PowerPoint

NURS 472 Leadership Interest Exploration Presentation Grading Rubric (100 Points)

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

MEETS EXPECTATIONS

APPROACHING EXPECTATIONS

DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATIONS

TOPIC and PURPOSE (10)

Topic, issue, or professional role and importance is clearly introduced and articulated. (5)

The topic, issue, or professional role and importance is stated without elaboration (4)

The topic, issue, or professional role is vaguely stated. The importance may or may not be mentioned. Lacks focus of topic. (1-3)

Topic is not introduced. (0)

Clear statements and description of personal interest in the topic, issue, or professional role. Clearly addresses how it affects not only nursing practice but interdisciplinary healthcare. (5)

Vague description on how topic, issue, or professional role interests you. Nursing and interdisciplinary healthcare are stated without great detail. (4)

Personal interest in topic, issue, or professional role not clearly stated or minimally described. How affects nursing and interdisciplinary healthcare is not included. (1-3)

Personal interest and how it affects nursing and interdisciplinary healthcare is not addressed. (0)

CONTENT (40)

Clear discussion on how topic will promote safe, high-quality care with a focus on continual improvement in an organization. Examples clearly articulate how this topic impacts the healthcare team and is interdisciplinary in nature. (10)

How topic promotes high-quality care with a focus on continual improvement in an organization is stated, but not expanded on. Examples are vague on how they relate. (5-9)

Minimal discussion on how safe, high-quality care is promoted through continual improvement. Lacks focus, missing content, or no examples given. (1-4)

Do not address safe, high-quality care and no examples provided. (0)

Clear discussion on how technology and information systems 1). impact this topic and 2). how it enhances communication, manage information, and supports decision-making to improve patient outcomes within an organization. Clear, specific evidence-based examples of technology are provided. (10)

Technology and information systems is discussed yet lacks explanation of how impacts topic and relates to communication, manage information, and supports decision-making. Examples vaguely relate or not supported by evidence. (5-9)

Minimal discussion on how technology and information systems impact topic and how it relates to communication, manage information, and supports decision-making to improve patient outcomes. Missing content or no examples given. (1-4)

No discussion on technology and information systems. (0)

Barriers, lack of information, or unanswered questions are discussed, clearly stated. Areas for future research are clearly articulated, discussed, and derived from evidence. (10)

Barriers, lack or information, or unanswered questions are identified but lack depth and relation to evidence. Future research implications are not directly associated with the topic. (5-9)

Minimal discussion on barriers or future research provided, may be unrelated to topic and not supported by research. (1-4)

No identification of barriers or future research provided. (0).

Course content or concepts from assigned readings, videos, and assignments are clearly defined and described in the presentation. Includes original thought and analysis. (10)

An attempt is made to connect topic with course content or concepts from assigned readings, videos, and assignments. (5-9)

Course content or concepts from assigned readings, videos, and assignments are mentioned, but not related to the topic presented. (1-4)

Course content or concepts is not mentioned in presentation. (0)

RESEARCH and REFERENCES (20)

Presentation includes 5-10 resources. More than sufficient EBP examples are included in the presentation. There is a clear application of references to the content. Synthesis of the material is present. (15)

At least 5 articles are reviewed. Evidence supports topic. Connections are made between references and topic. Material is partially synthesized or includes irrelevant information. EBP examples are included. (8-14)

Less than 5 articles are reviewed. There is a lack of or minimal EBP examples. Material is not synthesized. (1-7)

Less than 3 articles are reviewed. No EBP examples provided. (0)

Source citations and reference lists are in correct APA 7 format. (5)

Follows APA 7 format, but 1-2 consistent errors occur (3-4)

Many APA 7 formatting errors throughout presentation (1-2)

Source citations or reference list is missing (0).

EFFECTIVENESS OF PRESENTATION and RESPONDING TO 5 PEERS (30)

Presents a well-organized and clearly structured presentation that has 15-20 PowerPoint slides or 10-15 Prezi content areas (excludes title and reference slides). Content is clear, logically organized, visually appealing, font size and text carefully chosen to enhance readability, and only key words and phrases appear on the slides. (5)

Presentation is visually appealing, easy to read, and only key words or phrases appear on the slides. Graphics relate to the content on the slide. All of the presentation content is included, has appropriate number of slides, but lacks a logical flow or organization. Presentation was hard to follow. (3-4)

Slides are overly wordy, too busy. Text is read word for word on the slides. Voice breaks-up or is not audible. (1-2)

Presentation lacks appeal, overly wordy, no bullet points used, no organization, presentation jumps around and is hard to follow. (0)

A voice track recording in

Zoom or Kaltura MediaSpace is utilized to generate interest and excitement about the selected topic. Voice is clear and easily heard. Student is highly professional and uses appropriate terminology and vocabulary, and expands upon the material. (10)

A voice track in Zoom or Kaltura MediaSpace is used to present material. Student portrays interest in in topic selected, keeps audience somewhat engaged. Voice is audible. Diction is appropriate. Uses “I think/feel” statements instead of supporting evidence. (5-9)

A voice track is used to present material. Lacks professionalism in some areas of presentation. Slang, personal opinions, preachy, and whiny tone noted. Fumbles through presentation (not rehearsed). Voice may not be audible. (1-4)

No voice track was used. (0)

Proper grammar, spelling, and/or mechanics are used throughout the presentation. (5)

Consistent errors in grammar, spelling, and/or mechanics throughout the presentation. (3-4)

Three or more errors in grammar, spelling, and/or mechanics in presentation. Appears that presentation was not proof-read. (1-2)

Multiple grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors. (0)

Responded by due date to 5 peers on 5 different topics. (10)

Responded by due date to 4 peers on 4 different topics. (8)

Responded by due date to 1-3 peers or did not respond to five different topics. (1-4)

Did not respond to peers by due date. Responded to zero peers. (0)