Leadership in Health Care

12/15/22, 9:11 p.m.Yahoo Mail - No Subject

Página 1 de 4https://mail.yahoo.com/d/folders/1/messages/473

(No Subject)

From: Stephanie Betancourt ([email protected])

To: [email protected]

Date: Tuesday, December 13, 2022, 09:32 PM EST

Week 7 Leadership in Health Care Research Paper Start Assignment

Due  Sunday by 11:59pm   Points  280   Submitting  a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload

 In your final paper on your approved topic for leadership in health care, be sure to: 1. Present your topic, a summary of the larger scholarly discussion, and your thesis statement. 2. Present the evidence to support your thesis, referencing 6 peer-reviewed sources in an organized and

focused manner within your paper. You must thoroughly apply at least one leadership theory or approach to your chosen leadership in healthcare topic.

3. Conclude your paper by summarizing your findings, drawing conclusions, and making connections to the larger scholarly discussion.

4. Provide an APA-Style formatted title page and reference page.

The body and content of your research paper should be 4–5 pages total. This does not include the title or reference page. 

Review the rubric for further information on how your assignment will be graded.

Due Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time)

Points 280

Rubric Research Paper Rubric for LDR432

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic/ Thesis

42 to >34.44 pts Exceeds Expectations A relevant topic is thoroughly presented. The thesis illustrates an exemplary articulation and insightful analysis of significant concepts and/or theories related to leadership in healthcare.

34.44 to >30.24 pts Meets Expectations A relevant topic is presented, but may be too broad or too narrow in places. The discussion on leadership in healthcare lacks some detail. The thesis may be difficult to determine or somewhat unrelated to the leadership in healthcare topic.

30.24 to >24.78 pts Approaches Expectations A topic is presented but the writer provides insufficient explanations or it is irrelevant. The thesis may be disconnected from the concepts represented in the topic. The thesis may be very difficult to determine or significantly unrelated to the leadership in healthcare topic selected.

24.78 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations A relevant topic is missing or unclear. The thesis missing or far off topic. 42 pts

12/15/22, 9:11 p.m.Yahoo Mail - No Subject

Página 2 de 4https://mail.yahoo.com/d/folders/1/messages/473

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

84 to >68.88 pts Exceeds Expectations The paper demonstrates that the author fully understands and has applied concepts learned in the course.The paper includes several high quality, thought- provoking ideas/points which are skillfully used to creatively and completely support the thesis, adding new and unique insight to the discussion. The topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of the assignment.

68.88 to >60.48 pts Meets Expectations The paper demonstrates that the author understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. The paper includes some thought- provoking ideas/points which are used to support the thesis, adding some new or unique insight to the discussion. The topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of the assignment.

60.48 to >49.56 pts Approaches Expectations The paper does not demonstrates that the author fully understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Few, if any, thought- provoking ideas/points or unique insights to the discussion. The topic is not focused narrowly enough for the scope of the assignment.

49.56 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations The paper indicates no understanding of the concepts in the course. The paper lacks any exploration of the subject by the author. The topic is unclear or too broad for the scope of the assignment.

84 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupporting Evidence/ Research

70 to >57.4 pts Exceeds Expectations Six or more peer- reviewed scholarly sources are completely and eloquently integrated throughout the paper.Sources are highly relevant to the topic and add greatly to the development of the thesis. All sources are from credible, scholarly, peer-reviewed materials. Detailed,

57.4 to >50.4 pts Meets Expectations Four or more peer- reviewed scholarly sources are integrated in to the paper but there may be awkward or forced integration.Sources are mostly relevant to the topic but some may be slightly less relevant to the development of the thesis. All sources are credible. Quotations and paraphrases generally support the topic, although the reader must

50.4 to >41.3 pts Approaches Expectations Four or less credible sources are used.Not all sources are from credible, scholarly, peer- reviewed materials. Several sources are not relevant to the development of the thesis.

41.3 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations Sources missing or not credible. Lacking quotations and paraphrases.

70 pts

12/15/22, 9:11 p.m.Yahoo Mail - No Subject

Página 3 de 4https://mail.yahoo.com/d/folders/1/messages/473

meaningful quotations and paraphrases aptly and accurately support the topic.

make several inferences in order to the connections.

Quotations and paraphrases are lacking or do not support several subtopics.

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization/ Cohesiveness

56 to >45.92 pts Exceeds Expectations Introduction makes keen observations, making note of essential information.Connections among subtopics and the thesis/topic are clear without being repetitive or redundant. Concluding remarks demonstrate analysis and synthesis of ideas. Writing and integration of source materials is eloquent and skillful.

45.92 to >40.32 pts Meets Expectations Introduction offers a general overview of the topic. Connections among subtopics and the thesis/topic may be vague or have some redundancy. Conclusion restates the main idea but fails to synthesize ideas. Writing and integration of source materials is adequate with lapses in structure.

40.32 to >33.04 pts Approaches Expectations Introduction does not provide the reader with an overview of the topic. Connections among subtopics are missing or forced. Conclusion is unclear or disconnected from the topic. Writing and integration of source materials is awkward or confusing.

33.04 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations Introduction is missing or confusing. Direction of the paper is unclear. Connections among subtopics are missing. Subtopics are not presented. Conclusion is missing or disconnected from the topic. Writing lacks skill. Sources are not present.

56 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics/ APA

28 to >22.96 pts Exceeds Expectations The assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.

22.96 to >20.16 pts Meets Expectations The assignment consistently follows current APA format with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or

20.16 to >16.52 pts Approaches Expectations The assignment does not follow current APA format and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Many sources are cited and

16.52 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations No attempt to follow APA format is indicated. Sources are not used and/or there is no reference page. Mechanical errors significantly interfere with the readability of the 28 pts

12/15/22, 9:11 p.m.Yahoo Mail - No Subject

Página 4 de 4https://mail.yahoo.com/d/folders/1/messages/473

Total Points: 280 Research Paper Rubric for LDR432

All sources are cited and referenced correctly.

punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced correctly.

referenced incorrectly, or citations and references are missing where needed.

paper.

Stephanie Betancourt, RN   County Manager for SBP Staffing, in partnership with Nomi Health   (786) 712-5107   http://www.sbportventures.com