Leadership3.docx
ELON MUSK Paper 3
For Leader Analysis Paper #3, please submit a 4-5 page (minimum) double-spaced paper that details the following:
1. Specifically, how did your leader display (or not display) aspects of Leading and Managing Change (Unit 7), Problem Management and Decision Making (Unit 8), and Consensus Building and Negotiation (Unit 9). Please include citations and references to Units 7, 8, and 9 reading materials that support your answers.
2. How can you apply the conclusions of your assessment and analysis to leadership roles and responsibilities in your organization?
Table of Contents:
1. Leading and Managing Change
2. Problem Management and Decision Making
3. Consensus Building and Negotiation
4. Application of Analysis to Leadership roles and responsibilities
5. Preliminary Sources of Weekly Research (Include website/articles links)
6. Conclusion – (Based on the conclusion, also include how you will apply leadership role & responsibility in your organization) This will answer question 2.
7. References
Rubric
Leadership Analysis Papers Rubric
|
Leadership Analysis Papers Rubric
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
Accurately described the leader's style, traits and/or behaviours.
|
|
5 pts
Excellent
Fully described. No additional improvement is necessary.
|
4 pts
Good
Mostly described. Only minimal improvement is necessary.
|
3 pts
Acceptable
Moderately described. Improvement is necessary.
|
2 pts
Unacceptable
Minimally described. Room for significant improvement.
|
1 pts
Unacceptable
Did not accurately describe.
|
0 pts
No marks
|
|
5 pts
|
|
Applied course material to what you learned about the leader.
|
|
5 pts
Excellent
Fully applied. No improvement necessary
|
4 pts
Good
Mostly applied. Minimal improvement is necessary.
|
3 pts
Acceptable
Moderately applied. Improvement is necessary.
|
2 pts
Unacceptable
Minimallyapplied. Room for significant improvement.
|
1 pts
Unacceptable
Did not apply course material.
|
0 pts
No marks
|
|
5 pts
|
|
Used citations from the week's reading materials.
|
|
5 pts
Excellent
Fully cited course materials. No improvement is necessary.
|
4 pts
Good
Mostly cited course materials. Only minimal improvement necessary.
|
3 pts
Acceptable
Moderately cited course materials. Improvement is necessary.
|
2 pts
Unacceptable
Minimally cited. Room for significant improvement.
|
1 pts
Unacceptable
Did not cite appropriately.
|
0 pts
No marks
|
|
5 pts
|
|
Wrote with sufficient detail.
|
|
5 pts
Excellent
Fully detailed. No further improvement is necessary.
|
4 pts
Good
Mostly detailed. Only minimal improvement is necessary.
|
3 pts
Acceptable
Moderately detailed. Improvement is necessary.
|
2 pts
Unacceptable
Minimal detail. Room for significant improvement.
|
1 pts
Unacceptable
Did not provide sufficient detail.
|
0 pts
No marks
|
|
5 pts
|
|
Used appropriate grammar, punctuation and masters-level writing style
|
|
5 pts
Excellent
Fully used appropriate writing style. No further improvements are necessary.
|
4 pts
Good
Mostly used appropriate writing style. Only minimal improvement necessary.
|
3 pts
Accceptable
Moderately used appropriate writing style. Improvement is necessary.
|
2 pts
Unacceptable
Minimally used appropriate writing style. Room for significant improvement.
|
1 pts
Unacceptable
Did not use appropriate writing style.
|
0 pts
No marks
|
|
5 pts
|
|
Total Points: 25
|