Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.
LDR-462 The IDEAL Problem-Solving Method - Rubric
Apply IDEAL Problem-Solving Method to Selected Scenario 22.5 points
Criteria Description
5. Target 22.5 points
The application of the IDEAL problem-solving method to the scenario, including a
discussion of each aspect of the method, is thorough and contains substantial
supporting details.
4. Acceptable 19.13 points
The application of the IDEAL problem-solving method to the scenario, including a
discussion of each aspect of the method, is complete and contains relevant
supporting details.
3. Approaching 16.88 points
The application of the IDEAL problem-solving method to the scenario, including a
discussion of each aspect of the method, is included but lacks relevant detail.
2. Insufficient 14.63 points
The application of the IDEAL problem-solving method to the scenario, including a
discussion of each aspect of the method, is incomplete or incorrect.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
The application of the IDEAL problem-solving method to the scenario, including a
discussion of each aspect of the method, is not included.
Collapse All
© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Determining Unethical and Illegal Behavior 22.5 points
Criteria Description
5. Target 22.5 points
A determination of whether the behavior in the scenario is unethical or illegal,
including how it should be professionally addressed, is thorough and contains
substantial supporting details.
4. Acceptable 19.13 points
A determination of whether the behavior in the scenario is unethical or illegal,
including how it should be professionally addressed, is complete and contains
relevant supporting details.
3. Approaching 16.88 points
A determination of whether the behavior in the scenario is unethical or illegal,
including how it should be professionally addressed, is included but lacks relevant
details.
2. Insufficient 14.63 points
A determination of whether the behavior in the scenario is unethical or illegal,
including how it should be professionally addressed, is incomplete or incorrect.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
A determination of whether the behavior in the scenario is unethical or illegal,
including how it should be professionally addressed, is not included.
© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Steps of the IDEAL Method 22.5 points
Criteria Description
5. Target 22.5 points
The explanation of which step of the IDEAL method is the most beneficial in
examining the scenario is thorough and contains substantial supporting details.
4. Acceptable 19.13 points
The explanation of which step of the IDEAL method is the most beneficial in
examining the scenario is complete and contains relevant supporting details.
3. Approaching 16.88 points
The explanation of which step of the IDEAL method is the most beneficial in
examining the scenario is included but lacks relevant detail.
2. Insufficient 14.63 points
The explanation of which step of the IDEAL method is the most beneficial in
examining the scenario is incomplete or incorrect.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
The explanation of which step of the IDEAL method is the most beneficial in
examining the scenario is not included.
© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Mechanics of Writing 3.75 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence
structure, etc.
5. Target 3.75 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence
structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable 3.19 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence
structure are used.
3. Approaching 2.81 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally
appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient 2.44 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language
choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language
choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Format/Documentation 3.75 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;
documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,
appropriate to assignment and discipline.
5. Target 3.75 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
4. Acceptable 3.19 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, with only minor errors.
3. Approaching 2.81 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious
errors.
2. Insufficient 2.44 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors
in documentation of sources are evident.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
Total 75 points
© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2026. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.