustment – openness to experience – agreeableness – conscientiousness
Doing this exercise in Class
Objective
To develop your skill at perceiving personality traits of other people. With this skill, you can better understand and predict people’s behavior, which is helpful to leaders in influencing followers.
aaCSB General Skills area
The primary AACSB skills developed through this exercise are analytic and reflective thinking skills and application of knowledge.
procedure 1 (2–4 minutes) Break into groups of three. This group should be with people you know the best in the class. You may need some groups of two. If you don’t know people in the class, and you did Skill-Development Exercise 1 in Chapter 1, “Getting to Know You by Name,” get in a group with those people.
procedure 2 (4–6 minutes) Each person in the group writes down their perception of each of the other two group members. Simply rank which trait you believe to be the highest and lowest (put the Big Five dimension name on the line) for each person. Write a short reason for your perception, including some behavior you observed that leads you to your perception.
Name Highest personality score Lowest score
Reason for ranking
Name Highest personality score Lowest score
Reason for ranking
procedure 3 (4–6 minutes) One of the group members volunteers to go first to hear the other group members’ perceptions.
1 One person tells the volunteer which Big Five dimension he or she selected as the person’s highest and lowest score, and why these dimensions were selected. Do not discuss this information yet.
2 The other person also tells the volunteer the same information.
3 The volunteer gives the two others his or her actual high- est and lowest scores. The three group members discuss the accuracy of the perceptions.
procedure 4 (4–6 minutes) A second group member volunteers to go next to receive perceptions. Follow the same procedure as above.
procedure 5 (4–6 minutes) The third group member goes last. Follow the same procedure as above.
Conclusion The instructor may lead a class discussion and/or make concluding remarks.
apply It (2–4 minutes) What did I learn from this exercise? How will I use this knowledge in the future?
Sharing
In the group, or to the entire class, volunteers may give their answers to the “Apply It” questions.
Personality Perceptions
Developing Your Leadership Skills
2-3
preparing for this exercise Now that you have completed Self-Assessment 2-6 on pages 50–51 regarding ethical behavior, answer the discussion questions based on that assessment.
Discussion Questions
1 For the “College” section, items 1–3, who is harmed and who benefits from these unethical behaviors?
2 For the “Workplace” section, items 4–24, select the three items (circle their numbers) you consider the most seriously unethical behavior. Who is harmed and who benefits by these unethical behaviors?
3 If you observed unethical behavior but didn’t report it, why didn’t you report the behavior? If you did blow the whistle, why did you report the unethical behavior? What was the result?
Ethics and Whistle-blowing
Developing Your Leadership Skills
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 63 10/15/14 12:49 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
64 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
1 DuPont Web site (www.dupont.com), accessed November 7, 2013.
2 DuPont Web site (www.dupont.com), accessed November 7, 2013.
3 “Largest U.S. Corporations—Fortune 500,” Fortune (May 20, 2013): 1–20.
4 “Global 500,” Fortune (July 22, 2013): F1–F7.
5 “The World’s Most Admired Companies,” Fortune (March 18, 2013): 137–147.
6 G. Colvin, “Ignore These Leadership Lessons at Your Peril,” Fortune (October 28, 2013): 85.
7 H. C. Vough, M.T, Cardador, J.S. Bendar, E. Dane, and M.G. Pratt, “What Clients Don’t Get about My Profession: A Model of Perceived Role-Based Image Discrepancies,” Academy of Management Journal 56(4) (2013): 1050–1080.
8 B. Schyns, T. Kiefer, R. Kerschreiter, and A. Tymon, “Teaching Implicit Leadership Theories to Develop Leaders and Leadership: How and Why It Can Make a Difference,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2012): 397–408.
9 J. Antonakis, M. Fenley, and S. Liechti, “Can Charisma Be Taught? Tests of Two Interventions,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 374–396.
10 M.R. Barrick, M.K. Mount, and N. Li, “The Theory of Purposeful Work Behavior : The Role of Personality, Higher-Order Goals, and Job Characteristics,” Academy of Management Review 38(1) (2013): 132–153.
11 J. Antonakis, M. Fenley, and S. Liechti, “Can Charisma Be Taught? Tests of Two Interventions,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 374–396.
12 G. Yukl, “Effective Leadership Behavior : What We Know and What Questions Need More Attention,” Academy of Management Perspectives 26(4) (2011): 66–85.
13 J. Antonakis, M. Fenley, and S. Liechti, “Can Charisma Be Taught? Tests of Two Interventions,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 374–396.
14 J. Antonakis, M. Fenley, and S. Liechti, “Can Charisma Be Taught? Tests of Two Interventions,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 374–396.
15 C. Bendersky and N.P. Shah, “The Downfall of Extraverts and Rise of Neurotics: The Dynamic Process of Status Allocation in Task Groups,” Academy of Management Journal 56(2) (2013): 387–406.
16 T. A. Judge, R. Ilies, J.E. Bono, and M.W. Gerhardt, “Personality and Leadership: A Qualitative and Quantitative Review,” Journal of Applied Psychology 87(4) (2002): 765–768.
endnotes
4 As a manager, it is your responsibility to uphold ethical behavior. If you know employees are using any of these unethical behaviors, will you take action to enforce compliance with ethical standards?
Doing this exercise in Class
Objective
To better understand ethics and whistle-blowing, and decide what you will do about unethical behavior.
aaCSB General Skills area
The primary AACSB skills developed through this exercise are ethical understanding, analytic and reflective thinking skills, and application of knowledge.
preparation
You should have completed the preparation for this exercise.
experience
You will share your answers to the preparation questions but are not requested to share your ethics score.
procedure 1 (5–10 minutes) The instructor writes the num- bers 1–24 on the board. For each statement, students first raise their hands if they have observed this behavior, then if they have
reported the behavior. The instructor writes the numbers on the board. (Note: Procedure 1 and Procedure 2A can be combined.)
procedure 2 (10–20 minutes) Option A: As the instruc- tor takes a count of the students who have observed and repor ted unethical behavior, he or she leads a discussion on the statements.
Option B: Break into groups of four to six, and share your answers to the four discussion questions at the end of the prep- aration part of this exercise. The groups may be asked to report the general consensus of the group to the entire class. If so, se- lect a spokesperson before the discussion begins.
Option C: The instructor leads a class discussion on the four dis- cussion questions at the end of the preparation part of this exercise.
Conclusion
The instructor may make concluding remarks.
apply It (2–4 minutes) What did I learn from this exercise? How will I use this knowledge in the future to be ethical? When will I use a simple guide to ethics?
Sharing
Volunteers may give their answers to the “Apply It” questions.
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 64 10/15/14 12:49 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 2 LEADERShIP TRAITS AND EThICS 65
17 M. W. Morgan and M.M. Lombardo, Off the Track: Why and How Successful Executives Get Derailed (Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership, January 1988), Technical Report Nos. 21 & 34.
18 Staff, “Follow My Lead,” Entrepreneur (September 2013): 8.
19 M. Rosenwald, “The Origin of C-Suites,” BusinessWeek (January 24–30, 2011): 116–117.
20 J. B. Kahnweiler, “Why Introverts Can Make the Best Leaders,” Forbes (December 28, 2009): 8.
21 B. L. Blume, T.T. Baldwin, and K.C. Ryan, “Communication Apprehension: A Barrier to Students’ Leadership, Adaptability, and Multicultural Appreciation,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 12(2) (2013): 158–172.
22 M. R. Barrick, M.K. Mount, and N. Li, “The Theory of Purposeful Work Behavior : The Role of Personality, Higher-Order Goals, and Job Characteristics,” Academy of Management Review 38(1) (2013): 132–153.
23 C. Bendersky and N.P. Shah, “The Downfall of Extraverts and Rise of Neurotics: The Dynamic Process of Status Allocation in Task Groups,” Academy of Management Journal 56(2) (2013): 387–406.
24 C. Bendersky and N.P. Shah, “The Downfall of Extraverts and Rise of Neurotics: The Dynamic Process of Status Allocation in Task Groups,” Academy of Management Journal 56(2) (2013): 387–406.
25 G. Colvin, “Ignore These Leadership Lessons at Your Peril,” Fortune (October 28, 2013): 85.
26 T.T. Baldwin, J.R. Pierce, R.C. Jones, and S. Farouk, “The Elusiveness of Applied Management Knowledge: A Critical Challenge for Management Education,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(4) (2011): 583–605.
27 M. Korn, “Business Schools Know How You Think, but How Do You Feel?” Wall Street Journal (May 2, 2013): B1.
28 R. E. Boytzis and D. Goleman, The Emotional Competence Inventory (Boston: Hay Group, 2001).
29 G. Toegel, M. Kilduff, and N. Anand, “Emotion Helping by Managers: An Emergent Understanding of Discrepant Role Expectations and Outcomes,” Academy of Management Journal 56(2) (2013): 334–357.
30 C. Bendersky and N.P. Shah, “The Downfall of Extraverts and Rise of Neurotics: The Dynamic Process of Status Allocation in Task Groups,” Academy of Management Journal 56(2) (2013): 387–406.
31 B. P. Owens and D.R. Hekman, “Modeling How to Grow: An Inductive Examination of Humble Leader Behaviors, Contingencies, and Outcomes,” Academy of Management Journal 55(4) (2012): 787–818.
32 G. Yukl, “Effective Leadership Behavior : What We Know and What Questions Need More Attention,” Academy of Management Perspectives 26(4) (2011): 66–85.
33 R. Hurley, “Trust Me,” Wall Street Journal (October 24, 2011): R4.
34 G. Colvin, “Ignore These Leadership Lessons at Your Peril,” Fortune (October 28, 2013): 85.
35 G. Yukl, “Effective Leadership Behavior : What We Know and What Questions Need More Attention,” Academy of Management Perspectives 26(4) (2011): 66–85.
36 R. Karlgaard, “Scary Smar t: The Next Trillion-Dollar Industry,” Forbes (October 25, 2010): 26.
37 T. T. Baldwin, J.R. Pierce, R.C. Jones, and S. Farouk, “The Elusiveness of Applied Management Knowledge: A Critical Challenge for Management Education,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(4) (2011): 583–605.
38 C. Dunn, B. Kowitt, C. Leahey, and A. Vandermey, “The 50 Most Powerful Women,” Fortune (October 2013): 133–140.
39 D. McClelland, The Achieving Society (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1961); and D. McClelland and D. H. Burnham, “Power Is the Great Motivator,” Harvard Business Review (March/April 1978): 103.
40 D. C. McClelland and R. E. Boyatzis, “Leadership Motive Pattern and Long-Term Success in Management,” Journal of Applied Psychology 6(1982): 737–743.
41 C. Bendersky and N.P. Shah, “The Downfall of Extraverts and Rise of Neurotics: The Dynamic Process of Status Allocation in Task Groups,” Academy of Management Journal 56(2) (2013): 387–406.
42 D. C. McClelland, Human Motivation (Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman, 1985).
43 G. Toegel, M. Kilduff, and N. Anand, “Emotion Helping by Managers: An Emergent Understanding of Discrepant Role Expectations and Outcomes,” Academy of Management Journal 56(2) (2013): 334–357.
44 S. S. Wiltermuth and F.J. Flynn, “Power, Moral Clarity, and Punishment in the Workplace,” Academy of Management Journal 56(4) (2013): 1002–1023.
45 D. M. Mayer, K. Aquino, R.L. Greenbaum, and M. Kuenzi, “Who Displays Ethical Leadership, and Why an Examination of Antecedents and Consequences of Ethical Leadership,” Academy of Management Journal 55(1) (2012): 151–171.
46 D. McGregor, Leadership and Motivation (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1966).
47 Mind Tools Web site “Comparing Theory X and Theory Y” (www.mindtools.com), accessed November 27, 2013.
48 N. Rothbard, “Put on a Happy Face, Seriously,” Wall Street Journal (October 24, 2011): R2.
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 65 10/15/14 12:49 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
66 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
49 S. Waddock and J.M. Lozano, “Developing More Holistic Management Education: Lessons Learned from Two Programs,” Academy of Management Education & Learning 12(2) (2013): 265–284.
50 M. Pitesa and S. Thau, “Compliant Sinners, Obstinate Saints: How Power and Self-Focus Determine the Effectiveness of Social Influences in Ethical Decisions Making,” Academy of Management Journal 56(3) (2013): 635–658.
51 A. Simha and J.B. Cullen, “Ethical Climates and Their Effects on Organizational Outcomes: Implications from the Past and Prophecies for the Future,” Academy of Management Perspectives 26(4) (2012): 20–34.
52 A. W. Martin, S.H. Lopez, V.J. Roscigno, and R. Hodson, “Against the Rules: Synthesizing Types and Processes of Bureaucratic Rule-Breaking,” Academy of Management Review 38(4) (2013): 550–574.
53 R.A. Giacalone and M.D. Promislo, “Broken When Entering: The Stigmatization of Goodness and Business Ethics Education,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 12(1) (2012): 86–101.
54 M. Crossan, D. Mazutis, G. Seijts, and J. Gandz, “Developing Leadership Character in Business Programs,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 12(2) (2013): 285–305.
55 N. M. Pless, T. Moak, and D.A. Waldman, “Different Approaches toward Doing the Right Thing: Mapping the Responsibility Orientations of Leaders,” Academy of Management Perspectives 26(4) (2012): 51–65.
56 AACSB Web site (http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/ business/standards/2013/learning-and-teaching/standard9. asp), accessed October 24, 2013.
57 J. K. Nelson, L.W. Poms, and P.P. Wolf, “Developing Efficacy Beliefs for Ethics and Diversity Management,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 11(1) (2012): 49–68.
58 M. Crossan, D. Mazutis, G. Seijts, and J. Gandz, “Develop- ing Leadership Character in Business Programs,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 12(2) (2013): 285–305.
59 D. M. Mayer, K. Aquino, R.L. Greenbaum, and M. Kuenzi, “Who Displays Ethical Leadership, and Why an Exami- nation of Antecedents and Consequences of Ethical Leadership,” Academy of Management Journal 55(1) (2012): 151–171.
60 B. C. Gunia, L. Wang, L. Huang, J. Wang, and J.K. Murnighan, “Contemplation and Conversation: Subtle Influences on Moral Decision Making,” Academy of Management Journal 55(1) (2012): 13–33.
61 K. Leavitt, S.J. Reynolds, C.M. Barnes, P. Schilpzand, and S.T. Hannah, “Different Hats, Different Obligations: Plural Occupational Identities and Situated Moral
Judgments,” Academy of Management Journal 55(6) (2012): 1316–1333.
62 R. Murphree, “Visionary Leader : Gospel Is Key to Unlimited Success,” AFA Journal (March 2013): 11.
63 C. Bonanos, “The Lies We Tell at Work,” BusinessWeek (February 4–10, 2013): 71–73.
64 P. Zak, The Moral Molecule (New York: Penguin, 2012).
65 C. Downs, “Liar, Liar—Back’s on Fire,” AARP Magazine (October/November 2012): 22.
66 S.S. Wiltermuth and F.J. Flynn, “Power, Moral Clarity, and Punishment in the Workplace,” Academy of Management Journal 56(4) (2013): 1002–1023.
67 F. Farley, “What’s a Hero?” Entrepreneur (December 2013): 64.
68 J. A. Colquitt, J.A. Lepine, C.P. Zapata, and R.E. Wild, “Trust in Typical and High-Reliability Contexts: Building and Reacting to Trust among Firefighters,” Academy of Management Journal 54(5) (2011): 999–1015.
69 G. Yukl, “Effective Leadership Behavior : What We Know and What Questions Need More Attention,” Academy of Management Perspectives 26(4) (2011): 66–85.
70 B. C. Gunia, L. Wang, L. Huang, J. Wang, and J.K. Murnighan, “Contemplation and Conversation: Subtle Influences on Moral Decision Making,” Academy of Management Journal 55(1) (2012): 13–33.
71 D. Ariely, “Why We Lie,” Wall Street Journal (May 26–27, 2012): C1–C2.
72 D. Ariely, “Why We Lie,” Wall Street Journal (May 26–27, 2012): C1–C2.
73 S. D. Levitt and S.J. Dubner, Super Freakonomics: Global cooling, patriotic prostitutes, and why suicide bomb- ers should buy life insurance. Academy of Management Perspectives 25(2) (2011): 86–87.
74 M. Pitesa and S. Thau, “Compliant Sinners, Obstinate Saints: How Power and Self-Focus Determine the Effectiveness of Social Influences in Ethical Decisions Making,” Academy of Management Journal 56(3) (2013): 635–658.
75 D. Ariely, “Why We Lie,” Wall Street Journal (May 26–27, 2012): C1–C2.
76 S. Kolhathar, “The Man, the Myth, the Wolf,” BusinessWeek (November 11–17, 2013): 72–76.
77 M. Crossan, D. Mazutis, G. Seijts, and J. Gandz, “Developing Leadership Character in Business Programs,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 12(2) (2013): 285–305.
78 S. S. Wiltermuth and F.J. Flynn, “Power, Moral Clarity, and Punishment in the Workplace,” Academy of Management Journal 56(4) (2013): 1002–1023.
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 66 10/15/14 12:49 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 2 LEADERShIP TRAITS AND EThICS 67
79 D. M. Mayer, K. Aquino, R.L. Greenbaum, and M. Kuenzi, “Who Displays Ethical Leadership, and Why an Examination of Antecedents and Consequences of Ethical Leadership,” Academy of Management Journal 55(1) (2012): 151–171.
80 K. Leavitt, S.J. Reynolds, C.M. Barnes, P. Schilpzand, and S.T. Hannah, “Different Hats, Different Obligations: Plural Occupational Identities and Situated Moral Judgments,” Academy of Management Journal 55(6) (2012): 1316–1333.
81 R. L. Dufresne and E.H. Offstein, “Holistic and Intentional Student Character Development Process: Learning from West Point,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 11(4) (2012): 570–590.
82 M. Pitesa and S. Thau, “Compliant Sinners, Obstinate Saints: How Power and Self-Focus Determine the Effectiveness of Social Influences in Ethical Decisions Making,” Academy of Management Journal 56(3) (2013): 635–658.
83 M. Pitesa and S. Thau, “Compliant Sinners, Obstinate Saints: How Power and Self-Focus Determine the Effectiveness of Social Influences in Ethical Decisions Making,” Academy of Management Journal 56(3) (2013): 635–658.
84 J. M. Schaubroeck, “Embedding Ethical Leadership within and across Organizational Levels,” Academy of Management Journal 55(5) (2012): 1053–1078.
85 R. Sutton, “How a Few Bad Apples Ruin Everything,” Wall Street Journal (October 24, 2011): R5.
86 D. Ariely, “Why We Lie,” Wall Street Journal (May 26–27, 2012): C1–C2.
87 D. Akst, “Ethics’ Afternoon Swoon,” Wall Street Journal (November 9–10, 2013): C4.
88 Information taken from the DuPont Web site November 21, 2013.
89 M. Pitesa and S. Thau, “Compliant Sinners, Obstinate Saints: How Power and Self-Focus Determine the Effectiveness of Social Influences in Ethical Decisions Making,” Academy of Management Journal 56(3) (2013): 635–658.
90 B.C. Gunia, L. Wang, L. Huang, J. Wang, and J.K. Murnighan, “Contemplation and Conversation: Subtle Influences on Moral Decision Making,” Academy of Management Journal 55(1) (2012): 13–33.
91 D. Ariely, “Why We Lie,” Wall Street Journal (May 26–27, 2012): C1–C2.
92 K. Leavitt, S.J. Reynolds, C.M. Barnes, P. Schilpzand, and S.T. Hannah, “Different Hats, Different Obligations: Plural Occupational Identities and Situated Moral Judgments,” Academy of Management Journal 55(6) (2012): 1316–1333.
93 D. Ariely, “Why We Lie,” Wall Street Journal (May 26–27, 2012): C1–C2.
94 C. Bonanos, “The Lies We Tell at Work,” BusinessWeek (February 4–10, 2013): 71–73.
95 C. Bonanos, “The Lies We Tell at Work,” BusinessWeek (February 4–10, 2013): 71–73.
96 D. Ariely, “Why We Lie,” Wall Street Journal (May 26–27, 2012): C1–C2.
97 C. Bonanos, “The Lies We Tell at Work,” BusinessWeek (February 4–10, 2013): 71–73.
98 D. Ariely, “Why We Lie,” Wall Street Journal (May 26–27, 2012): C1–C2.
99 C. Bonanos, “The Lies We Tell at Work,” BusinessWeek (February 4–10, 2013): 71–73.
100 C. Bonanos, “The Lies We Tell at Work,” BusinessWeek (February 4–10, 2013): 71–73.
101 B. C. Gunia, L. Wang, L. Huang, J. Wang, and J.K. Murnighan, “Contemplation and Conversation: Subtle Influences on Moral Decision Making,” Academy of Management Journal 55(1) (2012): 13–33.
102 B. C. Gunia, L. Wang, L. Huang, J. Wang, and J.K. Murnighan, “Contemplation and Conversation: Subtle Influences on Moral Decision Making,” Academy of Management Journal 55(1) (2012): 13–33.
103 S. Hagar, “The Sammy Hagar School of Business,” Inc. (November 2013): 102.
104 A. Beiler, “My Advice,” Fortune (July 22, 2013): 24.
105 S. S. Wiltermuth and F.J. Flynn, “Power, Moral Clarity, and Punishment in the Workplace,” Academy of Management Journal 56(4) (2013): 1002–1023.
106 K. Leavitt, S.J. Reynolds, C.M. Barnes, P. Schilpzand, and S.T. Hannah, “Different Hats, Different Obligations: Plural Occupational Identities and Situated Moral Judgments,” Academy of Management Journal 55(6) (2012): 1316–1333.
107 B. C. Gunia, L. Wang, L. Huang, J. Wang, and J.K. Murnighan, “Contemplation and Conversation: Subtle Influences on Moral Decision Making.” Academy of Management Journal 55(1) (2012): 13–33.
108 J. M. Schaubroeck, “Embedding Ethical Leadership within and across Organizational Levels,” Academy of Management Journal 55(5) (2012): 1053–1078.
109 B. Mycoskie, Start Something That Matters (New York: Spiegel & Grau, 2012).
110 TOMS Web site (www.TOMS.com), accessed December 5, 2013.
111 B. Mycoskie, Start Something That Matters (New York: Spiegel & Grau, 2012).
112 TOMS Web site (www.TOMS.com), accessed December 5, 2013.
113 For more information on Zig Ziglar training, go to his Web site (www.ziglar.com).
66352_ch02_ptg01_031-067.indd 67 10/15/14 12:49 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
6 8
Chapter
3
C h a p t e r O U t L I N e
Leadership Behavior and Styles
Leadership Behavior
Leadership Styles and the University of Iowa Research
University of Michigan and Ohio State University Studies
University of Michigan: Job-Centered and Employee-Centered Behavior
Ohio State University: Initiating Structure and Consideration Behavior
Differences, Contributions, and Applications of Leadership Models
The Leadership Grid
Leadership Grid Theory
Leadership Grid and High- High Leader Research
Behavioral Theory Contributions
Leadership and Major Motivation Theories
Motivation and Leadership
The Motivation Process
An Overview of Three Major Classifications of Motivation Theories
Content Motivation Theories
Hierarchy of Needs Theory
Two-Factor Theory
Acquired Needs Theory
Balancing Work-Life Needs
Process Motivation Theories
Equity Theory
Expectancy Theory
Goal-Setting Theory
Reinforcement Theories
Types of Reinforcement
Schedules of Reinforcement
You Get What You Reinforce
Motivating with Reinforcement
Giving Praise
Putting the Motivation Theories Together within the Motivation Process
Leadership Behavior and Motivation
Learning Outcomes After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
1 List the University of Iowa leadership styles. p. 70
2 Describe similarities and differences between the University of Michigan and Ohio State University leadership models. p. 72
3 Discuss similarities and differences between the Ohio State University Leadership Model and the Leadership Grid. p. 75
4 Discuss similarities and differences among the three content motivation theories. p. 80
5 Discuss the major similarities and differences among the three process motivation theories. p. 87
6 Explain the four types of reinforcement. p. 93
7 State the major differences among content, process, and reinforcement theories. p. 98
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 68 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 3 LEaDErShIp BEhavIOr anD MOtIvatIOn 69
I n this chapter, we discuss two related topics: leadership behavior and motivation. The goal of behavioral scientists is to explain why people do what they do at work.2 Much of the leadership research has focused on behavior.3 Research findings include that behavior of leaders affects follower performance,4 and that leaders need to use
behaviors that promote, develop, and maintain team performance.5 The fundamental task for leaders is to motivate followers.6 Thus, leader behavior is used to motivate followers.7 In this chapter, we discuss four behavioral leadership models and seven motivation theories.
Leadership Behavior and Styles In this section, we discuss leadership behavior and the University of Iowa leadership styles.
Leadership Behavior By the late 1940s, most of the leadership research had shifted from the trait theory para- digm (Chapters 2 and 3) to the behavioral theory paradigm, which focuses on what the leader says and does. In the continuing quest to find the one best leadership style in all
trader Joe’s Trader Joe’s mission is to bring you the best-quality prod- ucts at the best prices. It’s not complicated; it just focuses on what matters—great food + great prices = Value. Joe Coulombe named the store Trader Joe’s to evoke images of the South Seas. As par t of its unique culture, employ- ees wear Hawaiian shir ts because they’re traders on the culinar y seas, searching the world over for cool items to bring home to its customers. They sail those seven seas, so customers can have some fun with its finds at their neigh- borhood Trader Joe’s.
Joe Coulombe opened the first Trader Joe’s over 40 years ago in Pasadena, California, with a quirky in-store culture with a different business model to make shopping at Trader Joe’s different from what people were used to in a supermarket—it’s an adventure. It’s an offbeat, fun discov- ery zone that elevates food shopping from being a chore to a cultural experience. Trader Joe’s stocks its shelves with a winning combination of low-cost, yuppie-friendly staples and exotic affordable luxuries.
Although Joe moved on, Joe’s fingerprints are still all over the company that bears his name, from the busi- ness model, robust selection of products, and culture to
the Hawaiian-print shirts that employees wear. Trader Joe’s is family-owned, not having any publicly owned stock. The current CEO Dan Bane runs the company with around 20,000 employees in 400 stores. 1
OpeNING CaSe QUeStIONS:
1. Which Ohio State University, University of Michi- gan, and Leadership Grid leadership style is em- phasized at Trader Joe’s?
2. What does Trader Joe’s do to motivate its em- ployees, and how does it affect performance?
3. (a–c). How does Trader Joe’s meet its employees’ content motivation needs?
4. (a–c). How does Trader Joe’s meet its employees’ process motivation needs?
5. How does Trader Joe’s use reinforcement theory to motivate its employees?
Can you answer any of these questions? You’ll find an- swers to these questions and learn more about Trader Joe’s and its leadership throughout the chapter.
To learn more about Trader Joe’s, visit the company’s Web site at http://www.traderjoes.com.
OPENING CASE Application
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 69 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
70 part 1 InDIvIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
situations, researchers attempted to identify the differences in the behavior of effective leaders versus ineffective leaders. Although the behavioral leadership theory made major contributions to leadership research, it never achieved its goal of finding one best style. However, today research continues to seek a better understanding of behavior in the workplace.8
Leadership Behavior Is Based on Traits Although the behavioral theorists focus on behavior, it’s important to realize that leaders’ behavior is based on their traits and skills. The manager’s leadership personality traits and attitudes directly affect his or her behavior and relationship with employees.9 Recall that the Pygmalion effect is based on traits, attitude expectations, and the manager’s be- havioral treatment of employees, which in turn determines the followers’ behavior and performance.
Leading by example is important to managers, and it takes place as followers observe the leader’s behavior and copy it. And the leader’s behavior is based on his or her traits. However, behavior is easier to learn and change than traits. We need to select relevant behaviors to inf luence follower behavior and performance.10
List the University of Iowa leadership styles. Learning Outcome
1
Leadership Styles and the University of Iowa research Leadership style is the combination of traits, skills, and behaviors leaders use as they interact with followers. Although a leadership style is based on traits and skills, the im- portant component is the behavior, because it is a relatively consistent pattern of behavior that characterizes a leader.
University of Iowa Leadership Styles In the 1930s, before behavioral theory became popular, Kurt Lewin and associates con- ducted studies at the University of Iowa that concentrated on the leadership style of the manager.11 Their studies identified two basic leadership styles:
• Autocratic leadership style. The autocratic leader makes the decisions, tells employees what to do, and closely supervises workers.
• Democratic leadership style. The democratic leader encourages participation in deci- sions, works with employees to determine what to do, and does not closely supervise employees.
The autocratic and democratic leadership styles are often placed at opposite ends of a continuum, as shown in Exhibit 3.1; thus a leader’s style usually falls somewhere between the two styles. The Iowa studies contributed to the behavioral movement and led to an era of behavioral, rather than trait, research. It started a taxonomy, or classification, of lead- ership behavior still used today.12
WORK Application 3-1 Recall a present or past manager. Which of the University of Iowa leadership styles does or did your manager use most often? Describe the behavior of your manager.
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 70 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 3 LEaDErShIp BEhavIOr anD MOtIvatIOn 71
University of Iowa Leadership Styles EXHIBIT 3.1
University of Michigan and Ohio State University Studies Leadership research was conducted at Ohio State and the University of Michigan at about the same time during the mid-1940s to mid-1950s. These studies were not based on prior autocratic and democratic leadership styles but rather sought to determine the behavior of effective leaders. In this section, we discuss leadership styles identified by these two universities. Before reading about these studies, complete Self-Assessment 3-1 to deter- mine your behavioral leadership style.
Your Behavioral Leadership StyleSELF-ASSESSMENT 3-1
For each of the following statements, select one of the following:
1– “I would not tend to do this.” 0– “I would tend to do this.” as a manager of a work unit. there are no right or wrong answers, so don’t try to select correctly.
1. I (would or would not) let my employees know that they should not be doing things during work hours that are not directly related to getting their jobs done.
2. I (would or would not) spend time talking to my employees to get to know them personally during work hours.
3. I (would or would not) have a clearly writ- ten agenda of things to accomplish during department meetings.
4. I (would or would not) allow employees to come in late or leave early to take care of personal issues.
5. I (would or would not) set clear goals so employees know what needs to be done.
6. I (would or would not) get involved with employee conflicts to help resolve them.
7. I (would or would not) spend much of my time directing employees to ensure that they meet department goals.
8. I (would or would not) encourage em ployees to solve problems related to their work without having to get my per- mission to do so.
9. I (would or would not) make sure that employees do their work according to the standard method to be sure it is done correctly.
10. I (would or would not) seek the advice of my employees when making decisions.
11. I (would or would not) keep good, fre- quent records of my department’s pro- ductivity and let employees know how they are doing.
12. I (would or would not) work to develop trust between my employees and me, and among the department members.
13. I (would or would not) be quick to take corrective action with employees who are not meeting the standards or goals.
Autocratic------------------------------------Democratic
Source: Adapted from K. Lewin, R. Lippett, and R. K. White. 1939. “Patterns of Aggressive Behavior in Experimentally Created Social Climates.” Journal of Social Psychology 10:271–301.
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 71 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
72 part 1 InDIvIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
University of Michigan: Job-Centered and employee-Centered Behavior The University of Michigan’s Survey Research Center, under the principal direction of Rensis Likert, conducted studies to determine how leaders functioned in small groups. Researchers created a questionnaire called the Survey of Organizations and conducted interviews to gather data on leadership styles. They gave the survey, similar to the one in Self-Assessment 3-1, to employees to complete based on their managers behavior. You can give Self-Assessment 3-1 to others to determine if they perceive your leadership style the same as you assessed it.
The researchers’ goals were to (1) classify the leaders as effective and ineffective by comparing the behavior of leaders from high-producing units and low-producing units and (2) determine reasons for effective leadership.13 The researchers identified two styles of leadership behavior, which they called job-centered and employee-centered. The Uni- versity of Michigan model stated that a leader is either more job-centered or more em- ployee-centered. The University of Michigan Leadership Model thus identifies two leadership styles: job-centered and employee-centered. See Exhibit 3.2 for the University of Michigan Leadership Model: It is a one-dimensional continuum between two leadership styles.
14. I (would or would not) personally thank employees for doing their job to standard and meeting goals.
15. I (would or would not) continue to set higher standards and goals and challenge my employees to meet them.
16. I (would or would not) be open to employees to discuss personal issues dur- ing work time.
17. I (would or would not) schedule my employ- ees’ work hours and tasks to be completed.
18. I (would or would not) encourage my employees to cooperate with, rather than compete against, each other.
19. I (would or would not) focus on continually trying to improve the productivity of my department with activities like cutting costs.
20. I (would or would not) defend good employees of mine if my manager or peers criticized their work rather than agree or say nothing.
add up the number of would do this for all odd-numbered items and place it here and on the continuum below.
1 0 — 9 — 8 — 7 — 6 — 5 — 4 — 3 — 2 — 1 High Task Leadership Style Low Task Leadership Style
add up the number of would do this for all even- numbered items and place it here and on the continuum below.
1 0 — 9 — 8 — 7 — 6 — 5 — 4 — 3 — 2 — 1 High People Leadership Style Low People Leadership Style
the higher your score for task leadership, the stronger is your tendency to focus on getting the job done. the higher your score for people leadership, the stronger is your tendency to focus on meeting people’s needs and developing supportive relationships. read on to better understand these leadership styles.
Describe similarities and differences between the University of Michigan and Ohio State University leadership models.
Learning Outcome
2
Your Behavioral Leadership Style (continued)SELF-ASSESSMENT 3-1
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 72 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 3 Leadership Behavior and Motivation 73
• Job-Centered Leadership Style. The job-centered style has scales measuring two job- oriented behaviors of goal emphasis and work facilitation. Job-centered behavior refers to the extent to which the leader takes charge to get the job done. The leader closely directs subordinates with clear roles and goals, whereas the manager tells them what to do and how to do. Review the odd-numbered items in Self-Assessment 3-1 for examples of job-(task-)oriented leadership behavior.
• Employee-Centered Leadership Style. The employee-centered style has scales measuring two employee-oriented behaviors of supportive leadership and interaction facilitation. Employee-centered behavior refers to the extent to which the leader focuses on meeting the human needs of employees while developing relationships. The leader is sensitive to subordinates and communicates to develop trust, support, and respect while look- ing out for their welfare. Review the even-numbered items in Self-Assessment 3-1 for examples of employee-(people-)oriented leadership behavior.
Based on Self-Assessment 3-1, is your leadership style more job-(task-) or employee (people-)centered?
Employee-Centered Leadership Style
Job-Centered Leadership Style
Source: Adapted from R. Likert, New Patterns of Management (New York: McGraw-Hill: 1961).
EXHIBIT 3.2 The University of Michigan Leadership Model: Two
CONCept APPLICATION 3-1
University of Michigan Leadership Styles Identify each of these five behaviors by its leadership style. Write the appropriate letter in the blank before each item. a. job-centered b. employee-centered
1. A manager is motivating employees to meet a difficult deadline.
2. A manager is giving detailed instructions to the follower to ensure the job is done right.
3. A manager is quietly observing employees as they do their jobs.
4. A manager is praising an employee for a job well done.
5. A manager is in the office developing the employee work schedule for next week.
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 73 10/21/14 2:13 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
74 part 1 InDIvIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
Ohio State University: Initiating Structure and Consideration Behavior The Personnel Research Board of Ohio State University, under the principal direction of Ralph Stogdill, began a study to determine effective leadership styles. These research- ers developed an instrument known as the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire (LBDQ). The LBDQ had 150 examples of definitive leader behaviors, which were nar- rowed down from 1,800 leadership functions. Respondents to the questionnaire per- ceived their manager’s behavior toward them on two distinct dimensions or leadership types, which they eventually called initiating structure and consideration:14
• Initiating structure behavior. The initiating structure leadership style is essentially the same as the job-centered leadership style; it focuses on getting the task done.
• Consideration behavior. The consideration leadership style is essentially the same as the employee-centered leadership style; it focuses on meeting people’s needs and develop- ing relationships. Because a leader can be high or low on initiating structure and/or consideration, four
leadership styles are developed. The Ohio State University Leadership Model iden- tifies four leadership styles: low structure and high consideration, high structure and high consideration, low structure and low consideration, and high structure and low consider- ation. Exhibit 3.3 illustrates the four leadership styles and their two dimensions.
Leaders with high structure and low consideration behavior use one-way communica- tions, and decisions are made by the managers, whereas leaders with high consideration and low structure use two-way communications and tend to share decision making. To determine your two-dimensional leadership style from Self-Assessment 3-1, put your two separate (“task” and “people”) scores together and determine which of the four styles in Exhibit 3.3 is the closest match.
WORK Application 3-2 Recall a present or past manager. Which of the four Ohio State leadership styles does or did your manager use most often? Describe the behavior of your manager.
Low Structure
&
High Consideration
Low Structure
&
Low Consideration
High Structure
&
High Consideration
High Structure
&
Low Consideration
C o
n si
d er
at io
n
Initiating Structure
Low High
Ohio State University
High
Low
EXHIBIT 3.3
The Ohio State University Leadership Model: Four Leadership Styles, Two Dimensions
Source: Adapted from R. Likert, New Patterns of Management. (New York: McGraw-Hill: 1961).
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 74 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 3 LEaDErShIp BEhavIOr anD MOtIvatIOn 75
Differences, Contributions, and applications of Leadership Models
Differences between the Models The Ohio State and University of Michigan leadership models are different in that the University of Michigan places the two leadership behaviors at opposite ends of the same continuum, making it one-dimensional. The Ohio State University model considers the two behaviors independent of one another, making it two-dimensional; thus this model has four leadership styles.
Contributions of the Models There is no one best leadership style in all situations; this is the first contribution to lead- ership theory, because it has helped lead researchers to the next paradigm—that of contin- gency leadership theory (the topic of Chapter 4). Thus, the contribution of the behavioral leadership paradigm was to identify two generic dimensions of leadership behavior that continue to have importance in accounting for leader effectiveness today.
Prior to the two university leadership studies, many organizations had focused on get- ting the job done with little, if any, concern for meeting employee needs. So there was a shift to place more emphasis on the human side of the organization to increase pro- ductivity; this is a second contribution. The saying that a happy worker is a productive worker comes from this period of research, and still has research support today.15
Another important research finding was that most leadership functions can be carried out by someone besides the designated leader of a group. Thus, more organizations began training managers to use participative leadership styles. Thus, as a third contribution of these leadership models, Likert has been credited as being the first to identify the partici- pative leadership style that is commonly used today.
Applications of the Models The two models don’t tell the leader how to behave, but they do provide a classification system reminding us that our behavior affects others through the “task” we perform as well as the “relationships” we develop. Many leadership development programs are struc- tured along the behavioral styles approach, and almost all give managers a questionnaire that in some way assesses their task and relationship behavior toward followers. Manag- ers use the assessment to improve their overall leadership style.
The behavioral styles approach is easily applied to leadership by assessing our behav- ioral style. Through our ongoing self-assessment, we can determine how we are coming across to others and how we could change our behavior to be more effective in perform- ing our task and in developing our relations.
The Leadership Grid In this section, we discuss the Leadership Grid theory, including research and contri- butions of the high-concern-for-people and high-concern-for-production (team leader) leadership styles.
Discuss similarities and differences between the Ohio State University Leadership Model and the Leadership Grid.
Learning Outcome
3
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 75 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
76 part 1 InDIvIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
Leadership Grid theory Robert Blake and Jane Mouton, from the University of Texas, developed the Manage- rial Grid® and published it in 1964, updated it in 1978 and 1985, and in 1991 it became the Leadership Grid® with Anne Adams McCanse replacing Mouton, who died in 1987. Blake and Mouton published numerous articles and around 40 books describing their theories.16
The Leadership Grid builds on the Ohio State and Michigan studies; it is based on the same two leadership dimensions, which Blake and Mouton called concern for pro- duction and concern for people. The concern for both people and production is mea- sured through a questionnaire on a scale from 1 to 9. Therefore, the grid has 81 possible combinations of concern for production and people. However, the Leadership Grid identifies five leadership styles: 1,1 impoverished; 9,1 authority compliance; 1,9 country club; 5,5 middle of the road; and 9,9 team leader. See Exhibit 3.4 for an adaptation of the Leadership Grid.
Following are descriptions of leadership styles in the Leadership Grid:
• The impoverished leader (1,1) has low concern for both production and people. The leader does the minimum required to remain employed in the position.
• The authority-compliance leader (9,1) has a high concern for production and a low con- cern for people. The leader focuses on getting the job done while people are treated like machines.
• The country-club leader (1,9) has a high concern for people and a low concern for production. The leader strives to maintain a friendly atmosphere without regard for production.
• The middle-of-the-road leader (5,5) has balanced, medium concern for both production and people. The leader strives to maintain satisfactory performance and morale.
• The team leader (9,9) has a high concern for both production and people. This leader strives for maximum performance and employee satisfaction. According to Blake, Mou- ton, and McCanse, the team leadership style is generally the most appropriate for use in all situations.
To estimate your Leadership Grid leadership st yle, using Self-Assessment 3-1, use you r task score as you r concern for produc t ion a nd you r people score, a nd
WORK Application 3-3 Recall a present or past manager. Which of the five Leadership Grid styles does or did your manager use most often? Describe the behavior of your manager.
C o
n ce
rn f
o r
P eo
p le
Concern for Production
High
Low 1
Low
9
High
1,9 9,9
9,11,1
5,5
EXHIBIT 3.4 Blake, Mouton, and McCanse Leadership Grid
Source: Adapted from Robert R. Blake and Jane S. Mouton, The Managerial Grid III (Houston: Gulf, 1985); and Robert R. Blake and Anna Adams McCanse, Leadership Dilemmas-Grid Solutions (Houston: Gulf, 1991), 29.
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 76 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 3 LEaDErShIp BEhavIOr anD MOtIvatIOn 77
1. Which Ohio State University and Leadership Grid leadership style is emphasized at trader Joe’s?
Trader Joe’s emphasizes the Ohio State University high structure and high consideration style, which is called the Leader- ship Grid team leader’s high concern for people and high concern for production (9,9) leadership style. Trader Joe’s treats its employees well but at the same time stresses high levels of performance. We will provide more detail with the answers to the other case application answers.
OPENING CASE application
CONCept APPLICATION 3-2
The Leadership Grid Identify the five statements by their leader’s style. Write the appropriate letter in the blank before each item.
a. 1,1 (impoverished) c. 9,1 (authority compliance) e. 9,9 (team) b. 1,9 (country club) d. 5,5 (middle of the road)
6. A group has an average productivity level compared to the other departments in the company.
7. A group dislikes its leader and has one of the lowest levels of morale in the company, but it is a top performer.
8. A group has a leader that doesn’t seem to care about the employees or how much work gets done.
9. A group has a leader that is very supportive of the employees, while also exceeding expectations as a top performer.
10. A group has very high morale but the department is one of the lowest performers in the company.
plot them on the Leadership Grid in Exhibit 3.4. Then select the closest of the f ive leadership styles.
Leadership Grid and high-high Leader research The high-high leader has concern for both production and people; this is the team lead- ership style. Blake and Mouton did conduct an extensive empirical research study that measured profitability before and after a ten-year period. In the study, one company sub- sidiary used an extensive Grid Organizational Development program designed to teach managers how to be 9,9 team leaders (experimental group), whereas another subsidiary did not use the program (control group). The subsidiary using the team leadership style increased its profits four times more than the control subsidiary. Thus, the researchers claimed that team leadership usually results in improved performance, low absenteeism and turnover, and high employee satisfaction.
However, another researcher disagreed with these findings, calling high-high leader- ship a myth. A more objective meta-analysis (a study combining the results of many prior studies) found that although task and relationship behavior tends to correlate positively with subordinate performance, the correlation is usually weak.17 In conclusion, although there is some support for the universal theory, the high-high leadership style is not ac- cepted as the one best style in all situations.
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 77 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
78 part 1 InDIvIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
Behavioral theory Contributions and applications Critics of behavioral theories suggested that different leadership styles are more effec- tive in different situations. Thus, a contribution of behavioral research is that it led to the shift in paradigm to contingency leadership theory. As you will learn in Chapter 4, contingency leadership theory is based on the behavioral theory of production and people leadership styles. Situational leadership models don’t agree with using the same leader- ship style in all situations but rather prescribe using the existing behavioral leadership style that best meets the situation.
A second contribution of behavioral leadership theory was the recognition that or- ganizations need both production and people leadership. A generic set of production- oriented and people-oriented leadership functions must be performed to ensure effective organizational performance.
A third related contribution of behavioral leadership theory supports coleadership. The manager does not have to perform both production and people functions. Thus, strong production-oriented leaders can be successful if they have coleaders to provide the people-oriented functions for them, and vice versa. So, if you tend to be more production- or people-oriented, seek coleaders to complement your weaker area.
Before we go on to motivation, let’s tie personality traits from Chapter 2 together with what we’ve covered so far. Complete Self-Assessment 3-2 now.
Your personality traits and Leadership StylesSELF-ASSESSMENT 3-2
We stated in the first section that traits affect leadership behavior. how does this relate to you? For the University of Michigan Leadership Model, generally, if you had a high personality score for the Big Five surgency dimension in Self- assessment 2-1 in Chapter 2 (dominance trait, high need for power), you most likely have a high score for the task (job-centered) leadership style. If you had a high score for agreeableness (sensitivity to others trait, high need for affilia- tion), you most likely have a high score for the people (employee-centered) leadership style. My U of M leadership style is primarily
For the Leadership Grid, you need to score your personality for surgency and agreeableness on a scale of 1 to 9. then you combine them on the grid, and these personality scores should generally provide about the same score as Self-assessment 3-1. My Leadership Grid style is primarily
For the Ohio State University Leadership Model, you need to score your personality for surgency and agreeableness as high or low. then you combine them, and these personality scores should generally provide the same two-dimensional behaviors corresponding to one of the four leadership styles. My OSU leadership style is primarily
If you scored a Leader Motive profile, your score for tasks should generally be higher than your score for people, because you have a greater need for power than affiliation. however, your leadership style on the Ohio State model could be high structure and high consideration, because this implies socialized power. You could also have a 9,9 team leader score on the Leadership Grid. My LMp is primarily
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 78 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 3 LEaDErShIp BEhavIOr anD MOtIvatIOn 79
Leadership and Major Motivation Theories In this section, we discuss motivation and leadership, the motivation process (which ex- plains how motivation affects behavior), and three classifications of motivation theories (content, process, and reinforcement).
Motivation and Leadership Leadership success requires motivating followers,18 and leadership behavior is used to motivate followers.19 Motivation is anything that affects behavior in pursuing a certain outcome. Outcomes in business are usually organizational goals or objectives, and it takes motivation to reach our goals.20 So you have to know how to motivate yourself,21 and you have to be able to motivate others.22 To be truly successful, you have to get people to do more than the minimum required.23
So what motivates us?24 We tend to seek job satisfaction as we satisfy our self-inter- est.25 So, if we want to motivate others, we should answer their often-unasked question, “What’s in it for me?”26 If we give people what they want, they will in turn tend to give us what we want. But the truly great leaders get followers to go beyond their own self-interest for the good of the team or organization.27 Unfortunately, it’s easier said than done, but you will learn how in the rest of this chapter.
the Motivation process The motivation process results from the joint effects of personality traits and task or so- cial job characteristics that explain work behavior.28 Through the motivation process, people go from need to motive to behavior to consequence to satisfaction or dissatisfaction. For example, you are thirsty (need) and have a drive (motive) to get a drink. You get a drink (behavior) that quenches (consequence and satisfaction) your thirst. However, if you could not get a drink, or a drink of what you really wanted, you would be dissatisfied. Satisfaction is usually short-lived. Getting that drink satisfied you, but sooner or later you will need another drink. For this reason, the motivation process has a feedback loop. See Exhibit 3.5 for an illustration of the motivation process.
Some need or want motivates all behavior. However, needs and motives are complex: We don’t always know what our needs are, or why we do the things we do. Have you ever done something and not known why you did it? Understanding needs will help you bet- ter understand motivation and behavior, or you will gain a better understanding of why people do the things they do for their rational self-interest.29
Like traits, motives cannot be observed, but you can observe behavior and infer what the person’s motive is (attribution theory). However, it is not easy to know why people behave the way they do, because people do the same things for different reasons. Also, people often attempt to satisfy several needs at once. Thus, a one-size-fits-all assumption about what motives people doesn’t work.30
Behavior Consequence Satisfaction or DissatisfactionMotiveNeed
Feedback
The Motivation Process EXHIBIT 3.5
© C
en ga
ge
Le ar
ni ng
®
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 79 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
80 part 1 InDIvIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
an Overview of three Major Classifications of Motivation theories There is no single, universally accepted theory of how to motivate people, or how to classify the theories. We will discuss motivation theories and how we can use them to motivate ourselves and others. In the following sections, you will learn about content mo- tivation theories, process motivation theories, and reinforcement theory. See Exhibit 3.6 for this classification, which is commonly used, with a listing of major motivation theo- ries you will learn.
After studying all of the theories separately, we can put them back together using the unifying motivation process to see the relationship between the theories. You can select one theory to use, or take from several to make your own theory, or apply the theory that best fits the specific situation.
2. What does trader Joe’s do to motivate its employees, and how does it affect performance?
Trader Joe’s primary motivator is creating an innovative fun environment to work in with good pay and benefits. Providing good compensation with above industry average salaries and great benefits to full-time crew members and store manage- ment (mates, commanders, captains) allows Trader Joe’s to hire highly self-motivated crew members.
Employees are motivated and provide a high-quality customer experience. The results are more than $8 billion in sales with around 400 stores in 30 states. Sales are estimated at $1,750 in merchandise per square foot, more than double Whole Foods. Trader Joe’s has no debt and funds all growth from its own profits.31
OPENING CASE application
Discuss similarities and differences among the three content motivation theories. Learning Outcome
4
Content Motivation Theories Before we present the content motivation theories, let’s discuss content motivation the- ories in general. Content motivation theories focus on explaining and predicting behavior based on people’s needs. The primary reason people do what they do is to meet their needs or wants—to be satisfied. Thus, it is important to understand needs (content motivation) theory. People want job satisfaction, and they will leave one organization for another to meet this need.32 The key to successful leadership is to meet the needs of employees while achieving organizational objectives.
hierarchy of Needs theory In the 1940s, Abraham Maslow developed his hierarchy of needs theory, which is based on four major assumptions. (1) Only unmet needs motivate. (2) People’s needs are ar- ranged in order of importance (hierarchy) going from basic to complex needs. (3) People will not be motivated to satisfy a higher-level need unless the lower-level need(s) has been at least minimally satisfied. (4) Maslow assumed that people have five classifica- tions of needs, which are presented here in hierarchical order from low to high level of need.33
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 80 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 3 LEaDErShIp BEhavIOr anD MOtIvatIOn 81
Hierarchy of Needs The hierarchy of needs theory proposes that people are motivated through five levels of needs—physiological, safety, belongingness, esteem, and self-actualization:
1. Physiological needs: These are people’s primary or basic needs: air, food, shelter, sex, and relief from or avoidance of pain.
2. Safety needs: Once the physiological needs are met, the individual is concerned with safety and security.
3. Belongingness needs: After establishing safety, people look for love, friendship, ac- ceptance, and affection. Belongingness is also called social needs.
4. Esteem needs: After the social needs are met, the individual focuses on ego, status, self-respect, recognition for accomplishments, and a feeling of self-confidence and prestige.
5. Self-actualization needs: The highest level of need is to develop one’s full potential. To do so, one seeks growth, achievement, and advancement.
EXHIBIT 3.6 Major Motivation Theories
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
CLaSSIFICatION OF MOtIVatION theOrIeS SpeCIFIC MOtIVatION theOrY
1. Content motivation theories focus on explaining and predicting behavior based on employee need motivation.
A. Hierarchy of needs theory proposes that employees are motivated through five levels of need— physiological, safety, social, esteem, and self- actualization.
B. Two-factor theory proposes that employees are motivated by motivators (higher-level needs) rather than maintenance (lower-level needs) factors.
C. Acquired needs theory proposes that employees are motivated by their need for achievement, power, and affiliation.
2. Process motivation theories focus on understanding how employees choose behaviors to fulfill their needs.
A. Equity theory proposes that employees will be motivated when their perceived inputs equal outputs.
B. Expectancy theory proposes that employees are motivated when they believe they can accomplish the task, they will be rewarded, and the rewards for doing so are worth the effort.
C. Goal-setting theory proposes that achievable but difficult goals motivate employees.
3. Reinforcement theory proposes that behavior can be explained, predicted, and controlled through the consequences for behavior.
Types of Reinforcement
• Positive
• Avoidance
• Extinction
• Punishment
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 81 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
82 part 1 InDIvIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
Maslow’s hierarchy of needs is commonly taught in psychology and business courses, because it offers a very rich theory of human motivation and its determinants at the in- dividual level. However, Maslow’s work was criticized because it did not take into con- sideration that people can be at different levels of needs based on different aspects of their lives. Nor did he mention that people can revert back to lower-level needs. Today, Maslow’s followers and others realize that needs are not on a simple five-step hierarchy. Maslow’s assumptions have recently been updated to ref lect this insight, and many orga- nizations today are using some of the management methods he proposed 30 years ago. Maslow has also been credited with inf luencing many management authors, including Douglas McGregor, Rensis Likert, and Peter Drucker.
Motivating Employees with Hierarchy of Needs Theory An important contribution of this theory is that we realize that people have a need for more than just pay. Second, even if we don’t have much money to give raises, we can have inexpensive socials, like barbecues, and there is no cost to giving compliments.34 Also, employees are more motivated when they perceive the organization supports them, which again does not have to be costly.
People want to fulfill higher-level needs,35 including self-esteem and recognition from peers,36 so a major recommendation to leaders is to meet employees’ lower-level needs so that they will not dominate the employees’ motivational process. You should get to know and understand people’s needs and meet them as a means of increasing performance. See Exhibit 3.7 for a list of ways in which managers attempt to meet all five needs.
WORK Application 3-4 On what level of the hierarchy of needs are you at this time for a specific aspect of your life (professional or personal)? Be sure to specify the level by name, and explain why you are at that level.
3-a. how does trader Joe’s meet its employees’ content motivation needs?
Trader Joe’s allows people to climb the hierarchy of needs. As stated in opening case answer to question 2, it pays well with great working conditions (physiological), with great benefits (safety). There is continual employee and customer contact (social). The job itself is interesting and challenging, with participation in decision making and employee development with opportunity for advancement through the Career Adventure path (esteem and self-actualization).
OPENING CASE application
two-Factor theory In the 1960s, Frederick Herzberg published his two-factor theory.37 Herzberg combined lower-level needs into one classification he called hygiene or maintenance; and higher- level needs into one classification he called motivators. The two-factor theory proposes that people are motivated by motivators rather than maintenance factors. Before you learn about two-factor theory, complete Self-Assessment 3-3.
Maintenance—Extrinsic Factors Maintenance factors are also called extrinsic motivators because motivation comes from outside the person and the job itself.38 Extrinsic motivators include pay, job security, working conditions, fringe benefits, and relationships. These factors are related to meet- ing lower-level needs. Review Self-Assessment 3-3, the even-numbered questions, for a list of extrinsic job factors.
Motivators—Intrinsic Factors Motivators are called intrinsic motivators because motivation comes from within the person through the work itself.39 Intrinsic motivators include achievement, recognition,
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 82 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 3 LEaDErShIp BEhavIOr anD MOtIvatIOn 83
EXHIBIT 3.7 How Organizations Motivate With Hierarchy of Needs Theory
Safety Needs
Organizations meet these needs through safe working conditions, salary increases to meet inflation, job security, and fringe benefits (medical insurance/sick pay/
pensions) that protect the physiological needs.
Self-Actualization Needs
Organizations meet these needs by the development of
employees’ skills, the chance to be creative, achievement and
promotions, and the ability to have complete control over their jobs.
Social Needs
Organizations meet these needs through the opportunity to interact with others, to be accepted, to have friends. Activities include parties,
picnics, trips, and sports teams.
Physiological Needs
Organizations meet these needs through adequate salary, breaks, and working conditions.
Esteem Needs
Organizations meet these needs through titles, the satisfaction of completing the job itself, merit pay
raises, recognition, challenging tasks, participation in decision making, and change for advancement.
Job Motivators and Maintenance FactorsSELF-ASSESSMENT 3-3
here are 12 job factors that contribute to job satisfaction. rate each according to how important it is to you by placing a number from 1 to 5 on the line before each factor.
very Somewhat not important important important
5 4 3 2 1
1. An interesting job I enjoy doing 2. A boss who treats everyone the same
regardless of the circumstances
3. Getting praise and other recognition and appreciation for the work that I do
4. A job that is routine without much change from day to day
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
(continued)
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 83 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
84 part 1 InDIvIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
challenge, and advancement. These factors are related to meeting higher-level needs, and are better at motivating than extrinsic factors.40 Review Self-Assessment 3-3, the odd- numbered questions, for a list of intrinsic job factors.
Herzberg’s Two-Factor Motivation Model Based on research, Herzberg and associates disagreed with the traditional view that sat- isfaction and dissatisfaction were at opposite ends of one continuum (a one-dimensional model). There are two continuums: not dissatisfied with the environment (maintenance) to dissatisfied, and satisfied with the job itself (motivators) to not satisfied (a two- dimensional model). See Exhibit 3.8 for Herzberg’s motivation model.
Job Motivators and Maintenance Factors (continued)SELF-ASSESSMENT 3-3
5. The opportunity for advancement 6. A nice title regardless of pay 7. Job responsibility that gives me freedom to
do things my way 8. Good working conditions (safe environ-
ment, cafeteria, etc.) 9. The opportunity to learn new things 10. An emphasis on following the rules, regula-
tions, procedures, and policies 11. A job I can do well and succeed at 12. Job security; a career with one company
For each factor, write the numbers from 1 to 5 that represent your answer. total each column (should be between 6 and 30 points).
Motivating factors Maintenance factors
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12.
totals Did you select motivators or maintenance factors as being more important to you? the closer to 30 (6) each score is, the more (less) important it is to you. Continue reading to understand the difference between motivators and maintenance factors.
High Low
Maintenance Factors
(extrinsic motivators—physiological, safety, and social needs—existence and relatedness needs) pay, benefits, job security, working conditions, company policies, human relations
Dissatis�ed(with the Maintenance Factors)Not Dissatis�ed
Motivator Factors
(intrinsic motivators—esteem and self-actualization needs—growth needs) work itself, recognition, achievement, increased responsibility, growth, advancement
Not Satis�ed (not motivated)
(with the Job Motivator Factors)Satis�ed (motivated)
Two-Factor Motivation Theory EXHIBIT 3.8
Source: Adapted from F. Herzberg. “The Motivation-Hygiene Concept and Problems of Manpower.” Personnel Administrator : 3–7 (1964); and F. Herzberg. “One More Time: How Do You Motivate Employees?” Harvard Business Review (January–February 1967):53.
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 84 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 3 LEaDErShIp BEhavIOr anD MOtIvatIOn 85
Employees are on a continuum from dissatisfied to not dissatisfied with their en- vironment. Herzberg contends that providing maintenance factors will keep employ- ees from being dissatisfied, but it will not make them satisfied or motivate them. For example,
Herzberg believes that if employees are dissatisfied with their pay and they get a raise, they will no longer be dissatisfied. However, before long people get accustomed to the new standard of living and will become dissatisfied again. Employees will need another raise to not be dissatisfied again. The vicious cycle goes on. So, Herzberg says you have to focus on motivators.
Money as a Motivator The current view of money as a motivator is that money matters more too some people than others, and that it may motivate some employees but not others. Money, however, does not necessarily motivate employees to work harder. Have you ever gotten a raise? Were you more motivated and more productive? Money also is limited in its ability to motivate. For example, many commissioned workers get to a comfortable point and don’t push to make extra money; and some employees get to the point where they don’t want overtime work, even though they are paid two or three times their normal wage for overtime.
Motivating Employees with Two-Factor Theory Under the old management paradigm, money (and other extrinsic motivators) was con- sidered the best motivator. Under the new leadership paradigm, pay is important, but it is not the best motivator; intrinsic motivators are.41 Herzberg’s theory has been criticized for having limited research support. However, current research does support that making work more meaningful increases motivation and performance.42
Herzberg fits the new paradigm: He said that managers must first ensure that the employees’ level of pay and other maintenance factors are adequate. Once employ- ees are not dissatisfied with their pay (and other maintenance factors), they can be
WORK Application 3-5 Recall a present or past job; are you or were you dissatisfied or not dissatisfied with the maintenance factors? Are or were you satisfied or not satisfied with the motivators? Be sure to identify and explain your satisfaction with the specific maintenance and motivator factors.
3-b. how does trader Joe’s meet its employees’ content motivation needs?
Related to two-factor theory, although Trader Joe’s offers great pay and benefits (maintenance), its focus is really more on motivators so employees can grow and meet their high-level needs of esteem and self-actualization. Its motto is “Where fun, food and opportunity align.” The Trader Joe’s Career Adventure (career path) has three levels.
1. Store Crew members do a little of everything—run registers, stock shelves, merchandise products, and chat up terrific customers. They have the opportunity to advance.
2. Store Leadership. Leaders are out on the store floor with their customers and crew creating a WOW! experience. Store leadership begins at the Novitiate level (entry-level supervisor). They participate in all aspects of managing a Trader Joe’s.
3. Store Management includes working up to becoming a 2nd and 1st Mate (assistant store managers) to Commander and Captain (store managers). There is also a Regional Mobile Thriver (RMT) Training Program for fast-tracking experienced and relocatable retail store managers through its promote-from-within structure.
OPENING CASE application
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 85 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
86 part 1 InDIvIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
motivated through their jobs. Herzberg also developed job enrichment, the process of building motivators into the job itself by making it more interesting and challenging. Job enrichment methods are commonly used today.43 Job enrichment has been used successfully to motivate employees to higher levels of performance at many organiza- tions,44 including AT&T, GM, IBM, Maytag, Monsanto, Motorola, Polaroid, and the Traveler’s.
acquired Needs theory acquired needs theory proposes that people are motivated by their need for achieve- ment, power, and affiliation. This is essentially the same definition given for achievement motivation theory in Chapter 2. It is now called acquired needs theory because David McClelland was not the first to study these needs. Because other management writers call McClelland’s theory acquired needs theory, a general needs theory was developed by Henry Murray, then adapted by John Atkinson, and David McClelland.45 You have al- ready learned about McClelland’s work, so we will be brief here.
Acquired needs theory says that all people have the need for achievement, power, and affiliation but to varying degrees. McClelland’s affiliation need is essentially the same as Maslow’s belongingness need; and power and achievement are related to esteem, self- actualization, and growth. McClelland’s motivation theory does not include lower-level needs for safety and physiological needs. Here are some ideas for motivating employees based on their dominant needs:
• Motivating employees with a high n Ach. Give them nonroutine, challenging tasks with clear, attainable objectives. Give them fast and frequent feedback on their performance. Continually give them increased responsibility for doing new things. Keep out of their way.
• Motivating employees with a high n Pow. Let them plan and control their jobs as much as possible. Try to include them in decision making, especially when they are affected by the decision. They tend to perform best alone rather than as team members. Try to assign them to a whole task rather than just part of a task.
• Motivating employees with a high n Aff. Be sure to let them work as part of a team. They derive satisfaction from the people they work with rather than the task itself. Give them lots of praise and recognition. Delegate responsibility for orienting and training new employees to them. They make great buddies and mentors.
WORK Application 3-6 Explain how your need for achievement, power, and/or affiliation has affected your behavior, or that of someone you work with or have worked with. What were the consequences of the behavior, and was the need satisfied?
3-c. how does trader Joe’s meet its employees’ content motivation needs?
Trader Joe’s does help employees meet all three acquired needs. It provides support they can do a good job, and it has a career path so that employees can achieve their goal of advancing. They have the power to be in control at the crew, leader, and manager positions. Employees are also encouraged to develop an affiliation with employees and customers.
OPENING CASE application
Before we discuss the need to balance professional and personal needs, see Exhibit 3.9 for a comparison of the three content theories of motivation.
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 86 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 3 LEaDErShIp BEhavIOr anD MOtIvatIOn 87
A Comparison of Content Motivation Theories
Self-Actualization
Esteem
Belongingness
Safety
Physiological
Needs must be met in a hierarchical order.
Motivators
Motivators
Maintenance
Maintenance
Maintenance
Maintenance factors will not motivate employees.
Achievement and Power
Achievement and Power
Affiliation
Not classified
Not classified
Employees must be motivated differently based on their acquired needs.
HIERARCHY OF NEEDS THEORY (MASLOW)
TWO-FACTOR THEORY (HERZBERG)
ACQUIRED NEEDS THEORY (MCCLELLAND)
EXHIBIT 3.9
Balancing Work–Life Needs Work–life balance is also called work–home and work–family balance. As discussed, we all have personal life needs and we have work needs, and both needs overlap and inf lu- ence each other. We need a healthy balance between our life and our work. However, with organizations working around the clock competing in a global marketplace, with a focus on getting more done with fewer people, and with technology making it easy to check our cell phones and work all hours of the day and night from anywhere, life and work are blurring together for many people. Negative consequences of imbalance (often called work–life conf lict) include stress, burnout, absenteeism, turnover, and dissatisfac- tion with job, family, and life. Balance is a much sought-after, but rarely claimed, state of being.
Two major things organizations are doing to help employees meet their personal needs are providing on-site day care centers—or giving employees information to help them find good day and elder care—and offering f lextime.46 Some leaders are also telling em- ployees to go home and “get a life” before it is too late.
Discuss the major similarities and differences among the three process motivation theories.
Learning Outcome
5
Process Motivation Theories process motivation theories focus on understanding how people choose behavior to fulfill their needs. Process motivation theories are more complex than content motivation theories. Content motivation theories simply focus on identifying and understanding people’s needs. Process motivation theories go a step further by attempting to understand the following: why people have different needs, why their needs change, how and why people choose to try to satisfy needs in different ways, the mental processes people go through as they understand situations, and how they evaluate their need satisfaction.
In this section you learn about three process motivation theories: equity theory, expec- tancy theory, and goal-setting theory.
equity theory Do you want to be treated fairly? If we perceive organizational decisions and managerial actions, such as pay, to be unfair or unjust, we are likely to experience feelings of anger, outrage, and resentment.47 Conversely, if we believe we are being treated fairly, we are
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 87 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
88 part 1 InDIvIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
more willing to accept managerial authority.48 Equity theory is primarily J. Stacy Adams’s motivation theory, in which people are said to be motivated to seek social equity in the rewards they receive (output) for their performance (input).49 equity theory proposes that people are motivated when their perceived inputs equal outputs.
Rewarding People Equitably Through the equity theory process, people compare their inputs (effort, experience, loy- alty, commitment, seniority, etc.) and outputs (financial compensation and intangibles of praise, recognition, etc.) to that of relevant others.50 A relevant other could be a co- worker or group of employees from the same or different organizations, or even from a hypothetical situation. Notice that our definition says perceived and not actual inputs to outputs. Others may perceive that equity actually exists and that the person complaining about inequity is wrong.
Equitable distribution of pay is crucial to organizations.51 Unfortunately, many em- ployees tend to inf late their own efforts or performance when comparing themselves to others. Employees also tend to overestimate what others earn. A comparison with rel- evant others leads to one of three conclusions: The employee is under-rewarded, over-re- warded, or equitably rewarded. When inequity is perceived, employees attempt to correct the balance by reducing input (e.g., put forth less effort) or increasing output (e.g., get a raise).
Motivating with Equity Theory People who believe they are over-rewarded usually don’t change their behavior. Instead, they often rationalize that they deserve the outputs. One view of equity is that it is like Herzberg’s maintenance factors. When employees are not dissatisfied, they are not ac- tively motivated, but maintenance factors do demotivate when employees are dissatisfied. According to equity theory, when employees believe they are equitably rewarded, they are not actively motivated. However, when employees believe they are under-rewarded, or not being treated fairly, they are demotivated.52 Unethical leaders tend to be viewed as unfair.53 Using equity theory in practice can be difficult, because you don’t always know who the employee’s reference group is, or his or her view of inputs and outcomes. How- ever, this theory does offer some useful general recommendations: Be aware that equity is based on perception, do reward equitably, and be sure to reward high performers so they don’t decrease their performance.
WORK Application 3-7 Give an example of how equity theory has affected your motivation, or that of someone else you work with or have worked with. Be sure to specify if you were under-rewarded, over-rewarded, or equitably rewarded.
4-a. how does trader Joe’s meet its employees’ process motivation needs?
Trader Joe’s treats all employees with equity. The management style is participative so everyone shares in the management at each store. Employees who put in the effor t (inputs) to climb the corporate ladder have potential rewards (outputs). However, not everyone is expected to move to leadership and store management. But even the part-time crew get good pay and benefits—yes, health insurance for all.
OPENING CASE application
expectancy theory Expectancy theory is based on Victor Vroom’s formula: motivation = expectancy × in- strumentality × valence.54 expectancy theory proposes that people are motivated when they believe they can accomplish the task, they will get the reward, and the rewards for doing the task are worth the effort. The theory is based on the following assumptions:
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 88 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 3 LEaDErShIp BEhavIOr anD MOtIvatIOn 89
Both internal (needs) and external (environment) factors affect behavior; behavior is the individual’s decision; people have different needs, desires, and goals; and people make behavior decisions based on their perception of the outcome.
Three Variables All three variable conditions must be met in Vroom’s formula for motivation to take place:
• Expectancy refers to the person’s perception of his or her ability (probability) to accom- plish an objective—self-efficacy.55 Generally, the higher one’s expectancy, the better the chance for motivation. When we do not believe that we can accomplish objectives, we will not be motivated to try.56
• Instrumentality refers to belief that the performance will result in getting the reward. If employees are certain to get the reward, they probably will be motivated. When not sure, employees may not be motivated.
• Valence refers to the value a person places on the outcome or reward. Generally, the higher the value (importance) of the outcome or reward, the better the chance of motivation.
Motivating with Expectancy Theory The following conditions should be implemented to make expectancy theory result in motivation:
1. Clearly define objectives and the performance necessary to achieve them.57 2. Tie performance to rewards. High performance should be rewarded. When one
employee works harder to produce more than other employees and is not rewarded, he or she may slow down productivity.
3. Be sure rewards are of value to the employee. Managers should get to know employees as individuals. Develop good human relations as a people developer.
4. Make sure our employees believe we will do what we say we will do. For example, employees must believe we will give them a merit raise if they do work hard.
5. Founder of Walmart Sam Walton said, “High expectations are the key to every- thing.” So use the Pygmalion effect (Chapter 2) to increase expectations. Your high expectations can result in follower self-fulfilling prophecy. As the level of expectation increases, so will performance.
WORK Application 3-8 Give an example of how expectancy theory has affected your motivation, or that of someone else you work with or have worked with. Be sure to specify the expectancy and valence.
4-b. how does trader Joe’s meet its employees’ process motivation needs?
Trader Joe’s focuses on attracting people who have the expectancy that they can be successful at the level of their choice, and it provides the training to help them succeed as store crew, leader, and manager. Employees know that if they do a good job they will get rewarded (instrumentality). The valence of employees does vary, but as discussed, Trader Joe’s offers good pay and benefits.
OPENING CASE application
Goal-Setting theory Based on his extensive research, goal-setting theory is primarily attributed to Edwin Locke. Goal-setting theory proposes that specific, difficult goals motivate people. Goal setting increases commitment, motivation, energy, and persistence toward goals.58
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 89 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
90 part 1 InDIvIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
Criteria for Objectives For an objective to be effective, it should include the four criteria listed in steps 3 and 4 of the writing objectives model:
1. Singular result. To avoid confusion, each objective should contain only one end result. When multiple objectives are listed together, one may be met but the other(s) may not.
2. Specific. The objective should not be vague, such as to learn a lot in this leadership course. It should state the exact level of performance expected, such as to get an A.
3. Measurable. The saying “what gets measured gets done” is true. If people are to achieve objectives, they must be able to observe and measure their progress regularly to monitor progress and to determine if the objective has been met.
4. Target date. A specific date should be set for accomplishing the objective. When peo- ple have a deadline, they usually try harder to get the task done on time.60 If people are simply told to do it when they can, they don’t tend to “get around to it” until they have to. It is also more effective to set a specific date, such as October 29, 2015, rather than a set time, such as in two weeks, because you can forget when the time began and should end. However, some objectives are ongoing and do not require a stated date. The target date is indefinite until it is changed, such as the Domino’s objective to deliver pizza within 30 minutes.
WORK Application 3-9 1. Using the writing objectives model, write one or more objectives for an organization you work for or have worked for that meet the criteria for objectives.
2. Give an example of how a goal(s) affected your motivation and performance, or those of someone else you work with or have worked with.
Writing Objectives To help you to write effective objectives that meet the criteria you will learn next, use the model. The parts of the writing objectives model are (1) To + (2) action verb + (3) singular, specific, and measurable result to be achieved + (4) target date. This is shown in Model 3.1, with and objective, that is adapted from Max E. Douglas’s model.
(1) To + (2) action verb + (3) singular, specific, and measurable result to be achieved + (4) target date.
1 2 3 4
Buffalo Wild Wings
To open 1,700 stores by year end 202059
Writing Effective Objectives Model MODEL 3.1
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 90 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 3 LEaDErShIp BEhavIOr anD MOtIvatIOn 91
In addition to the four criteria from the model, there are three other criteria that do not always fit within the model:
1. Difficult but achievable. Research shows that individuals perform better with chal- lenging objectives rather than (1) easy objectives, (2) objectives that are too difficult, or (3) simply told “do your best.”61
2. Participatively set. People that participate in setting their objectives generally outper- form those that are assigned objectives, because it helps gain commitment.62
3. Commitment. For objectives to be met, employees must accept them. If employees are not committed to striving for the objective, even if they meet the other criteria, they may not meet the objective.63
Microsoft Microsoft has a long tradition of having individuals set goals as part of its high perfor- mance–based culture. All employees are trained to set “SMART” (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Results-based, and Time-specific) written goals. Managers are trained to as- sist in the goal-setting process, including how to provide relevant performance feedback during the review process.
YOU Make the ethICaL Call
3.1 Academic Standards
Lou Holtz, former successful Notre Dame football coach, said that the power of goal setting is an incredible motivator for high performance; to be successful we need to set a higher goal. Have colleges followed his advice? Have academic standards dropped, main- tained, or increased over the years?
The academic credit-hour system was set many years ago to establish some formal standardization across colleges throughout the country so that academics and employers had the same expectations of the workload that a college student carried to earn a de- gree. This also allowed students to transfer credit from one university to another, assuming the same standards were met.
The credit-hour system was set at students doing two hours of preparation for each hour of in-class time. So, a student taking five classes should spend 15 hours in class and 30 hours preparing for class, or a total of 40+ hours per week—which is a full-time schedule.
1. How many hours outside of class, on average, do you and other students use to pre- pare for class each week?
2. Are college professors throughout the country assigning students two hours of prep- aration for every hour in class today? If not, why have they dropped the standard?
3. Are students who are putting in par t-time hours (20–30 hours) during college being well prepared for a career after graduation (40–60 hours)?
4. Is it ethical and socially responsible for professors to drop standards and for colleges to award degrees for doing less work today than 5, 10, or 20 years ago?
Using Goal Setting to Motivate employees Need we say anything more about setting objectives besides to follow the guidelines above? Yes. Setting a goal is just the first step; the next step is just as important as we need to plan how we will accomplish it.64 Relying on willpower is a horrible strategy; it’s doomed to fail,
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 91 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
92 part 1 InDIvIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
Reinforcement Theory B. F. Skinner, reinforcement motivation theorist, contended that to motivate employees it is really not necessary to identify and understand needs (content motivation theories), or to understand how employees choose behaviors to fulfill them (process motivation theories). All the manager needs to do is understand the relationship between behaviors and their consequences, and then arrange contingencies that reinforce desirable behaviors and dis- courage undesirable behaviors.65 reinforcement theory proposes that through the con- sequences for behavior, people will be motivated to behave in predetermined ways.
Let’s face it; all organizations develop systems to control employee behavior,66 and that is what reinforcement theory is all about. Reinforcement theory uses behavior modifica- tion (apply reinforcement theory to get employees to do what you want them to do) and operant conditioning (types and schedules of reinforcement). Skinner stated that behav- ior is learned through experiences of positive and negative consequences. Employees learn what is, and is not, desired behavior as a result of the consequences for specific behavior. The three components of Skinner’s framework are shown with an example in Exhibit 3.10.
In this section, we have five subsections, as we discuss the two important concepts used to modify behavior (1 the types of reinforcement and 2 the schedules of reinforce- ment): 3 that you get what you reinforce, 4 how to motivate using reinforcement, and 5 how to give praise.
and this is why so few people keep their New Year’s resolutions. We will provide details on tying goals and plans in the subsection “Changing Behavior.”
CONCept APPLICATION 3-3
Objectives For each objective, state which “must” criteria is not met. a. singular result c. measurable b. specific d. target date
11. To sell 12 percent more cars and 3 percent more services in 2015
12. To increase sales in 2016
13. To be perceived as the best bar in the Houston area by the end of 2017
14. To write personal objectives within two weeks
15. To double iPad production in China
4-c. how does trader Joe’s meet its employees’ process motivation needs?
Trader Joe’s does use goal-setting theory. One of its ongoing goals is to introduce 10–15 new products a week. Some of the new products are sold nationally, and some are selected by the store to take advantage of local products, such as farm fresh produce.
OPENING CASE application
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 92 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 3 LEaDErShIp BEhavIOr anD MOtIvatIOn 93
types of reinforcement The four types of reinforcement are positive, avoidance, punishment, and extinction. Ex- hibit 3.11 illustrates the four types of reinforcement.
Positive Reinforcement A met hod of encouraging continued behav ior is to of fer attractive consequences ( rewards) for desirable performance. Positive reinforcements are pay, promotions, time off, increased status, and so forth. Giving praise is a positive reinforcement, and you will learn how to give praise at the end of this section.
Motivating with rewards. There has been an ongoing debate about using the carrot (reward) or the stick (punishment), and the general consensus is to use rewards (be posi- tive not negative) when possible. Ever heard of the Angry Birds? A big part of its success is that the game gives lots of positive reinforcement, and doesn’t punish players. So when possible, use rewards to motivate yourself and others.
Avoidance Reinforcement Avoidance is also called negative reinforcement. Rules with punishment for violations are designed to get employees to avoid certain behavior. Employees don’t necessar- ily want to follow the rules, but they usually do to avoid the negative consequence of punishment.
Motivating with avoidance. Organizational leaders do need to develop rules, but rules in and of themselves are not a punishment. Punishment is given only if the rule is broken, which we hope will not happen. So note that with avoidance there is no actual punish- ment; it’s the “threat” of the punishment that controls behavior. So when needed, set rules that will contribute to performance.
Punishment Punishment is used to provide an undesirable consequence for undesirable behavior. Methods of punishment include harassing, taking away privileges, probation, fining, de- moting, firing, and so forth.
Motivating with punishment. Punishment is the most controversial and the least effec- tive method in motivating employees to do a good job. Punishment may reduce the undesir- able behavior; but its overuse may cause other undesirable behaviors, such as poor morale, lower productivity, and acts of theft or sabotage. However, leaders need to enforce the rules, so there are times when only punishment will do. So punish when rules are broken.
Explain the four types of reinforcement. Learning Outcome
6
Components of Reinforcement Theory EXHIBIT 3.10
Stimulus (legal speed limit)
Responding Behavior (speed)
Consequences of Behavior— Reinforcement (Police of�cer gives speeder a negative consequence— ticket or fine—to discourage repeat performance.)
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 93 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
94 part 1 InDIvIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
Extinction Rather than encourage desirable behavior, extinction (and punishment) attempts to reduce or eliminate undesirable. Extinction also includes ignoring the behavior to get the employee to stop it. From another perspective, managers who do not reward good performance can cause its extinction. In other words, if you ignore good employee performance, good performance may stop because employees think, “Why should I do a good job if I’m not rewarded in some way?”
Motivating with extinction. When employees don’t earn rewards, withhold them. For example, the manager may withhold a reward of value, such as a pay raise, until the employee performs to set standards. Also, don’t ignore good performance.
YOU Make the ethICaL Call
3.2 Airlines
An airline often charges higher fares for one-way tickets than round-trip tickets, and for direct flight tickets to its hub than for flight connections from its hub to another destina- tion. So some travelers buy round-trip tickets and only go one way, and some end their travel at the hub instead of taking the connection (a “hidden city” itinerar y), to save money. The airlines call this breach of contract: They have punished travel agencies for tickets that aren’t properly used, they sometimes demand higher fares from travelers caught, and they have seized some travelers’ frequent-flier miles, saying they were fraudu- lently obtained.
1. Not using the full travel of a ticket breaks airline rules but not the law, so it’s not illegal, unless travelers lie about what they are doing. But is it ethical and socially responsible behavior of travelers?
2. Is it ethical and socially responsible for airlines to charge more for less travel?
3. Is it ethical and socially responsible to punish people who break the ticket rules?
4. Is reinforcement theory effective (does it motivate you and others) in today’s global economy?
5. Is reinforcement theory ethical and socially responsible, or is it manipulative?
Schedules of reinforcement The second reinforcement consideration in controlling behavior is determining when to reinforce performance. The two major schedule classifications are continuous and intermittent.
Continuous Reinforcement With a continuous method, each and every desired behavior is reinforced. Examples of this method would be a machine with an automatic counter that lets the employee know (at any given moment) exactly how many units have been produced, and a sales rep who gets a commission on every sale.
Motivating with a continuous schedule. Continuous reinforcement is generally better at sustaining desired behavior. It works well as an incentive to produce. For example, a piece rate reward of $1 for each unit produced or a 10 percent commission on every sale.
Intermittent Reinforcement The reward is given based on the passage of time or output. When the reward is based on the passage of time, it is called an interval schedule. When it is based on output, it is
WORK Application 3-10 Give one or more examples of the types of reinforcement, and the schedules used, on a present or past job.
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 94 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 3 LEaDErShIp BEhavIOr anD MOtIvatIOn 95
called a ratio schedule. When electing to use intermittent reinforcement, you have four alternatives:
1. Fixed interval schedule. Giving a salary paycheck every week, or breaks and meals at the same time every day
2. Variable interval schedule. Giving praise only now and then, a surprise inspection, or a pop quiz
3. Fixed ratio schedule. Giving a piece rate or bonus after producing a standard rate 4. Variable ratio schedule. Giving praise for excellent work, or a lottery for employees
who have not been absent for a set amount of time
Motivating with an intermittent schedule. Continuous reinforcement is not always possible or practical, such as with giving praise. To be more effective, praise is generally only given for exceptional, not routine, performance. Otherwise, it becomes routine and tends to lose its effect. Ratios are generally better motivators than intervals. The variable ratio tends to be the most powerful schedule for sustaining behavior.
You Get What You reinforce One of the important things you should learn in this course is that people will do what they are reinforced for doing. People seek information concerning what activi- ties are reinforced, and then seek to do (or at least pretend to do) those things, of- ten to the exclusion of activities not reinforced. The extent to which this occurs, of course, depends on the attractiveness of the rewards offered and the punishment for the behavior.
For example, if the professor says, “A, B, and C from this chapter are important and I’ll test you on them, but X, Y, and Z will not be on the test,” will students spend equal time studying both groups of material? In the business setting, if the manager repeat- edly says quality is important, but there is no reward for taking the time and effort to do a quality job, or punishment for poor quality, many employees will not really care about quality.
Types of Reinforcement EXHIBIT 3.11
As a manager, you have an assistant who makes many errors when completing correspondence. Your objective, which you discussed with the assistant, is to decrease the error rate by 50 percent by Friday, June 3, 2016. Based on the assistant’s performance at that time, you have four types of reinforcement that you can use with her when you next review her work.
EMPLOYEE BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION (FUTURE)
MANAGER ACTION (CONSEQUENCE)
TYPE OF REINFORCEMENT
EMPLOYEE BEHAVIOR
Improved performance Positive Praise improvements Repeat quality work*
Improved performance Avoidance Do not give any reprimand Repeat quality work
Performance not improved Extinction Withhold praise/raise Do not repeat poor work
Performance not improved Punishment Discipline action, such as a written warning
Do not repeat poor work
*Assuming the employee improved performance, positive reinforcement is the best motivator.
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 95 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
96 part 1 InDIvIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
Motivating with reinforcement General Guides Here are some general guidelines for using reinforcement:
1. Make sure employees know exactly what is expected of them. Set clear objectives— goal-setting theory.
2. Select the appropriate type of reinforcement. A reward may work better for some, and avoidance, punishment, or extinction for others. Know your employees’ needs.
3. Select the appropriate reinforcement schedule—continuous in some situations and intermittence in others.
4. Do not reward mediocre or poor performance (use extinction), and punish rule violators.
5. Look for the positive and give praise, rather than focus on the negative and criticize. Listen to people and make them feel good about themselves (Pygmalion effect).
6. Never go a day without giving sincere praise. 7. Do things for your employees, instead of to them, and you will see productivity increase.
Changing Behavior If we are going to change our behavior, we need to retrain our brain to form new habits by conditioning ourselves to new behavior. Here are some tips on using reinforcement to change our behavior. The tips include a personal example, which is the same process as for professional behavior changes.
1. Begin by setting an objective using goal-setting theory. For example, to get into shape by working out three days a week for 30 minutes starting (list a specific date).
2. Specify the who, what, when, where, and how of your plan. I will go to the gym (or walk from my home) every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday at 6:00 a.m. before going to school/work.
3. Next, further develop the plan by implementing the following ideas within your over- all plan. • Reduce other life stress, if possible, so you can focus on your new behavior without
distractions. I’m going to stop my relationship with Chris. • Think in advance about what might cause you to slip and plan how you can avoid
those things. Why would you skip a workout? • Expect setbacks and slips and how you will bounce back as part of your plan. The
next tip can help. • Plan your reinforcement. Have punishments for undesirable behavior. If I skip a
workout, I will not watch TV that day, or I will make it up on another day. Have rewards for desired behavior. After working out for the three days of the week, I will treat myself to an ice cream.
Giving praise Pay is not the only, nor necessarily the best, reinforcer for performance. Employees want to know that their organization values their contributions and cares about their well-be- ing. Giving praise sends this message as it develops a positive self-concept in employ- ees and leads to better performance—the Pygmalion effect and self-fulfilling prophecy. Praise is a motivator (not maintenance) because it meets employees’ needs for esteem and self-actualization, growth, and achievement. Giving praise creates a win–win situation, only takes a minute, and doesn’t cost anything. It is probably the most powerful, simplest, least costly, and yet most underused motivational technique there is.
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 96 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 3 LEaDErShIp BEhavIOr anD MOtIvatIOn 97
Ken Blanchard and Spencer Johnson popularized giving praise back in the 1980s through their best-selling book, The One-Minute Manager. They developed a technique that involves giving one-minute feedback of praise. Model 3.2, Giving Praise, is an ad- aptation. The steps in the giving praise model are (1) Tell the employee exactly what was done correctly. (2) Tell the employee why the behavior is important. (3) Stop for a mo- ment of silence. (4) Encourage repeat performance. Blanchard calls it one-minute praise because it should not take more than one minute to give the praise. It is not necessary for the employee to say anything. The four steps are described below and illustrated in Model 3.2.
Giving Praise Model 3.2
Step 4
Encourage repeat performance.
Step 1
Tell the employee exactly what was done correctly.
Step 2
Tell the employee why the behavior is important.
Step 3
Stop for a moment of silence.
Step 1. Tell the employee exactly what was done correctly. When giving praise, look the person in the eye. Eye con- tact shows sincerity and concern. It is important to be very specific and descriptive. General statements, like “you’re a good worker,” are not as effective.
Step 2. Tel l the employee why the behav ior is impor tant. Brief ly state how the organization and/or person ben- efits from the action. It is also helpful to tell the em- ployee how you feel about the behavior. Be specific and descriptive.
Step 3. Stop for a moment of silence. Being silent is tough for many managers. The rationale for the silence is to give the employee the chance to “feel” the impact of the praise. It’s like “the pause that refreshes.” When you are thirsty and take the first sip or gulp of a refreshing drink, it’s not until you stop, and maybe say, “Ah,” that you feel your thirst quenched.
Step 4. Encourage repeat performance. This is the reinforce- ment that motivates the employee to continue the de- sired behavior.
As you can see, giv ing praise is easy, and it doesn’t cost a penny. One superma rket ma nager stated t hat a n employee was ta k ing his time stacking cans on a display. He gave the employee praise for stack- ing the cans so straight, rather than punishment for working slow. The employee was so pleased with the praise that the display went up with about a 100 percent increase in productivity. Being positive and giving praise first thing in the work day can get employees in a good mood, and it can increase performance.67
In this global environment, it is not always possible to give praise in person, so when you don’t see people face to face, use written commu- nication, including e-mail, instead. The personal handwritten note is considered to be special. Disney CEO Bob Iger writes personal, hand- written notes on Disney stationery to praise employees, even those he has never met. He says that writing a simple note goes a long way with people.
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 97 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
98 part 1 InDIvIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
5. how does trader Joe’s use reinforcement theory to motivate its employees?
Trader Joe’s uses positive reinforcement with good pay and benefits and its career path opportunities. Sales are on a contin- uous reinforcement schedule as managers know the sales volume throughout the day. Paychecks are given on a fixed interval schedule. Praise and other recognition for accomplishments are given on a variable interval and ratio schedule.
OPENING CASE application
CONCept APPLICATION 3-4
Motivation Theories Identify each supervisor’s statement of how to motivate employees by the theory behind the statement. Write the appropriate letter in the blank before each item. a. hierarchy of needs d. equity f. expectancy b. two-factor e. goal setting g. reinforcement c. acquired needs
16. A manager treats everyone fairly to motivate them.
17. A manager knows Jose likes people, so she gives him jobs working with others.
18. Edie would often make a sound because he knew it bothered the manager. So the manager decided to ignore it.
19. A manager knows employees values so she can offer rewards that will motivate them when they achieve attainable task performance.
20. Shaw retail store offers good working conditions, salaries, and benefits, so Shaw is working at meeting socialization needs by having monthly barbecues.
21. A manager thanks employees using a four-step model for doing a good job everyday.
22. A manager used to focus on improving working conditions, but stopped and now focuses on making the job more interesting and challenging.
23. A manager tells employees what he want them to do, with a tough deadline that is achievable.
24. A manager now realizes that she tends to be autocratic because it helps fill her needs. But now she is giving employees more autonomy on how they do their jobs.
25. A manager motivates employees by giving them more responsibility so they can grow and develop new skills.
State the major differences among content, process, and reinforcement theories. Learning Outcome
7
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 98 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 3 Leadership Behavior and Motivation 99
1. Need
(Unmet need or want to be satisfied at work)
Content Motivation Theories Hierarchy of Needs Theory
Two-Factor Theory Acquired Needs Theory
2. Motive
(Selecting behavior to satisfy need)
Process Motivation Theories Equity Theory
Expectancy Theory Goal-Setting Theory
3. Behavior
(Employee action to satisfy need)
4. Consequence
(Manager behavior and/or natural outcome of employee action)
Reinforcement Theory
5. Satisfaction or Dissatisfaction
(Degree to which the need is met— and for how long—before
dissatisfaction recurs, creating an unmet need)
The Motivation Process with the Motivation Theories
EXHIBIT 3.12 Putting the Motivation Theories Together within the Motivation Process Motivation is important because it helps explain why employ- ees behave the way they do. At this point you may be won- dering: How do these theories fit together? Is one the best? Should I try to pick the correct theory for a given situation? Actually, the groups of theories are complementary; each group of theories refers to a different stage in the motivation process. Each group of theories answers a different question. Content motivation theories answer the question: What needs do employees have that should be met on the job? Process motivation theories answer the question: How do employees choose behavior to fulfill their needs? Reinforcement theory answers the question: What can managers do to get employ- ees to behave in ways that meet the organizational objectives?
In t his chapter you learned t hat t he motivation pro- c e s s went f rom ne e d to mot ive to b ehav ior to cons e- quence to satisfaction or dissatisfaction. Now let’s ma ke the motivation process a little more complex by incorpo- rating the motivation theories, or answers to the preced- ing quest ions, into t he process. See Ex hibit 3.12 for a n illustration.
Note that step 4 loops back to step 3 because, accord- ing to reinforcement theory, behavior is learned through consequences. Step 4 does not loop back to steps 1 or 2 be- cause reinforcement theory is not concerned about needs, motives, or satisfaction; it focuses on getting employees to behave in predetermined ways, through consequences pro- vided by managers. Also note that step 5 loops back to step 1 because meeting needs is ongoing; meeting our needs is a never-ending process. Finally, be aware that according to two-factor theory, step 5 (satisfaction or dissatisfaction) is not on one continuum but on two separate continuums (satisf ied to not satisf ied, or dissatisf ied to not dissatis- fied), based on the level of need being met (motivator or maintenance).
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
“Take It To The Net”. Access student resources at www.cengagebrain.com. Search for Lussier, Leadership 6e to find student study tools.
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 99 10/24/14 5:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
100 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
Chapter Summary
Key terms
The chapter summary is organized to answer the eight learning outcomes for this chapter.
1 List the University of Iowa leadership styles.
The University of Iowa leadership styles are autocratic and democratic.
2 Describe similarities and differences between the University of Michigan and Ohio State University leadership models.
The University of Michigan and Ohio State University leadership models are similar because they are both based on the same two distinct leadership behaviors, al- though the models use different names for the two be- haviors. The models are different because the University of Michigan model identifies two leadership styles based on either job- or employee-centered behavior. The Ohio State University model states that a leader uses high or low structure and consideration, resulting in four leader- ship style combinations of these two behaviors.
3 Discuss similarities and differences between the Ohio State University Leadership Model and the Leadership Grid.
Both theories are based on the same two leadership be- haviors, but they use different names for the two dimen- sions. The theories are different because the Leadership Grid identifies five leadership styles, with one being mid- dle of the road, whereas the Ohio State model identi- fies four leadership styles. The Leadership Grid also gives each combination of the two-dimensional behaviors one leadership style name.
4 Discuss similarities and differences among the three content motivation theories.
Similarities among the content motivation theories in- clude their focus on identifying and understanding em- ployee needs. The theories identify similar needs but are different in the way they classify the needs. Hierarchy of needs theory includes physiological, safety, belongingness, esteem, and self-actualization needs. Two-factor theory
includes motivators and maintenance factors. Acquired needs theory includes achievement, power, and affiliation needs, and includes no lower-level needs, as the other two theories do.
5 Discuss the major similarities and differences among the three process motivation theories.
The similarity among the three process motivation theo- ries includes their focus on understanding how employ- ees choose behaviors to fulfill their needs. However, they are very different in their perceptions of how employees are motivated. Equity theory proposes that employees are motivated when their perceived inputs equal out- puts. Expectancy theory proposes that employees are motivated when they believe they can accomplish the task and the rewards for doing so are worth the effort. Goal-setting theory proposes that achievable, difficult goals motivate employees.
6 Explain the four types of reinforcement.
(1) Positive reinforcement provides the employee with a reward consequence for performing the desired be- havior. (2) Avoidance reinforcement encourages employ- ees to perform the desired behavior to avoid a negative consequence. (3) Extinction reinforcement withholds a positive consequence to get the employee to stop per- forming undesirable behavior. (4) Punishment reinforce- ment gives the employee a negative consequence to get the employee to stop performing undesirable behavior.
7 State the major differences among content, pro- cess, and reinforcement theories.
Content motivation theories focus on identifying and un- derstanding employees’ needs. Process motivation goes a step farther to understand how employees choose behavior to fulfill their needs. Reinforcement theory is not as concerned about employee needs; it focuses on getting employees to do what managers want them to do through the consequences provided by managers for their behavior. The use of rewards is the means of moti- vating employees.
acquired needs theory, 86
content motivation theories, 80
equity theory, 88
expectancy theory, 88
giving praise model, 97
goal-setting theory, 89
hierarchy of needs theory, 81
Leadership Grid, 76
leadership style, 70
motivation Process, 79
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 100 10/21/14 12:10 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 3 LEaDErShIp BEhavIOr anD MOtIvatIOn 101
review Questions
1 Why was there a shift from the trait to the behavioral theory paradigm?
2 How is leadership behavior based on traits?
3 What are the University of Iowa leadership styles?
4 What are the University of Michigan leadership styles?
5 What are the Ohio State University leadership styles?
6 What are three important contributions of the University of Michigan and Ohio State University studies?
7 What are the Leadership Grid leadership styles?
8 What are the three important contributions of the Leadership Grid and high-high research?
9 What is motivation, and why is it important to know how to motivate employees?
10 What are the content motivation theories?
11 What are the process motivation theories?
12 What are the types and schedules of reinforcement theory?
motivation process, 79
Ohio State University Leadership Model, 74
process motivation theories, 87
reinforcement theory, 92
two-factor theory, 82
University of Michigan Leadership Model, 72
writing objectives model, 90
The following critical-thinking questions can be used for class discussion and/or as written assignments to develop commu- nication skills. Be sure to give complete explanations for all questions.
1 Which leadership model do you prefer?
2 Do you agree with the University of Michigan model (with two leadership styles) or with the Ohio State model (with four leadership styles)?
3 Do you agree with the Leadership Grid’s claim that the one best leadership style is the team leader (9,9)?
4 Which of the three content motivation theories do you prefer? Why?
5 Which of the three process motivation theories do you prefer? Why?
6 What is your motivation theory? What major methods, techniques, and so on do you plan to use on the job as a manager to increase motivation and performance?
7 Reinforcement theory is unethical because it is used to manipulate employees. Do you agree with this statement? Explain your answer.
8 Which type and schedule of reinforcement do you plan to use most often as a leader?
9 Do you really get what you reinforce? Explain.
Critical-thinking Questions
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 101 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
102 part 1 InDIvIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
C a S E
Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg
Sher yl Sandberg is the chief operating officer (COO) at Facebook. Sandberg is second in command and is said to actually manage Facebook as an equal par tner with CEO Mark Zuckerberg so that he can focus on what he likes to do: product development and engineering. There has never been an executive like her. Sheryl is the world’s most famous COO and a billionaire best-selling author, and is ranked fifth on the Fortune Most Powerful Women list.68 She tends to use a participative leadership style as she spends much of her time e-mailing and in meetings, with an emphasis on influencing and motivating others to achieve the Facebook mission: to make the world more open and connected.69
Sheryl Sandberg published a thought-provoking book on the role of women in the office and at their home. The book is Sheryl’s attempt to help other women be successful in business. It was an instant best seller and has already generated meaning- ful discussion about the roles of men and women at work.
What is so controversial? Sher yl titled her book Lean In: Women, Work and the Will to Lead. The book is being sold around the wor ld under the following different titles to reflect the meaning of “Lean In” in each countr y. In France it is En Avant Toutes (“Forward All”), in Italy it is Facciamoci avanti (“Step Forward”), in Spanish it is Vayamos Adelante (“Let’s Go”), and in Brazil it is Faça Acontecer (“Make It Happen”).70
What does “Lean In” mean? Sandberg is calling on other women, as she puts it, to “lean in” and embrace success. Sand- berg feels that “if more women lean in, we can change the power structure of our world and expand oppor tunities for all. More female leadership will lead to fairer treatment for all women.”71 She also feels the half of the companies around the world should be run by women and half of the houses run by men—which is far from the reality of the situation. 72
Sandberg also states that her success was not just because she worked hard—but that she removed internal barriers that often hold women back. These barriers that women create are a lack of self-confidence, not raising their hands, and by pulling back when they should be leaning in. If women expect to crack the glass ceiling and access more powerful positions at work, they are going to have to Lean In.73
When the book was released, many newspapers and tele- vision disputed the merits of her theor y. The first reply was that it is easy for a woman that is wealthy and voted the fifth most powerful woman in the world to say that a woman can be a leader at work and at home.
Is a woman successful if she opts to Lean Out and just be- come a stay-at-home mom? Or, is she less successful if she just has a good middle-level job at work without the high levels of stress often associated with executive-level positions and decisions?
One of the goals of Lean In was to bring women together to discuss the issue. Facebook, and many other social media sites, already have a large number of groups formed that are meet- ing online and in person. You can join the lean in community at www.facebook.com/leaninorg or www.leanin.org.
G O t O t h e I N t e r N e t : To learn more about Sheryl Sandberg and Facebook, visit their Web sites www.facebook.com.
Support your answers to the following questions with spe- cific information from the case and text or with other informa- tion you get from the Web or other sources.
1. How would Sher yl Sandberg’s leadership style be de- scribed based on the four behavioral leadership styles?
2. How does Sandberg’s book Lean In emphasize the three content motivation theories?
3. How does Sandberg’s book Lean In emphasize the three process motivation theories?
4. Which type and schedule of reinforcement will help women advance in business?
C U M U L a t I V e C a S e Q U e S t I O N S
5. How do the five dimensions of our leadership definition (Chapter 1) apply to Sandberg as COO of Facebook?
6. What managerial leadership skills does Sandberg need as COO of Facebook (Chapter 1)?
7. How would you describe Sandberg’s Big Five Personal- ity, and do you believe she has the personality profile of an effective leader (Chapter 2)?
C a S e e X e r C I S e a N D r O L e - p L a Y
preparation: Think about reasons why women should and shouldn’t be given more opportunities to advance in organizations. In-Class Groups: Break into groups of four to six members and develop a list of reasons for and against giving women more opportunities for advancement in organizations. role-play: One person (representing him- or herself or a group) gives the reasons for giving women more opportunities to advance, and another to give the reasons against it.
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 102 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 3 LEaDErShIp BEhavIOr anD MOtIvatIOn 103
Founded in the late 1800s in Chicago, Washburn Guitars boasts a rich tradition of fine instrument making. Wash-burn Guitars produces a variety of acoustic and electric guitars. Washburn craftsmen also enjoy making custom guitars. In recent years, custom shop production has grown dramati- cally. Having a motivated workforce is essential because guitar making is labor intensive and requires attention to detail.
1. What motivates most employees at Washbur n Guitars?
2. What kinds of guitar s do employees most like to produce?
3. What is the connection between quality guitars and workforce motivation?
v I D E O C a S E
Motivation at Washburn Guitars
3-1
preparing for this exercise For this exercise, you will first work at improving objectives that do not meet the criteria for objectives. Then you will write nine objectives for yourself. part 1. For each objective below, identify the missing criteria and rewrite the objective so that it meets all essential criteria. When writing objectives, use the model: To + action verb + singular, specific, and measurable result + target date
1 To improve our company image by year-end 2018.
Criteria missing:
Improved objective:
2 To increase the number of customers by 10 percent.
Criteria missing:
Improved objective:
3 To increase profits during 2016.
Criteria missing:
Improved objective:
4 To sell 5 percent more hot dogs and 8 percent more soda at the baseball game on Sunday, June 12, 2016.
Criteria missing:
Improved objective:
part 2. Write three educational, personal, and career objectives you want to accomplish. Your objectives can be as short term as something you want to accomplish today, or as long term as 20
years from now. Be sure your objectives meet the criteria for effective objectives.
Doing this exercise in Class
Objective
To develop your skill at writing objectives.
aaCSB General Skills area
The primary AACSB learning skills developed through this exer- cise are written communications, analytic thinking, and applica- tion of knowledge.
preparation
You should have corrected the objectives in Part 1 and have written objectives in Part 2 during the preparation for this exercise.
experience
You will get feedback on how well you corrected the four objec- tives and share your written objectives with others.
Options (8–20 minutes)
a. The instructor goes over suggested corrections for the four objectives in Part 1 of the preparation, and then calls on class members to share their written objectives with the class in Part 2.
B. The instructor goes over suggested corrections for the four objectives in Part 1 of the preparation, and then the class breaks into groups of four to six to share their written objectives.
C. Break into groups of four to six and go over the correc- tions for the four objectives in Part 1. Tell the instructor when your group is done, but go on to Part 2, sharing
Writing Objectives
Developing Your Leadership Skills
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 103 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
104 part 1 InDIvIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
your written objectives, until all groups are finished with the four corrections. The instructor goes over the corrections and may allow more time for sharing objec- tives. Give each other feedback for improving your written objectives during Part 2.
Conclusion
The instructor may lead a class discussion and/or make conclud- ing remarks. apply It (2–4 minutes) What did I learn from this experience? How will I use the knowledge in the future?
This training for leadership behavior modeling skills has four parts, as follows:
1 First, read how to use the model.
2 Then, view the behavior model video that illustrates how to give praise, following the four steps in the model.
3 Develop the skill in class by doing Developing Your Leadership Skills Exercise 1.
4 Fur ther develop this skill by using the model in your per- sonal and professional life.
Giving praise Model Review Model 3.2, “Giving Praise,” in the text.
Behavior Model Skills training
Giving Praise
Objective
To assist you in giving praise that motivates others to high levels of performance.
Video (4½ minutes) Overview
You will watch a bank branch manager give praise to an employee for two different jobs well done.
Behavior Model video
Giving Praise
preparing for this exercise
Think of a job situation in which you did something well deserv- ing of praise and recognition. For example, you may have saved the company some money, you may have turned a dissatisfied customer into a happy one, and so forth. If you have never worked, interview someone who has. Put yourself in a manage- ment position and write out the praise you would give to an employee for doing what you did. Be sure to write your praise using the Giving Praise Model 3-2.
Doing this exercise in Class
Objective
To develop your skill at giving praise.
aaCSB General Skills area
The primary AACSB learning skills developed through this exercise are communication, and application of knowledge.
preparation
You will need your prepared praise.
experience
You will give and receive praise. procedure (10–15 minutes) Break into groups of four to six. One at a time, give the praise you prepared.
1 Explain the situation.
2 Select a group member to receive the praise.
3 Give the praise. (Talk; don’t read it off the paper.) Try to select the position you would use if you were actually giv- ing the praise on the job (both standing, both sitting, etc.).
4 Integration. The group gives the praise-giver feedback on how he or she did:
Step 1. Was the praise very specific and descriptive?
Did the giver look the employee in the eye?
Step 2. Was the importance of the behavior clearly stated?
Step 3. Did the giver stop for a moment of silence?
Developing Your Leadership Skills
Giving Praise
3-2
3-1
3-1
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 104 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 3 LEaDErShIp BEhavIOr anD MOtIvatIOn 105
Step 4. Did the giver encourage repeat performance?
Did the giver of praise touch the receiver (optional)?
Step 5. Did the praise take less than one minute? Was the praise sincere?
Conclusion
The instructor may lead a class discussion and/or make conclud- ing remarks. apply It (2–4 minutes) What did I learn from this experience? How will I use this knowledge in the future? When will I practice?
endnotes 1 Trader Joe’s Web site (www.traderjoes.com), retrieved
January 2, 2013.
2 M.R. Barrick, M.K. Mount, and N. Li, “The Theory of Purposeful Work Behavior : The Role of Personality, Higher-Order Goals, and Job Characteristics,” Academy of Management Review 38(1) (2013): 132–153.
3 B. Schyns, T. Kiefer, R. Kerschreiter, and A. Tymon, “Teaching Implicit Leadership Theories to Develop Leaders and Leadership: How and Why It Can Make a Difference,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2012): 397–408.
4 S.L. Martin and H. Liao, “Directive versus Empowering Leadership: A Field Experiment Comparing Impacts on Task Proficiency and Proactivity,” Academy of Management Journal 56(5) (2013): 1372–1395.
5 N.M. Lorinkova, M.J. Pearsall, and H.P. Sims, “Examining the Differential Longitudinal Performance of Directive versus Empowering Leadership in Teams,” Academy of Management Journal 56(2) (2013): 573–596.
6 A.M. Grant, “Leading with Meaning: Beneficiary Contact, Prosocial Impact, and the Performance Effects of Transformational Leadership,” Academy of Management Journal 55(2) (2012): 458–476.
7 G. Yukl, “Effective Leadership Behavior : What We Know and What Questions Need More Attention,” Academy of Management Perspectives 26(4) (2012): 66–85.
8 R. Klimoski and B. Amos, “Practicing Evidence-Based Education in Leadership Development,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 11(4) (2012): 685–702.
9 G. Yukl, “Effective Leadership Behavior : What We Know and What Questions Need More Attention,” Academy of Management Perspectives 26(4) (2012): 66–85.
10 G. Yukl, “Effective Leadership Behavior : What We Know and What Questions Need More Attention,” Academy of Management Perspectives 26(4) (2012): 66–85.
11 K. Lewin, R. Lippitt, and R.K. White, “Patterns of Aggressive Behavior in Experimentally Created Social Climates,” Journal of Social Psychology 10(1939): 271–301.
12 G. Yukl, “Effective Leadership Behavior : What We Know and What Questions Need More Attention,” Academy of Management Perspectives 26(4) (2012): 66–85.
13 R. Liker t, New Patterns of Management (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1961).
14 R. M. Stogdill and A.E. Coons (Eds.), Leader Behavior: Its Description and Measurement (Columbus: Ohio State University Bureau of Business Research, 1957).
15 A. Edmans, “The Link between Job Satisfaction and Firm Value, with Implications for Corporate Social Responsibility,” Academy of Management Perspectives 26(4) (2012): 1–19.
16 R. Blake and J. Mouton, The Managerial Grid (Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing, 1964); R. Blake and J. Mouton, The New Managerial Grid (Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing, 1978); R. Blake and J. Mouton, The Managerial Grid III: The Key to Leadership Excellence (Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing, 1985); and R. Blake and A. A. McCanse, Leadership Dilemmas— Grid Solutions (Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing, 1991). “R. Blake and J. Mouton: The Managerial Grid,” Thinkers (March 2002).
17 B. M. Fisher and J. E. Edwards, “Consideration and Initiating Structure and Their Relationship with Leader Effectiveness: A Meta-Analysis,” Proceeding of the Academy of Management (August 1988): 201–205.
18 M.A. Hogg, D. Van Knippenberg, and D.E. Rast, “Intergroup Leadership in Organizations: Leading across Group and Organizational Boundaries,” Academy of Management Review 37(2) (2012): 232–255.
19 G. Yukl, “Effective Leadership Behavior : What We Know and What Questions Need More Attention,” Academy of Management Perspectives 26(4) (2012): 66–85.
20 R.L. Dufresne and E.H. Offstein, “Holistic and Intentional Student Character Development Process: Learning from West Point,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 11(4) (2012): 570–590.
21 M. Cuban, “Motivate Yourself,” BusinessWeek (April 11, 2013): online.
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 105 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
106 part 1 InDIvIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
22 G.K. Stahl and M.Y. Brannen, “Building Cross-Cultural Leadership Competence: An Interview with Carlos Chosn,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 12(3) (2013): 494–502.
23 K. H. Dekas, T.N. Bauer, B. Welle, J. Kurkoski, and S. Sullivan, “Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Version 2.0: A Review and Qualitative Investigation of OCBs for Knowledge Workers at Google and Beyond,” Academy of Management Perspectives 27(3) (2013): 219–237.
24 S. Boivie, S.D. Graffin, and T.G. Pollock, “Time for Me to Fly: Predicting Director Exit at Large Firms,” Academy of Management Journal 55(6) (2012): 1334–1359.
25 L.M. Leslie, C.F. Manchester, T.Y. Park, and S. A. Mehng, “Flexible Work Practices: A Source of Career Premiums or Penalties?” Academy of Management Journal 55(6) (2012): 1407–1428.
26 L. Colan, “4 Questions to Help Build a Purpose-Driven Team,” Inc. (December 2013/January 2014): 12.
27 A.M. Grant and S.V. Patil, “Challenging the Norm of Self- Interest: Minority Influence and Transitions to Helping Norms in Work Units,” Academy of Management Review 37(4) (2012): 547–568.
28 M.R. Barrick, M.K. Mount, and N. Li, “The Theory of Purposeful Work Behavior : The Role of Personality, Higher-Order Goals, and Job Characteristics,” Academy of Management Review 38(1) (2013): 132–153.
29 A.H. Van De Ven and A. Lifschitz, “Rational and Reasonable Microfoundations of Markets and Institutions,” Academy of Management Perspectives 27(2) (2013): 156–172.
30 J. Eisenberg, C. E. J. Härtel, and G. K. Stahl, “From the Guest Editors: Cross-Cultural Management Learning and Education—Exploring Multiple Aims, Approaches, and Impacts,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 12(3) (2013): 323–329; A.H. Van De Ven and A. Lifschitz, “Rational and Reasonable Microfoundations of Markets and Institutions,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 27(2) (2013): 156–172.
31 B. Kowitt, “Inside Trader Joe’s,” Fortune (September 6, 2010): 86–96.
32 D. Liu, T.R. Mitchell, T.W. Lee, B.R. Holtom, and T.R. Hinkin, “When Employees Are Out of Step with Coworkers: How Job Satisfaction Trajectory and Dispersion influence Individual- and Unit-Level Voluntary Turnover,” Academy of Management Journal 55(6) (2012): 1360–1380.
33 A. Maslow, “A Theory of Human Motivation,” Psychological Review 50(1943): 370–396.
34 “Using the Malsow Hierarchy of Needs Theory,” Mind Tools Web site (www.mindtools.com), accessed January 17, 2014.
35 H.A. Richardson and S.G. Taylor, “Understanding Input Events: A Model of Employees’ Responses to Requests for Their Input,” Academy of Management Review 37(3) (2012): 471–491.
36 D. Ariely, “For Quick Decisions, Depend on Deadlines,” Wall Street Journal (August 3–4, 2013): C12.
37 F. Herzberg, “The Motivation-Hygiene Concept and Problems of Manpower,” Personnel Administrator (1964): 3–7; and F. Herzberg, “One More Time: How Do You Motivate Employees?” Harvard Business Review (January– February 1968): 53–62.
38 M. Kownatzki, J. Walter, S.W. Floyd, and C. Lechner, “Corporate Control and the Speed of Strategic Business Unit Decision Making,” Academy of Management Journal 56(5) (2013): 1295–1324.
39 M. Kownatzki, J. Walter, S.W. Floyd, and C. Lechner, “Corporate Control and the Speed of Strategic Business Unit Decision Making,” Academy of Management Journal 56(5) (2013): 1295–1324.
40 S. Boivie, S.D. Graffin, and T.G. Pollock, “Time for Me to Fly: Predicting Director Exit at Large Firms,” Academy of Management Journal 55(6) (2012): 1334–1359.
41 S. Boivie, S.D. Graffin, and T.G. Pollock, “Time for Me to Fly: Predicting Director Exit at Large Firms,” Academy of Management Journal 55(6) (2012): 1334–1359.
42 A.M. Grant, “Leading with Meaning: Beneficiary Contact, Prosocial Impact, and the Performance Effects of Transformational Leadership,” Academy of Management Journal 55(2) (2012): 458–476.
43 S.K. Parker, A. Johnson, C. Collins, and H. Nguyen, “Making the Most of Structural Support: Moderating Influence of Employees’ Clarity and Negative Affect,” Academy of Management Journal 56(3) (2013): 867–892.
44 M.R. Barrick, M.K. Mount, and N. Li, “The Theory of Purposeful Work Behavior : The Role of Personality, Higher-Order Goals, and Job Characteristics,” Academy of Management Review 38(1) (2013): 132–153.
45 H. Murray, Explorations in Personality (New York: Oxford University Press, 1938); J. Atkinson, An Introduction to Motivation (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1964); D. McClelland, The Achieving Society (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1961); and D. McClelland and D. H. Burnham, “Power Is the Great Motivator,” Harvard Business Review (March/April 1978): 103.
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 106 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 3 LEaDErShIp BEhavIOr anD MOtIvatIOn 107
46 L.M. Leslie, C.F. Manchester, T.Y. Park, and S.A. Mehng, “Flexible Work Practices: A Source of Career Premiums or Penalties?” Academy of Management Journal 55(6) (2012): 1407–1428.
47 A. Edmans, “The Link between Job Satisfaction and Firm Value, with Implications for Corporate Social Responsibility,” Academy of Management Perspectives 26(4) (2012): 1–19.
48 C.R. Long, C. Bendersky, and C. Morrill, “Fairness Monitoring: Linking Managerial Controls and Fairness Judgments in Organizations,” Academy of Management Journal 54(5) (2011): 1045–1056.
49 J. S. Adams, “Toward an Understanding of Inequity,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67 (1963): 422–436.
50 M.K. Duffy, K. L. Scott, J.D. Shaw, B.J. Tepper, and K Aquino, “A Social Context Model of Envy and Social Undermining,” Academy of Management Journal 55(2) (2012): 643–666.
51 C.O. Trevor, G. Reilly, and B. Gerhart, “Reconsidering Pay Dispersion’s Effect on the Performance of Interdependent Work: Reconciling Sorting and Pay Inequality,” Academy of Management Journal 55(3) (2012): 585–610.
52 A.H. Van De Ven and A. Lifschitz, “Rational and Reasonable Microfoundations of Markets and Institutions,” Academy of Management Perspectives 27(2) (2013): 156–172.
53 D.M. Mayer, K. Aquino, R.L. Greenbaum, and M. Kuenzi, “Who Displays Ethical Leadership, and Why an Examination of Antecedents and Consequences of Ethical Leadership,” Academy of Management Journal 55(1) (2012): 151–171.
54 V. Vroom, Work and Motivation (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1964).
55 J.K. Nelson, L.W. Poms, and P.P. Wolf, “Developing Efficacy Beliefs for Ethics and Diversity Management,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 11(1) (2012): 49–68.
56 H.J. Klein, J.C. Molloy, and C.T. Brinsfield, “Reconceptualizing Workplace Commitment to Redress a Stretched Construct: Revisiting Assumptions and Removing Confounds,” Academy of Management Review 37(1) (2012): 130–151.
57 A.H. Van De Ven and A. Lifschitz, “Rational and Reasonable Microfoundations of Markets and Institutions,” Academy of Management Perspectives 27(2) (2013): 156–172.
58 R.L. Dufresne and E.H. Offstein, “Holistic and Intentional Student Character Development Process: Learning from West Point,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 11(4) (2012): 570–590.
59 B. Southward, “The Crowd Goes Wild,” Fortune (July 22, 2013): 18.
60 D. Ariely, “For Quick Decisions, Depend on Deadlines,” Wall Street Journal (August 3–4, 2013): C12.
61 S.K. Johnson, L.L. Garrison, G.H. Bronnme, J.W. Fleenor, and J.L. Steed, “Go for the Goals: Relationship between Goal Setting and Transfer of Training Following Leadership Development,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 11(4) (2012): 555–569.
62 L.M. Leslie, C.F. Manchester, T.Y. Park, and S. A. Mehng, “Flexible Work Practices: A Source of Career Premiums or Penalties?” Academy of Management Journal 55(6) (2012): 1407–1428.
63 H.J. Klein, J.C. Molloy, and C.T. Brinsfield, “Reconceptualizing Workplace Commitment to Redress a Stretched Construct: Revisiting Assumptions and Removing Confounds,” Academy of Management Review 37(1) (2012): 130–151.
64 D. Ariely, “For Quick Decisions, Depend on Deadlines,” Wall Street Journal (August 3–4, 2013): C12.
65 B. F. Skinner, Beyond Freedom and Dignity (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1971).
66 M. Kownatzki, J. Walter, S.W. Floyd, and C. Lechner, “Corporate Control and the Speed of Strategic Business Unit Decision Making,” Academy of Management Journal 56(5) (2013): 1295–1324.
67 N. Rothbard, “Put on a Happy Face, Seriously,” Wall Street Journal (October 24, 2011): R2.
68 M. Helft, “Sheryl Sandberg: The Real Story,” Fortune (October 28, 2013): 122–130.
69 C. Rose, “Charlie Rose Talks to Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg,” BusinessWeek (November 14–20, 2011): 50.
70 C. Suddath, “Sheryl-Sandberg’s ‘Lean In’ Brand Goes Global,” Businessweek.com, March 22, 2013.
71 S. Sandberg, Lean In (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2013), p. 171.
72 S. Sandberg, Lean In (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2013), p. 7.
73 S. Sandberg, Lean In (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2013), p. 8.
66352_ch03_ptg01_068-107.indd 107 10/15/14 12:50 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
10 8
Chapter
4
C h a p t e r O U t L I N e
Contingency Leadership Theories and Models
Leadership Theories versus Leadership Models
Contingency Theory and Model Variables
Global Contingency Leadership
Contingency Leadership Theory and Model
Leadership Style and the LPC
Situational Favorableness
Determining the Appropriate Leadership Style
Research, Criticism, and Applications
Leadership Continuum Theory and Model
Path–Goal Leadership Theory and Model
Situational Factors
Leadership Styles
Research, Criticism, and Applications
Normative Leadership Theory and Models
Leadership Participation Styles
Model Questions to Determine the Appropriate Leadership Style
Selecting the Time-Driven or Development-Driven Model for the Situation
Determining the Appropriate Leadership Style
Research, Criticism, and Applications
Putting the Behavioral and Contingency Leadership Theories Together
Prescriptive and Descriptive Models
Leadership Substitutes Theory
Substitutes and Neutralizers
Leadership Style
Changing the Situation
Research, Criticism, and Applications
Contingency Leadership Theories
Learning Outcomes After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
1 State the major difference between behavioral and contingency leadership theories, and explain the behavioral contribution to contingency theories. p. 109
2 Describe the contingency leadership theory variables. p. 110
3 Identify the contingency leadership model styles and variables. p. 112
4 State the leadership continuum model major styles and variables. p. 116
5 Identify the path–goal leadership model styles and variables. p. 119
6 State the normative leadership model styles and the number of variables. p. 123
7 Discuss the major similarities and differences between the behavioral and contingency leadership theories. p. 128
8 Compare and contrast four major differences among the four contingency leadership models. p. 128
9 List which leadership models are prescriptive and descriptive, and explain why they are classified as such. p. 129
10 Explain substitutes and neutralizers of leadership. p. 131
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 108 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 4 ConTIngEnCy LEaDErShIp ThEorIES 109
PepsiCo has four major global business units: PepsiCo Americas Beverages (PAB) spans carbonated soft drinks (Pepsi, Mountain Dew), juices and juice drinks (Tropicana, Naked Juice), ready-to-drink teas and coffees (Lipton, Starbucks, Tazo), spor ts drinks (Gatorade), and bottled waters (Aquafina, Propel, IZZE). PepsiCo Americas Foods is the provider of many of the most popular food and snacks throughout North and Latin America. Its portfolio of busi- nesses includes Frito-Lay Nor th America (snack foods), Quaker Foods (cereal, granola bars) Nor th America, and Latin American food and snack businesses, including Sabritas and Gamesa brands. PepsiCo Europe includes all beverage, food, and snack businesses in Europe and South Africa. PepsiCo Asia, Middle East and Africa (AMEA) includes all beverage, food, and snack businesses in these areas.1
Indra K. Nooyi is chairman and CEO of PepsiCo, and she is consistently ranked at or near the top of the Fortune 50 Most Powerful Women list.2 Nooyi is a different kind of CEO, not just because she is an Indian woman. She says her approach boils down to “Performance with Purpose,” the goal of providing sustained financial performance through human sustainability, environmental sustainability, and talent sustainability. She was one of the first executives to realize that the health and green movements were not just fads, and she demanded true innovation.3
By the numbers, PepsiCo has done well under CEO Nooyi.4 Its stock price hit an all-time high in 2013. PepsiCo is ranked in the top 50 (43rd and Coca-Cola is 57th) on the Fortune 500 Largest U.S. Corporations list, with more than $6 billion in profits,5 and it is ranked in the top 40 (37th and Coca-Cola is 4th) of the For tune World’s Most Admired
Companies.6 But Pepsi has lost some market share to Coca- Cola. Critics say Nooyi put too much focus on healthy foods. In response, Pepsi is fighting back in the cola war with its first new ad campaign in three years.7 Can PepsiCo every win the cola war and outsell Coke? Some investors would like PepsiCo to split into two companies, separating food and beverages.8 Can Nooyi keep PepsiCo together?
OpeNING CaSe QUeStIONS:
1. What does climbing the corporate ladder to CEO of PepsiCo have to do with contingency leader- ship? What life, educational, and job experiences qualified Indra Nooyi for her job as CEO?
2. What do colleagues say about Indra Nooyi’s leadership—is it task or relationship, does she have a life outside of PepsiCo, and does she have any future career plans?
3. Which continuum leadership style does Indra Nooyi tend to use in making acquisitions at PepsiCo?
4. Which path–goal leadership styles does Indra Nooyi tend to use at PepsiCo?
5. Which normative leadership styles does Indra Nooyi tend to use at PepsiCo?
Can you answer any of these questions? You’ll find an- swers to these questions about PepsiCo and Indra Nooyi throughout the chapter.
To learn more about Indra Nooyi and PepsiCo, visit the company’s Web site at www.pepsico.com.
OPENING CASE application
Contingency Leadership Theories and Models Both the trait and behavioral leadership theories were attempts to find the one best lead- ership style in all situations. By the late 1960s, it became apparent that there is no one best leadership style in all situations. Thus, contingency leadership theory became the third major leadership paradigm (Chapter 1), and the leadership styles used in its models are based on the behavioral leadership theories.
Leadership is typically understood as taking place in a situation,9 so leaders need to change t heir behav ior to meet t he situationa l characteristics,10 which is ca lled
State the major difference between behavioral and contingency leadership theories, and explain the behavioral contribution to contingency theories.
Learning outcome
1
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 109 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
110 part 1 InDIVIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
contingency or situational leadership.11 Duke’s basketball Coach K says you have to ad- just your leadership to the composition of your team.12 In this section, we discuss theo- ries versus models, the contingency theory factors, and the need for global contingency leadership.
Leadership theories versus Leadership Models As defined in Chapter 1, a leadership theory is an explanation of some aspect of leader- ship; theories have practical value because they are used to better understand, predict, and control successful leadership. A leadership model is an example for emulation or use in a given situation. Models are used to represent the world of managers,13 and there are many academic models of leadership.14 In this chapter, we discuss using models in a given situation to improve performance of leaders, followers, or both.
All of the contingency leadership theories in this chapter have leadership models. The leadership theory is the longer text that explains the variables and leadership styles to be used in a given contingency situation. The leadership model is the short (one-page) summary of the theory to be used when selecting the appropriate leadership style for a given situation.15 Models have been compared to baseball in this way. A model can’t teach you to get a hit every time at bat, but if you use the model, it will improve your bat- ting average.
Describe the contingency leadership theory variables. Learning outcome
2
Contingency theory and Model Variables Contingency means “it depends.” One thing depends on other things, and for a leader to be effective, there must be an appropriate fit between the leader’s behavior and style and the followers and the situation.16 Recall from Chapter 1 that contingency leadership theo- ries attempt to explain the appropriate leadership style based on the leader, followers, and situation. Much of today’s contingency research focuses on team leadership,17 as leaders find themselves reacting to situational contingencies.18
See Exhibit 4.1 for a list of general contingency leadership variables that can be used as a framework in which to place all the contingency leadership model variables for analyz- ing leadership. Throughout this chapter, each contingency leadership model’s variables are described in terms of this framework. For each model, the leader variable also in- cludes the leadership styles of each model.
EXHIBIT 4.1 Framework for Contingency Leadership Variables
FOLLOWERS
Capability
Motivation
LEADER
Personality traits
Behavior
Experience
SITUATION
Task
Structure
Environment
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 110 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 4 ConTIngEnCy LEaDErShIp ThEorIES 111
Global Contingency Leadership Before we get into all the theories, let’s take a minute to quickly realize how important contingency leadership is in the global economy of today.20 Leadership is critical espe- cially with the importance of the globalization of business,21 and because executives have stated that new business school graduates have a weak global perspective.22 Multinational companies have long abandoned the parochial “one-size-fits-all” assumptions in manage- ment practices.23 Global companies like McDonald’s, with restaurants all over the world, realize that successful leadership styles can vary greatly from place to place. In Europe and other parts of the world, managers have more cultural than technical variables to deal with as they encounter diverse value systems and religious backgrounds among em- ployees. Employees in some countries prefer domineering, self-centered, and autocratic leaders, whereas other countries prefer a more democratic and participative leadership style. The focus of Chapter 10 is on organizational culture, ethics, and diversity. With respect to the discussion on diversity, we emphasize that the growing cultural diversity of the workforce and the increasing globalization of the marketplace create the need for leaders with multicultural backgrounds and experiences. This reinforces the message of global contingency leadership.
Companies, including IBM, are training their managers to work with a variety of for- eigners to become successful global players. In countries that are more like the United States (such as Australia, Canada, and England), Americans have fewer adjustments to make, whereas countries with cultures that are quite different from that of the United States (such as China, India, and Japan) require greater adjustment.
GLOBE stands for Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness, which is an ongoing cross-cultural investigation of leadership and national culture. The GLOBE research team used data from 825 organizations, with 18,000 managers, in 62 countries to identify nine dimensions in which national cultures are diverse.24 See Chapter 10 for an expanded discussion of national culture identities using Hofstede’s Model of five di- mensions that he used to distinguish a nation’s culture from other nations.
YOU Make the ethICaL Call
4.1 Leadership Gender
Should gender be a contingency variable in leadership? Are there differences in the lead- ership of men and women? Some researchers say that women tend to be more par- ticipative, relationship-oriented leaders and men are more asser tive and task oriented. However, others say that men and women leaders are more alike than different because they do the same things. Thus, there currently is no consensus in the literature that men and women lead differently or the same as men.19
1. Do you think that men and women lead the same or differently?
2. Are men or women more ethical and socially responsible leaders?
3. Would you prefer to have a man or woman for a boss?
4. Is it ethical and socially responsible to say that one gender makes better leaders?
5. Should global companies appoint women as managers in countries that believe in equal rights for women, but not allow women to be managers in countries that don’t have these beliefs?
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 111 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
112 part 1 InDIVIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
Contingency Leadership Theory and Model In 1951, Fred E. Fiedler began to develop the first situational leadership theory. It was the first theory to specify how situational variables interact with leader personality and behavior. He called the theory “Contingency Theory of Leader Effectiveness.”25 Contin- gency suggests that a leader’s effectiveness depends on how well the leader’s style fits the context of the job. So he was the first to develop a model to match the leadership style to the job. Although it is dated, researchers continue to conduct studies based on contin- gency theory.26
Fiedler believed that leadership style is a ref lection of personality (trait theory–ori- ented) and behavior (behavioral theory–oriented), and that leadership styles are basically constant. Leaders should not change styles; they should change the context of their job. Because his was the first, today his term “contingency theory” is used in other contexts that have nothing to do with Fiedler’s theory and model. You may have noticed that the title of this chapter is “Contingency Leadership Theories.” The objective of all four con- tingency theories we present is to choose the leadership style that matches the situation to maximize performance.27
The contingency leadership model is used to determine if a person’s leadership style is task- or relationship-oriented, and if the situation (leader–member relationship, task structure, and position power) matches the leader’s style to maximize performance. In this section, we discuss Fiedler’s leadership styles, situational favorableness, determining the appropriate leadership style for the situation, and research by Fiedler and others. See Exhibit 4.2 to see how Fiedler’s model fits into the framework of contingency leadership variables.
1. What does climbing the corporate ladder to CeO of pepsiCo have to do with contingency lead- ership? What life, educational, and job experiences qualified Indra Nooyi for her job as CeO?
Contingency theory is about using the right style in the right situation to succeed, which Indra Nooyi continues to do. Having grown up in India, Nooyi was the right person to continue to take PepsiCo global. On special occasions, Nooyi wears a traditional Indian sari. Her South Asian heritage gives her a wide-angle view on the world. She grew up in Chennai (formerly Madras), on the southeast coast of India, the daughter of a stay-at-home mom and an accountant father. Although her family is Hindu, Nooyi attended a Catholic school, was an avid debater, played cricket and the guitar, and formed an all-girl rock band. She earned a BS degree from Madras Christian College, an MBA from the Indian Institute of Management in Kolkata (formerly Calcutta), and a master of public and private management from Yale University. Before coming to PepsiCo, Nooyi was Senior VP and Director of Corporate Strategy and Planning at Motorola from 1986 to 1990 and Senior VP of Strategy and Strategic Marketing at Asea Brown Boveri from 1990 to 1994. She spent 12 years climbing the corporate ladder at PepsiCo. Nooyi star ted as Senior VP of Strategic Planning in 1994, was promoted to Senior VP of Corporate Strategy and Development in 1996, was promoted to President and CFO in 2001, and was promoted to CEO in 2006.
OPENING CASE application
Identify the contingency leadership model styles and variables. Learning outcome
3
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 112 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 4 ConTIngEnCy LEaDErShIp ThEorIES 113
Leadership Style and the LpC Although we may be able to change your behavior with different followers (although Fiedler didn’t think we can), we also have a dominant leadership style. The first major factor in using Fiedler’s model is to determine whether your dominant leadership style is task-motivated or relationship-motivated. People primarily gain satisfaction either from task accomplishment or from forming and maintaining relationships with followers.28 To determine leadership style, using Fiedler’s model, you must complete the least- preferred coworker (LPC) scales. The LPC essentially answers the question, “Are you more task- oriented or relationship-oriented?” The two leadership st yles are (1) task and (2) relationship. To determine your Fiedler leadership style, complete Self-Assessment 4-1.
EXHIBIT 4.2 Contingency Leadership Model Variables within the Contingency Leadership Framework
Leadership Style Your
Fiedler LpC
SELF-ASSESSMENT 4-1
1. Return to Chapter 3, Self-Assessment 1 on page 71, and place your score for tasks on the following Task line and your score for people on the Relationship line.
10 — 9 — 8 — 7 — 6 — 5 — 4 — 3 — 2 — 1 High Task Leadership Style
10 — 9 — 8 — 7 — 6 — 5 — 4 — 3 — 2 — 1 High Relationship Leadership Style
According to Fiedler, you are primarily either a task- or relationship-oriented leader. Your highest score is your primary leadership style. Neither leadership style is the one best style. The one appropriate leadership style to use is based on the situation—our next topic.
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
FOLLOWerS LeaDer SItUatION
Leader–member relations
L e a d e r – m e m b e r relations Task structure Position power
LeaDerShIp StYLeS Task
Relationship
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 113 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
114 part 1 INDIVIDUALS AS LEADERS
Situational Favorableness Af ter determining your leadership st yle, determine the situationa l favorableness. Situational favorableness refers to the degree to which a situation enables the leader to exert inf luence over the followers. The more control the leader has over the followers, the more favorable the situation is for the leader. The three variables, in order of importance, are as follows.
1. Leader–member relations. Is the relationship good (cooperative and friendly) or poor (antagonistic and difficult)? Do the followers trust, respect, accept, and have confidence in the leader (good)? The better the relations, the more favorable the situation.
2. Task structure. Is the task structured or unstructured? Do employees perform re- petitive, routine, unambiguous, standard tasks that are easily understood? The more structured the jobs are, the more favorable the situation.
3. Position power. Is position power strong or weak? Does the leader have the power to assign work, reward and punish, hire and fire, give raises and promotions? The more power, the more favorable the situation.
The relative weights of t hese t hree factors toget her create a continuum of situ- ational favorableness of the leader. Fiedler developed eight levels of favorableness, go- ing from 1 (highly favorable) to 8 (very unfavorable). See Exhibit 4.3 for an adapted model.
Determining the appropriate Leadership Style To determine whether task or relationship leadership is appropriate, you answer the three questions pertaining to situational favorableness, using the Fiedler contingency theory model (Exhibit 4.3). Start with question 1 and follow the decision tree to Good or Poor depending on the relations. Next, answer question 2 and follow the decision tree to Repetitive or Non repetitive. When answering question 3, you end up in one of eight possible situations. If the LPC leadership style matches, you do nothing, since you may be successful in that situation because your leadership st yle matches the situation.
Changing the Situation However, if the leadership style does not match the situation, the leader may be ineffec- tive. One option is to change to a job that matches the leadership style. Fiedler recom- mends (and trained people to) change the situation, rather than their leadership styles. Here are a few general examples of how to change the situation variables to make a more favorable match for the leader’s style:
• If relations are poor, the leader can work to improve them by showing interest in follow- ers, listening to them, and spending more time getting to know them personally.
• The task can be more or less structured by stating more or less specific standards and procedures for completing the task, and giving or not giving clear deadlines.
• Leaders with strong position power do not have to use it; they can empower employees.29 Leaders with weak power can try to get more power from their manager and play up the power by being more autocratic.
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 114 10/20/14 11:44 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 4 ConTIngEnCy LEaDErShIp ThEorIES 115
1. Are leader– followers rela- tions good or poor?
Appropriate Style for Situation
Situation3. Is the leader’s power strong or weak?
2. Is the task repetitive or nonrepetitive?
Start
Repetitive
Repetitive
Nonrepetitive
Nonrepetitive
Good
Poor
Strong
Weak
Strong
Weak
Strong
Weak
Strong
Weak
Task
Task
Task
Relationship
Relationship
Relationship
Relationship
Task
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
EXHIBIT 4.3 Fiedler Contingency Leadership Model
CONCept APPLICATION 4-1
Contingency Leadership Theory Using the contingency model in Exhibit 4.3, answer the three questions at the top of the model to get to the situation
(numbered 1–8). Follow the situation to the appropriate style in the last column of the model to determine the situation number with its corresponding appropriate leadership style (task or relationship). Select two answers below based on the answers you get from the model, writing the appropriate two letters in the blanks before each item.
Situation number a. 1 b. 2 c. 3 d. 4 e. 5 f. 6 g. 7 h. 8
Leadership style A. task-oriented B. relationship-oriented
1. Shawn, the manager, is from the human resources department. He helps the other departments write job descriptions. Shawn is viewed as not understanding the various departments. Employees tend to be rude in their dealings with Shawn.
2. Juan, the manager, oversees the processing of canceled checks for the bank. He is well liked by the employees. Juan’s manager enjoys hiring and evaluating his employees’ performance.
3. Sally, the principal of a school, assigns teachers to classes and has various other duties. The school atmosphere is tense. She hires and decides on tenure appointments.
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 115 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
116 part 1 InDIVIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
research, Criticism, and applications Despite its groundbreaking start to contingency theories, Fiedler’s work was criticized for weak statistical results.30 However, two meta-analyses concluded that the research tends to support the model, although not for every situation and not as strongly for field studies as for laboratory studies.31 Fiedler disagreed with some of the criticism and pub- lished two rejoinders.32 Thus, the debate continues over the validity and usefulness of the model.
Another major criticism is of Fiedler’s view that we leaders should not change our style, but rather the context of our job should be changed. It is generally agreed that it is much easier to change our style to meet the context of the job than to change the job context. Fiedler’s model also doesn’t really teach us how to change our job context. The other situational writers in this chapter suggest changing leadership styles, not our job context.
Despite the critics, Fiedler has helped contribute to the other contingency theories. It has application as it can be used to answer questions about the leadership of individuals in different types of organizations. It can help explain why a hard-working manager is not effective in a specific job—no match of style to context.
CONCept APPLICATION 4-1(continued)
4. Carlos, the chairperson of the HR committee, is highly regarded by its volunteer members from a variety of departments. The committee members are charged with recommending ways to increase minority hiring and promotions.
5. Tania, the manager, oversees the assembly of mass-produced pens. She has the power to reward and punish, and is viewed as a highly demanding manager.
WOrk Application 4-1 Select a present or past manager. Which LPC leadership style is, or was, dominant for that manager? Using the Fiedler model (see Exhibit 4.3 on page 115), which situation number is the manager in? What is the appropriate leadership style for the manager in this situation? Does it match his or her style? How successful a leader is your manager? Do you think there is a relationship between the manager’s leadership style and the situation?
If you are a manager, you may want to repeat this work application, using yourself as the manager.
2. What do colleagues say about Indra Nooyi’s leadership—is it task or relationship, does she have a life outside of pepsiCo, and does she have any future career plans?
Indra Nooyi’s colleagues say she is intense, decisive, an excellent negotiator, very open and very direct, demanding, and she challenges you. Nooyi is charismatic. She can rouse an audience and rally them around any project. Although she is task oriented, Nooyi also has strong relationships with her colleagues. She insists that everybody’s birthday be celebrated with a cake. She has a suppor tive husband (Raj) and two daughters (Preetha and Tara), and she enjoys being a soccer mom. Nooyi is a karaoke fan, and her karaoke machine is the ubiquitous party game at every PepsiCo gathering. Being CEO of PepsiCo will not be Nooyi’s last job. She says that she eventually wants to give back by going to Washington to work for the government.
OPENING CASE application
State the leadership continuum model major styles and variables. Learning outcome
4
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 116 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 4 ConTIngEnCy LEaDErShIp ThEorIES 117
Leadership Continuum Theory and Model Robert Tannenbaum and Warren Schmidt also developed a contingency theory in the 1950s.33 They stated that leadership behavior is on a continuum from boss-centered to subordinate-centered leadership. Their model focuses on who makes the decisions. They noted that a leader’s choice of a leadership pattern should be based on forces in the boss, forces in the subordinates, and forces in the situation. Look at Exhibit 4.4 to see how Tannenbaum and Schmidt’s variables fit within the framework of contingency leadership variables.
Leadership Continuum Model Variables within the Contingency Leadership FrameworkEXHIBIT 4.4
Tannenbaum and Schmidt identify seven major styles the leader can choose from. Ex- hibit 4.5 is an adaptation of their model, which lists the seven styles. The leadership continuum model is used to determine which one of seven styles to select, based on the use of boss-centered versus subordinate-centered leadership, to meet the situation (boss, subordinates, situation/time) to maximize performance.
Before selecting one of the seven leadership styles, the leader must consider the follow- ing three forces or variables:
• Boss. The leader’s personality and behavioral preferred style—based on experience, ex- pectation, values, and confidence in the subordinates—are considered in selecting a leadership style. Based on personality and behavior, some leaders tend to be more auto- cratic and others more participative.34
• Subordinates. The followers’ preferred style for the leader is based on personality and behavior, as with the leader. Generally, the more willing and able the followers are to participate, the more freedom of participation should be used, and vice versa.
• Situation (time). The environmental considerations, such as the organization’s size, structure, climate, goals, and technology, are considered in selecting a leadership style.
The time available is another consideration. It takes more time to make participative decisions. Thus, when there is no time to include followers in decision making, the leader uses an autocratic leadership style.
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
FOLLOWerS LeaDer SItUatION
Subordinates Boss Situation (time)
LeaDerShIp StYLeS
Boss-centered to subordinate-centered leadership with seven leadership styles along the continuum
in Exhibit 4.5
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 117 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
118 part 1 InDIVIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
Although the leadership continuum model was ver y popular, it did not undergo research testing like the contingency leadership model. One major criticism of this model is that the three factors to consider when selecting a leadership style are very subjective. In other words, determining which st yle to use, and when, is not clear in the model. The Situational Leadership® Model and Normative Leadership Model (to be discussed later in this chapter) thus took over in popularity, most likely be- cause they clearly identified which leadership style to use in a given, clearly defined situation.
You will determine your major leadership continuum style later in Self-Assessment 4-4 on page 143, which puts together three of the contingency leadership styles (contin- uum, path–goal, and normative).
Autocratic 1. State the decision that is not open to discussion
2. Make the decision and convince employees that it is a good idea
3. Present decision and ask if there are any questions
4. Present a decision that is subject to change based on input
5. State the situation, ask for a recommended decision, then makes the decision
6. Let employees make a decision within set limits
Participative 7. Let employees make ongoing decisions
Source: Adapted from How to Choose a Leadership Pattern by Robert Tannenbaum and Warren H. Schmidt, May–June 1973.
EXHIBIT 4.5 tannenbaum and Schmidt’s Leadership Continuum Model
Leadership Continuum Using the continuum model in Exhibit 4.5, identify these five statements by their leadership style (numbered 1–7 in the model). Select each answer, writing the appropriate letters in the blank before each item. a. 1 b. 2 c. 3 d. 4 e. 5 f. 6 g. 7
6. “This is the way I think we should do the job. Does anyone have any other ideas for how to do it?”
7. “Here is list of holidays you can get paid for. Tania, you get seven paid, so you can pick the ones you want.”
8. “I’d like your ideas on how to solve the problem. But I have the final say on the solution we implement.”
9. “Tony, I selected you to take on the new assignment. Do you have any questions about this assignment?”
10. “Helen, I like your report. Send it to the VP right away.”
WOrk Application 4-2 Using the leadership continuum model (Exhibit 4.5), identify your manager’s most commonly used leadership style by number and description. Would you say this is the most appropriate leadership style based on the leader, the followers, and the situation? Explain.
CONCept APPLICATION 4-2
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 118 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 4 ConTIngEnCy LEaDErShIp ThEorIES 119
Path–Goal Leadership Theory and Model The path–goal leadership theory was developed by Robert House, based on an early ver- sion of the theory by M. G. Evans, and published in 1971 and other articles over years.35 His theory specified a number of situational moderators of relationships between task- and person-oriented leadership and their effects. House attempted to explain how the behavior of a leader inf luences the performance and satisfaction of the followers (subor- dinates). Look at Exhibit 4.6 to see how House’s model fits into the framework of contin- gency leadership variables. Note that unlike the earlier contingency leadership models, House’s model does not have a leader trait and behavior variable. The leader is supposed to use the appropriate leadership style (one of four), regardless of preferred traits and be- havior to motivate employees to enhance their performance.
The path–goal leadership model is used to select the leadership style (directive, sup- portive, participative, or achievement-oriented) appropriate to the situation (subordinate and environment) to maximize both performance and job satisfaction. Note that path–goal leadership theory is based on motivation theories of goal-setting and expectancy theory. The leader is responsible for increasing followers’ motivation to attain personal and orga- nizational goals. Motivation is increased by (1) clarifying the follower’s path to the rewards that are available or (2) increasing the rewards that the follower values and desires. Path clarification means that the leader works with followers to help them identify and learn the behaviors that will lead to successful task accomplishment and organizational rewards.
3. Which continuum leadership style does Indra Nooyi tend to use in making acquisitions at pepsiCo?
Nooyi tends to use #5—the leader presents the problem, gets suggested solutions, and makes the decision. She has others look into possible acquisition targets and gets recommendations from them, but Nooyi has the final say on which companies will be acquired.
OPENING CASE application
Identify the path–goal leadership model styles and variables. Learning outcome
5
Path–Goal Leadership Model Variables within the Contingency Leadership FrameworkEXHIBIT 4.6
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
FOLLOWerS LeaDer SItUatION
Subordinates (authoritarianism, locus of control, ability)
None Environment (task structure, formal authority, and work group)
LeaDerShIp StYLeS Directive
Supportive Participative
Achievement-oriented
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 119 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
120 part 1 InDIVIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
The path–goal model is used to determine employee objectives and to clarify how to achieve them using one of four leadership styles. It focuses on how leaders inf luence employees’ perceptions of their goals and the paths they follow toward goal attainment. As shown in Exhibit 4.7 (an adaptation of the model), the situational factors are used to determine the leadership style that affects goal achievement through performance and satisfaction.
Situational Factors
Subordinate Subordinate situational characteristics are:
1. Authoritarianism is the degree to which employees defer to others, and want to be told what to do and how to do the job.
2. L oc u s of control (Chapter 2) is t he ex tent to wh ich employees bel ie ve t hey control goal achievement (internal) or if goal achievement is controlled by others (external).
3. Ability is the extent of the employees’ ability to perform tasks to achieve goals.
Environment Environment situational factors are:
1. Task structure is the extent of repetitiveness of the job. 2. Formal authority is the extent of the leader’s position power. Note that task structure
and formal authority are essentially the same as Fiedler’s. 3. Work group is the extent to which coworkers contribute to job satisfaction or the re-
lationship between followers. Note that House identifies work group as a situational variable. However, under the contingency framework, it would be considered a fol- lower variable.
House Path–Goal Leadership Model EXHIBIT 4.7
SITUATIONAL FACTORS (determine)
Subordinate (follower)
Authoritarianism Locus of control Ability
Environment
Task structure Formal authority Work group
LEADERSHIP STYLES (affect)
Directive Supportive Participative Achievement-oriented
GOAL ACHIEVEMENT
Performance Satisfaction
Source: Adapted from R. J. House, “A Path-Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness,” Administrative Science Quarterly 16(2), 1971: 321–329.
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 120 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 4 ConTIngEnCy LEaDErShIp ThEorIES 121
Leadership Styles Based on the situational factors in the path–goal model, the leader can select the most ap- propriate leadership style by using the following general guidelines for each style.
Directive The leader provides high structure. Directive leadership is appropriate when the followers want authority leadership and have external locus of control, and when the follower abil- ity is low. Directive leadership is also appropriate when the environmental task is complex or ambiguous, formal authority is strong, and the work group provides job satisfaction.
Supportive The leader provides high consideration. Supportive leadership is appropriate when the fol- lowers do not want autocratic leadership and have internal locus of control, and when fol- lower ability is high. Supportive leadership is also appropriate when the environmental tasks are simple, formal authority is weak, and the work group does not provide job satisfaction.
Participative The leader includes employee input into decision making. Participative leadership is appropriate when followers want to be involved and have internal locus of control, and when follower ability is high; when the environmental task is complex, authority is either strong or weak, and job satisfaction from coworkers is either high or low.
Achievement-Oriented The leader sets difficult but achievable goals, expects followers to perform at their highest level, and rewards them for doing so. In essence, the leader provides both high directive (structure) and high supportive (consideration) behavior. The leader tries to make the job challenging.36 Achievement-oriented leadership is appropriate when followers are open to autocratic leadership and have external locus of control, and when follower ability is high; when the environmental task is simple, authority is strong, and job satisfaction from co- workers is either high or low.
YOU Make the ethICaL Call
4.2 Drug Research
Several drug companies, including GlaxoSmithKline and Merck, have been accused of situ- ationally favorable research repor ting. When results suppor t the use of the drug, they are repor ted; when they don’t, results are not repor ted. Although all medications have side effects, some drug users have died because of medication. As a result, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been criticized for its process of approving drugs and monitor- ing their safety.
1. Is it ethical and socially responsible to repor t only the results that help gain FDA approval of drugs?
2. If you worked for a drug company and knew that the results of a study showed negative effects but were not included in a repor t, what would you do?
3. If you worked for a drug company and your boss asked you to change negative results into positive results, or to make results even better, what would you do?
4. What would you do if you gave your boss a negative repor t on a drug and found out the results were changed to positive results?
5. Is the FDA doing a good job of monitoring the safety of drugs? If not, what else should it do?
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 121 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
122 part 1 InDIVIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
research, Criticism, and applications A meta-analysis based on 120 studies examined directive and supportive behavior and showed that support for path–goal theory was significantly greater than chance, but re- sults were quite mixed. An extensive review of the research on moderator variables in leaders also had inconclusive findings.37
Although path–goal theory is more complex and specific than leadership continuum, it is also criticized by managers because it is difficult to know which style to use when. As you can see, there are many situations in which not all six situational factors are exactly as presented in the guidelines for when to use the style. Judgment calls are required to select the appropriate style as necessary. Plus, House suggests adding your own variables to the model.
Despite its limitations, the path–goal model has already made an important contribu- tion to the study of leadership by providing a conceptual framework to guide researchers in identifying potentially relevant situational variables. Path–goal leadership theory led to the development of the theory of charismatic leadership in 1976.
Pat h–goa l t heor y wa s considerably broadened i n scope, a nd i n 1996, Hou se referred to it as value-ba sed leadership theor y. You w i l l lea rn about cha rismat ic and va lues-based leadership in Chapter 9. Path–goa l theor y a lso provides a useful way for leaders to think about motivating followers. You will determine your path– goa l leadership st yle in Self-Assessment 4-4 on page 143, which puts toget her t he contingency leadership styles.
Path–Goal Leadership 2. Using Exhibit 4.7 on page 120 and text descriptions, identify the appropriate leadership style for the five situations. Write
the appropriate letter in the blank before each item.
a. directive c. participative
b. supportive d. achievement-oriented
11. A manager is assembling a new task force that will have an ambiguous task to complete. The members don’t know each other.
12. A manager has decided to give a new task to an employee who tends to be insecure and may feel threatened by taking on a new task.
13. The quar ter just ended and the sales team easily met the quota. The manager has strong position power and has decided to increase the quota to make the job more challenging.
14. A manager has an employee who has been coming in late for work. The manager has decided to get the employee to get to work on time.
15. A manager has a new task, and he is not sure how it should be done. Employees are experienced and like to be involved.
WOrk Application 4-3 Identify your manager’s most commonly used path–goal leadership style. Would you say this is the most appropriate leadership style based on the situational factors? Explain.
CONCept APPLICATION 4-3
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 122 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 4 ConTIngEnCy LEaDErShIp ThEorIES 123
Normative Leadership Theory and Models An important leadership question today is, “When should the manager take charge and when should the manager let the group make the decision?” In 1973, Victor Vroom (yes, the same guy who developed expectancy theory) and Philip Yetton published a decision- making model to answer this question while improving decision-making effectiveness. Vroom and Arthur Jago refined the model and expanded it to four models in 1988. In 2000, Victor Vroom published a revised version titled “Leadership and the Decision- Making Process.” We present the latest.38
The normative leadership model has a time-driven and development-driven deci- sion tree that enables the user to select one of five leadership styles (decide, consult individu- ally, consult group, facilitate, and delegate) appropriate for the situation (seven questions/ variables) to maximize decisions. See Exhibit 4.8 to see how the normative leadership model fits into the contingency leadership framework variables. It is called a normative model because it provides a sequential set of questions that are rules (norms) to follow to determine the best leadership style for the given situation.
4. Which path–goal leadership styles does Indra Nooyi tend to use at pepsiCo?
Nooyi tends to use the achievement-oriented and par ticipative styles. She sets high standards and expects everyone around her to measure up. She has red, green, and purple pens and uses them liberally to mark up everything that crosses her desk. Her scribbles are legendary, and include the following: “I have never seen such gross incompetence,” and “This is unacceptable,” with “unacceptable” underlined three times. Nooyi believes in people; you give them an objective and get them all to buy into it, and they can move mountains. She uses input from others, including her second-in-command, whom she treats like a partner, and her “Team Pepsi” members.
OPENING CASE application
State the normative leadership model styles and the number of variables. Learning outcome
6
EXHIBIT 4.8 Normative Leadership Model Variables within the Contingency Leadership Framework
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
FOLLOWerS LeaDer SItUatION
Development-Driven 3. Leader expertise Time-Driven
Decision Model Decision Model
2. Importance of commitment LeaDerShIp StYLeS 1. Decision significance
4. Likelihood of commitment Decide
5. Group support for objectives Consult individually
6. Group expertise Consult group
7. Team competence Facilitate
Delegate
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 123 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
124 part 1 InDIVIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
To use the normative model, you must have a specific decision to make, have the author- ity to make the decision, and have specific potential followers to participate in the decision.
Leadership participation Styles Vroom identified five leadership styles based on the level of participation in the decision by the followers. Vroom’s five leadership styles follow.
Decide The leader makes the decision alone and announces it, or sells it, to the followers.
Consult Individually The leader tells followers individually about the problem, gets information and sugges- tions, and then makes the decision.
Consult Group The leader holds a group meeting and tells followers the problem, gets information and suggestions, and then makes the decision.
Facilitate The leader holds a group meeting and acts as a facilitator to define the problem and the limits within which a decision must be made. Leaders seek participation and concurrence on the decision without pushing their ideas.
Delegate The leader lets the group diagnose the problem and make the decision within stated limits. The role of the leader is to answer questions and provide encouragement and resources.
Model Questions to Determine the appropriate Leadership Style To determine which of the five leadership styles is the most appropriate for a given situ- ation, you answer a series of diagnostic questions based on seven variables. The seven variables presented in Exhibit 4.8 are repeated in Exhibit 4.9 and in Exhibit 4.10.
We now explain how to answer the questions, based on the variables, when using the two models.
1. Decision Significance. How important is the decision to the success of the project or organization? Is the decision of high (H) importance or low (L) importance to the success? When making highly important decisions, leaders need to be involved.
2. Importance of Commitment. How important is follower commitment to implement the decision? If acceptance of the decision is critical to effective implementation, importance is high (H). If commitment is not important, it’s low (L). When mak- ing highly important commitment decisions that followers may not like and may not implement, followers generally need to be involved in making the decision.
3. Leader Expertise. How much knowledge and expertise does the leader have with this specific decision? Is expertise high (H) or low (L)? The more expertise the leader has, the less need there is for follower participation.
4. Likelihood of Commitment. If the leader were to make the decision alone, is the cer- tainty that the followers would be committed to the decision high (H) or low (L)? When making decisions that followers will like and want to implement, there is less need to involve them in the decision.
5. Group Support for Objectives. Do followers have high (H) or low (L) support for the team or organizational goals to be attained in solving the problem? Higher levels of participation are acceptable with high levels of support.
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 124 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 4 ConTIngEnCy LEaDErShIp ThEorIES 125
EXHIBIT 4.9 Normative Leadership Time-Driven Model
Instructions: The model is a decision tree that works like a funnel. Define the problem statement and then answer the questions from left to right as high (H) or low (L), skipping questions when not appropriate to the situation and avoiding crossing any horizontal lines. The last column you come to contains the appropriate leadership participation decision-making style for the situation.
Decide
Delegate
Consult (Group)
Consult (Group)
Consult (Individually)
Consult (Individually)
Facilitate
Decide
Decide
Decide
Delegate
FacilitateL
H
Facilitate
Facilitate
P R O B L E M
S T A T E M E N T
L
H
– –
L
– –
–
–
–
H L
L
D ec
is io
n Si
gn i�
ca n
ce ?
Im p
o rt
an ce
o f
C o
m m
it m
en t?
Le ad
er E
xp er
ti se
?
Li ke
lih o
o d
o f
C o
m m
it m
en t?
T ea
m C
o m
p et
en ce
?
G ro
u p
Su p
p o
rt ?
G ro
u p
E xp
er ti
se ?
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
–
–
– – – –
L
H
H H
–
– – – –
L
H
LL
– –L
– –L
– –L
–L
–L
–L
LH H
L
LH
H H
H
H H
H
H
H L
L H
H
– – –
H
L
Leadership Style
Source: Adapted from Organizational Dynamics 28, Victor H. Vroom, “Leadership and the Decision- Making Process,” p. 87.
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 125 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
126 part 1 InDIVIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
6. Group Expertise. How much knowledge and expertise do the individual followers have with this specific decision? Is expertise high (H) or low (L)? The more expertise the followers have, the greater the individual or group participation can be.
Normative Leadership Development-Driven Model EXHIBIT 4.10
Instructions: The model is a decision tree that works like a funnel. Define the problem statement, then answer the questions from left to right as high (H) or low (L), skipping questions when not appropriate to the situation and avoiding crossing any horizontal lines. The last column you come to contains the appropriate leadership participation decision-making style for the situation.
Delegate
Facilitate
Delegate
Consult (Group)
Consult (Group)
Consult (Group)
Decide
Decide
Delegate
Delegate
Facilitate
Facilitate
P R O B L E M
S T A T E M E N T
D ec
is io
n Si
gn i�
ca n
ce ?
Im p
o rt
an ce
o f
C o
m m
it m
en t?
Le ad
er E
xp er
ti se
?
Li ke
lih o
o d
o f
C o
m m
it m
en t?
T ea
m C
o m
p et
en ce
?
G ro
u p
Su p
p o
rt ?
G ro
u p
E xp
er ti
se ?
– –
– –
– –
H H
–L
– L L – – –
– ––
H
L
H
L
––
––
––
L
– H
L
L
L
L
H
H
HL
H L
–
H
H
–
H L
H
L
–
Leadership Style
H
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
Source: Adapted from Organizational Dynamics 28, Victor H. Vroom, “Leadership and the Decision-Making Process,” p. 88.
7. Team Competence. Is the ability of the individuals to work together as a team to solve the problem high (H) or low (L)? With high team competence, more participation can be used.
Not all seven variables/questions are relevant to all decisions. All seven or as few as two questions are needed to select the most appropriate leadership style in a given situation. The great thing about the models is that they tie the relevant variables together for us as we an- swer the questions to determine the most appropriate leadership style for the given situation.
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 126 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 4 ConTIngEnCy LEaDErShIp ThEorIES 127
Selecting the time-Driven or Development- Driven Model for the Situation The first step is actually to select one of the two models, based on whether the situation is driven by the importance of time or development of followers. The characteristics of the decision are focus, value, and orientation.
The Time-Driven Model See Exhibit 4.9 for the three characteristics:
1. Focus. The model is concerned with making effective decisions with minimum cost. Time is costly, as it takes longer for groups to make decisions than the leader alone.
2. Value. Value is placed on time, and no value is placed on follower development. 3. Orientation. The model has a short-term horizon.
The Development-Driven Model See Exhibit 4.10 for these three characteristics:
1. Focus. The model is concerned with making effective decisions with maximum de- velopment of followers. Follower development is worth the cost.
2. Value. Value is placed on follower development, and no value is placed on time. 3. Orientation. The model has a long-term horizon, as development takes time.
Computerized Normative Model Vroom has developed a computerized CD-ROM model that is more complex and more precise, yet easier to use. It combines the time-driven and development-driven mod- els into one model, includes 11 variables/questions (rather than seven), and has five variable measures (rather than H or L). It guides users through the process of analyz- ing the situation with definitions, examples, and other forms of help as they progress through the use of the model. The computerized model is beyond the scope of this course, but you will learn how to use the time-driven and development-driven models presented here in Exhibits 4.9 and 4.10 and used with Developing Your Leadership Skills Exercise 4-2.
Determining the appropriate Leadership Style To determine the appropriate style for a specific situation, use the best model (time- driven or development-driven) for the situation and answer the questions, some of which may be skipped based on the model used and answers to prior questions. The questions are sequential and are presented in a decision-tree format similar to the Fiedler model, in which you end up with the appropriate style to use. If we use both models for the same situations, for some decisions the appropriate style will be the same, and different for others.
research, Criticism, and applications The current normative model is based on the research of Vroom and colleagues at Yale University on leadership and decision-making processes, with more than 100,000 manag- ers making decisions.39 Numerous studies conducted by others have tested the normative leadership model. In general, the results found in the empirical research have supported the model.40 In a summary of prior research, managers—contrary to Fiedler—do change
WOrk Application 4-4 Recall a specific decision you or your boss has or had to make. Is or was the decision time-driven or development- driven? Using Exhibit 4.9 on page 125 or 4.10 on page 126, select the appropriate participation style for the situation. Be sure to state the questions you answered and how (H or L) you answered each.
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 127 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
128 part 1 InDIVIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
their style to meet the situation. Managers using the decision style recommended by the normative model were almost twice as likely to be successful as were managers using de- cisions not recommended by the model. Higher-level managers use more participation in decision making. Women managers tend to use more participation than men. Almost all managers view themselves as using a higher level of participation than do their followers. Over the 25 years of research, there has been a move toward higher levels of participation, greater empowerment, and use of teams.41
The model is not without its critics. Vroom treats decisions as a single, discrete epi- sode that occurs at one point in time, but most important decisions are not made that way. Important decisions often involve multiple meetings with various people. Thus, the leader may have to use a sequence of different decision procedures with different people at different times before the final decision is made. Also, the leader is assumed to have the skills needed to use each of the five leadership styles, and the leader’s skills are not included in the model.
The Vroom and Vroom Yetton/Jago model tends to be popular in the academic communit y because it is based on research and it is complex. It is not ver y popu- lar with managers because they find it cumbersome to select models and to pull out the model and follow a seven-question decision tree every time they have to make a decision.
You will determine your major normative leadership style in Self-Assessment 4-3 on pages 138, and you will learn how to use the models in Developing Your Leadership Skills Exercise 4-1 and 4-2.
5. Which normative leadership styles does Indra Nooyi tend to use at pepsiCo?
Based on the decision to be made, Nooyi consults and facilitates others. As chairman and CEO, she has the final say in major decisions affecting PepsiCo. However, she also delegates some decisions down the chain of command that involve specific products in American and international markets.
OPENING CASE application
Discuss the major similarities and differences between the behavioral and contingency leadership theories.
Compare and contrast four major differences among the four contingency leadership models.
Learning outcome
7,8
WOrk Application 4-5 1. Identify the one
contingency leadership model you prefer to use on the job, and state why.
2. Describe the type of leader that you want to be on the job. Identify specific behavior you plan to use as a leader. You may also want to identify behavior you will not use.
Putting the Behavioral and Contingency Leadership Theories Together Exhibit 4.11 is a review of different words that are used to describe the same two leader- ship behavior concepts. It includes the number of leadership styles based on the two be- havior concepts and the different names given to the leadership styles. We should realize
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 128 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 4 ConTIngEnCy LEaDErShIp ThEorIES 129
prescriptive and Descriptive Models One last difference between models, not shown in any exhibits, is the difference be- tween prescriptive and descriptive models. The contingency leadership model and the normative leadership model are prescriptive leadership models: They tell the user exactly which style to use in a given situation. However, the continuum and path– goal leadership models are descriptive leadership models: They identify contin- gency variables and leadership styles without specifying which style to use in a given situation. In other words, users of the descriptive model select the appropriate style based more on their own judgment. Look at all the leadership models and you will see what we mean.
List which leadership models are prescriptive and descriptive, and explain why they are classified as such.
Learning outcome
9
that all the leadership styles are based on the same two behavior concepts. We developed Exhibits 4.11 and 4.12 to put all these contingency leadership theories together with be- havioral leadership styles. These exhibits should help you better understand the similari- ties and differences between these theories.
Names Given to the Same Two Leadership Behavior Concepts EXHIBIT 4.11
NUMBER OF LEADERSHIP STYLES BASED ON BEHAVIOR CONCEPTS
LEADERSHIP & BEHAVIOR/STYLE
2DemocraticAutocraticUniversity of lowa
2Employee-centeredJob-centeredUniversity of Michigan
4ConsiderationStructureOhio State University
Leadership Grid® 5Concern for peopleConcern for production
Behavioral Theories
Contingency Theories
2RelationshipTaskContingency model
7Subordinate-centeredBoss-centeredLeadership continuum
4SupportiveDirectivePath-goal model
5GroupAutocraticNormative model
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 129 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
130 part 1 InDIVIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
P ut
ti ng
t he
B eh
av io
ra l an
d C
on ti ng
en cy
L ea
d er
sh ip
T he
or ie
s To
ge th
er E X
H IB
IT 4
.1 2
© Cengage Learning®
B e
h a
V IO
r a
L
t h
e O
r Ie
S L
e a
D e
r S
h Ip
S t
Y L
e S
C O
N t
IN G
e N
C Y
V
a r
Ia B
L e
S C
O N
t IN
G e
N C
Y
C h
a N
G e
D e
S I
r e
D
O U
t C
O M
e
U o
f M
ic hi
ga n
Jo b-
C en
te re
d Em
pl o ye
e- C
en te
re d
O hi
o S
ta te
U H
ig h
St ru
ct ur
e/ L
o w
C
o ns
id er
at io
n
H ig
h St
ru ct
ur e/
H ig
h C
o ns
id er
at io
n
Lo w
S tr
uc tu
re /
H ig
h C
o ns
id er
at io
n
Lo w
St
ru ct
ur e/
L o w
C
o ns
id er
at io
n
C O
N T
IN G
EN C
Y
T H
EO R
IE S
C o nt
in ge
nc y
Le ad
er sh
ip M
o de
l Ta
sk R
el at
io ns
hi p
Le ad
er /F
o llo
w er
R
el at
io ns
T as
k St
ru ct
ur e
Po si tio
n Po
w er
Si tu
at io
n Pe
rf o rm
an ce
Le ad
er sh
ip
C o nt
in uu
m M
o de
l Pa
th –G
o al
M o de
l
1 D
ir ec
tiv e
2& 3
A ch
ie ve
m en
t 4&
5 Su
pp o rt
iv e
6& 7
Pa rt
ic ip
at iv
e M
an ag
er Su
bo rd
in at
es Si
tu at
io n/
tim e
Su bo
rd in
at e
(a ut
ho ri ta
ri an
is m
, l o cu
s o f co
nt ro
l, ab
ili ty
) En
vi ro
nm en
t (t
as k
st ru
ct ur
e, f o rm
al
au th
o ri ty
, w o rk
g ro
up )
Le ad
er sh
ip S
ty le
Le ad
er sh
ip S
ty le
Pe rf
o rm
an ce
Pe rf
o rm
an ce
Jo b
Sa
tis fa
ct io
n
N o rm
at iv
e Le
ad er
sh ip
M o de
l D
ec id
e C
o ns
ul t
In di
vi du
al o
r G
ro up
Fa ci
lit at
e D
el eg
at e
D ev
el o pm
en t-
D ri ve
n o r
T im
e- D
ri ve
n M
o de
ls :
(1 )
D ec
is io
n si gn
ifi ca
nc e
(2 )
Im po
rt an
ce o
f co
m m
itm en
t (3
) Le
ad er
e xp
er tis
e (4
) Li
ke lih
o o d
o f
co m
m itm
en t
(5 )
G ro
up s
up po
rt f o r
o bj
ec tiv
es (6
) G
ro up
e xp
er tis
e (7
) Te
am c
o m
pe te
nc e
Le ad
er sh
ip S
ty le
D ec
is io
ns
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 130 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 4 ConTIngEnCy LEaDErShIp ThEorIES 131
Many managers prefer prescriptive models; this is a reason why they are more com- monly used in organizational leadership training programs than the descriptive leader- ship models. On the other hand, many academic researchers scoff at prescriptive models, especially simple ones, and prefer the more complex descriptive models based on solid theoretical foundations.
Explain substitutes and neutralizers of leadership. Learning outcome
Leadership Substitutes Theory The four leadership theories presented assume that some leadership style will be effective in each situation. However, in keeping with contingency theory, there are factors outside the leader’s control that have a larger impact on outcomes than do leadership actions. Contingency factors provide guidance and incentives to perform, making the leader’s role unnecessary in some situations. Steven Kerr and John Jermier argued that certain situ- ational variables prevent leaders from affecting subordinates’ (followers’) attitudes and behaviors.42 Substitutes for leadership include characteristics of the subordinate, task, and organization that replace the need for a leader or neutralize the leader’s behavior. This is the motivation for some organizations adopting self-managed teams. Self-managed teams are discussed in Chapter 8.
Substitutes and Neutralizers Thus, substitutes for leadership make a leadership style unnecessary or redundant. Highly skilled workers do not need a leader’s task behavior to tell them how to do their job. Neu- tralizers reduce or limit the effectiveness of a leader’s behavior. For example, managers who are not near an employee cannot readily give task-directive behavior. See Exhibit 4.13 to see how the substitutes for leadership fit into the framework of contingency lead- ership variables. Then, read a description of each substitute.
10
EXHIBIT 4.13 Substitutes for Leadership Variables within the Contingency Leadership Framework
FOLLOWERS LEADER SITUATION
Subordinates None Task Organization
The following variables may substitute or neutralize leadership by providing task- oriented direction and/or people-oriented support rather than a leader.
1. Characteristics of followers. Ability, knowledge, experience, training. Need for inde- pendence. Professional orientation. Indifference toward organizational rewards.
2. Characteristics of the task. Clarity and routine. Invariant methodology. Provision of own feedback concerning accomplishment. Intrinsic satisfaction for completing the task.
3. Characteristics of the organization. Formalization (explicit plans, goals, and areas of responsibility). Inf lexibility (rigid, unbending rules and procedures). Highly speci- fied and active advisory and staff functions. Closely knit, cohesive work groups. Organizational rewards not within the leader’s control. Spatial distance between leader and followers.
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 131 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
132 part 1 InDIVIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
Leadership Style Leaders can analyze their situation and better understand how these three characteristics substitute or neutralize their leadership style and thus can provide the leadership and fol- lowership most appropriate for the situation. The leader role is to provide the direction and support not already being provided by the task, group, or organization. The leader fills the gaps in leadership.
Changing the Situation Like Fiedler suggested, leaders can change the situation rather than their leadership style. Thus, substitutes for leadership can be designed in organizations in ways to complement existing leadership, to act in leadership absence, and to otherwise provide more compre- hensive leadership alternatives. After all, organizations have cut middle-management numbers, and something has to provide the leadership in their absence. One approach is to make the situation more favorable for the leader by removing neutralizers. Another way is to make leadership less important by increasing substitutes such as job enrich- ment, self-managing teams, and automation.
research, Criticism, and applications A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate bivariate relationships among leadership be- haviors, substitutes for leadership, followers’ attitudes, and role perceptions and perfor- mance, and to examine the relative strengths of the relationships among these variables. It was based on 435 relationships obtained from 22 studies containing 36 independent samples. Overall, the theory was supported.43
However, the theory does have its critics. As with the other theories, results are mixed. Research has found support for some aspects of the theory, but other aspects have not been tested or supported. Critics point out that for many of the substitutes, the behavior of the formal leader is merely replaced by similar leadership behavior carried out by peers or other informal leaders—so leadership still exists anyway.
Applications of leadership substitute theory include its strong evidence that situational variables can directly affect job satisfaction and motivation. As already discussed, chang- ing the situation is a major application of substitute theory.
To close this chapter, complete Self-Assessment 4-2 to determine how your personality inf luences your use of contingency leadership theory.
WOrk Application 4-6 Identify your present or past manager. Can the characteristics of followers, task, and/ or the organization substitute for this leader? In other words, is his or her leadership necessary?
Your personality and Contingency Leadership theoriesSELF-ASSESSMENT 4-2
In Self-Assessment 4-1 on page 113 were you more task or relationship oriented? Your being more task- or relationship-oriented is based very much on your personality.
Based on surgency, if you have a high need for power, you may tend to be more task oriented. Based on agree- ableness, if you are a real “people” person with a high need for affiliation, you may tend to be more relationship oriented. Based on conscientiousness, if you have a high need for achievement, you may tend to be more task oriented to make sure the job gets done, and done your way.
Based on your personality profile, does it match Fiedler’s contingency leadership theory, as presented in Self-Assessment 1? If you have a higher need for power, do you tend to use the autocratic (1–3) leadership continuum styles, the directive and achievement path–goal leadership styles, and then decide and consult norma- tive leadership styles?
If you have a higher need for affiliation, do you tend to use more participative leadership continuum styles, the supportive and participative path–goal styles, and the facilitate and delegate normative leadership styles?
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 132 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 4 ConTIngEnCy LEaDErShIp ThEorIES 133
You will better be able to understand which leadership style you do tend to use when you complete Self- Assessment 4-3 on page 138, “Determining Your Preferred Normative Leadership Style.” The leadership con- tinuum and path–goal styles are explored in Self-Assessment 4-4 on page 143. It is important to realize that your personality does affect your leadership style. However, you can use the leadership style that is most appropriate for the situation. You will learn how in Developing Your Leadership Skills Exercises 4-1 and 4-2.
Chapter Summary
The chapter summar y is organized to answer the 11 learning outcomes for this chapter.
1 State the major difference between behavioral and contingency leadership theories, and explain the behavioral contribution to contingency theories.
Behavioral theories attempt to determine the one best leadership style for all situations. Contingency leadership theories contend that there is no one best leadership style for all situations. Behavioral theories contributed to contingency theories because their basic leadership styles are used in contingency leadership models.
2 Describe the contingency leadership theory variables.
The contingency leadership variables used to explain the appropriate leadership style are the leader, followers, and situation. The leader factor is based on personality traits, behavior, and experience. The followers factor is based on capability and motivation. The situational factor is based on task, structure, and environment.
3 Identify the contingency leadership model styles and variables.
The contingency leadership model styles are task and relationship. The variables include (1) the leader– follower relationship, (2) the leadership styles—task or relationship, and (3) the situation—task structure and position power.
4 State the leadership continuum model major styles and variables.
The two major continuum leadership model styles are boss centered and subordinate centered. The variables include (1) the boss, (2) the subordinates, and (3) the situation (time).
5 Identify the path–goal leadership model styles and variables.
The path–goal leadership model styles include direc- tive, supportive, participative, and achievement-oriented.
Variables used to determine the leadership style are the subordinate and the environment.
6 State the normative leadership model styles and the number of variables.
The five normative leadership model styles are decide, consult individually, consult group, facilitate, and delegate. The model has seven variables.
7 Discuss the major similarities and differences between the behavioral and contingency leader- ship theories.
The primary similarity between these theories is that their leadership styles are all based on the same two leadership concepts, although they have different names. The major difference is that the contingency leadership models identify contingency variables on which to select the most appropriate behavioral leadership style for a given situation.
8 Compare and contrast four major differences among the four contingency leadership models.
Using Exhibit 4.12 on page 130, note that the first dif- ference is in the number of leadership styles used in the four models, which ranges from 2 (contingency) to 7 (continuum). The second difference is in the number of contingency variables used to select the appropriate leadership style, which ranges from 2 (path–goal) to 7 (normative). The third difference is what is changed when using the model. When using the contingency as example for emulation or use in a given model, the leader changes the situation; with the other three mod- els, the leader changes behavior (leadership style). The last difference is the desired outcome. Contingency and continuum leadership models focus on performance, and the path–goal model adds job satisfaction. The normative model focuses on decisions.
“Take It To The Net”. Access student resources at www.cengagebrain.com. Search for Lussier, Leadership 6e to find student study tools.
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 133 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
134 part 1 InDIVIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
9 List which leadership models are prescriptive and descriptive, and explain why they are classified as such.
The contingency and normative leadership models are prescriptive models, because they specify exactly which leadership style to use in a given situation. The contin- uum and path–goal leadership models are descriptive
models, because users select the appropriate leadership style for a given situation based on their own judgment.
10 explain substitutes and neutralizers of leadership.
Substitutes for leadership include characteristics of the subordinate, task, and organization that make leadership behavior unnecessary or redundant; neutralizers reduce or limit the effectiveness of a leader’s behavior.
Key terms contingency leadership model, 112
descriptive leadership models, 129
leadership continuum model, 117
leadership model, 110
normative leadership model, 123
path–goal leadership model, 119
prescriptive leadership models, 129
substitutes for leadership, 131
1 What is the difference between a theory and a model?
2 What contingency leadership variables are common to all of the theories?
3 How does the global economy relate to contingency leadership?
4 What are the two contingency leadership theory leader- ship styles?
5 Do the three situational favorableness factors of the con- tingency leadership model (see Exhibit 4.3 on page 115) fit in only one of the three variables (follower, leader, situ- ation) or all contingency leadership variables (see Exhibit 4.1 on page 110)? Explain.
6 What is the difference in the outcomes of the contingency leadership and the continuum leadership models and that of the path–goal model?
7 What are the three subordinate and environment situ- ational factors of the path–goal model?
8 What are the path–goal theory leadership styles?
9 What are the normative leadership theory leadership styles?
10 What is the primary difference between the contingency leadership model and the other leadership models (lead- ership continuum, path–goal, and normative leadership)?
11 What are the three substitutes for leadership?
review Questions
Critical-thinking Questions The following critical-thinking questions can be used for class discussion and/or as written assignments to develop commu- nication skills. Be sure to give complete explanations for all questions.
1 Do you agree with Fiedler’s belief that people have one dominant leadership style and cannot change styles? Explain.
2 Do you believe that managers today are using more boss- or more subordinate-centered leadership styles?
3 Do you agree that time is an important situational factor to consider in selecting a leadership style for the situation? Explain.
4 The normative leadership model is the most complex. Do more variables improve the model?
5 One group of authors believes that Fiedler’s contingency leadership model is the model best supported by research. However, a different author believes that it is the norma- tive leadership model. Which model do you believe is best supported by research? Why?
6 Which contingency leadership theory do you think is the best?
7 Which contingency leadership theory do you actually plan to use, and how? If you don’t plan to use any, give a detailed reason for not wanting to use any of the models.
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 134 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 4 ConTIngEnCy LEaDErShIp ThEorIES 135
C A S E
Foxconn Technology Group
Have you ever heard of Foxconn Technology Group and its founder and CEO Terr y Gou? It is the larg-est expor ter out of China. Gou star ted Hon Hai Precision Industry Company, the anchor company of Foxconn Technology Group, in 1974 at age 23 with a $7,500 loan from his mother to provide the lowest “total cost” solution to increase the affordability of electronics products for everyone. Foxconn has been the most trusted name in contract manu- facturing ser vices.44 Some of the major companies Foxconn makes contracted products for include IBM, Cisco, Microsoft, Nokia, Sony, Dell, Hewlett-Packard, and Apple. If you have a PlayStation, computer, or smart phone, there is a good chance that all or part of it was made by Foxconn.
Terry Gou has been characterized as always thinking about a way to shave another nickel off the cost of a product, as a charming salesman, as a daring strategist, as a ruthless taskmas- ter, and as a reincarnated Henry Ford. Gou is a billionaire, but he says, “I think for me, I am not interested in knowing how much I have. I don’t care. I am working not for the money at this moment, I am working for society, I am working for my employees.”45
Although Terr y Gou’s stor y is interesting, in this case we focus on lower-level manager Li Chang. (Please note: Foxconn is an existing company. However, Chang and Jackie Lee are not the names of actual managers at Foxconn; they are used to illustrate contingency leadership.)
Li Chang worked her way up to become the manager in a depar tment making par ts for the iPad. Chang’s job was to supervise the production of one par t that is used as a com- ponent in other products. Running the machines to make the standard par ts is not complicated, and her employees gener- ally find the job to be boring with low pay. Chang closely su- per vised the employees to make sure they kept production on schedule. She believed that if she did not watch the em- ployees closely and keep them informed of their output, they would slack off and miss production goals. Chang’s employees viewed her as an okay boss to work for, as she did take a per- sonal interest in them, and employees were productive. Chang did discipline employees who did not meet standard produc- tivity, and she ended up firing some workers.
Jackie Lee, the manager of a larger department that made instruments to customer specifications, retired, and Chang was given a promotion to manage this department because she did
a good job running her old department. Chang never did any design work, nor supervised it. The designers are all engineers who are paid well and who were doing a good job according to their prior supervisor Lee. As Chang observed workers in her usual manner, she realized that all of the designers did their work differently. So she closely observed their work and looked for good ideas that all her employees could follow. It wasn’t long be- fore Chang was telling employees how to do a better job of de- signing the custom specifications. Things were not going too well, however, as employees told Chang that she did not know what she was talking about. Chang tried to rely on her authority, which worked while she was watching employees. However, once she left one employee to observe another, the workers went back to doing things their own way. Chang’s employees were com- plaining about her being a poor manager behind her back.
The complaints about Chang being a poor manager got to Terry Gou. Gou also realized that performance in the design depar tment had gone down since Chang took over as man- ager. Gou decided to call Chang into his office to discuss how things are going.
G O t O t h e I N t e r N e t : To learn more about Terry Gou and Foxconn, visit its Web site (http://www. foxconn.com).
Support your answers to the following questions with spe- cific information from the case and text or with other informa- tion you get from the Web or other sources.
1. Which leadership style would Fiedler say Li Chang uses?
2. Using Exhibit 4.3 on page 115, Fiedler’s contingency leadership model, what situation and leadership style are appropriate for the production depar tment and for the custom design depar tment?
3. Why isn’t Chang doing an effective job in the design depar tment?
4. What would Fiedler and Kerr and Jermier recommend that Chang do to improve performance?
5. Which of the two basic continuum leadership styles would Tannenbaum and Schmidt recommend for Chang and other managers of the design depar tment?
6. Which path–goal leadership style would House rec- ommend for Chang and other managers of the design depar tment?
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 135 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
136 part 1 InDIVIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
C U M U L a t I V e C a S e Q U e S t I O N S
7. Describe Chang’s personality based on the Big Five model of personality (Chapter 2). How does Chang’s personality influence her leadership style?
8. How is Chang’s leadership style and behavior affecting employee needs and motivation (Chapter 3)?
C a S e e X e r C I S e a N D r O L e - p L a Y
preparation: Put yourself in the role of Terry Gou. (1) Which normative leadership style would you use with Chang during the meeting? (2) How would you handle the meeting with Chang? (3) What will you say to her?
In-Class Meeting: Break into groups of four to six members, and discuss the three preparation questions.
role-play: One person (representing themselves or a group) meets with Chang to role-play the meeting for the class
to observe. The person does not identify which normative leadership style they are using. You can discuss the role-play, as discussed next. More than one role-play may also take place.
observer role: As the rest of the class members watch the role-play, they should: (1) Identify the leadership style used by the person playing the role of Gou. (2) State if it is the appropriate leadership style for this situation. (3) Look for things that Gou does well, and does not do so well. For your suggested improvements, be sure to have alternative behaviors that are coaching.
Discussion: After the first role-play, the class (1) votes for the leadership style used by the person role-playing Gou, (2) deter- mines the appropriate leadership style, and (3) discusses good behavior and better behavior that could be used. If additional role-plays are used, skip step 2.
McDonald’s has achieved the status of one of the most recognizable franchises across the globe through a mixture of successful marketing, consistent ser vice and products, and strong leadership. Ray Kroc was a visionary leader who inspired others through his charisma. He saw the potential for standardizing an efficient, systematized restaurant model and replicating it across the country. Kroc is quoted as saying, “If you’ve got time to lean, you’ve got time to clean,”
which highlights his goal-oriented and task-focused leadership style that still exists in the corporation today.
1. What kind of normative leadership style do you think Ray Kroc, as a leader in the first years of McDonald’s, likely used? Explain your answer.
2. What are the benefits of a corporate leader ship strategy?
V I D E o C a S E
Leadership at McDonald’s
SELF-ASSESSMENT 4-3
Following are 12 situations. Select the one alternative that most closely describes what you would do in each situ- ation. Don’t be concerned with trying to pick the right answer; select the alternative you would really use. Circle a, b, c, or d. Ignore the S part, which will be explained later in Developing your Leadership Skills Exercise 1.
1. Your rookie crew seems to be developing well. Their need for direction and close supervision is diminishing. What do you do?
a. Stop directing and overseeing performance un- less there is a problem. S
b. Spend time getting to know them personally, but make sure they maintain performance lev- els. S
c. Make sure things keep going well; continue to direct and oversee closely. S
d. Begin to discuss new tasks of interest to them. S
Determining Your preferred Normative Leadership Style
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 136 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 4 ConTIngEnCy LEaDErShIp ThEorIES 137
2. You assigned Jill a task, specifying exactly how you wanted it done. Jill deliberately ignored your direc- tions and did it her way. The job will not meet the customer’s standards. This is not the first problem you’ve had with Jill. What do you decide to do?
a. Listen to Jill’s side, but be sure the job gets done right. S
b. Tell Jill to do it again the right way, and closely supervise the job. S
c. Tell her the customer will not accept the job, and let Jill handle it her way. S
d. Discuss the problem and possible solutions to it. S
3. Your employees work well together ; the depart- ment is a real team. It’s the top performer in the organization. Because of traffic problems, the pres- ident okayed staggered hours for departments. As a result, you can change your department’s hours. Several of your workers have suggested changing. You take what action?
a. Allow the group to decide its hours. S
b. Decide on new hours, explain why you chose them, and invite questions. S
c. Conduct a meeting to get the group members’ ideas. Select new hours together, with your ap- proval. S
d. Send around a memo stating the hours you want. S
4. You hired Bill, a new employee. He is not perform- ing at the level expected after one month’s train- ing. Bill is trying, but he seems to be a slow learner. What do you decide to do?
a. Clearly explain what needs to be done and oversee his work. Discuss why the procedures are important; support and encourage him. S
b. Tell Bill that his training is over and it’s time to pull his own weight. S
c. Review task procedures and supervise Bill’s work closely. S
d. Inform Bill that his training is over, and tell him to feel free to come to you if he has any prob- lems. S
5. Helen has had an excellent performance record for the last five years. Recently you have noticed a drop in the quality and quantity of her work. She has a family problem. What do you do?
a. Tell Helen to get back on track and closely su- pervise her. S
b. Discuss the problem with Helen. Help her real- ize that her personal problem is affecting her
work. Discuss ways to improve the situation. Be supportive and encourage her. S
c. Tell Helen you’re aware of her productivity slip, and that you’re sure she’ll work it out soon. S
d. Discuss the problem and solution with Helen, and supervise her closely. S
6. Your organization does not allow smoking in certain areas. You just walked by a restricted area and saw Joan smoking. She has been with the organization for 10 years and is a very productive worker. Joan has never been caught smoking be- fore. What action do you take?
a. Ask her to put it out, and then leave. S
b. Discuss why she is smoking, and ask what she intends to do about it. S
c. Give her a lecture about not smoking, and check up on her in the future. S
d. Tell her to put it out, watch her do it, and tell her you will check on her in the future. S
7. Your department usually works well together with little direction. Recently a conflict between Sue and Tom has caused problems. As a result, you take what action?
a. Call Sue and Tom together and make them realize how this conflict is affecting the depart- ment. Discuss how to resolve it and how you will check to make sure the problem is solved. S
b. Let the group resolve the conflict. S
c. Have Sue and Tom sit down and discuss their conflict and how to resolve it. Support their efforts to implement a solution. S
d. Tell Sue and Tom how to resolve their conflict and closely supervise them. S
8. Jim usually does his share of the work with some encouragement and direction. However, he has migraine headaches occasionally and doesn’t pull his weight when this happens. The others resent doing Jim’s work. What do you decide to do?
a. Discuss his problem and help him come up with ideas for maintaining his work; be supportive. S
b. Tell Jim to do his share of the work and closely watch his output. S
c. Inform Jim that he is creating a hardship for the others and should resolve the problem by himself. S
d. Be supportive, but set minimum performance levels and ensure compliance. S
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 137 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
138 part 1 InDIVIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
9. Barbara, your most experienced and productive worker, came to you with a detailed idea that could increase your department’s productivity at a very low cost. She can do her present job and this new assignment. You think it’s an excellent idea; what do you do?
a. Set some goals together. Encourage and sup- port her efforts. S
b. Set up goals for Barbara. Be sure she agrees with them and sees you as being supportive of her efforts. S
c. Tell Barbara to keep you informed and to come to you if she needs any help. S
d. Have Barbara check in with you frequently, so that you can direct and supervise her activities. S
10. Your boss asked you for a special report. Frank, a very capable worker who usually needs no direc- tion or support, has all the necessary skills to do the job. However, Frank is reluctant because he has never done a report. What do you do?
a. Tell Frank he has to do it. Give him direction and supervise him closely. S
b. Describe the project to Frank and let him do it his own way. S
c. Describe the benefits to Frank. Get his ideas on how to do it and check his progress. S
d. Discuss possible ways of doing the job. Be sup- portive; encourage Frank. S
11. Jean is the top producer in your department. However, her monthly reports are constantly late and contain errors. You are puzzled because she does everything else with no direction or support. What do you decide to do?
a. Go over past reports with Jean, explaining ex- actly what is expected of her. Schedule a meet- ing so that you can review the next report with her. S
b. Discuss the problem with Jean, and ask her what can be done about it; be supportive. S
c. Explain the importance of the report. Ask her what the problem is. Tell her that you expect the next report to be on time and error free. S
d. Remind Jean to get the next report in on time without errors. S
12. Your workers are very effective and like to partici- pate in decision making. A consultant was hired to
develop a new method for your department using the latest technology in the field. What do you do?
a. Explain the consultant’s method and let the group decide how to implement it. S
b. Teach them the new method and closely su- pervise them. S
c. Explain the new method and the reasons that it is important. Teach them the method and make sure the procedure is followed. Answer questions. S
d. Explain the new method and get the group’s input on ways to improve and implement it. S
To determine your preferred normative leadership style, follow these steps:
1. In this chart, circle the letter you selected for each situation.
T h e c o l u m n h e a d i n g s ( S 1 t h r o u g h S 4 ) r e p r e s e n t t h e s t y l e yo u s e l e c t e d .
S 1 = D e c i d e , S 2 = C o n s u l t ( I n d i v i d u a l l y o r G r o u p ) , S 3 = F a c i l i t a t e , S 4 = D e l e g a t e
S 1 D S 2 C S 3 F S 4 D L 1 c a d a 2 b a d c 3 d b c a 4 c a d b 5 a d b c 6 d c b a 7 d a c b 8 b d a c 9 d b a c 1 0 a c d b 1 1 a c b d 1 2 b c d a To t a l s
2. Add up the number of circled items per col- umn. The column with the highest total is your preferred leadership style. There is no correct or best normative leadership style. Below is an expla- nation about each style.
S1 Decide Leadership Style. The decide style includes making the decision alone. as a decider, you autocratically tell people how to implement your decision and follow up to make sure performance is maintained, or you tell people what to do and make sure they continue to do it.
S2 Consult (Individually or Group) Leadership Style. as they are both consult styles, we combine individual and group styles for this exercise. The consult style includes talking to individuals or groups for input in a support- ive way before you make the decision. as a consulter,
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 138 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 4 ConTIngEnCy LEaDErShIp ThEorIES 139
after making the decision, you also tell people how to implement your decision and follow up to make sure per- formance is maintained, while you support and encourage them as they implement your decision.
S3 Facilitate Leadership Style. The facilitate style includes having a group meeting to get input from members as you attempt to support the group to agree on a deci- sion within boundaries set by you; in other words, you still have the final say on the decision. as a facilitator, you are supportive and encouraging to the group members to both make the decision and implement the decision.
S4 Delegate Leadership Style. The delegate style includes letting the group make the decision within limits. as a delegator, you don’t tell the group what to do or facilitate the group during the decision making and its implementation.
To determine your flexibility to change styles, do the follow- ing. Look at your total score for each column leadership style. The more evenly distributed the totals (for example 4, 4, 4, 4), the more flexible you appear to be at changing your leadership style. having high numbers in some col- umns and low in others indicates a strong preference to use or avoid using one or more leadership styles.
Note: There is no right, correct, or best normative leadership style. What this self-assessment exercise does is allow you to know your preferred leadership style and your flexibility at changing styles. In Developing your Leadership Skills Exercise 1, you will develop your skill to identify the normative leadership styles. In Skill- Development Exercise 2, you will learn to use the nor- mative leadership models to select the most appropriate leadership style for a given situation.
4-1
preparing for this exercise Return to the 12 situations in Self-Assessment 3. This time, instead of selecting one of the four options, a–d, identify the normative leadership style used in each option, with the aid of the leadership style definitions in Self-Assessment 3 above. Let’s do the following example.
example
Your rookie crew seems to be developing well. Their need for direction and close supervision is diminishing. What do you do?
1 Stop directing and overseeing performance unless there is a problem. S_DL_
2 Spend time getting to know them personally, but make sure they maintain performance levels. S_C_
4 Make sure things keep going well; continue to direct and oversee closely. S_D_
4 Begin to discuss new tasks of interest to them. S_F_
answers
5 As indicated on the S_DL_line, this is the delegate leader- ship style. As in the definition of delegate, you are leaving the group alone—unless there is a problem (limits)—to make and implement its own decisions about work.
6 As indicated on the S_C_ line, this is the consult leader- ship style. As in the definition of consult, you are being
suppor tive by getting to know them, yet you are still fol- lowing up to make sure they get the job done.
7 As indicated on the S_D_ line, this is the decide leader- ship style. As in the definition of decide, you are following up to make sure performance is maintained.
8 As indicated on the S_F_ line, this is the facilitate leader- ship style. As in the definition of facilitate, you are facilitat- ing a group decision on possible new tasks for the group to perform.
Now, complete situation numbers 2–12 by determining the leadership style and placing the letters D, C, F, and DL on each of the a–d S_ lines as illustrated above. All four alternative behaviors do represent a different normative leadership style.
Doing this exercise in Class
Objective
To develop the skill of identifying normative leadership styles.
aaCSB General Skills area
The primary AACSB competencies developed through this exercise are communication, analytic skills, and application of knowledge.
procedure (5–30 minutes) Select an option:
9 The instructor goes over the answers.
10 The instructor calls on students and goes over the answers.
Identifying Normative Leadership Styles
Developing your Leadership Skills
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 139 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
140 part 1 InDIVIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
4-2
preparing for this exercise You should have studied the normative leadership model text material. Using Exhibits 4.9 and 4.10 on pages 125 and 126, determine the appropriate leadership style for the given prob- lem statements below. Follow these steps:
1 Determine which normative leadership model to use for the given situation.
2 Answer the variable questions (between 2 and 7) for the problem.
3 Select the appropriate leadership style from the model.
1. Production department manager. You are the manager of a mass-produced manufactured product. You have two major machines in your department with 10 people working on each. You have an important order that needs to be shipped first thing tomorrow morning. Your boss has made it very clear that you must meet this deadline. It’s 2:00 and you are right on schedule to meet the order deadline. At 2:15 an employee comes to tell you that one of the machines is smoking a little and making a noise. If you keep running the machine, it may make it until the end of the day and you will deliver the important shipment on time. If you shut down the machine, the manufacturer will not be able to check the machine until tomorrow and you will miss the deadline. You call your boss and there is no answer, and you don’t know how else to contact the boss or how long it will be before the boss gets back to you if you leave a message. There are no higher-level managers than you or anyone with more knowledge of the machine than you. Which leadership style should you use?
Step 1 Which model should you use? (____ time-driven ____ development-driven)
Step 2 Which questions on the normative model Exhibit 4.9 or 4.10 did you answer and how? (H = high, L = low, NA = not answered/skipped)
1. h L or na 3. h L or na 5. h L or na 7. h L or na 2. h L or na 4. h L or na 6. h L or na
Step 3 Which leadership style is the most appropriate? ____ decide ____ consult individually ____ consult ____ group ____ facilitate delegate
2. Religious leader. You are the top religious leader of your church with 125 families and 200 members. You have a doctor of religious studies degree with just two years’ experience as the head of a church, and no business courses. The church has one paid secretary, three part-time program directors for religious instruction, music, and social activities, plus many volunteers. Your
paid staff serves on your advisory board with 10 other church members who are primarily top-level business leaders in the community. You make a yearly budget with the board’s approval. The church source of income is weekly member donations. The board doesn’t want to operate in the red, and the church has very modest surplus funds. Your volunteer accountant (CPA), who is a board member, asked to meet with you. During the meeting, she informed you that weekly collections are 20 per- cent below budget and the cost of utilities has increased 25 percent over the yearly budget figure. You are running a large deficit, and at this rate your surplus will be gone in two months. Which leadership style will you use in this crisis?
Step 1 Which model should you use? (____ time-driven ____ development-driven)
Step 2 Which questions did you answer and how? (H = high, L = low, NA = not answered/skipped)
1. h L or na 3. h L or na 5. h L or na 7. h L or na 2. h L or na 4. h L or na 6. h L or na
Step 3 Which leadership style is the most appropriate? ___ decide ___consult individually ___ consult group___ facilitate ___ delegate
3. School of business dean. You are the new dean of the school of business at a small private university. Your faculty includes around 20 professors, only two of whom are nontenured, and the aver- age length of employment at the school is 12 years. Upon taking the job, you expect to leave for a larger school in three years. Your primary goal is to start a business school faculty advisory board to improve community relations and school alumni rela- tions, and to raise money for financial aid scholarships. You have already done this in your last job as dean. However, you are new to the area and have no business contacts. You need help to develop a network of alumni and other community leaders fairly quickly if you are to show achieved results on your resume in two-and-a-half years. Your faculty gets along well and is talk- ative, but when you approach small groups of them they tend to become quiet and disperse. Which primary leadership style would you use to achieve your objective?
Step 1 Which model should you use? (___ time-driven ___ development-driven)
Step 2 Which questions did you answer and how? (H = high, L = low, NA = not answered/skipped)
1. h L or na 3. h L or na 5. h L or na 7. h L or na 2. h L or na 4. h L or na 6. h L or na
Using the Normative Leadership Models
Developing your Leadership Skills
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 140 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 4 ConTIngEnCy LEaDErShIp ThEorIES 141
Step 3 Which leadership style is the most appropriate?
1. h L or na 3. h L or na 5. h L or na 7. h L or na 2. h L or na 4. h L or na 6. h L or na
Step 3 Which leadership style is the most appropriate? ___ decide ___ consult individually ___ consult group ___ facilitate ___ delegate group ___ facilitate ___ delegate
4. Dot.com president. You are the president of a dot.com com- pany that has been having financial problems for a few years. As a result, your top two managers left for other jobs. One left four months ago and the other two months ago. With your network- ing contacts you replaced both managers within a month; thus, they don’t have a lot of time on the job and haven’t worked together for very long. Plus, they currently do their own thing to get their jobs done. However, they are both very bright, hard- working, and dedicated to your vision of what the company can be. You know how to turn the company around and so do your two key managers. To turn the company around, you and your two managers will have to work together, with the help of all your employees. Virtually all the employees are high-tech special- ists who want to be included in decision making. Your business partners have no more money to invest. If you cannot turn a profit in four to five months, you will most likely go bankrupt. Which primary leadership style would you use to achieve your objective?
Step 1 Which model should you use? (___ time-driven development-driven)
Step 2 Which questions did you answer and how? (H = high, L = low, NA = not answered/skipped)
1. h L or na 3. h L or na 5. h L or na 7. h L or na 2. h L or na 4. h L or na 6. h L or na
Step 3 Which leadership style is the most appropriate? ____ decide ____ consult individually ____ consult group ____ facilitate ____ delegate
Doing this exercise in Class
Objective
To develop your skill at determining the appropriate leadership style to use in a given situation using the normative leadership models, Exhibits 4.9 and 4.10.
aaCSB General Skills area
The primary AACSB competencies developed through this exercise are communications, analytic skills, and application of knowledge.
experience
You will use the normative leadership models in four given problem situations.
procedure 1 (5–8 minutes) The instructor goes over the normative leadership models and uses the models to illustrate how to select the appropriate leadership style for problem situation 1.
procedure 2 (10–20 minutes) Break into groups of two or three and use the models to determine the appropriate lead- ership style for situations 2–4 in the preparation above. This is followed by the instructor going over or just stating the an- swers to situations 2–4.
Conclusion
The instructor may lead a class discussion and/or make conclud- ing remarks.
apply It (2–4 minutes) What did I learn from this experience? How will I apply normative leadership in the future?
Sharing
In the group, or to the entire class, volunteers may give their answers to the “Apply It” questions.
Your Leadership Continuum and path–Goal Leadership Styles
SELF-ASSESSMENT 4-4
you have already determined your preferred LpC contingency leadership style (Self-assessment 4-1 on page 113) and your preferred normative leadership style (Self-assessment 4-3 on pages 138–141). Using Self-assessment 4-4, you can determine your other preferred styles by checking your preferred normative leadership style in the first column. In the same row, the columns to the right show your continuum and path–goal preferred leadership styles. Does your preferred leadership style match your personality for Self-assessment 4-2 on page 132?
NOrMatIVe LeaDerShIp StYLe
LeaDerShIp CONtINUUM StYLe
path–GOaL LeaDerShIp StYLe
Decide 1 Boss-centered Directive
Consult (individually or group) 2 or 3 Achievement-oriented
Facilitate 4 or 5 Supportive
Delegate 6 or 7 Subordinate-centered Participative
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 141 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
142 part 1 InDIVIDUaLS aS LEaDErS
1 PepsiCo Web site (www.pepsico.com), accessed Januar y 28, 2014.
2 “The 50 Most Powerful Women,” Fortune (October 28, 2013): 133–138.
3 PepsiCo Web site (www.pepsico.com), accessed January 28, 2014.
4 G. Colvin, “Indra Nooyi’s Challenge,” Fortune (June 11, 2012): 149–156.
5 “Largest U.S. corporations—Fortune 500,” Fortune (May 20, 2013): 1–20.
6 “The World’s Most Admired Companies,” Fortune (March 18, 2013): 137–148.
7 M. Esterl and V. Baurlein, “PepsiCo Wakes Up and Smells the Cola,” Wall Street Journal (June 28, 2011): B1, B2.
8 M. Esterl, “PepsiCo Board Stands by Nooyi,” Wall Street Journal (January 13, 2012): B1.
9 M.A. Hogg, D. Van Knippenberg, and D.E. Rast, “Intergroup Leadership in Organizations: Leading across Group and Organizational Boundaries,” Academy of Management Review 37(2) (2012): 232–255.
10 H.R. Greve, “Microfoundations of Management: Behavioral Strategies and Levels of Rationality in Organizational Action,” Academy of Management Perspectives 27(2) (2013): 103–119.
11 A.M. Grant and S.V. Patil, “Challenging the Norm of Self- Interest: Minority Influence and Transitions to Helping Norms in Work Units,” Academy of Management Review 37(4) (2012): 547–568.
12 S.B. Sitkin and J.R. Hackman, “Developing Team Leadership: An Interview with Coach Mike Krzyzewski,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 494–501.
13 J.D. Harris and S.G. Sounder, “Model-Theoretic Knowledge Accumulation: The Case of Agency Theory and Incentive Alignment,” Academy of Management Review 38(3) (2013): 442–454.
14 B. Benjamin and C. O’Reilly, “Becoming a Leader : Early Career Challenges Faced by MBA Graduates,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 452–472.
15 B.P. Owens and D.R. Hekman, “Modeling How to Grow: An Inductive Examination of Humble Leader Behaviors, Contingencies, and Outcomes,” Academy of Management Journal 55(4) (2012): 787–818.
16 G. Yukl, “Effective Leadership Behavior : What We Know and What Questions Need More Attention,” Academy of Management Perspectives 26(4) (2011): 66–85.
17 N.M. Lorinkova, M.J. Pearsall, and H.P. Sims, “Examining the Differential Longitudinal Performance of Directive versus Empowering Leadership in Teams,” Academy of Management Journal 56(2) (2013): 573–596.
18 G. Toegel, M. Kilduff, and N. Anand, “Emotion Helping by Managers: An Emergent Understanding of Discrepant Role Expectations and Outcomes,” Academy of Management Journal 56(2) (2013): 334–357.
19 M.C. Sonfield and R.N. Lussier, “Gender in Family Business Ownership and Management: A Six Country Analysis,” International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship 1(2) (2009): 96–117.
20 J. Eisenberg, C.E.J. Härtel, and G.K. Stahl, “From the Guest Editors: Cross-Cultural Management Learning and Education—Exploring Multiple Aims, Approaches, and Impacts,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 12(3) (2013): 323–329; A.H. Van De Ven and A. Lifschitz, “Rational and Reasonable Microfoundations of Markets and Institutions,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 27(2) (2013): 156–172.
21 Y. Zhu and F.B. Chiappini, “Balancing Emic and Etic: Situated Learning and Ethnography of Communication in Cross-Cultural Management Education,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 12(3) (2013): 380–395.
22 M.E. Mendenhall, A.A. Arnardottir, G.R. Oddou, and L.A. Burke, “Developing Cross-Cultural Competencies in Management Education via Cognitive-Behavior Therapy,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 12(3) (2013): 436–451.
23 J. Eisenberg, C.E.J. Härtel, and G.K. Stahl, “From the Guest Editors: Cross-Cultural Management Learning and Education—Exploring Multiple Aims, Approaches, and Impacts,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 12(3) (2013): 323–329; A.H. Van De Ven and A. Lifschitz, “Rational and Reasonable Microfoundations of Markets and Institutions,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 27(2) (2013): 156–172.
24 R.J. House; et al., eds. Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2004).
25 F.E. Fiedler, A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967); F.E. Fiedler and M.M. Chemers, Improving Leadership Effectiveness: The Leader Match Concept, 2nd ed. (New York: Wiley, 1982).
26 P. Puranam, M. Raveendran, and T. Knudsen, “Organization Design: The Epistemic Interdependence Perspective,” Academy of Management Review 37(3) (2012): 419–440.
endnotes
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 142 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 4 ConTIngEnCy LEaDErShIp ThEorIES 143
27 G. Yukl, “Effective Leadership Behavior : What We Know and What Questions Need More Attention,” Academy of Management Perspectives 26(4) (2011): 66–85.
28 G. Toegel, M. Kilduff, and N. Anand, “Emotion Helping by Managers: An Emergent Understanding of Discrepant Role Expectations and Outcomes,” Academy of Management Journal 56(2) (2013): 334–357.
29 N.M. Lorinkova, M.J. Pearsall, and H.P. Sims, “Examining the Differential Longitudinal Performance of Directive versus Empowering Leadership in Teams,” Academy of Management Journal 56(2) (2013): 573–596.
30 G. Yukl, “Effective Leadership Behavior : What We Know and What Questions Need More Attention,” Academy of Management Perspectives 26(4) (2011): 66–85.
31 M.J. Strube and J.E. Garcia, “A Meta-Analytical Investigation of Fiedler’s Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness,” Psychology Bulletin 90 (1981): 307–321; and L.H. Peters, D.D. Hartke, and J.T. Pohlmann, “Fiedler’s Contingency Theory of Leadership: An Application of the Meta-Analysis Procedure of Schmidt and Hunter,” Psychological Bulletin 97 (1985): 274–285.
32 F.E. Fiedler, “A Rejoinder to Schriesheim and Kerr’s Pre- mature Obituary of the Contingency Model,” in J.G. Hunt and L.L. Larson, eds., Leadership: The Cutting Edge (Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1977): 45–50; and F.E. Fiedler, “The Contingency Model: A Reply to Ashour,” Organizational Performance and Human Behavior 9 (1973): 356–368.
33 R. Tannenbaum and W.H. Schmidt, “How to Choose a Leadership Pattern,” Harvard Business Review (March–April 1958): 95–101; R. Tannenbaum and W.H. Schmidt, “How to Choose a Leadership Pattern,” Harvard Business Review (May–June 1973): 166. R. Tannenbaum and W.H. Schmidt, excerpts from “How to Choose a Leadership Pattern,” Harvard Business Review (July–August 1986): 129.
34 B.P. Owens and D.R. Hekman, “Modeling How to Grow: An Inductive Examination of Humble Leader Behaviors, Contingencies, and Outcomes,” Academy of Management Journal 55(4) (2012): 787–818.
35 R.J. House, “A Path-Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness,” Administrative Science Quarterly 16(2) (1971): 321–329; M.G. Evans, “The Effects of Supervisory Behavior on the Path-Goal Relationship,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 5 (1970): 277–298; and R.N. House and R.J. Aditya, “The Social Scientific Study of Leadership: Quo Vadis?” Journal of Management 23 (May–June 1997): 409–474.
36 M.R. Barrick, M.K. Mount, and N. Li, “The Theory of Purposeful Work Behavior : The Role of Personality, Higher-Order Goals, and Job Characteristics,” Academy of Management Review 38(1) (2013): 132–153.
37 J.C. Wofford and L.Z. Liska, “Path-Goal Theories of Leadership: A Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Management 19 (1993): 858–876; and P.M. Podsakoff, S.B. MacKenzie, M. Ahearne, and W.H. Bommer, “Searching for a Needle in a Haystack: Trying to Identify the Illusive Moderators of Leadership Behavior,” Journal of Management 21 (1995): 423–470.
38 V.H. Vroom and P.W. Yetton, Leadership and Decision Making (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1973); V.H. Vroom and A.G. Jago, The New Leadership: Managing Participation in Organizations (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1988); and V.H. Vroom, “Leadership and the Decision- Making Process,” Organizational Dynamics 28 (Spring 2000): 82–94.
39 V.H. Vroom, “Leadership and the Decision-Making Process,” Organizational Dynamics 28 (Spring 2000): 82–94.
40 J.B. Miner, “The Uncertain Future of the Leadership Concept: An Overview,” in J.G. Hunt and L.L. Larson, eds., Leadership Frontiers (Kent, OH: Kent State University, 1975); R.H.G. Field, “A Critique of the Vroom-Yetton Contingency Model of Leadership Behavior,” Academy of Management Review 4 (1979): 249–257; R.H.G. Field, “A Test of the Vroom-Yetton Normative Model of Leadership,” Journal of Applied Psychology (October 1982): 523–532; and R.H.G. Field, P.C. Read, and J.J. Louviere, “The Effect of Situation Attributes on Decision Method Choice in the Vroom-Jago Model of Participation in Decision Making,” Leadership Quarterly 1 (1990): 165–176.
41 N.M. Lorinkova, M.J. Pearsall, and H.P. Sims, “Examining the Differential Longitudinal Performance of Directive versus Empowering Leadership in Teams,” Academy of Management Journal 56(2) (2013): 573–596.
42 S. Kerr and J. Jermier, “Substitutes for Leadership: Their Meaning and Measurement,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 22 (1978): 375–403.
43 P.M. Podsakoff, S.B. MacKenzie, and W.H. Bommer, “Meta- Analysis of the Relationships between Kerr and Jermier’s Substitutes for Leadership and Employee Job Attitudes, Role Perceptions, and Performance,” Journal of Applied Psychology 81 (August 1996): 380–400.
44 Foxconn Web site (www.foxconn.com), accessed February 4, 2014.
45 F. Balfour and T. Culpan, “Chairman Gou,” BusinessWeek (September 13–19, 2010): 58–69.
66352_ch04_ptg01_108-143.indd 143 10/15/14 12:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
14 4
Chapter
5
C h a p t e r O U t L I N e
Power
Sources of Power
Types of Power and Influencing Tactics, and Ways to Increase Your Power
Organizational Politics
The Nature of Organizational Politics
Political Behavior
Guidelines for Developing Political Skills
Networking
Perform a Self-Assessment and Set Goals
Create Your One-Minute Self-Sell
Develop Your Network
Conduct Networking Interviews
Maintain Your Network
Social Networking at Work
Negotiation
Negotiating
The Negotiation Process
Ethics and Influencing
Influencing: Power, Politics, Networking, and Negotiation
Learning Outcomes After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
1 Explain the differences between position power and personal power. p. 145
2 Discuss the differences among legitimate, reward, coercive, and referent power. p. 146
3 Discuss how power and politics are related. p. 154
4 Describe how money and politics have a similar use. p. 154
5 List and explain the steps in the networking process. p. 160
6 List the steps in the negotiation process. p. 166
7 Explain the relationships among negotiation and conflict, influencing tactics, power, and politics. p. 166
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 144 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 5 INfLuENcINg: PowEr, PoLItIcs, NEtworkINg, aND NEgotIatIoN 145
Serial entrepreneur Mark Cuban has ventured into many diverse businesses. Cuban’s first step into the business world occurred at age 12, when he sold garbage bags door to door. Soon after, he was selling stamps, coins, and baseball cards, which paid for his business degree at Indiana University (IU). While attending IU, Cuban bought a Bloomington bar and named it Motley’s, raising the money by selling shares to his friends. Cuban and Mar tin Woodall founded MicroSolutions, and they sold the company for $6 million. With Woodall, he also invested in the Landmark Theatres, Magnolia Pictures, AXS TV (formerly HDNet), and audio and video por tal Broadcast.com; he was also a day trader. Cuban also took acting lessons and was on the TV show Shark Tank. But Cuban is most famous, however, for his 90 percent ownership and controversial, zealous management of the NBA team Dallas Mavericks. Cuban is listed on the Forbes 400 Richest People in America, with a net worth of $2.5 billion.1
OpeNING CaSe QUeStIONS:
1. What sources and types of power does Mark Cuban have, and why has he had problems with power?
2. Why are organizational politics important to Mark Cuban’s enterprises?
3. How has Mark Cuban used networking?
4. What types of negotiations does Mark Cuban engage in?
5. Is Mark Cuban ethical in influencing others?
Can you answer any of these questions? You’ll find answers to these questions and learn more about Mark Cuban’s businesses and leadership style throughout the chapter.
To learn more about Mark Cuban, do an Internet search.
OPENING CASE application
B esides excellent work, what does it take to get ahead in an organization? To climb the corporate ladder, you will have to inf luence people2—to gain power, play organizational politics, network, and negotiate to get what you want. These related concepts are the topics of this chapter. Recall from our definition of leadership
(Chapter 1) that leadership is the “inf luencing” process of leaders and followers to achieve organizational objectives through change. Leaders and followers inf luence each other. This chapter focuses on leadership behavior by explaining how leaders inf luence others at the individual level of analysis. Let’s begin with power because if you want to make a difference, you need to have power.3
Power Power is the fundamental concept in social science,4 and power skills can be taught and developed.5 If we want to understand why organizations do the things they do, we must consider the power of managers and how power differences affect team and organiza- tional performance.6 Power is about achieving inf luence over others. However, power is the leader’s potential inf luence over followers. Because power is the potential to inf lu- ence, you do not actually have to use power to inf luence others. Often, it is the perception of power, rather than the actual use of power, that inf luences others. In this section, we discuss sources of power, types of power, inf luencing tactics, and ways to increase your power.
Explain the differences between position power and personal power. Learning outcome
1
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 145 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
146 part 1 INDIVIDuaLs as LEaDErs
Sources of power There are different sources of power,7 and here we discuss position power and personal power.
Position Power Position power is derived from top management, and it is delegated down the chain of command. Position status can give you power.8 Thus, a person who is in a management position has more potential power to inf luence than an employee who is not a manager.9 Some people view power as the ability to make people do what they want them to do or the ability to do something to people or for people. These definitions may be true, but they tend to give power a manipulative, negative connotation, as does the old saying by Lord Acton, “Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.” Power can also make people more self-focused.10
Within an organization, power should be viewed in a positive sense. Without power, managers could not achieve organizational objectives, so leadership and power go hand in hand. Managers rely on position power to get the job done.11 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. said, “Power properly understood is nothing but the ability to achieve purpose. It is the strength to bring about change.”
Personal Power Personal power is derived from the followers based on the leader’s behavior. Charismatic leaders have personal power. Again, followers do have some power over leaders. So you don’t have to be a manager to have power.
A manager can have only position power or both position and personal power, but a nonmanager can have only personal power. Today’s successful leaders share power (empowerment) by pushing power and decision making down the organization.12 As former NBA coach Phil Jackson puts it, you need to empower your players.13
Discuss the differences among legitimate, reward, coercive, and referent power. Learning outcome
2
types of power and Influencing tactics, and Ways to Increase Your power Seven types of power are illustrated, along with their source and inf luencing tactics, in Exhibit 5.1. In the late 1950s, French and Raven distinguished five types of power (reward, coercive, legitimate, expert, and referent).14 Connection (politics) and information power have been added to update the important types of power. We will discuss these seven types of power and explore ways to increase each type with inf luencing tactics, or actions.15 You can acquire power, without taking it away from others. Generally, power is given to those who get results and have good human relations skills that are useful to those in power.16
Legitimate Power Legitimate power is based on the user’s position power, given by the organization. It is also called the legitimization inf luencing tactic. Managers assign work, coaches decide who plays, and teachers award grades. These three positions have formal authority from the organization. Without this legitimate authority, they could not inf luence followers in the same way.17 Employees tend to have a felt obligation and feel that they ought to do what their manager says within the scope of the job.18
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 146 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 5 INfLuENcINg: PowEr, PoLItIcs, NEtworkINg, aND NEgotIatIoN 147
Appropriate Use of Legitimate Power. Employees agree to comply with management authority in return for the benef its of membership. The use of legitimate power is appropriate when asking people to do something that is within the scope of their job. Most day-to-day manager–employee interactions are based on legitimate power.
When using legitimate power, it is also helpful to use the consultation inf luencing tactic. With consultation, you seek others’ input about achieving an objective and are open to developing a plan together to achieve the objective. This process is also known as participative management and empowering employees. We will talk more about participa- tive management throughout the book.
Legitimate Use of Rational Persuasion. When we as managers are meeting objectives through our employees or dealing with higher-level managers and people over whom we have no authority, it is often helpful to use the rational persuasion inf luencing tactic. Rational persuasion includes logical arguments with factual evidence to persuade others to implement your recommended action.
When we use rational persuasion, we need to develop a persuasive case based on the other party’s needs, not ours. What seems logical and reasonable to you may not be to others. With multiple parties, a different logical argument may be made to meet indi- vidual needs. Logical arguments generally work well with people whose behavior is more inf luenced by thinking than by emotions. It works well when the leader and follower have the same shared interest and objectives.
When tr ying to persuade others to do something for us, it is helpful to use the ingratiation inf luencing tactic. Be friendly and praising others before you ask them for what you want—complements cost you nothing19 (use the giving praise model in Chapter 3).
Using Rational Persuasion. When you develop a rational persuasion, follow these guidelines:
• Explain the reason why the objective needs to be met. • Explain how the other party will benefit by meeting the objective. Try to think of the
other party’s often-unasked question: what’s in it for me? • Provide evidence that the objective can be met. • Explain how potential problems and concerns will be handled. Know the potential
problems and concerns and deal with them in the rational persuasion.
Increasing Legitimate Power. To increase legitimate power, follow these guidelines:
• To have legitimate power, we need management experience, which could also be a part of the job—for example, being in charge of a team project with peers.
• Exercise authority regularly. Follow up to make sure that objectives are achieved.
Source Personal Power
Types
Tactics
Legitimate
Legitimization
Consultation Rational persuasion Ingratiation
Reward
Exchange
Coercive
Pressure
Connection
Coalitions
Information
Rational persuasion
Expert
Rational persuasion
Referent
Inspirational appeal Personal appeal
Position Power
Inspirational appeal
EXHIBIT 5.1 Sources and Types of Power with Influencing Tactics
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 147 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
148 part 1 INDIVIDuaLs as LEaDErs
• Follow the guidelines for using rational persuasion, especially when authority is questioned.
• Back up your authority with rewards and punishment,20 our next two types of power, which are primarily based on having legitimate power.
Reward Power reward power is based on the user’s ability to inf luence others with something of value to them. In a management position, use positive reinforcements to inf luence behavior, with incentives such as praise, recognition (with pins, badges, hats, or jackets), special assign- ments or desirable activities, pay raises, bonuses, and promotions. Many organizations, including Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC), have employee-of-the-month awards. Tupper- ware holds rallies for its salespeople, and almost everyone gets something—ranging from pins to lucrative prizes for top performers. A leader’s power is strong or weak based on ability to punish and reward followers. An important part of reward power is having con- trol over getting and allocating resources.21
Appropriate Use of Reward Power. When employees do a good job, they should be rewarded, as discussed with reinforcement motivation theory (Chapter 3). When dealing with higher-level managers and people over whom we have no authority, we can use the exchange influencing tactic by offering some type of reward for helping meet our objective. The incentive for exchange can be anything of value, such as scarce resources, information, advice or assistance on another task, or career and political support. Exchange is common in reciprocity22 (you do something for me and I’ll do something for you—or you owe me one, for a later reward), which we will discuss in a later section on organizational politics.
Increasing Reward Power. To increase reward power, follow these guidelines:
• Gain and maintain control over evaluating employees’ performance and determining their raises, promotions, and other rewards.
• Find out what others value, and try to reward people in that way. • Let people know you control rewards, and state our criteria for giving rewards.
Coercive Power The use of coercive power involves punishment and withholding of rewards to inf lu- ence compliance. It is also called the pressure inf luencing tactic. From fear of reprimands, probation, suspension, or dismissal, employees often do as their manager requests. Other examples of coercive power include verbal abuse, humiliation, and ostracism. Group members also use coercive power (peer pressure) to enforce group norms.
Appropriate Use of Coercive Power. Coercive power is appropriate to use in maintain- ing discipline and enforcing rules. When employees are not willing to do as requested, coercive power may be the only way to gain compliance. Employees tend to resent man- agers’ use of coercive power. So keep the use of coercive power to a minimum by using it only as a last resort.
Increasing Coercive Power. To increase coercive power, follow these guidelines.
• Gain authority to use punishment and withhold rewards. • Don’t make rash threats; do not use coercion to manipulate others or to gain personal
benefits. • Be persistent. If we request that followers do something, we need to follow up to make
sure it is done.
WORk Application 5-1 Select a present or past manager who has or had coercive power. Give a specific example of how he or she uses or used reward and punishment to achieve an objective. Overall, how effective is (or was) this manager at using rewards and punishment?
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 148 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 5 INfLuENcINg: PowEr, PoLItIcs, NEtworkINg, aND NEgotIatIoN 149
Referent Power referent power is based on the user’s personal relationships with others. It is also called the personal appeals inf luencing tactic based on loyalty and friendship. Power stems pri- marily from relationships with the person using power. Charismatic leaders tend to use referent power.
Leaders can also use the inspirational appeals inf luencing tactic. You appeal to the follower’s values, ideals, and aspirations, or increase self-confidence by displaying your feelings to appeal to the follower’s emotions and enthusiasm. So rational persuasion uses logic, whereas inspirational persuasion appeals to emotions and enthusiasm. Thus, inspi- rational appeals generally work well with people whose behavior is more inf luenced by emotions than logical thinking.
To be inspirational, we need to understand the values, hopes, fears, and goals of fol- lowers. We need to be positive and optimistic and create a vision of how things will be when the objective is achieved. You can also include the ingratiation inf luencing tactic within your inspirational appeal.
Appropriate Use of Referent Power. The use of referent power is particularly appro- priate for people with weak, or no, position power, such as with peers. Referent power is needed in self-managed teams because leadership should be shared.
Increasing Referent Power. To increase referent power, follow these guidelines:
• Develop people skills, which are covered in all chapters. Remember that we don’t have to be a manager to have referent power.
• Work at relationships with managers and peers.
Expert Power expert power is based on the user’s skill and knowledge. Being an expert makes other people dependent on you. People often respect an expert, and the fewer people who pos- sess an expertise and knowledge, the more power the expert individual has.23
The more people come to us for advice, the greater is our expert power. Experts com- monly use the rational persuasion inf luencing tactic because people believe they know what they are saying and that it is correct.
YOU Make the ethICaL call
5.1 Following Orders
The armed forces are hierarchical by rank, based on power. Officers tend to give orders to troops by using legitimate power. When orders are followed, reward power is common. When orders are not followed, coercive power is commonly used to get the troops to implement the order. The conditioning of the military is to respect the power of authority and to follow orders, usually without questioning authority.
1. Is it ethical and socially responsible to teach people to follow orders without ques- tioning authority in the military or any other organization?
2. What would you do if your boss asked you to follow orders that you thought might be unethical? (Some options include the following: just do it; don’t say anything but don’t do it; question the motives; look closely at what you are asked to do; go to your boss’s boss to make sure it’s okay to do it; tell the boss you will not do it; ask the boss to do it him- or herself; blow the whistle to an outside source like the government or media; etc.)
3. Is following orders a good justification for unethical practices?
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 149 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
150 part 1 INDIVIDuaLs as LEaDErs
Appropriate Use of Expert Power. Managers, particularly at lower levels, are often— but not always—experts within their departments. New managers frequently depend on employees who have expertise in how the organization runs and know how to get things done politically. Thus, followers can have considerable inf luence over the leader. Expert power is essential to employees who are working with people from other departments and organizations.
Increasing Expert Power. To increase expert power, follow these guidelines:
• To become an expert, take all the training and educational programs the organization provides.
• Attend meetings of your trade or professional associations, and read their publications (magazines and journals) to keep up with current trends in your field. Write articles to be published. Become an officer in the organization.
• Keep up with the latest technology. Volunteer to be the first to learn something new. • Project a positive self-concept (Chapter 2),24 and let people know about your expertise
by developing a reputation for having expertise.
Information Power Information power is based on the user’s data desired by others. Information power involves access to vital information and knowledge and control over its distribution to others.25 Managers often have access to information that is not available to subordinates, giving them power. Managers also rely on employees for information, giving them some power. Some administrative assistants have more information and are more helpful in answering questions than the managers they work for.
Appropriate Use of Information Power. An important part of the manager’s job is to convey information. Employees often come to managers for information on what to do and how to do it. Leaders use information power when making rational persuasion and often with inspirational appeals.
Increasing Information Power. To increase information power, follow these guidelines:
• Have information flow through you. • Know what is going on in the organization. Serve on committees because it gives both
information and a chance to increase connection power. • Develop a network of information sources, and gather information from them.26 You
will learn how to network later in this chapter.
Connection Power Connection power is based on the user’s relationships with inf luential people. Connection power is also a form of politics, the topic of our next major section. The right connections can give power or at least the perception of having power. If people know you are friendly with people in power, they are more apt to do as you request.
Sometimes it is difficult to inf luence others all alone. With a coalition inf luencing tactic you use inf luential people to help persuade others to meet your objective. The more people you can get on your side, the more inf luence you can have on others. Coalitions are also a political strategy—a tactic that will be discussed again later in this chapter.
Appropriate Use of Connection Power. When you are looking for a job or promotions, connections can help. There is a lot of truth in the statement “It’s not what you know; it’s who you know.” Connection power can also help you get resources you need.27
WORk Application 5-2 Select a past or present job. Who did (or do) you usually go to for expertise and information? Give examples of when you went to someone for expertise and when you went to someone for information.
WORk Application 5-3 1. Think of a present
or past manager. Which type of power does (or did) the manager use most often? Explain.
2. Which one or two suggestions for increasing your power base are the most relevant to you? Explain.
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 150 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 5 INfLuENcINg: PowEr, PoLItIcs, NEtworkINg, aND NEgotIatIoN 151
Increasing Connection Power. To increase connection power, follow these guidelines:
• Expand your network of contacts with important managers who have power. • Join the “in-crowd” and the “right” associations and clubs. Participating in sports like
golf may help you meet influential people. • Follow the guidelines for using the coalition influencing tactic. When you want some-
thing, identify the people who can help you attain it, make coalitions, and win them over to your side.
• Get people to know your name. Get all the publicity you can. Have your accomplish- ments known by the people in power; send them notices without sounding like a bragger. Now that you have read about nine inf luencing tactics within seven types of power, see
Exhibit 5.1 for a review, and test your ability to apply them in Concept Applications 5-1 and 5-2. Then, complete Self-Assessment 5-1 to better understand how your personality traits relate to how you use power and inf luencing tactics to get what you want.
WORk Application 5-4 Give three different influencing tactics you or someone else used to achieve an objective in an organization you have worked for.
CONCept APPLICATION 5-1
Influencing Tactics For each situation, select the most appropriate individual tactic that will enhance your chances of getting a desired outcome. Write the appropriate letter in the blank before each item. a. rational persuasion d. ingratiation g. coalition b. inspirational appeals e. personal appeals h. legitimization c. consultation f. exchange i. pressure
1. Sonia is resisting helping a coworker thinking, “What’s in it for me?”
2. You have an employee Hank with a big ego and who is very moody at times. You want Hank to complete an assignment ahead of schedule.
3. You believe you have accomplished things deserving a pay raise. So you decide to ask your manager for it.
4. Next week the committee you serve on will elect officers. Nominations and elections will be done at the same time. You are interested in being the president. But you don’t want to nominate yourself and you don’t want to run and lose.
5. Your employee Nikki regularly passes in assignments late. The assignment you are giving her now is very important and must be done on time.
6. You have an idea about how to increase performance of your department. But you are not too sure if it will work or if the employees will like the idea.
7. You are a production manager and heard rumors that the company will be purchasing some new high-tech manufacturing equipment. You would like to know if it is true, and, if so, are you getting it. You know a person in the purchasing department, so you decide to contact that person to try to find out.
8. The purchasing person from situation 7 gave you the information you were looking for. She is calling to ask you for some information.
9. Some of your workers did not come in to work today. You have a large order that a sales rep said would go out today. It will be tough for the small crew to meet the deadline.
10. Although the crew members in situation 9 have agreed to push to meet the deadline, you would like to give them some help besides your own. You have an administrative assistant who doesn’t work on processing orders. You decide to talk to this nonunion employee about working with the crew today.
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 151 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
152 part 1 INDIVIDuaLs as LEaDErs
Using Power Identify the relevant type of power to use in each situation to get the best results. Write the appropriate letter in the blank before each item. a. coercive d. referent b. connection e. information or expert c. reward or legitimate
11. One of your best workers, Carl, who needs little direction from you, is not performing to standard. You believe that a personal problem is affecting his work.
12. A committee, which is very political, allocates money for resources. You want a new larger truck to help your crew be more productive.
13. One of your best workers, Latoya, wants to be a manager. Latoya is asking you to help prepare her for a promotion.
14. Shawn is not doing much work today. As occasionally happens, he claims that he does not feel well but cannot afford to take time off without pay. There is work that needs to be done today.
15. You gave Helen an assignment specifying exactly how it had to be done. She ignored your directives and the assignment doesn’t meet the customer’s request. This is not the first time this has happened.
Influencing tactics, power, and personality traitsSELF-ASSESSMENT 5-1
review the nine influencing tactics. which ones do you tend to use most often to help you get what you want? also review your personality profile self-assessment exercises in chapter 2.
Surgency/high Need for power If you have a high need for power (n Pow), you are apt to try to influence others, and you enjoy it. You tend to hate to lose, and when you don’t get what you want, it bothers you. thus, you are more likely to use harder methods of influence and power, such as pressure, exchange, coalitions, and legitimization, than other personality types. You probably also like to use rational persuasion and don’t understand why people don’t think or see things the way you do. Be careful; use socialized, rather than personalized, power to influence others.
agreeableness/high Need for affiliation If you have a high need for affiliation (n aff), you are apt to be less concerned about influencing others and gaining power than about getting along with them. thus, you are more likely to use softer methods of influence, such as personal and inspirational appeals and ingratiation, as well as rational appeals. You may tend not to seek power, and even avoid it.
Conscientiousness/high Need for achievement If you have a high need for achievement (n ach), you tend to be between the other two approaches to influencing others. You tend to have clear goals and work hard to get what you want, which often requires influencing others to help you. so, you don’t want power for its own sake, only to get what you want. But you like to play by the rules and may tend to use rational persuasion frequently.
Based on the preceding information, briefly describe how your personality affects the ways you attempt to influence others.
CONCept APPLICATION 5-2
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 152 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 5 INfLuENcINg: PowEr, PoLItIcs, NEtworkINg, aND NEgotIatIoN 153
Organizational Politics Just as the nine inf luencing tactics (see Exhibit 5.1) are used within the seven types of power, these tactics are also used in organizational politics. In this section, we discuss the nature of organizational politics, political behavior, and guidelines for developing political skills. But first, determine your own use of political behavior by completing Self-Assessment 5-2.
1. What sources and types of power does Mark Cuban have, and why has he had problems with power?
Mark Cuban is used to getting his own way, and he wants to be famous and influential as he attempts to reorder the land- scape of professional sports and entertainment. He has position power as an owner of multiple businesses. As a business owner, Cuban has legitimate power, and he rewards his employees for doing a good job. He has used coercive power (he fired the Mavericks coach), he has some referent power, and he is viewed as an expert in business. He also has informa- tion power and has connections with some influential people.
On the dark side, Cuban’s behavior has cost him money and respect. Cuban is not your typical pro sports team owner who watches the games from the owner’s box. He sits next to the Mavericks team bench and yells at the players. He has gone out on the court during games and listens in on team huddles. Cuban has stormed into the locker room and cursed out the players when they lost. He has berated the referees, which has led to fines and problems with the NBA.
OPENING CASE application
Use of political BehaviorSELF-ASSESSMENT 5-2
select the response that best describes your actual or planned use of the following behavior on the job. Place a number from 1 to 5 on the line before each statement.
1 — 2 — 3 — 4 — 5 Rarely Occasionally Usually
1. I use my personal contacts to get a job and promotions.
2. I try to find out what is going on in all the organizational departments.
3. I dress the same way as the people in power and take on the same interests (watch or play sports, join the same clubs, etc.).
4. I purposely seek contacts and network with higher-level managers.
5. If upper management offered me a raise and promotion requiring me to move to a new location, I’d say yes even if I did not want to move.
6. I get along with everyone, even those con- sidered to be difficult to get along with.
7. I try to make people feel important by complimenting them.
8. I do favors for others and use their favors in return, and I thank people and send them thank-you notes.
9. I work at developing a good working rela- tionship with my manager.
10. I ask my manager and other people for their advice.
11. When a person opposes me, I still work to maintain a positive working relationship with that person.
12. I’m courteous, pleasant, and positive with others.
13. When my manager makes a mistake, I never publicly point out the error.
14. I am more cooperative (I compromise) than competitive (I seek to get my own way).
15. I tell the truth.
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 153 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
154 part 1 INDIVIDuaLs as LEaDErs
Use of political Behavior (Continued)SELF-ASSESSMENT 5-2
16. I avoid saying negative things about my manager and others behind their backs.
17. I work at getting people to know me by name and face by continually introducing myself.
18. I ask some satisfied customers and people who know my work to let my manager know how good a job I’m doing.
19. I try to win contests and get prizes, pins, and other awards.
20. I send notices of my accomplishments to higher-level managers and company newsletters.
to determine your overall political behavior, add the 20 numbers you selected as your answers. the number will range from 20 to 100. the higher your score, the more political behavior you use. Place your score here and on the continuum below.
2 0 — 3 0 — 4 0 — 5 0 — 6 0 — 7 0 — 8 0 — 9 0 — 1 0 0 Nonpolitical Political
to determine your use of political behavior in four areas, add the numbers for the following questions and divide by the number of questions to get the average score in each area.
A. Learning the organizational culture and power players
Questions 1–5 total: divided by 5 =
B. Developing good working relationships, especially with your boss
Questions 6–12 total: divided by 7 =
C. Being a loyal, honest team player
Questions 13–16 total: divided by 4 =
D. Gaining recognition
Questions 17–20 total: divided by 4 =
the higher the average score of items a–D, the more you use this type of political behavior. Do you tend to use them all equally, or do you use some more than others?
Discuss how power and politics are related. Learning outcome
3
the Nature of Organizational politics Organizations are political,28 as they are a social process,29 and power and politics are related.30 politics is the process of gaining and using power. Some managers believe that playing the political game is not necessary and that they will advance based just on job performance. But they couldn’t be more wrong because research findings support that political skills are needed to climb the corporate ladder, or at least avoid getting thrown off it as many promising managers’ careers were derailed because of poor political skills.31 The amount and importance of politics vary from organization to organization. How- ever, larger organizations tend to be more political, and the higher the level of manage- ment, the more important politics becomes.
Describe how money and politics have a similar use. Learning outcome
4
Politics Is a Medium of Exchange Like power, politics often has a negative connotation because of people who abuse politi- cal power. A positive way to view politics is to realize that it is simply a social medium of exchange. Social exchange theory regards exchanges between people as “social,” as opposed to economic, in nature.
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 154 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 5 INfLuENcINg: PowEr, PoLItIcs, NEtworkINg, aND NEgotIatIoN 155
Like money, politics in and of itself is inherently neither good nor bad. Politics is sim- ply a system of getting things done, or getting what we want. In our economy, money is the medium of exchange (tangible currency); in an organization, social politics is the medium of exchange (political behavior). Favors are the currency by which productivity is purchased and goodwill is gained. Political behavior creates energy and commitment, a valuable currency.32
Politically effective leaders marshal resources to accomplish personal and professional goals through the power and inf luence of their relationships. So political skill is not about taking advantage of others or backstabbing to enhance self-interest at the expense of others, it’s about building relationships to help you meet your objectives.33
political Behavior How well you play politics directly affects your success.34 Networking, reciprocity, and coalitions are common organizational political behaviors.
Networking Networking is a critical facet of political skills.35 Networking is the process of devel- oping relationships for the purpose of socializing and politicking. Successful managers spend more time networking than average managers, so reach out to establish an ongoing network of contacts to help you bring about change to meet your objectives.36 Because networking is so important to career success, we are going to discuss it as our next major section, after we finish our other political skills discussions.
Reciprocity Using reciprocity involves creating obligations and developing alliances, and using them to accomplish objectives. Notice that the exchange inf luencing tactic is used with reciprocity. When people do something for you, you incur an obligation that they may expect to be repaid. When you do something for people, you create a debt that you may be able to collect at a later date when you need a favor. Isn’t part of relationships doing things (favors) for each other?37 Thus, ongoing reciprocal relationships build commu- nity needed to meet your objectives,38 and reciprocity builds trust in social exchange relationships.39
Here is a tip to increase your chances of getting help from others. When asking for help, use the word favor, because the mere mention of that word can persuade people to help you. People have a modal, rote response to a favor request, which is, “Yeah, sure, what is it?” So start with the phrase “Will you please do me a favor?”
Coalitions Using coalitions as an inf luencing tactic is political behavior. Each party helps the others get what they want. Reciprocity and networking are commonly used to achieve ongoing objectives, whereas coalitions are developed for achieving a specific objec- tive. A political tactic when developing coalitions is to use co-optation. Co-optation is the process of getting a person whose support you need to join your coalition rather than compete.
The reality of organizational life is that most important decisions are made by coali- tions outside of the formal meeting in which the decision is made. For example, let’s say you are on a team and the captain is selected by a nomination and vote of the team mem- bers. If you want to be captain, you can politic by asking close teammates who they will vote for to try to get their votes, and if they are supportive, you can ask them to promote you for captain to others. If the majority of the team says they will vote for you, you have
WORk Application 5-5 Give a job example of how networking, reciprocity, or a coalition was used to achieve an organizational objective
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 155 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
156 part 1 INDIVIDuaLs as LEaDErs
basically won the election before the coach even starts the meeting, nominating, and vot- ing by building a coalition. If you don’t get any support from your close teammates and others, you can drop the effort to build a coalition, knowing that you will lose. This same coalition-building process is used to inf luence all types of decisions.
The upcoming guidelines can be used with any of the three political behaviors. Before considering how to develop political skills, review Exhibit 5.2 for a list of political behav- iors and guidelines.
2. Why are organizational politics important to Mark Cuban’s enterprises?
Mark Cuban has clearly used politics to gain and use power in creating his business empire. For the owner of multiple businesses, organizational politics is not as important as using political skills outside the organization. The NBA is an orga- nization of multiple team owners, so politics is important for making changes in the league. Because of Cuban’s behavior, the NBA owners voted to pass rules of conduct that were really meant for Cuban. The NBA commissioner said that the more stringent rules were called for to prevent individual owners from overshadowing the games. Cuban was so upset that he walked out of the meeting before the vote. So Cuban can improve on his organizational politics skills.
OPENING CASE application
Guidelines for Developing political Skills Researchers have found that women and minorities tend to have weak political skills and will have many more opportunities for advancement if they expand and exercise their political skills.40 Carly Fiorina stated that she lost her job as CEO of HP because of politics. Successfully implementing the behavior guidelines presented here can result in increased political skills. However, if you don’t agree with a particular political behavior, don’t use it. You do not have to use all of the political behaviors to be successful. Learn what it takes in the organization where you work as you follow the guidelines.
Understand the Organizational Culture and Power Players Develop your connection power through politicking. It is natural, especially for young people, to take a purely rational approach to a job without considering politics. But many
Political Behavior and Guidelines for Developing Political Skills EXHIBIT 5.2
Understand the organizational culture
• Learn the organizational culture and power player.
• Develop good working relationships, especially with your manager.
• Be a loyal, honest team player.
• Gain recognition.
Networking
Reciprocity Coalitions
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 156 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 5 INfLuENcINg: PowEr, PoLItIcs, NEtworkINg, aND NEgotIatIoN 157
business decisions are not very rational; they are based on power and politics. Learn the cultural (Chapter 10) shared values and beliefs and how business and politics operate where you work. Learn to read between the lines.
In all organizations, there are some powerful key players. Your manager is a key player to you.41 Don’t just find out who the managers are; gain an understanding of what makes each of them tick. By understanding them, you can tailor the presentation of your ideas and style to fit each person’s needs.42 For example, some managers want to see detailed financial numbers and statistics, while others don’t. Some managers expect you to con- tinually follow up with them, while others will think you are bugging them.
Review Self-Assessment 2, questions 1 through 5. You can use these tactics to increase your political skills. Network with power players. Try to do favors for power players to help them.43 When developing coalitions, get key players on your side. When selecting a mentor, try to get one who is good at organizational politics to teach you. Also try to observe people who are good at politics, and copy their behavior.
Develop Good Working Relationships, Especially with Your Manager The ability to work well with others is critical to your career success, and it’s an important foundation of politics.44 The more people like and respect you, the more power you will gain. Managers often promote informal leaders to supervise their peers. Let’s focus on the relationship with our boss because it is a major indicator of job satisfaction today.
Advancement. If we want to get ahead, we need to have a good supportive working relationship with our manager—your manager says you’re a top performer. Your boss usually gives you formal performance appraisals, which are the primary bases for raises and promotions. Fair or not, many evaluations are inf luenced by the manager’s relation- ship with the employee. If your manager likes and supports you, you have a better chance of getting a good review, raises, and promotions. If you lose your bosses support, you will most likely lose your advancement with the organization.45 It helps to phrase your own ideas as if they were your managers, and to complement your boss.46
Do more than what is required. Supervisors also give higher ratings to employees who share their goals (goal congruence) and priorities than they give to those who don’t.47 Thus, get to know what your manager expects from you (key performance indicators and objectives), and do it.48 Beat or at least meet deadlines, and don’t miss them. Impress your boss by doing more than you are asked to do.
Share bad news. It’s common to put off telling the manager bad news. But if you are having a problem on the job, don’t put off letting your manager know about it. Most managers, and peers, like to be asked for advice. If you are behind schedule to meet an important deadline and your manager finds out about it from others, it is embarrassing, especially if your manager finds out from his or her manager. Also avoid showing up your manager in public, such as during a meeting.
Don’t go to your boss’s manager. If you cannot get along with your manager and are in conf lict, avoid going to his or her manager to resolve the conf lict. There are two dangers in going over the manager’s head. First, chances are your manager has a good working relationship with his or her manager, who will side with your manager. Even if the higher-level manager agrees with you, you will most likely hurt your relationship with your manager. He or she may consciously or unconsciously take some form of retaliation, such as giving you a lower performance review, which can hurt you in the long run.
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 157 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
158 part 1 INDIVIDuaLs as LEaDErs
Review Self-Assessment 2, questions 6 through 12. You can use these tactics to increase your political skills. Include your manager in your network, try to do favors for your manager, and include your manager in your coalitions. Use the ingratiation tactic with everyone. When was the last time you gave anyone, including your manager, a compliment? When was the last time you sent a thank-you or congratulations note?
Be a Loyal, Honest Team Player Many managers reward loyalty.49 Ethical behavior is important in organizational power and politics.50 Some backstabbing gossips may get short-term benefits from such behav- ior, but in the long run they are generally unsuccessful because others gun them down in return. In any organization, you must earn others’ respect, confidence, and trust.51 There are very few, if any, jobs in which objectives can be achieved without the support of a group or team. The trend is toward teamwork,52 so if you’re not a team player, work at it.
Review Self-Assessment 2, questions 13 through 16. You can use these tactics to increase your political skills. Be a loyal, honest team player in your network, in your reciprocity, and with your coalition members.
Gain Recognition Doing a great job does not help you get ahead in an organization if no one knows about it or doesn’t know who you are. Author Ken Blanchard says, “It’s not who you know that counts; it’s who knows you and what they think of you.”53 Recognition and knowing the power players go hand in hand. You want people higher in the organization to know your expertise and the contributions you are making to them and the organization.54
Review Self-Assessment 2, questions 17 through 20. You can use these tactics to increase your political skills. Let people in your network and coalitions, and people you reciprocate with, know of your accomplishments. You can also serve on committees and try to become an officer, which gives you name recognition.
WORk Application 5-6 Which one or two suggestions for developing political skills are the most relevant to you? Explain.
Political Behavior Identify the behavior in each situation as effective or ineffective political behavior. Write the appropriate letter in the blank before each item. a. effective b. ineffective
16. The manager, Breonna, has to drop off a daily report by noon. She delivers the report at around 11:00 a.m. on Friday, so that she can run into some executives who meet at that time. On the other days, Breonna drops the report off at around noon on her way to lunch.
17. Jamal is taking golf lessons so he can join the company golf group, which includes some executives.
18. A manager made a poor decision, and Chris told his manager’s boss about it.
19. Sonia really wants to do an excellent job, so she avoids socializing at work.
20. Juan sent a very positive performance report to three executives who did not request copies.
CONCept APPLICATION 5-3
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 158 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 5 INfLuENcINg: PowEr, PoLItIcs, NEtworkINg, aND NEgotIatIoN 159
Networking Recall that networking is part of politics, and through networking you can develop your power and inf luence to get others to help you reach your objectives.55 Through network- ing you develop relationships,56 and the relationships build a community support system to help you in your career.57 There are many benefits to networking.58 For example, more people find jobs through networking than all the other methods combined. Companies have been recruiting talented workers through social media site LinkedIn for years,59 and more companies are now also using Facebook to recruit as well as to increase sales.60 Assess your networking skills now in Self-Assessment 5-3 before reading on.
NetworkingSELF-ASSESSMENT 5-3
Identify each of the 16 statements according to how accurately it describes your behavior. Place a number from 1 to 5 on the line before each statement.
5 — 4 — 3 — 2 — 1
Describes me Does not describe me
1. When I start something (a new project, a career move, a major purchase), I seek help from people I know and seek new contacts for help.
2. I view networking as a way to create win– win situations.
3. I like to meet new people; I can easily strike up a conversation with people I don’t know.
4. I can quickly state two or three of my most important accomplishments.
5. When I contact business people who can help me (such as with career information), I have goals for the communication.
6. When I contact business people who can help me, I have a planned short opening statement.
7. When I contact business people who can help me, I praise their accomplishments.
8. When I contact people who can help me, I have a set of questions to ask.
9. I know contact information for at least 100 people who can potentially help me.
10. I have a file/database with contact infor- mation of people who can help me in my career, and I keep it updated and continue to add new names.
11. During communications with people who can help me, I ask them for names of oth- ers I can contact for more information.
12. When seeking help from others, I ask them how I might help them.
13. When people help me, I thank them at the time and for big favors with a follow-up thanks.
14. I keep in touch with people who have helped or can potentially help me in my career at least once a year, and I update them on my career progress.
15. I have regular communications with people in my industry who work for different organizations, such as members of trade professional organizations.
16. I attend trade/professional/career types of meetings to maintain relationships and to make new contacts.
add up your score and place it here ____ and on the continuum below.
80 — 70 — 60 — 50 — 40 — 30 — 16 Effective Networking Ineffective Networking
If you are a full-time student, you may not score high on networking effectiveness, but that’s okay as you can develop networking skills by following the steps and guidelines in this chapter.
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 159 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
160 part 1 INDIVIDuaLs as LEaDErs
Networking is not about asking everyone you know for a job (or whatever you need assistance with). How would you react if someone directly said “Can you give me a job?” Although the same networking process applies to broad career development, we focus more on the job search. Whenever you start something—a new project, a career move, a car or house purchase—use your networks.
You may have a social networking account, like Facebook, to communicate with your friends, but “career” networking is more than this. This section provides a how-to network process that can enhance career development.61 The process is summarized in Exhibit 5.3.
1. Perform a self-assessment and set goals.
2. Create your one-minute self-sell.
3. Develop your network.
4. Conduct networking interviews.
5. Maintain your network.
The Networking Process EXHIBIT 5.3
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
List and explain the steps in the networking process. Learning outcome
5
perform a Self-assessment and Set Goals The self-assessment includes writing down your skills, competencies, and knowledge. Self-assessment gives you insight into your transferable skills and the criteria that are important to you in a new job. Listing the major criteria that are most important to you in the new job and prioritizing these can help to clarify your ideal next position.
Factors to consider are industry, company size and growth, location, travel and com- muting requirements, compensation package/benefits, job requirements, and promotion potential. Other factors to assess are the style of management, culture, and work style of the organization. Critical to career satisfaction is the ability to use your talents, grow in your field, and do what you do best in your job. Although many tools exist to assess skills and preferences, a simple list with priorities can suffice to clarify your talents and the characteristics of an ideal new career or job.
Accomplishments After completing a self-assessment, you are ready to translate your talents into accom- plishments. The results you achieved in your jobs and/or college are the best evidence of your skills. Your future employer knows that your past behavior helps predicts your future behavior and that if you achieved results in the past, you will likely produce simi- lar results again. Accomplishments are what set you apart and provide evidence of your skills and abilities. We must articulate what we have accomplished in a way that is clear, concise, and compelling. Write down your accomplishments (at least two or three) and include them in your résumé. Whether you are looking for a job or not, you should always have an updated résumé handy.
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 160 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 5 INfLuENcINg: PowEr, PoLItIcs, NEtworkINg, aND NEgotIatIoN 161
Tie Your Accomplishments to the Job Interview You want to be sure to state your accomplishments that are based on your skill during the job interview. Many interviews begin with a broad question such as “Tell me about your- self.” Oftentimes candidates do not reveal anything compelling. Sell yourself by elaborat- ing on a problem that was solved or an opportunity taken and how you achieved it using your skills.
Set Networking Goals For example: to get a mentor; to determine the expertise, skills, and requirements needed for XYZ position; to get feedback on my résumé and job and/or career preparation for a career move into XYZ; or to attain a job as XYZ. Be sure to write objectives using the setting objectives Model 3.1 from Chapter 3.
Create Your One-Minute Self-Sell Our next step is to create a one-minute sell to help accomplish your goal. The one- minute self-sell is an opening statement used in networking that quickly summarizes your history and career plan and asks a question. It is also referred to as an elevator pitch. To take 60 seconds or less, your message must be concise, but it also needs to be clear and compelling. It gives the listener a sense of your background, identifies your career field and a key result you’ve achieved, plus provides the direction of your next job. It tells the listener what you plan to do next and why. It also stimulates conversation by asking your network for help in the area of support, coaching, contacts, or knowledge of the industry.
Part 1. History: Start with a career summar y, the highlights of your career to date. Include your most recent career or school history and a description of the type of work/internship or courses you have taken. Also include the industry and type of organization.
Part 2. Plans: Next, state the target career you are seeking, the industry you prefer, and a specific function or role. You can also mention names of organizations you are tar- geting as well as let the acquaintance know why you are looking for work.
Part 3. Question: Last, ask a question to encourage two-way communication. The question will vary depending on the person and your goal or the reason you are using the one-minute self-sell, for example:
• In what areas might there be opportunities for a person with my experience? • In what other fields can I use these skills or this degree? • In what other positions in your organization could my skills be used? • How does my targeted future career sound to you? Is it a match with my education and
skills? • Do you know of any job openings in my field?
Write and Practice Your One-Minute Self-Sell Write out your one-minute self-sell. Be sure to clearly separate your history, plans, and question, and customize your question based on the contact with whom you are talking. For example, Hello, my name is Will Smith. I am a senior at Spring field College majoring in marketing, and I have completed an internship in the marketing department at the Big Y supermarket. I am seeking a job in sales in the food industry. Can you give me some ideas on the types of sales positions available in the food industry? Practice delivering it with family and friends and get feedback to improve it. The more opportunities you find to use this brief introduction, the easier it becomes.
WORk Application 5-7 Write a networking goal.
WORk Application 5-8 Write a one-minute self-sell to achieve your networking goal from Work Application 7.
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 161 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
162 part 1 INDIVIDuaLs as LEaDErs
Develop Your Network Begin with who you know. Everyone can create a written network list of about 200 people consisting of professional and personal contacts. You may already have a network on an online social networking site, such as Facebook or LinkedIn, and you most likely have phone and an e-mail account with an address book. Address books and rolodexes are written network lists, but you need to continually develop and expand them. An e-mail or Facebook/LinkedIn account is a good place to store your network list and information on each person because you can easily contact one or more people.
One word of caution regarding social networking and other Web sites: Be careful with what is online. If a potentially helpful person or employer looks you up online and finds unf lattering pictures of you (under the inf luence of drugs or alcohol, not fully dressed, doing embarrassing things, etc.), it may cost you a contact or potential job. You may want to do a search on yourself to make sure that others don’t have unf lattering pictures or other things of you posted.
Professional contacts include colleagues (past and present), professional organizations, alumni associations, vendors, suppliers, managers, mentors, and many other professional acquaintances. On a personal level, your network includes family, neighbors, friends, religious groups, and other personal service providers (doctor, dentist, insurance agent, stock broker, accountant, hairstylist, politician). Compose a list of your network using the above categories, and continually update and add to your list with referrals from oth- ers. You will discover that your network grows exponentially and can get you closer to the decision makers in a hiring position. In today’s job market, it is critical to engage in a “passive job hunt” using your network and having your résumé ready.
Now expand your list to people you don’t know. Who do you want to build a tie to? Where should you go to develop your network? Anywhere people gather. Talk to every- one because you never know who’s connected to whom. To be more specific, get more involved with professional associations. Many have special student memberships, and some even have college chapters. If you really want to develop your career reputation, become a leader in your associations and not just a member. Volunteer to be on com- mittees and boards, to give presentations, and so on. Other opportunities to network with people you don’t know include the chamber of commerce, college alumni clubs/ reunions, civic organizations (Rotary, Lions, Kiwanis, Elks, Moose, Knights of Colum- bus, etc.), courses of any type, trade shows and career fairs, community groups, charities and religious groups (Goodwill, American Cancer Society, your local church), and social clubs (exercise, boating, golf, tennis, etc.).
Another important point is to work at developing your ability to remember people by name. If you want to impress people you have never met or hardly know, call them by their name. Ask others who they are, then go up and call them by name and introduce yourself with your one-minute self-sell. When you are introduced to people, call them by name during the conversation two or three times. If you think the person can help you, don’t stop with casual conversation; make an appointment at a later time for a phone conversation, personal meeting, coffee, or lunch. Get their business cards to add to your network list, and give your business card and/or résumé when appropriate.
Conduct Networking Interviews Even though the trend is toward more online communications, networking in person is important. Based on your goal, use your network list of people to set up a networking interview to meet your goal. It may take many interviews to meet a goal, such as to get a job. An informational interview is a phone call or preferably a meeting that you initiate to
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 162 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 5 INfLuENcINg: PowEr, PoLItIcs, NEtworkINg, aND NEgotIatIoN 163
meet a goal, such as to gain information from a contact with hands-on experience in your field of interest.
You are the interviewer (in contrast to a job interview) and need to be prepared with specific questions to ask the contact regarding your targeted career or industry based on your self-assessment and goal. Keep your agenda short; focus on what is most important. Ask for a 15- to 20-minute meeting, and, as a result, many people will talk to you.
These meetings can be most helpful when you have accessed someone who is in an organization you’d like to join or has a contact in an industry you are targeting. A face- to-face meeting of 20 minutes can have many benefits. Your contact will remember you after a personal meeting, and the likelihood of getting a job lead increases. Keeping the person posted on your job search progress as well as a thank-you note after the meeting also solidifies the relationship. The interviewing steps are the following:
Step 1. Establish Rapport: Provide a brief introduction and thank the contact for his or her time. Clearly state the purpose of the meeting; be clear that you are not asking for a job. Don’t start selling yourself; project an interest in the other per- son. Do some research and impress the person by stating an accomplishment, such as “I enjoyed your presentation at the Rotary meeting on….”
Step 2. Deliver Your One-Minute Self-Sell: Even if the person has already heard it, say it again. This enables you to quickly summarize your background and career direction.
Step 3. Ask Prepared Questions: As stated above, do your homework before the meeting and compose a series of questions to ask during the interview. Your questions should vary depending on your goal, the contact, and how he or she may help you with your job search. Sample questions include the following:
• What do you think of my qualifications for this field? • With your knowledge of the industry, what career opportunities do you see
in the future? • What advice do you have for me as I begin/advance in my career? • If you were exploring this field, who else would you talk with?
During the interview, if the interviewee mentions anything that could hinder your search, ask how such obstacles could be overcome. Take notes during the interview.
Step 4. Get Additional Contacts for Your Network: As mentioned previously, always ask who else you should speak with—a referral.62 Most people can give you three names, so if you are only offered one, ask for others—seek more refer- rals.63 Add the new contacts to your network list; be sure to write them down. When contacting new people, be sure to use your network person’s name. Be sure not to linger beyond the time you have been offered, unless invited to stay. Leave a business card and/or résumé so the person can contact you in case something comes up.
Step 5. Ask Your Contacts How You Might Help Them: Offer a copy of a recent journal article or any additional information that came up in your conversa- tion. Remember, it’s all about building relationships, and making yourself a resource for other people.
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 163 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
164 part 1 INDIVIDuaLs as LEaDErs
Step 6. Follow Up with a Thank-You Note and Status Report: By sending a thank- you note, along with another business card/résumé, and following up with your progress, you are continuing the networking relationship and maintain- ing a contact for the future.
Be sure to assess the effectiveness of your networking meetings using the six steps as your criteria. Did you implement all of the steps successfully? How can you improve next time? It is always helpful to create a log of calls, meetings, and contacts to maintain your network as it expands.
Maintain Your Network After you build your network, you should maintain it.64 If an individual was helpful in finding your new job, be sure to let him or her know the outcome. Saying thank you to those who helped in your transition will encourage the business relationship; providing this information will increase the likelihood of getting help in the future.
It is also a good idea to notify everyone in your network that you are in a new position and provide contact information. Go to trade shows and conventions, make business friends, and continue to update, correct, and add to your network list. Always thank others for their time.
Networking is also about helping others, especially your mentor.65 As you have been helped, you should help others. You will be amazed at how helping others comes back to you. Jack Gherty, former CEO of Land O’Lakes, said that he got ahead by helping other people win.
Try to contact everyone on your network list at least once a year (calls, e-mail, and cards are good). Send congratulations on recent achievements. By contacting everyone, we don’t mean sending a note to your 500 friends at the same time. You need to maintain regular personal contact, which is generally limited to around 150 people.
Social Networking at Work Once you land that new position, should you network on or off the job—or both? With increasing technolog y advances, people are blurring the differences between their personal and professional lives, including the use of social networking media, including LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter.66 Although many companies are encouraging employ- ees to use social networking media on the job, it brings new challenges. Is it business or personal? Will employees get the company into legal problems? To deal with potential problems, many companies are developing social media policies and rules. So on the new job, be sure to know the policy on social media and follow the rules, and be careful what you say about your boss and company.
3. how has Mark Cuban used networking?
Mark Cuban first started networking by selling garbage bags door to door and then by selling stamps and baseball cards before the Internet was available. As the owner of Motley’s, between bar tending and spinning records, he schmoozed customers. In fact, people came to see him, and when he wasn’t there, business wasn’t as good. When Cuban was selling computers, he was constantly socializing and trading business cards. To be successful in the enter tainment business, you have to network with the right people.
OPENING CASE application
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 164 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 5 INfLuENcINg: PowEr, PoLItIcs, NEtworkINg, aND NEgotIatIoN 165
Negotiation We negotiate to secure a more favorable outcome,67 so negotiating is an essential career skill,68 because good negotiators get more favorable outcomes, such as more pay.69 Let’s face it, whether you realize it or not, and whether you like it or not, we are all nego- tiators because we attempt to get what we want everyday. Negotiating is a process in which two or more parties have something the other wants and attempt to come to an agreement.
Inf luence tactics, power, and politics are commonly used during the negotiation pro- cess. Walmart keeps its everyday low prices because it is such a good negotiator. In this section, we focus on getting what we want by inf luencing others through negotiation. Before we get into the details of negotiating, complete Self-Assessment 5-4.
NegotiatingSELF-ASSESSMENT 5-4
Identify each of the 16 statements according to how accurately it describes your behavior. Place a number from 1 to 5 on the line before each statement.
5 — 4 — 3 — 2 — 1
Describes me Does not describe me
1. Before I negotiate, if possible, I find out about the person I will negotiate with to determine what they want and will be will- ing to give up.
2. Before I negotiate, I set objectives. 3. When planning my negotiating presenta-
tion, I focus on how the other party will benefit.
4. Before I negotiate, I have a target price I want to pay, a lowest price I will pay, and an opening offer.
5. Before I negotiate, I think through options and trade-offs in case I don’t get my target price.
6. Before I negotiate, I think of the questions and objections the other party might have, and I prepare answers.
7. At the beginning of negotiations, I develop rapport and read the person.
8. I let the other party make the first offer. 9. I listen to what the other parties are say-
ing and focus on helping them get what they want, rather than focusing on what I want.
10. I don’t give in too quickly to others’ offers.
11. When I compromise and give up some- thing, I ask for something in return.
12. If the other party tries to postpone the negotiation, I try to create urgency and tell them what they might lose.
13. If I want to postpone negotiation, I don’t let the other party pressure me into mak- ing a decision.
14. When I make a deal, I don’t second-guess, wonder whether I got the best price, and check prices.
15. If I can’t make an agreement, I ask for advice to help me with future negotiations.
16. During the entire business negotiating pro- cess, I’m trying to develop a relationship, not just a onetime deal.
add up your score and place it here ____ and on the continuum below.
80 — 70 — 60 — 50 — 40 — 30 — 16 Effective Networking Ineffective Networking
If you did not score high on negotiating effective- ness, that’s okay, as you can develop negotiating skills by following the steps and guidelines in this chapter.
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 165 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
166 part 1 INDIVIDuaLs as LEaDErs
Negotiating At certain times, negotiations are appropriate, such as when conducting management– union collective bargaining, buying and selling goods and services, accepting a new job and compensation offer, and getting a raise—all situations without a fixed price or deal. If there’s a set, take-it-or-leave-it deal, there is no negotiation.
All Parties Should Believe They Got a Good Deal Negotiation is often a zero-sum game in which one party’s gain is the other party’s loss. For example, every dollar less that you pay for a car is your gain and the seller’s loss. But it doesn’t have to be an “I win and you lose” negotiation. Like power and politics, negotiat- ing is not about taking advantage of others, it’s about building relationships and helping each other get what we want.
To get what we want, we have to sell our ideas and convince the other party to give us what we want. However, negotiation should be viewed by all parties as an opportunity for everyone to win. When possible, make the pie larger rather than fight over how to split it. If union employees believe they lost and management won, employees may experience job dissatisfaction, resulting in lower performance in the long run. If customers believe they got a bad deal, they may not give repeat business.
Negotiation Skills Can Be Developed Not everyone is born a great negotiator. Taking the time to learn how to negotiate before entering a deal is the best way to arrive at a successful settlement.70 Following the steps in the negotiation process can help develop negotiation skills.
List the steps in the negotiation process.
Explain the relationships among negotiation and conflict, influencing tactics, power, and politics.
Learning outcome
6
7
the Negotiation process The negotiation process has three, and possibly four, steps: plan, negotiations, possibly a postponement, and an agreement or no agreement. These steps are summarized in Model 5.1 and discussed in this section. Like the other models in this book, Model 5.1 is meant to give us step-by-step guidelines. However, in making it apply to varying types of nego- tiation, you may have to make slight adjustments.
Plan The key to any negotiation is preparation, so develop a plan. Know what’s negotiable and what’s not. Be clear about what it is you are negotiating over. Is it price, options, delivery time, sales quantity, or all four? Ask yourself “What exactly do I want?” Planning has four steps.
Step 1. Research the other party(ies). Put yourself in the other party’s shoes. Try to find out what the other parties want, and what they will and will not be willing to give up, before you negotiate. Find out their personality traits and negotiation style by networking with people who have negotiated with the other party before. If possible, establish a personal relationship before the negotiation. If you have experience working with the other party (e.g., your manager or a potential customer), what worked and did not work in the past?
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 166 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 5 INfLuENcINg: PowEr, PoLItIcs, NEtworkINg, aND NEgotIatIoN 167
Step 2. Set objectives. Based on your research, what can you expect from the nego- tiation—what is your objective? Set a lower limit, a target objective, and an opening objective. The objective may be price, but it could be working condi- tions, longer vacation, job security, and so on. Follow steps a, b, and c: (a) Set a specific lower limit and be willing to walk away; do not come to an agree- ment unless you get it. You need to be willing to walk away from a bad deal. (b) Set a target objective of what you believe is a fair deal. (c) Set an opening objective offer that is higher than you expect; you might get it.71 Remember that the other party is probably also setting three objectives. So don’t view their opening offer as final. The key to successful negotiations is for all parties to get between their minimum and target objective. This creates a win–win; everyone got a good deal situation.
Step 3. Try to develop options and trade-offs. In purchasing something as well as in looking for a job, if you have multiple sellers and job offers, you are in a stron- ger power position to get your target price. It is common practice to quote other offers and to ask if the other party can beat them.
If you have to give up something, or cannot get exactly what you want, be prepared to ask for something else in return. If you cannot get the higher raise you want, maybe you can get more days off, more in your retirement account, a nicer office, an assistant, and so on. Based on your research, what trade-offs do you expect from the other party?
Step 4. Anticipate questions and objections, and prepare answers. The other party may want to know why you are selling something, looking for a job, how the product or service works, or what are the features and benefits. You need to be prepared to answer the unasked question “What’s in it for me?” Don’t focus on what you want but on how your deal will benefit the other party.
There is a good chance that you will face some objection—reasons why the negotiations will not result in agreement or sale. Be prepared to overcome the
1. Research the other party(ies).
2. Set objectives.
3. Try to develop options and trade-offs.
4. Anticipate questions and objections, and prepare answers.
1. Develop rapport and focus on obstacles, not the person.
2. Let the other party make the first offer.
3. Listen and ask questions to focus on meeting the other party’s needs.
4. Don’t be too quick to give in, and ask for something in return.
• Other party is postponing, and you may create urgency.
• You want to postpone, and the other party may create urgency.
NegotiationsPlan
Postponement
Agreement
Close the deal.
No Agreement
Find out why for future negotiations.
The Negotiation Process MODEL 5.1
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 167 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
168 part 1 INDIVIDuaLs as LEaDErs
no’s you are bound to encounter. Unfortunately, not everyone comes out to state their real objections. So we need to listen and ask open-ended questions to get them talking so we can find out what is preventing the agreement.
Negotiations After we have planned, we are now ready to negotiate the deal. Face-to-face negotiations are generally preferred because you can see the other person’s nonverbal behavior and better understand objections. However, telephone and written negotiations (e-mail) work too. Again, know the other party’s preference. Handling negotiations also has four steps.
Step 1. Develop rapport and focus on obstacles, not the person. The first thing we sell in any negotiation is ourselves. The other party needs to trust us. Smile and call the other party by name as you greet them. Open with some small talk, like the weather, to get to know them. Deciding on how much time to wait until you get down to business depends on the other party’s style. Some people like to get right down to business; others want to get to know you first. However, you usually want the other party to make the first offer, so don’t wait too long or you may lose your chance.
“Focus on the obstacle, not the person” means never to attack the other’s personality or put others down with negative statements like “You are being unfair to ask for such a price cut.” If we do so, the other party will become defensive, we may end up arguing, and it will be harder to reach an agreement. So even if the other person starts it, refuse to fight on a name-calling level. Make statements like “You think my price is too high” to calm them down.
Step 2. Let the other party make the first offer. This usually gives you the advantage, because if the other party offers you more than your target objective, you can close the agreement. For example, if you are expecting to be paid $35,000 a year (your target objective) and the other party offers you $40,000, are you going to reject it? On the other hand, if you are offered $30,000 you can real- ize that it may be low and work at increasing the compensation. Ask questions like “What is the salary range?” or “What do you expect to pay for such a fine product?” Some say there are exceptions to the rule, such as salary negotia- tions for experienced professionals because if you state your requested salary first, the first number inf luences the rest of the negotiation.72
Try to avoid negotiating simply on price. When others pressure you to make the first offer with a common question like “Give us your best price, and we’ll tell you whether we’ll take it,” try asking them a question such as “What do you expect to pay?” or “What is a reasonable price?” When this does not work, say something like “Our usual (or list) price is xxx. However, if you make me a proposal, I’ll see what I can do for you.”
If things go well during steps 1 and 2, you may skip to closing the agree- ment. If you are not ready to agree, proceed to the next step or two.
Step 3. Listen and ask questions to focus on meeting the other party’s needs. Create an opportunity for the other party to disclose reservations and objections. When you speak, you give out information, but when you ask questions and listen, you receive information that will help you overcome the other party’s objections.
If you go on and on about the features you have to offer, without finding out what features the other party is really interested in, you may be killing
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 168 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 5 INfLuENcINg: PowEr, PoLItIcs, NEtworkINg, aND NEgotIatIoN 169
the deal. Ask questions such as “Is the price out of the ballpark?” or “Is it fast enough for you?” or “Is any feature you wanted missing?” If the objection is a “want” criteria, such as two years of work experience and you have only one, play up the features you know they want and that you do have, and you may reach an agreement.
If the objection is something you cannot meet, at least you found out and don’t waste time chasing a deal that will not happen. However, be sure the objection is really a “must” criterion: What if the employer gets no applicants with two years’ experience and you apply? You may get the job offer.
Step 4. Don’t be too quick to give in, and ask for something in return. Those who ask for more get more. Be persistent, don’t just give up.73 If our competitive advantage is service, and during negotiation we quickly give in for a lower price, we lose all the value in a minute. We want to satisfy the other party without giving up too much during the negotiation. Remember not to go below your minimum objective. If it is realistic, be prepared to walk away.
When we are not getting what we want, having other planned options can help give us bargaining power. If we do walk away, we may be called back, and, if not, we may be able to come back for the same low price—but not always. If other parties know we are desperate or just weak and will accept a low agree- ment, they will likely take advantage of us. Have you ever seen a sign on a product saying “must sell—need cash”? What type of price do you think that seller gets? You also need to avoid being intimidated by comments such as this said in a loud voice: “Are you kidding me, that’s too much.” Many people will quickly drop the price, but you don’t have to be intimidated.
However, when you are dealing with a complex deal, such as a management– union contract negotiation with trade-offs, be willing to be the first to make a concession. The other party tends to feel obligated, and then we can come back with a counter trade-off that is larger than the one we gave up.
Avoid giving unilateral concessions. Recall your planned trade-offs. If the other party asks for a lower price, ask for a trade-off such as a large-volume sale to get it, or a longer delivery time, a less popular color, and so on. We need to send the message that we don’t just give things away.
Postponement Take your time. When there doesn’t seem to be any progress, it may be wise to postpone the negotiations.
The Other Party Is Postponing, and You May Create Urgency. The other party says, “I’ll get back to you.” When we are not getting what we want, we may try to create urgency. For example, “This product is on sale, and the sale ends today.” However, hon- esty is the best policy. The primary reason people will negotiate with you is that they trust and respect you. If we do have other options, we can use them to create urgency, such as saying “I have another job offer pending; when will you let me know if you want to offer me the job?”
But what if urgency does not apply—or does not work—and the other party says, “I’ll think about it?” You might say, “That’s a good idea.” Then at least review the major features the other party liked about our proposed deal and ask if it meets their needs. The other party may decide to come to an agreement or sale. If not, and they don’t tell you when they will get back to you, ask, for example, “When can I expect to hear if I got the job?” Try to pin the other party down for a specific time; tell the person that if you don’t hear from them by then, you
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 169 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
170 part 1 INDIVIDuaLs as LEaDErs
will call them. If you are really interested, follow up with a letter (mail/e-mail) of thanks for their time and again highlight the features you think they liked. If you forgot to include any specific points during the negotiation, add them in the letter.
One thing to remember when the other party becomes resistant to making the agree- ment is that the hard sell will not work. Take the pressure off. Ask something like “Where do you want to go from here?” If we press for an answer, it may be no agreement; however, if we wait, we may have a better chance. To your manager, you might say, “Why don’t we think about it and discuss it some more later?” (Then pick an advantageous time to meet with your manager.)
We also need to learn to read between the lines, especially when working with people from different cultures. Some people will not come right out and tell us there is no deal. We should be persistent in trying to come to an agreement, but we also don’t want to waste our time chasing a deal that will not happen.
You Want to Postpone, and the Other Party May Create Urgency. Don’t be hurried by others, and don’t hurry yourself. If we are not satisfied with the deal, or want to shop around, tell the other party you want to think about it. You may also need to check with your manager or someone else, which simply may be for advice, before you can finalize the deal. If the other party is creating urgency, be sure it really is urgent. In many cases, we can get the same deal at a later date; don’t be pressured into making a deal you are not satisfied with or may regret later. If we do want to postpone, give the other party a specific time that we will get back to them, and do so with more prepared negotiations or simply to tell them we cannot make an agreement.
Agreement Once the agreement has been made, restate it and/or put it in writing when appropriate. It is common to follow up an agreement with a letter of thanks, restating the agreement to ensure the other parties have not changed their mind about what they agreed to. Also, after the deal is made, stop selling it. Change the subject to a personal one and/or leave, depending on the other person’s preferred negotiations. If they want a personal relation- ship, stick around; if not, leave.
No Agreement Our goal is to come to an agreement, but rejection, refusal, and failure happen to us all, even the superstars. The difference between the also-rans and the superstars lies in how they respond to the failure. The successful people keep trying, learn from their mistakes, and continue to work hard; failures usually don’t persevere. When there is no agreement, analyze the situation and try to determine what went wrong to improve in the future. We may also ask the other party for advice, such as “I realize I did not get the job; thanks for your time. Can you offer me any suggestions for improving my résumé and interview skills, or other ideas to help me to get a job in this field?”
WORk Application 5-9 8. How would you rate your negotiation skills? How can you improve?
4. What types of negotiations does Mark Cuban engage in?
A large part of Mark Cuban’s job is negotiating. He had to negotiate to buy the Dallas Mavericks and to get HDNet and HDNet Movies on DirecTV. Cuban still needs to negotiate to distribute his 2929 Productions and Magnolia Pictures through big studios. The Mavericks won the championship in 2011 and many of the fans like Mark Cuban.
OPENING CASE application
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 170 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 5 INfLuENcINg: PowEr, PoLItIcs, NEtworkINg, aND NEgotIatIoN 171
Ethics and Influencing Recall that leadership is the inf luencing process of leaders and followers to achieve orga- nizational objectives through change (Chapter 1). We usually inf luence others to get what we want. Power, politics, networking, and negotiating are all forms of inf luencing that can be used by leaders and followers. When inf luencing, recall that it pays to be ethical74 (Chapter 2). The number 1 reason people will help you is because you have integrity—you are honest and they can trust you.75 With deception comes loss of trust and inf luence. 76
People respond to incentives and can usually be motivated for good or bad if we find the right levers.77 So inf luence is neither good nor bad; it’s what we do with it. Power is ethical when it is used to help meet organizational objectives and those of its members, as well as to get what we want (socialized power, Chapters 2 and 9). Power is unethical when used to promote self-interest and manipulate others at their expense (personalized power).78
YOU Make the ethICaL call
5.2 Facebook Hired Firm to Target Google
The social networking company secretly hired the public-relations firm Burson-Marsteller to push stories critical of Google’s privacy practices to shift the online privacy spotlight away from itself and onto rival Google. But the controversial strategy backfired when bloggers and journalists disclosed Facebook’s behind-the-scenes role, forcing the company to explain its tactic.
Facebook said that it didn’t authorize or intend to run a “smear campaign” but wanted to highlight that Facebook didn’t approve of Google’s data collection from its social- network accounts.
The nonprofit Public Relations Society of America said that Burson-Marsteller’s lack of disclosure of Facebook is “deceptive” and violated its ethical standards.
Burson-Marsteller said that Facebook requested that its name be withheld because it was merely asking to bring publicly available information to light. But withholding Facebook’s name was against its policy and the assignment on those terms should have been declined.
Google did not respond to a request for a comment on the newspaper story.79
1. Was Facebook’s hiring of Burson-Marsteller to shift the online privacy spotlight away from itself and onto rival Google ethical and socially responsible? Do you believe that Facebook was or was not really trying to run a “smear campaign” to get itself out of the headline and Google into the news for lack of privacy? If your boss asked you to be the one to hire Burson-Marsteller, what would you have done?
2. Do you agree with the Public Relations Society of America’s statement that Burson- Marsteller’s lack of disclosure of Facebook is “deceptive” and is an unethical business tactic?
3. Was Burson-Marsteller ethical and socially responsible in taking the job from Facebook? Do you believe that the company simply made a mistake in taking the job or that it took the job knowing it was against company policy? If your boss asked you to be the one to smear Facebook against company policy, what would you have done?
4. Was it ethical and socially responsible of Google not to respond on this story when asked to do so? If you were the CEO of Google, what would your comment be about the behavior or your rival Facebook and Burson-Marsteller?
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 171 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
172 part 1 INDIVIDuaLs as LEaDErs
The chapter summary is organized to answer the eight learning outcomes for this chapter.
1 explain the differences between position power and personal power.
Position power is derived from top management and is delegated down the chain of command. thus, people at the top of the organization have more power than those at the bottom of the organization. Personal power is derived from the followers based on the lead- er’s behavior. all managers have position power, but they may or may not have personal power. Nonmanagers do not have position power, but they may have personal power.
2 Discuss the differences among legitimate, reward, coercive, and referent power.
Legitimate, reward, and coercive power are all related. a leader with position power usually has the power to reward and punish (coercive). However, a person with referent power may or may not have position power to reward and punish, and the leader influences followers based on relationships.
3 Discuss how power and politics are related. Power is the ability to influence others’ behavior. Politics is the process of gaining and using power. therefore, political skills are a part of power.
4 Describe how money and politics have a similar use.
Money and politics have a similar use, because they are mediums of exchange. In our economy, money is the medium of exchange. In an organization, politics is the medium of exchange.
5 List and explain the steps in the networking process.
the first step in the networking process is to perform a self-assessment to determine accomplishments and to set goals. second, create a one-minute self-sell that quickly summarizes history and career plans and asks a question. third, develop a written network list. fourth, conduct networking interviews to meet your goals. finally, maintain your network for meeting fu- ture goals.
Chapter Summary
When playing organizational politics (and to a lesser extent networking), it can be tempting to be unethical, but don’t do it. Even if others are using unethical behavior, don’t stoop to their level. We should confront others if we believe they are being unethical and try to resolve the issues. You will learn how to resolve conf lict in Chapter 6.
An ethical challenge in negotiation is telling the truth or not lying to the other party or being lied to. There is a difference between not giving extra information that is not asked for and lying to the other party. The person who caught us lying may tell others, and we can lose even more friends and business.
So when inf luencing others, try to use the stakeholders’ approach to ethics by creating a win–win situation for relevant parties.
5. Is Mark Cuban ethical in influencing others?
As discussed, Mark Cuban’s behavior has not always been appropriate and thus has gotten him into some trouble in sports and entertainment. Cuban is aware of this shortcoming, and only time will tell if he will earn the respect he believes he deserves as he strives to be famous and influential.
OPENING CASE application
“Take It To The Net”. Access student resources at www.cengagebrain.com. Search for Lussier, Leadership 6e to find student study tools.
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 172 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 5 INfLuENcINg: PowEr, PoLItIcs, NEtworkINg, aND NEgotIatIoN 173
1 What are the seven types of power?
2 What are the nine influencing tactics?
3 What is ingratiation influencing?
4 What is the difference between inspirational appeal and personal appeal influencing?
5 What are the three political behaviors and four guidelines for developing political skills?
6 How many interview questions should you bring to a networking interview?
7 Which step of “conduct networking interviews” involves getting additional contacts for your network?
8 What type of situation (win/lose) is the goal of negotiation?
9 What are the steps in negotiations?
10 What are the steps in planning a negotiation?
review Questions
coercive power, 148
connection power, 150
exper t power, 149
information power, 150
legitimate power, 146
negotiating, 165
networking, 155
one-minute self-sell, 161
politics, 154
power, 145
reciprocity, 155
referent power, 149
reward power, 148
Key terms
The following critical-thinking questions can be used for class discussion and/or as written assignments to develop commu- nication skills. Be sure to give complete explanations for all questions.
1 Is power good or bad for organizations?
2 Which influencing tactics do you tend to use most and least? How will you change and develop the ability to influ- ence using influencing tactics?
3 How would you rate your political skills, and which political behavior do you use most often? How will you change and develop your political skills?
4 How would you rate your relationship with your current or past boss? What will you do differently in the future to improve your relationship with your boss?
5 Can management stop the use of power and politics in their organizations?
6 Should people be judged based on their social skills?
7 How would you rate your networking skills? What will you do differently in the future to improve your networking skills?
8 Do people really need a written networking list?
9 How would you rate your negotiation skills? What will you do differently in the future to improve your negotiation skills?
10 Do you believe that most managers use influencing (power, politics, networking, and negotiating) for the good of the organization or for their own personal benefit? What can be done to help managers be more ethical in influencing others?
Critical-thinking Questions
6 List the steps in the negotiation process. the first step in the negotiation process is to plan for the negotiation. the second step is to conduct the actual negotiation, which can be postponed and results in an agreement or no agreement.
7 explain the relationships among negotiation and conflict, influencing tactics, power, and politics.
Negotiations take place when there is a conflict, and influencing tactics, power, and politics can be used during the negotiation process.
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 173 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
174 part 1 INDIVIDuaLs as LEaDErs
C A S E
Organizational Power and Politics
J ose Gonzalez, a Hispanic man, was highly sought after receiving his PhD in accounting. Today, he is a tenured professor at a small teaching college in the Midwest.80 The Department of Accounting (DA) has nine faculty members;
it is one of five depar tments in the School of Business (SB). The accounting depar tment chair is Helen Canton, who is in her first year as chair. Six faculty members, including Jose, have been in the department longer than Helen. Helen likes to have policies in place so that faculty members have guides for their behavior. On the college-wide level, however, there is no policy about the job of graduate assistant. Helen asked the dean of the SB about the policy. After a discussion with the vice presi- dent for academic affairs, the dean told Helen that there is no policy. The vice president and dean suggested letting the individual depar tments develop their own policy regarding what graduate assistants can and cannot do in their position. So, Helen made developing a policy for graduate assistants an agenda item for the department meeting.
During the DA meeting, Helen asked for members’ views on what graduate assistants should and should not be allowed to do. She was hoping that the depar tment could come to a consensus on a policy. It turns out that Jose was the only faculty member using graduate assistants to grade exams. Two other faculty members speak out against having graduate assistants grade exams. They believe it is the professor’s job to grade exams. Jose makes a few statements in hopes of not having to correct his own exams. Because his exams are objec- tive, requiring a correct answer, Jose believes it’s not necessary for him to personally grade the exams. He also points out that across the campus, and across the country, other faculty mem- bers are using graduate assistants to teach entire courses and to correct subjective papers and exams. Jose states that he does not think it fair that he can no longer use graduate as- sistants to grade objective exams when others are doing so. He also states that the depar tment does not need to have a policy and requests that the depar tment not set a policy. However, Helen states that she wants a policy. Jose is the only one to speak in favor of allowing graduate assistants to grade exams, although three others made no comments either way. But, after the meeting, one other member, Joel Corman, who said nothing during the meeting, tells Jose he agrees that it is not fair to deny him this use of a graduate assistant.
There was no depar tment consensus, as Helen hoped there would be. She said that she would draft a depar tment
policy, which will be discussed at a future DA meeting. The next day, Jose sent a memo to department members asking if it is ethical and legal to deny him the same resources as others are using across the campus. Jose also states that if the depart- ment sets a policy stating that he can no longer use graduate assistants to correct objective exams, he will appeal the policy decision to the dean, vice president, and president.
Support your answers to the following questions with spe- cific information from the case and text, or with other infor- mation you get from the Web or other sources.
1. (a) What source of power does Helen have, and (b) what type of power is she using? (c) Which influencing tactic is Helen using during the meeting? (d) Is negotia- tion and/or the (e) exchange tactic appropriate in this situation?
2. (a) What source of power does Jose have, and (b) what type of power is he using during the meeting? (c) Which two influencing tactics is Jose primarily using during the meeting? (d) Which influencing tactic is Jose using with the memo? (e) Is the memo a wise political move for Jose? What might he gain and lose by sending it?
3. What would you do if you were Helen? (a) Would you talk to the dean, letting her know that Jose said he would appeal the policy decision? (b) Which influ- encing tactic would this discussion involve? (c) Which political behavior would the discussion represent? (d) Would you draft a policy directly stating that gradu- ate assistants cannot be used to grade objective exams? (e) Would your answer to (d) be influenced by your answer to (a)?
4. (a) If you were Jose, knowing you had no verbal sup- por ters during the meeting, would you have continued to defend your position or agreed to stop using a gradu- ate assistant? (b) What do you think of Jose sending the memo? (c) As a tenured full professor, Jose is secure in his job. Would your answer change if you (as Jose) had not received tenure or promotion to the top rank?
5. (a) If you were Jose, and Helen drafted a policy and depar tment member s agreed with it, what would you do? Would you appeal the decision to the dean? (b) Again, would your answer change if you had not received tenure or promotion to the top rank?
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 174 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 5 INfLuENcINg: PowEr, PoLItIcs, NEtworkINg, aND NEgotIatIoN 175
6. If you were the dean of the School of Business (SB), knowing that the vice president does not want to set a college-wide policy, and Jose appealed to you, what would you do? Would you develop a school-wide policy for SB?
7. At what level (college-wide, by schools, or by depar t- ments within each school) should a graduate assistant policy be set?
8. (a) Should Joel Corman have spoken up in defense of Jose during the meeting? (b) If you were Joel, would you have taken Jose’s side against the other seven members? (c) Would your answer change if you were or were not friends with Jose, and if you were or were not a tenured full professor?
C U M U L a t I V e C a S e Q U e S t I O N S
9. Which level(s) of analysis of leadership theor y is (are) presented in this case (Chapter 1)?
10. Is it ethical for graduate students to correct undergrad- uate exams (Chapter 2)?
11. Which of the four Ohio State University leadership styles did Helen use during the depar tment meeting (Chapter 3)?
C a S e e X e r C I S e a N D r O L e - p L a Y
Preparation: Read the case and think about whether you agree or disagree with using graduate assistants to correct objective exams. If you do this exercise, we recommend that you complete it before discussing the questions and answers to the case.
In-class Da Meeting: A person who strongly agrees with Jose’s position volunteers to play this role (can be female) during a DA meeting. A second person who also agrees with the use of graduate assistants correcting exams plays the role of Joel (can be a male). However, recall that Joel cannot say anything during the meeting to support Jose. One person who strongly disagrees with Jose—who doesn’t want graduate assistants to correct exams and who also feels strongly that there should be a policy stating what graduate assistants can and cannot do—volunteers to play the role of the department chair (Helen) who runs the DA meeting. Six others who are neutral or disagree with graduate assistants grading exams play the roles of other department members.
The ten role-players sit in a circle in the center of the room, with the other class members sitting around the outside of the circle. Obser vers just quietly watch and listen to the meeting discussion.
role-Play: (about 15 minutes) Helen opens the meeting by simply stating that the agenda item is to set a graduate assistants policy stating what they can and cannot do and that he or she hopes the department can come to a consensus on a policy. Helen states his or her position on why graduate students should not be allowed to correct exams and then asks for other views. Jose and the others, except Joel, jump in anytime with their opinions.
Discussion: After the role-play is over, or when time runs out, the person playing the role of Jose expresses to the class how it felt to have everyone against him or her. Other department members state how they felt about the discussion, followed by observers’ statements as time permits. A discussion of the case questions and answers may follow.
Since 1911, Whirlpool Corporation has grown from a small company to a global corporation, with manufactur-ing locations on every major continent worldwide. Like many organizations, one of Whirlpool’s strategies for creating a culture of pluralism is encouraging the formation of employee network groups. These are voluntary groups formed around primary dimensions such as gender and ethnicity, which meet regularly to focus on business issues. The groups are also a resource to the employees by providing a suppor tive com- munity, decreasing social isolation, and promoting career
development. Fur ther, they help retain employees by provid- ing them a forum for expressing ideas. These discussions often spark new ideas that benefit the company as a whole.
1. Using the Whirlpool Corporation Web site (http:// www.whirlpoolcorp.com), identify the employee net- work groups at Whirlpool and the mission of each.
2. Do you think Whirlpool’s encouragement of employee networks works for or against creating a culture of diversity? Explain your answer.
V I D E o c a s E
Employee Networks at Whirlpool Corporation
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 175 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
176 part 1 INDIVIDuaLs as LEaDErs
Influencing Tactics
preparing for this exercise Following are three situations. For each situation, select the most appropriate influencing tactic(s) to use. Write the tactic(s) on the lines following the situation. At this time, don’t write out how you would behave (what you would say and do).
1 You are doing a college internship, which is going well.
You would like to become a full-time employee in a few weeks, after you graduate.
Which influencing tactic(s) would you use? ______
Who would you try to influence? ______
How would you do so (behavior)? ______
2 You have been working at your job for six months, and you are approaching the elevator. You see a powerful person who could potentially help you advance in your career waiting for the elevator. You have never met her, but you do know that her committee has recently completed a new five-year strategic plan for the company and that she plays tennis and is active at the same religious organization (church, synagogue, mosque) as you. Although you only have a couple of minutes, you decide to try to develop a connection.
Which influencing tactic(s) would you use? ______
How would you strike up a conversation? What topic(s) do you raise? ______
3 You are the manager of the production depar tment. Some of the sales staff has been scheduling deliver- ies for your product that your depar tment can’t meet. Customers are blaming you for late delivery. This is not good for the company, so you decide to talk to the sales staff manager about it over lunch.
Which influencing tactic(s) would you use? _________
How would you handle the situation (behavior)? _________
Now select one of the three situations that seems real to you—you can imagine yourself in the situation. Or briefly write in a real-life situation that you can quickly explain to a small group. Now, briefly write out the behavior (what you would do and say) that you would use in the situation to influence the person to do what you want.
Situation # ______Or, my situation: ______
Influencing tactic(s) to use: ______
Behavior : ______
Doing this exercise in Class
Objective
To develop your persuasion skills by using influencing tactics
aaCSB General Skills area
The primary AACSB skills developed through this exercise are analytic skills and application of knowledge—students learn to achieve their goals by influencing others.
experience
You will discuss which influencing tactics are most appropriate for the preparation situations. You may also be given the oppor- tunity to role-play how you would handle the one situation you selected; you will also play the role of the person to be influenced and observer.
procedure 1 (10–20 minutes)
Break up into groups of three, with one or two groups of two if needed. Try not to have two members in a group who selected the same situation; use people who selected their own situation. First, try to quickly agree on which influencing tactics are most appropriate in each situation. Select a spokes- person to give group answers to the class. In preparation to role-play, have each person state the behavior selected to han- dle the situation. The others give feedback for improvement: suggestions to delete, change, and/or add to the behavior (e.g., I would not say … , I’d say it this way … , I’d add … to what you have now).
procedure 2 (5–10 minutes)
One situation at a time, each group spokesperson tells the class which influencing styles it would use, followed by brief remarks from the professor. The professor may also ask people who selected their own situation to tell the class the situation.
Conclusion
The instructor may lead a class discussion and/or make conclud- ing remarks.
apply It (2–4 minutes)
What did I learn from this exercise? How will I use this knowl- edge in the future?
Sharing
In the group, or to the entire class, volunteers may give their answers to the “Apply It” questions.
Developing Your Leadership skills 5-1
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 176 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 5 INfLuENcINg: PowEr, PoLItIcs, NEtworkINg, aND NEgotIatIoN 177
Developing Your Leadership skills
Influencing, Power, and Politics
preparing for this exercise Your instructor will tell you to select one, two, or all three of the fol- lowing topics (influencing, power, and/or politics) for this preparation.
To get what you want, you need to develop your ability to influence others and gain power through politics. It is helpful to read about these topics and how to improve your skills, but unless you apply the concepts in your personal and professional life, you will not develop these skills.
This preparation covers three skills, each with two activities. The first activity is to develop a general guide to daily actions you can take to increase your influence, power, and/or under- standing of politics. The second is to think of a specific situation in the future, and develop a plan to get what you want. Use additional paper if you need more space to write your plan.
Influencing
• Write down the influencing tactic that you are the stron- gest at using:____. The weakest: ____. The one you would like to improve on: ____ (it does not have to be your weakest). Review the ideas for using this tactic, and write down a few ways in which you will work at developing your skill.
• Think of a specific situation in the near future in which you can use this type of power to help you get what you want. Briefly describe the situation, and explain how you will use this tactic—what you will say and do, and so on.
power
• Write down the one type of your power you would like to improve on:____. Review the ideas for increasing this type of power, and write down a few ways in which you will work at developing your power.
• Think of a specific situation in the near future in which you can use this tactic to help you get what you want. Briefly describe the situation, and explain how you will use this tactic—what you will say and do, and so on.
politics
• Write down the one area of politics you would like to improve on:____. Review the ideas for using this type of politics, and write down a few ways in which you will work at developing your skill.
• Think of a specific situation in the near future in which you can use this type of politicking to help you get what you want. Briefly describe the situation, and explain how you will use this tactic—what you will say and do, and so on.
Doing this exercise in Class
Objective
To develop your ability to influence others and gain power through politics
aaCSB General Skills area
The primary AACSB skills developed through this exercise are analytic skills and application of knowledge—students learn to achieve their goals by influencing others.
experience
You will develop a general guide to daily actions you can take to increase your influence, power, and/or understanding of politics. You’ll also develop a plan to get what you want.
preparation
You should have completed the preparation for this exercise, unless told not to do so by your instructor.
procedure 1 (10–20 minutes) Break into groups of three, with some groups of two if necessar y. If group members developed plans for more than one skill area, select only one to star t with. One group member volunteers to share first and states his or her preparation for influencing, power, or politics. The other members give input into how effective they think the plan is and offer ideas on how to improve the plan. After the first member shares, the other two have their turn, changing roles with each round. If there is time remain- ing after all have shared, go on to another skill area until the time is up.
procedure 2 (2–3 minutes) Each member commits to imple- menting his or her plan by a set time, and to telling the others how well the influence, power, or politics went by a specific date—before or after the class ends.
Name ______
Date of implementation ______
Date to report results ______
Name ______
Date of implementation ______
Date to report results ______
Name ______
Date of implementation ______
Date to report results ______
Conclusion
The instructor may make concluding remarks.
apply It (2–4 minutes) What did I learn from this experience? How will I use this knowledge in the future?
Sharing
In the group, or to the entire class, volunteers may give their answers to the “Apply It” questions.
5-2
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 177 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
178 part 1 INDIVIDuaLs as LEaDErs
Developing Your Leadership skills
Networking Skills*
preparing for this exercise Based on the section “Networking” and the subsection on the networking process, complete the following steps.
1 Perform a self-assessment and set goals. List two or three of your accomplishments and set a goal. The goal can be to learn more about career oppor tunities in your major ; to get an internship, par t-time, summer, or full-time job; and so on.
2 Create your one-minute self-sell. Write it out. See page 161 for a written example.
History: ______________
Plan: _________________
Question: ______________
3 Develop your network. List at least five people to be included in your network, preferably people who can help you achieve your goal.
4 Conduct networking interviews. To help meet your goal, select one person for a personal 20-minute interview or to interview by phone if it is difficult to meet in person. List the person and write questions to ask during the interview. This person can be a person in your college career center or a professor in your major.
*Source: This exercise was developed by Andra Gumbus, professor of management, College of Business, Sacred Heart University. © Andra Gumbus, 2002. It is used with Dr. Gumbus’s permission.
Doing this exercise in Class
Objective
To develop networking skills by implementing the steps in the networking process
aaCSB General Skills area
The primary AACSB skills developed through this exercise are analytic skills and application of knowledge—students learn to achieve their goals by networking.
experience
You will deliver your one-minute self-sell from the preparation and get feedback for improvement. You will also share your network list and interview questions and get feedback for improvement.
procedure 1 (7–10 minutes) A. Break into groups of two. Show each other your written
one-minute self-sell. Is the history, plan, and question clear (do you understand it), concise (60 seconds or less to say), and compelling (does it promote interest to help)? Offer suggestions for improvement.
B. After perfected, each person states (no reading) the one- minute self-sell. Was it stated clearly, concisely, and with confi- dence? Offer improvements. State it a second and third time, or until told to go on to the next procedure.
procedure 2 (7–10 minutes) Break into groups of three with people you did not wor k with during proce- dure 1. Follow procedures A and B above in your triad. Repeating your self-sell should improve your deliver y and confidence.
procedure 3 (10–20 minutes) Break into groups of four with people you did not work with during procedures 1 and 2, if possible. Share your answers from steps 3 (your network list) and 4 (your inter view questions). Offer each other improvements to the questions and new questions. You should also get ideas for writing new questions for your own inter view.
applications (done outside of class)
Expand your written network list to at least 25 names. Conduct the networking interview using the questions developed through this exercise.
Conclusion
The instructor may make concluding remarks, including requir- ing the network lists and/or networking interview in the “Applications” section. Written network lists and/or interview questions and answers (following the name, title, and organiza- tion of interviewee; date, time, and type of interview—phone or in person) may be passed in.
apply It (2–4 minutes) What did I learn from this experience? How will I use this knowledge in the future?
Sharing
In groups, or to the entire class, volunteers may give their answers to the “Apply It” questions.
*Source: This exercise was developed by Andra Gumbus, professor of management, College of Business, Sacred Heart University. © Andra Gumbus, 2002. It is used with Dr. Gumbus’s permission.
5-3
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 178 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 5 INfLuENcINg: PowEr, PoLItIcs, NEtworkINg, aND NEgotIatIoN 179
Developing Your Leadership skills
Car Dealer Negotiation*
preparing for this exercise You should have read and should understand the negotiation process.
Doing this exercise in Class
Objective
To develop your negotiation skills
aaCSB General Skills area
The primary AACSB skills developed through this exercise are analytic skills and application of knowledge—students learn to achieve their goals through negotiating.
experience
You will be the buyer or seller of a used car.
procedure 1 (1–2 minutes) Break up into groups of two and sit facing each other, so that you cannot read each other’s confidential sheet. Each group should be as far away from other groups as possible, to avoid overhearing each other’s conversations. If there is an odd number of students in the class, one student will be an observer or work with the instruc- tor. Select who will be the buyer and who will be the seller of the used car.
procedure 2 (1–2 minutes) The instructor goes to each group and gives each buyer and seller their confidential sheet.
procedure 3 (5–6 minutes) Buyers and sellers read their con- fidential sheets and write down some plans (what will be your basic approach, what will you say) for the lunch meeting.
procedure 4 (3–7 minutes) Negotiate the sale of the car. Try not to overhear your classmates’ conversations. You do not have to buy or sell the car. After you make the sale, or agree not to sell, read the confidential sheet of your partner in this exercise and discuss the experience.
Integration (3–7 minutes)
Answer the following questions: 1 Which of the nine influencing tactics (see Exhibit 5.1) did
you use during the negotiations?
2 Which of the seven types of power (Exhibit 5.1) did you use during the negotiations? Did both par ties believe that they got a good deal?
3 During your planning, did you (1) research the other par ty, (2) set an objective (price to pay or accept), (3) develop
options and trade-offs, and (4) anticipate questions and objections and prepare answers?
4 During the negotiations, did you (1) develop a rappor t and focus on obstacles, not the person; (2) let the other par ty make the first offer ; (3) listen and ask questions to focus on meeting the other par ty’s needs; and (4) did you refuse to give in too quickly, and did you remember to ask for something in return?
5 Did you reach an agreement to sell/buy the car? If yes, did you get exactly, more than, or less than your target price?
6 When negotiating, is it a good practice to ask for more than you expect to receive, or to offer less than you expect to pay?
7 When negotiating, is it better to be the one to give or receive the initial offer?
8 When negotiating, is it better to appear to be dealing with strong or weak power? In other words, should you try to por tray that you have other options and don’t really need to make a deal with this person? Or, should you appear to be in need of the deal?
9 Can having the power to intimidate others be helpful in negotiations?
Conclusion
The instructor leads a class discussion, or simply gives the answers to the “Integration” questions, and makes concluding remarks.
apply It (2–4 minutes)
What did I learn from this experience? How will I use this knowledge in the future? What will I do differently?
Sharing
In the group, or to the entire class, volunteers may give their answers to the “Apply It” questions.
*Source: The car dealer negotiation confidential information is from Arch G. Woodside, Tulane University. The Car Dealer Game is part of a paper, “Bargaining Behavior in Personal Selling and Buying Exchanges,” that was presented at the 1980 Eighth Annual Conference of the Association for Business Simulation and Experiential Learning (ABSEL). It is used with Dr. Woodside’s permission.
5-4
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 179 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
180 part 1 INDIVIDuaLs as LEaDErs
endnotes
1 Forbes Web site (www.forbes.com/profile/mark-cuban), retrieved February 4, 2014.
2 J. Pfeffer, “Don’t Dismiss Office Politics—Teach It,” Wall Street Journal (October 24, 2011): R6.
3 J. Pfeffer, “Don’t Dismiss Office Politics—Teach It,” Wall Street Journal (October 24, 2011): R6.
4 D. Ma, Mo. Rhee, and D. Yang, “Power Source Mismatch and the Effectiveness of Interorganizational Relations: The Case of Venture Capital Syndication,” Academy of Management Journal 56(3) (2013): 711–734.
5 J. Pfeffer, “Don’t Dismiss Office Politics—Teach It,” Wall Street Journal (October 24, 2011): R6.
6 L.P. Tost, F. Gino, and R.P. Larrick, “When Power Makes Others Speechless: The Negative Impact of Leader Power on Team Performance,” Academy of Management Journal 56(5) (2013): 1465–1486.
7 D. Ma, Mo. Rhee, and D. Yang, “Power Source Mismatch and the Effectiveness of Interorganizational Relations: The Case of Venture Capital Syndication,” Academy of Management Journal 56(3) (2013): 711–734.
8 A.G. Acharya and T.G. Pollock, “Shoot for the Starts’ Predicting the Recruitment of Prestigious Directors at Newly Public Firms,” Academy of Management Journal 56(3) (2013): 711–734.
9 N.M. Lorinkova, M.J. Pearsall, and H.P. Sims, “Examining the Differential Longitudinal Performance of Directive versus Empowering Leadership in Teams,” Academy of Management Journal 56(2) (2013): 573–596.
10 M. Pitesa and S. Thau, “Compliant Sinners, Obstinate Saints: How Power and Self-Focus Determine the Effectiveness of Social Influences in Ethical Decisions Making,” Academy of Management Journal 56(3) (2013): 635–658.
11 N.M. Lorinkova, M.J. Pearsall, and H.P. Sims, “Examining the Differential Longitudinal Performance of Directive versus Empowering Leadership in Teams,” Academy of Management Journal 56(2) (2013): 573–596.
12 N.M. Lorinkova, M.J. Pearsall, and H.P. Sims, “Examining the Differential Longitudinal Performance of Directive versus Empowering Leadership in Teams,” Academy of Management Journal 56(2) (2013): 573–596.
13 J. Saraceno, “Phil Jackson,” AARP Bulletin (January–February 2014): 10.
14 J. R. P. French and B. H. Raven, “The Bases of Social Power,” in D. Cartwright, Ed., Studies of Social Power (Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, 1959): 150–167.
15 S.S. Wiltermuth and F.J. Flynn, “Power, Moral Clarity, and Punishment in the Workplace,” Academy of Management Journal 56(4) (2013): 1002–1023.
16 J. Pfeffer, “Don’t Dismiss Office Politics—Teach It,” Wall Street Journal (October 24, 2011): R6.
17 S.S. Wiltermuth and F.J. Flynn, “Power, Moral Clarity, and Punishment in the Workplace,” Academy of Management Journal 56(4) (2013): 1002–1023.
18 J. Liang, C.I.C. Farh, and J.L. Farh, “Psychological Antecedents of Promotive and Prohibitive Voice: A Two-Wave Examination,” Academy of Management Journal 55(1) (2012): 71–92.
19 M. Selman, “Manipulate Creative People,” BusinessWeek (April 11, 2013): 92.
20 S.S. Wiltermuth and F.J. Flynn, “Power, Moral Clarity, and Punishment in the Workplace,” Academy of Management Journal 56(4) (2013): 1002–1023.
21 G. Ertug and F. Castellucci, “Getting What You Need: How Reputation and Status Affect Team Performance, Hiring, and Salaries in the NBA,” Academy of Management Journal 56(2) (2013): 407–431.
22 Staff, “Success with Help,” Entrepreneur (December 2013): 64.
23 R. Nag and D. Gioia, “From Common to Uncommon Knowledge: Foundations of Firm-Specific Use of Knowledge as a Resource,” Academy of Management Journal 55(2) (2012): 421–457.
24 S. Shellenbarger, “Strike a Powerful Pose,” Wall Street Journal (August 21, 2013): D1, D2.
25 G. Ertug and F. Castellucci, “Getting What You Need: How Reputation and Status Affect Team Performance, Hiring, and Salaries in the NBA,” Academy of Management Journal 56(2) (2013): 407–431.
26 C. Galunic, G. Ertug, and M. Gargiulo, “The Positive Externalities of Social Capital: Benefiting from Senior Brokers,” Academy of Management Journal 55(5) (2012): 1213–1231.
27 G. Ertug and F. Castellucci, “Getting What You Need: How Reputation and Status Affect Team Performance, Hiring, and Salaries in the NBA,” Academy of Management Journal 56(2) (2013): 407–431.
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 180 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 5 INfLuENcINg: PowEr, PoLItIcs, NEtworkINg, aND NEgotIatIoN 181
28 J. Battilana and T. Casciaro, “Change Agents, Networks, and Institutions: A Contingency Theory of Organizational Change,” Academy of Management Journal 55(2) (2012): 381–398.
29 B. Schyns, T. Kiefer, R. Kerschreiter, and A. Tymon, “Teaching Implicit Leadership Theories to Develop Leaders and Leadership: How and Why It Can Make a Difference,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2012): 397–408.
30 L.P. Tost, F. Gino, and R.P. Larrick, “When Power Makes Others Speechless: The Negative Impact of Leader Power on Team Performance,” Academy of Management Journal 56(5) (2013): 1465–1486.
31 J. Pfeffer, “Don’t Dismiss Office Politics—Teach It,” Wall Street Journal (October 24, 2011): R6.
32 G. Colvin, “Ignore These Leadership Lessons at Your Peril,” Fortune (October 28, 2013): 85.
33 J. Pfeffer, “Don’t Dismiss Office Politics—Teach It,” Wall Street Journal (October 24, 2011): R6.
34 J. Pfeffer, “Don’t Dismiss Office Politics—Teach It,” Wall Street Journal (October 24, 2011): R6.
35 M. Reinholt, T. Pedersen, and N.J. Foss, “Why a Central Network Position Isn’t Enough: The Role of Motivation and Ability for Knowledge Sharing in Employee Networks,” Academy of Management Journal 54(6) (2011): 1277–1297.
36 J. Battilana and T. Casciaro, “Change Agents, Networks, and Institutions: A Contingency Theory of Organizational Change,” Academy of Management Journal 55(2) (2012): 381–398.
37 J. Liang, C.I.C. Farh, and J.L. Farh, “Psychological Antecedents of Promotive and Prohibitive Voice: A Two-Wave Examination,” Academy of Management Journal 55(1) (2012): 71–92.
38 P. Andruss, “How the Great Ones Got Great,” Entrepreneur (December 2013): 64.
39 G. Toegel, M. Kilduff, and N. Anand, “Emotion Helping by Managers: An Emergent Understanding of Discrepant Role Expectations and Outcomes,” Academy of Management Journal 56(2) (2013): 334–357.
40 P.J. Frederickson, “Political Skill at Work,” Academy of Management Perspectives 20(2) (2006): 95–96.
41 B. Benjamin and C. O’Reilly, “Becoming a Leader : Early Career Challenges Faced by MBA Graduates,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 452–472.
42 J. Pfeffer, “Don’t Dismiss Office Politics—Teach It,” Wall Street Journal (October 24, 2011): R6.
43 Staff, “Success with Help,” Entrepreneur (December 2013): 64.
44 B. Benjamin and C. O’Reilly, “Becoming a Leader : Early Career Challenges Faced by MBA Graduates,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 452–472.
45 J. Pfeffer, “Don’t Dismiss Office Politics—Teach It,” Wall Street Journal (October 24, 2011): R6.
46 M. Selman, “Manipulate Creative People,” BusinessWeek (April 11, 2013): 92.
47 B. Benjamin and C. O’Reilly, “Becoming a Leader : Early Career Challenges Faced by MBA Graduates,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 452–472.
48 J. Pfeffer, “Don’t Dismiss Office Politics—Teach It,” Wall Street Journal (October 24, 2011): R6.
49 E.R. Burris, “The Risks and Rewards of Speaking Up: Managerial Responses to Employee Voice,” Academy of Management Journal 55(4) (2012): 851–875.
50 S.S. Wiltermuth and F.J. Flynn, “Power, Moral Clarity, and Punishment in the Workplace,” Academy of Management Journal 56(4) (2013): 1002–1023.
51 G. Colvin, “Ignore These Leadership Lessons at Your Peril,” Fortune (October 28, 2013): 85.
52 N.M. Lorinkova, M.J. Pearsall, and H.P. Sims, “Examining the Differential Longitudinal Performance of Directive versus Empowering Leadership in Teams,” Academy of Management Journal 56(2) (2013): 573–596.
53 K. Blanchard, D. Hutson, and E. Wills, The One Minute Entrepreneur (New York: Currency/Doubleday, 2008).
54 J. Pfeffer, “Don’t Dismiss Office Politics—Teach It,” Wall Street Journal (October 24, 2011): R6.
55 J. Battilana and T. Casciaro, “Change Agents, Networks, and Institutions: A Contingency Theory of Organizational Change,” Academy of Management Journal 55(2) (2012): 381–398.
56 M. Baer, “Putting Creativity to Work: The Implementation of Creative Ideas in Organizations,” Academy of Management Journal 55(5) (2012): 1102–1119.
57 P. Andruss, “How the Great Ones Got Great,” Entrepreneur (December 2013): 64.
58 C. Galunic, G. Ertug, and M. Gargiulo, “The Positive Externalities of Social Capital: Benefiting from Senior Brokers,” Academy of Management Journal 55(5) (2012): 1213–1231.
59 E. Glazer, “Problem—and—Solutions,” Wall Street Journal (October 24, 2011): R2.
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 181 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
182 part 1 INDIVIDuaLs as LEaDErs
60 S. Raice, “Friends—and Possible Employee,” Wall Street Journal (October 24, 2011): R4.
61 This section is adapted from A. Gumbus and R.N. Lussier, “Career Development: Enhancing Your Networking Skill,” Clinical Leadership & Management Review 17(1) (January– February 2003).
62 V. Harnish, “Five Ways to Boost Revenue,” Fortune (September 16, 2013): 45.
63 E. Glazer, “Problem—and—Solutions,” Wall Street Journal (October 24, 2011): R2.
64 C. Galunic, G. Ertug, and M. Gargiulo, “The Positive Externalities of Social Capital: Benefiting from Senior Brokers,” Academy of Management Journal 55(5) (2012): 1213–1231.
65 P. Andruss, “How the Great Ones Got Great,” Entrepreneur (December 2013): 64.
66 S. Raice, “Friends—and Possible Employee,” Wall Street Journal (October 24, 2011): R4.
67 M. Pitesa and S. Thau, “Compliant Sinners, Obstinate Saints: How Power and Self-Focus Determine the Effectiveness of Social Influences in Ethical Decisions Making,” Academy of Management Journal 56(3) (2013): 635–658.
68 W.M. Murphy, “From E-Mentoring to Blended Mentoring: Increasing Students’ Developmental Initiation and Mentors’ Satisfaction,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(4) (2011): 606–622.
69 C. Suddath, “The Ar t of Haggling,” BusinessWeek (November 26–December 2, 2012): 98.
70 W.S. Helms, C. Oliver, and K. Webb, “Antecedents of Settlement on a New Institutional Practice: Negotiation of the ISO 26000 Standard on Social Responsibility,” Academy of Management Journal 55(5) (2012): 1120–1145.
71 C. Suddath, “The Ar t of Haggling,” BusinessWeek (November 26–December 2, 2012): 98.
72 C. Suddath, “The Ar t of Haggling,” BusinessWeek (November 26–December 2, 2012): 98.
73 C. Suddath, “The Ar t of Haggling,” BusinessWeek (November 26–December 2, 2012): 98.
74 M. Pitesa and S. Thau, “Compliant Sinners, Obstinate Saints: How Power and Self-Focus Determine the Effectiveness of Social Influences in Ethical Decisions Making,” Academy of Management Journal 56(3) (2013): 635–658.
75 G. Colvin, “Ignore These Leadership Lessons at Your Peril,” Fortune (October 28, 2013): 85.
76 Staff, “What’s a Hero?” Entrepreneur (December 2013): 64.
77 R. Pinheiro, “Super Freakonomics,” Academy of Management Perspectives 25(2) (2011): 86–87.
78 S.S. Wiltermuth and F.J. Flynn, “Power, Moral Clarity, and Punishment in the Workplace,” Academy of Management Journal 56(4) (2013): 1002–1023.
79 G. A. Fowler and A. Efati, “Facebook Hired Firm to Target Google,” Wall Street Journal (May 13, 2011): B1, B-2.
80 This is an actual case, but the names have been changed to protect identities.
66352_ch05_ptg01_144-182.indd 182 10/15/14 12:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
18 3
Chapter
6
Communication, Coaching, and Conflict Skills
Learning Outcomes After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
1 List the steps in the oral message-sending process. p. 186
2 List and explain the three parts of the message-receiving process. p. 189
3 Describe paraphrasing and state why it is used. p. 191
4 Identify two common approaches to getting feedback, and explain why they don’t work. p.192
5 Describe the difference between criticism and coaching feedback. p. 197
6 Discuss the relationship between the performance formula and the coaching model. p. 198
7 Define the five conflict management styles. p. 201
8 List the steps in the initiating conflict resolution model. p. 206
C h a p t e r O U t L I N e
Communication
Communication and Leadership
Sending Messages and Giving Instructions
Receiving Messages
Feedback
The Importance of Feedback
Common Approaches to Getting Feedback on Messages—and Why They Don’t Work
How to Get Feedback on Messages
Coaching
How to Give Coaching Feedback
What Is Criticism—and Why Doesn’t It Work?
The Coaching Model for Employees Who Are Performing Below Standard
Mentoring
Managing Conflict
The Psychological Contract
Conflict Management Styles
Collaborating Conflict Management Style Models
Initiating Conflict Resolution
Responding to Conflict Resolution
Mediating Conflict Resolution
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 183 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
184 part 2 TEAM LEADERSHIP
The Ranch Golf Club (The Ranch), where every player is a special guest for the day, opened in 2001 in Southwick, Massachusetts. The Ranch’s competitive advantage is its upscale public course with links, woods, and a variety of elevations with unsurpassed service in New England. From the star t, The Ranch strived to be the best golf club in New England. In less than a year, The Ranch earned a 4-star course rating, one of only four in New England. It has gone on to win numerous other awards.
So how did The Ranch get started? Prior to being a golf club, it was a dairy farm owned by the Hall family. The Hall family wanted to turn the farm into a golf club with the help of Rowland Bates as project coordinator. The Halls were to provide the land, and investors would provide the capital.
Peter and Korby Clark were par t owners of nearly 50 Jiffy Lubes, selling most to Pennzoil in 1991. Bates offered Peter Clark the oppor tunity to create and help manage a new golf club. Although Clark played golf, it was not so much the golf but the challenge of creating a new course and also playing an ongoing par t in its management that interested him. Bates found two more investors, Bernard Chiu and Ronald Izen, to provide the additional funding, creating a one-third ownership by the Halls, Clarks, and Chiu and Izen.
The Clar ks were happy to have the professional golf management team of Willowbend run day-to-day operations because they had no experience managing a golf club and they would not have to work full time at
The Ranch. However, in 2005 Willowbend stopped manag- ing golf courses and sold its business. By then the Clarks had gained enough experience running The Ranch and no longer needed professional management. Peter Clark stopped his par t-time coaching of football and baseball and increased his management role to become the manag- ing par tner, overseeing day-to-day operations, and Korby works full time too.1
OpeNING CaSe QUeStIONS:
1. Why is communication important to the management of The Ranch?
2. How does management use feedback at The Ranch?
3. Is there a difference in managing an oil change business, a golf course, and a sports team, and how does Peter Clark use coaching at The Ranch?
4. Which conflict management style does Peter Clark tend to use at The Ranch?
5. What types of conflict resolutions do the Clarks deal with at The Ranch?
Can you answer any of these questions? You’ll find answers to these questions and learn more about The Ranch and its leadership throughout the chapter.
To learn more about The Ranch, or take a vir tual tour of the course, visit its Web site at http:// www .theranchgolfclub.com.
OPENING CASE Application
L eadership success is based on interpersonal skills,2 and the focus of this chapter is on three important interrelated parts of interpersonal skills. They are communication, coaching, and conf lict skills. We begin with sending and receiving communications, because it is the foundation for coaching and managing conf lict. We also discuss
feedback as it relates to both communication and coaching. Based on this foundation, you will learn how to coach followers, and then how to manage conf licts.
Communication In this section, we discuss the importance of communication in leadership and exam- ine the communication process of sending and receiving messages. Communication is the process of conveying information and meaning. True communication takes place only when all parties understand the message (information) from the same perspective (meaning).
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 184 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 6 CoMMunICATIon, CoACHIng, AnD ConfLICT SkILLS 185
Communication and Leadership Leaders use communications to inf luencing others, 3 so leaders need to have good communication sk ills.4 Forma l aut horit y af fects communication and, ultimately, performance.5 Managers use communications to monitor and reinforce performance standards;6 they share information.7 Information processing is so important that organi- zations are designed as a means to meet the information processing requirements gener- ated by interdependent activities.8 Unfortunately, some managers distort information.9 Thus, managers are not trusted today, as only 17 percent of U.S. respondents stated the information provided by top leaders is credible, and this level does not exceed 30 percent in most developed countries.10
With changing technology, how we communicate has changed over the years as mo- bile technologies provide a constant pattern of communication,11 which blurs our work and nonwork lives.12 Communicating is a social process,13 and the trend is to use net- working14 and social media.15 Facebook tends to be more personal and LinkedIn more professional networking,16 and people are using Twitter to get quick answers to ques- tions.17 But no matter which technology we use to communicate, two important parts of communication remain: sending and receiving messages.
Sending Messages and Giving Instructions Leaders send a variety of messages orally, in writing, and nonverbally. An important part of a manager’s job is to give instructions, which is sending a message. As managers, how well we give instructions directly affects performance.18 Have you ever heard a manager say “This isn’t what I asked for”? This tends to happen when managers do a poor job of giving instructions. Let’s discuss how to avoid this problem.
Planning the Message Before sending a message, we should plan it, remembering that brevity rules. Answer these questions while planning. What is the goal of my message? Who should receive my message? When will my message be transmitted? Where will my message be transmitted? How will I send the message?
With the receivers in mind, plan how you will convey the message so that it will be understood. Select the appropriate method for the audience and situation19 (see Concept Application 6-1 for a list).
CONCept APPLICATION 6-1
Methods of Sending Messages For each of these ten communication situations, select the most appropriate channel for transmitting the message. Write the most appropriate letter in the blank before each item.
Written communication (includes e-mail/texting Oral communication and traditional methods)
a. face-to-face e. memo h. bulletin board
b. meeting f. letter i. poster
c. presentation g. report j. newsletter
d. telephone (continued)
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 185 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
186 part 2 TEAM LEADERSHIP
The Oral Message-Sending Process Oral face-to-face communication is the richest channel because it allows for a maximum amount of information to be transmitted through dialogue between the parties.20 The big advantage over the other channels is that it allows us to read the person’s nonverbal com- munication. When using electronics, we lose the personal touch.
It is helpful to follow these steps in the oral message-sending process: (1) develop rapport; (2) state your communication objective; (3) transmit your message; (4) check the receiver’s understanding; and (5) get a commitment and follow up. Model 6.1 lists these steps.
Step 1. Develop rapport. Put the receiver at ease. It is usually appropriate to begin communications with small talk correlated to the message. It helps prepare the person to receive the message.
CONCept APPLICATION 6-1 1. You want one of your employees to stop being disruptive during meetings.
2. You have beaten the deadline on a major project and you want your boss to know about it so that it can have a positive influence on your next performance review.
3. Your child asked you to sell candy at work for a fund-raiser. However, you don’t want to ask anyone in person.
4. You have been asked for some financial information relating to your job.
5. You have been asked to speak at your union meeting.
6. You write well and want to be formally involved in sharing information throughout the organization.
7. You have been given a letter of complaint from a supplier and asked to respond.
8. You are waiting for an important letter to arrive, and you want to know if it is in the mail room yet.
9. You want workers to save electricity by shutting off the lights in the break room when no one is in it.
10. You have four employees from other departments who will be working on a new project. You need to explain the project to them.
List the steps in the oral message-sending process. Learning outcome
1
Step 2. State your communication objective. It is helpful for the receiver to know the desired end result of the communication before covering all the details.
Step 3. Transmit your message. Tell the people what you want them to do—give instructions. Be sure to set deadlines for completing tasks. Take it a step at a
1. Develop rapport.
2. State your communication
objective.
3. Transmit your
message.
4. Check the receiver’s
understanding.
5. Get a commitment and
follow up.
The Oral Message-Sending Process MODEL 6.1
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 186 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 6 CoMMunICATIon, CoACHIng, AnD ConfLICT SkILLS 187
time so you don’t have information overload.21 We will discuss how to delegate task in Chapter 7.
Step 4. Check the receiver’s understanding. When communicating, we should ask direct questions and/or use paraphrasing. To simply ask “Do you have any questions?” does not check understanding. In the next section of this chapter, you will learn how to check understanding by using feedback.
Step 5. Get a commitment and follow up. When giving instructions, it is important to get a commitment to the action. We need to make sure that followers can do the task and have it done by the deadline.
Written Communication and Writing Tips Because the use of mobile technology will continue to increase, your written communica- tion skills are more important than ever.22 Even if people aren’t telling you that you’re using incorrect grammar, they are evaluating you and may conclude you’re not intelligent. So we have included some simple but important tips that can help you to improve your writing.
• Lack of organization is a major writing problem. Before you begin writing, set an objec- tive for your communication. Keep the audience in mind. What do you want them to do? Make an outline, using letters and/or numbers, of the major points you want to get across. Now put the outline into written form. The first paragraph states the purpose of the communication. The middle paragraphs support the purpose of the communica- tion: facts, figures, and so forth. The last paragraph summarizes the major points and clearly states the action, if any, to be taken by you and other people.
• Write to communicate, not to impress. Keep the message short and simple. Follow the 1-5-15 rule. Limit each paragraph to a single topic and an average of five sentences. Sen- tences should average 15 words. Vary paragraph and sentence length. Write in the active voice (I recommend …) rather than the passive voice (it is recommended …).
• Edit your work and rewrite where necessary. To improve sentences and paragraphs, add to them to convey full meaning, cut out unnecessary words and phrases, and/or rear- range the words. Check your work with the computer spelling and grammar checkers. Have others edit your important work as well.
WORk Application 6-1 Recall a specific task that your manager assigned to you. Identify which steps the manager did and did not use in the oral message- sending process.
WORk Application 6-2 Select two or three of the tips that you can use to improve your written communication. Explain how using the tip will improve your writing.
YOU Make the ethICaL Call
6.1 Advertising
Companies use oral, nonverbal, and written communications to adver tise their products to increase sales. Selecting the best words to sell a product or service is impor tant. How- ever, some of the terms used in ads are misleading and even deceptive, although in some cases the words are legal.
For example, some companies use the word “natural” on foods that are highly processed, such as products including white sugar. So, some question the use of the term “natural.” Bags of chips are adver tised as being “all natural,” which leads people to think they are healthy, when in fact others classify them as junk food. Because obesity has become such a major health problem, the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) obesity task force is trying to crack down on misleading labels and ads, and is calling for warnings and fines for violators.
1. Is it ethical and socially responsible for food companies to use terms (like “natural’’) that can be misleading to increase sales and profits?
2. Should companies use terms that are considered misleading by some but are not illegal?
3. How would you define “natural”?
4. How should the FDA define “natural’’ so that it is not used to mislead people to buy food thinking that it is healthy, when in fact it is not?
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 187 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
188 part 2 TEAM LEADERSHIP
receiving Messages The second communication process that leaders are involved in is receiving messages, which includes listening 23 and responding to messages.24 Responding ef fectively improves communications.25 Let’s begin by completing the Self-Assessment 6-1 to determine the level and quality of your listening skills, and be honest.
Listening Skills
Select the response that best describes the frequency of your actual behavior. Write the letters A, u, f, o, or S on the line before each of the 15 statements.
A—almost always u—usually f—frequently o—occasionally S—seldom
______ 1. I like to listen to people talk. I encourage others to talk by showing interest, smiling, nodding, and so forth.
______ 2. I pay closer attention to people who are more similar to me than I do to people who are different from me.
______ 3. I evaluate people’s words and their non- verbal communication ability as they talk.
______ 4. I avoid distractions; if it’s noisy, I suggest moving to a quiet spot.
______ 5. When people come to me and interrupt me when I’m doing something, I put what I was doing out of my mind and give them my complete attention.
______ 6. When people are talking, I allow them time to finish. I do not interrupt, anticipate what they are going to say, or jump to conclusions.
______ 7. I tune people out who do not agree with my views.
______ 8. While the other person is talking, or pro- fessors are lecturing, my mind wanders to personal topics.
______ 9. While the other person is talking, I pay close attention to the nonverbal commu- nication to help me fully understand what they are trying to communicate.
______ 10. I tune out and pretend I understand when the topic is difficult for me to understand.
______ 11. When the other person is talking, I think about and prepare what I am going to say in reply.
______ 12. When I think there is something missing or contradictory, I ask direct questions to get the person to explain the idea more fully.
______ 13. When I don’t understand something, I let the other person know I don’t understand.
______ 14. When listening to other people, I try to put myself in their position and to see things from their perspective.
______ 15. During conversations I repeat back to the other person what has been said in my own words to be sure I correctly under- stand what has been said.
If people you talk to regularly were to answer these questions about you, would they have the same responses that you selected? To find out, have friends fill out the questions with you in mind rather than themselves. Then compare answers.
To determine your score, give yourself 5 points for each A, 4 for each u, 3 for each f, 2 for each o, and 1 for each S for statements 1, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, and 15. Place the numbers on the line next to your response letter. for items 2, 3, 7, 8, 10, and 11, the score reverses: 5 points for each S, 4 for each o, 3 for each f, 2 for each u, and 1 for each A. Place these score numbers on the lines next to the response letters. now add your total number of points. Your score should be between 15 and 75. Place your score on the continuum below. generally, the higher your score, the better your listening skills.
1 5 – 2 0 – 2 5 – 3 0 – 3 5 – 4 0 – 4 5 – 5 0 – 5 5 – 6 0 – 6 5 – 7 0 – 7 5 Poor listener Good listener
SELF-ASSESSMENT 6-1
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 188 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 6 CoMMunICATIon, CoACHIng, AnD ConfLICT SkILLS 189
If someone asks us “Are you a good listener,” most likely we would say yes. What was your score on the self-assessment? Unfortunately, a recent survey found that the number 1 thing lacking in new college grads is listening skills.26 Constant multitasking (including checking screens) is deteriorating our ability to pay attention for long and listen. For how long can you pay attention and listen effectively at school and work? Next time you begin reading a textbook, time how long you can go before you “have” to stop and multitask. By using the message-receiving process below, we can become better listeners.
The Message-Receiving Process The message-receiving process includes listening, analyzing, and checking under standing. To improve your listening skills, spend one week focusing your attention on listening by concentrating on what other people say and the nonverbal communications they send when they speak. Notice if their verbal and nonverbal communication are con- sistent. Talk only when necessary, so that you can listen and “see” what others are saying. If you apply the following tips, you will improve your listening skills. The tips are pre- sented in the depiction of the message-receiving process (Exhibit 6.1): We should listen, analyze, and then check understanding.
List and explain the three parts of the message-receiving process. Learning outcome
2
Listening Pay attention Avoid distractions Stay tuned in Don’t assume and interrupt Watch nonverbal cues Ask questions Take notes Convey meaning
Checking Understanding Paraphrase Watch nonverbal cues
Analyzing Think Wait to evaluate until after listening
The Message-Receiving Process EXHIBIT 6.1
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
Listening Listening is the process of giving the speaker your undivided attention. As the speaker sends the message, you should listen by:
• Paying attention. When people interrupt, stop what you are doing and give them your complete attention before you begin the conversation.
• Avoiding distractions. Keep your eye on the speaker. Avoid distractions; let your phone “take a message.” If you are in a noisy or distracting place, suggest moving to a quiet spot.
• Staying tuned in. Do not let your mind wander. If it does, gently bring it back or repeat in your mind what the person is saying to force yourself to pay attention. Do not think about what you are going to say in reply; just listen.
• Not assuming and interrupting. Do not assume you know what the speaker is going to say, or listen to the beginning and jump to conclusions. Listen to the entire message without interrupting the speaker.
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 189 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
190 part 2 TEAM LEADERSHIP
• Watching nonverbal cues. People sometimes say one thing and mean something else. So watch as you listen to be sure that the speaker’s eyes, body, and face are sending the same message as the verbal message. If something seems out of sync, get it cleared up by asking questions.
• Asking questions. When you feel there is something missing, contradictory, or you just do not understand, ask direct questions to get the person to explain the idea more fully.
• Taking notes. Part of listening is writing important things down so you can remember them later and document them when necessary. This is especially true when you’re lis- tening to instructions.
• Conveying meaning. The way to let the speaker know you are listening to the message is to use verbal clues, such as “you feel…,” “uh huh,” “I see,” and “I understand.” Use nonverbal communication such as eye contact, appropriate facial expressions, nod- ding of the head, or leaning slightly forward in your chair to indicate interest and listening.
Analyzing Analyzing is the process of thinking about, decoding, and evaluating the message. As the speaker sends the message, we should analyze by the following:
• Thinking. Listen actively by organizing, summarizing, reviewing, interpreting, and cri- tiquing often. These activities will help do an effective job of decoding the message.
• Waiting to evaluate until after listening. When we try to listen and evaluate what is said at the same time, we tend to miss part or the entire message. Just listen to the entire message, and then come to a conclusion.27
Checking Understanding Checking understanding is the process of giving feedback. After we have listened to the message—or during the message, if it’s a long one—check understanding of the message by the following:
• Paraphrasing. Begin speaking by giving feedback, using paraphrasing to repeat the mes- sage to the sender in your own words. When you can paraphrase the message correctly, you convey that you have listened and understood the other person.
• Watching nonverbal cues. As you speak, watch the other person’s nonverbal cues. If the person does not seem to understand what you are talking about, clarify the message before finishing the conversation.
Work to change your behavior to become a better listener. Review the 15 statements in Self-Assessment 6-1. To improve your listening skills, practice doing items 1, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, and 15; and avoid doing items 2, 3, 7, 8, 10, and 11.
WORk Application 6-3 Refer to Self- Assessment 6-1 and the listening tips. What is your weakest listening skill area on the job? How will you improve your listening ability?
1. Why is communication important to the management of the ranch?
The key to success at The Ranch is clear, open communications of expectations. Peter Clark has to continually commu- nicate with his par tners and depar tment heads, and nothing takes the place of sitting down face-to-face during regular weekly meetings and listening to each other to continually improve operations. Meetings of depar tment managers with
OPENING CASE Application
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 190 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 6 CoMMunICATIon, CoACHIng, AnD ConfLICT SkILLS 191
Feedback In this section, we discuss the importance of feedback, the common approaches to get- ting feedback (and why they don’t work), and how to get feedback. In the next section, we discuss how to give feedback as part of coaching.
the Importance of Feedback Communications inf luence behavior,28 as feedback motivates employees to achieve high levels of performance.29 Feedback is the process of verifying messages and determining if objectives are being met. In Chapter 7, we discuss leader–follower performance feedback. Effective leader–follower feedback focuses on the leader’s assessment of a follower’s job performance on assigned tasks and responsibilities.
The Role of Feedback in Verifying Messages Recall that checking receiver understanding is the fourth step in the oral message send- ing process. The best way to make sure communication has taken place is to get feedback from the receiver of the message through questioning and paraphrasing. paraphrasing is the process of having the receiver restate the message in his or her own words. If the receiver of the message can answer the questions or paraphrase the message, communica- tion has taken place.
The Role of Feedback in Meeting Objectives Leaders set objective for the desired level of performance.30 Thus, leaders should set spe- cific measurable objectives (Chapter 3) and monitor the process through ongoing feed- back to increase motivation toward goal accomplishment.31 Feedback is also used in recognition of good work.32 See Guidelines for Effective Leader Feedback in Chapter 7.
The Need to Be Open to Feedback—Criticism To improve our performance and get ahead in an organization, we have to be open to feedback commonly called criticism.33 We should actually solicit feedback. However, if we’re asking for personal feedback, remember that we are asking to hear things that may surprise, upset, or insult us, and even hurt our feelings. If we become defensive and emotional—and it is tough not to when we feel attacked—feedback will stop.
We do not really enjoy being criticized by our manager, peers, or others, even when it is constructive, because it tends to be painful. But keep the phrase “no pain, no gain” in mind when it comes to criticism. When criticized, whether you asked for it or not, stay calm34 (even when the other person is emotional), don’t get defensive, and don’t blame others. View it as an opportunity to improve. If the feedback is vague, ask what specific behavior they want that will improve performance. Although it is difficult to change our behavior, it is the only way we will improve.
WORk Application 6-4 Are you really open to feedback or criticism from others at work? How can you improve on accepting criticism?
Describe paraphrasing and state why it is used. Learning outcome
3
employees continually focus on the importance of communicating the philosophy of unsurpassed professional service. To communicate professionalism, all employees wear The Ranch uniforms and name tags, and they are trained with instruc- tions on how to perform high-quality ser vice. Even the words used are chosen to communicate professionalism. For example, The Ranch has player assistants (PAs), not rangers; golf cars, not golf carts; and it has a golf shop, not a pro shop.
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 191 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
192 part 2 TEAM LEADERSHIP
Common approaches to Getting Feedback on Messages—and Why they Don’t Work The first common approach is to send the entire message and then assume that the message has been conveyed with mutual understanding without getting any feedback. The second approach is to give the entire message and then ask “Do you have any questions?” Feedback usually does not follow, because people have a tendency “not” to ask questions. Asking ques- tions, especially if no one else does, is often considered an admission of not paying attention or not being bright enough to understand, or the receiver doesn’t know what to ask.
After managers send a message and ask if there are questions, they then proceed to make another common error: Managers assume that no questions means communication is complete and that there is mutual understanding of the message. In reality, the message is often misunderstood. When “this isn’t what I asked for” happens, the task often has to be done all over again. The end result is often wasted time, materials, and effort.
The most common cause of messages not resulting in communication is the lack of getting feedback that ensures mutual understanding. The proper use of questioning and paraphrasing can help you ensure that your messages are communicated.
how to Get Feedback on Messages Here are four guidelines we can use to ensure getting feedback on messages:
• Be open to feedback. There are no dumb questions. When someone asks a question, we need to be responsive, patiently answer questions, and explain things clearly. If people sense that we get upset if they ask questions, they will not ask questions.
YOU Make the ethICaL Call
6.2 Academic Grades
Grades are a form of feedback and are often criticized. (Recall Ethical Call “Academic Standards” in Chapter 3.) Successful managers set and maintain high expectations for all their employees, and as Lou Holtz said, we need to set a higher standard. While students are doing less work than in prior years, grades continue to increase, which is called grade inflation. At one time, most colleges had a set grade point average (GPA) to determine honors. But today, most colleges use a ranking system of GPA, because of grade inflation, to limit the number of students graduating with honors.
1. How do you react when you get a grade that is lower than you wanted or expected?
2. Do you use the feedback of correcting and grades to help you improve? Why or why not, and, if yes, how?
3. Why are professors giving higher grades today than were given 5, 10, or 20 years ago?
4. Are students who are putting in less time and getting higher grades being well prepared for a career with high standards after graduation?
5. Is it ethical and socially responsible for professors to drop standards and for colleges to award degrees with higher grades today than 5, 10, or 20 years ago?
Identify two common approaches to getting feedback, and explain why they don’t work.
Learning outcome
4
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 192 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 6 CoMMunICATIon, CoACHIng, AnD ConfLICT SkILLS 193
• Be aware of nonverbal communication. Be sure nonverbal communications encourage feedback. For example, if you say, “I encourage questions,” but when people ask ques- tions you look at them as though they are stupid, or you act impatient, people will learn not to ask questions. You must also be aware of, and read, people’s nonverbal commu- nications. For example, if you are explaining a task to Larry and he has a puzzled look on his face, he is probably confused but may not be willing to say so. In such a case, you should stop and clarify things before going on.
• Ask questions. When sending messages, it is better to know whether the messages are understood before action is taken, so that the action will not have to be changed or repeated. Ask questions to check understanding, rather than simply asking “Do you have any questions?” Direct questions dealing with the specific information you have given will indicate if the receiver has been listening, and whether he or she understands enough to give a direct reply. If the response is not accurate, try repeating, giving more examples, or elaborating further on the message.
• Use paraphrasing. The most accurate indicator of understanding is paraphrasing. How we ask the receiver to paraphrase will affect attitudes. For example, if we say “Joan, tell me what I just said so that I can be sure you will not make a mistake as usual,” this will probably result in defensive behavior on Joan’s part. Joan will probably make a mistake. Here are two examples of proper requests for paraphrasing:
“Now tell me what you are going to do, so we will be sure that we are in agreement.”
“Would you tell me what you are going to do, so that I can be sure that I explained myself clearly?”
Notice that the second statement takes the pressure off the employee. The sender is asking for a check on his or her ability, not that of the employee. These types of requests for paraphrasing should result in a positive attitude toward the message and the sender. They show concern for the employee and for communicating effectively.
360-Degree Multi-Rater Feedback The use of feedback from multiple sources, especially peers,35 is popular as a means of improving performance36 So far, we have discussed the informal methods of getting feed- back. We now turn to a formal evaluation process using 360-degree multi-rater feedback. As the name implies, 360-degree feedback is based on receiving performance evalua- tions from many people. Usually a 360-degree evaluation form is completed by the person being evaluated, his or her manager, peers, and subordinates when applicable. Customers, suppliers, and other outside people are also asked for an evaluation when applicable. See Exhibit 6.2 for an illustration of the 360-degree feedback process.
WORk Application 6-5 Recall a past or present manager. Did or does your manager use the common approach to getting feedback on messages regularly? Was or is he or she open to feedback and aware of nonverbal communication on a regular basis? Did the manager regularly ask questions and ask you to paraphrase?
360-Degree Feedback Sources EXHIBIT 6.2
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
may be customers
Manager 360-degree multirater
Peers feedback form results Self
Employees
may be suppliers
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 193 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
194 part 2 TEAM LEADERSHIP
Coaching Coaching is based on feedback and communications,37 and it improves performance.38 Coaching is the process of giving motivational feedback to maintain and improve perfor- mance. In this section, we discuss how to give coaching feedback, and what criticism is— and why that doesn’t work. We then present a coaching model you can use on the job, and we end by brief ly discussing mentoring, which may be considered a form of coaching.
how to Give Coaching Feedback When people hear the word coaching, they often think of athletes, but managers should also be looking for steady performance and continual improvement. Here we discuss some guidelines that will help us to be effective coaches; the guidelines are also shown in Exhibit 6.3. The guidelines are designed primarily for use with employees who are doing a good job.
If you are serious about getting ahead, it is critical to focus on feedback from your manager and any other evaluators and do what it takes to receive a good formal perfor- mance evaluation. You should work together with your manager to develop and imple- ment a plan for improvement during the next evaluation period.
2. how does management use feedback at the ranch?
Feedback is critical to success at The Ranch, because it is how the Clarks and the managers know if the players are getting quality ser vice and learn how to improve ser vice. The Clarks, managers, and employees are open to player criticism because they realize that the only way to improve is to listen and make changes to improve performance. In fact, Peter and Korby Clark spend much of their time at The Ranch talking to players about their experience, with the focus on listening for ways to make improvements. The Clarks and managers set clear objectives and have regular meetings with employees to get and give feedback on how The Ranch is progressing toward meeting its objectives.
Although it is a small business, during the summer 80 people work at The Ranch, and it has a sophisticated information system for its three depar tments—golf (greens and practice, tournaments/outings, golf shop), maintenance (the course and other facilities), and food and beverage (The Ranch Grille, bar, and functions)—that include many performance measures that are monitored for continuous improvements.
OPENING CASE Application
Coaching Guidelines EXHIBIT 6.3
1. Develop a supportive working relationship.
2. Give praise and recognition.
3. Avoid blame and embarrassment.
4. Focus on the behavior, not the person.
5. Have employees assess their own performance.
Give specific and descriptive feedback.6.
7. Give coaching feedback.
8. Provide modeling and training.
9. Make feedback timely, but flexible.
10. Don’t criticize.
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 194 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 6 CoMMunICATIon, CoACHIng, AnD ConfLICT SkILLS 195
Develop a Supportive Working Relationship Manager and employee do not have to be personal friends and socialize together—it’s about having a good working relationship. Our relationship with followers needs to con- vey concern for them as individuals and our commitment to coach them to success. We should periodically ask employees if there is anything we can do to help them do a better job. Take the time to listen to them. Our job as a manager is to run interference and to remove the stumbling blocks for the employees to improve their performance and that of the business unit.
Give Praise and Recognition In Chapter 3, you learned the importance of giving praise, and how to use the giving praise model. We cannot overemphasize the importance of giving praise and recognition. Recognition includes praise, awards, and recognition ceremonies. Awards include cer- tificates of achievement, a letter of commendation, a pin/plaque/trophy/medal, clothing, cash, trips, employee of the month, and so on.
Avoid Blame and Embarrassment The objective of coaching is to develop employees.39 Thus, any behavior that focuses on placing blame and making the person feel bad does not help.40 For example, if an employee makes a mistake and realizes it, verbalizing it is not needed; doing so only makes them feel bad. Statements like “I’m surprised that you did XYZ” or “I’m disappointed in you” should be avoided. Besides, effective leaders treat mistakes as learning experiences.
Focus on the Behavior, Not the Person Let’s use examples to illustrate the difference between coaching by focusing on changing behavior and coaching by focusing on the person. Notice that the statements focusing on the person place blame and embarrassment—or belittle the person:
• Situation 1. The employee is dominating the discussion at a meeting. Focus on person— You talk too much; give others a chance. Focus on behavior—I’d like to hear what some of the other group members have to say.
• Situation 2. The employee is late for a meeting again. Focus on person—You are always late for meetings; why can’t you be on time like the rest of us?
Focus on behavior—This is the second time in a row that you arrived late for our meet- ing. The group needs your input right from the start of the meeting.
Have Employees Assess Their Own Performance Here are some examples of criticism and of self-evaluation coaching feedback to help explain the difference:
• Situation 3. The employee has been making more errors lately. Criticism—You haven’t been working up to par lately; get on the ball. Self-evaluation—How would you assess the number of errors you have been making this week?
• Situation 4. The employee is working on a few reports, and one is due in two days. The manager believes the employee may not meet the deadline. Criticism—Are you going to meet the deadline for the report? Self-evaluation—How are you progressing on the cost-cutting report that’s due this Thursday? Is there something I can do to help?
Give Specific and Descriptive Feedback Specific feedback is needed to avoid confusion over which particular behavior needs to be improved.41 Compare the preceding criticism statements, which are not specific, to the self-evaluation statements, which are specific.
WORk Application 6-6 Recall the best and worst manager you ever had. With which manager did you have the best working relationship? Which one gave you the most encouragement, praise, and recognition for a job well done? Which one gave you the most negative criticism? Was your performance at a higher level for your best or worst manager?
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 195 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
196 part 2 TEAM LEADERSHIP
Descriptive feedback can be based on facts or inferences. Facts can be observed and proven; inferences cannot. In situation 3, the manager can observe and prove that the employee made more errors this week than in prior weeks. However, the manager cannot observe or prove why. The manager may infer many reasons for the changed behavior, such as laziness, illness, a personal problem, and so on.
In situation 4, the manager cannot prove that the report will be late; the manager is inferring that it will be and attempting to coach the employee to make sure it is com- pleted on time. Give factual, rather than inferential, feedback, because factual feedback tends to be specific and more positive, while inferential feedback tends to be more nega- tive criticism.
Give Coaching Feedback Self-assessment can work well.42 However, it is not always appropriate; if overused, it can have limited success. Here are some examples of how to coach versus criticize:
• Situation 5. The manager just saw an employee, who knows how it should be done, incorrectly pick up a fairly heavy box.
• Criticism—You just picked up the box wrong. Don’t let me catch you again. Coaching feedback—If you don’t want to injure your back, use your legs—not your back.
• Situation 6. A student sees a fellow student going to the Yahoo! Web site by typing in the entire address, http://www.yahoo.com. Criticism—You just wasted time typing in the entire Yahoo! Web site address. Coaching feedback—Would you like me to show you a faster way to get to the Yahoo!
home page?
Provide Modeling and Training A good manager leads by example. If employees see the manager doing things in an ef- fective manner, they will tend to copy the manager. As illustrated in situations 4 and 5, coaching often requires some training.43 The job instructional training method is widely used (see Model 6.2). The job instructional training (JIt) steps include (1) trainee receives preparation; (2) trainer presents the task; (3) trainee performs the task; and (4) trainer follows up. Remember that tasks we know well seem very simple, but they are usu- ally difficult for the new trainee.
Step 1. Trainee receives preparation. Put the trainee at ease as you create interest in the job and encourage questions. Explain the quantity and quality requirements and why they are important.
Step 2. Trainer presents the task. Perform the task yourself at a slow pace, explain- ing each step several times. Once the trainee seems to have the steps memo- rized, have the trainee explain each step as you slowly perform the task again. For complex tasks with multiple steps, it is helpful to write them out and to give a copy to the trainee.
Step 3. Trainee performs the task. Have the trainee perform the task at a slow pace, while explaining each step to you. Correct any errors and be patiently willing to
4. Trainer follows up.
3. Trainee performs the task.
2. Trainer presents the task.
1. Trainee receives preparation.
Job Instructional Training Steps MODEL 6.2
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 196 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 6 CoMMunICATIon, CoACHIng, AnD ConfLICT SkILLS 197
help the trainee perform any difficult steps. Continue until the trainee is profi- cient at performing the task.
Step 4. Trainer follows up. Tell the trainee whom to ask for help with any questions or problems. Observe the trainee performing the task, and be sure to correct any errors or faulty work procedures before they become a habit. As you follow up, be sure to be patient and encouraging.
Make Feedback Timely, but Flexible Feedback should be given as soon as possible after the behavior has been observed. For example, in situation 5 you will want to give the coaching feedback as soon as you see the employee lift the box incorrectly. To tell the employee about it a few days later will have less impact on changing the behavior, and the employee could be injured by then. The f lexibility part comes into play in two ways: (1) When you don’t have the time to do the full coaching job, make an appointment to do so; (2) when emotions are high, wait until everyone calms down to discuss the issue.
Remember that you can be a good coach by following the simple guidelines presented here. These general guidelines apply to any leadership situation. So start coaching—today.
What Is Criticism—and Why Doesn’t It Work? Placing blame and embarrassment and focusing on the person are types of criticism. Criticism is rarely effective. Criticism involves a judgment, which is that either the person is right or wrong. Criticism is also the process of pointing out mistakes, which places blame and is embarrassing.
Once we tell people they are wrong or made a mistake, directly or indirectly, four things usually happen. (1) They become defensive and justify their behavior, or they blame it on someone or something. (2) They don’t really listen to so-called constructive feedback. (3) They are embarrassed and feel bad about themselves, or they view themselves as losers. (4) They begin to dislike the task or job, as well as the critic. Plus, yelling at people makes things worse, and we tend to regret yelling.44 Conversely, when people feel good about the feedback they receive; they will be more open to changing their behavior, which increases performance.45
Demotivating Employees with overly critical managers tend to develop a negative attitude: “My man- ager doesn’t care about me or appreciate my work, so why should I work hard to do a good job?” They play it safe by doing the minimum, taking no risks, focusing on not making errors, and covering up any errors so they aren’t criticized. They avoid contact with the manager and they feel stress just seeing the manager approach them. They think, “What did I do this time?”
WORk Application 6-7 Recall a present or past manager. Which of the ten guidelines does or did the manager use most frequently and least frequently?
Describe the difference between criticism and coaching feedback. Learning outcome
5
The Difference between Criticism and Coaching Feedback Coaching feedback is based on a good, supportive relationship; it is specific and descriptive; and it is not judgmental criticism. And coaching is of ten based on the employee doing a self-assessment of performance. Criticism makes employees feel like losers; praise and coaching feedback makes them feel like winners. And nothing breeds success like good coaches.
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 197 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
198 part 2 TEAM LEADERSHIP
the Coaching Model for employees Who are performing Below Standard Coaching is needed when performance falls below expected levels.46 When giving feed- back to employees who are performing below standard, all nine of the coaching guidelines are important. They need your one-on-one coaching at its best. Be patient but persistent; don’t give up on them. Before getting into the coaching model, let’s discuss attribution theory and the performance formula because they affect the coaching model.
Attribution Theory attribution theory is used to explain the process managers go through in determining the reasons for effective or ineffective performance and deciding what to do about it. The reaction of a manager to poor performance has two stages. First, we try to determine the cause of the poor performance, and then to select an appropriate corrective action. To help determine the cause of poor performance, we provide the performance formula; and to take corrective action, the coaching model.
Determining the Cause of Poor Performance and Corrective Coaching Action The performance formula explains performance as a function of ability, motivation, and resources. Model 6.3 is a simple model that can help us determine the cause of poor performance and the corrective action to take based on the cause. When ability, motiva- tion, or resources are low, performance will be lower.
When the employee’s ability is the reason for keeping performance from being optimal, the corrective coaching action is training.47 When motivation is lacking, coach the em- ployee.48 Motivational techniques (discussed in Chapter 3) such as giving praise might help. When resources (tools, material, equipment, etc.) are the problem, look at getting the needed resources. When obstacles are getting in the way of performance, we need to overcome them.
CONCept APPLICATION 6-2
Criticism or Coaching Feedback Identify each of these five statements as criticism or coaching feedback. For each criticism only, write a coaching feedback statement to replace it. a. criticism b. coaching feedback
11. In a loud, angry voice: What are you doing?
12. Would you like to know a faster way to get it done?
13. This is still dirty. Clean it again.
14. Would you like me to tell you how you can minimize this problem in the future?
15. Make sure you don’t forget to use the spell check this time before you pass it in.
Discuss the relationship between the performance formula and the coaching model. Learning outcome
6
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 198 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 6 CoMMunICATIon, CoACHIng, AnD ConfLICT SkILLS 199
Improving Performance with the Coaching Model The steps in the coaching model are below.
Step 1. Describe current performance. In detail, using specific examples, describe the current behavior that needs to be changed.
For example, for an ability or motivation problem, say something like, “There is a way to lift boxes without straining our back that will decrease chances of getting injured.”
Step 2. Describe desired performance. Tell the employee exactly what the desired per- formance is, in detail. If ability is the reason for poor performance, modeling and training the employee with JIT are very appropriate. If the employee knows the proper way, the reason for poor performance is motivational. Demonstra- tion is not needed; just describe desired performance as you ask the employee to state why the performance is important.
For example: Ability—“If you squat down and pick up the box using your legs instead of your back, it is easier and there is less chance of injuring yourself. Let me demonstrate for you.” Motivation—“Why should you squat and use your legs rather than your back to pick up boxes?”
Step 3. Get a commitment to the change. When dealing with an ability performance issue, it is not necessary to get employees to verbally commit to the change if they seem willing to make it. However, if employees defend their way, and you’re sure it’s not as effective, explain why your proposed way is better. If you cannot get t he employee to understand and agree based on rationa l persuasion, get a verbal commitment through coercive power, such as a threat of discipline. For motivation performance issues, this is important because, if employees are not willing to commit to the change, they will most likely not make the change.
For example: Ability—the employee will most likely be willing to do it cor- rectly, so skip the step. Motivation—“Will you squat rather than use your back from now on?”
Step 4. Follow up. Remember, some employees do what managers inspect, not what they expect. We should follow up to ensure that the employee is behaving as desired.
When we are dealing with an ability performance issue, the person is recep- tive, and we skip step 3, say nothing. But watch to be sure the task is done cor- rectly in the future. Coach again, if necessary. For a motivation problem, make a statement that you will follow up, and describe possible consequences for repeated poor performance.
For example: Ability—say nothing, but observe. Motivation—“You know that picking up boxes with your back is dangerous; if I catch you doing it again, I will take disciplinary action.”
See Model 6.4 for a review of the steps in the coaching model.
The Performance Formula
Performance (f )* Ability, Motivation, and Resources
*(f ) = is a function of
MODEL 6.3
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 199 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
200 part 2 TEAM LEADERSHIP
Mentoring Mentoring is a form of coaching in which a more experienced manager helps a less expe- rienced protégé. Thus, the ten tips for coaching apply to mentoring. However, mentoring includes more than coaching, and it is more involved and personal than coaching. The formal mentor is usually at a higher level of management and is not the protégé’s immedi- ate manager. Family, friends, and peers can also be mentors.
The primary responsibility is to coach the protégé by providing good, sound career advice and to help develop leadership skills necessary for a successful career.49 Mentors can nurture your inner greatness.50 Mentoring is especially important in progressing from middle management to upper level management, especially for women and minori- ties because they are very underrepresented in Fortune 500 companies. We all need men- tors, so don’t wait for someone to ask you. Seek out a good mentor.51 If your organization has a formal mentoring program, try to sign up for it. If it is informal, ask around about getting a mentor, and remember that a mentor can be from another organization and in today’s global economy, e-mentoring is becoming more popular.52 Whenever you have job- or career-related questions and would like advice, contact your mentor.
Coaching Model
1. Describe current performance.
4. Follow up.3. Get a commitment to the change.
2. Describe desired performance.
MODEL 6.4
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
WORk Application 6-8 Recall a person who is or was a mentor to you. Briefly describe the relationship and type of advice you got from your mentor.
3. Is there a difference in managing an oil change business, a golf course, and a sports team; and how does peter Clark use coaching at the ranch?
Peter Clark says there are more similarities than differences in running a Jiffy Lube business and a golf club and coaching sports. The focus is the same—high-quality service. You have to treat the customer or player right. Clark uses the same 3 I’s coaching philosophy for all three: You need Intensity to be prepared to do the job right, Integrity to do the right thing when no one is watching, and Intimacy to be a team player. If one person does not do the job right, everyone is negatively affected. In business and sports, you need to strive to be the best. You need to set and meet challenging goals.
Clark strongly believes in being positive and in the need to develop a supportive working relationship, which includes sitting down to talk and really listening to the other person. He also strongly believes in the need for good training. Employees at The Ranch give high-quality service because they are thoroughly trained to do so, and they are continually coached to maintain and improve performance. Although The Ranch does not have a formal mentoring program, Clark clearly sees mentoring as an important role he plays at The Ranch.
OPENING CASE Application
Managing Conflict Poor communications, feedback, and coaching can lead to conf lict. A conflict exists whenever people are in disagreement and opposition. Conf lict is part of everyday life in organizations;53 it affects everyone involved54 and how we manage conf lict affects perfor- mance.55 With the trend toward teamwork, conf lict skills are increasingly important;56 as managers spend about 25 percent of their time resolving conf licts.57 Thus, ability to resolve conf licts will have a direct effect on your leadership success.58 In this section, we discuss the psychological contract and the five conf lict management styles we can use to resolve conf licts.
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 200 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 6 CoMMunICATIon, CoACHIng, AnD ConfLICT SkILLS 201
the psychological Contract All human relations rely on the psychological contract. The psychological contract is the unwritten implicit expectations of each party in a relationship. At work, you have a set of expectations of what you will contribute to the organization (effort, time, skills) and what it will provide to you (compensation, job satisfaction, etc.). We are often not aware of our expectations until they have not been met (for example, how we are treated by a manager).
Conflict Arises by Breaking the Psychological Contract The psychological contract is broken for two primary reasons: (1) We fail to make explicit our own expectations and fail to inquire into the expectations of the other parties; and/ or (2) we further assume that the other party(ies) has the same expectations that we hold. To help form the psychological contract, organizations have values, norms, and rules to guide fair and legitimate behavior.59
So as long as people meet our expectations, everything is fine; when they don’t meet our expectations, we are in conf lict. Thus, it is important to share information and nego- tiate expectations assertively. After all, how can you expect others to meet your expecta- tions when they don’t know what they are? However, we can’t confront people for every little thing that bothers us, but we should resolve conf licts that impede our work.60 It is especially important to resolve conf licts with our boss.61
Define the five conflict management styles. Learning outcome
7
Conflict Can Be Dysfunctional or Functional People often think of conf lict as fighting and view it as disruptive, which it can be.62 When conf lict is not resolved effectively, negative consequences occur.63 When conf lict prevents the achievement of organizational objectives, it is negative or dysfunctional conf lict. However, some say conf lict is not only inevitable, it can be good.64 Functional conf lict exists when disagreement and opposition supports change and the achievement of organizational objectives.65 The real question today is not whether conf lict is dysfunc- tional or functional but how to manage conf lict to benefit the organization.66
Conflict Management Styles When we are in conf lict, we have five conf lict management styles to choose from. The five styles are based on two dimensions of concern: concern for others’ needs and concern for our own needs. These concerns result in three types of behavior:
• A low concern for your own needs and a high concern for others’ needs results in passive behavior.
• A high concern for your own needs and a low concern for others’ needs results in aggressive behavior—only looking out for one’s own self-interest.67
• A moderate or high concern for your own needs and others’ needs results in assertive behavior.
Each conf lict style of behavior results in a different combination of win–lose situa- tions. The five styles, along with concern for needs and win–lose combinations, are pre- sented in Exhibit 6.4 and discussed here in order of passive, aggressive, and assertive behavior. The conf lict style that we tend to use the most is based on our personality and leadership style. There is no one best conf lict management style for all situations. In this section, we present the advantages and disadvantages and the appropriate use of each of the five conf lict management styles.
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 201 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
202 part 2 TEAM LEADERSHIP
Conflict Management Styles EXHIBIT 6.4
Accommodating Conflict Style Passive Behavior You Win, I Lose
Collaborating Conflict Style Assertive Behavior
You Win, I Win
Avoiding Conflict Style Passive Behavior You Lose, I Lose
Forcing Conflict Style Aggressive Behavior
You Lose, I Win
Negotiating Conflict Style Assertive Behavior
You Win Some, I Win Some
High Concern for Others’
Needs
Low Concern for Others’ and Own
Needs
High Concern for Others’ and Own
Needs
High Concern for Own Needs
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
Avoiding Conflict Style The avoiding conf lict style user attempts to passively ignore the conf lict rather than resolve it. When we avoid a conf lict, we are being unassertive and uncooperative. People avoid conf lict by refusing to take a stance, or escape conf lict by mentally withdraw- ing and physically leaving. A lose–lose situation is created because the conf lict is not resolved.
Advantages and Disadvantages of the Avoiding Conf lict Style. The advantage of the avoiding style is that it may maintain relationships that would be hurt through conf lict resolution. The disadvantage of this style is that conf licts do not get resolved, so avoiding is often not the best option. People tend to walk all over the consistent avoider. Avoiding problems usually does not make them go away; the problems usually get worse.68 And the longer you wait to confront others, the more difficult the confron- tation usually is.
Appropriate Use of the Avoiding Conf lict Style. The avoiding style is appropriate to use when (1) the conf lict is trivial, (2) our stake in the issue is not high, (3) confrontation will damage an important relationship, (4) we don’t have time to resolve the conf lict, or (5) emotions are high. When we don’t have time to resolve the conf lict or people are emo- tional, we should confront the person(s) later. However, it is inappropriate to repeatedly avoid confrontation until you get so upset that you end up yelling at the other person(s). This passive–aggressive behavior tends to make the situation worse by hurting human relations.69 Often people do not realize they are doing something that bothers us (that we are in conf lict), and when approached properly, they are willing to change.
Accommodating Conflict Style The accommodating conf lict style user attempts to resolve the conf lict by passively giv- ing in to the other party. When we use the accommodating style, we are being unas- sertive but cooperative. We attempt to satisfy the other party, neglecting our own needs by letting others get their own way. A win–lose situation is created, as we try to please everyone.
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 202 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 6 CoMMunICATIon, CoACHIng, AnD ConfLICT SkILLS 203
Differences between the Avoiding Accommodating Style. A common difference between the avoiding and accommodating styles is based on behavior. With the avoiding style, we don’t have to do anything we really do not want to do; with the accommodat- ing style, we do. For example, if you are talking to someone who makes a statement that you disagree with, to avoid a conf lict you can say nothing, change the subject, or stop the conversation. However, suppose you have to put up a display with someone who says “Let’s put up the display this way.” If you don’t want to do it the other person’s way, but say nothing and put it up the other person’s way, you have done something you really did not want to do—accommodation.
Advantages and Disadvantages of the Accommodating Conflict Style. The advantage of the accommodating style is that relationships are maintained by doing things the other person’s way. The disadvantage is that giving in may be counterproductive. You may have a better solution, such as a better way to put up a display. An overuse of this style tends to lead to people taking advantage of the accommodator, and the type of relationship the accommodator tries to maintain is usually lost.
Appropriate Use of the Accommodating Conf lict Style. The accommodating style is appropriate when (1) the person enjoys being a follower, (2) maintaining the relationship outweighs all other considerations, (3) the changes agreed to are not important to the accommodator but are to the other party, or (4) the time to resolve the conf lict is limited. This is often the only style that can be used with an autocratic manager who uses the forcing style.
Forcing Conflict Style The forcing conf lict style user attempts to resolve the conf lict by using aggressive behav- ior to get his or her own way. When we use the forcing style, we are uncooperative and aggressive, doing whatever it takes to satisfy our own needs—at the expense of others, if necessary. Forcers use authority, threaten, intimidate, and call for majority rule when they know they will win. Forcers commonly enjoy dealing with avoiders and accommo- dators. If you try to get others to change without being willing to change yourself, regard- less of the means, then you use the forcing style. A win–lose situation is created.
Advantages and Disadvantages of the Forcing Style. The advantage of the forc- ing style is that better organizational decisions will be made, when the forcer is correct, rather than less-effective compromised decisions. The disadvantage is that overuse of this style leads to hostility and resentment toward its user. Forcers tend to have poor human relations.
Appropriate Use of the Forcing Style. Some managers commonly use their position power to force others to do what they want them to do.70 The forcing style is appropriate to use when (1) unpopular action must be taken on important issues; (2) commitment by others to proposed action is not crucial to its implementation—in other words, people will not resist doing what we want them to do; (3) maintaining relationships is not criti- cal; or (4) the conf lict resolution is urgent.
Negotiating Conflict Style The negotiating conf lict style user attempts to resolve the conf lict through assertive, give-and-take concessions. This is also called the compromising style. When you use the compromising approach, you are moderate in assertiveness and cooperation. An “I win some, you win some’’ situation is created through compromise. As discussed in Chapter 5, negotiation skills are important in both your personal and your professional life.71
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 203 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
204 part 2 TEAM LEADERSHIP
Advantages and Disadvantages of the Negotiating Conf lict Style. The advantage of the negotiating style is that the conf lict is resolved relatively quickly and working rela- tionships are maintained. The disadvantage is that the compromise may lead to counter- productive results, such as suboptimum decisions. An overuse of this style leads to people playing games such as asking for twice as much as they need to get what they want. It is commonly used during management and labor collective bargaining.
Appropriate Use of the Negotiating Conf lict Style. The negotiating style is appropri- ate to use when (1) the issues are complex and critical, and there is no simple and clear solution; (2) parties have about equal power and are interested in different solutions; (3) a solution will be only temporary; or (4) time is short. Note that we are being assertive, not aggressive, to get what we want without being taken advantage of.
Collaborating Conflict Style The collaborating conf lict style user assertively attempts to jointly resolve the con- f lict with the best solution agreeable to all parties. It is also called the problem-solving style. When we use the collaborating approach, we are being assertive and cooperative. Although avoiders and accommodators are concerned about others’ needs, and forcers are concerned about their own needs, the collaborator is concerned about finding the best solution to the problem that is satisfactory to all parties. Unlike the forcer, the collabora- tor is willing to change if a better solution is presented. While negotiating is often based on secret information, collaboration is based on open and honest communication. This is the only style that creates a true win–win situation.
Differences between the Negotiation and Collaborating Style. A common difference between negotiating and collaborating is the solution. Let’s continue with the example of putting up a display. With negotiation, the two people may trade off by putting up one display one person’s way and the next display the other person’s way. This way they each win and lose. With collaboration, the two people work together to develop one display method that they both like. It may be a combination of both, or simply one person’s idea if, after an explanation, the other person really agrees that the method is better. The key to collaboration is agreeing that the solution is the best possible one.
Advantages and Disadvantages of the Collaborating Style. The advantage of the col- laborating style is that it tends to lead to the best solution to the conf lict, using assertive behavior. Again, assertiveness, not aggression, is often a good option. The disadvantage is that the skill, effort, and time it takes to resolve the conf lict are usually greater and longer than the other styles. There are situations, mentioned under “Negotiating Conf lict Style,” when collaboration is difficult, and when a forcer prevents its use. The collaborating style offers the most benefit to the individual, group, and organization.
CONCept APPLICATION 6-3
Selecting Conflict Management Styles For each of these five conflict situations, identify the most appropriate conflict management style. Write the appropriate letter in the blank before each item. a. avoiding c. forcing e. collaborating b. accommodating d. negotiating
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 204 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 6 CoMMunICATIon, CoACHIng, AnD ConfLICT SkILLS 205
Appropriate Use of the Collaborating Conflict Style. The collaborating style is appro- priate when (1) you are dealing with an important issue that requires an optimal solution, and compromise would result in suboptimizing; (2) people are willing to place the group goal before self-interest, and members will truly collaborate; (3) maintaining relation- ships is important; (4) time is available; and (5) it is a peer conf lict.
Of the five styles, the relatively easiest to use are the avoiding and accommodating styles. We generally want to avoid using the forcing style. The most difficult to implement successfully, due to the complexity and level of skill needed, is the collaborative style. It is most likely to be underutilized when it would have been appropriate. Therefore, to develop your conf lict skills, the collaborative style is the only one that we cover in detail in the next section. Recall that you learned how to negotiate in Chapter 5.
CONCept APPLICATION 6-3 16. You have joined a task force to meet people. Your interest in what the committee does is low. While serving on
the task force, you make a recommendation that is opposed by another member. You realize that you have the better idea. The other party is using a forcing style.
17. You are on a task force that has to select a new company smart phone. The alternatives will all do the job. It’s the brand, price, and service that members disagree on.
18. You are a sales manager. Jose, one of your competent salespeople, is trying to close a big sale. The two of you are discussing the next sales call he will make. You disagree on the strategy to use to close the sale.
19. You’re late and on your way to an important meeting. As you leave, at the other end of the work area you see one of your employees goofing off instead of working.
20. There aren’t many customers in the store, so you ask Tony, a part-time employee, to leave work early. Tony tells you he want to stay because he needs the money.
WORk Application 6-9 Select a present or past manager. Which conflict management style did that manager use most often? Explain by giving a typical example. Which one of the five conflict management styles do you tend to use most often? Explain your answer
4. Which conflict management style does peter Clark tend to use at the ranch?
At The Ranch, with partners and managers, conflict is inevitable. Peter Clark prefers to use the collaborating conflict style, which goes back to the importance he places on open communications and a good supportive working relationship. He prefers to sit down and work through problem issues together and agree on solutions. He believes that when you have a conflict problem, ignoring it using the avoiding conflict style usually does not solve the problem. When Clark is in conflict with a manager, he does not like to simply accommodate when he does not agree with what the manager wants to do, but he has accommodated.
Clark does not like to use the forcing conflict style, but there are times when he says no to managers. Clark’s guiding question is: Will spending the money clearly improve player satisfaction enough to pay for itself? Clark also has to negoti- ate with outside organizations.
OPENING CASE Application
Collaborating Conflict Management Style Models We can develop our skill to assertively confront (or be confronted by) people we are in conf lict with, and in a manner that resolves the conf lict without damaging relationships. In this last section, we provide a model with the steps we can follow when initiating, responding to, and mediating a conf lict resolution in or out of work.
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 205 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
206 part 2 TEAM LEADERSHIP
Initiating Conflict resolution We are the initiators when we confront the other person(s) to resolve the conf lict. If we did or said something that was wrong and hurt the other person or when we make a mis- take, placing us in conf lict, we should apologize. Telling others we are sorry is very ben- eficial for building and maintaining relationship. Apologizing to our boss, rather than trying to defend our action when we were wrong or made a mistake, can help our perfor- mance reviews.72
When initiating a conf lict resolution using the collaborating style, there is a model to use. The initiating conflict resolution model steps are (1) plan a BCF statement that maintains ownership of the problem; (2) present your BCF statement and agree on the conf lict; (3) ask for, and/or give, alternative conf lict resolutions; and (4) make an agreement for change.
Step 1. Plan a Behavior, Consequence, and Feeling (BCF) statement that maintains ownership of the problem. Planning is the starting point. Let’s begin by stat- ing what maintains ownership of the problem means. Assume you don’t smoke, and someone visits you while smoking. Is it you or the smoker who has a prob- lem? The smoke bothers you, not the smoker. It’s your problem. So we should open the confrontation with a request for the respondent to help us solve our problem. This approach reduces defensiveness and establishes an atmosphere of problem solving that will maintain the relationship.
There are three things we should NOT do in the BCF statement: (1) Don’t make judgments that evaluate others’ behavior (“You are wrong”).
Avoid judging and trying to determine who is to blame for something or who is right and wrong. Fixing blame or correctness only makes people defensive and argue about who is right as opposed to resolving the conf lict.73
(2) Don’t make threats (“I’m going to tell the boss on you”). This can hurt your relationship. Using threats should be our last, not first option.
(3) Don’t give solutions. This is done step 3, so don’t start with a solution. Don’t make statements like “You are inconsiderate of others,” “You shouldn’t
smoke” (judgmental evaluation), “You are going to get cancer, I’m going to tell on you and you will get in trouble” (threats), and “Just quit smoking” (solution).
The BCF model describes a conf lict in terms of behavior, consequences, and feelings. When you do B (behavior), C (consequences) happens, and I feel F (feel- ings). The longer the statement, the longer it will take to resolve the conf lict, so keep the opening BCF statement short. For example, when you smoke in my room (behavior), I have trouble breathing and become nauseous (consequence), and I feel uncomfortable and irritated (feeling). You can vary the BCF sequence. For example, I fear (feeling) that the advertisement is not going to work (behav- ior), and that we will lose money (consequences).
Try to put yourself in the other person’s position. If you were the other per- son, would you like the BCF presented? Would it make you defensive? If so, change it. After planning our BCF statement, we should practice saying it before confronting the other party. In addition, think of some possible alternatives we can offer to resolve the conf lict.
List the steps in the initiating conflict resolution model. Learning outcome
8
WORk Application 6-10 Use the BCF model to describe a conflict you face or have faced on the job.
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 206 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 6 CoMMunICATIon, CoACHIng, AnD ConfLICT SkILLS 207
Step 2. Present your BCF statement and agree on the conflict. After making the short, planned BCF statement, let the other party respond. If the other party does not understand or avoids acknowledgment of the problem, repeat the planned state- ment by explaining it in different terms until getting an acknowledgment or realizing it’s hopeless. But don’t give up too easily; be assertive. If you cannot agree on a conf lict, you may have to change our approach and use one of the other four conf lict management styles.
Step 3. Ask for, and/or give, alternative conf lict resolutions. Begin by asking the other party what can be done to resolve the conf lict. If both agree, great; if not, offer your resolution. However, remember that you are collaborating, not simply trying to change others. When the other party acknowledges the problem, but is not responsive to resolving it, appeal to common goals. Make others realize the benefits to them in resolving the conf lict.
Step 4. Make an agreement for change. Our goal is not to win but to agree on a plan of action so that the same error, mistake, or problem doesn’t occur again. Try to come to an agreement on specific action you will both take to resolve the conf lict. Clearly state—or, better yet for complex change, write down—the spe- cific behavior changes necessary by all parties to resolve the conf lict. Again, remember that you are collaborating, not forcing. The steps are also listed in Model 6.5.
responding to Conflict resolution As the responder, an initiator has confronted you.74 Here’s how to handle the role of the responder to a conf lict. Most initiators do not follow the model. Therefore, we must take responsibility for successful conf lict resolution by following the conf lict resolution model steps, which are also listed in Model 6.5:
1. Listen to and paraphrase the conf lict using the BCF model. You need to state the con- f lict in your own words to make sure you get it and agree to the conf lict.
2. Agree with some aspect of the complaint. Rarely is only one party the problem. So even if you don’t think you are wrong, at least agree with something (I agree that I upset you) so the conf lict can be resolved.
3. Ask for, and/or give, alternative conf lict resolutions. This is the same as step 3 of ini- tiating conf lict discussed above.
4. Make an agreement for change. This is the same as step 4 of initiating conf lict.
Mediating Conflict resolution Frequently, conf licting parties cannot resolve their dispute alone. In these cases, a media- tor should be used. A mediator is a neutral third party who helps resolve a conf lict. Some organizations have trained and designated employees as mediators. In unionized organi- zations, the mediator is usually a professional from outside the organization. However, a conf lict resolution should be sought internally first.
Before bringing the conf licting parties together, we should decide whether to start with a joint meeting or conduct individual meetings. If one employee comes to complain but has not confronted the other party, or if there is a serious discrepancy in employee perceptions, meet one-on-one with each party before bringing them together. On the other hand, when both parties have a similar awareness of the problem and motivation to solve it, you can begin with a joint meeting when all parties are calm. The leader should be a mediator, not a judge. Get the employees to resolve the conf lict, if possible. Remain
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 207 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
208 part 2 TEAM LEADERSHIP
impartial, unless one party is violating company policies. Do a good job of coaching. Avoid blame and embarrassment. Don’t make comments such as “I’m disappointed in you two” or “you’re acting like babies.”
The Collaborating Conflict Style
Initiating Conflict Resolution
Step 1. Plan a BCF statement that maintains ownership of the problem. Step 2. Present your BCF statement and agree on the conflict. Step 3. Ask for, and/or give, alternative conflict resolutions. Step 4. Make an agreement for change.
Responding to Conflict Resolution
Step 1. Listen to and paraphrase the conflict using the BCF model. Step 2. Agree with some aspect of the complaint. Step 3. Ask for, and/or give, alternative conflict resolutions. Step 4. Make an agreement for change.
Mediating Conflict Resolution
Step 1. Have each party state his or her complaint using the BCF model. Step 2. Agree on the conflict problem(s). Step 3. Develop alternative conflict resolutions. Step 4. Make an agreement for change. Step 5. Follow up to make sure the conflict is resolved.
MODEL 6.5
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
When bringing conf licting parties together, follow the mediating conf lict model steps listed in Model 6.5.
If either party blames the other, make a statement such as “We are here to resolve the conf lict; placing blame is not productive.” Focus on how the conf lict is affecting their work. Discuss the issues by addressing specific behavior, not personalities. If a person says “We cannot work together because of a personality conf lict,” ask the parties to state the specific behavior that is bothering them. The discussion should make the parties aware of their behavior and the consequences of their behavior. The mediator may ask questions or make statements to clarify what is being said. The mediator should develop one problem statement that is agreeable to all parties, if possible.
If the conf lict has not been resolved, an arbitrator may be used. An arbitrator is a neutral third party who makes a binding decision to resolve a conf lict. The arbitrator is like a judge; the decision must be followed. However, the use of arbitration should be kept to a minimum because it is not a collaborative conf lict style. Arbitrators commonly use a negotiating style in which each party wins some and loses some.
5. What types of conflict resolutions do the Clarks deal with at the ranch?
At The Ranch, Peter Clark more often responds to conflict than initiating conflict resolutions since, when problems arise, he is asked for solutions or to approve actions. Clark also has to occasionally mediate a conflict between par tners or between managers and employees.
OPENING CASE Application
As we end this chapter, you should understand how important communication, feed- back, coaching, and conf lict resolution are to leadership effectiveness in all organiza- tions. Self-Assessment 6-2 will help you understand how your personality traits affect your communication, feedback, coaching, and conf lict management style.
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 208 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 6 CoMMunICATIon, CoACHIng, AnD ConfLICT SkILLS 209
Your personality traits and Communication, Feedback, Coaching, and Conflict Management Style
SELF-ASSESSMENT 6-2
Let’s tie personality traits from Chapter 2 together with what we’ve covered in this chapter. We are going to pres- ent some general statements about how your personality may affect your communication, feedback, coaching, and conflict management styles. for each area, determine how the information relates to you. This will help you better understand your behavior strengths and weaknesses, and identify areas you may want to improve.
Communication If you have a high surgency personality, you most likely are an extrovert and have no difficulty initiating and com- municating with others. However, you may be dominating during communication and may not listen well and be open to others’ ideas. Be careful not to use communi- cations simply as a means of getting what you want; be concerned about others and what they want. If you are low in surgency, you may be quiet and reserved in your communications. You may want to be more vocal.
If you are high in agreeableness personality trait, you are most likely a good listener and communicator. Your adjustment level affects the emotional tone of your com- munications. If you tend to get emotional during commu- nications, you may want to work to keep your emotions under control. We cannot control our feelings, but we can control our behavior. If you are high in conscientiousness, you tend to have reliable communications. If you are not conscientious, you may want to work at returning mes- sages quickly. People who are open to new experience often initiate communication, because communicating is often part of the new experience.
Feedback and Coaching If you have a high surgency personality, you have a need to be in control. Watch the tendency to give feedback, but not listen to it. You may need to work at not criti- cizing. If you have low surgency, you may want to give more feedback and do more coaching. If you have a high agreeableness personality, you are a people person and probably enjoy coaching others. However, as a manager,
you must also discipline when needed, which may be dif- ficult for you.
If you are high on the adjustment personality trait, you may tend to give positive coaching; people with low adjustment need to watch the negative criticism. If you have a high conscientiousness with a high need for achievement, you may tend to be more concerned about your own success. This is also true of people with a high surgency personality. Remember that an important part of leadership is coaching others. If you have a low conscien- tiousness, you may need to put forth effort to be a good coach. Your openness to experience personality affects whether you are willing to listen to others’ feedback and make changes.
Conflict Styles generally, the best conflict style is collaboration. If you have a high surgency personality, you most likely have no problem confronting others when in conflict. However, be careful not to use the forcing style with others; remem- ber to use social, not personal power. If you have a high agreeableness personality, you tend to get along well with others. However, be careful not to use the avoiding and accommodating styles to get out of confronting others; you need to satisfy your needs too.
Adjustment will affect how to handle a conflict situation. Try not to be low in adjustment and get too emotional. If you are conscientious, you may be good at conflict resolution; but again, be careful to meet others’ needs too. Openness to experience affects conflicts, because their resolution often requires change; be open to new things.
action plan Based on your personality, what specific things will you do to improve your communication, feedback, coaching, and conflict management style?
“Take It To The Net”. Access student resources at www.cengagebrain.com. Search for Lussier, Leadership 6e to find student study tools.
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 209 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
210 part 2 TEAM LEADERSHIP
Key terms arbitrator, 208
attribution theory, 198
BCF model, 206
coaching, 194
coaching feedback, 197
communication, 184
conflict, 200
feedback, 191
initiating conflict resolution model, 206
job instructional training, 196
mediator, 207
mentoring, 200
message-receiving process, 189
oral message-sending process, 186
paraphrasing, 191
performance formula, 198
360-degree feedback, 193
This chapter summary is organized to answer the nine learning outcomes for Chapter 6.
1 List the steps in the oral message-sending process. The five steps in the oral message-sending process are (1) develop rapport; (2) state your communication objective; (3) transmit your message; (4) check the receiver’s understanding; (5) get a commitment and follow up.
2 List and explain the three parts of the message- receiving process.
The three parts of the message-receiving process are listening, analyzing, and checking understanding. Listening is the process of giving the speaker your undivided atten- tion. Analyzing is the process of thinking about, decoding, and evaluating the message. Checking understanding is the process of giving feedback.
3 Describe paraphrasing and state why it is used.
Paraphrasing is the process of having the receiver restate the message in his or her own words. Paraphrasing is used to check understanding of the transmitted message. If the receiver can paraphrase the message accurately, communication has taken place. If not, communication is not complete.
4 Identify two common approaches to getting feedback, and explain why they don’t work.
The first common approach is to send the entire mes- sage and to assume that the message has been conveyed with mutual understanding without getting any feedback. The second approach is to give the entire message fol- lowed by asking “Do you have any questions?” feedback usually does not follow because people have a tendency not to ask questions. Asking questions, especially if no one else does, is often considered an admission of not paying attention or not being bright enough to under- stand, or the receiver doesn’t know what to ask.
5 Describe the difference between criticism and coaching feedback.
Criticism is feedback that makes a judgment about behavior being wrong. Coaching feedback is based on a supportive relationship and offers specific and descrip- tive ways to improve performance. Criticism focuses on pointing out mistakes, while coaching feedback focuses on the benefits of positive behavior.
6 Discuss the relationship between the perfor- mance formula and the coaching model.
The performance formula is used to determine the rea- son for poor performance and the corrective action needed. The coaching model is then used to improve performance.
7 Define the five conflict management styles.
(1) The avoiding conflict style user attempts to pas- sively ignore the conflict rather than resolve it. (2) The accommodating conflict style user attempts to resolve the conflict by passively giving in to the other party. (3) The forcing conflict style user attempts to resolve the conflict by using aggressive behavior to get his or her own way. (4) The negotiating conflict style user attempts to resolve the conflict through assertive, give-and-take concessions. (5) The collaborating conflict style user assertively attempts to jointly resolve the conflict with the best solution agreeable to all parties.
8 List the steps in the initiating conflict resolution model.
The initiating conflict resolution model steps are (1) plan a BCf statement that maintains ownership of the prob- lem; (2) present your BCf statement and agree on the conflict; (3) ask for, and/or give, alternative conflict reso- lutions; and (4) make an agreement for change.
Chapter Summary
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 210 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
review Questions
1 What should be included in your plan to send a message?
2 What are the three parts of a written outline?
3 As an average, how many words should a sentence have, and how many sentences should there be in a paragraph?
4 Which personality traits are associated with being closed to feedback?
5 What are the four guidelines to getting feedback on messages?
6 What is 360-degree feedback, and are many organizations using it?
7 Should a supportive working relationship be a true friendship?
8 Why doesn’t criticism work?
9 Are all managers mentors?
10 How do you know when you are in conflict?
11 What is the difference between functional and dysfunc- tional conflict, and how does each affect performance?
12 What is meant by maintaining ownership of the problem?
13 How is the BCF model used?
14 What is the difference between a mediator and an arbitrator?
Critical-thinking Questions The following critical-thinking questions can be used for class discussion and/or as written assignments to develop commu- nication skills. Be sure to give complete explanations for all questions.
1 How would you assess communications in organizations? Give examples of good and poor communications in organizations.
2 How did you score on Self-Assessment 6-1, “Listening Skills”? State your plan for improving your listening skills.
3 How would you assess managers at giving feedback? Specifically, what should managers do to improve?
4 Is 360-degree multi-rater feedback really better than a boss-based assessment? As a manager, would you elect to use 360?
5 Do you agree with the statement “Don’t criticize”? Do managers tend to give criticism or coaching feedback? How can managers improve?
6 Women and minorities are less likely to have mentors, so should they get mentors? Will you seek out career mentors?
7 What are your psychological contract expectations of your boss and coworkers? Give examples of conflicts you have had at work, listing the expectation that was not met.
8 What percentage of the time do you think a manager can actually use the collaborating conflict management style? Give detailed examples of when managers have used col- laboration at work.
C A S E
Reed Hastings—Netflix
In January 2005, Wedbush Securities stock analysts Michael Pachter called Netflix a “wor thless piece of crap.” He put a price target of $3 on the stock that was trading at around $11. Doubters thought Blockbuster, Walmart, or Amazon.com, with their economies of scale and established customer bases, would simply destroy Netflix. Founder and CEO Reed Hastings
wasn’t supposed to be Fortune’s Businessperson of the Year in 2010, five years after his demise was predicted. Not only did Hasting earn the No. 1 spot; he and Netflix also killed it. Netflix was the stock of the year, up more than 200 percent in 2010, while the S&P 500 was up only 7 percent. Netflix shares ran laps around even Apple’s.75 Between 2010 and 2013
(continued)
Chapter 6 CoMMunICATIon, CoACHIng, AnD ConfLICT SkILLS 211
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 211 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
212 part 2 TEAM LEADERSHIP
Netflix subscribers doubled to over 40 million and its stock price quadrupled to $375, making it again the best- performing stock on the S&P 500.76 Don’t you wish you bought it back in 2005 when it was selling for $11? In For tune’s List of 2013’s Top People in Business, Reed Hastings was ranked #5, ahead of Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, Google’s Larry Page, Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, and Apple’s Tim Cook.77
So how did Hastings do it? A lot of his success is based on how he built his company on a hard-driving and risk-taking culture, and Hastings never stops looking over his shoulder to stay one step ahead of the competition. Unlike Blockbuster, which went into bankruptcy, Netflix wasn’t afraid to change its business model by abandoning the past to build its future.78 How, by cannibalizing its own mail order DVD customers to focus on streaming existing program and even to launching original series, including the highly successful House of Cards that won three Emmy awards, with more to come.79 Although the change in focus from mailing DVDs to streaming with a pricing revamping was clumsily handled, resulting in angry and lost mail customers, it clearly was a good strategic move.80 With streaming, Netflix is now stealing customers from cable and pay movie channels HBO, Showtime, and Starz, as it is the world’s largest video subscription company.81 Growth is also coming from Netflix global expansion from Canada (2010), to Latin America (2011) and most recently to Europe (2012), where streaming is new in many countries.82
Let’s talk about Hastings’s leadership style that led to suc- cess. It has changed over the years between the two compa- nies he created. As a young founding CEO of Pure Software, Hastings was considered as hard headed as they come and couldn’t take criticism. He used the autocratic style to push for his ways of doing things, and he sometimes embarrassed employees with nonverbal eye rolling and critical comments about dumb ideas. So much so that Hastings earned the nick- name “Animal.” Hastings sold Pure for $750 million, and it made him realize he had helped build a company he didn’t want to be part of.83
So when he used the money to star t Netflix, as CEO Hastings was determined to create a culture in which people enjoyed coming to every day. He wanted the company to be run differently, so he changed his style to be par ticipative. He is more honest and direct with employees but not confron- tational, but he still has a Steve Jobs–like perfectionist streak. Instead of simply telling others what to do, he actively seeks out ideas and advice from his employees. Now when he hears ideas that seem silly, he doesn’t roll his eyes and humili- ate employees by making critical comments about the idea or person being dumb. Hastings digs deeper by responding with comments like “I don’t understand how your idea will work, so help me to understand how it will solve the problem.”84
Hastings was ahead of the technology curve. Even back in 1997 when Hastings cofounded Netflix, he anticipated that consumers would eventually prefer to get movies instantly delivered via the Internet. This is actually amazing foresight because back then less than 7 percent of U.S. homes even had broadband. Hastings actually had a team working on the technology to bring movies to the home via the Internet back in 2000. They even developed a Netflix-branded box with a hard drive that connected to your movie queue, but it took six hours to download a movie back in the early 2000s. Once Hastings saw YouTube videos, he killed the hard-drive device and put this team to work on a streaming machine, a sor t of YouTube-in-a-box. This again was meant to be a branded piece of hardware produced and sold by Netflix. However, even though they built the technology, once again Hasting killed the idea in favor of software that could be embedded in all kinds of devices— the software today is known as apps. 85
No. This wasn’t wasted time. Netflix built on this base to be able to come out streaming a year and a half, in 2007, after YouTube showed the world instant viewing over the Inter- net. Also, it spun off the hardware technology into an existing company called Roku, which today makes a digital device that plays content via software from Netflix, as well as Hulu, Ama- zon, and others.
Does this mean that Netflix doesn’t face any present and future threats? As Hastings admits, there are plenty of challenges ahead. Analysts like Pachter now are warning that Netflix could be crushed or acquired by the likes of Amazon.com, Google, or Apple. Anyone can come after Netflix by streaming bits via con- tracts with data-delivery companies like Level 3, Limelight, and Akamai. Who knows what Facebook will come up with? Also, Netflix has to pay the studios for contents. Content acquisition could be denied or costs could go through the roof, and new expensive original series may not have the success of House or Cards. In February 2014, Netflix agreed to pay Comcast extra to speed up its streaming service to its customers, which could lead to having to pay other cable providers extra.86 The European media companies across the continent are girding for battle to stop Netflix from taking market share.87 But Hastings is confi- dent, as he enjoys solving subtle, yet tough, problems alongside the smar test people he can find. He said, “For me the thrill is making a contribution by solving hard problems.” Only time will tell if he can stay ahead of the competition and technology curve.
GO tO the INterNet: To learn more about Reed Hastings and Netflix, visit their Web site (http://www .netflix.com).
Support your answers to the following questions with spe- cific information from the case and text or with other informa- tion you get from the Web or other sources.
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 212 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 6 CoMMunICATIon, CoACHIng, AnD ConfLICT SkILLS 213
1. How did Hastings change his use of communications in sending and receiving messages from Pure Software to Netflix?
2. How did Hastings change his use of feedback from Pure Software to Netflix?
3. How did Hastings change his use of coaching guidelines (Exhibit 6.3) from Pure Software to Netflix?
4. Which conflict management style did Hastings tend to use at Pure and Netflix?
5. In making a deal with content suppliers, which conflict management style was most likely used by Netflix?
6. How would you improve Netflix’s product offerings (i.e., what things can’t you watch that you would like to watch) or processes (i.e., how can it improve its delivery or service)?
C U M U L a t I V e C a S e Q U e S t I O N S
7. Which level or levels of analysis and leadership para- digm are presented in this case, and did Hastings use the management or leadership paradigm (Chapter 1)?
8. How did Hastings’s Big Five model of personality leadership traits change from Pure Software to Netflix (Chapter 2)?
9. Which University of Iowa leadership styles did Hastings use at Pure Software and Netflix (Chapter 3)?
10. Explain how power, organizational politics, networking, and negotiation are, or are not, discussed in the case (Chapter 5)?
C a S e e X e r C I S e a N D r O L e - p L a Y
Preparation: An important part of success is to continually improve products and processes. So we are going to use answers to case question 6. In-Class groups: Break into groups of four to six members, and develop a list of improvements for Netflix. Select a spokesperson to record the ideas and then present them to Hastings in front of the class. Role-Play: One person from each group at a time presents the group’s suggested improvements to Hastings (played by the professor or one or more students as a committee). During and/or after the presentation, Hastings and/or committee members ask questions and make comments on the ideas. Are the ideas practical? Would you consider implementing the ideas? What research would you need to make a decision?
The decision to dedicate the resources needed to fund and suppor t the Depar tment of Communications within Navistar International sends a signal that corpo- rate communication is seen as vital to the health of this $12 billion truck and engine manufacturing and financial ser vices corporation. The Depar tment of Communications func- tions as a business par tner with the company’s three major business units. Each plant has a communications manager who repor ts to both the plant manager and the corporate director of the Depar tment of Communications. The role of the communications manager is to drive the message to the target audience. The manager uses different approaches
depending on the audience and the direction of the message, whether it’s heading up or down the corporate ladder or across business units.
1. Explain why the communication skills and techniques used within a business unit (depar tment) are not always effective in communicating across business units or up and down the corporate ladder.
2. Explain why conflict resolution communication skills are not always present in ever yday workplace situations and how a skilled communications professional would add value to that workplace.
V I D E o C A S E
Communication at Navistar International
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 213 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
214 part 2 TEAM LEADERSHIP
Doing this exercise in Class
Objective
To develop your ability to give and receive messages (commu- nication skills)
aaCSB General Skills area
The primary AACSB skill developed through this exercise is communication.
preparation
No preparation is necessary except reading and understanding the chapter. The instructor will provide the original drawings that must be drawn.
experience
You will plan, give, and receive instructions for completing a drawing of three objects.
procedure 1 (3–7 minutes) Read all of procedure 1 twice. The task is for the manager to give an employee instructions for completing a drawing of four objects. The objects must be drawn to scale and look like photocopies of the originals. You will have up to 15 minutes to complete the task.
The exercise has four separate parts or steps:
1 The manager plans.
2 The manager gives the instructions.
3 The employee does the drawing.
4 Evaluation of the results takes place.
Rules: The rules are numbered to correlate with the four parts of the exercise.
1 Planning. While planning, the manager may write out instructions for the employee, but may not do any draw- ing of any kind.
2 Instructions. While giving instructions, the manager may not show the original drawing to the employee. (The instructor will give it to you.) The instructions may be given orally, and/or in writing, but no nonverbal hand ges- tures are allowed. The employee may take notes while the instructions are being given, but cannot do any drawing with or without a pen. The manager must give the instruc- tions for all four objects before drawing begins.
3 Drawing. Once the employee begins the drawing, the man- ager should watch but no longer communicate in any way.
4 Evaluation. When the employee is finished or the time is up, the manager shows the employee the original drawing.
Discuss how you did. Turn to the “Integration” section of this exercise, and answer the questions. The manager, not the employee, writes the answers. The employee will write when playing the manager role.
procedure 2 (2–5 minutes) Half of the class members will act as the manager first and give instructions. Managers move their seats to one of the four walls (spread out). They should be fac- ing the center of the room with their backs close to the wall.
Employees sit in the middle of the room until called on by a manager. When called on, bring a seat to the manager. Sit facing the manager so that you cannot see any managers’ drawing.
procedure 3 (Up to 15 minutes for drawing and integration) The instructor gives each manager a copy of the drawing, being careful not to let any employees see it. The manager plans the instructions. When a manager is ready, she or he calls an employee and gives the instructions. It is helpful to use the mes- sage-sending process. Be sure to follow the rules. The employee should do the drawing on an 8½ by 11 sheet of paper, not in this book. If you use written instructions, they may be on the reverse side of the page that the employee draws on or on a different sheet of paper. You have up to 15 minutes to complete the drawing and about 5 minutes for integration (evaluation). When you finish the drawing, turn to the evaluation questions in the “Integration” section.
procedure 4 (Up to 15 minutes) The employees are now the managers, and they sit in the seats facing the center of the room. New employees go to the center of the room until called for.
Follow procedure 3, with the instructor giving a different drawing. Do not work with the same person; change partners.
Integration
Evaluating Questions: You may select more than one answer. The manager and employee discuss each question; and the manager, not the employee, writes the answers to the questions.
1. The goal of communication was to:
a. influence b. inform c. express feelings
2. The manager transmitted the message through communication channel(s).
a. oral b. written c. nonverbal d. combined
3. The manager spent time planning.
a. too much b. too little c. the right amount of
Giving Instructions
Developing Your Leadership Skills 6-1
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 214 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 6 CoMMunICATIon, CoACHIng, AnD ConfLICT SkILLS 215
Questions 4 through 8 relate to the steps in the message-sending process.
4. The manager developed rappor t. (Step 1)
a. true b. false
5. The manager stated the communication objective. (Step 2)
a. true b. false
6. The manager transmitted the message . (Step 3)
a. effectively b ineffectively
7. The manager checked understanding by using . (Step 4)
a. direct questions b. paraphrasing c. both d. neither
8. The amount of checking was .
a. too frequent b. too infrequent c. about right
9. The manager got a commitment and followed up. (Step 5)
a. true b. false
10. The employee did an job of listening, an job of analyzing, and an job of checking understanding through the receiving message process.
a. effective b ineffective
11. When going over this integration, the manager was and the employee was to criticism that
can help improve communication skills.
a. open b. closed
12. Were the objects drawn to approximate scale (same size)? If not, why not?
13. Did you follow the rules? If not, why not?
14. If you could do this exercise again, what would you do differently to improve communications?
Conclusion
The instructor leads a class discussion and/or makes concluding remarks.
apply It (2–4 minutes) What did I learn from this experi- ence? How will I use this knowledge in the future? When will I practice?
Behavior Model Skills Training 6-1 Session 1
In this behavior model skills training session, you will perform four activities:
1 Complete Self-Assessment 6-3 (to determine your pre- ferred communication style).
2 Read “The Situational Communications Model.”
3 Watch Behavior Model Video 6.1, “Situational Communications.”
4 Complete Developing Your Leadership Skills Exercise 6-2 (to apply the model to various situations).
For practice, use the situational communications model in your personal and professional communication.
Determining Your preferred Communication StyleSELF-ASSESSMENT 6-3
To determine your preferred communication style, select the one alternative that most closely describes what you would do in each of the 12 situations described. Do not be concerned with trying to pick the correct answer; select the alternative that best describes what you would actually do. Circle the letter a, b, c, or d.
for now, ignore these three types of lines:
1. (before each number) time information acceptance capability communication style • S (following each letter)
They are explained later, and will be used during the n-class part of Developing Your Leadership Skills Exercise 6-2.
1. Wendy, a knowledgeable person from another de- par tment, comes to you, the engineering super visor, and requests that you design a special product to her specifications. You would:
time information acceptance capability communication style
a. Control the conversation and tell Wendy what you will do for her. S
b. Ask Wendy to describe the product. Once you understand it, you would present your ideas. Let
(continued)
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 215 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
her realize that you are concerned and want to help by offering your ideas. S
c. Respond to Wendy’s request by conveying under- standing and support. Help clarify what is to
be done by you. Offer ideas, but do it her way. S
d. Find out what you need to know. Let Wendy know you will do it her way. S
2. Your depar tment has designed a product that is to be fabricated by Saul’s depar tment. Saul has been with the company longer than you have; he knows his department. Saul comes to you to change the product design. You decide to:
time information acceptance capability communication style
a. Listen to the change and why it would be beneficial. If you believe Saul’s way is better, change it; if not, explain why the original design is superior. If neces- sary, insist that it be done your way. S
b. Tell Saul to fabricate it any way he wants to. S
c. You are busy; tell Saul to do it your way. You don’t have time to listen and argue with him. S
d. Be supportive; make changes together as a team. S
3. Upper management has a decision to make. They call you to a meeting and tell you they need some infor- mation to solve a problem they describe to you. You:
time information acceptance capability communication style
a. Respond in a manner that conveys personal support and offer alternative ways to solve the problem. S
b. Just answer their questions. S c. Explain how to solve the problem. S d. Show your concern by explaining how to solve
the problem and why it is an effective solution. S
4. You have a routine work order. The work order is to be placed verbally and completed in three days. Sue, the receiver, is very experienced and willing to be of service to you. You decide to:
time information acceptance capability communication style
a. Explain your needs, but let Sue make the order decision. S
b. Tell Sue what you want and why you need it. S
c. Decide together what to order. S d. Simply give Sue the order. S
5. Work orders from the staff department normally take three days; however, you have an emergency and need the job today. Your colleague Jim, the depar tment su- pervisor, is knowledgeable and somewhat cooperative. You decide to:
time information acceptance capability communication style
a. Tell Jim that you need it by three o’clock and will return at that time to pick it up. S
b. Explain the situation and how the organization will benefit by expediting the order. Volunteer to help in any way you can. S
c. Explain the situation and ask Jim when the order will be ready. S
d. Explain the situation and together come to a solution to your problem. S
6. Danielle, a peer with a record of high performance, has recently had a drop in productivity. Her problem is affecting your performance. You know Danielle has a family problem. You:
time information acceptance capability communication style
a. Discuss the problem; help Danielle realize the problem is affecting her work and yours. Support- ively discuss ways to improve the situation. S
b. Tell the manager about it and let him decide what to do about it. S
c. Tell Danielle to get back on the job. S d. Discuss the problem and tell Danielle how
to solve the work situation; be supportive. S
7. You are a knowledgeable super visor. You buy sup- plies from Peter regular ly. He is an excellent salesper son and ver y knowledgeable about your situation. You are placing your weekly order. You decide to:
time information acceptance capability communication style
a. Explain what you want and why. Develop a supportive relationship. S
b. Explain what you want, and ask Peter to recommend products. S
c. Give Peter the order. S d. Explain your situation and allow Peter to make the
order. S
216 part 2 TEAM LEADERSHIP
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 216 10/20/14 11:46 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
8. Jean, a knowledgeable person from another depar t- ment, has asked you to perform a routine staff function to her specifications. You decide to:
time information acceptance capability communication style
a. Perform the task to her specifications without questioning her. S
b. Tell her that you will do it the usual way. S c. Explain what you will do and why. S d. Show your willingness to help; offer alternative
ways to do it. S
9. Tom, a salesper son, has requested an order for your depar tment’s ser vices with a shor t deliver y date. As usual, Tom claims it is a take-it-or-leave-it offer. He wants your decision now, or within a few minutes, because he is in the customer’s office. Your action is to:
time information acceptance capability communication style
a. Convince Tom to work together to come up with a later date. S
b. Give Tom a yes or no answer. S c. Explain your situation, and let Tom decide if you
should take the order. S d. Offer an alternative delivery date. Work on your
relationship; show your support. S
10. As a time-and-motion exper t, you have been called regarding a complaint about the standard time it takes to perform a job. As you analyze the entire job, you realize that one element of the job should take longer, but other elements should take less time. The end result is a shorter total standard time for the job. You decide to:
time information acceptance capability communication style
a. Tell the operator and foreman that the total time must be decreased and why. S
b. Agree with the operator and increase the standard time. S
c. Explain your findings. Deal with the operator and/ or foreman’s concerns, but ensure compliance with your new standard. S
d. Together with the operator, develop a standard time. S
11. You approve budget allocations for projects. Marie, who is ver y competent in developing budgets, has come to you. You:
time information acceptance capability communication style
a. Review the budget, make revisions, and explain them in a supportive way. Deal with concerns, but insist on your changes. S
b. Review the proposal and suggest areas where changes may be needed. Make changes together, if needed. S
c. Review the proposed budget, make revisions, and explain them. S
d. Answer any questions or concerns Marie has and approve the budget as is. S
12. You are a sales manager. A customer has offered you a contract for your product, but the contract has a shor t deliver y date—only two days. The contract would be profitable for you and the organization. The cooperation of the production depar tment is essen- tial to meet the deadline. Tim, the production man- ager, and you do not get along very well because of your repeated request for quick delivery. Your action is to:
time information acceptance capability communication style
a. Contact Tim and try to work together to com- plete the contract. S
b. Accept the contract and convince Tim in a sup- portive way to meet the obligation. S
c. Contact Tim and explain the situation. Ask him if he and you should accept the contract, but let him decide. S
d. Accept the contract. Contact Tim and tell him to meet the obligation. If he resists, tell him you will go to his manager. S
To determine your preferred communication style, do the following. (1) Circle the letter you selected as the alternative you chose in situations 1 through 12. The column headings indicate the style you selected. (2) Add up the number of circled items per column. The total for all the columns should not be more than 12. The column with the highest number represents your preferred communication style. There is no one best style in all situations. The more evenly distributed the numbers are between the four styles, the more flexible are your com- munications. A total of 0 or 1 in any column may indicate a reluctance to use the style(s). You could have problems in situations calling for the use of this style. Communication has the following five dimensions, which are each on a continuum:
Chapter 6 CoMMunICATIon, CoACHIng, AnD ConfLICT SkILLS 217
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 217 10/20/14 11:46 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
218 part 2 TEAM LEADERSHIP
autocratic (S1a)
Consultative (S2C)
participative (S3p)
empowerment (S4e)
1. a b c d
2. c a d b
3. c d a b
4. d b c a
5. a b d c
6. c d a b
7. c a b d
8. b c d a
9. b d a c
10. a c d b
11. c a b d
12. d b a c
Totals
Initiation response
• Initiation. The sender star ts, or initiates, the communica- tion. The sender may or may not expect a response to the initiated message.
• Response. The receiver’s reply or action taken to the sender’s message. In responding, the receiver can become an initiator. As two-way communication takes place, the role of initiator (sender) and responder (receiver) may change.
presentation elicitation
• Presentation. The sender’s message is structured, directive, or informative. A response may not be needed, although action may be called for. (“We are meeting to develop next year’s budget.” “Please open the door.”)
• Elicitation. The sender invites a response to the message. Action may or may not be needed. (“How large a budget do we need?” “Do you think we should leave the door open?”)
Closed Open
• Closed. The sender expects the receiver to follow the message. (“This is a new form to fill out and return with each order.”)
• Open. The sender is eliciting a response as a means of considering the receiver’s input. (“Should we use this new form with each order?”)
rejection acceptance
• Rejection. The receiver does not accept the sender’s mes- sage. (“I will not fill out this new form for each order!”)
• Acceptance. The receiver agrees with the sender’s mes- sage. (“I will fill out the new form for each order!”)
Strong Mild
• Strong. The sender will use force or power to have the mes- sage acted upon as directed. (“Fill in the form or you’re fired.”)
• Mild. The sender will not use force or power to have the message acted upon as directed. (“Please fill in the form when you can.”)
The Situational Communications Model
the Interactive process System
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 218 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 6 CoMMunICATIon, CoACHIng, AnD ConfLICT SkILLS 219
Situational Communication Styles Following is the interactive process. Acceptance or rejection can come from any of the styles because, to a large extent, it is out of the sender’s control.
the autocratic Communication Style (S1a). This style demonstrates high task/low relationship behavior (HT-LR), initiating a closed presentation. The other party has little, if any, information and is low in capability. • Initiation/Response. You initiate and control the communi-
cation with minimal, if any, response.
• Presentation/Elicitation. You make a presentation letting the other parties know they are expected to comply with your message; there is little, if any, elicitation.
• Closed/Open. You use a closed presentation; you will not consider the receiver’s input.
the Consultative Communication Style (S2C). This style demonstrates high task/high relationship behavior (HT-HR), using a closed presentation for the task with an open elicitation for the relationship. The other party has moderate information and capability. • Initiation/Response. You initiate the communication by let-
ting the other par ty know that you want him or her to buy into your influence. You desire some response.
• Presentation/Elicitation. Both are used. You use elicitation to determine the goal of the communication. For example, you may ask questions to determine the situation and follow up with a presentation. When the communication goal is known, little task elicitation is needed. Relationship communication is elicited to determine the interest of the other party and acceptance of the message. The open elicitation should show your concern for the other party’s point of view and motivate him or her to follow your influence.
• Closed/Open. You are closed to having the message accepted (task), but open to the person’s feelings (rela- tionship). Be empathetic.
the participative Communication Style (S3p). This style demonstrates low task/high relationship behavior (LT-HR), responding with open elicitation, some initiation, and little pre- sentation. The other party is high in information and capability. • Initiation/Response. You respond with some initiation. You
want to help the other par ty solve a problem or get him or her to help you solve one. You are helpful and convey personal suppor t.
• Presentation/Elicitation. Elicitation can occur with little pre- sentation. Your role is to elicit the other party’s ideas on how to reach objectives.
• Closed/Open. Open communication is used. If you par tici- pate well, the other par ty will come to a solution you can accept. If not, you may have to reject the other par ty’s message.
the empowerment Communication Style (S4e). This style demonstrates low task/low relationship behavior (LT-LR), responding with the necessary open presentation. The other party is outstanding in information and capability. • Initiation/Response. You respond to the other par ty with
little, if any, initiation.
• Presentation/Elicitation. You present the other party with information, structure, and so forth, which the sender wants.
• Closed/Open. Open, you convey that the other par ty is in charge; you will accept the message.
Situational Variables When selecting the appropriate communication style, you should consider four variables: time, information, acceptance, and capability. Answering the questions related to each of these vari- ables can help you select the appropriate style for the situation.
time. Do I have enough time to use two-way communi- cation—yes or no? When there is no time, the other three variables are not considered; the autocratic style is appropriate. When time is available, any of the other styles may be appropri- ate, depending on the other variables. Time is a relative term; in one situation, a few minutes may be considered a short time —in another situation, a month may be a short time.
Information. Do I have the necessary information to com- municate my message, make a decision, or take action? When you have all the information you need, the autocratic style may be appropriate. When you have some of the information, the consultative style may be appropriate. When you have little information, the participative or empowerment style may be appropriate.
acceptance. Will the other party accept my message with- out any input? If the receiver will accept the message, the auto- cratic style may be appropriate. If the receiver will be reluctant to accept it, the consultative style may be appropriate. If the receiver will reject the message, the participative or empower- ment style may be appropriate to gain acceptance. There are situations in which acceptance is critical to success, such as in the area of implementing changes.
Capability. Capability has two parts. Ability: Does the other party have the experience or knowledge to participate in two way communications? Will the receiver put the organization’s goals ahead of personal needs or goals? Motivation: Does the other party want to participate? When the other party is low in capability, the autocratic style may be appropriate; moderate in capability, the consultative style may be appropriate; high in capability, the participative style may be appropriate; outstand- ing in capability, the empowerment style may be appropriate. In addition, capability levels can change from one task to another. For example, a professor may have outstanding capability in classroom teaching but be low in capability for advising students.
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 219 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
220 part 2 TEAM LEADERSHIP
Selecting Communication Styles Successful managers rely on different communication styles according to the situation. There are three steps to follow when selecting the appropriate communication style in a given situa- tion. After reading these steps and looking at Model 6.6, you will get to practice this selection process in the section “Determining the Appropriate Communications Style for Situation 1.”
Step 1. Diagnose the situation. Answer the questions for each of the four situational variables (time, information, acceptance, and capability). In Self- Assessment 6-3 at the beginning of this training session, you were asked to select an alternative to 12 situations. You were told to ignore certain lines. When completing the in-class part of Developing Your Leadership Skills Exercise 6-2, you will place the style letters (S1A, S2C, S3P, S4E) on the lines provided for each of the 12 situations.
Step 2. Select the appropriate communication style for the situation. After analyzing the four variables, you select the appropriate communica- tion style for the situation. In some situations, variables may have conflicting styles; you should select the style of the most important variable
for the situation. For example, capability may be outstanding (S4E) but you have all the informa- tion needed (S1A). If the information is more im- portant, use the autocratic style even though the capability is outstanding. When doing the in-class part of Developing Your Leadership Skills Exercise 6-2, place the letters (S1A, S2C, S3P, S4E) for the appropriate communication styles on the style lines (S ).
Step 3. Use the appropriate communication style for the situation. During the in-class part of Developing Your Leadership Skills Exercise 6-2, you will identify one of the four communication styles for each alternative action; place the S1A, S2C, S3P, or S4E on the S lines. Select the alternative (a, b, c, or d) that represents the appropriate communication style for each of the 12 situations, and place it on the line before the number of the situation.
Model 6.6 summarizes the material in this preparation for the exercise. Use it to determine the appropriate communication style in situation 1 and during the in-class par t of Developing Your Leadership Skills Exercise 6-2.
Step 1. Diagnose the situation.
Step 2. Select the appropriate communication style for the situation.
YES
NO (S1A)
Information
Acceptance
Capability
All: S1A Some: S2C Little: S3P or S4E
Acceptable: S1A Reluctance: S2C Rejection: S3P or S4E
Low: S1A Moderate: S2C High: S3P Outstanding:
Variables Use of Management Style
Autocratic (S1A) High task/ low relationship
Initiate a closed presentation.
Empowerment (S4E) Low task/ low relationship
Respond with the necessary open presentation.
Participative (S3P) Low task/ high relationship
Respond with open elicitation, some initiation, and little presentation.
Consultative (S2C) High task/ high relationship
Initiate a closed presentation for the task. Use open elicitation for feelings and relationship.
Step 3. Use the appropriate communication style for the situation.
Time
S4E
Situational Communication MODEL 6.6
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 220 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 6 CommuniCation, CoaChing, and ConfliCt SkillS 221
Determining the appropriate Communication
Style for Situation 1
Step 1. Diagnose the situation. Answer the four vari- able questions from the model, and place the let- ters on the four variable lines for situation 1.
1. Wendy, a knowledgeable person from another department, comes to you, the engineering supervisor, and requests that you design a special product to her specifications. You would:
time information acceptance capability communication style
a. Control the conversation and tell Wendy what you will do for her. S
b. Ask Wendy to describe the product.
Once you understand it, you would present your ideas. Let her realize that you are concerned and want to help by offering your ideas. S
c. Respond to Wendy’s request by conveying understanding and support. Help clarify what is to be done by you. Offer ideas, but do it her way. S
d. Find out what you need to know. Let Wendy know you will do it her way. S
Step 2. Select the appropriate communication style for the situation. Review the four vari- ables. If they are all consistent, select one style. If they are conflicting, select the most important vari- able as the style to use. Place its letters (S1A, S2C, S3P, or S4E) on the style line.
Step 3. Use the appropriate communication style for the situation. Review the four alternative actions. Identify the communication style for each,
placing its letters on the S line, then place the appropriate match (a, b, c, d) on the line before the number.
Let’s See how You Did
1 Time: Time is available (or yes, you have time); it can be any style. Information: You have little information, so you need to use a par ticipative or empowerment style to find out what Wendy wants done (S3P or S4E). Acceptance: If you tr y to do it your way rather than Wendy’s way, she will most likely reject it. You need to use a par ticipative or empowerment style (S3P or S4E). Capability: Wendy is knowledgeable and has a high level of capability (S3P).
2 Reviewing the four variables, you see that there is a mix- ture of S3P and S4E. Because you are an engineer, it is appropriate to par ticipate with Wendy to give her what she needs. Therefore, the choice is S3P.
3 Alternative (a) is S1A; this is the autocratic style, high task/ low relationship. Alternative (b) is S2C; this is the consultative style, high task/high relationship. Alternative (c) is S3P; this is the par ticipative style, low task/high rela- tionship. Alternative (d) is S4E; this is empowerment style, low task/low relationship behavior. If you selected (c) as your action, you chose the most appropriate action for the situation. This was a three-point answer. If you selected (d) as your answer, this is also a good alternative; it scores two points. If you selected (b), you get one point for over- directing. If you selected (a), you get zero points; this is too much directing and will most likely hur t communications.
The better you match your communication style to the situation, the more effective you will be at communicating. In the in-class part of Developing Your Leadership Skills Exercise 6-3, you will apply the model to the other 11 situations in Self- Assessment 6-3 to develop your ability to communicate as a situational communicator.
Objectives
To better understand the four situational communication styles and which style to use in a given situation
Video (12 minutes) Overview
You will first listen to a lecture to understand how to use the situational communications model. Then, you will view two man- agers, Steve and Darius, meeting to discuss faulty parts. You are asked to identify the communication style Darius uses in four
different scenes. Write the letters of the style on the scene line after each scene. This may be completed as part of Developing Your Leadership Skills Exercise 6-2.
Scene 1. Autocratic (S1A)
Scene 2. Consultative (S2C)
Scene 3. Participative (S3P)
Scene 4. Empowerment (S4E)
Behavior model Video
Situational Communications
6-1
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 221 10/20/14 11:48 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
222 part 2 tEam lEadERShiP
Doing this exercise in Class
Objectives
To develop your ability to communicate using the appropriate style for the situation
aaCSB General Skills area
The primary AACSB skills developed through this exercise are communication, using analytical thinking to select which style to use in a given situation—application of knowledge.
preparation
You should have competed Self-Assessment 6-3, and finished the reading about situational communications. You may also want to view Behavior Model Video 6.1.
experience
You will select the appropriate style for the 12 situations in Self-Assessment 6-3. On the time line, place Y (yes); on the information, acceptance, and capability lines, place the letters S1A, S2C, S3P, or S4E that are appropriate for the situation. Based on your diagnoses, select the one style you would use by placing its letters (S1A, S2C, S3P, or S4E) on the communication style line. On the four S lines, write the letters S1A, S2C, S3P, or S4E to identify each style being used. Place the letters a, b, c, or d on the line before the exercise number that represents the most appropriate communication style for the situation.
procedure 1 (10–20 minutes) The instructor shows the video and then reviews the situational communications model, explaining how to apply it to determine the appropriate style for situation 2.
procedure 2 (4–8 minutes) Students, working alone, com- plete situation 3 of Self-Assessment 6-3 using the model. The instructor then goes over the recommended answers.
procedure 3 (20–50 minutes) a. Break into groups of two or three. As a team, apply the model
to situations 4 through 8. The instructor will go over the appro- priate answers when all teams are finished, or the time is up.
B. Break into new groups of two or three and do situations 9 through 12. The instructor will go over the appropriate answers.
Conclusion
The instructor leads a class discussion and/or makes concluding remarks.
apply It (2–4 minutes) What did I learn from this experi- ence? How will I use this knowledge in the future? When will I practice using the model?
developing Your leadership Skills
Situational Communications
In this behavior model skills training session, you will perform three activities:
1 Read “Improving Performance with the Coaching Model” (to review how to use the model).
2 Watch Behavior Model Video 6.2, “Coaching.’’
3 Complete Developing Your Leadership Skills Exercise 6-3 (to develop your coaching skills).
For further practice, use the coaching model in your personal and professional life.
the Coaching model
In the text, read about the coaching model and review Model 6.4.
Session 2
Behavior model Skills training 6-2
6-2
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 222 10/20/14 11:48 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 6 CommuniCation, CoaChing, and ConfliCt SkillS 223
preparing for this exercise
You should have read and understood the text material on coaching. You may also view Behavior Model Video 6.2.
Doing this exercise in Class
Objective
To develop your skill at improving performance through coaching
aaCSB General Skills area
The primary AACSB skills developed through this exercise are communication, using analytical thinking to effectively coach an employee to improve performance—application of knowledge.
experience
You will coach, be coached, and be observed coaching using Model 6.4 from the text.
procedure 1 (2–4 minutes) Break into groups of three. Make some groups of two, if necessary. Each member selects one of the following three situations in which to be the manager, and a different one in which to be the employee. In each situation, the employee knows the standing plans but is not motivated to follow them. You will take turns coaching and being coached.
three employee-Coaching Situations
1 Employee 1 is a clerical worker. The person uses paper medical files, as do the other three employees in the depar tment. The employees all know that they are sup- posed to return the files when they are finished so that others can find the files when they need them. Employees should have only one file out at a time. The supervisor notices that employee 1 has five files on the desk, and another employee is looking for one of them. The supervi- sor thinks that employee 1 will complain about the heavy
workload as an excuse for having more than one file out at a time.
2 Employee 2 is a ser ver in an ice cream shop. The person knows that the tables should be cleaned up quickly after customers leave so that new customers do not have to sit at dir ty tables. It’s a busy night. The super visor finds dir ty dishes on two of this employee’s occupied tables. Employee 2 is socializing with some friends at one of the tables. Employees are supposed to be friendly; employee 2 will probably use this as an excuse for the dir ty tables.
3 Employee 3 is an auto technician. All employees at the garage where this person works know that they are sup- posed to put a paper mat on the floor of each car so that the carpets don’t get dir ty. When the service supervisor got into a car repaired by employee 3, the car did not have a mat and there was grease on the carpet. Employee 3 does excellent work and will probably mention this fact when coached.
procedure 2 (3–7 minutes) Prepare for coaching to improve performance. On the following lines, each group member writes an outline of what he or she will say when coaching employee 1, 2, or 3, following the coaching steps listed:
1 Describe current performance.
2 Describe the desired behavior.
3 Get a commitment to the change.
developing Your leadership Skills
Coaching
Objective
To assist you in coaching to improve performance of employees who are not performing to standard
Video (3½ minutes) Overview
You will watch a Web development manager coach an employee who has missed deadlines for completing Web sites.
Behavior model Video
Coaching
6-2
6-3
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 223 10/20/14 11:48 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
224 part 2 tEam lEadERShiP
4 Follow up.
procedure 3 (5–8 minutes)
• Role-playing. The manager of employee 1, the clerical worker, coaches him or her as planned. (Use the actual name of the group member playing employee 1. Talk— do not read your written plan.) Employee 1, put yourself in the worker’s position. You work hard; there is a lot of pressure to work fast. It’s easier when you have more than one file. Refer to the workload while being coached. Both the manager and the employee will have to improvise their roles.
The person not playing a role is the observer. He or she takes notes using the observer form. Try to make positive coach- ing feedback comments for improvement. Give the manager alternative suggestions for what he or she could have said to improve the coaching session.
Observer Form
1 How well did the manager describe current behavior?
2 How well did the manager describe desired behavior?
3 How successful was the manager at getting a commitment to the change? Do you think the employee would change?
4 How well did the manager describe how he or she was going to follow up to ensure that the employee per- formed the desired behavior?
• Feedback. The observer leads a discussion on how well the manager coached the employee. (This should be a coaching discussion, not a lecture.) Focus on what the manager did well, and on how the manager could improve. The employee should also give feedback on how he or she felt, and what might have been more effective in get- ting him or her to change.
Do not go on to the next interview until you are told to do so. If you finish early, wait for the others to finish.
procedure 4 (5–8 minutes) Same as procedure 3, but change roles so that employee 2, the server, is coached. Employee 2 should make a comment about the importance of talking to customers to make them feel welcome. The job is not much fun if you can’t talk to your friends.
procedure 5 (5–8 minutes) Same as procedure 3, but change roles so that employee 3, the auto technician, is coached. Employee 3 should comment on the excellent work he or she does.
Conclusion
The instructor leads a class discussion and makes concluding remarks.
apply It (2–4 minutes) What did I learn from this experi- ence? How will I use this knowledge in the future? When will I practice?
In this behavior model skills training session, you will perform three activities: 1 Read “Initiating Conflict Resolution” to review how to use
the model. 2 Watch Behavior Model Video 6.3, “Initiating Conflict
Resolution.”
3 Complete Developing Your Leadership Skills Exercise 6-4 (to develop your conflict resolution skills).
For further practice, use the conflict resolution model in your personal and professional life.
developing Your leadership Skills
Session 3
6-4
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 224 10/20/14 11:48 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 6 CommuniCation, CoaChing, and ConfliCt SkillS 225
developing Your leadership Skills
preparing for this exercise
During class you will be given the oppor tunity to role-play a conflict you face, or have faced, to develop your conflict skills. Students and workers have repor ted that this exercise helped prepare them for a successful initiation of a conflict resolution with roommates and coworkers. Fill in the following information. Other party(ies). (You may use fictitious names.)
Describe the conflict situation:
List pertinent information about the other party (i.e., rela- tionship with you, knowledge of the situation, age, background, etc.).
Identify the other party’s possible reaction to your confron- tation. (How receptive will they be to collaborating? What might they say or do during the discussion to resist change?)
How will you overcome this resistance to change?
Following the initiating conflict resolution model steps, write out your planned opening BCF statement that maintains owner- ship of the problem.
Doing this exercise in Class
Objective
To experience and develop skills in resolving a conflict.
aaCSB General Skills area
The primary AACSB skills developed through this exercise are communication, using analytical thinking to select which style to resolve a conflict—application of knowledge.
preparation
You should have completed the questionnaire in Developing Your Leadership Skills Exercise 6-4.
experience
You will initiate, respond to, and observe a conflict role-play, and then evaluate the effectiveness of its resolution.
procedure 1 (2–3 minutes) Break into as many groups of three as possible. If there are any people not in a triad, make one or two groups of two. Each member selects the number 1, 2, or 3. Number 1 will be the first to initiate a conflict role-play, then 2, followed by 3.
Initiating Conflict Resolution
In the text, read the initiating conflict resolution model and review Model 6.5.
the initiating Conflict Resolution model 6-5
Behavior model Video
Objective
To assist you in resolving conflicts
Video (4½ minutes) Overview
You will watch an advertising agency’s employees. Alex initiates a conflict resolution with Catherine to resolve a conflict over a client.
Initiating Conflict Resolution
6-3
6-5
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 225 10/20/14 11:48 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
226 part 2 tEam lEadERShiP
procedure 2 (8–15 minutes)
1 Initiator number 1 gives his or her information from the preparation to number 2 (the responder) to read. Once number 2 understands, proceed with role-play (see item B). Number 3 is the observer.
2 Role-play the conflict resolution. Number 3, the observer, writes his or her observations on the feedback form at the end of this exercise.
3 Integration. When the role-play is over, the observer leads a discussion on the effectiveness of the conflict resolution. All three should discuss the effectiveness. Number 3 is not a lecturer. Do not go on until told to do so.
procedure 3 (8–15 minutes) Same as procedure 2, only number 2 is now the initiator, number 3 is the responder, and number 1 is the observer.
procedure 4 (8–15 minutes) Same as procedure 2, only number 3 is the initiator, number 1 is the responder, and number 2 is the observer.
Conclusion
The instructor leads a class discussion and/or makes concluding remarks.
apply It (2–4 minutes) What did I learn from this experi- ence? How will I use this knowledge in the future? When will I practice?
Feedback Form Try to have positive coaching improvement feedback com- ments for each step in initiating conflict resolution. Remember to be specific and descriptive, and for all improvements have an alternative positive behavior (APB). (For example: “If you would have said/done…, it would have improved the conflict resolu- tion by …”)
Initiating Conflict resolution Model Steps
Step 1. plan a BCF statement that maintains ownership of the problem. (Did the initiator have a well-planned, effective BCF statement?)
Step 2. present your BCF statement and agree on the conflict. (Did the initiator present the BCF statement effectively? Did the two agree on the conflict?)
Step 3. ask for, and/or give, alternative conflict resolutions. (Who suggested alternative solu- tions? Was it done effectively?)
Step 4. Make an agreement for change. (Was there an agreement for change?)
Objective
To view the process of mediating a conflict resolution between employees.
Video (6½ minutes) Overview
This is a follow-up to the advertising agency conflict (Video 6.3). The two employees end up in conflict again. Their manager, Peter,
brings them together to resolve the conflict by following the steps in “Mediating Conflict Resolution” (Model 6.5).
Note: There is no skill-development exercise.
Behavior model Video
Mediating Conflict Resolution
6-4
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 226 10/20/14 11:48 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 6 CoMMunICATIon, CoACHIng, AnD ConfLICT SkILLS 227
endnotes
1 Information taken from personal interviews with the Clarks and The Ranch Web site: http://www.theranchgolfclub .com, accessed February 18, 2014.
2 B.L. Blume, T.T. Baldwin, & K.C. Ryan, “Communication Apprehension: A Barrier to Students’ Leadership, Adaptability, and Multicultural Appreciation,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 12(2) (2013): 158–172.
3 A. Simha & J.B. Cullen, “Ethical Climates and Their Effects on Organizational Outcomes: Implications from the Past and Prophecies for the Future,” Academy of Management Perspectives 26(4) (2012): 20–34.
4 S.B. Sitkin & J.R. Hackman, “Developing Team Leadership: An Interview with Coach Mike Krzyzewski,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 494–501.
5 L.P. Tost, F. Gino, & R.P. Larrick, “When Power Makes Others Speechless: The Negative Impact of Leader Power on Team Performance,” Academy of Management Journal 56(5) (2013): 1465–1486.
6 C.R. Long, C. Bendersky, & C. Morrill, “Fairness Monitoring: Linking Managerial Controls and Fairness Judgments in Organizations,” Academy of Management Journal 54(5) (2011): 1045–1056.
7 A. Edmans, “The Link between Job Satisfaction and Firm Value, with Implications for Corporate Social Responsibility,” Academy of Management Perspectives 26(4) (2012): 1–19.
8 P. Puranam, M. Raveendran, & T. Knudsen, “Organization Design: The Epistemic Interdependence Perspective,” Academy of Management Review 37(3) (2012): 419–440.
9 M. Orlitzky, “Corporate Social Responsibility, Noise, and Stock Market Volatility,” Academy of Management Perspectives 27(3) (2013): 238–254.
10 N.M. Pless, T. Moak, & D.A. Waldman, “Different Approaches toward Doing the Right Thing: Mapping the Responsibility Orientations of Leaders,” Academy of Management Perspectives 26(4) (2012): 51–65.
11 M. Mazmania, “Avoiding the Trap of Constant Connectivity: When Congruent Frames Allow for Heterogeneous Practices,” Academy of Management Journal 56(5) (2013): 1225–1250.
12 L. Ramarajan & E. Reid, “Shattering the Myth of Separate Worlds: Negotiating Nonwork Identities at Work,” Academy of Management Review 38(4) (2013): 621–644.
13 B. Schyns, T. Kiefer, R. Kerschreiter, and A. Tymon, “Teaching Implicit Leadership Theories to Develop Leaders and Leadership: How and Why It Can Make a Difference,”
Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2012): 397–408.
14 P. Andruss, “How the Great Ones Got Great,” Entrepreneur (December 2013): 64.
15 E. Glazer, “Problem—and—Solutions,” Wall Street Journal (October 24, 2011): R2.
16 W.M. Murphy, “From E-Mentoring to Blended Mentoring: Increasing Students’ Developmental Initiation and Mentors’ Satisfaction,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(4) (2011): 606–622.
17 A.O. Malaterre, N.P. Rothbard, & J.M. Berg, “When Worlds Collide in Cyberspace: How Boundary Work in Online Social Networks Impacts Professional Relationships,” Academy of Management Review 38(4) (2013): 645–669.
18 S.B. Sitkin & J.R. Hackman, “Developing Team Leadership: An Interview with Coach Mike Krzyzewski,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 494–501.
19 B.L. Blume, T.T. Baldwin, & K.C. Ryan, “Communication Apprehension: A Barrier to Students’ Leadership, Adaptability, and Multicultural Appreciation,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 12(2) (2013): 158–172.
20 B.L. Blume, T.T. Baldwin, & K.C. Ryan, “Communication Apprehension: A Barrier to Students’ Leadership, Adaptability, and Multicultural Appreciation,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 12(2) (2013): 158–172.
21 J.B. Oldroyd & S.S. Morris, “Catching Falling Stars: A Human Resource Response to Social Capital’s Detrimental Effect of Information Overload on Start Employees,” Academy of Management Review 37(3) (2012): 396–418.
22 M. Mazmania, “Avoiding the Trap of Constant Connectivity: When Congruent Frames Allow for Heterogeneous Practices,” Academy of Management Journal 56(5) (2013): 1225–1250.
23 C.R. Long, C. Bendersky, & C. Morrill, “Fairness Monitoring: Linking Managerial Controls and Fairness Judgments in Organizations,” Academy of Management Journal 54(5) (2011): 1045–1068.
24 H.A. Richardson & S.G. Taylor, “Understanding Input Events: A Model of Employees’ Responses to Requests for Their Input,” Academy of Management Review 37(3) (2012): 471–491.
25 L.T. Madden, D. Duchon, T.M. Madden, & D.A. Plowman, “Emergent Organizational Capacity for Compassion,” Academy of Management Review 37(4) (2012): 689–708.
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 227 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
228 part 2 TEAM LEADERSHIP
26 Public Radio, News Broadcast, WFCR 88.5, aired May 28, 2010.
27 B. Benjamin & C. O’Reilly, “Becoming a Leader : Early Career Challenges Faced by MBA Graduates,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 452–472.
28 S.B. Sitkin & J.R. Hackman, “Developing Team Leadership: An Interview with Coach Mike Krzyzewski,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011), 494–501.
29 M. Feys, F. Anseel, & B. Wille, “Improving Feedback Reports: The Role of Procedural Information and Information Specificity,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(4) (2011): 661–681.
30 A.H. Jordan & P.G. Audia, “Self-Enhancement and Learning from Performance Feedback,” Academy of Management Review 37(2) (2012): 211–231.
31 R.L. Dufresne & E.H. Offstein, “Holistic and Intentional Student Character Development Process: Learning from West Point,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 11(4) (2012): 570–590.
32 A. Edmans, “The Link between Job Satisfaction and Firm Value, with Implications for Corporate Social Responsibility,” Academy of Management Perspectives 26(4) (2012): 1–19.
33 A.H. Jordan & P.G. Audia, “Self-Enhancement and Learning from Performance Feedback,” Academy of Management Review 37(2) (2012): 211–231.
34 S. Shellenbarger, “Shouting Is Less Tolerated in the Workplace, but Nasty Emails and Other Ways of Venting Take a Toll,” Wall Street Journal (August 15, 2012): D1, D2.
35 M. Mayo, M. Kakarika, J.C. Pastor, & S. Brutus, “Aligning or Inflating Your Leadership Self-Image? A Longitudinal Study of Responses to Peer Feedback in MBA Teams,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 11(4) (2012): 631–652.
36 R.L. Dufresne & E.H. Offstein, “Holistic and Intentional Student Character Development Process: Learning from West Point,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 11(4) (2012): 570–590.
37 T.T. Baldwin, J.R. Pierce, R.C. Jones, & S. Farouk, “The Elusiveness of Applied Management Knowledge: A Critical Challenge for Management Education,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(4) (2011): 583–605.
38 “Need Coaching?” HR Magazine (February 2013): 66.
39 J. Pfeffer, “Don’t Dismiss Office Politics—Teach It,” Wall Street Journal (October 24, 2011): R6.
40 T. Lenski, “Talk It Out,” BusinessWeek (December 10–16, 2012): 85.
41 R.L. Dufresne & E.H. Offstein, “Holistic and Intentional Student Character Development Process: Learning from West Point,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 11(4) (2012): 570–590.
42 J. Pfeffer, “Don’t Dismiss Office Politics—Teach It,” Wall Street Journal (October 24, 2011): R6.
43 T.T. Baldwin, J.R. Pierce, R.C. Jones, & S. Farouk, “The Elusiveness of Applied Management Knowledge: A Critical Challenge for Management Education,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(4) (2011): 583–605.
44 S. Shellenbarger, “Shouting Is Less Tolerated in the Workplace, but Nasty Emails and Other Ways of Venting Take a Toll,” Wall Street Journal (August 15, 2012): D1, D2.
45 M. Feys, F. Anseel, & B. Wille, “Improving Feedback Reports: The Role of Procedural Information and Information Specificity,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(4) (2011): 661–681.
46 A.H. Jordan & P.G. Audia, “Self-Enhancement and Learning from Performance Feedback,” Academy of Management Review 37(2) (2012): 211–231.
47 R.L. Dufresne & E.H. Offstein, “Holistic and Intentional Student Character Development Process: Learning from West Point,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 11(4) (2012): 570–590.
48 A.H. Jordan & P.G. Audia, “Self-Enhancement and Learning from Performance Feedback,” Academy of Management Review 37(2) (2012): 211–231.
49 P.B. Lester, S.T. Hannah, P.D. Harms, G.R. Vogelgesang, & B.J. Avolio, “Mentoring Impact on Leader Efficacy Development: A Field Experiment,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2012): 409–429.
50 Staff, “Success with Help,” Entrepreneur (December 2013): 64.
51 Staff, “Success with Help,” Entrepreneur (December 2013): 64.
52 W.M. Murphy, “From E-Mentoring to Blended Mentoring: Increasing Students’ Developmental Initiation and Mentors’ Satisfaction,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(4) (2011): 606–622.
53 R. Fehr & M.J. Gelfand, “The Forgiving Organization: A Multilevel Model of Forgiveness at Work,” Academy of Management Review 37(4) (2012): 664–688.
54 B. Benjamin & C. O’Reilly, “Becoming a Leader : Early Career Challenges Faced by MBA Graduates,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 452–472.
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 228 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 6 CoMMunICATIon, CoACHIng, AnD ConfLICT SkILLS 229
55 T.T. Baldwin, J.R. Pierce, R.C. Jones, & S. Farouk, “The Elusiveness of Applied Management Knowledge: A Critical Challenge for Management Education,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(4) (2011): 583–605.
56 R. Fehr & M.J. Gelfand, “The Forgiving Organization: A Multilevel Model of Forgiveness at Work,” Academy of Management Review 37(4) (2012): 664–688.
57 S. Shellenbarger, “Shouting Is Less Tolerated in the Workplace, but Nasty Emails and Other Ways of Venting Take a Toll,” Wall Street Journal (August 15, 2012): D1, D2.
58 M.A. Hogg, D. Van Knippenberg, & D.E. Rast, “Intergroup Leadership in Organizations: Leading across Group and Organizational Boundaries,” Academy of Management Review 37(2) (2012): 232–255.
59 A.H. Van De Ven & A. Fifschitz, “Rational and Reasonable Microfoundations of Markets and Institutions,” Academy of Management Perspectives 27(2) (2013): 156–172.
60 T. Lenski, “Talk It Out,” BusinessWeek (December 10–16, 2012): 85.
61 B. Benjamin & C. O’Reilly, “Becoming a Leader : Early Career Challenges Faced by MBA Graduates,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 10(3) (2011): 452–472.
62 M.A. Hogg, D. Van Knippenberg, & D.E. Rast, “Intergroup Leadership in Organizations: Leading across Group and Organizational Boundaries,” Academy of Management Review 37(2) (2012): 232–255.
63 R. Fehr & M.J. Gelfand, “The Forgiving Organization: A Multilevel Model of Forgiveness at Work,” Academy of Management Review 37(4) (2012): 664–688.
64 T. Lenski, “Talk It Out,” BusinessWeek (December 10–16, 2012): 85.
65 A.M. Grant & S.V. Patil, “Challenging the Norm of Self- Interest: Minority Influence and Transitions to Helping Norms in Work Units,” Academy of Management Review 37(4) (2012): 547–568.
66 R. Fehr & M.J. Gelfand, “The Forgiving Organization: A Multilevel Model of Forgiveness at Work,” Academy of Management Review 37(4) (2012): 664–688.
67 A.H. Van De Ven & A. Fifschitz, “Rational and Reasonable Microfoundations of Markets and Institutions,” Academy of Management Perspectives 27(2) (2013): 156–172.
68 S. Shellenbarger, “Shouting Is Less Tolerated in the Workplace, but Nasty Emails and Other Ways of Venting Take a Toll,” Wall Street Journal (August 15, 2012): D1, D2.
69 S. Shellenbarger, “Shouting Is Less Tolerated in the Workplace, but Nasty Emails and Other Ways of Venting Take a Toll,” Wall Street Journal (August 15, 2012): D1, D2.
70 L. P. Tost, F. Gino, & R.P. Larrick, “When Power Makes Others Speechless: The Negative Impact of Leader Power on Team Performance,” Academy of Management Journal 56(5) (2013): 1465–1486.
71 C. Suddath, “The Ar t of Haggling,” BusinessWeek (November 26–December 2, 2012): 98.
72 One of the authors uses this technique at work.
73 T. Lenski, “Talk It Out,” BusinessWeek (December 10–16, 2012): 85.
74 R. Fehr & M.J. Gelfand, “The Forgiving Organization: A Multilevel Model of Forgiveness at Work,” Academy of Management Review 37(4) (2012): 664–688.
75 M.V. Copeland, “Reed Hastings: Leader of the Pack,” Fortune (December 6, 2010): 212–130.
76 Staff, “Being Reed Hastings,” Forbes (January 20, 2014): 16.
77 M. Adamo & C. Leahey, “The List: 2013’s Top People in Business,” Fortune (December 9, 2013): 90–96.
78 R. Grover, D. Edwards, & A. Fixmer, “Can Netflix Find Its Future by Abandoning the Past?” BusinessWeek (September 26–October 2, 2011): 29–30.
79 Staff, “Being Reed Hastings,” Forbes (January 20, 2014): 16.
80 R. Ebert, “Don’t Bash My Netflix,” BusinessWeek (October 3–9, 2011): 113.
81 C. Edwards, A. Pringle, & N. Summers, “The Battle over Netflix,” BusinessWeek (November 11–17, 2013): 49–50.
82 S. Schechner & A. Sharma, “Europe’s Media Giants Prep for Netflix Landing,” Wall Street Journal (January 29, 2014): A1.
83 M. Jarzemsky, “Netflix to Enter Latin America,” Wall Street Journal (July 6, 2011): B5.
84 M. Jarzemsky, “Netflix to Enter Latin America,” Wall Street Journal (July 6, 2011): B5.
85 M. Jarzemsky, “Netflix to Enter Latin America,” Wall Street Journal (July 6, 2011): B5.
86 S. Ramachandran, “Netflix Will Pay Comcast for Speed,” Wall Street Journal (February 24, 2014): A1.
87 S. Schechner & A. Sharma, “Europe’s Media Giants Prep for Netflix Landing,” Wall Street Journal (January 29, 2014): A1.
66352_ch06_ptg01_183-229.indd 229 10/15/14 12:54 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
2 3 0
Chapter
7
C h a p t e r O U t L I N e
From Vertical Dyadic Linkage Theory to Leader– Member Exchange Theory
Vertical Dyadic Linkage (VDL) Theory
Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) Theory
Factors That Influence LMX Relationships
The Benefits of High-Quality LMX Relationships
Criticism of LMX Theory
Factors that Influence LMX Relationships.
The Role of the Leader
The Role of the Follower
Followership
Defining Followership
Types of Follower
Becoming an Effective Follower
Guidelines to Becoming an Effective Follower
Factors That Can Enhance Follower Influence
Dual Role of Being a Leader and a Follower
Delegation
Delegating
Delegation Decisions
Delegating with the Use of a Model
Evaluating Followers: Guidelines for Success
Leader–Member Exchange and Followership
Learning Outcomes After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
1 Describe the two subgroups that can form under Vertical Dyadic Linkage Theory. p. 232
2 Define the two kinds of relationships that can occur between a leader and followers under Leader–Member Exchange Theory. p. 234
3 Describe the role of the leader and follower in influencing LMX relationships. p. 235
4 Discuss the main Criticisms of LMX Theory. p. 238
5 Describe the two behaviors identified in the Kelley Model and the resulting five follower types. p. 240
6 Briefly describe the three factors than can enhance a follower’s influence. p. 246
7 List five things a leader should delegate. p. 250
8 An effective evaluation should accomplish at least three things. Name them. p. 253
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 230 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 7 LEADEr–MEMBEr EXChANgE AND FoLLowErship 231
Mark Zuckerberg—Facebook Founder and CeO In 2010, Zuckerberg was named Time magazine’s Person of the Year. Since then, much has changed in terms of his leadership performance. The company’s stock hit an all- time high (above $50) in October 2013 after falling to just $18 a year ago. This has been due to strong 2013 quarterly earnings reports in which the company has steadily beaten analysts’ estimates.
According to its latest sur vey, career site Glass- door, named Mark Zuckerberg No. 1 on its list of Top 50 CEOs in 2013. Facebook employees gave Mar k Zuckerberg a 99 percent approval rating for his role as CEO of the company. Zuckerberg replace Apple’s Tim Cook, who came in first in 2012. Zuckerberg’s ratings rose from 85 percent last year, while Cook’s dropped to 93 percent from 97 percent. According to Glassdoor, CEO approval ratings are calculated similar to Presi- dential approval ratings; employees are asked: “Do you approve or disapprove of the way your CEO is lead- ing the company?” Current and former employees de- scribed Facebook as an “intense and fun,” “awesome,” “amazing,” and “fantastic” place to work—this in keeping with the way Zuckerberg relates with his staff. He does not have one of those plush executive suites typical of corporate CEOs. His desk is near the middle of the of- fice, within arm’s length of his most senior employees. He is said to be a hands-on-type leader. His best friends are his staff; there are no separate offices. Zuckerberg, it is said, loves being around people—a far cr y from the shy recluse that he has been por trayed to be.
Facebook has been able to recruit and hire some of the best minds in the industry. According to one analyst, every- one at Facebook was a star in their previous employment. “You don’t get a lot of shy, retiring types at Facebook,” said one writer. These are intelligent, experienced, produc- tive and highly sought-after talents, “power nerds” for sure. Debate is the hallmark of staff meetings at Facebook and employees describe what an intense listener Zuckerberg is during these debates. It is said that he is often one of the last persons to leave the office.1
OpeNING CaSe QUeStIONS:
1. Describe the quality of the LMX relationship between Mark Zuckerberg and his followers?
2. What leadership qualities does Mark Zuckerberg possess, and how have these qualities influenced the quality of LMX relationships at Facebook?
3. According to the followership model of follower types, what types of followers has Facebook generally attracted?
4. The text discusses factors that can determine follower influence; when applied to Facebook employees, which factor(s) in your opinion stands out?
Can you answer any of these questions? You’ll find answers to these questions and learn more about Mark Zuckerberg and his leader ship approach throughout the chapter.
To learn more about Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook, visit the company’s Web site at http://www.facebook.com.
OPENING CASE Application
T here is ample research support for the proposition that effective leadership is a function of the interactions between leaders and followers.2 Leadership and followership represent active and dynamic roles in every level of organizational functions.3 In this chapter, you will explore the intricate nature of the relationship between a leader and
a follower. The relationship that develops between a follower and the leader does inf luence the follower’s job satisfaction, commitment, and performance.4 Often one of the reasons given for why employees quit their jobs is the lack of a good working relationship with the leader.5 In fact, for a new employee, leader– member exchange (LMX) acts as an important mediator in explaining his/her attachment to the job and organization.6 There is evidence from the literature showing that a high LMX relationship does indeed enhance follower organizational commitment and decreases their likelihood of quitting the job.7,8,9,10
We w ill discuss leader–member exchange (LM X) t heor y and followership. The chapter concludes with a discussion of delegation, including a model that can help you develop your delegation skills.
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 231 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
232 part 2 TEAM LEADErship
From Vertical Dyadic Linkage Theory to Leader–Member Exchange Theory For decades, the nature of the exchange relationship between a leader and a follower has been a topic of much interest for scholars and practitioners alike.11 12 Some have suggested that it is one of the most important relationships for followers, arguing that the quality of the social exchange between a leader and a follower is be more predictive of follower outcomes than traits or behaviors of leaders.13 14 15
Vertical dyadic linkage (VDL) theory focuses on the notion that the state of the rela- tionship (or linkage) between a leader and a follower can affect the leadership process. It focuses attention on follower participation and inf luence in the decision-making process.16 In the 1980s, this theor y was renamed leader–member exchange (LMX) theor y.17 We take a closer look at VDL theor y and its evolution to leader–member exchange theory.
Describe the two subgroups that can form under the vertical dyadic linkage theory. Learning outcome
1
Vertical Dyadic Linkage theory L e ader–fol lower i nter ac t ions have come to be v iewed a s a f u nc t ion of dy ad ic characteristics.18 Supporters of VDL theory believe that leadership is better understood by examining dyads (pairs of relations) made up of a leader and a follower (a vertical hierarchy) rather than a focus on Average Leadership Style (ALS), which in effect held that all subordinates are treated equally.19 A dyad is def ined as the individualized relationship between a leader and each follower in a work unit. Dyadic relationships and work roles are developed and negotiated over time through a series of exchanges between leader and member. For instance, many aspects of organizational life such as the employment interview, mentoring, negotiation, coaching, conf lict management, and performance evaluation inherently involve dyadic relationships and interactions between a leader and a follower.20 As such, it is important to understand the nature of these relationships.
Dyadic theory approaches leadership as an exchange relationship that develops between a leader and a follower over time during role-making activities. VDL theory focuses on the heterogeneity of dyadic relationships, arguing that a single leader will form different relationships with different followers. Such differential treatment by a leader creates situations in which the leader treats the various members of his/her work unit or team differently. The leader treats followers differently on social or task-related aspects of employment and distributes resources and rewards differently.21 With a select subset of followers known as the in-group, the leader perceives them as competent, trust- worthy, and motivated to work hard and accept responsibility. With others known as the out-group, the leader does not see them as possessing these traits.22 It is the “similarity- attraction” phenomenon.
The in-group includes followers with strong social ties to their leader in a supportive relationship characterized by high mutual trust, respect, loyalty, and inf luence. The leader is inclined to assign responsibi lit y for impor ta nt task s to members of t he in-group. The knowledge that in-group members are those willing to go out of their
WORk Application 7-1 Recall a work unit or organization you worked at that had both in-groups and out- groups. Describe some of the ways in which the manager’s behavior and actions toward in- group and out-group members varied.
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 232 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 7 LEADEr–MEMBEr EXChANgE AND FoLLowErship 233
way to help the leader makes him/her feel grateful and thus the desire by the leader to reciprocate.23 The leader is more likely to offer strong support, positive feedback, and high consideration to in-group followers. The governing principle for in-group mem- bers is expanded to include a social contract. Leaders primarily use expert, referent, and reward power to inf luence members of the in-group.
The out-group includes followers with few or no social ties to their leader, in a strictly task-centered relationship characterized by low exchange and top-down inf luence. The leader is less inclined to involve out-group members in major decisions or give them sig- nificant responsibilities. Leaders mostly use position power to inf luence out-group mem- bers. Out-group members are more likely to be managed according to the requirements of the employment contract and the leader’s formal authority. As long as such compliance is forthcoming, the out-group follower receives the standard benefits for the job (such as a salary) and no more.24 Before we begin, determine the dyadic relationship with your manager by completing Self-Assessment 7-1.
1. Describe the quality of the LMX relationship between Mark Zuckerberg and his followers?
As mentioned in the case, his best friends are his staff. It is said that he loves being around people. His desk is near the middle of the office, within arm’s length of his most senior employees. He is said to be a hands-on-type leader. Debate is the hallmark of staff meetings at Facebook, and employees describe what an intense listener Zuckerberg is during these debates. From this description, it’s a good bet that Mr. Zuckerberg has a high quality LMX relationship with his followers.
OPENING CASE Application
Dyadic relationship with Your ManagerSELF-ASSESSMENT 7-1
1. I have quick, easy access to talk with my manager anytime I want to.
2. I get along well with my manager. 3. I can influence my manager to get things
done my way—to get what I want. 4. When I interact with my manager, our con-
versation is often relationship-oriented (we talk on a personal level), rather than just task-oriented (we talk only about the job).
5. We have a loyal, trusting relationship. We look out for each other’s interest.
6. My manager understands my job and the problems that I face; he or she appreciates the work I do.
7. My manager recognizes my potential and gives me opportunities to grow on the job.
8. My manager listens carefully to what I have to say and seeks my advice.
9. My manager gives me good performance evaluations.
10. My manager gives me rewards (raises and other perks) in excess of the minimum. Add up the numbers on lines 1 through 10 and place your score here and on the continuum below.
1 0 — 2 0 — 3 0 — 4 0 — 5 0 In-group Out-group
The lower your score, the more characteristic your relationship is of the in-group.
select a present or past manager and answer each question describing your relationship using the following scale:
1 — 2 — 3 — 4 — 5 Is descriptive of our relationship Is not descriptive of our relationship
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 233 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
234 part 2 TEAM LEADErship
CONCept APPLICATION 7-1
In-Groups versus Out-Groups From each of the following statements from a subordinate, identify the group to which he or she belongs. Write the appro- priate letter in the blank before each item. a. in-group b. out-group
1. My boss helps me fulfill some of my social or personal goals.
2. I am highly committed to and energized by my work and organization and therefore, I am reciprocating with my best ideas and performance.
3. I seldom have any direct contact with my boss unless something is wrong with the way I have done my job.
4. For fear of being criticized, I do not take the initiative to seek out and successfully complete assignments that go above and beyond your job.
5. I do help out my boss, making him look good, even when I don’t get any credit.
Define the two kinds of relationships that can occur between a leader and followers under leader–member exchange theory.
Learning outcome
2
Leader–Member exchange (LMX) theory LMX focuses on the quality of the exchange relationship that develops between leaders and followers. Therefore, we define leader–member exchange (LMX) as the quality of the exchange relationship between a leader and a follower.25 The underlying assump- tion of LMX theory is that leaders or superiors have limited amounts of social, personal, and organizational resources (such as energy, time, attention, and discretion) and as a result tend to distribute them among followers selectively. Leaders do not always have positive relationships with all followers, which ultimately results in the formation of LMX exchanges that vary in quality. Leaders form high-quality social exchanges (based on trust and liking) with some members and low-quality economic exchanges with others. 26 27 The low-quality LMX relationship does not extend beyond the formal employment contract.28 Such differentiated leadership does affect individual and organizational effectiveness.
The theory predicts that followers in high-quality relationships with the leader will experience positive outcomes such as higher job satisfaction, better performance, lower turnover, greater commitment, creativity, innovation and organizational citizenship behavior.29
YOU Make the ethICaL Call
7.1 LMX at Work Leader–member exchange theory states that in each work group some employees belong to the in-group and others belong to the out-group. Think about your present or past employment. Can you identify members of the in-group and the out-group? Which group were you in?
1. Is it ethical to exclude employees from the in-group?
2. Do you think people in the in-group tend to think exclusion is ethical and those in the out-group tend to think it is unethical?
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 234 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 7 LEADEr–MEMBEr EXChANgE AND FoLLowErship 235
Factors that Influence LMX relationships LMX relationships are based on social exchanges, meaning that there is reciprocity.30 Each party must contribute something that is valued by the other party. According to LMX theory, a leader varies his or her behavior according to the quality of the interper- sonal relationship with each individual. Within the same work unit, there may exist a
2. What leadership qualities does Mark Zuckerberg possess, and how have these qualities influenced the quality of LMX relationship at Facebook?
Zuckerberg is close to all his employees. He is sociable and considerate. He has created a work environment that does not reflect rankings in the organizational hierarchy. He does not have one of those plush executive suites typical of cor- porate CEO offices. He maintains an office location that keeps him physically close to his most senior employees. This symbolic gesture conveys a sense of camaraderie and teamwork to his associates. He has earned the trust and respect of his coworkers, so much so that they they’re adamant in their avowals of affection for him. He is seen as a leader with high integrity, intelligence, and self-confidence. It seems the quality of the exchange relationship between Zuckerberg and his followers is quite high.
OPENING CASE Application
3. Is your answer to question 1 based on whether you were a member of the in-group or the out-group?
4. Is it possible for all employees to be in the in-group?
5. Should managers work to overcome LMX theor y by including all employees in the in-group?
CONCept APPLICATION 7-2
From VDL to LMX Which concept is described by the following statements? Write the appropriate letter in the blank before each item. a. vertical dyadic linkage theory b. leader–member exchange theory
6. The notion that leaders do not interact with all followers equally but rather focus on the formation of relationships that varies in quality.
7. A theory in which leadership is better understood by examining pairs of relations made up of a leader and a follower.
8. A hierarchical relationship in which leader–follower dyads (or pairs) develops.
9. A relationship in which leader–follower interactions do lead to the creation of in-groups and out-groups.
Describe the role of the leader and follower in influencing LMX relationships. Learning outcome
3
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 235 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
236 part 2 TEAM LEADErship
wide variation in the quality of each dyadic relationship.31 It takes at least two parties to form a relationship, and for our purpose the two parties will be the leader and the fol- lower. Each plays a role in inf luencing the relationship that ensues between them. There- fore, we will examine the role of the leader and the follower in inf luencing the exchange relationship.
The Role of the Leader The leader’s ability or willingness to develop a working relationship with a follower that goes beyond an economic-based exchange (which is strictly contractual in nature) to a socially based exchange relationship (characterized by friendship, mutual trust, loyalty, and respect between the leader and the follower) is critical in inf luencing the LMX relationship. Followers associated with the latter are more likely to exhibit greater organizational citizenship behavior (OCB).32 Organizational citizenship behavior is defined as individual behavior that is discretionary, not directly or explicitly recognized by the formal reward system, and that in the aggregate promotes the effective functioning of the organization.33 It is behavior that goes above and beyond the expected duties of an employee. Followers perceived by the leader to be hard working and willing to go the extra mile tend to have a higher-quality exchange relationship with the leader than those who are perceived to be lazy or unwilling to go the extra mile for the leader.
A leader’s resource strength is a major factor in inf luencing the quality of the exchange relationship with followers. An underlying assumption of LMX is that due to limited time and social resources, a leader cannot form close positive LMX relationships with all fol- lowers. Therefore, a leader has to ration these scarce resources. With some followers, the leader will develop high-quality LMX relationships (the in-group) and with others, low- quality LMX relationships (the out-group).34 Take, for example, a leader’s span of control. A leader’s span of control is the number of direct followers to a particular leader. The wider the span of control, the more difficult it is for the leader to form strong positive re- lationships with every follower and thus the disparity in the quality of exchange relation- ship. The same is true for time as a resource.
A leader’s ability to create a work environment that fosters positive exchange relation- ships between members of the work group is critical. A work climate of trust, respect, and openness may provide a setting for positive LMX relationships to develop not just between the leader and followers but between followers. This is the type of work envi- ronment that allows members to align their social identities with the group’s identity.35 Social identity is the degree to which members form close social ties with the group and how it subsequently inf luences interactions within and between group members.36 Within the work group, members who show a positive social identity to the organization are more likely to exhibit OCB and develop high-quality LMX relationships than members with a negative social identity or a lack of it.37 38
The Role of the Follower The difference between traditional leadership theories and LMX is that while the former focused on the leader primarily, the latter was one of the first attempts in leadership stud- ies to formally recognize the role of the follower in the leadership process. A follower’s behavior and attributes inf luence how the leader and other members perceive such a fol- lower. For example, a follower’s feedback-seeking behavior and self-promoting personal- ity can have a positive or negative effect on the LMX relationship. A proactive follower who takes the time to actively seek information and feedback about his or her role expec- tations and how to successfully perform them sets the right tone for forming not just a working relationship, but a high-quality relationship with the leader. Such followers show
WORk Application 7-2 Recall a work situation in which you were required to do something that was beyond your employment contract. How did you respond to your manager’s request, and what consequences did it have on your relationship with him or her?
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 236 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 7 LEADEr–MEMBEr EXChANgE AND FoLLowErship 237
initiative even in areas outside their immediate responsibility, possess a strong sense of commitment to work unit goals, and show a greater sense of responsibility for unit suc- cess. In short, they have the right attitude.39 As the saying goes, “attitude affects altitude.”
Proactive followers who want to form positive relationships wit h t heir leaders can employ any number of tactics. Here we discuss three such tactics: impressions management, ingratiation, and self-promotion. Effective followers can use these tactics to inf luence the relationship with their leaders
Impressions management is a follower’s effort to project a favorable image to gain an immediate benefit or improve a long-term relationship with the leader. Employees seek- ing to form a positive relationship with the leader will often be the ones seeking feedback on how to improve their work performance. Researchers have identified two kinds of motives associated with follower feedback-seeking behavior: performance-driven motive and impressions-driven motive. The performance-driven motive is the follower’s genuine attempt to seek information from the leader that will help improve work performance, while the impressions-driven motive refers to the desire to control how one appears to the leader.40 41
Ingratiation is the effort to appear supportive, appreciative, and respectful. Ingratia- tory inf luence tactics include favor rendering and behavioral conformity. In this instance, followers go beyond the call of duty to render services to the leader and to conform their behavior to the expectations of the leader. Studies have found a positive correlation between ingratiation by a follower and affection (or liking) by the leader for the follower. Affection, in turn, is positively related to the quality of the exchange relationship and the leader’s assessment of the follower’s competence, loyalty, commitment, and work ethic. These tactics are valuable tools that can enhance the visibility of the follower’s strengths and performance.
Self-promotion is the effort to appear competent and dependable.42 A positive rela- tionship is more likely when the follower is perceived to be competent and dependable, and when the follower’s values and ideals are similar to those of the leader. This in turn inf luences the leader to show support, delegate more, allow greater discretion, and engage in open communication with the follower. This reciprocation strengthens the LMX relationship. In other words, high-quality LMX not only increases job satisfaction, but that job satisfaction can also enhance high-quality supervisor–employee relationships.43 What this reveals is that follower traits and personality do inf luence the relationship between the leader and follower. However, there is the risk that these tactics can have a negative effect on the LMX relationship if deemed to be self-serving.44
the Benefits of high-Quality LMX relationships LMX takes a relationship-based approach to leadership, focusing on social dimensions of trust, loyalty, honesty, support, and respect that help define the nature of the dyadic rela- tionship between a leader and a follower.45 As discussed earlier, there are high-quality and low-quality LMX relationships. Followers in high-quality relationships with their leader show greater motivation and job performance, experience lower staff turnover, and report higher levels of satisfaction with their leaders. High-quality LMX employees exhibit greater OCB.46 In return, these followers routinely receive higher performance ratings on their job evaluations compared to followers in low-quality LMX relationships.47
A leader’s control over outcomes that are desirable to followers increases the leader’s reward power. For example, the leader can inf luence follower behavior with rewards such as helping with a follower’s career by recommending promotion, giving pay raises, offer- ing special favors (bigger office, better work schedule), and allowing greater participation
WORk Application 7-3 Recall an occasion when you had the opportunity to make a positive first impression on your manager. Describe what tactics you employed and their effects on your manager.
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 237 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
238 part 2 TEAM LEADErship
in decision making.48 In return for these benefits, members in high-quality LMX rela- tionships have certain obligations and expectations beyond those required of members in low-quality LMX relationships. In high-quality LMX relationships, members are expected to be loyal to the leader, to be more committed to task objectives, to work harder, and to share some of the leader’s administrative duties.
It is evident that high-quality LMX relationships create a reciprocal exchange.49 Unless this cycle of reciprocal reinforcement is interrupted, the relationship is likely to develop to a point where there is a high degree of mutual dependence, support, and loyalty. The greater the perceived value of the tangible and intangible benefits exchanged between the leader and followers, the higher the quality of LMX.
We should also note that the special relationship that exists between a leader and a follower in a high-quality LMX relationship does create certain obligations and con- straints for the leader.50 The leader cannot resort to coercion or heavy-handed inf luencing approaches without endangering the quality of the relationship. It is under such situa- tions that followers are said to have earned social capital, defined as the set of resources that inheres in the structure of relations between members of the group, which helps them get ahead.51
Now that you understand LMX, complete Self-Assessment 7-2.
WORk Application 7-4 Think of a leader you’ve had or now have a very positive high-quality relationship with. Describe some of the work-related benefits you received that can be directly or indirectly tied to your relationship with this leader/supervisor.
In-Group and Out-GroupSELF-ASSESSMENT 7-2
Based on self-Assessment 7-1 on page 233 and your reading of VDL and LMX theory, think of a current work environ- ment or one that you once were a part of and separate the workers into two groups—those who in your opinion had a high-quality LMX relationship with the leader and those who had a low-quality LMX relationship. Be sure to include yourself. Explain your thinking.
high-Quality LMX Members Low-Quality LMX Members
____________________________ ____________________________
____________________________ ____________________________
____________________________ ____________________________
Discuss the main criticisms of LMX theory. Learning outcome
4
Criticisms of LMX theory Deficiencies in measurement of LMX quality have been raised.52 The quality of the exchange relationship between a leader and a follower is measured through a survey called the LMX-7 questionnaire. The LMX-7 scale features such structured questions as the following:
• How well does your leader understand your job problems and needs? (Not a bit, a little, a fair amount, quite a bit, and a great deal)
• How well does your leader recognize your potential? (Not at all, a little, moderately, mostly, and fully)
• How would you characterize your working relationship with your leader? (Extremely ineffective, worse than average, average, better than average, and extremely effective)
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 238 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 7 LEADEr–MEMBEr EXChANgE AND FoLLowErship 239
A criticism of LMX-7 is that it determines the quality of the exchange relationship solely from the follower’s perspective. Leader variables have been found to explain the most variance in LMX quality.53 However, LMX-7 measures the quality of the exchange relationship only from the perspective of the follower.
Another criticism of LMX is attribution bias in favor of some group members. A leader who appreciates in-group members for making his life easier may reciprocate by giving favorable performance evaluations and feedback to such members. Positive job performance ratings often then become part of an individual’s employment record. An employee’s employment record is ultimately used as a resource to justify future selection, development, and promotion decisions. In many instances, those who get promoted are also those who consistently achieve higher scores in performance evaluations. Therefore, the development and career advancement of other group members who (regardless of their performance) are not similar to, familiar to, or well liked by their leader may be jeopardized. The out-group members may be paying a price for not having the same social standing or personal relationship with their leader as in-group members. This inherent bias in the system raises questions of fairness and equality in the treatment of all employees.
Fina lly, there have been criticisms of the predictive power of LM X theor y. For example, the research evidence on staff turnover is mixed at best and reservations about the performance measures used.
Complete Self-Assessment 7-3 to determine your LM X relationship w it h your manager.
Your LMX relationship with Your ManagerSELF-ASSESSMENT 7-3
self-Assessment 7-1 determined your status in terms of your relationship with your manager—whether you were part of the in-group or out-group. Your score in self-Assessment 7-1 also indicates the quality of the relationship that you have with your manager. place your score from self-Assessment 7-1 here _____ and on the following continuum. Note that some of the questions in self-Assessment 7-1 are similar to the LMX-7 questions.
1 0 — 2 0 — 3 0 — 4 0 — 5 0 High-quality LMX relationship Low-quality LMX relationship
The lower your score, generally, the better is your relationship with your manager. we say generally, because you could have a manager who does not have a good relationship with any employee. Thus, a good LMX can be a relative measure.
Followership While leader-centric studies have dominated the scholarship sphere on this topic, there is increasing evidence that follower-centric studies are showing significant promise in helping us understand the dynamics of the leader–follower relationship.54 55 Most schol- ars would agree that there is increasing use of the words follower and followership in discussions of organizational leadership.56 Past leadership research has focused on lead- ers and ignored the role of followers in explaining organizational successes or failures.57 This has led to criticism of existing leadership theories for being too “leader-centric.”58 The focus of these theories has been almost exclusively on the impact of leader traits and behaviors on follower outcomes. However, like leadership, good followership is
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 239 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
240 part 2 TEAM LEADErship
increasingly being recognized as an important component for strong organizational performance.59 Good followership is about ‘upward inf luencing.’60 Leaders have to put aside their egos and recognize that there are times when they have to listen to and take their followers’ counsel on how to proceed. This is a cultural change that needs top man- agement support, else nothing happens.61 Robert Kelley, a pioneer and early proponent of followership, states that “without followers, leadership is meaningless and leaders don’t exist.”62 To adequately understand the cognitions, attributes, behaviors, and contexts of followership, researchers have focused on such questions as the following: Why do some people choose to follow? Are there different types of followers? How does one become an effective follower? Can the leadership–followership relationship be nurtured? In this section, we address these questions and more. But first, we start with a definition of followership.
Defining Followership Followership is not merely the actions of a subordinate who blindly follows the dic- tates of formal authority figures in an organization. As such, followership is not the same as following. Following is reacting (consciously or unconsciously) to a leader’s orders. In contrast, followership is a self-conscious choice of the follower in the con- text of his or her relationship to the nominal leader. Issues of rank and authority play little or no role in such a choice. Followers are in control of the situation by the choices made.63 Therefore, followership refers to the behavior of followers that result from the leader–follower mutual inf luencing relationship. It is an interactive concept. To a large extent, societal views about followers have contributed to our limited understanding of followership. From an early age we are taught that organizations succeed because of the leader, with very little or no mention of the role of followers. The follower is seen as someone whose sole duty is to carry out the instructions of the leader. From this perspective, the follower is defined as someone who is under the direct inf luence and authority of a leader.
Leaders are just one part of a duality, because there can be no leaders without follow- ers. Effective leadership requires effective followership. Kelley and Chaleff are two early pioneers who brought focus to the role of followers in the leadership process. No work unit or organized effort can succeed and be sustained without followers; this, according to Kelley, is the power of followership.64 Chaleff discussed the fact that effective followers are also courageous followers who tend to demonstrate certain behaviors. He identifies the five behaviors as courage to accept responsibility, courage to serve, courage to ques- tion, courage to be part of necessary change, and courage to take a moral stand when necessary.65 66
Effective followers do more than fulfill the vision laid out by their leader; they are partners in creating the vision.67 They take responsibility for their actions, they take initiative in fixing problems, and they question leaders when they think they are wrong. According to Kelley, “Effective followers have the vision to see both the forest and the trees, the social capacity to work well with others, the strength of character to f lourish without heroic status, the moral and psychological balance to pursue personal and corpo- rate goals at no cost to either, and above all, the desire to participate in a team effort for the accomplishment of some greater purpose.”68
Describe the two behaviors identified in the Kelley Model and the resulting five follower types.
Learning outcome
5
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 240 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 7 LEADEr–MEMBEr EXChANgE AND FoLLowErship 241
types of Followers There are contextual influences that may affect both followership constructions and behav- ior in the follower role. For example, personal qualities such as obedience, expressing opin- ions, and taking initiative have been found to be most disparate across different types of followers.69 In her book titled Followership: How Followers Are Creating Change and Chang- ing Leaders, Barbara Kellerman classifies followers into five categories based on their level of engagement: isolates, bystanders, participants, activists, or diehards.70 Another typology of follower types is that of Robert Kelley.71 Based on their intellectual capacity to think critically and their level of involvement in organizational affairs—Kelley groups followers into five categories that we will elaborate on next.
Exhibit 7.1 depicts these two behavioral dimensions—level of independent critical thinking and the level of involvement. The high independent critical thinker refers to the follower who is able to examine, analyze, and evaluate matters of significance in the organization’s life. Conversely, the opposite of this person is someone who is low in ability to think critically. The second behavior dimension—level of involvement—refers to the follower who takes a visible and active role in organizational affairs. The opposite of this person is someone who prefers to be in the background and take a passive role in organi- zational affairs.
According to Kelley, combining these dimensions results in five basic follower types, identified as the following: alienated, passive, conformist, pragmatic, and effective fol- lower (see Exhibit 7.1):
Follower Types EXHIBIT 7.1
© 2
01 6
Ce ng
ag e
Le ar
ni ng
®
Le ve
l o f
In vo
lv em
en t
High
Low
Critical Thinking Low High
Conformist. follower
Effective. follower
Passive. follower
Alienated. follower
Pragmatic follower
• The lower-left quadrant identifies the Passive Follower. The passive follower is some- one who is low on critical thinking and low on involvement. The passive follower looks to the leader or others to do all the thinking and does not get involved. Lacking in initia- tive and commitment to the team, this invisible follower requires constant supervision and never goes beyond the job description. They are often described by their leaders as lazy, unmotivated, and incompetent.
• The upper-left quadrant identifies the Conformist Follower. The conformist follower is someone who is high on involvement but low on critical thinking. In other words, conformists are the “yes people” of the organization. They carry out all orders without
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 241 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
242 part 2 TEAM LEADErship
considering the consequences of such orders. A conformist would do anything to avoid conflict. Authoritarian leaders prefer conformist followers.
• The upper-right quadrant identifies the Effective Follower. The effective follower is someone who is high on critical thinking and involvement. Effective followers are not risk- averse, nor do they shy from conflict. They have the courage to initiate change and put themselves at risk or in conflict with others, even their leaders, to serve the best interest of the organization. As such, they are often described as proactive. Effective followers tend to function very well in self-managed teams. They are a manager’s best asset in that they complement the leader and can be relied upon to relieve the leader of many tasks.
• The lower-right quadrant identifies the Alienated Follower. The alienated follower is someone who is low on involvement, yet is high on critical thinking. The alienated follower is someone who feels cheated, or unappreciated, by his or her organization for exemplary work. Often cynical in their behavior, alienated followers are capable but unwilling to participate in developing solutions to problems. They are just happy to dwell on the negatives and ignore the positives as far as organizational life goes.
• The pragmatic follower exhibits a little of all four styles—depending on which style fits the prevailing situation. Pragmatic followers are “stuck in the middle” most of the time. Because it is difficult to discern just where they stand on issues, they present an ambiguous image, with positive and negative sides. On the positive side, when an organization is going through desperate times, the pragmatic follower knows how to “work the system to get things done.” On the negative side, this same behavior can be interpreted as “playing political games,” or adjusting to maximize self-interest.
5. according to the followership model of follower types, what types of followers has Facebook generally attracted?
Facebook has been able to recruit and hire some of the best minds in the industry. According to one analyst, everyone at Facebook was a star in their previous employment. Sheryl Sandberg, a veteran of Google, was the chief of staff for former treasury secretary Lawrence Summers. She joined Facebook as the company’s chief operating officer (COO). Chris Cox, Facebook’s vice president of product, was doing a master’s in artificial intelligence at Stanford when Zuckerberg personally convinced him to join Facebook. “You don’t get a lot of shy, retiring types at Facebook,” said one writer. These are intelligent, experienced, productive, and highly sought-after talents, “power nerds” to say the least. Remember, the effective follower is someone who is high on critical thinking and involvement. It is a safe bet that Zuckerberg and Facebook have mostly attracted effective followers.
OPENING CASE Application
Becoming an effective Follower How individuals see their role as followers informs how they function. While some scholars construct follower definitions around passivity, deference, and obedience, others emphasize the importance of constructively questioning and challenging their leaders.72 To be effective as a follower, it is important to acquire the skills necessary to combine two opposing follower roles—namely, to execute decisions made by a leader, and yet be able to raise issues about those decisions when they are deemed misguided or unethical. This is often referred to as “speaking truth to power.”73 Although this is not always easy to do, followers must be willing to risk the leader’s displeasure with such feedback. Moral integ- rity and a willingness to take stands based on principle are distinguishing characteristics of the effective follower.74 It could be argued that the effective follower has the greatest
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 242 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 7 LEADEr–MEMBEr EXChANgE AND FoLLowErship 243
potential to become an effective leader. Developing a high level of mutual trust and re- spect between the leader and follower can mitigate the risk of falling out of favor with the leader. In such a relationship, a leader is likely to view criticism and dissenting views as an honest effort to facilitate achievement of shared objectives, rather than as an intentional expression of personal disagreement or disloyalty.,75
The effective follower has a high self-efficacy compared to the ineffective follower. Self-efficacy is defined as a person’s beliefs in his or her capabilities to produce at a certain level of performance.76 Self-efficacy determines how people feel, think, and see themselves, which in turn inf luences their work ethic.
How followers perceive a leader plays a critical role in their ability to help the leader grow and succeed.77 Just as leaders make attributions about follower competence, followers make attributions about leader competence and intentions. Followers assess whether the leader’s primary motivation is more for his or her personal benefit or career advancement than for their own welfare and the organization’s well-being. Credibility is increased and follower commitment is enhanced when the leader makes self-sacrifices to gain support for his or her ideas, rather than imposing on followers. Leaders who appear insincere or motivated only by personal gain create an atmosphere in which integrating the two opposing follower roles is impossible. Here, followers would play the passive role of conforming to the leader’s expectations without offering any constructive criticism, even when it is called for in a leader’s decisions and actions. Complete Self-Assessment 7-4 to learn how effective you are as a follower.
effective FollowersSELF-ASSESSMENT 7-4
select a present or past boss and answer each question describing your behavior using the following scale.
5 — 4 — 3 — 2 — 1 I do this regularly I do not do this
1. I offer my support and encouragement to my boss when things are not going well.
2. I take initiative to do more than my nor- mal job without having to be asked to do things.
3. I counsel and coach my boss when it is appropriate, such as with a new, inexpe- rienced boss, and in a unique situation in which the boss needs help.
4. When the boss has a bad idea, I raise concerns and tr y to improve the plans, rather than simply implement a poor decision.
5. I seek and encourage the boss to give me honest feedback, rather than avoid it and act defensively when it is offered.
6. I tr y to clarify my role in tasks by mak- ing sure I understand my boss’s expec- tations of me and my performance standards.
7. I show my appreciation to my boss, such as saying thanks when the boss does some- thing in my interest.
8. I keep the boss informed; I don’t withhold bad news.
9. I would resist inappropriate influence by the boss; if asked, I would not do anything illegal or unethical.
Add up the numbers on lines 1 through 9 and place your score here _____ and on the continuum below.
9 — 1 5 — 2 5 — 3 5 — 4 5 Ineffective Follower Effective Follower
The higher your score, generally, the more effective you are as a follower. however, your boss also has an effect on your followership. A poor boss can affect your followership behavior; nevertheless, make sure you do try to be a good follower. read on to better understand how to be an effective follower.
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 243 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
244 part 2 TEAM LEADErship
Guidelines to Becoming an effective Follower Research focused on followership has identified certain behaviors that are associated with effective followers.78 79 These behaviors distinguish followers on top-performing teams from their counterparts on marginally performing teams. Exhibit 7.2 presents nine guidelines for effective followership; note that the nine questions in Self-Assessment 7-4 are based on these guidelines.
Offer Support to Leader A good follower looks for ways to express support and encouragement to a leader who is encountering resistance in trying to introduce needed change in his or her organization. Successful organizations are characterized by followers whose work ethic and philosophy are in congruence with those of the organization and the leader.
Take Initiative Effective followers take the initiative to do what is necessary without being told, includ- ing working beyond their normally assigned duties. They look for opportunities to make a positive impact on the organization’s objectives. When serious problems arise that impede the organization’s ability to accomplish its objectives, effective followers take the risk to initiate corrective action by pointing out the problem to the leader, suggesting alternative solutions, or, if necessary, resolving the problem outright. While taking the initiative often involves risks, if done carefully and properly, it can make the follower a valuable part of the team and a member of the leader’s trusted circle.
Counsel and Coach the Leader When Appropriate Contrary to the myth that leaders have all the answers, most people now recognize that followers also have opportunities to coach and counsel leaders, especially when a leader is new and inexperienced.80 A mutually trusting relationship with a leader facilitates upward coaching and counseling. An effective follower must be alert for opportunities to provide helpful advice, and ask questions, or simply be a good listener when the leader needs someone to confide in. Because some leaders may be reluctant to ask for help, it is the follower’s responsibility to recognize such situations and step in when appropri- ate. For example, a leader whose interpersonal relationship with another follower may be having a different effect than the leader intended could be counseled to see the inef- fectiveness of his approach or style by another follower: “I am sure you intended for Bob to see the value of being on time when you said…, but that is not how he took it.” When coaching and counseling a leader is done with respect, it is most effective. Respect creates
Guidelines to Becoming an Effective Follower EXHIBIT 7.2
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
a. Offer support to leader.
c. Play counseling and coaching roles to leader when appropriate.
e. Seek and encourage honest feedback from the leader.
g. Show appreciation.
i. Resist inappropriate influence of leader.
b. Take initiative.
d. Raise issues and/or concerns when necessary.
f. Clarify your role and expectations.
h. Keep the leader informed.
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 244 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 7 LEADEr–MEMBEr EXChANgE AND FoLLowErship 245
symmetry, empathy, and connection in all kinds of relationships, including that between a leader and a follower.81
Raise Issues and/or Concerns When Necessary When there are potential problems or drawbacks with a leader’s plans and proposals, a follower’s ability to bring these issues or concerns to light is critical. How the follower raises these issues is crucial, because leaders often get defensive in responding to negative feedback. Followers can minimize such defensiveness by acknowledging the leader’s su- perior status and communicating a sincere desire to be of help in accomplishing the orga- nization’s goals, rather than personal interest. When challenging a leader’s f lawed plans and proposals, it is important for the follower to pinpoint specifics rather than vague generalities, and to avoid personalizing the critique. This guideline is consistent with the prevailing view of the courageous follower as a person who is highly involved and very much an independent thinker with initiative and a well-developed sense of responsibility.
Seek and Encourage Honest Feedback from the Leader Followers can play a constructive role in how their leaders evaluate them. Some leaders are uncomfortable with expressing negative concerns about a follower’s performance, so they tend to focus only on the follower’s strengths. One way to overcome this tendency is for the follower to show willingness to accept both positive and negative feedback without being defensive. Encourage the leader to point out the strongest and weakest aspects of your work.
Clarify Your Role and Expectations Where there is evidence of role ambiguity or uncertainty about job expectations, this must be clarified with the leader. As will be revealed in Chapter 8 on leading effective teams, it is the leader’s responsibility to clearly communicate role expectations for fol- lowers. Nevertheless, some leaders fail to communicate clear job expectations, scope of authority and responsibility, performance targets, and deadlines. Followers must insist on clarification in these areas by their leaders. In some cases the problem is that of role conf lict. The leader directs a follower to perform mutually exclusive tasks and expects results on all of them at the same time. Followers should be assertive but diplomatic about resolving role ambiguity and role conf lict.
Show Appreciation Everyone, including leaders, loves to be appreciated when they perform a good deed that benefits others. When a leader makes a special effort to help a follower, such as help- ing to protect the follower’s interest, or nurturing and promoting the follower’s career, it is appropriate for the follower to show appreciation. Even if the leader’s actions don’t directly benefit a particular follower but represent a significant accomplishment for the organization, it is still an appropriate gesture for followers to express their appreciation and admiration for the leader. Recognition of this kind only reinforces desirable leader- ship behavior. Although some may argue that praising a leader is a form of ingratiation easily used to inf luence the leader, when sincere, it can help to build a positive leader– follower exchange relationship.
keep the Leader Informed Accurate and timely information enables a leader to make good decisions and to have a complete picture of where things stand in the organization. Leaders who appear not to know what is going on in their organizations do feel and look incompetent in front of their peers and superiors. It is embarrassing for a leader to hear about events or changes taking place within his or her unit from others. This responsibility of relaying information to the
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 245 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
246 part 2 TEAM LEADErship
leader includes both positive and negative information. Some followers tend to withhold bad news from their leaders. This is just as detrimental as providing no information at all.
Resist Inappropriate Influence from the Leader A leader may be tempted to use his or her power to inf luence the follower in ways that are inappropriate (legally or ethically). Despite the power gap between the leader and fol- lower, the follower is not required to comply with inappropriate inf luence attempts, or to be exploited by an abusive leader.82 Effective followers challenge the leader in a firm, tactful, and diplomatic way. Reminding the leader of his or her ethical responsibilities, insisting on your rights, and pointing out the negative consequences of complying are various ways in which a follower can resist inappropriate inf luence attempts by a leader. It is important to challenge such behavior early, before it becomes habitual, and to do it without personal hostility. Taking a moral stand may sometimes require the follower to psychologically and/or physically separate from the leader.
WORk Application 7-5 Give examples of how you or someone you worked with employed some of the suggested guidelines to becoming an effective follower.
CONCept APPLICATION 7-2
Guidelines to Becoming an Effective Follower Identify each guideline using the letters a–i from Exhibit 7.2 on page 244:
10. I understand the leader’s needs, goals, and constraints, and I work hard to help meet them.
11. I make a point to internally question the wisdom of the leader’s decision rather than just doing what I am told.
12. When the leader asks me to do something that runs contrary to my professional or personal preferences, I do you say “no” rather than “yes.”
13. I do you assert my views on important issues, especially when I know it will help the organization achieve its goals, even though it might mean conflict with my group.
14. I am actively developing my abilities in some critical areas so that I can become more valuable to the leader and the organization.
15. We have a new boss, and I’ve been filling her in on how we do things in our department.
16. We only have performance reviews once a year. But I wanted to know what my boss thinks of my work sooner, so we had a meeting to discuss my performance.
17. My boss hinted about having a sexual relationship, so I reminded her that I was happily married and clearly told her I was not interested and not to talk about it again.
18. We started a new project today but I did not understand what I was supposed to be doing or expected to do. So I went to talk to my boss about what to do.
Factors that Can enhance Follower Influence In every organization or work setting, some followers seem to have more inf luence over their peers (and even their leaders) than others. These are the followers that command respect, trust, and loyalty from everyone, including the leader. They are opinion leaders
Briefly describe the three factors than can enhance a follower’s influence. Learning outcome
6
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 246 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 7 LEADEr–MEMBEr EXChANgE AND FoLLowErship 247
amongst their peers. It is not uncommon for a follower of such stature to exert greater inf luence over other followers than even the leader of the group can. Leaders who under- stand this “follower–follower” dynamic can use it to their advantage.
It is not always the case that inf luential followers use their inf luence appropriately. Some may employ their inf luence in negative ways to make the leader’s job difficult. This section examines some of the key factors that have been found to enhance follower inf luence. We will discuss the follower’s relative power position, locus of control, and education/experience (see Exhibit 7.3).
Factors That Can Enhance Follower Influence EXHIBIT 7.3
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
Power Position
Education and Experience
Locus of Control
Power Position Leaders need to realize that they are no longer the sole possessors of power and inf lu- ence in their work units. The new reality is that no matter what position a person holds in the workplace, they can be a force for change. Some followers distinguish themselves as innovators, self-managers, or risk-takers. These are terms that have traditionally been reserved for describing leaders, not followers. Some followers may have personal, referent, expert, information, and connection power that can be used to boost upward inf luence. These power sources are discussed in Chapter 5. Any of these sources of power can give the follower the ability to inf luence others at different levels of the organization. As more and more employees come to rely on a particular follower for information, expertise, or simply because of his or her personality, the follower’s relative power position increases.83 These are the followers that can inf luence other followers to slow down performance, file grievances, stage demonstrations, or even sabotage operations—all actions that can hurt a leader’s reputation.
Locus of Control As discussed in Chapter 2, locus of control is on a continuum between an external and internal belief over who has control of a person’s destiny. People who believe they are “masters of their own destiny” are said to have an internal locus of control; they believe that they can inf luence people and events in their workplace. People who believe they are “pawns of fate” (external locus of control) tend to believe they have no inf luence or control at work. The literature mostly supports the view that leadership qualities are predomi- nantly present in those with an internal locus of control. 84 Followers with an internal locus of control prefer a work environment that encourages honest and open communi- cation with leaders, participation in decision making, and opportunities to be creative.
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 247 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
248 part 2 TEAM LEADErship
They are likely to be more inf luential with other followers than are those with external locus of control.
Education and Experience Not all followers have the same level of education and/or experience. These differences can have a major impact on the inf luencing ability of followers. Followers with valuable skills and experience may be able to use their expert power to inf luence other followers and even the leader. Leaders have to create opportunities to learn from others, including followers. Today’s workforce is far more educated, mobile, diverse, and younger than the workforce of 30 years ago. The experienced and educated follower can be much more inf luential with other followers than can the leader.
As workers’ educat ion a nd ex per ience i ncrease, t hey tend to rejec t top-dow n directive leadership. Leaders who ignore this fact will face higher employee dissatis- faction and turnover and miss out on the benefits of utilizing the talents of effective followers.
WORk Application 7-6 Recall a work-related incident when you felt more qualified to do the job than your boss because of your education and experience. Describe how this characteristic enabled you to influence your boss.
CONCept APPLICATION 7-4
Determinants of Follower Influence Identify the specific follower-influencing characteristic in each of these statements. a. power position b. locus of control c. education and experience
19. Given my technical background and long tenure in my department, I do help out other coworkers, making them look good, even when I don’t get any credit.
20. I try to solve the tough problems (technical or organizational), rather than look to the leader or others to do it for me.
21. I believe that no matter what I do to try to get ahead, there are always people out there trying to sabotage my plans.
22. Many of my peers depend on me for technical assistance because I am the only one in the department who has been trained to work with this new machine successfully.
23. When it comes to selling my points to peers, I easily get them to see things my way rather than the boss’s way due to my seniority and popularity in this division.
5. the text discusses factors that can determine follower influence, when applied to Facebook employees; which factor(s) in your opinion stands out?
It is clear from the case that Facebook employees are highly skilled and experienced software engineers. They are highly sought-after in the tech world. As mentioned in the case, everyone at Facebook was a star somewhere else and you don’t find a lot of shy, retiring types there. They are described as “power nerds.” Even those who have left Facebook have gone on to create their own ventures. Facebook employees have expert, connection, and referent power. By all indications, they have internal locus of control. Finally, Facebook employees are highly educated and experienced given the competitive and high-tech environment in which they operate.
OPENING CASE Application
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 248 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 7 LEADEr–MEMBEr EXChANgE AND FoLLowErship 249
Dual role of Being a Leader and a Follower As the guidelines for becoming an effective follower reveal, effective leadership is found in highly effective followers. It is important to recognize that even when someone is identified as a leader, the same person is also a follower to someone higher up the orga- nizational hierarchy.85 It is not at all uncommon to switch between being a leader and being a follower several times during the course of a day’s work. For example, within an organization, mid-level managers answer to vice presidents, who answer to the CEO, who answers to the board of directors; within the school system, teachers answer to the prin- cipal, who answers to the school superintendent, who answers to school board members. Regardless of one’s position in an organization, we are all in a follower role to someone else. To execute both roles effectively is a challenge, but one that can be done effectively.
Delegation We now focus on developing followers by delegating tasks to them. Delegation is the process of assigning responsibility and authority for accomplishing objectives. Telling employees to perform the tasks that are part of their job design is issuing orders, not delegating. Delegating refers to giving employees new tasks. The new task may become a part of a redesigned job, or it may simply be a onetime task. The true art of delegation lies in a manager’s ability to know what cannot be delegated and what should be delegated. Some management experts believe that if there were a top ten list of managerial mistakes, failure to delegate would be one of them.86 In this section, we discuss delegating, delega- tion decisions, and delegating with a model.
Delegating Effective delegation requires that a leader carefully consider several factors relating to the task, time requirement, and follower characteristics before delegating.87 A leader should delegate work when there is not enough time to attend to priority tasks, when followers desire more challenges and opportunities, and when the tasks match follower skill levels and experiences. Also a leader must find the proper person for the job and provide careful instructions. Effective delegation allows people to prosper in their own uniqueness.
Let’s begin by discussing the benefits of delegation, the obstacles to delegation, and signs of delegating too little.
Benefits of Delegation When managers delegate, they have more time to perform high-priority tasks. Delegation gets tasks accomplished and increases productivity. Delegation can empower followers and give them more confidence. 88 Delegating both responsibility and authority pushes decision making down the ladder, encourages input from operational employees who are closest to problems, and promotes a participative work environment. It enables leaders to mobilize resources and secure better results than they could have gotten alone. Delega- tion trains employees and improves their self-esteem, as well as eases the stress and bur- den on managers. By delegating responsibilities, leaders can focus on doing a few tasks well instead of many tasks less effectively. Consequently, they improve their management and leadership potential while training others to succeed them. It is a means of develop- ing followers by enriching their jobs. From the organization’s perspective, delegating can result in increased performance and work outcomes.89 It can also lead to more communi- cation between leaders and followers, thus encouraging followers to voice their opinions on how to improve the work environment.90
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 249 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
250 part 2 TEAM LEADErship
Obstacles to Delegation Managers become used to doing things themselves. They forget part of leadership is “get- ting work done through others.”91 Managers fear that employees will fail to accomplish tasks. You can delegate responsibility and authority but not your accountability. Managers believe they can perform tasks more efficiently than others. Some managers don’t realize that delegation is an important part of their job, others don’t know what to delegate, and some don’t know how to delegate. Effective delegation greatly improves a leader’s time management, without which efficiency and effectiveness suffer. If you let anything keep you from delegating, you could end up like Dr. Rudenstine, former president of Harvard University, who became ill due to job stress by trying to do too much by himself.
Signs of Delegating Too Little Certain behaviors are associated with leaders who are reluctant to delegate to their sub- ordinates. These behaviors are signs that a leader is delegating too little. Some of these behaviors include taking work home, performing employee tasks, being behind in work, a continual feeling of pressure and stress, rushing to meet deadlines, and requiring that employees seek approval before acting. Leaders who can’t disengage from the office and delegate authority and responsibility undermine employees’ confidence to make decisions and take responsibility for their actions.92 Unfortunately, in many of today’s cost-cutting environments, you don’t always have someone you can delegate some of your tasks to.
WORk Application 7-7 Describe an obstacle to delegation, or sign of delegating too little, that you have observed on the job.
List five things a leader should delegate. Learning outcome
7
Delegation Decisions As mentioned earlier, an important part of delegation is knowing which tasks to delegate. Successful delegation is often based on selecting what task to delegate and whom to del- egate it to.
What to Delegate As a general guide, use your prioritized to-do list and delegate anything that you don’t have to be personally involved with because of your unique knowledge or skill. Some pos- sibilities include the following:
• Paperwork. Have others prepare reports, memos, letters, and so on. • Routine tasks. Delegate checking inventory, scheduling, ordering, and so on. • Technical matters. Have top employees deal with technical questions and problems. • Tasks with developmental potential. Give employees the opportunity to learn new things.
Prepare them for advancement by enriching their jobs. • Employees’ problems. Train employees to solve their own problems; don’t solve problems
for them, unless their capability is low.
What Not to Delegate As a general guide, do not delegate anything that you need to be personally involved with because of your unique knowledge or skill.93 Here are some typical examples:
• Personnel matters. Performance appraisals, counseling, disciplining, firing, resolving conflicts, and so on.
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 250 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 7 LEADEr–MEMBEr EXChANgE AND FoLLowErship 251
• Confidential activities. Unless you have permission to do so. • Crises. There is no time to delegate. • Activities delegated to you personally. For example, if you are assigned to a committee, do
not assign someone else without permission.
Determining to Whom to Delegate Once you have decided what to delegate, you must select an employee to do the task. When selecting an employee to delegate to, be sure that he or she has the capability to get the job done right by the deadline. Consider your employees’ talents and interests when making a selection. You may consult with several employees to determine their interests before making the final choice.94
Before you learn how to delegate with the use of a model, complete Self-Assessment 7-5 to learn how your personality may affect your followership and delegation.
Followership and personalitySELF-ASSESSMENT 7-5
personality Differences generally, if you have an agreeableness Big Five personal- ity type, which is a high need for affiliation, you will have a good relationship with your manager, because having a good relationship with everyone helps you to meet your needs. if you have a lower need for power, you prefer to be a follower, rather than a leader. generally, you will be willing to delegate authority.
if you have a surgency/high need for power, you may have some problems getting along with your manager. You prefer to be in control, or to be a leader rather than a follower. however, if you don’t get along well with your manager, you will have difficulty climbing the corporate ladder. You may have some reluctance to delegate author- ity because you like to be in control—and when you delegate, you lose some control.
if you have a conscientiousness/high need for achieve- ment, you may not be concerned about your relationship with your manager, other than getting what you need to get the job done. however, if you don’t get along well with your manager, you will have difficulty getting what you want. You may also be reluctant to delegate tasks that you like to do, because you get satisfaction from doing the job itself, rather than having someone else to do it.
Being well adjusted also helps you have a good relation- ship with your manager. Being open to experience, which
includes an internal locus of control (Chapter 2), helps you to get along with others since you are willing to try new things.
Gender Differences Although there are exceptions, generally women tend to seek relationships that are on a more personal level than those favored by men. For example, two women who work together are more apt to talk about their family lives than two men. Men do socialize, but it is more frequently about other interests such as sports. it is not unusual for women who have worked together for months to know more about each other’s personal and family lives than men who have worked together for years. Men who do enjoy talking about their personal lives tend to talk more about their families in dyads with women than in those with men. one of the reasons men enjoy working with women is because they often bring a personal-level relationship to the job.
how does your personality affect your dyadic relation- ships, followership, and delegation?
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 251 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
252 part 2 TEAM LEADErship
Delegating with the Use of a Model After determining what to delegate and to whom, you must plan for and delegate the tasks. The delegation model steps are (1) explain the need for delegating and the rea- sons for selecting the employee; (2) set objectives that define responsibility, level of authority, and deadline; (3) develop a plan; and (4) establish control checkpoints and hold employ- ees accountable.96 Following these four steps can increase your chances of successfully delegating. As you read on, you will see how the delegation model is used with the job characteristics model, core job dimensions, and critical psychological states to inf luence performance and work outcomes.
Step 1. Explain the need for delegating and the reasons for selecting the employee. It is helpful for the employee to understand why the assignment must be completed. In other words, how will the department or organization benefit? Informing employ- ees helps them realize the importance of the task (experienced meaningfulness of work). Telling the employee why he or she was selected should make him or her feel valued. Don’t use the “it’s a lousy job, but someone has to do it” approach. Be positive; make employees aware of how they will benefit from the assignment. If step 1 is completed successfully, the employee should be motivated, or at least will- ing, to do the assignment.
Step 2. Set objectives that define responsibility, level of authority, and deadline. The objectives should clearly state the end result the employee is responsible for achieving by a specific deadline. You should also define the level of authority the employee has, as the following choices illustrate:
• Make a list of all supplies on hand, and present it to me each Friday at 2:00 (inform authority).
• Fill out a supply purchase order, and present it to me each Friday at 2:00 (recommend authority).
YOU Make the ethICaL Call
7.2
On May 3, 2011, Senator John Ensign of Nevada resigned. Ensign admitted to having an af- fair in 2009 with Cynthia Hampton—a past campaign aide and the wife of Doug Hampton. During a two-year inquiry into possible violations by Ensign, the Senate Ethics Committee found that he violated campaign finance laws and obscured justice to cover up his affair.
Senator Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, a friend of Ensign’s who confronted him about the adultery, became involved as an intermediary in negotiations between Ensign and Doug Hampton. The former aide is said to have sought some kind of financial settlement from Ensign soon after he became aware of the affair. Senator Coburn was the go-between in trying to negotiate settlement terms. According to reports, Ensign’s father eventually gave the Hamptons $96,000 as a gift, which the Ethics Committee determined to be in viola- tion of campaign finance laws.95
1. Is it ethically responsible for Senator Coburn to be trying to help his friend Senator Ensign pay off the Hamptons in a deal that is seen as a violation of campaign finance laws?
2. What would you do if your boss asked you to cover up evidence of wrongdoing by your organization? (Some options include the following: just do it, don’t say anything but don’t do it, question the motives, look closely at what you are asked to destroy, go to your boss’s boss to make sure it’s okay to do it, tell the boss you will not do it, ask the boss to do it him- or herself, blow the whistle to an outside source like the government or media.)
3. If you went to court for trying to cover up a violation like Senator Coburn was doing, do you believe you would have a good ethical defense by saying “I was not directly involved”?
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 252 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 7 LEADEr–MEMBEr EXChANgE AND FoLLowErship 253
• Fill out and sign a purchase order for supplies; send it to the purchasing depart- ment with a copy put in my in-basket each Friday by 2:00 (report authority).
• Fill out and sign a purchase order for supplies, and send it to the purchasing department each Friday by 2:00, keeping a copy (full authority).
Step 3. Develop a plan. Once the objective is set, a plan is needed to achieve it. It is helpful to write out the objective, specifying the level of authority and the plan. When developing a plan, be sure to identify the resources needed to achieve the objectives, and give the employee the authority necessary to obtain the resources. Inform all parties of the employee’s authority and with whom the employee must work. For example, if an employee is doing a marketing report, you should contact the marketing department and tell them the employee must have access to the necessary information.
Step 4. Establish control checkpoints and hold employees accountable. For simple, short tasks, a deadline without control checkpoints is appropriate. However, it is often advisable to check progress at predetermined times (control checkpoints) for tasks that have multiple steps or will ta ke some time to complete. This builds information f low into the delegation system right from the start. You and the employee should agree on the form (phone call, visit, memo, or detailed report) and time frame (daily, weekly, or after specific steps are completed but before going on to the next step) for information regarding the assignment. When establishing control, consider the employee’s capability level. The lower the capability, the more frequent the checks; the higher the capability, the less frequent the checks.
It is helpful to list the control checkpoints in writing on an operational planning sheet, making copies of the finished plan so that the parties involved and you as the delegating manager have a record to refer to. In addition, all parties involved should record the control checkpoints on their calendars. If the employee to whom the task was delegated does not report as scheduled, fol- low up to find out why the person did not report, and get the information. You should evaluate performance at each control checkpoint, and upon completion provide feedback that develops knowledge of the results of work.
Providing praise for progress and completion of the task motivates employees to do a good job. You will recall that Chapter 6 discussed how to give praise.
The four steps of the delegation process are summarized in Model 7.1. In Developing Your Leadership Skills Exercise 1, you will have the opportunity to use the model to del- egate a task and to develop your delegation skills.
WORk Application 7-8 Select a manager you work or have worked for, and analyze how well he or she implements the four steps of delegation. Which steps does the manager typically follow and not follow?
Step 4
Establish control checkpoints and hold employees accountable.
Step 1
Explain the need for delegating and the reasons for selecting the employee.
Step 2
Set objectives that define responsibility, level of authority, and deadline.
Step 3
Develop a plan.
Steps in the Delegation Process MODEL 7.1
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
An effective evaluation should accomplish at least three things. Name them. Learning outcome
8
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 253 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
254 part 2 TEAM LEADErship
evaluating Followers: Guidelines for Success Past research on employee evaluation and feedback has shown that when employees feel they are treated fairly, positive outcomes result and negative outcomes can be avoided. Evaluation and feedback is usually given to the employee by his superior, and represents an assessment of the employee’s job performance and efforts in the assigned task. There- fore, it should be seen as a tool for professional learning and growth for the employee or subordinate.
It is an important leadership responsibility that ought to be part of regular leadership training and development programs.97 Leader and subordinate persona lit y traits, self-efficacy, self-esteem, locus of control, and emotional stability have been shown to affect the feedback process.98 People in general tend to be defensive when being evalu- ated, especially when the evaluation is not very positive. To some followers, a negative evaluation questions their abilities and threatens their self-esteem. Some leaders are uncomfortable confronting followers who underperform because of this sentiment and the fear of hurting their relationship with the follower. However, addressing a follower’s performance deficiencies is required to help the follower address weaknesses, but the way it is done can preserve or strain the leader–follower relationship.99
Researchers and practitioners generally agree that followers admire and respect leaders who show honesty, caring, understanding, and empathy during the evaluation process.100 Followers also want to be convinced that the evaluation is fair and effective.101 That’s why the 360-degree multi-rater evaluation method is highly recommended. This evaluation tool uses multiple sources (self, peer, superior, customers, suppliers, etc.) to evaluate an individual.102 It goes by different names such as the 360-degree feedback, multi-source feedback, or crowdsourced performance reviews.103
A leader must learn to stay calm and professional when followers overreact to a negative evaluation. The leader must be specific in stating the deficiency, calmly explain- ing the impact of poor performance on team or organizational objectives, involving the follower in identifying the reasons for negative evaluation, and work with the follower to suggest remedies for change. At the conclusion of an evaluation session, the follower must come away believing that the leader showed a genuine desire to be of help and that both parties mutually agreed on specific action steps for improvement. The follower’s self-con- fidence should remain intact or be enhanced through evaluation and feedback, rather than being shattered. This is an indication that not only was the evaluation done well, but the feedback between the leader and follower was equally effective.104
An effective evaluation should accomplish three things:105
• Describe behavior, performance, and results the leader has observed. • Explain, illustrate, and support the leader’s conclusions. • Tell employees clearly what they are doing well and describe what they need to
improve.
Careful planning, execution, and monitoring of the process are required. Therefore, Exhibit 7.4 presents a three-step process for conducting successful evaluation; where planning is the pre-evaluation and feedback step, execution is the actual evaluation and feedback phase, and post-evaluation is the monitoring phase. We should note here that Chapter 6 has an expanded discussion on feedback. Other approaches for providing feed- back are presented as part of coaching.
WORk Application 7-9 Recall the last time you were evaluated on the job by your manager. Describe how you felt at the end of the session. What factors accounted for your feelings? See if some of the factors discussed in this section apply in your particular situation.
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 254 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 7 LEADEr–MEMBEr EXChANgE AND FoLLowErship 255
pre-evaluation and Feedback—Leader should:
• Have an agenda that specifies time and place • Gather accurate facts on follower performance
During evaluation and Feedback Session—Leader should:
• Be specific in stating performance deficiency • Explain negative impact of poor performance • Help follower identify reasons for poor performance • Ask follower to suggest remedies • Arrive at mutual agreement on specific action steps
post-evaluation and Feedback—Leader should:
• Follow up to ensure implementation of action steps • Show desire to be of help to follower • Build follower’s self-confidence
Effective Evaluation and Feedback EXHIBIT 7.4
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
The chapter summar y is organized to answer the 8 learning outcomes for this chapter.
1 Describe the two subgroups that can form under VDL theory.
Leaders develop positive social exchanges with a select subset of followers known as the in-group. with another subgroup known as the out-group, leaders develop economic-based authority relationships. Leaders primar- ily use expert, referent, and reward power to influence members of the in-group. out-group members are more likely to be managed according to the requirements of the employment contract. As long as such compliance is forthcoming, the out-group follower receives the stan- dard benefits for the job (such as a salary) and no more.
2 Define the two kinds of relationships that can occur between a leader and followers under Leader–Member exchange theory.
Leaders form high-quality social exchanges (based on trust and liking) with some members and low-quality economic exchanges with others.
3 Describe the role of the leader and follower in influencing LMX relationships
the Leader’s role. The leader’s ability or willingness to develop a working relationship with a follower that goes
beyond an economic-based exchange (which is strictly contractual in nature) to a socially based exchange re- lationship (characterized by friendship, mutual trust, loy- alty, and respect between the leader and the follower) is critical in influencing the LMX relationship. other factors such as a leader’s resource strength, span of control, and ability to create a supportive work climate or environ- ment will also greatly influence LMX relationships.
the Follower’s role. proactive followers who want to influence LMX relationships with their leaders can em- ploy tactics such as impressions management, ingratia- tion and self-promotion.
4 Discuss the main criticisms of LMX theory. The main criticisms of LMX theory are measurement issues and attribution bias and its predictive power. The main instrument for measuring LMX quality is the LMX-7. A criticism of LMX-7 is that it determines the quality of the exchange relationship solely from the fol- lower’s perspective. The leader’s input is not taken into account. A second criticism of LMX is its attribution bias in favor of in-group members. given the variability in a leader’s treatment of in-group and out-group members, it is quite possible that a leader’s favorable impressions toward in-group members may well translate into fa- vorable performance evaluations and feedback for such
Chapter Summary
“Take It To The Net”. Access student resources at www.cengagebrain.com. Search for Lussier, Leadership 6e to find student study tools.
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 255 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
256 part 2 TEAM LEADErship
members. Finally, there have been criticisms of the pre- dictive power of LMX theory. For example, the research evidence on staff turnover is mix at best and reserva- tions about the performance measures used.
5 Describe the two behaviors identified in the Kelley model and the resulting five follower types.
Using a combination of two types of behavior— independent critical thinking and level of involvement in organizational affairs—Kelley groups followers into five categories. The independent critical-thinking variable is on a continuum from low to high and the level of involvement on a continuum from low to high as well. The five basic follower types are: alienated, passive, conformist, pragmatic, and effective follower.
6 Briefly describe the three factors than can enhance a follower’s influence.
The three follower-influencing characteristics are: (1) relative power position—leaders need to realize that followers also have the power to influence them. (2) Locus of control—followers can have an internal or
external locus of control, based on their belief about who is the master of their destiny. Thus, leader–member exchanges should be different based on locus of control. (3) Education and experience— leaders need to realize that followers may have different levels of education and experience and that they need to supervise them differently.
7 List five things a leader should delegate. A leader should delegate paperwork, routine tasks, technical matters, tasks with developmental potential, and employees’ own problems.
8 an effective evaluation should accomplish at least three things. Name them.
An effective evaluation should:
• Describe behavior, performance, and results the leader has observed
• Explain, illustrate, and support the leader’s conclusions • Tell employees clearly what they are doing well and
describe what they need to improve.
alienated follower, 242
conformist follower, 241
delegation, 249
delegation model, 252
dyad, 232
dyadic theory, 232
effective follower, 242
follower, 240
followership, 240
impressions management, 237
ingratiation, 237
in-group, 232
leader–member exchange (LMX), 234
locus of control, 247
organizational citizenship behavior, 236
out-group, 233
passive follower, 241
pragmatic follower, 242
self-efficacy, 243
self-promotion, 237
social capital, 238
social identity 236
Key terms
1 What are the differences between in-groups and out-groups?
2 How do high-quality leader–member exchange relation- ships influence follower behavior?
3 Describe the inherent bias of LMX theory and how it can lead to unintended consequences.
4 How do education and experience, described as follower- influencing characteristics, affect effective followership?
5 What are some of the benefits of delegating?
6 What are some things that a leader should not delegate?
review Questions
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 256 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Critical-thinking Questions
The following critical-thinking questions can be used for class discussion and/or as written assignments to develop commu- nication skills. Be sure to give complete explanations for all questions.
1 In your opinion, can a leader maintain a personal friend- ship with some members of his or her work group or team without creating the perception of in-groups (those in his or her social circle) and out-groups (those outside his or her social circle)?
2 What should a leader do to dispel any notion or misper- ception that there are in-groups and out-groups in his or her work unit?
3 High-quality LMX relationships create a circle of reciproc- ity where followers feel like they should go the extra mile for a leader who supports them and the leader feels like he or she should offer the followers more support and
benefits to keep their loyalty. Do you believe this is the case in the real world or is it something different?
4 Movies dealing with the prison or college environment often depict one or two prisoners or students who seem to have more influence over other prisoners or students than even the guards or administrators. Can you think of one such case and explain why the individual was influen- tial over other prisoners or students?
5 What do you say to those who argue that tactics used by followers to get noticed by their leader (such as impres- sions management, ingratiation, and self-promotion) are shameful and self-serving and should be avoided?
6 Can someone have a successful career by aspiring to be an effective follower? Explain.
7 As a leader, how will you motivate the alienated follower?
Chapter 7 LEADEr–MEMBEr EXChANgE AND FoLLowErship 257
C A S E
W. L. Gore & Associates
Terri Kelly is the president and CEO of W. L. Gore & Associates. For the past 16 years, Gore has consistently been named among the “100 Best Companies to Work For” in the United States by Fortune magazine. Gore is now one of only a few companies to appear on all of the U.S. “100 Best Companies to Work For” lists since its initiation in 1984. In a recent interview, Ms. Kelly was asked what would be the most distinctive elements of the Gore management model to an outsider. She listed four factors: “We don’t operate in a hierarchy; we try to resist titles; our associates, who are all owners in the company, self-commit to what they want to do; and our leaders have positions of authority because they have followers.” According to CEO Kelly, these four attributes enable Gore to maximize individual potential while cultivat- ing an environment that fosters creativity and also to operate with high integrity. She is quick to remind everyone that all of Gore’s practices and ways of doing business reflect the innova- tive and entrepreneurial spirit of its founders.
Those founders are Bill and Vieve Gore, who in 1958 set out to create a business where innovation was a way of life and not a by-product. They founded W. L. Gore & Associates. There is no doubt that the Gores’ vision has been realized. Gore is a uniquely managed, privately owned, family business. Today Gore
is best known for its Gore-Tex range of high-performance fab- rics and Elixir Strings for guitars. Gore is the leading manufac- turer of thousands of advanced technology products for the medical, electronics, industrial, and fabrics markets. With annual revenues of $3.2 billion, the company employs more than 10,000 employees, called associates at more than 50 facilities around the world. Gore is truly a modern day success story.
CEO Kelly attributes Gore’s success to its unique culture. How work is conducted at Gore and how employees relate to one another sets Gore apart. There are no titles, no bosses, and no formal hierarchy. Compensation and promotion deci- sions are determined by peer rankings of each other’s perfor- mance. To avoid dampening employee creativity, the company has an organizational structure and culture that goes against conventional wisdom. W. L. Gore & Associates has been described as not only unmanaged but also unstructured. Bill Gore (the founder) referred to the company’s structure as a “lattice organization.”
Gore’s lattice structure includes the following features:106
• Direct lines of communication—person to person— with no intermediary
• No fixed or assigned authority
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 257 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
258 part 2 TEAM LEADErship
• Sponsors, not bosses • Natural leadership as evidenced by the willingness of
others to follow • Objectives set by those who must “make them
happen” • Tasks and functions organized through commitments • Complete avoidance of the hierarchical command
and control structure
The lattice structure as described by the people at Gore encourages hands-on innovation and discourages bureau- cratic red tape by involving those closest to a project in deci- sion making. Instead of a pyramid of bosses and managers, Gore has a flat organizational structure. There are no chains of command, no predetermined channels of communica- tion. It sounds very much like a self-managed team at a much broader scale.
Why has Gore achieved such remarkable success? W. L. Gore & Associates prefers to think of the various people who play key roles in the organization as being leaders, not managers. While Bill Gore did not believe in smother- ing the company in thick layers of formal management, he also knew that as the company grew, he had to find ways to assist new people and to follow their progress. Thus, W. L. Gore & Associates came up with its “sponsor” program. The sponsor program is a dyadic relationship between an incumbent, experienced employee and a newly hired, inex- perienced employee. Before a candidate is hired, an associate has to agree to be his or her sponsor or what others refer to as a mentor. The sponsor’s role is to take a personal inter- est in the new associate’s contributions, problems, and goals, acting as both a coach and an advocate. The sponsor tracks the new associate’s progress, offers help and encouragement, points out weaknesses and suggests ways to correct them, and concentrates on how the associate might better exploit his or her strengths.
Sponsoring is not a short-term commitment. All associates have sponsors, and many have more than one. When individu- als are hired, at first they are likely to have a sponsor in their immediate work area. As associates’ commitments change or grow, it’s normal for them to acquire additional sponsors. For instance, if they move to a new job in another area of the company, they typically gain a sponsor there. Sponsors help associates char t a course in the organization that will offer personal fulfillment while maximizing their contribution to the enterprise. Leaders emerge naturally by demonstrating spe- cial knowledge, skill, or experience that advances a business objective.
An internal memo describes the three kinds of sponsor- ship and how they might work:
• Starting sponsor—a sponsor who helps a new associate get star ted on his or her first job at Gore, or helps a present associate get star ted on a new job.
• advocate sponsor—a sponsor who sees to it that the associate being sponsored gets credit and recog- nition for contributions and accomplishments.
• Compensation sponsor—a sponsor who sees to it that the associate being sponsored is fairly paid for contributions to the success of the enterprise.
An associate can perform any one or all three kinds of sponsorship. Quite frequently, a sponsoring associate is a good friend, and it’s not uncommon for two associates to sponsor each other as advocates.
Being an associate is a natural commitment to four basic principles ar ticulated by Bill Gore and still a key belief of the company: fairness to each other and ever yone we come in contact with; freedom to encourage, help, and allow other as- sociates to grow in knowledge, skill, and scope of responsibility; the ability to make one’s own commitments and keep them; and consultation with other associates before undertaking ac- tions that could affect the reputation of the company.
Over the years, W. L. Gore & Associates has faced a num- ber of unionization drives. The company neither tries to dis- suade associates from attending organizational meetings nor retaliates against associates who pass out union flyers. How- ever, Bill Gore believes there is no need for third-par ty rep- resentation under the lattice structure. He asks, “Why would associates join a union when they own the company? It seems rather absurd.”
Commitment is seen as a two-way street at W. L. Gore & Associates—while associates are expected to commit to making a contribution to the company’s success, the com- pany is committed to providing a challenging, oppor tunity- rich work environment, and reasonable job security. The company tries to avoid laying off associates. If a workforce reduction becomes necessary, the company uses a system of temporar y transfers within a plant or cluster of plants, and requests voluntar y layoffs. According to CEO Kelly, Gore’s structure, systems, and culture have continued to yield im- pressive results for the company. In the more than 50 years that Gore has been in business, it has never made a loss.107
G O t O t h e I N t e r N e t : To learn more about W. L. Gore & Associates, visit its Web site (http://www .gore.com).
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 258 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 7 LEADEr–MEMBEr EXChANgE AND FoLLowErship 259
Support your answers to the following questions with spe- cific information from the case and text or with other informa- tion you get from the Web or other sources.
1. What theories from this chapter are revealed through the case?
2. How did Gore’s “sponsors” program facilitate the cre- ation of high-quality relationships among leaders, spon- sors, and associates?
3. Evaluate followership at W. L. Gore & Associates. What company actions and/or policies account for the quality of followership?
C U M U L a t I V e C a S e Q U e S t I O N S
4. Would you char acter ize the leader ship style at W. L. Gore & Associates as job-centered or employee- centered (Chapter 3)? Suppor t your answer.
5. Based on the types of power discussed in the text, what type(s) of power do sponsors have in their relationships with associates (Chapter 5)?
6. What role, if any, does coaching play in W. L. Gore’s lattice structure (Chapter 6)?
C a S e e X e r C I S e a N D r O L e - p L a Y
preparation: You are part of an organization that evaluates its employees at the end of each year. The month of the year when evaluations need to be completed by all leaders and managers is approaching. Your task is to play the role of a leader evaluating your followers, and then play the role of follower being evaluated by your own manager. Based on your understanding of the discussion of guidelines for effective leader feedback and guidelines for effective followership, (1) present a scenario of an effective and an ineffective feedback session, applying at least three of the guidelines discussed in the text and (2) present a scenario of effective and ineffective followership, applying at least three of the guidelines discussed in the text.
role-play: The instructor forms students into leader–fol- lower pairs and has each pair dramatize scenarios 1 and 2 in front of the rest of the class. After each scenario, the class is to contrast the two approaches (effective versus ineffective feedback) by identifying the guidelines that the presenters or actors employed in making their points. Different student teams should try the exercise by employing different guidelines to both scenarios.
Detroit native Everett Kircher moved to nor thern Michigan in 1947 and purchased land (for the price of $1) necessary to start his first ski resort known to- day as Boyne Mountain. Kircher practiced a traditional chain of command in a ver tical organizational structure. Every de- cision came from his desk. As his company expanded, addi- tional people were needed to manage the different locations. For Kircher, it was the beginning of a par tial decentralization and delegation of his leadership and decision making. In 2002, Everett Kircher died at the age of 85, but his legacy lives on. The company’s reorganization in 2004 paved the way for the “Boyne Brand” to grow while maintaining organizational
integrity. General managers were hired at each resor t loca- tion to oversee operations. In addition, vice presidents known as “subject matter exper ts” were hired. The VPs share critical information with the general managers to help each resor t operation. The general managers fold these exper ts into the decision-making process and help provide policy.
1. Describe leader–follower relations at Boyne USA Resor ts.
2. Why was decentralization and delegation necessary to Boyne’s future despite the success with Everett Kircher at the helm of a ver tical structure?
V i D E o C A s E
Delegation at Boyne USA Resorts
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 259 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
260 part 2 TEAM LEADErship
7-1
preparing for this exercise Based on your reading of effective leader–member exchange relationships, how can you improve your current or future rela- tionship with your manager?
Be sure to list specific things you plan to do.
Based on Self-Assessment 7-4 on page 243, “Effective Fol lowers,” how can you improve your followership skills with your present or future manager? Be sure to list specific things you plan to do.
Doing this exercise in Class
Objective
To develop a plan to improve your dyadic relationship with your manager and to improve your followership skills
aaCSB General Skills area
The primary AACSB learning standard skills developed through this exercise are reflective thinking and analytic skills.
preparation
You should have completed a plan in the preparation part of this exercise.
experience
You will share your plan in a small group to provide further development.
procedure 1 (8–12 minutes) Option A: Break into groups of three or four and share your plans. Offer each other ideas for improving plans.
Option B: Same as Option A, but add a spokesperson to record some of the best ideas from each group member.
procedure 2 (10–20 minutes) Option B, each spokesperson repor ts to the entire class.
Conclusion
The instructor leads a class discussion and/or makes concluding remarks.
apply It (2–4 minutes) What did I learn from this exercise? When will I implement my plan?
Sharing
In the group, or to the entire class, volunteers may give their answers to the “Apply It” questions.
Improving Dyadic Relationships—Followership
Developing Your Leadership skills
1 Read the section, “Delegation,” in this chapter (to learn how to use Model 7.1, page 253).
2 Watch Behavior Model Video 7.1, “Delegating.”
3 Complete Developing Your Leadership Skills Exercise 2 (to develop your delegating skills).
For further practice, use the delegation model in your personal and professional life.
Step 1 Explain the need for delegating and the reasons for selecting the employee.
Step 2 Set objectives that define responsibility, level of authority, and deadline.
Step 3 Develop a plan.
Step 4 Establish control checkpoints and hold employees accountable.
In this behavior model skills training session, you will perform three activities:
Behavior Model skills Training
The Delegation Model
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 260 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 7 LEADEr–MEMBEr EXChANgE AND FoLLowErship 261
7-2
preparing for this exercise You should have read and understood the material on delegation.
Doing this exercise in Class
Objective
To experience and develop skills in delegating a task
aaCSB General Skills area
The primary AACSB skill developed through this exercise is analytic skills and application of knowledge.
experience
You will delegate, be delegated to, and observe the delegation of a task, and then evaluate the effectiveness of the delegated task. You may also see a video example of how to delegate using the delegation model.
procedure 1 (4–8 minutes) Break into as many groups of three as possible, with the remainder in groups of two. Each person in the group picks a number 1, 2, or 3. Number 1 will be the first to delegate a task, then 2, and then 3. The level of difficulty of the delegation will increase with the number.
Each person then reads his or her delegation situation below (1, 2, or 3) and plans how he or she will delegate the task. If you prefer, you can use an actual delegation from a past or present job. Just be sure to fully explain the situation to the delegatee. Be sure to follow the four delegation steps in this chapter. An observer sheet is included at the end of this exercise for giving feedback on each delegation.
Delegation Situation 1
Delegator 1, you are a college student with a paper due in three days for your 10:00 a.m. class. It must be typed. You don’t type well, so you have decided to hire someone to do it for you. The going rate is $1.50 per page. Think of an actual paper you have written in the past or will write in the future. Plan to delegate. Be sure to include the course name, paper title, special typing instructions, and so on. Assume that you are meeting the typ-
ist for the first time. He or she doesn’t know you and doesn’t expect you.
Delegator 2, assume that you do typing and are willing to do the job if the delegation is acceptable to you.
Delegation Situation 2
Delegator 2, you are the manager of a fast-food restaurant. In the past, you have scheduled the workers. Your policy is to keep changing the workers’ schedules. You have decided to delegate the scheduling to your assistant manager. This person has never done any scheduling but appears to be very willing and confi- dent about taking on new responsibility. Plan your delegation.
Delegator 3, assume that you are interested in doing the scheduling if the manager delegates the task effectively.
Delegation Situation 3
Delegator 3, you own and manage your own business. You have eight employees, one of whom is the organization’s secretary. The secretary currently uses an old computer, which needs to be replaced. You have not kept up with the latest technology and don’t know what to buy. You can spend $1,200. You try to keep costs down and get the most for your money. Because the secretary will use the new machine, you believe that this employee should be involved or maybe even make the decision. The secretary has never purchased equipment, and you believe he or she will be somewhat insecure about the assignment. Plan your delegation.
Delegator 1, assume that you are able to do the job but are somewhat insecure. Accept the task if the delegator “par- ticipates” effectively.
procedure 2 (7–10 minutes)
a. Delegation 1. Delegator 1 delegates the task (role-play) to number 2. Number 3 is the observer. As the delegation takes place, the observer uses the form at the end of this exercise to provide feedback on the effectiveness of the delegator. Answer the questions on the form.
b. Integration. The observer (or number 3) leads a discussion of the effectiveness of the delegation, although all team
Delegating
Developing Your Leadership skills
7.1
Objective
To observe a manager delegating a task to an employee
Video (4½ minutes) Overview You will watch a production manager, Steve, delegate the completion of a production output form to Dale.
Delegating
Behavior Model Video
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 261 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
262 part 2 TEAM LEADErship
members should par ticipate. Do not continue until you are told to do so.
procedure 3 (7–10 minutes)
a. Delegation 2. Follow procedure 2A, except number 2 is now the delegator, number 3 is the delegatee, and num- ber 1 is the observer.
b. Integration. Follow procedure 2B with number 1 as the observer. Do not continue until you are told to do so.
procedure 4 (7–10 minutes)
a. Delegation 3. Follow procedure 2A, except number 3 is now the delegator, number 1 is the delegatee, and num- ber 2 is the observer. If you are in a group of two, be an additional observer for another group.
b. Integration. Follow procedure 2B with number 2 as the observer.
Conclusion
The instructor may lead a class discussion and make concluding remarks.
apply It (2–4 minutes) What did I learn from this experience? When will I delegate using the model?
Sharing
In the group, or to the entire class, volunteers may give their answers to the “Apply It” questions.
Note: Remember that the process does not end with del- egating the task; you must control (check progress at control points and help when needed) to ensure that the task is com- pleted as scheduled.
OBSerVer FOrM
During the delegation process, the observer checks off the items performed by the delegators. Items not checked were not performed. After the delegation, the delegator and delegatee also check off the items.
This sheet is used for all three situations. Use the appropriate column for each situation.
Situation Delegation items for all situations 1 2 3
Did the delegator follow these steps?
Step 1. Explain the need for delegating and the reasons for selecting the person.
Step 2. Set an objective that defines responsibility, level of authority, and deadline.
Step 3. Develop a plan.
Step 4. Establish control checkpoints and hold the person accountable.
process
Did the delegate clearly understand what was expected of him or her and know how to follow the plan?
Improvements
How could the delegation be improved if done again?
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 262 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 7 LEADEr–MEMBEr EXChANgE AND FoLLowErship 263
1 C. Guglielmo, “Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg Tops Apple’s Tim Cook as Best CEO of 2013,” Forbes.com (March 15, 2013): 6; Mac R. “Mark Zuckerberg’s Net Wor th Up $3.7 Billion as Facebook Shares Soar Following Earnings,” Forbes.com (July 25, 2013): 14; R. Stengel, “Person of the Year,” Time (December 15, 2010); J. A. Vargas, “The Face of Facebook,” The New Yorker (September, 20, 2010); “M. Zuckerberg,” New York Times (January 3, 2011).
2 B. J. Avolio, “Promoting More Integrative Strategies for Leadership Theory Building,” American Psychologist 62 (2007): 25–33; G. B. Graen & M. Uhl-Bien, “Relationship-Based Approach to Leadership: Development of Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership over 25 Years: Applying a Multi-Level Multi-Domain Perspective,” Leadership Quarterly 6 (1995): 219–247; G. B. Graen & T. A. Scandura, “Toward a Psychology of Dyadic Organizing: Research in Organizational Behavior,” In L. L. Cummings & B. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior 9 (1987): 175–208.
3 T. Smith & B. Kirkman, “Understanding Leadership: The Followers’ Influence on Leader Effectiveness,” Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, (January 2012): 1.
4 T. Rockstuhl, A. Soon, J. Dulebohn, & L. Shore, “Leader– Member Exchange (LMX) and Culture: A Meta-Analysis of Correlates of LMX across 23 Countries,” Journal of Applied Psychology 97(6) (November 2012): 1097–1130.
5 J. Shweta, & J. Srirang, “Leader-Member Exchange: A Critique of Theory & Practice,” Journal of Management & Public Policy 4(2) (June 2013): 42–53.
6 D. Sluss & B. Thompson, “Socializing the Newcomer : The Mediating Role of Leader–Member Exchange,” Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 119(1) (September 2012): 114–125.
7 R. Zhang, L. Tsingan, & L. Zhang, “Role Stressors and Job Attitudes: A Mediated Model of Leader–Member Exchange,” Journal of Social Psychology 153(5) (September 2013): 560–576.
8 J. DeConinck, “The Effects of Leader-Member Exchange and Organizational Identification on Performance and Turnover among Salespeople,” Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management 31(1) (Winter 2011): 21–34.
9 J. Volmer, D. Spurk, & C. Niessen, “Leader–Member Exchange (LMX), Job Autonomy, and Creative Work Involvement,” Leadership Quarterly 23(3) (June 2012): 456–465.
10 M. Biron & C. Boon. “Performance and Turnover Intentions: A Social Exchange Perspective,” Journal of Managerial Psychology 28(5) (September 2013): 511–531.
11 L. Raymond, M. Yina, & N. Hang-yue, “Linking Leader- Member Exchange and Employee Work Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Organizational Social and Economic Exchange,” Management & Organization Review 5(3) (2009): 401–422.
12 G. B. Graen & M. Uhl-Bien, “Relationship-Based Approach to Leadership: Development of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership over 25 Years: Applying a Multi-Level Multi-Domain Perspective,” Leadership Quarterly 6 (1995): 219–247.
13 A. Perumalu, I. Kandan, & I. Ali, “A Correlation Study of Leader-Member Exchange and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in a Public Sector Organization,” Journal of Global Business & Economics 1(1) (2010): 62–78.
14 D. S. Kang & J. Stewar t, “Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership and HRD: Development of Units of Theory and Laws of Interaction,” Leadership & Organizational Journal 28(6) (2007): 531–551.
15 J. Manzoni & J. Barsoux, The Set-Up-to-Fail Syndrome: How Good Managers Cause Great People to Fail (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2002).
16 F. Dansereau, G. B. Graen, & W. J. Haga, “A Vertical Dyad Linkage Approach to Leadership within Formal Organizations,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 13 (1975): 46–78.
17 G. B. Graen, M. A. Novak, & P. Sommerkamp, “The Effects of Leader-Member Exchange and Job Design on Productivity and Satisfaction: Testing the Dual Attachment Model,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 30 (1982): 109–131.
18 R. C. Liden & G. B. Graen, “Generalizability of the Vertical Dyad Linkage Model of Leadership.” Academy of Management Journal 23(3), 451–465.
19 C. A. Schriessheim, S. L. Castro, X. Zhou, & F. J. Yamarino, “The Folly of Theorizing “A” but Testing “B”: A Selective Level-of-Analysis View of the Field and Detailed Leader- Member Exchange Illustrations,” Leadership Quarterly (Winter 2001): 515–551.
20 D. Krasikova & J. LeBreton, “Just the Two of Us: Misalignment of Theory and Methods in Examining Dyadic Phenomena.” Journal of Applied Psychology 97(4) (July 2012): 739–757.
21 W. van Breukelen, R. van der Leeden, W. Wesselius, & M. Hoes, “Differential Treatment within Sports Teams, Leader-Member (Coach-Player) Exchange Quality, Team Atmosphere, and Team Performance,” Journal of Organizational Behavior 33(1) (January 2012): 43–63.
endnotes
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 263 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
264 part 2 TEAM LEADErship
22 V. Fernandez, P. Simo, M. Enache, & J. Sallan. “The Frequency of the Dyadic Influence Tactics according to Communication Media,” Behaviour & Information Technology 31(6) (June 2012): 577–586.
23 J. Volmer, C. Niessen, D. Spurk, A. Linz, & A. Abele, “Reciprocal Relationships between Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) and Job Satisfaction: A Cross-Lagged Analysis,” Applied Psychology: An International Review 60(4) (October 2011): 522–545.
24 A. Joshi, H. Liao, & S. Jackson, “Cross-Level Effects of Workplace Diversity on Sales Performance and Pay,” Academy of Management Journal 49(3) (2006): 459–481.
25 B. Erdogan, R. Liden, & L. Kraimer, “Justice and Leader– Member Exchange: The Moderating Role of Organizational Culture,” Academy of Management Journal 149 (2006): 395–406.
26 B. Kuvaas, R. Buch, A. Dysvik, & T. Haerem, “Economic and Social Leader–Member Exchange Relationships and Follower Performance,” Leadership Quarterly 23(5) (October 2012): 756–765.
27 J. B. Wu, A. S. Tsui, & A. J. Kinicki, “Consequences of Differentiated Leadership in Groups,” Academy of Management Journal 53(1) (2010): 90–106.
28 R. L Loi, Y. M. Mao, & H. Ngo, “Linking Leader-Member Exchange and Employee Work Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Organizational Social and Economic Exchange,” Management & Organization Review 5(3) (2009): 401–422.
29 R. Zhang, L. Tsingan, & L. Zhang, “Role Stressors and Job Attitudes: A Mediated Model of Leader-Member Exchange,” Journal of Social Psychology 153(5) (September 2013):560– 576; D. Ariani, “Leader-Member Exchanges as a Mediator of the Effect of Job Satisfaction on Affective Organizational Commitment: An Empirical Test,” International Journal of Management 29(1) (March 2012): 46–56; T. Rockstuhl, A. Soon, J. Dulebohn, & L. Shore, “Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) and Culture: A Meta-Analysis of Correlates of LMX across 23 Countries,” Journal of Applied Psychology 97(6) (November 2012): 1097–1130; J. Volmer, C. Niessen, D. Spurk, A. Linz, & A. Abele, “Reciprocal Relationships between Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) and Job Satisfaction: A Cross-Lagged Analysis,” Applied Psychology: An International Review 60(4) (October 2011): 522–545; M. Biron & C. Boon, “Performance and Turnover Intentions: A Social Exchange Perspective,” Journal of Managerial Psychology 28(5) (September 2013): 511–531; J. Shweta & J. Srirang, “Leader-Member Exchange: A Critique of Theory & Practice,” Journal of Management & Public Policy 4(2) (June 2013): 42–45; J. Volmer, D. Spurk, & C. Niessen, “Leader–Member Exchange (LMX), Job Autonomy, and
Creative Work Involvement,” Leadership Quarterly 23(3) (June 2012): 456–465.
30 J. Volmer, C. Niessen, D. Spurk, A. Linz, & A. Abele, “Reciprocal Relationships between Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) and Job Satisfaction: A Cross-Lagged Analysis,” Applied Psychology: An International Review 60(4) (October 2011): 522–545.
31 K. M. Sherony & S. G. Green, “Co-Worker Exchange Relationships between Co-Workers, Leader-Member Exchange, and Work Attitudes,” Journal of Applied Psychology 87(3) (2002): 542–548.
32 T. Rockstuhl, A. Soon, J. Dulebohn, & L. Shore, “Leader- Member Exchange (LMX) and Culture: A Meta-Analysis of Correlates of LMX across 23 Countries,” Journal of Applied Psychology 97(6) (November 2012): 1097–1130.
33 F. Walumbwa, R. Cropanzano, & B. Goldman, “How Leader-Member Exchange Influences Effective Work Behaviors: Social Exchange and Internal-External Efficacy Perspectives,” Personnel Psychology 64(3) (September 2011): 739–770.
34 M. Biron & C. Boon, “Performance and Turnover Intentions: A Social Exchange Perspective,” Journal of Managerial Psychology 28(5) (September 2013): 511–531.
35 T. Rockstuhl, A. Soon, J. Dulebohn, & L. Shore, “Leader- Member Exchange (LMX) and Culture: A Meta-Analysis of Correlates of LMX across 23 Countries,” Journal of Applied Psychology 97(6) (November 2012): 1097–1130.
36 E. Jackson & R. Johnson, “When Opposites Do (and Do Not) Attract: Interplay of Leader and Follower Self- Identities and Its Consequences for Leader–Member Exchange,” Leadership Quarterly 23(3) (June 2012): 488–501.
37 J. DeConinck, “The Effects of Leader-Member Exchange and Organizational Identification on Performance and Turnover among Salespeople,” Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management 31(1) (Winter 2011): 21–34.
38 M. Farrell & E. Oczkowski, “Organisational Identification and Leader Member Exchange Influences on Customer Orientation and Organisational Citizenship Behaviours,” Journal of Strategic Marketing 20(4) (July 2012): 365–377.
39 S. M. S. Malar, “Right Attitude: Grab It!” IUP Journal of Soft Skills 3 (September 2009): 19–25.
40 J. Westphal, S. Park, M. McDonald, & M. Hayward, “Helping Other CEOs Avoid Bad Press: Social Exchange and Impression Management Suppor t among CEOs in Communications with Journalists,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 57(2) (June 2012): 217–268.
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 264 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 7 LEADEr–MEMBEr EXChANgE AND FoLLowErship 265
41 W. Lam, X. Huang, & E. Snape, “Feedback Seeking Behavior and Leader–Member Exchange: Do Supervisor Attributed Motives Matter?” Academy of Management Journal 50 (2007): 348–363.
42 D. Paulhus, B. Westlake, S. Calvez, & P. Harms, “Self- Presentation Style in Job Interviews: The Role of Personality and Culture,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 43(10) (October 2013): 2042–2059.
43 J. Volmer, C. Niessen, D. Spurk, A. Linz, & A. Abele, “Reciprocal Relationships between Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) and Job Satisfaction: A Cross-Lagged Analysis,” Applied Psychology: An International Review 60(4) (October 2011): 522–545.
44 L. Wu, H. Kwan, L. Wei, & J. Liu, “Ingratiation in the Workplace: The Role of Subordinate and Supervisor Political Skill,” Journal of Management Studies 50(6) (September 2013): 991–1017.
45 C. Sue-Chan, A. Au, & R. Hackett, “Trust as a Mediator of the Relationship between Leader/Member Behavior and Leader-Member-Exchange Quality,” Journal of World Business 47(3) (July 2012): 459–468.
46 F. Walumbwa, R. Cropanzano, & B. Goldman, “How Leader- Member Exchange Influences Effective Work Behaviors: Social Exchange and Internal-External Efficacy Perspectives,” Personnel Psychology 64(3) (September 2011): 739–770.
47 J. Shweta & J. Srirang, “Leader-Member Exchange: A Critique of Theory & Practice,” Journal of Management & Public Policy 4(2) (June 2013): 42–53.
48 E. L. Mouriño-Ruiz, “Leader-Member Exchange (LMX): The Impact of Leader-Employee Relationships in the 21st Century Workplace (Implications for Research on Latinos in the Workforce),” The Business Journal of Hispanic Research 4(1) (2010): 35–42.
49 J. Volmer, C. Niessen, D. Spurk, A. Linz, & A. Abele, “Reciprocal Relationships between Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) and Job Satisfaction: A Cross-Lagged Analysis,” Applied Psychology: An International Review 60(4) (October 2011): 522–545.
50 M. Brewer, “The Importance of Being We: Human Nature and Intergroup Relations,” The American Psychologist 62 (2007): 728–738.
51 H. Oh, M.-H. Chung, & G. Labianca, “Group Social Capital and Group Effectiveness: The Role of Informal Socializing Ties,” Academy of Management Review 4(7) (2004): 860–875.
52 E. McKenna, Business Psychology and Organizational Behavior (5/e) (Hove & New York: Psychology Press, 2012).
53 J. Dulebohn, W. Bommer, R. Liden, R. Brouer, & G. Ferris, “A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Consequences of Leader-Member Exchange: Integrating the Past with an Eye toward the Future,” Journal Of Management 38(6) (November 2012): 1715–1759.
54 T. Smith & B. Kirkman, “Understanding Leadership: The Followers’ Influence on Leader Effectiveness,” Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings (Januar y 2012): 1.
55 I. Chaleff, The Courageous Follower: Standing up to and for Our Leaders (2nd ed.) (San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc, 2003); B. Kellerman, “Followership: How Followers Are Creating Change and Changing Leaders” (Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press, 2004).
56 R. Jerry, II., “Leadership and Followership,” University of Toledo Law Review 44(2) (Winter 2013): 345–354.
57 W. Bennis, “Art of Followership,” Leadership Excellence 27(1) (January 2010): 3–4.
58 C. Crippen, “Enhancing Authentic Leadership–Followership: Strengthening School Relationships,” Management in Education (Sage Publications, Ltd.) 26(4) (October 2012): 192–198.
59 J. Whitlock, “The Value of Active Followership,” Nursing Management–UK 20(2) (May 2013): 20–23.
60 D. Kirchhubel, “Effective ‘Followership’ How to Manage Upwards,” Manager : British Journal of Administrative Management (72) (Fall 2010): 18.
61 H. Greyvenstein & F. Cilliers, “Followership’s Experiences of Organisational Leadership: A Systems Psychodynamic Perspective,” South African Journal of Industrial Psychology 38(2) (June 2012): 1–10.
62 R. E. Kelley, Power of Followership: How to Create Leaders People Want to Follow and Followers Who Want to Lead Themselves, (New York: Doubleday, 1991).
63 I. Cox, G. Plagens, & K. Sylla, “The Leadership-Followership Dynamic: Making the Choice to Follow,” International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences 5(8) (December 2010): 37–51.
64 R. E. Kelley, The Power of Followership (New York: Doubleday, 1992).
65 I. Chaleff, “Courageous Followers,” Leadership Excellence 28(4) (April 2011): 19.
66 I. Chaleff, “The Courageous Follower : Standing Up to and for Our Leaders, Third Edition,” T+D 64(2) (February 2010): 75.
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 265 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
266 part 2 TEAM LEADErship
67 J. Kohles, M. Bligh, & M. Carsten, A Follower-Centric Approach to the Vision Integration Process,” Leadership Quarterly 23(3) (June 2012): 476–487.
68 R. Kelley, “In Praise of Followers,” Harvard Business Review (November–December 1988): 142–148.
69 M. Carsten, M. Uhl-Bien, B. West, J. Patera, & R. McGregor, “Exploring Social Constructions of Followership: A Qualitative Study,” Leadership Quarterly 21(3) (June 2010): 543–562.
70 B. Kellerman, “What Every Leader Needs to Know about Followers,” Harvard Business Review 85 (December 2007): 84–91.
71 R. E. Kelley, “In Praise of Followers,” Harvard Business Review (November/December 1988): 142–148.
72 M. Carsten, M. Uhl-Bien, B. West, J. Patera, & R. McGregor, “Exploring Social Constructions of Followership: A Qualitative Study,” Leadership Quarterly 21(3) (June 2010): 543–562.
73 B. Kaufman, “Speak Truth to Power,” Leadership Excellence 28(6) (June 2011): 6.
74 D.B. Zoogak, D.H. Agboh, & L. Leyland, “Determinants of Strategic Followership: An African Perspective,” Journal of International Business & Economics 10(4) (July 2010): 137–148.
75 J. M. Howell & B. Shamir, “The Role of Followers in the Charismatic Leadership Process: Relationships and Their Consequences,” Academy of Management Review 30(1) (2005): 96–112.
76 A. Bandura, “Self-Efficacy,” in V.S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81) (New York: Academic Press); repr. in H. Friedman [Ed.], Encyclopedia of Mental Health (San Diego: Academic Press, 1998).
77 S. Norman, B. Avolio, & F. Luthans, “The Impact of Positivity and Transparency on Trust in Leaders and Their Perceived Effectiveness,” Leadership Quarterly 21(3) (June 2010): 350–364.
78 C. Crippen, “Enhancing Authentic Leadership–Followership: Strengthening School Relationships,” Management in Education (Sage Publications, Ltd.) 26(4) (October 2012): 192–198.
79 D. Kirchhubel, “Effective ‘Followership’: How to Manage Upwards,” Manager : British Journal of Administrative Management (72) (Fall 2010): 18.
80 G. Abudi, “The Fine Art of Followership,” PM Network 24(10) (October 2010): 64–65.
81 A. J. DeLellis, “Clarifying the Concept of Respect: Implications for Leadership,” Journal of Leadership Studies 7 (Spring 2000): 2–37.
82 C. Thoroughgood, A. Padilla, S. Hunter, & B. Tate, “The Susceptible Circle: A Taxonomy of Followers Associated with Destructive Leadership,” Leadership Quarterly 23(5) (October 2012): 897–917.
83 A. Martinez, R. Kane, G. Ferris, & C. Brooks, “Power in Leader–Follower Work Relationships,” Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies (Sage Publications Inc.) 19(2) (May 2012): 142–151.
84 K. April, B. Dharani, & K. Peters, “Impact of Locus of Control Expectancy on Level of Well-Being,” Review of European Studies 4(2) (June 2012): 124–137.
85 D. Cavell, “Leadership or Followership: One or Both? All Successful Leaders Need Good Followers,” Healthcare Financial Management 61 (November 2007): 142–143.
86 P. M. Buhler, “Managing in the New Millennium: The Top Ten Managerial Mistakes,” Super vision 65 (August 2004): 15–18.
87 S. Chevrier & M. Viegas-Pires, “Delegating Effectively across Cultures,” Journal of World Business [serial online] 48(3) (July 2013): 431–439.
88 N. Lorinkova, M. Pearsall, & H. Sims Jr., “Examining the Differential Longitudinal Performance of Directive versus Empowering Leadership in Teams,” Academy of Management Journal 56(2) (April 2013): 573–596.
89 F. Csaszar & J. Eggers, “Organizational Decision Making: An Information Aggregation View,” Management Science 50(10) (October 2013): 2257–2277.
90 G. Charness, R. Cobo-Reyes, N. Jiménez, J. Lacomba, & F. Lagos, “The Hidden Advantage of Delegation: Pareto Improvements in a Gift Exchange Game,” American Economic Review 102(5) (August 2012): 2358–2379.
91 P. Danby, “Setting the Right Direction,” Business Strategy Review 20(4) (Winter 2009): 58–63.
92 C. Hymowitz, “A Vacationing Boss Should Take a Break; Let Staffers Step Up,” The Wall Street Journal (August 20, 2007): B1.
93 V. Thiele, “Subjective Performance Evaluations, Collusion, and Organizational Design,” Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 29(1) (February 2013): 35–59.
94 V. Thiele, “Subjective Performance Evaluations, Collusion, and Organizational Design,” Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 29(1) (February 2013): 35–59.
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 266 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 7 LEADEr–MEMBEr EXChANgE AND FoLLowErship 267
95 w w w. h u f f i n g t o n p o s t . c o m / . . . / t o m - c o b u r n - j o h n - ensign_n_861287.html, accessed May 25, 2011.
96 S. Chevrier & M. Viegas-Pires, “Delegating Effectively across Cultures,” Journal of World Business [serial online] 48(3) (July 2013): 431–439.
97 Q. Li, R. Zhou, H. Xiao, et al. “Pre-Training Evaluation and Feedback Improved Skills Retention of Basic Life Support in Medical Students,” Resuscitation 84(9) (September 2013): 1274–1278.
98 B. Krenn, S. Wuerth, & A. Hergovich, “Individual Differences Concerning the Impact of Feedback: Specifying the Role of Core Self-Evaluations,” Studia Psychologica 55(2) (April 2013): 95–110.
99 C. Westerman & D. Westerman, “What’s Fair? Public and Private Delivery of Project Feedback,” Journal of Business Communication 50(2) (April 2013): 190–207.
100 J. Kollée, S. Giessner, & D. van Knippenberg, “Leader Evaluations after Performance Feedback: The Role of Follower Mood,” Leadership Quarterly 24(1) (February 2013): 203–214.
101 C. Westerman, & D. Westerman, “What’s Fair? Public and Private Delivery of Project Feedback,” Journal of Business Communication 50(2) (April 2013): 190–207.
102 L. Darling-Hammond, “When Teachers Support & Evaluate Their Peers,” Educational Leadership 71 (2) (October 2013): 24–29.
103 A. Fisher, “Should Performance Reviews Be Crowdsourced?” Fortune.com [serial online] (October 9, 2013): 1.
104 R. Wolf, “Personal Feedback as a Tool for Good Management,” Mustang Journal of Business & Ethics (3) (August 2012): 113–121.
105 P.Harms, & D. Roebuck, “Teaching the Art and Craft of Giving and Receiving Feedback,” Business Communication Quarterly 73(4) (December 2010): 413–431.
106 Information taken from the W. L. Gore & Associates Web site: www.gore.com accessed July 8, 2008. Update to May 2011.
107 G. Hamel, “W. L. Gore: Lessons from a Management Revolutionary,” The Wall Street Journal (March 18, 2010); G. Hamel, “W. L. Gore: Lessons from a Management Revolutionary, Part 2,” The Wall Street Journal (April 2, 2010).
66352_ch07_ptg01_230-267.indd 267 10/15/14 12:55 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
2 6 8
Chapter
8
C h a p t e r O U t L I N e
The Use of Teams in Organizations
Is It a Group or a Team?
Benefits and Limitations of Teamwork
What Is an Effective Team?
Characteristics of Effective Teams
Team Leadership
Organizational Culture and Team Creativity
Types of Teams
Functional Team
Cross-Functional Team
Virtual Team
Self-Managed Team (SMT)
Decision Making in Teams
Normative Leadership Model
Team-Centered Decision-Making Model
Advantages and Disadvantages of Team-Centered Decision Making
Conducting Effective Team Meetings
Planning Meetings
Conducting Meetings
Handling Problem Members
Self-Managed Teams
The Nature of Self-Managed Teams
The Benefits of Self-Managed Teams
Top Management and Self- Managed Team Success
The Changing Role of Leadership in Self-Managed Teams
The Challenges of implementing Self-Managed Teams
Team Leadership and Self-Managed Teams
Learning Outcomes After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
1 Discuss the benefits and limitations of working in teams. p. 272
2 Identify and explain the ten characteristics of highly effective teams. p. 276
3 What role can a team leader play in creating an effective team? p. 279
4 Describe how organizational culture can influence team creativity. p. 281
5 Outline the three parts of conducting effective meetings. p. 291
6 Explain the differences between conventional and self- managed teams. p. 294
7 Describe the benefits of using self-managed teams in organizations. p. 295
8 Describe top management’s role in improving the success rate of self-managed teams. p. 296
9 Describe the challenges of implementing effective self-managed teams. p. 299
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 268 10/15/14 12:56 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 8 TEaM LEaDErShIp anD SELf-ManagED TEaMS 269
For more than four decades, Dallas-based Southwest Airlines continues to differentiate itself from other airlines with top-of-the-line customer ser vice delivered by more than 45,000 employees to more than 100 million custom- ers annually. Key to this success is Southwest’s teamwork and a people-centered culture. In his 2012 Southwest Airlines One Report, CEO Gary Kelly reiterated the com- pany’s team philosophy: “Our Employees are passionate about our Purpose to connect people . . . We couldn’t be who we are without our dedicated Employees.” As he puts it, at Southwest, “We believe in Living the Southwest Way, which is to have a Warrior Spirit, a Servant’s Hear t, and a Fun-LUVing Attitude.”
Southwest has an extensive training and development program for its employees that focuses on building their leadership and teamwork skills. The University for People and the Manager-in-Training (MIT) are two flagship pro- grams that make this possible. According to the company’s Web site, the University for People is a state-of-the-ar t training facility that offers employees training and devel- opment for every stage of their careers. Offerings include orientation sessions for hires, leadership for frontline and management-level employees, oral and written commu- nication, performance appraisals, and even a Myers-Briggs personality assessment to help teams better appreciate individual differences and work more cohesively.
The MIT program focuses on employees with high po- tential for leadership and interest in a long-term career at Southwest Airlines. MIT I is designed for employees at the super visor, team leader, and manager levels. MIT II is de- signed for managers and directors who aspire to higher leadership positions. Par ticipants learn how to become strategic leaders.
At Southwest, each depar tment has a dedicated team working together to create action plans to realize its mis- sion and vision. On May 3, 2013, CEO Kelly captured the essence of Southwest’s team approach with this closing statement in his annual repor t to employees and share- holders: “As we look to our future in building LUV (“LUV” is the ticker symbol for Southwest on the New York Stock Exchange), our priority is to maintain the excellence we have built . . . with our brand, Culture, Customer Ser vice, operational excellence, and consecutive annual profits. I am enthusiastic about our 2013 plan and believe our
transformation effor ts will make us better, stronger, and more competitive. And, the outstanding effor ts, commit- ment, and dedication of our People give me confidence in our ability to successfully execute our plan.” Southwest has ranked on Fortune’s World’s Most Admired Companies list ever y year since 1994. They upheld this record with the recent recognition in 2013 as the seventh most admired company in the world.1
OpeNING CaSe QUeStIONS:
1. What does it say about Gary Kelly’s leadership philosophy when he categorically proclaims, “Our people are our single greatest strength and most enduring long-term competitive advantage”?
2. How can you match our definition of team ef- fectiveness as a multivariable concept involving three components (task performance, group process, and individual satisfaction) to this statement by Mr. Kelly: “We believe in Living the Southwest Way, which is to have a Warrior Spirit, a Servant’s Heart, and a Fun-LUVing Attitude”?
3. What is the evidence that there is strong orga- nizational support for teamwork at Southwest?
4. In what way has Southwest shown that it under- stands the connection between team leadership and team success?
5. Southwest encourages its teams to be creative problem solvers. What are some examples of creative problem solving by Southwest teams?
6. Of the four types of teams discussed, which type(s) do you think Southwest is using?
7. Do you think Gary Kelly is the type of leader who would embrace the self-managed team con- cept? Explain your answer.
Can you answer any of these questions? You’ll find an- swers to these questions and learn more about Southwest Airlines and team leadership throughout the chapter.
To learn more about Gary Kelly and Southwest Airlines, visit Southwest’s Web site at http://www.southwest.com.
OPENING CASE application
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 269 10/15/14 12:56 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
270 part 2 TEaM LEaDErShIp
M any organizations have adopted the team approach in response to the growing trend toward eliminating functional boundaries common when work was mostly organized along functional or departmental lines.2,3 There is general agreement that functional boundaries tend to inhibit the f low of information
and limit opportunities for cross-functiona l cooperation and coordination.4 This limitation of the functional structure was also impacting another trend, which is the fact that many more value chain activities are conducted in project teams requiring input from employees with different expertise, background, education, and experience.5 The reason for this is the increasing realization that teams typically outperform individuals in tasks requiring multiple skills, abilities, and experiences. As a result, employers are requiring new hires to show evidence that they can function well in a team environment. Team leadership competency is now becoming a key requirement in hiring new leaders and managers.6
The first half of the chapter focuses on the team concept. We will discuss the growing use of teams in organizations, review some of the more popular types of teams, explore decision making in teams and explain how to plan and conduct effective team meetings. The second half of the chapter focuses on self-managed teams (SMTs). We discuss the na- ture of SMTs, the difference between SMTs and conventional teams, the benefits of using SMTs and how to improve SMT effectiveness.
The Use of Teams in Organizations As mentioned in the introduction, teamwork is a way of life in the postmodern orga- nization.7 There was a time when the use of teams in production processes made news because few companies were doing it. Today, it’s just the opposite. It’s the organization that does not use teams that has become newsworthy. Through the years, organizations have adopted team-based structures as the tool to promote cooperation and coordination of actions and, thus, enhance performance.8 The basic message behind teamwork is that teams offer the best opportunity for better organizational performance in the form of in- creased productivity and profits. In other words, the synergistic benefits of teamwork are such that members of a team working cooperatively with one another can achieve more in output than those working independently. As such, teams have become the basic unit of empowerment9—large enough for the collective strength and synergy of diverse talents and small enough for effective participation and bonding.10,11 This is discussed in greater depth as part of the presentation on the benefits and limitations of working in teams.
Since t he ea rly 1990s, va rious studies have repor ted g reater nu mbers of U.S. corporations using teams to accomplish organizational tasks.12 According to some esti- mates, over 50 percent of all organizations and 80 percent of organizations with more than 100 employees use some form of teams.13 Many organizations have reengineered their work processes and procedures to be performed by teams.14 The reasons for this trend are obvious. Many companies, large and small, face serious challenges from a dy- namic and complex global economy—challenges that have put in question the effective- ness of individual or non-team efforts to getting work done.15 As a consequence, many more organizations are seeking leaders who possess team leadership skills. Employers expect colleges and universities to be at the forefront of preparing graduates to effectively work in teams. They are actively looking for applicants who possess teamwork skills and abilities.16
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 270 10/15/14 12:56 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 8 TEaM LEaDErShIp anD SELf-ManagED TEaMS 271
However, not all team efforts have resulted in success. In some cases, the use of teams has resulted in such negative outcomes as increased costs, stress, and lower group cohe- sion.17,18 To avoid these negative outcomes, it is recommended that an organization ask critical questions of itself before embracing the team approach. Examples of such ques- tions include the following:
• Will the use of teams diffuse important organizational capabilities? • How much infrastructure realignment will be required? • Will leaders embrace the team concept and change their styles to suit?19 • Can teams carry out tasks previously performed by individuals or functional units? • How difficult it will be to develop team problem-solving capabilities?
These questions are addressed later in the chapter as part of the discussion on the role of top management, organizational culture, and the team leader in creating effec- tive teams. But first, a brief review of the distinction between a group and a team. We take the view that they are not synonymous.
Is It a Group or a team? All teams are groups, but not all groups are teams. A manager can put together a group of people and never build a team. A group is a collection of individuals who interact pri- marily to share information and to make decisions that enable each member to perform within his or her area of responsibility. As such, group performance is merely the sum- mation of each group member’s individual contribution. There is no synergy. A team creates synergy. That is, the collective efforts of the members result in a level of perfor- mance that is greater than the sum of the individual inputs. In other words, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts (1+1=3). A team brings together individuals from varied backgrounds to contribute toward a collective output. Team members have both indi- vidual and collective accountability for team outcomes. Therefore, we define a team as a unit of interdependent individuals with complementary skills who are committed to a common purpose and set of performance outcomes and to common expectations, for which they hold themselves accountable.20 In their comprehensive study of work groups and teams, Kozlowski and Bell describe teams as “collectives who exist to perform orga- nizationally-relevant tasks, share one or more common goals, interact socially, exhibit task interdependencies, maintain and manage boundaries and are embedded in an or- ganizational context that sets boundaries, constrains the team and inf luences exchanges with other units in the broader entity.”21 This supports and reinforces our definition of a team.
Whereas groups focus on individual performance and goals, and reliance on individ- ual abilities, teams have a collective mentality that focuses on the following: (1) shared mission; (2) common objectives; (3) sharing information, insights, and perspectives; (4) making decisions that support each individual to do his or her own job better; and (5) reinforcing each other’s efforts.22
The leadership style in a group tends to be boss-centered, whereas in a team it is more participative or empowerment-oriented. In a team, incentives are team-based; in contrast, a group is more likely to be characterized by self-interest, with a mentality of “what’s in it for me.” In the best teams, there are no stars, and everyone suppresses individual ego for the good of the whole.
WOrK Application 8-1 Think of a past or present job. Based on your knowledge of the distinction between a group and a team, would you say you were part of a team or a group? Explain.
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 271 10/15/14 12:56 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
272 part 2 TEaM LEaDErShIp
1. What does it say about Gary Kelly’s leadership philosophy when he categorically proclaims, “Our people are our single greatest strength and most enduring long-term competitive advantage”?
It demonstrates his people-centered leadership style. With his strong belief in the value of his employees to the com- pany’s success, it is not surprising that his orders are for each department to have a dedicated team working together to create action plans to make Southwest a happy place to work. Teamwork is a way of life at Southwest and this is a direct result of the commitment of the CEO to this approach to structuring tasks.
OPENING CASE application
Group or Team Based on each statement, identify it as characteristic of a group or a team. Write the appropriate letter in the blank before each item. a. group b. team
1. We have a collective mentality that focuses on a shared mission.
2. We all have a common objective that focuses our energies and resources.
3. Here every individual does his or her tasks separately and we add up our outputs at the end.
4. In our department, each person is rewarded for what they accomplish as an individual rather than what they contribute to the team effort.
5. My compensation is based primarily on my department’s performance and there is shared responsibility.
6. We are just a collection of about 30 people working individually on an assigned project.
7. Our tasks are interconnected, and we make decisions that support each individual to do his or her own job better.
Discuss the benefits and limitations of working in teams. Learning Outcome
1
Benefits and Limitations of teamwork teamwork is an understanding and commitment to a common goal on the part of all team members. The increased acceptance and use of teams suggests that their usage offers many benefits. However, there are inherent limitations associated with the use of teams. Let’s start with the benefits of working in teams.
Benefits of Using Teams There are several benefits of teamwork:
1. Teams offer synergistic benefits that non-team arrangements fail to offer.23 Synergy is when a team’s total output exceeds the sum of the various members’ contributions. It involves the creative cooperation of people working together to achieve something beyond the capacities of individuals working alone.24
CONCept APPLICATION 8-1
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 272 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 8 TEaM LEaDErShIp anD SELf-ManagED TEaMS 273
2. Team members can help each other avoid major errors. This tendency of mutual support and peer review of ideas helps teams make better decisions and can provide immunity for an organization against disruptive surprises.
3. Teams offer more opportunities for new ideas that advance innovation.25 4. Teams offer a work environment in which people feel empowered and satisf ied
with their jobs.26 Job satisfaction is important because it is associated with other positive organizational outcomes. For example, employees who are satisfied with their jobs are said to be less likely to quit their jobs, are absent less, and are more likely to display organizational citizenship behavior.27,28 Being a member of a team makes it possible to satisfy one’s social need for affiliation. Team members develop trust for each other and come to see the team as a social network that fulfills other needs.29
Limitations of Using Teams Employing the team approach has some potential limitations for both organizations and individuals:
1. There is the possibility that members face pressure to conform to team standards of performance and conduct, even if it goes against the individual’s or organization’s interest.30 For example, a team member may be ostracized for being much more pro- ductive than his or her coworkers if the team’s goal is to slow down production. This can lead to intra-team conf lict.
2. Shirk ing of individua l responsibilit y, a lso k nown as socia l loaf ing, is another limitation of teams. Social loafing is the conscious or unconscious tendency by some team members to shirk responsibility by withholding effort toward team goals when they are not individually accountable for their work.31 Many students who have worked on team projects (like group term papers) have encountered a social loafer. Social loafing is likely to result when individual effort is not recognized and assessed.32,33 Individ- ual performance evaluations can help discourage social loafing by holding each team member accountable for assigned tasks; however, this goes against the argument that team-based performance measures are necessary for a strong team identity. It’s a co- nundrum in that while instituting individual accountability may help reduce social loafing, it risks jeopardizing team accountability for shared goals—a critical charac- teristic of effective teams.
3. Another well-known disadvantage associated with highly cohesive teams is a mind- set known as groupthink. Groupthink is when members of a cohesive group tend to agree on a decision not on the basis of its merit but because they are less willing to risk rejection for questioning a majority viewpoint or presenting a dissenting opinion. The team values getting along more than getting things done. The team often becomes more concerned with striving for unanimity than with objectively appraising differ- ent courses of action. Dissenting views are suppressed in favor of consensus.34
4. Though cohesiveness is a desirable quality of teams, teams that are extremely cohe- sive can also become, at their worst, a source of intra-team and inter-team conf lict.35 A team may become so cohesive that it resembles a clique. A clan culture develops with each team (clan) fighting for dominance. There is pressure for members to stand by their teammates and to achieve the team’s goals at any cost. Even within teams, sub-groups could form and create fault lines that impede team success. When a team possesses strong fault lines in which one subset of members shares the same attributes while another subset of members shares a different set of attributes, its effectiveness is compromised.36,37
WOrK Application 8-2 Identify a team you were or are a part of and describe the benefits that you derived from being a member of the team.
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 273 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
274 part 2 TEaM LEaDErShIp
Effective team leaders find ways to maximize the benefits of teams and to minimize the limitations of teams. Suggested methods for accomplishing this include an under- standing of the significance of culture, norms, and beliefs; recognition of fault line trig- gers; use of suitable leadership styles; development of team incentives and recognition; and effective use of intra-team communications.38 More on these when we discuss the characteristics of effective teams and the role of top management and team leaders in creating effective teams.
C omple te S el f-A s s e s sment 8 -1 to e v a lu ate te a mwork f rom you r ow n work experience.
WOrK Application 8-3 Based on Self- Assessment 8-1, list some things that a team could do to improve its level of teamwork. Use experiences associated with a present or past job.
assessing teamwork in Your GroupSELF-ASSESSMENT 8-1
Based on experiences you have or have had with teams, indicate whether your team has (or had) the following charac- teristics by placing a checkmark in the appropriate column:
In my team: Mostly true
Mostly False
1. There is a common under- standing and commitment to group goals on the part of all team members.
2. Members support and pro- vide constructive feedback to one another’s ideas.
3. Members do not feel the pressure to conform to group standards of perfor- mance and conduct.
4. Dissenting views are accepted and discussed rather than suppressed in favor of consensus.
5. The level of interpersonal interaction among members is high.
6. Much of the responsibility and authority for making important decisions is turned over to the team.
7. There is an open com- munication channel for all members to voice their opinions.
8. Members are provided with the opportunity for continu- ous learning and training in appropriate skills.
Mostly true
Mostly False
9. Ever y team member is treated equally.
10. Members are more likely to provide backup and support for one another without the team leader’s instruction.
11. Rewards and recognition are linked to individual as well as team results.
12. Roles and responsibilities for performing various tasks are clearly established.
Scoring add up the number of mostly true answers and place the total on the continuum below.
12 — 11 — 10 — 9 — 8— 7 — 6 — 5 — 4— 3 — 2 — 1 Effective teamwork Ineffective teamwork
Interpreting the Score The higher the score, the more effective is the team- work. Self-assessment exercises like this can be used by groups during team building to improve teamwork. You will learn more about the team leader’s role in building effective teams in the next section and about SMTs later in the chapter.
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 274 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 8 TEaM LEaDErShIp anD SELf-ManagED TEaMS 275
What Is an effective team? In a teamwork environment, team members are required to be able to form positive exchange relationships not only with the team leader but also with each other. The former is what we have referred to as leader–member exchange (LMX) in Chapter 7, and the latter describes what has come to be known as team-member exchange (tMX). TMX is defined as a team member’s social exchanges with peers in terms of the mutual exchange of ideas, support, camaraderie, and feedback. High-quality LMX and TMX relations enhance group identification and collective efficacy, which positively contributes to team effectiveness.39,40
The obvious question then becomes, what makes one team effective and another in- effective? One model of team effectiveness focused on internal team processes such as group learning, team efficacy, self-leadership, interdependency, and team cohesion.41,42 According to this model, teams that excel in all these areas are said to be effective. Another model examined three contextual factors—team design, organizational resources and rewards, and process assistance—as determinants of team effectiveness.43 From these two models, we present team effectiveness as a construct consisting of three components: (1) task performance—the degree to which the team’s output (product or service) meets the needs and expectations of those who use it; (2) group process—the degree to which members interact or relate in ways that allow the team to work increasingly well together over time; and (3) individual satisfaction—the degree to which the group experience, on balance, is more satisfying than frustrating to team members.44
This definition embodies a number of performance outcomes that others have used as a basis for evaluating team effectiveness. These include innovation, efficiency, qual- ity, and employee satisfaction. Innovative teams are those with the capability to rapidly respond to new problems and changes with creative solutions. They are teams that have mastered what some refer to as “team learning.”45 team learning is the collective acqui- sition, combination, creation, and sharing of knowledge.46 Efficient teams enable the orga- nization to achieve its goals with fewer resources. Quality is the team’s ability to produce
YOU Make the ethICaL Call
8.1 He Is Not a Team Player
The story is told of a company that took a drastic decision to not interview a candidate for a job because of the feedback from the employee who picked up the candidate from the airpor t. The company prides itself on a culture that highly values its employees and teamwork approach to doing work. It’s a culture that takes the happiness of its employees seriously and everyone feels a sense of being par t of a fun-loving team. On her way back to the company headquar ters with a prospective candidate for a leadership position, she tried unsuccessfully to get the candidate to acknowledge her or even respond to her attempts at “small talk.” The candidate seemed unwilling to acknowledge or engage in conversation with someone much lower in status than himself. Upon arrival back at head- quar ters, the employee repor ted her feeling to her boss. She said that she didn’t think the candidate will make a good team player or fit in with the open, friendly, and fun-loving culture of the company. That was all it took for the candidate to be returned to the airport.
1. Is being a team player really necessary to be a successful employee?
2. Is it ethical and socially responsible of the company in this case to reject job candi- dates because they are considered not to be good team players?
3. Would you act the same way if you were the driver picking up the candidate?
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 275 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
276 part 2 TEaM LEaDErShIp
outputs that meet or exceed customer expectations. Satisfaction measures the team’s abil- ity to achieve not only the team’s goals (team satisfaction) but also satisfy the personal needs of its members (individual satisfaction).
2. how can you match our definition of team effectiveness as a multivariable concept involving three components (task performance, group process, and individual satisfaction) to this state- ment by Mr. Kelly: “We believe in Living the Southwest Way, which is to have a Warrior Spirit, a Servant’s heart, and a Fun-LUVing attitude”?
The “Southwest way” is the team spirit that every employee of the company shares. Having a “warrior spirit” is the over- whelming desire to succeed at whatever your task requires. Having a “servant’s hear t” is the way employees treat each other and the customer. It’s about everyone working together toward a common end. A good servant is a giver, a selfless and gracious individual. Finally, a “Fun-LUVing Attitude” is about the individual. People should love what they are doing and be satisfied doing it.
OPENING CASE application
Characteristics of highly effective teams The team approach, though beneficial in many ways, also presents organizations with many challenges, including the need for effective communication; resolving personality conf licts and egos; establishing unifying goals, direction, and focus; specifying an appro- priate reward and incentive systems; providing effective team leadership; and having the right team mix, autonomy, and accountability47,48,49. Failure to effectively address these challenges often results in dysfunctional or ineffective teams. Such dysfunctions create an environment where there is a lack of trust, fear of conf lict, lack of commitment, lack of accountability, and inattention to result.50 Exhibit 8.1 highlights ten characteristics of effective teams that address these challenges and dysfunctions. It should be noted that this is not a finite list of characteristics.
Identify and explain the ten characteristics of highly effective teams. Learning Outcome
2
1. Team charter and norms 2. Widely shared team goals 3. Team cohesion and task interdependence 4. Team demographics and size 5. Clearly define team member roles and responsibilities 6. positive interpersonal relationships 7. Clearly stated operating procedures 8. Effective conflict resolution strategies 9. high-level interpersonal communications 10. Strong top management support
Characteristics of Highly Effective Teams EXHIBIT 8.1
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 276 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 8 TEaM LEaDErShIp anD SELf-ManagED TEaMS 277
Team Charter and Norms A team charter is a governing document that should be jointly developed by team mem- bers and should specify the rules by which they agree to be governed. Norms evolve out of a team charter and become the framework for the decision-making process within the team, thus providing the underpinnings for team cohesion. team norms are acceptable standards of behavior that are shared by team members. For example, a team norm might specify cooperative over competitive behavior. This may be ref lected by the level of im- portance members place on shared pursuits, objectives, and mutual interests rather than personal interests. The reward structure must match this cooperative norm.
Widely Shared Team Goals When team members all share the same goals and each member clearly understands his or her role in helping achieve the goals, performance is enhanced. It is often the case that when team goals conf lict, tensions can appear within the team, and “the whole is no longer greater than the sum of its parts.”51 Therefore, setting team goals should be an inclusive process.52 The process should allow for open and honest exchange of ideas. Effective teams strive for consensus, consistency, and agreement on team goals. There is a sense of ownership in the goals of the team and thus greater accountability for team actions.
Team Cohesion and Task Interdependence Members of effective teams are able to collaborate and work well with each other.53 This happens when there is a high level of team cohesion and interdependence.54 Teams that have a history of working together in this way are more likely to succeed, confirming the importance of esprit de corps within the team.55,56 team cohesion is the extent to which team members band together and remain committed to achieving team goals. Team cohesion is increased when team members share similar attitudes and values and strong interpersonal relations and self-identification with the team.57 Teams that show a high degree of agreeableness between team members also show higher levels of cohesion and team performance.58
The degree to which team members depend on each other for information, resources, and other inputs to complete their own tasks determines the level of task interdepen- dence.59 The higher the level of interdependency, the greater the responsibility mem- bers feel toward each other.60 With interdependence comes the need for coordination to ensure that the team functions as a unified whole.
YOU Make the ethICaL Call
8.2 Norms
One or a few employees can break the norms and cause disastrous consequences for not only one organization but also entire industries. On the other hand, one or a few people can blow the whistle to disclose illegal and unethical business practices, which can lead to decreasing unethical behavior, such as at Enron. At the team level, employees influence each other’s behavior through developing and enforcing norms; we can also call it peer pressure.
1. Should employees be able to do their own thing without the group enforcing norms?
2. Is it ethical and socially responsible for teams to develop and enforce norms? If so, what type of ethical standards should a team have?
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 277 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
278 part 2 TEaM LEaDErShIp
Team Demographics and Size An effective team is more than just a bunch of people brought together to accomplish a goal. Team demographics focus on the diversity in culture, knowledge, skills, gender, per- sonality, background, and experiences of team members.61,62 The findings of one study revealed that top management team diversity is positively related to performance; and this effect is stronger in longer tenured teams, highly internationalized firms, and mu- nificent environments.63 Two other studies found that teams with an equal gender mix perform better than male-dominated teams in terms of sales and profits.64,65 Teams that have experience working together tend to demonstrate greater task proficiency and team- work effectiveness.
Size may affect team members’ ability to form close interpersonal relationships with other members. Small teams, typically fewer than 12 people, are generally more effec- tive than larger teams. In small teams, conf licts and differences are more manageable. In larger teams, it is much more difficult for members to interact and share ideas with each other. As a general rule, teams that participants perceive as too small or too large relative to the task at hand are deemed to have failed the size test and are generally less effective.
Clearly Defined Team Member roles and responsibilities There is a greater chance of realizing team goals and objectives when team members clearly understand their roles and responsibilities.66 In other words, team members know their specific task(s) and each individual’s task contributes to meeting team goals. As someone once said, “You know team roles and responsibilities are clearly defined when each team member is able to state, in one sentence: My job on this team is to help us get to our goal of X by doing Y or, I know I am doing my job when Z happens.”67 The benefits of having clearly defined roles and responsibilities are that team members are more likely to accept personal responsibility and not assign blame when things go wrong. They are more accountable for their actions. These are the kinds of teams where team members tend to be their own toughest critics.
Positive Interpersonal relationships Positive interpersonal relationships exist when there is mutual respect and trust, support, inclusion, collaboration, and open and honest communication between team members. Isolation from your team—such as not getting information, being excluded from team meetings, your work going unnoticed, your suggestions going unanswered, or the team leader playing favorites—is symptomatic of poor or negative interpersonal relationships. This can lead to feelings of insecurity, low self-esteem and even depression. Positive inter- personal relationships give members a sense of belonging in the team.68
Clearly Stated Operating Procedures An effective team starts out by laying down the operating rules and procedures that will govern how the team carries out its work together. Setting and abiding by the team’s rules and operating procedures will assure consistency in behavior among team members and reduce the chance of mistakes or conf lict that can jeopardize team success.69
Effective Conflict resolution Strategies Conf lict is an inevitable consequence of working with other people; however, it does not have to be dysfunctional.70 In any given team, differences on goals, needs/aspirations, opinions, values, and personality provide more than enough grounds for disagreement and conf lict. Conf lict can be task, relationship, or process based.71 Disagreements can
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 278 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 8 TEaM LEaDErShIp anD SELf-ManagED TEaMS 279
have both positive and negative consequences on team effectiveness. On the positive side, constructive disagreement is actually part of the reason why teams can be so ef- fective; the more perspectives that go into a decision, the better the end result. On the negative side, allowing disagreements to get out of hand can cause unnecessary dis- ruption and lead to breakdowns in working relationships.72 Such breakdowns can re- sult in intra-team conf licts, lack of communication, and ultimately lack of team spirit. Effective teams are proactive in developing conf lict resolution strategies that apply to all team members.
High-Level Interpersonal Communications Communication is “like the circulatory system in the human body.”73 Effective teams have open and honest communication with each other. Team members of effective teams tend to show a high competency in oral and written communication skills. Effective communication involves not just what is said but how it is said. Hurtful and insensi- tive ways of communicating can damage relations in a team. Other roadblocks to effec- tive communication—such as information overload, lack of filtering, defensiveness, and cultural differences—can be overcome by effective listening, applying feedback, being sensitive to others, and simplifying communication.
Strong Top Management Support Effective teams are those that have strong support from the upper-level management.74 After all, team resources and rewards come from top management. When teams are not achieving expected results, top management must determine if all or most of the char- acteristics of effective teams described above are present. Also, top management must create an organizational culture that supports teamwork and has reward programs that motivate and reinforce team behavior.75 This is discussed in greater depth in the next two sections.
WOrK Application 8-4 Recall a team you have worked with that you would characterize as effective. Which of the characteristics discussed and listed in Exhibit 8.1 did your team possess?
team Leadership Increasing organizational reliance on teams to perform complex tasks has led to a cor- responding increase in interest toward understanding the important role of leaders in improving team performance.76,77 Studies have shown that when leaders are trained to develop and nurture high-quality relationships with all of their followers, the results on
3. What is the evidence that there is strong organizational support for teamwork at Southwest?
At Southwest, there is the “University for People.” The University for People is a state-of-the-ar t training facility led by Southwest Airlines facilitators and senior leaders as guest professors. Here the company offers training and development for its employees at every stage of their careers. For example, the curriculum includes a Myers-Briggs personality assess- ment seminar to help teams better appreciate individual differences and work more cohesively.
OPENING CASE application
What role can a team leader play in creating an effective team? Learning Outcome
3
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 279 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
280 part 2 TEaM LEaDErShIp
follower performance are dramatic.78,79 To fully understand the factors that add to the quality of the working relationship between a leader and his or her team members, it is important not only to pay attention to the general leadership style of the leader toward the team as a whole but also to his or her specific behaviors toward various team members, described in Chapter 7 as the leader–member exchange relationship. A team leader’s em- powering or directive style of leadership will impact team performance.80 Team leaders must manage not just the work but also team member relations across diverse functional and cultural boundaries.81,82 Without effective team leaders, teams can get off course, go too far or not far enough, lose sight of their mission, and become meshed by interpersonal conf lict.83
T he tea m leader’s role i n creat i ng ef fec t ive tea ms is cr it ic a l. Here a re some examples:
• The team leader as chief motivator. Through the leader’s support, encouragement, and training, followers feel a sense of self-worth, appreciation, and value for their work, and they respond with high performance.84,85 As these relationships mature, the entire work group becomes more cohesive, and the payoffs only increase.
• The team leader as coach and mentor. Team-based organizations need leaders who are good at coaching and mentoring followers, especially new team members. Like any good coach, they are experienced and knowledgeable in the team process and are ca- pable of developing trust and teamwork norms in team members.86
• The team leader as a role model. A team leader must model the behavior that he/she wants to see in team members. For instance, a leader’s self-sacrificing behavior and dis- play of self-confidence do influence team members. Self-sacrificing leaders are those who go above and beyond what’s expected of them. They don’t just issue orders; they get involved in making things happen.87 Being a role model helps develop trust, com- mitment, and confidence in the leader.
• The team leader as team culture enforcer. The team leader plays a leading role in fos- tering a team culture that supports the team’s goals and operational strategies. A team culture specifies standards and values that govern team member behavior. The leader for example may insist on team incentives over individual incentives to promote team performance.88
• The team leader as cheerleader. Leaders with strong social skills tend to have greater influencing abilities and relate well with team members.89 As the team’s leading cheer- leader, the leader inspires and motivates team members to achieve higher levels of per- formance. When a team leader can leverage his/her social skills to obtain resources for the team, he or she is said to possess social capital. The leader can use social capital to resolve team conflict, encourage greater communication, and build a stronger commit- ment to the team effort.
• The team leader as resource person. The team leader’s role is to be the resource person that recognizes team needs and attends to them in a timely fashion. The team leader’s knowledge of the team’s capabilities enables him or her to address areas of weaknesses so the team can function more effectively and efficiently.
Although some individuals are skilled in all these areas and appear to have been born to be team leaders, the majority of aspiring leaders can benefit from team leader- ship development programs designed to assess and improve their effectiveness in team leadership.90
WOrK Application 8-5 Interview someone you have worked with or know who is a team leader. Ask him or her to provide specific examples for some of the roles discussed in the text.
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 280 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 8 TEaM LEaDErShIp anD SELf-ManagED TEaMS 281
Organizational Culture and team Creativity Creativity is one of the most complex mental functions. It requires the whole spectrum of affective experiences (positive and negative), and the cognitive processes they elicit between team members. Creativity feeds innovation, which is fast becoming a critical requirement for success in any type of business (profit or not-for-profit)—particularly for those organizations operating in highly volatile, competitive and dynamic market environments. Today’s economy has been rightly described as a “knowledge-based econ- omy” because more companies are gaining competitive advantages based on knowledge rather than on physical or financial resources alone. It will take both physical and finan- cial resources and a highly creative workforce to be competitive.
Creativity is generally viewed as the actions of individual employees exchanging ideas and information with each other.91 In the context of a team-based environment, team creativity entails being able to access and use each member’s unique talents to perform effectively. Harnessing the creativity of each team member is what team creativity is all about.92,93 Teams promote creativity through their effective cross-fertilization of ideas.94 Teams that are able to dynamically integrate member ideas into creative innovations are said to possess knowledge-integration capabilities.95 Knowledge-integration capabilities unleash employees’ innate creative talents. Such creative ideas do become the building blocks for organizational innovation and change.96,97
Therefore, we define team creativity as the creation of something that is valuable, useful, and novel by individuals working together in a complex social system. Top manage- ment plays a significant role in fostering a culture of learning and creativity.98 Creating an organizational culture that supports and encourages creativity provides the protec- tion that team members need to take creative risks.99 Another organizational factor that inf luences team creativity is a commitment to team diversity. Diverse teams feature dif- ferences in thinking styles, knowledge, skills, values, and beliefs among individual team members, which enhances creativity.100
Encouraging inter-team rivalries does stimulate creativity because the competition chal- lenges teams to bring out their best. Inter-team rivalries can turn a team into a vortex of creativ- ity. The goal is to create a team culture where there is simultaneous cooperative and competitive behavior within and between teams. Evidence shows that this dual competitive model does drive high-quality knowledge creation and sharing among cross-functional team members.101
Organizations that have a culture that supports and promotes team creativity have a team-goal orientation, team-centered recognition and rewards programs, team- centered resource allocation policies, f lexible operating procedures, team diversity, and a team- centered leadership development program.102,103,104
4. In what way has Southwest shown that it understands the connection between team leadership and team success?
Southwest has a program called Manager-in-Training (MIT) aimed at identifying employees with a high potential for lead- ership and interest in a long-term career with the company. Among the courses offered, there is one specifically designed for team leaders. The first course is called MIT I, designed for employees at the supervisor, team leader, and manager levels. This is a clear indication that top management takes team leadership seriously.
OPENING CASE application
Describe how organizational culture can influence team creativity. Learning Outcome
4
WOrK Application 8-6 Think of a work situation in which you were required to do a lot of creative thinking, or in which your job required doing a lot of very creative things. In what ways did the organization and your immediate supervisor or leader facilitate or hinder your effectiveness?
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 281 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
282 part 2 TEaM LEaDErShIp
Self-Assessment 8-2 should help you assess the culture for creativity in your organiza- tion or institution.
assessing the Culture for CreativitySELF-ASSESSMENT 8-2
place a checkmark in the appropriate column for each question.
In my team: Mostly agree
Mostly Disagree
1. Organizational practices gen- erally encourage creativity.
2. The reward system has been carefully designed to encour- age creativity.
3. People are not restricted by rules and regulations or many layers of approval when they want to try new ideas.
4. “Doing things the way they have always been done” is not a slogan that applies in this organization.
5. People are able to experi- ment and dream outside their regular functional area on company time.
6. The organization’s culture values and appreciates input from members.
7. People feel they have been properly matched with tasks that fit their skills, interests, and experiences.
8. Employees have greater autonomy to think and act freely than they would in another organization.
Mostly agree
Mostly Disagree
9. In looking around, it is certain that the work environment has been carefully designed to encourage creativity.
10. Managerial practices in this organization would lead to the conclusion that creativ- ity and innovation are highly valued at all levels.
Scoring Begin by placing a checkmark in the appropriate column for each question. add up the number of “mostly agree” checkmarks and place the sum on the continuum below.
1 0 — 9 — 8 — 7 — 6 — 5 — 4 — 3 — 2 — 1 Supportive climate Unsupportive climate
Interpreting the Score The higher the score, the more supportive the organiza- tional culture is of creativity and innovation. Self-assessment exercises like this can be used to encourage students to relate their work environments to the concepts in ways that others can benefit from their experience.
5. Southwest encourages its teams to be creative problem solvers. What are some examples of creative problem solving by Southwest teams?
Southwest employees have teamed up to find better ways of performing their task. Working together, Southwest employ- ees found better and faster ways to turn around their planes in just 25 minutes, one of the fastest in the industry. There are also countless customer accounts of Southwest employees going out of their way to help them. In many of the cases, the employees took it upon themselves to find a solution to the customer’s problem without waiting for managerial ap- proval. The company definitely encourages its employees to find creative, yet efficient, ways to accomplish their tasks and this is showing in the company’s bottom line.
OPENING CASE application
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 282 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 8 TEaM LEaDErShIp anD SELf-ManagED TEaMS 283
Types of Teams Structural metamorphosis seems to be the one constant in organizational life today. Traditional organizational structures, known for their stable designs, are changing in favor of more f luid designs that can respond to external opportunities and threats. A manufacturing enterprise might, for example, make use of a variety of teams, such as a quality improvement team, customer service team, self-managed team, cross-functional team, technology integration team, virtual team, new product development team, or safety teams; instead of relying on the old functional department form to get work done. In this section, we focus on four team types that are common across organizations today: the functional team, the cross-functional team, the virtual team, and the self-managed team.
Functional team One hundred years ago, Frederick Taylor, called the “father of scientific management,” espoused a leadership approach whereby managers made themselves functional experts, divided work processes into simple repetitive tasks, and treated workers as interchange- able parts. The functional team is mostly made up of a functional manager and a small group of frontline employees within that functional area or department. Therefore, we define a functional team as a group of employees belonging to the same functional de- partment, such as marketing, R&D, production, human resources, or information systems, who have a common objective.
Over time, the drawbacks of this approach became evident, as workers suffered from boredom due to the repetitive nature of their jobs. The structure of the functional team is generally more hierarchical, with the functional leader making all the decisions and expecting followers to implement them. Another drawback of the functional team, although unintended, is the tendency for team members to focus on their local area of specialization and ignore or downplay the overall organizational mission. This can lead to a lack of cooperation between functional teams, resulting in poor overall organization
Managing Creative Teams Identify which statement is likely to favor greater team creativity or lessen team creativity: a. may favor greater team creativity b. may lessen team creativity
8. A team policy dictates strict adherence to standard operating procedures.
9. A certain amount of our work day is left up to us to do whatever we chose—like experimenting and sharing new ideas.
10. Our work schedule is so hectic and regimented in a way that there is very little room for thinking “out of the box” in this team.
11. Our organization has different levels of team recognition and rewards programs for taking meaningful risks.
12. Our organization discourages inter-team rivalries because of the potential for internal conflict.
13. In our team, we have a suggestion box and team members can receive up to $500 in a gift certificate for good ideas.
CONCept APPLICATION 8-2
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 283 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
284 part 2 TEaM LEaDErShIp
performance. In fact, rivalry, rather than cooperation, is what often happens between functional teams that don’t interact with each other.
Over the years, the use of functional teams has been in decline. Cross-functional teams became popular in the late 1980s, when companies started to readjust their organi- zational structures to make them more f lexible and competitive.
Cross-Functional team In today’s dynamic business environment, organizations are realizing that to effec- tively respond to market and competitive challenges, there has to be cooperation across functional boundaries. Team leaders are under pressure to dismantle walls separating functional units and form cross-functional teams for the purpose of accomplishing or- ganizational objectives.105,106 We define a cross-functional team as one composed of members from different functional departments of an organization who are brought to- gether to perform unique tasks to create new and non-routine products or services.107 Team members may also include representatives from outside the organization, such as suppli- ers, clients, and joint-venture partners.
The appeal of the cross-functional team concept is that interaction, cooperation, co- ordination, information sharing, and cross-fertilization of ideas among people from dif- ferent functional areas produces better outcomes such as better-quality products/services with shorter developmental cycles.108
As cross-functional teams have become popular, interest in their effectiveness has also kept pace. In one study, researchers interviewed 75 current and previous leaders of cross- functional teams in Hewlett-Packard’s marketing, R&D, manufacturing, and informa- tion systems units. The interviews focused on identifying factors that were critical to the optimal performance of the teams.109 In another study, a survey of frontline managers on the barriers and gateways to management cooperation and teamwork identified five keys or gateways for getting frontline managers to work effectively in cross-functional teams.110 The factors or gateways for improving the effectiveness of cross-functional teams identified in these studies are no different from those discussed earlier as charac- teristics of effective teams.111
Cross-functional teams offer many potential benefits to an organization. For example:
• Bringing together the right mix of people gives the team a rich and diverse base of knowledge and creative potential that far exceeds anything a single functional team could come up with.
• Coordination is improved and many problems are avoided when people from different functional specialties come together to work on a project at the same time, rather than working in separate units.112
• The cross-functional makeup of a team offers the benefit of multiple sources of infor- mation and perspectives and contacts outside of one’s functional specialty; these are critical for success in globally competitive, high-technology markets.113
• Members learn new skills that are carried back to their functional units and to subse- quent teams.
• Finally, the positive synergy that occurs in effective cross-functional teams can help them achieve a level of performance that far exceeds the sum of the individual perfor- mances of members.114
Cross-functional teams are often an organization’s first step toward greater employee participation and empowerment. These teams may gradually evolve into virtual or self- managed teams, depending on the type of environmental challenges or opportunities the organization faces.
WOrK Application 8-7 Recall any experience you have had or currently have working with individuals from different disciplines or technical specialties outside of yours. How did you get along with these individuals? Describe the positives and negatives of your experience.
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 284 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 8 TEaM LEaDErShIp anD SELf-ManagED TEaMS 285
Virtual team Virtual teams are probably the most recent structural innovation of the 21st century.115 An increasing number of organizations are using virtual teams to provide human re- source f lexibility, customer service responsiveness, innovation, and speed in project completion.116 Increasingly, companies are investing in virtual teams to enhance their performance and competitiveness.117
Globalization and technological advances are driving organizations to adopt virtual teams.118 Virtual cross-functional teams are growing at a much faster rate in companies with global operations for obvious reasons. Global virtual team leaders are counseled to employ success strategies, such as building trust-based relationships, encouraging mem- bers to show respect for other cultures and languages, and promoting diversity as a team strength and not a weakness.119
Virtual teams enable organizations to pool the talents and expertise of employees and nonemployees by eliminating time and space barriers. In particular, new and advanced technologies are providing the means for work that is dispersed (carried out in differ- ent locations) and asynchronous (carried out at different times) to still be performed in team settings.120 The virtual team can be organized along functional or cross-functional lines. We define a virtual team as one whose members are geographically dispersed, requiring them to work together through electronic means with minimal face-to-face interaction.
In the United States, it is estimated that among companies with 5,000 or more em- ployees, more than half of them use virtual teams.121 Another survey by the Gartner Group revealed that more than 60 percent of professional employees now work in virtual teams.122 A recent report revealed that 102,900 federal employees worked in a telecom- muting environment in 2008.123
Virtual teams present significant collaboration, communication, and leadership chal- lenges that if not handled properly can potentially hinder team cohesion, information sharing, and knowledge integration—all critical to success.124,125 Recommendations for dealing with these challenges include focusing attention on both technological and inter- personal issues, with team leaders staying alert to relational and communication prob- lems.126 Leaders of successful virtual teams establish and maintain trust and commitment in their teams by making sure that the necessary technology, support, and reward sys- tems are in place.127 The fourth type of team is called the self-managed team SMT.
Self-Managed team (SMt) With self-managed (autonomous) work teams, a group of people work together without a leader to plan, coordinate, and evaluate each other’s work. We define self-managed teams (SMts) as relatively autonomous teams whose members share or rotate leadership responsi- bilities and hold one another mutually responsible for a set of performance targets assigned by top management. The SMT concept is discussed in greater depth later in the chapter.
WOrK Application 8-8 Recall a present or past job. Describe what type of team you are in or have been in— functional, cross-functional, or self-managed.
6. Of the four types of teams discussed, which type(s) do you think Southwest is using?
At Southwest, you get the sense that there are no walls separating the different depar tments—what some have called “silos.” There is evidence of cross-functional teamwork at different levels. The effor t to achieve a 25-minute turnaround time for each arriving flight takes a highly integrated and coordinated cross-functional team to accomplish.
OPENING CASE application
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 285 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
286 part 2 TEaM LEaDErShIp
Decision Making in Teams More and more, organizations are finding out that the leader-centered decision-making model does not work well in organizations professing to be team-oriented. Instead, there is greater acceptance and appreciation for the team-centered decision-making model. For work teams to be effective, leaders must relinquish some of the decision-making respon- sibilities to team members. Exactly how this can be done effectively is the focus of this section.
Recall that in Chapter 4, we discussed the normative leadership model. Also, recall that the normative models (Exhibits 4.9 and 4.10 on pages 125 and 126 ) and Chapter 4’s Developing Your Leadership Skills Exercise 4-2 (p.140) apply to group decision making, because the models are used to determine the level of follower participation in a given de- cision. Developing Your Leadership Skills Exercise 8-1 (on p. 304) presents a contingency leadership decision-making model that is adapted from the normative leadership model. It is a simpler model and uses the same leadership styles as situational communications (Developing Your Leadership Skills Exercise 6-2 in Chapter 6 on p.222) to help you deter- mine the appropriate level of participation to use in a given situation.
Normative Leadership Model The normative leadership model has a time-driven and development-driven decision tree that enables the user to select one of five leadership styles (decide, consult individually, consult group, facilitate, and delegate) appropriate for the situation to maximize deci- sion outcomes. Each of the five leadership styles affects the level of participation in the decision by followers. Leaders who employ the “facilitate” and “delegate” leadership styles allow greater team participation in decision making. This is what some have described as empowering leadership. Unlike directive leadership that is characterized by behaviors aimed at strict adherence to structure through clear directions and instructions, empow ering leadership gives team members a sense of psychological ownership of their task with greater latitude in decision making.128
Type of Team Identify each statement as characteristic of the following team types: a. functional c. virtual b. cross-functional d. self-managed
14. We are in the marketing department and our primary task is to deal with customer related problems.
15. We don’t really have a conventional boss in our team; instead we share leadership responsibilities.
16. We are developing a multi-specialty work team to speed up processing our orders, and we are including two other departments in the mix.
17. Members of my team are dispersed all over the country and even overseas, yet we conduct meetings and get our work done using the Internet and videoconferencing technologies.
18. Our team has been charged with developing a new product within three months, and we get to decide many job-related issues on our own.
CONCept APPLICATION 8-3
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 286 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 8 TEaM LEaDErShIp anD SELf-ManagED TEaMS 287
team-Centered Decision-Making Model The team-centered decision-making model is preferred when (a) relevant information and expertise are scattered among different people, (b) participation is needed to obtain necessary commitment, (c) concentrating power in a single individual hurts the team, and (d) unpopular decisions need to be made.129 The team- centered approach empowers team members to make decisions and follow through.130 Advocates of the team-centered approach argue that empowerment results in a more dedicated, energetic, and creative workforce. Further, they maintain that employees can be trusted to make decisions about their work, that they can be trained to acquire the skills and abilities needed to do so, and that organizational effectiveness is enhanced through this approach.131 The role of the leader in a team-centered decision-making model is to serve as a consultant, advisor, coach, or facilitator for the team.132
advantages and Disadvantages of team-Centered Decision Making Some advantages of team-centered decision making include the following:
• It can improve decision quality. • Exposure to team decision making has strong positive spillovers on the quality of indi-
vidual decisions.133 • It shifts much of the decision-making action away from the leader, thereby freeing him
or her to focus on more strategic issues. • It allows responsibility to be diffused among several people, thereby facilitating support
for some types of unpopular decisions. • It results in higher commitment by team members to implement decisions as compared
to decisions made alone by a leader.
Some disadvantages of team-centered decision making include the following:
• It can take longer than decisions made alone by a manager. • It can be self-serving and contrary to the best interests of the organization, if team
members have objectives and/or priorities that are different from those of the team or organization.
• It can end up being a poor compromise rather than an optimal solution when team members cannot agree among themselves.
• Leaders who are accustomed to making most or all team decisions may not want to give up this power or fear that if they do, they will appear weak or incompetent. This can lead to confusion and conflict in the team.
• Also, resistance may come from team members who prefer to avoid assuming more responsibility for leadership functions in the team.
Despite these potential problems, empowering team members to make team decisions is a far better approach than concentrating such power in a single individual.
There is general agreement that personality traits of team members affect their effec- tiveness in decision making. Team members with similar traits and experiences will more likely share a common frame of reference when making decisions.134 We should note that the characteristics of effective teams discussed earlier will also contribute toward effective decision making. Complete Self-Assessment 8-3 to better understand how your personality will affect your teamwork. An important part of a leader’s job is conducting team meetings. The next section focuses on conducting team meetings.
WOrK Application 8-9 Recall a team decision that you were a part of, and describe the team leader’s role during the process leading up to the final decision. Would you characterize the leader’s role as leader-centered or team-centered?
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 287 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
288 part 2 TEaM LEaDErShIp
personality traits and teamsSELF-ASSESSMENT 8-3
answer the following two questions, and then read how your personality profile can affect your teamwork. I enjoy being part of a team and working with others more than working alone.
7 — 6 — 5 — 4 — 3 — 2 — 1 Strongly agree Strongly disagree
I enjoy achieving team goals more than individual accomplishments.
7 — 6 — 5 — 4 — 3 — 2 — 1 Strongly agree Strongly disagree
The stronger you agree with the two statements, the higher the probability that you will be a good team player. however, lower scores do not mean that you are not a good team player. The following is some information on how Big five personality dimensions and their related motive needs can affect your teamwork.
Surgency—high need for power. If you have a high need for power, whether you are the team leader or not, you have to be careful not to dominate the group. Seek others’ input, and know when to lead and when to follow. Even when you have great ideas, be sensitive to others so they don’t feel that you are bullying them, and stay calm (adjustment) as you influence them. Be aware of your motives to make sure you use socialized, rather than personalized, power. You have the potential to make a positive contribution to the team with your influencing leadership skills. If you have a low need for power, try to be assertive so that others don’t take advantage of you, and speak up when you have good ideas.
agreeableness—high need for affiliation. If you have a high need for affiliation, you tend to be a good team player. however, don’t let the fear of hurting relationships get in the way of your influencing the team when you have good ideas. Don’t be too quick to give in to others; it doesn’t help the performance of the team when you have a better idea that is not implemented. You have the potential to be a valuable asset to the team as you contribute your skills of working well with others and making them feel important. If you have a low need for affiliation, be careful to be sensitive to others.
Conscientiousness—high need for achievement. If you have a high need for achievement, you have to watch your natural tendency to be more individualistic than team oriented. It’s good to have your own goals; but if the team and orga- nization fail, so do you. remember that there is usually more than one good way to do anything; your way is not always the best. In a related issue, don’t be a perfectionist, as you can cause problems with team members. Being conscientious, you have the potential to help the team do a good job and reach its full potential. If you have a low need for achievement, push yourself to be a valuable contributor to the group, or pull your own weight.
Conducting Effective Team Meetings In a team-oriented organization, leaders spend a great deal of time conducting meetings. Therefore, the need for conducting effective team meetings is stronger than ever.135 The success of meetings depends on the leader’s skill at managing the process. The most com- mon complaints about meetings are that there are too many of them, they are too long, and they are unproductive. Meeting leadership skills can lead to more productive meet- ings. A few years back, Ford Motor Company spent $500,000 to send 280 employees to a three-day training session on developing meeting leadership skills, with three one-day sessions to follow. After the training, fewer employees complained of meetings being too long or unproductive. Managers had gained the necessary meeting leadership skills and were putting this knowledge into practice. Ford’s investment had obviously paid off. In this section, we learn how to plan and conduct a meeting and how to handle problem team members.
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 288 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 8 TEaM LEaDErShIp anD SELf-ManagED TEaMS 289
planning Meetings Leader and member preparations for a meeting have a direct effect on the meeting. Un- prepared leaders tend to conduct unproductive meetings. Planning is needed in at least five areas: objectives, selecting participants and making assignments, the agenda, the time and place for the meeting, and leadership. A written copy of the plan should be sent to members prior to the meeting (see Exhibit 8.2).
• time. List date, place (if it changes), and time (both beginning and ending).
• Objective. State the objectives and/or purpose of the meeting. The objectives can be listed with agenda items, as shown below, rather than as a separate section. However, be sure objectives are specific.
• participation and assignments. If all members have the same assignment, list it. If dif- ferent members have different assignments, list their names and assignments. Assignments may be listed as agenda items, as shown below for Ted and Karen.
• agenda. List each item to be covered, in order of priority, with its approximate time limit. Accepting the minutes of the preceding meeting may be an agenda item. Here is an ex- ample agenda:
GOLD teaM MeetING November 22, 2013, Gold room, 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.
Participation and Assignments All members will attend and should have read the six computer brochures enclosed before the meeting. Be ready to discuss your preferences.
Agenda 1. Discussion and selection of two pCs to be presented to the team at a later date by
pC representatives—45 minutes. (note that this is the major objective; the actual selection takes place later.)
2. Ted will give the Venus project report—5 minutes. 3. Karen will present an idea for changing the product process slightly, without discus-
sion—5 minutes. Discussion will take place at the next meeting, after members have given the idea some thought.
Meeting Plans EXHIBIT 8.2
Objectives Probably the single greatest mistake made by those who call meetings is that they often have no clear idea and purpose for the meeting. Before calling a meeting, clearly define its purpose and set objectives to be accomplished during the meeting. The only exceptions may be at regularly scheduled information-dissemination or brainstorming meetings.
participants and assignments Before calling the meeting, decide who should attend. The more members who attend a meeting, the less the chance that any work will get done. Does the full group/team need to attend? Should some non-group specialist be invited to provide input? On controver- sial issues, the leader may find it wiser to meet with the key members before the meeting
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 289 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
290 part 2 TEaM LEaDErShIp
to discuss the issue. Participants should know in advance what is expected of them at the meeting. If any preparation is expected (read material, do some research, make a report, and so forth), they should have adequate advance notice.
agenda Before calling the meeting, identify the activities that will take place during the meet- ing to achieve the objective. The agenda tells the members what is expected and how the meeting will progress. Having a set time limit for each agenda item helps keep the group on target; needless discussion and getting off the subject are common at all meetings. However, you need to be f lexible and allow more time when really needed. Agenda items may also be submitted from members. If you get agenda items that require action, they should have objectives.
Place agenda items in order of priority. That way, if the group does not have time to cover every item, the least important items carry forward. In meetings in which the agenda items are not prioritized, the tendency is for the leader to put all the so-called quick items first. When this happens, the group gets bogged down and either rushes through the important items or puts them off until later.
Date, time, and place To determine which day(s) and time(s) of the week are best for meetings, get members’ input. Members tend to be more alert early in the day. When members are working in the same office or nearby, it is better to have more frequent shorter meetings focusing on one or just a few items. However, when members have to travel, fewer but longer meetings are needed. Be sure to select an appropriate place for the meeting, and plan for the physical comfort of the group. Be sure seating provides eye contact for small discussion groups, and plan enough time so that the members do not have to rush. If reservations are needed for the meeting place, make them far enough in advance to get a proper meeting room.
With advances in technology, telephone conferences are becoming quite common. Videoconferences are also gaining popularity. These techniques have saved travel costs and time and have resulted in better and quicker decisions. The majority of companies (big and small) today use videoconferencing and teleconferencing technologies to con- duct meetings. The personal computer has been said to be the most useful tool for run- ning meetings since Robert’s Rules of Order. The personal computer can be turned into a large-screen “intelligent chalkboard” that can dramatically change meeting results. Min- utes (notes on what took place during the last meeting) can be taken on the personal com- puter and distributed at the end of the meeting.
Leadership The leader should determine the appropriate leadership style for the meeting. It is recom- mended that leaders play the role of facilitators, which involves guiding the process of the meeting while not inf luencing the content. Each agenda item may need to be handled dif- ferently. For example, some items may simply call for disseminating information; others require a discussion, vote, or consensus; other items require a simple, quick report from a member, and so forth. An effective way to develop group members’ ability is to rotate the role of the group moderator/leader for each meeting.
Conducting Meetings The First Meeting At the first meeting, the group is in the orientation stage. The leader should use the high- task role. However, the members should be given the opportunity to spend some time getting to know one another. Introductions set the stage for subsequent interactions. A
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 290 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 8 TEaM LEaDErShIp anD SELf-ManagED TEaMS 291
simple technique is to start with introductions and then move on to the group’s purpose and objectives and members’ job roles. Sometime during or following this procedure, have a break that enables members to interact informally. If members find that their so- cial needs will not be met, dissatisfaction may occur quickly.
Outline the three parts of conducting effective meetings. Learning Outcome
5
the three parts of a Meeting Each meeting should cover the following:
1. Identifying objectives. Begin the meeting on time; waiting for late members penalizes the members who are on time and develops a norm for arriving late. Begin by review- ing progress to date, the group’s objectives, and the purpose/objective for the specific meeting. If minutes are recorded, they are usually approved at the beginning of the next meeting. For most meetings it is recommended that a secretary be appointed to take minutes.
2. Covering agenda items. Be sure to cover agenda items in priority order. Try to keep to the approximate times but be f lexible. If the discussion is constructive and members need more time, give it to them; however, if the discussion becomes more of a destructive argument, move ahead.
3. Summarizing and reviewing assignments. End the meeting on time. The leader should summarize what took place during the meeting. Were the meeting’s objectives achieved? Review all of the assignments given during the meeting. Get a commitment to the task that each member should perform for the next or a specific future meeting. The secretary and/or leader should record all assignments. If there is no accountabil- ity and follow-up on assignments, members may not complete them.
The team leader needs to focus on group structure, process, and development. As stated, the leadership style needs to change with the group’s level of development. The leader must be sure to provide the appropriate task and/or maintenance behavior when it is needed.
handling problem Members As members work together, personality types tend to emerge. Certain personality types can cause the group to be less efficient. Some of the problem members you may have in your group are the following: silent, talker, wanderer, bored, and arguer.
Silent To have a fully effective meeting, all group members should participate. If members are silent, the group does not get the benefit of their input. It is the leader’s responsibility to encourage the silent member to participate without being obvious or overdoing it. One technique the leader can use is the rotation method, in which all members take turns giv- ing their input. This method is generally less threatening than directly calling on people. However, the rotation method is not always appropriate. To build up the silent members’ confidence, call on them with questions they can easily answer. When you believe they have convictions, ask them to express them. Watch their nonverbal communication as indicators of when to call on them. If you are a silent type, try to participate more often. Know when to stand up for your views and be assertive. Silent types generally do not make good leaders.
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 291 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
292 part 2 TEaM LEaDErShIp
talker Talkers have something to say about everything. They like to dominate the discussion. However, if they do dominate, the other members do not get to participate. The talker can cause intragroup problems, such as low cohesiveness and conf licts. It is the leader’s responsibility to slow talkers down, not to shut them up. Do not let them dominate the group. The rotation technique is also effective with talkers. They have to wait their turn. When not using a rotation method, gently interrupt the talker and present your own ideas or call on other members to present their ideas. Prefacing questions with statements like “let’s give those who have not answered yet a chance” can also slow the talker down. If you tend to be a talker, try to slow down. Give others a chance to talk and do things for themselves. Good leaders develop others’ abilities in these areas.
Wanderer Wanderers distract the group from the agenda items; they tend to change the subject and often like to complain. The leader is responsible for keeping the group on track. If the wanderer wants to socialize, cut it off. Be kind; thank the member for the contribution, and then throw a question out to the group to get it back on track. If the wanderer has a complaint that is legitimate and solvable, allow the group to discuss it. Group struc- ture issues should be addressed and resolved. However, if an issue is not resolvable, get the group back on track. Griping without resolving anything tends to reduce morale and commitment to task accomplishment. If the wanderer complains about irresolvable is- sues, make statements like “We may be underpaid, but we have no control over our pay. Complaining will not get us a raise; let’s get back to the issue at hand.” If you tend to be a wanderer, try to be aware of your behavior and stay on the subject at hand.
Bored Your group may have one or more members who are not interested in the job. The bored person may be preoccupied with other issues and not pay attention or participate in the group meeting. The bored member may also feel superior and wonder why the group is spending so much time on the obvious.
The leader is responsible for keeping members motivated. Assign the bored member a task like recording ideas on the board and recording the minutes. Call on bored mem- bers; bring them into the group. If you allow them to sit back, things may get worse and others may decide not to participate either. If you tend to be bored, try to find ways to help motivate yourself. Work at becoming more patient and in control of behavior that can have negative effects on other members.
arguer Like the talker, the arguer likes to be the center of attention. This behavior can occur when you use the devil’s advocate approach, which is helpful in developing and select- ing alternative courses of action. However, arguers enjoy arguing for the sake of arguing, rather than helping the group. They turn things into a win–lose situation, and they can not stand losing.
The leader should resolve conf lict but not in an argumentative way. Do not get into an argument with arguers; that is exactly what they want to happen. If an argument starts, bring others into the discussion. If it is personal, cut it off. Personal attacks only hurt the group. Keep the discussion moving on target. If you tend to be an arguer, strive to convey your views in an assertive debate format, not as an aggressive argument. Listen to others’ views and be willing to change if they have better ideas.
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 292 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 8 TEaM LEaDErShIp anD SELf-ManagED TEaMS 293
Group problem people Identify the problem type as: a. silent b. talker c. wanderer d. bored e. arguer
19. Marcy is usually reluctant to share her ideas. When asked to expand on her ideas, Marcy often shrugs and declines further comment.
20. A usually very active team member, Frank seems very absent-minded today and not very engaged in the discussion. The other members are doing all the discussing and volunteering for assignments.
21. David seems to enjoy challenging members’ viewpoints on every issue so much so that other team members are getting really frustrated with him.
22. As the team is trying to resolve a crisis, Johnny’s focus was on trying to inform everyone about the company owner and the female mailroom clerk.
23. Charlie is always first or second to volunteer his ideas. He is long-winded in his presentations, which draws whispers from others about his “clueless” attitude.
Working with Group Members Whenever you work in a group, do not embarrass, intimidate, or argue with any mem- bers, no matter how they provoke you. If you do, the result will make a martyr of them and a bully of you to the group. If you have serious problem members who do not respond to the above techniques, confront them individually outside of the group. Get them to agree to work in a cooperative way.
The remainder of this chapter will focus on the concept of SMTs, an innovative exten- sion of the team concept.
Self-Managed Teams As work increases in complexity and domestic economies become part of the global economy, the desire to find new and more effective ways of organizing employees grows accordingly. During the latter part of the 20th century to the present, the use of teams has been the competitive weapon of choice for many organizations (for-prof it and not-for-profit). Lately, many of these organizations are experimenting with an innova- tive extension of the team concept called the self-managed team (SMT).136 Proponents of the SMT concept argue that autonomy in the form of shared control over critical task-related decisions does enable SMTs to perform better than conventional teams.137 It is the belief that team members who have such autonomy are more likely to feel invested in the process and be dedicated to accomplishing the stated goals. SMTs go by many different names: self-directed, autonomous, self-leading, self-maintaining, or self-regulating.138
This section examines the nature of SMTs by highlighting the differences between SMTs and conventional teams, the benefits of using SMTs, guidelines for improving their effectiveness, the role of leadership in the SMT concept, and the challenges of incorporat- ing SMTs into an organization’s structure.
WOrK Application 8-10 Recall a meeting you attended. Did you receive an agenda prior to the meeting? How well did the leader conduct the meeting? Give ideas on how the meeting could have been improved. Did the group have any problem members? How well did the leader handle them?
CONCept APPLICATION 8-4
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 293 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
294 part 2 TEaM LEaDErShIp
the Nature of Self-Managed teams In the quest to remain competitive in new product/service development, companies are finding out that effectively managing human interactions and the rapid transfer of tech- nology/ideas among individuals and functional units is key to staying competitive. Se- lecting, training, and rewarding employees as well as giving them autonomy in the form of collective control over critical task-related decisions can enable SMTs to perform more effectively.139 To better understand the nature of SMTs, we call attention to a few key dif- ferences between SMTs and traditional teams.
how are SMts Different from Conventional teams? Self-managed teams differ from conventional teams in a number of ways. In conven- tional teams, decision making resides in the hands of a leader who provides the team with direction and maintains control over work-related decisions. In contrast, SMTs have a significant amount of decision-making authority. Members are charged with duties such as managing themselves, self-appraisals, planning and scheduling work, making production- or service-related decisions, peer evaluation, and conf lict reso- lution. Members take responsibility for outlining how they will achieve the team’s objectives.140
The leadership function in a SMT is different from that in a conventional team. SMT members share or rotate leadership responsibilities and hold themselves mutually responsible for meeting team goals. Roles interchange frequently as members learn to be followers as well as leaders. Rather than being specialized, SMT members develop multi-skilled capabilities that make them very f lexible in performing various tasks within the team. SMTs give all team members a voice in making decisions about the design of work, as well as greater autonomy and discretion in task accomplishment. Members operate without direct managerial supervision—an idea almost unthinkable a generation ago.141
The nature of SMTs is one of team rather than individual empowerment and account- ability.142 Team accountability is a significant responsibility, because SMT members are responsible not only for their own performance but for that of other team members as well. In successful SMTs, members have come to see that what they collectively gain is greater than what they could achieve individually. It is the case that those who do well in SMT settings are good problem solvers, effective communicators, able to deal with con- f lict, very adaptive, and possess an internal locus of control.
Depending on the types of decisions, the amount of authority vested in an SMT varies from one organization to another. For instance, in some organizations, SMTs are given the primary responsibility for personnel decisions such as hiring and firing team mem- bers, conducting performance appraisals, and determining compensation (within speci- fied limits); in other organizations, such decisions are left to top management.143 Teams in this later setting are usually allowed to make small expenditures for supplies and equipment without prior approval, but like in most organizations, any action involving large purchases must be approved by top management. Exhibit 8.5 summarizes the key differences between conventional and SMT.
Explain the differences between conventional and self-managed teams. Learning Outcome
6
WOrK Application 8-11 Based on your own experience, or asking someone who has been part of an SMT, describe some of the self-managing activities of the team that made it a truly self-managing team as opposed to a traditional team.
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 294 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 8 TEaM LEaDErShIp anD SELf-ManagED TEaMS 295
Characteristics Self-Managed teams Conventional teams
Leadership Team member role Accountability Work design Job Descriptions Skills
Shared/Distributed Interchangeable Team Inter-dependent Flexible Multi-skilled
Singular/Sole Fixed Individual Task Oriented Fixed Specialized
Differences between Conventional and Self-Managed Teams EXHIBIT 8.3
the Benefits of Self-Managed teams A primary reason for growth in popularity of the SMT concept is the reported benefits by organizations (large and small) that have adopted it. Self-managed work teams are praised for bringing about results such as increased productivity, accelerated new product development and process improvements, greater product/service quality, improved worker participation, and better decisions overall.144 These outcomes do lead to increases in job satisfaction, which in turn have been associated with other positive organizational and employee outcomes, such as lower absenteeism rates, less turnover, higher motivation levels and self-esteem, increased organizational citizenship behavior, and, ultimately, in- creased levels of profitability.145,146
Describe the benefits of using self-managed teams in organizations. Learning Outcome
7
Types of Teams Identify each statement below with one of these key terms. a. group c. cross-functional team b. functional team d. self-managed team
24. I have been assigned to a team where leadership roles are rotated and shared, with the team responsible for its own planning and execution of plans.
25. At Solomon’s Technology Solutions, an integrated team with members from R&D, design, finance, customer service, and quality control oversaw an ambitious information system for a big client.
26. At the Furniture Factory, the quality control department headed by a manager is in charge of checking a sample of all finished furniture to make sure there are no defective items going to the retail customers.
27. In my organization, a number of us usually get together with no specific objective or purpose to discuss work- related and sometimes non-work-related matters.
CONCept APPLICATION 8-5
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 295 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
296 part 2 TEaM LEaDErShIp
SMTs do create a context for a shared and emotionally grounded identity that allows for a common set of guiding principles for decision making and action. Because any agreed-upon course of action is taken collectively, there is a strong commitment among all team members to make it successful.147 Pride in the team’s accomplishment and a strong sense of belonging inspire SMT members to connect with their organization’s vision and mission.
SMTs reduce costs because of the reductions in managerial ranks throughout the orga- nization. In a study examining the economic benefits of organizing field technicians into SMTs, it was found that SMTs absorb the monitoring and coordination tasks of supervi- sors, substantially reducing indirect labor costs but without adversely affecting quality and productivity.148
It should be noted that SMTs do exhibit the same general advantages of teamwork discussed earlier in the chapter. It’s a question of how much further these benefits go when conventional teams are replaced with SMTs. Exhibit 8.6 summarizes the benefits of SMTs. The next section discusses options for improving SMT effectiveness and addresses organizational-level factors that can impact SMT success.
• Greater improvements in quality, speed, process, and innovation.
• A strong sense of belonging and ownership in one’s work.
• Greater employee motivation.
• Accelerated new product development.
• Greater employee participation.
• Reduced operational costs because of reductions in managerial ranks and greater efficiencies.
• Greater employee job satisfaction, commitment, and productivity, and lower turnover and absenteeism rates.
Benefits of Self-Managed Teams EXHIBIT 8.4
WOrK Application 8-12 If you have been part of an SMT, describe the benefits that you derived from being part of the team. Be specific, matching your description to the list in Exhibit 8.4.
7. Do you think Gary Kelly is the type of leader who would embrace the SMt concept? explain your answer.
In 2008 and 2010, Mr. Kelly asked the Mercer Group, a management-consulting firm, to conduct an employee survey to determine how employees felt about the company and areas of improvement. This shows that the CEO is willing to listen to his followers and take their suggestions seriously. Reflecting on the careers of some of his young managers, whom he hired as entry-level employees, Gary Kelly said, “It is not such a stretch to feel that you’ve helped raised these people. They helped raise me, for that matter.” Coupled with Mr. Kelly’s objective to make Southwest a happy place for its employees and make work fun, it is a good bet that he would readily embrace SMTs if employees wanted to give it a try. He seems to be a leader who will be adaptable and willing to learn from his followers.
OPENING CASE application ©
C en
ga ge
L ea
rn in
g®
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 296 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 8 TEaM LEaDErShIp anD SELf-ManagED TEaMS 297
top Management and Self-Managed team Success Despite the documented benefits of SMTs, there is still much that needs to be done to improve their success rate. Many things can go wrong with SMTs, and adjusting to new behavioral expectations can be difficult. Many SMT initiatives are eventually abandoned.149 For SMTs to succeed there has to be strong and sustained top management support. The introduction of SMTs does threaten the positions of managers who are asked to function as team members instead of team leaders. Some rank-and-file employees may not be ready to handle the responsibility, authority, and accountability that SMTs put on them. The SMT concept may go against the organization’s old way of doing things and thus encounter resistance and even sabotage from other employees. Therefore, in plan- ning the introduction of SMTs into the organization’s structure, top management should abide by the following recommendations to ensure a higher rate of success:150
• Ensure that there is an organization-wide support and acceptance of the SMT concept. This can be done by confronting critical structural and cultural questions such as: Does the SMT have sufficient autonomy to perform its task and have access to infor- mation? Have conditions been created in which authority can shift between members to appropriately match the demands of their task? Are SMT participants adequately motivated and supported? Are there any psychological or functional walls preventing unity of purpose and action? This structural-cultural alignment with the SMT concept increases the chances of success.
• Have a champion to support and defend the SMT from opponents who are threatened by the new concept and what it represents. A self-managed team champion is an advocate of the SMT concept whose responsibility is to help the team obtain necessary re- sources, gain political support from top management and other stakeholders of the organi- zation, and defend it from enemy attacks. This advocacy role is especially critical when there is hostility and distrust by other managers who are afraid the SMTs will cause major shifts of power and authority in the organization. The SMT champion is therefore constantly engaged in getting others to “buy in” and gaining commitment at all levels, while communicating the benefits of the SMT.151
• Allow adequate time for training so team members can bond with one another and form team skills. Effective team-building interventions will break down barriers and create opportunities for greater cooperation.
• Selecting members for SMTs should be a careful and judicious process. Team mem- ber skills and experiences should match task requirements. Team diversity should be emphasized.152
• Provide specific goals and incentives. • Ensure that the organization has the necessary resources in time, money and people to
commit to this kind of change. • Avoid overreacting at the first sign of crisis. Team-building experts caution against over-
reacting when an SMT starts experiencing problems. Top management should resist the urge to pull the plug on the new program or the tendency to micromanage it. Instead, a careful review and analysis of problem areas should be done before any action is taken.
The next sections examine the changing role of leadership in SMTs and the challenges of implementing SMTs.
Describe top management’s role in improving the success rate of self-managed teams. Learning Outcome
8
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 297 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
298 part 2 TEaM LEaDErShIp
the Changing role of Leadership in Self-Managed teams If, as we defined it, SMTs are relatively autonomous teams whose members share or ro- tate leadership responsibilities and hold themselves mutually responsible for meeting team goals, then the obvious question becomes, what type of leadership does the SMT embody if at all? The answer lies in a leadership form that is not authority-determined or hierar- chical.153 Members have been highly trained to handle leadership responsibilities such as hiring, discipline, firing, motivation, performance appraisals, and training. Different persons lead as the needs of the team demand. We call this distributed or shared leader- ship.154,155 In distributed leadership, multiple leaders take complementary leadership roles in rotation within the same SMT, according to their area of expertise or interest.156,157 In other words, different members of the SMT assume different leadership roles as circum- stances and task requirements warrant. It is what some have described as peer leadership.158
Some organizations do assign a facilitator to SMTs. Where this is the case, the SMT reports to the facilitator. The purpose of the facilitator is to define the “broad parameters” for the SMT, clear the path in the organization for the team, and offer advice and coun- sel as needed. It is just as critical that the SMT facilitator possess the requisite skills and ability to effectively lead as was the case with conventional teams. The SMt facilitator is the external leader of an SMT, whose job is to create optimal working conditions so that team members take on responsibilities to work productively and solve complex problems on their own.
A su m ma r y of t he SMT faci l itator’s tea m-bu i ld i ng ac t iv it ies is presented i n Exhibit 8.5. Employing these team-building activities will generate greater identification with the team, especially as pride in the team’s accomplishments grows.
Improving the Success Rate of SMTs Identify which guideline for improving the success rate of SMTs is implied by each statement below. a. top management support and commitment b. specific goals and incentives c. SMT Champion d. adequate and necessary resources e. team composition f. matching culture and structure g. adequate team training time
28. Management expects us to get the job done but has not created the kind of environment that supports and values our unique set up and way of doing things.
29. The thing that frustrates me is the fact that we don’t have all that we need to meet our team objectives.
30. I got frustrated with my team because no two team members could agree on what we were supposed to be doing or how we will be evaluated for compensation.
31. The team members are not taking our new self-directed status seriously, because they believe SMTs are just the latest fad and those in charge will drop it for the next hot topic.
32. There are still a lot of people in this organization who don’t know why we operate differently from other traditional teams and thus are not very supportive of our efforts. We need someone to defend and promote us.
WOrK Application 8-13 Describe which of the SMT Facilitator’s team-building activities (see Exhibit 8.5) have been employed in a team that you are or had been a member.
CONCept APPLICATION 8-6
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 298 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 8 TEaM LEaDErShIp anD SELf-ManagED TEaMS 299
the Challenges of Implementing Self-Managed teams To observe a highly effective SMT at work is truly a sight to behold. However, it is a dif- ficult concept to implement. There are many reasons for this, not the least of which is the fact that management usually will not get out of the way. Some managers see the SMT as a threat to their future. Some have gone as far as to suggest that the use of self-managed work teams may signal the end of the middle manager.159
Even among members of the non-managerial ranks, the transition to SMTs has as much potential for frustrations and problems as it does for managers. This is usually due to unfa- miliarity with the new structure and new routines, and adjusting to team responsibilities. Team members must learn new behaviors. The need to adapt to a new working arrangement in which the definition of teamwork requires a fundamental adjustment, may be too much for some members, and thus lead to personality and behavior conf licts. The greatest challenge may lie in setting and enforcing new behavioral expectations made necessary by the absence of a conventional leader and the presence of new employee rights and responsibilities.
Some of the disadvantages of working in teams in general discussed earlier in the chap- ter—such as social loafing and groupthink—are also likely to occur in poorly designed SMTs.
The decision to use SMTs as a tool for re-engineering work in an organization is not always a guaranteed success. It requires a great deal of commitment, effort, and support from all members of the organization, especially senior management. In organizations where there has been careful planning, former managers become SMT facilitators and are retrained to function differently than they did in their previous role.
Many of the difficulties associated with SMTs stem from the inability of some manag- ers to transition from a conventional command-and-control leadership role to a shared role in self-managed teams.160 Ultimately, when former managers now working as part of an SMT worry more about their egos and avoid communicating with other members, they set a poor example for the rest of the team. This can lead to increased workplace conf lict and political activity, ill will, and decrease in morale. Changing old attitudes and mindsets is therefore a major challenge to implementing SMTs.
It is the case that managers who have become accustomed to traditional, autocratic man- agement and jaded at management fads that come and go may resist or undermine an SMT launch. In the long run, the benefits of SMTs such as improved employee morale, productiv- ity, quality, and economic savings are well worth the growing pains.
• Providing avenues for resolving interpersonal conflicts. • Creating opportunities for social interaction. • Increasing cohesiveness and cooperation among team members. • Facilitating high level communication among team members. • Highlighting mutual interest, not differences, of team members. • Using ceremonies, rituals, and symbols to build team identify and bonding. • Employing team-oriented incentives to foster team spirit.
SMT Facilitator: Team-Building Activities EXHIBIT 8.5
Describe the challenges of implementing effective self-managed teams. Learning Outcome
9
WOrK Application 8-14 Have you worked in a team in which former managers have been reassigned to function simply as members of the team? What was your experience with the behavior and attitude of these former managers in their new role as team members?
“Take It To The Net”. Access student resources at www.cengagebrain.com. Search for Lussier, Leadership 6e to find student study tools.
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 299 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
300 part 2 TEaM LEaDErShIp
Chapter Summary
The chapter summary is organized to answer the nine learning outcomes for this chapter.
1 Discuss the benefits and limitations of working in teams.
Benefits: In a team situation it is possible to achieve synergy, whereby the team’s total output exceeds the sum of individual member contributions. Team mem- bers often evaluate and add to one another’s thinking, so there are fewer chances of errors and the quality of the decisions is improved. a team atmosphere contrib- utes well toward effective problem solving, continuous improvement, and innovation. also, being a team mem- ber makes it possible for someone to satisfy more needs than working alone; among these are the need for affilia- tion, security, self-esteem, and self-fulfillment. Limitations: Some teams have the unhealthy practice of pressuring members to conform to lower group standards of performance and conduct. for example, a team member may be ostracized for being more pro- ductive than his or her coworkers. Shirking of individual responsibility, or social loafing, is another problem fre- quently noted in teams. another well-known problem common in teams is the practice of groupthink, which happens when the team values getting along so much that dissenting views are quickly suppressed in favor of group consensus.
2 Identify and explain the ten characteristics of highly effective teams.
See Exhibit 8.1 and the ensuing discussion of each char- acteristic in the text.
3 What role can a team leader play in creating an effective team?
The team leader’s role in creating an effective team in- clude being the (1) chief motivator, (2) team coach and mentor, (3) role model, (4) team culture enforcer, (5) cheerleader, and (6) resource person.
4 Describe how organizational culture can influ- ence team creativity.
Creating the right organizational culture is the respon- sibility of top management. Creativity does not work in hierarchical command-and-control environments. Top management has the responsibility to create the ap- propriate setting and support systems that foster and nourish creativity. Creating an organizational culture that supports and encourages creativity provides the protection that team members need to take creative risks. another organizational factor that influences team creativity is a commitment to team diversity. Diverse teams feature differences in thinking styles, knowledge,
skills, values, and beliefs among individual team members, which enhances creativity.
5 Outline the three parts of conducting effective meetings.
Each meeting should cover the following:
1. Identify objectives. Begin the meeting on time. Begin by reviewing progress to date, the group’s objectives, and the purpose/objective for the specific meeting. If min- utes are recorded, they are usually approved at the beginning of the next meeting.
2. Cover agenda items. Be sure to cover agenda items in priority order. Tr y to keep to the approximate times, but be flexible. If the discussion is constructive and members need more time, give it to them; however, if the discussion is more of a destructive argument, move ahead.
3. Summarize and review assignments. End the meet- ing on time. The leader should summarize what took place during the meeting. Were the meeting’s objec- tives achieved? Review all of the assignments given during the meeting. Get a commitment to the task that each member should perform for the next or a specific future meeting. The secretar y and/or leader should record all assignments.
6 explain the differences between conventional and self-managed teams.
SMTs differ from traditional teams in a number of ways. In SMTs, roles interchange frequently as members learn to be followers as well as leaders. rather than function- ing in their specialized units, SMT members develop multi-skilled capabilities that make them very flexible in performing various tasks within the team. The nature of SMTs is one of team empowerment and accountability rather than individual empowerment and accountability. Team accountability is a significant responsibility, espe- cially because SMT members determine how they will organize themselves to get the work done and are re- sponsible not only for their own performance but for that of other team members as well. See Exhibit 8.3.
7 Describe the benefits of using self-managed teams in organizations.
SMTs (1) create a stronger sense of commitment to the work effort among team members; (2) improve quality, speed, and innovation; (3) have more satisfied employees and lower turnover and absenteeism; (4) facilitate faster
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 300 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
new-product development; (5) allow cross-trained team members greater flexibility in dealing with personnel shortages due to illness or turnover; and (6) keep opera- tional costs down because of reductions in managerial ranks and increased efficiencies.
8 Describe top management’s role in improving the success rate of self-managed teams.
Senior management has the principal responsibility to create the right environment in which SMTs can grow and thrive. This involves undertaking activities to ensure that there is organization-wide support and acceptance of the SMT concept, appoint a champion to support and defend the SMT from opponents who are threatened by the new concept and what it represents, allow adequate time for training so team members can bond with one another and form team skills, carefully and judiciously se- lect team members so their skills and experiences match task requirements, provide specific goals and incentives,
insure the availability of adequate resources, and avoid overreacting at the first sign of a crisis.
9 Describe the challenges of implementing effec- tive self-managed teams.
Many of the challenges of implementing SMTs stem from the difficulties of transitioning from a traditional command- and-control work environment to SMTs. Managers who have become accustomed to traditional, autocratic man- agement and jaded by management fads that come and go may resist or undermine a team approach. Even among members of the non-managerial ranks, the transition to SMTs has as much potential for frustrations and problems as it does for managers. This is usually due to unfamiliar- ity with the new structure and new routines and adjusting to team responsibilities. The greatest challenge may lie in setting and enforcing new behavioral expectations, made necessary by the absence of a traditional leader and the presence of new employee rights and responsibilities.
cross-functional team, 284
distributed leadership, 298
functional team, 283
group, 271
groupthink, 273
self-managed team champion, 297
SMT facilitator, 298
self-managed teams (SMTs), 285
social loafing, 273
team, 271
team cohesion, 277
team creativity, 281
team effectiveness, 275
team learning, 275
team-member exchange (TMX), 275
team norms, 277
teamwork, 272
vir tual team, 285
Key Terms
1 What is groupthink, and under what conditions is it most likely to occur?
2 Describe the factors that generally contribute to high levels of team cohesion.
3 Creativity is usually thought of as a characteristic of indi- viduals, but are some teams more creative than individuals?
4 What is team-centered leadership, and how does it differ from the leader-centered approach?
5 Describe how a leader can avoid conducting nonproduc- tive meetings.
6 Describe the level of decision-making latitude commonly found in self-managed teams?
7 Briefly discuss some of the potential benefits and draw- backs of using self-managed teams.
Review Questions
ChapTeR 8 TEaM LEadErShip and SELf-ManagEd TEaMS 301
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 301 10/21/14 12:11 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
The following critical-thinking questions can be used for class discussion and/or as written assignments to develop criti- cal thinking skills. Be sure to give complete explanations for all questions.
1 Teams are often credited with making better decisions than individuals, yet they are also criticized for groupthink. What are some strategies for creating effective teams that don’t fall victim to the groupthink phenomenon?
2 Identify and describe any team you have been a member of, or know about otherwise, that has a strong norm of teamwork that all members support. What role did the team leader play in making this possible?
3 What are some of the key indicators of team dysfunction?
4 What is the key to creating cross-functional teams in which team members put the good of the team ahead of functional self-interest?
5 How can virtual teams work well together from far apart?
6 What would you describe as some of the dos and don’ts of team leadership?
7 Describe an organization whose culture, structure, and leadership philosophy clearly suppor t creativity and innovation.
Critical thinking Questions
302 part 2 TEaM LEaDErShIp
FedEx has built what is the most seamless global air and ground network in its industry, connecting more than 90 percent of the world’s economic activity. It is evident that FedEx’s open, flexible, and team-based organizational structure and culture has been instrumental in keeping the company’s lead position in overnight package ser vice. According to its founding CEO Fred Smith, teamwork and team leadership deserves much of the credit.
FedEx has expanded far beyond what Mr. Smith star ted with back in 1971. With annual revenues of $43 billion, FedEx has continued to strengthen its industr y leadership in global transpor tation services. Federal Express was the first service company to win the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award in 1990. In addition, FedEx has consistently been ranked on For- tune magazine’s industry lists, including “World’s Most Admired Companies,” “America’s Most Admired Companies,” “100 Best Companies to Work For,” and “Blue Ribbon Companies.”
With growth have come difficulties of coordination, maintaining efficiency, meeting customer expectations, and managing employees. Smith realized that a rigid hierarchy of command-and-control leadership would only magnify these difficulties. To give his employees the flexibility and freedom they need to move quickly and help FedEx remain the domi- nant overnight deliver y ser vice in the world, Smith decided to restructure FedEx by emphasizing the team approach to
getting work done. The phrase “FedEx Team” is common throughout the corporate literature and represents the way they view themselves. CEO Smith directed his executive team to create and empower more teams by giving them the au- thority and the responsibility to make the changes needed to improve productivity and customer satisfaction through- out the FedEx system. As described on the corporation’s Web site, FedEx’s operating strategy works seamlessly—and simultaneously—on three levels:
• Compete collectively by standing as one brand worldwide and speaking with one voice.
• Operate independently by focusing on our inde- pendent networks to meet distinct customer needs.
• Manage collaboratively by working together to sus- tain loyal relationships with our workforce, customers, and investors.
An example of the successful implementation of Mr. Smith’s vision can be found in Springfield, Virginia. With strong suppor t from their managers, employees formed the Quality Action Team to overhaul their package-sor ting techniques. The improvements they introduced put couri- ers on the road 12 minutes earlier than before and halved the number of packages they delivered late. The success of
C A S E
Frederick W. Smith—FedEx
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 302 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 8 TEaM LEaDErShIp anD SELf-ManagED TEaMS 303
teams at depar tmental or local levels encouraged the CEO and his leadership team to also assign employee teams to companywide projects. Facing growing competition from United Parcel Ser vice, the U.S. Postal Ser vice, and Airborne Express, FedEx organized its clerical employees into “super- teams” of up to 10 people. These teams operated as SMTs with little direct super vision from managers. One team cut ser vice glitches, such as incorrect bills and lost packages by 13 percent. Another team spotted—and worked until they eventually solved—a billing problem that had been costing the company $2.1 million a year.
FedEx teams have worked so well because Fred Smith sets stretch goals and then incentivizes his follower s to achieve them. He spearheaded the concept of the “golden package,” the idea that every package FedEx handles is criti- cal and must be delivered on time. Whenever there’s a crisis, whether due to operational failures or to Mother Nature threatening to ground the company’s planes, the team with the golden package takes charge to figure out how to make the delivery on time. Smith reinforces group performance by presenting a monthly Circle of Excellence award to the best FedEx station. He encourages innovative thinking by creat- ing a “job-secure environment.” He takes the position that “if you hang people who try to do something that doesn’t quite work, you’ll get people who don’t do anything.”
Managers are by no means obsolete at FedEx. Mr. Smith has redefined their roles. There has been a shift in mindset from the traditional leader-centric model to the team-cen- tered leadership approach. Managers are expected to for- mulate clear, attainable goals for their teams, solicit employee ideas, and act on the best employee suggestions. FedEx man- agers perceive their role as facilitators—and sometimes they are players. During emergencies at the Memphis hub, senior managers have been known to hurry down from the execu- tive suite to help load packages onto the conveyor belts that feed the company’s planes. They practice team leadership by doing, not by telling.
Mr. Smith is responsible for providing strategic vision for all FedEx Corporation operating companies, including FedEx Ser- vices, FedEx Express, FedEx Ground, and FedEx Freight. FedEx ser ves more than 220 countries and territories with opera- tions that include 634 aircraft and over 90,000 vehicles. FedEx inspires its more than 300,000 team members to remain “ab- solutely, positively” focused on safety, the highest ethical and professional standards and the needs of their customers and communities.161
G O t O t h e I N t e r N e t : To learn more about Fred Smith and FedEx, visit the Web site (http://www .fedex.com).
Support your answers to the following questions with specific information from the case and text or with other information you get from the Web or other sources.
1. How do the standards set by Fred Smith for FedEx teams improve organizational performance?
2. What motivates the member s of FedEx to remain highly engaged in their teams?
3. Describe the role FedEx managers play in facilitating team effectiveness.
4. What type of teams does FedEx use? Provide evidence from the case to suppor t your answer.
5. Leaders play a critical role in building effective teams. Cite evidence from the case that FedEx managers per- formed some of these roles in developing effective teams.
C U M U L a t I V e C a S e Q U e S t I O N S
6. The Big Five model of personality categorizes traits into dimensions of surgency, agreeableness, adjust- ment, conscientiousness, and openness to experience (Chapter 2). Which of these dimensions do you think Fred Smith possesses?
7. The normative leadership model identifies five leader- ship styles appropriate for different situations that us- ers can select to maximize decisions (Chapter 4). Which of the five leadership styles is practiced by FedEx team leaders?
8. The case reveals that at the Memphis hub senior man- agers have been known to hurry down from the execu- tive suite to help load packages during emergencies to get the plane off on time. FedEx leaders want to be seen as coaches, not managers. Specific guidelines can help a leader become an effective coach (Chapter 6). Which of the guideline(s) does the example above represent?
9. Research on follower ship descr ibes five types of followers (see Exhibit 7.1). Which of these types will work best in FedEx’s team environment as described in the case, and why?
C a S e e X e r C I S e a N D r O L e - p L a Y
preparation: You are senior vice president for operations at FedEx. FedEx’s monthly Circle of Excellence Award is presented to the best FedEx station. This time the best station was one that truly represented the spirit of teamwork in problem solving. The
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 303 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
304 part 2 TEaM LEaDErShIp
station manager spotted a loading problem that was costing the company millions of dollars a year and decided to leave it up to the station as a group to find ways of solving the problem. After a series of group meetings and key decisions, a solution was found that successfully took care of the loading problem and was adopted by the rest of the company. It has come to Fred Smith’s attention that a key reason for the station’s success is the leader- ship role played by the team leader during this process. Smith has asked that you use the award ceremony as an opportunity to highlight the virtues of the team-centered approach of leadership,
particularly with respect to decision making in teams. Develop the key parts of the speech you will give on this occasion.
Your instructor may elect to break the class into groups to share ideas and put together the speech or simply ask each stu- dent to prepare an independent speech. If you do a group speech, select one leader to present the speech to the entire class.
role-play: One person (representing oneself or a group) may give the speech to the entire class, or break into groups of five or six and deliver speeches one at a time.
The National Education for Assistance Dog Ser vices (NEADS) functions with teams of people. But an-other type of teamwork is also central to the mission of NEADS: the team of human and dog. NEADS acquires, raises, trains, and matches ser vice dogs to meet the needs of people with limited physical mobility or deafness. It takes about two years to train a service dog—and that requires a lot of teamwork. Volunteer families become par t of the team when, at four months of age, the puppies are placed in foster care. These families agree to feed, love, and raise the puppies so they become accustomed to the distractions and energy of the real world. Professional dog trainers from NEADS visit regularly to work with the families and dogs to ensure that the dogs receive the proper training in preparation for their
later work. The puppies live in their foster homes until they are about a year and a half old; then they return to the NEADS farm to continue their education. Here, they receive advanced training from professional dog trainers. When a dog’s training is complete, its new owner arrives on campus for a two-week stay, during which the person and the dog become a team. The person and dog have been matched through an extensive interview process that involves a team of people interviewers and dog trainers.
1. Describe the characteristics of a typical NEADS team, using the information discussed in the chapter.
2. What factors determine the cohesiveness of NEADS teams?
V I D E O C a S E
The NEADS Team: People and Dogs
Behavior Model Skills Training 8-1 This behavior model skills training on leadership decision mak- ing has four parts. You should first read how to use the model. Then, you may view the behavior model video that illustrates all four decision-making styles for the same decision. Parts III and IV are together in Developing Your Leadership Skills Exercise
8-1, which gives you the opportunity to develop your ability to select the leadership decision-making style most appropriate for a given situation. Lastly, you further develop this skill by using the model in your personal and professional life.
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 304 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 8 TEaM LEaDErShIp anD SELf-ManagED TEaMS 305
Leadership Decision-Making Model
Deciding Which Leadership Decision-Making Style to Use Read the instructions for using the leadership decision-making model, and see Model 8.1. You may want to refer to the model as you read.
Managers today realize the trend toward participation in decision making, and managers are open to using participation. It is sometimes difficult for managers to decide when to use participation and when not to, and what level of participation to use. You are about to learn how to use a model that will develop your skill at selecting the appropriate leadership style to meet the needs of the situation. First, let’s examine ways in which groups can be used to generate solutions.
Selecting the appropriate Leadership Decision Style We have the same four variables as in the Situational Communication Model 6.6—time, information, acceptance, and capability level.
Step 1 Diagnose the situation. The first step you follow as a leader involves diagnosing the situational variables—including time, information, acceptance, and follower capability.
time. You must determine whether there is enough time to include followers in decision making. Time is viewed as yes (you have time to use participation) or no (there is no time to use participation). If there is no time, you should use the autocratic style (S1A in Model 6.6), regardless of preference. When there is no time to include employees in problem solving and decision making, you ignore the other three variables; they are irrelevant if there is no time. If you say yes there is time, then the consulta- tive, participative, or empowerment styles may be appropriate. You use the other three variables to select the style.
Time is a relative term. In one situation, a few minutes may be considered a shor t time period, but in another a month may be a shor t period of time. Time is not wasted when the potential advantages of using par ticipation are realized.
Information. You must decide if you have enough information to make a quality decision alone. The more information you have, the less need for participation; the less information you have, the greater the need for participation. If you have all the neces- sary information, there is no need for follower participation, and the autocratic style (S1A) is appropriate. When you have some information, but need more, which can be obtained by asking questions, the consultative style (S2C) may be appropriate. If you have little information, the appropriate style may be participative (S3P—group discussion) or empowerment (S4E—group makes the decision).
acceptance. You must decide whether employee accep- tance of the decision is critical to implementation of the
decision. The more the followers will like a decision, the less need there is for par ticipation; the more the followers will dislike a decision, the greater the need for par ticipation. If you make the decision alone, will the follower or group willingly implement it? If the follower or group will be accepting, the appropriate style is probably autocratic (S1A). If the follower or group will be reluctant, the appropriate style may be consultative (S2C) or par ticipative (S3P). If they will probably reject the decision, the par ticipative (S3P) or empowerment style (S4E) may be appropriate. When teams make decisions, they are more understanding, accepting, and committed to implementing the decision.
Capability. You must decide whether the follower or group has the ability and motivation to be involved in problem solv- ing and decision making. Does the follower or group have the experience and information needed to be involved? Will followers put the organization’s or depar tment’s goals ahead of personal goals? Do the followers want to be involved in problem solving and decision making? Followers are more willing to par ticipate when the decisions personally affect them. If the follower or group capability level is low (C1), an autocratic style (S1A) may be appropriate. When capability is moderate (C2), a consultative style (S2C) may be appro- priate. If capability level is high (C3), a par ticipative style (S3P) might be adopted. If capability is outstanding (C4), choose the empowerment style (S4E). Remember that an employee’s or group’s capability level can change from situ- ation to situation.
Step 2 Select the appropriate leadership style. After considering the four variables, you select the appropriate style. In some situations, all variables will indicate that the same style is appropriate, whereas in other cases, the appropriate style is not so clear. For example, you could be in a situation in which you have time to use any style, may have all the information necessary (autocratic), followers may be reluctant (consultative or participative), and their capability may be moderate (consultative). In situations where different styles are indicated for different variables, you must determine which variables should be given more weight. In the above example, assume that acceptance was critical for successful implementation of the decision. Acceptance takes precedence over information. Because the followers involved have moderate capability, the consultative style would be appropriate. Again, Model 8.1 summarizes use of the four situational communication styles in decision making.
(Par t I)
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 305 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
306 part 2 TEaM LEaDErShIp
Step 1. Diagnose the situation
YES
NO (S1A)
Information
Acceptance
Capability
All: S1A Some: S2C Little: S3P or S4E
Acceptable: S1A Reluctance: S2C Rejection: S3P or S4E
Moderate S2C Low: S1A
High: S3P Outstanding:
Variables Use of Management Style (S1–4)
Level of Participation Note that with autocratic, consultative, and participative styles the manager retains the power to make the decision; with empowerment the group makes the decision.
Time
Step 2. Select the appropriate style for the situation
S4E
Autocratic (S1A) No participation
The manager makes the decision alone and announces it after the fact. An explanation of the rationale for the decision may be given.
Empowerment (S4E) Complete participation
The manager presents the situation to the group and describes any limitations to the decision. The group makes the decision. The manager may be a group member with equal input. Note that empowerment should only be used with employees with outstanding capability.
Participative (S3P) High participation
The manager may present a tentative decision to the group and ask for its input, and change the decision if the input warrants a change. Or the manager presents the problem to the group for suggestions. Based on employee participation, the manager makes the decision and explains its rationale.
Consultative (S2C) Limited participation
The manager consults individuals or the group for information and then makes the decision. Before implementing the decision, the manager explains the rationale for the decision and sells the benefits to the employees. The manager may invite questions and have a discussion.
Leadership Decision Making MODEL 8-1
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 306 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 8 TEaM LEaDErShIp anD SELf-ManagED TEaMS 307
Using the Leadership Decision-Making Model We will apply the model to the following situation; additional similar situations are presented later with the skill-development exercise.
Manager Ben can give one of his followers a merit pay raise. He has a week to make the decision. Ben knows how well each employee performed over the past year. The followers really have no option but to accept getting or not getting the pay raise, but they can complain to upper management about the selec- tion. The followers’ capability levels vary, but as a group they have a high capability level under normal circumstances.
time ____ information ____ acceptance ____ capability Leadership style ________________________________
Step 1 Diagnose the situation. Ben has plenty of time to use any level of participation (place a Y for yes on the “time” line below the situation). He has all the information needed to make the decision (place S1A on the “information” line). Followers have no choice but to accept the decision (place S1A on the “acceptance” line). And the group’s capability level is normally high (place S3P on the “capability” line).
Step 2 Select the appropriate Style for the Situation. There are conflicting styles to choose from (autocratic and participative): yes time; S1A information; S1A acceptance; S3P capability.
The variable that should be given precedence is information. The followers are normally capable, but in a situation like this they may not put the department’s goals ahead of their own. In other words, even if followers know who deserves the raise, they may fight for it anyway. Such a conflict could cause future
problems. Some ways to make the decision could include the following:
autocratic (S1a) The manager would select the person to be given the raise without discussing it with any followers. Ben would simply announce the decision after submitting it to the payroll depar tment.
Consultative (S2C). The manager would get informa- tion from the followers concerning who should get the raise. Ben would then decide who would get the raise. He would announce the decision and explain the rationale for it. He may invite questions and discussion.
participative (S3p). The manager could tentatively select the employee who gets the raise, but be open to change if a group member convinces him that someone else should. Or Ben could explain the situation to the group and lead a discus- sion concerning who should get the raise. After considering their input, Ben would make the decision and explain the ratio- nale for it. Notice that the consultative style does not allow for discussion as the par ticipative style does.
empowerment (S4e). The manager would explain the situ- ation and allow the group to decide who gets the raise. Ben may be a group member. Notice that this is the only style that allows the group to make the decision.
The autocratic style is appropriate for this situation. The consultative style is also a good approach. However, the par- ticipative and empowerment styles use too much par ticipation for the situation. Your skill at selecting the appropriate deci- sion-making leadership style should improve through using the model for the ten situations in the skill-development exercise. However, the next step is to view the behavior video model.
Deciding Which Leadership Decision-Making Style to Use
Objectives
To better understand the four leadership decision-making styles, and to select the most appropriate style for a given situation.
Video (13 minutes) Overview
The video begins by telling you how to use the model. Then it shows the human resources director, Richard, meeting with a supervisor, Denise, to discuss training changes. Each of the four styles is shown to illustrate how all four styles can be used in the same situation. Thus, you gain a better understanding of the four styles. During the video you will be asked to identify each of the four styles being used by Richard. The answers will be given by
your instructor during or at the end of the video. In viewing the video, you should also realize that some styles are more appro- priate than others for this situation. As a class, you may discuss which style would be the most effective, and at the end of the video, the recommended style is stated.
preparation
You should have read the “Leadership Decision-Making Model” section of this leadership behavior-modeling skills training.
procedure 1 (10–20 minutes) The instructor shows (or you view on your own) the video, “Decision Making.” As you view each of the four scenes, identify the four leadership decision- making styles being used by Richard. Write the letters and number of the style on the line after each scene.
Behavior Model Video 8-1 and Video Exercise
(Par t II)
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 307 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
308 part 2 TEaM LEaDErShIp
Scene 1. Autocratic (S1A)
Scene 2. Consultative (S2C)
Scene 3. Participative (S3P)
Scene 4. Empowerment (S4E)
Option A: View all four scenes and identify the style used by Richard. Select the one style that you would use in this situation. Are other styles also appropriate? Which style would you not use (is not appropriate) for this situation? Next to each style listed above, write the letter “a” for appropriate or “n” for not
appropriate. After everyone is finished the instructor leads a class discussion and/or gives the correct answers.
Option B: After each scene the class discusses the style used by Richard. The instructor states the correct answer after each of the four scenes. Then discuss which style is the most effective for the situation.
Option C: Simply view the entire video without any discussion.
Conclusion
The instructor may lead a class discussion and/or make concluding remarks.
Developing Your Leadership Skills 8-1 (Par ts III & IV)
Deciding Which Leadership Decision-Making Style to Use
preparation for this exercise Below are ten situations calling for a decision. Select the appro- priate decision-making style for each. Be sure to use Model 8.1 when determining the style to use. First determine the answers to the variables (S1A, S2C, S3P, S4E) and write them on the lines below the situation. Then place the selected style on the “Leadership style” line.
S1A autocratic S2C consultative S3P participative S4E empowerment
1 You have developed a new work procedure that will increase productivity. Your boss likes the idea and wants you to try it in a few weeks. You view your followers as fairly capable and believe that they will be receptive to the change.
time information acceptance capability Leadership style
2 There is new competition in your industry. Your organiza- tion’s revenues have been dropping. You have been told to lay off 3 of your 15 followers in two weeks. You have been supervisor for over three years. Normally, your followers are very capable.
time information acceptance capability Leadership style
3 Your depar tment has been facing a problem for several months. Many solutions have been tried and have failed. You’ve finally thought of a solution, but you’re not sure of
the possible consequences of the change required, or of acceptance by your highly capable followers.
time information acceptance capability Leadership style
4 Flextime has become popular in your organization. Some depar tments let each employee star t and end work when he or she chooses. However, because of the coopera- tion required of your followers, they must all work the same eight hours. You’re not sure of the level of interest in changing the hours. Your followers are a very capable group and like to make decisions.
time information acceptance capability Leadership style
5 The technology in your industry is changing too fast for the members of your organization to keep up. Top man- agement hired a consultant who has made recommenda- tions. You have two weeks to decide what to do about the recommendations. Your followers are usually capable; they enjoy par ticipating in the decision-making process.
time information acceptance capability Leadership style
6 Top management has handed down a change. How you implement it is your decision. The change takes effect in one month. It will affect everyone in your depar tment. Their acceptance is critical to the success of the change. Your followers are usually not interested in making rou- tine decisions.
time information acceptance capability Leadership style
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 308 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 8 TEaM LEaDErShIp anD SELf-ManagED TEaMS 309
7 Your boss called to tell you that someone requested an order for your depar tment’s product; the delivery date is very shor t. She asked you to call her back in 15 minutes with a decision about taking the order. Looking over the work schedule, you realize that it will be very difficult to deliver the order on time. Your followers will have to push hard to make it. They are cooperative, capable, and enjoy being involved in decision making.
time information acceptance capability Leadership style
8 Top management has decided to make a change that will affect all of your followers. You know that they will be upset because it will cause them hardship. One or two may even quit. The change goes into effect in 30 days. Your followers are very capable.
time information acceptance capability Leadership style
9 You believe that productivity in your depar tment could be increased. You have thought of some ways to increase it, but you’re not sure of them. Your followers are very experienced; almost all of them have been in the depar t- ment longer than you have.
time information acceptance capability Leadership style
10 A customer offered you a contract for your product with a quick delivery date. The offer is open for two days. To meet the contract deadline, followers would have to work nights and weekends for six weeks. You cannot require them to work over time. Filling this profitable contract could help get you the raise you want and feel you deserve. However, if you take the contract and don’t deliver on time, it will hur t your chances of getting a big raise. Your followers are very capable.
time information acceptance capability Leadership style
Doing this exercise in Class
Objective
To develop your skill at knowing which level of participation to use in a given decision-making situation. You will learn to use the leadership decision-making model.
aaCSB General Skills area
The primary AACSB skills developed through this exercise are interpersonal relations and teamwork skills, analytic and reflec- tive thinking skills and application of knowledge.
experience
You will try to select the appropriate decision-making style for each of ten situations in preparation for this exercise.
preparation
You should have completed the preparation for this exercise, unless told not to do so by your instructor. There is an option to do the preparation in class as part of the exercise.
procedure 1 (8–12 minutes) The instructor may review the leadership decision-making model (Model 8.1) and will explain how to use it to select the appropriate leadership style for the first situation.
procedure 2 (4–8 minutes) Students, working alone, com- plete situation 2 using the model, followed by the instructor going over the recommend answers. If the instructor will be testing you on leadership decision making, you may be told the details.
procedure 3 (10–20 minutes) Break into teams of two or three. Apply the model to situations 3 through 5 as a team. You may decide to change your original answers. The instructor goes over the recommended answers and scoring for situations 3 through 5. Your instructor may tell you not to continue on to situation 6 until he or she goes over the answers to situations 3 through 5.
procedure 4 (10–20 minutes) In the same teams, select decision-making styles for situations 6 through 10. The instructor will go over the recommended answers and scoring.
Conclusion
The instructor may lead a class discussion and/or make conclud- ing remarks.
apply It (2–4 minutes) What did I learn from this experi- ence? How will I use this knowledge in the future? Identify when you will practice this skill.
Sharing
In the group, or to the entire class, volunteers may give their answers to the “Apply It” questions.
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 309 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
310 part 2 TEaM LEaDErShIp
preparation for this exercise To complete this exercise you must answer the questions in Concept Applications 1 through 4 in the chapter.
Doing this exercise in Class
Objective
To compare individual and group decision making, to better understand when to use a group to make decisions
aaCSB General Skills area
The primary AACSB skills developed through this exercise are interpersonal relations and teamwork skills, analytic and reflec- tive thinking skills and application of knowledge.
preparation
As preparation, you should have answered the questions in Concept Applications 1 through 4.
experience
You will work in a group, each member of which will answer the same 20 questions, and then analyze the results to determine if the group or one (or more) of its members had the higher score.
procedure 1 (1–2 minutes) Place your answers to the 20 questions in the “Individual Answer” column in the table on page 320.
procedure 2 (15–20 minutes) Break into teams of five, with smaller or larger groups as necessary. As a group, come to an agreement on the answers to the 20 questions. Place the group answers in the “Group Answer” column. Try to use consensus rather than voting or majority in arriving at the answers.
procedure 3 (4–6 minutes) Scoring. The instructor will give the recommended answers. Determine how many you got right as an individual and as a group. Total your individual and the group’s score.
Compute the average individual score by adding all the indi- vidual scores and dividing by the number of group members. Write it here:___.
Now calculate the difference between the average individual score and the group score. If the group’s score is higher than the average individual score, you have a gain (+) of points; if the group score is lower, you have a loss (−) of points. Write it here, and circle one (+ or −).
Determine the highest individual score. Write it here: ___. Determine the number of individuals who scored higher
than the group’s score: ___.
procedure 4 (5–10 minutes) Integration. As a group, discuss the advantages or disadvantages of being in a group while mak- ing the decisions in this exercise. Go back to the text and review the advantages and disadvantages of team-centered decision making listed on pages 295–296 and discuss. Then try to agree on which of the advantages and disadvantages your group had. Overall, were the advantages of using a group greater than the disadvantages? If your group were to continue to work together, how could it improve its decision-making ability? Write your answer below.
Conclusion
The instructor may lead a class discussion and/or make conclud- ing remarks.
apply It (2–4 minutes) What did I learn from this experi- ence? How will I use this knowledge in the future? Specifically, what will I do the next time I’m in a group to help it make better decisions? When will I have the opportunity?
Sharing
In the group, or to the entire class, volunteers may give their answers to the “Apply It” questions.
Developing Your Leadership Skills
Individual versus Group Decision Making
8-2
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 310 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 8 TEaM LEaDErShIp anD SELf-ManagED TEaMS 311
Question Number
Individual answer
Group answer
recommended answer
Individual Score
Group Score
CA 1 1
2
3
4
5
CA 2 6
7
8
9
10
CA 3 11
12
13
14
15
CA 4 16
17
18
19
20
Total scores
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 311 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
endnotes
1 www.southwest.com; Building LUV - 2013 Southwest Air- lines One report; L. Betty, G. Kelly, CEO, Southwest Airlines, Is Interviewed. Bloomberg Transcripts [serial online] (n.d.); Available from: Newspaper Source Plus, Ipswich, MA. Ac- cessed January 1, 2014; PR N. Webcast Aler t: Southwest Airlines Co. Annual Meeting of Shareholders. PR Newswire US [serial online]. (2013, May 8); Available from: Newspa- per Source Plus, Ipswich, MA. Accessed Januar y 1, 2014 and Event Brief of Q2 2013 Southwest Airlines Earnings Conference Call - Final. Fair Disclosure Wire (Quarterly Earn- ings Reports) [serial online]. n.d.; Available from: Newspaper Source Plus, Ipswich, MA. Accessed January 1, 2014.
2 K. Lanaj, J. Hollenbeck, D. Ilgen, C. Barnes, and S. Harmon, “The Double-Edged Sword of Decentralized Planning in Multiteam Systems,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 56(3) (2013, June): 735–757.
3 J. Kleinert, J. Ohlert, M. Sulprizio, et al., “Group Dynamics in Spor ts: An Overview and Recommendations on Diagnostic and Intervention,” Sport Psychologist 26(3) (2012, September): 412–434.
4 A.A. Thompson, M.A. Peteraf, J.E. Gamble, and A.J. Strickland, Crafting & Executing Strategy – The Quest for Competitive Advantage (19/e) (New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin Publishing, 2014).
5 K. Lanaj, J. Hollenbeck, D. Ilgen, C. Barnes, S. Harmon, “The Double-Edged Sword of Decentralized Planning in Multiteam Systems. Academy of Management Journal 56(3) (2013, June): 735–757.
6 H. Gardner, B. Staats, and F. Gino, “Dynamically Integrating Knowledge in Teams: Transforming Resources into Performance. Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 55(4) (2012, August): 998–1022.
7 N. Lorinkova, M. Pearsall, H. Sims Jr., “Examining the Differential Longitudinal Performance of Directive Versus Empowering Leadership in Teams. Academy of Management Journal 56(2) (2013, April): 573–596.
8 A. Seers, “Interpersonal Workplace Theory at a Crossroads,” In G. B. Graen (Ed.), New Frontiers of Leadership, LMX Leadership: The series, 2: 1–31 (Greenwich, CT: Information Age, 2004); T. L. Baker and T. G. Hunt, “An Exploratory Investigation into the Effects of Team Composition on Moral Orientation,” Journal of Managerial Issues 15 (2003, Spring): 106–120; E. E. Lawler, III, S. A. Mohrman, and G. E. Ledford, Jr., Creating High Performance Organizations: Practices and Results of Employee Involvement and Total Quality Management in Fortune 1000 Companies (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1995); and J. Gordon, “Work Teams: How Far Have They Come?” Training 29 (1992): 59–65.
9 N. Lorinkova, M. Pearsall, H. Sims Jr., “Examining the Differential Longitudinal Performance of Directive versus Empowering Leadership in Teams. Academy of Management Journal 56(2) (2013, April): 573–596.
10 D. C. Jones and K. Takao, “The Impact of Teams on Output, Quality, and Downtime: An Empirical Analysis Using Individual Panel Data,” Industrial & Labor Relations Review 64(2) (2011, January): 215–240.
11 C. Huey-Wen, L. Yu-Hsun, and C. Shyan-Bin, “Team Cognition, Collective Efficacy, and Performance in Strategic Decision-Making Teams,” Social Behavior & Personality: An International 40(3) (2012, April): 381–394.
12 R. Th. A. J. Leenders, J.M.L. van Engelen, and J. Kratzer, “Systematic Design Methods and the Creative Performance of New Product Teams: Do They Contradict or Complement Each Other?” Journal of Product Innovation Management 24 (2007): 166–179; E. E. Lawler, S. A. Mohrman, and G. E. Ledford, Creating High Performance Organizations: Practices and Results of Employee Involvement and Total Quality Management in Fortune 1000 companies (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1995).
13 G.B. Graen, C. Hui, and E.A. Taylor, “Experience-Based Learning about LMX Leadership and Fairness in Project Teams: A Dyadic Directional Approach,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 5(4) (2006): 448–460.
14 H. E. Harding, et al., “The Impact of Preparing Faculty in the Effective Use of Student Teams,” College Student Journal 44(3) (2010): 752–761.
15 J. Lai, L. Lam, S. Lam, “Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Work Groups: A Team Cultural Perspective,” Journal of Organizational Behavior 34(7) (2013, October): 1039–1056.
16 M.E. Burbach, G.S. Matkin, K.M. Gambrell, K.M., and H.E. Harding, “The Impact of Preparing Faculty in the Effective Use of Student Teams,” College Student Journal 44(3) (2010): 752–761.
17 D. Naranjo-Gil, G. Cuevas-Rodrıguez, Á. López-Cabrales, and J. Sánchez, “The Effects of Incentive System and Cognitive Orientation on Teams’ Performance,” Behavioral Research in Accounting 24(2) (2012, June ): 177–191.
18 M. Butler, “Our HR Columnist,” People Management 13 (2007, November): 43.
19 N. Lorinkova, M. Pearsall, H. Sims Jr., “Examining the Differential Longitudinal Performance of Directive ver- sus Empowering Leadership in Teams,” Academy of Management Journal 56(2) (2013, April): 573–596.
20 A. Ellis, “System Breakdown: The Role of Mental Models and Transactive Memory in the Relationship between Acute
312 part 2 TEaM LEaDErShIp
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 312 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Stress and Team Performance,” Academy of Management Review 49(3) (2006): 576–589.
21 S.W.J. Kozlowski, and B.S.Bell, (2003), “Work Groups and Teams in Organizations,” in W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen and R. J. Klimoski (eds), Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 12 (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons), pp. 333–375.
22 J. Allen, “Building a Group into a Team,” Internet Journal of Healthcare Administration 6(1) (2009): 3.
23 N. Meslec, and P. Curseu, “Too Close or Too Far Hurts: Cognitive Distance and Group Cognitive Synergy,” Small Group Research 44(5) (2013, October): 471–497.
24 K. Lanaj, J. Hollenbeck, D. Ilgen, C. Barnes, and S. Harmon, “The Double-Edged Sword of Decentralized Planning in Multiteam Systems,” Academy of Management Journal 56(3) (2013, June): 735–757.
25 L. Hsieh and S. Chen, “A Study of Cross-Functional Collaboration in New Produce Development: A Social Capital Perspective,” International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management 2 (2006, November): 23.
26 Y. Badir, B. Büchel, and C. Tucci, “A Conceptual Framework of the Impact of NPD Project Team and Leader Empowerment on Communication and Performance: An Alliance Case Context,” International Journal of Project Management 30(8) (2012, November): 914–926.
27 J. Lai, L. Lam, and S. Lam, “Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Work Groups: A Team Cultural Perspective,” Journal of Organizational Behavior 34(7) (2013, October): 1039–1056.
28 L. Cheng-Chen, and P. Tai-Kuang, “From Organizational Citizenship Behaviour to Team Performance: The Mediation of Group Cohesion and Collective Efficacy,” Management & Organization Review 6(1) (2010): 55–75.
29 C. Hopp, and L. Zenk, “Collaborative Team Networks and Implications for Strategic HRM,” International Journal of Human Resource Management 23(14) (2012, July 15): 2975–2994.
30 D. Naranjo-Gil, G. Cuevas-Rodrıguez, Á. López-Cabrales, and J. Sánchez, “The Effects of Incentive System and Cognitive Orientation on Teams’ Performance,” Behavioral Research In Accounting 24(2) (2012, June): 177–191.
31 R. Kidwell and S. Valentine, “Positive Group Context, Work Attitudes, and Organizational Misbehavior : The Case of Withholding Job Effort,” Journal of Business Ethics 86(1) (2009): 15–28.
32 K. Price, D. Harrison, and J. Gavin, “Withholding Inputs in Team Contexts: Member Composition, Interaction Processes, Evaluation Structure, and Social Loafing,” Journal of Applied Psychology 91 (2006, November): 1375–1384.
33 E. Stark, J. Shaw, and M. Duffy, “Preference for Group Work, Winning Orientation, and Social Loafing Behavior Groups,” Group & Organization Management 32 (2007, December): 699–723.
34 K. McFarland, “Where Group-Think Is Good; Groups Often Provide the Best Answers to Business Problems— Provided You Know How to Structure the Team,” Business Week Online (April 2007).
35 K. Lanaj, J. Hollenbeck, D. Ilgen, C. Barnes, & S. Harmon, “The Double-Edged Sword of Decentralized Planning in Multiteam Systems,” Academy of Management Journal 56(3) (2013, June): 735–757.
36 A. Carton and J. Cummings, “A Theory of Subgroups in Work Teams,” Academy of Management Review [serial online] 37(3) (2012, July): 441–470.
37 K. Lanaj, J. Hollenbeck, D. Ilgen, C. Barnes, and S. Harmon, “The Double-Edged Sword of Decentralized Planning in Multiteam Systems,” Academy of Management Journal 56(3) (2013, June): 735–757.
38 Hall J. “Managing Teams with Diverse Compositions: Implications for Managers from Research on the Faultline Model,” SAM Advanced Management Journal (07497075) 78(1) (2013, winter): 4–10.
39 J. B Wu, A. S Tsui, and A. J. Kinicki, “Consequences of Differentiated Leadership in Groups,” Academy of Management Journal 53(1) (2010, February): 90–106.
40 J. Summers, S. Humphrey, and G. Ferris, “Team Member Change, Flux in Coordination, and Performance: Effects of Strategic Core Roles, Information Transfer, and Cognitive Ability,” Academy of Management Journal 55(2) (2012, April): 314–338.
41 K. Lanaj, J. Hollenbeck, D. Ilgen, C. Barnes, S. Harmon, “The Double-Edged Sword of Decentralized Planning in Multiteam Systems,” Academy of Management Journal 56(3) (2013, June): 735–757.
42 J. Kleinert, J. Ohlert, M. Sulprizio, et al., “Group Dynamics in Spor ts: An Overview and Recommendations on Diagnostic and Intervention,” Sport Psychologist 26(3) (2012, September): 412–434
43 M. Pryor, L. Singleton, S. Taneja, and L. Toombs, “Teaming as a Strategic and Tactical Tool: An Analysis with Recommendations,” International Journal of Management 26(2): 320–333.
44 L. Lynam, M. McCord, and L. Michaelsen, “Designing Effective Team Assignments: Kolb’s Learning Cycle Modified by the 4 S Method,” Business Education Innovation Journal 2(1) (2010): 67–75.
45 G. Yaping, K. Tae-Yeol, L. Deog-Ro, and Z. Jing, “A Multilevel Model of Team Goal Orientation, Information Exchange,
˘
Chapter 8 TEaM LEaDErShIp anD SELf-ManagED TEaMS 313
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 313 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
314 part 2 TEaM LEaDErShIp
and Creativity,” Academy of Management Journal 56(3) (2013, June): 827–851.
46 D. Vashdi, P. Bamberger, and M. Erez, “Can Surgical Teams Ever Learn? The Role of Coordination, Complexity, and Transitivity in Action Team Learning,” Academy of Management Journal 56(4) (2013, August): 945–971.
47 C. Huey-Wen, L. Yu-Hsun, and C. Shyan-Bin, “Team Cognition, Collective Efficacy, and Performance in Strategic Decision-Making Teams,” Social Behavior & Personality: An International 40(3) (2012, April): 381–394.
48 N. Sivasubramaniam, S. Liebowitz, and C. Lackman, “Determinants of New Product Development Team Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review,” Journal of Product Innovation Management 29(5) (2012, September): 803–820.
49 Hall J. “Managing Teams with Diverse Compositions: Implications for Managers from Research on the Faultline Model,” SAM Advanced Management Journal (07497075) 78(1) (2013, winter): 4–10.
50 P. Lencioni, “The Five Dysfunctions of a Team: A Leadership Fable,” Reviewed by J. R. Hackman and E. Pierce, Academy of Management Perspectives 20 (2006): 122–125.
51 D. Naranjo-Gil, G. Cuevas-Rodrıguez, Á. López-Cabrales, and J. Sánchez, “The Effects of Incentive System and Cognitive Orientation on Teams’ Performance,” Behavioral Research In Accounting 24(2) (2012, June): 177–191.
52 D. Jones, P. Kalmi, and A. Kauhanen, “How Does Employee Involvement Stack Up? The Effects of Human Resource Management Policies on Performance in a Retail Firm,” Industrial Relations 49(1) (2010): 1–21.
53 C. Hopp and L. Zenk, “Collaborative Team Networks and Implications for Strategic HRM,” International Journal of Human Resource Management 23(14) (2012, July 15): 2975–2994.
54 T. Brahm and F. Kunze, “The Role of Trust Climate in Virtual Teams,” Journal of Managerial Psychology 27(6) (2012, October): 595–614.
55 D. Vashdi, P. Bamberger, and M. Erez, “Can Surgical Teams Ever Learn? The Role of Coordination, Complexity, and Transitivity in Action Team Learning,” Academy of Management Journal 56(4) (2013, August): 945–971.
56 N. Sivasubramaniam, S. Liebowitz, and C. Lackman, “Determinants of New Product Development Team Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review,” Journal of Product Innovation Management 29(5) (2012, September): 803–820.
57 A. Pescosolido and R. Saavedra, “Cohesion and Sports Teams: A Review,” Small Group Research 43(6) (2012, December): 744–758.
58 B. Bradley, J. Baur, C. Banford, and B. Postlethwaite, “Team Players and Collective Performance: How Agreeableness Affects Team Performance over Time,” Small Group 44(6) (2013, December): 680–711.
59 T. Kline and J. O’Grady, “Team Member Personality, Team Processes and Outcomes: Relationships within a Graduate Student Project Team Sample,” North American Journal of Psychology 11(2) (2009): 369–382.
60 L. Wei and L. Wu, “What a Diverse Top Management Team Means: Testing an Integrated Model,” Journal of Management Studies 50(3) (2013, May): 389–412.
61 C. Hopp and L. Zenk, “Collaborative Team Networks and Implications for Strategic HRM,” International Journal of Human Resource Management 23(14) (2012, July 15): 2975–2994.
62 A. Nederveen Pieterse, D. van Knippenberg, and D. van Dierendonck, “Cultural Diversity and Team Performance: The Role of Team Member Goal Orientation,” Academy of Management Journal 56(3) (2013, June): 782–804.
63 B. Nielsen and S. Nielsen, “Top Management Team Nationality Diversity and Firm Performance: A Multilevel Study,” Strategic Management Journal 34(3) (2013, March): 373–382.
64 S. Hoogendoorn, H. Oosterbeek, and M. van Praag, “The Impact of Gender Diversity on the Performance of Business Teams: Evidence from a Field Experiment,” Management Science 59(7) (2013, July): 1514–1528.
65 S. Jee Young and H. Doo-Seung, “Gender Diversity: How Can We Facilitate Its Positive Effects on Teams?” Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal 41(3) (2013, March): 497–507.
66 R. Hollister and C. Mejia, “Navigating Team Whirlpools,” Journal of the Quality Assurance Institute 23(2) (2009): 16–19.
67 G. Clark, “The Seeds of Excellence,” Profit 28(5) (2009): 19.
68 M. Triana, C. Porter, S. DeGrassi, and M. Bergman, “We’re All in This Together...Except for You: The Effects of Workload, Performance Feedback, and Racial Distance on Helping Behavior in Teams,” Journal of Organizational Behavior 34(8) (2013, November): 1124–1144.
69 K. Eisenhardt, “Top Management Teams and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms,” Small Business Economics [serial online] 40(4) (2013, May): 805–816.
70 M. Lang, “Conflict Management: A Gap in Business Education Curricula,” Journal of Education for Business 84(4) (2009): 240–245.
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 314 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
71 T. O’Neill, N. Allen, and S. Hastings, “Examining the ‘Pros’ and ‘Cons’ of Team Conflict: A Team-Level Meta- Analysis of Task, Relationship, and Process Conflict,” Human Performance 26(3) (2013, July): 236–260.
72 C. Shu-Cheng Steve, H. Chiung-Yi, and C. Artemis, “Safety Climate and Relational Conflict in the Eyes of Team Members: Examining the Role of Need for Closure,” Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal 38(1) (2010): 103–114.
73 D. Sethi and M. Seth, “Interpersonal Communication: Lifeblood of an Organization,” IUP Journal of Soft Skills 3 (2009, September): 32–40.
74 C. Kauffman, “Employee Involvement: A New Blueprint for Success,” Journal of Accountancy 209 (2010, May): 46–49.
75 J. Kleinert, J. Ohlert, M. Sulprizio, et al., “Group Dynamics in Spor ts: An Overview and Recommendations on Diagnostic and Intervention,” Sport Psychologist 26(3) (2012, September): 412–434
76 N. Lorinkova, M. Pearsall, H. Sims Jr., “Examining the Differential Longitudinal Performance of Directive ver- sus Empowering Leadership in Teams,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 56(2) (2013, April): 573–596.
77 J. Kleinert, J. Ohlert, M. Sulprizio, et al., “Group Dynamics in Sports: An Overview and Recommendations on Diagnostic and Intervention,” Sport 26(3) (2012, September): 412–434.
78 D. Bhatnagar and D. Tjosvold, “Leader Values for Constructive Controversy and Team Effectiveness in India,” International Journal of Human Resource Management 23(1) (2012, January): 109–125.
79 M. Brodke, “Management Training to Ensure Excellent Team Performance,” Industrial & Commercial Training 45(7) (2013, December): 428–432.
80 N. Lorinkova, M. Pearsall, and H. Sims Jr., “Examining the Differential Longitudinal Performance of Directive versus Empowering Leadership in Teams,” Academy of Management Journal 56(2) (2013, April): 573–596.
81 V. S. Anantatmula, “Project Manager Leadership Role in Improving Project Performance,” Engineering Management Journal 22(1) (2010): 13–22.
82 S. Sarin and G. O’Connor, “First Among Equals: The Effect of Team Leader Characteristics on the Internal Dynamics of Cross-Functional Product Development Teams,” Journal of Product Innovation Management 26(2) (2009): 188–205.
83 N. Lorinkova, M. Pearsall, and H. Sims Jr., “Examining the Differential Longitudinal Performance of Directive versus Empowering Leadership in Teams,” Academy of Management Journal 56(2) (2013, April): 573–596.
84 D. Bhatnagar and D. Tjosvold, “Leader Values for Constructive Controversy and Team Effectiveness in India,” International Journal of Human Resource Management 23(1) (2012, January): 109–125.
85 H. Liao, D. Liu, and R. Loi “Looking at Both Sides of the Social Exchange Coin: A Social Cognitive Perspective on the Joint Effects of Relationship Quality and Differentiation on Creativity,” Academy of Management Journal 53(5) (2010): 1090–1109.
86 P. Wellington and N. Foster, “21st Century Teamwork,” Engineering & Technology (17509637) 4(118) (2009): 72–75.
87 S. Ruggieri and C. Abbate, “Leadership Style, Self-Sacrifice, and Team Identification,” Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal 41(7) (2013, August): 1171–1178.
88 N. R. Rothenberg, “Teams, Leaders, and Performance Measures,” Contemporar y Accounting Research 28(4) (2011): 1123–1140.
89 D. Derue, J. Hollenbeck, D. Ilgen, D. Feltz, “Efficacy Dispersion in Teams: Moving Beyond Agreement and Aggregation,” Personnel Psychology 63(1) (2010): 1–40.
90 M. Brodke, “Management Training to Ensure Excellent Team Performance,” Industrial & Commercial Training 45(7) (2013, December): 428–432.
91 G. Yaping, K. Tae-Yeol, L. Deog-Ro, and Z. Jing, “A Multilevel Model of Team Goal Orientation, Information Exchange, and Creativity,” Academy of Management Journal 56(3) (2013, June): 827–851.
92 D. Vashdi, P. Bamberger, and M. Erez, “Can Surgical Teams Ever Learn? The Role of Coordination, Complexity, and Transitivity in Action Team Learning,” Academy of Management Journal 56(4) (2013, August): 945–971.
93 H. Gardner, B. Staats, and F. Gino, “Dynamically Integrating Knowledge in Teams: Transforming Resources into Performance,” Academy of Management Journal 55(4) (2012, August): 998–1022.
94 W. Tsai, N. Chi, A. Grandey, and S. Fung, “Positive Group Affective Tone and Team Creativity: Negative Group Affective Tone and Team Trust as Boundary Conditions,” Journal of Organizational Behavior 33(5) (2012, July): 638–656.
95 H. Gardner, B. Staats, and F. Gino, “Dynamically Integrating Knowledge in Teams: Transforming Resources into Performance,” Academy of Management Journal 55(4) (2012, August): 998–1022.
96 G. Yaping, K. Tae-Yeol, L. Deog-Ro, and Z. Jing, “A Multilevel Model of Team Goal Orientation, Information Exchange, and Creativity,” Academy of Management Journal 56(3) (2013, June): 827–851.
Chapter 8 TEaM LEaDErShIp anD SELf-ManagED TEaMS 315
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 315 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
316 part 2 TEaM LEaDErShIp
97 B. Joo, J. Song, D. Lim, and S. Yoon, “Team Creativity: The Effects of Perceived Learning Culture, Developmental Feedback and Team Cohesion,” International Journal of Training & Development 16(2) (2012, June): 77–91.
98 M. Yueru, C. Weibo, B. Ribbens, and Z. Juanmei, “Linking Ethical Leadership to Employee Creativity: Knowledge Sharing and Self-Efficacy as Mediators,” Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal 41(9) (2013, October): 1409–1420.
99 B. Joo, J. Song, D. Lim, and S. Yoon, “Team Creativity: The Effects of Perceived Learning Culture, Developmental Feedback and Team Cohesion,” International Journal of Training & Development 16(2) (2012, June): 77–91.
100 S. Shin, T. Kim, J. Lee, and L. Bian, “Cognitive Team Diversity and Individual Team Member Creativity: A Cross-Level Interaction,” Academy of Management Journal 55(1) (2012, February): 197–212.
101 S. Ghobadi and J. D’Ambra, “Modeling High-Quality Knowledge Sharing in Cross-Functional Software Development Teams,” Information Processing & Management 49(1):138-157
102 G. Yaping, K. Tae-Yeol, L. Deog-Ro, and Z. Jing, “A Multilevel Model of Team Goal Orientation, Information Exchange, and Creativity,” Academy of Management Journal 56(3) (2013, June): 827–851.
103 S. Shin, T. Kim, J. Lee, and L. Bian, “Cognitive Team Diversity and Individual Team Member Creativity: A Cross-Level Interaction,” Academy of Management Journal 55(1) (2012, February): 197–212.
104 B. Joo, J. Song, D. Lim, and S. Yoon, “Team Creativity: The Effects of Perceived Learning Culture, Developmental Feedback and Team Cohesion,” International Journal of Training & Development 16(2) (2012, June): 77–91.
105 V. Vad Baunsgaard and S. Clegg, “‘Walls or Boxes’: The Effects of Professional Identity, Power and Rationality on Strategies for Cross-Functional Integration,” Organization Studies 34(9) (2013, September): 1299–1325.
106 N. Piercy, W. Phillips, and M. Lewis, “Change Management in the Public Sector: The Use of Cross-Functional Teams,” Production Planning & Control 24(10/11) (2013, November): 976–987.
107 A. Carr, H. Kaynak, and S. Muthusamy, “The Cross-Functional Coordination Between Operations, Marketing, Purchasing, and Engineering and the Impact on Performance,” International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management 13 (2007, December): 55.
108 H. Bruns, “Working Alone Together : Coordination in Collaboration across Domains of Expertise,” Academy of Management Journal 56(1) (2013, February): 62–83.
109 T.L.Legare, “How Hewlett-Packard Used Cross-Functional Teams to Deliver Healthcare Industry Solutions,” Journal of Organizational Excellence 20(4) (2001, Autumn): 29–38.
110 C.O. Longenecker, and M. Neubert, “Barriers and Gateways to Management Cooperation and Teamwork,” Business Horizons 43(5) (2000, September/October): 37–44.
111 N. Piercy, W. Phillips, and M. Lewis, “Change Management in the Public Sector : The Use of Cross-Functional Teams,” Production Planning & Control 24(10/11) (2013, November): 976–987.
112 E. Jones and J. Kelly, “The Psychological Costs of Knowledge Specialization in Groups: Unique Expertise Leaves You Out of the Loop,” Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 121(2) (2013, July): 174–182.
113 A. Joshi, N. Pandey, and G. Han, “Bracketing Team Boundary Spanning: An Examination of Task-Based, Team-Level, and Contextual Antecedents,” Journal of Organizational Behavior 30(6) (2009): 731–759.
114 H. Bruns, “Working Alone Together : Coordination in Collaboration across Domains of Expertise,” Academy of Management Journal 56(1) (2013, February): 62–83.
115 D. D. Greenand and G. E. Roberts, “Personnel Implications of Public Sector Virtual Organizations,” Public Personnel Management 39(1) (2010): 47–57.
116 M. Scott, “‘Communicate through the Roof ’: A Case Study Analysis of the Communicative Rules and Resources of an Effective Global Virtual Team,” Communication Quarterly 61(3) (2013, July): 301–318.
117 P. Ferreira, E. Lima, and S. da Costa, “Perception of Virtual Team’s Performance: A Multinational Exercise,” International Journal of Production Economics 140(1) (2012, November): 416–430.
118 A. Klitmøller and J. Lauring, “When Global Virtual Teams Share Knowledge: Media Richness, Cultural Difference and Language Commonality,” Journal of World Business 48(3) (2013, July): 398–406.
119 T. Brahm and F. Kunze, “The Role of Trust Climate in Virtual Teams,” Journal of Managerial Psychology 27(6) (2012, October): 595–614.
120 M. Scott, “‘Communicate through the Roof ’: A Case Study Analysis of the Communicative Rules and Resources of an Effective Global Virtual Team,” Communication 61(3) (2013, July): 301–318.
121 S.A. Furst, M. Reeves, B. Rosen, and R.S. Blackburn, “Managing the Life Cycle of Virtual Teams,” Academy of Management Executive (May 2004): 6–20; L. L. Martins, L. L. Gilson, and M T. Maynard, “Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go from Here,” Journal of Management 30(6) (2004): 805–835.
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 316 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
122 C.B. Gibson and J.L. Gibbs, “Unpacking the Concept of Virtuality: The Effects of Geographic Dispersion, Electronic Dependence, Dynamic Structure, and National Diversity on Team Innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly (2006, September): 451–495.
123 United States Office of Personnel Management. (2009). Status of Telework in the Federal Government, http://www. telework.gov/Reports
124 P. Ferreira, E. Lima, and S. da Costa, “Perception of Virtual Team’s Performance: A Multinational Exercise,” International Journal of Production Economics 140(1) (2012, November): 416–430.
125 L. Gilson, M. Maynard, and E. Bergiel, “Virtual Team Effectiveness: An Experiential Activity,” Small Group Research 44(4) (2013, August): 412–427.
126 Y. Tong, X. Yang, and H. Teo, “Spontaneous Vir tual Teams: Improving Organizational Performance through Information and Communication Technology,” Business Horizons 56(3) (2013, May): 361–375.
127 T. Brahm and F. Kunze, “The Role of Trust Climate in Virtual Teams,” Journal of Managerial Psychology 27(6) (2012, October): 595–614.
128 N. Lorinkova, M. Pearsall, and H. Sims Jr., “Examining the Differential Longitudinal Performance of Directive versus Empowering Leadership in Teams,” Academy of Management Journal 56(2) (2013, April): 573–596.
129 A. Ismail, N. Zainuddin, and Z. Ibrahim, “Linking Participative and Consultative Leadership Styles to Organizational Commitment as an Antecedent of Job Satisfaction,” UNITAR e-Journal 6(1) (2010): 11–26.
130 P. Carbonell and A. Rodriguez-Escudero, “Management Control, Role Expectations and Job Satisfaction of New Product Development Teams: The Moderating Effect of Par ticipative Decision-Making,” Industrial Marketing Management 42(2) (2013, February): 248–259.
131 Y. Badir, B. Büchel, and C. Tucci, “A Conceptual Framework of the Impact of NPD Project Team and Leader Empowerment on Communication and Performance: An Alliance Case Context,” International Journal of Project Management 30(8) (2012, November): 914–926.
132 N. Lorinkova, M. Pearsall, and H. Sims Jr., “Examining the Differential Longitudinal Performance of Directive versus Empowering Leadership in Teams,” Academy of Management Journal 56(2) (2013, April): 573–596.
133 B. Maciejovsky, M. Sutter, D. Budescu, and P. Bernau, “Teams Make You Smarter : How Exposure to Teams Improves Individual Decisions in Probability and Reasoning Tasks,” Management Science 59(6) (2013, June): 1255–1270.
134 M. Seo and L. Barrett, “Being Emotional During Decision Making—Good or Bad? An Empirical Investigation,” Academy of Management Journal 50 (2007): 923–940.
135 I. Bens, “Facilitating with Ease! Core Skills for Facilitators, Team Leaders and Members, Managers, Consultants, and Trainers,” Reviewed by J. K. Williams, Academy of Management Learning & Education 6(2) (June 2007): 294.
136 Q. Roberson and I. Williamson, “Justice in Self-Managing Teams: The Role of Social Networks in the Emergence of Procedural Justice Climates,” Academy of Management Journal 55(3) (2012, June): 685–701.
137 H. McIntyre and R. Foti, “The Impact of Shared Leadership on Teamwork Mental Models and Performance in Self- Directed Teams,” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 16(1) (2013, January): 46–57.
138 B. Hawkins, “Gendering the Eye of the Norm: Exploring Gendered Concertive Control Processes in Two Self- Managing Teams,” Gender, Work & Organization 20(1) (2013, January): 113–126.
139 Q. Roberson and I. Williamson, “Justice in Self-Managing Teams: The Role of Social Networks in the Emergence of Procedural Justice Climates,” Academy of Management Journal 55(3) (2012, June): 685–701.
140 N. Watersand and M. Beruvides, “An Empirical Study Analyzing Traditional Work Schemes versus Work Teams,” Engineering Management Journal 21(4) (2009): 36–43.
141 Q. Roberson and I. Williamson, “Justice in Self-Managing Teams: The Role of Social Networks in the Emergence of Procedural Justice Climates,” Academy of Management Journal 55(3) (2012, June): 685–701.
142 Y. Badir, B. Büchel, and C. Tucci, “A Conceptual Framework of the Impact of NPD Project Team and Leader Empowerment on Communication and Performance: An Alliance Case Context,” International Journal of Project Management 30(8) (2012, November): 914–926.
143 Q. Roberson and I. Williamson, “Justice in Self-Managing Teams: The Role of Social Networks in the Emergence of Procedural Justice Climates,” Academy of Management Journal 55(3) (2012, June): 685–701.
144 I. P. Vlachos, “The Effects of Human Resource Practices on Firm Growth,” International Journal of Business Science & Applied Management 4(2) (2009): 17–34.
145 A. Fazzariand J. Mosca, “ ‘Par tners in Perfection’: Human Resources Facilitating Creation and Ongoing Implementation of Self-Managed Manufacturing Teams in a Small Medium Enterprise,” Human Resource Development Quarterly 20(3) (2009): 353–376.
Chapter 8 TEaM LEaDErShIp anD SELf-ManagED TEaMS 317
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 317 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
318 part 2 TEaM LEaDErShIp
146 Z. Omar, A. Zainal, F. Omar, and R. Khairudin, “The Influence of Leadership Behaviour on Organisational Citizenship Behaviour in Self-Managed Work Teams in Malaysia,” South African Journal of Human Resource Management 7(1) (2009): 196–206.
147 H. McIntyre and R. Foti, “The Impact of Shared Leadership on Teamwork Mental Models and Performance in Self- Directed Teams,” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 16(1) (2013, January): 46–57.
148 Q. Roberson and I. Williamson, “Justice in Self-Managing Teams: The Role of Social Networks in the Emergence of Procedural Justice Climates,” Academy of Management Journal 55(3) (2012, June): 685–701.
149 C. Langfred, “The Downside of Self-Management: A Longitudinal Study of the Effects of Conflict on Trust, Autonomy, and Task Interdependence in Self-Managing Teams,” Academy of Management Journal 50 (2007): 885–900.
150 M. Moravec, O. J. Johannessen, and T. A. Hjelmas, “The Well-Managed SMT,” Management Review 87 (June 1998): 56–58.
151 J. Ingvaldsen and M. Rolfsen, “Autonomous Work Groups and the Challenge of Inter-Group Coordination,” Human Relations 65(7) (2012, July): 861–881.
152 A. Nederveen Pieterse, D. van Knippenberg, and D. van Dierendonck, “Cultural Diversity and Team Performance: The Role of Team Member Goal Orientation,” Academy of Management Journal 56(3) (2013, June): 782–804.
153 Q. Roberson and I. Williamson, “Justice in Self-Managing Teams: The Role of Social Networks in the Emergence of Procedural Justice Climates,” Academy of Management Journal 55(3) (2012, June): 685–701.
154 H. McIntyre and R. Foti, “The Impact of Shared Leadership on Teamwork Mental Models and Performance in Self- directed Teams,” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 16(1) (2013, January): 46–57.
155 J. Ingvaldsen and M. Rolfsen, “Autonomous Work Groups and the Challenge of Inter-Group Coordination,” Human Relations 65(7) (2012, July): 861–881.
156 H. McIntyre and R. Foti, “The Impact of Shared Leadership on Teamwork Mental Models and Performance in Self- Directed Teams,” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 16(1) (2013, January): 46–57.
157 R. Bolden, “Distributed Leadership in Organizations: A Review of Theory and Research,” International Journal of Management Reviews 13(3) (2011, September): 251–269.
158 J. Ingvaldsen and M. Rolfsen, “Autonomous Work Groups and the Challenge of Inter-Group Coordination,” Human Relations 65(7) (2012, July): 861–881.
159 L. Gratton, “The End of the Middle Manager,” Harvard Business Review 89(11/2) (2011): 36.
160 Q. Roberson and I. Williamson, “Justice in Self-Managing Teams: The Role of Social Networks in the Emergence of Procedural Justice Climates,” Academy of Management Journal 55(3) (2012, June): 685–701.
161 http://news.van.fedex.com/Holiday2013; “The Purple Promise,” Smart Business Orange County [serial online] 8(2) (2013, June): 22; “The Purple Promise,” Smart Business Houston [serial online] 7(12) (2013, June): 10; W. Risher, “FedEx Marks 40th Anniversary,” The Commercial Appeal, April 18, 2013.
66352_ch08_ptg01_268-318.indd 318 10/15/14 12:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
319
Chapter
Charismatic and Transfor mational Leadership
Learning Outcomes After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
1 Briefly explain Max Weber’s conceptualization of charisma. p. 321
2 Explain what is meant by the “locus of charismatic leadership.” p. 322
3 Discuss the effects of charismatic leadership on followers. p. 323
4 Discuss how one can acquire charismatic qualities. p. 324
5 Distinguish between socialized and personalized charismatic leader types. p. 326
6 Explain the four stages of the transformation process. p. 331
7 List the qualities of effective charismatic and transformational leaders. p. 333
8 Describe the four behavior dimensions associated with transformational and charismatic leaders. p. 337
9
C h a p t e r O U t L I N e
Charismatic Leadership
Weber’s Conceptualization of Charisma
Locus of Charismatic Leadership
The Effects of Charismatic Leaders on Followers
How One Acquires Charismatic Qualities
Charisma: A Double-Edged Sword
Transformational Leadership
The Effects of Transformational Leadership
Transformational and Transactional Leadership
The Transformation Process
Charismatic- Transformational Leadership
Qualities of Effective Charismatic and Transformational Leadership
Transformational and Charismatic Leader Behaviors
Charismatic and Transformational Leadership: What’s the Difference?
Stewardship and Servant Leadership
Stewardship and Attributes of the Effective Steward Leader
Servant Leadership and Attributes of the Effective Servant Leader
9 Distinguish between charismatic and transformational leadership. p. 338
10 Explain the basis of stewardship and servant leadership. p. 342
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 319 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
320 part 3 organizaTionaL LEaDErSHiP
C harismatic and transformational theories return our focus to organizational leadership. These theories shine the light on exemplary leaders whose inf luence impacts entire social, cultural, economic, and political systems. Charismatic and transformational leaders are able to inf luence followers to rally toward a shared
goal(s). They generate emotion, energy, and excitement that cause followers to make significant personal sacrifices in the interest of the organization.
Oprah Winfrey and OWN From childhood pover ty and sexual abuse and her battle with weight loss, Oprah’s drive and charisma have made her the “near-perfect spokesperson for eternal optimism” in the psyche of her followers. Her influence is unparal- leled. The Oprah Winfrey Show has been described as one of the most successful daytime programs in TV histor y. She launched O magazine that boasts a circulation rate of about 2.5 million, launched the TV careers of now-famous TV personalities like Dr. Oz, Dr. Phil, and Rachael Ray, and the designer Nate Berkus. Anything she endorses or men- tions in a favorable light becomes an instant best seller in its categor y. As one writer puts it, “Her brand could sell everything from croissants to refrigerators.” It is estimated that Oprah’s net worth is about $3 billion.
In Januar y 2008, Opr ah and Discover y Channel announced the launching of OWN (Oprah Winfrey Network). It is a 50–50 par tnership in which Discover y would invest $100 million in the new network that would focus on Oprah’s mantra—“Live Your Best Life.” Exper ts point out that “startups in today’s fragmented media market tend to be moguls’ pipe dreams.” They cite the struggles of Rupert Murdock and Martha Stewart as examples. So, why would this charismatic figure after 25 years of ruling daytime TV give it all up to take the biggest risk and gamble of her professional life? The answer according to Oprah is that she is ready to get “out of the chairs and into the hear ts of peoples’ lives.” She adds, “I want to expand Americans’ views of people in the world.” Her vision is to use OWN as the platform to impact as many people as possible. Asked how she would define success in her next chapter, Oprah said, “The truth is … I’m not one of those people who says ‘Oh, if I change just one person’s life.… Nope, not satisfied with just a few. I want millions of people!”
Since its launch, the network’s average viewership has fallen from 204,000 to 153,000 people as of May 15, 2011.
According to David Zaslav, CEO of Discovery, which owns half of OWN, “the ratings have been below expectations.” After such a rough star t and many changes by Oprah, OWN began to show signs of growth and profitability in 2013. She has surprised industry exper ts, who did not think she could do it. Oprah is showing that she has the leadership skills to transform a failing network, thus earning her claim as not just a charismatic but a transformational leader as well.1
OpeNING CaSe QUeStIONS:
1. Why was Oprah (and possibly still is) such a popular and admired figure on TV?
2. Is Oprah’s charisma more of a function of her personal qualities or the environment?
3. What effects has Oprah’s charisma had on her followers?
4. Does Oprah embody the example of a socialized charismatic leader or a personalized charismatic leader?
5. What qualities of charismatic leadership does Oprah possess?
6. Is Oprah a transformational leader, a charismatic leader, or both?
7. Oprah seems to have a clear sense of her personal meaning or purpose in life. What factors do you think have contributed to her understanding?
Can you answer any of these questions? You’ll find answers to these questions and learn more about Oprah Winfrey’s businesses and leadership style throughout the chapter. To learn more about Oprah Winfrey, visit her Web site at http://www.oprah.com.
OPENING CASE application
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 320 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 9 CHariSMaTiC anD TranSfor MaTionaL LEaDErSHiP 321
In t his chapter, we w i l l star t by discussing charismatic leadership; second, we will discuss transformational leadership; third, we will ta ke a combined approach in examining issues common to both charismatic and transformational leadership; a nd f ina l ly, we w i l l brief ly explore t he related topics of stewardship a nd ser va nt leadership.
Charismatic Leadership Charismatic leadership has generally been analyzed in terms of the effects the leader has on followers, or in terms of the relationship between leaders and followers. In this section, we will review Max Weber’s conceptualization of charisma, explain the locus of charismatic leadership, discuss the effects of charismatic leaders on followers, explore how anyone can develop charismatic qualities, and examine the notion of charisma as a double-edged sword.
Weber’s Conceptualization of Charisma The Greek word charisma means “divinely inspired gift.” Like the term leadership itself, charisma has roots in many disciplines, including politics, economics, social movements, and religion. Of the early theories of charisma, the sociologist Max Weber made what is probably the single most important contribution.2 Weber used the term “charisma” to explain a form of inf luence based not on traditional or legal–rational authority systems but rather on follower perceptions that a leader is endowed with the gift of divine inspi- ration or supernatural qualities.3 As such, charismatic leadership might be less a “gift from God” and more a “gift from followers.”4 Weber saw in a charismatic leader someone who single-handedly visualizes a transcendent vision or course of action that is not only appealing to potential followers but also compels them to act on it because they believe the leader is extraordinarily gifted.5 Vision is the ability to imagine different and better conditions and the ways to achieve them. Other attributes of charisma identified in the political and sociological literature include acts of heroism, an ability to inspire and build confidence, espousing of revolutionary ideals, oratorical ability, and a “powerful aura.”6
Charisma has been called “a fire that ignites followers’ energy and commitment, pro- ducing results above and beyond the ordinary.”7 It is relational in nature. Charisma is not something found solely in the leader as a psychological phenomenon, nor is it totally
1. Why was Oprah (and possibly still is) such a popular and admired figure on tV?
Because of the values she espouses and the causes she champions. She has used her celebrity status to push for social change in our society. She has championed the cause for child abuse, poverty, domestic violence, illiteracy, and much more. Through her television show and magazine, she has enter tained, enlightened, and empowered millions of viewers not just in the United States but also around the world.
OPENING CASE application
Briefly explain Max Weber’s conceptualization of charisma. Learning outcome
1
WOrk Application 9-1 Think of a leader from your work experience or education whom you believe has charisma. Explain why.
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 321 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
322 part 3 organizaTionaL LEaDErSHiP
situation determined. Instead, charisma manifests itself in the interplay between a leader (his or her traits and behaviors) and followers (their values, needs, perceptions, and beliefs). Charisma is therefore defined as a social construct between the leader and follower, in which the leader offers a transformative vision or ideal that exceeds the status quo and then convinces followers to accept this course of action not because of its rational likelihood of suc- cess, but because of their implicit belief in the extraordinary qualities of the leader8
Explain what is meant by the “locus of charismatic leadership.” Learning outcome
2
Locus of Charismatic Leadership The locus of charismatic leadership focuses on one question: what is the basis of charisma? This question centers on the debate over whether charisma is primarily the result of (a) the situation or social climate facing the leader, (b) the leader’s extraordinary qualities, or (c) a combination of the situation and the leader’s qualities.
There are those who believe that charismatic leadership could not take place unless the society was in a state of crisis—that charisma is situationally determined. For those shar- ing this viewpoint, the charismatic leader is simply an opportunist who capitalizes on a crisis situation. Proponents of this view argue that before an individual with extraordi- nary qualities could be perceived as a charismatic leader, the social situation presents the opportunity for followers to recognize the need for the leader’s qualities. And thus, absent a crisis or situation, such an individual may never be known to possess charismatic quali- ties. The sociological literature, led by Weber, supports this viewpoint, emphasizing that charismatic leadership is born out of stressful situations. Under stressful situations, charismatic leaders are able to express sentiments that are different from the established order, and also inspire others to buy into their vision of a better future. Advocates of this position would then argue that Martin Luther King Jr., Nelson Mandela, Adolph Hitler, or Gandhi would not have emerged as charismatic leaders without the prevailing socio- economic and political crises in their respective countries.
On the other side of the debate are those who argue that charisma need not be born out of distress but rather that charisma is primarily the result of leaders’ innate attributes as seen by their followers. These attributes include a strong sense of vision, exceptional communication skills, strong conviction, trustworthiness, high self-confidence, intelli- gence, energy and a proactive orientation. Advocates of this position would argue that none of the leaders mentioned earlier would have earned the label of charisma if they did not possess these qualities, regardless of the situation.9
2. Is Oprah’s charisma more of a function of her personal qualities or the environment?
The locus of Oprah’s charisma can be attributed to her extraordinar y qualities rather than to her environment. “Knowledge is power! With knowledge you can soar and reach as high as your dreams can take you,” said Oprah. This belief has guided Oprah Winfrey on her brilliant journey from a troubled youth to international fame. Oprah Winfrey is a success story that the everyday person can relate to. She is an effective communicator and a passionate individual. She has the ability to inspire trust and loyalty. Her personal stor y is inspirational and pulls people in to form strong emotional bonds with her.
OPENING CASE application
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 322 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 9 CHariSMaTiC anD TranSfor MaTionaL LEaDErSHiP 323
Finally, there are those who believe that charismatic leadership does not depend on the leader’s innate qualities or the presence of a crisis alone, but rather that it is the interaction of the two. Advocates view charisma as the result of follower attributions, inf luenced not only by actual leader characteristics and behavior but also by the context of the situation.
Discuss the effects of charismatic leadership on followers. Learning outcome
3
the effects of Charismatic Leaders on Followers An area of interest for many scholars of charisma concerns the effects that charismatic leadership has on follower motivations, job performance, and satisfaction, as well as on an organization’s overall performance.10
Followers of charismatic leaders often develop a strong sense of trust and bonding with the leader that is hard to find in other leader–follower relationships.11 The relation- ship between the charismatic leader and the followers is comparable to that of disciples to a master. Such a strong emotional bond is possible because the charismatic leader is believed to have the power to effect radical change by virtue of his or her transcendent vision—one that is different from the status quo.12 Followers stay with the charismatic leader, not out of fear or monetary inducement, but out of love, passionate devotion, trust, and commitment.13 There is the effect of unconditional acceptance of the char- ismatic leader by his/her followers that is not often seen with other types of leaders. Charismatic leaders are seen as generally more positive in their personality than non- charismatic leaders. This type of positiveness and the leader’s capacity to spread it has an effect on followers. Followers develop a strong sense of self-confidence and self-efficacy as they work to realize the leader’s vision. By observing the leader display self-confidence, followers develop self-confidence as well. When this happens, a positive atmosphere per- meates the organization and fuels excitement and energy for the leader’s cause. Some scholars have found that this cycle of inf luence ultimately increases followers’ organiza- tional citizenship behavior and empowerment.14
Followers of charismatic leaders tend to assume greater risk than they would with other types of leaders. Followers are willing to suffer whatever fate awaits the charismatic leader as he or she fights to change the status quo. They have absolute trust in the leader and his or her cause. There is an unquestioning loyalty and obedience to the leader.15 This was the case with Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr.’s followers, as they fought to bring about equality and freedom for all. They completely bought into these two leaders’ phi- losophy of nonviolent resistance even when faced with violence from their opponents.
Another effect of charismatic leadership on followers is to motivate them to set or aim for higher goals and ideals and have greater confidence in their ability to achieve such goals.16 The charismatic leader is seen as an object of identification by followers who try to emulate his or her behavior. When the character of the leader is grounded on such core values as integrity, hard work, responsibility, respect, and accountability, it has an effect on followers who already desire to align their beliefs, self-concept, cognitions, and values with those of their leader. We are all aware of business leaders—such as Oprah Winfrey (OWN), Richard Branson (the Virgin Group), and Mark Zuckerberg (Facebook)—who command an extraordinary level of respect and affection from their followers. The effect of the leader’s charisma on followers is seen by some as more critical than any other lead- ership qualities the leader may possess.
WOrk Application 9-2 Refer back to Work Application 9-1 on the leader you thought has charisma. Briefly discuss examples of the effect his or her charisma had on your work ethic, job performance, or job satisfaction.
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 323 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
324 part 3 organizaTionaL LEaDErSHiP
At the organizational level, there is an ongoing debate in academic circles on charis- matic CEOs and their effect on performance. The question is whether charismatic CEOs achieve better organizational performance than their less charismatic counterparts. The results are mixed; some studies revealed that charismatic leadership showed a positive relationship to financial performance17 and others seemed to show no effect. According to the findings of one study, supervisors’ charismatic leadership style inf luenced subordi- nates’ work performance and turnover intention.18 There are also those who say a char- ismatic leader may indeed make the organization more attractive to outside stakeholders such as investors, customers, suppliers, and activists groups.19 Exhibit 9.1 summarizes these effects.
The Effects of Charismatic Leaders on Followers
a. Followers are inspired by the “rightness” of the leader’s vision and a strong bond develops b. Unconditional acceptance of the leader c. Increased follower self-confidence and self-efficacy d. Follower acceptance of higher or challenging goals e. Increase in followers’ organizational citizenship behavior f. Tendency of followers to assume greater risks g. Strong loyalty and obedience to the leader h. Increased follower motivation to set or aim for higher goals i. Follower desire to align their beliefs, self-concept, cognitions, and values with those of the
leader
Source: Based on R. J. House, and M. L. Baetx (1979). “Leadership: Some Empirical Generalizations and New Research Directions.” In B.M. Staw (Ed.), Research in Organizational behavior, vol. 1 (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1979), 399–401.
EXHIBIT 9.1
3. What effects has Oprah’s charisma had on her followers?
The effects of charismatic leadership summarized in Exhibit 9.1 are very much applicable to Oprah and her followers. Oprah’s followers and suppor ters seem to have an unquestioning loyalty to her and all that she stands for. There is a strong affection and unconditional acceptance of her and a willingness to trust in the “rightness” of whatever cause she champions.
OPENING CASE application
Discuss how one can acquire charismatic qualities. Learning outcome
4
how One acquires Charismatic Qualities There are those who believe that charisma, the ability to inspire and captivate an audi- ence, is an innate quality that cannot be trained into someone. However, there are also those who believe that charismatic qualities can be acquired—that everyone has the potential to develop charismatic qualities.20 It is possible through training to improve
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 324 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 9 CHariSMaTiC anD TranSfor MaTionaL LEaDErSHiP 325
one’s communication skills, build self-confidence, and learn techniques to inspire others. There have been great charismatic leaders who did not reveal their charismatic qualities until much later in life. Hitler certainly was not born with charismatic qualities. He was living life on the fringes of society and failed in most of his early endeavors. However, he gradually developed his oratorical and interpersonal skills when he had the opportu- nity to inf luence others of like-minded thinking. Richard Branson (CEO and founder of the Virgin Group) and Jack Welch (former CEO of GE) are two very effective leaders who have been described as charismatic and transformational; yet they both overcame stut- tering, a speech impediment that causes many others to avoid public speaking. In 2011, the best picture in the Oscar awards ceremony went to The King’s Speech, a movie about the King of England who had a terrible speech impediment and only through the help of a speech coach did he overcome this weakness. He became an effective speaker and gave some inspiring speeches during World War II.
Nelson Mandela, John F. Kennedy, and Martin Luther King Jr., on the other hand, seemed to have had charismatic qualities early on as young adults that carried on into their mature years as leaders. Suggested strategies for acquiring or enhancing one’s char- ismatic qualities include:
• Through training and practice, you can improve your communication and interper- sonal skills. A coach or speech therapist can help you overcome a speech impediment such as stuttering that may be hindering you from communicating effectively. An expert on interpersonal relationships can help you learn how to relate to others in a positive and inspiring way.
The Effects of Charismatic Leaders on Followers Referring to Exhibit 9.1 on page 324, align each statement with the effect(s) it illustrates using the letters a–i.
1. According to one writer, over the years, Oprah has stoked a number of controversies, “yet these embarrassments barely affected Winfrey’s standing. Her moral character hasn’t been questioned.” What effect(s) does this example reveal?
2. At Facebook, the cult of Zuckerberg is described as “downright Jobsian in its intensity. Engineers are romanced by the size and scope of his vision and for many, winning his approval is its own reward.” What effect(s) does this example reveal?
3. In our church, the relationship between some members and the pastor is comparable to that of disciples to a master. These followers obey every instruction he utters.
4. The members of the church referred to in No. 3 believe that the pastor has the power to effect radical change by virtue of his transcendent vision, which is different from the status quo.
5. Our leader, who is very charismatic, has somehow convinced every one of us that we can do anything if only we believe in ourselves.
6. Your friend tells you that she is very uncomfortable with some of the comments her CEO makes about gays and minorities but does not want to say anything because of her strong commitment to his overall mission.
7. Every few months, Facebook holds an all-night workfest called the “hackathon.” It’s a test of their mettle. As one engineer describes it, “Your body’s like, ‘I’m hungry; I’m tired; I want to go home.’ Your brain’s like, ‘No, no, no this can become something real.’ ” What effect(s) does this example reveal?
CONCept APPLICATION 9-1
WOrk Application 9-3 Identify a leader you have worked with or currently work with whom you think has charismatic potential. Describe one trait or characteristic of this individual that, if developed, can transform him or her into an effective charismatic leader.
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 325 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
326 part 3 organizaTionaL LEaDErSHiP
• Through education, you can develop your visionary skills by practicing the act of creating a vision in a college course like this one. The role-play exercise at the end of this chapter is directed at this issue.
• You can practice being candid. Although not insensitive, the charismatic person is typi- cally forthright in giving his or her assessment of a situation, whether the assessment is positive or negative. Charismatic leaders are direct in their approach, so that there is no ambiguity about their position on issues.
• Through a leadership development workshop or seminar, you can develop an attractive, enthusiastic, optimistic, and energetic personality profile. A major behavior pattern of charismatic leaders is their combination of vision, enthusiasm, optimism, and a high energy level that they bring to the situation. As mentioned earlier, charisma is a rela- tional concept and ultimately comes from the attributions of followers.
Distinguish between socialized and personalized charismatic leader types. Learning outcome
5
Charisma: a Double-edged Sword Most people agree that charisma can be a double-edged sword capable of producing both positive and negative outcomes. It is possible in reading about the personal magnetism, vision, self-confidence, masterful rhetorical skills, and empowering style of charismatic leaders to conclude that they are all good moral leaders whom others should emulate. We live in a society where hero worship is a common occurrence. It is foolish and even danger- ous to follow a leader just because he/she is charismatic. Leaders such as Nelson Mandela, Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., John F. Kennedy, and Winston Churchill exhibited tre- mendous charisma.21 So did leaders such as Osama bin Laden, Charles Manson, David Koresh, Adolph Hitler, and the Reverend Jim Jones of the People’s Temple. This latter group of charismatic leaders represents the dark side of charisma.22 These leaders and many others like them are prone to extreme narcissism that leads them to promote highly self- serving and grandiose goals. Therefore, charisma can cut both ways; it is not always used in the ser- vice of a greater good, thus our description of charisma as a “double-edged sword.”
A meaningful approach for differentiating between positive and negative charisma is in terms of the values and motives of the leader. Values research proposes that two op- posing but complementary motives drive an individual’s behavior: self-glorification and self-transcendence. The self-glorification motive is about the self-maintenance and self- enhancement of the leader. It seeks to protect, maintain, and enhance the leader’s self- esteem and is consistent with negative or destructive charisma.23 On the other hand, the self-transcendence motive is about the collective interest or good of the broader society. It seeks to build mutually supportive relationships with followers and is consistent with altruistic and empowering orientations of positive or constructive charisma.
Based on this construct of positive and negative charisma, two types of charismatic leaders are identified: the socialized or positive charismatic leader and the personalized or negative charismatic leader. The socialized charismatic leader (SCL) is one who possesses an egalitarian, self-transcendent, and empowering personality and uses cha- risma for the benefit of others.24 The personalized charismatic leader (pCL) is one who possesses a dominant, self-centered, self-aggrandizing, and narcissistic personality and uses charisma for self-glorification.
SCLs pursue orga nization-driven goa ls a nd promote empowerment, persona l growth, and equal participation for followers, whereas PCLs pursue leader-driven goals
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 326 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 9 CHariSMaTiC anD TranSfor MaTionaL LEaDErSHiP 327
and promote obedience, dependency, and submission.25 The PCL has a tendency to be authoritarian and exploitative.
With socialized charismatic leaders, rewards are used to reinforce behavior that is consistent with the vision and mission of the organization; personalized charismatic leaders use rewards and punishment to manipulate and control followers, and informa- tion is restricted or used to preserve the image of the leader or to exaggerate external threats to the organization. Socialized charismatic leaders tend to have followers who are part of a cohesive team. They convey a values-based message that aligns with the mission and objectives of the organization.26
Personalized or negative charismatic leaders emphasize devotion to themselves more than to ideals. Decisions of these leaders are often self-serving. Group accomplishments are used for self-glorification. Ideological appeals are only a ploy to gain power, after which the ideology is ignored or arbitrarily changed to serve the leader’s self-interest. In contrast, socialized or positive charismatic leaders seek to instill devotion to ideology more than devotion to self.27
WOrk Application 9-4 Describe a leader in your work experience who manifested positive or negative charismatic qualities. How did this affect your relationship with the leader?
4. Does Oprah embody the example of a socialized charismatic leader or a personalized charismatic leader?
Oprah’s philanthropic activities and the way she conducts herself would suggest that she is definitely a socialized charis- matic leader. The Oprah Winfrey Foundation was established to suppor t the inspiration, empowerment, education, and well-being of women, children, and families around the world. Through this private charity, Oprah has directly served the needs of low-oppor tunity people and has awarded hundreds of grants to organizations that carry out this mission. She has contributed millions of dollars toward providing a better education for underprivileged students who have merit but no means. She created the “Oprah Winfrey Scholars Program,” which gives scholarships to students determined to use their education to give back to their communities in the United States and abroad.
OPENING CASE application
YOU Make the ethICaL Call
9.1 Obesity and Charismatic Ads
The federal government has repor ted that obesity might over take tobacco as the leading cause of death in the United States.28 Some social activists are blaming part of the obesity problem on marketing junk food to kids,29 and food makers and ad agencies are defending advertising to children.30 Some companies use charismatic star performers and athletes to promote their junk food products to get people to eat more. At the same time, American health officials are trying to persuade people to lose weight. The government has taken out public service ads to convince people to get in shape and eat right. Part of the ads’ success depends on whether people take personal responsibility for their own health and weight.
1. What is the reason for the increase in obesity in the United States? Are junk food ads using charismatic stars to promote their products contributing to the obesity problem?
2. Is it ethical for junk food sellers to use charismatic stars to promote their products?
3. Is it ethical and socially responsible for the government to try to get people to lose weight, through ads and other methods?
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 327 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
328 part 3 organizaTionaL LEaDErSHiP
Transformational Leadership J. M. Burns first articulated the idea of transformational leadership in 1978 before Bernard Bass expanded on it almost a decade later. Burns proposed two leadership approaches for getting work done: transactional and transformational.31 Transforma- tional leaders are less a function of follower attributions; rather, they earn their reputa- tion as transformational leaders from their known accomplishments. Transformational leaders are known for moving and changing organizations “in a big way,” by communi- cating to followers an inspiring vision of the future and, like charismatic leaders, tapping into followers’ higher ideals and desire for change. The transformational leader seeks to transform a mediocre organization by inf luencing followers to buy into a new vision and new possibilities.32
Effective transformational leaders know that to move forward, they must first earn the trust, commitment, and respect of followers. When this happens, the transformational leader is more likely to achieve a collective “buy-in” to his vision. Followers willingly expend excep- tional effort in achieving organizational goals. Therefore, transformational leadership seeks to change the status quo by articulating to followers the problems in the current sys- tem and a compelling vision of what a new organization could be, whereas transactional leadership seeks to maintain stability within an organization through regular economic and social exchanges that achieve specific goals for both leaders and their followers.
In this section, we will focus attention on the effects of transformational leaders on followers, similar to the discussion on charismatic leaders. We will also differentiate between transactional and transformational leadership and review key stages in the transformation process.
the effects of transformational Leadership As organizations continue to face global challenges, there is greater need for leaders who can successfully craft and implement bold strategies that will enable an organization to achieve above average returns and competitiveness.33 Transformational leadership describes a process of bold vision creation and articulation that changes and transforms
Socialized versus Personalized Charismatic Leaders Identify each statement as being more characteristic of one or the other type of charismatic leadership: a. socialized charismatic leader b. personalized charismatic leader
8. A leader like the late Nelson Mandela who advocated peace and forgiveness toward the white-dominated apartheid government that had imprisoned him for 27 years.
9. An organization where information is restricted and only used to preserve the image of the leader or to exaggerate external threats to the organization.
10. A leader whose primary motive is self-glorification and self-aggrandizement.
11. A leader whose primary motive is to achieve collective interest through close supportive relationships with all follower.
12. A leader who is more interested in protecting, maintaining, and enhancing his or her self-image.
13. A leader who wants obedience, dependency, and submission from his followers.
CONCept APPLICATION 9-2
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 328 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 9 CHariSMaTiC anD TranSfor MaTionaL LEaDErSHiP 329
organizations and individuals.34,35 A number of studies have highlighted the effects of transformational leadership on various organizational and follower outcomes.
At the organizational level, studies have found that transformational leadership has positive effects on organizational performance, 36,37 culture, and learning. 38 Transforma- tional leaders are more likely to be strong advocates of teamwork, cooperation, and in- novation—all ingredients of a learning culture.39,40,41
At the individual level, transformational leadership has been found to positively affect follower organizational commitment and organizational commitment ref lects the extent to which members are loyal and willing to work hard toward achieving organizational objectives. 42,43 Organizational commitment has direct implications on employee turn- over rates, performance, and citizenship behavior.44 An effective transformational leader has the effect of inf luencing followers to shift from a focus on self-interest to a focus on collective interests.45,46 Effective transformational leaders use their charisma and power to inspire and motivate followers to trust and work hard to achieve the organization’s objec- tives.47,48 They generate excitement and energy by presenting a compelling and inspiring vision of the future. 49 Followers associated with transformational leaders report higher levels of job satisfaction and empowerment and lower levels of turnover and stress.50,51,52 In certain work situations, transformational leadership is associated with increased employee cognitive abilities, which in turn improve creativity and decision quality.53,54
transformational versus transactional Leadership Begin this section by completing Self-Assessment 9-1 to determine if you are more of a transactional or a transformational leader.
are You More of a transformational Leader?SELF-ASSESSMENT 9-1
Complete the following questions based on how you will act (or have acted) in a typical work or school situation. Use the following scale:
1 — 2 — 3 — 4 — 5
Disagree Agree
1. I enjoy change and see myself as a change agent.
2. I am better at inspiring employees toward a new future than motivating them to perform their current jobs.
3. I have/had a vision of how an organization can change for the better.
4. I see myself as someone who is comfort- able encouraging people to express ideas and opinions that differ from my own.
5. I enjoy taking risks, but I’m not reckless. 6. I enjoy spending time developing new
solutions to old problems rather than implementing existing solutions.
7. I deliberate carefully before acting; I’m not impulsive.
8. I like to support change initiatives, even when the idea may not work.
9. I learn from my experience; I don’t repeat the same mistakes.
10. I believe the effort to change something for the better should be rewarded, even if the final outcome is disappointing.
add up the numbers on lines 1–10 and place your total score here and on the continuum below.
10 — 20 — 30 — 40 — 50 Transactional leader Transformational leader
The higher the score, generally, the more you exhibit transformational leader qualities. However, transforma- tional leaders also perform transactional behaviors. it is also generally easier to be transformational at higher levels of management than at lower levels.
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 329 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
330 part 3 organizaTionaL LEaDErSHiP
In today’s globally competitive environment, experts and scholars agree that employee creativity and innovative behavior is imperative for organizations’ survival. Transforma- tional leadership has been determined to be particularly effective in engendering follower innovative behavior and innovation happens to be a driving force in transforming organizations.55 Therefore, transformational leadership is about changing the status quo. The transformational leader wants to change the status quo by articulating to followers the problems in the current system and a compelling vision of what a new organization could be.
The transactional leadership process involves an exchange of valued benefits, based on defined expectations and motivations of both leaders and followers. The transac- tional leader enters into specific contractual arrangements with followers. In exchange for meeting specific objectives or performing certain duties, the leader provides benefits that satisfy followers’ needs and expectations.56 It is akin to the leader–member exchange (LMX) process in which the leader rewards the follower for specific behaviors and per- formance that meets with expectations and punishes behavior or performance that does not.57 Such exchanges represent defined contingent reward and punishment behaviors that cater to the self-interest of the followers in exchange for performance that benefits the immediate needs of the organization.
Therefore, transformational leaders are described as vision-oriented, whereas trans- actional leaders are described as task and reward-oriented. Transformational leaders value change, especially change that improves on the status quo. Transactional leaders value stability, especially stability in the efficiency and effectiveness of the enterprise as it works to achieve its short- and long-term objectives. Transactional leaders manage the daily ongoing transactions that help further the leader’s vision. Transactional leadership tends to be transitory in that once a transaction is completed the relationship between the parties may end or be redefined. Transformational leadership puts the emphasis on the
Transformational or Transactional Leadership Identify each statement as being more characteristic of one or the other style: a. transformational leadership b. transactional leadership
14. Oprah’s determination to inspire her followers to live their best lives is an example of what type of leadership?
15. As the head of my unit, I believe my primary responsibility is to maintain the steady progress we have been making with this current strategy.
16. Facebook has a guiding philosophy called the “hacker way.” The hacker way is about continuous improvement and iteration. According to Mark Zuckerberg (Facebook CEO), if the hacker way has one enemy, it’s the status quo. This example illustrates what type of leadership?
17. I like to think that as a leader, I inspire my followers to focus on higher ideals and organizational accomplishments rather than self-interest.
18. My vision is one that changes the status quo of this organization to something bigger and better.
19. My job is to fulfill specific contractual arrangements with my employees, one individual and one project at a time.
20. My job is to insure that my team efficiently and effectively meets daily task requirements by using the right mix of rewards and incentives to motivate team members.
21. As a leader, I believe my job is to exploit current opportunities rather than chasing new opportunities that may not materialize.
CONCept APPLICATION 9-3
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 330 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 9 CHariSMaTiC anD TranSfor MaTionaL LEaDErSHiP 331
long-term future of the organization, thus it is more enduring.58 In studies comparing the inf luential abilities of transformational and transactional leaders on employees’ creativity and innovative behavior, transformational leadership led to greater employee creativity and innovative behavior.59,60
Because of the attention paid to both charismatic and transformational leaders, the tendency for some has been to diminish the importance that transactional leaders have on organizational success. Recent studies, however, are revealing that transactional leadership does have substantial effects on employee attitudes, commitment, organiza- tional citizenship behavior, and job performance.61,62 Bernard Bass argued that contrary to Burns’s assertion that transformational and transactional leadership are at opposite ends of a single continuum of leadership, the two approaches are actually interdependent and complementary. A meta-analytic test of the relative validity of transformational and transactional leadership styles confirmed Bass’s assertion. The study revealed that both are valid approaches for achieving organizational objectives, with transformational lead- ership showing the highest overall results and transactional or contingent reward leader- ship a close second.63,64
WOrk Application 9-5 Identify a leader you have worked for or working with now. In your opinion, is this leader more of a transformational or transactional leader? Explain why and include examples
the transformation process Transformational leaders are usually brought into an organization that is experiencing a decline or in need of a major change in direction. The transformation leader is brought in to institute turnaround strategies that can transform the organization and put it on a path to prosperity. This often involves fundamental changes in vision, mission, strate- gies, and policies. The transformational leader usually employs his/her charisma and/or power to inf luence follower behaviors and work ethic. A successful transformation pro- cess involves broad participation among organizational stakeholders with the ultimate goal of embracing a shared vision, negotiating and communicating priorities, minimiz- ing risk, and creating action plans and commitments for change.65 It is not an ad hoc, ser- endipitous process. We present a four-part process that starts with the transformational leader’s ability to (1) challenge the status quo and make a convincing case for change, (2) present an inspiring vision of the future, (3) provide effective leadership during the trans- formation, and (4) institutionalize the change. Exhibit 9.2 presents the four stages of the transformation process with suggested activities in each stage.
Explain the four stages of the transformation process. Learning outcome
6
The Transformation Process EXHIBIT 9.2
Stages Suggested activities
1. Make a compelling case for change • Increase sensitivity and awareness to environmental opportunities and threats.
• Challenge the status quo. • Identify attractive new trends.
2. Present a shared vision • Encourage everyone to think of a new and brighter future.
• Involve others in seeing and moving toward the vision. • Express new vision in ideological, not just economic terms. • Inspire followers.
(continued)
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 331 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
332 part 3 organizaTionaL LEaDErSHiP
The Transformation Process (continued) EXHIBIT 9.2
Stages Suggested activities
3. Lead the transformation Instill a sense of urgency for the change. Empower, support, foster collaboration, and strengthen followers. Help followers understand need for change. Increase followers’ self-confidence and optimism. Establish priorities. Minimize risk. Avoid the temptation of a “quick fix.” Recognize and deal openly with conflict and resistance.
4. Institutionalize the change Enable and strengthen followers with a “greatness attitude”; for example, recognize and celebrate accomplishments. Help followers find self-fulfillment with new vision. Help followers look beyond self-interests to collective interests. Change appraisal procedures and reward systems. Implement team-building interventions and personnel changes. Appoint a special task force to monitor progress. Encourage top leaders and managers to model the way.
Source: Based on Carolyn Hines and William Hines Jr., “Seminar on the Essence of Transformational Leadership (Leadership Training Institute),” Nation’s Cities Weekly 25(9) (March 4, 2002): 8.
YOU Make the ethICaL Call
9.2 Breach of Privacy
Recent news that smar t phone devices like the iPhone and iPad had been recording and retaining locational information generated a lot of anger from customers, privacy advocates, and government officials. There is great concern that keeping a detailed history of users’ geographical locations without consent violates their privacy. Apple, the maker of these devices, argued that the purpose of maintaining a comprehensive location database is to ensure quicker and more precise location services to its iPhone and iPad customers.66
The dilemma for Apple is that while for some customers, privacy supersedes all other considerations, for others, location data provides the services they want and expect. For these users, finding the location of an appointment, a restaurant in a new par t of town, or networking with a friend, the geolocation feature is a must-have. For others who worry about privacy, this feature could be a problem when, for example, an abusive spouse is involved or when an overzealous government agency can collect information on an indi- vidual without legal authorization like a search warrant. Both sides want the government and/or Apple to take steps to address their worries.67
1. Is it ethical for Apple to record and store location data for its customers without their consent?
2. What about the rights of those who want this location feature? What if taking out the lo- cation feature causes these customers to switch phone brands? Will this be fair to Apple?
3. In your opinion, what is the ethical thing for Apple to do?
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 332 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 9 CHariSMaTiC anD TranSfor MaTionaL LEaDErSHiP 333
Charismatic-Transformational Leadership In the literature, both charismatic and transformational leadership forms have been presented as one construct called charismatic-transformational leadership.68 Both leader- ship types share similarities in terms of the qualities that describe each, the effects that they have on followers and in the nature of the relationships (inf luencing behavior) that exist between them and their followers. Some would argue that the election of President Obama illustrates how he was able to use his transformational and charismatic qualities to inf luence the electorate to make such a cultural shift in the 2008 presidential elec- tions.69 Therefore, this section examines the qualities of effectiveness common to both charismatic and transformational leadership types, the leader behaviors they share in common, and what sets them apart.
Qualities of effective Charismatic and transformational Leadership Effective charismatic and transformational leaders share certain qualities. Exhibit 9.3 lists these qualities. Some of these qualities may have greater application to one leader- ship type and not the other; however, both share the majority of them. We will brief ly discuss each quality and point out similarities and variations associated with either leadership type.
List the qualities of effective charismatic and transformational leaders. Learning outcome
7
Qualities of Effective Charismatic and Transformational Leaders
a. Vision b. Superb communication skills c. Self-confidence and moral conviction d. Ability to inspire trust e. High risk orientation f. High energy and action orientation g. Relational power base h. Achievement orientation i. Ability to empower followers j. Self-promoting personality
EXHIBIT 9.3
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
Vision Researchers have consistently emphasized the role of vision in charismatic and transfor- mational leadership. Both leadership types articulate a transcendent vision that becomes the rallying cry of a movement or a cause. Charismatic and transformational leaders have the ability to articulate an idealized vision of a future that is significantly better than the present. They are able to recognize and articulate fundamental discrepancies between the status quo and the way things can (or should) be.70 An effective vision should uplift and rally followers to a shared purpose, something charismatic and transformational leaders do very well.
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 333 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
334 part 3 organizaTionaL LEaDErSHiP
Superb Communication Skills In addition to having a vision, charismatic and transformational leaders are known for their ability to communicate effectively.71 In fact, this is one quality that sets charis- matic leaders apart. Not only are they effective communicators, they are also excellent orators when it comes to delivery of their message. The charismatic leader’s eloquent, imaginative, and passionate presentations awaken followers’ desire for change and in- spire them to embrace the leader’s vision.72 Charismatic leaders use their superior ora- torical skills to stir dissatisfaction with the status quo while they build support for their vision of a new future. They employ rhetorical techniques such as metaphors, analo- gies, similes; stories and anecdotes; contrasts; rhetorical questions; and expressions of moral conviction to drive home their points so that their message will have a profound impact on followers;73 all along, conveying confidence that their vision and goals can be achieved. Fitting examples here include Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech, Hitler’s “Thousand-year Reich” speech, or John F. Kennedy’s inaugural speech in 1961.74
Transformational leaders are able to make their case for change but not always with the same oratorical eloquence and style known for charismatic leaders. Both leadership types are good at knowing what (facts) followers need to know, when (timing) they need to know, who (appropriate audience) needs to know, and where (media choice) the infor- mation needs to be for access. The distinction between the two leadership types often lies in how (oratorical ability) the information is delivered. Transformational leaders who are not very charismatic may use other means (written communication or a spokesperson) to communicate their ideas.
Self-Confidence and Moral Conviction Charismatic and transformational leaders display an unshakable self-confidence and optimism as part of their persona. Charismatic leaders are, however, known to espouse messages of change that have religious and/or political overtones, thus emphasizing their strong faith and moral conviction in the message.75 These qualities are critical in every- day interactions with followers, and all the more so for a leader who must convince others to join his or her cause.
Followers feel connected to leaders who are themselves optimistic and confident in the ultimate success of their mission. The leader’s moral conviction in the rightness of his or her cause inspires followers’ faith in the leader. Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech is an example of how a leader’s self-confidence, faith, optimism, and strong moral conviction can inspire hope and faith in a better future and move an entire nation.
Ability to Inspire Trust Trust is critical in any relationship but even more so for transformational and char- ismatic leaders because of the magnitude of change they often present to their fol- lowers. Constituents have to believe very strongly in the integrity of charismatic and transformational leaders to risk their careers, and even lives in some cases, for them. Charismatic and transformational leaders build support and trust by being honest with followers. Also, these leaders “talk the talk and walk the walk ”; in other words, they model what they desire of their followers. This builds credibility with their followers and garners the support and cooperation of everyone. Effective charismatic and trans- formational leaders want to be role models to a new value system that is congruent with their articulations.
Gandhi represents an outstanding example of such systematic and intentional role modeling. He preached self-sacrifice, brotherly love, and nonviolent resistance to British
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 334 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 9 CHariSMaTiC anD TranSfor MaTionaL LEaDErSHiP 335
rule. Repeatedly he engaged in self-sacrificing behaviors, such as giving up his lucrative law practice to live the life of a peasant, engaging in civil disobedience, fasting, and refus- ing to accept the ordinary conveniences offered to him by others.
High-risk Orientation Charismatic and transformational leaders are willing to take greater risk than the average leader. From a business standpoint, transformational leaders understand the risk–return relationship. They know that to earn high returns, one must take higher but calculated risks. Charismatic leaders on their part are willing to incur great personal risk to realize their vision. The fearlessness of the charismatic leader romanticizes death as an honorable outcome. People admire the courage of those who take high risk. Putting themselves on the line is one way charismatic leaders affirm self-advocacy for their vision and thus gain the admiration and respect of their followers. It has been reported that Martin Luther King Jr. received death threats against himself and his family almost every day during the civil rights movement. Yet he persisted with his mission until his assassination.
In addition to assuming great risk, transformational and charismatic leaders use unconventional means to achieve success. Martin Luther King Jr. and his nonviolent campaign against angry violent opponents was a novel idea in the United States when he started. Contemporary examples of transformational leaders who have used uncon- ventional methods to inspire followers include Herb Kelleher, former CEO of Southwest Airlines. Kelleher encouraged employees to break the rules, maintain their individuality, and have fun—a style he called “management by fooling around.” It is a follower-centric style that has made Southwest Airlines employees the most productive in the industry. This is very similar to the laissez-faire leadership approach employed by Richard Branson of Virgin Airlines.
High Energy and Action Orientation Charismatic and transformational leaders believe time is not on their side and thus are always on the move. There is urgency in the way they express courage and conviction about their vision. Few people can match the daily routines of these leaders.
relational Power Base Effective leaders in general have close working relationships with followers. However, as mentioned earlier, a key part of charismatic leadership is the close emotional bond the leader has with followers.76 Unlike other types of leadership, it is intensely relational and based almost entirely on soft power bases, even when the leader occupies a formal organizational position.77 Followers are often in awe of the charismatic leader. There is a powerful identification with and emulation of such a magnetic personality and an unquestioning acceptance of and affection for him or her. The transformational leader’s power source is typically positional. They have reward and punishment power. However, effective transformational leaders do not rely solely on their positional power to inf luence followers; they try to develop close relations with their followers similar to the charis- matic leader.78
Achievement Orientation Typically, charismatic and transformational leaders have a strong belief in the “rightness” of their cause, which explains why they persist and stay the course, even through set- backs. Because of this conviction, they experience less internal conf lict and discomfort even when faced with resistance and threats to themselves and their families. This is much more so with charismatic leaders who have given up their lives or freedom for what they believe.
WOrk Application 9-6 As part of your general education requirements, you have taken courses in the natural sciences, history, and literature. Identify a leader from any of these disciplines who you believe was either a transformational or charismatic leader. How many of the qualities of charismatic and transformational leaders found in Exhibit 9.3, can you assign to your chosen leader?
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 335 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
336 part 3 organizaTionaL LEaDErSHiP
Ability to Empower Followers Transformational and charismatic leaders understand that they cannot achieve their vision alone. They need help and support from their followers. Effective charismatic and transformational leaders empower their followers to do what has to be done to achieve organizational goals. They are good at transforming followers into highly effective team players with the message that together, great things can be accomplished. They do this not with extrinsic rewards but with intrinsic rewards such as pride from accomplishing great things.
Self-Promoting Personality Even if no one will take up their cause, transformational and charismatic leaders are fre- quently out in media circles, promoting their vision. Richard Branson and Donald Trump have relied on self-promotion to help build their business empires. These leaders are “not afraid to toot their own horn.”
5. What qualities of charismatic leadership does Oprah possess?
As one writer puts it, Oprah is the “near-perfect peddler of a relentless optimism.” Her message is one of self- improvement, doing good, and controlling your own destiny. Her mantra is “live your best life.” Oprah is a vision-driven leader. She is a superb communicator. She has self-confidence and a strong sense of moral conviction in everything she does. She has inspired and empowered millions of people through her show and magazine. She is of high energy. Oprah is described by those close to her as inspirational, brilliant, and personable. Oprah exemplifies all or most of the qualities of charismatic and transformational leaders listed in Exhibit 9.3 on page 333.
OPENING CASE application
Qualities of Effective Charismatic and Transformational Leaders Referring to the qualities listed in Exhibit 9.3 on page 333 identify each statement by the quality or qualities it highlights using the letters a–j.
22. Of all the gutsy moves Oprah has made throughout her career, none is as bold and risky as the decision to launch her own very cable network—OWN. Which quality(s) does this move reveal of Oprah?
23. As CEO of this company, I see a future that is much better than the status quo. Let us grab the opportunity before it’s too late.
24. Jordan’s honesty, sincerity, and integrity have had a significant impact on her followers; they seem to have more faith when it comes to following her directives. What does this say about Jordan as a leader?
25. As the leader of his fraternity, Justin has a way of using eloquent, imaginative, and passionate presentations to inspire his fraternity brothers.
26. Brooke has convinced each member of her cycling team that they have what it takes to win the Tour de France without resorting to using banned substances—that is, doping. What effect does this have on Brooke’s followers?
27. Unlike her peer managers, Mrs. Smith has given her followers greater latitude and freedom in decisions affecting their jobs.
CONCept APPLICATION 9-4
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 336 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 9 CHariSMaTiC anD TranSfor MaTionaL LEaDErSHiP 337
Transformational and Charismatic Leader Behaviors To achieve their mission and objectives, transformational and charismatic leaders engage in a variety of behaviors.79,80 This section focuses on some of these shared behavior dimensions.
Bass and Avilio proposed that transformational leadership is composed of four behavior dimensions; they referred to them as the “four Is”—idealized inf luence, inspi- rational motivation, individual consideration, and intellectual stimulation.81 Both leader- ship types are well known for using these behavior dimensions to inf luence followers and advance their visions. The four behavior dimensions are discussed below.
• Idealized influence is a powerful tool used by transformational and charismatic leaders. They possess the ability to develop great symbolic power that is then used to influence followers. Followers idealize such leaders and often develop a strong emotional attach- ment to their vision. The charismatic and transformational leader engages in behavior that infuses followers with a strong sense of idealism.
• The second behavior dimension is inspirational motivation. Transformational and char- ismatic leaders have the ability to passionately communicate a future idealistic vision that is a much better alternative to the status quo.82 Both leadership types employ com- pelling visionary explanations to depict what the work group can accomplish and what it will mean to them. Excited followers are then motivated and inspired to achieve chal- lenging organizational goals.
• The third behavior dimension, individual consideration, is about the mentoring role often assumed by charismatic and transformational leaders.83 They serve as mentors to their followers. Effective charismatic and transformational leaders use an individ- ualized developmental model that responds to follower needs and concerns. Studies have found that in dyadic relationships characterized by strong individualized leader–follower exchanges, followers felt a greater sense of self-worth. Transforma- tional leaders were found to support the development of these exchange relation- ships in greater measure.84
• Finally, intellectual stimulation describes the charismatic and transformational leader’s creative and out-of-the-box way of thinking. They encourage followers to approach old and familiar problems in new ways. By stimulating novel thinking, charismatic and transformational leaders inspire followers to question their own assumptions and learn to solve problems creatively. In a fast-changing environment such as we have today, innovation has come to be seen as a strategic imperative for organizational survival. Because of the strategic significance of innovation, leader behaviors must focus on in- tellectual stimulation of followers. Leaders have to take a leading role in building and enhancing innovative capabilities of the organization. This includes an emphasis on creativity, risk taking, and experimentation. The organizational culture should embrace change and constantly challenge the status quo.85 Charismatic and transformational leaders lead the pack in this area.
A leader who exemplifies these four behavior dimensions is the late Nelson Mandela. Nelson Mandela led the change that is depolarizing a nation racially polarized for decades. Mandela’s transformational leadership humanized apartheid South Africa and
Describe the four behavior dimensions associated with transformational and charismatic leaders.
Learning outcome
8
WOrk Application 9-7 Think of a leader in our society today who is generally perceived to be a charismatic or transformational leader. In your opinion, which of the behavioral dimensions of charismatic and transformational leadership described in the text can be attributed to him or her?
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 337 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
338 part 3 organizaTionaL LEaDErSHiP
led to the emergence of a nation deserving of global recognition. His charismatic effects softened the hardest stances of the “haves” and “have-nots” and aligned them in pursuit of a constructive common purpose.
Martin Luther King Jr. was both a charismatic and a transformational leader like Nelson Mandela. A study focused on examining his legacy concluded that he per- sonified the four behavior dimensions listed earlier. The study emphasized Martin Luther King Jr.’s efforts at building follower confidence (individualized consideration), challenging taken-for-granted assumptions (intellectual stimulation), developing fol- lower needs (inspirational motivation), and upholding high moral values (idealized inf luence).86
Distinguish between charismatic and transformational leadership. Learning outcome
9
6. Is Oprah a transformational leader, a charismatic leader, or both?
Oprah’s current venture into cable network TV with the launch of OWN and her success so far in is transforming the network is an example of her transformational leadership qualities. Oprah is a transformational leader with charismatic qualities. She embodies both leadership styles.
OPENING CASE application ©
C en
ga ge
L ea
rn in
g®
Transformational and Charismatic Leader Behaviors EXHIBIT 9.4
Behavioral Dimension Description
Idealized Influence Behavior that conveys an ideal future that is much better than the present. The leader’s behavior is aimed at inspiring followers to share in his or her vision.
Inspirational Motivation Passionate communications of better days ahead that motivates followers to buy into the leader’s vision.
Individual Consideration Behavior that employs an individualized developmental model that responds to follower needs and concerns
Intellectual Stimulation Behavior that challenges followers to think “outside of the box” and re-examine old ways and methods
Source: Based on B.M. Bass and B.J. Avilio, Improving Organizational Effectiveness through Transformational Leadership (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994); and P.M. Podsakoff, S.B. Mackenzie, R.H. Moorman, and R. Fetter, “Transformational Leader Behaviors and Their Effects on Followers’ Trust in Leader, Satisfaction, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior,” Leadership Quarterly 1(2) (1990): 107–142.
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 338 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 9 CHariSMaTiC anD TranSfor MaTionaL LEaDErSHiP 339
Charismatic and transformational Leadership: What’s the Difference? Some authors make no distinction between the charismatic and the transformational leader, preferring to combine them into one model of leadership. They refer to the com- bined model as charismatic leadership because charisma is a central theme in both, either explicitly or implicitly. The thinking behind this viewpoint is that charismatic leaders are by nature transformational. Their vision is almost always about transforming from the status quo to something else. Also, supporters of the combined theory approach make the case that transformational leaders share a lot of the qualities associated with charismatic leaders such as vision, honesty, optimism, inspiration, communication skills, confidence, and, yes, charisma itself.
From this perspective, it would appear that charismatic and transformational leadership theories are one and the same. However, a closer examination does reveal some key differ- ences between the two theories. The first notable area of difference is that though charis- matic and transformational leadership theories are about change, not all transformational leaders are charismatic. There are many examples of very successful transformational lead- ers who achieved great transforming results but not through the charismatic effects of their personalities. These leaders are lacking in charisma but very effective as transformational leaders. Many will agree that leaders like Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, Abraham Lincoln, or Jack Welch are transformational, but few will label them as charismatic.87 A more recent example is Mark Zuckerberg, the founder and CEO of Facebook. Not only is he leading the transformation of Facebook in the social network media industry, but he is also transform- ing our society in the ways we relate and communicate with each other. Yet he is described as shy, a recluse, a loner, and not very comfortable with the public.88 No one will label him today as a charismatic leader; maybe he will develop charismatic qualities later in life. On the other hand, there are leaders such as Martin Luther King Jr., John F. Kennedy, Adolf Hitler, Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, Richard Branson, and many others whose successful transforming results are to a great extent attributed to their charismatic qualities. These leaders for the most part live by the tenets of consultation, teamwork, persuasion, and cooperation, and they shun coercion and domination.
A second area of difference is how one achieves the label of charisma or transformer. Attribution theory states that followers make attributions of heroic or extraordinary lead- ership qualities when they observe certain behaviors in their leader. These attributions form the basis upon which a leader is seen as possessing or not possessing charisma.89 Such attributions of charisma then become the reason for follower unconditional loyalty, devotion, self-sacrifice, obedience, and commitment to the leader and his or her cause.90 Transformational leaders, on the other hand, do not achieve their label from follower attributions. They are labeled as transformational leaders because they actually trans- formed the organizations they led. It is a reputation or label based on an individual’s track record of past accomplishments and training; not follower attributions.91
A third area of difference is on the mind-set of charismatic and transformational leaders. Charismatic leaders tend to have a more activist mind-set. They see political and social causes as opportunities to inf luence change and provide a better life for their followers. Pursuing these causes provide charismatic leaders with meaning or sense of purpose for their existence. Charismatic leaders have a greater sensitivity to political, cul- tural, and economic conditions that are ripe for change. They magnify a climate of dis- satisfaction by encouraging activism that heightens followers’ willingness to change the status quo. When followers are going through periods of turmoil and collective stress, they
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 339 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
340 part 3 organizaTionaL LEaDErSHiP
may respond to a leader who is able to give meaning to their experiences in terms of a new social or political order. For example, Oprah’s commitment to children led her to initi- ate the National Child Protection Act in 1991, when she testified before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee to establish a national database of convicted child abusers. On December 20, 1993, President Clinton signed the national “Oprah Bill” into law. Transfor- mational leaders are more strategic in their approach. They find and exploit opportunities that maximize their gains and avoid threats. In fact, they try to steer away from political controversy. They are mostly driven by economic factors.
A fourth area of difference is on the career path that each leadership type is likely to fol- low. Transformational leaders do follow an organic career path of promotions and growth that ultimately puts them in a position of top leadership where they can showcase their transformational qualities. In contrast, charismatic leaders are more likely to emerge in the throes of a crisis, when an organization or society is in turmoil because of conf lict- ing values or belief systems. It is also the case that a leader could emerge from obscurity to prominence with or without a crisis simply because of his or her charismatic qualities. Such a leader could go on to pursue a career in public speaking without any track record of specific achievements. It’s a more inorganic career path.
A fifth area of difference between charismatic and transformational leaders is how each perceives their personal meaning or purpose in life. Charismatic leaders tend to express their personal meaning or purpose in life at a much earlier age and use it as a driving force behind their vision. We define personal meaning as the degree to which people’s lives make emotional sense and to which the demands confronted by them are perceived as being worthy of their energy and commitment. Personal meaning inf luences behavior especially for individuals facing challenges. It is more often cited as the moti- vational force behind charismatic leader behaviors than transformational leader behav- iors. You don’t hear a transformational leader say their purpose in life has always been to become the CEO of Ford and turn it around. But you will hear a charismatic leader like Nelson Mandela say that peace and freedom for South Africa has always been his purpose in life—a cause that has dominated his entire life.
Finally, the sixth area of difference between the charismatic and transformational leader is the degree of risk each faces from opponents of their vision. Often, the emotional levels of resistance and conf lict toward charismatic leaders are more extreme than those toward transformational leaders. There is more polarization between supporters and op- ponents for a charismatic leader’s vision. They either love or hate the charismatic leader for what he/she stands for; there is very little in between. Resistance to the transforma- tional leader’s vision is less emotional. This may explain why more charismatic leaders have met with violent deaths (such as Martin Luther King Jr., John F. Kennedy, Mussolini, Hitler, and Mahatma Gandhi) than transformational leaders. Mostly, transformational leaders lose their job or resign in the face of unrelenting resistance or conf lict.
WOrk Application 9-8 Identify a leader you have worked with or are working with now. In your opinion, is this leader more of a transformational or charismatic leader? Explain why and include examples.
7. Oprah seems to have a clear sense of her personal meaning or purpose in life. What factors do you think have contributed to her understanding?
Oprah believes her purpose or personal meaning is to help others achieve their full potential in life. Oprah’s life experi- ences, her values, and faith have been instrumental in shaping her sense of personal meaning. Oprah speaks openly of her strong faith and spirituality.
OPENING CASE application
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 340 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 9 CHariSMaTiC anD TranSfor MaTionaL LEaDErSHiP 341
are You More Charismatic, transformational, or Both?SELF-ASSESSMENT 9-2
There are no right or wrong answers, so be honest and you will really increase your self-awareness. We suggest doing this exercise in pencil or making a copy before you write on it. We will explain why later.
Using the scale below, rate each of the 20 statements according to how accurately it describes you. Place a number from 1 to 7 on the line before each statement.
Like me Somewhat like me not like me 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
1. I do enjoy getting up in front of audiences and giving passionate presentations on topics I care about.
2. I tend to associate my faith and religious values to issues I care very much about.
3. I enjoy change and see myself as a change agent.
4. I have always seen myself as someone who has the ability to inspire trust with my fellow students.
5. On occasions when I have made a diffi- cult moral decision (or if I had to make a moral decision), I was (or will be) guided by the desire to not seem like a hypocrite if my actions became public.
6. I see myself as someone who, if given a leadership opportunity, will influence my followers and colleagues based on who I am (my vision and values), not what I am (my position).
7. When I walk into a room of people (other students), I generally feel like my presence evokes a “powerful aura” or immediate attention.
8. I make friends easily and feel like I am extra ordinarily gifted in more ways than others.
9. I am pretty good at making people feel empowered and self-confident.
10. If I believe in something, I will not give up trying to achieve it even if my life is threatened because of it.
11. I want to be remembered for something special I did beyond just being a loving member of my family.
12. I am better at inspiring employees toward a new future than motivating them to perform their current jobs.
13. I have/had a vision of how an organization can change for the better.
14. I see myself as someone who is comfort- able encouraging people to express ideas and opinions that differ from my own.
15. I enjoy taking risks but I’m not reckless. 16. I enjoy spending time developing new
solutions to old problems rather than implementing existing solutions.
17. I deliberate carefully before acting; I’m not impulsive.
18. Being in a position to turn a struggling organization around will be more attrac- tive to me than leading a stable (no big changes required) type organization.
To determine whether you are more charismatic, transformational, or both: (1) in the blanks, place a number from 1 to 7 that represents your score for each statement. (2) add up each column. Your total should be a number from 5 to 35. (3) on the number scale, circle the number that is closest to your total score. Each column in the chart represents an attribute of charismatic or transfor- mational leadership.
1 Charismatic 2 transformational 3 Both
35 35 35
30 30 30
1. 25 12. 25 3. 25
2. 20 14. 20 4. 20
7. 15 15. 15 5. 15
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 341 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
342 part 3 organizaTionaL LEaDErSHiP
Stewardship and Servant Leadership Stewardship and servant leadership represent a shift in the leadership paradigm from a focus on leading to a focus on serving. Traditional leadership theories elevate the leader and his or her role in effecting organizational success. The leader is the authority from whom followers take their orders. Advocates of stewardship and servant leadership view the leader as a steward and servant of the people. They believe that leadership has less to do with directing other people and more to do with serving people by placing others’ needs ahead of the leader’s.92 Servant leadership and stewardship have their roots in ethics, virtues and morality.93 Stewardship and servant leadership describe leaders who lead from positions of moral inf luence, not power, and who are very follower-centric. Both leadership types call for empathy, kindness, honesty, humility, equality, moral in- tegrity, empowerment, and respect for others, especially the less powerful or inf luential.94 These attributes are important in identifying leaders who can be effective in the role of servant leader or stewardship. Some have used the term values-based leadership to de- scribe these two leadership types. Values-based leadership is the moral foundation under- lying the decisions and actions of servant and steward leaders.95,96
Though some may view these two leadership types as one and the same, they are not exactly identical. The cognitive and behavioral disposition of leaders with a servant pro- file and the organizational contexts that inf luence it are not exactly the same for steward leadership.97 While both shine the spotlight on followers, servant leadership goes a step further. Servant leadership calls for the highest level of self lessness—a level that some doubt exists in the real world or at best can only be found in a few individuals.
Therefore, we define stewardship as an employee-focused form of leadership that empowers followers to make decisions and have control over their jobs. We define servant leadership as leadership that transcends self-interest to serve the needs of others, by helping them grow professionally and personally. Both stewardship and servant leadership advocate moral imperatives related to public policy, such as the need to address poverty and economic exploitation.98,99 They remind followers to be good stewards of resources (especially natural resources) so future generations are not short-changed and also to serve those in need.100
In this section, we examine the cognitive and behavioral disposition of leaders with servant and steward identities and the organizational contexts that inf luence each type. We conclude with a discussion of the attributes of effectiveness for the steward and servant leader.
The higher the total number, the stronger you are in that particular leadership type. as discussed in the text, you
can always improve your weak areas if you want to be a better charismatic or transformational leader or both.
(Self-Assessment 2 continued)
8. 10 16. 10 6. 10
10. 5 17. 5 9. 5
11. 18. 13.
Total Scale Total Scale Total Scale
Explain the basis of stewardship and servant leadership. Learning outcome 10
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 342 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 9 CHariSMaTiC anD TranSfor MaTionaL LEaDErSHiP 343
Stewardship and attributes of the effective Steward Leader Leaders who embody the stewardship philosophy have a particular structural and psychological frame of mind that inf luences their thinking and behavior.101 They are sincerely concerned about their followers and want to assist them to grow, develop, and achieve both personal and organizational goals.102 A central theme of stewardship is commitment to people’s growth and building community.103 An effective steward leader creates the environment for individual and team empowerment where decision making is highly decentralized. Therefore, stewardship is more about facilitating than actively leading. Another critical element in steward leadership is trust. Ethical stewardship is when followers perceive the leader’s behavior as trustworthy.104 Exhibit 9.5 highlights four attributes of effective stewardship.
Strong Team Orientation Steward leadership works best in environments where leaders and followers come together as a team to formulate goals, strategies, and policies for achieving a collective vision.105 Here, the steward leader’s role is less dominant and more supportive of the pro- cess. Where a strong team spirit is present, the steward leader is just one of the team members. His or her job is more of a coach or facilitator than leader of the team.106
Decentralized Decision Making and Power The steward leader is most effective when authority and decision making is decentralized and brought to the level where work gets done and followers are encouraged to take an active role in self-leadership.107 In this environment, the steward leader is highly effective, given the empowered status of followers and the positive exchange relationship between the steward leader and followers.108
Equality Stewardship works best when there is equality between the steward leader and follow- ers. It is a partnership of equals rather than a hierarchical leader–follower command and control relationship. The role of the steward leader is to find opportunities to empower followers to serve rather than dictate orders.109 Honesty, respect, and mutual trust prevail when there is equality; these are values that enhance the success of stewardship. The absence of equality makes stewardship almost inoperable.
reward Stewardship puts greater responsibility in the hands of employees. Increased responsi- bilities should be matched with appropriate rewards. Employees with more responsibility and authority who are compensated accordingly f lourish under stewardship because they are motivated and committed to the organization’s mission. Without rewards that are aligned with performance, it is hard to sustain stewardship.
Attributes of Effective Stewardship EXHIBIT 9.5
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
Stewardship
Teamwork Orientation
Decentralization
Equality
Reward
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 343 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
344 part 3 organizaTionaL LEaDErSHiP
Stewardship leaders are known not only for their great deeds but for empowering o t h e r s t o a c h i e ve g r e a t d e e d s a s we l l . T h e s e l e a d e r s d on’t l e a d ; t h e y c o a c h (Chapter 6) followers to do t he leading. This encourages followers to be more in- volved and committed to their jobs. In a study measuring the impact of stewardship on employer–employee relationships, t he aut hors found t hat stewardship signif i- ca nt ly impacted feelings of trust, commit ment, satisfaction, a nd ba la nced power bet ween t he employer and t he employee. Additiona lly, t hey a lso revea led t hat in- creased use of stewardship resulted in increased involvement by employees.110
Servant Leadership and attributes of the effective Servant Leader Servant leadership is linked to ethics, virtues, and morality. At the core of servant leadership is self-sacrifice for others without regard to what one might receive in return. The leader makes a conscious decision to hold followers in high regard. The leader is driven to serve, not to be served. According to Robert K. Greenleaf, servant leadership begins with the natural feeling that one wants to serve. Robert Greenleaf first introduced the concept of the leader as a servant more than three decades ago. Today, there is a Greenleaf Center for Servant Leader- ship with a global reach that includes 11 branch offices located around the world.111
Servant leaders approach leadership from a strong moral perspective. The servant leader operates from the viewpoint that we all have a moral duty to one another and that as leaders, we have to both serve and lead. Leadership is seen as an opportunity to serve at the ground level, not to direct orders from the top. It is a leadership approach that is centered on a strong service orientation and moral–spiritual grounding. Servant leaders exhibit personality traits high on agreeableness, active listening, empathy, and integrity.112,113
Right from the first few moments of his appearance as head of the Roman Catholic Church, Pope Francis I showed humility through his demeanor as well as his words. It is reported that after that first public appearance as the new pope, for instance, he waited and took the last bus back to the bishops’ lodgings instead of hopping into a waiting limo. He is clearly representing himself as a servant of the people. His decision to wash the feet of women on Holy Thursday was a clear signal that he intended to be a servant of his followers. Many observers admire his humbleness for not choosing to live in the apostolic palace, his refusal to wear symbols of monarchy, and his desire to eat in the common dining room and celebrate mass with common people.114
Another example of servant leadership is the late Mother Teresa who founded the Missionaries of Charity, a Catholic order of nuns dedicated to helping the less fortunate. Begun in Kolkata (formerly Calcutta), India, the Missionaries of Charity grew to help the poor, the dying, orphans, lepers, and AIDS sufferers in over a hundred countries. Mother Teresa’s self less effort to help those in need is a true model of servant leadership. From a performance standpoint, a recent study revealed that servant leadership enhances prof- its through reduced customer turnover and increased organizational trust, and also that employee satisfaction increases in organizations where leaders see themselves as servants first.115 Other studies have corroborated this finding of higher performance and servant leadership.116,117,118 Exhibit 9.6 highlights four attributes of the effective servant leader.
Helping Others Discover Their Inner Spirit The servant leader’s role is to help followers discover the strength of their inner spirit and their potential to make a difference. This requires servant leaders to be empathetic to the circumstances of others.119 Servant leaders are not afraid to show their vulnerabilities. Mother Teresa was able to inspire hundreds of followers to join her order and serve others.
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 344 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 9 CharismatiC and transfor mational leadership 345
Earning and Keeping Others’ Trust Servant leaders earn followers’ trust by being honest and true to their word. They work hard to preserve their integrity. They don’t have any hidden agendas, and they are not afraid to give up power, recognition, or control to followers if it helps move the organiza- tion forward. It is how servant leaders build strong working relationships with followers. Servant leadership is about inf luence that is based on trust, not power.120
Service over Self-Interest The hallmark of servant leadership is the desire to help others, rather than the desire to attain power and control over others. Doing what’s right for others takes precedence over protecting one’s position. Servant leaders make decisions to further the interests of the group rather than their own interests.121
Effective Listening Servant leaders do not impose their will on the team; rather, they listen carefully to the problems others are facing and then engage the team to find solutions. They show love, acceptance, and encouragement for their followers and are very empathetic.122
The discussion in this chapter has emphasized two leadership approaches (charismatic and transformational leadership) that operate under the thesis that maintaining the status quo in a changing environment is a recipe for organizational decline and ultimate irrel- evance. We also examined two relevant, yet not very popular, approaches to leadership— Stewardship and Servant Leadership—that are very follower-centric. Self-Assessment 9-3 provides the opportunity to link these leadership approaches to one personality type.
Attributes of the Effective Servant Leader EXHIBIT 9.6
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
Servant Leadership
Effective listening
Helping others discover their inner spirit
Service to others over self-interest
Earning and keeping others’ trust
WOrK Application 9-9 In your college or work experience, identify one leader you have come across whom you can say fits the bill of either a steward or servant leader. Explain why.
SELF-ASSESSMENT 9-3 personality and Charismatic and transformational Leadership
Charismatic leaders have charisma based on personality and other personal traits that cut across all of the Big five personality types. review the ten qualities of charismatic leaders in exhibit 9.3 on page 333. Which traits do you have?
if you have a high surgency Big five personality style and a high need for power, you need to focus on
using socialized, rather than personalized, charismatic leadership.
Transformational leaders tend to be charismatic as well. in self-assessment 9-1 on page 329 you determined if you were more transformational or transactional. how does your personality affect your transformational and transac- tional leadership styles?
“Take It To The Net”. Access student resources at www.cengagebrain.com. Search for Lussier, Leadership 6e to find student study tools.
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 345 10/24/14 5:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
The chapter summar y is organized to answer the 10 learning outcomes for this chapter.
1 Briefly explain Max Weber’s conceptualization of charisma.
Weber used the term charisma to explain a form of in- fluence based on follower perceptions that the leader is endowed with the gift of divine inspiration, not a tra- ditional or legal mandate of authority. This gift of divine inspiration is the force behind a charismatic leader’s ability to focus society’s attention on both the crisis it faces and the leader’s vision for a new and better future. according to Weber, charismatic individuals emerge as leaders during times of great social crisis and inspire people to do more than they would under normal circumstances.
2 explain what is meant by the “locus of charis- matic leadership.”
The question scholars have entertained since Weber’s conceptualization of charisma is whether charisma is a function of the prevailing social climate, the leader’s ex- traordinary qualities, or the confluence of the two. Sup- porters of the view that charismatic leadership could not take place unless the society were in a tumultuous, unstable situation argue that without a crisis and fol- lowers’ need for change, a leader’s charismatic qualities would be hard to notice or appreciate. Therefore, for proponents of this viewpoint, the locus of charismatic leadership is external from the leader. others argue that charismatic leadership is primarily the result of leader attributes (internal), not the situation. They maintain that leader characteristics such as vision, exceptional com- munication skills, trustworthiness, self-confidence, and focus on empowering others are what qualify someone as a charismatic leader regardless of the external situa- tion. finally, there is an emerging view that charismatic leadership is a convergence of follower perceptions and reactions influenced by leader characteristics and the prevailing social situation.
3 Discuss the effects of charismatic leadership on followers.
Charismatic leaders tend to have a strong emotional bond with their followers. The effects of such a bond are that followers are inspired to give unconditional loyalty, devotion, obedience, and commitment to the leader and to the cause the leader represents. a sense of fulfillment and satisfaction is derived from the pursuit of worthwhile activities and goals and having positive
beliefs and values about life as presented by the charis- matic leader. implicitly, the charismatic leader is seen as an object of identification by which a follower emulates his or her behavior; thus, followers model their behav- ior, values, and cognitions after the leader. for example, followers are more likely to set or accept higher goals and have greater confidence in their ability to contrib- ute to the achievement of such goals. By observing the leader display self-confidence, followers develop self- confidence as well.
4 Discuss how one can acquire charismatic qualities.
There are suggested strategies for acquiring or enhanc- ing charismatic qualities. Through training and educa- tion, people can enhance their communication skills and learn techniques of crafting visionary statements, as well as how to empower followers. Through prac- tice and self-discipline, an individual can build his or her self- confidence and develop a personality profile that is warm, positive, enthusiastic, and optimistic.
5 Distinguish between socialized and personalized charismatic leader types.
The charismatic leader seeks to achieve the uncon- ditional commitment and devotion of followers to his or her vision. However, negative charismatic lead- ers emphasize devotion to themselves more than to ideals, and positive charismatic leaders seek the oppo- site. negative charismatics are said to have a personal- ized power orientation and positive charismatics have a socialized power orientation. in the former, ideological appeals are only a ploy to gain power and manipulate and control followers. in the latter, ideological appeals are organization-driven and seek to empower followers to achieve the vision and mission of the organization. Personalized (negative) charismatic leaders seek self- glorification, and socialized (positive) charismatic leaders seek organizational transformation through empower- ment of followers.
6 explain the four stages of the transformation process.
a transformational leader who is brought into an orga- nization facing a serious crisis or approaching total col- lapse has to institute a turnaround strategy. Turnaround strategies are often radical transformations that put the organization on a different path for future growth and prosperity. The magnitude of the task and the high risk of failure require that it be approached in a systematic
Chapter Summary
346 part 3 organizaTionaL LEaDErSHiP
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 346 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
fashion. Thus, the transformation process is a four stage approach that starts with the recognition of the need for change. This provides the opportunity for the leader to formulate and introduce a new vision for the organiza- tion that promises a better and brighter future than the present. once there is acceptance of the leader’s vision, the third stage involves implementing the new vision and effectively managing the transition. Here, instilling in man- agers a sense of urgency for change, raising followers’ self-confidence and optimism, and recognizing and deal- ing with resistance will greatly increase the chances of a successful transformation. The last stage is institutional- izing the change so that it is not a short-lived transforma- tion. Effective strategies for institutionalizing change are outlined in the text.
7 List the qualities of effective charismatic and transformational leaders.
The qualities that effective charismatic and transfor- mational leader share are vision, superb communica- tion skills, self-confidence and moral conviction, ability to inspire trust, high risk orientation, high energy and action orientation, relational power base, minimum internal conflict, ability to empower others, self- promoting personality, selflessness, and having an activist mind-set.
8 Describe the four behavior dimensions asso- ciated with transformational and charismatic leaders.
The four behavior dimensions, also known as the “four is” are idealized influence, inspirational motivation, individual consideration, and intellectual stimulation.
Idealized Influence—behavior that conveys an ideal future that is much better than the present. The leader’s behav- ior is aimed at inspiring followers to share in his or her vision.
Inspirational Motivation—passionate communications of better days ahead that motivates followers to buy into the leader’s vision.
Individual Consideration—behavior that employs an indi- vidualized developmental model that responds to fol- lower needs and concerns.
Intellectual Stimulation—behavior that challenges follow- ers to think “outside of the box” and reexamine old ways and methods. it implores followers to be creative and innovate.
9 Distinguish between charismatic and transfor- mational leadership.
The two leadership types are similar in that charisma and vision are central concepts in both of them. also, both leadership types share the ability to influence fol- lowers to believe in their vision. They are different in many ways: · Charismatic leaders are by nature transforma-
tional (regardless of the kind of transformation they seek), but not all transformational leaders are charismatic. How one achieves the label of charisma or transformation is different for the two. Charisma is attributed to an individual by fol- lowers who believe he or she possesses charis- matic qualities. Transformational is an earned title based on past accomplishments.
· Charismatic leaders tend to have a more activist mind-set than transformational leaders. They use political and social causes as opportunities to influ- ence change and provide a better life for their fol- lowers. Transformational leaders are more strategic in their approach.
· Charismatic leaders tend to have a sense of their purpose or personal meaning much earlier in life than transformational leaders. Transformational lead- ers follow a career path that brings them to the point of leadership where they then display their transformational abilities.
· The level of resistance and conflict toward charis- matic leaders are more extreme than those toward transformational leaders. This may explain why more charismatic leaders have met with violent deaths than have transformational leaders.
10 explain the basis of stewardship and servant leadership.
Both leadership types are based on placing others ahead of oneself. Servant leadership and stewardship have their roots in ethics, virtues, and morality. Stewardship and servant leadership describe leaders who lead from posi- tions of moral influence, not power, and who are very follower-centric. Both leadership styles call for empathy, kindness, honesty, humility, equality, moral integrity, em- powerment, and respect for others, especially the less powerful or influential.
Chapter 9 CHariSMaTiC anD TranSfor MaTionaL LEaDErSHiP 347
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 347 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
348 part 3 organizaTionaL LEaDErSHiP
The following critical-thinking questions can be used for class discussion and/or as written assignments to develop commu- nication skills. Be sure to give complete explanations for all questions.
1 A strong emotional attachment and loyalty to a char- ismatic leader can have both beneficial and detrimen- tal effects on followers. Explain both types of effects on followers.
2 Charismatic leaders are said to possess special traits that influence their behaviors. Three such traits described in the chapter are envisioning, empathy, and empowerment. Explain how each of these traits influences how followers perceive the charismatic leader.
3 In Chapter 5, different types of power—legitimate, reward, coercive, referent, expert, connection, and information power—and influencing tactics were discussed. What type of power is the charismatic leader most likely to be associ- ated with and why?
4 Explain the importance of effective communication skills for charismatic and transformational leaders.
5 Servant leadership emphasizes being able to serve and lead. In your opinion, is this contradictory or doable?
6 Do you believe everyone has the same capability to become a servant leader, or are some people by their nature more inclined to be servant leaders?
Critical-thinking Questions
charisma, 322
personalized charismatic leader (PCL), 326
personal meaning, 340
servant leadership, 342
socialized charismatic leader (SCL), 326
stewardship, 342
transformational leadership, 328
transactional leadership, 328
vision, 321
Key terms
1 Citing specific examples, explain how a charismatic leader can use vision and superb communication skills to make his/her case.
2 Describe the leading characteristics of charismatic leaders.
3 Martin Luther King Jr., Gandhi, John F. Kennedy, Adolph Hitler, Nelson Mandela, David Koresh (of the Branch Davidians), Herb Kelleher (of Southwest Airlines), and Richard Branson (of the Virgin Group) are/were charis- matic leaders. Can you associate with each name a charac- teristic (see Exhibit 9.3 on page 333) of charisma you think best describes the individual? Note: If you are not familiar
with these individuals, do library or Internet research on them before attempting an answer.
4 Why is the theory of charisma described as a double- edged sword?
5 Describe the limitations of charismatic leadership theory.
6 Describe four key behaviors characteristic of transforma- tional and charismatic leaders.
7 Describe some key attributes/qualities of charismatic and transformational leaders.
8 What is servant leadership?
review Questions
348 part 3 organizaTionaL LEaDErSHiP
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 348 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 9 CHariSMaTiC anD TranSfor MaTionaL LEaDErSHiP 349
Ms. Burns joined Xerox in 1980 as a mechanical engi-neer and worked her way to the top, becoming the chairwoman and CEO in 2009. Alongside then CEO and her former boss, Anne Mulcahy, Ms. Burns worked to re- structure Xerox through its transformation and turnaround. She is just one of 21 women who hold the title of an S&P 500 CEO. That’s just 4 percent. Xerox Corporation is a $23 billion global enterprise for business process and document management.
Ur sula Burns’s elevation mar ked two milestones: the first time an African American woman was named CEO of a major American corporation and the first time a woman succeeded another woman in the top job at a company of this size.123 Ms. Burns’s stor y is the quintessential tale of the American Dream. She has defied the odds. She was raised in a housing project on Manhattan’s Lower East Side by a hard-working single mother, who cleaned, ironed, did child care—anything to see that Ursula and her siblings got a good education. She attended all-girls Catholic High School in New York. She then went on to obtain a BS in mechanical engi- neering from the Polytechnic Institute of NYU in 1980 and a master’s in mechanical engineering from Columbia University a year later. Burns describes her mother as a values-driven single mother who believed in the mantra “where you are is not who you are” and who viewed a good education as a way “up and out.”
Asked to describe her leadership approach, Burns said there are two tenets guiding how she leads the company— the customer and innovation. She went on to describe the culture at Xerox as extremely collaborative. “We try to make people win. We try to have winners in the organization, versus winners and losers. We try to have parity in the organization so that we can get the best out of the group.” She encour- ages participation in decision making and frowns on compart- mentalization, where people mostly think along functional or depar tmental lines. She advises her managers to check at the door their functional affiliation as the primar y thought pro- cess by which they give her input. She is team-oriented and wants everyone to focus on the customer, competitors, em- ployees, and shareholders. Burns preaches a “can do” attitude. She describes Xerox’s culture in one word—“possibility.” “We actually believe that there’s not a challenge that we cannot un- der take. When there’s a big challenge or a huge oppor tunity, we have a culture that says, yes, let’s go after it.”
It is obvious that Ms. Burns is not comfortable being in the spotlight or getting all the recognition and praise that the me- dia and others have heaped on her since being named to the top job at Xerox. “The accolades that I get for doing absolutely nothing are amazing—I’ve been named to every list, literally, since I became the CEO,” Ms. Burns says. “In the first 30 days, I was named to a list of the most impressive XYZ. The accolades are good for five minutes, but then it takes kind of a shine off the real story. The real story is not Ursula Burns. I just happen to be the person standing up at this point representing Xerox.”
Ms. Burns is emphatic on the values that she wants Xerox employees to espouse. Describing how Xerox goes about in the conduct of its business with stakeholders, Burns said they put a huge premium on “means.” As she puts it, “Are we contributing or taking away? If you have the wrong means, you can probably knock the ball out of the park for a while, but you wouldn’t be able to do it in a sustainable way.”
In talking about the problems that have plagued Xerox in the recent past, Ms. Burns said that there was a disconnect be- tween formulated strategies and implementation. “We had no way to screen through what capability our organization had to do some of the things we wanted to do. You can’t just wish it and expect it to come out without enabling.” There was a sense that Xerox had become bureaucratic and less responsive to changing circumstances. She had to redefine core concepts like collaboration and teamwork that had assumed a negative context among her followers. “Teamwork doesn’t mean every- body agrees 100 percent,” she said. She advocated teamwork and fearlessness as tools to implement decisions with agility and to take corrective action when necessary.
Ms. Burns does not believe leading and managing are syn- onymous. As she puts it, “lead” does not mean “manage.” She describes the early years with Anne Mulcahy (her predeces- sor) as the “bunker” years. “During the bunker days, for both Anne and me, and probably the top ten people of the com- pany, 80 percent of what we did was managing.” Now, under her tenure, it’s totally switched, with 20 percent managing and 80 percent leading, because the company has been stabilized. This is a clear illustration of the distinction we drew in the text between leadership and management and also between trans- formational and transactional leadership. Managers maintain the status quo and leaders bring about change through their vision. Transformational leaders lead, and transactional leaders manage.
C A S E
Ursula Burns: Xerox’s Chairwoman and CEO
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 349 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
350 part 3 organizaTionaL LEaDErSHiP
There is no doubt that Ursula Burns sees her role as that of vision setter for Xerox. Asked if there has been any change in Xerox’s purpose, vision, and values in recent years, Burns said she has had to change the purpose and vision in the in- termediate term but not the values. She believes that vision formulation should be an ongoing exercise because of the changing business environment. When one purpose and vision is fulfilled, there is an urgent need for the leader to usher in a new vision; else, as she puts it, “People look up and say, now what? If you don’t define it clearly, then people actually make up their own. Then you can forget it. Then you just stagnate.”
About accomplishments that have taken place since Burns became CEO, such as major product announcements, launches of new businesses, acquisitions, and major operational efficien- cies, she said they are all the “collective accomplishments of Team Xerox.” According to the Wall Street Journal, the corner- stone of Ms. Burns’s strategy, which she dubbed Xerox 2010, was the acquisition of Dallas-based service company Affiliated Computer Services (ACS) for $6.4 billion. The service sector of Xerox is now bringing in nearly half of the company’s total revenue. Recently, Lynn Blodgett, former CEO of ACS who’s now president of Xerox Services, remarked on the terrific job Ms. Burns had done in getting the right level of integration and at the same time preserving the entrepreneurial spirit that made ACS such a great company. This is impor tant because many analysts and investors had criticized her for taking this action. They said it was the wrong move because it was too costly in the midst of a recession and too large—ACS had 74,000 employees compared to Xerox’s 54,000 at the time.
Asked to defined great leadership in a sentence or two, she said it is about persons who can define a purpose, select a great team, empower that team appropriately, enable them to understand what greatness is about, and then let them go.124
G O t O t h e I N t e r N e t : To learn more about Ursula Burns and Xerox, visit the latter’s Web site (http://www.xerox.com). Support your answers to the following questions with specific information from the case and text or with other information you get from the Web or other sources.
1. In your opinion is Ursula Burns more of a charismatic, transformational, or transactional leader? Or is she all of these leadership types?
2. Exhibit 9.4 identifies transformational and charismatic leader behaviors. In your opinion, which of the behav- ioral components does Ms. Burns exemplify?
3. A key attribute of servant leadership is that it transcends self-interest to serve the needs of others. Does Ursula Burns fit this bill?
4. Exhibit 9.3 identifies the qualities of charismatic and transformational leaders. Based on your knowledge of Ms. Burns, which of the ten qualities can you directly attribute to her?
5. What is the evidence that Ms. Burns employed the transformation process described and outline (see Exhibit 9.2) in the text?
C U M U L a t I V e C a S e Q U e S t I O N S
6. According to the leader ship continuum model of Tannenbaum and Schmidt, where would you put Ur sula Burns based on the facts of the case (see Chapter 4)?
7. Communication is a major competency for leaders (Chapter 6). Would you agree that this is a quality that Burns likely possesses, to have been as effective as she has been so far?
8. One of the characteristics of effective teams is the pres- ence of a capable and competent team leader (Chapter 8). Chapter 8 describes different activities of the team leader in creating an effective team (see Exhibit 8.1 on page 276), including turning obstacles into oppor tuni- ties. Would you describe Ursula Burns as an effective team leader?
C a S e e X e r C I S e a N D r O L e - p L a Y
Preparation: Assume you are part of the leadership of an organization or organizational unit that is in need of redirec- tion in a changing market environment. Your task is to formu- late a new vision and mission statement that would transform your organization. in-Class groups: Break into groups of four to six members and develop an inspiring vision of no more than 15 words and a mission statement of no more than 100 words.
role-Play: One student (representing the group) will present the team’s vision and mission statement before other mem- bers of the class. At the end of the presentations, the profes- sor should call for a vote on who has the most inspiring and compelling vision and mission.
Here are some guidelines:
1. Identify key environmental trends or changes that have influenced your group’s vision.
2. Make up a list of core values that your organization holds, or you would want it to have, and incorporate these in your mission statement.
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 350 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 9 CHariSMaTiC anD TranSfor MaTionaL LEaDErSHiP 351
Making decisions is a big part of any manager’s job. Mak-ing decisions that determine the direction a company will take is the job of a CEO. Mark Dwight, former CEO of Timbuk2, a manufacturer of bicycle messenger bags, was comfor table with this role, even though it meant some- times making unpopular decisions—or even making mistakes. Most of the decisions Dwight made at Timbuk2 were non- programmed decisions—such as the design of a new product or the type of fabric to use. These decisions can affect sales, the brand image, and even overall performance of the company. “Mark is the guy with the vision,” said marketing manager Macy Allatt. “He will drive decision making, but he’s very open to tak- ing input from other people. When decisions need to be made,
everyone sits down and we hash it out, and when we come out of the room, we feel like we’re going to make some prog- ress.” Just about every decision Mark Dwight faced at Timbuk2 had some degree of uncer tainty. He knew that he wanted Timbuk2 to achieve $25 million in sales in five years; he knew that he wanted the firm to reach new markets; he knew that the firm needed to find new distribution channels. But there was no guarantee that a single decision would be the right one.
1. Would you describe Timbuk2’s former CEO Mar k Dwight as a charismatic leader? Why or why not?
2. Does Mark Dwight possess any characteristics of a transformational leader? If so, what are they?
V i D E o C a S E
Timbuk2: Former CEO Sets a Course
preparing for this exercise Rate the current president of the United States on each of the ten characteristics of charismatic leaders. For each characteristic, rate the president as high (H), medium (M), or low (L). Be sure to provide a specific example (what the president did or said) for why you rate the president as H, M, or L for each characteristic.
1 Vision
2 Superb communication skills
3 Self-confidence and moral conviction
4 Ability to inspire trust
5 High-risk orientation
6 High energy and action orientation
7 Relational power base
8 Achievement orientation
9 Ability to empower others
10 Self-promoting personality
Based on the text, what specific things do you recommend the president do or say to improve his skills as a charismatic leader?
preparing for this exercise in Class
Objective
To develop your ability to assess a leader’s charismatic qualities or lack thereof.
aaCSB General Skills area
The primary AACSB learning skills developed through this exer- cise are analytic skills and reflective thinking.
procedure (10–30 minutes) Option A: As a class, go over the preparation and rate the president as high, medium, or low on each charismatic leadership characteristic, and give an overall rating.
Option B: Break into groups of four to six, go over the preparation, and rate the president as high, medium, or low on each charismatic leadership characteristic, giving an overall rating. Be sure to provide a specific example (what the president did or said) for why your group rated the president as H, M, or L for each characteristic.
Option C: Same as B, but also select a spokesperson to present the group’s answers to the entire class.
Conclusion
The instructor may lead a class discussion and/or make conclud- ing remarks.
apply It (2–4 minutes) What did I learn from this experience? How will I use this knowledge in the future?
Sharing
In the group, or to the entire class, volunteers may give their answers to the “Apply It” questions.
Is the President of the United States a Charismatic Leader?
Developing Your Leadership Skills 9-1
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 351 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
1 S. Berfield, “Marketing Lessons from Brand Oprah,” Bloomberg Businessweek (4230) (2011, May 23): 20–22.; M. Townsend, “Riding the Oprah Wave, Ready or Not,” Bloomberg Businessweek (4230) (2011, May 23): 24; R. Grover and A. Fixmer, “Is Cable One Market Oprah Can’t Conquer?” Bloomberg Businessweek (4230) (2011, May 23): 25–26; and P. Sellers, “Oprah’s Next Act,” (cover story). Fortune 162(6) (2010, October 18): 116–126.
2 M. Weber, (1947) Max Weber: The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Translated by A. M. Henderson & Talcott Parsons. New York: The Free Press.
3 J. Taylor, “Max Weber Revisited: Charisma and Institution at the Origins of Christianity,” Australian E-Journal of Theology 19(3) (2012, December): 195–208.
4 S. Kempster and K. Parry, “Charismatic Leadership through the Eyes of Followers,” Strategic HR Review 13(1) (2014, January): 20–23
5 C. Adair-Toteff, “Max Weber’s Charisma,” Journal of Classical Sociology 5(2) (2005): 189–204, Academic Search Complete, EBSCOhost, retrieved June 6, 2011.
6 M. G. Scott, “Max Weber : On Charisma and Institution Building (Book),” British Journal of Sociology 21(4) (1970): 458–460, Academic Search Complete, EBSCOhost, retrieved June 6, 2011.
7 A. B. Seligman, “Charisma and the Transformation of Grace in the Early Modern Era,” Social Research 58(3) (1991): 591–620.
8 T. E. Dow, Jr., “The Theory of Charisma,” Sociological Quarterly 10 (1969): 306–318.
9 M. Bligh and J. Robinson, “Was Gandhi ‘Charismatic?’ Exploring the Rhetorical Leadership of Mahatma Gandhi,” Leadership Quarterly 21(5) (2010): 844–855.
10 C. Wilderom, P. van den Berg, and U. Wiersma, “A Longitudinal Study of the Effects of Charismatic Leadership and Organizational Culture on Objective and Perceived Corporate Performance,” Leadership Quarterly 23(5) (2012, October): 835–848.
11 B. Michaelis, R. Stegmaier, and K. Sonntag, “Affective Commitment to Change and Innovation Implementation Behavior : The Role of Charismatic Leadership and Employees’ Trust in Top Management,” Journal of Change Management 9(4) (2009): 399–417.
12 C. Nohe, B. Michaelis, J. Menges, Z. Zhang, and K. Sonntag, “Charisma and Organizational Change: A Multilevel Study of Perceived Charisma, Commitment to Change, and Team
Performance,” Leadership Quarterly 24(2) (2013, April): 378–389.
13 S. Kempster and K. Parry, “Charismatic Leadership through the Eyes of Followers,” Strategic HR Review 13(1) (2014, January): 20–23.
14 W. Kwak, “Charismatic Leadership Influence on Empowered and Less Empowered Followers’ Voice: A Mediated Moderation Model,” Journal of Leadership, Accountability & Ethics 9(1) (2012, January): 56–70.
15 A. Samnani and P. Singh, “When Leaders Victimize: The Role of Charismatic Leaders in Facilitating Group Pressures,” Leadership Quarterly 24(1) (2013, February): 189–202.
16 W. Kwak, “Charismatic Leadership Influence on Empowered and Less Empowered Followers’ Voice: A Mediated Moderation Model,” Journal of Leadership, Accountability & Ethics 9(1) (2012, January): 56–70.
17 C. Wilderom, P. van den Berg, and U. Wiersma, “A Longitudinal Study of the Effects of Charismatic Leadership and Organizational Culture on Objective and Perceived Corporate Performance,” Leadership Quarterly 23(5) (2012, October): 835–848.
18 M. Wu and J. Wang, “Developing a Charismatic Leadership Model for Chinese Organizations: The Mediating Role of Loyalty to Supervisors,” International Journal of Human Resource Management 23(19) (2012, November): 4069–4084.
19 P. Vlachos, N. Panagopoulos, and A. Rapp, “Feeling Good by Doing Good: Employee CSR-Induced Attributions, Job Satisfaction, and the Role of Charismatic Leadership,” Journal of Business Ethics 118(3) (2013, December 15): 577–588.
20 J. Antonakis, M. Fenley, and S. Liechti, “Learning Charisma,” Harvard Business Review 90(6) (2012, June): 127–130.
21 M. Bligh and J. Robinson “Was Gandhi ‘Charismatic’? Exploring the Rhetorical Leadership of Mahatma Gandhi,” Leadership Quarterly 21(5) (2010): 844–855.
22 A. Samnani and P. Singh, “When Leaders Victimize: The Role of Charismatic Leaders in Facilitating Group Pressures,” Leadership Quarterly 24(1) (2013, February): 189–202.
23 J. Humphreys, D. Zhao, K. Ingram, J. Gladstone, and L. Basham, “Situational Narcissism and Charismatic Leadership: A Conceptual Framework,” Journal of Behavioral & Applied Management 11(2) (2010): 118–136.
24 R. Nielsen, J. Marrone, and H. Slay, “A New Look at Humility: Exploring the Humility Concept and Its Role in
endnotes
352 part 3 organizaTionaL LEaDErSHiP
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 352 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Socialized Charismatic Leadership,” Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 17(1) (2010): 33–43.
25 P. Varella, M. Javidan, and Dr. Waldman, “Leadership, Group Behavior, and Density of Instrumental Ties in Organizational Groups,” Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings (2010): 1–5.
26 M. Brown and L. Trevifio, “Leader-Follower Values Congruence: Are Socialized Charismatic Leaders Better Able to Achieve It?” Journal of Applied Psychology 94(2) (2009): 478–490.
27 A. Samnani, and P. Singh, “When Leaders Victimize: The Role of Charismatic Leaders in Facilitating Group Pressures,” Leadership Quarterly 24(1) (2013, February): 189–202.
28 www.cdc.gov, retrieved June 3, 2011.
29 http://www.thehealthcarecenter.com/child_obesity_from_ fast_food.html, retrieved June 3, 2011.
30 www.fastfoodmarketing.org, retrieved June 3, 2011.
31 J. M. Burns, Leadership (New York: Harper & Row, 1978).
32 H. Tse, and W. Chiu, “Transformational Leadership and Job Performance: A Social Identity Perspective,” Journal of Business Research 67(1) (2014, January): 2827–2835.
33 H. Tse, and W. Chiu, “Transformational Leadership and Job Performance: A Social Identity Perspective,” Journal of Business Research 67(1) (2014, January): 2827–2835.
34 A. Grant, “Leading with Meaning: Beneficiary Contact, Prosocial Impact, and the Performance Effects of Transformational Leadership,” Academy of Management Journal 55(2) (2012, April): 458–476.
35 D. Bealer, and R. Bhanugopan, “Transactional and Transformational Leadership Behaviour of Expatriate and National Managers in the UAE: A Cross-Cultural Comparative Analysis,” International Journal of Human Resource Management 25(1/2) (2014, January 19): 293–316.
36 S. Braun, C. Peus, S. Weisweiler, and D. Frey, “Transformational Leadership, Job Satisfaction, and Team Performance: A Multilevel Mediation Model of Trust,” Leadership Quarterly [serial online] 24(1) (2013, February): 270–283.
37 A. Choudhary, S. Akhtar, and A. Zaheer, “Impact of Transformational and Servant Leadership on Organizational Performance: A Comparative Analysis,” Journal of Business Ethics 116(2) (2013, August 5): 433–440.
38 V. García-Morales, M. Jiménez-Barrionuevo, and L. Gutiérrez- Gutiérrez, “Transformational Leadership Influence on Organizational Performance through Organizational Learning and Innovation,” Journal of Business Research 65(7) (2012, July): 1040–1050.
39 S. Eisenbeiß and S. Boerner, “A Double-Edged Sword: Transformational Leadership and Individual Creativity,” British Journal of Management 24(1) (2013, March): 54–68.
40 H. Tse and W. Chiu, “Transformational Leadership and Job Performance: A Social Identity Perspective,” Journal of Business Research 67(1) (2014, January): 2827–2835.
41 N. Paulsen, V. Callan, O. Ayoko, and D. Saunders, “Transformational Leadership and Innovation in an R&D Organization Experiencing Major Change,” Journal of Organizational Change Management 26(3) (2013, May): 595–610.
42 S. Kovjanic, S. Schuh, and K. Jonas, “Transformational Leadership and Performance: An Experimental Investigation of the Mediating Effects of Basic Needs Satisfaction and Work Engagement,” Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology 86(4) (2013, December): 543–555.
43 T. Dvir, D. Eden, B. Avolio, and B. Shamir, “Impact of Transformational Leadership on Follower Development and Performance: A Field Experiment,” Academy of Management Journal 45(4) (2002, August): 735–744.
44 A. Pierro, B. Raven, C. Amato, and J. Bélanger, “Bases of Social Power, Leadership Styles, and Organizational Commitment,” International Journal of Psychology 48(6) (2013, December): 1122–1134.
45 A. Colbert, A. Kristof-Brown, B. Bradley, and M. Barrick, “CEO Transformational Leadership: The Role of Goal Importance Congruence in Top Management Teams,” Academy of Management Journal 51(1) (2008, February): 81–96.
46 J. Caillier, “Do Employees Feel Comfortable Blowing the Whistle When Their Supervisors Practice Transformational Leadership?” International Journal of Public Administration 36(14) (2013, December): 1020–1028.
47 C. Schwepker Jr. and D. Good, “Improving Salespeople’s Trust in the Organization, Moral Judgment and Performance through Transformational Leadership,” Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 28(7) (2013, November): 535–546.
48 H. Shih, Y. Chiang, and T. Chen, “Transformational Leadership, Trusting Climate, and Knowledge-Exchange Behaviors in Taiwan,” International Journal of Human Resource Management 23(6) (2012, March 15): 1057–1073.
49 A. Grant, “Leading with Meaning: Beneficiary Contact, Prosocial Impact, and the Performance Effects of Transformational Leadership,” Academy of Management Journal 55(2) (2012, April): 458–476.
Chapter 9 CHariSMaTiC anD TranSfor MaTionaL LEaDErSHiP 353
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 353 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
50 A. Pierro, B. Raven, C. Amato, and J. Bélanger, “Bases of Social Power, Leadership Styles, and Organizational Commitment,” International Journal of Psychology 48(6) (2013, December): 1122–1134.
51 J. Caillier, “Do Employees Feel Comfortable Blowing the Whistle When Their Supervisors Practice Transformational Leadership?” International Journal of Public Administration 36(14) (2013, December): 1020–1028.
52 S. Jha, “Managerial Practices, Transformational Leadership, Customer Satisfaction and Self Efficacy as Antecedents of Psychological Empowerment,” Journal of Management Research (09725814) 13(2) (2013, April): 105–117.
53 S. Kahai, R. Jestire, and H. Rui, “Effects of Transformational and Transactional Leadership on Cognitive Effort and Outcomes during Collaborative Learning within a Virtual World,” British Journal of Educational Technology 44(6) (2013, November): 969–985.
54 S. Si and F. Wei, “Transformational and Transactional Leaderships, Empowerment Climate, and Innovation Performance: A Multilevel Analysis in the Chinese Context,” European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology 21(2) (2012, April): 299–320.
55 A. Pieterse, D. van Knippenberg, M. Schippers, and D. Stam, “Transformational and Transactional Leadership and Innovative Behavior : The Moderating Role of Psychological Empowerment,” Journal of Organizational Behavior [serial online] 31(4) (2010, May): 609–623. Available from: Business Source Complete, Ipswich, MA. Accessed November 17, 2013.
56 A. Ismail, M. Mohamad, H. Mohamed, N. Rafiuddin, and K. Zhen, “Transformational and Transactional Leadership Styles as a Predictor of Individual Outcomes,” Theoretical & Applied Economics 17(6) (2010): 89–104.
57 R. L. Loi, Y. M. Mao, and H. Ngo, “Linking Leader-Member Exchange and Employee Work Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Organizational Social and Economic Exchange,” Management & Organization Review 5(3) (2009): 401–422.
58 S. Ruggieri and C. Abbate, “Leadership Style, Self-Sacrifice, and Team Identification,” Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal [serial online] 41(7) (2013, August): 1171–1178.
59 S. Si and F. Wei, “Transformational and Transactional Leaderships, Empowerment Climate, and Innovation Performance: A Multilevel Analysis in the Chinese Context,” European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology 21(2) (2012, April): 299–320.
60 S. Kahai, R. Jestire, and H. Rui, “Effects of Transformational and Transactional Leadership on Cognitive Effort and
Outcomes during Collaborative Learning within a Virtual World,” British Journal of Educational Technology 44(6) (2013, November): 969–985.
61 S. Ruggieri and C. Abbate, “Leadership Style, Self-Sacrifice, and Team Identification,” Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal [serial online] 41(7) (2013, August): 1171–1178.
62 N. Podsakoff, P. Podsakoff, and V. Kuskova, “Dispelling Misconceptions and Providing Guidelines for Leader Reward and Punishment Behavior,” Business Horizons 53(3) (2010): 291–303.
63 B. M. Bass, B. J. Avolio, D. I. Jung, and Y. Berson, “Predicting Unit Performance by Assessing Transformational and Transactional Leadership,” Journal of Applied Psychology 88(2) (April 2003): 207–219.
64 T. Judge and R. Piccolo, “Transformational and Transactional Leadership: A Meta-Analytic Test of Their Relative Validity,” Journal of Applied Psychology 89(5) (2004, October): 755–768.
65 E. Davis, J. Kee, and K. Newcomer, “Strategic Transformation Process: Toward Purpose, People, Process and Power,” Organization Management Journal 7(1) (2010): 66–80.
66 A. Thierer, “Apple, The iPhone and a Locational Privacy Techno-Panic,” Forbes (2011, May).
67 S. Thurm and Y. I. Kane, “Your Apps Are Watching You: A WSJ Investigation Finds That iPhone and Android Apps Are Breaching the Privacy of Smartphone Users,” Wall Street Journal (2010, December 17).
68 D. van Knippenberg and S. Sitkin, “A Critical Assessment of Charismatic—Transformational Leadership Research: Back to the Drawing Board?” Academy of Management Annals 7(1) (2013, June): 1–60.
69 D. Green and G. Roberts, “Transformational Leadership in a Postmodern World: The Presidential Election of Barack Obama,” Academy of Strategic Management Journal 11(1) (2012, January): 9–25.
70 C. Nohe, B. Michaelis, J. Menges, Z. Zhang, and K. Sonntag, “Charisma and Organizational Change: A Multilevel Study of Perceived Charisma, Commitment to Change, and Team Performance,” Leadership Quarterly 24(2) (2013, April): 378–389.
71 Levine, R. Muenchen, and A. Brooks, “Measuring Transformational and Charismatic Leadership: Why Isn’t Charisma Measured?” Communication Monographs 77(4) (2010): 576–591.
72 K. Davis and W. Gardner, “Charisma under Crisis Revisited: Presidential Leadership, Perceived Leader Effectiveness,
354 part 3 organizaTionaL LEaDErSHiP
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 354 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
and Contextual Influences,” Leadership Quarterly 23(5) (2012, October): 918–933.
73 J. Antonakis, M. Fenley, and S. Liechti, “Learning Charisma,” Harvard Business Review 90(6) (2012, June): 127–130.
74 J. Robinson and D. Topping, “The Rhetoric of Power : A Comparison of Hitler and Martin Luther King Jr,” Journal of Management Inquiry 22(2) (2013, April): 194–210.
75 J. Sosik, J. Juzbasich, and J. Chun, “Effects of Moral Reasoning and Management Level on Ratings of Charismatic Leadership, In-Role and Extra-Role Performance of Managers: A Multi-Source Examination,” Leadership Quarterly 22(2) (2011): 434–450.
76 B. Galvin, P. Balkundi, and D. Waldman, “Spreading the Word: The Role of Surrogates in Charismatic Leadership Process,” Academy of Management Review 35(3) (2010): 477–494.
77 A. Pierro, B. Raven, C. Amato, and J. Bélanger, “Bases of Social Power, Leadership Styles, and Organizational Commitment,” International Journal of Psychology 48(6) (2013, December): 1122–1134.
78 R. Rubin, D. Munz, and W. Bommer, “Leading from Within: The Effects of Emotion Recognition and Personality on Transformational Leadership Behavior,” Academy of Management Journal 48(5) (2005, October): 845–858.
79 C. Davidson, “Leadership: Do You Have It?” Employee Benefit Adviser [serial online] 10(2) (2012, February): 58–59. Available from: Business Source Complete, Ipswich, MA. Accessed November 17, 2013.
80 F. Walter and H. Bruch, “An Affective Events Model of Charismatic Leadership Behavior : A Review, Theoretical Integration, and Research Agenda,” Journal of Management 35(6) (2009): 1428–1452.
81 B. M. Bass and B. J. Avilio, Improving Organizational Effectiveness through Transformational Leadership (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994).
82 R. De Vries, A. Bakker-Pieper, and W. Oostenveld, “Leadership = Communication? The Relations of Leaders’ Communication Styles with Leadership Styles, Knowledge Sharing and Leadership Outcomes,” Journal of Business & Psychology 25(3) (2010): 367–380.
83 S. Eisenbeiß, and S. Boerner, “A Double-Edged Sword: Transformational Leadership and Individual Creativity,” British Journal of Management [serial online] 24(1) (2013, March): 54–68. Available from: Business Source Complete, Ipswich, MA. Accessed November 16, 2013.
84 N. Wallis, F. Yammarino, and A. Feyerherm, “Individualized Leadership: A Qualitative Study of Senior Executive Leaders,” Leadership Quarterly 22(1) (2011): 182–206.
85 A. Oke, N. Munsh, and F. Walumbwa, “The Influence of Leadership on Innovation Processes and Activities,” Organizational Dynamics 38(1) (2009): 64–72.
86 D. McGuire and K. Hutchings, “Portrait of a Transformational Leader : The Legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.,” Leadership & Organization Development Journal 28 (2007): 154–166.
87 M. Cusumano, “Technology Strategy and Management: The Legacy of Bill Gates,” Communications of the ACM 52(1) (2009): 25–26.
88 R. Stengel, “Person of the Year,” Time (Wednesday, 2010, December 15); J.A. Vargas, “The Face of Facebook,” The New Yorker (2010, September 20); “M. Zuckerberg,” New York Times (2011, January 3).
89 D. Jung and J. Sosik, “Who Are the Spellbinders? Identifying Personal Attributes of Charismatic Leaders,” Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 12 (2006): 12–26.
90 J. M. Howell and B. Shamir, “The Role of Followers in the Charismatic Leadership Process: Relationships and Their Consequences,” Academy of Management Review 30(1) (2005, January): 96–112.
91 R. Hassan, B. Fuwad, and A. Rauf, “Pre-Training Motivation and the Effectiveness of Transformational Leadership Training: An Experiment,” Academy of Strategic Management Journal 9(2) (2010, June): 1–8.
92 M. McCuddy and M. Cavin, “The Demographic Context of Servant Leadership,” Journal of the Academy of Business & Economics 9(2) (2009): 129–139.
93 D. Parris and J. Peachey, “A Systematic Literature Review of Servant Leadership Theory in Organizational Contexts,” Journal of Business Ethics 113(3) (2013, March 11): 377–393.
94 R. Mittal and P. Dorfman, “Servant Leadership across Cultures,” Journal of World Business 47(4) (2012, October): 555–570.
95 D. Parris and J. Peachey, “A Systematic Literature Review of Servant Leadership Theory in Organizational Contexts,” Journal of Business Ethics 113(3) (2013, March 11): 377–393.
96 M. Ahn, L. Ettner, and A. Loupin, “From Classical to Contemporar y Leadership Challenges,” Journal of Leadership Studies 5(1) (2011): 6–22.
97 P. Sun, “The Servant Identity: Influences on the Cognition and Behavior of Servant Leaders,” Leadership Quarterly 24(4) (2013, August): 544–557.
98 A. Choudhary, S. Akhtar, and A. Zaheer, “Impact of Transformational and Servant Leadership on Organizational
Chapter 9 CHariSMaTiC anD TranSfor MaTionaL LEaDErSHiP 355
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 355 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Performance: A Comparative Analysis,” Journal of Business Ethics [serial online] 116(2) (2013, August 5): 433–440.
99 S. Dutta, R. Lawson, and D. Marcinko, “Paradigms for Sustainable Development: Implications of Management Theory,” Corporate Social Responsibility & Environmental Management 19(1) (2012, January): 1–10.
100 H. Walsh and T. Dowding, “Sustainability and the Coca- Cola Company: The Global Water Crisis and Coca-Cola’s Business Case for Water Stewardship,” International Journal of Business Insights & Transformation 4 (Special Issue) (2012, January): 106–118.
101 M. Hernandez, “Toward an Understanding of the Psychology of Stewardship,” Academy of Management Review 37(2) (2012, April): 172–193.
102 R. Waters, D. Bortree, and N. Tindall, “Can Public Relations Improve the Workplace? Measuring the Impact of Stewardship on the Employer-Employee Relationship,” Employee Relations 35(6) (2013, December): 613–629.
103 B. Vanourek and G. Vanourek, “Financial Executives as Leadership Stewards,” Financial Executive 29(1) (2013, January): 36–39.
104 B. Vanourek and G. Vanourek, “Financial Executives as Leadership Stewards,” Financial Executive 29(1) (2013, January): 36–39.
105 R. Waters, D. Bortree, and N. Tindall, “Can Public Relations Improve the Workplace? Measuring the Impact of Stewardship on the Employer-Employee Relationship,” Employee Relations 35(6) (2013, December): 613–629.
106 M. Hernandez, “Toward an Understanding of the Psychology of Stewardship,” Academy of Management Review 37(2) (2012, April): 172–193.
107 R. Waters, D. Bortree, and N. Tindall, “Can Public Relations Improve the Workplace? Measuring the Impact of Stewardship on the Employer-Employee Relationship,” Employee Relations 35(6) (2013, December): 613–629.
108 M. Hernandez, “Toward an Understanding of the Psychology of Stewardship,” Academy of Management Review 37(2) (2012, April): 172–193.
109 M. Hernandez, “Toward an Understanding of the Psychology of Stewardship,” Academy of Management Review 37(2) (2012, April): 172–193.
110 R. Waters, D. Bortree, and N. Tindall, “Can Public Relations Improve the Workplace? Measuring the Impact of Stewardship on the Employer-Employee Relationship,” Employee Relations 35(6) (2013, December): 613–629.
111 R. K. Greenleaf, Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness (Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press, 1977), p. 7.
112 D. Parris and J. Peachey, “A Systematic Literature Review of Servant Leadership Theory in Organizational Contexts,” Journal of Business Ethics 113(3) (2013, March 11): 377–393.
113 R. Rai and A. Prakash, “A Relational Perspective to Knowledge Creation: Role of Servant Leadership,” Journal of Leadership Studies 6(2) (2012, summer): 61–85.
114 R. Berger, “The Pope We’ve Been Waiting For?” Sojourners Magazine [serial online] 42(6) (2013, June): 31.
115 D. Jones, “Does Servant Leadership Lead to Greater Customer Focus and Employee Satisfaction?” Business Studies Journal 4(2) (2012, July): 21–35.
116 S. Peterson, B. Galvin, and D. Lange, “CEO Servant Leadership: Exploring Executive Characteristics and Firm Performance,” Personnel Psychology 65(3) (2012, September): 565–596.
117 R. Rai and A. Prakash, “A Relational Perspective to Knowledge Creation: Role of Servant Leadership,” Journal of Leadership Studies 6(2) (2012, summer): 61–85.
118 D. Jones, “Servant Leadership’s Impact on Profit, Employee Satisfaction, and Empowerment within the Framework of a Participative Culture in Business,” Business Studies Journal 4(1) (2012, January): 35–49.
119 R. Mittal and P. Dorfman, “Servant Leadership across Cultures,” Journal of World Business 47(4) (2012, October): 555–570.
120 R. Mittal and P. Dorfman, “Servant Leadership across Cultures,” Journal of World Business 47(4) (2012, October): 555–570.
121 R. Mittal and P. Dorfman, “Servant Leadership across Cultures,” Journal of World Business 47(4) (2012, October): 555–570.
122 R. Rai and A. Prakash, “A Relational Perspective to Knowledge Creation: Role of Servant Leadership,” Journal of Leadership Studies 6(2) (2012, summer): 61–85.
123 A. Bryant, “Xerox’s New Chief Tries to Redefine Its Culture,” New York Times (2010, February 20).
124 http://triplecrownleadership.com/a-vision-of-great-leader- ship/—Interview with Ursula Burns, Chairman and CEO, Xerox Leaders Speak Series. December 03, 2012; Bob and Gregg Vanourek, Triple Crown Leadership: Building Excellent, Ethical, and Enduring Organizations (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2012); http://www.dallasnews.com/business /columnists/cher yl-hall/20130504-ceo-leads-xerox-in-a- new-direction-with-acs-deal.ece?nclick_check=1; http:// wbusinesstoday.intoday.in/stor y/inter view-with-xerox- ursula-burns/1/198431.html.
356 part 3 organizaTionaL LEaDErSHiP
66352_ch09_ptg01_319-356.indd 356 10/15/14 12:58 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
3 57
Chapter
C h a p t e r O U t L I N e
What Is Organizational Culture?
Culture Creation and Sustainability
The Power of Culture
Strong versus Weak Cultures
The Leader’s Role in Influencing Culture
Types of Cultures
National Culture Identities— Hofstede’s Value Dimensions
Organizational Ethics
Fostering an Ethical Work Environment
Authentic Leadership
Diversity Leadership
The Changing Work Place
Benefits of Embracing Diversity
Creating a Pro-Diversity Organizational Culture
The Effects of Globalization on Diversity Leadership
Leadership of Culture, Ethics, and Diversity
Learning Outcomes After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
1 Explain the power of culture to an organization’s effectiveness, both internally and externally. p. 360
2 Describe the characteristics of strong versus weak cultures. p. 361
3 Distinguish between symbolic and substantive leadership actions for shaping organizational culture. p. 364
4 Identify and briefly describe the four types of culture commonly found in organizations. p. 366
5 Describe Hofstede’s theory on National Culture Identities. p. 369
6 Identify organizational practices that do foster an ethical work environment. p. 372
7 Explain how authentic leadership has its roots in moral and ethical theory of leadership. p. 374
8 Explain the benefits of embracing diversity. p. 376
9 What leadership actions can support and sustain a pro-diversity culture? p. 378
10
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 357 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
358 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
I n this chapter, we examine issues of organizational culture, ethics, and diversity— and the leader’s role in shaping them. Regardless of the type of business or the size, organizations that consistently achieve outstanding results also have what we call a strong or high-performing culture.2 Organizations with strong cultures have an
unmistakable profile that sets them apart from average performers—a profile that includes distinctive characteristics of a shared value system, a reputation for ethical leadership, and a talented, motivated, and diversified workforce.3
Sheri McCoy is the CEO of Avon Corporation. Prior to joining Avon, she worked at Johnson and Johnson, where she was responsible for the pharmaceutical and consumer business divisions of the company. In 2013, she was named by Fortune magazine as the 20th woman on their list of “50 Most Powerful Women in Business.” Looking ahead, she said her vision is to restore Avon’s image as an iconic beauty brand and its leadership position in global direct selling. She is a big believer in Avon’s mission of empower- ing women.
Avon is the world’s largest direct seller, with six million representatives in more than 100 countries, and the world’s fifth-largest beauty company. Lately, there has not been much to celebrate at Avon. Over the last five years, the stock has fallen more than 50 percent and net income has plunged as well. Compounding its weakening financial situa- tion is a pending regulatory investigation. The Securities and Exchange Commission is examining whether Avon officials made illicit payments to officials of foreign governments, actions that could amount to briber y in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
A few months after she took over, CEO McCoy an- nounced her turnaround plan: cut 1,500 jobs, pull out of struggling markets such as Vietnam and South Korea, invest $200 million to update its information systems, embrace digital and social media as contemporary selling tools, in- crease sales in hard-hit markets like the United States and the United Kingdom, and push premium brands like its anti- aging line Anew. She emphasized that the focus of her strat- egy is the Avon sales representative and the customers.
CEO McCoy sees technology as the biggest differ- ence in terms of changing the buying and selling experi- ence of customers and Avon reps. She believes that Avon’s future sur vival will depend on its ability to evolve and adapt to changing market and economic conditions. Asked to describe her leadership style, Ms. McCoy said she is
thoughtful, disciplined, and deliberate. She is a people- centered leader. As she puts it, “I like to think I set aspi- rational but reasonable goals and encourage my team to achieve them. I clearly recognize that people drive results, and it’s about getting the right people around you and giving them the suppor t.” Throughout her career, she has consistently promoted employee engagement, leadership development, and diversity of thought. She is committed to Avon’s culture and its five core values of trust, respect, belief, humility, and integrity.1
OpeNING CaSe QUeStIONS:
1. Is Avon’s culture a contributing factor to its recent struggles? Explain.
2. The text points out that an organization’s culture serves two important functions: (1) it creates internal unity and (2) it helps the organization adapt to changes in the external environment. Has this been the case at Avon?
3. The chapter discusses the characteristics of high-performance (or strong) and low- performing (or weak) cultures. How will you describe Avon’s culture?
4. Is Avon’s culture more of a competitive, adaptive, bureaucratic, or cooperative type?
5. What role can CEO McCoy play in fostering a climate of strict ethical standards at Avon?
6. What is Avon’s stance on diversity?
Can you answer any of these questions? You’ll find an- swers to these questions and learn more about Avon and its leadership throughout the chapter.
To learn more about Avon and Sheri McCoy, visit Avon’s Web site at http://www.avoncompany.com.
OPENING CASE Application
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 358 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 10 LEADERSHIP Of CuLTuRE, ETHICS, AND DIvERSITy 359
What Is Organizational Culture? The concept of culture traces its roots to anthropology and sociology. An organization’s culture is manifested in the structures, rules, routines, values, norms, and expectations that leaders preach and practice; in its employees’ attitudes and behavior; in ethical guide- lines; in operating policies; and in the stories people repeat about key events in the orga- nization.4 Culture gives meaning to each individual’s membership in the workplace and, in so doing, describes the organization’s essential nature. Organizational culture gives identity to an organization.5 Culture can guide and constrain behavior in that it clarifies and reinforces standards of behavior.
An organization’s culture is the operating system that gives meaning to the underlying core values of the organization.6 Organizational culture has been described as a “shared mental model” or the “social glue” that holds an organization together. Therefore, we de- fine culture as the aggregate of beliefs, norms, attitudes, values, assumptions, and ways of doing things that is shared by members of an organization and taught to new members.7 Beliefs, morals, customs, and practices make up the cultural DNA that gives organiza- tions and individuals their identities.8 For a deeper appreciation and understanding of the concept, we will focus our discussion in the following areas: culture creation and sus- tainability, the power of culture, strong versus weak cultures, the role of leadership in inf luencing culture, and culture types.
Culture Creation and Sustainability Culture creation and sustainability highlights top management’s role in this area.9 The effectiveness of top management in inf luencing follower behavior is partly determined by the type of organizational culture in place. Culture is created either by intentional design or by default.
By design, culture can be imposed on an organization by a new leader’s intentions to change or adapt an existing culture so it aligns with his or her vision, values, objec- tives, and strategies. An essential challenge of a new culture implantation is to smoothly and quickly incorporate new behaviors into one’s cultural orientation, described by one source as “cultural retooling.” Accordingly, this process of cultural retooling can unfold over three distinct phases—conf lict, ambivalence, and authenticity. And the outcome for individuals going through the process can take one of three paths—regress, stagnate, or transform.10 This underscores the difficulty and complexity of effecting a successful cul- ture change and why so many attempts end in failure.
It can be a difficult undertaking if the new leader’s proposed cultural changes are incongruent with those of the organization’s members. Unwelcomed changes to an en- trenched culture can provoke negative emotional reactions, often of an intense nature. This can create conf lict and ambivalence amongst organization members. However, when followers’ values are congruent with those of the leader, they tend to react to change more positively, thus believing in the authenticity of the leader and embracing the new culture. So, rather than regressing or stagnating, they transform into the new culture.11
Culture creation can also happen by default as a slowly evolving process. An organi- zation’s core values and beliefs can come about from the experiences gained or lessons learned during trying times of the organization’s life. The lessons learned during these hard times ultimately serve as the basis for role expectations that guide future behavior and become embedded in the memory bank of organizational members. Shared by lead- ers and followers, these expectations persist as new employees are encouraged to embrace them. This shared memory of core values may include hard work, commitment, loyalty, honesty, perseverance, trustworthiness, and respect. Eventually, these values become so
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 359 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
360 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
deeply rooted in the culture that organizational members are no longer consciously aware of them. We should note that cultural values and norms can also be learned during posi- tive times of growth and prosperity. This organic process is consistent with the long-held view that culture emerges from the history and experiences of individuals and groups in a particular organization’s context.
A culture is sustained as each successive generation of leaders and followers embraces and passes it to the next through mechanisms such as stories, artifacts, rituals, slogans, symbols, and special ceremonies.12 These mechanisms reproduce as well as reinforce the accepted culture. Top management must play a central role in sustaining an organiza- tion’s culture. An example of this would be Sam Walton’s conception of Walmart’s cul- ture from its early years. The essence of Walmart’s culture is a commitment to customer satisfaction, zealous pursuit of low costs, and a strong work ethic. To show his commit- ment to upholding these cultural values, Sam Walton instituted his ritualistic Saturday morning executive meetings at headquarters to exchange ideas and review problems. Also, he required company executives to visit stores, talk to customers, and solicit sugges- tions from employees. This tradition has carried on long after Mr. Walton’s death. Creat- ing and sustaining a high-performing culture at Walmart has been critical to its success.
1. Is avon’s culture a contributing factor to its struggles? explain.
The culture of Avon is encapsulated in what it calls “The Five Values of Avon,” which are trust, respect, integrity, belief, and humility. According to the company’s management, these five values have served as a continuing source of strength throughout Avon’s proud history and will remain at the heart of who they are as a company. Avon enjoys a proud legacy and commitment to women. It is not certain at this time that Avon’s culture is contributing to its financial weakness and the pending regulatory investigation. If anything, Avon’s culture should be a strength on which the new CEO can build.
OPENING CASE Application
the power of Culture An organization’s culture determines the way that it responds to changes in its environ- ment. Experts and scholars on organizational culture have long maintained that culture serves two important functions in organizations: (1) it creates internal unity and (2) it helps the organization adapt to changes in its environment.13
Internal Unity Organizational culture defines a normative order that serves as a source of consistent behavior inside an organization. To the extent that culture provides organizational members with a way of making sense of their daily lives and establishes guidelines and rules for how to behave, it is a social control mechanism. A supportive culture provides a system of rules and peer pressures, which can be very powerful in inf luencing behav- ior, thus affecting organizational performance. A strong culture is a tool that regulates behavior and promotes strong employee identification with the organization’s vision, mission, goals, and strategy. Culturally approved behavior thrives and is rewarded, whereas culturally disapproved behavior is discouraged and even punished. Culture
Explain the power of culture to an organization’s effectiveness, both internally and externally.
Learning Outcome
1
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 360 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 10 LEADERSHIP Of CuLTuRE, ETHICS, AND DIvERSITy 361
offers a shared understanding about the identity of an organization. The right culture can make employees feel that they are valued participants and become self-motivated to take on the challenges of realizing the organization’s mission, resulting in a unified work- force.14 The right culture can transform an organization’s workforce into a source of cre- ativity and innovative solutions.15
External Adaptation Culture determines how the organization responds to changes in its environment. De- pending on the volatility in the business environment, some changes are significant enough to threaten an organization’s competitiveness and even its long-term survival. Culture plays a key role in informing sense-making or meaning when external changes are severe enough to force members to reevaluate aspects of their organizational iden- tity and purpose.16 Having the right culture can ensure that an organization responds quickly to rapidly changing environmental conditions in the market place.17 There has to be a strategy-culture fit for performance to be optimized. For example, if the com- petitive environment requires a strategy of superior customer service, the organizational culture should encourage and support such values as listening to customers, empowering employees to address customer problems, and rewarding employees for outstanding cus- tomer service deeds. In such a case, the organization is said to exhibit a high degree of fit or alignment between strategy and culture. A low degree (or absence) of fit between strategy and an organization’s culture is a recipe for failure.18 Despite the empirical evidence of a strong correlation between organizational culture and performance, many organizations still don’t have a credible claim to owning a strong or high-performing culture. The next section examines the characteristics of strong versus weak cultures.
2. the text points out that an organization’s culture serves two important functions: (1) it creates internal unity and (2) it helps the organization adapt to the external environment. has this been the case at avon?
Avon strives to create a work environment that values and encourages the uniqueness of each individual, and it is com- mitted to creating a culture that suppor ts associates as they balance their many, and sometimes competing work and personal responsibilities. The culture of Avon is cer tainly a factor in explaining the strong bond or internal unity that ex- ists among company employees and also between sales representatives and their customers. As CEO McCoy reiterated recently, Avon must evolve and adapt to changing market and economic situations.
OPENING CASE Application
Describe the characteristics of strong versus weak cultures. Learning Outcome
2
Strong versus Weak Cultures A growing body of literature documents the economic benefits of investing in a strong culture. A strong culture is a performance-oriented culture.19 Organizational culture has been found to inf luence such performance outcomes as quality, customer satisfaction, innovation, turnover and absenteeism rates, workforce productivity, employee job satis- faction, creativity, commitment, and learning.20,21,22,23 A unique corporate culture is hard to duplicate or imitate and thus can be the source of a firm’s competitive advantage. The
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 361 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
362 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
strength of any culture depends on the degree to which behavioral norms and practices are widely shared and strongly held throughout the organization.24 Therefore, a weak culture symbolizes a lack of agreement or shared mind-set on key values and norms, whereas a strong culture symbolizes a complete agreement or shared mind-set on key values and norms, with leaders playing a key role. The strong culture is described as dis- tinctive and very tight—so much so that members whose values don’t match the orga- nization’s values are more likely to have a short tenure because they are either forced to quit or voluntarily quit.25 Let us examine in greater depth the characteristics of weak and strong performing cultures.
Characteristics of Weak (Low) Performing Cultures Weak cultures are generally associated with low performance. An organization’s culture is weak when there is little or no agreement on the values, beliefs, and norms governing member behavior. There is a low degree of fit between practice and an organization’s culture.26 Negative behaviors like gossiping, manipulation, favoritism, lack of communi- cation, and internal conf lict prevail in a weak culture.
In a weak culture, the internal environment is highly politicized. Many issues or prob- lems get resolved along the lines of power. Vocal support or opposition by powerful in- dividuals, as well as personal lobbying by key individuals or groups with vested interests in a particular outcome, may stif le important change. Also, because of such a politicized internal environment, unhealthy promotion and other career-related practices abound. For example, no effort is made to match the skills and capabilities of candidates to the tasks requirements of a new position; instead, promotions are based on personal con- siderations (friendship, family ties, favoritism, etc.). What’s best for the organization is secondary to the self-interests of individual players or groups.
Weak cultures suffer from insular or inward thinking. There is a tendency to want to stick with the existing way of doing things even if external conditions call for a change. They resist any efforts to change the old culture.
In a weak culture, members of the organization typically show no deeply felt sense of identity with the organization’s vision, mission, objectives, and strategy. There is a gen- eral absence of passion and goal orientation. Without knowledge of what the organiza- tion stands for or ownership and pride in its mission, followers work against managerial aspirations.
Lack of trust, closed-mindedness, low expectations, and absence of accountability and integrity are defining features of relationships between leaders and their followers in weak or low-performing cultures.27 See a summary list of characteristics of weak cultures in Exhibit 10.1.
Characteristics of Weak (Low) Performing Cultures EXHIBIT 10.1
• Insular thinking
• Resistance to change
• Politicized internal environment
• Unhealthy promotion practices
• Lack of shared values
• Low expectations and lack of passion for achievement
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 362 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 10 LEADERSHIP Of CuLTuRE, ETHICS, AND DIvERSITy 363
Characteristics of Strong (High) Performing Cultures Strong cultures are generally associated with high performance. 28 An organization’s culture is considered strong and cohesive when it conducts its business according to a clear and explicit set of principles and values that are widely shared. In this culture, man- agement commits considerable time to communicating these principles and values and explaining how they relate to the mission and strategies of the organization. There is a higher degree of fit between practice and the organization’s culture.29
In a strong culture, leaders use ceremonies, rewards, rituals, symbols, stories, and other social events to reinforce dramatic examples of what the company values. Cere- monies recognize and celebrate high-performing employees. Leaders tell stories to new employees to illustrate the company’s primary values, which then creates a shared under- standing among workers. They also use symbols, rituals, and specialized language (such as slogans) to convey meaning and values.
Ultimately, strong cultures have what can only be described as a culture of discipline— where everyone is responsible and accountable to the mission of the company. There is a “can-do” spirit amongst all employees of the organization. It is a very results-oriented culture.30 Everyone takes ownership of their goals and as such demonstrate a higher com- mitment and motivation to achieve them. Goals form the basis of leader–follower per- formance evaluations and feedback. Leaders seek out reasons and opportunities to give out pins, buttons, badges, certificates, and medals to those who stand out in their perfor- mance. Leaders reinforce high performance with matching rewards.
In a strong culture, there is an emphasis on excellence. Management pursues poli- cies that benchmark best practices in the industry.31 There is a passion for achieving and employees are encouraged to take measured risks. Mistakes are seen as opportunities to learn and not reasons for punishment.32
Finally, strong or high-performing cultures are very people-centered. They see their employees as their number one asset. They treat employees with dignity and respect, grant them greater autonomy, involve them in decision making, celebrate their achieve- ments, and use the full range of rewards and punishment to enforce high performance standards. A reciprocal relationship develops because such employees are more likely to behave in ways that help the organization succeed. This cycle of success is like a “virtuous spiral” that reinforces the reciprocal pattern again and again. Trust, openness, responsi- bility, accountability, and integrity are defining features of relationships between leaders and their followers in strong or high-performing cultures.33, 34 These culture attributes offer firm-specific benefits that provide unique value and, because they are hard for competitors to imitate, present the best means for building and sustaining a competitive advantage. See the characteristics shared by strong cultures in Exhibit 10.2
WOrk Application 10-1 Would you describe the organization where you work or have worked as a low- or high- performance culture? Explain your answer.
Characteristics of Strong (High) Performing Cultures EXHIBIT 10.2
• Strong performance with a passion for achieving
• Intensely people oriented with a “can-do” spirit
• Results oriented and goal driven
• Emphasis on excellence
• Learn from mistakes
• Reinforce performance with matching rewards
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 363 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
364 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
3. the chapter discusses the characteristics of high-performing (strong) and low-performing (weak) cultures. how will you describe avon’s culture?
Everyone at Avon seems to share the same dream and aspiration. There is an emotional bond with the mission of the company, and every employee works hard to realize the long-term goals set by the CEO and her senior leadership team. At Avon, leaders and managers at various levels are encouraged to communicate with the rank and file openly and fre- quently. Though Avon has struggled to perform in the past five years and is facing allegations of regulatory violations, its culture as represented in policies, principles, and values suggest strength and may provide the foundation for its recovery.
OPENING CASE Application
Characteristics of Strong versus Weak Cultures a. Strong performance with a passion for achieving f. Insular thinking b. Intensely people oriented g. Resistance to change c. Results oriented and goal driven h. Politicized internal environment d. Emphasis on excellence i. Unhealthy promotion practices e. Shared values and beliefs j. Reinforce performance with matching rewards
Identify each statement with a characteristic associated with a strong versus weak culture. Write the appropriate letter in the blank before each item.
1. In our organization, management “talks the talk” and “walks the walk” in how it treats employees.
2. I wonder how many of the top executives here got to where they are today on merit?
3. We have always done things here in a certain way and it’s worked so far. I see no need to change that which is not broken.
4. Here, you have a big role in setting your own goals, but once they are set, you are held to them.
5. In our organization, management pursues policies that benchmark best practices in the industry.
6. In our organization, there is little or no agreement on the values, beliefs, and norms governing member behavior and negative behaviors like gossiping, manipulation, favoritism, lack of communication, and internal conflict prevail.
7. In our company, we have a “can-do” spirit with a healthy level of internal competition between departments.
8. I think every department in the company has a copy of the mission and values statement on the wall somewhere.
9. In our organization, leaders seek out reasons and opportunities to reward those who stand out in their performance.
10. Every division here is striving to be No. 1 or 2 in its industry; it is very challenging, yet motivating.
CONCept APPLICATION 10-1
Distinguish between symbolic and substantive leadership actions for shaping organizational culture
Learning Outcome
3
the Leader’s role in Influencing Culture Leaders have many different tools at their disposal for changing, modifying or sustain- ing culture. Some of these may include new policies, programs or practices. Some of these actions are substantive, whereas others are simply symbolic; yet taken together, they can shape the culture of an organization according to the expectations of the leader.
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 364 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 10 LEADERSHIP Of CuLTuRE, ETHICS, AND DIvERSITy 365
Substantive actions are explicit and highly visible and are indicative of management’s commitment to a new way of doing things. These are actions that everyone will under- stand and are intended to establish a new culture more in tune with the organization’s mission and strategy. Symbolic actions are valuable for the signals they send about the kinds of behavior and expectations leaders wish to encourage and promote. In his book Organizational Culture and Leadership, author Edgar Schein uses the terms primary and secondary mechanisms to distinguish between symbolic and substantive actions.35
Substantive Actions Substantive actions that a leader can employ to inf luence culture include aligning cultural values and principles to HR policies and practices, strategy, and structure; matching re- wards/incentives to the culture indicators; and designing physical work environments that match espoused cultural norms. Let us briefly examine each of these matching relationships.
The strongest sign that management is truly committed to creating a new culture is replacing current members who are unwilling to change with a new breed of employees. This can be accomplished through new HR criteria for recruiting, selecting, promoting, and firing employees. These new criteria should match the values and expectations of the new culture. A lack of “fit” will hinder or constrain strategy execution. Existing policies and practices that impede the execution of new strategies must be scrapped. Through these actions, leaders let followers know what is important.
Creating a strategy-culture fit is another substantive action leaders can take. In rapidly changing business environments, the capacity to introduce new strategies is a necessity if a company is to perform well over long periods of time. Strategic agility and fast organi- zational response to new opportunities and threats require a culture that quickly adapts to environmental change rather than a culture that resists change. Another name for this type of culture is the organizational learning culture. Chapter 12 examines in greater depth the organizational learning culture. Thus, if the strategy calls for rapid new product innovation and the culture is one that resist change and risk-taking, there is a lack of fit between strat- egy and culture.
Tying rewards and incentive programs directly to new performance metrics is another substantive culture-shaping action because it gives the leader leverage to reward only those performances that are supportive of the strategy and culture. It is often the case that in many organizations, when strategies change, changes in the reward structure tend to lag behind. Imagine an organization in which the CEO has articulated an integration- based strategy that will require leaders at all levels to think and act across departmental or divisional boundaries and act on behalf of the entire enterprise. However, the orga- nizational reward system only offers incentives for achieving unit success. Such reward/ incentive misalignments weaken an organization’s culture.
Finally, leaders can design the physical work environment to ref lect the values they want to promote within the organization. For example, having common eating facilities for all employees, no special parking areas, and similar offices is consistent with a value of equality. An open office layout with fewer walls separating employees is consistent with a value for open communication. In designing its headquarters, Google wanted to provide open work spaces and an environment that promoted coworker contact and in- teraction. Google succeeded in communicating an employee-friendly culture through its facility design, with the architecture and comfort of the setting reinforced by the cultural and aesthetic elements in the building.
Symbolic Actions Symbolic actions that a leader can employ to inf luence culture include modeling expected behavior, recognizing and celebrating accomplishments, and being visible.
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 365 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
366 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Senior executives are role models, and the stories they tell, decisions they make, and actions they take reveal an implicit cultural expectation for followers. Employees learn what is valued most in an organization by watching what attitudes and behaviors leaders pay attention to and reward and whether the leaders’ own behaviors match the espoused values.36 Employees want to see that their leaders “walk the walk.” For example, when top executives lead a cost-reduction effort by curtailing executive perks, or when they empha- size the importance of responding to customers’ needs by requiring members of the top management team (TMT) to spend a portion of each week talking with customers and understanding their needs, these actions set a good example. The message employees get when a leader institutes a policy but fails to act in accordance with it is that the policy is really not important or necessary.37
Leaders can schedule ceremonies to celebrate and honor people whose actions and performance exemplif y what is called for in the new culture. Ceremonies reinforce specific values and create emotional bonds by allowing employees to share in important moments. A culture that celebrates accomplishments helps retain valued employees.
Another symbolic action a leader can use to inf luence culture is simply being visible. A leader who appears at ceremonial functions to praise followers who exemplify the values and practices of the new culture is making a symbolic, yet instructive, gesture. Effective leaders will also make special appearances at non-ceremonial events (such as employee training workshops) to stress key priorities, values, norms, and ethical principles. To followers, the mere appearance of the executive—and the things he or she chooses to emphasize—clearly communicates management’s commitment to the new culture.38 Exhibit 10.3 summarizes the substantive and symbolic actions that leaders can use to inf luence or shape organizational culture.
WOrk Application 10-2 Identify and briefly explain which of the leadership actions for shaping culture have been used by a leader where you work or have worked.
Leadership Actions for Shaping Culture EXHIBIT 10.3
Substantive Actions
a. Instituting new policies and practices
b. Aligning strategy and structure to culture
c. Matching rewards/incentives to the culture
d. Matching work environment design to culture
Symbolic Actions
a. Modeling expected behavior
b. Recognizing and celebrating accomplishments
c. Being visible
Identify and briefly describe the four types of culture commonly found in organizations.
Learning Outcome
4
types of Culture There is no one best organizational culture. The ideal culture is that which supports the organization’s mission and strategy. In the academic community, we hear names such as learning, innovative, team, clan, and market or adhocracy cultures.39 Each of these names is intended to communicate something about the core values, principles, and
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 366 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 10 Leadership of CuLture, ethiCs, and diversity 367
expectations of an organization. We will focus on four often mentioned culture types that encompass these other labels: the cooperative, adaptive, competitive, and bureaucratic cultures. These culture types are not mutually exclusive; an organization’s culture may reveal characteristics that will fit one or more of these types. However, high-performing organizations with strong cohesive cultures tend to emphasize or lean more toward one particular culture type—a shared mind-set.
Cooperative Culture The cooperative culture represents a leadership belief in strong, mutually reinforcing exchanges and linkages between employees and departments. In this type of culture, op- erating policies, beliefs, norms, and practices are all designed with one goal in mind—to encourage cooperation, teamwork, power sharing, and camaraderie among employees. Management thinking is predicated on the belief that organizational success is inf luenced more by effective cooperative relationships inside the organization than by external rela- tionships. It is an internally focused culture. Proponents of the cooperative culture ar- gue that in today’s dynamic work setting—characterized by constant changes and f luid projects—creating a work setting in which workers collaborate with each other and work in highly effective teams, leads to synergy and increases productivity. It is a culture where employees are empowered to act and think like owners rather than hired hands. A company like Southwest Airlines puts a high premium on cooperation and teamwork amongst its employees and defines its culture along these lines.
Adaptive Culture The adaptive culture represents a leadership belief in active monitoring of the external environment for emerging opportunities and threats and adapting to them. In this type of culture, existing policies, beliefs, norms, and practices are designed with the purpose to support employees’ ability to respond quickly to changing environmental conditions. In adaptive cultures, members are encouraged to take risks, experiment, innovate, and learn from these experiences.
Management thinking is predicated on the belief that organizational success is inf lu- enced more by events outside the organization than by internal factors. Therefore, em- ployees are empowered to make decisions and act quickly to take advantage of emerging opportunities and avoid threats. There is greater individual autonomy and tolerance for failure. There is a spirit of doing what is necessary to ensure both short- and long-term organizational success, provided core values and business principles are upheld in the process. The adaptive culture is generally known for its f lexibility and innovativeness. The core principles of the adaptive culture are similar to those of organizational learning culture (OLC) discussed in Chapter 12. Companies like Google, Facebook, 3M, Apple, Nike, Tesla Motors, and many others are known for their adaptive or innovative cultures. These companies pursue a strategy of differentiation.
Competitive Culture The competitive culture represents a leadership mind-set that encourages and values a highly competitive work environment. Organizational policies, beliefs, norms, and work prac- tices are all designed to foster both internal competition (employee versus employee, depart- ment versus department, or division versus division) and external competition (company versus competitors). An organization with a competitive culture operates in a mature mar- ket environment in which competition for customers is intense. It is the type of culture that some have described as the market-oriented culture.40 The drive to win either against one another internally or against an external competitor is what holds the organization together.
PepsiCo and Coca-Cola are two companies that exemplify the competitive culture. We all remember the “cola wars.” Each company socializes its members to view the other’s
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 367 10/20/14 11:51 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
368 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
employees as enemies and to do whatever is necessary to defeat them in the marketplace. High performance standards and tough reviews are used to weed out the weak and re- ward the strong. At PepsiCo, for example, former CEO Wayne Calloway was known to set backbreaking standards and then systematically raise them each year. Executives who met his standards were generously rewarded—stock options, bonuses, rapid promo- tions—and those who did not felt the pressure to produce or risk negative consequences such as demotions, transfers, or job termination.
Bureaucratic Culture The bureaucratic culture represents a leadership mind-set that values order, stability, sta- tus, and efficiency. Bureaucratic cultures emphasizes strict adherence to set rules, policies, and procedures, which ensure an orderly way of doing business. Organizations with bureau- cratic cultures are highly structured and efficiency driven. The bureaucratic culture may work for an organization pursuing a low-cost leadership strategy (like Walmart and other discount retailers) but not for one pursuing a differentiation strategy (like Nordstrom’s and other high-end department store retailers). The bureaucratic culture is becoming increas- ingly less attractive even for low–cost driven companies. Faced with the increasing threat of competition from domestic and global competitors, many leaders are forced to make the shift away from bureaucratic cultures because of the need for greater flexibility and adaptation.
WOrk Application 10-3 Describe which of the four types of organizational cultures exist where you work or have worked. Does it lean toward one type or is it a compilation of the four types?
4. Is avon’s culture more of a competitive, adaptive, bureaucratic, or cooperative type?
Avon’s culture fits with three of the four culture types. Avon wants its sales reps to share ideas with each other and to work together as a team. To facilitate this, Avon provides opportunities for employees to network among themselves. This qualifies Avon as having a cooperative culture. However, Avon is also cognizant of the need to adapt to market and tech- nological changes. Avon can also be described as having a competitive culture in the sense that the company is aware of its competitors and is constantly positioning and repositioning its marketing strategies vis-à-vis its competitors. In essence, Avon’s culture is a little bit of the cooperative, competitive, and adaptive types.
OPENING CASE Application
Type of Organizational Culture Identify each statement as characteristic of one of the types of organizational culture. Write the appropriate letter in the blank before each item. a. competitive c. bureaucratic e. team b. adaptive d. cooperative f. clan
11. Google has been described as a company where employees have a lot of flexibility and are empowered to pursue creative solutions to customer problems.
12. In our company, there is a set way of doing things and our managers hold firm to these practices because they have been found to improve efficiency and keep cost down.
13. In our industry, every action draws a counteraction from competitors; thus we keep a close eye on our competitors to make sure they are not stealing our customers.
14. Being a small family business, we want our employees to work collaboratively with each other and share ideas/information.
CONCept APPLICATION 10-2
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 368 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 10 LEADERSHIP Of CuLTuRE, ETHICS, AND DIvERSITy 369
National Culture Identities— hofstede’s Value Dimensions Whether culture is analyzed from an organizational or national context, it is still a prod- uct of values, beliefs, and norms that people use to guide and control behavior. Relation- ships between leaders and members of an organization are based on shared values and beliefs. On a national level, there are unique cultural identities associated with different countries. An organization’s cultural archetype may have its roots or some of its roots in the national culture.42 The people of a particular country are socialized into the national culture as they grow up and, thus, are inf luenced by it. A well-known study on this sub- ject is that of Geert Hofstede. Hofstede developed five value dimensions that distinguish a nation’s culture from other nations.43 Exhibit 10.4 summarizes these value dimensions, which are brief ly discussed along with leadership implications. Each of these five dimen- sions contains two opposing values that are at opposite ends.
Describe Hofstede’s theory on National Culture Identities. Learning Outcome
5
Individualistic versus Collectivistic Cultures This dimension involves a person’s source of identity in society. Some societies value individualism more than collectivism, and vice versa. Individualism is a psychological state in which people see themselves first as individuals and believe their own interest and values are primary. Other names for the individualistic culture are the autonomy culture or the self-expression culture. Collectivism is the state of mind wherein the values and goals of the group—whether extended family, ethnic group, company, or community—are primary. The United States, Great Britain, and Canada have been described as individu- alistic cultures, whereas Greece, Japan, and Mexico are said to have collectivistic cultures.
Hofstede’s Value Dimensions for Understanding National Cultural Differences EXHIBIT 10.4
Individualism High Power
Distance
Long-term Orientation
Masculinity
Collectivism Low Uncertainty Avoidance
Low Power
Distance
Short-term Orientation
Femininity
High Uncertainty Avoidance
Source: Based on G. Hofstede, “Cultural Constraints in Management Theories,” Academy of Management Executive 7 (1993), pp. 81–94.
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 369 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
370 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
High- versus Low-Uncertainty-Avoidance Cultures A society with a high-uncertainty-avoidance culture has a majority of people who do not tolerate risk, avoid the unknown, and are comfortable when the future is relatively pre- dictable and certain. In a high-uncertainty-avoidance country like Japan, managers prefer well-structured and predictable situations. The other end of the continuum is a society where the majority of the people have low uncertainty avoidance. A low-uncertainty- avoidance culture has a majority of people who are comfortable with and accepting of the unknown, and tolerate risk and unpredictability. The United States, Australia, and Canada are associated with low-uncertainty-avoidance cultures, whereas Argentina, Italy, Japan, and Israel are associated with high-uncertainty-avoidance cultures.
High- versus Low-Power-Distance Cultures This dimension deals with a society’s view on power and status. The way in which peo- ple of different social standing (status), power, or authority should relate to each other as equals or unequals is referred to as power distance. In a high-power-distance cul- ture, leaders and followers rarely interact as equals, whereas in a low-power-distance culture, leaders and their followers interact on several levels as equals. It is also called the egalitarian culture. High-power-distance cultures include Mexico, Japan, Spain, and France. Low-power-distance cultures include Germany, the United States, and Ireland.
Long- versus Short-Term Orientation This dimension refers to a society’s long- or short-term orientation toward life and work. People from a culture with a long-term orientation have a future-oriented view of life and thus are thrifty (saving for the future) and persistent in achieving goals. A short-term orientation derives from values that express a concern for maintaining personal happi- ness and living in the present. Immediate gratification is a priority. Most Asian countries, known for their long-term orientation, are also known for their high rate of per capita savings, whereas most European countries and the United States tend to spend more and save less because they tend to have a short-term orientation.
Masculinity versus Femininity Cultures This value dimension was used by Hofstede to make the distinction between the quest for material assets (which he called masculinity) and the quest for social connections with people (which he called femininity). In this context, masculinity describes a cul- ture that emphasizes assertiveness and a competitive drive for money and material objects. At the other end of the continuum is femininity, which describes a culture that empha- sizes developing and nurturing personal relationships and a high quality of life. Countries with masculine cultures include Japan and Italy; feminine cultures include Sweden and Denmark.
Implications for Leadership The growing diversity of the workforce and the increasing globalization of the market- place create the need for leaders with multicultural backgrounds and experiences. This trend explains why the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) lists among required knowledge and skill areas the dynamics of the global economy and multicultural diversity understanding.44 In the academic community, there is greater rec- ognition that future leaders need diversity competencies to effectively leverage a diverse workforce. Leaders have to recognize, for example, that although employers in the United States may reward and encourage individual achievements, a different norm may apply in Japan, where team recognition and rewards are paramount. In the United States, compe- tition between work-group members for career advancement is desirable. In collectivistic
WOrk Application 10-4 Based on the five value dimensions discussed, briefly explain the level of cultural understanding that exists where you work or have worked.
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 370 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 10 LEADERSHIP Of CuLTuRE, ETHICS, AND DIvERSITy 371
cultures, however, members may resist competing with peers for rewards or promotions to avoid disrupting the harmony of the group or appearing self-centered.
Cross-cultural and international joint venture (IJV) studies often identify cultural differences as the cause of many interpersonal difficulties, including conf lict and poor performance in post–merger and acquisition deals.45 More and more organizations are relying on leaders with international experience to lead a multicultural workforce and compete in the global marketplace.
Organizational Ethics Leadership and culture does relate to ethical cognitions and behaviors of followers in an organization.46 Organizational core values inf luence ethics. Ethics inf luence behavior and the combination of core values and ethics describe an organization’s culture.47 An ethical organizational culture encourages a different set of behaviors from one that has the opposite culture.48 The importance of organizational ethics can be seen in the crises of the recent past. These crises revealed huge, and in some cases criminal failures of both ethics and leadership in the banking and finance industry, the real estate sub-prime mar- ket, and government. The AACSB lists ethical understanding and reasoning as important leadership competencies. This may explain why quite a few colleges and universities are adding ethics courses in their curriculum. ethics are the standards of right and wrong that inf luence behavior. Ethics provide guidelines for judging conduct and decision making.49 The discussion of ethics in Chapter 3 was from the individual’s perspective. The emphasis was on how an individual’s personality traits and attitudes, level of moral development, and the situational context affect their ethical behavior.50
In this chapter, we examine ethics from an organizational perspective by focusing on the role of leadership in creating an ethical work environment. The absence of an ethical work environment can lead to severe consequences for the organizations involved. Enron, Tyco, and WorldCom did not happen in a vacuum. The ethical and legal violations that took place at these companies cannot be explained as simply one or two individuals who were morally corrupt. The ethical breakdowns that occurred in these companies happened over a period of time, involved numerous individuals both inside and outside of the or- ganization, and brought about the implosion of these companies.51 Organizational eth- ics applies not only to larger corporations but also small- and medium-sized enterprises.
YOU Make the ethICaL Call
10.1 Buy American
Organizational culture is also based on national culture. People tend to believe their coun- try or company is the best. You most likely have heard the slogan “Buy American.” Unions tend to ask Americans to buy products made in the United States to help save their jobs. On the other hand, some Americans ask why they should buy American products, espe- cially if they cost more or they are inferior in quality or style to foreign-made products. Many (or most) Americans don’t know the country of ownership of many products they buy, and some domestic products are made with more than half of the components com- ing from other countries—so is the product really made in America?
1. Is it ethical and socially responsible to ask people to buy American or from their home country?
2. Is it ethical and socially responsible to buy foreign products?
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 371 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
372 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Therefore, we will focus our discussion on organizational practices that can foster an ethi- cal work environment. We also discuss the related concept of authentic leadership. Before we begin, complete Self-Assessment 10-1 to determine your personal values in eight areas.
personal ValuesSELF-ASSESSMENT 10-1
Below are 16 items. Rate how important each one is to you on a scale of 0 (not important) to 100 (very important). Write the numbers 0–100 on the line to the left of each item.
0 — 10 — 20 — 30 — 40 — 50 — 60 — 70 — 80—90 — 100 Not important Some what important very important
1. An enjoyable, satisfying job 2. A high-paying job 3. A good marriage 4. Meeting new people, social events 5. Involvement in community activities 6. My relationship with God/my religion 7. Exercising, playing sports 8. Intellectual development 9. A career with challenging opportunities 10. Nice cars, clothes, home, and so on 11. Spending time with family 12. Having several close friends 13. Volunteer work for not-for-profit organi-
zations like the Cancer Society 14. Meditation, quiet time to think, pray, and
so on 15. A healthy, balanced diet 16. Educational reading, self-improvement
programs, TV, and so on
Next, transfer your rating numbers for each of the 16 items to the appropriate columns. Then add the two numbers in each column.
P r o f e s s i o n a l F i n a n c i a l F a m i l y S o c i a l 1 . 2 . 3 . 4 . 9 . 1 0 . 1 1 . 1 2 . To t a l s
C o m m u n i t y S p i r i t u a l P h y s i c a l I n t e l l e c t u a l 5 . 6 . 7 . 8 . 1 3 . 1 4 . 1 5 . 1 6 . To t a l s
The higher the total in any area, the higher the value you place on that particular area. The closer the numbers are in all eight areas, the better rounded you are.
Think about the time and effort you put forth in your top three values. Is it sufficient to allow you to achieve the level of success you want in each of those areas? If not, what can you do to change? Is there any area in which you feel you should have a higher value total? If yes, which, and what can you do to change?
Identify organizational practices that do foster an ethical work environment. Learning Outcome
6
Fostering an ethical Work environment For an organization to display consistently high ethical and socially responsible behavior, its leaders must create and maintain a culture of ethics that permeates the entire organi- zation.52,53 The inf luences of ethical leadership occur not only directly, between leaders and followers within work units, but also indirectly, across hierarchical levels, through senior leaders’ inf luences on subordinate–leader behavior.54 An ethical work environ- ment is mission and values-driven, stakeholder balanced, and effectively managed.55,56 Some of the tools available for creating and fostering this type of ethical work environ- ment are discussed below.
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 372 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 10 LEADERSHIP Of CuLTuRE, ETHICS, AND DIvERSITy 373
Code of Ethics Many organizations have a written code of ethics or code of conduct that displays the val- ues and principles governing employee behavior. Written statements have the advantage of explicitly stating the company’s position on ethical and moral issues, and they serve as benchmarks for judging both company decisions and actions and individual conduct.57 A growing number of organizations have added a code of ethics to their list of formal state- ments and public pronouncements. They are seen as tools for highlighting an organiza- tion’s ethical and socially responsible culture.
Leaders must constantly communicate to members the value of not only observing ethical codes but also reporting ethical violations. “Gray areas” must be identified and openly discussed with members, and leaders should offer guidelines on what to do when disagreements arise. It is generally believed that the more an organization’s employees are informed of ethical expectations, the more likely they are to do the right thing. A code of ethics is of no consequence if a supportive corporate culture and leadership are lacking.58
Ethics Committees Having a code of ethics is no guarantee that everyone will behave ethically. Enforcing the ethical code is critical. To ensure compliance with the code of ethics, effective lead- ers also require the creation of ethics committees charged with resolving ethical viola- tions and updating ethical standards. In other organizations the responsibility is given to an ombudsperson. An ethics ombudsperson is a single person entrusted with the responsibility of acting as the organization’s conscience. He or she hears and investigates complaints and points out potential ethics gaps to top management. In many large cor- porations, ethics departments with full-time staff are now part of the organizational setup and charged with helping employees deal with day-to-day ethical problems or questions.
Training and Education Programs Training and education provide the opportunity for everyone in the organization to be informed and educated on the company’s code of ethics and social responsibility obliga- tions. Training teaches employees how to incorporate ethics into daily behavior. In short, training helps align member behaviors with the organization’s values. Educators at every level need to play a greater role in instilling ethical values in their students, who are, after all, future business leaders. Organizations must train their employees to focus not only on the economic imperative of profit generation but also the fiduciary imperative of ethi- cally anchored and socially responsible behavior.59
Disclosure Mechanisms As part of enforcing ethical conduct, proactive organizations have also instituted dis- closure mechanisms to encourage employees to report any knowledge of ethical viola- tions. Whistle-blowing is employee disclosure of illegal or unethical practices within an organization. Whistle-blowing can be risky for those who choose to do it—they have been known to suffer consequences, including being ostracized by coworkers, demoted or transferred to less-desirable jobs, and even losing their jobs. Policies that protect employees from going through these setbacks will signal management’s genu- ine commitment to enforce ethical standards.60 Some organizations have done this by setting up hotlines to give employees a confidential way to report unethical or illegal actions.
WOrk Application 10-5 In your school, look around or investigate if any of the tools discussed here for enforcing an ethical and socially responsible work environment is present. Describe briefly what it is, where it is located, and what behavior it regulates.
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 373 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
374 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
authentic Leadership In the wake of corporate scandals involving companies like JPMorgan, Tyco, Enron, Bank of America, and many others, trust in leadership is at an all-time low.62 With frequent headlines on corruption, deceit, and ethical lapses, a common occurrence, there are calls for leaders to be more transparent and truthful, and lead with authenticity and integ- rity.63 We need authentic leaders, people of the highest integrity, committed to building enduring organizations—leaders who have a deep sense of purpose and are true to their values. We need leaders who have the courage to tell their followers the hard truths even if it’s not what they want to hear. Authentic leadership is a values-based concept. Earning the trust and loyalty of followers lays the groundwork for a high-performing, motivated, and engaged workforce.64 To fully understand this leadership approach, we focus our dis- cussion on the personality profile of an authentic leader and his/her impact on follower behavior, attitudes, and performance.
5. What role can Sheri McCoy play in fostering a climate of strict ethical standards at avon?
First of all, let us start by identifying Avon’s ethical standards. On its Web site, the following declaration is posted: “At Avon, we strive always to maintain the highest standards of integrity and ethical conduct, consistent with our Company values and in compliance with both the letter and spirit of all applicable laws and regulations. Each Avon Associate is individually responsible for strict compliance with the policies applicable to their work. Information published on this site reflects our commitment to upholding the highest of standards in the area of ethics, corporate governance and compliance.” CEO McCoy will have to be out front reiterating Avon’s ethical standards and being a role model for them.
OPENING CASE Application
YOU Make the ethICaL Call
10.2 avon Bribe Investigation
In a Wall Street Journal ar ticle on May 5, 2011, it was repor ted that Avon was widening its internal investigation into possible briber y of foreign officials. A person familiar with the case said that internal investigators at the door-to-door beauty seller have turned up mil- lions of dollars of questionable payments to officials in Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, India, and Japan in amounts that are “not insignificant.”61
This is a violation that falls under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which basically says that it is illegal and a criminal act for U.S. company officials to bribe foreign govern- ment officials to curry business favors. Over the years, many have questioned this law given that other countries don’t punish or forbid the same practice. If anything, it is encouraged. The view of opponents of the law is that it puts American businesses at a disadvantage since bribery is a way of doing business in many cultures; especially developing countries.
1. Do you think this law is fair to American businesses?
2. An Avon official has already been suspended. Is Avon doing the right thing?
3. Is it ethical that other countries are allowing or even encouraging this practice?
Explain how authentic leadership has its roots in moral and ethical theory of leadership.
Learning Outcome
7
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 374 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 10 LEADERSHIP Of CuLTuRE, ETHICS, AND DIvERSITy 375
Personality Profile of the Authentic Leader Authenticity is about genuineness. It is a leadership approach that focuses on knowing and acting in accordance with one’s core values, beliefs, emotions, and preferences. The authentic leader holds him- or herself to a higher standard of integrity and accountability. It is rooted in the notion of a “true self.”65 Authentic leadership has an introspective qual- ity that allows leaders to ref lect on whether their actions are consistent with who they are, ensuring that their values and ethics take precedence over external pressures and not vice versa. Authentic leaders try to convey a message of hopefulness, optimism, and resiliency to their followers.
Authentic leadership theory is grounded in moral and ethical foundations of leader- ship.66 The authentic leader is driven by a value system that calls for being truthful to others, focusing on what is ethical or the right thing to do, staying the course even at per- sonal risk, making empowerment of others a priority, and maintaining open communica- tion with all followers. It is closely associated with other positive leadership models such as charismatic, transformational, and servant leadership.
Authentic leadership is also about courage and character. Character provides the moral compass for decision making, especially for the tough decisions. When faced with difficult decisions, authentic leaders know what they stand for, and they have the courage to act on their principles even if the decision is unpopular. Courageous leaders are able to speak out to right wrongs, admit to personal weaknesses, and own up to mistakes.67 They don’t shy away from making tough decisions, because they are motivated not by the desire to be liked but by their values and purpose. They don’t allow social inf luences or pressures within the organization to affect their ethics when tough decisions have to be made.68
How Authentic Leaders Influence Follower Behaviors and Attitudes How a leader’s authenticity inf luences follower behavior and attitudes is an important consideration and a worthwhile discussion.69 Followers take their cue from the leader, which is why the role of the leader in creating an ethical work environment is so criti- cal. Trust is seen as the primary intervening variable linking authentic leadership to fol- lower attitudes and behaviors.70 Authentic leaders understand that trust must be earned. Therefore, authentic leadership emphasizes a transparent and high-quality exchange relationship between leaders and followers. This allows for the formation of positive leader–member exchange relationships. This increases follower organizational citizen- ship behavior, job satisfaction, and retention. These are the outcomes that do lead to high levels of team spirit and productivity among employees and the bases of a sustainable competitive advantage. Because authentic leaders are consistent in their behavior, follow- ers know what to expect from their leader and what is expected of them. Leader authen- ticity leads to higher levels of follower identification with the leader.71
Diversity Leadership Diversity leadership focuses on the role that leaders, especially those at the top, play in fostering diversity in their organizations. Without a strong leadership inf luence, diver- sity initiatives are shallow and ineffective.72,73,74 Diversity is the inclusion of all groups at all levels in an organization. During the past three decades, the U.S. workplace has become more multiculturally diverse.75 A number of factors have contributed to this trend; among these are the Civil Rights Acts, which outlawed most types of employment discrimination; increased immigration, which has resulted in a more racially and ethni- cally mixed population; changing demographics; and the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) that has further broadened the scope of diversity in the workplace.
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 375 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
376 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
In this section, we explore changing demographics and its impact on workforce diver- sity, the benefits of embracing diversity, creating a pro-diversity organizational culture, and the effects of globalization on diversity leadership.
the Changing Work place Major demographic changes, as well as greater minority representation in the workforce, have accounted for the most significant increase in workforce diversity.76 The last census revealed an increasing number of Hispanics, African Americans, and Asians in the U.S. workforce. The population of these minority groups is growing at a faster rate than the overall population, thus accelerating the cultural diversity of the U.S. population. The 2010 U.S. Census revealed that the number of Hispanics now stands at 16.3 percent (a 43 percent increase from 2000 to 2010). It is now the largest minority group and growing the fastest. The percentage of African-Americans is 12.6 percent, a 12.3 percent increase from 2000 to 2010. Longer term, Caucasians are projected to become a minority by 2050. Four states (California, Hawaii, New Mexico, and Texas) currently have the distinction of hav- ing a combined minority population greater than white populations, which only grew by 5.7 percent in the last census.
In the new work environment, workers must often share work duties and space with co-workers who are disabled. The passage of the ADA has further broadened the scope of diversity in the workplace.
Another demographic trend is the age and gender mix. There are more women en- tering the work force today than at any other time in recent memor y.77 This trend is only going to continue as more young women earn college degrees than their male counterparts.78 The aging trend has now created what some have called generational or age diversity in the workplace.79 For the first time, four distinct generations comprise today’s workforce—the Traditionalists (1900–1945), the Baby Boomers (1946–1964), the Generation Xers (1965–1980), and the Millennials (1981–2000). Different generations have different attitudes and values, making the job of managing a team of mixed genera- tions challenging to say the least.80
A greater likelihood exists that individuals will find themselves leading or under the leadership of someone demographically different from them.81 As the U.S. workforce di- versity continues to grow rapidly, effective leaders must create a workplace culture that allows workers from diverse backgrounds to succeed.82 There is a growing interest in adding diversity management competency as part of leadership development programs.83 84 Diversity competency training will enable leaders to understand how various leader- ship styles interact with followers’ cultural value orientations to inf luence their affective, cognitive, and behavioral outcomes.85 Also, more corporate boards are recommending that TMTs be diversified. 86
WOrk Application 10-6 Describe diversity where you work or have worked. For example, approximately what percentages are male versus female, Caucasian versus non- Caucasian, older versus younger, and so on?
Explain the benefits of embracing diversity. Learning Outcome
8
Benefits of embracing Diversity Decades of research have confirmed what many in the business world already know— that diversity makes for good business.87,88 From a purely humanistic perspective, many of us believe that there is an ethical and moral imperative to pursue a policy of inclusion rather than exclusion.89 Advocates of this viewpoint believe that it is a matter of fairness and that an inclusionary policy signals a company’s commitment to uphold the dignity of every person regardless of their circumstance.
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 376 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 10 LEADERSHIP Of CuLTuRE, ETHICS, AND DIvERSITy 377
From a legal perspective, embracing diversity is in compliance with laws that have precedent and historical foundations. From a practical perspective, shifting demograph- ics and increasing globalization have significantly changed the composition of the work- force, forcing corporations to respond or suffer economic loss. Organizations are forced to change their views and their approach to diversity to ref lect this new reality.
Regardless of the moral, legal, or practical imperative of diversity, it must also have a positive link to the “bottom line.” Many studies have examined the relationship between workforce diversity and organizational performance. There is a general acknowledgment that effective management of diversity initiatives/programs does produce positive out- comes.90,91 Diversity initiatives that succeed in the short and long term are those that have a tangible impact on shareholder, customer, and employee value. Some of the economic benefits or value that make the case for embracing diversity include the following:
1. Embracing diversity offers a company a marketing advantage. More organizations are competing for talent and customers in a tight labor market, and they recognize that demographic shifts are going to dramatically change their marketplace over the next 20 years. A diversified workforce may offer a greater understanding on how to meet the needs of diverse customers. A diversified workforce is suitable to serve a diversified market place because employees who share similar cultural traits with the customers may be able to develop better, longer-lasting customer relationships. Diversity, therefore, can enable a company to gain access in markets that others may not find easy to penetrate.
2. Companies that embrace diversity are able to recruit from a larger pool, train and retain superior performers, and maximize the benefits of a diverse workforce. When an organization has a reputation for valuing diversity, it tends to attract the best job candidates among women and other culturally diverse groups. For example, many HR recruiters have discovered that focusing on diversity in recruitment advertising helps attract more applicants from diverse backgrounds. Minority job seekers may feel more comfortable applying for employment with companies that have a proven diversity record.
3. Embracing diversity has cost implications. Organizations that wholeheartedly em- brace diversity and make everyone feel valued for their contributions can increase the job satisfaction of diverse groups, thus decreasing turnover and absenteeism and their associated costs. An organization’s commitment to not only manage but also truly value diversity can lead to positive effects on employees’ commitment and performance.92
4. Embracing diversity provides an organization with a broader and deeper base of cre- ative problem solvers and decision makers. Creative solutions to problems are more likely to be reached in diverse work groups than homogeneous groups. In diverse groups, people bring different perspectives, knowledge, information, expertise, and skills to problems—resulting in better solutions and greater innovation.93 In inno- vative companies, leaders are challenged to create organizational environments that nurture and support creative thinking and the sharing of diverse viewpoints.
5. Diverse teams have been found to outperform non-diverse teams. According to the findings of one study, cultural diversity is more positive for team performance be- cause of the aforementioned benefits of greater diverse inputs, cross-learning, and creativity.94,95
We should caution that simply responding to legislative mandates does not auto- matically result in meaningful, substantive changes in behaviors and attitudes. Rather, diversity initiatives must have top management support and commitment, have broad participation through empowerment, and require constant reinforcement.
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 377 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
378 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Left unmanaged, workforce diversity is more likely to damage morale and creativity, increase turnover, and cause communication difficulties and ultimately conf lict.96 This may occur because people generally feel more comfortable dealing with others who are like themselves. Rather than a unified team, distrust toward one another may characterize a di- verse work environment and ultimately lead to a decline in performance.97 The next section focuses on organizational practices that are characteristic of a pro-diversity culture. The kind of practices that can lower the risk of diversity initiatives turning into a dysfunction.
What leadership actions can support and sustain a pro-diversity culture? Learning Outcome
9
Creating a pro-Diversity Organizational Culture There are still reported accounts of racial and minority groups experiencing feelings of discomfort, alienation, and frustration as they try to assimilate into the workplace.98 At the executive level, there is still the persistent underrepresentation of women and other minorities among those who are seen as members of the “corporate elite.”99 For organiza- tions to embrace and value diversity, the concept itself must be embedded in the culture of the organization and led from the top.100
An organization that has a strong pro-diversity culture has a commitment to attract, retain, and promote employees of minority backgrounds and offers a system that rewards diversity initiatives throughout the organization. The best companies look beyond diver- sity compliance (with its focus on simply managing the numbers) to diversity institution- alization (with its focus on results). Saying you have a pro-diversity culture and being a diversified organization are two different things. It is the gap that exists between public diversity pronouncements and actual practices that distinguishes the two. Some organi- zations publicize compliance programs that are nothing but window dressing, symbolic gestures designed to give the appearance of satisfying regulatory, and social responsi- bility expectations without changing their practices substantively. That is why diversity proponents emphasize the importance of executive leadership and organization-wide
Factors That Support and Sustain a Pro-Diversity Culture EXHIBIT 10.5
Culture of Diversity
Organizational Policies and Practices
Training and Education
Top Management Support and Commitment
Heightened Awareness
Including Diversity as a Criterion for Measuring
Success
Remove Obstacles
Source: Based on J. A. Gilbert and J. M. Ivancevich, “Valuing Diversity: A Tale of Two Organizations,” Academy of Management Executive 14(1) (2000): 93-105.
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 378 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 10 LEADERSHIP Of CuLTuRE, ETHICS, AND DIvERSITy 379
participation.101 Exhibit 10.5 identifies key factors that can enhance and promote a strong culture of diversity.
Top Management Support and Commitment Publishing a statement that says an organization supports diversity does not guarantee success, unless it is woven into the fabric of organizational life in such a way that all em- ployees, regardless of race, creed, age, or gender, feel welcomed to be a part of the organi- zation. This is where top management support and commitment make a big difference. The commitment of the CEO and his or her executive team to diversity will filter down the organizational hierarchy, thus making diversity an institutionalized concept. Leaders who talk diversity must “walk the walk.” CEO commitment is considered to be the cor- nerstone of any successful diversity initiative. Diversity must start from the boardroom downward. The Board of directors and TMT diversity send a clear message where the organization stands on the subject. Studies have found a strong correlation between TMT diversity and firm performance.102
To achieve full diversity, leaders are challenged to institute policies that provide women, African Americans, Hispanics, and other minorities equal opportunities to move up the corporate ladder into leadership positions.103 Though slowly changing, it is still the case that top leadership positions in most of corporate America are occupied by white males, despite the growing population of women and other minorities in the workplace.104
remove Obstacles Organizations with a pro-diversity culture make every effort to remove diversity blockers or obstacles.105 Diversity blockers are company policies and practices that result in unin- tended consequences such as stereotypes and prejudices, ethnocentric beliefs, the “glass ceiling” effect, and, ultimately, an unfriendly work environment.
A stereotype is an assumption, without evidence, that people who are not part of the mainstream culture (Hispanics, African Americans, and other minorities) are inher- ently inferior, less competent at their jobs, and less suitable for leadership positions. Un- checked, stereotypes can lead to prejudice and discrimination. ethnocentrism is the belief that one’s own group or subculture is naturally superior to other groups and cultures. It is easy to see how this kind of mind-set can be an obstacle to diversity and, at its worst, lead to discrimination.
The “glass ceiling” effect is the concentration of women and minorities at the lower rungs of the corporate ladder, where their skills and talents are not fully utilized.106 The glass ceil- ing is defined as an invisible barrier that separate women and minorities from top leadership positions. The truth is that women and minorities are still vastly underrepresented in the board rooms and upper management positions.107 Despite college and graduate school en- rollments among women that exceed those of men and despite a workforce participation rate since the mid-1960s that has resulted in three-fourths of all working-age women now in the labor force, the upper echelon of most U.S. corporations is still a decidedly male bastion.108
Organizational Policies and Practices Policies express an organization’s intentions and provide a blueprint for action. One could argue that policies on diversity document the organization’s “diversity talk,” whereas practices represent the organization’s “diversity walk.” Unfortunately, it is not always the case that the two go hand in hand. We’ve all heard of the phrase “talk is cheap.” To ensure that organizations “talk the talk” and “walk the walk,” top leaders must put in place pro- diversity policies and practices. As such, policies on recruitment, hiring, training, promo- tion, compensation, and layoffs must be examined to make sure that minorities are not unfairly treated by actions taken in these areas.
WOrk Application 10-7 Identify and briefly explain which of the obstacles to diversity exist and/or have been removed where you work or have worked.
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 379 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
380 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
The work environment for many minorities can be a lonely, unfriendly, and stress- ful place, particularly at the executive level where Caucasian men outnumber women and minorities.109 Sexual harassment, intimidation, bullying, and social rejection are all examples of behavior that make the work place unfriendly. Minorities and women may be excluded from social activities in or out of the office, which often leads to feelings of alienation and despair. This in turn often leads to job dissatisfaction and high turnover among minority groups. Organizational practices such as periodic audits of recruitment, retention, compensation, performance appraisal, employee development, and promotion would ensure that diversity gains are not reversed.
Heightened Awareness Organizational communication in the form of newsletters, posters, calendars, or cof- fee mugs celebrating diversity achievements, and regular surveys of employee attitudes and opinions, are ways to heighten awareness of diversity. Repeated exposure to diversity themes would help promote the message that diversity is a normal and accepted part of everyday life in the organization.
Include Diversity as a Criterion for Measuring Success Creating a culture that supports diversity also means including diversity as a performance metric. Rewards and incentives must be tied to diversity goal metrics and progress. Or- ganizational objectives such as recruiting and promoting more minorities into manage- rial positions, developing and implementing regular diversity refresher workshops, or addressing diversity concerns in a timely manner can be tied to managerial compensa- tion by requiring that a certain percentage of the manager’s compensation be dependent on meeting these diversity targets. Not rewarding accomplishment of diversity goals could send a message that diversity is not a top management priority.
Training and Education Finally, sustaining a culture of diversity takes continuous training and education.110 New employees are oriented on the organization’s diversity culture while existing employees undergo refresher courses to keep them from backsliding into old habits.111 Diversity training can include but is not limited to activities such as:
• Role-playing, in which participants act out appropriate and inappropriate ways to deal with diverse employees
• Self-assessment activities, in which participants discover how their own hidden or overt biases influences their thinking about specific individuals and groups
• Sensitivity projects in which participants learn about others who differ from them in race, gender, culture, and so on.
Diversity training is most likely to be successful when it is not a onetime event, but an ongoing activity, and when there are follow-up activities to evaluate behavior post training.
As recommended by the AACSB, colleges and universities should incorporate multi- cultural and diversity understanding in their curriculum. Through education, students develop their knowledge of different cultures and ethnicities. They learn that diversity is a strength, not a weakness. Through education, diversity blockers like stereotypes, prej- udice, ethnocentrism, and other negative attitudes that can lead to discrimination are removed.
WOrk Application 10-8 Identify and briefly explain which of the six factors related to creating a pro-diversity culture exist or do not exist where you work or have worked.
WOrk Application 10-9 Does the organization you work or have worked for offer diversity-awareness training and education? If you are not sure, contact the human resources department to find out. If it does, briefly describe the program.
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 380 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 10 LEADERSHIP Of CuLTuRE, ETHICS, AND DIvERSITy 381
YOU Make the ethICaL Call
10.3 Gender Discrimination
On June 20, 2011, the Supreme Cour t ruled that a class action lawsuit filed against Walmar t could not go forward. The majority opinion said that each case was different from the other, casting doubt on the claim that it was an intentional company-wide pol- icy to discriminate against women.112 Therefore, the case did not meet the standard for a class action lawsuit. The plaintiffs can still pursue the case but on an individual basis. Walmar t had been accused of denying women workers equal pay and oppor tunities for promotion. The suit claimed that even if Walmar t policies were not clearly discriminatory, its organizational culture perpetuated gender stereotypes that lead to differences in pay and promotion between men and women. It is estimated that up to 1.6 million women had join the class action suit. Walmar t strongly disagreed with the lower cour t’s decision to proceed with a class action lawsuit and appealed to the Supreme Cour t. Since the lawsuit was filed, Walmar t’s CEO Lee Scott has initiated workplace-diversity moves to achieve full diversity. Walmar t hired a director of diversity and set diversity targets, and ex- ecutive bonuses are cut if the company doesn’t meet the objectives. Walmar t now posts management openings on its company-wide computer network.
1. Do you believe that organizational culture can lead to discrimination? Why or why not?
2. Do you agree with the Supreme Cour t ruling?
3. What’s your opinion of Walmar t’s actions on diversity after the lawsuit was filed? Do you believe Walmar t would have initiated the changes without the lawsuit?
Factors That Support and Sustain a Pro-Diversity Culture Match each statement to one of the factors below. These are factors that show the extent to which an organization’s policies and practices support a pro-diversity culture. Write the appropriate letter in the blank before each item. a. Top Management Support and Commitment b. Remove Obstacles c. Organizational Policies and Practices d. Heightened Awareness e. Diversity as a Criterion for Measuring Success f. Training and Education
15. Using newsletters, posters calendars, and conducting regular surveys of employee attitudes and opinions on diversity issues is part of which factor?
16. Making sure that hiring, training, promotion, compensation, and retirement or layoffs decisions don’t unfairly affect minorities is an example of which factor?
17. Taking action to prevent behaviors or practices that can result in an unfriendly work environment are part of which factor?
18. A company-wide mind-set that views diversity as a strategic imperative to the organization’s success refers to which factor?
19. Though many factors are involved, this particular factor is considered to be the cornerstone of any successful diversity initiative.
20. Using diversity metrics as part of leadership performance evaluations is associated with which factor?
CONCept APPLICATION 10-3
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 381 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
382 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
the effects of Globalization on Diversity Leadership Corporations are becoming more global and hence more ethnically diverse. Globalization has led firms to originate, produce, and market their products and services worldwide. A global labor market is emerging, dominated by Brazil, Russia, India, and China (“BRIC” countries). U.S.-based companies such as Pepsi-Cola, Coca-Cola, Procter & Gamble, and many others have established a significant presence in China and India, partly motivated by cheap labor and a sizable consumer market. They face competition from European companies such as Daimler-Benz, Nestlé of Switzerland, Canada’s Northern Telecom, and many others with a significant presence in the United States. These corporations have to deal with a diverse cross-cultural workforce, customers, competitors, suppliers, and financial institutions. The formation of regional trading blocks like NAFTA or the EU are one way to overcome the growing threat of nationalism—the tendency to want to purchase products from one’s own country rather than a foreign country.113
In this global environment, understanding cultural differences and learning to deal effectively with partners from different cultures will be critical. This may partially ex- plain why the number of foreign-born managers being appointed to lead U.S. companies is increasing. More and more, multinational companies are recruiting and hiring leaders who have multicultural experiences.114
6. What is avon’s stance on diversity?
Avon embraces diversity in the workforce and continues to be a leader in taking affirmative action to ensure that doors are open to talented individuals, and that all associates and employees have opportunities for development and advance- ment. Avon has more women in management positions than any other For tune 500 company, and half of its board of directors is women. In the United States and elsewhere, Avon has internal networks of associates, including a Parents’ Network, a Hispanic Network, a Black Professional Association, an Asian network, and a Gay and Lesbian network. The networks act as liaisons between associates and management, to bring voice to critical issues that impact the workplace and the marketplace.
OPENING CASE Application
Now that you have learned about culture and diversity as described in this chapter, you may find it interesting to see how your own personality traits match up. Complete Self-Assessment 10-2.
personality, Culture, Values, and DiversitySELF-ASSESSMENT 10-2
Culture and Values If you scored high on the Big Five personality dimension of conscientiousness (high need for achievement), you tend to be a conformist and will most likely feel comfortable in an organization with a strong culture. If you have a high agreeableness (high need for affiliation) personality, you tend to get along well with people, can fit into a strong culture, and would do well in a cooperative culture that values collectivism, low power distance, and femininity. If you have surgency (high need for power), you like to dominate and may not like to fit into a strong culture that does not reflect the values you have. You would tend to do well in a competitive culture that values individualism, high-power distance (if you have it), and masculinity.
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 382 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 10 LEADERSHIP Of CuLTuRE, ETHICS, AND DIvERSITy 383
On the Big Five, if you are open to new experiences you will do well in an adaptive culture that values low-uncer tainty-avoidance, whereas if you are closed to new experiences, you will tend to do well in a bureaucratic culture that values high-uncertainty-avoidance. Would you like to work in an organization with a weak or strong culture? What type of culture and values interest you?
Diversity If you have a Big Five agreeableness personality type (high need for affiliation), are open to experience, and are well adjusted, you will tend to embrace diversity and get along well with people who are different from you. However, if you have a surgency personality type (high need for power), are closed to experience, and are not well adjusted, you will tend to want to have things done your way and may have problems with a diverse group of people who don’t want to give you the power. If you have a conscientiousness personality type (high need for achievement), are well adjusted, and have openness to experience, you will tend to work with those who share your achievement values regardless of other differences. Do you enjoy working with a diversity of people?
Chapter Summary
The chapter summary is organized to answer the nine learning outcomes for Chapter 10.
1 explain the power of culture to an organization’s effectiveness, both internally and externally.
An organization’s culture determines the way that it re- sponds to changes in its external and internal environ- ments. The two important functions served by culture are directly tied to this concept: (1) that culture creates internal unity and (2) that culture helps the organization adapt to the external environment. Culture provides a value system in which to operate, and when all employ- ees buy into such a value system, there is internal unity. Culture determines how the organization responds to changes in its external environment.
2 Describe the characteristics of strong versus weak cultures.
When there is little or no consensus on a set of values and norms governing member behavior, we describe it as a low-performing or weak cultures. Strong cultures are ones in which core values are widely shared across the organization, from top management to rank-and-file
employees. The characteristics of low-performance cul- tures include insular thinking, resistance to change, a highly politicized internal environment, and poorly con- ceived promotion or advancement practices for employ- ees. The characteristics of high-performance cultures include a reputation for valuing their employees, being very results-oriented, and constantly pushing for out- standing performance and excellence.
3 Distinguish between symbolic and substantive leadership actions for shaping organizational culture.
Leaders can initiate many different types of policies, programs, and practices to change, modify, or sustain an organization’s culture. Some of these actions are sub- stantive, whereas others are simply symbolic; yet taken together, they can shape the culture of an organization according to the expectations of the leader. Substantive actions are explicit and highly visible and are indicative of management’s commitment to a particular way of doing things. Symbolic actions are valuable for the signals they send about the kinds of behavior and expectations lead- ers wish to encourage and promote.
“Take It To The Net”. Access student resources at www.cengagebrain.com. Search for Lussier, Leadership 6e to find student study tools.
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 383 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
384 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
4 Identify and briefly describe the four types of culture commonly found in organizations.
The cooperative culture emphasizes teamwork amongst its employees. Collaboration is seen as critical to achiev- ing organizational goals. The belief is that empowering, respecting, rewarding, and trusting employees is the key to capitalizing on external opportunities. The adap- tive and cooperative cultures are often referred to as cultures of innovation, for their flexibility and creativ- ity in responding to environmental changes. Competitive cultures are common in mature markets in which the emphasis is on the achievement of specific targets (such as market share, revenue growth, and profitability). The bureaucratic culture emphasizes strict adherence to set rules, procedures, and authority lines. Organizations with bureaucratic cultures are highly structured and efficiency driven. Change is slow in bureaucratic cultures.
5 Describe hofstede’s theory on national culture identities.
The conceptual framework for understanding global cul- tural differences proposes that national cultures differ by the values they espouse. Researchers have associated different value dimensions with the cultures of different nationalities and/or regions of the world. Leading this effort is the work of Geert Hofstede, whose research identified five value dimensions for understanding global cultural differences. Each value dimension represents a continuum of two opposite ends. The five value dimen- sions making up the framework are the following: a. Individualism–collectivism b. High–low uncertainty avoidance c. High–low power distance d. Long-term–short-term orientation e. Masculinity–femininity
6 Identify organizational practices that do foster an ethical work environment.
Organizational practices that can promote an ethical work environment include the following: a jointly de- veloped code of ethics that everyone is well informed of its contents, creating ethics committees to oversee and process ethical violations, making ethical training part of employee development programs, and ensuring
that there are available and safe disclosure mechanisms such as a whistle-blowing program for reporting ethical violations.
7 explain how authentic leadership has its roots in moral and ethical theory of leadership.
Authenticity is a psychological construct that focuses on knowing, accepting, and acting in accordance with one’s core values, beliefs, emotions, and preferences. The au- thentic leader holds him-or herself to a higher moral standard. Authentic leadership theory has an introspec- tive quality that allows leaders to reflect on whether their actions are consistent with who they are, ensuring that their values and ethics take precedence over exter- nal pressures and not vice versa. The authentic leader is driven by a value system that calls for being moral and focusing on what is ethical or the right thing to do.
8 explain the benefits of embracing diversity.
The value of diversity is evident in studies that have found, among other things, that a diversified workforce offers an advantage in understanding and meeting the needs of diverse customers; some of the best job candi- dates are found among women and other culturally di- verse groups; embracing and valuing diversity can lower an organization’s cost attributed to high turnover and/or absenteeism among minority groups; and diverse work groups are more creative and innovative than homoge- neous work groups.
9 What leadership actions can support and sustain a pro-diversity culture?
An organization that has a strong culture of diversity has a commitment to attract, retain, and promote employ- ees of minority backgrounds and a system that rewards diversity initiatives throughout the organization. The best companies look beyond diversity compliance (with its focus on simply managing the numbers) to diversity institutionalization (with its focus on results). Some of the factors that promote a culture of diversity include top management support and commitment, removing obstacles, including diversity as a criterion for assessing and rewarding managerial performance, organizational awareness, organizational practices and policies, and reg- ular training and education on diversity.
Key terms
adaptive culture, 367
bureaucratic culture, 368
collectivism, 369
culture, 359
competitive culture, 367
cooperative culture, 367
diversity, 375
ethics, 371
ethics ombudsperson, 373
ethnocentrism, 379
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 384 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 10 LEADERSHIP Of CuLTuRE, ETHICS, AND DIvERSITy 385 Chapter 10 LEADERSHIP Of CuLTuRE, ETHICS, AND DIvERSITy 385
femininity, 370
glass ceiling, 379
high-power-distance culture, 370
high-uncer tainty-avoidance culture, 370
individualism, 369
long-term orientation, 370
low-power-distance culture, 370
low-uncer tainty-avoidance culture, 370
masculinity, 370
shor t-term orientation, 370
strong culture, 362
weak culture, 362
whistle-blowing, 373
review Questions 1 What are the similarities and differences between the co-
operative culture and the adaptive culture?
2 How does a code of ethics help enforce ethical behavior in an organization?
3 What potential problems could develop in a case in which a leader is from a high-power-distance culture, but his fol- lowers are from a low-power-distance culture?
4 Describe the personality profile of an authentic leader.
5 What are the major obstacles often encountered in trying to achieve diversity?
The following critical-thinking questions can be used for class dis- cussion and/or as written assignments to develop communica- tion skills. Be sure to give complete explanations for all questions.
1 Based on your knowledge of the Enron case (Google it), what par t did culture play in its actions and ultimate demise?
2 Describe some of the practices, policies, and norms that you would expect to find in an organization that prides itself on building a culture of respect and trust.
3 Describe the different generations that make up what some people are now referring to as “generational
diversity” and identify their unique characteristics. What are the implications of generational diversity on effective leadership?
4 Despite the benefits of diversity, some have described it as a “double-edged sword.” Explain why.
5 What is the difference between diversity compliance and diversity institutionalization?
6 In your opinion, what would be some strategies for devel- oping a diversity sensitive orientation (DSO)?
Critical-thinking Questions
C A S E
Mary Barra—New CEO of General Motors
On Januar y 15, 2014, Mar y Barra became the chief executive officer (CEO) of General Motors, the first female CEO of a major global automaker. She is also a member of the GM board of directors. Commenting on her appointment, Hillary Clinton, former secretary of state, said, “I guess you could say she broke through the steel ceiling, not the glass ceiling.”
Ms. Barra is not new to GM. She is an engineer who rose through the ranks, ser ving in a wide variety of jobs, including plant manager and vice president roles in manu- facturing, engineering, human resources, and new product development. She has been with GM since 1980, when she first came as an intern. She is seen as someone with great smar t skills, and toughness. Barra represents the
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 385 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
386 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
new face of GM and an end to old thinking about the car maker.
Asked to describe her management style, CEO Barra an- swered with one word, “collaborative.” She is a strong believer in the power of teamwork. “We come together as a team,” she said. “Putting a car, truck or crossover on the road is a team spor t, and I just view myself as par t of the team.” Given the tough decisions that have to be made on GM’s direction and strategies, Barra says she welcomes the constructive ten- sion that comes with vigorous debates. “I try to create an en- vironment where people feel they could voice their concerns and that we can get the best ideas on the table and then make the right decision. But at the end of the day, when the decision has to be made, if we don’t have complete unanimity, I have no qualms about making it. But I want that tension in a construc- tive way to make sure we evaluate things from every angle.”
Barra inherits a company that is much stronger in many ways but still with significant weaknesses. GM’s losses in Europe continue to mount (though they may have leveled off) as it fights to hold on to its gains in China against a resurgent Volkswagen. GM has to reestablish itself as a technology leader after losing more than a billion dollars on the failed Chevrolet Volt. Just about all the exper ts or analysts believe that she is highly qualified to deal with these issues. She proved herself in the restructuring of Europe’s Opel. Her engineering back- ground and ability to get involved will allow her to efficiently super vise the rebuilding of GM’s product por tfolio. And her earlier appointment as head of human resources gives her rare and valuable insights into GM’s still-evolving employee culture.
Some say her biggest challenge will be to win over surviv- ing GM traditionalists, those who either wanted her job or wanted someone from the old-boy network to get the job. Ms. Barra says she will know she has become successful when people stop referring to her as a “car girl” and just call her “boss.” Under her leadership, GM is striving to become the global industr y leader in automobile design and technology, product quality, customer service, and profitability. Her goal is to make sure that GM is profitable and “wins” in ever y seg- ment of the market where it competes.
Barra credits her parents for instilling core values about in- tegrity and the impor tance of hard work; values that she has taken with her to every job she has ever held. On being a role model for aspiring young women, she said if by being a woman CEO, she can encourage young women who like math and sci- ence to not shy away from it, and to pursue technical careers, she has no hesitation doing that. 115
G O t O t h e I N t e r N e t : To learn more about CEO Mary Barra, visit the official Web site of General Motors at http://www.gm.com.
Support your answers to the following questions with spe- cific information from the case and text or with information you get from the Web or another source.
1. In your opinion, what culture type is CEO Barra bringing to GM? Support your answer with evidence from the case.
2. In what ways has GM’s governing board shown that it embraces and suppor ts diversity?
3. What is the evidence in the case to suppor t the asser- tion that CEO Barra exemplifies the principles of au- thentic leadership?
4. What are some the factors in Mary Barra’s life that have influenced her values?
C U M U L a t I V e C a S e Q U e S t I O N S
5. Based on what you know so far of Mary Barra, describe the quality of the exchange relationship (Chapter 7) she would most likely have with her followers. Explain your answer.
6. In Chapter 8, we discussed how organizational climate can influence team creativity and the role of top lead- ers in creating such a climate. Is Mary Barra the kind of CEO that can make this happen at GM? Suppor t your answer.
7. Transformational versus transactional leadership de- scribes two leadership styles commonly associated with senior leaders of corporations (Chapter 9). Which of these leadership types is more representative of Mar y Barra? Suppor t your answer.
C a S e e X e r C I S e a N D r O L e - p L a Y
Preparation: Put yourself in CEO Barra’s position. Since the announcement that she was GM’s new CEO, she has been featured in media outlets across the globe and bombarded by reporters, photographers, and TV crews on her reaction to being the first female to lead a major automaker. She wants to craft a short and insightful statement that she can give every time the question is asked so she can move on to other things. Prepare the exact wording of such a statement.
In-Class Groups: Break into groups of four to six members to share ideas and develop the response.
Role-Play: One student (representing themselves or their group) may give the response to the entire class, with the class acting like members of the media.
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 386 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 10 LEADERSHIP Of CuLTuRE, ETHICS, AND DIvERSITy 387
Imagine tr ying to manage and accommodate the needs of more than 185,000 people at once. Imagine a variety of voices, languages, cultures, ethnic backgrounds, families, life- styles, ages, and geographies all vying for attention, all bearing the name PepsiCo. From the top down, PepsiCo embraces diversity and inclusion in its worldwide workforce. Top execu- tives believe that nurturing diversity in the organization is not only a matter of responsible ethics but also good business. The Frito-Lay North American Diversity/Inclusion Model is a good example of how PepsiCo builds a measurable framework for
diversity. The model addresses five key areas, ranging from “evolving the culture” to “leveraging our people systems.” By following a structure, the human resources depar tment and other managers can develop and implement specific programs to meet the needs of their employees.
1. Why is it impor tant for upper-level manager s at PepsiCo to receive diversity and inclusion training?
2. Do you think that PepsiCo’s encour agement of employee networks actually works against diversity and the formation of multicultural teams? Why or why not?
v I D E O C A S E
Diversity at PepsiCo
Identifying and Improving Organizational Culture
preparing for this exercise
1 Select one organization you work for or have worked for. Identify its culture by providing your responses to the following Work Applications (WA) in the text: WA 1 (is it a high- or low-performance culture?), WA 2 (which of the leadership actions for shaping culture are used?), WA 3 (which of the four types of organizational cultures does it have?), and WA 4 (Which of the five value dimensions of national culture does it reveal?). For Work Application 4, your answer can be between the two poles (on each of the five dimensions); however, try to identify which end of the spectrum the culture is closest to.
2 What are the mission and values of the organization? Does the culture support the mission and values of the
organization? Explain why or why not. If the organization does not have a clearly written mission and values state- ment, that would be a good starting point.
3 Based on the organization’s mission and values, how can the culture be improved? Be specific.
Doing this exercise in Class
Objective
To improve your ability to identify and improve an organization’s culture to support its mission and values
aaCSB General Skills area
The primary AACSB learning standard skill developed through this exercise is global and multicultural trends, diversity, and ethics.
preparation
You should have completed the preparation for this exercise.
procedure (10–45 minutes)
a The instructor calls on students to give their answers to the preparation, with or without a class discussion.
B Break into groups of four to six and share your answers to the preparation.
C Same as B, but select one group member to present their answer to the entire class.
Conclusion
The instructor may lead a class discussion and/or make conclud- ing remarks.
apply It (2–4 minutes) What did I learn from this exercise? When will I implement my plan?
Sharing
In the group, or to the entire class, volunteers may give their answers to the “Apply It” questions.
10-1Developing your Leadership Skills
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 387 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
388 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Diversity Training
preparing for this exercise In preparation for the in-class exercise, write out the answers to the following questions.
race and ethnicity
1. I am of race and ethnicity(ies).
2. My name is . It is significant because it means and/or I was named after .
3. One positive thing about being this race/ethnicity is .
4. One difficult or challenging thing is .
religion
1. I am of religion/nonreligious/atheist.
2. One positive thing about it is .
3. One difficult or challenging thing about it is .
Gender
1. I am of gender.
2. One positive thing about being this gender is .
3. One difficult or challenging thing is .
4. Men and women are primarily different in because .
age
1. I am years old.
2. One positive thing about this age is .
3. One difficult or embarrassing thing about being this age is and on the job. I do/don’t have a disability.
ability
1. I am of (high, medium, low) ability in college and on the job. I do/don’t have a disability.
2. One positive thing about being of this ability is .
3. One difficult or challenging thing about being of this ability is .
Other
1. The major other way(s) in which I’m different than other people is .
2. One positive thing about being different in this way is .
3. One difficult or challenging thing about being different in this way is .
prejudice, Stereotypes, Discrimination Identify how you have been prejudged, stereotyped, and dis- criminated against.
Doing this exercise in Class
Objective
To increase your understanding of the value of diversity and being different. The more you value diversity, the more effort you will place on developing good human relations with a diversity of people.
The primary AACSB learning standard skill developed through this exercise is global and multicultural trends, diversity, and ethics.
preparation
You should have answered the preparation questions for this exercise.
procedure 1 (2–3 minutes) Break into groups of four to six with as much diversity as possible. The instructor will check the diversity levels and reassign people to groups to improve diversity, if necessary. Select a spokesperson to give the group’s best one or two answers to the “Prejudice, Stereotype, Discrimination” question; it is not necessary to repor t on any other areas.
procedure 2 (10–30 minutes) The instructor sets a time limit
procedure 3 (5–20 minutes) The spokesperson from each group gives the one or two best examples of prejudice, stereo- types, and discrimination.
Conclusion
The instructor may lead a class discussion and/or make conclud- ing remarks.
apply It (2–4 minutes) What did I learn from this experience? How will I use this knowledge in the future? More specifically, what will I do differently to personally embrace diversity? How will I encourage others to embrace diversity?
Sharing
In the group, or to the entire class, volunteers may give their answers to the “Apply It” questions.
10-2Developing your Leadership Skills
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 388 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 10 LEADERSHIP Of CuLTuRE, ETHICS, AND DIvERSITy 389
Developing an Effective Multicultural Team
preparing for this exercise Assume you are part of a team and your task is to develop a brand new product called the Mind Reader 2010. It will make it possible for you to tell what someone is thinking by simply focusing the device in their direction. There is currently no product or substitute like it on the market—but time is of the essence and this product has to be on the market within a very short time; otherwise, other competing groups will beat you to it. You are a multicultural team with members from the follow- ing countries: the United States, Japan, Argentina, Mexico, and Sweden. As discussed in the text section (pp. 369), “National Culture Identities—Hofstede’s Value Dimensions,” researchers have found key dimensions that explain broad cultural differ- ences among selected nationalities. The following table (see below) summarizes the value dimensions of five countries from which team members are to be selected.
Doing this exercise in Class
Objective
To learn how to deal with the different values, norms, and attitudes that characterize different cultures. Leaders have to recognize that cultural differences can lead to conflicts in multi- cultural team settings, and finding common ground where value differences exist is key to effective teamwork.
The primary AACSB learning standard skills developed through this exercise are teamwork and global and multicultural trends, diversity, and ethics.
preparation
Read and understand the meaning of each value dimension in Exhibit 10.4 on page 369. Review the table in this exercise for the particular value dimensions of each country.
procedure 1 (3–5 minutes) Break up into groups of four to six with as much diversity as possible. The instructor will check to ensure that each group is well diversified and reassign students to groups needing more diversity, if possible. Select a leader who will present the findings of the group’s deliberations.
procedure 2 (10–20 minutes) The instructor sets a time limit on the deliberations. If quality, teamwork, and speed are criti- cal to successfully completing this project, what adaptations in behavior would your group have to make, given the different countries your group members are from? Be mindful of the values associated with each country and team member. For example, somebody from an individualistic culture or a high- uncer tainty avoidance culture may have difficulty working as par t of a team or working with people who are comfor table with and accepting of the unknown, and who tolerate risk and unpredictability. What ideas does the group have to help this individual adapt to the needs of the team to finish the project on time? Other potential areas of conflict exist. Identify them based on the composition of your team, and deliberate on pos- sible solutions, keeping the objective in mind.
procedure 3 (15–20 minutes) The leader from each group presents the potential conflicts introduced by the differences
10-3Developing your Leadership Skills
Country Fe m
in in
it y
Time Orientation
In di
vi du
al is
m
C ol
le ct
iv is
m
Uncertainty Avoidance
Power Distance
Lo ng
T er
m
Sh or
t T er
m
H ig
h
Lo w
H ig
h
Lo w
United States X X
Japan X X X X
Argentina X
Mexico X X
Sweden X X X
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 389 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
390 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
in the value dimensions of team members and the team’s solutions for dealing with such conflicts to achieve the desired objectives.
Conclusion
The instructor may lead a class discussion and/or make conclud- ing remarks.
apply It (2–4 minutes)
What did I learn from this experience? How will I use this knowledge in the future?
apply It (2–4 minutes)
What did I learn from this experience? How will I use this knowledge in the future?
Sharing
In the group, or to the entire class, volunteers may give their answers to the “Apply It” questions.
endnotes
1 G. Jenna, “New Avon CEO Vows to Restore the 126-Year- Old Beauty Company to Former Glory.” Forbes (February 27, 2013); www.avon.com; http://dealbook.nytimes .com/2012/04/09/avon-appoints-new-chief-executive/?_ php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0
2 A. Mushtaq, F. Ahmad, and A. Tanveer, “Organizational Culture in Hotel Industry: Perceptions and Preferences among Staff.” Advances in Management 6(5): 55–60.
3 C. Panico, “Naked Leadership: Lead to Win Hearts and Minds,” Business & Professional Ethics Journal 32(3/4) (2013, September): 259– 270.
4 J. Gehman, L. Treviño, and R. Garud, “Values Work: A Process Study of the Emergence and Performance of Organizational Values Practices,” Academy Of Management Journal 56(1) (2013, February): 84–112.
5 C. Chih-Chung and Y. Baiyin, “Structure and Mechanism of Organizational Cultural Identification in a Chinese Business Context,” Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal 41(8) (2013, September): 1347–1358.
6 H. Bourne and M. Jenkins, “Organizational Values: A Dynamic Perspective,” Organization Studies (01708406) 34(4) (2013, April): 495–514.
7 E. H. Schein, (2004). Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd ed. (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2004).
8 C. Chih-Chung and Y. Baiyin, “Structure and Mechanism of Organizational Cultural Identification in a Chinese Business
Context,” Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal 41(8) (2013, September): 1347–1358.
9 Q. Hu, T. Dinev, P. Hart, D. Cooke, Decision Sciences 43 (4) (2012, August): 615–660.
10 A. Molinsky, “The Psychological Processes of Cultural Retooling,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 56(3) (2013, June): 683–710.
11 A. Molinsky, “The Psychological Processes of Cultural Retooling,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 56(3) (2013, June): 683–710.
12 S. Dolan and Y. Bao, “Sharing the Culture: Embedding Storytelling and Ethics in the Culture Change Management Process,” Journal of Management & Change 29(1) (2012, June): 10–23.
13 E. Schien, Organizational Culture and Leadership, 2nd ed. (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1992).
14 G. Sharoni, A. Tziner, E. C. Fein, T. Shultz, K. Shaul, and L. Zilberman, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 42 (Supplement) (2012, December): pE267–E294.
15 V. Cristian-Liviu, “Organizational Culture and Strategy. How Does It Work? An Empirical Research,” Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Science Series 22(1) (2013, July): 1690–1696.
16 P. Duncan, M. Green, and R. Herrera, “Culture Predicting Leadership,” Business Studies Journal 4 (2012, January 2): 71–84.
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 390 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
17 A. Canato, D. Ravasi, and N. Phillips, “Coerced Practice Implementation in Cases of Low Cultural Fit: Cultural Change and Practice Adaptation during the Implementation of Six Sigma at 3M,” Academy of Management Journal 56(6) (2013, December): 1724–1753.
18 A. Canato, D. Ravasi, and N. Phillips, “Coerced Practice Implementation in Cases of Low Cultural Fit: Cultural Change and Practice Adaptation during the Implementation of Six Sigma at 3M,” Academy of Management Journal 56(6) (2013, December): 1724–1753.
19 S. Ramakrishnan, “Vital Missing Link in Organizational Transformation,” Industrial Management 55(1) (2013, January): 8–9.
20 J. Gimenez-Espin, D. Jiménez-Jiménez, and M. Martínez- Costa, “Organizational Culture for Total Quality Management,” Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 24(5/6) (2013, June): 678–692.
21 Sudarmo, “Influence Business Principles, Organizational Culture, Fundamental Safe Work Practices, Operational Excellence Expectations, and Corporate Commitment to the Tenets of Corporate Operations and Corporate Performance Oil and Gas Chevron Indonesia,” Journal of Accounting, Business & Management 20(1) (2013, April): 71–90.
22 I. Cho, J. K. Kim, C. Park, N.-H. Cho, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 24(7/8) (2013, August): 753–768.
23 E. Berman, M. Sabharwal, R. Gomes, et al., “The Impact of Societal Culture on the Use of Performance Strategies in East Asia: Evidence from a Comparative Survey,” Public Management Review 15(8) (2013, November): 1065–1089.
24 “Build a Confident Employee Culture,” Marketing Health Services 32(1) (2012, winter): 28–29.
25 P. Ruiz-Palomino and R. Martínez-Cañas, “Ethical Culture, Ethical Intent, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior : The Moderating and Mediating Role of Person-Organization Fit,” Journal of Business Ethics 120(1) (2014, March): 95–108.
26 A. Canato, D. Ravasi, and N. Phillips, “Coerced Practice Implementation in Cases of Low Cultural Fit: Cultural Change and Practice Adaptation during the Implementation of Six Sigma at 3M,” Academy of Management Journal 56(6) (2013, December): 1724–1753.
27 K. Jin, R. Drozdenko, and S. DeLoughy, “The Role of Corporate Value Clusters in Ethics, Social Responsibility, and Performance: A Study of Financial Professionals and Implications for the Financial Meltdown,” Journal of Business Ethics 112(1) (2013, January): 15–24.
28 A. Mushtaq, F. Ahmad, and A. Tanveer, “Organizational Culture in Hotel Industry: Perceptions and Preferences among Staff.” Advances in Management 6(5): 55–60.
29 A. Canato, D. Ravasi, and N. Phillips, “Coerced Practice Implementation in Cases of Low Cultural Fit: Cultural Change and Practice Adaptation during the Implementation of Six Sigma at 3M,” Academy of Management Journal 56(6) (2013, December): 1724–1753.
30 M. V. Davis, E. Mahanna, B. Joly, M. Zelek, W. Riley, P. Verma, and J. Solomon Fisher, American Journal of Public Health 104(1) (2014, January): e98–e104.
31 M. V. Davis, E. Mahanna, B. Joly, M. Zelek, W. Riley, P. Verma, and J. Solomon Fisher, American Journal of Public Health 104(1) (2014, January): e98–e104.
32 H. Darvish and E. A. Nazari, Economic Insights—Trends & Challenges 65(1) (2013): 1–16.
33 K. Jin, R. Drozdenko, and S. DeLoughy, “The Role of Corporate Value Clusters in Ethics, Social Responsibility, and Performance: A Study of Financial Professionals and Implications for the Financial Meltdown,” Journal of Business Ethics 112(1) (2013, January): 15–24.
34 R. Scotney, “Good Leadership: Where Do We Begin?” Human Resources Magazine 17(4) (2012, October): 14–15.
35 E. H. Schein, (2004). Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd ed. (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2004).
36 J. Gehman, L. Treviño, and R. Garud, “Values Work: A Process Study of the Emergence and Performance of Organizational Values Practices,” Academy Of Management Journal 56(1) (2013, February): 84–112.
37 J. Kottke and K. Pelletier, “Measuring and Differentiating Perceptions of Supervisor and Top Leader Ethics,” Journal of Business Ethics 113(3) (2013, March 11): 415–428.
38 J. Kottke and K. Pelletier, “Measuring and Differentiating Perceptions of Supervisor and Top Leader Ethics,” Journal of Business Ethics 113(3) (2013, March 11): 415–428.
39 J. Gimenez-Espin, D. Jiménez-Jiménez, and M. Martínez- Costa, “Organizational Culture for Total Quality Management,” Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 24(5/6) (2013, June): 678–692.
40 J. Gimenez-Espin, D. Jiménez-Jiménez, and M. Martínez- Costa, “Organizational Culture for Total Quality Management,” Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 24(5/6) (2013, June): 678–692.
41 P. Yu-Shu, D. Altan-Uya, and C. Hsiang Lin, “National Culture and Firm’s CSR Engagement: A Cross-Nation Study,” Journal of Marketing & Management 5(1) (2014, May): 38–49.
Chapter 10 LEADERSHIP Of CuLTuRE, ETHICS, AND DIvERSITy 391
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 391 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
392 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
42 D. Rottig and A. Rubens, “A Conceptual Model of Strategic Leadership and Employee Perception of Inequity,” Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings (2012, January): 1.
43 G. Hofstede, “Cultural Constraints in Management Theories,” Academy of Management Executive 7(1) (February, 1993): 81–94.
44 http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/2013standards/
45 L. Pinto, C. Cabral-Cardoso, and W. Werther, “Why Solidarity Matters (and Sociability Doesn’t): The Effects of Perceived Organizational Culture on Expatriation Adjustment,” Thunderbird International Business Review 53(3) (2011): 377–389.
46 J. Schaubroeck, S. Hannah, and A. Peng, et al., “Embedding Ethical Leadership within and across Organization Levels,” Academy of Management Journal 55(5) (2012, October): 1053–1078.
47 M. Pitesa and S. Thau, “Compliant Sinners, Obstinate Saints: How Power and Self-Focus Determine the Effectiveness of Social Influences in Ethical Decision Making,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 56(3) (2013, June): 635–658.
48 M. Huhtala, T. Feldt, K. Hyvönen, and S. Mauno, “Ethical Organisational Culture as a Context for Managers’ Personal Work Goals,” Journal of Business Ethics 114(2) (2013, May): 265–282.
49 N. McClaren, “The Personal Selling and Sales Management Ethics Research: Managerial Implications and Research Directions from a Comprehensive Review of the Empirical Literature,” Journal of Business Ethics 112(1) (2013, January): 101–125.
50 C. Matherne, III and S. Litchfield, “Investigating the Relationship between Affective Commitment and Unethical Pro- Organizational Behaviors: The Role of Moral Identity,” Journal of Leadership, Accountability & Ethics 9(5) (2012, November): 35–46.
51 R. Jackson, C. Wood, and J. Zboja, “The Dissolution of Ethical Decision-Making in Organizations: A Comprehensive Review and Model,” Journal of Business Ethics 116(2) (2013, August 5): 233–250.
52 J. Schaubroeck, S. Hannah, and A. Peng, et al., “Embedding Ethical Leadership within and across Organization Levels,” Academy of Management Journal 55(5) (2012, October): 1053–1078.
53 H. Baird, “A Word from the President,” Financial Management (14719185) (2012, May): 3.
54 J. Schaubroeck, S. Hannah, and A. Peng, et al., “Embedding Ethical Leadership within and across Organization Levels,”
Academy of Management Journal 55(5) (2012, October): 1053–1078.
55 M. Huhtala, T. Feldt, K. Hyvönen, and S. Mauno, “Ethical Organisational Culture as a Context for Managers’ Personal Work Goals,” Journal of Business Ethics 114(2) (2013, May): 265–282.
56 M. Painter-Morland, “The Relationship between Identity Crises and Crises of Control,” Journal of Business Ethics 114(1) (2013, April 8): 1–14.
57 H. Baird, “A Word from the President,” Financial Management (14719185) (2012, May): 3.
58 C. Jurkiewicz, “Developing a Multicultural Organizational Code of Ethics Rooted in the Moral Obligations of Citizenr y,” Public Organization Review 12(3) (2012, September): 243–249.
59 B. Bayley, “Organizational Ethics Training,” Journal for Quality & Participation 35(2) (2012, July): 15–19.
60 K. Loyens, “Towards a Custom-Made Whistle Blowing Policy. Using Grid-Group Cultural Theory to Match Policy Measures to Different Styles of Peer Reporting,” Journal of Business Ethics 114(2) (2013, May): 239–249.
61 E. Byron, “Avon Bribe Investigation Widens,” Wall Street Journal (Thursday, May 5, 2011).
62 C. Panico, “Naked Leadership: Lead to Win Hearts and Minds,” Business & Professional Ethics Journal 32(3/4) (2013, September): 259–270.
63 C. Peus, J. Wesche, B. Streicher, S. Braun, and D. Frey, “Authentic Leadership: An Empirical Test of Its Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Mechanisms,” Journal of Business Ethics 107(3) (2012, May 15): 331–348.
64 J. Schaubroeck, A, Chunyan Peng, and S. Hannah, “Developing Trust with Peers and Leaders: Impacts on Organizational Identification and Performance during Entry,” Academy of Management Journal 56(4) (2013, August): 1148–1168.
65 C. Peus, J. Wesche, B. Streicher, S. Braun, and D. Frey, “Authentic Leadership: An Empirical Test of Its Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Mechanisms,” Journal of Business Ethics 107(3) (2012, May 15): 331–348.
66 C. Caldwell, R. Dixon, L. Floyd, J. Chaudoin, J. Post, and G. Cheokas, “Transformative Leadership: Achieving Unparalleled Excellence,” Journal of Business Ethics 109(2) (2012, August 20): 175–187.
67 C. Caldwell, R. Dixon, L. Floyd, J. Chaudoin, J. Post, and G. Cheokas, “Transformative Leadership: Achieving Unparalleled Excellence,” Journal of Business Ethics 109(2) (2012, August 20): 175–187.
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 392 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 10 LEADERSHIP Of CuLTuRE, ETHICS, AND DIvERSITy 393
68 M. Pitesa, and S. Thau, “Compliant Sinners, Obstinate Saints: How Power and Self-Focus Determine the Effectiveness of Social Influences in Ethical Decision Making,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 56(3) (2013, June): 635–658.
69 S. Peterson, F. Walumbwa, B. Avolio, and S. Hannah, “The Relationship between Authentic Leadership and Follower Job Performance: The Mediating Role of Follower Positivity in Extreme Contexts,” Leadership Quarterly 23(3) (2012, June): 502–516.
70 J. Schaubroeck, A, Chunyan Peng, and S. Hannah, “Developing Trust with Peers and Leaders: Impacts on Organizational Identification and Performance during Entry,” Academy of Management Journal 56(4) (2013, August): 1148–1168.
71 J. Schaubroeck, A, Chunyan Peng, and S. Hannah, “Developing Trust with Peers and Leaders: Impacts on Organizational Identification and Performance during Entry,” Academy of Management Journal 56(4) (2013, August): 1148–1168.
72 “Working toward More Diverse Leadership,” Financial Executive 28(5) (2012, June): 6.
73 M. Coleman, “Leadership and Diversity,” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 40(5) (2012, September): 592–609.
74 E. A. Ewoh, “Managing and Valuing Diversity: Challenges to Public Managers in the 21st Century,” Public Personnel Management 42(2) (2013, June): 107–122.
75 P. A. Nederveen, D. Van Knippenberg, D. Van Dierendonck, “Cultural Diversity and Team Performance: The Role of Team Member Goal Orientation,” Academy of Management Journal 56(3) (2013, June): 782–804.
76 P. A. Nederveen, D. Van Knippenberg, D. Van Dierendonck, “Cultural Diversity and Team Performance: The Role of Team Member Goal Orientation,” Academy of Management Journal 56(3) (2013, June): 782–804.
77 L. Nishii, “The Benefits of Climate for Inclusion for Gender- Diverse Groups,” Academy of Management Journal 56(6) (2013, December): 1754–1774.
78 H. Rosin, “The End of Men and the Rise of Women,” Boston University Law Review 93(3) (2013, May): 667–680.
79 J. Hendricks and V. Cope, “Generational Diversity: What Nurse Managers Need to Know,” Journal of Advanced Nursing 69(3) (2013, March): 717–725.
80 E. A. Ewoh, “Managing and Valuing Diversity: Challenges to Public Managers in the 21st Century,” Public Personnel Management 42(2) (2013, June): 107–122.
81 M. Virick and C. Greer, “Gender Diversity in Leadership Succession: Preparing for the Future,” Human Resource Management 51(4) (2012, July): 575–600.
82 M. Mcdonald and J. Westphal, “Access Denied: Low Mentoring of Women and Minority First-Time Directors and Its Negative Effects on Appointments to Additional Boards,” Academy of Management Journal 56(4) (2013, August): 1169–1198.
83 “Working toward More Diverse Leadership,” Financial Executive 28(5) (2012, June): 6.
84 E. A. Ewoh, “Managing and Valuing Diversity: Challenges to Public Managers in the 21st Century,” Public Personnel Management 42(2) (2013, June): 107–122.
85 C. Butts, B. Trejo, K. Parks, and D. McDonald, “The Integration of Diversity and Cross-Cultural Work: Competencies and Commonalities,” Industrial & Organizational Psychology 5(3) (2012, September): 361–364.
86 M. Mcdonald and J. Westphal, “Access Denied: Low Mentoring of Women and Minority First-Time Directors and Its Negative Effects on Appointments to Additional Boards,” Academy of Management Journal 56(4) (2013, August): 1169–1198.
87 D. Chrobot-Mason and N. Aramovich, “The Psychological Benefits of Creating an Affirming Climate for Workplace Diversity,” Group & Organization Management 38(6) (2013, December): 659–689.
88 P. A. Nederveen, D. Van Knippenberg, D. Van Dierendonck, “Cultural Diversity and Team Performance: The Role of Team Member Goal Orientation,” Academy of Management Journal 56(3) (2013, June): 782–804.
89 L. Nishii, “The Benefits of Climate for Inclusion for Gender- Diverse Groups,” Academy of Management Journal 56(6) (2013, December): 1754–1774.
90 P. A. Nederveen, D. Van Knippenberg, D. Van Dierendonck, “Cultural Diversity and Team Performance: The Role of Team Member Goal Orientation,” Academy of Management Journal 56(3) (2013, June): 782–804.
91 V. Senichev, “Human Resource Diversity and Performance within the Frame of Organizations, Teams and Individuals,” Business: Theory & Practice 14(4) (2013, December): 337–345.
92 E. A. Ewoh, “Managing and Valuing Diversity: Challenges to Public Managers in the 21st Century,” Public Personnel Management 42(2) (2013, June): 107–122.
93 L. Nishii, “The Benefits of Climate for Inclusion for Gender- Diverse Groups,” Academy of Management Journal 56(6) (2013, December): 1754–1774.
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 393 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
394 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
94 P. A. Nederveen, D. Van Knippenberg, and D. Van Dierendonck, “Cultural Diversity and Team Performance: The Role of Team Member Goal Orientation,” Academy of Management Journal 56(3) (2013, June): 782–804.
95 S. Shin, T. Kim, J. Lee, and L. Bian, “Cognitive Team Diversity and Individual Team Member Creativity: A Cross-Level Interaction,” Academy Of Management Journal 55(1) (2012, February): 197–212.
96 E. A. Ewoh, “Managing and Valuing Diversity: Challenges to Public Managers in the 21st Century,” Public Personnel Management 42(2) (2013, June): 107–122.
97 R. Chua, “The Costs of Ambient Cultural Disharmony: Indirect Intercultural Conflicts in Social Environment Undermine Creativity,” Academy of Management Journal 56(6) (2013, December): 1545–1577.
98 M. Mcdonald and J. Westphal, “Access Denied: Low Mentoring of Women and Minority First-Time Directors and Its Negative Effects on Appointments to Additional Boards,” Academy of Management Journal 56(4) (2013, August): 1169–1198.
99 M. Mcdonald and J. Westphal, “Access Denied: Low Mentoring of Women and Minority First-Time Directors and Its Negative Effects on Appointments to Additional Boards,” Academy of Management Journal 56(4) (2013, August): 1169–1198.
100 E. Ng and G. Sears, “CEO Leadership Styles and the Implementation of Organizational Diversity Practices: Moderating Effects of Social Values and Age,” Journal of Business Ethics 105(1) (2012, January): 41–52.
101 E. A. Ewoh, “Managing and Valuing Diversity: Challenges to Public Managers in the 21st Century,” Public Personnel Management 42(2) (2013, June): 107–122.
102 B. Nielsen and S. Nielsen, “Top Management Team Nationality Diversity and Firm Performance: A Multilevel Study,” Strategic Management Journal 34(3) (2013, March): 373–382.
103 C. Dezsö and D. Ross, “Does Female Representation in Top Management Improve Firm Performance? A Panel Data Investigation,” Strategic Management Journal 33(9) (2012, September): 1072–1089.
104 B. Luscombe, “The Rise of the Sheconomy,” Time 176(21) (2010, November 22): 58–61.
105 T. Dolan, “Increasing Diversity in Governance and Management,” Journal of Healthcare Management 58(2) (2013, March): 84–86.
106 L. Clevenger and N. Singh, “Exploring Barriers That Lead to the Glass Ceiling Effect for Women in the U.S. Hospitality Industry,” Journal Of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism 12(4) (2013, October): 376–399.
107 A. Cook and C. Glass, “Women and Top Leadership Positions: Towards an Institutional Analysis,” Gender, Work & Organization 21(1) (2014, January): 91–103.
108 C. Dezsö and D. Ross, “Does Female Representation in Top Management Improve Firm Performance? A Panel Data Investigation,” Strategic Management Journal 33(9) (2012, September): 1072–1089.
109 M. Mcdonald and J. Westphal, “Access Denied: Low Mentoring of Women and Minority First-Time Directors and Its Negative Effects on Appointments to Additional Boards,” Academy of Management Journal 56(4) (2013, August): 1169–1198.
110 A. Lee, R. Williams, and R. Kilaberia, “Engaging Diversity in First-Year College Classrooms,” Innovative Higher Education. June 2012; 37(3):199–213.
111 K. Bezrukova, K. Jehn, and C. Spell, “Reviewing Diversity Training: Where We Have Been and Where We Should Go,” Academy Of Management Learning & Education 11(2) (2012, June): 207–227.
112 J. Bravin and A. Zimmerman, “Wal-Mart Ruling to Have Wide Reach,” Wall Street Journal (Tuesday, June 21, 2011).
113 M. Wright and T. Reeskens, “Of What Cloth Are the Ties That Bind? National Identity and Support for the Welfare State across 29 European Countries,” Journal of European Public Policy 20(10) (2013, December 10): 1443–1463.
114 B. Nielsen and S. Nielsen, “Top Management Team Nationality Diversity and Firm Performance: A Multilevel Study,” Strategic Management Journal 34(3) (2013, March): 373–382.
115 h t t p : / / w w w. g m . c o m / c o m p a ny / c o r p o r a t e - o f fi c e r s /mar y-barra; http://www.latimes.com/business/autos /la-fi-hy-mar y-bar r a-gm-ceo-20131211,0,6764014. story#axzz2u6lnLXWf; http://www.business2community. com/leadership/mar y-barra-new-general-motors-ceo- wor thy-role-model-women-business-0783707#!wUYWh; http://www.businessweek.com/news/2014-01-27/clinton- says-gm-s-barra-broke-steel-ceiling-as-sector-recovers; http://www.forbes.com/sites/joannmuller/2014/02/06 /mary-barras-to-do-list-at-general-motors/.
66352_ch10_ptg01_357-394.indd 394 10/15/14 12:59 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
3 9 5
Chapter
C h a p t e r O u t l i n e
Strategic Leadership
Globalization and Environmental Sustainability
Strategic Leadership and the Strategic Management Process
The Strategic Management Process
Crafting a Vision and Mission Statement
Setting Organizational Objectives
Strategy Formulation
Strategy Execution
Strategy Evaluation and Control
Leading Change
The Need for Change
The Role of Strategic Leaders in Managing Change
The Change Management Process
Why People Resist Change
Minimizing Resistance to Change
Strategic Leadership and Change Management
learning Outcomes After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
1 Discuss the role of strategic leadership in the strategic management process. p. 399
2 Identify the five major decision categories in the strategic management process. p. 402
3 Explain the relationship between objectives and strategies. p. 404
4 Describe the relevance of analyzing an organization’s internal and external environment as part of strategy formulation. p. 405
5 Explain the importance of strategy evaluation in the strategic management process. p. 411
6 Describe the change management process using Kurt Lewin’s force-field model of change. p. 413
7 Identify the major reasons for resisting change. p. 414 8 Discuss some of the recommendations for minimizing
resistance to change. p. 416
11
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 395 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
396 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
As chief executive officer, Larr y Page is responsible for Google’s product development and technology strat- egy. Sergey Brin co-founded Google Inc. with Larr y Page in 1998. Today, he directs special projects. Eric Schmidt, former CEO, is the executive chairman of the board. Together, these three men provide strategic leadership at Google.
Google’s mission is to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful. By providing the best user experience, Google and its leadership team believe that they can build a company that will create more value, not just for its users but ultimately for its share- holders. Its business model is based on providing a free information search engine to millions of subscribers in ex- change for the sale of ads that appear alongside its search engine results. Google’s adver tising programs range from simple text ads to rich media ads that help businesses find customers and help publishers make money off of their content. The company also provides cloud computing tools for businesses that save money and help organizations be more productive.
Google has on its Web site a page titled “Ten things we know to be true.” The 10th item states, “Great just isn’t good enough.” This 10th item discusses Google’s goal-setting strategy: “We set ourselves goals we know we can’t reach yet, because we know that by stretching to meet them we can get fur ther than we expected.” Google sets stretch goals, a mark of strategic leaders whose vision stretches way beyond what others think is possible. Through innova- tion and iteration, Google aims to take things that work well and improve upon them in unexpected ways. “We try to anticipate needs not yet ar ticulated by our global audi- ence, and meet them with products and services that set new standards.” This is the essence of strategic leadership— anticipating customer needs and then designing innovative products/services that will satisfy those needs. The strate- gic management process is about having the right vision, setting challenging objectives, and formulating the right strategies to achieve these objectives and keep mov- ing toward the vision. Google is cer tainly pursuing a dif- ferentiation strategy. Google is always looking for new oppor tunities where it can make a difference. “Ultimately, our constant dissatisfaction with the way things are becomes the driving force behind ever ything we do.”
In other words, Google is a change-driven, not a status-quo, organization.
Google cer tainly strives for a strategy-culture fit. As Google’s leadership sees it, great, creative things are more likely to happen with the right company culture. At Google, there is an emphasis on team achievements and pride in individual accomplishments that contribute to its success. The company puts great stock in its employees who are described as energetic and passionate. Google strongly believes in diversity. Its employees come from diverse backgrounds with creative approaches to work and play. The company’s culture is adaptive, yet casual and ver y informal. This culture type is key to Google’s success as an innovator. Idea generation is the first step to new product development. At Google, it is not uncommon for a new idea to emerge in a café line, at a team meeting, or at the gym. What sets Google apar t from its competitors is the dizzying speed with which new ideas are traded, tested, and put into practice.
Google is one of the world’s most dominant com- panies. Google can be accessed in 120 languages and available in 50 countries worldwide. By any standard or metric, Google is a standout company, and perhaps the main reason for its superiority is its remarkable style of leadership. Google’s results speak for its performance. The com- pany reached $1 billion in revenue in six year s, ten years faster than Microsoft. The Google brand is valued at $100 billion, making it the world’s first “one-hundred billion” brand.
OpeninG CaSe QueStiOnS:
1. How effective has the executive leadership team of Schmidt, Page, and Brin been in providing the kind of strategic leadership that Google has seen so far?
2. Critique Google’s mission statement.
3. How well do Google’s long-term objectives balance with the interests of its stakeholders?
4. Describe Google’s business environment. How well is Google adapting to it?
5. What type of strategy is Google pursuing, and why do you think the leadership team has cho- sen such a course rather than the alternatives?
OPENING CASE Application
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 396 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 11 STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT 397
6. What are some of the factors contributing to Google’s effective strategy implementation?
7. Why have Schmidt, Page, and Brin encountered less resistance in bringing about changes at Google than most companies experience?
Can you answer any of these questions? You’ll find an- swers to these questions and learn more about Google and its leadership throughout the chapter.
To learn more about Google and its leadership team, visit the company’s Web site at http://www.google.com.
Strategic Leadership In the past two decades, the spread of globalization and the Internet have generated un- precedented changes in ways organizations are managed. These changes have produced new requirements for competition and forced a new emphasis on strategic thinking and leadership.1
Although there are varying definitions of the concept of strategic leadership, they all seem to revolve around the same themes: vision, change, people, and performance. Strate- gic leadership is the responsibility of the CEO and top management. Top management will include the vice presidents of divisions or strategic business units. They take the lead in crafting the organization’s vision, mission, core values, objectives, and strategies. Strategic leaders are responsible for the organization’s near-term performance, as well as for creat- ing conditions that will ensure the organization’s long-term competitiveness.2 There is am- ple evidence supporting the hypothesis that strategic leaders have positive effects on firm performance because of their leading role in planning and executing firm strategies.3,4
In their study involv ing more than 20,000 executives, Shoema ker, Krupp, and Howland identified six skills that, when mastered and used in concert, allow leaders to think strategically and navigate the unknown effectively. They are the abilities to anticipate, challenge, interpret, decide, align, and learn.5 Along with these abilities, the effective strategic leader must be capable of the following:6
• Anticipating and forecasting events in the external environment that have the potential to impact business performance—they observe from the outside in.
• Finding and sustaining competitive advantage by building core competencies and selecting the right entrepreneurial opportunities to pursue.7
• Evaluating strategy implementation and results systematically, and making strategic adjustments.
• Building a highly effective, efficient, and motivated team of employees.8 • Selecting, developing, and mentoring a talented team of top leaders who can sense,
capture, and shape market opportunities for firm growth.9 • Deciding on appropriate goals and priorities. • Communicating effectively.
Therefore, we define strategic leadership as a leader’s ability to anticipate, envision, maintain f lexibility, think strategically, and work with others to initiate changes that will create a viable future for an organization.10,11 It is a process of providing the leadership and inspiration necessary to create and implement a firm’s vision, mission, and strategies to achieve organizational objectives.12
The focus of this chapter is on strategic leadership and the strategic management pro- cess, and change management. However, before delving into these topics, we will brief ly explore two related topics: globalization and environmental sustainability.
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 397 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
398 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
1. I have a tendency to plan ahead instead of waiting until the last minute before acting on issues/problems.
2. I am a very flexible person when it comes to dealing with people or issues.
3. As a student, I often find myself playing the role of a leader rather than a follower.
4. When the stakes are high, I am comfortable being the one to make the final decision.
5. I am very good at setting personal goals and prioritizing events in my life.
6. I tend to consider the long-term conse- quences of my decisions and actions today rather than just the immediate consequences.
7. When I contact businesspeople who can help me, I praise their accomplishments.
8. I am the type that likes to sit back and try to envision my future to see where or what I will be in ten years.
9. When it comes to working with others, I am more of a team player than a loner.
10. I am the type that would want the ball with the play clock counting down to zero and the chance to make the winning basket.
11. I am the type that would be very comfort- able mentoring, training, and motivating oth- ers to meet team goals.
12. When it comes to interacting with people, I can communicate effectively with all kinds of people.
13. When it comes to solving problems or completing group projects, I will describe myself as more analytical than most of my peers.
14. I like to keep things the way they are (espe- cially if they are working just fine) rather than trying to change them.
15. I have a strong desire to one day become the CEO of an organization.
16. I am a very ethical person when it comes to dealing with others or acting according to accepted norms.
Add up your score and place it here and on the continuum below.
8 0 — 7 0 — 6 0 — 5 0 — 4 0 — 3 0 — 1 6 Strong Strategic Leadership Weak Strategic Leadership Potential Potential
This self-assessment exercise is similar to the first one in Chapter 1 except this focuses on your potential to lead from the top. Generally, the higher your score on the continuum above, the greater your potential for strategic leadership. However, the key to realizing your aspirations is education, hard work, and persistence, not simply potential. You can develop your strategic leadership ability through this course by applying the principles and theories to your personal and professional life.
1. how effective has the executive leadership team of Schmidt, page, and Brin been in providing the kind of strategic leadership that Google has utilized so far?
Together, this trio has created a profitable business model built around keyword adver tising. Since going public in 2004, Google has exceeded analysts’ estimates for its financial performance in all but one quar ter. Google’s stock is currently trading at over $1,200 per share. The trio of strategic leaders is performing exceptionally well in all the areas identified above. Evidence of this can be seen in the market standing of the company today.
OPENING CASE Application
Strategic leadershipSELF-ASSESSMENT 11-1
Identify each of the 16 statements according to how accurately it describes you. Place a number from 1 to 5 on the line before each statement.
5 — 4 — 3 — 2 — 1 More like me Less like me Not me at all
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 398 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 11 STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT 399
Globalization and environmental Sustainability One area in which change is unmista kable is t he increasingly globa l competitive marketplace.13 Virtually every company, large or small, faces competition for critical resources and market opportunities, not just from competitors in the home market but also more and more from distant and often little-understood regions of the world.14,15 In his book The World Is Flat, Thomas Friedman eloquently makes the case that labor, jobs, information, knowledge, and capital readily move across borders with far less restric- tions and at greater speed than was possible only a few years ago, a view that has been supported by many others.16,17,18 How successful a company is at exploiting emerging opportunities and dealing with associated threats depends crucially on leadership’s abil- ity to cultivate a global mind-set among managers and their followers.19 International experience is now considered key for anyone aspiring to top leadership in many organi- zations. There is a renewed interest in the development of global leadership and intercul- tural competency.20,21
Beginning in the later part of the 20th century, there has been increasing atten- tion paid to the idea of environmental sustainability.22 There seems to be emerging a collective understanding that the natural environment (which includes physical re- sources, wildlife, and climate) cannot sustain itself if human behavior toward the air, water, land, natural resources, f lora, and fauna does not change.23 Leaders today have a responsibility to ensure that they reduce side effects such as pollution, deforesta- tion, and greenhouse gas emissions. Sustainability is about conservation of natural re- sources and minimization of waste in operations through actions such as recycling. The common phrase used nowadays to refer to this trend is “going green.”24 Companies are increasingly seeking to develop and market environmentally friendly products.25 Stakeholder groups (customers, shareholders, activists, and policymakers) are increas- ingly demanding improved environmental performance from firms globally.26 As such, organizations are paying greater attention to the environmental impact of their busi- ness activities. This has led to calls for strategic leaders to formulate strategies that will help sustain the environment. Top management’s active involvement and support are needed for environmental sustainability initiatives to succeed.27 The extent to which firms are willing to compromise on short-term profit maximization for the larger good of society is directly tied to the vision and commitment of top management.28 Environ- mental sustainability is a part of the broader concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR). CSR is about the ethical and discretionary responsibilities an organization owes its stakeholders.29
Being pro-environment is also financially good for business. It’s called “green mar- keting” and more companies are doing well selling products that are environmentally friendly like cars (Tesla Motors and Toyota), packaging for consumer goods (Procter & Gamble and General Mills), and shoes (Nike). The importance of environmental sustain- ability can be seen in the growing number of higher education programs focused on sus- tainability.30,31 In fact, there is now an Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education. Although it is still the goal of strategic leaders to develop and grow their businesses, there is now talk of sustainable development—development that caters to the needs of today’s generation without shortchanging the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.32
Discuss the role of strategic leadership in the strategic management process. Learning Outcome
1
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 399 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
400 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Strategic leadership and the Strategic Management process The link between leadership and strategy was firmly established in the early 1960s with the application of strategy to business planning. However, by the mid-1960s, there were attempts to separate the two as some dismissed the role of leadership in strategic plan- ning in favor of objective analyses of the external environment that eliminated any need for leadership skills, judgment, values, or intuition.33 Today, the reverse is taking place. More and more, there is the realization that leadership and the strategic management process are interconnected.34 You need an experienced strategist to lead the process and when this has happened, the outcome has been positive for the organization.35 The leader makes a difference by maintaining a strong sense of purpose, refocusing the organization when it starts to stray off track, and repositioning it when its original vision has run its course and a new vision is warranted.36 We should note that the leader’s role in leading the strategic management process applies to for-profit as well as not-for-profit organiza- tions.37 Some of the key questions requiring top management input and leadership during the strategic management process include the following:38
• What’s our vision? • What’s our mission? • What are our objectives—short and long term? Is there company-wide clarity about our
objectives? • Who is our customer(s) and what are their needs? • Do we have a viable and competitive business model? • What are the changes/trends taking place in our industry and broader environment and
why? • Do we understand where these changes will take the market (and us)? • Who are our competitors (direct and indirect) and how do they rank against us? • Do we understand our competitors’ strategies? Can we find ways to outcompete them? • What is our core strategy? Are we innovative and bold with our strategy? Are we taking
appropriate risks? Do we understand what needs to be done and who will be account- able for specific parts of the plan?
• As we get to the execution phase of our strategy, do we have the right people to execute the strategy? Do we have the right kinds and level of resources to execute our strategy? What is our compensation structure? What are the performance targets for tracking success?39
• In terms of our positioning, how are we different? What’s our culture and is it strong or weak?
• How does our overall strategic road map look? Do all the parts fit together? Will it satisfy our stakeholders? Are we on the right track to realizing our vision?
• What contingency plans do we have if the bets we make prove unsuccessful?40
Taking the leading role in addressing these and other questions is what strategic lead- ership is about. 41 Some describe it as strategic thinking.42,43 These questions provide content for the strategic management framework, which consists of five key decision categories (see Exhibit 11.1): Crafting a strategic vision and mission statement, setting objectives, strategy formulation, strategy execution, and strategy evaluation and control.
An effective strategic leader seeks the participation of a broad coalition of employees throughout the strategic management process because followers who participate in the process take ownership in it and are more committed to its success.44 We now turn our attention to the strategic management process.
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 400 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 11 STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT 401
The Strategic Management Process The strategic management process consists of the set of decisions and actions used to formulate and implement specific strategies that are aligned with the organization’s capabilities and its environment, to achieve organizational goals.45 Formulating and executing strategy is the central theme of strategic leadership in any organization. How to perform this task proficiently is what distinguishes effective from ineffective strate- gic leaders.46 As mentioned earlier, the strategic management process consists of five key decision areas: craft a strategic vision and mission statement, set objectives, formulate, execute, and evaluate and control strategy (see Exhibit 11.1). We examine each of these decision categories, focusing on the role of the strategic leader in bringing together every- one to participate in filling in the details and thus putting in place a strategic road map for the entire organization.
Identify the five major decision categories in the strategic management process. Learning Outcome
2
Step 1: Crafting a Strategic Vision and Mission Statement • What is our long-term direction? (Where are we going and why?) • What’s our present business and purpose? (Who are we and what do we do?) • Who is our customer(s) and what are their needs? • Do we have a viable and competitive business model? • What values and principles should govern our behavior?
Step 2: Setting Objectives • What are our strategic and financial objectives/outcomes—shor t and long term? Is
there company-wide clarity about our objectives?
• Does every depar tment and manager understand what objectives/outcomes they are responsible for and their accountability?
Step 3: Strategy Formulation • What are the changes/trends taking place in our industry and broader environment
and why?
• Do we understand where these changes will take the market (and us)? • Who are our competitors (direct and indirect) and how do they rank against us? • Do we understand their strategies? Can we find ways to outcompete them? • What is our core strategy? Are we innovative and bold with our strategy? • Is it the right strategy for capturing emerging opportunities, meeting our customers’
needs, and defending against our competitors? Are we taking appropriate risks?
Step 4: Strategy execution • As we get to the execution phase of our strategy, do we have the right people to
execute the strategy? Do we have the right kinds and level of resources to execute our strategy? What is our compensation structure? Is there a strategy-resource fit? What are the performance targets for tracking success?
The Strategic Management Process EXHIBIT 11.1
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 401 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
402 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
• In terms of our positioning, how are we different? What’s our culture and is it strong or weak? Is there a strategy-culture fit? Do we have the appropriate structure for executing our strategy? Is there a strategy-structure fit?
Step 5: Strategy evaluation & Control • How does our overall strategic road map look? Do all the par ts fit together? Will it
satisfy our stakeholders? Are we on the right track to realizing our vision?
• How well did our strategy perform this quar ter? Did we meet our quar terly milestones?
• What corrective actions do we need to take to address weaknesses in our strategy?
EXHIBIT 11.1 The Strategic Management Process (continued)
YOu Make the ethiCal Call
11.1 Strategic Leadership and Management
An impor tant par t of strategic leadership and management is creating the business model of how the business competes. The University of Miami Online High School (UMOHS) is in par tnership with the University of Miami. UMOHS is for young athletes and performers (grades 8–12) who are too busy to attend traditional classes; it gives them more time to train and to travel to compete/perform. It wants to become the establishment school in the spor ts and performing world. UMOHS also accepts international students who want an American diploma. Some argue that online high school deprives a child of a traditional education and prevents a kid from being a kid and enjoying childhood.
1. How do you feel about high school students enrolling in an online school and missing the experience of attending traditional classes? Do you agree with the mission of UMOHS?
2. Is it ethical and socially responsible to offer an online high school for athletes and performers?
Crafting a Vision and Mission Statement Strategic leadership starts with communicating what direction the organization wants to go. It is generally believed that a leader’s inspiring vision motivates followers to focus on reaching a desirable future state that is better than the present state.
A mission statement on the other hand specifies an organization’s present purpose— its market niche (customers), product/service offerings, operating principles, and busi- ness model. So, a vision statement represents a future aspiration, whereas the mission statement represents the enduring purpose of the organization in the present. The job of strategic leadership is to ensure that the best vision and mission statements are put forth and that they are widely shared and embraced by members of the organization. Mission and vision statements provide identity and a road map of the future for an organization.47
Getting the behaviors of diverse workers to coalesce around a common purpose and future path is a major challenge for top management. The values espoused as part of the mission and vision can act as a powerful force in bringing people together to perform effectively.48,49 So, let’s focus on crafting a strategic vision, mission, and values statements.
Crafting a Strategic Vision A strategic vision is defined as an ambitious view of the future that everyone in the orga- nization can believe in and that is not readily attainable, yet offers a future that is better in
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 402 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 11 STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT 403
important ways than what now exists.50 It is important for the CEO to convey a vision of the organization’s future and to do it in such a way that followers accept it as their vision as well.51 The leader must have a clear idea of where he or she wants to take the organiza- tion and the strength to persist even in the face of setbacks and even failures.
John F. Kennedy demonstrated vision when he promised that an American would land on the moon during the 1960s, because at the time of his announcement, NASA was in its infancy and the state-of-the-art technology for space exploration was Sputnik.
To be motivating, a vision must be expressed in ideological terms, not just in economic terms, to help people develop a personal connection with the organization.
To be widely accepted, vision creation should be a shared experience. The role of the leader in bringing together all the key players to the visioning process is critical. To make a difference, a vision must be based on the input of employees representing different functional units or divisions and levels of the organizational hierarchy. Other stakeholder groups such as the shareholders, customers, suppliers, and the board of directors should also be represented. A well-crafted vision is one that is the result of a broad consensus. It should be simple enough to be understood, appealing enough to energize and garner commitment, and credible enough to be accepted as realistic and attainable. During a period of crisis or transformation, a vision statement helps to provide direction.52
Some examples of companies with simple, yet inspiring, vision statements include the following:
• Google: To organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful.
• Komatsu: “Encircle Caterpillar” • Pepsi: “To put into action through programs and a focus on environmental stewardship,
activities to benefit society, and a commitment to build shareholder value by making PepsiCo a truly sustainable company.”
• American Express: “To be the world’s most respected service brand”
Crafting a Mission Statement A mission statement is an enduring statement of purpose that distinguishes one orga- nization from other similar enterprises. It is the organization’s core purpose and reason for existence.53 It answers the question “What business are we in?”54 It is in a company’s mission statement that its business model (or at least part of it) is revealed. A business model specifies an organization’s customer value proposition and its profit formula. In other words, what is the company proposing to offer its customers and can it earn a reasonable return or profit in the process? The customer value proposition doesn’t just describe goods and services; it describes the broad needs (immediate and anticipated) of the people served by the organization’s products or services. This is very much the purpose of the organization. The job of the strategic leader is to ensure that the company has a sound and sustainable business mission.
Examples abound of organizations that have been adversely affected by poorly crafted mission statements. The railroad industry almost brought about its own demise by defin- ing its mission as being in the railroad business rather than the transportation business. The March of Dimes’ original mission was “to cure polio,” until a cure was discovered and the organization found itself without a purpose. Today, its mission is to advance human health.
The mission should be broad but not so broad that it does not distinguish the organi- zation from its competitors. It should be specific but not so specific that it creates rigidity and resistance to new ideas.55 It is generally believed that mission-driven organizations
WORK Application11-1 Write an inspiring vision statement for an organization you work or worked for. If the company has one, you may use it or revise it. Explain why you think it has an inspirational appeal.
WORK Application 11-2 Write an inspiring mission statement for an organization you work or worked for. If the company has one, you may use it or revise it. Explain the core values and core purpose of your mission statement.
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 403 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
404 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
stand a better chance of succeeding and thus creating long-term shareholder value than those that are not mission driven. Studies that have examined the relationship between mission statements and performance found that organizations with well-crafted mission statements showed higher returns on certain financial measures than companies that did not have well-crafted mission statements.56
A well-crafted mission statement can provide other benefits to an organization, in- cluding providing direction and focus, forming the basis for objectives and strategies, inspiring positive emotions about the organization, ensuring unanimity of purpose, and helping resolve divergent views among managers.57
2. Critique Google’s mission statement.
Google’s mission is to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful. It succinctly identi- fies Google’s purpose. It focuses on the need (information) that Google’s product/service (search engine technology) provides. It is neither too broad nor too narrow. Of the two components often featured in mission statements—core values and core purpose—Google’s mission statement only identifies its core purpose; however, Google has a separate document called “Google’s Code of Conduct” that identifies its core values. Overall, Google’s mission statement is well designed.
OPENING CASE Application
Crafting a Values Statement A values statement is the set of beliefs, traits, and behavioral norms that management has determined should guide the pursuit of its vision and mission.58 Also known as core values, they outline the guiding principles and ethical standards by which company personnel will conduct business. Avon Corporation’s five core values are trust, respect, belief, humility, and integrity. Strategic leaders who truly believe that core values should be practiced rather than just serve as window-dressing incorporate core values into the culture of the organization. They model the principles embodied in the core values and insist that everyone else does the same. The values are institutionalized and become the way of life in the organization.
Explain the relationship between objectives and strategies. Learning Outcome
3
Setting Organizational Objectives Objectives are the desired immediate and long-term outcomes that an organization seeks to achieve for its various stakeholders—employees, customers, shareholders, and others.59 They represent a clear and unambiguous articulation of what the organization seeks to achieve.60
Companies develop both financial and strategic objectives. Financial objectives may include measures such as return on investment, sales, profits, earnings per share, or return on equity. Strategic goals may include acquiring new customers, opening new market, or creating new products. Meeting one’s strategic objectives does contribute to the overall performance of a successful company.61
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 404 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 11 STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT 405
Commitment to organizational outcomes is achieved when there is broad participation in goal setting, and rewards are linked to goal achievement.62 According to goal-setting theory, people with specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-specific goals perform better than those with vague goals (such as “do your best”) or easily attained goals. Effective strategic leadership is about setting “SMART” goals. Refer to Chapter 3 for details on how to write good objectives (see Model 3.1 in Chapter 3).
Goals are essential because they help focus everyone in the same direction; they offer feedback on how well an organization’s strategy is working; they create synergy; they are the means by which organizations reveal their priorities; and they are the basis for mak- ing corrective adjustments.63
3. how well do Google’s long-term objectives balance the interests of its stakeholders?
Google’s executive leadership team under CEO Larry Page believes that in the long term, Google’s obligation is to maxi- mize shareholder and customer value by providing the best user experience. Google is a company that has remained relentlessly focused on the end user by continuously improving on the quality of its search results. To accomplish this, Google has brought together a highly talented and motivated workforce. The media has regularly featured stories tout- ing Google’s generous incentives and compensation package for its employees. The focus on quality has brought in more users and consequently more adver tising revenues and profits. Google’s philanthropic causes include disease prediction and prevention and improvement of public services by informing and empowering people. These examples illustrate how stakeholder-centric Google is in its business strategy.
OPENING CASE Application
Strategy Formulation Strategy formulation is about selecting appropriate strategies for achieving an organiza- tion’s objectives. Therefore, strategies are the means to the ends (objectives). Simply put, a strategy is an organization’s chosen plan of action for outperforming its competitors and achieving superior outcomes. Before formulating a core strategy, an organization must first complete an analysis of its environment, also called a situation analysis. Thus, let’s start with a discussion of what it entails.
Environmental or Situation Analysis A situation analysis focuses on an organization’s internal environment (for its strengths and weaknesses) and its external environment (for opportunities and threats). The external envi- ronment focuses on the industry and general environments. They determine the attractive- ness or unattractiveness of the industry or competitive environment. Awareness of the trends taking place in the economic, political, technological, sociocultural, industry and competitive sectors provides critical input for selecting an appropriate strategy or strategies. As one author puts it, every leader needs to cultivate a triad of awareness, in abundance and in the proper balance, because a failure to focus inward leaves one rudderless, a failure to focus on others renders one clueless, and a failure to focus outward may cause one to be blindsided.64 A good strategist knows where the organization is headed (vision), knows what the competitors are doing or plan to do (competitor intelligence), and is aware and prepared for newly emerging opportunities and threats before competitors.
Describe the relevance of analyzing an organization’s internal and external environment as part of strategy formulation.
Learning Outcome
4
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 405 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
406 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
The combined analysis of the external and internal environment is commonly referred to as SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis. The effective- ness of an organization’s strategies is inf luenced by the degree of fit or alignment between the organization’s internal capabilities/resources (strengths) and its opportunities.65 The outcome of an environmental analysis can also lead to a fine-turning of the strategic vision and long-term objectives.
4. Describe Google’s business environment. how well is Google adapting to it?
Google operates in a high-tech environment, a sector that is undergoing significant transformations every day. The compe- tition between Google, Facebook, Yahoo!, and Microsoft for supremacy is intense. The technologies for serving user needs in the industry are constantly changing. Major demographic changes are taking place among the user market. The world’s economy is now one boundary-less global market with as much universality as diversity in customer needs. Google has adapted well to this turbulent business environment. Their focus on technological innovation and operating efficiency has created a search engine that is currently number one in its industry.
OPENING CASE Application
Selecting from Alternative Strategies An organization’s core strategy is the source of its competitive advantage and is how the organization differentiates itself from its competitors. There are three generic core strate- gies that strategic leaders can select from:66
• Broad or Niche Differentiation Strategy: Develop innovative products or exceptional services ahead of your competitors that are difficult to imitate or copy (think Apple, Google, Facebook, 3M, Nike, BMW, etc.).
• Broad or Niche Low-Cost Strategy (Operational efficiency): Gain a cost advantage through relentless attention to productivity improvement and cost management (think Wal-Mart, SW Airlines, Costco, Dollar General, etc.).
• Best-Cost or Value-Based Strategy: This strategy aims to satisfy the value-conscious customer who desires upscale products and services, though not as high as those of the differentiator and is willing a pay a little more than the low-cost providers are charging. It is called a hybrid strategy because it is positioned between the differentiation and low-cost provider strategies. The problem with trying to be great at two things at once is that your competitors who have pick one or the other will be better than you at each.
A strategic leader’s decisions about what to invest in, what kind of people to hire, and what markets to pursue should determine what core strategy to select. Having more than one core strategy is common among large companies but for a small enterprise with lim- ited resources, focusing on more than one core strategy may lead to resources getting diluted and competitive advantage diminished.
Accurate and timely interpretation of environmental trends plays a large part in the future actions and the continuing effectiveness of an organization’s strategy. The impor- tance of speed in recognizing and responding to environmental trends has been dramati- cally accentuated by the highly competitive landscape facing most organizations. As a result, some strategic leaders believe that it is much better to be a first-mover or pioneer and make mistakes occasionally than to be a follower.67 In this type of turbulent business environment, the leader’s ability to think quickly and navigate the unknown is critical.
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 406 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 11 STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT 407
For the highly effective strategic leaders with good instincts, the more the uncertainty there is in the environment, the greater the opportunities to be exploited.68
Other related decisions involving core strategy include deciding whether to adopt a defender, prospector, analyzer, or reactor posture. Defenders seldom search for new opportunities. They are content with establishing a stable position in a limited operating domain and improving their cost competitiveness. In contrast, prospectors continuously search for market opportunities. They are constantly searching for new product markets and profit opportunities. Analyzers carefully deliberate and decide upon the optimum timing of investment to seize upon market opportunities using their existing technology. They are like prospectors but more deliberate in their approach. Reactors are those pur- suing a late-follower strategy. They tend to delay actions until much later when they are convinced the strategy is working for others.69
Delivering value to the customer is the central premise of any strategy. Customer value is the perceived benefits received to the perceived price paid by the customer. At the end of the day, every strategy is designed to satisfy the needs or expectations of a firm’s customers. Firms that meet or exceed the customer’s expectations are the ones leading their competitors in the market place.
WORK Application 11-3 Think of your college or university. Prepare a SWOT analysis that identifies one opportunity and one threat facing your institution in the next five years. Also identify a strength and a weakness that you think your institution has.
5. What type of strategy is Google pursuing, and why do you think the leadership team has chosen such a course rather than the alternatives?
Google is pursuing a differentiation strategy. It’s all about innovation and new products/services for its users. It is evident from its actions in the market place that Google is a prospector not a defender or reactor. Google is actively pursuing merger and acquisition opportunities with other related businesses. This strategy is preferred because it allows Google to quickly adopt new technologies and processes rather than trying to develop them internally.
OPENING CASE Application
Strategic Management Process Match each statement to one of the strategic management concepts (a through h) below. a. threat/opportunity d. objective g. core competency b. vision e. strategy h. strength/weakness c. mission f. customer value
1. GM: To increase revenue by 10 percent from 2013 to 2014.
2. YMCA: We are the only child care provider to offer gym and swim classes as part of our programs.
3. Discover : Our small-business credit card is the only one that will give you 5 percent back on your office supplies and gas purchases.
4. Google: We are number 1 because we offer the best search engine for free to our users.
5. Motorola: The Apple iPhone is taking away our sales.
6. Microsoft: A personal computer on every desk in every home.
7. UVA’s College at Wise: We educate students in spirit, mind, and body for leadership in service to humanity.
COnCept APPLICATION 11-1
(continued)
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 407 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
408 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Strategy execution Strategy execution is the primary domain of operational leaders—those who are in charge of functional departments such as marketing, production, finance, human resources, and R&D. They provide the leadership necessary to convert plans into actions.
An excellent strategy that is poorly executed will yield the same poor results as a bad strategy.70 Therefore, careful consideration must be paid not just to strategy formulation but to its implementation as well.71 Strategy implementation takes place through the basic organizational architecture (structure, culture, policies, procedures, systems, incentives, and governance) that makes things happen. Strategy execution has been described as the most important and most difficult step of the strategic management process.
As mentioned, there are a number of factors that need to be present for strateg y execution to progress successfully. They include having the right front-line leadership and skilled employees to execute the strategy, creating a strategy-supportive organiza- tional structure, provide adequate resources and capabilities, institute the right policies and procedures, create appropriate reward and incentive package, adopt best practices, and instill a culture that supports good strategy execution. A few of these are highlighted below:
Strong Leadership and Competent Managers Strong leadership is a critical requirement for successful strateg y implementation. A strong leadership team and an abundance of skilled and well trained operational leaders/managers make a difference. An internal study at Google identified eight quali- ties of leaders/managers (listed in the order of importance) that contribute to successful strategy execution. They are:72
1. Be a good coach. 2. Empower your team and don’t micromanage. 3. Express interest in your team members’ success and well-being. 4. Be productive and results-oriented. 5. Be a good communicator and listen to your team. 6. Help your employees with career development. 7. Have a clear vision and strategy for the team. 8. Have technical skills so you can advise the team.
These qualities are not unique to Google. They are applicable to any organization that aims for effective strategy execution. Successful strategy execution requires galvanizing the organization’s employees and managers at all levels to turn formulated strategies into action.
Appropriate Policies and Procedure Policies provide guidance for employees in the workplace. The policies and procedures of an organization regulate behavior and help set the tone of the work climate. They
8. Jiffy Lube: We have the lowest cost in the industry and this gives us the lowest price our services in the oil change market space.
9. InBev: We are focused on developing unique, high-quality products that meet our customers’ needs
10. Avon Cosmetics: To give unlimited opportunity to women.
COnCept APPLICATION 11-1
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 408 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 11 STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT 409
contribute to an understanding of “how we do things around here” mentality. Policies and procedures insure consistency in how employees do their jobs because they standard- ize the way specific strategy-execution tasks are performed. This insures the quality and reliability of the strategy execution process.73 With a new strategy, there is often a need to review existing policies and procedures to make sure they are supportive of the strategy.
Adequate Organizational Capabilities Resources are the foundation of a company’s capabilities and core competencies. Building a company’s capabilities into core competencies and further into distinctive core compe- tencies is a key responsibility of strategic leadership. Strategies that are based on a compa- ny’s unique or distinctive core competencies are hard to copy and not easily substitutable, and as such have a better chance of sustaining the company’s competitive advantage.74 Therefore, a distinctive core competence is a capability that allows an organization to perform extremely well in comparison to competitors and is the basis for a competitive advantage.
Arguably, the most distinctive and hard-to-imitate resource available to firms is knowledge, especially people-based knowledge. Unlike physical resources, which are depleted when used, core competencies increase (in terms of their efficient application) as they are used. Such employee-based competencies are what some have referred to as human capital. Human capital is among key organizational resources that are hard to imitate; therefore, maintaining and developing it is crucial for organizations to stay ahead of the competition.75
Another resource that can affect strategy execution is time. Time is of the essence in strategy execution. Being careful and rational during strategy formulation is important but not sufficient if managers are slow to initiate actions. Managers must avoid becoming trapped in the vicious cycle of rigidity and inaction that prevents them from acting in a timely fashion. We call it “paralysis by analysis.”
Having the Right Corporate Culture An organization’s culture is the aggregate of beliefs, norms, attitudes, values, assump- tions, and ways of doing things that is shared by members of an organization and taught to new members.76 The shared actions and interactions of employees across functional boundaries help create an organizational identity that differentiates the organization from rivals. A supportive organizational culture enhances the success of strategy execu- tion.77 Organizational identity is the members’ consensual understanding of “who we are as an organization” that emerges from that which is central, distinctive, and enduring to the organization as a whole. Organizations like Southwest Airlines, Nike, Walmart, Google, Facebook, and many others are well known for fostering an identity and culture that separates them from their competitors.
Appropriate Rewards and Incentives An appropriate reward structure must go hand in hand with a new strategy. Rewards and incentives are powerful motivating tools that can greatly enhance strategy execution. Rewards and other forms of compensation must be aligned with the objectives that employees are seeking to accomplish. The right package of financial and nonfinancial incentives will drive up employee commitment, hard work, speed, quality, and satisfac- tion, leading to greater output and profitability.
Underlining the discussion of successful strategy execution is the concept of “stra- tegic alignment” or “fit” with various components of a firm’s strategic framework.78 Let’s illustrate with an example. A company pursuing a strateg y of differentiation through innovation in a bureaucratic and hierarchical structure will be an example of
WORK Application 11-4 Identify a core competence of an organization you work or worked for. Explain how it differentiates the organization from its competitors.
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 409 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
410 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
a misalignment or lack of fit between strategy and structure. A strategy of differen- tiation works best with an adaptive or f lexible structure. However, a company pursu- ing a strategy of operational efficiency and stability, aimed at offering customers lower prices than competitors (low-cost leadership), is more likely to succeed with this type of centralized hierarchical structure because of its strict controls on cost containment. Other strategic “fits” that can enhance firm performance are a strategy-culture fit, a strategy-capability fit, and a strategy-leadership fit.79,80 Assessing the extent to which stated goals or expectations have been achieved or not achieved after implementation is strategy evaluation.
6. What are some of the factors contributing to Google’s effective strategy execution?
Granting employees the freedom to implement strategy is one part of Google’s people-management system. The other is to provide the employees with a hassle-free environment so that they can concentrate fully on work. In other words, the goal is to strip away everything that gets in the employees’ way. The company provides a standard package of benefits to employees that it tops up with a seemingly endless and highly enviable array of perks—just about anything a hardwork- ing employee might want to be taken care of while he/she is at work. In fact, employees don’t even have to worry much about getting dressed up, as Google’s corporate vision includes such axioms as “You can be serious without a suit.” Lead- ership’s policy of empowering and facilitating employees’ work has led to a large number of innovations and, consequently, to the explosive growth of the company.
OPENING CASE Application
Strategic Leadership Identify in each statement if the view expressed is reflective of a strategic leader or operational leader/manager. a. strategic leader b. operational leader/manager
11. My goal is to motivate and lead my team to meet our production quota every week and not worry about other departments.
12. In our business, the environment changes very quickly. Therefore, we have to constantly monitor it for emerging opportunities and threats.
13. It is my responsibility to ensure that we have the right strategy to achieve our long-term objectives and mission.
14. I am concerned that our technology is not keeping up with the latest technological trends and our culture is not aligned with strategy.
15. I am not worried about the future because our current portfolio of products is meeting our customers’ present needs just fine.
16. I get paid to deliver results today, not to worry about the future.
17. My job is to motivate and challenge my team to meet our monthly targets.
18. I worry if our strategy is bold and innovative relative to our competitors.
19. We are not concerned about developing future capabilities and other resources that we don’t not need today.
20. I am responsible for setting the future direction for my company.
COnCept APPLICATION 11-2
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 410 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 11 STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT 411
Strategy evaluation and Control Strategy evaluation and control is the last and final phase of the strategic management process. This phase compares actual results (outcomes) with expected results (stated objectives), which then provides feedback for necessary adjustments throughout the process. It is the primary means of determining the overall effectiveness or success of a strategy. Effective strategy evaluation is a three-step process: (1) reviewing internal and external factors that are the bases for the current strategy, (2) measuring actual perfor- mance against stated objectives, and (3) taking corrective action.81 When step two reveals that actual performance did not meet expected or set targets, it is the responsibility of strategic and operational leaders to take corrective actions. Another tool used to measure the effectiveness of executed strategies is the balance scorecard. The balance scorecard evaluates the company’s financial and strategic objectives.82 Feedback from strategy eval- uation should be shared throughout the organization and necessary changes acted upon. We now turn our attention to leading and managing change.
Leading Organizational Change Rapid environmental changes are causing fundamental dislocations that are having a dramatic impact on organizations and presenting new opportunities and threats for lead- ership. Organizational or institutional change is an alteration of not only structures, sys- tems, and processes but also a cognitive leadership reorientation. There is little doubt that implementing strategic change is an important responsibility of any strategic leader.83 Leaders must be ready and able to make necessary changes when conditions warrant such actions. Successful implementation of strategic change can re-energize a business, whereas failure can lead to loss of confidence among employees.
Organizational change can be transformational or incremental, and sometimes an incremental change can amplify into a much larger and radical change than was first anticipated. A transformational change can be as radical as changing an organization’s entire business model or as simple as changing a company policy. Our focus here is on organizational or institutional change—change that affects the entire organization.
Ultimately, organizational change is about changes in human behavior. It is about people doing things differently—for example, re-engineering business practices, learn- ing new processes or systems, adopting new technologies, or acquiring new skills and capabilities. In this section, we discuss the need for organizational change, the role of strategic leaders in implementing change, the change management process, why people resist change, and strategies for minimizing resistance to change.
Explain the importance of strategy evaluation in the strategic management process. Learning Outcome
5
YOu Make the ethiCal Call
11.2 Change through Upgrading
SAP is a leading software company in the world, headquar tered in Germany. Fluor Corporation is one of the world’s largest publicly owned engineering, procurement, construction, and maintenance services organizations.
Fluor and other businesses have accused SAP and other software companies of forcing them to upgrade their software. Fluor claims that SAP upgrades are often minor and not
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 411 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
412 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
the need for Organizational Change A key first step in managing change is for the leader to identify and explain to followers the need for change.84,85 The need for change may be triggered by weaknesses in an orga- nization’s internal environment or because of threats in its external environment.
Externally, threats in the form of direct competition from key rivals, new technolo- gies and innovations that render a company’s existing technologies or processes obsolete, weakness in the economy and consequent effects on an organization’s performance, new regulations with strategic implications for an organization, or major changes in consumer attitudes and buying behavior that negatively affect demand for a company’s products/ services. The need for change may also be triggered by emerging opportunities in the external environment that a company is not prepared or capable of exploiting.
Internally, the need for change may be triggered by a leadership change, such as when a long-time CEO retires and a new CEO is brought in or a current CEO is fired for poor per- formance. This in itself could then lead to many other internal change initiatives (such as in personnel, culture, or strategy) by the new CEO.86,87 A company’s internal assessment may also reveal weaknesses in its capabilities or competencies that need to be addressed.
It is the leader’s responsibility to communicate the need for change, especially when the organization is in a crisis state. People need to know that change is needed—now—and why. The leader has to create a sense of urgency or what Edgar Schein—a leading scholar on change management—referred to as “survival anxiety.” Survival anxiety is the feeling that unless an organization makes a change, it is going to be out of business or fail to achieve some important goals. However, Professor Schein cautions that even if survival anxiety increases acceptance of the need for change, another type of anxiety may be a counter- force creating resistance to change. Change often requires new skills, capabilities, and knowledge. According to Professor Schein, the prospect of learning something new cre- ates “learning anxiety.” Therefore, communicating the urgency for change is critical, but leaders have to also acknowledge the anxiety that learning new skills and technologies can create. Left unmanaged, learning anxiety can create strong resistance even when the need to survive is high. The next section examines the role of leadership in managing change.
the role of top leaders in Managing Change Studies on institutional change have stressed the role of change agents (leaders) in ef- fectively managing the process, focusing on how they need to infuse new values, ex- pectations, and beliefs into the organization’s social structure. The top leader’s role is to
needed, yet Fluor is required to purchase the upgrades. In fact, Fluor dropped part of the products it had licensed from SAP and tried to take over its own software, hiring its own chief information officer (CIO) at a cost of about $13 million. However, SAP told Fluor that it would have to install a new version or pay even higher annual fees to get updates, fixes for bugs, and access to SAP’s technicians.
1. Do you believe that companies come out with upgrades just to make more money (sometimes called planned obsolescence), or do you believe companies are being honestly innovative and customers are just resistant to change?
2. As a sales rep, would you push selling an upgrade to a customer who doesn’t really need one so that you can make a commission?
3. What would you do if your boss pressured you to sell unneeded upgrades?
4. Is it ethical and socially responsible to “require” updates to continue using a product or service?
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 412 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 11 STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT 413
garner collective action in support of a change initiative.88,89 It is one thing to talk about making a major change; it is quite another to actually execute it successfully. To insure successful change execution, effective leaders stay engaged and do things such as:
• Continuing to articulate a compelling reason for the change. • Eliminate policies, procedures, and behaviors that undermine change efforts. • Maintaining adequate human, financial and material resources. • Forming a coalition of supporters and experts to counter any opposition. • Celebrating milestones along the way. • Staying the course in spite of perceived difficulties. • Incentivizing workers with recognition and rewards. • Keeping the process transparent.
Effective leaders are role models for change. A leader must embody the change that he or she wants to see in followers.90 Gandhi put it best when he said “We must become the change we want to see.” Effective change agents must be good listeners. Listening helps a leader have a better understanding of the root causes of resistance.
An organized and systematic change management process enhances the chances of successful change implementation and the likelihood that more people will support and commit to the change rather than resist it. The next section focuses on the change man- agement process.
the Change Management process Not every change initiative succeeds. Some fail miserably. Employing the change man- agement process is one way to mitigate the chances of failure. It requires moving through key steps and executing specific tasks at each step to achieve a desired end result.
One of the earliest and most widely used change management process theories is Kurt Lewin’s classic theory of planned change, also known as the force-field model of change. The three steps in the force-field model of change are (1) “unfreezing” an existing state, (2) moving to a new and desirable state, and then (3) “refreezing” new state.91,92
Step 1: Unfreeze The earlier discussion on establishing the need for change is a major part of unfreezing the current state. The key here is to identify the threats facing the organization that call for an urgent need to change. It is important to invest the time at this early stage to ex- plain not just the threat but also its root cause(s). When followers are not convinced of the need for change or don’t understand it, there is a greater likelihood of resistance. Step two is the actual implementation of the change initiative.
Step 2: Change This step is about execution of the change. The key is developing new attitudes, values, and behaviors that are aligned with the proposed change. People look to the leader for a plan of action. Some specific actions include forming a powerful coalition of supporters, consistently communicating the rationale for the change, empowering followers to act on it, insuring the availability of needed resources, celebrating short-term wins, and consoli- dating gains for greater change.
Describe the change management process using Kurt Lewin’s force-field model of change.
Learning Outcome
6
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 413 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
414 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Step 3: Refreeze For any change to become permanent and accepted into the everyday practices of an organiza- tion, the leader must follow through to the final stage of refreezing the new change. A variety of things can be done to achieve this including new norms, practices, traditions, regulations, and reward schemes to institutionalize the new changes and increase desired behaviors. This will prevent a reversion to the old ways post implementation. Complete transformation can only occur when the desired changes in behavior become habitual. As the saying goes, “old habits die hard.” Resistance that may have been resolved during the changing phase can re- surface in the form of resentment toward those who supported and committed to the change.
Though the three steps in the change process generally overlap, each step is critical for success. An attempt to start the changing phase without first unfreezing old attitudes and behaviors is likely to meet with strong resistance. Not refreezing new attitudes and behaviors may result in the change being reversed soon after implementation. Under- standing these steps is important for change-minded leaders, who must exercise good judgment throughout the process.
It should be noted that following these steps does not guarantee success; it only en- hances the chances of success. It increases the likelihood that the majority of organiza- tional members will commit to, rather than resist, the change. Even with the best change implementation efforts, a few people will always resist any change. However, it is gener- ally the case that these holdouts tend to come around when confronted by fellow group members whose majority membership is committed to the change and also when the holdouts begin to see the positive effects of the change.
Why people resist Change Although indispensable for long-term economic growth, organizational changes are fre- quently met with resistance. Change can disrupt the status quo and lead to stress, discom- fort, and, for some, even dislocation. These negative outcomes often motivate people to resist change. Cultural inertia can also be a big factor. Cultural inertia is a rigid, outdated culture that works against anything new or different from the status quo. Whether it’s because of personal factors or cultural inertia, resistance is a natural response by those who want to protect their self-interest in the organization. For these employees, change is perceived as a win–lose proposition. Change has to be perceived as a win–win proposition for both leaders and followers. Exhibit 11.2 summarizes some of the reasons why people resist change.
WORK Application 11-5 Think of a time when a major change initiative at an organization you were or are affiliated with succeeded or failed. Identify possible reasons for the success or failure, and tie them to the three phases of the change model— unfreezing, changing, and refreezing.
Identify the major reasons for resisting change. Learning Outcome
7
Reasons for Resisting Change EXHIBIT 11.2
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
a. Threat to one’s self-interest
b. Uncertainty
c. Lack of confidence that change will succeed
d. Lack of conviction that change is necessary
e. Distrust of leadership
f. Threat to Existing Cultural values
g. Fear of being manipulated
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 414 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 11 STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT 415
Threat to One’s Self-Interest An employee’s self-interest in protecting his or her power, position, prestige, pay, and other company benefits is a major reason for opposing change. When an organization embarks on a major change, such as pursuing a new strategy, it often results in a shift in the relative power structure and the status of individuals and units within the organiza- tion. For example, changes in job design or technology may require knowledge and skills not currently possessed by employees. For these employees, the fear of losing their jobs or status is a major impetus for resisting change, regardless of the benefits to the organiza- tion. Fear of having to learn new skills and capabilities may create learning anxiety.
Uncertainty Uncertainty represents a fear of the unknown. Lack of information about a change ini- tiative creates a sense of uncertainty. When employees don’t have full knowledge of how a proposed change will affect them, they are less likely to support the change and more likely to resist.
Lack of Confidence That Change Will Succeed A proposed change may require such a radical transformation from the old ways of doing things that some will question its likelihood of succeeding. In this case, even though there may be a general acknowledgment of problems and the need for change, the lack of confidence that the change will succeed creates resistance. Also, if there have been instances of past failures, this may create cynicism and doubt for future change initiatives. This cynicism does affect employee attitudes and behavior toward any proposed change.93
Lack of Conviction That Change Is Necessary People may resist change if the leader has failed to articulate a real need and urgency for change-described earlier as the unfreezing step in the change management process. This is especially true in cases where employees believe that the current strategy is working just fine and there is no need to change. It’s that old adage of “if it’s not broken, don’t fix it.”
Distrust of Leadership Trust between parties is the basic requirement for sustaining any relationship. Change is resisted if people suspect that there are hidden consequences or motives that manage- ment is not revealing. Trust is a valuable currency for leaders to have, because it is the foundation upon which the benefits of a proposed change can be sold to employees who may suffer personal losses from such action. Employees may be skeptical of corporate change initiatives but are willing to put their trust in change proposals that are supported by inf luential peers or trusted leaders.
Threat to Existing Cultural Values When a proposed change threatens an organization’s existing values, it ignites powerful feelings that fuel resistance to the change. Any proposed change must take into account its impact on the values of those who are affected by the change, especially values that are closely aligned with an entrenched organizational culture. If threatened, values that are aligned with an entrenched organizational culture will ignite resistance that is organization-wide rather than isolated.
Fear of Being Manipulated When people perceive change as an attempt by management to manipulate them, they will resist. However, when people understand and accept the need for change and believe that they have a voice in determining how to implement the change, resistance is lessened.
WORK Application 11-6 Give an example of when you were resistant to change. Be sure to identify your resistance with one of the seven reasons in Exhibit 11.2.
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 415 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
416 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
In the end, leaders who regard resistance as a distraction rather than a real and legitimate concern will find it hard to move beyond the first step of the change manage- ment model. Effective leaders will not only follow the steps in the model but also employ the best strategies to minimize employee resistance.
7. Why have page, Schmidt, and Brin encountered less resistance in bringing about changes at Google than most companies experience?
Google’s leadership style and its culture have largely contributed to the lack of resistance. Though Eric Schmidt came from a corporate background, his leadership style had many things in common with the culture already created and put in place by the founders of Google. Since Page took over, not much has changed in the culture. At Google, there is a sense of “we are in this together.” There is little in the way of corporate hierarchy, and everyone wears several hats. Everyone realizes that they are an important part of Google’s success. Though growing rapidly, Google still maintains a small-company feel. At its headquar ters, almost everyone eats in the Google café (known as “Charlie’s Cafe”), sitting at whatever table has an opening and enjoying conversations with Googlers from different departments. Google’s culture of transparency and open communication minimizes resistance to change initiatives.
OPENING CASE Application
Resistance to Change Using the letters “a” through “g” that accompany the reasons listed in Exhibit 11.2, identify which reason for resisting change explains each employee statement.
21. I’m not too sure about this new program. Is it really going to make a difference or just another fad?
22. Why should we adopt the culture of the company we are merging with? Their values and principles rub me the wrong way.
23. If we get these new machines, we will need fewer operators and there goes my job.
24. Why do we have to put in a new system when the current one is only a year old and is working fine?
25. How can management ask us to take a pay cut when they are the ones who are making all the money? We shouldn’t let them take advantage of us.
COnCept APPLICATION 11-3
Minimizing resistance to Change Effective leaders do not downplay resistance or perceive it as a discipline problem to be dealt with through punishment or coercion. Turning resistance into positive momentum can focus the energy where it will do the most good. One way to do this is for leaders to become good listeners and be open to feedback from followers. People want to be heard when they express their feelings and they want validation. From this humanistic point of view, resistance to change is said to have a cognitive, emotional, and behavioral dimension.
Discuss some of the recommendations for minimizing resistance to change. Learning Outcome
8
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 416 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 11 STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT 417
From a cognitive perspective, there is a rational calculation from both sides (support- ers and non-supporters) that change cannot occur unless the forces driving the need for change are stronger than the forces resisting it. When there is a concerted effort to in- crease the forces of resistance against the forces of support, resistance wins. This is why leaders should form a powerful coalition of supporters and experts during the early stages of the change process to counter the forces of resistance. From an emotional perspective, the fear of loss (status, position, job, pay, etc.) and fear of the unknown cause a lot of frus- tration and anger. Capitalizing on such anger can really heighten resistance. Resistance to change as a behavior focuses on the actions of members opposed to the change. Exam- ples of such actions include sabotage and intentional work slowdowns. Effective leaders have to be aware of these behaviors and find ways to neutralize them before they become bigger problems
Effective communication before, during, and after a change has been implemented will prevent misunderstandings, false rumors, and conf lict. It is important that those to be affected by change not learn about it from secondhand sources. Employees should be informed of what is changing, why it is changing, who is affected, how the change will affect individuals, and when the change will start and end. Another way to put this is for change agents to pay attention to the “5 Ps”—purpose, priorities, people, process, and proof. A stated purpose describes what is changing with specific targets identified and prioritized, people potentially affected by the change, a process that employs appropri- ate levels of participation and consultation, and proof that the change will accomplish its stated goals. Taking this approach can mitigate any attempts of sabotage or work slow- downs by those opposing change.
Ultimately it all comes down to creating an organizational climate that supports change and addresses the fears of those opposing it.94 This involves leaders making process, policy, and structural changes in the organization. For example, adopting f latter, more agile structures or empowering teams/individuals to make decisions within stated guidelines are better ways of minimizing resistance to change. Although it is time- consuming, getting employees involved in designing change activities pays off in that it gives them a sense of control. Exhibit 11.3 presents recommendations that leaders can employ to minimize resistance to change.
Now that you have learned about strategic leadership and change leadership, complete Self-Assessment 11-1 to determine how your personality affects your strategic planning and ability to change.
recommendations for Minimizing resistance EXHIBIT 11.3
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
To minimize resistance to change, effective leaders:
• Show relentless suppor t and unquestionable commitment to the change process. • Communicate the need and the urgency for change to everyone. • Maintain ongoing communication about the progress of change. • Avoid micromanaging and empower people to implement the change. • Ensure that change efforts are adequately staffed and funded. • Anticipate and prepare people for the necessary adjustments that change will trigger.
Provide career counseling and/or retraining.
• Create an organizational climate that suppor ts change.
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 417 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
418 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
personality, leadership, and ChangeSELF-ASSESSMENT 11-2
Strategic leadership is less based on personality than is charismatic or transformational leadership. Management level also has a lot to do with strategic planning and lead- ership, as it is primarily a function of top-level managers. Are you a strategic thinker with a focus on long term planning? Do you have any business or personal plans for three to five years from now, or do you take things as they come without planning for the future?
Change leadership is based on the Big Five personality dimension of openness to experience. Charismatic, transformational, and strategic leadership all require being receptive to change and influencing others to change. Are you open to trying new things and to change, or do you tend to like the status quo and resist change? Do you attempt to influence others to try new things?
The chapter summary is organized to answer the eight learning outcomes for this chapter.
1 Discuss the role of strategic leadership in the strategic management process.
Strategic leaders establish organizational direction through vision and strategy. They lead the strategic man- agement process by crafting a vision everyone can be- lieve in and work toward. Strategic leaders encourage a team effort through the entire strategic management process, knowing when to be actively involved and when to simply facilitate. They understand that broad partici- pation is key to success but that ultimate responsibility rest on them.
2 identify the five major decision categories in the strategic management process.
The five key decision categories are: (1) craft a strategic vision and mission statement, (2) set strategic objectives, (3) formulate strategy or strategies, (4) execute strategy, and (5) evaluate and control strategy.
3 explain the relationship between objectives and strategies.
Corporate objectives are the desired outcomes that an organization seeks to achieve for its various
stakeholders. Strategies are the means by which objec- tives will be realized. It is for this reason that the vision, mission, and objectives of an organization are established before the strategy formulation step in the strategic management process.
4 Describe the relevance of analyzing an organiza- tion’s internal and external environment as part of strategy formulation.
The basic premise of an environmental (situation) analy- sis is that organizations need to formulate strategies to take advantage of external opportunities and to avoid or reduce the negative impact of external threats. Monitor- ing the industry and competitive environment presents emerging opportunities or threats that can influence the choice of strategies to pursue. Analyzing the inter- nal environment focuses on assessing an organization’s financial position, employee capabilities and core com- petencies, culture, and the organization’s structure. This analysis reveals the organization’s strengths and weak- nesses. The combined analysis of the external and in- ternal environment is commonly referred to as SWOT or situation analysis. The best strategies are those that rely on the organization’s strengths to exploit op- portunities and avert threats. A strategy that relies on
Chapter Summary
“Take It To The Net”. Access student resources at www.cengagebrain.com. Search for Lussier, Leadership 6e to find student study tools.
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 418 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 11 Strategic LeaderShip and change ManageMent 419
Key terms
change leadership, 418
distinctive core competence, 409
culture, 409
customer value, 407
mission statement, 403
organizational identity, 409
strategy, 405
strategic leadership, 418
strategic management process, 401
strategic vision, 402
survival anxiety, 412
values statement, 404
the weaknesses of the organization for its execution is doomed to fail.
5 explain the importance of strategy evaluation in the strategic management process.
Strategy evaluation involves three fundamental activities: (1) reviewing internal and external factors that are the bases for the current strategies, (2) measuring perfor- mance against stated objectives, and (3) taking correc- tive action. corrective action utilizes the feedback that results from the strategy evaluation process.
6 Describe the change management process using Kurt Lewin’s force-field model of change.
the force-field model proposes that the change process can be divided into three phases: unfreezing, changing, and refreezing. during the unfreezing phase, the leader establishes the need for change by communicating the problems associated with the current situation and presenting a vision of a better future. awareness of the need for change and acceptance of a new direction sets the stage for the changing phase. it is during the sec- ond step that the proposed change is implemented. it is action oriented. the leader must empower followers to act on the change by giving them resources, information, and discretion to make decisions. the leader removes obstacles to change, which may include policies, proce- dures, and structures that are counterproductive to the change effort. the third phase, refreezing, involves insti- tutionalizing the change so that it is not reversed soon
after implementation. Because of refreezing, old habits, values, customs, and attitudes are permanently replaced.
7 Identify the major reasons for resisting change.
change is not a risk-free proposition. change often brings with it pain and stress. Some people get de- moted, reassigned, relocated, or even fired from their jobs. With all of these negative possibilities, the first re- action of most people is to resist any attempts at mak- ing a change. Some of the major reasons why people resist change are the threat to one’s self-interest, lack of conviction that change is necessary, fear of being ma- nipulated, threat to existing cultural values, lack of con- fidence that change will succeed, distrust of leadership, and uncertainty.
8 Discuss some of the recommendations for mini- mizing resistance to change.
to overcome resistance to change, effective leaders must do the following: anticipate change and prepare people for the necessary adjustments that change will trigger, avoid micromanaging and empower people to implement the change, ensure that change efforts are adequately staffed and funded, communicate a strong message about the urgency for change, celebrate and maintain ongoing communication about the progress of change, and show a strong commitment to the change process.
review Questions 1 Discuss how an organization’s objectives may affect its
search for opportunities.
2 What are the key elements of the strategic management process?
3 What is the difference between a strategic vision and a mission statement?
4 The essence of the strategic management process is adapting to change. Discuss.
5 Describe the role of leadership in successful change implementation.
6 Why is organizational change often perceived as a win– lose proposition between leaders and followers?
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 419 10/21/14 12:09 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
(continued)
proclaims, “Most companies embrace diversity. Not Nike. We soak it up. We squeeze it out. We want it to drip over ev- erything Nike does.” Nike’s mission is to harness diversity and inclusion to inspire ideas and ignite innovation.
Commenting on his 30-year career at Nike, Mark Parker acknowledged that it has been a long time but quickly added that some things haven’t changed. As he put it, “I think our suc- cess has been based on our commitment to innovation and great design, which really in our case star ts with our commit- ment to the athlete—and really understanding the athlete and the insights we get from that relationship.”96
Nike has what it calls “Nike Sustainable Business + Innovation” program. Nike believes it can use the power of its brand, the energy and passion of its people, and the scale of its business to create meaningful change. Nike believes the opportunity is greater than ever for sustainable principles and practices to deliver business returns and create a positive social and envi- ronmental impact in the world.97
Parker isn’t an attention-seeking sort of CEO, so until now it has been hard to get a sense of him. But the imprint he is making as CEO is turning out to be as meaningful as his design
Behind a great company are strong leaders. This is cer-tainly true for Nike and Mark Parker. Since assuming the role of CEO of Nike in 2006, Parker and his team have overhauled the way Nike runs, shifting the brand away from the previous sub-brand and product-based structure to a customer-driven structure. He has structured Nike into six “customer-focused” categories, such as running, basketball, and women’s fitness. Parker has personally shaped Nike’s innova- tion processes. Nike’s mission is to bring inspiration and inno- vation to every athlete in the world.
Mark Parker took the helm of Nike at a time when the stakes in the U.S. athletic footwear market were par ticularly high, especially as Adidas was becoming more powerful with the acquisition of Reebok. Parker said at the time that he be- lieved he was the right person to lead Nike through the chal- lenges of the future. He said it was his job to help carry the torch into the future. He has always maintained that all Nike employees work for one boss—the consumer. Mark’s greatest strength lies in his ability to synthesize the input of disparate influences, from lab engineers to downtown ar tists.95 Nike’s commitment to diversity is unmatched. Its Web site proudly
C A S E
Nike in the Era of CEO Mark Parker
The following critical-thinking questions can be used for class discussion and/or as written assignments to develop commu- nication skills. Be sure to give complete explanations for all questions.
1 What in your opinion, were the risks and benefits of the previous leadership arrangement at Google, where the two founders (Larr y Page and Sergey Brin) elected to bring in Eric Schmidt to be the CEO while they functioned as presidents under him?
2 Comment on this statement: “Google is so success- ful it does not need to change anything in its strategic framework.”
3 As leaders make strategic decisions, they must balance the interests of various stakeholders—employees, customers, shareholders, suppliers, unions/activists, and the commu- nity. Describe the best approach for doing this.
4 Many decisions made by strategic leaders benefit some people at the expense of others, thus raising ethical issues. Give specific examples for each of the following categories of unethical behavior :
• Breaking laws or evading regulations • Legal but unethical behavior • Acts of omission rather than commission
5 For CEOs and many other senior executives, strategic leadership is an important role they must perform well. Briefly describe some of the specific actions or responsi- bilities of the CEO that strategic leadership entails.
6 Resistance to change is more likely to succeed if the forces resisting the change are stronger than the forces driving the need for change. Describe some of the spe- cific tactics that resisters could employ to thwar t change effor ts.
Critical thinking Questions
420 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 420 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 11 STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT 421
6. Communication, coaching, and conflict management are said to be skills that have a direct and significant im- pact on a leader’s career success (Chapter 6). Given the weak market and financial position that Nike was in prior to Mark Parker’s appointment, how critical are these skills in his effor ts to reposition the company and address its weaknesses?
C a S e e X e r C i S e a n D r O l e - p l a Y
Preparation: Assume you are part of the leadership of an organization or organizational unit whose objective is to train the management team of its foreign subsidiary to embrace and practice diversity at the highest levels. Assume your parent company’s diversity strategy is no different from Nike’s. Under Mark Parker, Nike is leading the way in diversity. Nike’s vision is for every team to be high performing, diverse, and inclusive. To achieve this vision, Nike’s strategy is to: • Cultivate diversity and inclusion to develop world-class,
high-performing teams
• Ignite change and inspire critical conversations around diversity, inclusion, and innovation
• Create venues and environments for open dialogue, diverse opinions, and a multitude of perspectives
A multinational corporation like Nike wants to ensure that all its subsidiaries around the world have high diversity standards (visit Nike’s Web site at www.nike.com for more information).
Your task is to help your foreign subsidiary develop diver- sity standards for its respective units that are in congruence with the overall diversity standards of the parent corporation.
In-Class Groups: Break into groups of four to six members. Select a spokesperson to record the diversity statement.
Role-Play: One person from each group at a time presents the group’s crafted statement to the rest of the class. The statement is to be no more than 100 words. During and/or after the presentation, Nike representatives (played by other students) and/or committee members ask questions and make comments on each statement. Are the ideas in line with Nike’s diversity vision? After the presentations and Q&A, the class then votes on who has the best diversity statement.
work. Parker has reorganized the company into units based on particular sports, “a conscious decision to sharpen each piece of the business so we’re not some big fat dumb company,” he says; he reshuffled its regions to put new emphasis on China and Japan; streamlined the repor ting process and removed regional middle management, and handled a rare round of layoffs.
Since his appointment in 2006, Nike has reached annual revenues of $24 billion, up 60 percent. “At Nike we run a complete offense, and it’s based on a core commitment to innovation. That’s how we stay opportunistic, serve the athlete, reward our shareholders, and continue to lead our industry,” said Mark Parker. These statements in par ticular and the case in general are the essence of strategic leadership and the stra- tegic management process as presented in this chapter.
GO tO the internet: (http://www.nike.com) Suppor t your answers to the following questions with specific information from the case and text or with other information you get from the Web or other sources.
1. What external and internal pressures did Mark Parker face when he assumed the leadership of Nike, and how did he respond to these challenges?
2. Strategic management is about formulating strategies that align an organization’s internal capabilities with external oppor tunities while avoiding or minimizing threats. How effective has Mark Parker been as a strate- gist so far?
3. What is the evidence that Mark Parker and Nike un- derstand the impact of environmental sustainability on Nike’s business practices?
4. An effective strategist develops strategies that (1) en- hance value to its customers, (2) create synergistic oppor tunities, and (3) build on the company’s core competencies. What evidence shows that Mark Parker is pursuing this course or shares this viewpoint?
C u M u l a t i V e C a S e Q u e S t i O n S
5. According to the Big Five Model of Personality, what traits would Mark Parker consider critical for his manag- ers to possess (Chapter 2)?
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 421 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
422 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Chris Kolbe is a master of change. Now president of Original Penguin, Kolbe essentially runs the divi-sion for its parent company, Perr y Ellis International. Original Penguin was a 1950s icon—the penguin logo ap- peared on Munsingwear Penguin knit spor t shir ts for men. Eventually, its popularity faded, and Perr y Ellis International later acquired the brand. Chris Kolbe was working in mer- chandising at retailer Urban Outfitters when he conceived the idea of rejuvenating the penguin—but with a new twist and for a new market. Star ting with a few new shir ts, which sold out almost immediately, the “new” Original Penguin began to
grow, and Perry Ellis tapped Kolbe to complete the transfor- mation as head of a new venture team. Kolbe recognizes that the fashion industry is a hotbed of change—and any clothing company that wants to survive must embrace innovation. He also understands that change takes time and patience.
1. Why has it been impor tant for Perry Ellis International to give freedom to a new venture team to launch Original Penguin?
2. In what respects does Original Penguin represent a cultural change for Perry Ellis?
V I D E O C A S E
Original Penguin Spreads Its Wings
Strategic Planning
preparing for this exercise Think of a business that you would like to start someday. Develop a simple strategic plan for your proposed business by following steps 1 through 4 below. If you cannot think of a business you would like to start, select an existing business. Do not select a company if you are familiar with their strategic plan. What is the name and location of the business?
1 What would be some of your strengths and weaknesses, oppor tunities and threats, compared to your competi- tors? It may be helpful to think about your answer to step 4 below before doing your SWOT analysis.
2 Develop a vision statement for your business.
3 Develop a mission statement for your business.
4 As par t of the strategy formulation, identify your core competencies. Be sure they answer the questions “What will your business do better or different than your com- petitors? and Why should someone do business with you rather than your competitors?” This stage is related to the SWOT analysis in step 1 above.
Doing this exercise in Class
Objective
To develop a simple strategic plan for a business you would like to start someday
aaCSB General Skills area
The primary AACSB skills developed through this exercise are communication, using analytical thinking to select appropriate strategies—application of knowledge.
procedure (10–30 minutes)
Option A: Break into groups of three to six and share your strategic plans. Offer each other suggestions for improvements.
Option B: Same as A, but select the best strategy from the group to be presented to the entire class. Each group’s selected strategy is presented to the class.
Conclusion
The instructor may make concluding remarks.
apply it (2–4 minutes) What did I learn from this exercise? How will I use this knowledge in the future?
Sharing
In the group, or to the entire class, volunteers may give their answers to the “Apply It” questions.
11-1Developing Your Leadership Skills
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 422 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 11 STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT 423
preparing this exercise Select a change at work or in your personal life that you would like to make, and develop a plan as follows. 1 Unfreezing. Briefly describe the change and why it is needed.
2 Changing. State the beginning-of-change date and end-of- change date. Develop a plan for making the change.
3 Refreezing. Identify plans for maintaining the new change.
Doing this exercise in Class
Objective
To develop a personal plan for change
aaCSB General Skills area
The primary AACSB skills developed through this exercise are communication, analytical thinking and problem solving (i.e., implementing change).
procedure (10–30 minutes)
Option A: Break into groups of three to six and share your change plans. Offer each other suggestions for improvements.
Option B: Same as A, but select the best plan from the group to be presented to the entire class. Each group’s selected plan is presented to the class.
Conclusion
The instructor may make concluding remarks.
apply it (2–4 minutes) What did I learn from this experience? How will I use this knowledge in the future? Relist your begin- ning and ending target dates for the change.
Sharing
In the group, or to the entire class, volunteers may give their answers to the “Apply It” questions.
Developing Your Leadership Skills
Planning a Change Using the Force-Field Model
11-2
Doing this exercise in Class
Objective
To develop a large-scale plan for change
aaCSB General Skills area
The primary AACSB skills developed through this exercise are communication, analytical thinking, and problem solving (i.e., implementing change)
procedures (10–30 minutes)
As an individual, group, or class, select a change you would like to see implemented at your college. Answer the following ques- tions and conduct the force-field analysis.
1 State the change you want.
2 Identify possible resistance to the change.
3 Select strategies for overcoming the resistance.
4 Conduct a force-field analysis for the change. Below, write the present situation in the center and the forces that hinder the change and the forces that can help get the change implemented.
Hindering Forces Present Situation Driving Forces
Developing Your Leadership Skills
Managing Change at Your College
11-3
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 423 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
424 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Conclusion
The instructor may make concluding remarks.
apply it (2–4 minutes) What did I learn from this experience? How will I use this knowledge in the future?
Sharing
In the group, or to the entire class, volunteers may give their answers to the “Apply It” questions.
endnotes 1 T. Mészáros, “Traditional and New Elements in Strategic
Thinking,” International Journal of Management Cases [serial online] 14(1) (2012, January): 134–152.
2 P. Schoemaker, S. Krupp, and S. Howland, “Strategic Leadership: The Essential Skills,” Harvard Business Review [serial online] 91(1) (2013, January): 131–134.
3 H. Wang, D. Waldman, and H. Zhang, “Strategic Leadership across Cultures: Current Findings and Future Research Directions,” Journal of World Business [serial online] 47(4) (2012, October): 571–580.
4 S. Dunn, and B. Avolio, “Monetizing Leadership Quality,” People & Strategy [serial online] 36(1) (2013, January): 12.
5 P. Schoemaker, S. Krupp, and S. Howland, “Strategic Leadership: The Essential Skills,” Harvard Business Review [serial online] 91(1) (2013, January): 131–134.
6 H. Wang, D. Waldman, and H. Zhang, “Strategic Leadership across Cultures: Current Findings and Future Research Directions,” Journal of World Business [serial online] 47(4) (2012, October): 571–580.
7 S. Abdelgawad, S. Zahra, S. Svejenova, and H. Sapienza, “Strategic Leadership and Entrepreneurial Capability for Game Change,” Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies (Sage Publications Inc.) [serial online] 20(4) (2013, November): 394–407.
8 C. Brumm, and S. Drury, “Leadership That Empowers: How Strategic Planning Relates to Followership,” Engineering Management Journal [serial online] 25(4) (2013, December): 17–32.
9 S. Abdelgawad, S. Zahra, S. Svejenova, and H. Sapienza, “Strategic Leadership and Entrepreneurial Capability for Game Change,” Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies (Sage Publications Inc.) [serial online] 20(4) (2013, November): 394–407.
10 P. Schoemaker, S. Krupp, and S. Howland, “Strategic Leadership: The Essential Skills,” Harvard Business Review [serial online] 91(1) (2013, January): 131–134.
11 M. Salleh and D. Grunewald, “Organizational Leadership— The Strategic Role of the Chief Exec,” Journal of Leadership, Accountability & Ethics [serial online] 10(5) (2013, December): 9–20.
12 M. Salleh and D. Grunewald, “Organizational Leadership— The Strategic Role of the Chief Exec,” Journal of Leadership, Accountability & Ethics [serial online] 10(5) (2013, December): 9–20.
13 N. J. Emami, “The Shor t and Long-Run Impact of Globalization if Firms Differ in Factor Input Ratios,” Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control [serial online] 38 (2014, January): 37–64.
14 L. Heng, J. Xu, Z. Jianqi, and Z. Xinglu, “Strategic Flexibility and International Venturing by Emerging Market Firms: The Moderating Effects of Institutional and Relational Factors,” Journal of International Marketing [serial online] 21(2) (2013, June): 79–98.
15 E. Van Genderen, “The Trendy World in Which We Live: ‘Flat’, ‘Spiky’, or ‘Wavy’?” Middle East Journal of Business [serial online] 8(1) (2013, January): 4–6.
16 T. L. Friedman, The World Is Flat (New York: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux, 2005).
17 L. Ramrattan and M. Szenberg, “A Generalized Model for Foreign Direct Investment Flows to All Countries,” Journal of Developing Areas [serial online] 48(1) (2014, winter): 165–175.
18 M. Timmer, B. Los, R. Stehrer, and G. Vries, “Fragmentation, Incomes and Jobs: An Analysis of European Competitiveness,” Economic Policy [serial online] 28(76) (2013, October): 613–661.
19 S. Khavul, M. Peterson, D. Mullens, and A. Rasheed, “Going Global with Innovations from Emerging Economies: Investment in Customer Support Capabilities Pays Off,” Journal of International Marketing 18(4) (2010): 22–42.
20 A. Andenoro, “Introduction,” Journal of Leadership Studies [serial online] 6(1) (2012, spring): 50–51.
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 424 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 11 STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT 425
21 A. Brown and D. Snower, “Skills Development: Rethinking the Future,” OECD Observer [serial online] (290/291) (2012, May): 47–48.
22 E. Van der Heijden and E. Moxnes, “Leading by Example to Protect the Environment: Do the Costs of Leading Matter?” Journal of Conflict Resolution [serial online] 57(2) (2013, April): 307–326.
23 J. Robertson and J. Barling, “Greening Organizations through Leaders’ Influence on Employees’ Pro-Environmental Behaviors,” Journal of Organizational Behavior [serial online] 34(2) (2013, February): 176–194.
24 J. Robertson and J. Barling, “Greening Organizations through Leaders’ Influence on Employees’ Pro-Environmental Behaviors,” Journal of Organizational Behavior [serial online] 34(2) (2013, February): 176–194.
25 M. Pagell, F. Wiengarten, and B. Fynes, “Institutional Effects and the Decision to Make Environmental Investments,” International Journal of Production Research [serial online] 51(2) (2013, January 15): 427–446.
26 Thompson, Peteraf, Gamble & Strickland, Crafting & Executing, Strategy: The Quest for Competitive Advantage, 19th ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2014).
27 J. Robertson and J. Barling, “Greening Organizations through Leaders’ Influence on Employees’ Pro-Environmental Behaviors,” Journal of Organizational Behavior [serial online] 34(2) (2013, February): 176–194.
28 Y. Nini, C. Colvin, and W. Yim-Yu, “Navigating Corporate Social Responsibility Components and Strategic Options: The IHR Perspective,” Academy of Strategic Management Journal [serial online] 12(1) (2013, Januar y): 39–58.
29 Thompson, Peteraf, Gamble & Strickland, and Crafting & Executing, Strategy: The Quest for Competitive Advantage, 19th ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2014).
30 P. Shrivastava, “Pedagogy of Passion for Sustainability,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 9(3) (2010): 443–455.
31 S. Benn and A. Mar tin, “Learning and Change for Sustainability Reconsidered: A Role for Boundary Objects,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 9(3) (2010): 397–412.
32 M. Pagell, F. Wiengarten, and B. Fynes, “Institutional Effects and the Decision to Make Environmental Investments,” International Journal of Production Research [serial online] 51(2) (2013, January 15): 427–446.
33 T. Marx, “Teaching Leadership and Strategy,” Business Education Innovation Journal [serial online] 5(2) (2013, December): 12–19.
34 S. Kumar, V. Adhish, and N. Deoki, “Introduction to Strategic Management and Leadership for Health Professionals,” Indian Journal of Community Medicine [serial online] 39(1) (2014, January): 13–16.
35 “Institute Hosts 2013 Leadership Academy Class,” Journal of Accountancy [serial online] 216(6) (2013, December): 1–2.
36 B. Leavy, “Updating a Classic Formula for Strategic Success: Focus, Alignment, Repeatability and Leadership,” Strategy & Leadership [serial online] 41(1) (2013, January): 18–28.
37 P. Markiewicz, “Methodical Aspects of Applying Strategy Map in an Organization,” Business, Management & Education / Verslas, Vadyba Ir Studijos [serial online] 11(1) (2013, June): 153–167.
38 R. Olie, A. van Iterson, and Z. Simsek, “When Do CEOs versus Top Management Teams Matter in Explaining Strategic Decision-Making Processes?” International Studies of Management & Organization [serial online] 42(4) (2012, winter): 86–105.
39 A. Adams, “Mapping a Strategic Approach to HR Leadership,” Strategic HR Review [serial online] 11(1) (2012, January): 31–36.
40 “Put Your Strategy to the Test,” Sunday Times [serial online] (2013, September 29): 3.
41 M. Salleh and D. Grunewald, “Organizational Leadership— The Strategic Role of the Chief Exec,” Journal of Leadership, Accountability & Ethics [serial online] 10(5) (2013, December): 9–20.
42 C. Markides, “Think Again: Fine-Tuning Your Strategic Thinking,” Business Strategy Review [serial online] 23(4) (2012, winter): 80–85.
43 S. Krupp and S. Howland, “Strategic Leadership,” Leadership Excellence [serial online] 30(5) (2013, May): 17.
44 C. Brumm, and S. Drury, “Leadership That Empowers: How Strategic Planning Relates to Followership,” Engineering Management Journal [serial online] 25(4) (2013, December): 17–32.
45 P. Daewoo, R. Chinta, M. Lee, J. Turner, and L. Kilbourne, “Macro-Fit versus Micro-Fit of the Organization with Its Environment: Implications for Strategic Leadership,” International Journal of Management 28(2) (2011): 488–492.
46 M. Salleh and D. Grunewald, “Organizational Leadership— The Strategic Role of the Chief Exec,” Journal of Leadership, Accountability & Ethics [serial online] 10(5) (2013, December): 9–20.
47 A. Choudhary, “Mission ‘Trust,’ ” Academy of Strategic Management Journal [serial online] 11(1) (2012, January): 101–113.
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 425 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
426 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
48 A. Choudhary, “Mission ‘Trust,’ ” Academy of Strategic Management Journal [serial online] 11(1) (2012, January): 101–113.
49 “Mission, Vision, and Values Statements,” NAMTA Journal [serial online] (2012, August 2): 85–106.
50 S. Kantabutra and G. Avery, “The Power of Vision: Statements That Resonate,” Journal of Business Strategy 31(1) (2010): 37–45.
51 F. Slack, J. Orife, and F. Anderson, “Effects of Commitment to Corporate Vision on Employee Satisfaction with Their Organization: An Empirical Study in the United States,” International Journal of Management 27(3) (2010): 421–436.
52 M. L. Kukkurainen, S. Tarja, R. Sirkku, H. Eeva, and K. Liisa, “Organizational Vision: Experience at the Unit Level,” Journal of Nursing Management 20(7) (2012): 868–876.
53 D. King and C. M. K. Case, “2012 Mission Statements: A Ten Country Global Analysis,” Academy of Strategic Management Journal [serial online] 12(1) (2013, January): 77–93.
54 I. Anitsal, M. Anitsal, and T. Girard, “Retail Mission Statements: Top 100 Global Retailers,” Academy of Strategic Management Journal [serial online] 12(1) (2013, January): 1–20.
55 J. Rajasekar, “A Comparative Analysis of Mission Statement Content and Readability,” Journal of Management Policy & Practice [serial online] 14(6) (2013, December): 131–147.
56 I. Anitsal, M. Anitsal, and T. Girard, “Retail Mission Statements: Top 100 Global Retailers,” Academy of Strategic Management Journal [serial online] 12(1) (2013, January): 1–20.
57 D. King and C. M. K. Case, “2012 Mission Statements: A Ten Country Global Analysis,” Academy of Strategic Management Journal [serial online] 12(1) (2013, January): 77–93.
58 Thompson, Peteraf, Gamble & Strickland, Crafting & Executing, Strategy: The Quest for Competitive Advantage, 19th ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2014).
59 H. Sundin, M. Granlund, and D. Brown, “Balancing Multiple Competing Objectives with a Balanced Scorecard,” European Accounting Review 19(2) (2010): 203–246.
60 D. Stacks and S. Bowen, “The Strategic Approach: Writing Measurable Objectives,” Public Relations Tactics 18(5) (2011): 14.
61 F. Mitchell, L. Nielsen, H. Nørreklit, and L. Nørreklit, “Scoring Strategic Performance: A Pragmatic Constructivist Approach to Strategic Performance Measurement,” Journal of Management & Governance [serial online] 17(1) (2013, February): 5–34.
62 N. Foss and S. Lindenberg, “Microfoundations for Strategy: A Goal-Framing Perspective on the Drivers of Value Creation,” Academy of Management Perspectives [serial online] 27(2) (2013, May): 85–102.
63 N. Foss and S. Lindenberg, “Microfoundations for Strategy: A Goal-Framing Perspective on the Drivers of Value Creation,” Academy of Management Perspectives [serial online] 27(2) (2013, May): 85–102.
64 D. Goleman, “The Focused Leader,” (cover story). Harvard Business Review [serial online] 91(12) (2013, December): 50–60.
65 L. Pleshko and R. Heiens, “The Market Share Impact of the Fit between Market Leadership Efforts and Overall Strategic Aggressiveness,” Business & Economics Research Journal [serial online] 3(3) (2012, July): 1–15.
66 Thompson, Peteraf, Gamble & Strickland, and Crafting & Executing, Strategy: The Quest for Competitive Advantage, 19th ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2014).
67 Thompson, Peteraf, Gamble & Strickland, and Crafting & Executing, Strategy: The Quest for Competitive Advantage, 19th ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2014).
68 P. Schoemaker, S. Krupp, and S. Howland, “Strategic Leadership: The Essential Skills,” Harvard Business Review [serial online] 91(1) (2013, January): 131–134.
69 N. Shimizu and A. Tamura, “Connecting Capital Budgeting Practice with the Miles-Snow Strategic Type: A Novel Managerial Accounting Approach,” Global Conference on Business & Finance Proceedings [serial online] 7(1) (2012, January): 45–56.
70 T. Poister, L. Edwards, O. Pasha, and J. Edwards, “Strategy Formulation and Performance,” Public Performance & Management Review [serial online] 36(4) (2013, June): 585–615.
71 B. Ramaseshan, A. Ishak, and R. Kingshott, “Interactive Effects of Marketing Strategy Formulation and Implementation upon Firm Performance,” Journal of Marketing Management [serial online] 29(11/12) (2013, August): 1224–1250.
72 http://iveybusinessjournal.com/topics/leadership/distrib- uted-leadership-at-google-lessons-from-the-billion-dollar- brand#.UxfFLzYo5Vc
73 Thompson, Peteraf, Gamble & Strickland, and Crafting & Executing, Strategy: The Quest for Competitive Advantage, 19th ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2014).
74 Thompson, Peteraf, Gamble & Strickland, and Crafting & Executing, Strategy: The Quest for Competitive Advantage, 19th ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2014).
75 E. Ndinguri, L. Prieto, and K. Machtmes, “Human Capital Development Dynamics: The Knowledge Based Approach,”
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 426 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 11 STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND CHANGE MANAGEMENT 427
Academy of Strategic Management Journal [serial online] 11(2) (2012, June): 121–136.
76 E. H. Schein, Organizational Culture and Leadership, 3rd ed. (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2004).
77 A. Toaldo, S. Didonet, and F. Luce, “The Influence of Innovative Organizational Culture on Marketing Strategy Formulation and Results,” Latin American Business Review [serial online] 14(3/4) (2013, July): 251–269.
78 L. Pleshko and R. Heiens, “The Market Share Impact of the Fit between Market Leadership Efforts and Overall Strategic Aggressiveness,” Business & Economics Research Journal [serial online] 3(3) (2012, July): 1–15.
79 L. Pleshko and R. Heiens, “The Market Share Impact of the Fit between Market Leadership Efforts and Overall Strategic Aggressiveness,” Business & Economics Research Journal [serial online] 3(3) (2012, July): 1–15.
80 D. Blettner, F. Chaddad, and R. Bettis, “The CEO Perfor mance Effect: Statistical Issues and a Complex Fit Perspective,” Strategic Management Journal [serial online] 33(8) (2012, August): 986–999.
81 Thompson, Peteraf, Gamble & Strickland, Crafting & Executing, Strategy: The Quest for Competitive Advantage, 19th ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2014).
82 P. Markiewicz, “Methodical Aspects of Applying Strategy Map in an Organization,” Business, Management & Education / Verslas, Vadyba Ir Studijos [serial online] 11(1) (2013, June): 153–167.
83 A. Karaevli and E. Zajac, “When Do Outsider CEOs Generate Strategic Change? The Enabling Role of Corporate Stability,” Journal of Management Studies [serial online] 50(7) (2013, November): 1267–1294.
84 P. Yeoh, “Internationalization and Performance Outcomes of Entrepreneurial Family SMEs: The Role of Outside CEOs, Technology Sourcing, and Innovation,” Thunderbird International Business Review [serial online] 56(1) (2014, January): 77–96.
85 J. Younger, R. Sorensen, C. Cleemann, A. Younger, A. Freed, and S. Moller, “Accelerating Strategic Change through Action Learning,” Strategic HR Review [serial online] 12(4) (2013, July): 177–184.
86 A. Karaevli and E. Zajac, “When Do Outsider CEOs Generate Strategic Change? The Enabling Role of
Corporate Stability,” Journal of Management Studies [serial online] 50(7) (2013, November): 1267–1294.
87 P. Yeoh, “Internationalization and Performance Outcomes of Entrepreneurial Family SMEs: The Role of Outside CEOs, Technology Sourcing, and Innovation,” Thunderbird International Business Review [serial online] 56(1) (2014, January): 77–96.
88 A. Karaevli and E. Zajac, “When Do Outsider CEOs Generate Strategic Change? The Enabling Role of Corporate Stability,” Journal of Management Studies [serial online] 50(7) (2013, November): 1267–1294.
89 P. Yeoh, “Internationalization and Performance Outcomes of Entrepreneurial Family SMEs: The Role of Outside CEOs, Technology Sourcing, and Innovation,” Thunderbird International Business Review [serial online] 56(1) (2014, January): 77–96.
90 M. Shirey, “Strategic Leadership for Organizational Change. Executive Presence for Strategic Influence,” Journal of Nursing Administration [serial online] 43(7/8) (2013, July): 373–376.
91 M. Shirey, “Strategic Leadership for Organizational Change. Lewin’s Theory of Planned Change as a Strategic Resource,” Journal of Nursing Administration [serial online] 43(2) (2013, February): 69–72.
92 E. H. Schein, “Kurt Lewin’s Change Theory in the Field and in the Classroom: Notes Toward a Model of Managed Learning,” www.a2zpsychology.com/articles/Kurt_Lewin’s_ Change_Theory.htm
93 K. DeCelles, P. Tesluk, and F. Taxman, “A Field Investigation of Multilevel Cynicism toward Change,” Organization Science [serial online] 24(1) (2013, January): 154–171.
94 A. S. Lutz, J. Smith, and N. Da Silva, “Leadership Style in Relation to Organizational Change and Organizational Creativity: Perceptions from Nonprofit Organizational Members,” Nonprofit Management & Leadership [serial online] 24(1) (2013, Fall): 23–42.
95 http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB1000142405270230 3376904579135802125126572.
96 http://www.fastcompany.com/3022912/bottom-line/nike- ceo-mark-parker-on-how-insight-and-innovation-intersect
97 www.nikemedia.com
66352_ch11_ptg01_395-427.indd 427 10/15/14 1:00 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
4 2 8
Chapter
Learning Outcomes After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
1 Explain why crisis leadership competency is an impor tant consideration when hiring new leaders. p. 430
2 What are the benefits of having a crisis management plan in advance of a crisis? p. 432
3 Briefly describe the three stages of a crisis management plan. p. 433
4 Describe the role of top management during a crisis. p. 435
5 Describe the fivestep process for crisis risk assessment. p. 437
6 Describe the importance of effective communication during a crisis. p. 440
7 Describe the key characteristics of a learning organization. p. 444
8 Distinguish between the traditional and the learning organization. p. 446
9 Describe the role of leadership in creating a learning organization culture. p. 449
The Learning Organization and Knowledge Management
Learning Organization Characteristics
What Is Knowledge Management?
Traditional versus the Learning Organization
The Learning Organization Culture and Firm Performance
The Role of Leaders in Creating a Learning Organization Culture
Crisis Leadership
Crisis Communication in the Age of Social Media
Formulating a Crisis Plan
The Three-Stage Crisis Management Plan
The Five-Step Crisis Risk Assessment Model
Effective Crisis Communications
Guidelines to Effective Crisis Communication
C h a p t e r O U t L I N e Crisis Leadership and the Learning Organization
12
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 428 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 12 Crisis LEaDErship anD thE LEarning OrganizatiOn 429
antonio perez—eastman Kodak Antonio Perez, one of only seven Latino CEO’s in Fortune 500 companies, took over as chairman and CEO of East- man Kodak in 2005. Perez is an American, born in Spain. His father was a fisherman. From this humble beginning, Perez went on to graduate from college and star t a ca- reer at Hewlett-Packard (HP), where he worked for 25 years before leaving to join Eastman Kodak in 2003. He was instr umental in transforming HP’s inkjet printer business division from a money-losing to a money- making operation. HP increased its market share to over 60 percent around the world. Despite his accomplish- ments, Perez was passed over as a choice to the company’s CEO position in 2003, so he resigned.
Kodak, the once-innovative digital giant with 17,000 patents wor th between $2 and $3 billion, was on a fast slide downward. Its stock price, once wor th around $25, had plunged to just cents to the dollar.1 The company that gave bir th to the first digital camera in 1975 was now being left behind in the digital revolution. Kodak had turned to a slow-moving bureaucratic company. It was los- ing ground to competitors like Sony, Nikon, Canon, and Olympus in the digital imaging business. These companies were much faster at innovating and responding to market demands.
On Januar y 19, 2012, Perez announced that Eastman Kodak was filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Along with this filing, Perez embarked on an aggressive restructuring strategy to cut cost while diversifying into new business sectors to increase revenues. Despite these actions, many investors believe Perez was not acting fast enough in his transformation plans. He was criticized for acting too slow in winding down operations and making the layoffs that the company needed to sur vive before it was in an unavoidable bankruptcy.2 However, the board of directors thought differently. Perez, it said, will remain CEO for one year post-bankruptcy emergence, or until the post- emergence board of directors elects his successor, which- ever is sooner.3 Kodak emerged from bankruptcy and its restructuring on September 3, 2013.
Kodak is coming out of what has been one of the most trying periods in the company’s history. It has transformed into a business-to-business company focused on imaging. It
describes itself as a company centered on disruptive tech- nologies and breakthrough solutions for the product goods packaging, graphic communications, and functional print- ing industries.4 As a result of Perez’s reorganization strat- egy, Kodak today is leaner, financially stronger, and ready to grow. The stock price that once traded for just cents to the dollar is now back over $27 a share. It seems Perez is proving his critics wrong. For those who thought Perez was risking his own survival by taking a stake at Kodak’s survival, time may prove them wrong. He would soon be leaving Kodak with his reputation intact.
OpeNING CaSe QUeStIONS:
1. Describe the nature of the crisis that Kodak has been going through since Perez took over as CEO in 2005?
2. In your opinion, could this crisis have been avoided?
3. How effective has CEO Perez been in managing the crisis so far?
4. In your opinion, has Mr. Perez been an effective communicator in the way he has handled the crisis?
5. What are some of the changes Mr. Perez has instituted to avoid a repeat of a similar crisis in the future?
6. Describe the threats facing Kodak in its external environment. Do these threats justify or go against adopting a learning organizational culture?
7. In your opinion, does Kodak represent the tradi- tional organization or the learning organization?
8. What additional steps will you recommend that Antonio Perez take to make Kodak more of a learning organization?
Can you answer any of these questions? You’ll find answers to these questions and learn more about Kodak and its leadership throughout the chapter.
To learn more about Eastman Kodak and Antonio Perez, visit Kodak’s Web site at http://www.kodak.com.
OPENING CASE application
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 429 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
430 part 3 OrganizatiOnaL LEaDErship
A crisis is a low-probability but high-impact event that threatens the viability of an organization and is characterized by ambiguity of cause, effect, and means of resolution, as well as by a belief that decisions must be made swiftly.5 Crises are omnipresent in today’s environment.6 A crisis by its very nature is an event
that could not be predicted or anticipated prior to its occurrence. Therefore, avoidance is rarely possible. Crisis leadership is now an integral part of effective organizational leadership.7
Crises are indeed damaging to an organization if not properly managed.8 A crisis that is mismanaged can damage an organization’s reputation, personal careers, and dimin- ish consumer confidence in the organization, and in some cases have led to its demise altogether.9 Increasingly, organizations are investing significant resources in developing crises response plans.10,11
Crises come in many forms—natural disasters (the 2011 earthquake in Japan and subsequent nuclear accident), mass shootings (December 2012, Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown), product failures (GM’s recall crisis of 2014), human error disasters (Bangladesh factory collapse in 2014 that killed 1,100 workers), and system failures (the disastrous debut of Healthcare.gov in 2013).12 Also, many crises don’t always make the front pages of newspapers or aren’t featured in the TV news, such as sexual harassment, executive misconduct, sabotage, and succession crisis.
Regardless of the nature of the crises or the ty pe of organization, what they all have in common is the stress and pressure they place on organizational resources and systems. Any weaknesses that may have been present in the system prior to a crisis are exposed. It is therefore imperative that organizations prepare their leaders on manag- ing a crisis.
The most recent example of a corporate crisis involves General Motors. A House panel will investigate the response of General Motors and U.S. regulators to consumer com- plaints about ignition-switch failures that led to the recall of 1.6 million vehicles and are linked to at least 13 deaths. The issue is emerging as the first major test in crisis man- agement for GM’s chief executive officer Mary Barra, who was promoted to the position two weeks before an internal company decision on January 31, 2014, to do a recall. She is personally leading senior executives who are monitoring progress on the recall, which includes Chevrolet Cobalt and Pontiac G5 small cars.13
The first half of this chapter discusses crisis leadership. The second half of the chapter focuses on organizational learning and knowledge management. The learning organiza- tion is one that emphasizes creativity, innovation, and knowledge creation as a way of maintaining its competitive edge.
Explain why crisis leadership competency is an important consideration when hiring new leaders.
Learning Outcome
1
Crisis Leadership Crisis leadership is about being prepared with a plan to follow when a crisis occurs. It is about the role of corporate leaders in crisis prevention and preparedness. Un- fortunately, many leaders never think this is a critical part of their job until a crisis happens. These are the leaders who are surprised by events and become ver y reac- tive in their approach. They apply knee-jerk, shoot-from-the-hip solutions. Accord- ing to experts in the field, effective crisis leadership is about having the foresight and
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 430 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 12 Crisis LEaDErship anD thE LEarning OrganizatiOn 431
proper pre-crisis planning for managing a crisis.14 It is a proactive approach to crisis management.
Today, more than ever, there is a great need for leaders from all walks of life to show that they possess the skills and competence to lead during times of crisis.15 Mismanaging a crisis has ended the careers of many executives. Proactive organizations have found it pru- dent to designate a specific individual or unit with the task of scanning and monitoring the internal and external environments for potential threats or warning signs of a crisis.16
In the event of a crisis, the leader must be visible, in control, and overseeing all aspects of the plan’s execution. The ultimate responsibility of the crisis leader is to plan for a crisis and lead during a crisis. In planning for a crisis, the leader has to focus on five integrated tasks:
1. Formulate an overarching vision of crisis management for the organization. 2. Establish strategic goals and program objectives for crisis management. 3. Coordinate the creation of a crisis management plan. 4. Establish a communication plan for notification and mobilization when needed. 5. Develop a pre-crisis simulation and drill plan for the crisis team and the entire
organization.
Leaders who develop proficiency in performing these tasks have a greater success rate at resolving crisis than those without these competencies.17 It is worth noting that these five tasks are closely related to the tasks needed for successful strategic leadership of an organization that we outlined and discussed in Chapter 11. Therefore, top management or strategic leaders should require that crisis planning be incorporated into the strategic framework of their organizations. This would insure that crisis planning is an ongoing exercise and not a once-in-a-while practice.
These five tasks point to the essential competencies of crisis leaders, which are the ability to:
• Craft a vision. • Set objectives. • Formulate, Execute, and Evaluate crisis plan. • Communicate. • Manage people.
To be effective, a crisis leader must have the power, resources, position, and stature to inf luence events when a crisis erupts. For example, an organization must empower the crisis leader to make a critical decision such as shutting down a production line if a defect is suspected, or halting operations on an assembly line if multiple injuries or malfunc- tions have occurred. The ability of crisis leaders to grasp the impact of events in the early stages of development has helped some organizations avert a crisis and has even helped others turn would-be crises into opportunities.18,19
According to Warren Bennis, a well-known scholar in leadership research, crises are always crucibles of leadership in that sooner or later some transformative event or expe- rience comes along that is central to finding one’s voice, learning how to engage others through shared meaning, and acquiring other skills of leadership.20
Crisis leadership training and development programs should be available for lead- ers to learn and hone the competencies outlined above. Leaders who develop these competencies are more self-confident in their abilities to resolve any future crisis. The Three-Stage Crisis Management Plan (Exhibit 12.2) and Effective Crisis Communica- tion (Exhibit 12.3), discussed later in the chapter are effective tools for crises leadership training.
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 431 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
432 part 3 OrganizatiOnaL LEaDErship
Crisis Communication in the age of Social Media Advances in communications technologies now allow millions to analyze and critique virtually every aspect of an organization’s response to a crisis—such as a violent act on the job, a major accident, or a product recall. Technologies such as e-mail, Web pages, cable news, and social-networking sites (such Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, or Snapchat) are weapons for affected organizations and the outside world to use during a crisis.21 Social networks must be part of an integrated communication strategy that ensures that all affected parties are receiving a coherent and consistent message.22
A crisis is instantly visible and viral with the potential to inf lict terminal damage on the affected organization. These technologies have diminished an organization’s ability to control crisis communications by opening alternate channels that others can use to disseminate their views and build support.23
A company today may have only minutes, not hours, to contain a crisis. In many cases, there is a minute-by-minute real-time analysis of the financial implications of a crisis by investors, customers, and analysts, as Internet and cable television are linked with investment portfolios. Stakeholders may have more information at their fingertips about an ongoing crisis than the company. To stay ahead, effective leaders are incorporating crisis management into their strategic and operating plans and updating their skills in crisis leadership.24
Anticipating the kinds of crises that an organization can encounter is not an easy task for any leader. Literally thousands of incidents can turn into crises and handicap an orga- nization’s attempts to achieve its financial and strategic goals. The challenge is detecting the signals that warn of a crisis before it hits. Many organizations are presented with early warning signals of an impending crisis but fail to recognize and heed them like in the case of Kodak in the opening case. Therefore, the same degree of care invested in putting together a strategic plan for growth must be devoted to pre-crisis planning.
A crisis can present the opportunity for an organization to learn and adapt when the next crisis hits. Some leaders start paying attention to pre-crisis planning only after they encounter a crisis. Up until a crisis hits, it is an often neglected part of leadership in most organizations.25 This approach is dangerous because there may not always be a second chance to learn from your mistakes. The next section discusses crisis management planning using the three-stage crisis planning model.
1. Describe the nature of the crisis that Kodak was in prior to Mr. perez’s appointment.
Eastman Kodak’s problems did not star t with the digital revolution. As one writer put it, “The company has been one of the longest drawn out train wrecks that has taken about 15 years to play out as the digital age destroyed its core markets.”26 For many years prior to Perez joining the company in 2003, Kodak had become a slow-moving bureau- cratic company with a workforce that reached nearly 150,000 employees in 1998. It had been living off its patents and lawsuits against competitors for decades, burning cash, and not finding new ways to generate genuine earnings. Kodak’s traditional business model did not move fast enough to confront fierce competition from companies like Sony, Nikon, Canon, Olympus, and other smaller manufacturers in the digital imaging business.
OPENING CASE application
Identify the benefits of having a crisis management plan in advance of a crisis. Learning Outcome
2
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 432 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 12 Crisis LEaDErship anD thE LEarning OrganizatiOn 433
Formulating a Crisis plan Many people seldom contemplate the possibility that a fire, coworker violence, robbery, or natural disaster could occur where they work. The tendency is to develop a mental detachment from the issue—it happens to other people, not to me or our organization. Some leaders rationalize that the present systems are adequate to deal with such crises should they arise, whereas others find solace in the “positive thinking” (nothing bad will happen) approach. Denial of the occurrence of these low-probability, high-impact events makes thinking the unthinkable a major leadership challenge. Leaders who are able to overcome these psychological roadblocks and perceive risks realistically can approach crisis management planning in a logical and systematic way.
The literature suggests that organizations with early crisis identification systems and crisis management plans already in place before the occurrence of a crisis are significantly better prepared to manage and survive a crisis event. In addition, these better prepared organizations have the opportunity to reposition themselves and turn a crisis event into a strategic opportunity.27 Therefore, an organization’s readiness to respond to a crisis is a function of the following:
• The skills, abilities, and experience of a designated crisis leader • A trained and well-prepared crisis team • Organizational preparedness through regular drills and training • Adequate organizational resources • Top management support and commitment
Crises by nature are not part of the regular work experience; therefore, effectively managing crisis situations requires leaders to be well prepared for the unknown. There are benefits to putting a crisis plan in place.
The Benefits of a Crisis Plan Though suffering some loss is almost unavoidable, having a crisis plan in the event of an actual crisis has several benefits. Having a crisis plan in place can: (a) reduce the duration of a crisis, (b) enhance or retain a corporation’s image and reputation, (c) allow for quick and effective responses, (d) improve communications, (e) enhance coordination and coopera- tion, (f) ensure ready and available resources, (g) ensure fewer costly mistakes, (h) ensure less panic, (i) ensure quicker resolution of the crisis, and (j) limit or protect financial loss.
During a crisis, the leader is responsible for the safety and security of both employees and the organization. In the event of a crisis, the leader must be visible, in control, and overseeing all aspects of the plan’s execution.
In the next section, we propose a three-stage crisis response plan for managing a crisis.
Briefly describe the three stages of crisis planning and management. Learning Outcome
3
the three-Stage Crisis Management plan The three-stage crisis management plan consists of pre-crisis planning, leading during a crisis, and adapting after a crisis (see Exhibit 12.1).
Pre-Crisis Planning Every organization (large, small, for-profit, or nonprofit) should have a pre-crisis plan. Although no one can develop a pre-crisis plan that would accurately anticipate and address every possibility in the future, such a plan is still the best way to mitigate the
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 433 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
434 part 3 OrganizatiOnaL LEaDErship
negative consequences of any crisis. The message in pre-crisis planning is to hope for the best and plan for the worst. A pre-crisis plan enables leaders and their followers to make good decisions under the most difficult and unpleasant circumstances.28 Pre-crisis plan- ning addresses three key questions: (1) Do we have a crisis response team and who is on it? (2) What is our crisis plan of action? and (3) Do we have all the necessary resources in place?
On the first question, having a standing crisis response team increases an organiza- tion’s ability to respond to a crisis in a timely and effective manner. A crisis response team should involve a good mix of representatives from all parts of the organization. Diversity in the makeup of the crisis response team increases diverse input that contributes to better decisions.29
In the event of a crisis, a leader wants a team that has trained and worked together.30 Unfortunately, it is often the case that during a crisis, people who must work together have no history of doing so because they have never practiced or rehearsed the plan; thus, they have no understanding of each other’s roles and responsibilities. During pre-crisis planning, questions on information f low and chains of command are addressed.
On the second question, developing a crisis plan of action involves imagining the worst possible scenarios that could happen to the organization and the impact on employees, customers, and other stakeholders. To be well prepared, the crisis plan must incorpo- rate as many potential emergency situations as possible. The crisis leader and the team should then assess the risk of these potential events, and evaluate their possible ramifica- tions. For each crisis scenario, the crisis team tries to imagine the responses of different stakeholder groups—this includes stockholders, customers, employees, activist groups, the media, and the community. Anticipating what each of these groups might need from the organization during a crisis enhances preparation and reduces the level of confusion, anxiety, and frustration that often ensues. We will discuss crisis scenario and risk assess- ment analysis in greater detail when we examine the five-step risk assessment model later in the chapter.
On the third question of resources, having the right quantity and quality of resources is critical for success. Both financial and non-financial resources are needed. It is often the case that during a crisis, resources (people, technology, and equipment) that are brought to bear may never have been deployed to see how well they function together. This underscores the importance of training and drills that simulate actual crisis situations or scenarios.
WOrK Application 12-1 Find out if your college or university has a pre- crisis plan. If you find one, read and critique it for its effectiveness and present your findings to your classmates. If there is none, present an argument for having one.
Pre-Crisis Planning
• Form Crisis Response Team • Develop Crisis Plan
Leading during a Crisis
• The Role of Senior Leaders • Effective Crisis Communication • Crisis Resolution
Adapting after a Crisis
• Evaluation of Crisis Response • Lessons Learned • Preventing a Future Crisis
Three-Stage Crisis Management Plan EXHIBIT 12.1
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 434 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 12 Crisis LEaDErship anD thE LEarning OrganizatiOn 435
Another aspect of pre-crisis planning is deciding on the appropriate communications strategy when a crisis hits. Decisions on who will take charge of news conferences with the media and who will handle ongoing daily communications with outside groups are finalized. For example, while the CEO or some other designated senior executive handles major news conferences, public relations staff may field questions from other stakeholder groups and the legal staff responds to legal inquiries. A well-coordinated crisis commu- nication plan helps avoid both the mistake of putting out mixed messages from multiple sources and potential power struggles over jurisdiction.31 These problems affect crisis response effectiveness.32
In the event of a crisis, the pre-crisis plan is put into action. The crisis leader and his team have to step forward and manage the crisis effectively.
WOrK Application 12-2 Identify someone who has been or is part of a crisis prevention and management team, preferably someone on your campus’s crisis prevention and management team. Ask him or her to describe the makeup and function of the team.
Leading during a Crisis When a crisis erupts, a rapid response is vital. The crisis leader must step forward and lead. The effective leader focuses on three key areas: goals, people, and resources. The goals define the “What”—that is, the specific outcomes and objectives of the crisis intervention. People define the “Who”—getting the right people in the right positions with the right teams.33 Resources define the “how”—determining how resources will be allocated to the right people and how they will employ such resources. These are issues that should already be spelled out in the pre-crisis plan. The crisis leader should avoid the temptation of micromanaging or denying that there is a crisis. Some leaders go into denial about the ur- gency and severity of a crisis. This hampers an immediate and effective response to a crisis.
During a crisis, effective leaders employ a team effort. They take advantage of the crisis team. A team with a balance of complementary skills and talents can move quickly and effectively. Not only should a leader seek wise counsel from the team; he or she should also instill a sense of “togetherness” among all employees by allowing them to share their emotions and feelings with each other in group settings.34 This is where pre-crisis plan- ning and risk assessment pay big dividends. Effective leaders understand that their job during a crisis includes showing compassion for employees, customers, and other affected parties.
Within minutes of becoming aware that a crisis situation may exist, company officials must be prepared to issue an initial statement to the media and other key stakeholder groups—providing facts as they are known and an indication of when additional details will be made available. At the local, state, and federal level, government agencies are mandated to utilize Incident Command Systems (ICS) to structure on-scene response efforts.35 The purpose of an immediate response on the part of the affected organiza- tion is to fill an information vacuum with facts and perspectives. Such quick action can help preserve the credibility and reputation of the organization and its leaders during the crisis. Experience has shown that the longer companies wait, the more likely the vacuum will be filled with inaccurate statements and outright misinformation that becomes accepted as truth.36
Effective leadership from the top is critical during a crisis.37 During a crisis, employ- ees will look to the CEO or other top management executives on how to cope with the situation.38 Unfortunately, some senior leaders have been known to retreat behind closed
Describe the role of top management during a crisis. Learning Outcome
4
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 435 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
436 part 3 OrganizatiOnaL LEaDErship
doors when a crisis hits. They rely totally on the crisis leader or manager to handle the crisis. The crisis leader becomes the face of the organization as far as the media is con- cerned. This is a questionable approach at best. CEO or other top executives who dig deeper into their foxhole or adopt a bunker mentality during a crisis reminds us of the familiar tale of Nero playing the fiddle while Rome burned. A strategic leader’s physical presence is a matter of moral importance even when it lacks immediate practical value. Being there conveys moral solidarity, commitment, and concern, apart from the leader’s actual empathy or sensitivity.39,40
When all is said and done, there are three key principles of crisis leadership: (1) stay engaged and lead from the front, (2) focus on the big picture and communicate the vision, and (3) work with the crisis management team. The message of crisis leadership is to pre- pare for crises, respond quickly, act with integrity, and disclose fully. Another way of say- ing this is for the crisis leader to be mindful of the “three As”—acknowledge, action, and avoid. Acknowledge or admit the crisis, specify what action you are taking to contain or repair the damage, and tell the public what you are going to do to avoid a repeat in the future.
Adapting after a Crisis An effective post-crisis evaluation can turn a negative event into a growth and learning experience.41 Most forward-looking organizations do a postmortem. That is, in the after- math of a crisis, top management authorizes a review (preferably conducted by an objective third party) of the organization’s effectiveness in resolving the crisis. The whole purpose of the review is to determine which parts of the crisis response plan worked and which parts failed.42
The review should include performance indicators such as the following:
• Effectiveness in communicating with key stakeholder groups • Effectiveness in addressing the root cause(s) of the crisis • Crisis team effectiveness • Leadership effectiveness • Effectiveness in dealing with victims and family members
It is about looking beyond the present crisis and into the future. The information generated from the post-crisis evaluation can help prevent future crises or improve the effectiveness with which future crisis are handled. Actively communicating post-crisis evaluation information with key stakeholder groups can be very effective in protecting positive corporate reputation than a no-message or a justification strategy.43
Developing a crisis plan such as the one introduced above is a cross-functional activ- ity that affects different departments and maybe even outside groups. It is a multifaceted
WOrK Application 12-3 Think of a leader whom you have observed in a crisis situation, either in person or on TV. Critique the leader’s handling of the crisis using the text discussion as your guide.
5. What are some of the changes Mr. perez has instituted to avoid a repeat of a similar crisis in the future?
It was under Perez’s leadership that Kodak began a massive, four-year restructuring that saw it shed thousands of jobs, de- molish numerous buildings at Eastman Business Park, and sell off such business lines as health imaging. While in bankruptcy, Kodak has eliminated health care benefits for retirees and ended its digital camera and desktop inkjet printer lines. The decision to eliminate health care benefits for retirees resolved large, longstanding legacy liabilities that the company could no longer maintain. Through these actions, Kodak today is a leaner and financially stronger company, ready to grow.
OPENING CASE application
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 436 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 12 Crisis LEaDErship anD thE LEarning OrganizatiOn 437
activity that requires systemic thinking. A risk assessment model provides the best tool for developing a comprehensive crisis plan. So, the next section focuses on the five-step risk assessment model for developing crisis plans.
Describe the five-step process for crisis risk assessment. Learning Outcome
5
Step 1. risk identification Crisis team members begin pre-crisis planning by f irst identif ying the worst-case incidents that could have severe consequences on people, the organization’s financial po- sition, or its image. It is a “what-if ” scenario analysis that focuses on identifying realistic incidents under various crisis situations. This first step is akin to the analytical process of monitoring an organization’s internal operations and core businesses to identify potential weaknesses/strengths and industry trends (to identify threats and opportunities) that could impact its business model. For the strategist, such an analysis is a form of crisis aversion.44 This first step does result in the creation of a risk chart that features all the potential crisis incidents that could materialize and negatively impact the organization.
Risk Identification (Risk Chart)
Pre-Crisis Simulation and Drill Plan
Crisis Management
Criteria
Risk Reduction Strategies
Risk Assessment & Ranking
1
2
3
4
5
S W O T
Five-Step risk Crisis Assessment Model EXHIBIT 12.2
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
the Five-Step Crisis risk assessment Model The five-step crisis risk assessment model is a scenario analysis and planning tool that highlights different contingencies. It is the tool used to put together a crisis management action plan discussed earlier. For example, members may entertain questions such as “what could happen?” “where are we vulnerable?” “what is the worst-case scenario?” and “what are the short- and long- term outlooks?” The five-steps in the crisis risk assessment model are: (1) risk identification, (2) risk assessment and ranking, (3) risk reduction, (4) crisis prevention, and (5) crisis management. (See Exhibit 12.2.)
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 437 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
438 part 3 OrganizatiOnaL LEaDErship
Step 2. risk assessment and ranking Next, these incidents are analyzed and ranked using criteria such as loss of life, injuries, emotional trauma, or minimal inconvenience for each incident’s human impact. On the financial and image side, ranking criteria such as extraordinary impact (i.e., it will bank- rupt the organization), serious but insured (i.e., we are covered), or small impact (i.e., nothing to worry about) may be employed. This information is then used as the basis for launching the third step, which is risk reduction.
Step 3. risk reduction During the risk reduction step, the crisis leader shares the risk chart with larger audiences, and they begin debating and formulating strategies for countering top-ranked potential crisis or threat. SWOT analysis comes into play as a tool in determining what resources and capabilities are available or needed to better manage each crisis. For instance, assume the or- ganization is a chemical plant. An item on the risk chart may indicate the risk of a “poisonous gas leak” as a likely event. A SWOT analysis of this particular risk may progress as follows: The crisis team identifies strengths the organization has if such an incident should occur (such as scientists who have experience working with poison gas), weaknesses (such as the present lack of a poisonous gas leak response plan), opportunities (such as community support for the plant because of its economic impact on the area), and threats (such as environmentalists who are likely to protest and demand that the plant be closed). Based on this analysis, the crisis team may recommend a risk-reduction plan that calls on the organization to begin safety awareness programs and conduct joint meetings with local emergency response teams such as the hospital or fire department. The process is repeated for other risk scenarios identified on the chart.
Step 4. Pre-Crisis Simulation and Drill Plan Pre-crisis simulations and drills are conducted to test employees’ responsiveness. Again, SWOT analysis information is used to fine-tune this step. This step helps sensitize the organization to any potential crisis. After the simulations and drills and the resulting discussions, evaluations, and feedback from managers at all levels of the organization, the crisis team can then rest easy with the assurance that the organization is better prepared to handle such a crisis.
Step 5. Crisis management Ongoing reviews and updates to the crisis plan become a regular part of doing business in the organization.
WOrK Application 12-4 Using your college or university as a reference, identify five risk areas that could result in crisis if nothing is done now. Recommend a risk reduction plan or strategy that can help your school avert or deal with a crisis for one of these risk areas.
2. In your opinion, could the crisis at Kodak have been avoided?
The shor t answer is yes. Kodak’s was a slow evolving crisis that previous leaders and the board failed to see until it was almost too late. Failure to restructure and diversify into new and attractive business sectors in a timely manner meant an over-reliance on an old business model that was no longer relevant for the technological revolution the industry was undergoing. It was a crisis brought on by a lack of leadership.
It is a fact of life that in spite of all the crisis-prevention planning that organizations undergo, sooner or later a crisis will emerge and an organization will have to deal with it.
OPENING CASE application
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 438 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 12 Crisis LEaDErship anD thE LEarning OrganizatiOn 439
Ultimately, the best gauge to determine an organization’s readiness to respond to a crisis is how it rates according to the following five factors:45
1. Quality of crisis plan 2. Awareness and access to crisis management information 3. Readiness for an effective and timely response 4. Effective communication plan in place 5. Effective crisis leadership
As mentioned in step 4 and 5 of the crisis risk reduction model, unless the crisis response plan is rehearsed and practiced regularly, it becomes just another document collecting dust on the bookshelf.
How a company deals with a crisis from a communications standpoint can make or break it. The next section focuses on the importance of effective communication during a crisis.
YOU Make the ethICaL Call
12.1 Toyota Recall Crisis
The Toyota recall crisis of 2010 prompted much criticism in media circles, national business forums, and automotive trade publications. The original complaint from some customers was that the brakes were failing and causing accidents. One such case was a driver on the freeway who had called 911 to repor t an ongoing crisis he was experienc- ing as his Toyota was not responding to repeated attempts to stop. Toyota did its own tests and kept saying that they had found nothing wrong with the brakes. At some point, as the media attention mounted, Toyota said they had concluded that the floor mats were causing the problem. Many lawsuits were filed against Toyota. Later, it was repor ted that the driver on the freeway had staged the supposed problem he was repor ting about. There are those who think Toyota waited too long to take the complaints seriously and others who think it was unfair the way the American media targeted Toyota without waiting for the facts. It so happens that all this was happening at the same time that the American auto industr y was going through its worst crisis. Some have speculated that the Toyota crisis did help the American auto manufacturers as many people switched from Toyota to American models.
A recent sur vey on this subject revealed the following: from a total of 109 par ticipants that included 72 business college students and 37 adults from the local community, a majority (57 percent) of the sample felt that Toyota leadership’s handling of the recall was somewhat disappointing or very poor. Moreover, few respondents (18 percent) had any confidence in the veracity of public statements from Toyota. With regard to ethics, 50 percent of the sample felt that Toyota’s decision making is unethical to some degree. In addition, a majority (56 percent) expressed little faith in Toyota’s transparency during this crisis. Notewor thy is that only 13 percent felt that Toyota would probably not regain its prominence in the auto sector.46
1. In your opinion, was the media coverage of the crisis fair and ethical?
2. What would you criticize of the sur vey results and the methodology for collecting the data?
3. If 50 percent of the sample felt that Toyota’s decision making is unethical to some degree, why then is it that only 13 percent felt that Toyota would probably not regain its prominence in the auto sector?
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 439 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
440 part 3 OrganizatiOnaL LEaDErship
Describe the importance of effective communication during a crisis. Learning Outcome
6
effective Crisis Communication Leaders must be able to communicate quickly and effectively during crises. It has become increasingly clear that opening communication lines with primar y stakeholders— employees, customers, board members, the news media, and regulatory bodies—is critical for survival when a crisis hits. Four questions that often emerge after a crisis are: (1) what happened? (2) how did it happen? (3) what’s being done to address the crisis? and (4) what has been done to ensure it never happens again? Providing honest, accurate, and timely answers to these questions is the essence of effective crisis communication.49 The crisis response team must guard against releasing information too late or not countering rumors and myths in real time.50
Another potential problem with crisis communication is the seniority level of the per- son representing the organization. As mentioned before, it is important for the CEO or the most senior leader in the organization to show up rather than retreat to the back- ground. The level of seniority demonstrates to the public the seriousness with which the incident is viewed. The organization does not want to send the message that it does not care or take the crisis seriously.51 Leaders who retreat into their foxholes during a crisis are more likely to engage in a blame game—trying to assign responsibility and account- ability to someone else.
Others, especially employees, can also play a critical role during crisis. To emotion- ally cope with a crisis, members of the community may need more than institutionally framed messages. They may seek information from employees or other sources. There- fore, well-informed employees can assist the organization in presenting accurate facts to the outside world on the current crisis.52 They can only do this if they have been kept in the loop.
Internally, everyone should know what role(s) they would play in the event of a crisis and how communication will be handled within and between departments. There should be no power struggles over jurisdiction. It is important for everyone to be on the same page in communicating a unified message. Therefore, investing time and other resources in developing a comprehensive crisis communication system is necessary.53
Also, employees, even those at the lower levels of the organization, may have excellent insight on the incident and valuable suggestions on solution alternatives. Their immediate input may provide the pathway to a quick recovery. In the long term, this team approach will have won over the confidence, loyalty, and commitment of the employees who
3. how effective has CeO perez been in managing the crisis he inherited?
The evidence so far indicates that Mr. Perez is successfully transforming Kodak. As a result of Perez’s reorganization strat- egy, Kodak today is leaner, financially stronger, and ready to grow. The stock price that once traded for just cents to the dollar is now back over $27 a share.
OPENING CASE application
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 440 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 12 Crisis LEaDErship anD thE LEarning OrganizatiOn 441
appreciate being included and listened to during the crisis. Employees’ sense of belonging and self-worth is enhanced, and a culture of teamwork and cohesion is created. The post- crisis feeling of “we did it together” can carry over into other areas as the organization moves forward.
The literature is rich with several “dos” and “don’ts” when it comes to effective crisis communication. Some of these “dos” and “don’ts” are presented as part of the discussion on the guidelines to effective crisis communication. This is our next discussion.
4. In your opinion, has Mr. perez been an effective communicator in the way he has handled the crisis?
Effective communication is the key. The CEO should be out there communicating the what, how, and when. People need to know the facts and what leadership is doing to address the crisis. On January 8, 2014, Perez—joined by customers and other Kodak leaders—rang the opening bell to kick off Kodak’s new era and spotlight its return to NYSE. He is out communicating to key stakeholders (customers, employees, shareholders, and others) his vision and strategy for bringing Kodak out of its doldrums. His style of leadership and actions have endeared him to many including members of the Board of Directors who kept him on despite vocal calls for his removal.
OPENING CASE application
Guidelines to effective Crisis Communication It is generally believed that the first 24 hours of a crisis are crucial because of the media’s need to know what happened so they can tell their audiences. There is an information vacuum that, if left unfilled, will be filled by others. The longer organizations wait, the more likely falsehoods will become accepted as truths.54 The key is to be open, straight- forward, and transparent. Tell the truth and tell it quickly. Telling the truth up front is the simplest and most effective way of defusing public hostility, no matter how bad the incident.55
Rather than being preoccupied with protecting itself from liability, a company must demonstrate a strong sense of integrity, responsibility, and commitment. Getting out in front of the crisis with honest accounts of the facts and accepting responsibility will build confidence and credibility with all stakeholders.56
An organization can use a number of media and disclosure mechanisms to inform the public or tell its side of the story to weather the storm brought on by a crisis. These include press releases, press kits, news conferences, and one-on-one interviews with vari- ous media.57 A press release is a printed statement that describes how an organization is responding to a crisis and who is in charge. A press kit is a package of information about a company, including names and pictures of its executives, a fact sheet, and key milestones in the company’s history. In the event of a crisis, the last item included in the press kit is a specific press release related to the current incident. This package is ready for distribution to the media when a crisis breaks.
The public needs fast and accurate information so they are in the best possible position to cope with the shock of a crisis.58 Telling what your organization is doing to address a crisis is especially important to family or close relatives of victims, especially a crisis that
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 441 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
442 part 3 OrganizatiOnaL LEaDErship
YOU Make the ethICaL Call
12.2 GM’s Recall Crisis
Refer to the discussion we presented at the beginning of this chapter on the GM recall. You can Google the topic for more information.
During a congressional hearing on the matter, Republicans and Democrats questioned GM’s CEO Mar y Barra on what she knew of the ignition problems, when she knew it, what she was doing so far to address the needs of those who have been hur t, and how she can prevent such a problem in the future. Many family members of the victims did not think she was being truthful. Some analysts thought her apologies went too far and may in the end jeopardize GM’s legal defense case and expose it to higher levels of liability.
1. In your opinion, does the GM case have ethical implications and what are the ethical issues?
2. What is your opinion on the contrasting positions of family members of the victims and industry analysts regarding CEO Barra’s public statements so far?
3. Based on what you have read on the media coverage of the crisis, how would you evaluate CEO Barra’s communications strategy on the crisis so far?
4. In your opinion, will this issue be a major factor in investors’ decision to buy or not buy GM’s stock? Explain.
is the result of wrongdoing by an organization. These family members must be handled with utmost sensitivity. Leaders must avoid paternalistic attitudes that treat victims or the public as unintelligent or uninformed. The absence of genuine concern and empathy can lead to a perception of arrogance.59 Exhibit 12.3 presents ten simple communication rules to remember during a crisis.
Effective Crisis Communication—rules to Follow EXHIBIT 12.3
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
a. Be present.
b. Don’t “spin.” Tell it like it is.
c. Communicate the plan of action for resolving the crisis.
d. Be sensitive with affected parties.
e. Avoid conflicting messages.
f. Show a plan for how you will avoid a repeat in the future.
g. Don’t make excuses for yourself or the leader.
h. Go the extra mile. Go beyond the requirements of the situation.
i. When things are going good, take credit for it without being self-absorbed.
j. The media is your friend and link to the public. Be honest and straightforward with them.60
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 442 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 12 Crisis LEaDErship anD thE LEarning OrganizatiOn 443
The Learning Organization and Knowledge Management Today’s organizations—large and small—are challenged by intense competitive pressure. Learning and knowledge management are widely seen as competencies able to support the management of complex situations in times of turbulence.61 Organizational learning is the pathway to knowledge creation, and knowledge is seen as a strategic resource. 62
Because of environmental complexities, organizations are increasingly dependent on innovation to create value for their customers. In a k nowledge-based economy, learning and creativity are key to maintaining one’s competitiveness.63 For this to hap- pen, leaders must develop knowledge-integration capabilities to dynamically coordi- nate and translate members’ knowledge into higher performance.64 The question for many leaders is how to continuously harness this human capacity for the growth and survival of the organization.65
Rules of Effective Crisis Communications Using the letters a through j that accompany the guidelines in Exhibit 12.3, identify which guideline is explained by each statement below.
1. The public relations person addresses the media and says something that is later contradicted by the CEO in his own press conference.
2. After the Concorde crashed, the French authorities along with British Airways immediately grounded all Concorde flights until the designers came up with a fuel tank protection solution.
3. The accident happened because we relied on faulty instruments from our subcontractor who designed the part. Without their error, this would never have happened.
4. Family or close ones of victims, or those affected, are brought to a central location and provided with services such as counseling, support, and other facilities that might be needed to help them cope.
5. Information is held back or filtered to say only what the leaders or those in charge want you to know about a crisis.
6. The CEO of a company is on vacation when a crisis breaks out but refuses to cancel his vacation and return home to deal with the crisis.
7. The principal of a high school where a fatal shooting has just taken place appears before parents to explain what he and the security team are doing in response to the crisis. Many of the parents criticize him afterward for not having much to say about the incident.
8. Expect and treat victims and/or family members’ emotional outbursts with empathy.
9. I don’t like the press because they tend to overemphasize the negative as if we have never done anything good in this community. From now on, I will only tell them what they need to know.
10. After our post-crisis analysis, I realized that we did everything just right to address the crisis despite the criticisms that we received early on from some groups. It is a good thing we did not listen to them; after all what do they know about crisis management?
CONCept APPLICATION 12-1
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 443 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
444 part 3 OrganizatiOnaL LEaDErship
In his book The Fif th Discipline, Peter Senge ma kes a compelling case t hat an organization’s survival is linked to its ability to learn and adapt. He describes a learning organization as one that can develop not only new capabilities but also undergo a funda- mental mind-set transformation.66 To stay competitive, organizations must continuously innovate.
The responsibility of any organization desirous of change and innovation in a rapidly changing environment must be for its leaders to make it a priority to build and maintain a learning culture that engages employees in learning activities and that enables them to master new knowledge, skills, and abilities.67
In this section, we examine the concept of the learning organization, how a learning organization differs from a traditional organization, and the role of leadership in creating a learning organizational culture.
Describe the key characteristics of a learning organization. Learning Outcome
7
Learning Organization Characterisitcs The learning organization describes a work environment with the following charac- teristics: (a) work patterns, structures, and routines are open to continuous adapta- tion and improvement, (b) everyone engages in continuous learning, (c) the culture is supportive of experimentation, creativity and innovation,68 (d) knowledge creation and application is an imperative, and (e) decision mak ing is informed by objective facts and analysis.
In rapidly changing environments, characterized by increasing globalization, intense competition, and continuous demographic and technological shifts, employee skills and abilities can quickly become obsolete and irrelevant. In this type of environment, there is increasing pressure on everyone to continuously upgrade their skills, abilities, and knowledge.69 Learning organizations are constantly reinventing themselves so much so that the process itself is seen as a distinctive capability for those who do it exceptionally well.70 For these organizations, change is a way of life. Employees who upgrade their skills package through continuous learning have better employment prospects than those who stick with their current knowledge base.
Organizations must learn to create and assimilate new knowledge at an increasing pace, share the knowledge, and learn to compete in new ways. This is more likely to happen in organizations that have adopted a learning organizational culture. A learning organization culture is one in which members have accepted and embraced continuous learning and knowledge creation as a way of life.71,72 The results of one study showed a strong and statistically significant relationship between organizational learning culture and innovativeness.73 We define a learning organization as one that is skilled at creating, acquiring, and transferring knowledge, and at modifying behavior to ref lect new knowledge and insights.74 It is through learning that knowledge is created. In the past, organizations generally viewed learning as formal training programs that took place during specified periods of the year. However, many now recognize that learning should be an ongoing activity for every employee. Each assignment, job responsibility, temporary or permanent project, and other daily tasks are opportunities for expansive learning.75
Leaders, especially those in top positions, must create the type of environment that supports and nurtures collective learning (also known as organizational learning).76 Only
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 444 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 12 Crisis LEaDErship anD thE LEarning OrganizatiOn 445
through learning do members acquire new knowledge and develop capabilities that result in new products/services.77
Organizational learning can occur from interactions that take place internally or externally. Externally, an organization can learn from its customers, suppliers, competi- tors, industry and academic publications, business partners, and consultants. Internally, organizations can learn from their employees. Every employee, especially those who work directly with customers, is a great source of new ideas.78
What Is Knowledge Management? Creating, storing, and leveraging knowledge are integral to knowledge management processes.79 Organizational knowledge is the tacit and explicit know-how that individuals possess about products, services, systems, and processes. Explicit or formal knowledge is expressed in a system of rules and is easily communicated and shared. It is often codified in manuals, databases, and information systems.
Tacit or informal knowledge is highly personal, difficult to communicate, strongly rooted in action, and highly contextual in nature. Unlike explicit knowledge, such as the design of a product or the description of a business process, tacit knowledge is the instinct and intuition that an experienced practitioner possesses.80
Organizational knowledge has been referred to as intellectual or human capital and is seen as a competitive asset for sustaining one’s advantage in today’s marketplace. Human capital is among key organizational resources that are hard to imitate; there- fore, maintaining and developing it is crucial for organizations to stay competitive.81 Superior performance is achieved when newly acquired knowledge is disseminated and integrated with existing k nowledge and applied to solve problems. Therefore, the tendency by some to hide new knowledge from coworkers is counterproductive and creates other problems. The f indings of one study revealed that when employ- ees hide k nowledge, they trigger a reciprocal distrust loop in which coworkers are unwilling to share knowledge with them and everyone suffers.82 Organizations must invest in human capital development approaches that lead to knowledge creation and application.83
6. Describe the threats facing Kodak in its external environment. Do these threats support or go against adopting a learning organizational culture?
Kodak, like many other multinational corporations, is facing major threats from the technological, economic, and competitive environments. Kodak’s industry is undergoing a digital revolution. As a result, the company is losing ground to competitors like Sony, Nikon, Canon, Olympus, and other smaller manufacturers in the digital imaging business who were much faster at innovating and responding to market demands. Mr. Perez attributed par t of Kodak’s economic decline to the weak economy. Today, Kodak describes itself as a company centered on disruptive technologies and breakthrough solutions—a clear indication that the company is returning to its roots as a learning or knowledge-based enterprise.
OPENING CASE application
Before we get into the details of the learning organization and how it differs from the traditional organization, complete Self-Assessment 12-1.
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 445 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
446 part 3 OrganizatiOnaL LEaDErship
Learning OrganizationsSELF-ASSESSMENT 12-1
select an organization you work or have worked for and rate it for each question on a scale of 1–5. if you are not sure, rate it as 3.
5 — 4 — 3 — 2 — 1 Describes organization Does NOT describe organization
1. The organization has a flat structure, few layers of management, and makes decisions quickly.
2. Decision making is decentralized; lower- level managers make important decisions.
3. There are no job descriptions, or they are very general and focused on getting the job done.
4. There is a focus on continuous improve- ment and change.
5. Everyone has easy access to communi- cate with anyone.
6. Managers encourage creative thinking. 7. Managers listen to and implement
employee ideas for improvement. 8. The climate encourages experimentation
of new ideas. 9. There are incentives for learning new things. 10. There are incentives for contributing new
ideas and innovations. 11. Employees are encouraged to identify
and solve problems.
12. There are no departmental boundaries; people don’t focus on developing depart- mental power.
13. When new methods are developed, they are shared with everyone throughout the organization to use.
14. The focus is on teamwork, not individual accomplishments.
15. When employees implement new ideas that fail, they are encouraged to keep trying rather than being punished.
add up your score. place the score here and on the continuum below.
75—70—65—60—55—50—45—40—35—30—25—20—15 Learning organization NOT a learning organization
the higher the score, the more characteristic the firm is of a learning organization. Most organizations group around the middle.
Distinguish between the traditional and the learning organization. Learning Outcome
8
traditional versus the Learning Organization By all accounts, most organizations today operate in environments characterized by continuous change, and for some—like the bio- and high-tech companies—the level of change is discontinuous. Discontinuous change occurs when anticipated or expected changes bear no resemblance to the present or the past. In this type of environment, learning and innovation are critical.84 In what used to be called stable environments, organizations focused on being efficient through highly structured command sys- tems with strong vertical hierarchies and specialized jobs. However, given the realities of the current dynamic environment facing just about every industry, this traditional organization form is being replaced by the learning organization form. See Exhibit 12.4 for a comparison of the two organization types.
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 446 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 12 Crisis Leadership and the Learning OrganizatiOn 447
Characteristics of the Traditional Organization The traditional organization is based on the bureaucratic model that emphasizes a command-and-control structure, centralized decision making, highly formalized systems, and specialized tasks. These vertical bureaucratic structures are effective under stable environmental conditions where the pace of change is slow or incremental at best.
More often than not, the culture of the traditional organization is rigid and resistant to change. There is less openness and sharing of ideas. Rewards and other incentives are individualized. This fosters competition and less collaboration among individuals.
The mind-set of leaders in the traditional organization is that there is a “right way” to do things and a wrong way. There is an elaborate formal system of reporting that allows leaders to closely monitor work operations that are rigidly defined and special- ized. This formal system is a powerful tool for controlling information and often acts as a filter in determining what information leaders pass down to lower-level employees. Because the traditional organization is efficiency driven, deviating from standard operat- ing procedures is frowned upon and mistakes are punished. Therefore, employees don’t take chances, and mistakes and problems are hidden.
Characteristics of the Learning Organization The learning organization culture is open, adaptive, and innovation-driven. 85 In learn- ing organizations, the vertical structure is abandoned for a f lat and f lexible structure. Flat and f lexible structures are set up for greater participation and less bureaucratic red tape in decision making. Strategy formulation in these organizations is a collaborative process. This, in turn, leads to greater input and better decisions in the strategy-making process.86
Interdisciplinary teams and network systems are highly valued tools in learning orga- nizations.87 Network systems facilitate open communication and exchange throughout the organization and with other external entities. Networks that connect teams provide access to knowledge, resources, markets, and technologies.88
To encourage innovation and creativity in meeting current challenges, learning orga- nizations are putting fewer restrictions on how things should be done. Responsibility and authority are decentralized to lower-level workers, empowering them to think, debate, create, learn, and solve problems at their level.89
A learning organization culture encourages individual, group, and organizational levels of analysis.90 It involves multiple learning processes (experimentation, analysis, intuition, serendipity, or integration). There is a recognition that learning should f low
Key Differences between the Traditional and the Learning Organization EXHIBIT 12.4
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
traditional (efficiency driven) Learning (innovation driven)
• Stable environment • Vertical bureaucratic structure • Strategy formulation is top-down • Centralized decision making • Rigidly defined and specialized tasks • Rigid organizational culture • Top-down communication model
• Changing environment • Flat and flexible structure • Strategy formulation is collaborative • Decentralized decision making • Loose, flexible, and adaptive roles • Adaptive organizational culture • Open, two-way communication model
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 447 10/20/14 11:53 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
448 part 3 OrganizatiOnaL LEaDErship
forward (from those at the bottom to the top) and f low backward (from the top to those at the bottom). Learning is a multilevel, organization-wide process. The most successful learning organizations compound their learning advantage by encouraging employees at all levels to collect and share information across boundaries rather than hoarding it.91 The infrastructure for these types of exchanges are communication and information hubs that facilitate the f low and exchange of information.
The learning organization takes the view that people will learn if encouraged to be creative, to experiment, and to ref lect on their experiences.92,93 Creating a sense of collective ownership of the learning process can be an important motivational force. In learning organizations, there is ack nowledgement that people learn more from their mistakes than successes. This is supported by research findings that knowledge acquired through failure tends to depreciate slowly than knowledge acquired from successes.94 Thus, failure does not draw the same negative reactions like in traditional organizations.
Examples of learning organizations today include Google, Facebook, Apple, Toyota, W. L. Gore & Associates, Xerox, 3M, Johnson & Johnson, Procter & Gamble, and many others. These companies are finding that success is more about nurturing the imagina- tion, creativity, and passion of employees to solve customer problems than focusing on costs and profits.
WOrK Application 12-5 Explain whether where you work or have worked is more of a traditional organization or a learning organization. Identify some of the characteristics of the organization to justify your response.
7. In your opinion, does Kodak represent the traditional organization or the learning organization?
The company that gave birth to the first digital camera in 1975 was now being left behind in the digital revolution. Kodak had turned into a slow-moving bureaucratic company. Coming out of what has been one of the most trying periods in the company’s history, Kodak has transformed into a business-to-business (B2B) company focused on its imaging business. Today, it describes itself as a company centered on disruptive technologies and breakthrough solutions. It is apparent that Kodak is returning to its roots as a learning organization.
OPENING CASE application
Differentiating between the traditional and learning organization Identify each statement by the type of organization it illustrates. Write the appropriate letter in the blank before each item. a. traditional b. learning
11. In our organization, employees are encouraged to experiment and take risk without fear of punishment when they fail.
12. Top-level managers make all the important decisions around here.
13. Our organization’s structure can be described as flat or horizontal with much decision-making responsibility delegated downward.
14. With a union, we have clearly defined jobs and are not allowed to do other work.
15. There aren’t many levels of management in our company.
CONCept APPLICATION 12-2
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 448 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 12 Crisis LEaDErship anD thE LEarning OrganizatiOn 449
the Learning Organization Culture and Firm performance It is believed that a learning organization is more likely to develop and sustain its competitiveness because human capital assets are less substitutable and difficult to dupli- cate than other assets.95 Increasingly, researchers are finding that the higher the level of learning and knowledge creation, the greater the level of firm financial and non-financial performance.96 Here are a few examples:
• Studies investigating the relationship between knowledge creation and value creation found that a firm’s ability to create and share knowledge is positively related to new product development success.
• Productivity and profits increase in organizations that embrace a learning culture. • Organizational learning cultures have been found to have a positive and direct influence
on a team’s creativity and its collaborative knowledge creation practices.97,98,99,100 • Organizational learning and knowledge creation have a direct positive influence on the
level of creativity and innovation.101,102 • The learning organization culture has been shown to have a direct positive impact on
employee, customer, and supplier satisfaction levels.103 • The learning organization culture displays significantly higher levels of organizational
citizenship behavior, knowledge-sharing intention, interpersonal trust, and organiza- tional commitment amongst employees.104
the role of Leaders in Creating a Learning Organization Culture Leaders are seen as the inspirational force behind employee engagement in learning activities that result in new knowledge.105,106 On the flip side, leader behavior can also impede follower creativity and innovative behavior.107 The learning organization is driven to innovate.
Leaders in learning organizations face a dual challenge to maintain efficient operations and create a f lexible and adaptive organization at the same time.108 For example, leaders have to balance the need to encouraging creativity and f lexibility versus emphasizing efficiency and strict controls.109 Exhibit 12.5 presents recommendations that leaders can employ to create conditions conducive to learning and knowledge creation.
Describe the role of leadership in creating a learning organization culture. Learning Outcome
9
Fostering a Learning Organizational Culture EXHIBIT 12.5
© C
en ga
ge L
ea rn
in g®
• Encourage creative thinking.
• Create a climate where risk taking and failure are tolerated.
• Provide incentives for learning and innovation.
• Build confidence in followers’ capacity to learn and adapt.
• Encourage systems thinking.
• Institute mechanisms for channeling and nurturing creative ideas for innovation.
• Create a shared vision for learning.
• Broaden employees’ frame of reference.
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 449 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
450 part 3 OrganizatiOnaL LEaDErship
Encourage Creative Thinking Creative thinking can occur at the individual, group, and organizational level. At the individua l level, leaders can enhance learning by encouraging members to “think outside t he box”—in ot her words, consider possibilities t hat do not a lready exist. Rather than responding to k nown cha llenges, employees are encouraged to create the future.110 People who advocate radical or different ideas must not be looked on as disruptive or troublesome. At the organizational and group level, creativity is affected by leadership style, culture, climate, structure, and systems that the organization has in place.111 A facilitative leadership st yle, learning organization culture, suppor t- ive work climate, f lexible structure, and adaptive systems can all contribute toward higher levels of creativity.
Create a Climate of risk Taking and Tolerance for Failure Some of the most important inventions or scientif ic brea kthroughs resulted from investigating failed outcomes. Unfortunately, in many organizations, when experiments or full-scale ventures fail, the tendency is to immediately abandon the activity to save face or avoid negative consequences. This is often the wrong approach, because more learning takes place from things that go wrong than from things that go right. After all, when things turn out as expected, it just confirms existing theories or assumptions. New insights are more likely when there is an investigation into why expected outcomes were not realized. An organization that claims to support experimentation should not then turn around and punish employees for taking risks that are within accepted company guidelines.
Provide Incentives for Learning and Innovation The use of incent ives a nd rewa rds is a power f u l tool t hat leaders ca n employ to encourage learning and innovation. Organizations are often criticized for proclaiming themselves as champions of learning and innovation but not able to provide matching incentives.
Build Confidence in Followers’ Capacity to Learn and Adapt Providing opportunities for employees to solve problems will increase their confidence and pride in the process especially when their successes are rewarded and celebrated. With each celebrated success comes greater confidence in dealing with new challenges. Over time, a habit of creativity and resulting innovation is institutionalized and becomes a way of life.112
Encourage Systems Thinking To enhance broad-based learning, the leader should help members see the organization as a system in which everybody’s work affects the work of everybody else. The empha- sis on the whole system eliminates boundaries both within the organization and with other partners, which allows for collaboration and continuous learning.113 Benchmark- ing of best practices is encouraged. Benchmarking is a process that allows an organi- zation to adopt the best practices of others. An organization striving for excellence will even improve upon the best practices of competitors and launch innovations ahead of competitors.114
Institute Mechanisms for Channeling and Nurturing Creative Ideas for Innovation The birth of a new idea or k nowledge begins with the individual. Knowledge that is shared has a multiplying or cumulative effect. Ideas generated within or outside an organization may become the source of new products or innovations. Venture teams, task
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 450 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 12 Crisis LEaDErship anD thE LEarning OrganizatiOn 451
forces, information systems networks, seminars, and workshops are mechanisms that can be used to diffuse knowledge and to channel creative ideas to appropriate locations for evaluation and application.115
Create a Shared Vision for Learning Creating a shared vision enhances learning as organization members develop a com- mon purpose and commitment to make learning an ongoing part of the organiza- tion. If employees all believe that the organization is headed toward greatness, they will be motivated to be part of it by learning and contributing their best ideas and solutions.116
Broaden Employees’ Frame of reference A person’s frame of reference determines how he or she sees the world. The ways we gather, analyze, and interpret information—and how we make decisions based on such informa- tion—are affected by our personal frames of reference. A frame of reference influences people’s assumptions, and those assumptions, consciously or unconsciously, affect how they interpret events. To enhance employees’ ability to learn, it is important for leaders to broaden the lens through which employees see the organization and the world around them. Exposing employees to different experiences and practices outside of their normal environment is one way to broaden their frame of reference. A manufacturing business, for example, may take its employees to observe how a NASCAR pit crew functions during races. Or, a retail chain may take its staff to Las Vegas to observe how casino and hotel staff perform their jobs.
Learning is a never-ending exercise. Leaders must communicate the message that learning and continuous improvements are imperative in today’s highly dy namic business environment. Leaders must take the lead in challenging the status quo and creating organizationa l conditions that are conducive to learning and continuous innovation.117
YOU Make the ethICaL Call
12.3 Departmentalization
Colleges and universities are known to have rigid depar tments, such as economics, management, marketing, accounting, and finance. At some schools, these depar tments are more concerned about themselves (related to budgets and number of faculty and courses) than ser ving students and cooperating with other depar tments. For example, some economics faculty have stated that they are concerned with theor y and don’t need to teach anything practical. There is also overlap in some courses offered by differ- ent depar tments, such as strategy being taught in management and marketing courses. In the business world, there is a trend to break down the barriers between depar tments and to be much more cooperative. However, academia doesn’t seem to be following this trend.
1. Should the faculty’s top priority be students, their depar tment, or cooperating with other depar tments?
2. Should faculty move away from a focus on theory to more practical applications to business?
3. Should colleges follow the business trend of breaking away from depar tments and cooperate more? Or are they different from businesses, thus needing clear depar t- ments differentiated by discipline?
WOrK Application 12-6 The workplace should be a place of learning but some critics argue that not all of them have a culture that encourages learning. Of the eight recommendations for fostering a learning organizational culture in Exhibit 12.5, how many would you say are true of your current or past workplace?
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 451 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
452 part 3 OrganizatiOnaL LEaDErship
Now that you have learned about crisis leadership and the learning organization, you may find it interesting to see how your own personality traits match up. Complete Self-Assessment 12-2.
8. What additional steps will you recommend that Mr. perez take to make Kodak more of a learning organization?
CEO Perez can employ many of the guidelines for enhancing organizational learning listed in Exhibit 12.5 and described in this section. Action on all or any number of these guidelines will increase Kodak’s efforts to become a successful learning organization.
OPENING CASE application
personality and Crisis and the Learning OrganizationSELF-ASSESSMENT 12-2
Crisis When facing a crisis, surgency personalities tend to take the leadership position to solve the crisis, and agreeable ness personalities are glad to follow. those with adjust ment problems tend to get emotional under the pressure of a crisis and often get defensive and deny there is a problem, whereas conscientious personalities with an openness to experience tend to want to resolve the crisis. how do you handle crisis situations? how can you improve?
Learning Organization the key personality trait that differs between the tra ditional organization and the learning organization is openness to new experience. if you are closed to new experience, you will tend to like a traditional organiza tion in which change is slow and top management makes the decisions. if you are open to new experiences, you will tend to enjoy a learning organization in which you are encouraged and valued for implementing change and making many of your own decisions. Would you be more comfortable in a traditional or learning organization? Why?
The chapter summary is organized to answer the nine learning outcomes for this chapter.
1 explain why crisis leadership competency is an important consideration when hiring new leaders.
Crises are inevitable. it is not a question of “if ” a cri sis will happen, but “when.” a crisis can inflict severe
damage to an organization if not properly managed. in a crisis, stock prices plummet and costs escalate, causing both short and longterm financial losses. a crisis that is mismanaged can also damage an organization’s reputa tion and diminish consumer confidence in the organiza tion’s mission, or in some cases can lead to its demise altogether. For these reasons, leaders must show some competency in crisis leadership and management.
Chapter Summary
“Take It To The Net”. Access student resources at www.cengagebrain.com. Search for Lussier, Leadership 6e to find student study tools.
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 452 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 12 Crisis LEaDErship anD thE LEarning OrganizatiOn 453
2 What are the benefits of having a crisis manage- ment plan in advance of a crisis.
precrisis planning buys you time. You are ready when a crisis strikes. having a crisis management plan in place can (a) reduce the duration of a crisis, (b) enhance or retain a corporation’s image and reputation, (c) allow for quick and effective responses, (d) improve commu nications, (e) enhance coordination and cooperation, (f) ensure ready and available resources, (g) ensure fewer costly mistakes, (h) ensure less panic, (i) ensure quicker resolution of the crisis, and (j) limit or protect financial loss
3 Briefly describe the three stages of a crisis management plan.
the threestage crisis management plan consists of pre crisis planning, leading during a crisis, and adapting after a crisis. pre-crisis planning addresses two key questions: (1) Do we have a crisis response team and who is on it? and (2) What is our crisis plan of action? having a standing crisis response team increases an organization’s ability to respond to a crisis in a timely and effective manner. On the second question, developing a crisis plan of action in volves imagining the worst possible scenarios that could happen to the organization and the impact on employ ees, customers, or operational systems. action plans for high ranking crisis scenarios are developed and practiced. Leading during a crisis requires a rapid response. the crisis leader must step forward and lead. the leader’s job is to insure that everyone plays their role as spelled out in the precrisis plan. adapting after a crisis is about lessons learned. Most forwardlooking organizations do a postmortem. that is, in the aftermath of a crisis, top management authorizes a review of the organization’s effectiveness in managing the crisis.
4 Describe the role of the top management during a crisis.
When there is a crisis, employees will look to the CEO or other top management personnel on how to cope with the situation. During a crisis, top management should (1) stay engaged and lead from the front, (2) focus on the big picture and communicate the vision, and (3) work with the crisis leader and the crisis manage ment team. Effective leaders understand that their job during a crisis includes showing compassion for victims, and other affected parties.
5 Describe the five-step process for crisis risk assessment.
the fivestep process for risk assessment consists of: (1) risk identification, (2) risk assessment and rank ing, (3) risk reduction strategies, (4) crisis prevention and simulations, and (5) crisis management. in step 1 (risk identification), crisis team members begin by iden tifying the worstcase scenarios that could have severe
consequences on people, the organization’s financial po sition, or its image. this process results in the creation of a risk chart. step 2 (risk assessment and ranking), potential crisis incidents are analyzed and ranked. step 3 (risk re- duction strategies), there is debate and discussion of the crisis scenarios in step 2 and strategies for countering each incident are formulated. step 4 (crisis prevention simulations), precrisis drills such as simulations are con ducted to test employees’ responsiveness. step 5 (crisis management), the plan is reviewed and updated on a regular basis and ready to be put into action in the event of a real crisis.
6 Describe the importance of effective communi- cation during a crisis.
Four questions that often emerge after a crisis are: (1) What happened? (2) how did it happen? (3) What’s being done to address the crisis? and (4) What has been done to ensure it never happens again? providing hon est, accurate, and timely answers to these questions is the essence of effective crisis communication. another potential problem during crisis communication is the seniority level of the person representing the organi zation. it is important for the CEO or the most senior leader in the organization to show up rather than retreat to the background. the level of seniority dem onstrates to the public the seriousness with which the incident is viewed.
7 Describe the key characteristics of a learning organization.
the learning organization describes a work environ ment where (a) work patterns, structures, and routines are open to continuous adaptation and improvement, (b) everyone engages in continuous learning, (c) the culture is supportive of experimentation, creativity, and innovation, (d) knowledge creation and sharing are imperative, and (e) decision making is informed by objective facts and analysis
8 Distinguish between the traditional and the learning organization.
the following table highlights some of the differences between the traditional and the learning organization:
traditional (efficiency driven)
Learning (innovation driven)
• stable environment • Changing environment
• Vertical bureaucratic structure
• Flat adaptive structure
• strategy formulation is topdown
• strategy formulation is collaborative.
• Centralized decision making
• Decentralized decision making
Chapter 12 Crisis LEaDErship anD thE LEarning OrganizatiOn 453
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 453 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
• rigidly defined and spe cialized tasks
• Loose, flexible, and adap tive roles
• rigid organizational culture
• adaptive organizational culture
• topdown communica tion model
• Open, twoway commu nication model
9 Describe the role of leadership in creating a learning organization culture.
in today’s rapidly changing business environment, orga nizations must transform into active learning organisms or risk becoming extinct. to succeed, organizations must be proactive and anticipatory, which requires continuous
adaptation and innovation. thus, the traditional organiza tion model that emphasizes efficiency and stability is be ing replaced by a model that is learning and knowledge driven. Leaders play a critical role in effecting this trans formation. Without effective leadership from the top, it is hard to imagine how the learning organization can suc ceed. a shared vision and culture of learning are critical to the success of a learning organization, and this is the domain of the strategic leader. Leaders can play a key role in organizational learning by encouraging creative think ing, creating a climate in which experimentation and risk taking are encouraged, providing incentives for learning and innovation, building confidence in followers’ capacity to learn and adapt, and encouraging systems thinking.
454 part 3 OrganizatiOnaL LEaDErship
1 In planning for a crisis, the leader has to focus on five inte- grated tasks. Identify these tasks.
2 How has social media affected the way crises are managed in our society today?
3 What are the main components of a pre-crisis plan?
4 Pre-crisis planning is about asking and answering two critical questions. What are they?
5 The best indicator of an organization’s readiness to respond to a crisis is how it rates in five areas of assess- ment. What are these five areas?
6 Briefly explain what a crisis management plan of action entails?
7 One of the characteristics of a learning organization’s cultures is that learning is a multilevel, organization-wide process. What exactly do we mean by this statement?
8 Explain or illustrate how a leader can foster a learning organizational culture by creating a climate where risk taking and failure are tolerated?
review Questions
crisis, 430
benchmarking, 450
discontinuous change, 446
learning organization, 444
organizational knowledge, 445
press kit, 441
press release, 441
Key terms
The following critical-thinking questions can be used for class discussion and/or as written assignments to develop commu- nication skills. Be sure to give complete explanations for all questions.
1 Describe why a senior leader’s physical presence is critical during a crisis.
2 What are the benefits of creating a comprehensive crisis response plan before a crisis happens?
3 What advice would you give to a leader who wants to improve his or her organization’s communications function so that it is more effective during a crisis?
4 How important to an organization is internal (employee) communication during a crisis?
5 What message does it send when the organizational culture encourages employees to view mistakes/problems as oppor tunities for improvement rather than reasons to blame or punish those involved?
Critical thinking Questions
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 454 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 12 Crisis LEaDErship anD thE LEarning OrganizatiOn 455
C a s E
Merck CEO–Ken Frazier. First African American Leading a Major Pharmaceutical Company
Mr. Kenneth Frazier has been the CEO of Merck since Januar y 1, 2011. In an industr y dominated by white men who are either scientists or salesmen, Ken Frazier is an unlikely CEO. He is a lawyer by training and an African American who grew up in Philadelphia’s inner city. He comes from a very humble background. His father was a jani- tor with a limited education who Frazier admires and adores. He describes his father as “one of the most intelligent men” he has ever met.
At the time of his appointment, many analysts saw Merck as a company in need of rejuvenation. Merck’s mission is to save and improve lives around the world, and to uphold the highest standards of ethics and integrity. All indications were that Merck was having a difficult time fulfilling this mission. For a company that has introduced more new medicines in the past 60 years than any other company, Merck ranks only fifth in new drug approvals over the past 10 years. Since 2003 the company’s stock has been up and down with no clear direction. Except for the purchase of Schering-Plough in 2009, organic growth has been stagnant. Merck has not launched a drug that has reached annual sales of more than $1 billion since 2007. Drug research is a high-risk and time-consuming process. Only one out of ever y 5,000–10,000 compounds screened becomes an approved drug. It takes an average of 10 to 15 years at an average cost of more than $1 billion to develop a successful medicine.118 Mr. Frazier was seen as the candidate best suited to set things right.
Mr. Frazier’s understanding of Merck’s business comes from his 35-year career with the company; first as an outside attorney and then as the company’s general counsel and top marketer. Frazier believes that Merck’s competitive advantage is the quality of its research, and he worships its researchers, who can spend 15 or more years developing a single new medicine. “All I can do is create an environment where really talented, smar t, committed people want to show up and (discover new drugs),” he once proclaimed.119 Echoing this sentiment, one writer said of Mr. Frazier, “He professes a near- religious belief in letting his scientists do their jobs.”120
After a slow start, Mr. Frazier has begun to make some real changes. A lot of his initiatives are right in line with our recom- mendations for fostering a learning organizational culture (see Exhibit 12-5). For example:
• Since assuming the leadership of Merck, Frazier has reit- erated his desire to return Merck to a culture of innova- tion. In his 2012 annual repor t he said, “We believe that innovative and productive research and development is the only sustainable way to create true and enduring value for all of our stakeholders.” He backed his com- mitment by increasing Merck’s R&D budget for research. The world is changing, Mr. Frazier said, but Merck’s focus on pursuing the best science and building a sustainable business is steadfast. One of the recommendations for fostering a culture of learning is to create a shared vision for learning.
• As a learning organization, Merck aims to promote a culture of professional development that will sup- por t its employees’ growth while aligning their career aspirations with the company’s strategic priorities. With its new professional development tool called Career Maps, employees have increased exposure to key com- petencies and skills for roles across the company. The competencies within Career Maps are linked to learn- ing resources, empowering employees to focus their professional development on building and enhancing skills and helping them develop a plan to achieve their personal career goals. This is par t of creating a culture conducive for individual and team learning, providing incentives for learning and innovation, instituting mecha- nisms for channeling and nur turing creative ideas, and building confidence in followers’ capacity to learn and adapt.
• Merck recognizes that its employees are an invaluable source of ideas that can help transform it into a stron- ger, more innovative company. So, to take advantage of this asset, Merck created an annual event for collabora- tion among thousands of its employees globally. Over a three-day period, employees engage in an online brainstorming forum to tackle some of Merck’s greatest transformational challenges. The round-the-clock format is designed to break down traditional divisional and geographic barriers and engage and inspire par ticipants from all levels of the organization. At its latest gather- ing in 2012, some 24,000 employees from around the
(continued)
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 455 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
456 part 3 OrganizatiOnaL LEaDErship
globe contributed more than 16,000 comments and ideas. This program encourages creative thinking, fa- cilitates systems thinking, broadens employees’ frame of reference, creates an environment in which people can share ideas and learn from each other, and is a great mechanism for channeling and nur turing creative ideas.
These programs and initiatives are all hallmarks of a learn- ing and knowledge-based organization. Another hallmark of a learning and knowledge-based organization is innovation. Merck is dedicated to the highest level of scientific excellence. Merck’s commitment is reflected in this direct quote from its Web site, “We strive to identify the most critical needs of con- sumers and customers, and through continuous innovation, we challenge ourselves to meet those needs.”
Merck is a $44 billion company in revenues. It employs about 76,000 people worldwide. The stock is near its 52- week high at $59.84 a share, which occurred on May 1, 2014. According to information from its Web site, Merck has a robust pipeline of potential new drugs, with a wide range of product candidates across each phase of development. For those who said at his appointment that “only time will tell,” there is evidence that Mr. Frazier’s leadership is beginning to pay dividends. There is broad confidence in the long-term out- look of the company because of the strategies and changes that Ken Frazier is putting in place.
G O t O t h e I N t e r N e t : To learn more about Ken Frazier and Merck, visit www.merck.com.
Support your answers to the following questions with specific information from the case and text or with other information you get from the Web or other sources.
1. In what way(s) has Ken Frazier demonstrated his effectiveness as the leader of a learning and knowledge- based organization?
2. Given our discussion on the distinction between a tradi- tional and learning organization, what type of organiza- tion is Merck? Suppor t your answer.
3. Mr. Frazier has maintained that the pillar of Merck’s strategy will remain innovation. Suggest some ideas he can institute to enhance innovation.
4. Describe the strategy that Ken Frazier has ar ticulated for moving Merck forward.
5. Drug research is a high-risk and time-consuming pro- cess. What evidence is there to suppor t this asser tion?
6. What specific personality and leadership traits does Ken Frazier possess that align with leading a learning- and knowledge-driven organization like Merck?
C U M U L a t I V e C a S e Q U e S t I O N S
7. What is CEO Frazier’s source of power? Also, what type of power and influencing tactics has he been using, and is it the appropriate power type? If not, which power type should he be using (Chapter 5)?
8. Chapter 6 discusses communication, coaching, and mentoring as ways to develop the leadership skills of underlings by senior leaders. Research the relation- ship between Ken Frazier and his predecessor. Based on your findings, is Mr. Frazier a beneficiar y of effective mentoring and coaching?
9. Strategic leadership is about having a vision that aligns with future environmental trends and working with and through others to realize it (Chapter 11). What evidences is there that Ken Frazier is an effective strategic leader?
C a S e e X e r C I S e a N D r O L e - p L a Y
preparation: Put yourself in the position of Ken Frazier. There has been a major incident involving one of Merck’s drugs. Patients using the drug have been experiencing some seri- ous side effects. The lawsuits are beginning to mount. You and the crisis management team are getting ready for a news conference with the media on the crisis. Prepare a list of ques- tions you anticipate the media will be asking and what your response should be. What other preparations do you have to make prior to the news conference?
inClass groups: Break into groups of four to six members, and discuss the prepared questions.
roleplay: Taking turns, one group will represent the crisis management team led by Mr. Frazier. Let other groups play the role of the media. They should select no more than three questions from their prepared list to ask. The rest of the class should listen and judge the performance of the Merck crisis management team in addressing the media. Each group should take turns role-playing the media, the Merck crisis manage- ment team, or the judges. Each team playing the role of the media should ask a different set of questions, so the same questions are not repeated during each round.
Observer role: As the rest of the class members watch the role-play, they should judge (1) the opening remarks of the crisis management team—their demeanor, body language, tone, style, and substance; (2) the quality of questions that the media team asked; and (3) the quality of responses given by
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 456 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 12 Crisis LEaDErship anD thE LEarning OrganizatiOn 457
Mr. Frazier and his team—how honest and truthful they are with their answers. Did Mr. Frazier take a leading role or did he stay in the background and let others do the talking? Use the guidelines for effective crisis communication (Exhibit 12.3) as the tool to judge Merck’s crisis management team perfor- mance during the news conference. Look for things that the person playing Mr. Frazier did well or did not do well during the news conference.
Discussion: After the role-plays, the class votes for the crisis management team that did the best job with its opening remarks and responding to questions. The instructor should weigh in with his or her opinion on which team did the best job in the questioning and which team did the best job in responding to the questions. Which team member playing Mr. Frazier did the best job and why? Where did the others fall short?
Managers today are expected to deal with uncer tainty, unexpected events, diversity, and change. They must demonstrate flexibility, foster trust, and engage the hearts and minds of employees. The managers at Second City Theater have a leg up in developing these skills and dealing with these situations because Second City has been doing it for years—on stage. In 1975, owner and executive producer Andrew Alexander star ted the Second City television series (SCTV) in response to the new trend of television sketch comedy. Later, the company opened the Second City Training Center, an educational center offering classes in improvisa- tion, acting, writing, and other skills. Most recently, Second City
opened a corporate communications division, which provides training in the areas of internal communications, external mar- keting and branding, and learning development. With its focus on human skills, Second City demonstrates all of the qualities of a learning organization. The managers at Second City foster a climate where experimentation and learning are encouraged.
1. Many students of the Second City Training Center are businesspeople looking to gain skills for the corporate context. What skills from the world of improvisational comedy would be valuable to a business manager?
2. What do you think would be the challenges of a man- ager in a learning organization? Why?
V i D E O C a s E
Managing in Turbulent Times at Second City Theater
preparation for this exercise Research the business news and find an organization that has just had a crisis. Below, identify the firm and the crisis. Also, read Procedure 2 below and think of your “Three As” response to the crisis.
Doing this exercise in Class
Objective
To develop your ability to handle a crisis
aaCSB General Skills area
The primary AACSB skills developed through this exercise are communication, analytical thinking, and problem solving.
preparation
You should have selected a business in crisis.
procedure 1 (3–5 minutes) Break into crisis teams of four to six and select one business crisis that the group will work on resolving.
procedure 2 (10–15 minutes) Develop a crisis communica- tion plan, identifying your “Three As.”
Handling a Crisis
Developing Your Leadership skills 12-1
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 457 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
458 part 3 ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Acknowledge:
Action:
Avoid:
procedure 3 (10–20 minutes) Each crisis team selects a spokesperson who tells the class the organization chosen and its crisis, followed by the team’s “Three As” plan.
Conclusion
The instructor may lead a class discussion and/or make conclud- ing remarks.
apply It (2–4 minutes) What did I learn from this experience? How will I use this knowledge in the future?
Sharing
In the group, or to the entire class, volunteers may give their answers to the “Apply It” questions.
preparation for this Exercise Return to Self-Assessment 12.1, Learning Organizations, on page 446. Below, identify the firm you assessed and its score.
Select any 3 of the 15 characteristics of learning organization questions that can be improved. Below, list the numbers and develop a plan on how the organization can improve on each of the three characteristics.
Doing this Exercise in Class
Objective
To develop your skill to improve a firm’s ability to learn
aaCSB General Skills area
The primary AACSB skills developed through this exercise are communication, analytical thinking, and problem solving.
preparation
You should have developed plans to improve learning on three characteristics of learning organizations.
procedure 1 (10–15 minutes) Break into teams of four to six and share your preparation plans. Help each other improve the plans.
procedure 2 (10–20 minutes) Each team selects a spokesper- son who tells the class the organization chosen and the plans to improve learning.
Conclusion
The instructor may lead a class discussion and/or make conclud- ing remarks.
apply It (2–4 minutes) What did I learn from this experience? How will I use this knowledge in the future?
Sharing
In the group, or to the entire class, volunteers may give their answers to the “Apply It” questions.
The Learning Organization
Developing Your Leadership Skills 12-2
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 458 10/24/14 4:08 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 12 Crisis LEaDErship anD thE LEarning OrganizatiOn 459
1 S. G. Baumann, “Antonio Perez’ Struggle for Survival at Eastman Kodak,” VOXXI, September 12, 2012. (http://voxxi.com /2012/09/12/antonio-perez-struggle-for-survival-eastman- kodak/)
2 S. G. Baumann, “Antonio Perez’ Struggle for Survival at Eastman Kodak,” VOXXI, September 12, 2012. (http:// voxxi.com/2012/09/12/antonio-perez-str uggle-for- survival-eastman-kodak/)
3 http://247wallst.com/consumer-products/2013/07/31 /bankruptcy-myster y-antonio-perez-remains-kodak-ceo- for-yet-another-year-or-even-longer/
4 www.kodak.com
5 A. Carmeli and J. Schaubroeck, “Organizational Crisis- Preparedness: The Importance of Learning from Failures,” Long Range Planning 41(2) (2008, April): 177–196.
6 C. Bergeron and F. Cooren, “The Collective Framing of Crisis Management: A Ventriloqual Analysis of Emergency Operations Centres,” Journal of Contingencies & Crisis Management [serial online] 20(3) (2012, September): 120–137.
7 C. Bergeron and F. Cooren, “The Collective Framing of Crisis Management: A Ventriloqual Analysis of Emergency Operations Centres,” Journal of Contingencies & Crisis Management [serial online] 20(3) (2012, September): 120–137.
8 S. Grebe, “Things Can Get Worse How Mismanagement of a Crisis Response Strategy Can Cause a Secondary or Double Crisis: The Example of the AWB Corporate Scandal,” Corporate Communications: An International Journal [serial online] 18(1) (2013, February): 70–86.
9 A. Choudhary, “Mission ‘Trust.’ ” Academy of Strategic Management Journal [serial online] 11(1) (2012, January): 101–113.
10 V. Cuñat, “Why Some Firms Thrive While Others Fail: Governance and Management Lessons from the Crisis,” Economica [serial online] 81(321) (2014, January): 187–188.
11 V. Cuñat, “Why Some Firms Thrive While Others Fail: Governance and Management Lessons from the Crisis,” Economica [serial online] 81(321) (2014, January): 187–188.
12 http://money.cnn.com/galler y/news/companies/2013/12/27 /business-scandals.fortune/6.html
13 J. Plungis and J. Green, “House Panel to Probe GM Recall of Vehicles for Ignition Switches,” Bloomberg News (March 11, 2014).
14 www.ropella.com
15 T. Jaques, “Crisis Leadership: A View from the Executive Suite,” Journal of Public Affairs (14723891) [serial online] 12(4) (2012, November): 366–372.
16 “The Art of Strategic Renewal,” MIT Sloan Management Review [serial online] 55(2) (2014, Winter): 21–23.
17 T. Jaques, “Crisis Leadership: A View from the Executive Suite,” Journal of Public Affairs (14723891) [serial online] 12(4) (2012, November): 366–372.
18 T. Coppens, “How to Turn a Planning Conflict into a Planning Success? Conditions for Constructive Conflict Management in the Case of Ruggeveld-Boterlaar-Silsburg in Antwerp, Belgium,” Planning Practice & Research [serial online] 29(1) (2014, February): 96–111.
19 “Turning Crisis into Oppor tunity: The Key Role of Leadership,” Strategic Direction [serial online] 29(4) (2013, April): 29–32.
20 W. Bennis, “Crises Reveal the Quality of Leadership,” Leader to Leader (154) (2009): 27–31.
21 Y. Jin, B. Liu, and L. Austin, “Examining the Role of Social Media in Effective Crisis Management: The Effects of Crisis Origin, Information Form, and Source on Publics’ Crisis Responses,” Communication Research [serial online] 41(1) (2014, February): 74–94.
22 A. Coleman, “Managing a Crisis in the Era of Social Communication: How Greater Manchester Police Is Developing Community Engagement and Communication,” Journal of Brand Strategy [serial online] 2(2) (2013, Summer): 128–133.
23 A. Pang, N. Hassan, and A. Chong, “Negotiating Crisis in the Social Media Environment: Evolution of Crises Online, Gaining Credibility Offline,” Corporate Communications: An International Journal [serial online] 19(1) (2014, February): 96–118.
24 A. Zavyalova, M. Pfarrer, R. Reger, and D. Shapiro, “Managing the Message: The Effects of Firm Actions and Industry Spillovers on Media Coverage Following Wrongdoing,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 55(5) (2012, October): 1079–1101.
25 J. A. Gruman, N. Chhinzer, and G. W. Smith, “An Exploratory Study of the Level of Disaster Preparedness in the Canadian Hospitality Industry,” International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration 12(1) (2011): 43–59.
endnotes
Chapter 12 Crisis LEaDErship anD thE LEarning OrganizatiOn 459
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 459 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
26 http://www.marketwatch.com/story/bankruptcy-mystery- antonio-perez-remains-kodak-ceo-for-yet-another-year- or-even-longer-2013-07-31
27 S. Appelbaum, S. Keller, H. Alvarez, and C. Bédard, “Organizational Crisis: Lessons from Lehman Brothers and Paulson & Company,” International Journal of Commerce & Management [serial online] 22(4) (2012, October): 286–305.
28 D. Bauman, “Evaluating Ethical Approaches to Crisis Leadership: Insights from Unintentional Harm Research,” Journal of Business Ethics 98(2) (2011): 281–295.
29 D. Canyon, “Crisis Management Teams in Health Organisations,” Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning [serial online] 5(4) (2012, Spring): 365–372.
30 D. Canyon, “Crisis Management Teams in Health Organisations,” Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning [serial online] 5(4) (2012, Spring): 365–372.
31 W. Kahn, M. Barton, and S. Fellows, “Organizational Crises and the Disturbance of Relational Systems,” Academy of Management Review [serial online] 38(3) (2013, July): 377–396.
32 W. Johansen, H. Aggerholm, and F. Frandsen, “Entering New Territory: A Study of Internal Crisis Management and Crisis Communication in Organizations,” Public Relations Review [serial online] 38(2) (2012, June): 270–279.
33 www.ropella.com
34 P. Riddell, “Rallying the Troops: Crisis Communication and Reputation Management in Financial Services,” Journal of Brand Strategy [serial online] 2(3) (2013, Fall): 222–227.
35 J. Jensen and W. Waugh, “The United States’ Experience with the Incident Command System: What We Think We Know and What We Need to Know More About,” Journal of Contingencies & Crisis Management [serial online] 22(1) (2014, March): 5–17.
36 P. Palttala, C. Boano, R. Lund, and M. Vos, “Communication Gaps in Disaster Management: Perceptions by Experts from Governmental and Non-Governmental Organizations,” Journal of Contingencies & Crisis Management [serial online] 20(1) (2012, March): 2–12.
37 A. Carone and L. Di Iorio, “Crisis Management: An Extended Reference Framework for Decision Makers,” Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning [serial online] 6(4) (2013, Summer): 347–359.
38 K. Brumfield, “Succeeding in Crisis Leadership,” Financial Executive [serial online] (October 2012): 45–47.
39 K. Brumfield, “Succeeding in Crisis Leadership,” Financial Executive [serial online] (October 2012): 45–47.
40 A. Carone and L. Di Iorio, “Crisis Management: An Extended Reference Framework for Decision Makers,” Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning [serial online] 6(4) (2013, Summer): 347–359.
41 “Turning Crisis into Oppor tunity: The Key Role of Leadership,” Strategic Direction [serial online] 29(4) (2013, April): 29–32.
42 C. Rongier, M. Lauras, F. Galasso, and D. Gourc, “Towards a Crisis Performance-Measurement System,” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing [serial online] 26(11) (2013, November): 1087–1102.
43 S. Kim, “The Role of Prior Expectancies and Relational Satisfaction in Crisis,” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly [serial online] 91(1) (2014, March): 139–158.
44 “The Art of Strategic Renewal,” MIT Sloan Management Review [serial online] 55(2) (2014, Winter): 21–23.
45 W. Johansen, H. Aggerholm, and F. Frandsen, “Entering New Territory: A Study of Internal Crisis Management and Crisis Communication in Organizations,” Public Relations Review [serial online] 38(2) (2012, June): 270–279.
46 P. Chris and R. W. Guyette, Jr., “Toyota Recall Crisis: Public Attitudes on Leadership and Ethics,” Organization Development Journal 28(2) (2010): 89–97.
47 W. Kahn, M. Barton, & S. Fellows, “Organizational Crises and the Disturbance of Relational Systems,” Academy of Management Review [serial online] 38(3) (2013, July): 377–396.
48 W. Johansen, H. Aggerholm, and F. Frandsen, “Entering New Territory: A Study of Internal Crisis Management and Crisis Communication in Organizations,” Public Relations Review [serial online] 38(2) (2012, June): 270–279.
49 S. Kim, “The Role of Prior Expectancies and Relational Satisfaction in Crisis,” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly [serial online] 91(1) (2014, March): 139–158.
50 P. Palttala, C. Boano, R. Lund, and M. Vos, “Communication Gaps in Disaster Management: Perceptions by Experts from Governmental and Non-Governmental Organizations,” Journal of Contingencies & Crisis Management [serial online] 20(1) (2012, March): 2–12.
51 K. Brumfield, “Succeeding in Crisis Leadership,” Financial Executive [serial online] (October 2012): 45–47.
52 T. Vihalemm, M. Kiisel, and H. Harro-Loit, “Citizens’ Response Patterns to Warning Messages,” Journal of Contingencies & Crisis Management [serial online] 20(1) (2012, March): 13–25.
53 W. Johansen, H. Aggerholm, and F. Frandsen, “Entering New Territory: A Study of Internal Crisis Management and Crisis
460 part 3 OrganizatiOnaL LEaDErship
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 460 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 12 Crisis LEaDErship anD thE LEarning OrganizatiOn 461
Communication in Organizations,” Public Relations Review [serial online] 38(2) (2012, June): 270–279.
54 A. Pang, N. Hassan, and A. Chong, “Negotiating Crisis in the Social Media Environment: Evolution of Crises Online, Gaining Credibility Offline,” Corporate Communications: An International Journal [serial online] 19(1) (2014, February): 96–118.
55 S. Stern, “Truth, Not Secrets, for Better Leadership,” Strategic Communication Management 15(3) (2011): 11.
56 A. Zavyalova, M. Pfarrer, R. Reger, and D. Shapiro, “Managing the Message: The Effects of Firm Actions and Industry Spillovers on Media Coverage Following Wrongdoing,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 55(5) (2012, October): 1079–1101.
57 P. Palttala and M. Vos, “Quality Indicators for Crisis Communication to Suppor t Emergency Management by Public Authorities,” Journal of Contingencies & Crisis Management [serial online] 20(1) (2012, March): 39–51.
58 A. Scholtens, J. Jorritsma, and I. Helsloot, “On the Need for a Paradigm Shift in the Dutch Command and Information System for the Acute Phase of Disasters,” Journal of Contingencies & Crisis Management [serial online] 22(1) (2014, March): 39–51.
59 A. Zavyalova, M. Pfarrer, R. Reger, and D. Shapiro, “Managing the Message: The Effects of Firm Actions and Industry Spillovers on Media Coverage Following Wrongdoing,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 55(5) (2012, October): 1079–1101.
60 A. Zavyalova, M. Pfarrer, R. Reger, and D. Shapiro, “Managing the Message: The Effects of Firm Actions and Industry Spillovers on Media Coverage Following Wrongdoing,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 55(5) (2012, October): 1079–1101.
61 S. Ponis, and E. Koronis, “A Knowledge Management Process-Based Approach to Support Corporate Crisis Management,” Knowledge & Process Management [serial online] 19(3) (2012, July): 148–159.
62 R. Nag and D. Gioia, “From Common to Uncommon Knowledge: Foundations of Firm-Specific Use of Knowledge as a Resource,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 55(2) (2012, April): 421–457.
63 M. Černe, C. Nerstad, A. Dysvik, and M. Škerlavaj, “What Goes around Comes Around: Knowledge Hiding, Perceived Motivational Climate, and Creativity,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 57(1) (2014, February): 172–192.
64 H. Gardner, B. Staats, and F. Gino, “Dynamically Integrating Knowledge in Teams: Transforming Resources into
Performance,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 55(4) (2012, August): 998–1022.
65 R. Nag and D. Gioia, “From Common to Uncommon Knowledge: Foundations of Firm-Specific Use of Knowledge as a Resource,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 55(2) (2012, April): 421–457.
66 P. M. Senge, The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization (Rev. ed.). (New York: Doubleday, 2006).
67 H. Darvish and E. A. Nazari, Economic Insights—Trends & Challenges 65(1) (2013): 1–16.
68 R. Chua, “The Costs of Ambient Cultural Disharmony: Indirect Intercultural Conflicts In Social Environment Undermine Creativity,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 56(6) (2013, December): 1545–1577.
69 R. Mackay and R. Chia, “Choice, Chance, and Unintended Consequences in Strategic Change: A Process Understanding of the Rise and Fall of Northco Automotive,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 56(1) (2013, February): 208–230.
70 P. Klarner and S. Raisch, “Move to the Beat—Rhythms of Change and Firm Performance,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 56(1) (2013, February): 160–184.
71 M. Kalyar and N. Rafi, “‘Organizational Learning Culture’: An Ingenious Device for Promoting Firm’s Innovativeness,” Service Industries Journal [serial online] 33(12) (2013, November 5): 1135–1147.
72 H. Darvish and E. A. Nazari, Economic Insights—Trends & Challenges 65(1) (2013): 1–16.
73 H. Darvish and E. A. Nazari, Economic Insights—Trends & Challenges 65(1) (2013): 1–16.
74 P. M. Senge, The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization (Rev. ed.) (New York: Doubleday, 2006).
75 H. Darvish and E. A. Nazari, Economic Insights—Trends & Challenges 65(1) (2013): 1–16.
76 L. Qiang, P. Maggitti, K. Smith, P. Tesluk, and R. Katila, “Top Management Attention to Innovation: The Role of Search Selection and Intensity in New Product Introductions,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 56(3) (2013, June): 893–916.
77 M. Kalyar and N. Rafi, “‘Organizational Learning Culture’: An Ingenious Device for Promoting Firm’s Innovativeness,” Service Industries Journal [serial online] 33(12) (2013, November 5): 1135–1147.
78 R. Funk, “Making the Most of Where You Are: Geography, Networks, and Innovation in Organizations,” Academy of
Chapter 12 Crisis LEaDErship anD thE LEarning OrganizatiOn 461
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 461 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Management Journal [serial online] 57(1) (2014, February): 193–222.
79 By: S.-H. Liao, W.-J. Chang, D.-C. Hu, and Y.-L. Yueh, International Journal of Human Resource Management 23(1) (2012, January): 52–70.
80 H. Bresman, “Changing Routines: A Process Model of Vicarious Group Learning in Pharmaceutical R&D,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 56(1) (2013, February): 35–61.
81 E. Ndinguri, L. Prieto, and K. Machtmes, “Human Capital Development Dynamics: The Knowledge Based Approach,” Academy of Strategic Management Journal [serial online] 11(2) (2012, June): 121–136.
82 M. Černe, C. Nerstad, A. Dysvik, and M. Škerlavaj, “What Goes around Comes Around: Knowledge Hiding, Perceived Motivational Climate, and Creativity,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 57(1) (2014, February): 172–192.
83 E. Ndinguri, L. Prieto, and K. Machtmes, “Human Capital Development Dynamics: The Knowledge Based Approach,” Academy of Strategic Management Journal [serial online] 11(2) (2012, June): 121–136.
84 E. Antonacopoulou and Z. Sheaffer, “Learning in Crisis: Rethinking the Relationship Between Organizational Learning and Crisis Management,” Journal of Management Inquiry [serial online] 23(1) (2014, January): 5–21.
85 N. Akhtar and R. Khan, “Exploring the Paradox of Organizational Learning and Learning Organization,” Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business 2(9) (2011): 257–270.
86 H. Bruns, “Working Alone Together : Coordination in Collaboration across Domains of Expertise,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 56(1) (2013, February): 62–83.
87 G. Yaping, K. Tae-Yeol, L. Deog-RO, and Z. Jing, “A Multilevel Model of Team Goal Orientation, Information Exchange, and Creativity,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 56(3) (2013, June): 827–851.
88 M. Sytch and A. Tatarynowicz, “Exploring the Locus of Invention: The Dynamics of Network Communities and Firms’ Invention Productivity,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 57(1) (2014, February): 249–279.
89 M. Kalyar and N. Rafi, “‘Organizational Learning Culture’: An Ingenious Device for Promoting Firm’s Innovativeness,” Service Industries Journal [serial online] 33(12) (2013, November 5): 1135–1147.
90 G. Yaping, K. Tae-Yeol, L. Deog-RO, and Z. Jing, “A Multilevel Model of Team Goal Orientation, Information Exchange,
and Creativity,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 56(3) (2013, June): 827–851.
91 M. Černe, C. Nerstad, A. Dysvik, and M. Škerlavaj, “What Goes around Comes Around: Knowledge Hiding, Perceived Motivational Climate, and Creativity,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 57(1) (2014, February): 172–192.
92 L. Dong, L. Hui, and R. Loi, “The Dark Side of Leadership: A Three-Level Investigation of the Cascading Effect of Abusive Supervision on Employee Creativity,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 55(5) (2012, October): 1187–1212.
93 M. Baer, “Putting Creativity to Work: The Implementation of Creative Ideas in Organizations,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 55(5) (2012, October): 1102–1119.
94 P. M. Madsen and V. Desai, “Failing to Learn the Effects of Failure and Success on Organizational Learning in the Global Orbital Launch Vehicle Industry,” Academy of Management Journal 53(3) (2010): 451–476.
95 E. Ndinguri, L. Prieto, and K. Machtmes, “Human Capital Development Dynamics: The Knowledge Based Approach,” Academy of Strategic Management Journal [serial online] 11(2) (2012, June): 121–136.
96 M. Santos-Vijande, J. López-Sánchez, and J. Trespalacios, “How Organizational Learning Affects a Firm’s Flexibility, Competitive Strategy, and Performance,” Journal of Business Research [serial online] 65(8) (2012, August): 1079–1089.
97 R. Chua, “The Costs of Ambient Cultural Disharmony: Indirect Intercultural Conflicts in Social Environment Undermine Creativity,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 56(6) (2013, December): 1545–1577.
98 G. Yaping, K. Tae-Yeol, L. Deog-RO, and Z. Jing, “A Multilevel Model of Team Goal Orientation, Information Exchange, and Creativity,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 56(3) (2013, June): 827–851.
99 S. Liao, W. Chang, D. Hu, and Y. Yueh, “Relationships Among Organizational Culture, Knowledge Acquisition, Organizational Learning, and Organizational Innovation in Taiwan’s Banking and Insurance Industries,” International Journal of Human Resource Management [serial online] 23(1) (2012, January): 52–70.
100 L. Dong, L. Hui, and R. Loi, “The Dark Side of Leadership: A Three-Level Investigation of the Cascading Effect of Abusive Supervision on Employee Creativity,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 55(5) (2012, October): 1187–1212.
101 M. Kalyar and N. Rafi, “‘Organizational Learning Culture’: An Ingenious Device for Promoting Firm’s Innovativeness,”
462 part 3 OrganizatiOnaL LEaDErship
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 462 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 12 Crisis LEaDErship anD thE LEarning OrganizatiOn 463
Service Industries Journal [serial online] 33(12) (2013, November 5): 1135–1147.
102 M. Baer, “Putting Creativity to Work: The Implementation of Creative Ideas in Organizations,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 55(5) (2012, October): 1102–1119.
103 S. Chich-Jen, “Study on the Relations among the Customer Knowledge Management, Learning Organization, and Organizational Performance,” Service Industries Journal 31(5) (2011): 791–807.
104 J. Sung Jun and B. Joo, “Knowledge Sharing: The Influences of Learning Organization Culture, Organizational Commitment, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors,” Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 18(3) (2011): 353–364.
105 J. Sung Jun and B. Joo, “Knowledge Sharing: The Influences of Learning Organization Culture, Organizational Commitment, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors,” Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 18(3) (2011): 353–364.
106 S. Liao, W. Chang, D. Hu, and Y. Yueh, “Relationships among Organizational Culture, Knowledge Acquisition, Organizational Learning, and Organizational Innovation in Taiwan’s Banking and Insurance Industries,” International Journal of Human Resource Management [serial online] 23(1) (2012, January): 52–70.
107 L. Dong, L. Hui, and R. Loi, “The Dark Side of Leadership: A Three-Level Investigation of the Cascading Effect of Abusive Supervision on Employee Creativity,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 55(5) (2012, October): 1187–1212.
108 M. Santos-Vijande, J. López-Sánchez, and J. Trespalacios, “How Organizational Learning Affects a Firm’s Flexibility, Competitive Strategy, and Performance,” Journal of Business Research [serial online] 65(8) (2012, August): 1079–1089.
109 M. Baer, “Putting Creativity to Work: The Implementation of Creative Ideas in Organizations,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 55(5) (2012, October): 1102–1119.
110 M. Baer, “Putting Creativity to Work: The Implementation of Creative Ideas in Organizations,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 55(5) (2012, October): 1102–1119.
111 R. Chua, “The Costs of Ambient Cultural Disharmony: Indirect Intercultural Conflicts in Social Environment Undermine Creativity,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 56(6) (2013, December): 1545–1577.
112 M. Baer, “Putting Creativity to Work: The Implementation of Creative Ideas in Organizations,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 55(5) (2012, October): 1102–1119.
113 H. Bruns, “Working Alone Together : Coordination in Collaboration across Domains of Expertise,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 56(1) (2013, February): 62–83.
114 A. Toaldo, S. Didonet, and F. Luce, “The Influence of Innovative Organizational Culture on Marketing Strategy Formulation and Results,” Latin American Business Review [serial online] 14(3/4) (2013, July): 251–269.
115 M. Baer, “Putting Creativity to Work: The Implementation of Creative Ideas in Organizations,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 55(5) (2012, October): 1102–1119.
116 L. Qiang, P. Maggitti, K. Smith, P. Tesluk, and R. Katila, “Top Management Attention to Innovation: The Role of Search Selection and Intensity in New Product Introductions,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 56(3) (2013, June): 893–916.
117 L. Qiang, P. Maggitti, K. Smith, P. Tesluk, and R. Katila, “Top Management Attention to Innovation: The Role of Search Selection and Intensity in New Product Introductions,” Academy of Management Journal [serial online] 56(3) (2013, June): 893–916.
118 http://www.innovation.org/index.cfm/ToolsandResources /FactSheets/Innovation_by_the_Numbers
119 www.merck.com
120 H. Mathew, “Merck Could Return to Greatness if CEO Can Leave His Own Past Behind,” Forbes (May 6, 2013). (http://www.forbes.com/sites/matthewherper/2013/04/17 /merck-could-return-to-greatness-if-ceo-can-leave-his- own-past-behind/)
Chapter 12 Crisis LEaDErship anD thE LEarning OrganizatiOn 463
66352_ch12_ptg01_428-463.indd 463 10/15/14 1:02 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
4 6 4
Appendix
Leadership and Spirituality in the Workplace
Judith Neal, PhD*
T he pur pose of t his appendi x is t wofold: (1) It prov ides a n over v iew of t he concept of faith and spirituality in the workplace and (2) it provides spiritual principles that have been useful to many leaders in their personal and professional development.
Spirituality in the Workplace Tom Aageson, former Director of Aid to Artisans—a nonprofit organization that helps artists in third-world countries—takes an annual retreat in which he contemplates ques- tions about the purpose of his life, and evaluates how well he is living in alignment with his values. Angel Martinez, former CEO of Rockport Shoes, invited all his top execu- tives to a retreat that included exploring the integration of each person’s spiritual jour- ney with his or her work journey. At Integrated Project Systems (IPS) in San Francisco, former CEO Bill Kern created a document called “The Corporate Stand” that is very ex- plicit about “The Integrity of the Human Spirit.” These are key principles that employ- ees live by at IPS. Rodale Press, publisher of such well-known magazines as Prevention, Men’s Health, Runner’s World, and Organic Gardening, has a “kiva room” at corporate headquarters where employees may go to meditate, pray, or just spend quiet time when things get too stressful. ANZ Bank in Australia and New Zealand sends all its employ- ees through personal transformation programs, conducts an audit based on levels of cor- porate consciousness, and allows each bank branch to design its own meditation/quiet room. Tyson Foods has over 120 workplace chaplains on the payroll and is committed to being a “faith-friendly workplace.”
Stories like these are becoming more and more common in all kinds of workplaces. Academic and professional conferences are offering an increasing number of sessions that have words such as Faith, Spirituality, Consciousness, or Soul in the title. There is a new openness in management education to recognition of our spiritual nature. This recogni- tion can be on a personal level, such as when a person explores his or her own spiritual
A P P E N D I X O U T L I N E
Spirituality in the Workplace Guidelines for Leading from a Spiritual Perspective
Resources on the Web
*Appendix written by Judith A. Neal, PhD, chairman, Edgewalkers International, http://edgewalkers.org/. © 2011 by Judith Neal; used by permission of the author.
66352_App_ptg01_464-473.indd 464 10/20/14 11:57 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
APPENDIX LeaDerShiP aND SPirituaLity iN the WorkPLace 465
journey and struggles with what this means regarding work. It is also on a conceptual level, as both academics and practitioners explore the role that spirituality might have in bringing meaning, purpose, and increased performance to organizational life. A major change is going on in the personal and professional lives of leaders, as many of them more deeply integrate their spirituality and their work. And most would agree that this integra- tion is leading to positive changes in their relationships and their effectiveness.
Defining Spirituality in the Workplace Spirituality is difficult to define. The Latin origin of the word “spirit” is spirare, mean- ing “to breathe.” At its most basic, then, spirit is what inhabits us when we are alive and breathing; it is the life force. Spirituality has been defined as “that which is tradition- ally believed to be the vital principle or animating force within living beings—that which constitutes one’s unseen intangible being, or the real sense or significance of something.”1 A fairly comprehensive definition, part of which is provided here, is as follows:
One’s spirituality is the essence of who he or she is. It defines the inner self, separate from the body, but including the physical and intellectual self. . . . Spirituality also is the qual- ity of being spiritual, of recognizing the intangible, life-affirming force in self and all hu- man beings. It is a state of intimate relationship with the inner self of higher values and morality. It is a recognition of the truth of the inner nature of people. . . . Spirituality does not apply to particular religions, although the values of some religions may be a part of a person’s spiritual focus. Said another way, spirituality is the song we all sing. Each religion has its own singer.2
Perhaps the difficulty people have had in defining spirituality is that they are trying to objectify and categorize an experience and way of being that is at its core very subjective and beyond categorizing. For this reason, some have resorted to poetry as a way of trying to capture the essence of the experience of spirituality. Lee Bolman did this very effec- tively in his keynote presentation on spirituality in the workplace to the Eastern Academy of Management in May 1995. He quoted the Persian poet Rumi:3
All day I think about it, then at night I say it Where did I come from and what am I supposed to be doing? I have no idea My soul is elsewhere, I’m sure of that And I intend to end up there.
James Autry, a successful Fortune 500 executive, wrote a poem called “Threads.” Here is an excerpt from that poem:4
Listen. In every office
You hear the threads of love and joy and fear and guilt,
the cries for celebration and reassurance, and somehow you know that connecting those threads
is what you are supposed to do and business takes care of itself.
Spirituality in the workplace is about people seeing their work as a spiritual path, as an opportunity to grow personally and to contribute to society in a meaningful way. It is about learning to be more caring and compassionate with fellow employees, with bosses, with subordinates and customers. It is about integrity, being true to oneself, and telling the truth to others. Spirituality in the workplace can refer to an individual’s attempts to
66352_App_ptg01_464-473.indd 465 10/15/14 1:11 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
466 APPENDIX LeaDerShiP aND SPirituaLity iN the WorkPLace
live his or her values more fully in the workplace. Or it can refer to the ways in which or- ganizations structure themselves to support the spiritual growth of employees.
In the final analysis, the understanding of spirit and of spirituality in the workplace is a very individual and personal matter. There are as many expressions of these concepts as there are people who talk or write about them.
Approaches to Implementing Spirituality in the Workplace In practice, organizations are implementing spirituality in the workplace utilizing one or more of the following four approaches:5
1: Individual Development At this level, programs focus on helping the individual employee understand more about his or her values, spiritual principles, and sense of purpose. The organization is commit- ted to helping individuals live in alignment with their faith and spiritual path, may offer meditation rooms or courses on spiritual practices and/or teachings, and may bring in speakers who talk about spiritual development. There is an understanding that if people can discover and respond to their own “calling” or sense of purpose, they will be more creative, committed, and service-oriented.
2: Leadership and Team Development Organizations are offering courses to leaders with titles like “Authentic Leadership,” “Leading with Soul,” and “Spiritual Leadership.” Leaders are encouraged to apply spiri- tual values such as humility, trust, courage, integrity, and faith to their work with teams. They may offer courses such as “Team Spirit” and “Noble Purpose” developed by Barry Heerman.6 Some organizations are offering lunchtime Spirit at Work discussion groups. Others are offering team-building courses that incorporate spiritual values or practices.
3: Total System Development A growing number of CEOs and organizational leaders have become personally commit- ted to creating organizations that nurture the human spirit of the company’s employees, customers, and other stakeholders. Several systemic approaches have been developed to help organizations evolve to a higher level of congruence with spiritual values. These in- clude “Corporate Tools” by Richard Barrett,7 “Spiral Dynamics” by Don Beck and Chris Cowan,8 “Appreciative Inquiry” by David Cooperrider and colleagues,9 “Positive Organi- zational Scholarship” and “The Abundance Framework” by Kim Cameron,10 and “Open Space Technology” by Harrison Owen.11 The key aim in each of these organizational de- velopment processes is to help an organization move beyond just a focus on profits and the bottom line to a commitment to human development and a positive contribution to society.
4: Redefining the Role of Business A new paradigm is emerging among business leaders that redefines the purpose of busi- ness as the solution to solving problems in society and around the globe, rather than be- ing a contributor to them. The focus is on using the creative energy and talent of their employees, along with their vast capital resources and international reach, to truly make a positive difference in the world. Willis Harman, cofounder of the Institute of Noetic Sci- ences and of the World Business Academy, was probably the first person to speak about the important role of business in increasing consciousness in the world.12 More recently, Case Western Reserve’s Wetherhead School of Management has created a Center of Ex- cellence called the Center of Business as an Agent of World Benefit (BAWB), which has
66352_App_ptg01_464-473.indd 466 10/15/14 1:11 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
APPENDIX LeaDerShiP aND SPirituaLity iN the WorkPLace 467
Spiritual Intelligence at WorkSELF-ASSESSMENT 1
instructions: Please read each statement below and decide to what degree you either agree or disagree with the statement.
1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Somewhat Disagree 3 = Neither agree nor Disagree 4 = Somewhat agree 5 = Strongly agree
1. I am very aware of my values and beliefs at work.
2. It is important to accept that others in my workplace may not have the same values and beliefs that I do.
3. I have had one or more transcendent experiences that have affected the way I feel about my work.
4. People I work with describe me as calm and nonjudgmental.
5. When someone has done something that makes me angry, I find it very difficult to forgive them.
6. I try to have daily contact with my Higher Power, the Divine, God, or Universal Consciousness.
7. In difficult situations, I find that a calm part of me can remain detached and observe my thoughts, feelings, and behaviors.
8. I have a great deal of compassion for the leaders of my organization.
9. When I need special help or guidance in my work, I turn to prayer, meditation, or other spiritual guidance.
10. I do not feel the need to grow or develop myself at work.
11. It is important to keep business life and personal life separate in my relationships at work.
12. I feel divinely guided to the work I am doing.
13. I have a regular spiritual or religious prac- tice that I find helpful to me in my work.
14. I often feel a real sense of love and caring work for the people I interact with at work.
15. I do not believe that there is anything greater than myself and know that the only way to make it in my life and career is to rely on my own abilities.
16. If I found myself in a work situation where I was asked to compromise my values, I would have to stick to my values, even if it hurt me or my career.
17. My primary motivation at work is to be of service to others.
18. I am deeply concerned about the effects of some business practices on the planet.
19. The reality of business is that sometimes you just have to compromise your values for the sake of the company or for your career.
20. Dealing with people at work is a great cause of frustration for me.
sponsored an ongoing inquiry research project into the ways business is making a posi- tive difference in the world.
Each organization is unique in terms of its values, vision, and readiness for spirituality in the workplace, so there is no one formula that leaders can use to implement spiritual values and practices in their organizations. The best thing to do is to learn as much as possible from organizations that have been successful in this integration. A great place to start is to study the organizations that have received the International Spirit at Work Award for their explicit spiritual practices and commitment to nurturing the human spirit of their employees; for more information, go to http://edgewalkers.org.
Before we discuss guidelines for leading from a spiritual perspective, complete the self- assessment below to better know thyself.
(continued)
66352_App_ptg01_464-473.indd 467 10/15/14 1:11 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
468 APPENDIX LeaDerShiP aND SPirituaLity iN the WorkPLace
21. It is important to me that my organization operate in a way that is respectful of all life.
22. I have a real sense of calling about the work I do.
23. I really try to get to know the people I work with on a deeper level than just work-related issues.
24. I believe that my work is part of a larger divinely guided plan.
25. My mission in life is very clear to me. 26. People in my workplace often come to me
to talk about personal or spiritual issues. 27. I feel a sense of the sacred in my workplace. 28. I often feel stressed at work. 29. I work hard at having authentic and caring
relationships with people at work. 30. Because of my belief in something greater
than myself, I try to live in alignment with key virtues such as trustworthiness, humil- ity, justice, and unity.
Spiritual Intelligence at Work—
Scoring key instructions:
1. transpose the numbers from the questionnaire to the columns below. For starred items (*), reverse the scoring by subtracting your answer from 6. For instance, if you responded to question 5 with a “4,” 6 2 4 5 2, so put a “2” in item 5 below.
2. add up the totals for each column.
column a column B column c 1. ________ 2. ________ 3. ________ 4. ________ *5. ________ 6. ________ 7. ________ 8. ________ 9. ________ *10. ________ *11. _______ 12. ________ 13. ________ 14. ________ *15. ________ 16. ________ 17. ________ 18. ________ *19. ________ *20. ________ 21. ________ 22. ________ 23. ________ 24. ________ 25. ________ 26. ________ 27. ________ *28. ________ 29. ________ 30. ________ totals: column a: ______ column B: ______ column c: ______
Spiritual Intelligence at Work—
interpretation of Scores
Spiritual intelligence is the ability to feel a connection to self, a connection to others, and a connection to some- thing greater than oneself. column a provides you the score for “connection to Self,” column B for “connection to others,” and column c for “connection to the
transcendent.” Make note of your highest score and your lowest score and write your thoughts about that here:
Connection to Self
Spiritual intelligence must begin with some sense of self-awareness. as the Delphi oracle declared, “know thyself.” of the five dimensions of work (physical, intel- lectual, emotional, volitional, and spiritual), “connection to Self” is most related to the “intellectual” dimension because of its emphasis on self-development. People who have a strong connection to self are in touch with their values and beliefs, have a strong degree of emotional intelligence, and have done enough spiritual practice or self-development work so that they can calmly observe themselves and gain mastery over their thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. other people experience people who are high in connection to self as calm, able to act competently in chaotic situations, and as having serene competence.
40–50 you have a strong connection to self and may want to help others develop this capacity through your coaching or mentoring.
30–39 you are fairly self-aware with room for devel- opment. you may want to think about taking on a spiri- tual practice such as meditation or prayer, or receiving coaching or mentoring from someone who has a highly developed sense of connection to self.
20–29 you may often feel out of touch, confused by others’ responses to you, and unsure of your sense of pur- pose or mission in life. it may be useful to take personal or spiritual growth workshops or to take time for a personal retreat where you can have time to reflect on yourself, your goals, and the kind of person you want to be.
0–19 you may feel fairly disconnected from yourself, and may be focusing most of your time and energy on external activities or on pleasing other people to your own detriment. you should give serious thought to the value of increasing your self-awareness of your beliefs, values, behavior, and goals in life. therapy, spiritual di- rection, and support groups can all be very helpful in increasing your connection to self.
Connection to Others
it is not enough to just be self-aware and concerned with your own growth. People with high Spiritual intelligence use this self-knowledge as a basis for under- standing others better and for developing meaningful
(Self-Assessment 1 continued)
66352_App_ptg01_464-473.indd 468 10/15/14 1:11 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
APPENDIX LeaDerShiP aND SPirituaLity iN the WorkPLace 469
relationships. of the five dimensions of work (physical, intel- lectual, emotional, volitional, and spiritual), “connection to others” is most related to the “emotional” dimension because of its emphasis on the interpersonal aspects of the work environment. People who have a strong connec- tion to others are very respectful of differences in values, beliefs, and cultural background and often curious to learn more. they are caring, compassionate, and able to forgive. they see the Divine in others and treat each person as unique and as a sacred being.
40–50 you have a strong connection to others and are probably good at team building and at creating a sense of community. People tend to trust you and you take that very seriously.
30–39 you are fairly good at relationship building with room for development. People are generally pretty comfortable with you and find you open and supportive. however, occasionally there may be things you say or do that are out of character. When this happens, take the time to reflect on your behavior and the underlying values, beliefs, or attitudes that you may want to change.
20–29 you may often feel uncomfortable in your rela- tionships at work. you may either find yourself feeling angry or resentful a lot, or intimidated or unappreciated. it can be easy to blame others for this, but it may be worth taking a look at your own behavior. consider taking courses or workshops in interpersonal skills such as communication, assertiveness training, or conflict resolution. it is also helpful to ask someone you trust for feedback on your behavior.
0–19 you may feel fairly isolated from others, and find yourself preferring to work alone to avoid the un- comfortableness of difficult relationships. it is helpful to spend time reflecting on how you can take responsibility for improving the situation. interpersonal skills work- shops, such as those mentioned above, may be helpful. you might also consider hiring a professional coach to help you improve your relationships.
Connection to the Transcendent
Perhaps the major element that distinguishes Spiritual intelligence from other forms of human intelligence is its emphasis on the connection to something greater than ourselves—what people may refer to as God, the universe, the Divine, the transcendent, or similar terms. of the five dimensions of work (physical, intellectual, emotional, volitional, and spiritual), “connection to the transcendent” is most related to the “Spiritual” dimen- sion because of its emphasis on the sacredness of human
beings and all life. People who are high in “connection to the transcendent” have a belief in something greater than themselves, and find themselves guided and led by the transcendent. they tend to have a clear sense of their greater purpose in life and are concerned with moral issues such as justice and respect.
40–50 you have a strong connection to the transcen- dent and find yourself guided by a greater wisdom. you see your work as part of a much larger plan that con- tributes to the human race and the good of the planet. Because of your vision and your spiritual connection, others turn to you for leadership and inspiration.
30–39 you value your connection to the transcen- dent, but it may not be a part of your daily awareness. you have a desire to deepen this relationship but may either think you don’t have the time to do this, or it may be that you don’t know how. it may be helpful to explore the spiritual traditions of your childhood, or to read some of the inspiring books on the relationship to the transcen- dent, such as “how to know God,” by Deepak chopra.
20–29 you may feel somewhat disconnected from the spiritual dimension of your life, although you turn to your higher Self or higher Power on occasion when there are difficult situations at work. you are probably not that interested in larger issues of justice, respect, or morality at work, but may find yourself getting upset if you feel that a personal injustice has been done to you, or someone has shown you a lack of respect. it may be helpful to focus on some basic principles such as the Golden rule (see chapter 2) or the concept of unity.
0–19 a connection to the transcendent is not a big part of your life, and you may feel a lack of inspiration or sense of purpose about your work. it’s possible that you may be dealing with basic survival issues and can- not focus on the bigger picture at this time. if you wish to enhance this part of your Spiritual intelligence, you must develop the “Volitional” dimension of work—that is, the will to change for the better. to improve your connection to the transcendent, you will need to make a commitment to a spiritual practice such as prayer, medi- tation, journaling, or spending time in nature. as part of your practice, ask the transcendent for guidance on how to improve your connection. Make note of your reactions to your scores and list one or two areas you would like to develop further.
(Self-Assessment 1 continued)
66352_App_ptg01_464-473.indd 469 10/15/14 1:11 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
470 APPENDIX LeaDerShiP aND SPirituaLity iN the WorkPLace
Guidelines for Leading from a Spiritual Perspective Following are five spiritual principles that have been useful to many leaders in their per- sonal and professional development.
Know Thyself All spiritual growth processes incorporate the principle of self-awareness. That is why we included the self-assessment on spiritual intelligence at work, and here are some other ways to know thyself. Leading provides a great opportunity to become more self-aware. Examine why you respond to situations the way you do. Take a moment in the morning to ref lect on the kind of leader you would like to be today. At the end of the day, take quiet time to assess how well you did, and to what extent you were able to live in alignment with your most deeply held core values. It is also helpful to take personal and leadership assessment tools, such as the one in this appendix and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. You might also consider taking the Spiritual Intelligence Assessment developed by Cindy Wigglesworth at Deep Change.
Act with Authenticity and Congruency Followers learn a lot more from who we are and how we behave than from what we say. Authenticity means being oneself, being fully congruent, and not playing a role. Many managers really get into the role of “leader,” and they see managing as a place to assert their superiority and control. They would never want employees to see the more human, softer parts of them. Yet we are finding that managers who are more authentic, humble, and congruent tend to be more effective.13
It is a real challenge to be authentic and congruent in the workplace. Most people feel that if they are truly themselves, and if they say what they are really thinking, it will be the end of their careers. But I believe that if we don’t do this, we sell a little bit of our souls every time we are inauthentic, and that saps our creative energy and our emotional intel- ligence. It also reduces our sense of commitment to the work we do, and we cannot per- form at our highest level. Experiment with greater authenticity and with showing more of your humanness. You will be surprised at how positively people will respond.
It is also important to create a climate in which employees are encouraged to behave authentically and congruently. This means that they should be comfortable expressing feelings as well as thoughts and ideas. Contrary to popular opinion, humility accompa- nied by a strong will does create an enduring organization and is a much more powerful tool for success than a strong ego.
Respect and Honor the Beliefs of Others It can be very risky and maybe even inappropriate to talk about your own spirituality in the workplace. Yet if spirituality is a guiding force in your life and your leading, and if you follow the guideline of authenticity and congruency, you cannot hide that part of yourself. It is a fine line to walk.
What seems to work best is to build a climate of trust and openness first, and to model an acceptance of opinions and ideas that are different from yours. Then, if an appropriate opportunity comes up in which you can mention something about your spiritual beliefs, you should emphasize that they are yours alone. Explain that people have different beliefs and that you respect those differences. It is extremely important that employees do not feel that you are imposing your belief system (spiritual, religious, or otherwise) on them.
66352_App_ptg01_464-473.indd 470 10/15/14 1:11 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
APPENDIX LeaDerShiP aND SPirituaLity iN the WorkPLace 471
At the same time, it is worthwhile to do anything that you can do to nurture spiritual and ethical development in your employees in a way that allows them to explore their own deepest values and beliefs.
Be as Trusting as You Can Be This guideline operates on many levels. On the personal level, this guideline of “being as trusting as you can be” applies to trusting oneself, one’s inner voice, or one’s source of spiritual guidance. This means trusting that there is a Higher Power in your life and that if you ask you will receive guidance on important issues. It also operates on the interper- sonal, team, and organizational level. If you truly learn to see yourself as trustworthy, and believe that it is our essential nature as humans to be trustworthy, then you will naturally feel trusting of colleagues and subordinates. And you will also feel more trusting that the processes and events that are happening have a higher purpose to them if you look for it and amplify it.
Maintain a Spiritual Practice In a research study on people who integrate their spirituality and their work, the most frequently mentioned spiritual practice is spending time in nature. Examples of other practices are meditation, prayer, reading inspirational literature, hatha yoga, shamanistic practices, writing in a journal, and walking a labyrinth. People reported that it is very important for them to consistently commit to whatever individual spiritual practice they have chosen. The regular involvement in a chosen practice appears to be the best way to deepen one’s spirituality.14
When leaders faithfully commit to a particular spiritual practice they are calmer, more creative, more in tune with employees and customers, and more compassionate.15
Resources on the Web • Center of Business as an Agent of World Benefit (BAWB) at Case Western Reserve’s
Wetherhead School of Management. http://worldbenefit.case.edu • Spiritual Intelligence Assessment developed by Cindy Wigglesworth at Deep Change,
http://www.deepchange.com Note: The instrument is free if it is used as a part of a research project.
• Tyson Center for Faith and Spirituality in the Workplace, Sam M. Walton College of Business, University of Arkansas. http://tfsw.uark.edu. This Web site has research papers, dissertations, podcasts, videos, and many other resources for those interested in the integration of faith and spirituality in the workplace.
WORK Applications
A-1. Give an example of spirituality in the place where you work or have worked.
A-2. Have you or anyone you know struggled with spiritual journey and what this means for work? Explain.
Appendix Summary There is a growing trend to talk more openly about spirituality and to want to integrate spiritual principles into all aspects of life—relationships, community, and work. This appendix has pre- sented some resources for leaders who are interested in more fully integrating their spirituality and their leadership. A newly emerging field expands beyond just the focus on spirituality in the workplace. It goes by such names as Faith at Work, Spiritual
Capitalism, Compassionate Capitalism, and Conscious Capitalism. Leading edge thinkers are now exploring ideas about spiritual and humanistic values applied to economic and political systems.
Living more congruently with deeply held spiritual principles is never easy, but it is extremely rewarding and meaningful. I hope that some of the resources provided here will help to make the journey a little easier.
66352_App_ptg01_464-473.indd 471 10/15/14 1:11 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
472 APPENDIX LeaDerShiP aND SPirituaLity iN the WorkPLace
1. Spirituality is about learning to be more caring and com- passionate in the workplace. Should we be more caring and compassionate with others at work? Why or why not?
2. Spirituality is about integrity, being true to oneself, and telling the truth to others in the workplace. Should we be honest with others at work? Why or why not?
3. Is knowing oneself important to leading from a spiritual perspective? Why or why not?
4. Should leaders let followers see the more human, softer parts of them (truly be themselves)? What effect would this have on productivity?
Critical-Thinking Questions
Review Questions
The following critical-thinking questions can be used for class discussion and/or as written assignments to develop communica- tion skills. Be sure to give complete explanations for all questions.
1. There is no single accepted definition of spirituality in the workplace. What is your definition?
2. Are managers who have a spiritual practice more effective leaders than those who do not?
3. Do you have a spiritual practice? If yes, what is it?
4. If our capitalistic system were based on spiritual principles, what would it look like? How would business and govern- ment be different?
Endnotes 1 K. T. Scott, “Leadership and spirituality: A quest for recon-
ciliation,” in J. Conger (ed.), Discovering the Spirituality in Leadership (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1994), 63–99.
2 G. Fairholm, Capturing the heart of -leadership: Spirituality and community in the new American workplace. (Westport, CT: Praeger), 1997.
3 C. Barks, The Essential Rumi (San Francisco: Harper, 1996).
4 J. Autry, Love and profit: The art of caring leadership (New York: Avon Books, 1991).
5 For details on the four levels of -spirituality in the work- place implementation, with case studies, worksheets, and assessments, the Creating Enlightened Organizations Manual by J. Neal can be ordered from the Association for Spirit at Work, http://www.spiritatwork.org.
6 B. Heermann, Building team spirit: Activities for inspiring and energizing teams (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1997). Noble purpose: Igniting extraordinary passion for life and work (Fairfax, VA: QSU Publishing, 2004).
7 R. Barrett, Liberating the corporate soul: Building the visionary organization (Cambridge, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1998); http://www.corptools.com.
8 D. Beck and C. Cowen, Spiral dynamics: Mastering values, leadership, and change (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 1996); http://www.spiraldynamics.com.
9 David Cooperrider and Suresh Srivastva first devel- oped the concept of Appreciative Inquiry in 1987, in D. Cooperrider and S. Srivastva, “Appreciative inquiry in -organizational life,” in R. W. Woodman & W. A. Pasmore (eds.), Research in -organizational change and develop- ment. (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1987). The most recent book in this field is D. Whitney, A. Trosten-Bloom, and D. Cooperrider, The power of appreciative inquiry: A practical guide to positive change (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, 2003); http://-appreciativeinquiry. cwru.edu/.
10 Kim Cameron coedited, with Jane Dutton and Robert Quinn, Positive Organization Scholarship (San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, 2003). This book was widely acclaimed by the academic community; however the -business com- munity responded that it was too “ivory tower.” Cameron has recently -written a book for the business community called The abundance framework (in press); http://www.bus. umich.edu/Positive/.
66352_App_ptg01_464-473.indd 472 10/15/14 1:11 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
APPENDIX LeaDerShiP aND SPirituaLity iN the WorkPLace 473
11 H. Owen, Open space technology: A user’s guide, 2nd ed. (San Francisco: -Berrett-Koehler, 1997); http://www. opens- paceworld.org/.
12 W. Harman and J. Hormann, Creative work: The construc- tive role of business in transforming society (Indianapolis: Knowledge Systems, 1990).
13 J. Collins, Good to great: Why some companies make the leap . . . and others don’t (NY: HarperBusiness, 2001). See Chapter 2 on “Level 5 Leadership,” which documents the success of leaders who demonstrate the virtue of humility.
14 J. Neal, B. Lichtenstein, and D. Banner, “Spiritual perspec- tives on individual, -organizational, and societal -transfor- mation,” Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12(3), 175–185.
15 C. Schaefer and J. Darling, “Does spirit matter? A look at contemplative practice in the workplace,” Spirit at Work newsletter, July 1997.
66352_App_ptg01_464-473.indd 473 10/15/14 1:11 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
4 74
A
360-degree feedback It is based on receiving perfor- mance evaluations from many people.
achievement motivation theory It attempts to explain and predict behavior and performance based on a person’s need for achievement, power, and affiliation.
acquired needs theory It proposes that people are motivated by their need for achievement, power, and affiliation.
adaptive culture It represents a leadership belief in active monitoring of the external environment for emerging opportunities and threats and adapting to them.
adjustment personality dimension It includes traits of emotional stability and self-confidence.
agreeableness personality dimension It includes traits of sociability and emotional intelligence.
alienated follower It is someone who is low on involvement, yet is high on critical thinking.
arbitrator He/She is a neutral third party who makes a binding decision to resolve a conf lict.
attribution theory It is used to explain the process managers go through in determining the reasons for effective or ineffective performance and deciding what to do about it.
B
BCF model It describes a conf lict in terms of behav- ior, consequences, and feelings.
behavioral leadership theories They attempt to explain distinctive styles used by effective leaders, or to define the nature of their work.
benchmarking It is a process that allows an organi- zation to adopt the best practices of others.
Big Five Model of Personality It categorizes traits into the dimensions of surgency, agreeableness, adjust- ment, conscientiousness, and openness to experience.
bureaucratic culture It represents a leadership mind- set that values order, stability, status, and efficiency.
C
charisma A social construct between the leader and follower, in which the leader offers a transformative vision or ideal that exceeds the status quo and then convinces followers to accept this course of action not because of its rational likelihood of success, but because of their implicit belief in the extraordinary qualities of the leader.
coaching It is the process of giving motivational feedback to maintain and improve performance.
coaching feedback It is based on a good, supportive relationship; it is specific and descriptive; and it is not judgmental criticism.
coercive power It involves punishment and with- holding of rewards to inf luence compliance.
collectivism It is the state of mind wherein the values and goals of the group—whether extended family, ethnic group, company, or community—are primary.
communication It is the process of conveying infor- mation and meaning.
competitive culture It represents a leadership mind- set that encourages and values a highly competitive work environment.
conflict It exists whenever people are in disagree- ment and opposition.
Glossary
66352_gloss_ptg01_474-480.indd 474 10/21/14 12:05 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
GLOSSARY 475
conformist follower It is someone who is high on involvement but low on critical thinking.
connection power It is based on the user’s relation- ships with inf luential people.
conscientiousness personality dimension It includes traits of dependability and integrity.
content motivation theories They focus on explain- ing and predicting behavior based on people’s needs.
contingency leadership model It is used to deter- mine if a person’s leadership style is task- or relation- ship-oriented, and if the situation (leader–member relationship, task structure, and position power) matches the leader’s style to maximize performance
contingency leadership theories They attempt to explain the appropriate leadership style based on the leader, followers, and situation.
cooperative culture It represents a leadership belief in strong, mutually reinforcing exchanges and linkages between employees and departments.
crisis It is a low-probability but high-impact event that threatens the viability of an organization and is characterized by ambiguity of cause, effect, and means of resolution, as well as by a belief that decisions must be made swiftly.
cross-functional team It is composed of members from different functional departments of an organiza- tion who are brought together to perform unique tasks to create new and non-routine products or services.
culture The aggregate of beliefs, norms, attitudes, values, assumptions, and ways of doing things that is shared by members of an organization and taught to new members.
D
decisional leadership roles It includes entrepreneur, disturbance-handler, resource allocator, and negotiator.
decision-making skills They are based on the ability to conceptualize situations and select alternatives to solve problems and take advantage of opportunities.
delegation It is the process of assigning responsibility and authority for accomplishing objectives.
delegation model The steps involved in delegation model are (1) explain the need for delegating and the
reasons for selecting the employee; (2) set objectives that define responsibility, level of authority, and dead- line; (3) develop a plan; and (4) establish control check- points and hold employees accountable
descriptive leadership models They identify contin- gency variables and leadership styles without specify- ing which style to use in a given situation.
discontinuous change It occurs when anticipated or expected changes bear no resemblance to the present or the past.
distributed leadership Here, multiple leaders take complementary leadership roles in rotation within the same SMT, according to their area of expertise or interest.
diversity It is the inclusion of all groups at all levels in an organization.
dyad It is defined as the individualized relationship between a leader and each follower in a work unit.
dyadic theory It approaches leadership as an exchange relationship that develops between a leader and a follower over time during role-making activities.
E
effective follower It is someone who is high on criti- cal thinking and involvement.
equity theory It proposes that people are motivated when their perceived inputs equal outputs.
ethics They are the standards of right and wrong that inf luence behavior.
ethics They are the standards of right and wrong that inf luence behavior.
ethics ombudsperson It is a single person entrusted with the responsibility of acting as the organization’s conscience.
ethnocentrism It is the belief that one’s own group or subculture is naturally superior to other groups and cultures.
evidence-based management It means that deci- sions and organizational practices are based on the best available scientific evidence.
expectancy theory It proposes that people are moti- vated when they believe they can accomplish the task,
66352_gloss_ptg01_474-480.indd 475 10/20/14 3:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
476 GLOSSARY
they will get the reward, and the rewards for doing the task are worth the effort
expert power It is based on the user’s skill and knowledge.
F
feedback It is the process of verifying messages and determining if objectives are being met.
femininity It describes a culture that emphasizes developing and nurturing personal relationships and a high quality of life.
follower It is defined as someone who is under the direct inf luence and authority of a leader.
followership It refers to the behavior of followers that result from the leader–follower mutual inf luencing relationship.
functional team It is a group of employees belonging to the same functional department, such as marketing, R&D, production, human resources, or information systems, who have a common objective.
G
giving praise model They are (1) Tell the employee exactly what was done correctly. (2) Tell the employee why the behavior is important. (3) Stop for a moment of silence. (4) Encourage repeat performance.
glass ceiling It is defined as an invisible barrier that separate women and minorities from top leadership positions.
goal-setting theory It proposes that specific, difficult goals motivate people.
group It is a collection of individuals who interact primarily to share information and to make decisions that enable each member to perform within his or her area of responsibility.
groupthink It is when members of a cohesive group tend to agree on a decision not on the basis of its merit but because they are less willing to risk rejection for question- ing a majority viewpoint or presenting a dissenting opinion.
H
hierarchy of needs theory It proposes that people are motivated through five levels of needs—physiological, safety, belongingness, esteem, and self-actualization.
high-power-distance culture Leaders and followers rarely interact as equals here.
high-uncertainty-avoidance culture A majority of people who do not tolerate risk, avoid the unknown, and are comfortable when the future is relatively pre- dictable and certain.
I
impressions management It is a follower’s effort to project a favorable image to gain an immediate benefit or improve a long-term relationship with the leader.
individualism It is a psychological state in which people see themselves first as individuals and believe their own interest and values are primary.
influencing The process of a leader communicat- ing ideas, gaining acceptance of them, and motivating followers to support and implement the ideas through change.
information power It is based on the user’s data desired by others.
informational leadership roles It includes monitor, disseminator, and spokesperson.
ingratiation It is the effort to appear supportive, appreciative, and respectful.
in-group It includes followers with strong social ties to their leader in a supportive relationship char- acterized by high mutual trust, respect, loyalty, and inf luence.
initiating conflict resolution model The steps are (1) plan a BCF statement
that maintains ownership of the problem; (2) present your BCF statement and agree on the conf lict; (3) ask for, and/or give, alternative conf lict resolutions; and (4) make an agreement for change.
integrative leadership theories They attempt to combine the trait, behavioral, and contingency theo- ries to explain successful, inf luencing leader–follower relationships.
interpersonal leadership roles It includes figure- head, leader, and liaison.
interpersonal skills It involves the ability to understand, communicate, and work well with indi- viduals and groups through developing effective relationships
66352_gloss_ptg01_474-480.indd 476 10/20/14 3:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
GLOSSARY 477
J
job instructional training (JIT) The steps include (1) trainee receiving preparation; (2) trainer presenting the task; (3) trainee performing the task; and (4) trainer following up.
L
leader Motive Profile (LMP) It includes a high need for power, which is socialized, that is greater than the need for affiliation and with a moderate need for achievement.
leader motive profile theory It attempts to explain and predict leadership success based on a person’s need for achievement, power, and affiliation.
leader–member exchange (LMX) The quality of the exchange relationship between a leader and a follower.
leadership The inf luencing process between lead- ers and followers to achieve organizational objectives through change.
leadership continuum model It is used to determine which one of seven styles to select, based on the use of boss-centered versus subordinate-centered leadership, to meet the situation (boss, subordinates, situation/ time) to maximize performance
leadership Grid It identifies five leadership styles: 1,1 impoverished; 9,1 authority compliance; 1,9 country club; 5,5 middle of the road; and 9,9 team leader.
leadership model It is an example of emulation or use in a given situation
leadership paradigm It is a shared mindset that represents a fundamental way of thinking about, per- ceiving, studying, researching, and understanding leadership.
leadership style It is the combination of traits, skills, and behaviors leaders use as they interact with followers.
leadership theory It is an explanation of some aspect of leadership; theories have practical value because they are used to better understand, predict, and control suc- cessful leadership.
leadership theory classifications They include trait, behavioral, contingency, and integrative theories.
leadership trait theories They attempt to explain distinctive characteristics accounting for leadership effectiveness.
learning organization It is one that is skilled at creating, acquiring, and transferring knowledge, and at modifying behavior to ref lect new knowledge and insights.
legitimate power It is based on the user’s position power, given by the organization. It is also called the legitimization inf luencing tactic
levels of analysis of leadership theory They are indi- vidual, group, and organizational.
locus of control It is on a continuum between an external and internal belief over who has control of a person’s destiny.
long-term orientation They have a future-oriented view of life and thus are thrifty (saving for the future) and persistent in achieving goals.
low-power-distance culture Leaders and their fol- lowers interact on several levels as equals.
low-uncertainty avoidance culture It has a majority of people who are comfortable with and accepting of the unknown, and tolerate risk and unpredictability.
M
management to the leadership theory paradigm It is a shift from the older autocratic management style to the newer participative leadership style of management.
managerial role categories They are interpersonal, informational, and decisional.
masculinity It describes a culture that emphasizes assertiveness and a competitive drive for money and material objects.
mediator He/she is a neutral third party who helps resolve a conf lict.
mentoring It is a form of coaching in which a more experienced manager helps a less experienced protégé.
message-receiving process It includes listening, analyzing, and checking understanding.
moral justification It is the thinking process of ratio- nalizing why unethical behavior is used.
66352_gloss_ptg01_474-480.indd 477 10/20/14 3:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
478 GLOSSARY
motivation It is anything that affects behavior in pursuing a certain outcome.
motivation process In motivation process people go from need to motive to behavior to consequence to satisfaction or dissatisfaction.
N
negotiating It is a process in which two or more par- ties have something the other wants and attempt to come to an agreement.
networking It is the process of developing relation- ships for the purpose of socializing and politicking.
normative leadership model It has a time-driven and development-driven decision tree that enables the user to select one of five leadership styles (decide, con- sult individually, consult group, facilitate, and delegate) appropriate for the situation (seven questions/variables) to maximize decisions.
O
Ohio State University Leadership Model It identifies four leadership styles: low structure and high consider- ation, high structure and high consideration, low struc- ture and low consideration, and high structure and low consideration.
one-minute self-sell It is an opening statement used in networking that quickly summarizes your history and career plan and asks a question
openness-to-experience personality dimension It includes traits of f lexibility, intelligence, and internal locus of control.
oral message-sending process (1) It develops rapport; (2) It states your communication objective; (3) It transmits your message; (4) It checks the receiver’s understanding; and (5) gets a commitment and follow up.
organizational citizenship behavior It is defined as individual behavior that is discretionary, not directly or explicitly recognized by the formal reward system, and that in the aggregate promotes the effective functioning of the organization.
organizational knowledge It is the tacit and explicit know-how that individuals possess about products, services, systems, and processes.
out-group It includes followers with few or no social ties to their leader, in a strictly task-centered relation- ship characterized by low exchange and top-down inf luence.
P
paraphrasing It is the process of having the receiver restate the message in his or her own words.
passive follower It is someone who is low on critical thinking and low on involvement.
path–goal leadership model It is used to select the leadership style (directive, supportive, participative, or achievement-oriented) appropriate to the situation (subordinate and environment) to maximize both performance and job satisfaction
performance formula It explains performance as a function of ability, motivation, and resources.
personal meaning The degree to which people’s lives make emotional sense and to which the demands con- fronted by them are perceived as being worthy of their energy and commitment.
personality It is a combination of traits that classifies an individual’s behavior.
personality profiles They identify individual stron- ger and weaker traits.
personalized charismatic leader (PCL) It is one who possesses a dominant, self-centered, self-aggrandizing, and narcissistic personality and uses charisma for self-glorification.
politics It is the process of gaining and using power.
power It is the leader’s potential inf luence over followers
pragmatic follower It exhibits a little of all four styles— depending on which style fits the prevailing situation.
prescriptive leadership models They tell the user exactly which style to use in a given situation
press kit It is a package of information about a com- pany, including names and pictures of its executives, a fact sheet, and key milestones in the company’s history.
press release It is a printed statement that describes how an organization is responding to a crisis and who is in charge.
66352_gloss_ptg01_474-480.indd 478 10/20/14 3:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
GLOSSARY 479
process motivation theories It focus on understand- ing how people choose behavior to fulfill their needs.
Pygmalion effect It proposes that leaders’ attitudes toward and expectations of followers, and their treat- ment of them, explain and predict followers’ behavior and performance.
R
reciprocity It involves creating obligations and developing alliances, and using them to accomplish objectives.
referent power It is based on the user’s personal rela- tionships with others.
reinforcement theory It proposes that through the consequences for behavior, people will be motivated to behave in predetermined ways.
reward power It is based on the user’s ability to inf lu- ence others with something of value to them.
S
self-concept It refers to the positive or negative atti- tudes people have about themselves.
self-efficacy It is defined as a person’s beliefs in his or her capabilities to produce at a certain level of performance.
self-managed team champion He/she is an advocate of the SMT concept whose responsibility is to help the team obtain necessary resources, gain political support from top management and other stakeholders of the organization, and defend it from enemy attacks.
self-managed teams(SMTs) It is relatively autono- mous teams whose members share or rotate leadership responsibilities and hold one another mutually respon- sible for a set of performance targets assigned by top management.
self-promotion It is the effort to appear competent and dependable.
servant leadership Leadership that transcends self- interest to serve the needs of others, by helping them grow professionally and personally
short-term orientation It derives from values that express a concern for maintaining personal happiness and living in the present.
SMT facilitator He/she is the external leader of an SMT, whose job is to create optimal working conditions so that team members take on responsibilities to work productively and solve complex problems on their own.
social capital It is defined as the set of resources that inheres in the structure of relations between members of the group, which helps them get ahead.
social identity It s the degree to which members form close social ties with the group and how it sub- sequently inf luences interactions within and between group members.
social loafing It is the conscious or unconscious ten- dency by some team members to shirk responsibility by withholding effort toward team goals when they are not individually accountable for their work.
socialized charismatic leader (SCL) It is one who possesses an egalitarian, self-transcendent, and empowering personality and uses charisma for the ben- efit of others.
stakeholder approach to ethics One creates a win–win situation for relevant parties affected by the decision.
stewardship An employee-focused form of leadership that empowers followers to make decisions and have control over their jobs.
strong culture It symbolizes a complete agreement or shared mind-set on key values and norms, with leaders playing a key role.
substitutes for leadership They include character- istics of the subordinate, task, and organization that replace the need for a leader or neutralize the leader’s behavior
surgency personality dimension It includes domi- nance, extraversion, and high energy with determination.
T
team It is a unit of interdependent individuals with complementary skills who are committed to a com- mon purpose and set of performance outcomes and to common expectations, for which they hold themselves accountable.
team cohesion It is the extent to which team mem- bers band together and remain committed to achieving team goals.
66352_gloss_ptg01_474-480.indd 479 10/20/14 3:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
480 GLOSSARY
team creativity It is the creation of something that is valuable, useful, and novel by individuals working together in a complex social system.
team effectiveness It is a construct consisting of three components: (1) task performance—the degree to which the team’s output (product or service) meets the needs and expectations of those who use it; (2) group process—the degree to which members interact or relate in ways that allow the team to work increasingly well together over time; and (3) individual satisfac- tion—the degree to which the group experience, on balance, is more satisfying than frustrating to team members.
team learning It is the collective acquisition, combi- nation, creation, and sharing of knowledge.
team norms They are acceptable standards of behav- ior that are shared by team members.
team-member exchange (TMX) It is a team mem- ber’s social exchanges with peers in terms of the mutual exchange of ideas, support, camaraderie, and feedback.
technical skills It involves the ability to use methods and techniques to perform a task.
Theory X and Theory Y It attempt to explain and predict leadership behavior and performance based on the leader’s attitude about followers.
traits They are distinguishing personal characteristics.
transactional leadership It seeks to maintain stabil- ity within an organization through regular economic and social exchanges that achieve specific goals for both leaders and their followers.
transformational leadership It seeks to change the status quo by articulating to followers the problems in the current system and a compelling vision of what a new organization could be.
two-factor theory It proposes that people are moti- vated by motivators rather than maintenance factors.
U
University of Michigan Leadership Model It identifies two leadership styles: job-centered and employee-centered.
V
virtual team It is one whose members are geo- graphically dispersed, requiring them to work together through electronic means with minimal face-to-face interaction.”
vision It is the ability to imagine different and better conditions and the ways to achieve them.
W
whistle-blowing It is employee disclosure of illegal or unethical practices within an organization.
writing objectives model They are (1) To + (2) action verb + (3) singular, specific, and measurable result to be achieved + (4) target date.
66352_gloss_ptg01_474-480.indd 480 10/20/14 3:52 PM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
4 81
Index A
Ability, 120 Academic grades, ethics and, 192 Academy of Management (AoM), 19 Accommodating conf lict style, 202–203 Achievement, motive profile and, 43 Achievement Motivation Theory
achievement (n Ach), need for, 41 affiliation (n Aff ), need for, 41 defined, 41 leader motive profile, 43. See also Leader Motive
Profile Theory motive profile, 42 power (n Pow), need for, 41
Achievement orientation, charismatic leadership and, 335 Achievement-oriented leadership style, 121 Acquired needs theory, 86 Action orientation, charismatic leadership and, 335 Actions, substantive/symbolic, 365 Adams, Scott, 5 Adaptive culture, 367 Adjustment personality dimension, 37–38
emotional stability, 38 narcissism, 38 self-confidence, 38 self-control, 38
Advantageous comparison, unethical behavior justification, 55 Advertising, ethics and, 187 Affiliation
motive profile and, 43 need for, 41
Age, diversity and, 376 Agenda, for team meeting, 290 Agreeableness personality dimension, 37 Agreement, negotiation, 170 Airlines, ethics and, 94 Alexander, Andrew, 457 Alienated follower, 241 (exhibit), 242 Amazon, 2, 4, 7, 11, 13 American Express, 403 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 375 Analysis. See Levels of analysis of leadership theory Analytical thinking, 19 Apple, 23–24, 332 Application of knowledge, 19 Arbitrator, 208
Assessment, spiritual intelligence, 467–469 Assignments, for team meeting, 289–290 Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB),
19–20, 370 Atkinson, John, 86 Attitudes
authentic leadership effect on, 375 defined, 45 ethical behavior and, 52 improving, 61–62 leadership style and, 49, 49 (exhibit)
Attribution of blame, unethical behavior justification, 55 Attribution theory, 198, 339 Authentic leadership, 374–376
inf luence follower behaviors and attitudes, 375 personality profile of, 375
Authoritarianism, 120 Authority-compliance leader, 76 Autocratic styles
communication, 219 leadership, 70
Autry, James, 465 Avoidance reinforcement, 93 Avoiding conf lict style, 202 Avon Company, 358, 360, 361, 364, 368, 374, 382 Awareness, 380
B
Baby Boomers, 376 Balance, work/life, 87 Balance scorecard, 411 Barra, Mary (CEO of General Motors), 385–386 Barrett, Richard, 466 Bass, Bernard, 328, 331 BCF model, 206 Beck, Don, 466 Behavior
authentic leadership effect on, 375 changing for effectiveness, 35 employee-oriented, 73 ethical. See Ethical leadership job-centered, 73 leadership. See Leadership behavior political, use of, 153–154
Behavioral leadership theory, 16–17 and contingency together, 128–131, 130 (exhibit)
66352_ind_ptg01_481-500.indd 481 10/21/14 12:39 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
482 Index
Behavior modeling leadership training, skill development, 20 Behavior theory, leadership style and, 78 Belongingness needs, 81 Benchmarking, 450 Bennis, Warren, 431 Best-Cost. See Value-based strategy Bezos, Jeff, 2, 4, 7, 11, 13 Big Five correlates with leadership, 34 Big Five model of personality
adjustment, 37–38 agreeableness, 37 conscientiousness, 38 defined, 36, 36 (exhibit) openness-to-experience, 38–39 surgency, 36–37. See also Surgency personality dimension
Blake, Robert, 76–77 Blanchard. Ken, 97, 158 Bolman, Lee, 465 Boyne USA Resorts, 259 Branson, Richard, 325 Bribery, ethics and, 374 Brin, Sergey, 396, 398, 416 Buffet, Warren, 339 Bureaucratic culture, 368 Bureaucratic model, 447 Burns, J. M., 328, 331 Burns, Ursula, 349–350 Burson-Marsteller, 171 Business accreditation standards, 19–20 Business skills. See Technical skills, of leadership
C
Cable news, 432 Cameron, Kim, 466 Canton, Helen, 174 Career path, charismatic/transformational
leadership, 340 Cases
Apple—Steve Jobs, 23–24 Blake Mycoskie and TOMS, 59–60 FedEx—Frederick W. Smith, 302–304 Foxconn Technology Group, 135–136 General Motors-Mary Barra, 385–386 Merck—CEO Ken Frazier, 455–457 Nike—CEO Mark Parker, 420–421 organizational power and politics, 174–175 Sheryl Sandberg-Facebook COO, 102 W. L. Gore & Associates, 257–259
Change charismatic/transformational leadership
and, 339–340 leadership and, 7 resistance to, 414–416, 414 (exhibit) through upgrading, 411–412
Change, leading leaders role in, 412–413 need for change, 411–412 refreezing phase, 414
Change, three-stage model of about, 413 changing phase, 413 unfreezing phase, 413
Change management process, 413–414 minimizing resistance, 416–417, 417 (exhibit) resistance to, 414–416
Change process theories, 413 Changing phase, three-stage model of change, 413 Charisma, defined, 322 Charismatic advertisements, obesity ethics and, 327 Charismatic leadership, 122
acquiring charisma, 324–326 behaviors of leader, 337–338, 338 (exhibit) charismatic leaders on followers, effects of, 323–324,
324 (exhibit) dark side of charisma, 326–327 locus of, 322–323 qualities of, 333–338, 333 (exhibit) transformational change vs., 333–338, 339–340 vision, 321 Weber’s conceptualization of, 321–322
Check understanding, 190 Civil Rights Act, 375 Clark, Korby, 184 Clark, Peter, 184, 190–191, 194, 200, 205, 208 Clinton, Hillary, 385 Coaching
blame and embarrassment, 195 defined, 194 feedback, 194–197 focus on the behavior, 195 guidelines, 194 (exhibit) mentoring, 200 model, for failing employees, 198–199 modeling and training, 196–197 performance, improve with, 199, 200 (exhibit) praise and recognition, 195 self-evaluation, 195 specific/descriptive feedback, 195–196 supportive working relationship, 195 timely/f lexible feedback, 197
Coaching feedback, defined, 197 Coalition inf luencing tactic, 150 Coalitions, 155–156 Coburn, Tom, 252 Code of ethics, 57, 373 Coercive power, 148 Collaborating conf lict style, 204–205, 208 (exhibit) Collaborating conf lict style models
about, 205 initiating conf lict resolution, 206–207 initiating conf lict resolution model, 206–207 mediating conf lict resolution, 207–208 respond, to conf lict resolution, 207
Collectivism, 369 Communication
charismatic leadership and, 334 defined, 184–185 effective crisis, 440–441
66352_ind_ptg01_481-500.indd 482 10/21/14 12:29 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Index 483
guidelines to effective crisis, 441–442 and leadership, 185 preferred style, 215–218 situational model, 218–221 teams and, 279 written, tips for, 187
Competitive culture, 367–368 Computerized normative model, 127 Concept application
achievement motivation theory, 42 Big Five personality, 40 contingency leadership theory, 115–116 criticism or coaching feedback, 198 determinants of follower inf luence, 248 effects of charismatic leaders on followers, 325 group or team, 272 group problem people, 293 improving the success rate of SMTs, 298 inf luencing tactics, 151 in-groups versus out-groups, 234 justifying unethical behavior, 55 leadership continuum, 118 leadership grid, 77 leadership managerial roles, 13–14 leadership theories, 18 managerial leadership skills, 10 managing creative teams, 283 methods of sending messages, 185–186 motivation theories, 98 path–goal leadership, 122 personality traits of effective leaders, 40 political behavior, 158 pro-diversity culture, 381 qualities of effective charismatic and transformational leaders, 336 resistance to change, 416 rules of effective crisis communications, 443 selecting conf lict management styles, 204–205 socialized versus personalized charismatic leaders, 328 strategic leadership, 410 strategic management process, 407–408 traditional and learning organization, 448 transformational or transactional leadership, 330 type of organizational culture, 368 type of teams, 286, 295 university of Michigan leadership styles, 73 using power, 152 from VDL to LMX, 235
Conf lict management, teams and, 278–279 Conf lict management styles
about, 201, 202 (exhibit) accommodating, 202–203 avoiding conf lict, 202 collaborating, 204–205 forcing conf lict, 203 negotiation conf lict, 203–204
Conf lict resolution initiating, model of, 206–207 mediating, 207–208 responding to, 207
Conformist follower, 241, 241 (exhibit)
Connection power, 150–151 Conscientiousness personality dimension, 38
dependability, 38 integrity, 38
Consideration behavior, 74 Consultation inf luencing tactic, 147 Consultative communication style, 219 Content motivation theories
acquired needs theory, 86 comparison of, 87 (exhibit) defined, 80 hierarchy of needs theory, 80–82 two-factor theory, 82–86
Contingency, 110 Contingency leadership model
defined, 112 Fiedler’s, 115 (exhibit)
Contingency leadership theories about, 109–110, 112 and behavioral leadership together, 128–131, 130 (exhibit)
defined, 17 framework for, 110 (exhibit) leadership style and, 113 model variables and, 110, 113 (exhibit) research, criticism, applications, 116 situational favorableness, 114 substitutes for leadership variables within, 131 (exhibit)
Contingency leadership theory Contingency theory, continuum, 117–118 Contingency theory of leader effectiveness, 112 Continuous reinforcement, 94 Continuum leadership style, 117–118, 141 Conventional moral development, 53 Cook, Tim, 23–24, 231 Cooperative culture, 367 Cooperrider, David, 466 Corporations, multinational, 382 Coulombe, Joe, 69, 77 Country-club leader, 76 Cowan, Chris, 466 Cox, Chris, 242 Creative thinking, 450 Crisis
adapting after, 436–437 communication, age of social media, 432 defined, 430 formulating plan, 433 leader task during, 431 leading during, 435–436
Crisis communication effective, 440–441, 442 (exhibit) guidelines to effective, 441–442
Crisis leadership about, 430–431 crisis communication, in social media, 432 essential competencies of, 431 formulating a crisis plan, 433
Crisis management plan adapting after a crisis, 436–437 benefits of, 433
66352_ind_ptg01_481-500.indd 483 10/21/14 12:43 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
484 Index
Crisis management plan (continued) effective communication, 440–441 formulating, 433 leading during a crisis, 435–436 precrisis planning, 433–435. See also Precrisis planning three-stage, 433–437, 434 (exhibit)
Criticism about, 197 coaching feedback vs., 197 need for, 191
Cross-cultural studies, 371 Cross-functional team, 284 Cuban, Mark, 145, 153, 156, 164, 170, 172 Cultural inertia, 414 Culture
defined, 359, 409 strong versus weak, 361–363
Culture, organizational about, 359 adaptive, 367 bureaucratic, 368 competitive, 367–368 cooperative, 367 culture creation and sustainability, 359–360 femininity, 370 leader role, inf luencing, 364–366 learning organizations, 449 masculinity, 370 power of, 360–361 strong versus weak cultures, 361–363 types of, 366–368
Customer value, 407
D
Date, for team meeting, 290 Decision leadership roles
defined, 12 disturbance-handler, 12 entrepreneur, 12 negotiator, 12–13 resource-allocator, 12
Decision making, team. See Team decision making Decision-making skills, 10 Delegation
benefits of, 249 decisions, 250–251 defined, 249 delegating, 249–250 obstacles to, 250 signs of, little, 250
Delegation model, 252–253 Delegation process, 252–253, 253 (exhibit) Democratic leadership style, 70 Demographic diversity, 376 Demotivating, criticism, 197 Departmentalization, 451 Dependability, conscientiousness and, 38 Derailed leadership traits, 35, 35 (exhibit)
Descriptive feedback, 195–196 Descriptive leadership models, 129 Development, spirituality in the workplace, 466 Development-driven model, 127 Diffusion of responsibility, unethical behavior justification, 55 Dilbert, 5 Directive, leadership style, 121 Discernment and advice, 57 Disclosure mechanisms, ethical conduct and, 373 Discontinuous change, 446 Discrimination. See Diversity leadership Disney, 97 Displacement of responsibility, unethical behavior justification, 55 Disseminator role, 12 Distinctive core competence, 409 Distortion of consequences, unethical behavior justification, 55 Distributed leadership, 298 Disturbance-handler role, 12 Diverse and multicultural work environments, 19 Diversity, defined, 375 Diversity leadership
about, 375 awareness, 380 benefits of embracing, 376–378 changing work place, 376 globalization, effect on, 382 management support/commitment, 379 for measuring success, 380 organizational policies and practices, 379–380 pro-diversity culture, creating, 378–380, 378 (exhibit) training/education, 380
Dominance, personality trait, 36 Dominant leadership style, 113 Douglas, Max E., 90 Downsizing, part-time workers and, 39 Drug research, ethics, 121 DuPont, 32, 39–40, 44, 47, 48, 54 Dwight, Mark, 351 Dyad, defined, 232 Dyadic theory
defined, 232 leader-member exchange (LMX) theory, 234 vertical dyadic linkage (VDL) theory, 232–233
Dysfunctional conf lict, 201
E
Eastman Kodak, 429, 432, 436, 438, 440, 445, 448, 452 Education, followership and, 248 Effective follower
defined, 241 (exhibit), 242 guidelines to becoming, 244–246, 244 (exhibit) self-assessment, 243
Effective leaders, personality profile of, 41–43 Effective team
about, 275–276 characteristics of highly, 276–279, 276 (exhibit)
E-mail, 432 Emotional Intelligence, 37
66352_ind_ptg01_481-500.indd 484 10/21/14 12:29 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Index 485
Emotional stability, adjustment and, 38 Employee
classifications, 6 coaching model for failing, 198–199 equity theory, motivation, 88 expectancy theory, motivating with, 89 frame of reference, broaden, 451 goal setting theory, motivate with, 89–92 hierarchy of needs, motivating with, 82, 83 (exhibit) in learning organizations, 449–451 motivate with acquired needs, 86 motivate with two-factor theory, 85–86 networks, Whirlpool, 175 praising, 96–97 spirituality in the workplace, 464–471 unethical, 51
Employee-centered leadership style, 73 Empowerment
charismatic leadership and, 336 communication style, 219
Enron, 371 Ensign, John (Senator), 252 Entrepreneur role, 12 Environmental analysis, 405–406 Environmental sustainability, globalization and, 399 Environment situational factors, 120 Equity theory
defined, 88 motivation with, 88
Esteem needs, 81 Ethical behavior
codes of ethics, 57 discernment and advice, 57 golden rule, 56 guide to, 56–57 justify unethical behavior, 54–55 self-assessment, 50–51 sex and violence on television, 56 situations and, 54 stakeholder approach to, 57 whistle-blowing and, 63–64
Ethical call academic grades, 192 academic standards, 91 advertising, 187 airlines, 94 Avon bribe investigation, 374 breach of privacy, 332 buy American, 371 change through upgrading, 411–412 departmentalization, 451 downsizing and part-time workers, 39 drug research, 121 executive compensation, 15 Facebook hired Firm to target Google, 171 following orders, 149 gender discrimination, 381 GM’s recall crisis, 442 leadership, importance, 4 leadership gender, 111
LMX at work, 234–235 norms, 277 obesity and charismatic ads, 327 sex and violence, 56 strategic leadership and management, 402 Toyota, crisis at, 439
Ethical leadership about, 50–51 factors inf luencing, 52–54 integration, 54 moral development and, 52–54, 53 (exhibit) rewards of, 51–52 situation, 54
Ethical understanding and reasoning, 19 Ethical work
team player, or not, 275 Ethics
defined, 51, 371 inf luencing and, 171–172
Ethics committees, 373 Ethics ombudsperson, 373 Ethics organizational
about, 371 code of ethics, 373 disclosure mechanism, 373 ethics committees, 373 training and education process, 373
Ethnocentrism, 379 Euphemistic labeling, unethical behavior justification, 55 Evans, M. G., 119 Evidence-based management, 19 Executive compensation, ethics and, 15 Expectancy theory
defined, 88 expectancy theory, motivation, 89 three variables, Vroom’s formula, 89
Experience, followership and, 248 Expert power, 149–150 External adaptation, 361 Externalizer, 39 External locus of control, 247 Extinction, 94 Extraversion, personality trait, 37 Extrinsic factors, 82 Extrinsic motivators. See Maintenance factors
F
Facebook, 102, 185, 339 ethics, 171 opening case, 231, 233, 235, 242, 248.
Federico, Rick, 24 FedEx, 302–304 Feedback
coaching and, 194–197 criticism and, 197 defined, 191 follower, evaluation and, 254, 255 (exhibit) importance of, 191 on messages, getting, 192–194
66352_ind_ptg01_481-500.indd 485 10/21/14 12:29 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
486 Index
Feedback (continued) specific/descriptive, 195–196 strategic management and, 411 timely/f lexible, 197
Femininity, 370 Fiedler, Fred E., 112–116, 127, 132 Fiedler contingency leadership model, 115 (exhibit) Fifth Discipline, The (Senge), 444 Figurehead role, 11–12 Fixed interval schedule, 95 Fixed ratio schedule, 95 Flexibility, openness-to experience and, 38 Follower
authentic leaders and, 375 charismatic leadership and, 323–324, 324 (exhibit) defined, 6, 240 evaluation and feedback, 254, 255 (exhibit) impressions management, 237 in learning organizations, 450 role of, 236–237 types of, 241–242, 241 (exhibit)
Followership becoming an effective follower, 242–243 defining, 240 dual role, leader and, 249 factors that can enhance follower inf luence, 246–248, 247
(exhibit) guidelines to becoming an effective follower, 244–246 personality and, 251 types, 241–242, 241 (exhibit)
Food and Drug Administration, 121 Forcing conf lict style, 203 Ford, Henry, 48 Ford Motor Company, 288 Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, 358, 374 Formal authority, 120 Fortune 500 company, 2, 15, 23, 32, 35, 109, 200 Four-way test, for ethical behavior, 56 Foxconn Technology Group, 135–136 Frazier, Ken, 455–457 Friedman, Thomas, 399 Functional conf lict, 201 Functional team, 283–284
G
Gates, Bill, 339 Gender
discrimination, 381 diversity and, 376 followership differences, 251 glass ceiling, 379 leadership, 111
General Electric, 32 General Motors, 385–386 Generation X, 376 Giving praise model, 97 Glass ceiling, 379
Glaxo-SmithKline, 121 Global contingency leadership, 111 Globalization
diversity leadership and, 382 environmental sustainability and, 399 virtual teams and, 285
GLOBE, cross-cultural investigation, leadership/culture and, 111
Goals organizational, 404 teams and, 277
Goal setting, self-assessment and, 160–161 Goal setting theory
defined, 89 motivating employees with, 91–92 writing objectives, 90
Golden rule, ethical behavior and, 56 Gonzalez, Jose, 174 Google
ethics, 171 leadership and, 396, 398, 404, 405, 406,
407, 410, 416 Gou, Terry, 135 Greenleaf, Robert K., 344 Grid Organizational Development program, 77 Group level of analysis, 14 Group process, 14 Group(s)
in, 233, 238 defined, 271 out, 234, 238
Groupthink, 273
H
Hampton, Doug, 252 Harman, Willis, 466 Hastings, Reed, 211–213 Herzberg, Frederick, 82, 84–88 Herzberg’s two-factor motivation model, 84–85 Hierarchy of needs theory, 80–82, 83 (exhibit)
defined, 81 motivating employees with, 82, 83 (exhibit)
High energy determination charismatic leadership and, 335 personality trait, 37
Higher purpose, unethical behavior justification, 55 High-high leader research, 77 High performing cultures. See Strong performing cultures High-power-distance culture, 370 High-risk orientation, 335 High-uncertainty-avoidance culture, 370 Hitler, Adolf, 322, 325, 326, 334, 339, 340 Hofstede, Geert, 369–371 Hofstede’s value dimensions, national culture and, 369–371 Holtz, Liz, 45, 47, 48 Holtz, Lou, 91 House, Robert, 119
66352_ind_ptg01_481-500.indd 486 10/21/14 12:29 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Index 487
I
Idealized inf luence, 337 Iger, Bob, 97 Implementation, of strategy, 408 Impoverished leader, 76 Impressions-driven motive, 237 Impressions management, 237 Incentives, 409–410 Individual consideration, 337 Individual development, spirituality in the workplace, 466 Individualism, 369 Individual level of analysis, 14 Inf luence
coalition, 150 consultation inf luencing tactic, 147 defined, 6 ethics and, 171–172 factors that can enhance follower, 246–248 inspirational appeals, 149 rational persuasion, 147 tactics, power, personality traits, 152
Informational leadership roles defined, 12 disseminator, 12 monitor, 12 spokesperson, 12
Information power, 150 Information technology, 19 Ingratiation, 237 In-group, 233, 238 Initiating conf lict resolution model, 206–207 Initiating structure behavior, 74 Inspirational appeals inf luencing tactic, 149 Inspirational motivation, 337 Instrumentality, expectancy theory and, 89 Integration, moral development and, 54 Integrative leadership theory, defined, 17 Integrity, conscientiousness and, 38 Intellectual stimulation, 337 Intelligence, openness-to experience and, 38–39 Interactive process system, situation communications model,
218–221 Intermittent reinforcement, 94–95 Internalizers, 39 Internal locus of control, 247 Internal unity, 360–361 International joint venture (IJV), 371 Interpersonal communication skills, 279 Interpersonal leadership roles, 11–12
defined, 11 figurehead, 11–12 leader, 11 liaison, 12
Interpersonal relations and teamwork, 19 Interpersonal relationships, teams and, 278 Interpersonal skills, 10, 184 Intrinsic factors, 82, 84
J
Jackson, Phil, 146 Jago, Arthur, 123 J.C.Penny, 15 Job-centered leadership style, 73 Job instructional training (JIT)
defined, 196 steps, 196 (exhibit)
Job motivators, maintenance factors, 83–84 Job performance, personality profiles and, 34 Jobs, Steve, 23–24 Johnson, Spencer, 97
K
Kelleher, Herb, 335 Kelley, Robert, 240 Kelly, Gary, 269, 272, 276, 296 Kelly, Terri, 257–258 Kennedy, John F., 325, 326, 334, 339, 340, 403 King, Martin Luther, Jr., 146, 322, 323, 325, 326, 334,
335, 338–340 Kings Speech, The, 325 Kircher, Everett, 259 Knowledge-based economy, 443 Knowledge management, 12, 445 Kolbe, Chris, 422 Komatsu, 403 Kroc, Ray, 136 Kullman, Ellen, 32, 39–40, 44, 47, 48
L
Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire (LBDQ), 74 Leader-member exchange (LMX)
criticisms of, 238–239 defined, 234 delegation, 249–255 factors inf luencing, 235–237 followership, 239–249 organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), 234–235 relationship benefit, 237–238 relationships, develop high quality, 237–238 at work, 234–235
Leader-member relations, 114 Leader Motive Profile Theory (LMP)
achievement, 43 affiliation, 43 defined, 43 power, 43 socialized power, 43
Leader role, 11, 236 Leader(s)
Big Five personality traits of, 36–39, 36 (exhibit). See also Big Five model of personality
culture, role in inf luencing, 364–366
66352_ind_ptg01_481-500.indd 487 10/21/14 12:29 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
488 Index
Leader(s) (continued) defined, 6 learning organization culture, role of in, 449–451, 449 (exhibit) role in managing change, 412–413 role of, 11, 236 span of control, 236
Leadership actions for shaping culture, 366 (exhibit) book objectives, 18–20, 18 (exhibit) born or made?, 8 change and, 7 communication and, 185 crisis. See Crisis leadership defined, 5, 5 (exhibit) describing, 2–7 development, 2–3 distributed, 298 diversity. See Diversity leadership ethics. See Ethics leadership and followers, 6 importance of, 2–3 inf luence, 6–7 interest, self-assessment, 44–45 levels of analysis of, 14–16. See also Levels of analysis of leadership
theory managerial leadership roles, 11–13, 11 (exhibit). See also
Managerial leadership roles managerial level, skills needed for, 10 organizational objectives and, 7 people and, 7 self-managed teams and, 294, 298 skills. See Leadership skills spirituality in the workplace and, 466 from spiritual perspective, 470–471 strategic. See Strategic leadership strong, 408 team, 279–280 in team meetings, 290 transformational. See Transformational leadership
Leadership attitudes about, 45–46 developing positive, 48–49 Pygmalion effect, 47 self-concept, 48–49 Theory X and Theory Y, 46–47
Leadership behavior about, 69–70 contributions of, applications of, 78 names given to the same two, 129 (exhibit) traits, 70
Leadership continuum theory and model, 117–118, 141 within the contingency leadership framework, 117 (exhibit) defined, 117 Schmidt’s, 118 (exhibit) Tannenbaum’s, 118 (exhibit)
Leadership decision making model, 306 (exhibit) Leadership gender, 111 Leadership grid theory
about, 76, 76 (exhibit) authority-compliance leader, 76
country-club leader, 76 defined, 76 high-high leader research and, 77 impoverished leader, 76 middle-of-the-road, 76 team leader, 76
Leadership model defined, 110 theories vs., 110
Leadership motivation and, 79–80 Leadership paradigm, defined, 16 Leadership participation styles
consulting group, 124 consulting individually, 124 decision, 124 delegate, 124 facilitator, 124
Leadership skill development about, 20 authentic. See Authentic leadership behavior modeling, 20 model vs. exhibits, 20 practice, 20
Leadership skills, 8–10 born or made?, 8 decision-making, 10 managerial, 9–10, 9 (exhibit) taught, 9 technical, 9. See also Leadership skills
Leadership style achievement-oriented, 121 attitude and, 49, 49 (exhibit) defined, 70 determine appropriate, 114 determining, 127 directive, 121 employee-centered, 73 job-centered, 73 LPC and, 113 Michigan and Ohio State Universities, 71 participative, 121 path-goal model and, 121 personality traits and, 78 supportive, 121 task/relationship, 113 University of Iowa Leadership Styles, 70–71,
71 (exhibit) Leadership substitutes theory
about, 131 changing the situation, 132 leadership style, 132 research, criticism, applications, 132 substitutes/neutralizers, 131
Leadership theory AACSB business accreditation standards, 19–20 application of, 20 evidence-based management (EBM), 19 leadership model vs., 110
Leadership theory, defined, 16 Leadership theory classifications, defined, 16
66352_ind_ptg01_481-500.indd 488 10/21/14 12:29 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Index 489
Leadership theory paradigms behavioral theory, 16–17 contingency theory paradigm, 17 defined, 16 integrative theory paradigm, 17 management to leadership paradigm, 17 trait theory paradigm, 16
Leadership trait, 35 Leadership trait theories, 16 Lean In: Women, Work and the Will to Lead (Sheryl), 102 Learning anxiety, 412 Learning organization
characteristics of, 447 creative idea for innovation, 450–451 creative thinking, 450 culture and firm performance, 449 defined, 444 frame of reference, employees, 451 incentives and innovation, 450 risk taking, 450 role of leader in creating, 449–451, 449 (exhibit) systems thinking, 450 tolerance for failure, 450 traditional organization vs., 446–448, 447 (exhibit) vision for, 451
Least-preferred co-worker (LPC) scales, 113 Legitimate power, 146–148 Levels of analysis of leadership theory
defined, 14 group level, 14 individual level of analysis, 14 interrelationships among, 15–16, 15 (exhibit) organizational, 14
Lewin, Kurt, 413 Liaison role, 12 Lincoln, Abraham, 339 LinkedIn, 185 LMX, leader-member exchange, 234 Locke, Edwin, 89 Locus of charismatic leadership, 322–323 Locus of control, 39, 120, 247 Lombardi, Vince, 8 Long-term orientation, 370 Low performing cultures. See Weak performing cultures Low-power-distance culture, 370 Low structure leadership style, 74 Low-uncertainty-avoidance culture, 370 LPC. See Least-preferred co-worker (LPC) scales
M
Maintenance factors, 82 Management
leading change, 412–413 self-managed teams, challenge to. See Self-managed
team (SMT) strategic. See Strategic management
Management functions, 7, 11 teams and, 279
Management to the leadership theory, 17
Managerial Grid®, 76 Managerial leadership skills, 9–10, 9 (exhibit) Managerial role categories
decision, 12–13. See also Decision roles defined, 11 informational, 12–13. See also Informational leadership roles interpersonal, 11–12. See also Interpersonal leadership roles
Manager(s) competent, 408 defined, 6 dyadic relationship, 233 skills needed, 10
Mandela, Nelson, 322, 325, 326, 337–340 Marriott, W. Jr., 45 Masculinity, 370 Maslow, Abraham, 80, 82 McCanse, Anne Adams, 76 McClelland, David, 41, 43 McClelland’s trait theories, 41, 86 McCoy, Sheri, 358 McDonald’s, leadership at, 136 McGregor, Douglas, 47 Mediator, conf lict resolution, 207 Meetings, team. See Team meetings, leadership skills for Mentoring, 200 Merck, 121, 455–457 Message receiving process
analyzing messages, 190 check understanding, 190 defined, 189 listening, 189–190
Messages, receiving about, 188–189 process, 189–190. See also Message receiving process
Messages, sending about, 185 orally, 186–187 written, 187
Microsoft Excel, 9 Middle-of-the-road leader, 76 Military, following orders, 149 Millennials, 376 Mind-set, of charismatic/transformational leaders, 339 Mintzberg, Henry, 11, 16 Mission statement, 403–404 Model questions to determine leadership style, 124–126
decision significance, 124 group expertise, 126 group support for objectives, 124 importance of commitment, 124 leaders expertise, 124 likelihood of commitment, 124 team competence, 126
Model variables, contingency theory and, 110, 113 (exhibit) Model vs. exhibits, skill development and, 20 Monitor role, 12 Moral conviction, charismatic leadership and, 334 Moral development, levels of, 53 (exhibit) Moral justification, 54 Mother Teresa, 344
66352_ind_ptg01_481-500.indd 489 10/21/14 12:29 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
490 Index
Motivation defined, 79 impressions-driven motive, 237 and leadership, 79 performance-driven motive, 237 process, 79, 79 (exhibit) with reinforcement, 96
Motivation process, 79, 79 (exhibit) avoidance, 93 continuous schedule, 94 equity theory and, 87–88 expectancy theory and, 89 extinction, 94 intermittent schedule, 95 motivation theory together within, 99 punishment, 93 rewards, 93
Motivation theories content motivation, 80–87. See also Content motivation theories leadership and, 79 major, 81 (exhibit) overview of three major classifications of, 80 process, 79
Motivation theory, motivation process and, 99 Motivators
extrinsic/intrinsic, 82, 84 money as, 85
Motive profile, 42. See also Leader Motive Profile Theory Mouton, Jane, 76–77 Multinational corporations, 382 Multi-rater feedback, 360-degree, 193–194 Murray, Henry, 86 Mycoskie, Blake, 59–60 Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, 470
N
Narcissism, adjustment and, 38 National Child Protection Act, 340 National culture
GLOBE and, 111 Hofstede’s Value Dimensions, 369–371
National Education for Assistance Dog Services (NEADS), 304 Navistar International, 213 Neal, Judith, 464–471 Need for achievement (n Ach), 41 Need for affiliation (n Aff ), 41 Need for power (n Pow), 41 Negative charisma, 326–327 Negotiation
about, 165 agreement/no agreement, 170 as conf lict style, 203–204 ethical challenge, 172 face-to-face negotiation, 168–169 plan, 166–168 postponement, 169–170 process of, 166–170, 167 (exhibit) skills, 166
Negotiator role, 12–13 Netf lix, 211–213 Networking
about, 159–160 defined, 155 develop, 162 interviews, 162–164 maintain, 164
Neutralizers, for leadership, 131 Niche differentiation strategy, 406 Niche low-cost strategy, 406 Nike, 420–421 No agreement, negotiations, 170 Nonverbal cues, 190, 193 Nooyi, Indra, 109, 112, 116, 119, 123, 128 Normative leadership model, 286 Normative leadership theory and models
about, 123 defined, 123 determine leadership style, 127, 136–139 development-driven model, 126 (exhibit) leadership participation styles, 124 questions to determine style, 124–126 research, criticisms, applications, 127–128 selecting for situation, 127 time-driven model, 125 (exhibit)
Norms, team and, 277
O
Objectives criteria for, 90–91 feedback and, 191 for goal setting, 90–91 writing, 90
Objectives, for team meeting, 289 Obstacles, removing, 379 Ohio State University Leadership Model
about, 74 application of the models, 75 contribution of models, 75 differences with University of Michigan model, 75 four styles, two dimensions, 75 (exhibit) initiating structure/consideration behavior, 74 leadership styles, 71 Trader Joe’s and, 77
Ombudsperson, 373 One-Minute Manager, The (Blanchard & Johnson), 97 One-minute self-sell, 161 Opening case
Amazon, 2, 4, 7, 10, 13 Avon Company, 358, 360, 361, 364, 368, 374, 382 DuPont, 32, 39, 44, 47, 48, 54 Eastman Kodak, 429, 432, 436, 438, 440, 445, 448, 452 Facebook, 231, 233, 235, 242, 248. See also Social networks Google, 396, 398, 404, 405, 406, 407, 410, 416 PepsiCo, 109, 112, 116, 119, 123, 128 power, 145, 153, 156, 164, 170, 172 Ranch Golf Club, 184, 190–191, 194, 200, 205, 208
66352_ind_ptg01_481-500.indd 490 10/21/14 12:29 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Index 491
Southwest Airlines, 269, 272, 276, 279, 281, 282, 285, 296 Trader Joe’s, 69, 77, 80, 82, 85, 86, 89, 92, 98 Winfrey, Oprah, 320, 321, 322, 324, 327, 336, 338, 340
Openness-to-experience personality dimension defined, 38 f lexibility, 38 intelligence, 38–39 locus of control, 39
Operating procedures, teams and, 278 Operational efficiency. See Niche low-cost strategy Oracle, 15 Oral communication, 19 Oral message-sending process, 186–187, 186 (exhibit) Orders, following, ethics and, 149 Organization
of textbook, 20–21, 21 (exhibit) traditional vs. learning, 446–448, 447 (exhibit)
Organizational change about, 411 need for, 412
Organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), 236 Organizational climate, team creativity and, 281 Organizational culture. See Culture, organizational Organizational identity, 409 Organizational knowledge, 445 Organizational level of analysis, 14 Organizational objectives, 7, 404–405 Organizational politics
about, 153 case, 174–175 coalitions, 155–156 ethical behavior and, 172 interviews, networking, 162–164 maintain network, 164 nature of, 154–155 network, develop, 162 networking, 155 one-minute self-sell, 161 political behavior, 155–156 political skills, develop, 156–158 politics, as medium of exchange, 154–155 reciprocity, 155 relationships, develop good working, 157–158 setting goals/self-assessment, 160–161 team player, 158
Organizational process, 14 Organizations
employee classifications, 6 hierarchy of needs, motivation and, 83 (exhibit) teams, use of in, 270–281
Original Penguin, 422 Out-group, 234, 238 Owen, Harrison, 466
P
Page, Larry, 396, 398, 405, 416 Paraphrasing, 191, 193 Parker, Mark, 420–421
Participants, for team meeting, 289–290 Participative, leadership style, 121 Participative communication style, 219 Part-time workers, downsizing and, 39 Passive follower, 241, 241 (exhibit) Path clarification, 119 Path-goal leadership theory and model
about, 119–120 within the contingency leadership framework, 119 (exhibit) defined, 119 determine, 141 house, 120 (exhibit) leadership styles, 121 research, criticism, applications, 122 situational factors, 120
People, leadership and, 7 People’s names, remembering, 25 PepsiCo, 403
diversity at, 387 opening case, 109, 112, 116, 119, 123, 128
Perez, Antonio, 429, 432, 436, 440, 452 Performance, improve with coaching, 199, 200 (exhibit) Performance-driven motive, 237 Performance formula, 198, 199 (exhibit) Perry Ellis International, 422 Personality
charismatic/transformational leadership and, 345 defined, 34 differences in followership, 251 importance of understanding, 34 perceptions, 63
Personality profile(s) correlates with leadership, Big Five, 34 defined, 34 of effective leaders. See Effective leaders, personality profile of derailed leadership traits, 35, 35 (exhibit) job performance, 34
Personality traits ethical behavior and, 52 improving, 61–62 leadership styles and, 78 teams and, 288
Personality traits, leadership and about, 32 leadership trait, 35 personality and traits, 33–34 personality profiles, 34–35
Personalized charismatic leader (PCL), 326 Personal meaning, defined, 340 Personal power, 146 Persuasion, rational, 147 P.F. Chang’s
leadership at, 24 workers at, 61
Physiological needs, 81 Place, for team meeting, 290 Planning
pre-crisis, 433–435. See also Precrisis planning team meetings, 289–290, 289 (exhibit)
66352_ind_ptg01_481-500.indd 491 10/21/14 12:29 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
492 Index
Policies and procedures, 408–409 Political behavior, use of, 153–154
guidelines for developing skills, 156–158, 156 (exhibit)
Politics defined, 154 ethics, 252 as medium of exchange, 154–155 networking, 155 political behavior, 155–156
Position power, 114, 146 Positive interpersonal relationships, 278 Positive reinforcement, 93 Postconventional moral development, 53 Postponement, 169–170 Power
coercive, 148 connection, 150–151 of culture, 360–361 defined, 145 expert, 149–150 followership, 247 inf luencing tactics, 146–151, 147 (exhibit) information, 150 legitimate, 146–148 motive profile and, 43 need for, 41 personal, 146 position, 146 referent, 149 reward, 148 sources of, 146, 147 (exhibit) types of, 146–151, 147 (exhibit)
Power players, 156–157 Practice, skill development, 20 Pragmatic follower, 241 (exhibit), 242 Praise, employees, 96–97 Preconventional moral development, 53 Precrisis planning, 433–435
crisis plan of action, 434 crisis response team, 434 resources, 434
Prescriptive leadership models, 129 Press kit, 441 Press release, 441 Privacy, breaching, ethics and, 332 Problem people, in groups/teams, 291–293
arguer, 292 bored, 292 silent, 291 talker, 292 wanderer, 292
Process motivation theories defined, 87 equity theory, 87–88 equity theory, motivation, 88 rewarding people equitably, 88
Psychological contract, 201 Public Relations Society of America, 171 Punishment, 93 Pygmalion effect, 47
R
Race, diversity and, 376 Ranch Golf Club, 184, 190–191, 194, 200, 205, 208 Rational persuasion, 147 Receiving messages. See Messages, receiving Reciprocity, 155 Recognition, gain, 158 Referent power, 149 Ref lective thinking, 19 Refreezing phase, in change model, 414 Reinforcement theory
avoidance, 93 changing behavior, 96 continuous, 94 defined, 92 extinction, 94 general guidelines, 96 intermittent, 94–95 motivating with, 96 positive, 93 praise, giving, 96–97 punishment, 93 reward, 93 types of, 93–94, 95 (exhibit)
Relational power base, charismatic leadership and, 335 Relationship leadership style, 113 Relationship management, 37 Relationships, good working, 157–158 Religion, diversity and, 376 Resisting change
distrust of leadership, 415 fear of being manipulated, 415–416 lack of confidence, 415 lack of conviction, 415 minimizing, 416–417, 417 (exhibit) reasons for, 414 (exhibit) threat to existing cultural values, 415 threat to self interest, 415 uncertainty, 415
Resource-allocator role, 12 Responsibility, unethical behavior justification, 55 Reward power, 148 Rewards, 409–410 Risk, degree of, charismatic/ transformational leadership and, 340 Risk assessment, crisis
crisis management, 438–439 drill plan, 438 five-step model, 437–439, 437 (exhibit) pre-crisis simulations, 438 risk assessment and ranking, 438 risk identification, 437 risk reduction, 438
S
Safety needs, 81 Sandberg, Sheryl, 102, 242 Schedules of reinforcement
continuous, 94 intermittent, 94–95
66352_ind_ptg01_481-500.indd 492 10/21/14 12:29 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Index 493
Schein, Edgar, 412 Schmidt, Eric, 396, 398, 416 Schmidt, Warren, 117 Scott, Lee, 381 Second City Theater, 457 Self-actualization needs, 81 Self assessment
assessing teamwork in group, 274 assessing the culture for creativity, 282 Big Five personality profile, 32–33 conf lict styles, 209 determining preferred communication style, 215–218 dyadic relationship with manager, 233 effective follower, 243 ethical behavior, 50–51 feedback and coaching, 209 followership and personality, 251 in-group and out-group, 238 leadership interest, 44–45 leadership potential, 3–4 learning organizations, 446 listening skills, 188 LMX relationship with manager, 239 managerial leadership skills, 8 motive profile, 42 motive with socialized power, 44 personality, crisis and learning organization, 452 personality, culture, values, and diversity, 382–383 personality, leadership, and change, 418 personality charismatic and transformational
leadership and, 345 personality traits and communication, 209 personality traits and teams, 288 personal values, 371 spiritual intelligence at work, 467–469 strategic leadership, 398 theory X and theory Y, 46–47 transformational leader, 329
Self-assessment behavioral leadership style, 71–72 determining preferred normative leadership style, 136–139 inf luencing tactics, power, and personality traits, 152 job motivators and maintenance factors, 83–84 leadership continuum and path–goal leadership
styles, 141 leadership style, Fiedler LPC, 113 negotiating, 165 networking, 159 personality and contingency leadership theories, 132–133 personality and leadership styles, 78 use of political behavior, 153–154
Self-awareness, 37 Self-concept, 48–49 Self-confidence
about, 38, 48 charismatic leadership and, 334
Self-control, adjustment and, 38 Self-efficacy, 48, 243 Self-interest
moral development and, 53 threat to, resistance to change and, 415
Self-managed team (SMT) about, 293 benefits of, 295–296, 296 (exhibit) vs. conventional teams, 294, 295 (exhibit) defined, 285 implementing, challenges of, 299 leadership, changing roles of in, 298 nature of, 294 success, 297 top management, 297
Self-managed team champion, 297 Self-managed team facilitator, 298, 299 (exhibit) Self-management, 37 Self-promotion, 237
charismatic leadership and, 336 Sending messages. See Messages, sending Senge, Peter, 444 Sensitivity, personality trait, 37 Servant leader
attributes of effective, 344–345, 345 (exhibit) defined, 342
Sexual orientation, 376 Short-term orientation, 370 Situation, ethical behavior and, 54 Situational communications model, 218–221 Situational factors, path-goal leadership
environment, 120 subordinate, 120
Situation analysis, 405–406 Skills
interpersonal, 10 listening, 188 managerial leadership, 9–10 managerial level, needed based on, 10 negotiating, 166 technical, of leadership, 9
Skinner, B.F., 92 SMART goals, 91, 405 Smith, Frederick W., 302–304 SMT facilitator, 298, 299 (exhibit) Sociability, personality trait, 37 Social awareness, 37 Social capital, 238 Social exchange theory, 154 Social identity, 236 Socialized charismatic leader (SCL), 326 Socialized power, motive profile and, 43 Social loafing, 273 Social-networking sites, 432 Social networks, 185
about/dangers, 162 at work, 164
Southwest Airlines, 269, 272, 276, 279, 281, 282, 285, 296, 335
Span of control, 236 Specific feedback, 195–196 Spiritual intelligence, at work, 467–469 Spiritual Intelligence Assessment, 470 Spirituality, in the workplace, 464–471
defining, 465–466 guidelines for leading, 470–471
66352_ind_ptg01_481-500.indd 493 10/21/14 12:29 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
494 Index
Spirituality, in the workplace (continued) implementing, 466–467 individual development, 466 leadership, 466 redefining role of business, 466–467 team development, 466 total system development, 466 web resources, 471
Spokesperson role, 12 Sputnik, 403 Stable, adjustment and, 38 Standards, ethics and academic, 91 Start Something That Matters (Mycoskie), 60 Stewardship
attributes of effective, 343–344, 343 (exhibit) defined, 342
Strategic leadership change and. See Change defined, 397 globalization, environmental sustainability
and, 399 and strategic management process, 400
Strategic management process defined, 401, 401 (exhibit)–402 (exhibit) leading change, 411–417 organizational objectives, 404–405 and strategic leadership, 400 strategy evaluation and control, 411 strategy execution, 408–410 strategy formulation, 405–407 vision and mission statement, 402–404
Strategic vision, 402 Strategy evaluation and control, 411 Strategy execution, 408–410
competent managers, 408 organizational capabilities, 409 policies and procedure, 408–409 rewards and incentives, 409–410 right corporate culture, 409 strong leadership, 408
Strategy formulation, 405–407 selecting from alternative strategies, 406–407 situation analysis, 405–406
Strategy implementation, 408 Strong culture, defined, 362 Strong leadership, 408 Strong performing cultures
characteristics of, 363, 363 (exhibit) Subordinate situational characteristics, 120 Substantive actions, 365 Substitutes for leadership, 131 Supportive, leadership style, 121 Surgency personality dimension
defined, 36 dominance, 36 extraversion, 37 high energy with determination, 37
Survey of Organizations, 72 Survival anxiety, 412
SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis, 406
Symbolic actions, 365–366 Systems thinking, 450
T
Tannenbaum, Robert, 117 Task interdependence, teams and, 277 Task leadership style, 113 Task structure, 114, 120 Team-centered decision-making model, 287
advantages of, 287 disadvantages of, 287
Team charter, 277 Team cohesion, 277 Team creativity, 281 Team decision making, 286–287 Team demographics, 278 Team effectiveness, 275 Team leader, 76 Team leadership, 279–280 Team learning, 275 Team meetings
about, 288 conducting, 290–291 first, 290–291 planning, 289–290, 289 (exhibit) problem members, 291–293 three parts of, 291 working with group members, 293
Team-member exchange (TMX), defined, 275 Team norms, 277 Team player, 158 Team(s)
charter, 277 defined, 271 goals, 277 norms, 277 positive interpersonal relationships, 278 roles and responsibilities, 278. See also Self-managed
team (SMT) task interdependence, 277 team cohesion, 277 team demographics and size, 278
Teams, in organizations about, 270 benefits of, 272–273 characteristics of, 276–279, 276 (exhibit) effectiveness, 275–276 group vs. team, 271 limitations of using, 273–274 team player, or not, 275
Teams, types of cross-functional, 284 functional, 283–284 self-managed, 285 virtual, 285
Team size, 278
66352_ind_ptg01_481-500.indd 494 10/21/14 12:29 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Index 495
Teamwork benefits, 272–273 defined, 272 limitations, 273–274
Technical skills, of leadership, 9 Television, sex and violence on, 56 Theory X and Theory Y, 46–47 360-degree multi-rater feedback, 193–194 Three-stage theory, of change, 413–414 Timbuk2, 351 Time, for team meeting, 290 Time-driven model, 127 TOMS, 59–60 Total System Development, spirituality in the workplace, 466 Toyota, crisis at, 439 Trade-offs, negotiations, 167, 169 Trader Joe’s, 69, 77, 80, 82, 85, 86, 89, 92, 98 Traditionalists, 376 Traditional organization
characteristics of, 447 learning vs., 446–448, 447 (exhibit)
Training diversity competency, 376, 380 ethics, 373 job instructional, 196
Traits, defined, 34 Trait theory paradigm, 16 Transactional leadership
defined, 328 transformational leadership vs., 329–331
Transformational leadership behaviors, of leader, 337–338, 338 (exhibit) charismatic vs., 339–340 defined, 328 effects of, 328–329 qualities of, vs. charismatic, 333–338, 333 (exhibit) transactional leadership vs., 329–331 transformation process, 331, 331 (exhibit) –332 (exhibit)
Transformational process, 331, 331 (exhibit) –332 (exhibit) Trust
inspiring, charismatic leadership and, 334 teams and, 279
Twitter, 185 Two-factor theory, 84 (exhibit)
defined, 82 Herzberg’s, 84–85 maintenance—extrinsic factors, 82 money as motivator, 85 motivating employees, 85–86 motivators—intrinsic factors, 82, 84
Tyco, 371
U
Unfreezing phase, three-stage model of change, 413 University of Iowa Leadership Styles, 70–71, 71 (exhibit) University of Miami Online High School (UMOHS), 402 University of Michigan Leadership Model
about, 71 application of the models, 75
contribution of models, 75 defined, 72 difference with Ohio State model, 75 job-centered and employee-centered behavior,
72–73 leadership styles, 71, 73 (exhibit)
Unstable, 38
V
Valance, expectancy theory and, 89 Value-based leadership, 122 Value-based strategy, 406 Value dimensions, 369–371 Values statement, 404 Variable interval schedule, 95 Variable ratio schedule, 95 Vertical dyadic linkage (VDL) theory, 232–233 Video Case
communication at Navistar International, 213 delegation at Boyne USA Resorts, 259 diversity at PepsiCo, 387 employee networks Whirlpool corporation, 175 leadership at McDonald’s, 136 leadership at P.F. Chang’s, 24 managing, Second City Theater, 457 NEADS team: people and dogs, 304 Original Penguin, 422 P.F. Chang’s employees, 61 Timbuk2, 351 Washburn Guitars, 103
Virtual team, 285 Vision, 321, 333 Vroom, Victor, 123
W
Wall Street Journal, The, 374 Walmart, 89, 360, 368, 381
part-time workers, 39 Walton, Sam, 89, 360 Washburn Guitars, 103 Weak culture, defined, 362 Weak performing cultures
characteristics of, 362, 362 (exhibit) Weber, Max, 321–322 Web pages, 432 Welch, Jack, 325, 339 What-if scenario analysis, crisis planning, 437 Whirlpool Corporation, 175 Whistle-blowing
defined, 373 ethics and, 63–64
Wigglesworth, Cindy, 471 Winfrey, Oprah, 320, 321, 322, 324, 327, 336, 338, 340 W.L. Gore & Associates, 257–259 Work group, 120, 236 Work-life balance, 87 Workplace, spirituality in the, 464–471
66352_ind_ptg01_481-500.indd 495 10/21/14 12:29 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
496 Index
WorldCom, 371 World Is Flat, The (Friedman), 399 Wozniak, Steve, 23 Writing objectives model, 90 Written communication, 19, 187
X
Xerox, 349–350
Y
Yetton, Philip, 123
Z
Zero-sum game, 166 Zuckerberg, Mark, 102, 231, 233, 235, 242, 248, 339
66352_ind_ptg01_481-500.indd 496 10/21/14 12:29 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
66352_ind_ptg01_481-500.indd 497 10/21/14 12:29 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
66352_ind_ptg01_481-500.indd 498 10/21/14 12:29 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
66352_ind_ptg01_481-500.indd 499 10/21/14 12:29 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
66352_ind_ptg01_481-500.indd 500 10/21/14 12:29 AM
Copyright 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
- Brief Contents
- Contents���������������
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- About the Authors
- Ch 1: Who is a Leader and What Skills Do Leaders Need?
- Learning Outcomes������������������������
- Chapter Outline����������������������
- Leadership Described���������������������������
- Leadership Skills������������������������
- Leadership Managerial Roles����������������������������������
- Levels of Analysis of Leadership Theory����������������������������������������������
- Leadership Theory Paradigms����������������������������������
- Objectives of the Book�����������������������������
- Organization of the Book�������������������������������
- Chapter Summary����������������������
- Key Terms����������������
- Review Questions�����������������������
- Critical-Thinking Questions����������������������������������
- Endnotes���������������
- Ch 2: Leadership Traits and Ethics�����������������������������������������
- Learning Outcomes������������������������
- Chapter Outline����������������������
- Personality Traits and Leadership Trait Universality�����������������������������������������������������������
- The Big Five Including Traits of Effective Leaders���������������������������������������������������������
- The Personality Profile of Effective Leaders���������������������������������������������������
- Leadership Attitudes���������������������������
- Ethical Leadership�������������������������
- Chapter Summary����������������������
- Key Terms����������������
- Review Questions�����������������������
- Critical-Thinking Questions����������������������������������
- Endnotes���������������
- Ch 3: Leadership Behavior and Motivation�����������������������������������������������
- Learning Outcomes������������������������
- Chapter Outline����������������������
- Leadership Behavior and Styles�������������������������������������
- University of Michigan and Ohio State University Studies���������������������������������������������������������������
- The Leadership Grid��������������������������
- Leadership and Major Motivation Theories�����������������������������������������������
- Content Motivation Theories����������������������������������
- Process Motivation Theories����������������������������������
- Reinforcement Theory���������������������������
- Putting the Motivation Theories Together within the Motivation Process�����������������������������������������������������������������������������
- Chapter Summary����������������������
- Key Terms����������������
- Review Questions�����������������������
- Critical-Thinking Questions����������������������������������
- Endnotes���������������
- Ch 4: Contingency Leadership Theories��������������������������������������������
- Learning Outcomes������������������������
- Chapter Outline����������������������
- Contingency Leadership Theories and Models�������������������������������������������������
- Contingency Leadership Theory and Model����������������������������������������������
- Leadership Continuum Theory and Model��������������������������������������������
- Path-Goal Leadership Theory and Model��������������������������������������������
- Normative Leadership Theory and Models���������������������������������������������
- Putting the Behavioral and Contingency Leadership Theories Together��������������������������������������������������������������������������
- Leadership Substitutes Theory������������������������������������
- Chapter Summary����������������������
- Key Terms����������������
- Review Questions�����������������������
- Critical-Thinking Questions����������������������������������
- Endnotes���������������
- Ch 5: Influencing: Power, Politics, Networking, and Negotiation����������������������������������������������������������������������
- Learning Outcomes������������������������
- Chapter Outline����������������������
- Power������������
- Organizational Politics������������������������������
- Networking�����������������
- Negotiation������������������
- Ethics and Influencing�����������������������������
- Chapter Summary����������������������
- Key Terms����������������
- Review Questions�����������������������
- Critical-Thinking Questions����������������������������������
- Endnotes���������������
- Ch 6: Communication, Coaching, and Conflict Skills���������������������������������������������������������
- Learning Outcomes������������������������
- Chapter Outline����������������������
- Communication��������������������
- Feedback���������������
- Coaching���������������
- Managing Conflict������������������������
- Collaborating Conflict Management Style Models�����������������������������������������������������
- Chapter Summary����������������������
- Key Terms����������������
- Review Questions�����������������������
- Critical-Thinking Questions����������������������������������
- Endnotes���������������
- Ch 7: Leader-Member Exchange and Followership����������������������������������������������������
- Learning Outcomes������������������������
- Chapter Outline����������������������
- From Vertical Dyadic Linkage Theory to Leader-Member Exchange Theory���������������������������������������������������������������������������
- Followership�������������������
- Delegation�����������������
- Chapter Summary����������������������
- Key Terms����������������
- Review Questions�����������������������
- Critical-Thinking Questions����������������������������������
- Endnotes���������������
- Ch 8: Team Leadership and Self-Managed Teams���������������������������������������������������
- Learning Outcomes������������������������
- Chapter Outline����������������������
- The Use of Teams in Organizations����������������������������������������
- Types of Teams���������������������
- Decision Making in Teams�������������������������������
- Conducting Effective Team Meetings�����������������������������������������
- Self-Managed Teams�������������������������
- Chapter Summary����������������������
- Key Terms����������������
- Review Questions�����������������������
- Critical Thinking Questions����������������������������������
- Endnotes���������������
- Ch 9: Charismatic and Transformational Leadership��������������������������������������������������������
- Learning Outcomes������������������������
- Chapter Outline����������������������
- Charismatic Leadership�����������������������������
- Transformational Leadership����������������������������������
- Charismatic-Transformational Leadership����������������������������������������������
- Stewardship and Servant Leadership�����������������������������������������
- Chapter Summary����������������������
- Key Terms����������������
- Review Questions�����������������������
- Critical-Thinking Questions����������������������������������
- Endnotes���������������
- Ch 10: Leadership of Culture, Ethics, and Diversity����������������������������������������������������������
- Learning Outcomes������������������������
- Chapter Outline����������������������
- What is Organizational Culture?��������������������������������������
- Organizational Ethics����������������������������
- Diversity Leadership���������������������������
- Chapter Summary����������������������
- Key Terms����������������
- Review Questions�����������������������
- Critical-Thinking Questions����������������������������������
- Endnotes���������������
- Ch 11: Strategic Leadership and Change Management��������������������������������������������������������
- Learning Outcomes������������������������
- Chapter Outline����������������������
- Strategic Leadership���������������������������
- The Strategic Management Process���������������������������������������
- Leading Organizational Change������������������������������������
- Chapter Summary����������������������
- Key Terms����������������
- Review Questions�����������������������
- Critical Thinking Questions����������������������������������
- Endnotes���������������
- Ch 12: Crisis Leadership and the Learning Organization�������������������������������������������������������������
- Learning Outcomes������������������������
- Chapter Outline����������������������
- Crisis Leadership������������������������
- The Learning Organization and Knowledge Management���������������������������������������������������������
- Chapter Summary����������������������
- Key Terms����������������
- Review Questions�����������������������
- Critical Thinking Questions����������������������������������
- Endnotes���������������
- Appendix: Leadership and Spirituality in the Workplace
- Appendix Outline
- Spirituality in the Workplace
- Guidelines for Leading from a Spiritual Perspective
- Resources on the Web
- Appendix Summary
- Review Questions
- Critical-Thinking Questions
- Endnotes
- Glossary
- Index
-
- 2014-12-12T18:29:03+0000
- Preflight Ticket Signature