Paper #2
Umika Kumar
Professor Lydia Hearn
English Writing 2
16 July 2016
Fallacies: genetic, tu quoque, ambiguity
Maddening Marginalization of Minorities: Gilmore Girls Edition
Moral self-licensing is when we allow ourselves to stay racist, homophobic, or
misogynistic because of one behavior that “proves” us as otherwise. Stanford psychologists
Merritt, Effron and Monin explain, “Past good deeds can liberate individuals to engage in
behaviors that are immoral, unethical, or otherwise problematic, behaviors that they would
otherwise avoid for fear of feeling or appearing immoral” (Merritt et al). This phenomenon is
apparent in all aspects of our daily lives, from Presidential elections to baseball drafts alike. An
example of moral self-licensing in action, highlighted in Malcolm Gladwell’s Revisionist History
podcast, is the assertion that people who voted for Obama were more likely to be racist
(Gladwell). Casting a vote for a black man was their justification to continue being racist—their
one good action allowed for any amount of subsequent negative action. Most subtly, we see
moral self-licensing in our TV shows and media. A show will shatter stereotypes in one area and
perpetuate stereotypes in another. This is particularly apparent in Gilmore Girls, a popular
television show from the turn of the century that is often lauded for its feminist trailblazing.
However, despite challenging notions of Western womanhood, Gilmore Girls uses the standard
of Western culture to subordinate people of color.
Gilmore Girls shows Lorelai, the mother and protagonist, as a spectacular boss and
parent, thereby challenging the norm that mothers are not leaders. Yet while one stereotype is
shattered, the show continues to marginalize the people of color in her workplace, asserting that
they are not as important. While Lorelai shines and breaks down barriers for single mothers
everywhere, people of color are continually reduced to sideline characters. A perfect example of
this dichotomy is shown in the very first instance of her being seen at work on the show. The
scene opens on the gorgeous colonial inn. As Lorelai steps into work, Michel, the black, French
concierge is on the phone with a customer, repeating over and over that they are completely
booked in a heavy French accent. He is professional in tone, yet has an air of resolute annoyance
with the caller. A minute later, Lorelai’s teenage daughter Rory appears to say hello, and Lorelai
tells her to ask Michel to check Rory’s French paper. He says no sharply1, finally succumbing to
their pleas when Lorelai begins taunting him with a fake French accent. But as early as in the
fifth minute of the show, when this scene occurs, it is obvious that even considering being mean
to Rory makes you a bad person, as Rory is a sweet and intelligent girl. In contrast, Michel is
tall, thin, and incredibly irritated; his persona does not waver throughout the duration of the
show. More than him just being a direct person, he is shown as elitist through the way he speaks
and his body language. Bluntly, he is not a loveable character. In one instance in the first episode
of the series, he notes “people are particularly stupid today. I can’t talk anymore” (“Pilot”).
Michel’s elitism also furthers the divide between “us” and “them.” Because he is the only French
or black character on the show, his elitism is automatically assumed to be representative of the
“other side’s” feelings towards Americans. This assumption creates an almost-imperceptible rift
between the white American and the international community / people of color. This scene is
particularly meaningful because it shows Lorelai efficiently running the inn and remaining an
engaged and loving mother to Rory at the exact same time as showing Michel as an antagonizing 1 It is important to note that Gilmore Girls sets up Lorelai and Rory as the most loveable characters, namely because they are the protagonists of the show. They have flaws, of course, but these flaws exist to humanize the women rather than to demonize them.
figure. While Lorelai breaks the glass ceiling, Michel’s actions drop him down the hypothetical
lovability ladder. Even though Michel is only one character, a lot of people in more homogenous
areas get their intercultural understanding through the one or two people of color on a given
show. So to demonize one of the three consistently-appearing people of color only works to
reinforce stereotypes and xenophobic attitudes.
While Michel is the one person of color who speaks in Lorelai’s interactions at work, he
is not the only example of her empowerment being at the expense of people of color. Many of
her interactions at work are with men of color, be it the plumber, a bellhop, a line cook or
Michel. But none of these interactions afford them any kind of agency; aside from Michel, we
often never see their faces. They are props to the series. For example, in the pilot episode, a black
bellhop hands Lorelai a key as she walks in. We see him just long enough to know he is black,
but not a second longer; the blurry half-glimpse of his face is his entire cameo. She thanks him,
but the camera remains focused on her face and her movements through the hotel lobby. This
entire exchange takes up a grand total of three seconds, whereas the transition to this scene, a
panning of the greenery around the inn, takes at least fifteen (“Pilot”). Later on, we see her
talking to (perhaps) the same man, breathlessly rattling off a laundry list of little chores to be
done. To this, he nods and dashes away from her. In this instance, again, we do not see his face,
only enough to know that he is black, nor do we hear his voice. The focus remains on her. She is
running an inn, and the implication with her quick speech is that she has a lot to do. In both
instances, Lorelai is a strong working woman and the men of color are inconsequential and
forgettable. In terms of female representation, Gilmore Girls portrays a clear step away from the
motifs of yesteryear, with older TV shows like “Leave It To Beaver” and “The Waltons”
showing “all-American” families with a mother, father, and multiple children. Unlike these
decades-old television shows, Gilmore Girls is headlined by a happy, successful single-mother-
and-daughter pair.
Gilmore Girls’ marginalization of minorities is not just limited to situations in which it
affects the issue of women at work. The show often focuses on parenting as a place to lift
Western women up and also tear minority women down for their otherness. The show pushes the
idea of a new standard of parenting in how it portrays the relationship of Lorelai and her
daughter Rory. Upon getting Rory’s letter of acceptance to an elite preparatory high school,
Lorelai exclaims, “This is it. She can go to Harvard and get the education I couldn’t. Do things
that I couldn’t. Then I can resent her for it and we can finally have a normal mother-daughter
relationship!” (“Pilot”). This comment pokes fun at the idea of the “typical,” dysfunctional
parent-child relationship while emphasizing the Gilmore girls’ amazing relationship. Their
relationship is in stark contrast to Rory’s best friend, Lane Kim, and her relationship with her
parents, Mr. and Mrs. Kim. In the first episode, Lane puts on an Eminem t-shirt over her long-
sleeved top as the two girls walk away from Lane’s home. Rory then asks, “When are you going
to let your parents know that you listen to the evil rock music? You’re an American teenager, for
God’s sake” (“Pilot”). To this, Lane responds, “Rory, if my parents still get upset over the
obscene portion size of American food, I seriously doubt I’m going to make any inroads with
Eminem” (“Pilot”). While innocuous at first, these comments reveal a deep-seated “us” versus
“them” sentiment, implying that while Lane’s identity is stoutly American, her parents’ identity
is not. Lane’s enjoyment of “American things” is negative in her household. This interaction sets
the tone for the rest of the series. Lane’s parents are strictly Christian, disapprove of many things
their daughter does, and keep Lane on a tight leash. But these things are not attributed to the fact
that they are strict parents, but to the fact that they are Korean, rooting the judgement in
xenophobia rather than in a rejection of the norm. Throughout the series, Lane is often grounded,
hiding her CDs under her floorboards and colorful lights and fun clothing in her closet. Lane’s
relationship with her parents is exactly the kind of relationship that Lorelai poked fun against
earlier in the episode—marked by secrecy, miscommunication, and mistrust, and exacerbated by
the fact that they have a cultural gap. The mere juxtaposition of the two of these familial
interactions serves to vilify the “other” and drive home stereotypes. Yet familial interactions are
not the only level at which Gilmore Girls uses the Kim family as a figure of sharp contrast.
Women speak a lot in Gilmore Girls, which challenges the ideal of submissive, demure
women, yet when minority women speak, they are often abrasive, which works to ostracize
them. To exemplify this point: Lorelai speaks a lot, in fact, she and Rory dominate the speaking
time in Gilmore Girls. Their comments are chock-full with literary and popular culture allusions,
wit, and intelligence. Yet they remain easy to listen to; their voices are not shrill or harsh, and
they rarely yell. This is in stark contrast to minority women, particularly Mrs. Kim, an incredibly
flat character whose only apparent role on the show is to reinforce stereotypes. Lane is portrayed
more often as a victim of the minority woman rather than as a minority herself. With her
obsession with music and American mannerisms, Lane is set up as an American girl who has to
put up with her Korean mother’s antics. So Mrs. Kim remains the one dependable example of a
minority woman on the show. Her accent is thick and she speaks in an almost-stilted manner,
using fewer words than a grammatically perfect English sentence normally would. Mrs. Kim’s
voice is almost like a bark, even when she does something as simple as offering the girls a snack
after school. At one point in the pilot episode, Rory asks Lane why Mrs. Kim doesn’t like her
mother, to which Lane states, “She doesn’t trust unmarried women” (“Pilot”). This serves to
vilify Mrs. Kim in a number of ways. Mrs. Kim clearly prefers the married-with-children norm
of the day and is suspicious of Lorelai, even though the show has established the kindness,
coolness, and all-around positivity of Lorelai as a person. Mrs. Kim thinks differently from the
show’s accepted point of view. Further, Mrs. Kim’s distrust of Lorelai shows Mrs. Kim
immediately to be a judgemental and harsh person. This reinforces the idea that minority women
are different in a negative way.
Television is an incredibly mainstream form of media, and until recently, reflected the
culture of the time. If Gilmore Girls was our sole cultural snapshot into the 2000s, we could
assume that America was warming up to more nontraditional families and backgrounds, yet was
not fully integrated with immigrants or people of color. In a strange way, Gilmore Girls back
then is representative of today. Minorities have made major inroads in places like the Silicon
Valley and other technology hubs, and women have learnt to “lean in” a lot more in the
workplace. Yet there is a division between the families who have been in America for
generations and the recently immigrated people of color—it is a disconnect about what it means
to be American. Gilmore Girls used moral self-licensing to say that since they were changing the
view of women by making Lorelai strong, courageous, and dynamic, it was okay for them to
leave views of immigrants as more or less the same. This is a classic example of White
Feminism, a recently-coined type of feminism that ignores the intersectionality of identities and
the distinct struggles of women of color. As a child of immigrants and as a woman of color, this
dichotomy leaves me frustrated. I am as much an American as a white teenage girl from Stars
Hollow with a single mother. I am as much a woman as she. Yet our culture so often makes it
okay to demonize minorities whilst lifting up white people; we see examples of this division in
shows like the Big Bang Theory (Raj), Ally McBeal (Lily), and, yes, in Gilmore Girls. While it is
praised often for being a feminist masterpiece, it has its pitfalls. Employing White Feminist
undertones and continuing to marginalize of minorities is very much one of them.
Works Cited
Gladwell, Malcolm. “The Lady Vanishes.” Audio blog post. Revisionist History. The Slate
Group, 15 June 2016. Web. 13 July 2016. <http://revisionisthistory.com/episodes/
01-the-lady-vanishes>.
Merritt, Anna C., Daniel A. Effron, and Benoît Monin. "Moral Self-Licensing: When Being
Good Frees Us to Be Bad." Social and Personality Psychology Compass (2010): 344-57.
Web. <http://www-psych.stanford.edu/~monin/papers/Merritt,%20Effron%20%
26%20Monin%202010%20Compass%20on%20Moral%20Licensing.pdf>.
“Pilot.” Gilmore Girls. Writ. Amy Sherman-Palladino. Dir. Lesli Linka Glatter. Warner Bros.,
2000. Netflix. Web. 12 July 2016.