management

profileRock1027
Leadership-1.ppt

Empowering Human Potential at Work

MGT 551

Leadership Theory

*

*

Mgt. versus Leadership

*

“Leadership is Action, not Position”

Donald McGannon

*

Great Man

Theories

Early 1900s

Research focused

on individual

characteristics

that universally

differentiated

leaders

from nonleaders

Traits Interacting

With Situational

Demands on Leaders

1930-50s

Landmark Stogdill (1948)

study - analyzed and

synthesized 124 trait studies

- Leadership

reconceptualized

as a relationship between

people in a social situation

Mann (1959) reviewed 1,400

findings of personality and

leadership in small groups

- Less emphasis on situations

- Suggested personality traits

could be used to discriminate

leaders from nonleaders

Revival of Critical Role of

Traits in Leader

Effectiveness

Stogdill (1974)

- Analyzed 163 new studies

with 1948 study findings

- Validated original study

- 10 characteristics

positively identified with

leadership

Lord, DeVader, &

Alliger (1986) meta-analysis

- Personality traits can be

used to differentiate

leaders/nonleaders

Kirkpatrick & Locke (1991)

- 6 traits make up the

“Right Stuff” for leaders

Historical Shifts in Trait Perspective

1970’s - Early 90s

Innate Qualities

Situations

Personality / Behaviors

Today

Intelligence

Self-Confidence

Determination

Integrity

Sociability

5 Major

Leadership

Traits

*

As we see from this model, trait research has changed over time. The focus went from innate qualities to situational leadership, to a focus on personality. This led us to what researchers consider to be the 5 Major Leadership Traits.

While the trait theory has changed over time, people still look for certain traits when interviewing someone, especially for a higher ranking position like CEO.

Consider whether you agree with the 5 Major Leadership Traits. Should there be more? Which others and why?

Trait Approaches

Certain individuals have special innate or inborn characteristics or qualities that differentiate them from non-leaders.

Focused on identifying innate qualities and characteristics possessed by great social, political, & military leaders

*

Trait
Model

LEADER

FOLLOWERS

Leadership

Height

Intelligence

Extroversion

Fluency

Other Traits

*

Leadership as a trait implies that it is something that some people have, and some don’t, or at least have it in various levels. It would be like height or hair color. Past leadership theorists sought to prove that great leaders had a specific set of traits. This exercise proved fruitless, as leaders can possess a myriad of combinations of traits that are successful given their specific workplace context.

*

Big 5 Personality Factors

*

Skills Approach

Leaders need certain skills – but, skill ability and importance changes based on level of management

*

Management Skills

*

Process Approach

Leadership is a property or set of properties possessed in varying degrees by different people (Jago, 1982).

  • Observed in leadership behaviors
  • Can be learned

*

Process
Model

LEADER

Leadership

(Interaction)

FOLLOWERS

*

When we think of leadership as a process, it implies that leadership can occur almost anywhere and at any time, given the right people and context involved. The interaction between and among individuals is what allows for the OPPORTUNITY for leadership to be exposed. It is then up to the individual(s) to decide in the workplace context whom the leaders are and whom the followers are.

The Hersey-Blanchard situational leadership model

Matches leadership styles with the maturity of followers

Intellectual Capital = Competency x Commitment

*

Employee’s Developmental level

R1

Low Competence

Low Commitment

R2

Low Competence

High Commitment

R3

Mod-High Competence

Low Commitment

R4

High Competence

High Commitment

Leader’s Leadership style

S1 – Telling

High Directive-Low Supportive

S2 – Selling

High Directive-High Supportive

S3 – Participating

High Supportive-Low Directive

S4 – Delegating

Low Supportive-Low Directive

How Does The Situational Approach Work?

How Does The Situational Approach Work?

*

House’s Path – Goal Theory

Matches leadership styles with task and follower characteristics

*

Path – Goal Model

Help followers move along paths to achieve work and personal goals

*

Path – Goal Theory Components

*

Path-Goal Theory Matrix

*

Leader – Member Exchange
(LMX) Theory

Conceptualizes leadership as a process that is centered on the interactions between a leader and subordinates

Describes how leaders treat in-group and out-group followers

*

In-Group

Out-Group

Leader

In-Group

  • more information, influence, confidence & concern from Leader
  • more dependable, highly involved & communicative than out-group

Out-Group

  • less compatible with Leader
  • usually just come to work, do their job & go home

Subordinates

S

Subordinate

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

*

Scripted

One Way

Low Quality

Self

Phases in Leadership Making

*

Blake and Mouton’s
Leadership Grid

Describes a leader’s day-to-day style of management and leadership of production and people

*

Leadership Styles

*

Authority-Obedience

Efficiency in operations results from arranging conditions of work such
that human interference
is minimal

  • Heavy emphasis on task and job requirements and less emphasis on people
  • Communicating with subordinates outside task instructions not emphasized
  • Results driven – people regarded as tools to that end
  • Seen as controlling, demanding, hard-driving & overpowering

Definition

Role Focus

*

Country Club

Thoughtful attention to the needs of people leads to a comfortable, friendly organizational atmosphere and work tempo

  • Low concern for task accomplishment coupled with high concern for interpersonal relationships
  • De-emphasizes production – leaders stress the attitudes and feelings of people
  • Try to create a positive climate by being agreeable, eager to help, comforting, noncontroversial

Definition

Role Focus

*

Impoverished

Minimal effort exerted to get work done is appropriate to sustain organizational membership

  • Leader unconcerned with both task and interpersonal relationships
  • Going through the motions, but uninvolved and withdrawn
  • Have little contact with followers and are described as indifferent, noncommittal, resigned, and apathetic

Definition

Role Focus

*

Middle-of-the-Road

Adequate organizational performance possible through balancing the necessity of getting work done while maintaining satisfactory morale

  • Leaders who are compromisers; have intermediate concern for task and people who do task
  • To achieve equilibrium, leader avoids conflict while emphasizing moderate levels of production and interpersonal relationships
  • Described as expedient; prefers the middle ground, soft-pedals disagreement, swallows convictions in the interest of “progress”

Definition

Role Focus

*

Team

Work accomplished through committed people; interdependence via a “common stake” in the organization’s purpose, which leads to relationships of trust and respect

  • Strong emphasis on both tasks and interpersonal relationships
  • Promotes high degree of participation & teamwork, satisfies basic need of employee to be involved & committed to their work
  • Stimulates participation, acts determined, makes priorities clear, follows through, behaves open-mindedly and enjoys working

Definition

Role Focus

*

Transactional Leadership

Exchanges rewards or privileges for desirable outcomes or behaviors.

Transformational Leadership

Goes beyond basic needs to satisfy a follower’s higher-level needs

*

Psychodynamic Approach

The leader’s personality, in conjunction with their environment, is characterized by natural tendencies or qualities.

These may vary from person to person, but understanding ourselves and others can help us become better leaders and followers.

*

*

Servant Leadership

Managers see employees as “equals” and act as “servants” or facilitators of their success.

Managers provide tools and resources that employees need to do their work rather than direction and control.

*

Concern for people

Stewardship

Equity / justice

Indebtedness

Self-understanding

Servant Leadership 5 Principles

Ethics in Leadership

  • Has to do with what leaders do and who leaders are
  • In any decision-making situation, ethical issues are either implicitly or explicitly involved
  • What choices leaders make and how they respond in a particular circumstance are informed and directed by their ethics

*

Ethics

  • A derivative of the Greek word ethos, meaning customs, conduct, or character
  • Concerned with the kinds of values and morals an individual or society ascribes as desirable or appropriate
  • Focus on the virtuousness of individuals & their motives

Ethical Theory

  • Provides a system of rules or principles as a guide in making decisions about what is right / wrong and good / bad in a specific situation

Leadership Ethics

*

Development of ethical theory goes back to Plato and Aristotle.

Read slide

Ethical Theories

*

Page 304 in text Read slide

Principles of Ethical Leadership

*

Discussion of 5 principles of ethical leadership – These principles provide a foundation for the development of sound ethical leadership

In addition I am emphasizing 3 points that reinforce the impact a leader has on followers, and the responsibility leaders have to be sensitive to how their leadership affects followers lives and why Ethics is central to leadership, because of -

Authentic Leadership

Draws upon and promotes both positive psychological capacities and a positive ethical climate, to foster greater self-awareness, an internalized moral perspective, balanced processing of information, and relational transparency on the part of leaders working with followers, fostering positive self-development.

*

Purpose (passion)

Values (behavior)

Heart (compassion)

Relationships (connectedness)

Self-discipline (consistency)

Authentic Leadership

Ignatian Leadership

Brings together accepted leadership beliefs with the tenets of Ignatian spirituality.

*

Ignatian Leadership Model

*

Ignatian Leadership Model

*

Ignatian Leadership Model

*

Ignatian Leadership Model

*

A Context for Leadership

*

Leadership involves having the requisite competence and commitment, to inspire and influence others, so they willingly direct their efforts toward making things better.

-- Michael Alleruzzo 2015

One Definition of Leadership

*

  • Seeing what needs to be done
  • Understanding underlying forces
  • Having the courage to initiate action to make things better

Leader’s P.O.V.

  • Leaders need to influence people who may not be interested in being influenced.
  • They operate inside structures that have history and momentum.
  • They must get results.

Leadership Challenges

*

Often times people come into leadership positions responsible for departments that have issues. These may include:

  • Employees who have been there awhile
  • They may not want to be led
  • They had poor leaders in the past and don’t trust you to be any better
  • They may fear change and their position and role in the future

Company history may be negative

  • No pattern of getting results
  • Company may be in downward slide

Results

  • Leaders must get results or they will be fired
  • Company structure may make it very hard for leaders to get results