holistic plan

Thank you for submitting your assignment for review and feedback. You were asked to develop a 4â��6 page holistic intervention plan design to improve the quality of outcomes for your target population and setting.

 

I can tell that you worked hard on this assessment. You drafted an intervention plan design which was supported by relevant and credible data and provides a plan for change.

Please take a look at each criterion section below for more substantial feedback to each section. Please let me know if you have any concerns or questions, and I am happy to provide additional feedback.

Great work! I look forward to your next assessment.

Please highlight any changes you choose to make so that I can capture you hard work on this assessment.

Dr. D

DOWNLOAD YOUR EVALUATED ASSESSMENT FILE

COMPETENCY 1

Lead organizational change to improve the experience of care, population health, and professional work life while decreasing cost of care.

CRITERION

Demonstrate completion of hours toward the practicum experience.

Your result: Distinguished

Distinguished

Demonstrates completion of hours toward the practicum experience and provides a clear and concise description of the focus of the clinical hours and alignment to the capstone project.

Proficient

Demonstrates completion of hours toward the practicum experience.

Basic

Demonstrates completion of hours toward the practicum experience, but provides no details about activities completed during those hours.

Non-Performance

Does not demonstrate completion of hours toward the practicum experience.

Faculty Comments:

Demonstrates completion of hours toward the practicum experience, and provides a clear and concise description of the focus of the clinical hours and alignment to the capstone project.

COMPETENCY 2

Evaluate the best available evidence for use in clinical and organizational decision making.

CRITERION

Evaluate theoretical nursing models, strategies from other disciplines, and health care technologies relevant to an intervention plan.

Your result: Basic

Distinguished

Evaluates, identifying both strengths and weaknesses of, theoretical nursing models, strategies from other disciplines, and health care technologies relevant to an intervention plan.

Proficient

Evaluates theoretical nursing models, strategies from other disciplines, and health care technologies relevant to an intervention plan.

Basic

Attempts to evaluate theoretical nursing models, strategies from other disciplines, and health care technologies, but fails to show their relevance to the intervention plan.

Non-Performance

Does not evaluate theoretical nursing models, strategies from other disciplines, and health care technologies relevant to an intervention plan.

Faculty Comments:

Great job on Ace Model, but you also need to address nursing and technology. What about identifying both strengths and weaknesses of the model as relevant to your intervention plan.

CRITERION

Analyze the impact of stakeholder needs, health care policy, regulations, and governing bodies relevant to health care practice and specific components of an intervention plan.

Your result: Proficient

Distinguished

Analyzes the impact of stakeholder needs, health care policy, regulations, and governing bodies relevant to health care practice and specific components of an intervention plan, and identifies assumptions on which the analysis is based.

Proficient

Analyzes the impact of stakeholder needs, health care policy, regulations, and governing bodies relevant to health care practice and specific components of an intervention plan.

Basic

Provides an incomplete or flawed analysis of how stakeholder needs, health care policy, regulations, or governing bodies will affect the specific components of an intervention plan.

Non-Performance

Does not analyze the impact of stakeholder needs, health care policy, regulations, and governing bodies relevant to health care practice and specific components of an intervention plan.

Faculty Comments:

You analyzed the impact of stakeholder needs, health care policy, regulations, and governing bodies relevant to health care practice and specific components of an intervention plan,

To earn distinguished, please address assumptions on which the analysis is based.

COMPETENCY 3

Apply quality improvement methods to impact patient, population, and systems outcomes.

CRITERION

Define the major components of an intervention plan for a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education, or management need.

Your result: Distinguished

Distinguished

Defines the major components of an intervention plan for a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education, or management need, and suggests criteria that could be used to evaluate the success of such a plan.

Proficient

Defines the major components of an intervention plan for a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education, or management need.

Basic

Attempts to define the major components of an intervention plan for a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education, or management need, but fails to clarify how components will lead to improvements or why they are the best option to address the need.

Non-Performance

Does not define the major components of an intervention plan for a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education, or management need.

Faculty Comments:

Nice job defining the major components of an intervention plan for a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education, or management need, and suggests criteria that could be used to evaluate the success of such a plan. What challenges, obstacles, objections to this intervention can you identify and how would you address those issues?

 

COMPETENCY 4

Design patient- and population-centered care to improve health outcomes.

CRITERION

Explain the impact of cultural needs and characteristics of a target population and setting on the development of intervention plan components.

Your result: Proficient

Distinguished

Explains the impact of cultural needs and characteristics of a target population and setting on the development of intervention plan components, and identifies assumptions on which the explanation is based.

Proficient

Explains the impact of cultural needs and characteristics of a target population and setting on the development of intervention plan components.

Basic

Partially explains the impact of cultural needs and characteristics of a target population and setting, but omits some aspects or fails to make a logical connection to show how the cultural needs and characteristics will impact the development of intervention plan components.

Non-Performance

Does not explain the impact of cultural needs and characteristics of a target population and setting on the development of intervention plan components.

Faculty Comments:

I liked how you explained the impact of cultural needs and characteristics of a target population and setting on the development of intervention plan components,

To earn distinguished, please address assumptions on which the explanation is based.

COMPETENCY 5

Evaluate the ability of existing and emerging information, communication, and health care technologies to improve safety and quality and to decrease cost.

CRITERION

Justify the major components of an intervention by referencing relevant and contemporary evidence from the literature and best practices.

Your result: Distinguished

Distinguished

Justifies the major components of an intervention by referencing relevant and contemporary evidence from the literature and best practices, and impartially considers conflicting data and other perspectives.

Proficient

Justifies the major components of an intervention by referencing relevant and contemporary evidence from the literature and best practices.

Basic

Attempts to justify the major components of an intervention, but cited references lack relevance to the proposed intervention or are insufficient to justify the plan.

Non-Performance

Does not justify the major components of an intervention by referencing relevant and contemporary evidence from the literature and best practices.

Faculty Comments:

Thorough justification of the major components of an intervention by referencing relevant and contemporary evidence from the literature and best practices, and impartially considers conflicting data and other perspectives.

CRITERION

Communicate intervention plan in a professional way that helps the audience to understand the proposed intervention and the implications of the plan that must be taken into account.

Your result: Basic

Distinguished

Communicates intervention plan in a professional way that helps the audience to understand the proposed intervention and the implications of the plan that must be taken into account. Grammar, punctuation, spelling, and citations are error-free.

Proficient

Communicates intervention plan in a professional way that helps the audience to understand the proposed intervention and the implications of the plan that must be taken into account.

Basic

Inconsistently communicates intervention plan in a way that partially helps the audience to understand the proposed intervention and the implications of the plan that must be taken into account.

Non-Performance

Does not communicate intervention plan in a professional way that helps the audience to understand the proposed intervention and the implications of the plan that must be taken into account.

Faculty Comments:

You did a great job with your communication throughout your assessment. Your assessment was well written, organized and had credible, reliable resources. In addition, here's a link to the Capella Writing Center to learn more about scholarly writing:  https://campus.capella.edu/web/writing-center/home . Your writing is clear and has good grammar and punctuation.

Good APA format though there are several issues to address:

1. the paper should be left justified

2. .headings should be centered

3. paragraphs should be indented

4. references should just be 5 spaces indented on reference page

For additional APA formatting that may be helpful please click on this link:  http://www.apastyle.org/learn/tutorials/basics-tutorial.aspx

COMPETENCY 6

Defend health policy that improves the experience of care, population health, and professional work life while decreasing cost of care.

CRITERION

Analyze relevant ethical and legal issues related to health care practice, organizational change, and specific components of an intervention plan.

Your result: Distinguished

Distinguished

Analyzes relevant ethical and legal issues related to health care practice, organizational change, and specific components of an intervention plan; identifies knowledge gaps, unknowns, missing information, unanswered questions, or areas of uncertainty (where further information could improve the analysis).

Proficient

Analyzes relevant ethical and legal issues related to health care practice, organizational change, and specific components of an intervention plan.

Basic

Discusses ethical and legal issues, but fails to analyze their relationship to health care practice, organizational change, and specific components of an intervention plan.

Non-Performance

Does not discuss relevant ethical and legal issues related to health care practice, organizational change, and specific components of an intervention plan.