Case Study- Report

6/18/2020 KICL FC301: FC301 Statistics Investigation - Marking Checklist

https://pathways.kaplaninternational.com/mod/page/view.php?id=327847 1/2

Dashboard / My courses / KICL FC301 / The Case Study- Report / FC301 Statistics Investigation - Marking Checklist

KICL FC301 Statistics

FC301 Statistics Investigation - Marking Checklist

FC301 Statistics Investigation Mark Scheme

Student ID:

 

Name:

Tutor: Date:

   

CRITERIA BEING ASSESSED 5 4 3 2 1 0

States suitable research questions, finds and presents relevant data to address these (ML2, ML3, AL1)

·         Research topic is clearly stated using good English

·         At least 3 research questions are stated relating to topic

·         Appropriate data are collected addressing research questions

·         Data are presented clearly and accurately with citations and a reference list

 

           

Uses graphical methods to effectively display data (ML2, ML3, AL3)

·         At least 3 graphs have been produced to display data

·         At least 2 types of graphs have been produced

·         Graphs are appropriate, clear and accurately display data

           

Analyses data, identifies and describes patterns (ML1, ML3, AL2, AL4, AL6)

·         Data is accurately described including any patterns observed

·         Descriptions are clear and use good English

·         Appropriate calculations are performed and their relevance indicated

           

Uses data to draw conclusions addressing research questions (ML1, ML4, AL4, AL5, AL6)

·         Appropriate conclusions are clearly stated using good English

·         Conclusions are supported by reference to data

·         Conclusions are linked to research questions

           

6/18/2020 KICL FC301: FC301 Statistics Investigation - Marking Checklist

https://pathways.kaplaninternational.com/mod/page/view.php?id=327847 2/2

Evaluates the validity and reliability of conclusions (ML4, AL5, AL6)

·         The degree to which data supports conclusions is indicated (calculations may be performed where appropriate)

·         The source(s) of data are considered when assessing the validity and reliability of conclusions

           

Maximum Mark: 25 Actual Mark: Final Mark (%):

 

 

Marking guidance:

5 – Excellent evidence: As comprehensive as could be expected

4 – Very good evidence: Thorough attempt to represent this aspect with only minor errors, omissions and/or missed opportunities

3 – Sufficient evidence: Good attempt to represent this aspect but noticeable errors, omissions and/or missed opportunities

2 – Limited and/or inconsistent evidence: Aspect represented reasonably but numerous errors, omissions and/or missed opportunities exist throughout

1 – Insufficient evidence: Attempt to represent aspect inappropriate or too weak to convey anything meaningful and/or academic.

0 – No attempt to represent this aspect

Last modified: Friday, 1 May 2020, 2�07 PM

◀ FC301 Statistics Investigation - Assessment Task InformationJump to... FC301- Examples for selecting data sets ▶

Copyright © 2020 Kaplan International Pathways – All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement