15000 words for bussiness managements assignments

LD9631DRILPSep2020ApprovedAssignmentBrief.docx

Home >Business & Finance homework help >Management homework help >15000 words for bussiness managements assignments

Assessment Brief –Undergraduate

Module Code:	LD9631
Module Title:	Developing Research Informed Learning and Practice
Distributed on:	First week of module	Hand in Date:	14th January 2021 (by 11.59 am)

Further information about general assessment criteria, The Academic Regulations for Taught Awards (ARTA) regulations, referencing and plagiarism can be found on the module’s site on the e-Learning Portal.

Programme (Level) Learning outcomes that this module contributes to:

Goal 1 - Acquisition of internationally relevant business, management and leadership knowledge for an SME context

6.1.1 Demonstrate critical understanding of key aspects of enterprise, entrepreneurship, business, management and leadership knowledge, at least some of which are at or informed by the forefront of aspects of the discipline.

Goal 4 – Development of the capacity for personal reflection as a means of informing effective personal contribution in a SME business environment

6.4.1 Demonstrate evidence of how self-reflection has enhanced appreciation of issues to address in developing future potential to contribute effectively in a SME business /organisational environment

This assessment will address the following Module Learning outcomes:

Module Learning Outcomes	Task 1	Task 2	Task 3
1	x
2	x
3	x
4		x

MLO 1 Your knowledge of business and management topics at least some of which are at, or informed by, the forefront of aspects of the discipline.

MLO2 Your ability to conduct a critical literature review into a SME related topic.

MLO3 Your ability to apply your knowledge in order to inform the aims/objectives of a SME related research project

MLO4 Demonstrate critical reflection of your own learning preference and the subsequent implications for your learning development on this programme AOL 4.

Instructions for the Assessment of this module:

You will be summatively assessed by a 3,000 word portfolio that will consist of the following pieces of work:

1. A 1,500 word critical review of literature relating to a business topic to be allocated by the module leader. (40% weighting) (MLO1, MLO2, MLO3)

2. A 1,500 words critical appraisal of your learning preference(s) results on the specific theories / models covered in the class. This should include a discussion of the implications these results have for your learning development on this programme. (40% weighting) (MLO4) AOL 4 COLLECTION POINT

3. The completion of a module learning log consisting of a total of 6 learning reflective logs (20%) The word count for this is not limited or included in word count.

Your answers should demonstrate wide reading from academic book and journal sources from the university E-library. The work should consider appropriate and relevant theories, models and concepts. Work should be appropriately cited and referenced using the APA referencing system.

Guidance for Module Learning Log

A good log entry will show:

· Some evidence of critical thinking and analysis, describing your own thought process about your learning and personal development, and what you have learnt from the module;

· Some self-awareness demonstrating openness and honesty about performance along with some consideration of your own strengths and weaknesses, achievement of personal aims and objectives; challenges faced and how you resolved them;

· Some evidence of learning, appropriately describing what needs to be learned, why and how.

Word limits and penalties for assignments Students should note the following criteria will apply

Under the word limit

No Penalty: In not making use of the full word count, students may have self-penalised their work. If students have been able to achieve the requirements of the assessment using fewer words than allocated, they will not be penalised.

Up to 10% over word limit

No Penalty: Situation flagged by tutor in feedback but over-run is tolerated and no deduction is made from the final mark.

More than 10% over the word limit

The marker will stop reading when they judge that the word count exceeds the recommended word count by more than 10% i.e. for a 3000 word essay, the marker will read only the first 3300 words and will indicate on the text where they stop reading. The content following this point will not be read and a mark will be awarded only for the content up to this point.

The word count is to be declared on the front page of your assignment and the assignment cover sheet. The word count does not include:

· Title and Contents page	· Reference list	· Appendices	· Appropriate tables, figures and illustrations
· Glossary	· Bibliography

Please note, in text citations [e.g. (Smith, 2011)] and direct secondary quotations [e.g. “dib-dab nonsense analysis” (Smith, 2011 p.123)] are INCLUDED in the word count.

If this word count is falsified, students are reminded that under The Academic Regulations for Taught Awards (ARTA) page 30 Section 3.4 this will be regarded as academic misconduct.

If the word limit of the full assignment exceeds the +10% limit,

Students are advised that they may be asked to submit an electronic version of their assignment and so should retain an electronic version of the assignment.

Submission of Assessment:

You should submit your assessments electronically to the Turnitin Submission Tool within the module ELearning Site. This can be found in the Assessment and Submission section

Your assignment will be marked and feedback offered 4 weeks from the hand in date.

You must also keep a copy of your assignment for your own records in case a second copy is required. The assignment submitted will not be returned to you, so again keep a copy for your own use.

It is your responsibility as the student to ensure that you are submitting your final and complete assignment to be marked. Only send your assignment to the above email address to avoid confusion.

Trait	0- 30% Clear Fail Standard not met 1	30-39%Fail Standard not met 2	40-49 Pass Adequate Meets Standard 1	50-59 Pass Good Meets Standard 2	60-69 Pass Very Good Meets Standard 3	70-79 Excellent Exceeds Standard 1	80-89 Outstanding Exceeds Standard 2	90-100 Exemplary Exceeds Standard 3
Task Part 1 Literature Review 6.1.1 (40 marks) .	Completely insufficient critical literature review. The review of the literature is purely descriptive, inappropriate, irrelevant and lacks he required academic underpinning and focus.	Insufficient critical literature review. The review of the literature is purely descriptive, generally irrelevant and lacks academic underpinning.	Adequate / basic critical literature review. The review of the literature is somewhat relevant but lacks focus and is descriptive with no critical points made and a limited number of academic sources.	A good critical literature review. The review of the literature is relevant to the topic area but is mainly descriptive with few critical points made.	Very Good critical literature review. A very good review of academic literature relevant to the topic area with some critical points made but could have been developed further.	Excellent critical literature review. Excellent review of the literature relevant to the topic area with evidence of much critical discussion from a range of academic sources.	Outstanding critical literature review. Outstanding critical review of a range of both contemporary and seminal scholars relevant to the topic area.	Exemplary critical literature review. Exemplary critical review of a range of both contemporary and seminal scholars relevant to the topic area.

Task Part 2 Learning Styles 6.4.1 Aol 4(40 Marks)	Completely Insufficient references or relevant learning theories/Models have been cited Completely Insufficient discussion of how learning styles results have implications for learning development on programme Completely Insufficient critical appraisal of learning styles results Completely Insufficient structure and expression	Insufficient set of references or relevant learning theories/ models have been cited Insufficient discussion regarding how learning theories results have implications for learning development on programme Insufficient critical appraisal of learning styles results Insufficient structure and expression	Adequate / basic set of references of relevant learning theories and models have been cited Adequate / basic discussion of how Learning theories may have implications results have implications for learning development on programme Adequate / basic critical appraisal of learning styles results Adequate / basic structure and expression	A good, if limited set of references of relevant learning theories and models have been cited A good, if limited discussion of how Learning preferences results have implications for learning development on programme A good, if limited critical appraisal of learning styles results A good, albeit limited structure and expression	A very good set of references of learning theories and models have been cited Very good discussion of how Learning preferences results have implications for learning development on programme Very good re critical appraisal of learning styles results Very good structure and expression	Excellent set of references of learning theories and models have been cited Excellent discussion of how Learning preferences results have implications for learning development on programme Excellent critical appraisal of learning styles results Excellent structure and expression	Outstanding set of references of learning theories and models have been cited Outstanding discussion of how Learning preferences results have implications for learning development on programme Outstanding critical appraisal of learning styles results Outstanding structure and expression	Exemplary set of references of learning theories and models have been cited Exemplary discussion of how Learning preferences results have implications for learning development on programme Exemplary critical appraisal of learning styles results Exemplary structure and expression

Task Part 3 Learning Log (20 Marks)	Completely Insufficient or Incomplete weekly sheets, with Completely Insufficient Reflection and / or Application	Insufficient or Incomplete weekly sheets, with Insufficient reflection and / or Application	Adequate / basic weekly sheets, with Adequate reflection and Application	Good weekly sheets, with Good Reflection and Application	Very Good weekly sheets, with Very Good reflection and Application	Excellent weekly sheets, with Excellent reflection and Application	Outstanding weekly sheets, with Outstanding Reflection and Application	Exemplary weekly sheets, with Exemplary reflection and Application