BOOK REVIEW ESSAY
Rubric for Book/Movie Paper
|
Criteria |
Excellent |
Good |
Acceptable |
Marginal |
Fail |
|
APA Format is used correctly |
|
|
Format is correct All headers, page numbers, spacing, subheadings, citations and references |
Most of the headers, page numbers, spacing, subheadings, citations and references |
Most of the headers, page numbers are not used, spacing is a problem, subheadings are not used, citations are used incorrectly, references are not in order and do not match citations |
|
Brief Overview of the Film/Book
|
Complete overview of the contents of the book or film, including the major focus or plot, main characters, arc of the action, beginning, middle, and end. |
Almost complete overview of the contents of the book or film, including the major focus or plot, main characters, arc of the action, beginning, middle, and end. |
Basic overview of the contents of the book or film, including the major focus or plot, main characters, arc of the action, beginning, middle, and end. |
Overview does not include all aspects of the focus or plot of the book or movie, limited mention of the beginning, middle, or end |
Very limited overview of the major points or focus of the book or movie |
|
Criteria |
Excellent |
Good |
Acceptable |
Marginal |
Fail |
|
Explanation of the Sociological Concepts and Comparison of Concepts to Book or Movie
|
Shows a clear understanding of the material and is able to compare and contrast the information from the text/discussion. Also, is able to relate the information read or viewed to material learned in the course and/or to personal experiences. Indicated specific incidents in the book/movie relating to concepts |
Shows a general understanding of the material but did not have nuanced comparisons to the text/discussions. Was able to relate the information to materials learned in the course and/or to personal experiences. Indicated only a few incidents that related book/movie to concepts |
Attempts to make connections between the information presented in class/text but may fall short of clear connections. Shows a basic ability to relate the information from information read or viewed to what was learned in class. Indicated only one incident that related book/movie to concepts |
Does not establish the obvious connections between the concepts in class/text but does try to relate it to learned information or personal experiences. |
Does not attempt to make any connections between information in text/discussions or to information learned in the course. |
|
Organization
|
The ideas are organized logically and flow smoothly from one idea to the next. |
The ideas are organized but the transitions sentences are not used effectively. |
There is a lack of organization of ideas which interrupts the flow of the paper. |
The lack of organization results in redundancy of information resulting in poor flow of ideas. |
There is no organization. Just a series of long quotes or ramblings.
|
|
Criteria |
Excellent |
Good |
Acceptable |
Marginal |
Fail |
|
Writing Mechanics (grammar, spelling, punctuation, subject-verb agreement, noun-pronoun agreement, establishing and using abbreviations correctly, etc.)
|
There are so few errors in writing mechanics that there is not disruption in the flow of the paper. |
Occasional errors in writing mechanics but they do not represent a major distraction to the paper |
The number of writing errors begins to distract the reader from the purpose of the paper. |
Several mechanical errors cause a major distraction from the purpose of the paper. |
The errors are so frequent that the purpose of the paper is obscured. |
|
Reference Page Format was correct—author(s), year of publication, title of article in lower case, name of journal, volume, number, pages
|
|
|
References listed in alphabetical order and the formatting is correct. |
Either alphabetical listing or format was not correct. |
Did not list in alphabetical order or format correctly. |
|
Length of Paper
|
|
|
Met the required page length of the paper. |
|
Does not meet the required page length of the paper. |
Point Values for Criteria (based on a 50-point paper)
|
Criteria |
Excellent |
Good |
Acceptable |
Marginal |
Fail |
Comments |
|
APA Formatting-Title Page, headers, margins, spacing, headings, font, citations |
6 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1-0 |
|
|
Section I: Brief Overview of the film/book (content of the book/film, major focus, main characters, beginning, middle, end |
8 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
1-0 |
|
|
Section II: Explanation of the Sociological Concepts using texts & research articles. |
10 |
8 |
6 |
2 |
1-0 |
|
|
Section III. Actual scenes in the movie or passages in the book that depict each of the three concepts presented in Section II |
8 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
1-0 |
|
|
Section IV. Conclusion-recap of main points in paper |
6 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1-0 |
|
|
Organization (ideas are organized contributing to the flow of the paper) |
|
4 |
3 |
2 |
1-0 |
|
|
Writing Mechanics (proper use of subject-verb agreement, noun-pronoun agreement, establishing abbreviations, sentence structure, wording, no contractions, fragments, etc.) |
6 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1-0 |
|
|
Section V: Reference Page (alphabetical and formatting); Quality of articles |
6 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1-0 |
|
Total Points:____________________
|
Criteria |
Excellent |
Grade |
|
APA Formatting- |
6 |
|
|
Section I: Brief |
8 |
|
|
Section II: Sociological Concepts using texts & research articles. |
10 |
|
|
Section III. Actual scenes |
8 |
|
|
Section IV. Conclusion- |
6 |
|
|
Organization |
4 |
|
|
Writing |
6 |
|
|
Section V: Reference |
6 |
|
PAGE
5