CliftonStrengths Reflection Paper
GRADING GUIDELINES for Papers Rebecca Straforelli’s class
|
|
CONTENT |
ORGANIZATION |
EXPRESSION / DlCTION |
MECHANICS (GRAMMAR, PUNCTUATION, SPELLING, ETC.) |
|
Excellent A (85%)
Exceeds requirements |
Intelligent consideration and knowledge of topic with considerable originality of thought Interaction with the ideas Carefully selected details which support general statements and central thesis Comprehensive coverage of topic Considerable and varied quotes used (from video, readings – text/reserve, handouts, lectures) Good synthesis evident among various subject areas represented
|
Creative introduction and conclusion Various parts of the essay effectively tied together Writing flows smoothly, with effective paragraphs and transitions Effective plan of development
|
Clear, controlled, and fluent diction Fluency with course terminology Effective variety in sentence type, length, and structure Effective subordination and co-ordination Appropriate, lively, and wide-ranging word choice
|
No grammatical errors Sentence fragments, if present, are used deliberately for effect and emphasis Impeccable punctuation and spelling Evidence of careful proofreading
On time
(If exceeds word count, first cleared with instructor)
|
|
Proficient B (75%)
Meets requirements |
Clear central thesisEffective development of the topic Good coverage of the topic Good engagement with topic but little originality Some quotes used to support ideas Appropriate details most of the time
|
Clear introduction, body and conclusion Unified, well-developed paragraphs Effective paragraph transitions; sentence transitions sometimes conventional Specific plan followed fairly consistently
|
Appropriate use of course terminology (definitions not needed) Clear and reasonably fluent Appropriate sentence variety Satisfactory subordination and co-ordination Appropriate, clear, and correct word choice |
A few minor errors which do not reduce the clarity of communication Clear, accurate indication of source Good title page “Works Cited” page Word count
|
|
Satisfactory C (65%)
|
Adequately limited central thesis Adequate knowledge; ideas may be conventional Details may be repetitious, but must be accurate Adequate coverage of topic |
Reasonably adequate introduction, body and conclusion Adequate paragraphs but some are needlessly long or short Mechanical or abrupt transitions Specific plan but emphasis sometimes misplaced
|
Clear and functional Some sentence variety Subordination and co-ordination usually correct Correct but unimaginative word choice
|
Minor errors and a few major errors which sometimes impede communication Meets min. word count (paper length)
|
|
Not Acceptable D (55%) |
Ambiguous central thesis, insufficiently limited Writer demonstrates some understanding of topic, but ideas are mainly obvious Insufficient, unclear, or inaccurate details
|
Identifiable but mechanical introduction, body and conclusion Some paragraphs inadequately developed Transitions may be weak or ill-chosen Plan of development barely apparent
|
Fairly clear, but functional and occasionally awkward Little sentence variety Overuse of co-ordination Limited and sometimes inaccurate word choice
|
Many minor and several major errors which result in clumsy writing
|
|
F (50% and below) |
Central thesis not clear and topic not limited Limited knowledge; trite ideas Insufficient, inappropriate, or illogical details
|
No clear introduction or conclusion Paragraphs not sufficiently unified or developed Transitions poor and inappropriate Confused order of development and misplaced emphasis
|
Frequently awkward Almost no sentence variety Excessive use of co-ordination or simple sentences Restricted vocabulary (frequently inaccurate, dependence on slang) |
Frequent errors which seriously impede communication
|