Marketing
CHAPTER 3
Marketing Decision Making and Case Analysis
1
Describe each step in the decision-making process using the “DECIDE” method.
Prepare and present an analysis of a written case.
AFTER READING THIS CHAPTER YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO:
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
2
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
“Decision making is a rational and systematic process and that its organization is a definite sequence of steps, each of them in turn rational and systematic.”
— Peter Drucker
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
3
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
CHAPTER 3: MARKETING DECISION MAKING AND CASE ANALYSIS
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
4
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: DECIDE
Enumerate the decision factors
Consider relevant information
Define the problem
Identify the best alternative
Develop a plan for implementing the chosen alternative
Evaluate the decision and the decision process
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
5
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: DECIDE
“A problem well defined is half solved.”
— John Dewey
Problem definition framework includes:
Objectives
Constraints
Success Measures
Step 1: Define the Problem
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
6
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: DECIDE
Two decision factors to be enumerated and related to each other:
Controllable by the decision maker such as the marketing mix
Alternative Courses of Action
Uncertainties
Uncontrollable factors that the manager cannot influence
Step 2: Enumerate the Decision Factors
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
7
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: DECIDE
Relevant information consists of information that relates to the alternatives identified by the manager as being likely to affect future events. Includes characteristics of the following:
Consumers
Competitors
Industry
Organization (competitive strengths and position)
Alternatives
Step 3: Consider Relevant Information
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
8
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: DECIDE
Identifying relevant information is difficult:
There is often too much info and viewpoints
Determining what does and does not matter is a skill learned through experience
Don’t consider everything as factual info
Sometimes relevant info must be created
A manager has performed a situation analysis when steps 1 through 3 are completed
Step 3: Consider Relevant Information
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: DECIDE
Uses a decision tree and a payoff table to show the relationship among alternatives, uncertainties, and potential outcomes
Matches each alternative with the uncertainties in the environment
Assigns a quantitative value to the outcome associated with each match
Step 4: Identify the Best Alternative
Decision analysis:
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: DECIDE
Example: El Nacho Foods
Uncertainties about Competitors
Reduce price
Maintain price
Maintain lower price
Reduce price further
Alternative Courses of Action for Frozen Dinners
Step 4: Identify the Best Alternative
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
11
EXHIBIT 3.1: DECISION TREE FOR EL NACHO FOODS
$175,000
$90,000
Company Action
Competitive Response
Financial Outcome
$150,000
$110,000
Maintain price
Maintain price
Reduce price further
Maintain price
Reduce price further
Reduce price
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
12
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: DECIDE
Displays the alternatives, uncertainties, and outcomes facing a firm
A payoff table:
Includes management’s determination of the probability of an uncertainty’s occurrence
Step 4: Identify the Best Alternative
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
13
EXHIBIT 3.2: PAYOFF TABLE FOR EL NACHO FOODS
$110,000
$90,000
$150,000
$175,000
Competitors Maintain Price (Probability = 0.9)
Reduce price
Maintain price
Uncertainties
Alternatives
Competitors Reduce Price (Probability = 0.1)
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
14
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: DECIDE
A payoff table computes the “expected monetary value” (EMV) for each alternative
The EMV is calculated as follows:
EMVPI = EMV of Perfect Information
EMV
Outcome of Uncertainty1
=
+
×
Probability (p) of Uncertainty1
(
)
Outcome of Uncertainty2
Probability (p) of Uncertainty2
+
×
(
)
…
Step 4: Identify the Best Alternative
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
15
EXHIBIT 3.3: DECISION ANALYSIS AND THE VALUE OF INFORMATION
$110,000
$90,000
$150,000
$175,000
Competitors Maintain Price (Probability = 0.9)
A1: Reduce price
A2: Maintain price
Payoff Table Uncertainties
Alternatives
Competitors Reduce Price (Probability = 0.1)
EMV Calculation
$166,500
$146,000
EMVA1 = (0.9 × $150,000) + (0.1 × $110,000) = $146,000
EMVA2 = (0.9 × $175,000) + (0.1 × $90,000) = $166,500
EMVCertainty = (0.9 × $175,000) + (0.1 × $110,000) = $168,500
EMVPI = EMVCertainty – EMVBest alternative
EMVPI = $168,500 – $166,500 = $2,000
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
16
Change P from 0.9 to 0.7 and then practice the previous several slides in class How does the EMVPI change and why?
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: DECIDE
Is a fundamental tool for considering “what if” situations
Decision analysis is important because it:
Forces the manager to quantify outcomes associated with specific actions
Is useful in a variety of settings
Can be used in determining the value of “perfect” information
Step 4: Identify the Best Alternative
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
18
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: DECIDE
Allocating marketing, financial, and manufacturing resources
An implementation plan involves:
The time needed to develop a marketing plan
Step 5: Develop a Plan for Implementing the Chosen Alternative
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
19
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: DECIDE
Was a decision made?
With respect to the decision itself, ask:
Was the decision proper given the situation?
Step 6: Evaluate the Decision and the Decision Process
Insufficient information present?
Failure to consider and interpret relevant information?
Logical assumptions made regarding data gaps?
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
20
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: DECIDE
Was the problem defined adequately?
Ask 5 questions of the decision-making process:
Were all the pertinent alternatives and uncertainties identified? Were the assumptions realistic?
Was all the relevant information considered?
Was an appropriate course of action recommended? Was the logic consistent? Was any important piece of information overlooked?
How can the recommendation be implemented?
Step 6: Evaluate the Decision and the Decision Process
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
21
PREPARING AND PRESENTING A CASE ANALYSIS
CHAPTER 3: MARKETING DECISION MAKING AND CASE ANALYSIS
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
22
PREPARING AND PRESENTING A CASE ANALYSIS
First reading. Become familiar with the situation of the organization:
Identify insights into the problem
Obtain background information on the environment and organization
Approaching the Case
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
23
PREPARING AND PRESENTING A CASE ANALYSIS
Second reading. Pay attention to key facts and assumptions:
Determine relevance and reliability of the data
Obtain background information on the environment and organization
Approaching the Case
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
24
PREPARING AND PRESENTING A CASE ANALYSIS
Do not rush to a conclusion
Avoid these pitfalls:
Do not confuse supposition with fact
Do not “work the numbers” until their meaning and derivation are understood
Approaching the Case
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
25
EXHIBIT 3.4a: MARKETING CASE ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
Nature of the Industry, Market, and Buyer Behavior
What is the nature of the industry structure, conduct, and performance?
Who are the competitors, and what are their strengths and weaknesses?
How do consumers buy (why, where, when, how) in this industry or market?
Can the market be segmented? How? Can the segments be quantified?
What are the requirements for success in this industry?
Formulating the Case Analysis
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
26
EXHIBIT 3.4b: MARKETING CASE ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
The Organization
Formulating the Case Analysis
What are the organization’s mission, objectives, and distinctive competency?
What is its offering to the market? How can its past and present performance be characterized? What is its potential?
What is the situation in which the manager or organization finds itself?
What factors have contributed to the present situation?
What are its financial, human, and material resources?
What is the “fit” between it and its environment based on the SWOT?
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
27
EXHIBIT 3.4c: MARKETING CASE ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
A Plan of Action
What actions are available to the firm based on the situation analysis?
What are the costs and benefits of action in both qualitative and quantitative terms?
Is there a disparity between what the organization wants to do, should do, can do, and must do?
Formulating the Case Analysis
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
28
EXHIBIT 3.4d: MARKETING CASE ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
Potential Outcomes
Formulating the Case Analysis
What will be the buyer, trade, and competitive response to each course of action?
How will each course of action satisfy buyer, trade, and organization requirements?
What is the potential profitability of each course of action?
Will the action enhance or reduce the organization’s ability to compete in the future?
What is the best course of action to pursue?
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
29
If using teams:
Create a balanced team whose member’s skill sets complement one another (writing, oral presentation, financial, etc.)
PREPARING AND PRESENTING A CASE ANALYSIS
Be committed to the task and dependable
Formulating the Case Analysis
Avoid “groupthink”
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
30
COMMUNICATING THE CASE ANALYSIS
Class Discussion
Case preparation requires 4-5 hours
Bring notes to class
Carefully listen to the viewpoints of other students during the discussion of the case
Prepare a short summary of the case after discussing it in class
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
31
COMMUNICATING THE CASE ANALYSIS
Oral Presentation
Visual aids do not replace the oral presentation
Do not read slides to the audience
Do not use too many graphics, colors, and transitions
Rehearse the presentation
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
32
COMMUNICATING THE CASE ANALYSIS
Presentation title and presenters’ names
Outline of the presentation
Key problems and strategic issues that management needs to address
Analysis of the organization’s situation or problem
Recommendations and supporting reasoning
Oral Presentation
Slides should cover the following:
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
33
COMMUNICATING THE CASE ANALYSIS
Written Report
Be carefully organized and grammatically correct
Has three major sections:
Strategic problem and issue identification
Analysis and evaluation
Recommendations
Slide 1-‹#›
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
34