For Fortified only

LASA2.pdf

Home >Psychology homework help >For Fortified only

Page 1 of 3 Administrative Dimensions of Human Services

LASA 2: SWOT Analysis Report In this assignment, you need to select a human services agency of your choice and conduct a SWOT analysis.

Tasks:

Create a 10- to 12-page report, including the following:

• Analysis of the agency’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities for future growth, and threats to its viability (SWOT)

• Application of appropriate organizational theories into the SWOT analysis of the agency

• Proposal for a new initiative along with 1–3 recommendations toward its implementation

• Identification of stakeholders and 1–3 strategies to use to advocate the approval of the new initiative

Include a title and a reference page in your report and apply APA standards to the citation of sources, including in-text citations and full references.

Your report should rely upon at least five sources from additional professional literature. Professional literature may include the Argosy University online library resources, relevant textbooks, peer-reviewed journal articles, and websites created by professional organizations, agencies, or institutions (.edu, .org, and .gov).

Submission Details:

• By Module 5, Day 5, save your Microsoft Word document as M5_A2_Lastname_Firstname.doc and submit it to the M5 Assignment 2 LASA 2 Dropbox.

LASA 2 is worth 300 points and will be graded according to the following rubric.

Assignment Components

Unsatisfactory

77% or lower

Emerging

78 – 82%

(C+ to B-)

Proficient

83 – 89%

(B to B+)

Exemplar

90 – 100 %

(A- to A)

Score

To calculate

score:

(% / 100) x max pts.

e.g.

(80% / 100) x 12

= 9.6

Page 2 of 3 Administrative Dimensions of Human Services

LASA 2: SWOT Analysis Report

Assignment Components

Analyze the

agency’s

strengths,

weaknesses,

opportunities for

future growth, and

threats to its

viability (SWOT).

CO: 2, 3, 4 PO: 2, 3, 6, 7, 8

A mostly unclear

and illogical analysis

of the agency’s

strengths,

weaknesses,

opportunities for

future growth, and

threats to its viability

is present. Few (or

no) examples are

provided.

A somewhat

unclear and

illogical analysis

of the agency’s

strengths,

weaknesses,

opportunities for

future growth, and

threats to its

viability is present.

Few examples are

provided.

A clear and logical

analysis of the

agency’s

strengths,

weaknesses,

opportunities for

future growth, and

threats to its

viability is present.

Many examples

are provided.

A clear, logical,

and detailed

analysis of the

agency’s

strengths,

weaknesses,

opportunities for

future growth,

and threats to its

viability is

present. Several

insightful

examples are

provided.

/ 88 pts.

Apply appropriate

organizational

theories into the

SWOT analysis of

the agency.

CO: 1 PO: 2, 4, 8

Only a few

organizational

theories are applied

into the SWOT

analysis of the

agency, and/or it is

mostly inappropriate.

Some appropriate

organizational

theories are

applied into the

SWOT analysis of

the agency.

Many appropriate

organizational

theories are

applied into the

SWOT analysis of

the agency.

Several

appropriate

organizational

theories are

applied into the

SWOT analysis

of the agency. In

addition, several

insightful

examples are

given.

/ 40 pts.

Propose a new

initiative along

with 1–3

recommendations

toward its

implementation.

CO: 3, 4 PO: 2, 3, 6, 7, 8

The proposal for a

new initiative is

mostly illogical. It

includes 3 (or less)

mostly inappropriate

recommendations

toward

implementation. Few

(or no) scholarly

resources are

utilized in support.

The proposal for a

new initiative is

somewhat

illogical. It

includes 1–3

somewhat

inappropriate

recommendations

toward

implementation.

Few scholarly

resources are

utilized in support.

The proposal for a

new initiative is

clear and logical. It

includes 1–3

appropriate

recommendations

toward

implementation.

Many scholarly

resources are

utilized in support.

The proposal for

a new initiative is

clear, logical, and

creative. It

includes 3+

appropriate and

intriguing

recommendations

toward

implementation.

Several scholarly resources are utilized in support.

/ 88 pts.

Identify the

stakeholders

along with 1–3

strategies to use

to advocate for

the approval of

the new initiative.

Identification of the

stakeholders is

mostly incorrect. The

three (or less)

strategies given to

use to advocate for

the approval of the

new initiative are

Identification of

the stakeholders

is somewhat

incorrect. The 1–3

strategies given to

use to advocate

for the approval of

the new initiative

Identification of

the stakeholders is

correct. The 1–3

strategies given to

use to advocate

for the approval of

the new initiative

are clear and

Identification of

the stakeholders

is correct. There

are 3+ strategies

given to use to

advocate for the

approval of the

new initiative that

/ 60 pts.

Page 3 of 3 Administrative Dimensions of Human Services

LASA 2: SWOT Analysis Report

CO: 2, 3 PO: 2, 6, 7, 8

mostly illogical. Few

(or no) scholarly

resources are

utilized in support.

are somewhat

illogical. Few

scholarly

resources are

utilized in support.

logical. Many

scholarly

resources are

utilized in support.

are clear, logical,

and creative.

Several scholarly

resources are

utilized in

support.

Academic Writing

Write in a clear,

concise, and

organized

manner;

demonstrate

ethical

scholarship in

accurate

representation

and attribution of

sources; and

display accurate

spelling,

grammar, and

punctuation.

Include citations

in text and at the

end of the

document in

correct APA

format.

Writing is unclear

and disorganized,

and rereading to

solidify

understanding is

frequently

necessary. Although

an attempt at ethical

scholarship is

attempted, it is

sloppy or incomplete

throughout. Spelling,

grammar, or

punctuation errors

severely interfere

with readers’

comprehension.

Citations in text and

at the end of the

document are not in

correct APA format.

Writing is

somewhat clear

and somewhat

organized,

although

rereading to

solidify

understanding is

occasionally

necessary. It

demonstrates an

attempt at ethical

scholarship in

accurate

representation

and attribution of

sources, but

errors are

occasional or

minor. Writing has

good spelling,

grammar, and

punctuation, but

errors somewhat

interfere with

readers’

comprehension.

Citations in text

and at the end of

the document are

mostly in

correct APA

format.

Writing is

generally clear

and in an

organized manner.

It demonstrates

ethical scholarship

in accurate

representation and

attribution of

sources and

generally displays

accurate spelling,

grammar,

punctuation.

Errors are few,

isolated, and do

not interfere with

readers’

comprehension.

Citations in text and at the end of the document are in correct APA format.

Writing is clear,

concise, and in

an organized

manner;

demonstrates

ethical

scholarship in

accurate

representation

and attribution of

sources; and

displays accurate

spelling,

grammar, and

punctuation.

Citations in text and at the end of the document are in correct APA format.

/ 24 pts.

Total Score

/300

Points