week 2 mentor intervieww- confirmation part 1

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Content 70%

Advanced 92-100% (A)

Proficient 84-91% (B)

Developing 1-83% (< C)

Not present

Introduction:

3

Provides a 1-page (250-300 words) rationale why mentoring is important supported by at least one footnote/citation

2

Provides a 200-250 word rationale why mentoring is important; no documentation provided

1

Provides a rationale of less than 200 words why mentoring is important – no documentation

0 points

Comparison and Contrast

41-45

Compares and contrasts the 2 mentoring interviews (3 page- 750-900 word minimum).

38-40

Compares and contrasts the 2 mentoring interviews (2 page- 500-749 words)

1-37

Compares and contrasts the 2 mentoring interviews (less than 500 words)

0 points

Conclusion

5

Describes the top 3 lessons on mentoring learned from the interviews and how they will impact your implementation of mentoring (250-300 words).

4

Describes the top 2 lessons on mentoring learned from the interviews and how they will impact your implementation of mentoring (200-249 words).

1-3

Provides 0-1 lessons on mentoring learned from the interviews and how they will impact your implementation of mentoring (Less than 200 words).

0 points

Structure 30%

Advanced 92-100% (A)

Proficient 84-91% (B)

Developing 1-83% (< C)

Not present

Structure

20-22

Format, Title page and Bibliography are free from grammar/spelling errors and are consistent with formatting of the student’s program (e.g. Turabian, APA and AMA formatting guides are provided by Liberty University)

18-19

Format, Title page and Bibliography have 6-10 grammar/spelling errors and are inconsistent with formatting of the student’s program (e.g. Turabian, APA and AMA formatting guides are provided by Liberty University)

1-17

Format, Title page and Bibliography have more than 10 grammar/spelling errors and do not correlate with formatting of the student’s program.

0 points