LAST Article Critique
jameohxlzb
LASTArticleCritique.docx
Each critique will include a summary of the study's purpose, the sample, and the method applied. Furthermore, you will summarize significant findings, and an explanation of how the article relates to the subject of sport ministry. Each Article Critique must be 2½ - 3 pages and adhere to APA format. It should be composed in a Word document and include a title page, abstract, and bibliography ( NOT included in the PAGE COUNT ). Each critique should be exclusively written in your own words--no quotations should be used.
THE ARTICLE YOU HAVE TO READ IN ORDER TO DO THE ARTICLE CRITIQUE IS ON THE OTHER FILE LISTED !
SMGT 504 Article Critique Grading Rubric
40 points
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
|||
|
Content |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
Summary of study 12 points |
11 to 12 points Each of the study’s purpose, sample, method, and significant findings are clearly identified and concisely explained. |
10 points Each of the study’s purpose, sample, and method are identified, but the summary lacks clarity. |
1 to 9 points The summary lacks clarity and one or more of the key elements is missing.
|
0 points Missing |
|
Reaction 12 points |
11 to 12 points Student clearly connects the article to text reading and sport ministry while providing a personal response that is appropriate and clearly related to the topic. |
10 points Student’s connection of the article to the text and sport ministry is unclear or incomplete and/or their personal response isn’t clearly related to the topic. |
1 to 9 points One or both of the student’s connection of the article to the text and sport ministry and their personal response is missing. |
0 points Missing |
|
Article 4 points |
4 points The article critiqued is a peer-reviewed scholarly work, it is clearly related to the topic, and hasn’t been selected by another student. |
3 points The article critiqued is a peer-reviewed scholarly work, but it is not clearly related to the topic. It hasn’t been selected by another student. |
1 to 2 points The article critiqued is either not a peer-reviewed scholarly work, it is not related to the topic, or it has been previously selected by another student (or all of the above). |
0 points Missing |
|
Structure |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Not present |
|
Writing 5 points |
5 points Spelling, grammar, and sentence structure are correct. Ideas flow well and paragraphs build on each other. |
4 points There are minor, noticeable, spelling, grammar, or sentence structure errors. Ideas flow well and paragraphs build on each other. |
1 to 3 points There are more than a few noticeable spelling, grammar, and/or sentence structure errors. Writing lacks flow and paragraphs are too long or don’t build on each other. |
0 points Missing |
|
Formatting 5 points |
5 points Paper is APA formatted. |
4 points Paper is generally formatted well with few minor errors. |
1 to 3 points More than a few elements of APA formatting are missing. |
0 points Missing |
|
Length 2 points |
2 points Submission is the correct length. |
1.5 points Submission is too long. |
1 points Submission is too short. |
0 points Missing |
