LDRCB/535 Competency 3 - Reflection

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

LDRCB/535 Competency 3 - Assessment and Rubric Course Title: Leading Change

Competency Assessment Title: Change Management Presentation

Total Number of Points: 100

Assignment Directions

You’ve been hired as a consultant to develop strategies with supporting tactics to implement positive changes in the corporation you chose in Part 1. Review your analysis of the corporation’s change process to be sure you understand the exact nature of the change and why the corporation needs to make it. Create a 12- to 13-slide Change Management Presentation showing strategies with supporting tactics to implement positive changes for the company’s board of directors. Complete the following in your presentation:

• Evaluate why this change needed to occur. o Explain how this change impacts the company on a global scale. o Explain how this change impacts employees.

• Using Kotter’s 8 Steps to Organizational Change Model, chart strategies and tactics for positively implementing the organizational change. In your chart, complete the following:

o Develop strategies for each of the 8 steps in Kotter’s model. o Develop tactics to support each strategy. o Justify the effectiveness of each strategy and tactic with a rationale.

Conclude your presentation with an explanation of how this positive organizational change will help the company sustain a competitive advantage in the global market. Include speaker notes for your presentation. Ensure that your slides contain only essential information.

Submit your assignment.

LDRCB/535 Competency 3 Rubric Page 2 of 3

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Competency Assessment Rubric

Assignment/Performance Criteria

Mastery 100%

Meets Expectations 85%

Not Met 0%

1. Why Change Needed to Occur

(weight 10%)

Thoroughly evaluated why this change needed to occur

Partially evaluated why this change needed to occur

Narrowly evaluated why this change needed to occur or no attempt to evaluate why this change needed to occur was made

2. Impact of Change on Company on a Global Scale

(weight 15%)

Thoroughly evaluated how this change impacts the company on a global scale

Partially evaluated how this change impacts the company on a global scale

Narrowly evaluated how this change impacts the company on a global scale or no attempt to evaluate how this change impacts the company on a global scale was made

3. Impact of Change on Employees

(weight 15%)

Thoroughly evaluated how this change impacts employees

Partially evaluated how this change impacts employees

Narrowly evaluated how this change impacts employees or no attempt to evaluate how this change impacts employees was made

4. Strategies

(weight 15%)

Developed comprehensive strategies for each of 8 steps in Kotter’s model

Partially developed strategies for each of 8 steps in Kotter’s model

Narrowly developed strategies for each of 8 steps in Kotter’s model or no attempt to develop strategies for each of 8 steps in Kotter’s model was made

5. Tactics

(weight 15%)

Developed comprehensive tactics for each strategy

Partially developed tactics for each strategy

Narrowly developed tactics for each strategy or no attempt to develop tactics for each strategy was made

6. Justification for Strategies & Tactics

(weight 15%)

Thoroughly justified the effectiveness of each strategy and tactic with a rationale

Partially justified the effectiveness of each strategy and tactic with a rationale

Narrowly justified the effectiveness of each strategy and tactic with a rationale or no attempt to justify the effectiveness of each strategy and tactic with a rationale was made

Copyright 2021 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

Assignment/Performance Criteria

Mastery 100%

Meets Expectations 85%

Not Met 0%

7. Impact of Change on Sustaining Company’s Competitive Advantage

(weight 15%)

Thoroughly explained how this positive organizational change will help the company sustain a competitive advantage in the global market

Partially explained how this positive organizational change will help the company sustain a competitive advantage in the global market

Narrowly explained how this positive organizational change will help the company sustain a competitive advantage in the global market or no attempt to explain how this positive organizational change will help the company sustain a competitive advantage in the global market was made