Please identify an ethical dilemma from ENRON Collapse You answer these assignment before Make sure you state your issue as a dilemma (see definition below).
Michelle_Michy
KNES381-Rubric.docKNES 381: History of Sport, Games and Culture
Grading Rubric
|
|
Excellent |
Good |
Fair |
Poor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thesis |
The book’s Thesis is insightful, plausible and original |
The book’s Thesis is plausible with some good insight
|
The book’s Thesis is plausible but not insightful or original
|
The book’s Thesis is not plausible or insightful /5 |
|
Organization And Explosion |
Thesis is clearly stated Each Paragraph has a clear topic Argument progresses in a logical order Progress through the arguments is clearly signposted Effectively links course material to the major themes discussed in the book Skillfully weaves personal sport history into the narrative Effectively weighs up the strengths and weaknesses of the book
|
Thesis is clearly stated A few paragraphs lack focus A few ideas are out of order Some transitions are lacking Attempts to link course material to the major themes discussed in the book Attempts to weave personal sport history into the narrative Attempts to weigh up the strengths and weaknesses of the book
|
Thesis is somewhat clearly stated Several paragraphs lack focus Ideas are not always presented in the best order Argument wanders, lacks transitions Makes a limited attempt to link course material to the major themes discussed in the book Makes a limited attempt to weave personal sport history into the narrative Makes a limited attempt to weigh up the strengths and weaknesses of the book
|
No clear thesis stated Many paragraphs are unfocused Major organizational problems No clear flow or argument Makes no attempt to link course material to the major themes discussed in the book Makes no attempt to weave personal sport history into the narrative Makes no attempt to weigh up the strengths and weaknesses of the book /10
|
|
Use and citation of evidence (APA Referencing Style) |
All major arguments are supported by scholarly evidence from the book Evidence is appropriately chosen, formatted and cited Evidence is specific and directly relevant to the topic |
Nearly all major arguments are supported by scholarly evidence from the book A few minor errors in format and citation are present In a few cases the evidence provided does not support the argument |
Most major arguments are supported by real-world or scholarly evidence Several minor errors in format and citation are present Scholarly sources are established, peer reviewed publications and resources In several cases evidence provided does not support the argument |
Several major arguments lack evidentiary support Many errors in format or citation are present Inappropriate (i.e. not peer-reviewed) resources are used Sources are not cited frequently enough Evidence cited is not relevant /2 |
|
Mechanics (double-spaced with a font of 12)
|
Paper is nearly free of stylistic, grammatical, or punctuation errors Nearly all sentences are clear and easy to understand |
A few stylistic, grammatical, or punctuation errors are present A few sentences are unclear or hard to understand |
Many stylistic, grammatical, or punctuation errors are present Many sentences are unclear or hard to understand |
Very frequent grammatical, or punctuation errors Very frequent unclear sentences /3 |
