Leader 3

profileNJ_
Leadership3.docx

ELON MUSK Paper 3

For Leader Analysis Paper #3, please submit a 4-5 page (minimum) double-spaced paper that details the following:

1.   Specifically, how did your leader display (or not display) aspects of Leading and Managing Change (Unit 7), Problem Management and Decision Making (Unit 8), and Consensus Building and Negotiation  (Unit 9). Please include citations and references to Units 7, 8, and 9 reading materials that support your answers.

2.  How can you apply the conclusions of your assessment and analysis to leadership roles and responsibilities in your organization?

Table of Contents:

1. Leading and Managing Change

2. Problem Management and Decision Making

3. Consensus Building and Negotiation

4. Application of Analysis to Leadership roles and responsibilities

5. Preliminary Sources of Weekly Research (Include website/articles links)

6. Conclusion – (Based on the conclusion, also include how you will apply leadership role & responsibility in your organization) This will answer question 2.

7. References

Rubric

Leadership Analysis Papers Rubric

Leadership Analysis Papers Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

Accurately described the leader's style, traits and/or behaviours.

5 pts

Excellent

Fully described. No additional improvement is necessary.

4 pts

Good

Mostly described. Only minimal improvement is necessary.

3 pts

Acceptable

Moderately described. Improvement is necessary.

2 pts

Unacceptable

Minimally described. Room for significant improvement.

1 pts

Unacceptable

Did not accurately describe.

0 pts

No marks

5 pts

Applied course material to what you learned about the leader.

5 pts

Excellent

Fully applied. No improvement necessary

4 pts

Good

Mostly applied. Minimal improvement is necessary.

3 pts

Acceptable

Moderately applied. Improvement is necessary.

2 pts

Unacceptable

Minimallyapplied. Room for significant improvement.

1 pts

Unacceptable

Did not apply course material.

0 pts

No marks

5 pts

Used citations from the week's reading materials.

5 pts

Excellent

Fully cited course materials. No improvement is necessary.

4 pts

Good

Mostly cited course materials. Only minimal improvement necessary.

3 pts

Acceptable

Moderately cited course materials. Improvement is necessary.

2 pts

Unacceptable

Minimally cited. Room for significant improvement.

1 pts

Unacceptable

Did not cite appropriately.

0 pts

No marks

5 pts

Wrote with sufficient detail.

5 pts

Excellent

Fully detailed. No further improvement is necessary.

4 pts

Good

Mostly detailed. Only minimal improvement is necessary.

3 pts

Acceptable

Moderately detailed. Improvement is necessary.

2 pts

Unacceptable

Minimal detail. Room for significant improvement.

1 pts

Unacceptable

Did not provide sufficient detail.

0 pts

No marks

5 pts

Used appropriate grammar, punctuation and masters-level writing style

5 pts

Excellent

Fully used appropriate writing style. No further improvements are necessary.

4 pts

Good

Mostly used appropriate writing style. Only minimal improvement necessary.

3 pts

Accceptable

Moderately used appropriate writing style. Improvement is necessary.

2 pts

Unacceptable

Minimally used appropriate writing style. Room for significant improvement.

1 pts

Unacceptable

Did not use appropriate writing style.

0 pts

No marks

5 pts

Total Points: 25